Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Mar 8;19(3):e0299369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299369

The research on the effect of temperature of electro-surgical unit to surgical smoke distribution in theatre-in vitro and simulation study

Hui Yu 1,*
Editor: Jorddy Neves Cruz2
PMCID: PMC10923457  PMID: 38457434

Abstract

In electro-surgery, surgical smoke was hazard to surgeons and patient in theatre. In order to institute effective countermeasures, quantifying of the effect of tip temperature of electro-surgical unit to surgical smoke distribution in theatre was studied. The relation of tip temperature to power of electro-surgical unit through in vitro cutting experiment. Based on experiment data, the mathematical model was established to simulate the electro-surgery in laminar operation room. As the power of electro-surgical knife increased, the knife tip temperature increased. Total content of (CO, CO2, CH4, NH3) in waste gas and net flow rate of waste gas at outlet increased with the rising temperature of knife tip and formation rate of condensed tar droplets and non-viable particles also increased. Based on simulation, it was found that The maximum height of surgical smoke rising right above the incision of electro-surgical unit was increased with rising temperature of electro-surgical knife tip. There was a spread route of dispersed surgical smoke near the walls of theatre through natural convection. The polynomial fitting relationship was derived. As the tip temperature of knife increased from 200 to 500°C, maximum ascending height of surgical smoke right above the incision position of electro-surgical unit increased from 1.1 m to 1.45 m. When the tip temperature of electro-knife was more 400°C, the CO content in the surgeon’s operating zone was more than 200 ppm, which would cause the surgeon’s HbCO level increased. As the patient’s tissue in the wound during operation was open, when the electro-knife of more than 400°C, the content of condensed tar droplets and in-viable particle was higher than 20 g/m3 and 12 g/m3 in the zone around patient’s wound of open tissue, which should be hazard to health of patient.

Introduction

In electro-surgery, surgical smoke was a health risk to person in theatre. The surgical smoke had a pungent odor, hindered the surgeons’ vision, and caused irritation of eyes. Many studies show that it contained harmful substances [14].

Surgical smoke was sourced from ablation of tissue protein and fat. It was observed that surgical smoke was smoke or plume produced by cautery or diathermy, and there was aerosols filled in theatre [5, 6]. The air stream, thermal of electro-surgical knife and volatizing of tissues drove the smoke to spread in the whole theatre [79].

The potential hazards of surgical smoke were carbon monoxide, toxic chemicals and non-viable particles [1012]. The production of CO was common during tissue ablation, and the CO level was abundantly increased after an electro-surgery [13]. The non-viable particles produced in electro-surgery were ultrafine with size of 0.5–5μm, and traveled long in theatre [14]. It was found that electro-surgical coagulation induced the production of a high number concentration (> 100,000 cm−3) of particles. The peak concentration was confined to the near surrounding of the surgical bed [15]. There were many kinds of toxic chemical compounds in surgical smoke, and the most toxic chemicals were produced in electro-surgery in the formed of volatized tar [16]. The common toxic chemical compounds were polyaromatic hydrocarbons, such as benzene, nitriles and phenols [1720].

As the power level of electro-surgical unit increased, tip temperature of knife rose, and production of surgical smoke increased [21]. And the flow field and concentration field in theatre changed with the raising of tip temperature of knife. In order to effective protection of person in theatre during electro-surgery, it was necessary to understand the effect of tip temperature of knife on surgical smoke distribution in threatre during with simulation of mathematical model.

This paper focused on the effect of tip temperature of knife on distribution of waste gas, tar and non-viable particles in theatre, and based on the results of the model estimation, the risk of the surgeon and patient after electro-surgery was analyzed.

Methods

In vitro cutting tissue operation

The tissue cutting experiments of back muscle tissue in miniature porcine with the electro-surgical knife at certain power levels were carried out for in vitro study of the effect of power level of electro-surgical knife on quantity of waste gas, non-viable particles and tar generated from cutting position. Based on the experiment data, the mathematical model was established to simulate the flow and concentration field in theatre during electro-surgery with the aim to study the effect of tip temperature of knife on distribution of waste gas, tar and non-viable particles in theatre.

Muscle tissue samples were collected in back section of a dead 90-day-old miniature porcine bought in market, and then were sliced into 10×5×5cm pieces, which were put in stainless container and then placed on ice. In the experiment, the tissue piece was fixed on a plate in a stainless crucible with sealing lid, the plate could move horizontally by drawing of shaft outside and the shaft was sealed with rubber through the wall of crucible, as shown in Fig 1. The electro-surgical unit (DGD-300B-2) could insert through the rubber sealing hole of lid into crucible and reached 5mm cutting depth of sample tissue piece. Air flowed 4×10−5 m3/s into stainless crucible through the stainless inlet pipe on lid of crucible and flow out through outlet pipe on the lid. There were a water-cool tube, a filter section and rotor flowmeter connected in the stainless outlet pipe. Tar formed in crucible during experiment was collected in water-cool tube, non-viable particles were collected in the filter section, and the outflow rate of air was measured with LZB6 rotor flowmeter.

Fig 1. Schematic diagram of in vitro cutting tissue operation.

Fig 1

During experiment, the muscle tissue sample piece was put on the plate in crucible, lid of crucible was covered and sealed, air flowed into the crucible, electro-surgical knife was inserted through the rubber sealing hole on the lid and turned on, the power of the electro-surgical knife was lifted up to certain level(20, 30,40, 50, 60, 70 and 80W), then the electro-surgical unit was inserted into tissue sample with depth of 5 mm, then the sample fixed on the plate was drawn horizontally with a speed of 5×10−4 m/s by the shaft driven outside, and the sample was cut by the electro-surgical unit by this method. The waste gas flowed out the crucible with tar and non-viable particles through the outlet stainless pipe, and was cooled in a water-cooled tube to collect the tar, and then passed filter to collect non-viable particles inside the outflow gas from crucible. After each experiment, water-cool tube was washed with CH2Cl2 to dissolve and tar released as tissue pyrolysis was collected, and then CH2Cl2 was evaporated on a water bath, and finally tar was weighted. The physical property of tar was measured with DAM4500 densimeter and SYD-265C-1 kinematic viscosimeter. The non-viable particles were captured with filter section in out-stream pipe, and the weight of non-viable particles was measured with electronic balance. Finally, the flow rate of waste gas was gauged with rotor flowmeter, and temperature of waste gas was measured with Pt100 temperature sensor, and then the flow rate of waste gas at STP (standard temperature and pressure) was converted with consideration of the difference between mass flow rate of inflow and outflow. There was Pt100 temperature sensor strapped to the electro-surgical unit with the distance of 5mm to the tip of the knife with the aim to measure the gas temperature at the incision of the electro-surgical knife and there was a thin ceramic insulating pad between the sensor and knife to keep out of the influence of electrical current on the knife. As the gas at the incision of the electro-surgical unit was sourced by the nearby knife tip, the gas temperature was set as the tip temperature of the electro-surgical knife. The composition of outflow gas from stainless crucible was measured with ZGC-2100 gas chromatography.

Mathematical model

Based on the quantity and property data of waste gas, tar and non-viable particles measured in the above in vitro cutting tissue operation, a mathematical model was established to simulate the flow field in theatre during electro-surgery with the aim to understand the distribution of non-viable particles or tar droplets in the theatre.

The flow field of a laminar flow operation room (Fig 2) during laparotomy with electro-surgical knife was simulated with mathematical model. The theatre was 8 m long, 6 m wide and 3 m high. The fresh air flowed vertically down from an inlet (2.4 m×2.6 m) on the ceiling, and the waste gas in theatre flowed out through two outlets (4 m×0.3 m, the lower edge of outlet was 0.1 m off the floor) on the two opposite walls in theatre. There was an operating table (1.8 m×0.8 m×0.8 m) in the theatre. The cutting position of electro-surgical unit in a patient on the operation bed was assumed at the point 0.1m above the center of the operating table.

Fig 2. A laminar flow operation room during electro-surgery, which was simulated with mathematical model.

Fig 2

As a complex process, the flow behavior of gas and the temperature change in theatre during electro-surgery was simulated with the equation of continuity equation, the momentum equation of Navier-Stokes equation, describing the turbulence model of k-ε two equation model and energy equation. The waste gas formed from the tip of the electro-surgical knife was simulated with the species transport equation. The tar and non-viable particles formed at the cutting position were tracked with the discrete phase model.

(1) The continuity equation:

ρt+ρuixi=0 (1)

In the formula, ui was the time averaged velocity expressed by tensors, m/s;·ρ was pressure(Pa); t was time(s);

(2) The Navier-Stokes equation:

ρuit+ρuiujxj=pxi+xjμeffuixj+ujxi+ρgi (2)

Where ui and uj denoted the velocity of i and j direction, m/s; xi and xj stood for coordinates i and j direction, m; ρ and p was fluid density(kg/m3) and pressure(Pa); ueff indicated the coefficient of effective viscosity(Pa·s) determined by the k-ε two equation turbulence model;

(3)The k-ε two equation model

k equation of turbulent kinetic energy:

ρkt+xiρuikμeffσkkxi=Gkρε (3)

In the formula, k represented turbulent kinetic energy, m2/s2, and ε denoted the dissipation rate of turbulent flow energy, m2/s3;

ε equation of dissipation rate of turbulent energy:

ρεt+xiρuiεμeffσεεxi=(C1εGkC2ρε2)/k (4)

Where the Gk and ueff could be calculated by equations as follows:

Gk=μεujxiuixj+ujxi (5)
μeff=μ+μt=μ+ρCμk2/ε (6)

In the formula, μt represented the turbulent viscosity coefficient, Pa·s, and μ was the viscosity coefficient, Pa·s; μi (i = 1,2,3) denoted the velocities of the three axes X, Y, and Z respectively; C1, C2, Cμ, σk, στ were empirical constant, C1 = 1.43, C2 = 1.93, Cμ = 0.09, σk = 1.0, σε = 1.43.

(4)The energy equation:

ρuiHxi=xikeffTxi (7)

Where H was enthalpy of gas in theatre, T denoted gas temperature, and keff was effective heat transfer coefficient, which could be calculated as follow:

keffTxi=μσT+μtσt,T (8)

In the formula, σT and σt,T were empirical constant,σT = 1.00; σt,T = 0.9.

(5)The species transport in the gas flow is described with the transport equation.

ρYit+ρYiujxj=xjτiYixj+Ri+Si (9)

Where Yi is the mass ratio of species i, τi is the mass transfer coefficient of species i, Ri is the generation/consumption rate of species i, Si is the source term. In this paper Ri = 0 and Si = 0.

(6)The trajectory equation of non-viable particles and tar droplets

dup,idt=18ρμρpdp21+0.15Rep0.687uiup,i (10)

Where up was velocity of non-viable particles or tar droplets, m/s; ρp was density of non-viable particles or condensed tar droplets, kg/m3; dp was diameter of non-viable particles or tar droplets, m; Rep was Reynolds number of non-viable particles or tar droplets.

Boundary conditions of the model were summarized as follows:

  1. The laminar air entrance was defined at the inlet of in the ceiling of the theatre, entrance velocity (Vin = 0.096 m/s) determined by air down flow rate in ambient steady state (27°C); The turbulent kinetic energy(kinlet) and turbulent energy dissipation rate(εinlet) at the entrance are calculated by Eqs (11) and (12) respectively, in which the turbulence intensity Ti was 3.7%, and the turbulence length scale l was 0.07 times of inlet width, and Cμ was taken as 0.09;
    kinlet=1.5VinTi2 (11)
    εinlet=Cμ0.75k1.5/l (12)
  2. The air exit was set up at the bottom of wall as ‘pressure outlet’;

  3. The cutting position of electro-surgical unit was set as an inlet of electro-surgical smoke, which included waste gas species, non-viable particles and condensed tar droplets. The flow rate, property and temperature of waste gas, non-viable particles and condensed tar droplets, were based on measurement data in the above mentioned experiment;

  4. The wall of the theatre with no slip surface was treated by standard wall function, and the heat transfer at the walls was third boundary conditions with heat transfer coefficient of 1.5 and outer temperature set as 30°C;

  5. The ceiling and floor of the theatre was treated as no slip surface and adiabatic boundary.

The mathematical model was computed in FLUENT software and the grid division(3.4×105 nodes created) was carried out with ICEM software. For the distribution of condensed tar droplets and non-viable particles, the multiphase mixture model was used, and the diameter of condensed tar droplets and non-viable particles were assumed as 2μm, according to the other researchers’ work [1720]. SIMPLEC algorithm (Semi-Implicit Method -Consistent) was used in the model to simulate the three-dimensional flow field and temperature field in the theatre, equation residual value was less than 10−4 as the convergence criteria solving the model equations. The thermophysical properties of materials in theatre were shown in S1 Table.

Results

Results of in vitro experiment

The knife tip temperature, composition and volume flow rate was measured in vitro cutting experiments of porcine back muscle with electro-surgical unit under different power levels, as shown in Figs 35. The formation rate of tar and non-viable particles was also measured in the experiments, Figs 6 and 7. The properties of waste gas, tar and non-viable particles were measured and listed in S1 Table (tar would transfer to condensed droplet when tar in gas phase released from the cutting position and temperature dropped to ambient.

Fig 3. Electro-knife tip temperature at different power levels in vitro experiment.

Fig 3

Fig 5. Net flow rate of waste gas at different power levels of electro-knife in vitro experiment.

Fig 5

Fig 6. Formation rate of condensed tar droplets at different power levels of electro-knife in vitro experiment.

Fig 6

Fig 7. Formation rate of non-viable particles at different power levels of electro-knife in vitro experiment.

Fig 7

Fig 4. Composition in waste gas at different power levels of electro-knife in vitro experiment.

Fig 4

From Figs 35, it was found that as the power of electro-surgical knife increased, the knife tip temperature, total content of (CO, CO2, CH4, NH3) in outlet waste gas and net flow rate of waste gas at outlet increased. Net flow rate of waste gas was the difference between inlet and outlet flow rate of experiment facility during in vitro cutting experiment with electro-surgical unit. At outlet, composition of (CO, CO2, CH4, NH3) was sourced from the cutting position during experiment and content of CO+CO2 was much higher than content of CH4+NH3 in waste gas. So the main composition of waste gas at cutting position was CO+CO2. Eqs (13) and (14) descripted the effect of power level of electro-surgical knife to the knife tip temperature and net flow rate of waste gas at outlet.

Ttip=2704.59×P+0.095×P2 (13)
Gwastegas=9.30×1064.49×108P+7.16×109P2 (14)

Where, Ttip was the knife tip temperature, °C; P was the power of electro-surgical knife, W; Gwaste gas was net flow rate of waste gas at outlet, i.e. the difference between inlet and outlet flow rate of experiment facility during in vitro cutting experiment with electro-surgical unit, m3/s.

It was shown in Figs 6 and 7 that the formation rate of condensed tar droplets and non-viable particles increased with the rising power of electro-surgical knife. Eqs (15) and (16) denoted the relation between power level of electro-surgical knife and the formation rate of condensed tar droplets and non-viable particles, which were got from polynomial fitting of experiment data.

Fparticle=4.14×103+6.33×104P2.06×106P2+2.80×107P3 (15)
Ftar=2.82×103+4.69×104P9.69×106P2+1.98×107P3 (16)

Where, Fparticle was the formation rate of non-viable particles during experiment, g/s; Ftar was the formation rate of condensed tar droplets during experiment, g/s.

According to Eq (13), when the power of electro-surgical knife was at levels of 20, 60, 70 and 80 W, the knife tip temperature was at levels of 200, 300, 400 and 500°C, respectively. Based on Eqs (14), (15) and (16), the corresponding values of Gwaste gas, Fparticle and Ftar to knife tip temperature 200, 300, 400 and 500°C were calculated.

Results of simulation of theatre during electrosurgery

Based on the results of in vitro cutting experiment, there were 4 cases of electro-surgery-laparotomy in laminar operation room simulated with FLUENT, and in the cases the tip temperatures of electro-surgical knife were 200, 300, 400, 500°C.

From the simulation, it was found that the flow field in the theatre during electro-surgery-laparotomy could be divided into 7 zones according to Z velocity (Fig 8): (1) upwelling flow zone right above the incision position of electro-surgical knife, (2) downward laminar zone right above operating table, (4) horizontal flow zone (towards outlets) between operating table and outlets, (5) downward slow flow zone around laminar flow zone, (6) horizontal flow zone (towards walls without outlet) and (7) upward natural convection flow zone nearing the walls without outlet on them. In these zones, the upwelling flow zone right above the incision position was most important, as the surgical smoke sourced in this zone, most contamination was concentrated in this zone and spread to the whole theatre. According to the simulation, the maximum height of upwelling flow zone (Hsmoke) increased as the tip temperature of electro-surgical knife rose, Fig 9. The upward natural convection flow zone nearing the walls without outlet on them was also important, as the surgical smoke spread to this zone, stayed and accumulated in this zone.

Fig 8. The contour of velocity Z of gas in theatre during electro-surgery.

Fig 8

Fig 9. The peak height of surgical smoke vs tip temperature of electro-surgical knife.

Fig 9

The waste gas, non-viable particles and condensed tar droplets distribution along the center line of operating table at the height of patient’s nose (Z = 1.1 m), who was lying on the operating table, was shown in Figs 1012. It was found that the concentration of waste gas, non-viable particles and condensed tar droplet was high in the area <0.5 m from the cutting position, and the peak concentration was increased with the rising of tip temperature of electro-surgical unit at height of lying patient’s nose.

Fig 10. The waste gas distribution along the center line of operating table at the height of patient’s nose (Z = 1.1 m).

Fig 10

Fig 12. Condensed tar droplet distribution along the center line of operating table at the height of patient’s nose (Z = 1.1 m).

Fig 12

Fig 11. Non-viable particle distribution along the center line of operating table at the height of patient’s nose (Z = 1.1 m).

Fig 11

The non-viable particles and condensed tar droplets distribution along the border of operating table at the height of surgeon’s nose (Z = 1.5 m), who was standing around the operating table, was shown in Figs 13 and 14. It was found that the concentration of non-viable particles and condensed tar droplet was high near head part and feet part of operating table, and the maximum concentration was increased with the rising of tip temperature of electro-surgical unit at height of standing surgeon’s nose around the operating table.

Fig 13. Non-viable particles distribution along the border of operating table at the height of surgeon’s nose (Z = 1.5 m).

Fig 13

Fig 14. Condensed tar droplet distribution along the border of operating table at the height of surgeon’s nose (Z = 1.5 m).

Fig 14

Discussion

From Figs 35, the tip temperature of electro-surgical knife increased with the increasing power of knife, and the rising rate of tip temperature accelerated when power of knife was above 60 W. The relation of formation rate of non-viable particles to power of knife had the similar law. But the formation rate of waste gas and condensed tar droplets increased gradually as power of knife increasing. The main components of waste gas formed from incision of electro-surgical unit were CO+CO2.

Based on the derived flow field of theatre during electro-surgery (laparotomy), Fig 8, it was found: (1) the surgical smoke including waste gas, condensed tar droplets and in-viable particles, upwelled from the incision of electro-surgical knife and the driving forces were upward thrust of new formed waste gas by tissue pyrolysis at high temperature knife tip and buoyancy of hot waste gas; (2) As reversed to downward laminar air flow from the ceiling of theatre, the surgical smoke turned 180 degrees from upward to downward, and the height where velocity Z of gas = 0 was defined as the maximum height of surgical smoke rising right above the incision of electro-surgical unit (Hsmoke); (3) large portion of surgical smoke was then flowed downward to outlets of theatre, and small portion of surgical smoke spread to the head or feet direction of operating table; (4) there was a spread route of dispersed surgical smoke near the walls of theatre without outlet, in which some surgery spread to the walls without outlet, the nature convection near the wall (the wall temperature higher than gas temperature in theatre as heat transfer from outside) drove the dispersed surgical smoke upward into upper part of theatre, and then spread to the whole theatre.

It was also found that the maximum height of surgical smoke rising right above the incision of electro-surgical unit (Hsmoke) was increased with rising tip temperature(Ttip) of electro-surgical knife, Fig 9, and Eq (17) was the polynomial fit of Hsmoke vs Ttip data points.

Hsmoke=1.146.37×Ttip+2.45×Ttip2 (17)

Based on the simulation of electro-surgery (laparotomy) in laminar operation room, the surgical smoke including waste gas, condensed tar droplets and in-viable particles, upwelled from the incision of electro-surgical knife to the height of 1.1–1.45 m, Fig 9, and then turned back to by the falling downward laminar air. In the counter flow area, the waste gas, non-viable particles and condensed tar droplets were concentrated by the upward and downward stream. Within 1.45 m in height and 0.5 m in horizontal from incision position of knife, the concentrations of the waste gas, non-viable particles and condensed tar droplets were high.

During laparotomy, the surgeon should bow into this area, the high contamination of waste gas, condensed tar droplets and in-viable particle should be hazard to health of surgeon. The CO concentrate in the waste gas at the operating zone of surgeon, that is 1.1–1.45 m above the cutting zone, was higher than 50 ppm, when the tip temperature of the electro-surgical unit more than 400°C, this content is much greater than the 9 ppm upper limit for an 8-hour exposure set by the Unites States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [22]. Continuous exposure more than 5 days to a this level of CO content leads to a mean the operating surgeon’s HbCO level > 2%, which was above the threshold for diagnosis of CO poisoning [23].

As the tip temperature of knife increased from 200 to 500°C, the horizontal range of high contamination area around the incision position of electro-surgical unit was not enlarged, but vertical range of high contamination area around the incision position of electro-surgical unit rose from 1.1 m to 1.45 m, and the concentration of waste gas, condensed tar droplets and non-viable particles increased.

For the patient, the CO concentrate in the waste gas in the wound from the cutting operation, when the tip temperature of the electro-surgical unit more than 400°C, was near 100ppm, this content was also much greater than the 9 ppm upper limit for an 8-hour exposure set by the Unites States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [22]. The condensed tar droplets and in-viable particle in the wound from the cutting operation were high than 20 g/m3 and 12 g/m3, which was near that value in the smoke of the cigarette [3]. As the tissue in the wound from the cutting operation is open, the high contamination of waste gas, condensed tar droplets and in-viable particle during electro-surgery should be more hazard to health of patient.

The natural convection near the walls without outlets also influenced the contamination of whole theatre, led waste gas, condensed tar droplets and non-viable particles into the low velocity region outside laminar region under the air inlet. At the nose height of the standing surgeon around operating table, the regions near the head or feet of operating table, respectively, were contaminated with higher concentration of non-viable particles and condensed tar droplets. As the tip temperature of electro-surgical knife increased, the concentration of non-viable particles and condensed tar droplets in the regions increased more than 3 times, Figs 13 and 14.

Conclusion

  1. The tip temperature of electro-surgical knife increased with the increasing power of knife, and the rising rate of tip temperature accelerated when power of knife was above 60 W. The polynomial fitting relationship was derived.

  2. As the tip temperature of electro-knife increased from 200 to 500°C, maximum ascending height of surgical smoke right above the incision position of electro-surgical unit increased from 1.1 m to 1.45 m.

  3. When the tip temperature of electro-knife was more 400°C, the CO content in the operating zone of surgeon was more than 200 ppm, which would cause HbCO level increase after multi-day’s continuous work.

  4. As the tissue in the patient’s wound was open during the electro-knife operation with tip temperature more than 400°C, the content of condensed tar droplets and in-viable particle was higher than 20 g/m3 and 12 g/m3, which should be more hazard to health of patient than that of surgeon.

  5. The natural convection flow near the walls without outlet caused part of surgical smoke to stay and accumulate in the theatre.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Material properties.

(DOCX)

pone.0299369.s001.docx (14KB, docx)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files, or have been deposited at the following figshare page: (DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24936747).

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Pavan N, Crestani A, Abrate A, Nunzio C D; Esperto F, Giannarini G, et al. Risk of virus contamination through surgical smoke during minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review of the literature on a neglected issue revived in the COVID-19 pandemic era. European Urology Focus. 2020; 6(5): 452–461. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.05.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zouzias D C, Ciocon H D. Surgical smoke safety for dermatologists during the COVID-19 pandemic. Dermatologic Surgery. 2020; 46(11): 1440–1441. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brenda C, Ulmer R N, CNOR M N. The hazards of surgical smoke[J]. AORN Journal. 2008; 87(4): 721–738. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2007.10.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kameyama H, Otani T, Yamazaki T, Iwaya A, Uehara H, Harada R, et al. Comparison of surgical smoke between open surgery and laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease in the COVID-19 era. Surgical Endoscopy. 2022; 36(2): 1243–1250. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08394-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bigony L. Risks associated with exposure to surgical smoke plume: a review of the literature. AORN Journal. 2007; 86(6): 1013–1024. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2007.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Edwards B E, Reiman R E. Results of a survey on current surgical smoke control practices. AORN Journal. 2008; 87(4): 739–749. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2007.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gao S, Koehler R H, Yermakov M, Grinshpun S A, et al. Performance of facepiece respirators and surgical masks against surgical smoke: Simulated workplace protection factor study. Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 2016; 60(5): 608–618. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mew006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chapman L W, Korta D Z, Lee P K, Linden K G. Awareness of Surgical Smoke Risks and Assessment of Safety Practices During electro-surgery Among US Dermatology Residents. Jama Dermatology. 2017; 153(5): 467–468. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.5899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lin Y W, Fan S Z, Chang K H, Huang C S, Tang C S. A novel inspection protocol to detect volatile compounds in breast surgery electrocautery smoke. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 2010; 109(7): 511–516. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(10)60085-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dalal A J, McLennan A S. Surgical smoke evacuation: a modification to improve efficiency and minimise potential health risk. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2017; 55(1): 90–91. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.03.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Holmes S. Factors affecting surgical plume evacuation compliance. The Journal of Perioperative Nursing in Australia. 2016; 29(4): 39. doi: 10.26550/2209-1092.1010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Steege A L, Boiano J M, Sweeney M H. Secondhand smoke in the operating room? Precautionary practices lacking for surgical smoke. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2016; 59(11): 1020–1031. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ilce A, Yuzden G E, Yavuz van Giersbergen M. The examination of problems experienced by nurses and doctors associated with exposure to surgical smoke and the necessary precautions. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2017, 26(11): 1555–1561. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Romano F, Gustén J, Antonellis S D, Joppolo C M. electro-surgical smoke: ultrafine particle measurements and work environment quality in different operating theatres. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017; 14(2), 137. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14020137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kieran G, Baljinder D, Jonathan M. electro-surgery. Surgery. 2011; 29(2): 70–72. doi: 10.1016/j.mpsur.2010.11.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Michele G, Dieter H, Julien M R, Markus W S. Quantitative chemical analysis of surgical smoke generated during laparoscopic surgery with a vessel-sealing device[J]. Surgical Innovation, 2014, 21(2): 170–179. doi: 10.1177/1553350613492025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Canicoba A R B, Poveda V D B. Surgical Smoke and Biological Symptoms in Healthcare Professionals and Patients: A Systematic Review. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing. 2022; 37(1): 130–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2021.06.106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Meakin L B, Murrell J C, Doran I C P, Knowles T G, Tivers M, Chanoit G. electro-surgery reduces blood loss and immediate postoperative inflammation compared to cold instruments for midline celiotomy in dogs: A randomized controlled trial. Veterinary Surgery. 2017; 46(4): 1–5. doi: 10.1111/vsu.12641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hensman C, Baty D, Willis R G, Cuschieri A. Chemical composition of smoke produced by high-frequency electro-surgery in a closed gaseous environment. Surgical Endoscopy. 1998; 12(8): 1017–1019. doi: 10.1007/s004649900771 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sahaf O S A, Vega-Carrascal I, Cunningham F O, McGrath J P, Bloomfield F J. Chemical composition of smoke produced by high-frequency electro-surgery. Irish Journal of Medical Science. 2007; 176(3): 229–232. doi: 10.1007/s11845-007-0068-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dodde R E, Gee J S, Geiger J D, Shih A J. Monopolar electro-surgical thermal management for minimizing tissue damage. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2012; 59(1): 167–173. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2011.2168956 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Graham J D, Holtgrave D R. Predicting EPA’s forthcoming CO standards in light of new clinical evidence. Risk Analysis. 1991; 11(2):325–332. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1991.tb00608.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yu H, Jin Y. Effect of electro-surgery in the operating room on surgeons blood indices: a simulation model and experiment on rabbits. Journal of International Medical Research. 2018. 46(12): 5245–5256. doi: 10.1177/0300060518804376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Jorddy Neves Cruz

23 Nov 2023

PONE-D-23-32898The research on the effect of temperature of electro-surgical unit to surgical smoke distribution in theatre-in vitro and simulation studyPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Yu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 07 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jorddy Neves Cruz

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please note that PLOS ONE has specific guidelines on code sharing for submissions in which author-generated code underpins the findings in the manuscript. In these cases, all author-generated code must be made available without restrictions upon publication of the work. Please review our guidelines at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/materials-and-software-sharing#loc-sharing-code and ensure that your code is shared in a way that follows best practice and facilitates reproducibility and reuse.

3. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

"Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

4. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

All modifications made to the manuscript must be marked in yellow.

A point-by-point response must be provided to the reviewer.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The abstract should be in a structured format with aims, methodology, results and summary.

The blurred figures should be replaced.

The graphical representations of the results and its discussion should be elaborated in context to clinical applications

Reviewer #2: First of all, I found this study on surgical smoke particle measurement very valuable. I wish you continued work. I have some suggestions other than article modelling.

The size of the pathicle according to the types of cautery should be added here in the literature.

Page 20 line 46: harmful substances: It would be good to explain what these items are.

line 46: not only tissue protein and fat but the vast majority of water, vapour

line 70 : not only surgeons and patients but scrap nurses and anaesthetists. It affects everyone in the room, even if it's not sterile in the surgical field. It should be written with references.

Results: The region of upward natural convection flow with no outlet towards the walls was also important, because it was said that the surgical smoke spread to this region, stayed in this region and accumulated.

There is information in the literature that the particles reached a distance of 1 meter away. this part is also important in terms of the transmission of biological particles, this part should be explained.

Is the chemical content of what is called tar droplets distribution? Is the composition of voc and pah should be written more clearly.

In the result section, it is stated that there is an increase in the number of non-living particles. has this content been fully analysed? because it may also contain biological living materials. hepatitis b transmission is available in the literature. if such a test has not been performed, no definite judgement should be made. if it has been done, it should be explained.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Prof. Dr. Karthikeyan Ramalingam

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 8;19(3):e0299369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299369.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


8 Jan 2024

PONE-D-23-32898

In the following content, Q denotes Question from reviewers, A denotes Answer from author.

Reviewer #1: 

(Q1) The abstract should be in a structured format with aims, methodology, results and summary.

(A1) The abstract have been revised to a structured format, as follows.

“Aim

In order to institute effective countermeasures, quantifying of the effect of tip temperature of electro-surgical unit to surgical smoke distribution in theatre was studied.

Methodology

The relation of tip temperature to power of electro-surgical unit through in vitro cutting experiment. Based on experiment data, the mathematical model was established to simulate the electro-surgery in laminar operating room.

Results

As the tip temperature of knife increased from 200 to 500 ℃, maximum ascending height of surgical smoke right above the incision position of electro-surgical unit increased from 1.1 m to 1.45 m. When the tip temperature of electro-knife was more 400 ℃, the CO content in the medical staff’s operating zone was more than 200 ppm, which would cause the medical staff’s HbCO level increased. As the patient’s tissue in the wound during operation was open, when the electro-knife of more than 400 ℃, the content of condensed tar droplets and in-viable particle was higher than 20 g/m3 and 12 g/m3 in the zone around patient’s wound of open tissue.

Summary

As the power of electro-surgical knife increased, the knife tip temperature increased. Total content of (CO, CO2, CH4, NH3) in waste gas and net flow rate of waste gas at outlet increased with the rising temperature of knife tip and formation rate of condensed tar droplets and non-viable particles also increased. The maximum height of surgical smoke rising right above the incision of electro-surgical unit was increased with rising temperature of electro-surgical knife tip.”

(Q2) The blurred figures should be replaced.

(A2) Fig2 and Fig8 are changed as follows.

Fig2

Fig8

(Q3) The graphical representations of the results and its discussion should be elaborated in context to clinical applications.

(A3) The representation of the results and discussion have been changed as follow.

Line 256 added: “The chemical analysis of condensed tar droplets was the mixture of benzene, toluene, acrylonitrile, methylpropene and acetaldehyde. The chemical composition of non-viable particles was mostly carbon and a small amount of calcia and magnesia. The sizes of the condensed tar droplets and non-viable particles partly measured in the experiment was between 0.5 µm and 10 µm.”

Line 285 changed: “The upward natural convection flow zone nearing the walls without outlet lead to spreading, staying and accumulating of the surgical smoke to this zone, stayed and accumulated in this zone.”

Line 357 changed: “During laparotomy, the medical staff operated around the operating bed and they need to bow into the high contamination zone of waste gas, condensed tar droplets and in-viable particle should be hazard to health of medical staff.”

Reviewer #2: 

(Q1) First of all, I found this study on surgical smoke particle measurement very valuable. I wish you continued work. I have some suggestions other than article modelling.

(A1) Thank you, Sir. We will carry out more refine research next step.

(Q2) The size of the particle according to the types of cautery should be added here in the literature.

(A2) We have measured some particles collected in the experiments, but not all the particles were measured. So the size distribution of particles was not given in this paper. This sentence “The chemical analysis of condensed tar droplets was the mixture of benzene, toluene, acrylonitrile, methylpropene and acetaldehyde. The chemical composition of non-viable particles was mostly carbon and a small amount of calcia and magnesia. The sizes of the condensed tar droplets and non-viable particles partly measured in the experiment was between 0.5 µm and 10 µm.” was add at Line 256.

(Q3) Page 20 line 46: harmful substances: It would be good to explain what these items are.

(A3) The Line 46 was changed to “Many studies show that it contained vapour, harmful substances, e.g. benzene, toluene, carbon monoxide and lung-damaging particulates [1-4].”

(Q4) line 46: not only tissue protein and fat but the vast majority of water, vapour

(A4) line46 was changed as “Surgical smoke was sourced from ablation of tissue water, protein and fat.”.

(Q5) line 70 : not only surgeons and patients but scrap nurses and anaesthetists. It affects everyone in the room, even if it's not sterile in the surgical field. It should be written with references.

(A5) In this paper the word “surgeon” have been changed as “Medical staff” in all sections and figures, which includes surgeons, nurses and anaethetists etc in the operating room. And reference 22 was added to the paper: “22. Ball K, Gilder R. A Mixed Method Survey on the Impact of Exposure to Surgical Smoke on Perioperative Nurses[J]. Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management. 2021; 26(3): 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.pcorm.2021.100232.”.

(Q6) Results: The region of upward natural convection flow with no outlet towards the walls was also important, because it was said that the surgical smoke spread to this region, stayed in this region and accumulated.

(A6) According to the model research in this paper, the accumulation of surgical smoke near the wall without outlets was discussed. And Line 380 was changed as “The natural convection near the walls without outlets led to surgical smoke accumulated in the region 1 m from the bed, for non-viable particles increased to 1.9×10-5 g/m3 and the condensed tar droplets 0.03 g/m3, this also influenced the contamination of whole theatre, led waste gas, condensed tar droplets and non-viable particles into the low velocity region outside laminar region under the air inlet. At the nose height of the standing medical staff around operating table, the regions near the head or feet of operating table, respectively, were contaminated with higher concentration of non-viable particles and condensed tar droplets.”.

(Q7) There is information in the literature that the particles reached a distance of 1 meter away. this part is also important in terms of the transmission of biological particles, this part should be explained.

(A7) As the model research in this paper, the region 1 meter at the direction to the wall without outlet from the operating bed was the surgical smoke accumulating region and medical staff operating region, as new Fig13 and Fig14. But in our research the biological particles were not measured and this part was not discussed.

(Q8) Is the chemical content of what is called tar droplets distribution? Is the composition of voc and pah should be written more clearly.

(A8) The content of tar droplets was partly measured and Line 256 was added: “The chemical analysis of condensed tar droplets was the mixture of benzene, toluene, acrylonitrile, methylpropene and acetaldehyde. The chemical composition of non-viable particles was mostly carbon and a small amount of calcia and magnesia. The sizes of the condensed tar droplets and non-viable particles partly measured in the experiment was between 0.5 µm and 10 µm.”

(Q9) In the result section, it is stated that there is an increase in the number of non-living particles. has this content been fully analysed? because it may also contain biological living materials. hepatitis b transmission is available in the literature. if such a test has not been performed, no definite judgement should be made. if it has been done, it should be explained.

(A9) The size of non-viable particles was partly measured, its weight was measured, however its size distribution was not discussed. We will research this content in the future. The chemical analysis of the non-viable particles was measured as the mixture of mostly Carbon and small amount of Oxides, however the biological living materials on the particles was not measured. Thanks for the suggestions from the reviewers, we will research in this content. Thanks again.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0299369.s002.docx (313.9KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Jorddy Neves Cruz

9 Feb 2024

The research on the effect of temperature of electro-surgical unit to surgical smoke distribution in theatre-in vitro and simulation study

PONE-D-23-32898R1

Dear Dr. Yu,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Jorddy Neves Cruz

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Jorddy Neves Cruz

23 Feb 2024

PONE-D-23-32898R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Yu,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Jorddy Neves Cruz

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Material properties.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0299369.s001.docx (14KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0299369.s002.docx (313.9KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files, or have been deposited at the following figshare page: (DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24936747).


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES