Skip to main content
Journal of Neurological Surgery. Part B, Skull Base logoLink to Journal of Neurological Surgery. Part B, Skull Base
. 2023 Jan 5;85(2):109–118. doi: 10.1055/a-1993-7790

Ectopic Olfactory Neuroblastoma: Systematic Review of a Rare Clinical Entity among Sinonasal Tumors

Christopher G Lui 1, Ido Badash 2, Liyang Tang 2, Michelle E Mark 3, Pete S Batra 3, Bozena B Wrobel 2,
PMCID: PMC10923629  PMID: 38463937

Abstract

Objectives  Ectopic olfactory neuroblastoma is an uncommon manifestation of an already rare neoplasm. We aimed to systematically review the literature for cases of ectopic olfactory neuroblastoma to better characterize this rare disease entity and to present two new case reports.

Methods  A search of the PubMed and Embase databases was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify English-language articles reporting cases of ectopic olfactory neuroblastoma, published from 1955 through November 2021.

Results  Sixty-six cases of ectopic olfactory neuroblastoma were identified in 62 articles including the current review. Ectopic olfactory neuroblastoma arose in a wide age range (2–89 years) without significant sex predilection. It occurred most commonly in the ethmoid (25%), maxillary (25%), and sphenoid (16%) sinuses. Seventy-three percent of cases presented with low Hyams grade (I and II). The most common symptoms were nasal obstruction (32%) and epistaxis (32%). Paraneoplastic syndromes were observed in 27% of patients. The most common treatment was surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. Overall, 76% of all patients were disease-free at the time of last follow-up. Locoregional recurrences and distant metastases were found in 19 and 5% of cases, respectively.

Conclusion  This systematic review describes previously reported cases of ectopic olfactory neuroblastoma, a disease entity with poorly understood characteristics. Physicians should consider olfactory neuroblastoma in the differential diagnosis for sinonasal masses, as their ectopic presentation may present considerable diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. Patients with olfactory neuroblastoma may benefit from long-term follow-up and routine endoscopic examinations for surveillance of ectopic recurrences.

Keywords: olfactory neuroblastoma, esthesioneuroblastoma, sinonasal tumor, olfactory neuroepithelium, paraneoplastic syndrome, ectopic, systematic review

Introduction

Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB), also known as esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB), is an uncommon malignant tumor arising from the olfactory neuroepithelium in the sinonasal cavity. It was first characterized by Berger et al in 1924, 1 and there have been over 1,000 cases reported in the literature to date. 2 The tumors generally arise from the cribriform plate in the superior nasal cavity. ONB represents approximately 3% of all intranasal tumors and 5% of malignant nasal and paranasal sinus tumors. 3 4 The initial clinical presentation of ONB can be highly varied, although common presenting symptoms include nasal obstruction and epistaxis. Less commonly, nonspecific findings such as headache, paresthesia, and vision loss are observed, which can often lead to delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis. 5 ONB has been described as a “great impostor” as it is often confused for other tumors of the head and neck region. 6 In rare cases, ONB has also been seen in association with various paraneoplastic syndromes including syndrome of inappropriate anti-diuretic hormone (SIADH) 7 and Cushing's syndrome. 8 Local recurrence is thought to occur in 20 to 30% of patients following treatment, 9 while regional recurrence in the neck occurs in around 14% of patients. 10 Distant metastatic spread is thought to occur in around 8% of all cases. 11

The exact cell type from which ONB originates has not yet been clearly defined in the literature. The likely cell of origin is hypothesized to be the basal neural cells of the olfactory mucosa, 3 as almost all tumors arise from the cribriform plate region. 12 13 However, this does not adequately explain the etiology of ectopic ONB originating outside the nasal cavity, even though these cases are exceedingly rare. The first case of ectopic ONB was described in the literature by McCormack and Harris in 1955. 14 Since then, several cases of ONB originating outside of the olfactory neuroepithelium have been reported in the literature. 13 15 16 17 18 Due to its rarity, little is known about the presentation and disease characteristics of ectopic ONB.

In this review, we aim to better characterize ectopic ONB and familiarize clinicians with its unique diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas. Herein, we present two new cases of ONB originating from the maxillary sinus and systematically review all previously published case series and reports of ectopic ONB.

Case Reports

Case Report 1

In 2015, a 20-year-old female presented with a 6-month history of right-sided nasal obstruction. Computed tomography (CT) of the sinuses was performed, which showed a 4.4 × 3.2 × 3.7 cm mass centered in the middle nasal cavity extending into the right maxillary sinus and right frontal recess with no intracranial invasion ( Fig. 1 ). On nasal endoscopy, a large right-sided sinonasal mass was visualized. A biopsy was performed, and pathology was suspicious for an inverted papilloma. A diagnostic angiogram showed significant vascularization of the mass. Hence, the patient underwent preoperative embolization before her tumor resection. She subsequently underwent a right endoscopic medial maxillectomy, ethmoidectomy, sphenoidotomy, and frontal sinusotomy. The entirety of the surgical resection was extradural. The mass was friable with a smooth encapsulated surface. Intraoperatively, the mass's primary site of attachment was noted to be within the maxillary sinus, and the tumor filled the maxillary sinus and right nasal cavity without any evidence of extension or invasion into other contiguous regions ( Fig. 1 ).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan with ( A ) coronal and ( B ) axial slices showing a large mass filling the right maxillary sinus and nasal cavity measuring 4.4 cm in its largest diameter.

Histologic sections showed a tumor with lobular architecture composed of relatively monotonous small to medium cells forming occasional Homer-Wright rosettes. The tumor cells stained positive for synaptophysin, chromogranin, CD56, and MIB-1, and negative for keratin AE1/AE3 and CD45. This was consistent with Hyams grade II, Kadish stage B ONB. Histologic resection margins were negative.

A positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT) performed at the 3-week postoperative period showed no evidence of residual locoregional or distant disease. The patient received adjuvant chemoradiation at an outside institution but attended routine postoperative visits at our hospital. She was free of disease 5 years after her surgical resection.

Case Report 2

In 2004, a 43-year-old female presented with 18 months of nasal obstruction and a right-sided nasal mass. She endorsed discolored rhinorrhea, right-sided anosmia, and intermittent facial pain. Partial smell preservation was noted on the contralateral side. Nasal endoscopy noted a friable mass filling the right nasal cavity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT imaging of the sinuses was performed and noted a large mass filling the right nasal cavity extending from the area of the olfactory cleft without frank invasion or evidence of metastasis. A biopsy was performed and was consistent with ONB, Hyams grade I. The tumor cells stained positive for synaptophysin and S-100, and were negative for Melan-A, HMB45, and cytokeratin A1/3.

The patient subsequently underwent right-sided endoscopic sinus surgery with skull base resection and multilayered skull base reconstruction. The resection was extradural, and surgical pathology confirmed negative resection margins, including negative dural biopsies. The multilayered skull base reconstruction included use of acellular dermis and a free septal mucosal graft. The patient subsequently completed intensity-modulated radiation therapy (5,220 cGy in 29 fractions) targeted at the skull base. The radiation field did not include the maxillary sinuses.

She was monitored with frequent PET-CT and MRI scans without any indications of recurrence until 2018. At the time, the patient reported mild recurrent right epistaxis. Visualization with endoscopy showed an exophytic area involving the right inferolateral maxillary sinus. Review of prior MRIs identified a mild nonspecific signal along the floor of the right maxillary sinus that was more prominent on more recent imaging.

Biopsy of the right maxillary sinus was performed, and histologic studies revealed a submucosal neoplasm composed of round to oval uniform cells with few mitotic figures and no necrosis, consistent with ONB. The tumor cells stained positive for synaptophysin and chromogranin and negative for cytokeratin 8/17, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and had a 1% Mib-1 proliferation index. This represented ectopic recurrence 14 years after treatment of her first ONB. Of note, there was no tumor noted in proximity of the maxillary sinus at the time of the initial resection to serve as a possible nidus for tumor recurrence in this area.

The patient underwent tumor resection with combined endoscopic medial maxillectomy and Caldwell-Luc approach. Multiple frozen section biopsies of margins were taken, which were all negative. The final pathology was consistent with T2N0M0, Hyams grade I, Kadish stage B ONB. Postoperatively, the patient completed 5,940 cGy of intensity-modulated radiation therapy in 33 fractions in 2019. Two years from the date of her tumor resection, the patient remained without evidence of disease recurrence.

Systematic Review Methods

Search Strategy

A systematic review of the literature on cases of ectopic ONB was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines. According to the University of Southern California's Office for the Protection of Research Subjects, a case report does not meet the definition of human subjects' research requiring institutional review board (IRB) reviews, and as such, this study did not require IRB review.

PubMed and Embase databases were searched from inception to November 2021. The search was conducted on November 10, 2021. Search terms including olfactory neuroblastoma or esthesioneuroblastoma , in conjunction with disease location (e.g., ectopic , maxillary , ethmoid , sphenoid , sphenoclival , sellar , nasopharynx , or meatus ) were used to identify relevant articles.

Eligibility Criteria

The inclusion criteria were newly reported cases of ONB that had primary sites of attachment and appeared to originate outside of the olfactory epithelium/cribriform region. For cases of ectopic ONB recurring after resection of traditional nasal cavity ONB, the recurrence must have arisen more than 5 years after the original resection, at a different location than the original tumor, and outside of the initial surgical field. Non-English papers, articles with unclear tumor origin, and cases where the primary tumor arose from the olfactory mucosa but subsequently recurred in an ectopic location < 5 years after treatment were excluded. References of relevant articles were screened for any additional articles that would meet the criteria for inclusion in this review.

Three investigators (C.L., I.B., and L.T.) independently reviewed all identified records by titles and abstracts to determine eligibility for inclusion. Any discrepancies between the articles chosen for inclusion by the reviewers were resolved by consensus.

Data Extraction

Data was extracted systematically using a standardized form on Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, 2018). Information that was recorded for each case included patient demographics, location of the tumor, symptoms at presentation, diagnostic modalities utilized, tumor staging, primary treatment, adjuvant treatment, and long-term outcomes.

Results

A database search yielded 398 unique articles, with an additional 18 articles added after reviewing the references of included articles. 2 8 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 Of those 416 articles, 61 were found to be suitable for inclusion based on the previously described inclusion and exclusion criteria, representing a total of 64 patient cases. All included articles were case reports except for one case series. With the addition of the two case reports we described above, there were a total of 66 cases of ectopic ONB included in this analysis ( Table 1 ). Fig. 2 shows the literature search process.

Table 1. Summary information of cases included in the systematic review ( n  = 66) .

Author Age Sex Tumor location Treatment Recurrence a Staging/Grading (Kadish/Hyams) b
McCormack and Harris (1955) 29 F Ethmoid sinus Surgery + radiotherapy No - / -
King (1959) 14 M Nasopharynx Surgery + radiotherapy Locoregional recurrence - / -
Church and Uhler (1959) N/A c N/A c Maxillary alveolus Surgery Locoregional recurrence; 8 months after treatment - / -
Mashberg et al (1960) 24 M Maxillary sinus Surgery No - / III
Becker and Jacox (1964) 51 M Frontal sinus Surgery Locoregional recurrence; 3 years after treatment - / -
Fitz-Hugh et al (1965) 53 F Ethmoid sinus Surgery + radiotherapy No - / -
Schochet et al (1975) 31 F Parasella Surgery + radiotherapy No - / -
Sarwar (1979) 31 F Sella/Parasella Surgery + radiotherapy No - / -
Pope et al (1980) 56 F Ethmoid sinus Surgery + radiotherapy No - / -
Meyrowitz et al (1984) 71 F Maxillary sinus Surgery + radiotherapy Locoregional recurrence; 18 months after treatment - / -
Woerner et al (1986) 2 M Maxillary sinus Chemoradiotherapy No - / -
Berman et al (1992) 11 F Sphenoid sinus Surgery + chemoradiotherapy No - / -
Feifel et al (1992) 47 F Maxillary alveolus Radiotherapy Locoregional recurrence; 6 months after treatment - / -
Myers et al (1994) 79 F Maxillary sinus Radiotherapy Distant metastasis; 6 months after treatment - / -
Chacko et al (1998) 62 F Sphenoid sinus Died before treatment N/A C / -
Roy et al (2000) 44 F Sella Surgery + radiotherapy No - / -
Miura et al (2001) 56 M Ethmoid sinus Chemoradiotherapy Distant metastasis; 3 months after treatment B / III
Sharma et al (2002) 40 M Sphenoid sinus Chemoradiotherapy No - / -
Chirico et al (2003) 59 F Sphenoid sinus Chemoradiotherapy Unknown - / II
Mariani et al (2004) 35 F Sella Surgery No A / II
Morris et al (2004) 63 M Sphenoid sinus Surgery No - / -
Yu et al (2004) 36 M Ethmoid sinus Radiotherapy No - / -
Kanno et al (2005) 39 F Ethmoid sinus Surgery + radiotherapy Locoregional recurrence; 2 years after treatment - / -
Sajko et al (2005) 57 F Sella Surgery + radiotherapy No - / -
Unal et al (2006) 14 F Maxillary sinus Surgery + chemotherapy No B / -
Butt and Olczak (2007) 52 M Ethmoid sinus Surgery + radiotherapy Locoregional recurrence; 4 years after treatment - / -
Lee et al (2007) 49 M Multifocal: maxillary sinus; ethmoid sinus Surgery No - / -
Lee and Kim (2007) 89 M Inferior meatus Radiotherapy Locoregional recurrence; 5 months after treatment A / IV
Josephs et al (2008) 48 M Ethmoid sinus Surgery + radiotherapy No C / -
J.H. Lin et al (2009) 40 M Sella Surgery + radiotherapy No - / -
Kodama et al (2009) 52 F Maxillary sinus Surgery + radiotherapy No C / II
H. Lin et al (2009) 64 F Sphenoid sinus Died before treatment N/A - / -
Chan et al (2009) 79 M Sphenoid sinus Surgery + radiotherapy No C / -
Seccia et al (2010) 69 F Pterygopalatine fossa Surgery + radiotherapy No - / -
Wormald et al (2011) 15 F Ethmoid sinus Surgery + radiotherapy No C / II
Wormald et al (2011) 60 M Sphenoid sinus Surgery + radiotherapy No B / II
Wormald et al (2011) 61 M Nasopharynx Surgery + radiotherapy No A / I
Wormald et al (2011) 12 M Nasal floor Surgery No  - / -
Senchak et al (2012) 28 F Middle turbinate Surgery No - / I
Akinfolarin et al (2012) 33 M Sphenoid sinus Surgery + chemoradiotherapy Distant metastasis; 5 months after treatment - / -
Kumar et al (2013) 35 F Lateral wall/middle meatus Surgery + radiotherapy No B / III
Lopez et al (2013) 73 F Maxillary sinus Surgery + radiotherapy Unknown C / -
Gabbay et al (2013) 50 M Ethmoid sinus Surgery No - / -
Mayur et al (2014) 19 M Ethmoid sinus Surgery + chemotherapy No C / -
Squillaci (2014) 81 F Ethmoid sinus Surgery + chemotherapy No - / -
Abdel-Rahman and Kamal (2014) 55 M Sphenoid sinus Surgery + chemoradiotherapy Unknown - / -
Jiang et al (2015) N/A c M Maxillary sinus Surgery + radiotherapy No B / -
Purohit et al (2015) 62 F Sphenoclival Chemoradiotherapy Locoregional recurrence; 6 months after treatment C / III
Holmes et al (2016) 63 F Maxillary sinus Surgery Unknown - / IV
Leon-Soriano et al (2016) 41 M Multifocal: ethmoid sinus; ethmoid sinus Surgery + radiotherapy No B / II
Nakano et al (2017) 27 F Ethmoid sinus Surgery + chemoradiotherapy No - / -
Thomas et al (2016) 13 F Maxillary sinus Chemoradiotherapy No C / II
Zahedi et al (2017) 71 M Sphenoclival Surgery No - / -
Parrilla et al (2017) 31 M Ethmoid sinus Surgery + radiotherapy No B / -
Fosbøl et al (2018) 17 F Maxillary sinus Surgery + radiotherapy No - / I
Rasool et al (2018) 28 F Maxillary sinus Surgery + radiotherapy No - / I
Familiar and Azcutia (2019) 31 M Sphenoid sinus Chemoradiotherapy No C / I
Caldwell and Sato (2019) 15 M Nasopharynx Chemoradiotherapy Locoregional recurrence; 3 months after treatment D / I
Wong et al (2019) 17 F Maxillary sinus Surgery + radiotherapy No B / I
Mims et al (2020) 13 M Lateral wall of nasal cavity Surgery + radiotherapy No - / II
Peyneshki et al (2020) 66 M Sella Surgery + radiotherapy No - / II
Heiland and Heiland (2021) 35 M Middle meatus Surgery No B / -
Zhong et al (2023) 55 M Nasopharynx Surgery Locoregional recurrence; 14 months after treatment - / IV
Tudor et al (2021) 11 F Maxillary sinus Surgery + chemotherapy Unknown - / I
Lui et al (current study) 20 F Maxillary sinus Surgery + chemoradiotherapy No B / II
Lui et al. (current study) 57 F Maxillary sinus Surgery + radiotherapy No B / I

Abbreviations: F, female; M, male; N/A, not available.

a

As reported at the time of each case's publication.

b

Staging and grading information as reported by each article.

c

Information not reported by article.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart.

The average patient age at the time of presentation was 43 years old (range: 2–89 years), and the disease showed no major sex predilection, with 52% of cases arising in females ( Table 2 ). The most common locations of ectopic ONB outside of the nasal cavity were the ethmoid sinus (25%) and maxillary sinus (25%) ( Table 3 ). The next most common tumor locations were the sphenoid sinus (16%) and the sellar or parasellar areas (10%). Less common locations included atypical nasal cavity locations (9%), nasopharynx (6%), sphenoclival region (3%), alveolar process of the maxilla (3%), frontal sinus (1%), and the pterygopalatine fossa (1%). ONB affected the left (49%) and right side (47%) equally. In two cases, simultaneous multifocal disease was discovered with separate noncontiguous ONBs arising in both right- and left-sided locations. Upon diagnosis, the majority of cases with reported histologic Hyams grading ( n  = 26) were Hyams I (35%) or Hyams II (38%). In terms of Kadish classification, the majority of cases with reported staging ( n  = 25) presented as Kadish stage B (44%) or C (40%) ( Table 3 ).

Table 2. Demographic characteristics of patients with ectopic olfactory neuroblastoma.

Characteristic Number of patients (%)
Age ( n  = 64)
 Mean 43 y
 Range 2–89 y
  0–9 1 (2)
  10–19 12 (19)
  20–29 6 (9)
  30–39 10 (16)
  40–49 7 (11)
  50–59 12 (19)
  60–69 9 (14)
  70–79 5 (8)
  80–89 2 (3)
Sex ( n  = 65)
 Male 31 (48)
 Female 34 (52)

Table 3. Tumor features at time of initial presentation and diagnosis.

Characteristic Number of patients (%)
Laterality ( n  = 49)
 Right 23 (47)
 Left 24 (49)
 Multifocal a 2 (4)
Location ( n  = 68)
 Ethmoid sinus 17 (25)
 Maxillary sinus 17 (25)
 Sphenoid sinus 11 (16)
 Sellar/parasellar 7 (10)
 Nasopharynx 4 (6)
 Lateral wall 2 (3)
 Alveolar process of maxilla 2 (3)
 Sphenoclival 2 (3)
 Frontal sinus 1 (1)
 Middle turbinate 1 (1)
 Middle meatus 1 (1)
 Inferior meatus 1 (1)
 Pterygopalatine fossa 1 (1)
 Nasal floor 1 (1)
Grading/Staging
 Hyams ( n  = 26)
  I 9 (35)
  II 10 (38)
  III 4 (15)
  IV 3 (12)
 Kadish ( n  = 25)
  A 3 (12)
  B 11 (44)
  C 10 (40)
  D 1 (4)
a

Both cases of multifocal disease involved two masses arising from a right- and left-sided location.

Clinical presentation most often involved symptoms of nasal obstruction (32%), epistaxis (32%), and headache (26%) ( Table 4 ). Central nervous system (vomiting, altered mental status) and ophthalmic (vision loss, cranial nerve VI palsy) symptoms were also present in some cases. Endocrine paraneoplastic syndromes were observed in 27% of the cases reported, with 12 cases of SIADH (18%) and 6 cases of ectopic Cushing's syndrome (9%).

Table 4. Presenting symptoms, primary treatment modalities, and outcomes of ectopic olfactory neuroblastomas.

Characteristic Number of patients (%)
Symptoms at presentation
 Nasal obstruction 21 (32)
 Epistaxis 21 (32)
 Headache 17 (26)
 Paraneoplastic syndrome 18 (27)
  SIADH 12 (18)
  Ectopic Cushing's syndrome 6 (9)
 Edema 11 (17)
 Vision loss 9 (14)
 Abducens nerve palsy 8 (12)
 Vomiting 5 (8)
 Altered mental status 5 (8)
 Hypoesthesia 4 (6)
Primary treatment ( n  = 66)
 Surgery alone 12 (18)
 Surgery + radiotherapy 31 (47)
 Surgery + chemotherapy 4 (6)
 Surgery + chemoradiotherapy 5 (8)
 Radiotherapy alone 4 (6)
 Chemoradiotherapy 8 (12)
 No treatment 2 (3)
Surgical approach ( n  = 52)
 Open 25 (48)
 Endoscopic 27 (52)
Post-treatment outcomes ( n  = 59)
 Disease-free a 45 (76)
 Locoregional recurrence 11 (19)
 Distant metastases 3 (5)

Abbreviation: SIADH, syndrome of inappropriate anti-diuretic hormone.

a

Disease-free at time of original case report publication without any history of recurrence or metastasis.

The majority of cases were treated with surgery (79%), with or without adjuvant therapy. Eighteen percent of patients were treated with surgery alone, 47% with adjuvant radiotherapy, 6% with adjuvant chemotherapy, and 8% with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The remaining cases did not receive surgical treatment. Twelve percent of patients received chemoradiotherapy alone, 6% received radiotherapy alone, and 3% received no treatment. Of the 59 cases that underwent treatment and had known outcomes, 76% of patients remained disease-free at the time of original case publication, 19% had locoregional recurrence of disease within 5 years of initial treatment, and 5% had distant metastatic disease without neck involvement ( Table 4 ).

Discussion

To our knowledge, our review consisting of 66 confirmed cases is the most comprehensive report on ectopic ONB to date. We found that these tumors can occur at any age without any obvious sex predilection, and were most commonly found in the ethmoid sinus, maxillary sinus, sphenoid sinus, and sella turcica. Unlike primary site ONB, in which a majority of cases present with the classic findings of nasal obstruction and epistaxis, patients with ectopic disease only present with obstruction or epistaxis in roughly a third of cases. 71 Of note, 27% of patients presented with a paraneoplastic syndrome of either SIADH or Cushing's syndrome. These findings suggest that an ectopic ONB should be considered for sinonasal masses presenting atypically, and in situations where paraneoplastic syndromes are present and unaccounted for.

Staging and grading of ONBs is usually conducted via clinical (Kadish) and histological (Hyams) classification. Kadish staging is based on the location and extent of invasion of the tumor, with the modified version by Morita including four stages (A–D), such that Kadish stage D is associated with the worst prognosis. 72 Hyams proposed a grading scheme based on histological and clinical findings, including mitotic activity and tumor necrosis, with four grades in total (I–IV). Recent studies have mostly validated these classification systems, showing that a higher Kadish stage and Hyams grade of ONBs lead to higher rates of recurrence and lower rates of overall survival. 73 In our two case reports, the tumors were classified as Kadish B/Hyams II and Kadish B/Hyams I, respectively. These low staging and grading classifications predict good overall outcomes, as observed in our cases. Since the Kadish staging system is based on the location of tumor, there may be a decrease in prognostic reliability when used for classifying ectopic ONBs, as the lowest Kadish stage is assigned to ONBs located solely in the nasal cavity. Ectopic cases arising outside of the nasal cavity often must be staged as at least Kadish B, even though some of these cases may represent tumors that are less aggressive and share a similar prognosis to nonectopic ENBs categorized as Kadish A. The Hyams grading system may therefore be more useful for predicting the aggressiveness of ectopic cases. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate the prognostic utility of the current classification systems when used in ectopic cases of ONB.

For the treatment of ectopic ONB, the most commonly reported modality was surgical resection with adjuvant radiotherapy. While open surgical approaches were more common overall, endoscopic resections have become more common in recent years. Generally, ectopic ONBs tended to be locally aggressive, so negative surgical margins should be confirmed. However, cervical lymph node involvement appears to be uncommon in ectopic ONB and was only reported in four cases. 34 36 51 65 Two of these cases were treated with neck dissection along with adjuvant therapy: chemoradiotherapy in one, and radiotherapy in the other. One case was treated with chemoradiation, and the final patient died before treatment was initiated. Regardless, prognoses were relatively favorable for these malignancies, considering that 76% of patients were disease-free at the time of case publication, recurrences developed locoregionally in 19% of patients within 5 years of treatment, and distant metastases were reported in only 5% of patients. As reported in this review, cervical lymph node involvement as well as locoregional recurrences in patients with ectopic ONB appear to be lower than the previously reported rates in the literature for nonectopic ONB. 9 10 However, these positive outcomes may be biased by the fact that most published cases reported follow-up periods of 5 years or less. It is possible that with more thorough long-term surveillance, the rate of recurrence could match that of typical ONB cases. As this disease entity is rarely encountered with few reports overall, the data surrounding initial presentation as well as long-term outcomes remains unclear which could explain the present report's lower than expected rates of cervical lymph node involvement and locoregional recurrence as discussed above. Nonetheless, the findings in this review suggest that early diagnosis and appropriate surgical and adjuvant therapy can lead to a good prognosis in these patients. Of note, there were two patients reported in the literature who had ectopic ONB occurring more than 10 years after treatment of a primary ONB, including our second case report. There have been rare instances of ONB developing following radiation exposure to the head and neck, with five cases currently reported in the literature to our knowledge. 74 75 The patient in our second case report originally had nonectopic disease treated with surgical resection and radiation therapy with subsequent ectopic ONB; however, the radiation field did not include the maxillary sinuses, so the case likely represents de novo ectopic ONB. As such, clinicians should be aware that patients with history of superior nasal cavity ONB may be at risk for disease recurrence in ectopic locations later in life, and would likely benefit from long-term, routine endoscopic sinonasal evaluations. Similarly, patients with prior head and neck radiation should be monitored closely for development of malignancies, including ectopic ONB, in previously irradiated tissue.

Our review found that regions reported to harbor ectopic disease included the paranasal sinuses, sellar and parasellar regions, atypical locations within the nasal cavity, nasopharynx, sphenoclival region, pterygopalatine fossa, and the alveolar process of the maxilla. While it is generally accepted that ONBs are of neural crest origin, the exact cell of origin remains unknown. Possible progenitors include cells from the pterygopalatine ganglion, the vomeronasal organ, the terminal nerve, autonomic ganglion in the nasal mucosa, and the basal cells of the olfactory epithelium. 3 4 65 Furthermore, the etiology of aberrant ectopic cases has yet to be determined. A leading hypothesis is that the olfactory neuroepithelium may deposit in ectopic locations during embryological development. An alternative hypothesis suggests that separate neuroendocrine cell populations that typically involute during fetal development can persist into adulthood and serve as the origin for ectopic ONB. 12 76 Further research is needed to elucidate the embryologic origins of ONB and the mechanism through which they may present in ectopic locations.

The main limitation of this systematic review is the quality of evidence included in the selected articles. Due to the rare incidence of ectopic ONB, the only descriptions of this disease found in the literature were either case reports or case series. Furthermore, there was significant heterogeneity in the amount and type of information reported on patient demographics, symptoms, treatment, outcomes, and follow-up periods among the included articles. As a result, this review can only comment on general characteristics of the disease without conducting any statistical analysis or drawing any definitive conclusions. The heterogeneity in reported information also made it difficult to accurately determine whether recurrences were local or regional in location, and therefore we reported recurrences either as locoregional or distant. Furthermore, although the ethmoid air cells and maxillary sinus were the most common locations for ectopic tumor sites in this systematic review, it is important to note that there are olfactory filaments extending down the length of the middle and superior turbinates. If these structures were primarily involved, then these cases may not necessarily represent ectopic tumors in the traditional sense. Finally, since the follow-up period reported in the majority of ectopic ONB cases in the literature was less than 5 years, future studies investigating outcomes and complications over a longer time course could help further guide the longitudinal management of patients with these tumors.

Conclusion

Although rare, ectopic ONB may be considered in the list differential diagnoses of sinonasal tumors as it can pose a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. More than a quarter of patients with ectopic ONB may initially present only with symptoms of a paraneoplastic syndrome. Patients with primary ONB can have recurrence of disease in ectopic locations many years after initial remission and may benefit from long-term surveillance and careful endoscopic survey of the sinuses.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest None declared.

References

  • 1.Berger L, Luc R, Richard D. L'esthesioneuroepitheliome olfactif. Bull Assoc Fr Etud Cancer. 1924;13:410–421. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wormald R, Lennon P, O'Dwyer T P. Ectopic olfactory neuroblastoma: report of four cases and a review of the literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;268(04):555–560. doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1423-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dulguerov P, Allal A S, Calcaterra T C. Esthesioneuroblastoma: a meta-analysis and review. Lancet Oncol. 2001;2(11):683–690. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(01)00558-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Broich G, Pagliari A, Ottaviani F.Esthesioneuroblastoma: a general review of the cases published since the discovery of the tumour in 1924 Anticancer Res 199717(4A):2683–2706. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mintzer D M, Zheng S, Nagamine M, Newman J, Benito M. Esthesioneuroblastoma (Olfactory Neuroblastoma) with Ectopic ACTH Syndrome: a multidisciplinary case presentation from the Joan Karnell cancer center of Pennsylvania Hospital. Oncologist. 2010;15(01):51–58. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ogura J H, Schenck N L. Unusual nasal tumors. Problems in diagnosis and treatment. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1973;6(03):813–837. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wade P M, Jr, Smith R E, Johns M E. Response of esthesioneuroblastoma to chemotherapy. Report of five cases and review of the literature. Cancer. 1984;53(05):1036–1041. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840301)53:5<1036::aid-cncr2820530504>3.0.co;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kanno K, Morokuma Y, Tateno T et al. Olfactory neuroblastoma causing ectopic ACTH syndrome. Endocr J. 2005;52(06):675–681. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.52.675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gore M R, Zanation A M. Salvage treatment of local recurrence in esthesioneuroblastoma: a meta-analysis. Skull Base. 2011;21(01):1–6. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1254406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Naples J G, Spiro J, Tessema B, Kuwada C, Kuo C-L, Brown S M. Neck recurrence and mortality in esthesioneuroblastoma: implications for management of the N0 neck. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(06):1373–1379. doi: 10.1002/lary.25803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mattavelli F, Pizzi N, Pennacchioli E et al. Esthesioneuroblastoma metastatic to the trachea. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2009;29(03):164–168. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Morris L, Govindaraj S, Genden E M. Primary sphenoid sinus esthesioneuroblastoma. Am J Otolaryngol. 2004;25(05):350–353. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2004.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Holmes M, Su S Y, Bell D. Ectopic primary olfactory neuroblastoma of the maxillary sinus. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2016;22:45–48. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2016.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McCormack L J, Harris H E. Neurogenic tumors of the nasal fossa. J Am Med Assoc. 1955;157(04):318–321. doi: 10.1001/jama.1955.02950210014004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kodama S, Kawano T, Suzuki M.Endoscopic transnasal resection of ectopic esthesioneuroblastoma in the pterygopalatine fossa: technical case reportNeurosurgery 2009;65(6, Suppl):E112–E113, discussion E113 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 16.Lin J H, Tsai D H, Chiang Y H. A primary sellar esthesioneuroblastomas with unusual presentations: a case report and reviews of literatures. Pituitary. 2009;12(01):70–75. doi: 10.1007/s11102-007-0081-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wong E, Choroomi S, Palme C E, Singh N P. Isolated primary maxillary sinus esthesioneuroblastoma presenting as idiopathic syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone. BMJ Case Rep. 2019;12(05):e228666. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2018-228666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Leon-Soriano E, Alfonso C, Yebenes L, Garcia-Polo J, Lassaletta L, Gavilan J. Bilateral synchronous ectopic ethmoid sinus olfactory neuroblastoma: a case report. Am J Case Rep. 2016;17:268–273. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.897623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.King J T. Olfactory neurocytoma (“esthésioneuroépithéliome olfactif”) case arising in the nasopharynx. AMA Arch Otolaryngol. 1959;69(06):729–729. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1959.00730030743013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Church L E, Uhler I V. Olfactory neuroblastoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1959;12:1040–1047. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(59)90311-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mashberg A, Thoma K H, Wasilewski E J. Olfactory neuroblastoma (esthesioneuroepithelioma) of the maxillary sinus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1960;13:908–912. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(60)90032-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Becker M H, Jacox H W. Olfactory esthesioneuroepithelioma; experiences in the management of a rare intranasal malignant neoplasm. Radiology. 1964;82:77–83. doi: 10.1148/82.1.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fitz-Hugh G S, Allen M S, Jr, Rucker T N, Sprinkle P M. Olfactory neuroblastoma (esthesioneuroepithelioma) Arch Otolaryngol. 1965;81:161–168. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1965.00750050168011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schochet S S, Jr, Peters B, O'Neal J, McCormick W F. Intracranial esthesioneuroblastoma. A light and electron microscopic study. Acta Neuropathol. 1975;31(03):181–189. doi: 10.1007/BF00684557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sarwar M. Primary sellar-parasellar esthesioneuroblastoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1979;133(01):140–141. doi: 10.2214/ajr.133.1.140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pope T L, Jr, Morris J L, Cail W S, Elkon D. Esthesioneuroblastoma presenting as an intracranial mass. South Med J. 1980;73(05):643–645. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198005000-00025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Meyrowitz M R, Mauro J V, Mintz S, Schiro W. Olfactory neuroblastoma: report of case. J Am Dent Assoc. 1984;108(02):199–201. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1984.0448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Woerner S J, Lazerson J, Munn R J, Turner E A. Olfactory neuroblastoma (esthesioneuroblastoma) in a 2-year-old boy. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1986;3(02):167–174. doi: 10.3109/08880018609031213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Berman E L, Chu A, Wirtschafter J D et al. Esthesioneuroblastoma presenting as sudden unilateral blindness. Histopathologic confirmation of optic nerve demyelination. J Clin Neuroophthalmol. 1992;12(01):31–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Feifel H, Riediger D, Gärtner H V. Esthesioneuroblastoma. A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;21(05):292–294. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80740-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Myers S L, Hardy D A, Wiebe C B, Shiffman J. Olfactory neuroblastoma invading the oral cavity in a patient with inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994;77(06):645–650. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(94)90328-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chacko G, Chandi S M, Chandy M J. Primary sphenoid and petrous apex esthesioneuroblastoma: case report. Br J Neurosurg. 1998;12(03):264–266. doi: 10.1080/02688699845113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Roy A, Timothy J, Anthony R, Chakrabarty A. Correspondence: aesthesioneuroblastoma arising in pituitary gland. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2000;26(02):177–179. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2990.2000.026002177.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Miura K, Mineta H, Yokota N, Tsutsui Y. Olfactory neuroblastoma with epithelial and endocrine differentiation transformed into ganglioneuroma after chemoradiotherapy. Pathol Int. 2001;51(12):942–947. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1827.2001.01300.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sharma S C, Reddy C E, Srinivasan S S, Rawal A, Singh D P. Isolated esthesioneuroblastoma of sphenoid sinus. Am J Otolaryngol. 2002;23(05):287–289. doi: 10.1053/ajot.2001.26500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chirico G, Pergolizzi S, Mazziotti S, Santacaterina A, Ascenti G. Primary sphenoid esthesioneuroblastoma studied with MR. Clin Imaging. 2003;27(01):38–40. doi: 10.1016/s0899-7071(02)00533-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mariani L, Schaller B, Weis J, Ozdoba C, Seiler R W. Esthesioneuroblastoma of the pituitary gland: a clinicopathological entity? Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 2004;101(06):1049–1052. doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.6.1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yu J, Koch C A, Patsalides A et al. Ectopic Cushing's syndrome caused by an esthesioneuroblastoma. Endocr Pract. 2004;10(02):119–124. doi: 10.4158/EP.10.2.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sajko T, Rumboldt Z, Talan-Hranilovic J, Radic I, Gnjidic Z.Primary sellar esthesioneuroblastoma Acta Neurochir (Wien) 200514704447–448., discussion 448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Unal A, Ozlugedik S, Tezer M S, Kulacoglu S, Ozcan M. An atypical esthesioneuroblastoma of the inferior nasal cavity and maxillary sinus: report of a case. Tumori. 2006;92(05):440–443. doi: 10.1177/030089160609200514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lee A, Goldstein D P, Irish J, Gentili F, Perez-Ordonez B. Noncontiguous bilateral esthesioneuroblastoma: a case report. Skull Base. 2007;17(06):405–407. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-986459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Butt M, Olczak S. Cushing syndrome secondary to ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone secretion from recurrent olfactory neuroblastoma. Endocrinologist. 2007;17(03):160–161. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lee J Y, Kim H K. Primary olfactory neuroblastoma originating from the inferior meatus of the nasal cavity. Am J Otolaryngol. 2007;28(03):196–200. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2006.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Josephs L, Jones L, Marenette L, McKeever P. Cushing's syndrome: an unusual presentation of olfactory neuroblastoma. Skull Base. 2008;18(01):73–76. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lin H-H, Lin C-M, Tseng H-K.Refractory post-herpetic neuralgia as an initial presentation of olfactory neuroblastoma-related ectopic ACTH syndromeInt J Gerontol 2009;3(01):
  • 46.Chan L P, Wang L F, Tai C F, Wu C C, Kuo W R. Huge sphenoid sinus olfactory neuroblastoma: a case report. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2009;25(02):87–92. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70046-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Seccia V, Lenzi R, Casani A P, Muscatello L. Ectopic olfactory neuroblastoma arising in the pterygopalatine fossa. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;142(03):460–461. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.09.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Senchak A, Freeman J, Ruhl D, Senchak J, Klem C. Low-grade esthesioneuroblastoma presenting as SIADH: a review of atypical manifestations. Case Rep Otolaryngol. 2012;2012:582180. doi: 10.1155/2012/582180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Akinfolarin J, Jazaerly T, Jones K et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology of primary sphenoid sinus esthesioneuroblastoma metastatic to the skin. Avicenna J Med. 2012;2(01):15–18. doi: 10.4103/2231-0770.94806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kumar A, Sethi B, Kumar Y, Mishra J P. Esthesioneuroblastoma arising from the middle meatus. J Cancer Res Ther. 2013;9(01):99–101. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.110391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lopez R, Mazzoni L, Chaput B, Jalbert F. Olfactory neuroblastoma presenting with exclusive orbital manifestations. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(02):667–669. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182802053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gabbay U, Leider-Trejo L, Marshak G, Gabbay M, Fliss D M.A case and a series of published cases of esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB) in which long-standing paraneoplastic SIADH had preceded ENB diagnosis Ear Nose Throat J 201392(10-11):E6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mayur N, Bordoni R E, Locandro D, McLaughlin M. Cushing's syndrome due to ectopic adrenocorticotrophic hormone production by olfactory neuroblastoma. Endocr Pract. 2014;20(03):e47–e52. doi: 10.4158/EP13007.CR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Squillaci S. Olfactory neuroblastoma with focal ganglioneuroblastic differentiation: a case report with literature review. Pathologica. 2014;106(02):61–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Abdel-Rahman O, Kamal K. Sphenoidal esthesioneuroblastoma treated with sequential chemo radiotherapy: a case report and review of the literature. J Cancer Res Ther. 2014;10(04):1101–1103. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.146110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jiang Z Y, Katz A, Francis C. Hyponatremia and right maxillary sinus mass. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;141(11):1021–1022. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.2314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Purohit B, Winder T, Maggio E M, Kollias S S. Aggressive primary olfactory neuroblastoma of the sphenoclival region: a case report and literature review. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(04):822–825. doi: 10.1002/lary.24925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Nakano T, Motoshita J, Sawada F et al. Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion in a case of olfactory neuroblastoma without anti-diuretic hormone immunoreactivity: a case report and review of the literature. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2017;44(06):771–774. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2016.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Thomas S B, Balasubramaniam D, Hiran K R, Dinesh M, Pavithran K. Esthesioneuroblastoma with intracranial extension: a non-surgical approach. Asian J Neurosurg. 2016;11(03):313. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.145087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zahedi F D, Gendeh B S, Husain S, Kumar R, Kew T Y. Ectopic esthesioneuroblastoma of the sphenoclivus: a rare entity. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;69(01):125–129. doi: 10.1007/s12070-016-0978-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Parrilla C, Lucidi D, Petrone G, Bastanza G, Colosimo C. Idiopathic SIADH in young patients: don't forget the nose. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2017;37(01):76–79. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Fosbøl MØ, Bilde A, Friborg J et al. An uncommon case of pediatric esthesioneuroblastoma presenting as SIADH: 18 F-FDG PET/CT in staging and post-therapeutic assessment . Diagnostics (Basel) 2018;8(01):8. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics8010008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Rasool A, Dadgostar A, Manji J, Al-Asousi F, Javer A. Esthesioneuroblastoma isolated to the maxillary sinus antrum presenting as SIADH: a case report. OTO Open. 2018;2(03):X18792488. doi: 10.1177/2473974X18792488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Familiar C, Azcutia A. Adrenocorticotropic hormone-dependent Cushing syndrome caused by an olfactory neuroblastoma. Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. 2019;12:1.179551419825832E15. doi: 10.1177/1179551419825832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Caldwell N J, Sato T S. Ectopic primary olfactory neuroblastoma of the nasopharynx: a case report and review of the literature. Radiol Case Rep. 2019;14(08):997–1002. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2019.05.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Mims M M, Mady L J, Baddour K, Snyderman C H, Stapleton A L.Pediatric ectopic esthesioneuroblastoma: A case report and literature reviewOtolaryngology Case Reports 2020;16
  • 67.Peyneshki I, Weisstanner C, Serra C, Holzmann D, Rushing E J, Winklhofer S. Primary olfactory neuroblastoma masquerading as a pituitary adenoma : case report and review of the literature. Clin Neuroradiol. 2020;30(04):855–859. doi: 10.1007/s00062-020-00903-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Heiland L, Heiland K. Functional olfactory neuroblastoma inducing symptomatic SIADH. Ear Nose Throat J. 2021;014556132110221:1.455613211022102E15. doi: 10.1177/01455613211022102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zhong W, Wang C, Ye W, Wu D. Primary olfactory neuroblastoma of the nasopharynx: a case report. Ear Nose Throat J. 2023;102(01):NP19–NP23. doi: 10.1177/0145561321989436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Tudor D, Kolombo I, Tot A, Cikojevic D, Simunovic M, Skrabic V. Chronic hyponatremia based on maxillary sinus mass. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2021;2021:21-0068. doi: 10.1530/EDM-21-0068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Thompson L D. Olfactory neuroblastoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2009;3(03):252–259. doi: 10.1007/s12105-009-0125-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kadish S, Goodman M, Wang C C. Olfactory neuroblastoma. A clinical analysis of 17 cases. Cancer. 1976;37(03):1571–1576. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197603)37:3<1571::aid-cncr2820370347>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bell D, Saade R, Roberts D et al. Prognostic utility of Hyams histological grading and Kadish-Morita staging systems for esthesioneuroblastoma outcomes. Head Neck Pathol. 2015;9(01):51–59. doi: 10.1007/s12105-014-0547-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Perez Garcia V, Martinez Izquierdo MdeL. Radiation-induced olfactory neuroblastoma: a new etiology is possible. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;15(02):71–77. doi: 10.1007/s10006-010-0234-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Muraki K, Ogo E, Suzuki G et al. Radiation-induced olfactory neuroblastoma following treatment for NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type. Kurume Med J. 2022;67(01):41–47. doi: 10.2739/kurumemedj.MS671003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Jakumeit H D. Neuroblastoma of the olfactory nerve. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1971;25(01):99–108. doi: 10.1007/BF01808865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurological Surgery. Part B, Skull Base are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES