Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 Mar 8;14:5754. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56395-6

Apigenin ameliorates genitourinary dysfunction in a type 1 diabetic rat model via Drp1 modulation

Mai Khaled 1,, Raghda A M Salama 2, Azza Aboughalia 1, Mai Tarek 3, Nesma Mohamed Fawzy 1
PMCID: PMC10924091  PMID: 38459102

Abstract

The present study aimed to explore the potential ameliorative effect of apigenin (APG) against diabetes-associated genitourinary complications in rats. A diabetic rat model was induced by the intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (STZ). All experimental animals were treated with vehicle or vehicle plus APG at a dose of 0.78 mg/kg/day for 10 days, either once diabetes was confirmed or at the end of the 3rd week after confirmation of diabetes. Rats were sacrificed at the end of the fifth week. In addition to the histological assessment, an analysis of kidney function tests and serum testosterone was performed to assess diabetic genitourinary complications. Gene expression of the mitochondrial fission protein, dynamin related protein 1 (Drp1), was measured in renal and testicular tissues using qRT PCR. APG can increase body weight, reduce blood glucose levels, and improve renal and testicular functions in diabetic rats. APG decreased Drp1 overexpression in diabetic animals’ kidneys and testes. In summary, our current work discloses that APG attenuates diabetic genitourinary lesions in rats via suppressing Drp1 overexpression.

Keywords: Diabetes mellitus, Diabetic nephropathy, Genitourinary complications, Dynamin-related protein 1, Apigenin

Subject terms: Biochemistry, Molecular biology

Introduction

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a chronic metabolic disease that results from an autoimmune attack of the insulin-producing β-cells of the pancreas in genetically susceptible individuals1. Diabetic complications represent a major problem in diabetic patients, for example; they are the leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) worldwide2. Hyperglycemia promotes the loss of podocytes, endothelial cell hyperfiltration, the expansion of mesangial cells, and thickening of the glomerular basement membrane3. Consequently, diabetic nephropathy (DN) is characterized by albuminuria and a reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR)4.

Moreover, diabetes mellitus (DM) leads to gonadal dysfunction, apoptotic cell death, a decrease in testicular weight, and testosterone production that leads to insufficient production of spermatozoids5.

Apigenin (APG; 4′, 5, 7-trihydroxyflavone) is a natural flavonoid widely found in vegetables and fruits6. This plant-derived molecule is assumed to have various biological activities such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimutagenic, antiapoptotic, and antitumorigenic in different types of body tissue7,8, respectively). Additionally, it has antidiabetic effects as it decreases damage to pancreatic β cells by suppressing oxidative stress and encouraging insulin secretion9. The antioxidant property of APG is also responsible for its protective effect on testicular injury in a rat model of ischemia reperfusion injury10.

Balanced mitochondrial fusion, fission, and mitophagy are critical to maintaining cell viability. The dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) is a cytosolic GTPase protein that mediates mitochondrial fission11. Upon activation, it oligomerizes around the outer mitochondrial membrane, initiating its fission and provoking its fragmentation12. Assumptions from previous studies suggest that Drp1 promotes Bax/Bak cytochrome c release, which leads to excess fission and ultimately ends with lethal effects on cells up to apoptotic death13.

Hyperglycemia provokes certain signaling pathways upstream of Drp1, leading to its overexpression and the loss of normal mitochondrial dynamics14. Consequently, Drp1 over-expression has become an obvious finding in DM15.

In DM, many signaling pathways regulate Drp1, including the P38-MAPK-axis, which is activated by reactive oxygen species (ROS)11. Also, PKCδ/Drp1-HK2 and HK2-PINK1/Parkin signal pathways are attributed to mitophagy inhibition by Drp1 upon their activation11. On cellular and subcellular levels, podocytes and glomerular mesangial cells display over-expressed Drp1 during their growth in high glucose media16. Thus, exaggerated mitochondrial fission compromises glomerular function and ends with diabetic nephropathy. Moreover, both testes can be affected by Drp1 overexpression that can be modulated for potential therapeutic purposes17.

Based on the aforementioned findings, the present study was carried out to investigate the possible ameliorative effect of APG on genitourinary dysfunction in a type 1 diabetic rat model.

Material and methods

Animals

Twenty-eight male Wister rats weighing between 180 and 220 g were obtained from Animal Farm (El-Zyad import office of experimental animals for colleges and research centers, Giza). The rats were housed at the animal house of the Medical Ain Shams Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine at Ain Shams University, and were allowed to acclimatize for one week. They were housed two per cage and subjected to a 12:12-h light/darkness with suitable environmental conditions (temperature 25 ± 2 °C, humidity 55% ± 5%, and good ventilation) and free access to water. The standard rat diet was freshly introduced daily, at 8 a.m. All samples and specimens included in this research were derived from rats (no human participation). Approval for the study was obtained from the ethical committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, with the approval number.: (FMASU MS 74/2021, FWA 000017585), which operates according to the guidelines of the International Council on Harmonization (ICH) for Medical Science (IOMS), the United States Office for Human Research. The animal experiments and procedures were carried out according to the guidelines of ethical care and standard regulations. We have conducted the experiments in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines18. All experimental animals were euthanized by the cervical dislocation method, which is a common method for euthanasia.

Induction of type-1 diabetes in rats

Type-1 diabetes was induced by a single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 40 mg/kg b.wt. freshly prepared STZ (STZ; Sigma Aldrich, USA) dissolved in 2 ml of citrate buffer (0.1 N, pH 4.5), following overnight fasting19. After 6 h of STZ injection, rats were given a 5% glucose solution to counter the possible hypoglycemic shock (resulting from the sudden release of insulin from the damaged β-cells). The diabetic state was assessed by measuring the fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels from rats’ tails 72 h after STZ injection using a strip operated reflectance meter (Gluco Doctor meter, Korea). The rats with a blood glucose level above 250 mg/dl were considered diabetics20.

Animal groups

Rats were allocated into four equal groups, as follows: Group 1: (Vehicle-injected); rats were subjected to overnight fasting that was followed by a single i.p. injection of 2 ml citrate buffer (used as solvent for STZ). Group 2: (Diabetic control); rats in this group were subjected to induction of type-1 diabetes without receiving APG. Group 3: (Early APG-injected diabetic group); rats received 0.78 mg/kg/day APG (Sigma Aldrich, USA) dissolved in saline subcutaneously for 10 days21, starting once diabetes was confirmed. Group 4: (Late APG-injected diabetic group); rats received APG (same dose and duration as group 3) starting at the end of the 3rd week after confirmation of diabetes and the development of diabetic nephropathy as indicated by the deterioration of their kidney function tests.

Experimental samples

Collection of urine samples

The rats were kept in special metabolic cages for the collection of urine samples. Two urine samples were collected throughout the experiment: one by the end of the third week and the other by the end of the fifth week (i.e., before scarification). Each urine sample was kept at 4 °C till assessment of albumin, creatinine, and albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR).

Preparation of blood and tissue samples

By the end of the fifth week, rats were weighted and then sacrificed. A midline abdominal incision was made. Blood samples were collected from the abdominal aorta, and then they were left at 37 °C for 30 min. Serum samples were collected after centrifugation and stored at − 80 °C until analysis. Kidneys and testes were dissected and washed with normal saline. Parts of the tissues were kept frozen at − 80 °C until subsequent biochemical analysis, whereas the other parts were fixed in 10% formalin for histopathological evaluation.

Biochemical analyses

Urinary microalbumin and creatinine

Urinary albumin was measured using the rat microalbumin (Malb) ELISA Kit (MyBiosource, USA), whereas urinary and serum creatinine were measured using the QuantiChrom Creatinine ELISA Kit (BioAssay Systems, USA). Urinary ACR was estimated according to the formula: urinary microalbumin (mg/dl)/urinary creatinine (g/dl).

The concentrations of serum urea, FBG and testosterone were measured using (QuantiChrom Urea ELISA Kit (BioAssay Systems, USA), immunoassay Glucose kit (Sigma, USA) and testosterone ELISA kit (CUSABIO, China), respectively, according to the manufacturers’ instructions.

Molecular analysis

After homogenization of the collected tissue samples by the Cryo Grinder System (OPS Diagnostics; Lebanon, New Jersey), total RNA was extracted from the tissue homogenate using the Spin Vacuum Total RNA Isolation System (Promega, Madison, WI, Catalog code Z3101) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The quantity and quality of total RNA were checked. Equal amounts of total RNA (300 ng) were reverse transcribed into cDNA using the Affinity Script QPCR cDNA Synthesis Kit (Agilent, California; Catalog #600559). The reaction mixtures were incubated in a thermal cycler for 60 min at 37 °C, followed by the inactivation of enzymes at 95 °C for 10 min, and finally cooled at 4 °C. Gene expression levels of DRP1 were assessed by the SYBR Green-based Real-Time Quantitative PCR method in the ABI Prism 7500 sequence detector system (Applied Biosystems; Foster City, California). Ready-made primers for Drp1 and beta-actin genes were purchased from Qiagen, Germany. All primer sets had a calculated annealing temperature of 60 °C. The reaction mixture was 50 μL consisting of 25 μL of 2 × Brilliant II SYBR Green QPCR Master Mix (Agilent, California; catalog #60083), 2.5 μL primer pair mix (5 PMol/μL each primer), 21.5 μL H2O, and 1 μL of cDNA.

The amplification conditions were 2 min at 98 °C for initial denaturation, followed by 40 cycles of 10 s at 98 °C, 10 s at 55 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C. The expression of our target gene was defined based on cycle threshold (Ct) and calculated as 2−∆∆Ct after normalization to the relative expression of the beta actin gene22 using Step One Applied Biosystems Software (Foster City).

Histopathological evaluation

Testicular and renal tissues were fixed in 10% formalin, followed by dehydration, clearing, and embedding in paraffin. Paraffin sections were cut at 4–6 μm thickness and stained by H&E.

For Periodic Acid Achiff (PAS)-stained sections, measurement of PAS% for mesangium was taken by marking the parietal layer of glomerular capsule and excluding the dark color tone for basement membrane of capillaries and red blood cells inside the area and selecting the light color tone only to get the area % of mesangium23.

The seminiferous tubules’ diameters were calculated through the averages of the lengths of the short edge and the long edge (two diameters perpendicular to each other), while epithelial thickness was measured by measuring the distances between the sperm closest to the lumen and the basal membrane.

Five specimens from each rat of each group were examined. Five different non-overlapping fields from each specimen were examined. Readings from each field were counted. The sections were examined using magnification 400× for the PAS% of mesangium and epithelial thickness of seminiferous tubules, and using 100× magnification for the mean diameter of the seminiferous tubules.

Measurements were taken by an independent observer blinded to the specimens’ details to get an unbiased assessment. An image analyzer program (Leica Q Win V.3) installed on a computer in the Histology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, was used for the morphometric measurements. The computer was connected to a Leica DM2500 microscope (Wetzlar, Germany).Photos were taken by Canon EOS 11000 camera at a resolution 1920 × 1280 pixels.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out and graphically presented using GraphPad Prism version 5.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, USA). Data were presented as mean ± SEM. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni Multiple Comparison tests was performed to compare different groups. Comparisons between groups with repeated time points were carried out using repeated measures 2-way ANOVA. Bonferroni post-tests were used to compare similar time points in different groups. Paired two tailed T test was used to compare the same group in different time points. Results were considered significant at p < 0.05.

Ethical compliance

All procedures carried out in this study were approved by Ain Shams University Ethical Committee was granted with an autho-rization number: FWA 000017585.

Results

Changes in body weight and FBG (from rats’ tails throughout the experiment and from serum after scarification)

In Table 1, the basal body weights of the four groups were matched (P > 0.05). At the end of the 5th week (i.e., just before scarification), only the vehicle-injected rats showed significant increase in their body weight as compared to the starting weight (superscript a indicates p < 0.001).

Table 1.

Changes in body weight (grams) in the different groups of rats.

Groups Basal body weight (g) At 5th week body weight (g)
Vehicle-injected 215.6 ± 11.44 315 ± 6.47a
Diabetic control 231 ± 14.42 225.1 ± 17.6
Diabetic + early APG-injection 228.9 ± 4.83 252 ± 24.46
Diabetic + late APG-injection 233.1 ± 10.77 207 ± 13.39

Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. Superscript a indicates P < 0.001 versus respective baseline value (paired, two tailed t test).

The comparison of FBG (in blood samples obtained from rats’ tails) of the different groups throughout the whole duration of the study at each time point (Fig. 1A) showed the following: There was no significant difference at baseline; (b) a significant decrease (P < 0.001) in the early APG-injected group (compared to the diabetic control and late APG-injected groups) at the 4th and 5th weeks; (c) significant decrease (P < 0.01) in the late APG-injected group compared to the diabetic control group only at the 5th week.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Effects of STZ and APG-injection on FBG from (A) rats’ tails, and (B) serum after scarification. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Superscript a indicates p < 0.001 compared to the vehicle-injected group. Superscripts b and c indicate p < 0.01, p < 0.001 respectively compared to the diabetic control group, while d indicates p < 0.001 compared to late APG-injected group (using one way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison post-test).

After scarification, serum FBG level (Fig. 1B) was higher in the diabetic control group compared to the vehicle-injected group (P < 0.001). Also, there was a significant decrease in FBG in the two APG-injected groups compared to the diabetic control group (P < 0.001).

Effects of STZ and/or apigenin-injection on renal functions and structure, as well as Drp1 mRNA expression

At the 3rd week, there was a significant increase of urinary ACR (mg/g) in the diabetic control than vehicle-injected rats (P < 0.05). At the 5th week, the same ratio was still higher in the diabetic control group than each of the three other groups. Furthermore, each of the early and late APG-injected groups showed reduction of urinary ACR in the 5th than 3rd week (paired two tailed test) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Urinary albumin/ creatinine ratio (mg/g) in the different groups of rats.

Groups 3rd week 5th week
Vehicle-injected 29.54 ± 2.42 39.72 ± 4.42
Diabetic control 109.3 ± 19.6a 141 ± 9.81b
Early APG-injection 88.20 ± 12.67 46.88 ± 3.69c,d
Late APG-injection 126.5 ± 21.122 58.79 ± 3.03c,e

Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Superscripts a and b indicate P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively versus vehicle-injected group, c indicates P < 0.001 versus diabetic control group (One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test). d indicates P < 0.01, e indicates P < 0.05 versus respective 3rd week value (paired, two tailed t test).

In serum, the concentrations of urea and creatinine were higher in the diabetic control than vehicle-injected rats (Fig. 2A,B). These concentrations were reduced after APG-injection (P < 0.001). However, no statistically significant change was found in relation to the time of APG-injection (i.e., early vs late injection).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effects of STZ and APG-injection on (A) serum urea, (B) serum creatinine, and (C) renal Drp1 expression. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Superscripts a and b indicate p < 0.001 as compared to the vehicle-injected and diabetic control group respectively (One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison post-test).

The expression of Drp1 mRNA in renal tissue (Fig. 2C) was higher (six folds) in the diabetic control group. Meanwhile, this elevation of Drp1 expression was decreased after APG-injection (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the decrease was more evident upon early as compared to late APG-injection, but with lack of statistical significance.

Examination of H&E-stained sections showed the normal structure of the kidney (Fig. 3A). In diabetic control group (Fig. 3B); renal tubules showed variable degrees of affection. In the early APG-injected rats (Fig. 4), the renal corpuscles and tubules restored the normal structure except for some detached renal tubular epithelial cells, some inflammatory cells and some congested blood vessels. In the late APG-injected group (Fig. 5), some renal tubules were seen with sloughed epithelium. Meanwhile, acidophilic hyaline material in lumen of some renal tubules and congested blood vessels were still seen.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

H&E-stained sections of kidney in different groups: (A) Vehicle-injected group, (B) Diabetic control group (X400). Glomerulus (G); proximal convoluted tubules (P), distal convoluted tubules (D), sloughed tubular epithelium (↑), congested blood vessels (C); Hyalinized acidophilic material (H) and vacuolated tubular epithelium (∆).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

H&E-stained sections of kidney in early APG-injected group: (C, C1, C2) (X400). Glomerulus (G); sloughed tubular epithelium (↑), congested blood vessels (C) and inflammatory cells (IC).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

H&E-stained sections of kidney in Late APG-injected group: (D, D1, D2) (X400). Glomerulus (G); sloughed tubular epithelium (↑), congested blood vessels (C); Hyalinized acidophilic material (H) and inflammatory cells (IC).

Staining of renal tissues with Periodic Acid Schiff (PAS) (Fig. 6) showed increase of PAS area % in the diabetic control group (p < 0.001). Renal sections from both APG injected groups revealed % decrease of PAS area in comparison to diabetic control group (Fig. 7). The decrease was more evident upon early APG injection (early vs late) (Fig. 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Effects of STZ and APG-injection on PAS area %. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Superscripts a and b indicate p < 0.001 as compared to the vehicle-injected and diabetic control groups, respectively, while c indicates p < 0.001 upon comparison with late APG-injected group.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

PAS-stained sections of renal tissues in different groups: (A) vehicle-injected group, (B) diabetic control group, (C) early APG-injected group, (D) late APG-injected group (X400). PAS positive material in glomerular tuft of capillaries (G); apparent brush border of renal tubules (↑); partial loss of brush border of renal material inside renal tubules (▲); interrupted ill-defined basement membrane of renal tubules (∆).

Examination of PAS-stained renal tissue sections from vehicle-injected rats (Fig. 7A); showed PAS positive basement membrane with prominent brush border of proximal convoluted tubules. In the diabetic control group (Fig. 7B); most renal tubules were seen with ill-defined basement membrane and partial loss of brush border. In the early APG-injected group (Fig. 7C); the brush borders of renal tubules were preserved in most of the examined section. However, in the late APG-injected rats (Fig. 7D); the renal tubules were occasionally seen with ill-defined brush borders.

Effects of STZ and/APG-injection on testicular weight, functions, structure and Drp1 mRNA expression

In spite of the decrease in testicular weight in diabetic control rats compared to other groups, it does not reach a statistical significance (p > 0.05). In (Fig. 8A), the serum concentration of testosterone showed a significant decrease in diabetic control group compared to vehicle-injected group (p < 0.001). Meanwhile, APG-injection (either early or late) elevated serum testosterone compared to diabetic group (p < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between early and late APG-injected groups.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Effects of STZ and/or APG-injection on (A) serum testosterone concentration (B) and testicular Drp1 expression. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, where superscript a indicates p < 0.001 compared to vehicle-injected group. Superscripts b, c and d indicate p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively, upon comparison with diabetic control group.

It was found that testicular Drp1 expression was significantly up-regulated (about 3.5-folds) in the diabetic control group compared to vehicle-injected group (Fig. 8B). Early and late APG-injection resulted in a significant down-regulation of Drp1 expression, compared to diabetic control group (p < 0.001, p < 0.05 respectively; Fig. 8B). There was no significant difference between early and late APG-injected groups.

There was a significant decrease in the testicular epithelial thickness and seminiferous tubules, diameters in the diabetic control compared to the vehicle-injected rats (Fig. 9A,B). Both parameters (i.e., epithelial thickness and seminiferous tubules, diameters) were improved after APG-injection. Meanwhile, the improvement in seminiferous tubules, diameters was more evident upon early than late APG-injection.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Effects of STZ-induced diabetes and injection of APG on (A) epithelial thickness and (B) seminiferous tubules’ diameters. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Superscripts a, b, c indicate p < 0.001 upon comparison with the vehicle-injection, diabetic control and late APG-injection groups, respectively.

Examination of H&E-stained testicular sections from vehicle-injected rats showed normal testicular structure (Fig. 10A) which was distorted in the diabetic control rats, with occasional appearance of sperms within some seminiferous tubules (Fig. 10B). Testicular sections from the early APG-injected rats (Fig. 10C) restored the normal testicular structure except for interstitial edema and wide lumen of some seminiferous tubules. Tissue sections from the late APG-injected rats showed partial restoration of the normal testicular structure. However, some pathological changes can be seen (Fig. 10D).

Figure 10.

Figure 10

H&E stained sections of testis from different groups of rats: (A) Vehicle-injected group, (B) Diabetic control group, (C) Early APG-injected group, (D) Late APG-injected group (X250). N.B: Closely packed seminiferous tubules separated by a narrow interstitial space (ST); spermatozoa inside seminiferous tubule (S); detached spermatogenic cells inside the lumen (▲); discontinuous basement membrane (↑); amorphous acidophilic material inside the lumen (∆); edema in-between the seminiferous tubules (*); separation between spermatogenic cells and basement membrane (↑↑); Congested blood vessels (Curved arrow); seminiferous tubules with wide lumen (Elbow arrow).

At a higher magnification of H&E-stained testicular sections in each seminefrous tubule, the spermatogenic cells included spermatogonia, primary spermatocytes, secondary spermatocytes and early spermatids. Spermatogonia were located in the basal compartment (Fig. 11A,C,D). Primary spermatocytes appeared large in size forming many layers. Secondary spermatocytes were rarely detected. Spermatozoa were detected in the lumen of seminiferous tubules (Fig. 11A,C,D). Meanwhile, this arrangement was highly distorted (Fig. 11B).

Figure 11.

Figure 11

H&E stained sections of testis from different groups of rats at high power: (A) vehicle-injected group, (B) diabetic control group, (C) early APG-injected group, (D) late APG-injected group (X400). N.B: Seminiferous tubules lined by spermatogonia ([); primary spermatids (white arrow) and spermatozoa inside seminiferous tubule (S) and discontinuous basement membrane (↑).

The effects of apigenin injection (early and late) in STZ-induced diabetes could be summarized in (Table 3).

Table 3.

Summary of effects of STZ-induced diabetes and injection of APG in the different groups of rats.

Tissue Assay Vehicle-injected Diabetic control Early apigenin-injection Late apigenin-injection
Blood FBG in serum (mg/dl) 116.9 ± 4.8

429.1 ± 31.76a

267%#

188.0 ± 55.8d

-56%*

186.3 ± 9.33d

-57%*

-1%$

Kidney Urinary ACR (mg/g) 5th week 39.72 ± 4.42

141 ± 9.81a

255%#

46.88 ± 3.69d

-67%*

58.79 ± 3.03d

-58%*

25%$

Serum urea (mg/dl) 37.29 ± 1.66

69.00 ± 2.870a

85%#

45.29 ± 2.33d

-34%*

50.29 ± 2.15d

-27%*

11%$

Serum creatinine (mg/dl) 0.47 ± 0.03

0.99 ± 0.03a

111%#

0.70 ± 0.06d

-29%*

0.63 ± 0.02d

-36%*

-10%$

Renal Drp1 expression 1.03 ± 0.014

6.27 ± 0.97a

509%#

2.073 ± 0.25d

-67%*

2.97 ± 0.21d

-53%*

43%$

PAS area % 4.74 ± 0.18

16.56 ± 0.34a

249%#

6.89 ± 0.23d

-58%*

9.64 ± 0.23d

-42%

40%$

Testis Serum testosterone (ng/ml) 1.2 ± 0.08

0.69 ± 0.05a

-43%#

1.02 ± 0.04c

48%*

0.99 ± 0.02c

43%*

-3%$

Testicular Drp1 expression 1.02 ± 0.01

3.59 ± 0.56a

252%#

1.58 ± 0.12d

-56%*

2.30 ± 0.19b

-36%*

46%$

Epithelial thickness (μm) 43.06 ± 1

28.06 ± 0.61a

-35%#

38.51 ± 1.26d

37%*

37.23 ± 0.43d

33%*

-3%$

Seminiferous tubule diameter (μm) 301.1 ± 6.13

242.7 ± 2.71a

-19%#

294.7 ± 4.71d

21%*

268.4 ± 2.15d

11%*

-9%$

Data are presented as means ± S.E.M, where superscript a indicates p < 0.001 compared to the vehicle- injected group. While superscripts b, c and d indicate p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively, upon comparison with diabetic control group.

#Represents mean % change from vehicle-injected group.

*Represents mean % change from diabetic control group.

$Represents mean % change from early apigenin-injected group.

Discussion

DM is a metabolic disorder with growing global health concerns. Despite the availability of promising treatments, the prevention of tissue damage in the genitourinary system as well as other body systems remains a great challenge24. Evidently, STZ is an ideal inducer of diabetes and its complications in rats. It leads to persistent hyperglycemia, which in turn provokes excessive production of ROS with their hazardous effects, especially on mitochondria25. The accumulation of evidence indicates that mitochondrial dysfunction contributes to the pathogenesis of diabetic complications25.

Impressively, previous studies proved that renal pathological and functional changes in the STZ-induced diabetic rat model are very similar to those seen in the human diabetic kidney, making it an ideal model for research26. Consequently, genitourinary complications were provoked in rats by STZ.

Urinary ACR is a reliable biomarker used to screen and diagnose DN, even in its early stages27. The results of the present study showed that urinary ACR was elevated (at 3rd and 5th weeks) after diabetes induction by STZ, and serum urea and creatinine were elevated after scarification as well. On a tissue level, H&E stain revealed loss of normal renal architecture, filling of tubules with acidophilic materials, and sloughing of cells. In turn, the increase in PAS area% (mesangial expansion with an ill-defined basement membrane), which is considered another pathognomonic feature of DN28, was evident in the diabetic group of rats.

Evaluation of genital complications revealed that serum testosterone was decreased in diabetic control rats. Moreover, H&E-stained testicular sections showed that the seminiferous tubules were disorganized, decreased in diameter, and surrounded by edema. Additionally, the number of epithelial cell linings was reduced, and the sections were filled with detached cells. The same findings were also reported by Ma et al.29.

APG is a flavonoid with potent antidiabetic benefits due to its ability to suppress α-glucosidase activity, stimulate insulin secretion, and manage of ROS30. One of the aims of the current study was to assess the beneficial effect of APG on diabetic genitourinary complications.

Impressively, the results of the current study demonstrated that APG injection was associated with restoration of FBG to its normal value, improvement of urinary and serum kidney function’s tests, and secretion of more testosterone. On the tissue level, APG alleviated the hyperglycemia-induced microstructure damage in the genitourinary system. As the PAS area % was reduced, the diameters of seminiferous tubules were increased, and their epithelia linings were greatly restored.

Previous works revealed the astonishing ability of APG to improve diabetic genitourinary complications from a biochemical and histological perspective25,31. Concerning the mechanistic pattern, former studies attributed the benefits of APG to a variety of signaling pathways. Most pathways eventually merge on NF-kB (major inflammatory transcription factor), both in the kidney as well as the testis3234). While, with the purpose of DN improvement, Hou et al.35 anticipated the miR-423-5P-USF2 axis as a molecular network influenced by APG.

The current work proposes Drp1 as a novel potential downstream effector of APG in the management of diabetes based on the following: first, Drp1 is a mitochondrial fission protein; upon its over-expression and/or over-activation, an imbalance in mitochondrial fission or fusion occurs, which becomes an evident driver in the pathogenesis of diabetes and its genitourinary drawbacks16,36,37. Second, a plethora of previous works elucidated that Drp1 is not only considered an initiator of diabetes in the pancreas38, but also a modulator of diabetic complications in body organs such as the brain39, eyes11, and heart40. Hence, the current study evaluated Drp1 expression in the excised kidneys and testicular tissues of the four included groups of rats. Interestingly, our results revealed up-regulation of Drp1 in both organs excised from the diabetic rat control group. Meanwhile, rats injected with APG displayed lower expression of Drp1 in these organs. Our results came in accordance with preceding studies approving that Drp1 is a probable diabetic modulator, hence revealing the impact of mitochondrial dynamics on cell survival.

From a molecular perspective, hyperglycemia and its subsequent elevation of ROS can induce Drp1 overexpression41. Meanwhile, Altara et al.42 reported induction of Drp1 expression by sustained NF-κB activation and vice versa (i.e., blocking NF-κB reduces activity of Drp1 in endothelium). Exploiting the KEGG bioinformatics database (KEGG PATHWAY: map04217) revealed that Drp1 merges with the inflammasome (NLRP3) in the pathway of necroptosis. In the same context, Swanson et al.43 and Lu et al.44 reported that NLRP3 can be activated by NF-κB with ultimate cell pyroptosis, while it can be blocked by APG in mice, respectively.

Taken together, the current study hypothesized the existence of a novel signaling axis (Drp1/NF-κB/NLRP3) that is involved in diabetic genitourinary complications, and can be suppressed by APG administration.

As regard the timing effects of APG injection, the current study showed improvement in all studied parameters (including Drp1, renal, and testicular functions and structures) upon early as well as late injections. Although the changes were more evident in the early APG-injected diabetic group, they didn’t statistically differ from the late APG-injected one. Thus, we hypothesized that changing the dose, duration, and/or route of APG supplementation may reveal prophylactic as well as therapeutic benefits of APG during the management of diabetic genitourinary complications.

To summarize, the innovative aspect of the current work indicated that APG injection may attenuate diabetic genitourinary complications by means of decreasing blood glucose and improving renal and testicular structures and functions. Thus, the beneficial effects of APG may be mediated by suppressing Drp1 expression. We further recommend the following: first, to investigate the entire members of the pathway hypothesized by this study. Second, to evaluate the competing endogenous RNA network that regulates Drp1 in diabetes with and without APG injection. Third, all pharmaceutical aspects (such as dose, duration, route, etc.) of APG should be studied in relation to Drp1 expression. Finally, the proteomics of Drp1 should be assessed in all of the above-mentioned conditions.

Abbreviations

ACR

Albumin/creatinine ratio

APG

Apigenin

Bax/Bak

Bcl-2-associated X protein / Bcl-2 homologous antagonist/killer

CKD

Chronic kidney disease

DM

Diabetes mellitus

DN

Diabetic nephropathy

Drp1

Dynamin related protein 1

FBG

Fasting blood glucose

GFR

Glomerular filtration rate

H&E

Hematoxylin and eosin

HK2/PINK1

Hexokinase 2/PTEN-induced kinase1, phosphatase and tensin homologue-induced kinase 1

i.p.

Intraperitoneal

KEGG

Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes

NF-κB

Nuclear factor kappa B

NLRP3

Nod-like receptor protein

P38-MAPK

P38 mitogen-activated protein kinase

PAS

Periodic-acid-Schiff

PKCδ

Protein kinase C delta

qRT PCR

Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

STZ

Streptozotocin

T1DM

Type 1 diabetes mellitus

Author contributions

Mai Khaled: conceptualization; investigation; abstract; discussion; writing—original draft. Raghda Salama: conceptualization; investigation; statistical data analyses; methodology; results; writing—original draft. Azza Aboghalia: conceptualization; formal analysis; resources; supervision; visualization; writing—review and editing. Mai Tarek: imaging; analysis of images; results. Nesma Mohamed Fawzy: conceptualization; investigation; introduction; methodology; results; writing—original draft. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. All authors contributed to the study conception and design.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Nekoua MP, Alidjinou EK, Hober D. Persistent coxsackievirus B infection and pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2022;18(8):503–516. doi: 10.1038/s41574-022-00688-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sawaf H, Thomas G, Taliercio JJ, Nakhoul G, Vachharajani TJ, Mehdi A. Therapeutic advances in diabetic nephropathy. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11(2):378. doi: 10.3390/jcm11020378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shao BY, Zhang SF, Li HD, Meng XM, Chen HY. Epigenetics and inflammation in diabetic nephropathy. Front. Physiol. 2021;12:649587. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.649587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Huang TS, Wu T, Wu YD, Li XH, Tan J, Shen CH, Xiong SJ, Feng ZQ, Gao SF, Li H, Cai WB. Long-term statins administration exacerbates diabetic nephropathy via ectopic fat deposition in diabetic mice. Nat. Commun. 2023;14(1):390. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-35944-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Andlib N, Sajad M, Kumar R, Thakur SC. Abnormalities in sex hormones and sexual dysfunction in males with diabetes mellitus: A mechanistic insight. Acta Histochem. 2023;125(1):151974. doi: 10.1016/j.acthis.2022.151974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Xu K, Yang Y, Lan M, Wang J, Liu B, Yan M, Wang H, Li W, Sun S, Zhu K, Zhang X, Hei M, Huang X, Dou L, Tang W, He Q, Li J, Shen T. Apigenin alleviates oxidative stress-induced myocardial injury by regulating SIRT1 signaling pathway. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2023;944:175584. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.175584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fehaid A, Al-Ghamdi MS, Alzahrani KJ, Theyab A, Al-Amer OM, Al-Shehri SS, Algahtani M, Oyouni AAA, Alnfiai MM, Aly MH, Alsharif KF, Albrakati A, Althagafi HA, Alharthi F, Abdel Moneim AE, Lokman MS. Apigenin protects from hepatorenal damage caused by lead acetate in rats. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2023;37(3):e23275. doi: 10.1002/jbt.23275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Moslehi M, Rezaei S, Talebzadeh P, Ansari MJ, Jawad MA, Jalil AT, Rastegar-Pouyani N, Jafarzadeh E, Taeb S, Najafi M. Apigenin in cancer therapy: Prevention of genomic instability and anticancer mechanisms. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2023;50(1):3–18. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.13725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ihim SA, Kaneko YK, Yamamoto M, Yamaguchi M, Kimura T, Ishikawa T. Apigenin alleviates endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis in INS-1 β-cells. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2023;46(4):630–635. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b22-00913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Skondras I, Lambropoulou M, Tsaroucha A, Gardikis S, Tripsianis G, Simopoulos C, Vaos G. The role of Apigenin in testicular damage in experimental ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. Hippokratia. 2015;19(3):225–230. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang MY, Zhu L, Zheng X, Xie TH, Wang W, Zou J, Li Y, Li HY, Cai J, Gu S, Yao Y, Wei TT, Wei TT. TGR5 activation ameliorates mitochondrial homeostasis via regulating the PKCδ/Drp1-HK2 signaling in diabetic retinopathy. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022;9:759421. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.759421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Song SB, Park JS, Jang SY, Hwang ES. Nicotinamide treatment facilitates mitochondrial fission through Drp1 activation mediated by SIRT1-induced changes in cellular levels of cAMP and Ca2+ Cells. 2021;10(3):612. doi: 10.3390/cells10030612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Michelle L. DRP1-dependent apoptotic mitochondrial fission occurs independently of BAX, BAK and APAF1 to amplify cell death by BID and oxidative stress. BBA-Bioenerg. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2016.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Huang S, Wang Y, Gan X, Fang D, Zhong C, Wu L, Hu G, Sosunov AA, McKhann GM, Yu H, Yan SS. Drp1-mediated mitochondrial abnormalities link to synaptic injury in diabetes model. Diabetes. 2015;64(5):1728–1742. doi: 10.2337/db14-0758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim D, Sesaki H, Roy S. Reduced levels of Drp1 protect against development of retinal vascular lesions in diabetic retinopathy. Cells. 2021;10(6):1379. doi: 10.3390/cells10061379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen Z, Ma Y, Yang Q, Hu J, Feng J, Liang W, Ding G. AKAP1 mediates high glucose-induced mitochondrial fission through the phosphorylation of Drp1 in podocytes. J. Cell. Physiol. 2020;235(10):7433–7448. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tektemur A, Tektemur NK, Güzel EE. The therapeutic effect of hesperetin on doxorubicin-induced testicular toxicity: Potential roles of the mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase (mTOR) and dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2022;435:115833. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2021.115833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Percie du Sert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, Browne WJ, Clark A, Cuthill IC, Dirnagl U, Emerson M, Garner P, Holgate ST, Howells DW, Karp NA, Lazic SE, Lidster K, MacCallum CJ, Macleod M, Pearl EJ, Petersen O, Rawle F, Peynolds P, Rooney K, Sena ES, Silberberg SD, Steckler T, Wurbel H. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2020;1:1. doi: 10.1111/bph.15193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sheweita SA, Mashaly S, Newairy AA, Abdou HM, Eweda SM. Changes in oxidative stress and antioxidant enzyme activities in streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus in rats: role of Alhagi maurorum extracts. Oxid: Med. Cell. Longev; 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Oghbaei H, Ahmadi Asl N, Sheikhzadeh F, Alipour MR, Khamaneh AM. The effect of regular moderate exercise on miRNA-192 expression changes in kidney of streptozotocin-induced diabetic male rats. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2015;5(1):127–132. doi: 10.5681/apb.2015.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Panda S, Kar A. Apigenin (4’,5,7-trihydroxyflavone) regulates hyperglycaemia, thyroid dysfunction and lipid peroxidation in alloxan-induced diabetic mice. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2007;59:1543–1548. doi: 10.1211/jpp.59.11.0012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fang D, Wan X, Deng W, Guan H, Ke W, Xiao H, Li Y. Fufang Xue Shuan Tong capsules inhibit renal oxidative stress markers and indices of nephropathy in diabetic rats. Exp. Ther. Med. 2012;4(5):871–876. doi: 10.3892/etm.2012.680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gandhi J, Dagur G, Warren K, Smith NL, Khan SA. Genitourinary complications of diabetes mellitus: An overview of pathogenesis, evaluation, and management. Curr. Diab. Rev. 2017;13(5):498–518. doi: 10.2174/1573399812666161019162747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Malik S, Suchal K, Khan SI, Bhatia J, Kishore K, Dinda AK, Arya DS. Apigenin ameliorates streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy in rats via MAPK-NF-κB-TNF-α and TGF-β1-MAPK-fibronectin pathways. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2017;313(2):F414–F422. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00393.2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Noshahr, Z. S., Salmani, H., Khajavi Rad, A., & Sahebkar, A. Animal models of diabetes-associated renal injury. Journal of diabetes research, 2020. Article ID 9416419. 10.1155/2020/9416419 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 27.Bhaisare SD, Rao AK, Jog AS, Kolapkar HU. Clinical study of urine albumin creatinine ratio as an earlier predictor of diabetic nephropathy. J. Evol. Med. Dent. Sci. 2020;9(9):598–603. doi: 10.14260/jemds/2020/133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Qi C, Mao X, Zhang Z, Wu H. Classification and differential diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy. J. Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:8637138. doi: 10.1155/2017/8637138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ma D, Hu L, Wang J, Luo M, Liang A, Lei X, Liao B, Li M, Xie M, Li H, Gong Y, Zi D, Li X, Chen X, Liao X. Nicotinamide mononucleotide improves spermatogenic function in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice via modulating the glycolysis pathway: Nicotinamide mononucleotide improves spermatogenic function. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2022;54(9):1314. doi: 10.3724/abbs.2022099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Barky A, Ezz A, Mohammed T. The potential role of apigenin in diabetes mellitus. Int. J. Clin. Case Rep. Rev. 2020;3(1):32. doi: 10.31579/2690-4861/032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liu XY, Zhang SX, Zhang N, Hao CF, Zhuang LL, Huang X. Effects of apigenin on scrotal heat-induced damage in the mice testis. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2016;9:6342–6347. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Che DN, Cho BO, Kim JS, Shin JY, Kang HJ, Jang SI. Luteolin and apigenin attenuate LPS-induced astrocyte activation and cytokine production by targeting MAPK, STAT3, and NF-κB signaling pathways. Inflammation. 2020;43:1716–1728. doi: 10.1007/s10753-020-01245-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li J, Wang Y, Wu T, Li S, Sun YN, Liu ZH. Baicalein suppresses high glucose-induced inflammation and apoptosis in trophoblasts by targeting the miRNA-17-5p-Mfn1/2-NF-κB pathway. Placenta. 2022;121:126–136. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2022.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shi Y, Bai J, Dang Y, Bai Q, Zheng R, Chen J, Li Z. Protection of apigenin against acrylonitrile-induced sperm and testis injury in rats: Involvement of activation of ASK1-JNK/p38 signaling pathway. Toxicol. Res. 2021;10(2):159–168. doi: 10.1093/toxres/tfab017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hou Y, Zhang Y, Lin S, Yu Y, Yang L, Li L, Wang W. Protective mechanism of apigenin in diabetic nephropathy is related to its regulation of miR-423-5P-USF2 axis. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2021;13(4):2006. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tagaya M, Kume S, Yasuda-Yamahara M, Kuwagata S, Yamahara K, Takeda N, Tanaka Y, Chin-Kanasaki M, Nakae Y, Yokoi H, Mukoyama M, Ishihara N, Nomura M, Araki S, Maegawa H. Inhibition of mitochondrial fission protects podocytes from albumin-induced cell damage in diabetic kidney disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) 2022;1868(5):166368. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2022.166368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang P, Zhang S, Lin S, Lv Z. Melatonin ameliorates diabetic hyperglycaemia-induced impairment of Leydig cell steroidogenic function through activation of SIRT1 pathway. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2022;20(1):1–17. doi: 10.1186/s12958-022-00991-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Men X, Wang H, Li M, Cai H, Xu S, Zhang W, Xu Y, Ye L, Yang W, Wollheim CB, Lou J. Dynamin-related protein 1 mediates high glucose induced pancreatic beta cell apoptosis. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2009;41(4):879–890. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Vincent AM, Edwards JL, McLean LL, Hong Y, Cerri F, Lopez I, Quattrini A, Feldman EL. Mitochondrial biogenesis and fission in axons in cell culture and animal models of diabetic neuropathy. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;120:477–489. doi: 10.1007/s00401-010-0697-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Xiao-Gang S, Bing W, Yong-Qing C. Research progress on the mechanism of Drp1 in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Med. J. Chin. People’s Liberation Army. 2022;47(9):926–931. doi: 10.11855/j.issn.0577-7402.2022.09.0926. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dabravolski SA, Sadykhov NK, Kartuesov AG, Borisov EE, Sukhorukov VN, Orekhov AN. The role of mitochondrial abnormalities in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23(14):7863. doi: 10.3390/ijms23147863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Altara R, Zouein FA, Booz GW. Untangling the interplay between mitochondrial fission and NF-κB signaling in endothelial inflammation. Hypertension. 2020;76(1):1. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Swanson KV, Deng M, Ting JPY. The NLRP3 inflammasome: Molecular activation and regulation to therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019;19(8):477–489. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0165-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lu Z, Liu L, Zhao S, Zhao J, Li S, Li M. Apigenin attenuates atherosclerosis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease through inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome in mice. Sci. Rep. 2023;13(1):7996. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34654-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES