ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Fireworks can cause severe ocular injuries which can be prevented if used with proper precautions. It causes not only mechanical injuries but also thermal and chemical injuries. This study aimed to find out the prevalence of ocular firework injuries among patients presented to the emergency department during festival season in a tertiary eye hospital.
Methods:
This is a descriptive cross-sectional study done among patients presenting in the emergency department of a tertiary eye hospital after obtaining ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee. Data of patients from medical records between 26 October 2021 to 28 November 2021 and 15 October 2022 to 17 November 2022 was collected. A convenience sampling method was used. The point estimate was calculated at a 95% Confidence Interval.
Results:
Among 132 patients, the prevalence of ocular firework injuries was seen in 73 (55.30%) (46.82-63.78, 95% Confidence Interval). Closed globe injury was mostly observed in 56 (76.71%) patients with ocular injuries. The most common age group affected was those less than 30 years old 54 (73.97%).
Conclusions:
The prevalence of ocular firework injuries was found to be lower than other studies done in similar settings. Protective measures should be used to prevent ocular injuries. A public awareness program needs to be launched before such festivals.
Keywords: festivals, injuries, prevalence
INTRODUCTION
Fireworks are used during various events around the world as they enhance the festive mood.1 In a systematic review of firework-related ocular injuries, ocular trauma was found in 21.8% (range 16-45%).2 These can be dangerous if not used with proper precautions.3 It causes not only thermal but also chemical and mechanical injuries.4 Trying to check the unlit cracker and lighting it without protective wear can lead to serious consequences.5
In developing and developed countries it contributed to 22% of total eye injuries.2 These injuries can create heavy economic, medical, and social burdens.2,6,7
This study aimed to find out the prevalence of ocular firework injuries among patients presented to the emergency department during festival season in a tertiary eye hospital.
METHODS
This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among patients presented to the Emergency Department at Birtanagar Eye Hospital, Biratnagar, Morang, Nepal. Ethical approval was taken from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: BEH IRC-171/A). Data of patients from medical records between 26 October 2021 to 28 November 2021 and 15 October 2022 to 17 November 2022 was collected. All patients during the study time presenting to the Emergency Department of Biratnagar Eye Hospital were included in the study. Patients who had treatment started from other centres were excluded from the study. A convenience sampling method was used. The sample size was calculated by using the following formula:
Where,
n = minimum required sample size
Z = 1.96 at 95 % Confidence Interval (CI)
p = prevalence taken as 50% for maximum sample size
q = 1-p
e = margin of error, 9%
The minimum required sample size was 119. However, the final sample size taken was 132.
All patients underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examination. All relevant data related to age, gender, laterality, type of firework, whether the patient was an active ignitor or bystander, baseline visual acuity (VA), details of injuries, diagnosis, whether the patient received surgical and/or medical treatment and final best-corrected VA (BCVA) at the 1 month follow up was recorded. The immediate management comprised of thorough eye wash with normal saline, removal of dust, soot particles and debris and finally ruling out open globe injury. Depending on the severity of the ocular injury, patients were started on copious lubricants, cycloplegics, topical antibiotics and steroid eye drops. All the ocular injuries were classified according to the Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology System (BETTS) (2004).8
Data were entered and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 17.0. The point estimate was calculated at a 95% CI.
RESULTS
Among 132 patients, ocular firework injuries were seen in 73 (55.30%) (46.82-63.78, 95% CI) patients. The right eye was involved in 58 (79.45%) of the patients. No bilateral case of ocular injury was noted in our patients. A total of 55 (75.34%) patients were male. The most common age group was 10-30 years seen in 59 (67.12%) (Table 1).
Table 1. Age of presentation and types of injuries among patients with firework-related injuries (n = 73).
|
Age (years) |
Open globe injury n (%) |
Closed globe injury n (%) |
Total n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
<10 |
2 (2.74) |
3 (4.11) |
5 (6.84) |
|
10-30 |
12 (16.44) |
37 (50.68) |
49 (67.12) |
|
31-50 |
3 (4.11) |
13 (17.81) |
16 (21.91) |
|
>50 |
- |
3 (4.11) |
3 (4.11) |
Bystanders and patients not actively involved in igniting the fireworks at the time of ocular injury were 57 (78.08%). The majority of patients with ocular injuries needed medical management 39 (53.42%). Close-globe injuries were noted n 46 (82.14%) patients. Most common injuries were seen in the anterior segment of which corneal abrasion was the commonest 41 (56.16%) (Table 2).
Table 2. Ocular injury among patients with firework-related injuries (n = 73).
|
Anatomical parts of eyes |
n (%) |
|---|---|
|
Appendages of eye | |
|
Eyelid laceration |
16 (21.92) |
|
Eyelash/Eyelid burn |
12 (16.44) |
|
Anterior segment | |
|
Corneal abrasion |
41 (56.16) |
|
Iridocyclitis |
34 (46.58) |
|
Hyphaema |
22 (30.14) |
|
Corneal perforation |
16 (21.92) |
|
Traumatic cataract |
19 (26.03) |
|
Scleral perforation |
4 (5.48) |
|
Iridodialysis |
3 (4.11) |
|
Dislocated lens |
1 (1.37) |
|
Posterior segment | |
|
Vitreous haemorrhage |
21 (28.77) |
|
Retinal detachment |
8 (10.96) |
|
Macular hole |
4 (5.48) |
|
Intraocular foreign body |
1 (1.37) |
Patients with ocular injuries who presented to the hospital within 24 hours were 14 (19.18%). Firecracker was the most common firework causing ocular injury 24 (32.88%) in our study (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Types of fireworks among patients with ocular firework injuries (n= 73).

Visual acuity of most of the patients 40 (54.79%) on presentation had vision less than 3/60 (Table 3).
Table 3. Visual acuity at presentation of patients with ocular firework injuries (n = 73).
|
Vision |
n (%) |
|---|---|
|
6/6-6/9 |
- |
|
6/12-6/18 |
5 (6.85) |
|
6/24-6/60 |
20 (27.40) |
|
5/60-3/60 |
8 (10.96) |
|
<3/60 |
40 (54.79) |
DISCUSSION
In our study, the prevalence of ocular firework injuries were seen in 73 (55.30%). In a similar study prevalence of ocular injuries was found to be 65%.9 In this study, close-globe injuries were seen in 56 (76.71%) patients.
A total of 55 (75.34%) patients were male similar to the other studies from various parts of the world.2,5,10,11 This indicates that men are more prone to eye injuries caused by fireworks because they are more frequently exposed to outdoor activities than females. In our study, 67.12% of the patients were under 30 yrs which is similar to the other study.2,11 The possible reason for the lower number of female patients might be because they are involved in indoor activities like decoration and cooking, also parents are more vigilant for firework-related injuries to them because of cosmetic reasons.12
In our study, firework-related injury showed a decrease in number as the age increased, mostly because adults are more responsible while handling firecrackers and they are less involved in burning fireworks.3 The type of fireworks involved also determines the severity of ocular injury sustained. The majority of injuries in our study were caused by firecrackers accounting for 32.88%, similar to the other study.9 The possible reason might be that it is small so it can be easily smuggled through the open border of neighbouring countries as firework is legally banned in Nepal. So, the chances of illegal import of heavy and powerful fireworks is less and so are their injuries.
Eyelid injuries were seen in 38.35% and corneal abrasion was the most common ocular injury noted accounting for 56.16%% higher than previous study.3 Open globe injury in our study was 46.5% which was similar to another study (35.5%).13 The possible reason for the high number of open globe injuries was that our hospital is a non-profitable tertiary eye hospital which is run by NNJS (Nepal Netra Jyoti Sangh) where most of the referred patient is treated. Most of the open globe injuries in our study occurred during the Chaat festival (64.7%), which is celebrated at a nearby river bank or pond worshipping the sun and has strict rituals. Because the parents are usually busy with the rituals, the children are not under supervision in the crowded area where fireworks are launched, so the chances of trauma to them are high. Many Indian studies have shown that more than 85 % of firecracker injuries occurred while children were not under-supervised by adults.3,12-14 Studies have shown that bystanders are more at risk of injuries because they are unaware of the fireworks approaching them and can't anticipate the danger.3 In our study 78.8% of the patients who had ocular injuries were bystanders and not actively participating in lunching firework similar to previous study.8
There are a few limitations in our study. Restricting the cases studied to those that occurred during only two festivals may have resulted in an underestimation of the magnitude of the problem during other period of year.
CONCLUSIONS
The prevalence of ocular firework injuries was found to be lower than other studies done in similar settings. Protective measures should be used to prevent ocular injuries. A public awareness program needs to be launched before such festivals as well as strengthened education on safety and proper legislation for using fireworks are the key methods to reduce such serious trauma.
Conflict of Interest
None.
REFERENCES
- 1.Tandon R, Agrawal K, Narayan RP, Tiwari VK, Prakash V, Kumar S, et al. Firecracker injuries during Diwali festival: the epidemiology and impact of legislation in Delhi. Indian J Plast Surg. 2012 Jan;45(1):97–101. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.96595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wisse RP, Bijlsma WR, Stilma JS. Ocular firework trauma: a systematic review on incidence, severity, outcome and prevention. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec;94(12):1586–91. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.168419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kurien NA, Peter J, Jacob P. Spectrum of ocular injuries and visual outcome following firework injury to the eye. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2020 Jan-Mar;13(1):39–44. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_62_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gabel-Pfisterer A, Bohringer D, Agostini H. Ocular injuries due to fireworks and firecrackers. Ophthalmologe. 2019 Dec;116(12):1136–37. doi: 10.1007/s00347-019-00997-3. German. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Frimmel S, de Faber JT, Wubbels RJ, Kniestedt C, Paridaens D. Type, severity, management and outcome of ocular and adnexal firework-related injuries: the Rotterdam experience. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep;96(6):607–15. doi: 10.1111/aos.13711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rashid RA, Heidary F, Hussein A, Hitam WH, Rashid RA, Ghani ZA, et al. Ocular burns and related injuries due to fireworks during the Aidil Fitri celebration on the East Coast of the Peninsular Malaysia. Burns. 2011 Feb;37(1):170–3. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sacu S, Segur-Eltz N, Stenng K, Zehetmayer M. Ocular firework injuries at New Year's eve. Ophthalmologica. 2002 Jan-Feb;216(1):55–9. doi: 10.1159/000048298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Malla T, Sahu S. Firework-related ocular injuries during festival season: a hospital based study in a tertiary eye care center of Nepal. Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan;13(25):31–9. doi: 10.3126/nepjoph.v13i1.31246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Parija S, Chakraborty K, Ravikumar SR. Firework related ocular injuries in Eastern India - a clinical-epidemiological analysis. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec;69(12):3538–44. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_753_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kuhn FC, Morris RC, Witherspoon DC, Mann L, Mester V, Modis L, et al. Serious fireworks-related eye injuries. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2000 Jun;7(2):139–48. doi: 10.1076/0928-6586(200006)7:2;1-Z;FT139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Mester V. The Birmingham eye trauma terminology system (BETT). J Fr Ophtalmol. 2004 Feb;27(2):206–10. doi: 10.1016/S0181-5512(04)96122-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Turgut F, Bograd A, Jeltsch B, Weber A, Schwarzer P, Ciotu IM, et al. Occurrence and outcome of firework-related ocular injuries in Switzerland: a descriptive retrospective study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 7;22(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02513-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Patel R, Mukherjee B. Crash and Burn: Ocular Injuries due to Fireworks. Semin Ophthalmol. 2016;31(3):243–8. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2014.962157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.AlGhadeer H, Khandekar R. Profile and management outcomes of fireworks-related eye injuries in Saudi Arabia: a 16-year retrospective study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct 15;15:4163–8. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S333121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
