Skip to main content
Biodiversity Data Journal logoLink to Biodiversity Data Journal
. 2024 Feb 29;12:e117275. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.12.e117275

Fossil Collection at the Zoology Museum of the University of Concepción: enhancing understanding of Chile's past biodiversity

Francisca Alejandra Beltrán Echeverría 1,, Laura Tavera Martínez 1,2,, Cristián E Hernández 3,4
PMCID: PMC10925857  PMID: 38469223

Abstract

Background

The digital inventory of paleontological material stored in Chilean museums is highly relevant as it increases accessibility to information, both locally and over long distances, while reducing wear and tear on specimens caused by physical manipulation. The Fossil Collection database of the Museum of Zoology of the University of Concepción (UCC_MZUC_FOS) includes 144 records, with the main representatives being marine invertebrates of the Bivalvia, Echinoidea and Gastropoda classes. Notable species include Encopecalderensis, Hemiasterwayensis, Zygochlamyspatagonica and Retrotapesexalbidus, most of which come from important Chilean fossil sites. Material was collected between 1970 and 2017, with a large portion of it being donated and identified by Professor Emeritus Hugo I. Moyano and Dr. Alberto Larraín. Although the specimens contained in the resource offer basic collecting information, they substantially contribute to sharing knowledge on the fossils kept in the museums throughout the country, while providing data on their distribution.

New information

This resource corresponds to the first publication of data on faunal fossils from a museum collection in Chile on the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) platform, thereby enhancing the understanding and documentation of Chile's paleontological heritage and its national biodiversity.

Keywords: fossils, databases, biological collections, Chile, fossiliferous localities, marine invertebrates.

Introduction

Chile’s palaeontological heritage is rich and diverse, with numerous fossiliferous localities distributed throughout its territory (Vega-Jorquera et al. 2015). These sites cover different geological periods and represent a wide range of paleoenvironments. This natural and scientific heritage, which is crucial for researching and understanding past biodiversity, must be protected and preserved. Accredited institutions, such as universities and museums, play a vital role in safeguarding this heritage by creating biological and scientific collections. This ensures its long-term preservation and accesibility for research inquiries.

The creation of inventories of biological collections and their subsequent digitisation in standard biodiversity formats, such as Darwin Core (DwC), has become increasingly relevant in recent years. This format provides a common language for sharing biodiversity data through a set of terms with clearly defined semantics that can be understood by people or interpreted by software, allowing the appropriation of the encoded data (Wieczorek et al. 2012). Access to local, regional and global information on specimens is available directly from a computer, cell phone or device with an internet connection, free of charge, eliminating or reducing the need of travelling to consult collections or handle specimens, thereby preventing wear and tear caused by physical handling. In addition, the information associated with the specimen, such as habitat, environmental variables and biological associations, provided by the databases, favours research in different areas of knowledge, such as evolution, systematics and ecology (Lendemer et al. 2020).

Given the importance of faunal fossil records in Chile, the objective of this work is to contribute to the knowledge and documentation of fossils housed in Chilean museums, with emphasis on the material from localities of the national territory. The Fossil Collection at the Zoology Museum of the University of Concepción (UCCC_MZUC_FOS) is mainly composed of material bequeathed by the professors of the Faculty of Natural Sciences and Oceanography, Hugo I. Moyano and Alberto Larraín, starting in 1986. The collection consists of 144 specimens of fossil fauna that provide information on two important geological formations of the Biobío Region, the Quiriquina Formation and the Tubul Formation, as well as fossiliferous localities in the regions of Antofagasta (Quebrada El Way) and Atacama (Punta Cabeza de Vaca), amongst others.

This collection is digitised in DwC format and published in the Global Biodiversity Information System–GBIF, constituting the first database on faunal fossils in Chile. Therefore, this work is crucial for the preservation and accesibility of Chile's paleontological heritage.

Geological setting

The Quebrada El Way fossiliferous deposit is located about 10 km south of the City of Antofagasta and is the type locality of the El Way Formation (Wenzel 1957), a succession of marine strata composed mainly of calcilutites, calcarenites and limestones. Its deposits belong to the Lower Cretaceous (Brüggen 1950, Wenzel 1957, Harrington 1961, Barceló 1972). The specimens housed at the Zoology Museum of the University of Concepción (MZUC-UCCC) that come from this formation correspond to Hemiasterwayensis, a species described by Larraín (1985).

The Quiriquina Formation represents Maastrichtian (Upper Cretaceous) transgressive deposits (Biró-Bagóczky 1982) that outcrop from Algarrobo, San Antonio Province, to Lebu, Arauco Province. The type locality of the formation is located in Bahía Las Tablas, Quiriquina Island and the parastratotype locality is in Cocholgüe, north of Tomé. The strata of the Quiriquina Formation were deposited in a gradually deepening coastal environment (Palma-Heldt and Quinzio 2006). This formation is known for their vast faunal record, including ammonoids, nautiloids, bivalves, gastropods, scaphopods, elasmobranch teeth and skeletal remains of marine reptiles, which have been studied by several scientists since the 1840s, including (Darwin 1846, Gay 1848, Gay 1854, Philippi 1887, Casamiquela 1969, amongst others). The latest specimen described from this formation is the plesiosaur Aristonectesquiriquinensis (Otero et al. 2015). The specimens in the MZUC-UCCC Fossil Collection that come from this formation are dental structures of Carcharias sp. and Plesiosaurus sp., Baculites sp., Dentalium sp. and shells of Pacitrigonia sp., amongst others.

The specimens of the species Encopecalderensis listed in the collection database come from the upper levels of a coastal cliff south of Punta Cabeza de Vaca, Atacama Region, which is comprised of Pliocene marine sediments (Covacevich and Frassinetti 1977).

Finally, the Tubul Formation, whose type locality is located in the southern sector of the Gulf of Arauco, was deposited rapidly during the late Pliocene near the Plio-Pleistocene boundary in a nearshore area (Pineda 1983, Pineda 1986). This marine assemblage contains a wide diversity of invertebrates, including the bivalves Zygochlamyspatagonica and Retrotapesexalbidus.

Geographic coverage

Description

All the specimens come from the American continent, 141 are from Chile, two from Argentina and a single specimen from the United States (Fig. 1). Two sampling localities were found outside the national territory: Bristol Bay, in the United States and Cerro Negro, in Argentina. The fossil material recovered in Chile comes from localities distributed from north to south of the country, including the regions of Antofagasta, Atacama, Biobío, Los Ríos, Los Lagos, Magallanes and Chilean Antarctica (Table 1). None of the specimens presents geographical coordinates and many of them come from unspecific localities that cannot be represented on a map, but when the geological formation is detailed, it is posible to deduce their region of origin. In addition, the collection data on the museum labels do not present information on the sampling methods used in the extraction of the specimens that compose the present database.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

World distribution map of the specimens from the Fossil Collection of the Museum of Zoology of the University of Concepción (MZUC-UCCC).

Table 1.

Main collection locations for specimens from the MZUC-UCCC Fossil Collection.

Location Country Region (if applicable)
Bristol Bay United States
Cerro Negro, Potrerillos Argentina
Checo del Cobre, Nantoco Chile Atacama
Punta Cabeza de Vaca Chile Atacama
Quebrada El Way Chile Antofagasta
Cocholgüe Chile Biobio
Lirquén Chile Biobio
Las Tablas Beach, Quiriquina Island Chile Biobio
Quiriquina Formation Chile Biobio
Caleta Tubul Chile Biobio
Tubul Formation Chile Biobio
Arauco Beach Chile Biobio
Arauco to Lebu road Chile Biobio
Road to Lebu Chile Biobio
Valdivia Chile Los Ríos
Cuesta Los Quinientos Chile Los Ríos
Quenuir, Maullín River mouth Chile Los Lagos
Sector Flamenco, between Caleta San Sebastián and Bahía Inútil Chile Magallanes and Chilean Antarctica

Taxonomic coverage

Description

All taxa were identified to the lowest possible taxonomic category. The taxonomic coverage included one kingdom, six phyla, 10 classes, 24 orders, 34 families, 42 genera and 25 species (valid and invalid). The most represented classes in the collection are Bivalvia, with 57 specimens and Echinoidea, with 51 specimens. They are followed by the classes Gastropoda (14), Rhynchonellata (8), Cephalopoda (4), Polychaeta (1), Sauropsida (1), Scaphopoda (1) and Thecostraca (1) (Fig. 2). The main representatives of this collection correspond to marine invertebrates, such as Encopecalderensis, Hemiasterwayensis, Zygochlamyspatagonica and Retrotapesexalbidus, amongst others (Fig. 3).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Number of specimens for each class registered in the MZUC-CCC Fossil collection.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Representatives of the MZUC-UCCC Fossil collection. 1: Cephalopoda MZUC-UCCC 45745. 2: Baculites sp. MZUC-UCCC 46366. 3: Balanus sp. MZUC-UCCC 45746. 4: Loxechinus sp. MZUC-UCCC 18133. 5: Plesiosaurus sp. MZUC-UCCC 45747. 6: Encopecalderensis MZUC-UCCC 10762. 7: Hemiasterwayensis MZUC-UCCC 10811. 8: Retrotapesexalbidus MZUC-UCCC 45722. 9: Zygochlamyspatagonica MZUC-UCCC 45736. Scale: 1 centimetre. Photographs by: Francisca Beltrán.

Data quality control: The taxonomic information originally recorded by the collectors and/or determiners of each specimen was validated. For this, the “Match Taxa” tool of the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS Editorial Board 2022) was used, followed by the “Species matching” tool of the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF.org 2022). These tools made it possible to update currently-accepted species and correct scientific names with misspellings. These changes were incorporated both in the DwC databases and in the labels of each specimen. Finally, validation of the collection database in DwC format was carried out using the GBIF data validator. This filtering of the information was carried out prior to the publication of the resource in the GBIF platform, verifying that the structure of the data complied with the criteria of the DwC format. This ensured that the data were published with good quality, guaranteeing that the published information was accurate and reliable.

Taxa included

Rank Scientific Name Common Name
class Bivalvia Bivalve
class Cephalopoda Cephalopod
genus Baculites
genus Balanus Acorn barnacle
genus Carcharias
genus Dentalium
genus Fusitriton
genus Loxechinus
genus Ostrea Oyster
genus Pacitrigonia
genus Plesiosaurus Plesiosaur
genus Retrotapes Clam
genus Rhynchonella
genus Scapanorhynchus
genus Schizaster
genus Serpula
genus Tegula
genus Trophon
genus Turritella
species Acanthinaunicornis
species Belapaessleri
species Chorusgiganteus Trumulco snail
species Cirsotremamagellanicum
species Crepiduladilatata
species Echinarachniusparma Sand dollar
species Encopecalderensis
species Ennuculagrayi
species Ensismacha Concha navaja, huepo, Chilean macha, navajuela
species Eurhomaleaexalbida Clam
species Euspiraguamblinensis
species Fusitritonmagellanicus
species Hemiasterwayensis
subspecies Iheringiellapatagonensis
species Ischyrhizachilensis Plesiosaur
species Leukomaantiqua Clam
species Macoplomainornata
species Magellaniavenosa
species Mangeliapaessleri
species Monophorasterdarwini
species Pandorabraziliensis
species Pseudechinusmagellanicus Dwarf hedgehog
species Tindariopsissulculata
species Xymenopsisdispar
species Zygochlamyspatagonica Patagonian oction

Temporal coverage

Data range: 1970-4-30 – 2017-8-23.

Notes

The specimens were collected between 1970 and 2017 (Fig. 4) and were deposited with other collections of the Museum of Zoology of the University of Concepción, mainly the Echinoderm Collection and the Mollusk Collection. Subsequently, between 2017 and 2022, the MZUC-UCCC Fossil Collection was formed.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Number of specimens from the MZUC-UCCC Fossil Collection collected for each recorded sampling year.

Usage licence

Usage licence

Creative Commons Public Domain Waiver (CC-Zero)

IP rights notes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC-BY-NC) 4.0 License.

Data resources

Data package title

Fossil Collection of the Zoology Museum of the University of Concepción UCCC_MZUC_FOS

Resource link

https://doi.org/10.15468/wdmeh2

Number of data sets

1

Data set 1.

Data set name

Fossil Collection of the Zoology Museum of the University of Concepción UCCC_MZUC_FOS

Data format

Darwin Core

Download URL

https://www.gbif.org/dataset/c83ef5fa-e70f-460d-80cc-435694892a6a

Description

The resource consists of a database of fossils belonging to the Zoology Museum of the University of Concepción (Beltrán-Echeverría et al. 2023). Most of the specimens were collected by Emeritus Professor Hugo Moyano and Dr. Alberto Larraín. The database includes a total of 144 records associated with a number MZUC-UCCC, mainly from Chile and, to a lesser extent, from Argentina and the United States. The main Chilean localities include the Quiriquina Formation and Tubul Formation, from the Upper Cretaceous and the Plio-Pleistocene of the Biobío Region, respectively, Quebrada El Way from the Lower Cretaceous of the Antofagasta Region and Punta Cabeza de Vaca, from the Pliocene of the Atacama Region.

The following data categories from the Darwin Core Standard were used:

Data set 1.
Column label Column description
occurrenceID Unique correlative indicator of the biological record.
basisOfRecord “FossilSpecimen” for all records.
type “PhysicalObject” for all records.
institutionCode “Museum of Zoology of the University of Concepción (MZUC-UCCC)” for all records.
institutionID The identifier of the institution to which the resource was referred.
collectionCode “UCCC_MZUC_FOS” for all records.
collectionID The identifier of the collection or dataset to which the resource was derived.
catalogNumber Correlative number.
datasetName “Fossil Collection of the Zoology Museum of the University of Concepción” for all records.
language Spanish.
license CC BY-NC 4.0.
rightsHolder “Zoology Museum of the University of Concepción” for all records.
accessRights “not-for-profit use only” for all records.
ownerInstitutionCode “Museum of Zoology of the University of Concepción (MZUC-UCCC)” for all records.
recordedBy Name of the person responsible for the registration.
individualCount Number of registered individuals.
organismScope DwC instance type description: Organism. It can be used to indicate whether the dwc instance: Organism represents a discrete organism or whether it represents a particular type of aggregation.
previousIdentifications A list of previous naming assignments to the dwc: Organism.
preparation “Fossil” for all records.
disposition “In collection” for all records.
eventDate The date and time or interval during which the event occurred.
year The four-digit year in which the event occurred, according to the Common Era Calendar.
month The entire month in which the event occurred.
day The entire day of the month in which the event occurred.
verbatimEventDate The original textual representation of the date and time information for the event.
fieldNumber An identifier given to the event in the field.
continent The name of the continent on which the locality occurs.
waterBody The name of the body of water in which the locality occurs.
islandGroup The name of the group of islands on which the locality occurs.
island The name of the island on or near which the locality occurs.
country The name of the country or main administrative unit in which the locality occurs.
countryCode The standard code for the country in which the locality occurs.
stateProvince The name of the next administrative region smaller than the country (state, region) in which the locality occurs.
county The full, unabbreviated name of the administrative region next smaller than stateProvince in which the locality occurs.
municipality The full, unabbreviated name of the administrative region smaller than the county in which the locality occurs.
locality The specific description of the place.
verbatimLocality The original textual description of the place.
verbatimDepth The original description of the depth below the local surface.
locationRemarks Comments or notes from the locality.
earliestEonOrLowestEonothem The full name of the earliest possible geochronological eon attributable to the stratigraphic horizon from which the element was collected.
latestEonOrHighestEonothem The full name of the latest possible geochronological eon attributable to the stratigraphic horizon from which the element was collected.
earliestEraOrLowestErathem The full name of the earliest possible geochronological era attributable to the stratigraphic horizon from which the element was collected.
latestEraOrHighestErathem The full name of the latest possible geochronological era attributable to the stratigraphic horizon from which the feature was collected.
earliestPeriodOrLowestSystem The full name of the earliest possible geochronological period attributable to the stratigraphic horizon from which the catalogued element was collected.
latestPeriodOrHighestSystem The full name of the latest possible geochronological period attributable to the stratigraphic horizon from which the feature was collected.
earliestEpochOrLowestSeries The full name of the earliest possible geochronological epoch attributable to the stratigraphic horizon from which the element was collected.
latestEpochOrHightestSeries The full name of the latest possible geochronological epoch attributable to the stratigraphic horizon from which the feature was collected.
earliestAgeOrLowestStage The full name of the earliest possible geochronological age attributable to the stratigraphic horizon from which the element was collected.
latestAgeOrHighestStage The full name of the latest possible geochronological age attributable to the stratigraphic horizon from which the element was collected.
lithostratigraphicTerms The combination of all lithostratigraphic names of the rock from which the element was collected.
formation The full name of the lithostratigraphic formation from which the element was collected.
identifiedBy A list of names of people, groups or organisations that assigned the name to the taxon.
dateIdentified The date the taxon was determined.
identificationReferences A list of references (publication) used in identification.
typeStatus Nomenclatural types (holotype, paratype).
scientificName The name of the species or taxon of the record.
scientificNameAuthorship Authorship information for the scientific name.
kingdom The scientific name of the kingdom in which the taxon is classified.
phylum The scientific name of the phylum in which the taxon is classified.
class The scientific name of the class in which the taxon is classified.
order The scientific name of the order in which the taxon is classified.
family The scientific name of the family in which the taxon is classified.
subfamily The scientific name of the subfamily in which the taxon is classified.
genus The scientific name of the genus in which the taxon is classified.
specificEpithet The name of the species epithet of the scientific name.
taxonRank The taxonomic rank of the most specific name of the scientific name.
verbatimTaxonRank The taxonomic rank of the most specific name of the scientific name as it appears in the original record.
vernacularName Common name.
taxonomicStatus The status of use of the scientific name (invalid, synonym, valid).
acceptedNameUsage Accepted name in use.

Additional information

Contributions made to the MZUC-UCCC Fossil collection

Prior to digitising the collection, several researchers and students reviewed the collection, mainly from the Faculty of Natural and Oceanographic Sciences of the University of Concepción. The marine biologist Marina Fuentes created the Fossil Collection of the Zoology Museum of the University of Concepción in 2017, performing the verification of the status of the specimens, their sampling data and taxonomic determination. Dr. Alberto Larraín Prat collected and determined several of the specimens and authored the species H.wayensis, whose holotype is in this collection. Professor Emeritus Hugo Moyano also collected and determined some specimens. Finally, in 2022, the resource was created by the author, optimising the internal database of the Museum of Zoology according to the standard criteria of the Darwin Core format reported in this study, along with the development of the metadata and the photographic record of the specimens of the collection.

Conclusions

This resource is the first publication on faunal fossil data from a museum collection in Chile, thus constituting a valuable contribution to the knowledge of historical biodiversity. It is located in one of the most important international repositories of biodiversity (GBIF), with free access for the community and with a standard format (DwC) that facilitates its understanding. For this reason, the digitisation and publication of biological (specifically, paleontological) collections in formats accepted worldwide, are of great relevance to expand access to information and promote the development of research in different areas of biology, thus allowing us to understand the changes of past biodiversity through large temporal and spatial scales.

Acknowledgements

Francisca Beltrán would like to express her sincere gratitude to Marina Fuentes and Myriam Ramírez for their assistance in the maintenance of the Fossil Collection and in the development of the resource. She would like to thank Carolina Cuevas for her guidance in the process of digitising the collection in standard Darwin Core format. Thanks to Leisy Montano, director of the GBIF Chile node, for her recommendations to improve the final version of the database. Thanks to Dr. Laura Tavera for her advice in the development and refinement of this paper, which significantly improved the quality of the manuscript. Thanks to Dr. Cristián Hernández for his support and the enriching discussions on the importance of Chile's past biodiversity. Thanks to FONDECYT Project No 1201506 for providing funding to this scientific article. Finally, F.B. thanks the reviewers of Biodiversity Data Journal who provided valuable comments on this Data Paper.

Funding Statement

FONDECYT-1201506

Contributor Information

Francisca Alejandra Beltrán Echeverría, Email: fbeltran2019@udec.cl.

Laura Tavera Martínez, Email: ltavera@udec.cl.

Author contributions

F.B. contributed to developing the concept of the scientific article, carried out collection maintenance tasks, digitised data in internal museum format and Standard Darwin Core format with its respective metadata and carried out photographic documentation of samples per species present in the collection.

L.T. supervised the elaboration of the manuscript, editing and refining its writing to bring it to its best quality state.

C.E.H. supported the development of the concept of the manuscript, enriching it with his advice and providing the funds for this publication.

References

  1. Barceló J. CORFO, Chile, División de Minería, Mimeograph; 1972. Estudio geológico yacimiento de calizas "El Way". 118 p. [Google Scholar]
  2. Beltrán-Echeverría F., Fuentes M., Moyano H., Larraín A. Museo de Zoología de la Universidad de Concepción (MZUC-UCCC); 2023. Colección de Fósiles del Museo de Zoología de la Universidad de Concepción UCCC_MZUC_FOS. 1.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Biró-Bagóczky L. Revisión y redefinición de los “Estratos de Quiriquina”, Campaniano- Maastrichtiano, en su localidad tipo, en isla Quiriquina, 36°37’ Lat. Sur, Chile, Sudamérica, con un perfil complementario en Cocholgüe. In: , editor. Actas del III Congreso Geológico Chileno; III Congreso Geológico Chileno; Concepción, Chile. 1982. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brüggen J. Instituto Geográfico Militar, Santiago; 1950. Fundamentos de la Geología de Chile. [Google Scholar]
  5. Casamiquela R. M. La presencia en Chile de Aristonectes cabrera (Plesiosauria), del Maestrichtiense del Chubut, Argentina. 1969. IV Jornadas Geológicas Argentinas, pp. 199-213.
  6. Covacevich V., Frassinetti D. El género Encope en el Plioceno del Norte de Chile (Echinodermata, Echinoidea) Boletín Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Chile. 1977;35:49–60. doi: 10.54830/bmnhn.v35.1977.505. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Darwin C. Observaciones geológicas en Sudamérica. Smith Elder and Co; London: 1846. 279 [Google Scholar]
  8. Gay C. Historia física i política de Chile: Zoología. Vol. 2. Maude & Renou; París: 1848. 372 [Google Scholar]
  9. Gay C. Historia física y política de Chile: Zoología. Vol. 8. Maude & Renou; Paris: 1854. 499 [Google Scholar]
  10. GBIF.org GBIF Home Page. https://www.gbif.org https://www.gbif.org
  11. Harrington H. Geology of parts of Antofagasta and Atacama provinces, Northern Chile. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists. 1961;45:169–197. [Google Scholar]
  12. Larraín A. A new, early Hemiaster (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) from the Lower Cretaceous of Antofagasta, Northern Chile. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1304953 Journal of Paleontology. 1985;59(6):1401–1408. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lendemer J., Thiers B., Monfils A. K., Zaspel J., Ellwood E. R., Bentley A., LeVan K., Bates J., Jennings D., Contreras D., Lagomarsino L., Mabee P., Ford L. S., Guralnick R., Gropp R. E., Revelez M., Cobb N., Seltmann K., Aime M. C. The extended specimen network: A strategy to enhance US Biodiversity Collections, promote research and education. Bioscience. 2020;70(1):23–30. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biz140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Otero R., Soto-Acuña S., O'Keefe F., O'Gorman J., Stinnesbeck W., Suárez M., Rubilar-Rogers D., Salazar C., Quinzio L. A. Aristonectesquiriquinensis, sp. nov., a new highly derived elasmosaurid from the upper Maastrichtian of central Chile. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2015;34(1):100–125. doi: 10.1080/02724634.2013.780953. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Palma-Heldt S., Quinzio L. A. Aporte de la palinología al conocimiento del límite Cretácico-Paleógeno en la Cuenca de Arauco. VIII Región, Chile. 2006. Actas del IX Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Bioestratigrafía, Córdoba, 231 p.
  16. Philippi R. A. Los fósiles terciarios i cuaternarios de Chile. Brockhaus; Leipzig: 1887. 256 [Google Scholar]
  17. Pineda M. V. Evolución paleogeográfica de la península de Arauco durante el Cretácico Superior-Terciario. Departamento de Geología y Geofísica, Universidad de Chile; Santiago: 1983. 267 [Google Scholar]
  18. Pineda M. V. In: Geología y Recursos naturales de Chile. Frutos J., Oyarzún R., Pincheira M., editors. Universidad de Concepción; Concepción: 1986. Evolución paleogeográfica de la cuenca sedimentaria Cretácica – Terciaria de Arauco. [Google Scholar]
  19. Vega-Jorquera L., Gustein C. S., Otero R. A. Patrimonio Paleontológico: un análisis diagnóstico de la gestión en el marco de la evaluación ambiental en Chile. 2015. Actas del XIV Congreso Geológico Chileno, La Serena, pp. 396-399.
  20. Wenzel O. In: Chile-Chili. In Lexique Stratigraphique International. Amérique Latine. Hoffsetter R., Fuenzalida H., Cecioni G., editors. Vol. 5. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Paris: 1957. Calizas del Way.374 [Google Scholar]
  21. Wieczorek J., Bloom D., Guralnick R., Blum S., Döring M., et al. Darwin Core: An evolving community-developed biodiversity data standard. PLOS One. 2012;7(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Board WoRMS Editorial. World Register of Marine Species. https://www.marinespecies.org https://www.marinespecies.org

Articles from Biodiversity Data Journal are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES