The Coordinating Research Council (CRC) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) co-sponsored an Air Quality Research Needs (AQRN) workshop that was held on November 8 and 9, 2022 at the University of California, Davis. The workshop attracted researchers from academia, federal and state agencies, industry, and other stakeholders and included over 60 attendees.
Many advances have been made over the years in physics and chemistry in air quality models (AQMs) that also take advantage of advances in computational resources; however, major gaps and uncertainties remain. Therefore, stakeholders were brought together to reflect on the status of AQMs and brainstorm on future research needs to further improve the models to meet the ever-growing needs and the evolving research drivers. A previous AQRN workshop was held in 20161. This article provides an overview of the workshop and summarizes the prioritized key research issues and future research needs.
WORKSHOP OBJECTIVES AND ORGANIZATION
The objective of the workshop was to brainstorm on key research issues related to future air quality model development needs and identify specific research needs. The workshop was organized around four themes to facilitate discussions: emissions, meteorology, chemistry, and regional and local air quality modeling.
Three speakers for each workshop theme provided an overview of the current state of science, research gaps, and initial thoughts on future research needs. This was followed by a plenary brainstorming session to identify and discuss big picture issues/needs. The breakout sessions identified specific research issues under each theme and attendees voted for the top five research issues for each theme. The breakout session participants also discussed specific research needs to address the research issues that were identified. At a final plenary session, the results of the breakout sessions were presented, discussed and voted on to determine the overall top ten research issues.
TOP RESEARCH ISSUES/NEEDS
The overall top ten research issues that were identified are shown in Table 1, and details of each of these issues are provided below.
Table 1. Top Ten Overall Research Issues Identified from the 2022 AQRN Workshop.
| Issue # | Research Issue | Theme |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Multi-component Satellite / Ground Data Assimilation | Modeling |
| 2 | Emissions Inventories on Environmental Justice-Relevant Scales | Emissions |
| 3 | Coupling + Feedbacks between Air Pollution and Meteorology | Modeling |
| 4 | Chemistry of Today and Tomorrow | Chemistry |
| 5 | Consistent Implementation of Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL) Processes in Air Quality and Meteorological Models | Meteorology |
| 6 | Measure and Speciate N-containing and Particulate Matter (PM) Emissions from Fuel Combustion | Emissions |
| 7 | Organic Aerosol (OA) Temperature Dependence | Chemistry |
| 8 | Urban Biogenic Emissions | Emissions |
| 8 (tie) | Gas-Phase Mechanism Evaluation | Chemistry |
| 10 | Characterization of Global Scale Processes that Act as Boundary Conditions for Cities | Modeling |
Research Issue 1: Multi-component Satellite / Ground Data Assimilation
AQMs have limitations in accurately predicting pollutant concentrations2. Data assimilation methods that merge satellite measurements, ground-based measurements, and model predictions improve predictions of various components of air pollution3. The key research needs identified are:
Develop methods that combine measurement data into continuous fields while still respecting conservation of mass, and chemical kinetic/thermodynamic principles;
“Big data” to test new methods for data integration;
Intercomparison studies to identify the most promising assimilation methods.
Research Issue 2: Emissions Inventories on Environmental Justice Relevant Scales
Environmental Justice (EJ) communities often experience degraded air quality, but our current inventories don’t have the necessary spatial scales, chemical and sectoral/compositional detail to support needed resolution for modeling in the EJ communities. The key research needs identified are:
Reconcile spatial scales of existing inventories for EJ communities and those used for regional and regulatory modeling;
Compare top-down versus bottom-up inventories on EJ relevant spatial scales;
Develop appropriate surrogates for leveraging inventories from local scales to improve larger scale inventories;
Develop spatial distribution of electric vehicles activity and future trends.
Research Issue 3: Coupling + Feedbacks between Air Pollution and Meteorology
The highest air pollution exposure events in the western US are now almost exclusively driven by wildfires4. AQMs struggle to predict concentrations on the scales needed to represent complex behavior of fire plumes, therefore we need to improve the fundamental abilities of coupled meteorology-air pollution models to predict fire plume behavior. The key research needs identified are:
New coupled algorithms within weather models that are computationally efficient;
Multiscale models with adaptive grids or meshless techniques.
Research Issue 4: Chemistry of Today and Tomorrow
Challenges faced today in understanding organic aerosol (OA) will become even greater as emissions sources evolve. Current understanding of OA is shaped by chamber experiments; however, the chamber data that are most widely used to underpin air quality models are not adequately reflective of environmental conditions and sources5. The key research needs for more relevant data are:
Laboratory experiments over a wider range of conditions that improve overlap with current and future atmospheric conditions;
Identify methods to best extrapolate from chamber conditions to the atmosphere, i.e., models;
Further expand coverage of OA precursor emissions from traditional internal combustion engines to new fuels, volatile chemical products (VCPs), cooking, asphalt, biomass burning, and more-diverse biogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
Research Issue 5: Consistent Implementation of Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL) Processes in Air Quality and Meteorological Models
Some AQMs employ PBL schemes that differ from the meteorological model, which can produce unintended errors in the air quality simulation. In meteorological models, PBL processes are constrained by continuous implicit feedback between wind and temperature profiles and turbulent parameters6. Without a similar constraint in the AQMs, the transport of chemical species should be applied identically to the meteorological model. The key research needs identified are:
Develop and test new approaches such as: including the chemical species scalars in the same code responsible for meteorological PBL processes and the AQM for on-line integrated meteorology-chemistry models; and using the same PBL module in the meteorological model and the AQM for coupled models;
For PBL models that use non-local gradient adjustment schemes or higher-order closure (i.e., 2rd order or higher), either develop methods to include chemical tracers or assess the error incurred by approximate solutions.
Deployment of a nation-wide, high vertical resolution, profiling network with hourly frequency for both meteorology and chemical measurements for use in model evaluation.
Research Issue 6: Measure and Speciate N-containing and PM Emissions from Fuel Combustion
Large uncertainties in NOx and PM emissions from many in-use combustion sources exist7. Emissions from sources such as off-road mobile, residential equipment, and transportation with locomotive, marine, and aircraft are not well understood. This is especially true for Ammonia (NH3) emissions from NOx control devices, which are likely to increase and are poorly quantified. The key research needs identified are:
Speciated N-containing (Nitric Oxide or NO, Nitrogen Dioxide or NO2, Nitrous Oxide or N2O) and PM emissions from in-use on-road, non-road, and other fuel combustion (e.g., residential);
Determine NO/NO2 emission ratios and NH3 emission factors for different combustion sources;
Improve non-road locomotive, marine, and aircraft emissions data;
Determine extended idling emissions and locations, fleet composition, and defeat device presence of trucks;
Determine deterioration factors for any fuel combustion sources.
Research Issue 7: OA Temperature Dependence
Temperature strongly influences atmospheric OA concentrations, as observations show summertime PM2.5 increases with temperature8. Understanding this temperature dependence and evaluating options for controlling PM2.5 on the hottest days are aspects of aerosol chemistry that test our understanding of process and mechanisms in ways that are different from examination of average concentrations. The key research needs identified are:
Conduct experimental studies that characterize OA temperature dependence for relevant precursors;
Conduct ambient measurements that characterize temperature dependence of Secondary OA (SOA) together with temperature dependence of precursor emissions;
Compare observed OA temperature dependence against AQMs.
Research Issue 8: Urban Biogenic Emissions
Urban vegetation can be a major source of VOCs and a significant contributor to ozone and secondary organic aerosol formation9. Lack of appropriate detail in urban land cover classifications and emission factors can cause uncertainty in urban biogenic emissions. In some cities, such as New York City, biogenic VOCs can be the main VOCs related to ozone formation. The key research needs identified are:
Update urban speciated biogenic emission inventories;
Better parameterization of urban specific emission factors related to stress such as drought and forest edge effects;
Comparison of the emission parameterization of urban vegetation with natural forest or grassland ecosystems;
Improve land cover classification and biomass density maps by leveraging existing and upcoming VPRM (Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model) inputs for CO2 respiration.
Research Issue 8 (tied): Gas-Phase Mechanism Evaluation
Gas-phase reactions are central to understanding atmospheric oxidants, PM, and many toxic air contaminants10. There is an ongoing need for chemical mechanism maintenance and evaluation, as new information emerges, to provide confidence that air quality management strategies are well-grounded. The key research needs identified are:
Conduct gas-phase mechanism evaluation that considers the speciation of odd-hydrogen (Hox) and Noy (sum of NOx and all oxidized atmospheric odd-nitrogen species), the amount of NOx recycled from NOy, sensitivity of ozone production to VOC/NOx ratio, and other factors such as influence of temperature;
Investigate how uncertainties in mechanism parameters influence overall mechanism uncertainty and develop alternate mechanism realizations (e.g., “hot” and “cold” versions of the same mechanism) that support “ensemble” applications of air quality models.
Research Issue 10: Characterization of Global Scale Processes that Act as Boundary Conditions for Cities
As emissions in the US continue to decline, “background” concentrations account for an increasing fraction of the urban air pollution11. Understanding the trends in future concentrations for background pollutants will be critical in planning attainment strategies. Previous studies suggest background concentrations for ozone in the U.S. range between 30 – 60 ppb depending on the location, but there can be large uncertainty in these estimates. The key research needs identified are:
Use global scale models that use the same chemical mechanisms as regional scale models;
Evaluate global scale models to reproduce historical trends in background concentrations, identify critical sources/mechanisms, and project those into the future.
Conclusion
The list of air quality research issues and research needs identified as part of the 2022 AQRN workshop can serve as a guide to research organizations when prioritizing their own research activities. Given limited resources available for research, we encourage different organizations to collaborate to leverage their resources to address issues that may require significant funding (e.g., any research that requires large field/laboratory experiments). The list of issues and research needs can also serve as a guide to researchers who are looking to collaborate with others on these high priority topics. Many research projects could address multiple issues simultaneously.
Acknowledgements
Authors would like to acknowledge funding support from Coordinating Research Council and California Air Resources Board to sponsor the 2022 AQRN workshop, as well as the presenters, and other participants of this workshop for their contribution. The organizing committee of the workshop included the following individuals who contributed significantly to shape the overall objectives, structure, and agenda of the workshop:
Sandy Winkler (co-chair), Ford
Chris Rabideau (co-chair), Chevron
Naresh Kumar (workshop facilitator), Desert Research Institute
Tim French, EMA
Tyler Fox, US EPA
Mike Kleeman, UC Davis
Toshi Kuwayama, California Air Resources Board
Sang-Mi Lee, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Rohit Mathur, US EPA
Footnotes
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the view or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, CRC, and CARB.
References
- 1.Collet S, Guensler R, Beardsley M, Mathur R, and Gao S, Highlights from CRC’s 2016 Air Quality Research Needs Workshop; EM Magazine, July 2016, pp 36–41, 2016.
- 2.Emery C, Liu Z, Russell AG, Odman MT, Yarwood G, and Kumar N, Recommendations on statistics and benchmarks to assess photochemical model performance, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc, 67(5), 582–598, doi: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1265027, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tang Y, Tong DQ, Yang K and Lee P, Air quality impacts of the 2018 Mt. Kilauea Volcano eruption in Hawaii: A regional chemical transport model study with satellite-constrained emissions, Atmos. Env 237:117648, DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117648, 2020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pan K, and Faloona IC, The impacts of wildfires on ozone production and boundary layer dynamics in California’s Central Valley, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 22, 9681–9702, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Porter WC, Jimenez JL and Barsanti KC, Quantifying atmospheric parameter ranges for ambient secondary organic aerosol formation. ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 5(9), pp.2380–2397, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- 6.McNider RT, Pour-Biazar A, Doty K, White A, Wu Y, Qin M, Hu Y, Odman T, Cleary P, Knipping E and Dornblaser B, Examination of the physical atmosphere in the Great Lakes region and its potential impact on air quality—Overwater stability and satellite assimilation. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 57(12), pp.2789–2816, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Holnicki P, Nahorski Z Emission Data Uncertainty in Urban Air Quality Modeling—Case Study. Environ Model Assess 20, 583–597. 10.1007/s10666-015-9445-7, 2015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nussbaumer CM and Cohen RC, Impact of OA on the Temperature Dependence of PM 2.5 in the Los Angeles Basin, Env. Sci. and Tech, 10.1021/acs.est.0c07144, 2021. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 9.Gu S, Guenther A and Faiola C, Effects of anthropogenic and biogenic volatile organic compounds on Los Angeles air quality. Env. Sci. and Tech, 55(18), pp.12191–12201, 2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ren X, Van Duin D, Cazorla M, Chen S, Mao J, Zhang L, Brune WH, Flynn JH, Grossberg N, Lefer BL and Rappenglück B, Atmospheric oxidation chemistry and ozone production: Results from SHARP 2009 in Houston, Texas. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118(11), pp.5770–5780, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nopmongcol O, Jung J, Kumar N, Yarwood G, Changes in US background ozone due to global anthropogenic emissions from 1970 to 2020, Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 140, 446–455, 2016. [Google Scholar]
