Skip to main content
Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases logoLink to Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases
letter
. 2024 Mar 1;16(1):e2024030. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2024.030

Internal Medicine Ward with Hematological Skills for the Treatment of Complications Suffered by Hematological Patients on Therapy: Experience of Villa Betania Hospital in Rome

A Andriani 1,, L Marchetti 1, F Rossi 1, MA Perretti 1, S Raja 1, U Recine 1
PMCID: PMC10927202  PMID: 38468836

To the Editor,

Due to the availability of more and more new biological therapies, outpatient/DH treatment of most hematological patients has become the standard cure regimen. New therapeutic strategies are orally or subcutaneously administrated and only in a few cases intravenously. For these reasons, the majority of patients are treated at home or as an ambulatory/Day Hospital regimen. The Hematological Department admits for treatment in ordinary hospitalization H24 exclusively patient candidates for intensive and high-dose or biological therapies that need strict, continuous, and skillful supervision.

New drugs have different toxicities, not only hematological but also cardiovascular, pulmonary, neurological, and cutaneous. For these reasons, when a side effect occurs, many patients are hospitalized in Internal Medicine wards.1,2 Often, in these departments, physicians should have training to face hematological problems. For this reason, we proposed to activate a section inside the Internal Medicine ward of Villa Betania Hospital in Rome, where a team of hematologists and hospitalists could take care of frail hematological patients with comorbidity or complications of hematologic therapy.

Patients and Methods

From January 2022 to July 2023, 112 pts (53 M, 60 F, median age 77 years) were admitted to our ward, forwarded by various Hematological Departments or by the Emergency Departments of General Hospitals in Rome (Policlinico Umberto I°, S. Filippo Neri, S. Spirito, S. Giovanni, S. Eugenio, S. Andrea and Cristo Re). All patients were followed and treated at home for their hematological disease, and they came to the emergency room due to the complications or progression of the disease; before being transferred to our Department, patients were evaluated by the referring hematologist’s final decision to send them back home or to admit them into hospital. The transfer request was sent by mail or fax to the emergency room together with the patient’s clinical report. The patient admittance in our ward has been granted within 12–72 hours of the invoiced request.

Patient Typology

During the study period, our hospital received 112 requests by mail or fax for admitting patients affected by hematologic disease or complications of hematologic therapy, such as diabetes, cardiac failure, second primary neoplasm, sepsis, other infections, hemorrhages, etc. The main characteristics of patients and the type of hematological disease are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Main characteristics of hematological patients at the address to our Department.

Variables Total (N=112)

Gender, n (%)

 Male 53 (47.32)

 Female 59 (52.68)

Median age, years (range) 80 (41–96)

Hematologic disease, n (%)

 Multiple Myeloma (MM) 26 (23.21)

 Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) 21 (18.75)

 Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) 19 (16.96)

 Acute Leukemia (AL) 7 (6.25)

 Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) 11 (9.82)

 Myelofibrosis (MF) 7 (6.25)

 Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) other than MF 7 (6.25)

 other 14 (12.5)

All admitted patients were assisted with specific therapies according to the specific complications or complaints (transfusional or supportive therapy as antibiotics, hydration, etc.) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Main reasons for hospitalization.

89 out of 112 were referred back to their hematologist; 9 patients were followed after discharge at least once before referring back to sending hematologists; 11 were sent to long-term or motor rehabilitation hospitalization, 3 pts were entrusted to the hospice, 1 patient left without medical consent and 6 pts died for complications. Only 2 pts were sent back to the emergency room for complications during the hospitalization (Table 2).

Table 2.

Days of hospitalization, main treatment and type of discharge.

Variables Total (N=112)
Day of hospitalization, days (range) 9 (1–31)
Main therapy, n (%)*
 Antibiotics 45 (40.18)
 Hematologic disease-specific treatment 17 (15.18)
 RBC transfusions 12 (10.71)
 Supportive therapy for anemia (other than RBC transfusions) 11 (9.82)
 Intravenous fluid therapy 10 (8.93)
 Diagnostic exams 7 (6.25)
 Steroid therapy 6 (5.36)
 Pain therapy 4 (3.57)
Type of discharge
 Planned discharge/referred to his/her hematologist 80 (71.43)
 Planned discharge only after one onsite encounter 9 (8.04)
 Transferred to long-term care unit 8 (7.14)
 Death 6 (5.36)
 Trasferred to hospice 3 (2.68)
 Trasferred to riabilitative units 3 (2.68)
 Trasferred to emergency 2 (1.78)
 Leave against medical advice 1 (0.89)

Discussion and Conclusions

In recent years, the treatment of hematological diseases has been continuously evolving. New target therapies can be administered in ambulatory or in Day-Hospital regimen. More drugs can be taken orally or subcutaneously,3,4 and patients can also be treated at home.5,6 These new modalities of treatments have changed the quality of life of patients, their family, and their habits.7 Certainly, these new types of treatments have led to a bed number reduction in Hematology Departments, reserving them only for the most complex and intensive therapies. These new molecules are more effective in terms of therapeutic results, but they can cause side effects worsening comorbidities which require the internist skills.

An ever-increasing number of hematologic patients on therapy are forced back toward the nearest hospital for complications. In the emergency room only, the acute problem is usually treated. Then, the patients are transferred to medical divisions where hematologists are rarely on duty, and physicians are frequently not used to treating this type of pathology. For this reason, the birth of departments of internal medicine with hematological skills can help and support the outcome of these frail patients.

The median life of the population has been prolonged, so the majority of hematological diseases appear over sixty years in patients with comorbidities, and the possibility of treating complications and comorbidity at the same time can determine a better outcome and survival. For this reason, we have implemented, as a pilot section in a generalist hospital, some beds to admit and treat these patients by a team of hematologists and hospitalists working together.

Our results are encouraging because we have managed to ameliorate the outcome of these particularly frail patients, referring most of them back to their hematological team for continuing specific treatment. Only a few patients died of complications, so almost all patients had their acute medical complications resolved. This type of organization can lighten the workload of hematological departments, integrating more specialists in the treatment of these complex patients. Moreover, we have to consider health cost reduction by employing non-specialist departments, which are less expensive for technical resources and medical personnel than specialist wards.8

In conclusion, this new specific regimen of assistance has achieved its expected goal of taking care of comorbid, frail patients with complications of hematological disease or therapy. An internal medicine department, where hematologists with knowledge of hematological protocols and side effects of the new molecules work together with the hospitalist, can improve the assistance and outcomes of these patients.

Our initiative is the first operating in our city, and the hematological departments have very much welcomed it.

Footnotes

Competing interests: The authors declare no conflict of Interest.

References

  • 1.Low J, Smith A, George S, Roderick P, Davis C. How many patients with haematological malignancy need the facilities offered by a district general hospital? J Public Health Med. 2002 Sep;24(3):196–9. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/24.3.196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Snowden JA, O’Connell S, Hawkins J, Dalley C, Jack A, Mannari D, McNamara C, Scott M, Shenton G, Soilleux E, Macbeth F Guideline Committee. Haematological cancers: improving outcomes. A summary of updated NICE service guidance in relation to Specialist Integrated Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Services (SIHMDS) J Clin Pathol. 2017 Jun;70(6):461–468. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-204029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kim K, Phelps MA. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Daratumumab. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023 Jun;62(6):789–806. doi: 10.1007/s40262-023-01240-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Paul B, Hamadeh I, Atrash S, Bhutani M, Voorhees P, Usmani SZ. Daratumumab subcutaneous formulation for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2020 Nov;20(11):1253–1259. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2020.1806231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.De Angelis G, Fiorini A, Trapè G, Panichi V, Chavez MG, Emanueli Cippitelli E, Innocenti V, Perazzini R, Talucci R, Topini G, Di Veroli A, Mercanti C, Natalino F, Tarnani M, Morucci M, Mastini C, Silvestri A, Andriani A, Montanaro M, Ciambella S, Latagliata R. Subcutaneous Daratumumab at Home Is a Safe and Effective Procedure for Frail Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Myelhome Project Report. Blood. 2023;142(Supplement 1):7242. doi: 10.1182/blood-2023-187362. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sanguinetti JM, Martínez D, Dimase F, Streich G, Castro P, Vega V, Batagelj E. Patient Safety and Satisfaction in Home Chemotherapy. Home Healthc Now. 2021;39:139–144. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lüthi F, Fucina N, Divorne N, Santos-Eggimann B, Currat-Zweifel C, Rollier P, Wasserfallen JB, Ketterer N, Leyvraz S. Home care--a safe and attractive alternative to inpatient administration of intensive chemotherapies. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:575–81. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1125-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Joo EH, Rha SY, Ahn JB, Kang HY. Economic and patient-reported outcomes of outpatient home-based versus inpatient hospital-based chemotherapy for patients with colorectal cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2011;19:971–8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0917-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Catholic University in Rome

RESOURCES