Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 11.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Catal. 2023 Aug 16;13(17):11522–11527. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c01789

1,2-Diborylsilanes: Catalytic Enantioselective Synthesis and Site-Selective Cross-Coupling

Ziyin Kong 1, Weipeng Hu 1, James P Morken 1
PMCID: PMC10927258  NIHMSID: NIHMS1972320  PMID: 38469392

Abstract

A Pt-catalyzed enantioselective hydrosilylation of (Z)-1,2-diborylethylene provides a 1,2-diboryl-1-silylalkane that can be used in catalytic cross-coupling reactions. Depending on the catalyst employed and the cross-coupling reaction conditions, the coupling can occur at either α or β relative to the silane center.

Keywords: Organoboron Compounds, Catalysis, Silanes, Enantioselective Catalysis, Cross–Coupling

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1972320-f0001.jpg


Due to their high reactivity and their ability to undergo stereospecific transformations, chiral organometallic compounds are valuable reagents in modern organic chemistry.1 Amongst these species, structures bearing two or more organometallic groups can be employed to address complexity-generating synthesis via sequential chemoselective transformations.2 As alternatives to reactive organometallic reagents such as organolithium compounds3 or Grignard reagents, organoboron and organosilicon reagents have attracted attention in recent years due to their configurational stability, low-toxicity, and versatility.4 These compounds can undergo an array of C–C and C–heteroatom bond formation via transition metal catalyzed cross-coupling reactions such as the Suzuki–Miyaura5 and Hiyama–Denmark reactions.6 While significant effort has been directed towards the preparation and utilization of motifs bearing multiple boronic esters such as diboryl7 and triborylalkanes8, due to challenges in the stereoselective synthesis of requisite reagents, the utility of dimetallic reagents bearing silanes is less explored. Considering the polyfunctionalization that might emanate from silylborylalkanes9, we initiated studies on a modular route to these materials along with a study of their transformations.

Often employed as carbanion precursors or masked alcohols, organosilanes possess unique electronic properties. Despite the large size of silanes, the elongated Si–C bond distance reduces steric hindrance10 while still offering electronic modulation of reactivity due to the α11 and β12 silicon effect. These unique properties offer useful reactivity to silylboronate intermediates, especially geminal borylsilylalkanes.13 It was hypothesized that a chiral trifunctional diborylsilylalkane might allow sequential functionalization thereby affording useful routes to enantiomerically-enriched building blocks. Pioneering investigations by Yun showed that these reagents could be prepared by enantioselective Cu-catalyzed double borylation of silylacetylenes (Figure 1a).14 As an alternate route, the Chen group accessed α-silyl-β-boryl-allylboronates by diboration of allenylsilanes (Figure 1b).15 Whereas these two studies examined oxidation and allylation of diborylsilylalkanes, studies in cross-coupling have not been undertaken. Addressing related compounds, regioselective coupling of enantiomerically-enriched vicinal bis(boronates) with either palladium catalysts,16 or copper catalysts (Figure 1c)17 have been described. These processes occur by transmetalation at the less hindered primary boronate, followed by coupling with the electrophile. In this connection, our interest in examining 1,2-diborylsilanes (1, Figure 1d), compounds that contain the structural features of both vicinal bis(boronates) and α-boryl silanes, derives from fundamental questions about whether the boronate or the silyl group participates in transmetalation preferentially, whether the site-selectivity of coupling depends on the nature of the catalyst, and whether steric effects or electronic effects dictate regioselectivity of coupling.11 In this report we show that coupling of electrophiles can be controlled by the catalyst and offers a route for the rapid synthesis of diverse molecules based on the simple diborylsilane skeleton.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(a) Catalytic enantioselective preparation of 1,2-diborylsilanes from alkynes. (b) Enantioselective diboration of allenylsilanes. (c) Catalytic coupling reactions involving vicinal bis(boronates). (d) This work: complementary site-selective couplings of 1,2-diboryl-1-silylalkanes

Expecting that 1,2-diboryl-1-silylalkanes might be useful chiral building blocks, we initiated studies on the development of a method to prepare these compounds in a catalytic asymmetric fashion. Strategies involving enantioselective diboration18 of vinylsilanes19 were examined first and as depicted in Figure 2A (entries 1–4, see Supporting Information for additional data) either provided modest yield or modest selectivity. We suspect that the diminished selectivity relative to reactions of 1-alkenes and styrenes20 results from an elongated C–Si bond that results in lessened catalyst substrate interaction. As an alternative method, Pt-catalyzed hydrosilylation of diboryl ethylene was examined and was found to occur with good efficiency (entries 5–13).21 The requisite (Z)-diborylethylene (2) could be accessed in quantitative yield from Zr-mediated reduction of diborylacetylene.22 Examination of a collection of taddol-derived phosphoramidite ligands revealed L6 (Figure 2B, entries 11, 12) to be highly effective, providing quantitative yield and 94:6 er when the reaction was conducted in THF solvent. Other taddol-derived ligands were also surveyed and gave moderate reactivity and enantioselectivity (Figure 2B, entries 5–10). Of note, because (Z)-2 is symmetrically substituted, its reaction doesn’t suffer from regiochemical concerns and, in a quadrant diagram analysis23(Figure 2C), the two prochiral faces of the alkene are well distinguished. The use of the (Z)-diborylethylene was crucial to obtain a high level of enantioselectivity, as the analogous (E)-diborylalkene reacted with diminished selectivity despite furnishing the same enantiomer of product (entry 13). Quadrant diagram analysis (Figure 2C) suggests that steric bulk from the catalyst ensemble may extend from quadrant a into quadrant b thereby enhancing selectivity for the cis alkene but diminishing selectivity for the trans alkene. In addition to Me2PhSiH, Me2PMPSiH, Me2BnSiH and Et3SiH also showed high reactivity and modest to good enantioselectivity (entries 14–16, Figure 2B).

Figure 2. Development of a Catalytic Enantioselective Synthesis of Silyldiboronates.

Figure 2.

A. Diboration of vinyl silanes. B. Hydrosilation of 1,2-diborylethylene. C. Analysis of selectivity with cis versus trans substrates. aYields are of isolated material after purification by column chromatography. Reactions were carried out with 0.20 mmol of substrate and 1 mL of solvent. bReaction carried out using (E)- diborylalkene.

With a route to chiral enantiomerically-enriched 1,2-diboryl organosilanes established, we initiated studies on the reactivity of these species. Initial studies focused on the copper-catalyzed reaction of racemic 1,2-diborylsilanes, which were readily prepared by diboration of commercially available dimethylphenylvinylsilane.24,25 Similar to previous studies on copper-catalyzed coupling of vicinal diboronates17, CuCN was initially employed as catalyst for coupling reactions with allyl bromide serving as the electrophile. In contrast to reactions with 1,2-diborylalkanes, when the 1,2-diborylsilane 1a was used as the substrate, the reaction occurred at the more substituted carbon and produced allylation product 3a as a single regioisomer (Figure 3). We considered that the reversal of regioselectivity might arise as a result of α silicon effect: during transmetalation, the incipient σC–Cu may be stabilized by donation into the adjacent σ*C–Si.26 To probe the role of the vicinal diboronate motif, experiments with α-boryl silane 4 and β-boryl silanes 5 and 6 were also conducted. These reactions did not provide any product and returned the substrate unchanged thereby indicating the activating effect of the 1,2-diboryl motif in facilitating the reaction of substrates 1a and 1e.

Figure 3. Copper-catalyzed coupling of allyl bromide with diborylsilanes (1).

Figure 3.

Reaction of other borylsilanes (4–6) do not provide product.

With coupling conditions identified, we briefly examined the impact of reaction conditions and found CuCN●2 LiCl consistently provided the highest yields. The scope of the coupling was then examined with different classes of electrophiles (Figure 4). As noted in previous studies,17 Cu complexes are known to engage a broad array of electrophiles. In addition to allyl bromide, electrophiles bearing other leaving groups such as allyl chloride, allyl iodide and allyl phosphate reacted with a similar level of efficiency (7). Functionalized allyl electrophiles were also found to be effective coupling partners. Aromatic, aliphatic, and halogenated substituents were well-tolerated and their presence did not alter the course of the reaction (products 812). Of note, the 2-silyl-4-alkenol products of this reaction sequence have been employed by others in stereoselective electrophile-induced cyclization.27,28 Coupling reactions with trichloropropene gave the dichloroalkene 12 as product, which could be transformed into an ester functional group in one step.29 In addition, SN2’ coupling to substituted primary propargylic bromides afforded substituted terminal allenes (1318) bearing different functional groups. These homoallenylsilanes are valuable synthetic intermediates and can undergo further chemoselective transformation.30,31,32 Base-sensitive functional groups such as an alkyl bromide and an alkenyl silane survived the reaction intact. While most propargylic bromides gave rise to SN2’ product, triisopropylsilyl (TIPS) protected propargyl bromide gave SN2 product (19) only, presumably due to increased steric demand. Copper-catalyzed coupling with functionalized alkynyl bromides provided access to propargylic silanes 2026, which were previously prepared via Cu-catalyzed 1,4-addition conjugate of silicon nucleophiles to alkyne-containing enones,33 or alkynyl carbene insertion into Si−H bonds.34 Apart from aryl- and alkyl-substituted alkynes, alkenyl substituents were also incorporated in the product. Lastly, with access to enantiomerically enriched substrate 1 from enantioselective hydrosilylation, we examined the stereospecificity of coupling reactions. The products of coupling to allyl (R-7, Figure 4), propargyl (R-15) and alkynyl (R-23) electrophiles occurred with near-perfect stereospecificity delivering chiral silane products. For compounds 20 and 7, the overall process was determined to occur with retention of configuration at carbon by correlation of both the starting material and the product with compounds of known configuration.

Figure 4. Scope of the Cu-catalyzed cross-coupling of α-boryl silylboronates and organic electrophiles.

Figure 4.

Yields are of isolated material after purification by column chromatography.

With the knowledge that cooperative Pd/Cu co-catalysis might allow coupling of aromatic electrophiles,35 , 36 we envisioned that the alkyl−Cu intermediate derived from diborylsilanes 1 might undergo Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling. Probing this strategy, 5 mol% of Pd(OAc)2/Ruphos and an aryl bromide were introduced into the copper-catalyzed coupling reactions (Figure 5). After purification of the reaction mixture, the corresponding coupling products were obtained in synthetically useful yield for several substrates. In general, electron-rich aromatic electrophiles were effective coupling partners regardless of their steric encumbrance. When alkenyl electrophiles were engaged in the reaction, the process delivered allylsilanes (33, 34), which are versatile reagents in organic synthesis.37,38 Lastly, similar to the examples in Figure 3, when enantiomerically-enriched substrate was employed in the reaction, this co-catalyzed coupling occurred with useful levels of enantiospecificity (91% es for 27, 86% es for 28) and comparison of the product configuration to the substrate configuration showed the reaction occurred with net retention of configuration at carbon.

Figure 5. Scope of the Cu/Pd synergistic catalyzed cross-coupling of α-boryl silylboronates and organic electrophiles.

Figure 5.

Yields are of isolated material after purification by column chromatography. aP(i-Pr)3(6 mol%) was used instead of Ruphos.

While the Cu-catalyzed cross-coupling reaction with LiOMe as the activator resulted in regioselective coupling α to the silyl group, coupling at the site β to the silicon group could be effected with alternate activation conditions. As depicted in Figure 6, when the diborylsilane 1 was subjected to Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reaction in the absence of copper cyanide, efficient cross-coupling with the primary boronic ester was observed.16 We suspect the small size and linear nature of CuCN allow it to transmetalate at the more hindered secondary boronate and benefit from the a-silicon effect, whereas the dramatically increased steric demand of a four-coordinate ligand-bearing palladium center prohibits transmetalation at the more encumbered site thereby resulting in the observed product. As expected, the configuration at the pre-existing stereocenter is essentially unperturbed during the coupling and it is notable that this cross-coupling could be extended to a series of other electrophilic substrates to furnish 3641. The geminal silylboronates that arise from this reaction are known to be useful building blocks in the construction of allylsilanes, aminosilanes, amino alcohol derivative.21, 39

Figure 6. Direct Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling of a β-silyl boronate with C(sp2) bromide electrophiles.

Figure 6.

Yields are of isolated material after purification by column chromatography.

A last feature that was probed with respect to synthesis utility, was the possibility of conducting single flask hydrosilation/coupling sequences in such a way that the intermediate diborylsilane need not be isolated (Figure 7). Thus, starting from the (Z)-diborylethylene, Pt-catalyzed hydrosilylation and in situ Cu-catalyzed cross-coupling with allyl bromide furnished vicinal silylboronate (S)-7 in good yield and enantioselectivity. Similarly, Pt-catalyzed hydrosilylation followed by in situ Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling with bromobenzene afforded geminal silylboronate (R)-35 in good yield and enantioselectivity.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Single-flask sequential catalytic hydrosilylation/Cu-catalyzed allylation of 1,2-bis(boryl)ethylene and single-flask sequential catalytic hydrosilylation/Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling.

In summary, we have demonstrated the regiodivergent transformation of 1,2-diborylsilanes by transition-metal catalyzed stereospecific reactions to afford functionalized organosilane products. The requisite reagents could be prepared with high level of enantiomeric purity by Pt-catalyzed enantioselective hydrosilylation. This method offers a synthetic route to useful silicon-containing building blocks in an efficient fashion.

Supplementary Material

Supp Info

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by instrument grants from the NSF MRI (CHE2117246) and the NIH (S10 1S10OD026910).

Funding Sources

This work was supported by a grant from the NIH (NIGMS R35GM127140 to J.P.M.)

Footnotes

Supporting Information

Procedures, characterization, and spectral data. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

REFERENCES

  • (1).Cherney AH; Kadunce NT; Reisman SE Enantioselective and Enantiospecific Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions of Organometallic Reagents to Construct C-C Bonds. Chem. Rev 2015, 115, 9587–9652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Morken JP 4.16 Bismetallation and Bismetallative Reaction of Alkenes, Alkynes, and Allenes. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Knochel P Ed.; Elsevier, 2014; pp 939–960. [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Perez M; Fananas-Mastral M; Bos PH; Rudolph A; Harutyunyan SR; Feringa BL Catalytic asymmetric carbon-carbon bond formation via allylic alkylations with organolithium compounds. Nat. Chem 2011, 3, 377–381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).For selected reviews on organoboron:; (a) Hall DG Structure, Properties, and Preparation of Boronic Acid Derivatives. In Boronic Acids: Preparation and Applications in Organic Synthesis, Medicine and Materials, 2nd ed.; Hall DG Ed.; Wiley-VCH, 2011; pp 1–133. [Google Scholar]; (b) Fernández E; Whiting A Synthesis and Applications of Organoboron Compounds. Topics in Organometallic Chemistry; Springer: Heidelberg, Berlin, 2015. [Google Scholar]; For selected reviews on organosilicon:; (c) Denmark SE; Sweis RF Organosilicon Compounds in Cross-Coupling Reactions. In Metal‐Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions, 2nd ed.; de Meijere A Diederich F Eds.; Wiley-VCH, 2004; pp 163–216. [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Miyaura N; Suzuki A Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions of Organoboron Compounds. Chem. Rev 1995, 95, 2457–2483. [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Denmark SE; Regen CS Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions of Organosilanols and Their Salts: Practical Alternatives to Boron- and Tin-Based Methods. Acc. Chem. Res 2008, 41, 1486–1499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Lee Y; Han S; Cho SH Catalytic Chemo- and Enantioselective Transformations of gem-Diborylalkanes and (Diborylmethyl)metallic Species. Acc. Chem. Res 2021, 54, 3917–3929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Salvado O; Fernandez E Tri(boryl)alkanes and Tri(boryl)-alkenes: the Versatile Reagents. Molecules 2020, 25, 1758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Sun W; Hu Y; Xia C; Liu C Recent Advances in the Synthesis and Transformation of gem-Borylsilylalkanes. New J. Chem 2021, 45, 14847–14854. [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Fleming I; Barbero A; Walter D Stereochemical Control in Organic Synthesis Using Silicon-Containing Compounds. Chem. Rev 1997, 97, 2063–2192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).(a) Ager DJ Preparation of α-silyl carbanions. J. Org. Chem 1984, 49, 168–170. [Google Scholar]; (b) Wetzel DM; Brauman JI Quantitative Measure of α-Silyl Carbanion Stabilization. The Electron Affinity of (Trimethylsilyl)Methyl Radical. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1988, 110, 8333–8336. [Google Scholar]; (c) Brinkman EA; Berger S; Brauman JI α-Silyl-Substituent Stabilization of Carbanions and Silyl Anions. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1994, 116, 8304–8310. [Google Scholar]
  • (12).(a) Lambert JB; Zhao Y; Emblidge RW; Salvador LA; Liu X; So JH; Chelius EC The β Effect of Silicon and Related Manifestations of Sigma Conjugation. Acc. Chem. Res 1999, 32, 183–190. [Google Scholar]; (b) Haines BE; Sarpong R; Musaev DG Generality and Strength of Transition Metal β-Effects. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 10612–10618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Roberts DD; McLaughlin MG Strategic Applications of the β-Silicon Effect. Adv. Synth. Catal 2022, 364, 2307–2332. [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Zhang C; Hu W; Morken JP α-Boryl Organometallic Reagents in Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis. Acs. Catal 2021, 11, 10660–10680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Jung HY; Yun J Copper-Catalyzed Double Borylation of Silylacetylenes: Highly Regio- and Stereoselective Synthesis of syn-Vicinal Diboronates. Org. Lett 2012, 14, 2606–2609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Chen J; Gao S; Chen M Stereoselective Syntheses of γ, δ-Bifunctionalized Homoallylic Alcohols and Ethers via Chemoselective Allyl Addition to Aldehydes. Org. Lett 2019, 21, 9893–9897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Mlynarski SN; Schuster CH; Morken JP Asymmetric Synthesis from Terminal Alkenes by Cascades of Diboration and Cross-Coupling. Nature 2014, 505, 386–390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Xu N; Kong Z; Wang JZ; Lovinger GJ; Morken JP Copper-Catalyzed Coupling of Alkyl Vicinal Bis(boronic Esters) to an Array of Electrophiles. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2022, 144, 17815–17823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Neeve EC; Geier SJ; Mkhalid IAI; Westcott SA; Marder TB Diboron(4) Compounds: From Structural Curiosity to Synthetic Workhorse. Chem. Rev 2016, 116, 9091–9161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Harb HY; Collins KD; Altur JVG; Bowker S; Campbell L; Procter DJ SmI2-Mediated Radical Cyclizations Directed by a C−Si Bond. Org. Lett 2010, 12, 5446–5449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Coombs JR; Haeffner F; Kliman LT; Morken JP Scope and Mechanism of the Pt-Catalyzed Enantioselective Diboration of Monosubstituted Alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135, 11222–11231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Szymaniak AA; Zhang C; Coombs JR; Morken JP, Enantioselective Synthesis of Nonracemic Geminal Silylboronates by Pt-Catalyzed Hydrosilylation. Acs. Catal 2018, 8, 2897–2901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Kang YK; Deria P; Carroll PJ; Therien MJ, Synthesis of Water-Soluble Poly(p-phenyleneethynylene) in Neat Water under Aerobic Conditions via Suzuki-Miyaura Polycondensation Using a Diborylethyne Synthon. Org. Lett 2008, 10, 1341–1344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).For a discussion of alkene substitution and geometry on selectivity, see:; Gladysz JA; Boone BJ Chiral Recognition in π Complexes of Alkenes, Aldehydes, and Ketones with Transition Metal Lewis Acids; Development of a General Model for Enantioface Binding Selectivities. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl 1997, 36, 550–583. [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Nóvoa L; Trulli L; Parra A; Tortosa M, Stereoselective Diboration of Spirocyclobutenes: A Platform for the Synthesis of Spirocycles with Orthogonal Exit Vectors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2021, 60, 11763–11768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Kliman LT; Mlynarski SN; Morken JP, Pt-Catalyzed Enantioselective Diboration of Terminal Alkenes with B2(pin)2. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2009, 131, 13210–13211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Fleming I Molecular Orbitals and the Structures of Organic Molecules. In Molecular Orbitals and Organic Chemical Reactions, 1st ed.; Fleming I Ed.; Wiley; 2010; pp 69–25. [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Sakurai H; Imai T; Hosomi A, Preparation of Cyclopropyl-Methyl Ketones From 3-Butenylsilane and Acid Chloride. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 18, 4045–4048. [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Andrey O; Glanzmann C; Landais Y; Parra-Rapado L, 1,3-Asymmetric Induction in Electrophilic Addition onto Homoallylsilanes. An Approach Towards the Total Synthesis of (+/−)-Kumausyne. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 2835–2854. [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Ma X; Herzon SB, Synthesis of Ketones and Esters from Heteroatom-Functionalized Alkenes by Cobalt-Mediated Hydrogen Atom Transfer. J. Org. Chem 2016, 81, 8673–8695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Ho Lee P; Bang K; Lee K; Lee CH; Chang S, In-Mediated Synthesis of 2-(2-Hydroxyethyl)Homoallenylsilanes. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 7521–7524. [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Yang C; Liu ZL; Dai DT; Li Q; Ma WW; Zhao M; Xu YH, Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Protosilylation and Protoborylation of 2-Trifluoromethyl Enynes for Synthesis of Functionalized Allenes. Org. Lett 2020, 22, 1360–1367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Li Q; Wang ZL; Lu HX; Xu YH, Copper-Catalyzed Enantioselective 1,4-Protosilylation of Alkynyl-substituted Enones to Synthesize the Highly Diastereomeric Chiral Homoallenylsilanes. Org. Lett 2022, 24, 2832–2836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Mao W; Oestreich M, Enantioselective Synthesis of α-Chiral Propargylic Silanes by Copper-Catalyzed 1,4-Selective Addition of Silicon Nucleophiles to Enyne-Type α, β, γ, δ-Unsaturated Acceptors. Org. Lett 2020, 22, 8096–8100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Yang LL; Ouyang J; Zou HN; Zhu SF; Zhou QL, Enantioselective Insertion of Alkynyl Carbenes into Si–H Bonds: An Efficient Access to Chiral Propargylsilanes and Allenylsilanes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2021, 143, 6401–6406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Allen AE; MacMillan DWC, Synergistic catalysis: A powerful synthetic strategy for new reaction development. Chem. Sci 2012, 3, 633–658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Dorn SK; Brown MK, Cooperative Pd/Cu Catalysis for Alkene Arylboration: Opportunities for Divergent Reactivity. Acs. Catal 2022, 12, 2058–2063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Chabaud L; James P; Landais Y, Allylsilanes in Organic Synthesis − Recent Developments. Eur. J. Org. Chem 2004, 2004, 3173–3199. [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Marshall JA, Chiral Allylic and Allenic Metal Reagents for Organic Synthesis. J. Org. Chem 2007, 72, 8153–8166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (39).(a) Meng F; Jang H; Hoveyda AH Exceptionally E- and α-Selective NHC-Cu-Catalyzed Proto-Silyl Additions to Terminal Alkynes and Site- and Enantioselective Proto-Boryl Additions to the Resulting Vinylsilanes: Synthesis of Enantiomerically Enriched Vicinal and Geminal Borosilanes. Chem. - Eur. J 2013, 19, 3204–3214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kim J; Cho SH Access to Enantioenriched Benzylic 1,1-Silylboronate Rsters by Palladium-Catalyzed Enantiotopic-Group Selective Suzuki–Miyaura Coupling of (Diborylmethyl)silanes with Aryl Iodides. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 230–235 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp Info

RESOURCES