Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2024 Feb 27;121(10):e2318537121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2318537121

Three-atom-wide gold quantum rods with periodic elongation and strongly polarized excitons

Lianshun Luo a,1, Zhongyu Liu a,1, Jie Kong b,1, Christopher G Gianopoulos c, Isabelle Coburn a, Kristin Kirschbaum c, Meng Zhou b,2, Rongchao Jin a,2
PMCID: PMC10927531  PMID: 38412123

Significance

Ultrasmall gold nanoparticles (e.g., comprising only dozens of atoms per core) become nonmetallic due to strong quantum size effects, manifested in the disappearance of plasmon excitation and emergence of multiple excitons in the optical absorption spectrum. While this plasmon-to-exciton transition has been clear in spherical particles, it remains unclear in non-spherical (or anisotropic) cases such as rods. In early theory, plasmon-like features in quantum rods (QRs) of gold were predicted but there has been no experimental success yet. In the current work, we have experimentally attained a periodic series of gold QRs (Au42 to Au114 protected by the same thiolate), which exhibit unusual optical properties and shed light on the theoretical prediction more than a decade ago.

Keywords: atomically precise nanoclusters, 3-atom diameter quantum rods, gold, optical properties

Abstract

Atomically precise control over anisotropic nanoclusters constitutes a grand challenge in nanoscience. In this work, we report our success in achieving a periodic series of atomically precise gold quantum rods (abbrev. Au QRs) with unusual excitonic properties. These QRs possess hexagonal close-packed kernels with a constant three-atom diameter but increasing aspect ratios (ARs) from 6.3 to 18.7, all being protected by the same thiolate (SR) ligand. The kernels of the QRs are in a Au1–(Au3)n–Au1 configuration (where n is the number of Au3 layers) and follow a periodic elongation with a uniform Au18(SR)12 increment consisting of four Au3 layers. These Au QRs possess distinct HOMO–LUMO gaps (Eg = 0.6 to 1.3 eV) and exhibit strongly polarized excitonic transition along the longitudinal direction, resulting in very intense absorption in the near-infrared (800 to 1,700 nm). While excitons in gapped systems and plasmons in gapless systems are distinctly different types of excitations, the strongly polarized excitons in Au QRs surprisingly exhibit plasmon-like behaviors manifested in the shape-induced polarization, very intense absorption (~106 M−1 cm−1), and linear scaling relations with the AR, all of which resemble the behaviors of conventional metallic-state Au nanorods (i.e., gapless systems), but the QRs possess distinct gaps and very long excited-state lifetimes (10 to 2,122 ns), which hold promise in applications such as near-infrared solar energy utilization, hot carrier generation and transfer. The observation of plasmon-like behaviors from single-electron transitions in Au QRs elegantly bridges the distinct realms of single-electron and collective-electron excitations and may stimulate more research on excitonics and plasmonics.


Exciton (i.e., single-electron transition in a gapped system) and plasmon (i.e., collective-electron excitation in a gapless system) are two distinctive types of excitation in materials. The plasmon excitation, as a collective and coherent oscillation of conduction electrons, imparts metal nanostructures (14) such as gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) and doped semiconductor quantum dots (5) (e.g., Cu2xSe) with elegant optical properties, which have attracted multidisciplinary scientific interest. Among the plasmonic metals, Au NPs (e.g., 5 to 100 nm) have been extensively pursued. As the dimensions of Au NPs decrease to a critical threshold, e.g., ~2.2 nm, the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) vanishes due to an evolution from metallic to nonmetallic state and the electronic structure quantization (6, 7). These ultrasmall Au NPs, called nanoclusters (NCs), display discrete energy levels and multiple optical absorption peaks of excitonic nature (8, 9). The plasmon-to-exciton transition has been clear in spherical particles, (7, 9) but it remains unclear in non-spherical (or anisotropic) cases. In theoretical work, single-electron transition between HOMO–LUMO in ultrasmall Au and Ag quantum rods (QRs) has been computationally proved to induce plasmonic behaviors (10), such as the redshift of the longitudinal excitation with increasing aspect ratio (AR) (11). Apparently, classical electrodynamics can no longer describe such quantum systems. From a quantum mechanical perspective, multiple criteria have been put forth for defining the plasmon in such QRs (1215), but there are conflicting classifications of the longitudinal excited states of the QRs when using either collectivity or transition dipole moments as the criteria (16, 17). In some work, the electron–electron interaction scaling parameter was used for identifying the plasmon nature against single-electron transitions (18). It is noteworthy that all the calculations and criteria were based on bare QRs (without ligand protection) (19, 20), which are not possible for experimental testing, and the structures of bare QRs are difficult to obtain. Other than metal systems, plasmon research has also extended to the doped quantum dots (e.g., Ag2Se and Cu2Se QDs) (5), which exhibit plasmons in the infrared region when a sufficient number of carriers are doped into the quantized band (21). In both metal and semiconductor systems, some fundamental questions are i) whether few-carrier quantum systems can exhibit SPRs (21), and ii) how the particle shape (e.g., QRs) affects the quantized electronic transition (8). We aim to synthesize ligand-protected QRs with well-defined structures to investigate the potentially unusual excitonic or plasmonic behavior of peculiar quantum systems (10, 11), which may reconcile the existing discrepancies in theory (1020) and shed light on the profound exciton–plasmon relationship.

Here, we report a periodic series of atomically precise Au QRs with a constant three-atom diameter and varying AR from 6.3 to 18.7, including Au42(PET)32, Au60(PET)44, Au78(PET)56, Au96(PET)68, and Au114(PET)80, where PET = 2-phenylethanethiolate. These ultrasmall Au QRs possess hexagonal-close packed (hcp) kernels in a Au1–(Au3)n–Au1 configuration (where n is the number of Au3 layers) and follow a periodic elongation by four Au3 layers. The optical spectra of these Au QRs (with Eg = 0.6 to 1.3 eV) exhibit an absorption peak in the visible region and an intense peak in the near-infrared (NIR) that is tunable by the AR, akin to their larger plasmonic nanorods (e.g., >10 nm). Theoretical simulations reveal that the longitudinal NIR peak arises from the HOMO–LUMO transition and is strongly polarized. The NIR peak wavelength and strong absorption coefficient exhibit linear scaling relations with the AR, in agreement with the behaviors of conventional nanorods, but the Au QRs have much longer excited-state lifetimes (10 to 2,122 ns). Such unusual behaviors in Au QRs reveal profound relationships between single- and collective-electron excitations in peculiar quantum systems. These Au QRs hold promise in NIR solar energy utilization, quantum emitting, and optoelectronic applications.

Results and Discussion

The series of Au QRs was synthesized by an optimized NHC-mediated method (NHC = N-heterocyclic carbene), (22) which involved two primary steps: 1) the production of insoluble Au(I)-SR polymers and 2) the subsequent reduction of Au(I)-SR using sodium borohydride (see SI Appendix, Fig. S1 for details). Five Au NCs were separated by thin-layer chromatography, which were further extracted with dichloromethane to obtain pure products (Fig. 1A and SI Appendix, Fig. S2). Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) analyses of these five products show peaks corresponding to [Au42(PET)32+2Cs]2+, [Au60(PET)44]2+, [Au78(PET)56]4+, [Au96(PET)68]4+, and [Au114(PET)80]4+ (Fig. 1 BF), note: the charges are caused by ESI. The experimental isotope patterns match well with the calculated patterns, confirming the formulas of these five NCs. The experimental isotope patterns generally match well with the calculated ones, confirming the formulas of the five NCs. The slight deviation (<1 amu) in [Au42(PET)32+2Cs]2+ and [Au78 (PET)56]4+ should be caused by the low signal-to-noise ratio of the peaks. Among these five NCs, a constant mass increment corresponding to Au18(PET)12 was observed, hinting at a recurring structural evolution (vide infra), i.e., a periodic series.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

(A) Thin-layer chromatography separation (Upper part) of Au42(PET)32, Au60(PET)44, Au78(PET)56, Au96(PET)68, and Au114(PET)80 from the product mixture, and the photographs (Lower part) of purified Au QRs dissolved in DCM. (BF) ESI mass spectra (Upper parts) of Au42(PET)32, Au60(PET)44, Au78(PET)56, Au96(PET)68, and Au114(PET)80, with the Lower parts showing the experimental isotope patterns of [Au42(PET)32+2Cs]2+ (m/z at 6464.81), [Au60(PET)44]2+ (m/z at 8927.96), [Au78(PET)56]4+ (m/z at 5762.18), [Au96(PET)68]4+ (m/z at 7059.90), [Au114(PET)80]4+ (m/z at 8357.99), and the simulated patterns (black).

The structures of Au42 and Au60 were solved by X-ray crystallography. The Au42 QR possesses a rod-shaped hcp Au20 kernel comprising six layers of Au3 stacked in an a-b-a-b-a-b manner, with two more Au atoms capping the two ends (i.e., Au1–(Au3)6–Au1) (Fig. 2 A, Left) (22, 23). The two ends of the Au20 kernel are protected by two pairs of interlocked Au4(PET)5 motifs exhibiting a ∼90° rotation relative to each other (marked in green and light green), and the body of the kernel is further protected by six monomeric Au(PET)2 motifs (marked in icy blue). Here, we further determined the structure of Au60 by growing single crystals, followed by X-ray crystallography analysis (SI Appendix, Table S1). Similar to Au42, Au60 also exhibits a rod-shaped structure consisting of an Au32 kernel with ten Au3 layers arranged in a hcp pattern, and two more Au atoms cap the two ends, forming a Au1–(Au3)10–Au1 sequence (Fig. 2 A, Right). Two pairs of interlocked Au4(PET)5 motifs shield the two ends of the kernel, and 12 Au(PET)2 motifs are attached to the body of the kernel. A detailed comparison between Au42 and Au60 unveils a distinct evolution in the structural elongation. Compared to Au42, the kernel of Au60 comprises four extra Au3 layers (marked in violet, Fig. 2A) encircled by six Au(PET)2 motifs, which forms the Au18(PET)12 elongation unit (Fig. 2B and SI Appendix, Fig. S3). This elongation unit is consistent with the mass difference observed in ESI-MS analysis. Therefore, Au60 is an elongated version of the Au42 structure along the long axis.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

(A) Illustration of the structural evolution from Au42 to Au60. (B) Twelve Au(PET)2 motifs wrapping the Au32 kernel of Au60 along the C3 axis. (C) Structure schematic of Au42, Au60, Au78, Au96, and Au114 with kernel length ranging from 19.76 to 58.79 Å. Color code: yellow = S, other colors = Au, carbon tails are omitted for clarity.

Based on the two determined rod structures, the constant mass difference, and similar optical spectral features of the QR series, we infer that Au78, Au96, and Au114 should be further elongated structures along the long axis, with one, two, and three more Au18(PET)12 elongation units added to the Au60, respectively (Fig. 2C and SI Appendix, Figs. S4–S6). The rod-shaped kernels of Au42, Au60, Au78, Au96, and Au114 share the same radius (3.15 Å, for a circle of Au3 atomic centers), whereas the length exhibits a step-wise increase from 19.76 Å for Au42 to 29.38 Å for Au60, 39.02 Å for Au78, 48.87 Å for Au96, and 58.79 Å for Au114. Therefore, the ARs of the kernels for Au42, Au60, Au78, Au96, and Au114 are 6.3, 9.3, 12.4, 15.5, and 18.7, respectively. Such slender QRs (with AR > 10) are quite rare yet sufficiently stable (SI Appendix, Fig. S7). The ARs of conventional Au NRs are typically below 10.

The optical absorption spectra of the five QRs are shown in Fig. 3A and SI Appendix, Figs. S8–S12. All QRs exhibit an absorption peak at ~400 nm (nearly constant) and an intense NIR-absorption peak that is AR-dependent, resembling the spectra of conventional Au nanorods (e.g., >10 nm) (1 to 3). Specifically, the NIR peaks of QRs are located at 806 nm (molar absorption coefficient ε = 1.08 × 105 M−1 cm−1) for Au42, 1,076 nm (ε = 2.97 × 105 M−1 cm−1) for Au60, 1,310 nm (ε = 6.08 × 105 M−1 cm−1) for Au78, 1,528 nm (ε = 9.06 × 105 M−1 cm−1) for Au96, and 1,727 nm (ε = 7.28 × 105 M−1 cm−1) for Au114 (SI Appendix, Figs. S13–S17). The strong NIR-absorption is exceptional given the ultrasmall sizes of these QRs [c.f., ε = 103–4 M−1 cm−1 for typical NCs (8), which are two orders of magnitude lower]. While previous work reported rod-shaped NCs, such as Au37 (i.e., a linear assembly of three icosahedral Au13 units via vertex sharing, AR~3) (24), their low ARs did not lead to similar features as in the current QRs. We further determined the optical gap (Eg) of Au42 (1.33 eV), Au60 (1.01 eV), Au78 (0.81 eV), Au96 (0.69 eV), and Au114 (0.60 eV) by extrapolating absorbance to zero (SI Appendix, Figs. S8–S12). The Eg values display a declining tendency as the number of gold atoms increases (SI Appendix, Fig. S18). The observed size-dependent Eg can be well reproduced by the Schrödinger equation for 1D “particle in a box” (Fig. 3B), consistent with the linearly elongated structures. Furthermore, the Eg of Au QRs at the infinite length is estimated to be 0.20 eV by the 1D particle-in-a-box model.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

(A) Optical absorption spectra of Au QRs (dissolved in deuterated chloroform to avoid overtone vibrational peaks in the NIR range). The error bars of the NIR peak positions for Au42, Au60, Au78, Au96, and Au114 are 0.2, 0.2, 0.3, 0.1, and 0.1 nm, respectively. (B) Fitting of optical gaps by the Schrödinger equation for the 1D particle in a box; L: the length of Au QRs, n: the energy level, m: electron mass.

To understand the nature of the strong NIR absorption observed in ultrasmall Au QRs, DFT and TD-DFT calculations (25, 26) were performed to simulate their electronic structure and optical absorption spectra. To reduce the computational demand, we simplified the ligands on Au42 as -SCH3 and those on Au60/78/96 as -SH; this is widely adopted in the DFT analysis of NCs (25, 26). Note: the Au114 was not simulated due to its very large size and being computationally intractable in our attempts. As shown in Fig. 4 AD, the experimental spectral profiles and peak positions of Au42/60/78/96 are well reproduced by TD-DFT calculations, with the simulated NIR absorption peaks of Au42/60/78/96 being at 1.63, 1.30, 1.08, and 0.91 eV, respectively (~0.1 eV deviated from experiment). The NIR peaks are almost entirely (96 to 99%) contributed by the HOMO–LUMO transitions in Au42 to Au96. The orbitals are presented in Fig. 4E; it is evident that the HOMO and LUMO orbitals of all Au QRs are primarily localized on the kernels and extend along the z-axis. Moreover, the transition dipole moments, which are related to the absorption peaks, exhibit a much stronger magnitude along the z axis, nearly an order of magnitude larger than those on the x and y axes (SI Appendix, Table S2), indicating that i) the HOMO–LUMO transition is split into radial and longitudinal components due to the rod shape, which is akin to the splitting of SPR in conventional Au nanorods (NRs) (1 to 3) and ii) the HOMO–LUMO transition occurs predominantly along the long axis (i.e., highly polarized transition), which is similar to that of conventional Au NRs.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Experimental absorption spectra (black lines) of (A) Au42(PET)32, (B) Au60(PET)44, (C) Au78(PET)56, and (D) Au96(PET)68, and TDDFT-simulated absorption spectra (violet lines) of Au42(SCH3)32, Au60(SH)44, Au78(SH)56, and Au96(SH)68. (E) The HOMO and LUMO orbitals of Au42(SCH3)32, Au60(SH)44, Au78(SH)56, and Au96(SH)68. The % value represents the proportion of the HOMO–LUMO transition in the simulated NIR peak. The x/y/z axes on the right represent the orientations of Cartesian coordinates, corresponding to the directions of electric transition dipole moments from the ground to the excited state, with the values on these axes denoting the magnitude of the electric transition dipole moment transitioning from the ground state to an excited state.

A strong transition dipole moment is a prerequisite for an excited state to display plasmonic behavior. The series of ultrasmall Au QRs exhibit significantly higher oscillator strength (f), e.g., f = 1.05 for Au42, in comparison to f = 4.536 × 10–4 for spherical [Au25(SH)18]) (26). The large f values are consistent with the high absorption coefficients observed experimentally for the Au QRs. To understand the enhanced oscillator strengths, we further analyzed the hole–electron distributions to ascertain the characteristics of the S1 (NIR) state (the lowest excited state). The distributions of hole and electron for the S0→S1 excitation at the optimized S0 geometry of each QR are shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S19. Interestingly, a substantial overlap between the hole and electron was found in the S0→S1 transition as indicated by a Sr index (27) ( Sr =ρholer ρele(r)dr ), for example, Au42 with Sr = 0.73. This result suggests that the distribution of electron remains largely unchanged after excitation, which is indicative of a local excitation feature (D = 0.011 Å, where D is a metric that measures the distance between the electron and the hole after excitation), thus, it gives rise to a high oscillator strength in Au42. As the AR of the Au QRs increases, the overlap between electron and hole intensifies, hence, the higher f values (SI Appendix, Fig. S20A), and the integral of μS0→S1 = <S0|−r|S1> escalates, reinforcing the transition dipole moment between electronic states. Meanwhile, the ellipticity of the contour surface of electron and hole is amplified, which implies a stronger electronic transition along the longitudinal axis compared to other directions, leading to an anisotropic oscillation that is reminiscent of plasmon splitting in metallic nanorods.

The computed orbital diagrams are shown in Fig. 5A, in which the HOMO–LUMO gaps of Au QRs shrink as the AR increases, while the oscillator strength along the z-axis and the ratio of longitudinal-axis to transversal-axis transition dipole moments show an increasing trend (SI Appendix, Table S2). These observations show that the electronic transition becomes progressively confined to the longitudinal axis. Additionally, a linear relationship is observed between the HOMO–LUMO gap and the AR (Fig. 5B). The oscillator strength also shows a linear dependence on the AR (SI Appendix, Fig. S20A) and so is the computed NIR absorption peak (SI Appendix, Fig. S20B), thus the computed trends are consistent with experiment.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

(A) Kohn–Sham orbital energy level diagrams of Au42, Au60, Au78, and Au96. (B) The HOMO–LUMO gap vs. the AR. (C) Variation of longitudinal extinction peak for simulated Au nanorods (diameter =10 nm, ARs from 2 to 20) (28) and ultrasmall Au QRs as the AR increases. (D) Variation of extinction coefficient for Au nanorods and ultrasmall Au QRs as the AR increases. (E) The ns-TA kinetics at 400 nm excitation and corresponding fits of Au42, Au60, Au78, Au96, and Au114. (F) The Eg gap–dependent excited state lifetimes of Au42, Au60, Au78, Au96, and Au114 (the error bars of excited state lifetimes are 71.8, 8.2, 4.5, 1.9, and 0.7 ns, respectively).

The plasmon-like behavior of the Au QRs is also manifested in several scaling relationships. It is well known that conventional Au NRs show two distinctive SPRs due to the anisotropic shape, i.e., the transverse SPR and the longitudinal one (13, 29). The latter peak position exhibits a linear increase from the visible to NIR with increasing AR (3033), and the extinction coefficient of the longitudinal SPR also shows a linear enhancement with increasing AR. However, the ARs of plasmonic Au NRs with extinction coefficients reported are no more than 10 (28, 34, 35). Thus, in order to do a comparison with the high ARs (6 to 18.7) of our ultrasmall Au QRs, we employed Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) calculations (36) to calculate the optical spectra of plasmonic Au NRs (fixed diameter of 10 nm and increasing AR from 2 to 20) to remediate the insufficiency of available data of conventional Au NRs. As displayed in Fig. 5C and SI Appendix, Fig. S21, a linear relationship is seen in plasmonic Au NRs, even with AR reaching 20. This linear correlation between the peak wavelength and AR also remains valid in the five ultrasmall Au QRs (Fig. 5C), suggesting a common feature between the classical rods and QRs. Additionally, a linear correlation between the extinction coefficient of the longitudinal SPR and the AR of plasmonic Au NRs (28) (Fig. 5 D, Left) is also observed in ultrasmall Au QRs (Fig. 5 D, Right), except for Au114; note that the declined absorption coefficient of Au114 is not yet understood since its TD-DFT simulation is very challenging and thus not pursued. The absorption coefficients per Au atom for the QRs and conventional NRs are roughly on the same order of magnitude (103 to 104) (SI Appendix, Fig. S22). Furthermore, the longitudinal SPR peak position of plasmonic Au NRs is known to depend on the refractive index (RI) of the surrounding medium, and a linear dependence is seen as the RI increases. (35, 37) In the Au QRs, one can also observe a linear dependence (SI Appendix, Figs. S23–S27), albeit the sensitivity is less (Table 1). Taken together, all the scaling relations suggest that the five Au QRs possess plasmon-like characteristics when compared with the conventional Au NRs.

Table 1.

RI sensitivity of the longitudinal peak of Au QRs

Sample AR RI Sensitivity (peak shift/RI variation)
Au42 6.3 24.1
Au60 9.3 62.7
Au78 12.4 103.5
Au96 15.5 134.8
Au114 18.7 201.4

To further probe the electronic properties of these ultrasmall Au QRs, we investigated the excited-state dynamics using time-resolved optical spectroscopy. The overall excited-state lifetimes of these Au QRs can be obtained by conducting nanosecond transient absorption spectroscopy, as detailed in SI Appendix, Figs. S28–S33. A notable observation is the exponential decrease in the excited-state lifetime of Au QRs with shrinking Eg (Fig. 5 E and F and SI Appendix, Fig. S34), which agrees with the energy gap law (38); note that the optical gap is the same as the HOMO–LUMO gap based on the DFT analysis of these Au QRs. Furthermore, we found that the exciton lifetime (2,122 ns) of Au42 is ~212 times longer than that of Au114 (10 ns), indicating a significant intensification of intramolecular interactions within the Au114 due to its significant elongation. Additionally, this series of Au QRs displayed fluence-independent dynamics in the femtosecond transient absorption (SI Appendix, Fig. S35), which is in contrast with conventional Au NRs that are metallic and exhibit fluence-dependent dynamics (2, 5, 9). The fluence-independent electron dynamics in the QRs is due to the presence of Eg (1.33 to 0.6 eV for Au42 to Au114), albeit these Au QRs show plasmon-like behaviors. Therefore, the Au QRs present some major differences from the classical plasmons in gapless systems, such as the less sensitivity to refractive-index changes and the long excited-state lifetimes of Au QRs. It is noteworthy that the excited state lifetimes of these ultrasmall Au QRs range from 10 to 2,122 ns and are significantly longer than those of metallic-state Au NRs (~hundreds of femtoseconds) (5, 39), which highlights the potential of Au QRs in NIR solar energy conversion and NIR photocatalysis applications. In addition, such Au QRs may act as NIR quantum emitters for quantum information telecommunications.

The observation of plasmon-like behavior in Au QRs is intriguing. On the other hand, such QRs possess distinct HOMO–LUMO gaps, thus the electronic excitations in QRs exhibit some important differences from the classical SPRs in conventional NRs. Here, it is also worth comparing with the plasmons of self-doped QDs in the infrared region (5, 21, 40, 41), such as the doped Ag2Se QDs (41). The Au QRs and Ag2Se QDs both show a femtosecond-order dephasing time and possess quality factors of about 10, SI Appendix, Table S3. Future work may reveal more insights into the intriguing behavior of the Au QRs.

Conclusion

In summary, this work demonstrates that single-electron transition in molecular-state Au QRs (Eg = 0.6 to 1.33 eV) may exhibit plasmon-like behavior, manifested in several aspects, including the strongly polarized longitudinal component due to the rod shape, the intense NIR peak (105–6 M−1 cm−1), and its linear scaling relations with the AR. The excited states of these ultrasmall Au QRs exhibit long lifetimes (10 to 2,122 ns), being significantly longer than that of the classical plasmons (i.e., hundreds of femtoseconds), which renders the QRs quite promising in applications that require long lifetimes of carriers, such as NIR photocatalysis and solar cells (42). The intriguing relationship between excitons and plasmons in such Au QRs and this periodic series of materials may present opportunities for future research in exciton-plasmon hybrids (4, 42), quantum optics (10), and NIR solar energy conversion applications (4).

Materials and Methods

Details of the synthesis and isolation of Au42(PET)32, Au60(PET)44, Au78(PET)56, Au96(PET)68, and Au114(PET)80 are provided in SI Appendix. Characterizations include the electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, optical absorption, femtosecond and nanosecond transient absorption, and single-crystal X-ray crystallography (see details in SI Appendix). Furthermore, DFT and TDDFT calculations were performed on ligand-simplified model NCs: Au42(SCH3)32, Au60(SH)44, Au78(SH)56, and Au96(SH)68 with the Gaussian 16 package (note: Au114(SH)80 was not computationally tractable and thus not pursued). Finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations of plasmonic Au nanorods (fixed 10 nm diameter and various ARs) were performed and compared with the Au QRs. SI Appendix, Figs. S1–S35 and SI Appendix, Tables S1–S5 are also provided in SI Appendix.

Supplementary Material

Appendix 01 (PDF)

Dataset S01 (CIF)

Acknowledgments

R.J. acknowledges the financial support from the Charles E. Kaufman Foundation. M.Z. acknowledges the financial support from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB0450202 and YSBR-007) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (22273095).

Author contributions

R.J. designed research; L.L., Z.L., J.K., C.G.G., I.C., K.K., and M.Z. performed research; L.L., Z.L., J.K., C.G.G., K.K., M.Z., and R.J. analyzed data; and L.L., Z.L., J.K., C.G.G., K.K., M.Z., and R.J. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Footnotes

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

Contributor Information

Meng Zhou, Email: mzhou88@ustc.edu.cn.

Rongchao Jin, Email: rongchao@andrew.cmu.edu.

Data, Materials, and Software Availability

All study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix.

Supporting Information

References

  • 1.Murphy C. J., et al. , Virus-sized gold nanorods: Plasmonic particles for biology. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 2124–2135 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Burda C., Chen X., Narayanan R., El-Sayed M. A., Chemistry and properties of nanocrystals of different shapes. Chem. Rev. 105, 1025–1102 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Qiao L., et al. , Atomically precise nanoclusters predominantly seed gold nanoparticle syntheses. Nat. Commun. 14, 4408 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brongersma M. L., Halas N. J., Nordlander P., Plasmon-induced hot carrier science and technology. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 25–34 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Agrawal A., et al. , Localized surface plasmon resonance in semiconductor nanocrystals. Chem. Rev. 118, 3121–3207 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhou M., Du X., Wang H., Jin R., The critical number of gold atoms for a metallic state nanocluster: Resolving a decades-long question. ACS Nano 15, 13980–13992 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Higaki T., et al. , Sharp transition from nonmetallic Au246 to metallic Au279 with nascent surface plasmon resonance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 5691–5695 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jin R., Zeng C., Zhou M., Chen Y., Atomically precise colloidal metal nanoclusters and nanoparticles: Fundamentals and opportunities. Chem. Rev. 116, 10346–10413 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhou M., et al. , Three-stage evolution from nonscalable to scalable optical properties of thiolate-protected gold nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 19754–19764 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gieseking R. L. M., Plasmons: Untangling the classical, experimental, and quantum mechanical definitions. Mater. Horiz. 9, 25–42 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Guidez E. B., Aikens C. M., Diameter dependence of the excitation spectra of silver and gold nanorods. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 12325–12336 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bursi L., Calzolari A., Corni S., Molinari E., Quantifying the plasmonic character of optical excitations in nanostructures. ACS Photonics 3, 520–525 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Casanova D., Matxain J. M., Ugalde J. M., Plasmonic resonances in the Al13 cluster: Quantification and origin of exciton collectivity. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 12742–12750 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang R., et al. , How to identify plasmons from the optical response of nanostructures. ACS Nano 11, 7321–7335 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gieseking R. L. M., Ashwell A. P., Ratner M. A., Schatz G. C., Analytical approaches to identify plasmon-like excited states in bare and ligand-protected metal nanoclusters. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 3260–3269 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gieseking R. L. M., Third-order nonlinear optical properties of Ag nanoclusters: Connecting molecule-like and nanoparticle-like behavior. Chem. Mater. 31, 6850–6859 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yan J., Yuan Z., Gao S. W., End and central plasmon resonances in linear atomic chains. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 216602 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bernadotte S., Evers F., Jacob C. R., Plasmons in molecules. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 1863–1878 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schira R., Rabilloud F., Localized surface plasmon resonance in free silver nanoclusters Agn, n = 20–147. J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 6205–6212 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dillon A. D., Gieseking R. L. M., Evolution of plasmon-like excited states in silver nanowires and nanorods. J. Chem. Phys. 156, 074301 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jain P. K., Plasmon-in-a-box: On the physical nature of few-carrier plasmon resonances. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 3112–3119 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Luo L., Liu Z., Du X., Jin R., Near-infrared dual emission from the Au42(SR)32 nanocluster and tailoring of intersystem crossing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 19243–19247 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Li Y., et al. , Atomically precise Au42 nanorods with longitudinal excitons for an intense photothermal effect. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 12381–12389 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jin R., et al. , Tri-icosahedral gold nanocluster [Au37(PPh3)10(SC2H4Ph)10X2]+: Linear assembly of icosahedral building blocks. ACS Nano 9, 8530–8536 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li J., Wang P., Pei Y., Ligand shell isomerization induces different fluorescence origins of two Au28 nanoclusters. J. Phys. Chem. 13, 3718–3725 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Weerawardene K. L., Aikens C. M., Theoretical insights into the origin of photoluminescence of Au25(SR)18- nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 11202–11210 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lu T., Chen F., Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 33, 580 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Orendorff C. J., Murphy C. J., Quantitation of metal content in the silver-assisted growth of gold nanorods. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 3990–3994 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zheng J., et al. , Gold nanorods: The most versatile plasmonic nanoparticles. Chem. Rev. 121, 13342–13453 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jain P. K., Lee K. S., El-Sayed I. H., El-Sayed M. A., Calculated absorption and scattering properties of gold nanoparticles of different size, shape, and composition: Applications in biological imaging and biomedicine. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 7238–7248 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ni W. H., Kou X. S., Yang Z., Wang J. F., Tailoring longitudinal surface plasmon wavelengths, scattering and absorption cross sections of gold nanorods. ACS Nano 2, 677–686 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chang H. H., Murphy C. J., Mini gold nanorods with tunable plasmonic peaks beyond 1000 nm. Chem. Mater. 30, 1427–1435 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Perez-Juste J., Pastoriza-Santos I., Liz-Marzan L. M., Mulvaney P., Gold nanorods: Synthesis, characterization and applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 249, 1870–1901 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ye X., Zheng C., Chen J., Gao Y., Murray C. B., Using binary surfactant mixtures to simultaneously improve the dimensional tunability and monodispersity in the seeded growth of gold nanorods. Nano Lett. 13, 765–771 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sanchez-Iglesias A., Jenkinson K., Bals S., Liz-Marzan L. M., Kinetic regulation of the synthesis of pentatwinned gold nanorods below room temperature. J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 23937–23944 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Myroshnychenko V., et al. , Modelling the optical response of gold nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 1792–1805 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Khan A. U., Zhao S., Liu G., Key parameter controlling the sensitivity of plasmonic metal nanoparticles: Aspect ratio. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 19353–19364 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kwak K., Thanthirige V. D., Pyo K., Lee D., Ramakrishna G., Energy gap law for exciton dynamics in gold cluster molecules. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 4898–4905 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhao T., Herbert P. J., Zheng H., Knappenberger K. L. Jr., State-resolved metal nanoparticle dynamics viewed through the combined lenses of ultrafast and magneto-optical spectroscopies. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 1433–1442 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhao Y., et al. , Plasmonic Cu2-xS nanocrystals: Optical and structural properties of copper-deficient copper(I) sulfides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 4253–4261 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Song H., Lee J. H., Eom S. Y., Choi D., Jeong K. S., Ultranarrow mid-infrared quantum plasmon resonance of self-doped silver selenide nanocrystal. ACS Nano 17, 16895–16903 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rossi T. P., Erhart P., Kuisma M., Hot-carrier generation in plasmonic nanoparticles: The importance of atomic structure. ACS Nano 14, 9963–9971 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix 01 (PDF)

Dataset S01 (CIF)

Data Availability Statement

All study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix.


Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES