Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2024 Feb 20;13(3):e00934-23. doi: 10.1128/mra.00934-23

Draft genome sequences of Pseudomonas strains zfem001–005 isolated from the intestine of larval zebrafish Danio rerio

Sabona B Simbassa 1,2, Justin Clark 3,4, Keiko Salazar 3,4, Anthony Maresso 3,4, Anne- Marie Krachler 1,
Editor: Catherine Putonti5
PMCID: PMC10927638  PMID: 38376340

ABSTRACT

Here, we report the draft genome sequences of Pseudomonas strains zfem001–005, five isolates from the intestinal microbiota of healthy larval zebrafish Danio rerio at a developmental age of 7 days post fertilization. The isolates have been identified as Pseudomonas sediminis, Pseudomonas japonica, Pseudomonas otitidis, Pseudomonas sichuanensis, and Pseudomonas tohonis, respectively.

KEYWORDS: Pseudomonas, nonhuman microbiome, zebrafish, intestinal colonization, Danio rerio

ANNOUNCEMENT

Larval zebrafish are increasingly used as a vertebrate model for intestinal host–microbe interactions due to their genetic tractability, optical transparency, and a physiology that shares many similarities with mammalian models (1). The endogenous microbiota and its interactions with larval and adult zebrafish have been extensively characterized (2, 3). These studies have shown that, although larval zebrafish are colonized early during development and form a stable gut microbiome, the composition of the microbiome varies between different facilities (4). In order to provide a resource for colonization studies on larval zebrafish, we have isolated five of the most abundant isolates from the intestinal tissues of larval zebrafish derived from the Center for Laboratory Animal Medicine and Care aquatics facility at UTHealth Science Center at Houston at 7 days post fertilization (dpf) and sequenced their genomes.

At 7 dpf, larval zebrafish were euthanized, and intestinal tissues were homogenized, diluted, and plated on lysogeny broth (LB) agar as described previously (5). Following growth on LB agar at 37°C for 20 h, individual colonies were picked and streak purified twice on LB agar, with an incubation at 37°C for 20 h each time (colony morphologies; see Fig. 1A). Prior to DNA isolation, individual colonies were used to inoculate LB, and cultures were grown at 37°C for 20 h, shaking at 185 rpm.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

(A) Colony morphology of Pseudomonas isolates zfem001–005 grown on LB agar. (B) Phylogenetic tree was generated using autoMLST in de novo mode with concatenated alignments and 1,000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates. Branch labels show percent consensus bootstrap support. Tree is rooted in Azobacter beijerinckii DSM 378 (accession number NZ_FOFJ00000000.1).

Genomic DNA was extracted from all five isolates using the Omega E.Z.N.A. Bacterial DNA Kit and was sent to Novogene for sequencing on the Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform. Raw reads were trimmed to a quality score of 30, and reads under 50 bp were filtered out using BBDuk (v.38.84) with default parameters (6). Trimmed reads were subsampled using Geneious Assembler to bring assembled coverage depth to between 40× and 80× and then assembled using Geneious Assembler in Geneious Prime (v.2022.1.1) (https://www.geneious.com), with medium-low sensitivity settings. Contigs that were larger than 1,000 bp and consistent with the largest contigs in terms of coverage were extracted and used as a reference to validate all reads by mapping all reads to the reference in Geneious Assembler with settings to detect variants of any size. For detailed assembly statistics, see Table 1. Assemblies were then annotated using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (v.6.6) (7) and default parameters. BLAST was used to search assemblies against the NCBI 16S ribosomal RNA sequence database to find closely related strains (8, 9). A tree was created using autoMLST in de novo mode with a concatenated alignment and 1,000 IQ-TREE Ultrafast Bootstrap replicates (10). The displayed taxa were chosen manually from the strains in the Pseudomonas genus that were among the 50 closest species identified by autoMLST. The phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1B) was plotted using Geneious Tree Viewer and rooted in Azobacter beijerinckii DSM 378 (accession number NZ_FOFJ00000000.1). Species designations (Table 1) were determined using PubMLST (v.1) (https://pubmlst.org/) (11).

TABLE 1.

Pseudomonas isolates zfem001–005 properties and assembly statistics

Isolate ID PubMLST species ID Genome size
(bp)
GC content
(%)
Number of contigs Number of reads Assembly stats N50 length
(bp)
Pseudomonas zfem001 Pseudomonas sediminis 5,150,040 62.4 12 10.8M Assembled using 2,943,983 paired hits and 1,740 unpaired hits 469,972
Pseudomonas zfem002 Pseudomonas japonica 6,799,339 64.3 57 12.6M Assembled using 2,854,410 paired hits and 3,098 unpaired hits 202,513
Pseudomonas zfem003 Pseudomonas otitidis 6,825,556 67.1 25 13.8M Assembled using 3,115,034 paired hits and 3,438 unpaired hits 535,079
Pseudomonas zfem004 Pseudomonas sichuanensis 5,828,281 64 50 13.8M Assembled using 2,453,113 paired hits and 1,857 unpaired hits 201,843
Pseudomonas zfem005 Pseudomonas tohonis 6,927,531 66.2 27 10.8M Assembled using 1,974,192 paired hits and 838 unpaired hits 423,767

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health to A.M.K.

(R01AI132354) and to A.M.K. and A.M. (R21AI151259).

Contributor Information

Anne- Marie Krachler, Email: anne.marie.krachler@uth.tmc.edu.

Catherine Putonti, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The draft genome sequences of five Pseudomonas strains isolated from larval zebrafish have been deposited at GenBank under accession numbers SRX22040690 (zfem001 chromosome), SRX22040691 (zfem002), SRX22040692 (zfem003), SRX22040693 (zfem004), and SRX22040694 (zfem005)

ETHICS APPROVAL

All zebrafish care, breeding, and experiments were performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Welfare Committee of the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (protocol number AWC-19–0078).

REFERENCES

  • 1. Wallace KN, Pack M. 2003. Unique and conserved aspects of gut development in zebrafish. Dev Biol 255:12–29. doi: 10.1016/s0012-1606(02)00034-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Rawls JF, Samuel BS, Gordon JI. 2004. Gnotobiotic zebrafish reveal evolutionarily conserved responses to the gut microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:4596–4601. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400706101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bates JM, Mittge E, Kuhlman J, Baden KN, Cheesman SE, Guillemin K. 2006. Distinct signals from the microbiota promote different aspects of zebrafish gut differentiation. Dev Biol 297:374–386. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Roeselers G, Mittge EK, Stephens WZ, Parichy DM, Cavanaugh CM, Guillemin K, Rawls JF. 2011. Evidence for a core gut microbiota in the zebrafish. ISME J 5:1595–1608. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.38 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Stones DH, Fehr AGJ, Thompson L, Rocha J, Perez-Soto N, Madhavan VTP, Voelz K, Krachler AM. 2017. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) as a vertebrate model host to study colonization, pathogenesis, and transmission of foodborne Escherichia coli O157. mSphere 2:e00365-17. doi: 10.1128/mSphereDirect.00365-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bushnell B. 2014. BBMap: A fast, accurate, splice-aware Aligner. United States: N. p. Web. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformat 10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Johnson M, Zaretskaya I, Raytselis Y, Merezhuk Y, McGinnis S, Madden TL. 2008. NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res 36:W5–9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Alanjary M, Steinke K, Ziemert N. 2019. AutoMLST: an automated web server for generating multi-locus species trees highlighting natural product potential. Nucleic Acids Res 47:W276–W282. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Jolley KA, Bray JE, Maiden MCJ. 2018. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res 3:124. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14826.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The draft genome sequences of five Pseudomonas strains isolated from larval zebrafish have been deposited at GenBank under accession numbers SRX22040690 (zfem001 chromosome), SRX22040691 (zfem002), SRX22040692 (zfem003), SRX22040693 (zfem004), and SRX22040694 (zfem005)


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES