ABSTRACT
Here, we present the complete 4.77 Mb genome of Enterobacter roggenkampii 0-E assembled with Oxford Nanopore long reads. This genome harbors 19 antimicrobial resistance genes, including ramA and marA decreasing permeability to carbapenems. This genome adds novel knowledge on emerging multidrug resistance in the Enterobacter cloacae species complex.
KEYWORDS: antimicrobial resistance, enterobacteriaceae, carbapenems
ANNOUNCEMENT
Enterobacter spp. (1) cause a variety of foodborne infections in humans and livestock (2). In particular, resistance to carbapenems, a critical class of broad-spectrum antibiotics (3), appears widespread among Enterobacter cloacae complex strains (4). Furthermore, a multidrug-resistant Enterobacter roggenkampii isolated from Japan (OIPH-N260), also a member of the E. cloacae complex (5), possesses carbapenemase genes blaIMP-1 and blaGES-5 encoded on one IncP6 plasmid, thus placing E. roggenkampii as an emerging threat potentially capable of transferring carbapenem resistance to other pathogens (6). Here, we present the complete genome sequence and AMR profile of E. roggenkampii isolate 0-E.
E. roggenkampii 0-E was obtained from the Centre d’expertise en analyse environnementale du Québec and was grown at 37°C for 24 h on Brain Infusion Agar (BD Difco). One pure colony was resuspended in 2 mL Brain Infusion Broth (BD Difco) and grown at 37°C until it reached an OD600 of ~1.0. Cells from 1 mL culture were pelleted (14,000 × g, 5 min, 4°C), and genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (QIAGEN) using the manufacturer’s recommended protocol for gram-negative bacteria.
Up to 1 µg of DNA was prepared with Oxford Nanopore’s Ligation Sequencing Kit (SQK-LSK109) and then sequenced on a GridION apparatus equipped with an R9.4.1 flow cell (FLO-MIN106). Bases were called in situ with MinKNOW 22.04 (REF), the GridION’s proprietary firmware. Prior to assembly, Nanopore reads were revised using the “correct” module from Canu v2.1 (7), leading to 32,862 consensus-corrected reads with an N50 of 13,7 kb. Then, assembly was performed with Unicycler v.0.5.0 (8). Medaka v1.4.3 (https://github.com/nanoporetech/medaka) was then used to polish the assembly. All software were run with default parameters unless specified.
The resulting assembly has 5.0 Mb length with a GC content of 55.5% and 26× mean coverage. It includes one chromosome (4,772,997 bp) and four plasmids of size 157,085, 62,568, 5,743, and 5,103 bp, respectively (Table 1). Annotation with PGAP version 20220210 (9) revealed 4,852 genes, of which 4,509 are protein coding.
TABLE 1.
Main genome characteristics of Enterobacter roggenkampii 0-Ea
| Replicon | Size (bp) | CDS | tRNAs | rRNAs | AMR genes (abbreviations) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chromosome | 4,772,997 | 4,546 | 86 | 8 | MIR-10, FosA2, acrA, ramA, msbA, KpnE, KpnF, oqxA, adeF, marA, H-NS, baeR, emrR, emrB, rsmA, CRP, EF-Tu mutant, PBP3 |
| pER0-E1 | 157,085 | 168 | – | – | no AMR gene detected |
| pER0-E2 | 62,568 | 66 | 1 | – | mcr-10.1 |
| pER0-E3 | 5,743 | 6 | – | – | no AMR gene detected |
| pER0-E4 | 5,103 | 5 | – | - | no AMR gene detected |
CDS, coding DNA sequence; tRNAs, transfer RNA genes; rRNAs, ribosomal RNA genes; AMR, antimicrobial resistance. Gene annotations were produced with prokka v1.14.6 except for AMR genes which were annotated with RGI 6.0.1 web portal using the CARD v3.2.6 database.
Taxonomy was verified with GTDB-Tk v2.1.0 (10), which classifies prokaryotic genomes with both average nucleotide identity (ANI) and phylogenomic placement on a class-level tree. This genome was classified as Enterobacter roggenkampii, given 98.9% ANI to the closest reference (NCBI accession: GCF_001729805.1), which is also its nearest tree neighbor.
AMR gene annotation was done with Resistance Gene Identifier v5.2.0 (11) with CARD v3.0.6 as database (12) and revealed 18 putative chromosomal AMR genes and 1 on plasmid pER0-E2 (Table 1). From these chromosomal genes, two efflux genes (ramA and marA) are known to cause decreased permeability to carbapenems (13, 14). Their risk of horizontal spread, however, is unknown and requires further investigation of their genomic context. However, unlike E. roggenkampii OIPH-N260, no sensu stricto carbapenemase genes were detected.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors wish to thank Brian Boyle and the IBIS Genomics Platform for genomic DNA quality control and critical advice.
This study was funded with a grant from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (to RCL). We also thank Manuela Villion from CEAEQ for her time in documenting the strain.
Contributor Information
Roger C. Levesque, Email: rclevesq@ibis.ulaval.ca.
André O. Hudson, Rochester Institute of Technology, USA
DATA AVAILABILITY
Raw reads and complete assemblies are available on the NCBI’s Genome and Sequence Read Archive (SRA) databases under the following BioProject number: PRJNA945021. The genome sequence is available under accession GCA_029536245.1; raw reads are available at SRR26902467.
REFERENCES
- 1. Davin-Regli A, Lavigne J-P, Pagès J-M. 2019. Enterobacter spp.: update on taxonomy, clinical aspects, and emerging antimicrobial resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 32:e00002-19. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00002-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Annavajhala MK, Gomez-Simmonds A, Uhlemann A-C. 2019. Multidrug-resistant Enterobacter cloacae complex emerging as a global, diversifying threat. Front Microbiol 10:44. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Papp-Wallace KM, Endimiani A, Taracila MA, Bonomo RA. 2011. Carbapenems: past, present, and future ▿. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:4943–4960. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00296-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Han M, Liu C, Xie H, Zheng J, Zhang Y, Li C, Shen H, Cao X. 2023. Genomic and clinical characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae complex isolates collected in a Chinese tertiary hospital during 2013–2021. Front Microbiol 14:1127948. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1127948 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hoffmann H, Roggenkamp A. 2003. Population genetics of the nomenspecies Enterobacter cloacae. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:5306–5318. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.9.5306-5318.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hardiman CA, Weingarten RA, Conlan S, Khil P, Dekker JP, Mathers AJ, Sheppard AE, Segre JA, Frank KM. 2016. Horizontal transfer of carbapenemase-encoding plasmids and comparison with hospital epidemiology data. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:4910–4919. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00014-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. 2017. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 27:722–736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLOS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH, Hancock J. 2019. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinform 36:1925–1927. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Alcock BP, Huynh W, Chalil R, Smith KW, Raphenya AR, Wlodarski MA, Edalatmand A, Petkau A, Syed SA, Tsang KK, et al. 2023. CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D690–D699. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. McArthur AG, Waglechner N, Nizam F, Yan A, Azad MA, Baylay AJ, Bhullar K, Canova MJ, De Pascale G, Ejim L, et al. 2013. The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3348–3357. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00419-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Holden ER, Webber MA. 2020. MarA, RamA, and SoxS as mediators of the stress response: survival at a cost. Front Microbiol 11:828. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Chollet R, Chevalier J, Bollet C, Pages J-M, Davin-Regli A. 2004. RamA is an alternate activator of the multidrug resistance cascade in Enterobacter aerogenes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:2518–2523. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.7.2518-2523.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Raw reads and complete assemblies are available on the NCBI’s Genome and Sequence Read Archive (SRA) databases under the following BioProject number: PRJNA945021. The genome sequence is available under accession GCA_029536245.1; raw reads are available at SRR26902467.
