Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2024 Feb 1;13(3):e01131-23. doi: 10.1128/mra.01131-23

Draft genome sequences of two Micromonospora strains isolated from the root nodules of Alnus glutinosa

Ryan Michael Thompson 1,, Edward M Fox 2, Maria del Carmen Montero-Calasanz 1,3,
Editor: David A Baltrus4
PMCID: PMC10927674  PMID: 38299839

ABSTRACT

In this paper, the draft genomes of Micromonospora RTGN7 and RTP1Z1, derived from Alnus glutinosa root nodules, are reported. The assembly of RTGN7 is 6.6 Mbp, composed of 59 contigs, with an N50 of 321,872. RTP1Z1’s assembly is 6.3 Mbp, composed of 151 contigs, with an N50 of 76,442 bp.

KEYWORDS: Micromonospora, endophytes, Alnus glutinosa, Alnus, genomes

ANNOUNCEMENT

Alnus glutinosa nodules are hosts of Micromonospora, with isolation of two strains reported (1, 2). Isolation was conducted from the nodules of a single A. glutinosa within Saltwell Park, United Kingdom (54.944723–1.605852). Nodules were washed with tap water, and 4–15 lobes were surface sterilized in 1 mL of 25% strength household bleach (~1.125% sodium hypochlorite) for 5 minutes. After removing the bleach, the lobes were washed five times in 1 mL of sterile distilled water and homogenized in 0.5 mL of ¼ strength Ringer’s solution. To the homogenate, 14.5 mL of ¼ strength Ringer’s solution was added and plated upon tap water yeast extract agar (https://www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/medium/pdf/DSMZ_Medium1625.pdf) and Zhang starch soil extract agar (both containing 50 mg/mL nystatin) and incubated at 28°C (3).

RTGN7 and RTP1Z1 were recovered from tap water yeast extract and Zhang starch soil extract, respectively, after 30 and 40 days of respective incubation. Single colonies were streaked upon their corresponding media and incubated at 28°C for 24 and 14 days individually, with three subculturing iterations performed from single colonies.

From a 10-day old culture of RTGN7, grown upon GYM agar (https://www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/medium/pdf/DSMZ_Medium65.pdf), DNA was extracted using a GenEluteBacterial Genomic DNA Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) with an additional ethanol precipitation step. Sequencing was conducted by Novogene Co. Ltd., with a DNA library prepared using a Novogene NGS DNA library prep set (catalog no. Pt004), in which the DNA was randomly sheared into short fragments, end repaired, A tailed then ligated with the Illumina adaptor. These sequences were amplified using PCR, size selected for 350 bp, purified, and then sequenced using 150-bp Illumina paired-end sequencing upon an Illumina NovaSeq, with raw reads filtered using FastP (version 0.23.1) (4).

From an 11-day-old nutrient broth culture of RTP1Z1, DNA extraction and sequencing were conducted by MicrobesNG (http://www.microbesng.com). The material was incubated in 120 µL of TE buffer containing lysozyme (0.1 mg/mL) and RNase A (0.1 mg/mL) at 37°C for 25 minutes. After which, proteinase K and SDS (final concentration 0.1 mg/mL and 0.5%, respectively) were added and incubated for 5 minutes at 65°C. Genomic DNA was purified using equal volume solid-phase reversible immobilisation beads and elution buffer, with a DNA library prepared using a Nextera XT library prep kit (Illumina, USA). Two modifications were made according to the manufacturer’s protocol, the DNA amount was increased twofold, and the PCR elongation was extended to 45 seconds. The library was sequenced using a 250-bp paired-end protocol upon an Illumina NovaSeq 6000. The reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic (version 0.30) with a sliding window quality cutoff of Q15 (5).

The following analysis was conducted using the program’s standard settings unless otherwise noted. Both isolates reads were uploaded to Galaxy Europe (https://usegalaxy.eu/) (6), assessed using FASTQC (Galaxy Version 0.73 + galaxy0) (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/), and assembled using Shovill (Galaxy Version 1.1.0 + galaxy1) (https://github.com/tseemann/shovill), and the assembly quality was assessed using Quast (Galaxy Version 5.0.2 + galaxy5) (79), with contigs <200 bp removed. The taxonomic relationship of RTGN7 and RTP1Z1 to their nearest neighbours was determined using TYGS (v389) (10, 11) (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Summary of read and assembly statistics of the isolates RTGN7 and RTP1Z1

Isolate Raw read number Filtered read Assembly length (bp) Contig number N50 value GC% Estimated sequencing depth Nearest neighbor (percentage identity)
RTGN7 9,080,972 9,041,320 6,649,740 84 321,872 72.18 205× Micromonospora rubida NEAU-HG-1 (37.8%)
RTP1Z1 1,332,626 1,253,492 6,386,282 151 76,442 72.28 66× Micromonospora kangleipakensis DSM 45612 (48.2%)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We gratefully thank the Gateshead council and Jayne Calvert for their assistance with sample collection within Saltwell Park.

This research was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council’s ONE Planet Doctoral Training Partnership (grant number NE/S007512/1). M.C.M.C. is grateful for the funding received from the Ramón y Cajal Research Grant (RYC2019-028468-I) from the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness (MINECO).

Contributor Information

Ryan Michael Thompson, Email: R.thompson12@newcastle.ac.uk.

Maria del Carmen Montero-Calasanz, Email: mariac.montero.calasanz@juntadeandalucia.es.

David A. Baltrus, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA

DATA AVAILABILITY

The draft genomes of Micromonospora sp. RTGN7 and RTP1Z1 were deposited in INSDC under the accession numbers JAPZLF000000000 and JAPFQV000000000, respectively. The SRA data of Micromonospora sp. RTGN7 and RTP1Z1 were deposited in INSDC under the accession numbers SRR22064616 and SRR22354992, respectively.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Carro L, Pujic P, Trujillo ME, Normand P. 2013. Micromonospora is a normal occupant of actinorhizal nodules. J Biosci 38:685–693. doi: 10.1007/s12038-013-9359-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ghodhbane-Gtari F, Essoussi I, Chattaoui M, Chouaia B, Jaouani A, Daffonchio D, Boudabous A, Gtari M. 2010. Isolation and characterization of non-Frankia actinobacteria from root nodules of Alnus glutinosa, Casuarina glauca and Elaeagnus angustifolia. Symbiosis 50:51–57. doi: 10.1007/s13199-009-0029-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Zhang J, Zhang L. 2011. Improvement of an isolation medium for actinomycetes. MAS 5:124–127. doi: 10.5539/mas.v5n2p124 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. 2018. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer of illumina sequencing data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Afgan E, Baker D, Batut B, van den Beek M, Bouvier D, Cech M, Chilton J, Clements D, Coraor N, Grüning BA, Guerler A, Hillman-Jackson J, Hiltemann S, Jalili V, Rasche H, Soranzo N, Goecks J, Taylor J, Nekrutenko A, Blankenberg D. 2018. The galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W537–W544. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. Quast: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Mikheenko A, Prjibelski A, Saveliev V, Antipov D, Gurevich A. 2018. Versatile genome assembly evaluation with QUAST-LG. Bioinformatics 34:i142–i150. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mikheenko A, Valin G, Prjibelski A, Saveliev V, Gurevich A. 2016. Icarus: visualizer for de novo assembly evaluation. Bioinformatics 32:3321–3323. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. 2019. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 10:2182. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. 2022. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 50:D801–D807. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The draft genomes of Micromonospora sp. RTGN7 and RTP1Z1 were deposited in INSDC under the accession numbers JAPZLF000000000 and JAPFQV000000000, respectively. The SRA data of Micromonospora sp. RTGN7 and RTP1Z1 were deposited in INSDC under the accession numbers SRR22064616 and SRR22354992, respectively.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES