Skip to main content
Access Microbiology logoLink to Access Microbiology
. 2024 Feb 16;6(2):000626.v4. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000626.v4

Microfungal flora of Apis mellifera anatoliaca (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and Varroa destructor (Mesostigmata: Varroidae) from the Eastern Black Sea Region and fungal vector capacity in honey bee colonies

Mehtap Usta 1,*
PMCID: PMC10928410  PMID: 38482356

Abstract

Honey bees have a great economic importance both in Turkey and in the world due to the products they produce and their contribution to pollination. For this reason, many microflora and microbiota studies have been conducted on bees. While these research were primarily focused on pathogen isolation, the ecological roles of non-pathogenic flora members and how they may be used are now being studied more extensively. Considering the importance of pathogens, the number of studies is expected to continue to increase. This study was carried out to determine the microfungal flora of the body surfaces and digestive tracts of dead honey bee (Apis mellifera anatoliaca) and Varroa destructor samples taken from different apiaries in the Eastern Black Sea Region of Turkey (Gümüşhane, Trabzon, Artvin and Ordu) in 2022. As a result of the study, a total of 11 different fungal species belonging to the genera Penicillium, Alternaria, Mucor, Trichoderma, Fusarium, Aspergillus and Verticillium were identified and the relationships of these fungi with bees were discussed based on the literature.

Keywords: Apis mellifera anatoliaca, fungal flora, honey bee health, microbiology, Varroa destructor

Data Summary

No supporting external data were generated for this work.

Introduction

Bees belong to the Apiformes group of the superfamily Apoidea in the order Hymenoptera [1]. There are around 25 000 recognized bee species worldwide [2]. Bumblebees are non-honey bee (Apis mellifera) species. However, in addition to Apis mellifera, there are around 10 000 other honey bee species worldwide, most of which are found in Far Eastern countries. Turkey’s climatic conditions, topography and location promote a richness of flora and other living species, making the bee fauna extremely diverse. Özbek [3] estimates that Turkey has around 2000 bee species.

Bees create and provide honey, beeswax, royal jelly, bee venom, and propolis to humans. Another benefit is that they pollinate cultivated plants that require allogamy (counter-pollination) alongside wild bees, ensuring a greater number and quality of crop yields [4–6].

Apis mellifera and the substances it produces are accompanied by a variety of microbes such as bacteria, moulds and yeast. More than 6000 micro-organisms have been isolated and identified from bees and their products. Fungi and yeasts were found to be more frequent than bacteria in bee isolates [7].

Fungal isolates from bees are critical for understanding and treating illnesses affecting bee populations. The fungus Aspergillus fumigatus has been a major focus of bee health study due to its link to nosemosis, or ‘nosema disease’, in Western honey bees (Apis mellifera) [8]. Isolation of fungal strains that are harmful to bees is critical for several investigations, including population genetics, illness development and ecological competition [9]. Additionally, the close relatedness of the black queen cell virus (BQCV) isolated from the fungus Ascosphaera apis to bee samples emphasizes the possibility for viral crossover between fungal and bee species [10]. Ascosphaera apis, which causes chalkbrood disease in honey bees, has been commonly observed in temperate countries, including Brazil [11]. Melipona scutellaris bees are vulnerable to the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana, emphasizing the need to study how fungal infections affect diverse bee populations [12].

Understanding the function of fungi in bee health is critical to creating appropriate management measures. For example, Beauveria bassiana, an entomopathogenic fungus, has been studied with regard to treating Varroa mite infestations in honey bee colonies [13]. Furthermore, the possible ecological relevance of Monascus strains isolated from stingless bee colonies highlights the need to study the relationships between fungi and various bee species [14]. The discovery of honey bee genes that are differently expressed in response to infection with the chalkbrood fungus, Ascosphaera apis, has shed light on the molecular processes driving bee–fungus interactions [15]. Furthermore, the transit of fungi from the genus Ascosphaera to North America, together with bees from their original habitat in Japan, demonstrates the possible transcontinental movement of bee-associated fungi [16].

According to Doğan et al. quoted in Benjamin et al. [17], most fungi have various forms of symbiotic relationships with mites and other arthropods [18]. This association may be fairly clear at times. In other circumstances, a microscopic study of insects, thorough dissection, or observation of fungus-infected species throughout their life cycle is sufficient to detect the presence of a fungus. Fungi that can spread through these relationships are necrotrophic and biotrophic parasites [19]. Insects are often hosts to microbial symbionts. Although much symbiosis research has focused on bacterial communities, insect–fungus connections are also widespread. These relationships have important roles in insect nutrition and defence [20–22]. In other interactions, the insect uses the fungus directly as food or as a source of enzymes [23]. Some of these fungi are carried by arthropods in their environment [24–26]. The species of micro-organisms isolated from bees show great diversity. The number and diversity of micro-organisms isolated from worker bees collecting pollen and nectar is higher than from bees remaining in the hive. This is because bees harvesting pollen are subject to a diversity of micro-organisms by their activity outside the hive than bees within the hive. Larvae ingest these micro-organisms by eating contaminated food. Bees transmit this flora to each other during pollen consumption and food exchange with other bees in the colony [7]. Fungal spores can be found in bee pollen, combs, honey and on all surfaces within the hive. Spores can survive for years and can be a continuous source of infection [27–29]. Bee-associated fungi, particularly pathogenic fungi [30], are described as those that are saprophytic on stored bee resources or products or that harm bee health. Aspergillus P. Micheli ex Link, Penicillium Link and Mucor Fresen species are known to be secondary invaders of bee larvae and prepupae [31, 32]. Fungi belonging to this genus (Aspergillus) are usually found in the digestive tract of worker bees. Penicillium glabrum (Wehmer) Westling, Penicillium aurantiogriseum Dierckx, Aspergillus flavus Link and Aspergillus niger var. niger Tiegh are usually the isolated species belonging to these genera [33, 34]. Other fungi isolated from the intestines of worker bees include Cladosporium cladosporioides (Fresen) G.A. de Vries and Alternaria tenuissima (Kunze) Wiltshire [7]. In addition, fungi belonging to the genera Penicillium, Aspergillus, Mucor and Trichoderma Persian have been isolated from many surfaces such as dead bees in the colony, combs, bee food, honey and pollen [35]. Frequent isolation of fungi from beehives is closely related to the temperature and humidity conditions inside the hive [36].

Benoit et al. investigated the microfungal flora of Varroa destructor, a mite harmful to honey bees, and found that this flora consists of cosmopolitan soil saprophytes such as Aspergillus, Penicillium, Fusarium Link, Trichoderma, Alternaria Nees, Rhizopus Ehrenb and Mucor [37]. According to Muz, Varroa destructor mites feed on the haemolymph of the bee [38]. Meanwhile, the wounds opened by the mite provide ease of passage for microbial pathogens vectored in the bee body.

Özakın et al. also examined old and new combs bacteriologically and mycologically and isolated Aspergillus fumigatus Fresen, Cladosporium corrioni and Penicillum spp. as fungal flora [39]. Özkırım and Keskin isolated Ascosphaera apis (Maasen ex Claussen), the agent of lime disease, and Aspergillus flavus, the agent of stone disease, from honeycomb samples taken from Ankara province and its surroundings [40].

It has been reported that some fungi belonging to genera such as Fusarium, Penicillium, Rhizopus and Aspergillus occasionally spoil nutrients in the hive and cause the extinction of natural populations due to decreases in the food source [35].

In Turkey, fungal isolation studies have been carried out on bee products, but there are insufficient mycoflora studies on bees. In this study, the microfungal flora of the body surface and digestive systems of honey bees (Apis mellifera) taken from different beekeepers in the Eastern Black Sea Region was determined with regard to bee–fungus relationships. Various aspects of entomopathogenic, phytopathogenic, parasitic and antagonistic properties are discussed based on the literature. Thus, this paper contributes to the limited number of microflora studies on bees and their isolated fungal species. In addition, fungal vector potential against pests was evaluated by isolating fungi from the surface of Varroa mites.

Apart from pathogenic interactions, the observation of fungi in bees is generally recognized as a sign of stress. Bees stressed by nosemosis, xenobiotics or high overwintering temperatures harbour more fungi in their gastrointestinal tract [41–47]. However, it is increasingly recognized that not all fungi associated with bees are indicative of disease or decay, and some may be commensal or even mutualistic [48, 49]

Bee fungal isolations are critical to understanding the dynamics of bee–fungus interactions, disease transmission and the formulation of control plans. The wide range of fungi that impact various bee species highlights the importance of conducting extensive studies to protect bee populations and their critical function in ecosystems. This study aimed to determine whether the fungi obtained from Apis mellifera anatoliaca, the most abundant species in Turkey, and Varroa destructor mites, which causes the greatest damage to honey bees, come from natural flora or herbal factors, and we aimed to develop natural control methods for the disease-causing fungi. The potential of the fungi obtained, especially on mites, will be tested in future studies.

Methods

Collection of honey bees and varroa mites and isolation of fungi

Dead bees collected from the hive front board were brought to the laboratory under sterile conditions. Live honey bees collected were not used in the experiments. The reason for the use of dead honey bees was that fungal death was suspected. Honey bee and Varroa mite samples were collected from the provinces of Gümüşhane, Trabzon, Artvin, and Ordu based on observations of people with an interest in beekeeping. For the outer surface flora, the bees were mixed by placing them in glass tubes containing 5 ml of sterile physiological water (Adeka), and each of these mixtures was placed in Petri dishes containing potato dextrose agar (PDA) [15]. Physiological water used in the study is a commercial product used for medical purposes. To determine the intestinal flora, surface sterilization of the bees taken from the glass tubes was ensured, and intestines removed by dissection under aseptic conditions were homogenized and left on the PDA medium [50]. Petri dishes containing PDA were incubated at 25 °C under aerobic conditions for 1 week and colonies with different colours or morphologically different appearances were isolated. The isolates with different colony morphology were purified. PDAY (potato dextrose agar +1 % yeast extract) was used as the first medium during purification. Ampicillin (50 µg ml−1), streptomycin (200 µg ml−1) and tetracycline (20 µg ml−1) were added to the medium to avoid bacterial growth [51]. Glycerol stocks of pure fungal samples were prepared and stored at −80 °C for used in the studies.

Varroa mites were collected from hives and were brought to the laboratory under sterile conditions. No fungi were seen on the mites, either macroscopically or microscopically (100×), and all the mites appeared healthy. The mites (in three batches) were rinsed twice for 1 min in 1 ml fresh deionized (DI) water in cap bottles and transferred to a 9 cm Petri dish with PDA. Plates were incubated for 7 days at 22–24 °C with daily observations for fungal growth. Hyphae tips, visible under a dissecting microscope, were excised using a sterile scalpel and subcultured in PDA. Petri dishes containing PDA were incubated at 25 °C under aerobic conditions for 1 week and those isolates with different colours or morphologically different appearances were isolated. The isolates with different colony morphology were purified. PDAY was used as the initial medium during purification. Ampicillin (50 µg ml−1), streptomycin (200 µg ml−1) and tetracycline (20 µg ml−1) were added to the medium to avoid bacterial growth [51]. Glycerol stocks of pure fungal samples were prepared and stored at −80 °C for use in the studies.

Molecular identification

DNA was extracted from the mycelium after 14 days of growth on PDAY medium at 28 °C. DNA isolation was performed using the QuickDNA Fungal/Bacterial MiniPrep Kit (Zymo Research). Isolation was carried out in line with the kit’s instruction booklet. The partial sequence of the ITS1–5.8S–ITS2 gene region was amplified by PCR using primers ITS5 (5′-GGAAGTAAAATCGTAACAAGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) [52]. The ITS1–5.8S–ITS2 gene region is a widely used region for species identification [53]. PCR mixes contained 50 ng DNA template, 10 µl 5× Phusion reaction buffer, 200 µmol dNTPs, 1 µl (50 pmol) of each primer, and 1 unit of PhusionDNA polymerase in a total volume of 50 µl. PCR conditions were set as described in the PCR kit using a thermal cycler (Bio-Rad).

PCR products were sent to Sentebiogen (Ankara) for DNA sequence analysis. To validate species identification, the resultant DNA sequences were matched with DNA sequences in the NCBI GenBank using the Blast tool, and then utilized for phylogenetic analysis [54]. The program mega 7 [53] was used for phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1). Table 1 lists the GenBank accession numbers for each sequence.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Evolutionary relationships of the taxa studied. The evolutionary history was inferred using the neighbour-joining method [99, 100]. The optimal tree with the sum of branch length=2.05567204 is shown. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together was determined in a bootstrap test (1000 replicates) [101].

Table 1.

Percentage query coverage, level of similarity and accession numbers of the isolated fungi based on blast searches in NCBI GenBank using ITS gene sequences

Fungus host

Isolate name

Fungus name

Accession no.

Query coverage (%)

Similarity (%)

Honey bee

Hb1

Alternaria sp.

OQ692417

100

96.05

Honey bee

Hb2

Aspergillus sp.

OQ692419

99

98.0

Honey bee

Hb3

Fusarium sp.

OQ692421

98

96.85

Honey bee

Hb4

Mucor sp.

OQ692422

99

98.45

Honey bee

Hb5

Penicillium sp.

OQ692424

99

99.80

Honey bee

Hb6

Verticillium sp.

OQ692427

98

98.66

Varroa mite

Vm1

Alternaria sp.

OQ692418

99

97.88

Varroa mite

Vm2

Penicillium sp.

OQ692425

99

98.41

Varroa mite

Vm3

Aspergillus sp.

OQ692420

100

98.01

Varroa mite

Vm4

Mucor sp.

OQ692423

98

98.93

Varroa mite

Vm5

Trichoderma sp.

OQ692426

98

98.24

Results and discussion

As a result of the isolation procedure, 150 colonies were obtained from the surfaces and intestines of honey bees; 45 of them were determined as yeast and were not included in the study. As a result, six different genus-level fungi were determined and registered to NCBI GenBank; registration numbers are given in (Table 1). Phylogenetic analysis was performed by using mega 7 (Fig. 1). The results of phylogenetic tree analysis also support the molecular analysis, phylogenetic analysis showing high similarity rates to the same genera. It is expected that samples isolated from both Varroa mites and honey bees and belonging to the same genus will be similar under phylogenetic analysis. Fungi were determined at five different genus levels from Varroa mites. They were also registered with NCBI GenBank; registration numbers are shown in (Table 1). Alternaria sp., Trichoderma sp. and Penicillium sp. were isolated from the surfaces and intestines of dead bees. Verticillium sp. from the surfaces of dead bees, Mucor sp., Aspergillus sp. and Aspergillus sp. from the intestines of dead bees, the surface of dead bees and the gut of dead bees and Fusarium sp. and Mucor sp. from the surfaces of dead bees.

The isolation of Alternaria sp., Trichoderma sp., Penicillium sp., Verticillium sp., Mucor sp., Aspergillus sp. and Fusarium sp. fungi from bees has important consequences for bee health and ecological relationships. The wide variety of fungi recovered from bees demonstrates the complexities of bee–fungus interactions and their potential influence on bee populations. For example, various studies have reported the isolation of Penicillium sp. and Aspergillus sp. from bees, highlighting the prevalence of these fungi in bee-related environments [37, 55–59]. Additionally, the presence of Mucor sp. and Trichoderma sp. in bee samples highlights the need to study their ecological significance in bee habitats [60–64].

Furthermore, the isolation of Fusarium sp. and Alternaria sp. from bees raises concerns regarding their possible pathogenicity and influence on bee health. These fungi have been linked to plant illnesses and may influence bees via in variety of ways, including direct pathogenicity and secondary metabolite synthesis [65, 66]. Furthermore, the presence of Verticillium sp. in bee settings emphasizes the need to examine the possible connections between this fungus and bee populations, given its known pathogenicity in plants [59].

The isolation of these fungi from bees also raises questions about the sources of exposure and transmission routes. Understanding how bees come into contact with these fungi and the potential implications for bee health is crucial for developing effective management strategies. Moreover, the potential for these fungi to interact with other micro-organisms in the bee microbiome underlines the complexity of bee–fungus interactions and their ecological significance [55, 67, 68].

Low-molecular-weight compounds formed as a result of secondary metabolism of fungal genera such as Aspergillus, Penicillium, Fusarium, Alternaria and Claviceps are termed mycotoxins. These compounds have various toxic effects on human and animal health. Fungi producing mycotoxins can be found ubiquitously (such as various layers of the atmosphere) by being transported by wind and air. The presence of mycotoxins may vary according to climatic conditions, type of product, geographical location, season and year [69].

Aspergillus and Penicillium are common in honey bee colonies [7]. In the present study, specimens belonging to these genera were isolated. Aspergillus sp. and Penicillium sp. were isolated from the surfaces and digestive systems of dead bees. In addition, Aspergillus sp. was isolated ifrom Varroa mites, which may indicate the possibility of transmission through adult honey bees. However, Aspergillus sp. is most likely to access new brood cells via conidia carried on mites that enter the hive in search of a new host bee. Thus, in addition to causing heavy losses in the honey bee industry through direct invasion [70], Varroa destructor may also promote the spread of stone brood disease, as first suggested by Liu [71]. In previous studies, Aspergillus niger was isolated from the digestive systems of worker bees, and Aspergillus fumigatus from honeycombs; Aspergillus flavus was isolated from both the digestive systems of worker bees and honeycombs [7, 39, 40]. Penicillium species, which were found in four separate isolation studies, have been isolated from many surfaces such as dead bees, hives, pollen, honey and honeycombs [35]. Accordingly, the species found in honeycombs and beehives in previous pstudies were expected in the surface flora of bees in this study, and the species found in honey and pollen were encountered in the digestive systems of bees. In addition to these studies, fungi in the genus Aspergillus can be opportunistic pathogens of both adult bees and larvae [31] and produce mycotoxins that can be toxic to bees [34, 33]. Bees are also associated with moulds, fungi including the genera Aspergillus, Penicillium and Cladosporium, which grow by spread of mycelia. Unlike yeasts, moulds are generally not very selective in their habitat. They can grow by utilizing various carbon sources of energy. Moulds are often found in flower pollen and stored pollen matter. Within these bee-associated genera there are many different varieties of fungi. They inhabit a wide variety of habitats and have different ecological roles, including plant pathogens (e.g. Alternaria), bee pathogens (e.g. Aspergillus flavus [72]; Ascosphaera [30]).

Mucor and Fusarium species were isolated from the surface flora of dead bees. Spores of these fungi were not found in their digestive systems. Mucor species have been isolated from many surfaces, dead bees, pollen, and bee larvae in hives [35]. Glifiski and Buczek defined Mucor species as secondary invaders of bees [32]. This genus is known to include soil-borne cosmopolitan and saprophytic species [73]. Therefore, Mucor species are likely to be found in the surface flora of bees and show saprophytic development after the death of bees. Fungi may also benefit bees by reducing the growth of pathogens in bee products or micro-organisms that cause spoilage in bee products through competition between microorganisms, but the literature on this is complex and is not clear [74]. For example, Mucor, Penicillium, Aspergillus, Talaromyces, Rhizopus and Cladosporium isolated from honey bee products and guts inhibited the growth of Ascosphaera apis [75, 76].

Fusarium species are known to be isolated from hives [35]. Fusarium species cause fungal diseases known as Fusarium wilt in agricultural products [77]. Accordingly, it is thought that the bees may have taken fungal spores from the plants they visited to collect pollen and nectar and carried them to the hive. Fungi of the genera Fusarium, Cladosporium and Alternaria are known to be predominant in the mycobiota of forage legumes. As long as bees visit these plants, they will transfer contaminated pollen grains to the hives [78, 79].

Trichoderma and Alternaria species have been isolated from Varroa destructor mites, which is a parasite of honey bees [37]. In addition, Trichoderma species are common in bee colonies, in addition to Aspergillus, Penicillium and Mucor species [35].

Some fungi are known to have antagonistic properties to plant pest fungi. Trichoderma species are preferred in biological control because they accelerate plant development, make plants resistant to soil-borne pathogens by stimulating plant defence mechanisms, and produce various antibiotic compounds, and many commercially produced preparations exist [80, 81, 82, 83]

According to Kapongo et al. honey bees and bumblebees have been used effectively as vectors of fungi that suppress plant pathogens [84]. In this study, Trichoderma species were isolated from Varroa mites, and Trichoderma harzianum is known to be an antagonistic fungus used in biological control against Botrytis cinerea Pers. By using it as a vector, Trichoderma harzianum was delivered to the target plant and a significant yield increase was achieved [85–87]. The use of Trichoderma species as biocontrol agents has been investigated for over 70 years, but the commercial use of strains has gained importance in recent years. As biocontrol agents, Trichoderma spp. are particularly effective against fungi of the Ascomycetes, Deuteromycetes and Basidiomycetes groups, which contain soil-borne and even air-borne pathogens. Many strains such as T. harzianum, T. viride, T. virens (Gliocladium virens), T. aureoviride, T. pseudokoningii, T. koningii and T. longibrachiatum have been identified for use as potential biocontrol agents and the fungi they affect have been determined [88, 89].

The phytopathogenic fungus Alternaria alternata, which is abundant in soil and rotten plant material, causes ‘alternaria brown rot’ in many plants [90]. Some Alternaria species are causal agents of many plant diseases commonly known as black spot, brown spot, Alternaria spot, leaf spot and stem canker in cereals, oilseeds, fruits and vegetables. These diseases caused by pathogenic species and the toxins they produce greatly affect structures that have important roles in cell metabolism such as mitochondria, chloroplasts, plasma membranes, Golgi complex and nucleus [91, 92] In this study, Alternaria sp. was isolated. This suggests that honey bees are carriers of Alternaria sp. Isolates of the genus Alternaria isolated from nature, agricultural products or manufactured foods and developed under laboratory conditions have been found to be toxic in studies on rats [93], chicken embryos [94] and human cells [69, 95].

Verticillium is a genus that harbours a variety of plant and insect pathogens. Verticillium sp. was isolated from the surface of dead bees. Among the mycoflora studies on bees, no isolation of Verticillium species was previously reported. Isolation of Verticillium isolation was done in a study conducted in 2010 [96]. However, the presence of plant pathogenic and insect pathogen species in this genus suggests that such fungi will be encountered in isolations from bees. At least 700 species of entomopathogenic fungi belonging to at least 90 genera have been described. Some species such as Verticillium lecani (Zimm.) (candlestick mould), Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vull. (insect mould), Isaria fumosorosea (Wize) Brown [pleasant isarya (=Paecilomyces fumosoroseus] and Metarhizium anisopliae (Metch) Sorok (insectivore) are commercially produced and used for the control of different pests in many countries [97, 98].

Conclusion

Numerous studies have aimed at the discovery of micro-organisms found associated with bees and investigated the tasks of these micro-organisms. However, these studies aimed to increase bee products by eliminating pathogens and parasites, and also to distribute those that are not pathogenic to bees and have the potential to be used in the biological control of pests through bees.

In this study, one of the isolated fungi is Aspergillus sp., known for causing stone disease in bees. Except for this species, no fungi harmful to bees were identified. Consequently, our evaluation of the bee–fungus relationship extends beyond pathogenicity considerations. There is a pressing need for further research to uncover additional micro-organisms that do not harm bees but may have remained undetected. Our contribution aims to enrich the understanding of the mycoflora specific to bees in the Eastern Black Sea Region, a crucial honey source area in Turkey. Subsequent research endeavours will focus on exploring the potential of Varroa as a fungal vector and isolating additional fungal strains important for both Varroa destructor and Apis mellifera.

In conclusion, the isolation of Alternaria sp., Trichoderma sp., Penicillium sp., Verticillium sp., Mucor sp., Aspergillus sp. and Fusarium sp. fungi from bees emphasizes the need for extensive investigation to understand their roles in bee health, disease dynamics and ecological interactions. Understanding the effects of these fungi on bee populations is critical for establishing measures to protect bee health and maintain their key function in ecosystems.

Funding information

This work received no specific grant from any funding agency.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Dr Seda BİRYOL for informative contributions to the isolation of fungi.

Author contributions

Author(s) contributed to the conceptualization, design of methodolgy, and acquisition of funds for the experiments, conducted the investigation process, performed the formal analysis and wrote the original draft. All author(s) contributed to review and editing of the draft.

Conflicts of interest

The author(s) declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical statement

An ethics certificate was not required for the study. The animals (honey bees) used in the study died naturally and were collected from nature. Live honey bees were collected for control and not used in experiments. Live honey bees were bred for control purposes only.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: BQCV, black queen cell virus; DI, deinonized water; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; dNTP, deoxynucleoside triphosphate; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PDA, potato dextrose agar; PDAY, potato dextrose agar+yeast.

References

  • 1.Michener CD. The Bees of the World. The Johns Hopkins UniversUniversity Baltimore and London; 2000. p. 913. p. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.O’Toole C, Raw A. Bees of the World. London, Blanford; 1991. p. 192. p. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Özbek H. Arılar ve Doğa. Uludağ Arı Derg. 2002:22–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Crane E, Walker P. Pollination Directory for World Crops. London: International Bee Research Association; 1984. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Free JB. Insect Pollination of Crops. 2nd. London: Academic Press; 1970. edn. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McGregor SE. Insect Pollination of Cultivated Crop Plants. Agricultural Research Service Western Region. Arizona, USA: USDA, Tucson; 1976. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gilliam M, Vandenberg JD. In: Honey Bee Pests, Predators and Diseases. Morse RA, Flottum PK, editors. Medina, OH: A.I. Root Co; 1997. Fungi; pp. 79–112. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hristov P, Shumkova R, Palova N, Neov B. Factors associated with honey bee colony losses: a mini-review. Vet Sci. 2020;7:166. doi: 10.3390/vetsci7040166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jensen AB, James RR, Eilenberg J. Long-term storage of Ascosphaera aggregata and Ascosphaera apis, pathogens of the leafcutting bee (Megachile rotundata) and the honey bee (Apis mellifera) J Invertebr Pathol. 2009;101:157–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2009.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Murray EA, Burand J, Trikoz N, Schnabel J, Grab H, et al. Viral transmission in honey bees and native bees, supported by a global black queen cell virus phylogeny. Environ Microbiol. 2019;21:972–983. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Castagnino GLB, Mateos A, Meana A, Montejo L, Zamorano Iturralde LV, et al. Etiology, symptoms and prevention of chalkbrood disease: a literature review. Rev bras saúde prod anim. 2020;21 doi: 10.1590/s1519-9940210332020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Conceição P de J, Neves CM de L, Sodré G da S, De Carvalho CAL, Souza AV, et al. Susceptibility of Melipona scutellaris Latreille, 1811 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) worker bees to Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. Sociobiology. 2014;61:184–188. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v61i2.184-188. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Meikle WG, Mercadier G, Holst N, Girod V. Impact of two treatments of a formulation of Beauveria bassiana (Deuteromycota: Hyphomycetes) conidia on Varroa mites (Acari: Varroidae) and on honeybee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colony health. Exp Appl Acarol. 2008;46:105–117. doi: 10.1007/s10493-008-9160-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Paludo CR, Menezes C, Silva-Junior EA, Vollet-Neto A, Andrade-Dominguez A, et al. Stingless bee larvae require fungal steroid to pupate. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1122. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19583-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Aronstein KA, Murray KD. Chalkbrood disease in honey bees. J Invertebr Pathol. 2010;103 Suppl 1:S20–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2009.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hedtke SM, Blitzer EJ, Montgomery GA, Danforth BN. Introduction of non-native pollinators can lead to trans-continental movement of bee-associated fungi. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0130560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Benjamin MA, Zhioua E, Ostfeld RS. Laboratory and field evaluation of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae (Deuteromycetes) for controlling questing adult Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) J Med Entomol. 2002;39:723–728. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585-39.5.723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Doğan S, Ocak İ, Hasenekoğlu İ, Sezek F. First records of fungi in the families Caligonellidae, Cryptognathidae, Stigmaeidae and Tectocepheidae mites (Arachnida: Acari) from Turkey. Archs Sci Geneve. 2003;56:137–142. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Biryol S, Demirbağ Z, Erdoğan P, Demir I. Development of Beauveria bassiana (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) as a mycoinsecticide to control green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Homoptera: Aphididae) and investigation of its biocontrol potential. J Asia-Pac Entomol. 2022;25:101878. doi: 10.1016/j.aspen.2022.101878. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Biedermann PHW, Vega FE. Ecology and evolution of insect-fungus mutualisms. Annu Rev Entomol. 2020;65:431–455. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-024910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stefanini I. Yeast-insect associations: It takes guts. Yeast. 2018;35:315–330. doi: 10.1002/yea.3309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vega FE, Blackwell M. Insect-Fungal Associations: Ecology and Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005. pp. 257–291. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Soto-Robles LV, Torres-Banda V, Rivera-Orduña FN, Curiel-Quesada E, Hidalgo-Lara ME, et al. An overview of genes from Cyberlindnera americana, a symbiont yeast isolated from the Gut of the bark Beetle Dendroctonus rhizophagus (Curculionidae: Scolytinae), involved in the detoxification process using genome and transcriptome data. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2180. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Aanen DK, Eggleton P, Rouland-Lefevre C, Guldberg-Froslev T, Rosendahl S, et al. The evolution of fungus-growing termites and their mutualistic fungal symbionts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:14887–14892. doi: 10.1073/pnas.222313099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Beaver R. In: Insect-Fungus Interactions. Wilding N, Collins NM, Hammond PM, Webber JF, editors. London: Academic Press; 1989. Insect–fungus relationships in the bark and ambrosia beetles; pp. 121–143. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mueller UG, Rehner SA, Schultz TR. The evolution of agriculture in ants. Science. 1998;281:2034–2038. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5385.2034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Flores JM, Spivak M, Gutiérrez I. Spores of Ascosphaera apis contained in wax foundation can infect honeybee brood. Vet Microbiol. 2005;108:141–144. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Heath LAF. Development of chalk brood in a honeybee colony: a review. Bee World. 1982;63:119–130. doi: 10.1080/0005772X.1982.11097876. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Puerta F, Flores JM, Bustos M, Padilla F. Field and laboratory studies on Chalkbrood disease of honeybees. Am Bee J. 1995;122:2934. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Evison SE, Jensen AB. The biology and prevalence of fungal diseases in managed and wild bees. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2018;26:105–113. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2018.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Becchimanzi A, Nicoletti R. Aspergillus-bees: a dynamic symbiotic association. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:968963. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.968963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Glifiski Z, Buczek K. Response of the apoidea to fungal infections. Apicata. 2003;38:183–189. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Niu G, Johnson RM, Berenbaum MR. Toxicity of mycotoxins to honeybees and its amelioration by propolis. Apidologie. 2011;42:79–87. doi: 10.1051/apido/2010039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kostić AŽ, Milinčić DD, Petrović TS, Krnjaja VS, Stanojević SP, et al. Mycotoxins and mycotoxin producing fungi in pollen: review. Toxins. 2019;11:64. doi: 10.3390/toxins11020064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Batra LR, Batra SWT, Bohart GE. The mycoflora of domesticated and wild bees (Apoidea) Mycopathol Mycol Appl. 1973;49:13–44. doi: 10.1007/BF02057445. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yoder JA, Sammataro D, Peterson JA, Needham GR, Bruce WA. Water requirements of adult females of the honey bee parasitic mite, Varroa jacobsoni (Acari: Varroidae) and implications for control. Int J Acarol. 1999;25:329–335. doi: 10.1080/01647959908684171. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Benoit JB, Yoder JA, Sammataro D, Zettler LW. Mycoflora and fungal vector capacity of the parasitic mite Varroa destructor (Mesostigmata: varroidae) in honey bee (Hymenoptera: apidae) colonies. Int J Acarol. 2004;30:103–106. doi: 10.1080/01647950408684376. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Muz MN. Bal Arılarında ani Koloni Sönmesi. Türkiye Parazitol Derg. 2008;32:271–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Özakın C, Aydın L, Çakmak İ, Güleğen E. Hazır ve Eski Peteklerin Bakteriyolojik ve Mikolojik Yönden Incelenmesi. Uludağ Arı Derg, Şubat; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Özkırım A, Keskin N. Ankara Ili ve Çevresindeki Arılıklarda Teşhis Edilen Başlıca Yavru Hastalmılarının Dağılımı. Mellifera. 2002;2–4:8–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Borsuk G, Ptaszynska AA, Olszewski K. Impact of nosemosis on the intestinal yeast flora of honey bees. Med Weter. 2013;69:726–729. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gilliam M. Are yeasts present in adult worker honey bees1 as a consequence of stress?2,3. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1973;66:1176. doi: 10.1093/aesa/66.5.1176. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gilliam M, Wickerham LJ, Morton HL, Martin RD. Yeasts isolated from honey bees, Apis mellifera, fed 2,4-D and antibiotics. J Invertebr Pathol. 1974;24:349–356. doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(74)90143-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Maes PW, Floyd AS, Mott BM, Anderson KE. Overwintering honey bee colonies: effect of worker age and climate on the Hindgut microbiota. Insects. 2021;12:224. doi: 10.3390/insects12030224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ptaszyńska AA, Borsuk G, Mułenko W, Wilk J. Impact of vertebrate probiotics on honeybee yeast microbiota and on the course of nosemosis. Med Weter. 2016;72:430–434. doi: 10.21521/mw.5534. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ptaszyńska AA, Paleolog J, Borsuk G. Nosema ceranae infection promotes proliferation of yeasts in honey bee intestines. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0164477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rada V, Máchová M, Huk J, Marounek M, Dušková D. Microflora in the honeybee digestive tract: counts, characteristics and sensitivity to veterinary drugs. Apidologie. 1997;28:357–365. doi: 10.1051/apido:19970603. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lunn K, Frøslev T, Rhodes M, Taylor L, Oliveira HFM, et al. Non-target effects of agri-environmental schemes on solitary bees and fungi in the United Kingdom. Bull Entomol Res. 2022;112:734–744. doi: 10.1017/S0007485322000414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pitts-Singer TL. Examination of ‘pollen balls’ in nests of the alfalfa leafcutting bee, Megachile rotundata . J Api Res. 2004;43:40–46. doi: 10.1080/00218839.2004.11101108. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Yoshiyama M, Kimura K. Bacteria in the gut of Japanese honeybee, Apis cerana japonica, and their antagonistic effect against Paenibacillus larvae, the causal agent of American foulbrood. J Invertebr Pathol. 2009;102:91–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2009.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sevim A, Demir I, Höfte M, Humber RA, Demirbag Z. Isolation and characterization of entomopathogenic fungi from hazelnut-growing region of Turkey. BioControl. 2010;55:279–297. doi: 10.1007/s10526-009-9235-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. In: PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. San Diago: Academic Press; 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA Genes for phylogenetics; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Clark K, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D48–53. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Barbosa RN, Leong SL, Vinnere-Pettersson O, Chen AJ, Souza-Motta CM, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of Monascus and new species from honey, pollen and nests of stingless bees. Stud Mycol. 2017;86:29–51. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2017.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Barbosa RN, Bezerra JDP, Souza-Motta CM, Frisvad JC, Samson RA, et al. New Penicillium and Talaromyces species from honey, pollen and nests of stingless bees. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2018;111:1883–1912. doi: 10.1007/s10482-018-1081-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Agbo BE, Ogar AV, Itah AY, Brooks AA, Akonjor MA. Assessment of the effects of cassava mill effluent on the soil and its microbiota in Biase local government area of Cross river state, Nigeria. World J Adv Res Rev. 2019;1:034–044. doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2019.1.2.0012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Nnenna OJP, Precious O. Effect of storage conditions on the microbial and proximate composition of bread made from wheat flour and white flour. AFSJ. 2022:21–30. doi: 10.9734/afsj/2022/v21i130397. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.de Souza PM, Bittencourt ML de A, Caprara CC, de Freitas M, de Almeida RPC, et al. A biotechnology perspective of fungal proteases. Braz J Microbiol. 2015;46:337–346. doi: 10.1590/S1517-838246220140359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Montoya-Castrillón M, Serna-Vasco KJ, Pinilla L, Quiceno-Rico JM, Cardona-Bermúdez LM, et al. Isolation and characterization of filamentous fungi from wood and soil samples of “La Lorena”, Sonsón, Antioquia (Colombia), natural reserve. DYNA. 2021;88:171–180. doi: 10.15446/dyna.v88n219.96144. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Nguyen TTT, Lee HB. Discovery of three new Mucor species associated with Cricket insects in Korea. J Fungi. 2022;8:601. doi: 10.3390/jof8060601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Rozpądek P, Nosek M, Domka A, Ważny R, Jędrzejczyk R, et al. Acclimation of the photosynthetic apparatus and alterations in sugar metabolism in response to inoculation with endophytic fungi. Plant Cell Environ. 2019;42:1408–1423. doi: 10.1111/pce.13485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Urbahillah A, Jayus J, Nurhayati N. Improving SCOBY starter using co-culture of tapai and bakery yeast. Biodiversitas. 2021;22:10. doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d221055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wagner L, Stielow JB, de Hoog GS, Bensch K, Schwartze VU, et al. A new species concept for the clinically relevant Mucor circinelloides complex. Persoonia. 2020;44:67–97. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2020.44.03. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Accoti A, Engdahl CS, Dimopoulos G. Discovery of novel entomopathogenic Fungi for mosquito-borne disease control. Front Fungal Biol. 2021;2:637234. doi: 10.3389/ffunb.2021.637234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Besong PN, Kinge TR. Fungi diversity on some fruits and biological control using two plants extracts. JABB. 2021:24–38. doi: 10.9734/jabb/2021/v24i430209. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Viegas C, Faria T, dos Santos M, Carolino E, Sabino R, et al. Slaughterhouses fungal burden assessment: a contribution for the pursuit of a better assessment strategy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13:297. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13030297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Janet Olufunmilayo W, Gloria O. Fungal population and physicochemical characteristics of Abattoir-Impacted soil in Iwofe, Rivers State. SAJRM. 2021:36–44. doi: 10.9734/sajrm/2021/v11i230249. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Tunail N. Funguslar ve Mikotoksinler. Gıda Mikrobiyolojisi ve Uygulamaları, Genişletilmiş. 2000;2:1–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sammataro D, Gerson U, Needham GR. Parasitic mites of honey bees: life history, implications, and impact. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:519–548. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Liu TP. Varroa mites as carriers of honey bee chalkbrood. Amer Bee J. 1996;138:655. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Foley K, Fazio G, Jensen AB, Hughes WOH. The distribution of Aspergillus spp. opportunistic parasites in hives and their pathogenicity to honey bees. Vet Microbiol. 2014;169:203–210. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.11.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hasenekoğlu İ. Toprak Mikrofungusları, 1-7 Cilt. Atatürk Üniversitesi Yayınları. 1991:689. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Inglis GD, Goettel MS, Sigler L. Influence of microorganisms on Alfalfa Leafcutter Bee (Megachile rotundata) larval development and susceptibility to Ascosphaera aggregata . J Invert Pathol. 1993;61:236–243. doi: 10.1006/jipa.1993.1046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Disayathanoowat T, Li H, Supapimon N, Suwannarach N, Lumyong S, et al. Different dynamics of bacterial and fungal communities in hive-stored bee bread and their possible roles: a case study from two commercial honey bees in China. Microorganisms. 2020;8:264. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8020264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Gilliam M, Taber S, Lorenz BJ, Prest DB. Factors affecting development of chalkbrood disease in colonies of honey bees, Apis mellifera, fed pollen contaminated with Ascosphaera apis . J Invert Pathol. 1988;52:314–325. doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(88)90141-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Küçük Ç, Kıvanç M, Kınacı E, Kınacı G. Cladosporium herbarum ve fusarium SP.'Nin gelişimlerine bikarbonatlarmn Etkisi. Orlab On-Line. 2006;5:1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kononenko GP, Burkin AA, Gavrilova OP, Gagkaeva TY. Fungal species and multiple mycotoxin contamination of cultivated forage crops. AFSci. 2015;24:323–330. doi: 10.23986/afsci.52313. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Lager R, Johnsson L. Seed-borne fungi affect field emergence in red clover. J Plant Dis Prot. 2002;109:350–356. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Schirmböck M, Lorito M, Wang YL, Hayes CK, Arisan-Atac I, et al. Parallel formation and synergism of hydrolytic enzymes and peptaibol antibiotics, molecular mechanisms involved in the antagonistic action of Trichoderma harzianum against phytopathogenic fungi. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994;60:4364–4370. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.12.4364-4370.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Küçük Ç, Kıvanç M. Isolation of Trichoderma spp. and their antifungal, biochemical and physiological features. Turk J Biol. 2003;27:247–253. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Yigit F. Bitki Patojenlerinin Kontrolünde Kullanılan Biyokontrol Ürünler ve Özellikleri. Selçuk Univ Ziraat Fak Derg. 2005;19:70–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Dönel G, Örtücü S, Doğan S. Research on the antagonistic interactions between Microfungi isolated from the body surfaces of some mites (Acari) and an Entomopathogen fungus Beauveria Bassiana (Balsamo) (Hyphomycetes) under laboratory conditions. Muğla. 2009 [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kapongo JP, Shipp L, Kevan P, Sutton JC. Co-vectoring of Beauveria bassiana and Clonostachys rosea by bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) for control of insect pests and suppression of grey mould in greenhouse tomato and sweet pepper. Biol Con. 2008;46:508–514. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.05.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kovach J, Petzoldt R, Harman GE. Use of honey bees and bumble bees to disseminate Trichoderma harzianum 1295-22 to strawberries for botrytis control. Biol Con. 2000;18:235–242. doi: 10.1006/bcon.2000.0839. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kohl J. Effect of Ulocladium atrum and other antagonists on sporulation of Botrytis cinerea on dead lily leaves exposed to field conditions. Phytopathology. 1996;85:393. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-85-393. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Köhl J, Molhoek WML. Effect of water potential on conidial germination and antagonism of Ulocladium atrum against Botrytis cinerea . Phytopathology. 2001;91:485–491. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2001.91.5.485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Howell CR, Stipanovic RD, Lumsden RD. Antibiotic production by strains of Gliocladium virens and its relation to the biocontrol of cotton seedling diseases. Bio Sci Technol. 1993;3:435–441. doi: 10.1080/09583159309355298. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Monte E. Understanding Trichoderma: between biotechnology and microbial ecology. Int Microbiol. 2001;4:1–4. doi: 10.1007/s101230100001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Erkılıç A, Canıhoş Y, Biçici M, Kurt Ş. Türkiye’De alternaria alternata F.Sp. Citri’Nin Minneola Tangelo Izolatlarının İProdion’'A Karşı Dayanıklılıkları. J Agricult Forest. 1999;23:1051–1056. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Karabulut ÖA, Değirmencioğlu T. Hayvan yemi olarak kullanılan buğday danelerinde toksin oluşumuna neden olan fungusların Sodyum Hidroksit Uygulamasıyla Engellenmesi. Uludağ Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 2002;16:129–138. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Tsuge T, Harimoto Y, Akimitsu K, Ohtani K, Kodama M, et al. Host-selective toxins produced by the plant pathogenic fungus Alternaria alternata. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013;37:44–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00350.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Sauer DB, Seitz LM, Burroughs R, Mohr HE, West JL, et al. Toxicity of Alternaria metabolites found in weathered sorghum grain at harvest. J Agric Food Chem. 1978;26:1380–1393. doi: 10.1021/jf60220a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Griffin GF, Chu FS. Toxicity of the Alternaria metabolites alternariol, alternariol methyl ether, altenuene, and tenuazonic acid in the chicken embryo assay. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983;46:1420–1422. doi: 10.1128/aem.46.6.1420-1422.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Ostry V. Alternaria mycotoxins: an overview of chemical characterization, producers, toxicity, analysis and occurrence in foodstuffs. WMJ. 2008;1:175–188. doi: 10.3920/WMJ2008.x013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kırpık MA, Aydoğan MN, Örtücü S, Hasenekoğlu İ. Kafkas Arısı (Apis Mellifera Caucasica Pollmann, 1889) (Hymenoptera: Apidae)’Nın, Dış Yüzey ve Sindirim Sistemi Mikrofungus Florasının Belirlenmesi. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2010;16:S347–S352. [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Rath AC. The use of entomopathogenic fungi for control of termites. Bio Sci Technol. 2000;10:563–581. doi: 10.1080/095831500750016370. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Sesli E, Selçuk F. Türkiye Mantarları Listesi (the checklist of fungi of Turkey) İstanbul: Ali Nihat Gökyiğit Vakfı Yayını. 2020:1177. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Tamura K, Nei M, Kumar S. Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:11030–11035. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404206101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenices: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39:783–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Access Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES