Skip to main content
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine logoLink to Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
. 2024 Feb 28;27(4):171. doi: 10.3892/etm.2024.12459

Predictive nomogram models for atrial fibrillation in COPD patients: A comprehensive analysis of risk factors and prognosis

Tao Huang 1, Xingjie Huang 2, Xueying Cui 3, Qinghua Dong 4,
PMCID: PMC10928814  PMID: 38476891

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to identify the independent risk factors and prognostic indicators for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to develop predictive nomogram models. This retrospective study included a total of 286 patients with COPD who were admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical College between January 2020 and May 2022. The average age of the patients was 77.11±8.67 years. Based on the presence or absence of AF, the patients were divided into two groups: The AF group (n=87) and the non-AF group (n=199). Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify variables with significant differences between the two groups. Nomogram models were constructed to predict the occurrence of AF in COPD patients and to assess prognosis. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The follow-up period for the present study extended until April 31, 2023. Survival time was defined as the duration from the date of the interview to the date the participant succumbed or the end of the follow-up period. In the present study, age, uric acid (UA) and left atrial diameter (LAD) were found to be independent risk factors for the development of AF in patients diagnosed with COPD. The stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that age had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.072 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.019-1.128; P=0.007], UA had an OR of 1.004 (95% CI: 1.001-1.008; P=0.010) and LAD had an OR of 1.195 (95% CI: 1.098-1.301; P<0.001). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that LAD and UA were independent prognostic factors for long-term mortality in COPD patients with AF. LAD had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.104 (95% CI: 1.046-1.165; P<0.001) and UA had an HR of 1.004 (95% CI: 1.000-1.008; P=0.042). Based on these findings, predictive nomogram models were developed for AF in COPD patients, which demonstrated good discrimination ability with an area under the curve of 0.886. The prognostic nomogram for COPD patients with AF also showed good predictive accuracy with a concordance index of 0.886 (95% CI: 0.842-0.930). These models can provide valuable information for risk assessment and prognosis evaluation in clinical practice. Age, UA and LAD are independent risk factors for AF in COPD patients. The developed nomogram models provide a reliable tool for predicting AF in COPD patients and for prognosis assessment.

Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, risk factors, prognosis, nomogram model

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a prevalent and devastating global health issue, placing a substantial strain on both population health and healthcare resources (1). This disease is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and irreversible airflow limitation (2). COPD is closely linked to chronic bronchitis and emphysema, which are the primary underlying conditions leading to the development of COPD, often presenting with overlapping features (3). Epidemiological data from 2015 estimated that ~299 million individuals worldwide were affected by COPD, with >3 million deaths attributed to this chronic ailment (4). COPD not only exacts a significant economic toll on society but also poses a grave threat to the physical and psychological well-being of individuals (5).

In recent years, comorbidity has emerged as a global concern, referring to the coexistence of two or more chronic diseases. COPD is a systemic ailment commonly associated with various chronic conditions, such as atrial fibrillation (AF), cardiovascular disease, diabetes, lung cancer, osteoporosis and depression (6-8). AF, a significant complication of COPD, is known to worsen the quality of life and increase all-cause mortality, thereby imposing a substantial disease and economic burden on COPD patients (9-11). Currently, AF is the most prevalent supraventricular arrhythmia, affecting an estimated 8 million patients in China alone (12). A meta-analysis involving 4.2 million COPD patients revealed that 13% of them had concurrent AF (13). Furthermore, Goudis et al (14) demonstrated that COPD patients face a twofold increased risk of developing AF compared to non-COPD patients, with severe COPD patients exhibiting a fourfold higher incidence. Although the risk factors for COPD combined with AF remain unclear, a study involving 2,352 AF patients identified left atrial enlargement and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction as potential risk factors for this comorbidity (15). A meta-analysis conducted in 2020 revealed that advanced age (>65), male gender and Caucasian ethnicity are associated with an increased risk of AF in patients with COPD (16). Furthermore, independent risk factors for COPD-induced AF include myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, chronic heart failure, pulmonary infections, acute respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation, chronic kidney disease and the use of ipratropium bromide. Notably, the administration of β-adrenergic agonists and theophylline during acute exacerbation of COPD was found to elevate cardiac instability, which is an independent risk factor for COPD-induced AF (17). However, no significant association was observed between hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, liver failure and the risk of new-onset AF in the present study. Conversely, literature reports have identified diabetes, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease and liver failure as independent risk factors for the development of AF in non-COPD patients (16). Given the current controversy surrounding the identification of risk factors for COPD combined with AF, it is imperative to establish a diagnostic model for this condition.

To identify COPD patients at high risk of developing AF and with poor survival rates, the present study aimed to construct a diagnostic model for predicting the risk of COPD combined with AF. Additionally, a prognostic model was developed to predict the prognosis of COPD combined with AF. This was achieved by utilizing demographic and common hematological parameters of COPD patients admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University between January 2020 and May 2022. The ultimate goal was to identify specific patient subgroups and tailor personalized treatment strategies, leading to improved clinical outcomes and enhanced quality of life.

Materials and methods

Study population

This retrospective study analyzed patients with COPD who were admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical College (Guilin, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, P.R. China) between January 2020 and May 2022. Based on the presence or absence of AF, the study population was divided into the AF group (COPD with AF) and the non-AF group (COPD without AF). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University (approval no. NO.YJS-2021011). The inclusion criteria were as follows: i) Patients aged 40 years or older, of any gender, admitted for the treatment of dyspnea, cough, or exacerbation of sputum in COPD; ii) COPD diagnosis in accordance with the 2021 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines (1); iii) completion of electrocardiography or 24-h Holter monitoring, echocardiography, pulmonary function tests, blood gas analysis and renal function tests; iv) alert and able to communicate effectively. The exclusion criteria were as follows: i) Patients with concomitant valvular heart disease and recurrent AF after catheter radiofrequency ablation; ii) presence of active chronic respiratory diseases such as obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, bronchial asthma, severe pneumonia, bronchiectasis, tuberculosis, or pulmonary malignancies; iii) presence of other systemic diseases such as rheumatic autoimmune diseases or severe hepatic or renal failure; iv) need for tracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation, or concomitant multiple organ failure; v) incomplete research data. The definition and diagnostic criteria for COPD were based on the 2018 GOLD guidelines (1). The diagnostic criteria for AF were the presence of AF on surface electrocardiography or single-lead electrocardiographic recording lasting >30 sec (18). The diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension was based on the 2022 European Respiratory Society and European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (19).

Data collection

Clinical data were collected, including age, gender, height, weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure upon admission, duration of COPD, smoking and alcohol history, comorbidities and respiratory medication history. Laboratory test results upon admission included complete blood count, renal function and blood gas analysis (Table I). Transthoracic echocardiography was performed to measure relevant parameters such as left atrial diameter (LAD), right atrial diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction and pulmonary artery systolic pressure. Pulmonary function tests were conducted using a Master Screen spirometer by trained technicians. Prior to the tests, the height and weight of patients were measured in a standing position and the tests were conducted according to the guidelines established by the Pulmonary Function Group of the Chinese Medical Association Respiratory Branch. Patients received 1-2 practice sessions before the tests and there were no absolute contraindications to pulmonary function testing in any of the patients. The main outcome measures collected were forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), FEV1 as a percentage of predicted (FEV1%Pred) and the FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio. The follow-up period for the study extended until April 31, 2023. Survival time was defined as the duration from the date of the interview to the date of the participant succumbing or the end of the follow-up period.

Table I.

Comparison of baseline data between AF group and non-AF group.

Characteristic AF non-AF P-value Statistic Method
N 87 199      
Sex (Male/Female), n (%)     0.237 1.400 χ2
     Male 65 (74.7) 161 (80.9)      
     Female 22 (25.3) 38 (19.1)      
Age, years (median IQR) 77 (70-81) 69 (63-76) <0.001   Wilcoxon
Hypertension, n (%) 37 (42.5) 63 (31.7) 0.076 3.146 χ2
Chronic heart failure, n (%) 61 (70.1) 58 (29.1) <0.001 41.821 χ2
History of myocardial infarction, n (%) 0 (0) 1 (0.5) 1   Fisher test
Chronic kidney disease, n (%) 23 (26.4) 15 (7.5) <0.001 18.767 χ2
Respiratory failure, n (%) 22 (25.3) 32 (16.1) 0.067 3.350 χ2
Pulmonary infection, n (%) 87(100) 196 (98.5) 0.603 0.271 Yates' correction
Cerebrovascular accident, n (%) 16 (18.4) 27 (13.6) 0.294 1.102 χ2
Smoking, n (%) 37 (42.5) 105 (52.8) 0.111 2.537 χ2
SBP, mmHg, (median IQR) 129 (114-143) 130 (116-142) 0.878   Wilcoxon
DBP, mmHg, mean ± standard deviation 78.977±14.487 80.477±12.73 0.380 -0.879 T test
Heart rate, beats per minute, (median IQR) 92 (78-101) 93 (82.5-102) 0.674   Wilcoxon
Respiratory rate, breaths per minute, (median IQR) 22 (20.5-23.5) 22 (21-23) 0.647   Wilcoxon
Duration of COPD, (median IQR) 10 (2-10) 8 (3-10) 0.750   Wilcoxon
Home oxygen therapy, n (%) 7(8) 10(5) 0.320 0.988 χ2
ICS, n (%) 2 (2.3) 9 (4.5) 0.572 0.320 Yates' correction
Anticholinergic drugs, n (%) 33 (37.9) 63 (31.7) 0.301 1.068 χ2
LABA, n (%) 28 (32.2) 59 (29.6) 0.668 0.184 χ2
Xanthine drugs, n (%) 45 (51.7) 127 (63.8) 0.055 3.694 χ2
ICS + LABA, n (%) 37 (42.5) 93 (46.7) 0.511 0.432 χ2
WBC, (median IQR) 7.6 (5.905-11.28) 8.04 (6.26-10.125) 0.893   Wilcoxon
RBC, (median IQR) 4.34 (3.75-4.63) 4.43 (4.0625-4.8675) 0.057   Wilcoxon
Hb, (median IQR) 128 (114-142) 132 (122-144) 0.099   Wilcoxon
Plt, (median IQR) 208 (162-275) 230 (191-268) 0.103   Wilcoxon
Lymphocyte count, (median IQR) 1.34 (0.76-1.45) 1.305 (0.93-1.74) 0.062   Wilcoxon
Monocyte count, (median IQR) 0.66 (0.51-0.9) 0.65 (0.4925-0.8375) 0.318   Wilcoxon
Neutrophil count, (median IQR) 5.89 (3.96-9.35) 5.57 (3.885-7.9125) 0.640   Wilcoxon
Hematocrit, median, (median IQR) 39.5 (35.7-44) 40.7 (37.2-43.7) 0.232   Wilcoxon
CRP, (median IQR) 6.965 (4-21.828) 5.36 (4-28.265) 0.588   Wilcoxon
pH, (median IQR) 7.41 (7.39-7.445) 7.41 (7.3893-7.43) 0.302   Wilcoxon
PCO2, (median IQR) 43 (37.3-51.25) 44.85 (39.825-52.75) 0.138   Wilcoxon
PO2, (median IQR) 76.1 (61-88.85) 77.55 (67-89.8) 0.570   Wilcoxon
HCO3, (median IQR) 27.1 (24.8-32) 27.9 (25.5-32) 0.276   Wilcoxon
FEV1, (median IQR) 1.05 (0.65-1.82) 1.3 (0.825-1.815) 0.201   Wilcoxon
Predicted FEV1, (median IQR) 48.3 (31-61) 48.6 (34.2-69.8) 0.329   Wilcoxon
FVC, (median IQR) 2.14 (1.62-2.875) 2.23 (1.71-2.93) 0.410   Wilcoxon
Predicted FVC, (median IQR) 56.7 (15.945-68.15) 53.2 (1.99-66.9) 0.108   Wilcoxon
FEV1/FVC, (median IQR) 57.04 (42.205-75.95) 64.14 (48.69-76.85) 0.233   Wilcoxon
Predicted FEV1/FVC, mean ± standard deviation 59.174±17.409 59.296±13.334 0.953 -0.058 Welch t' test
Pulmonary hypertension, n (%) 58 (75.3) 75 (37.7) <0.001 31.498 χ2
Pulmonary artery pressure, (median IQR) 48 (37.5-59) 39 (31-46) 0.002   Wilcoxon
LAD, (median IQR) 38 (31.5-45) 28 (25-31) <0.001   Wilcoxon
RAD, (median IQR) 38 (30-45.5) 29 (26-32) <0.001   Wilcoxon
UA, (median IQR) 413 (329.5-484.5) 336.5 (274.25-396) <0.001   Wilcoxon

IQR, interquartile range; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids; LABA, long-acting β agonists; WBC, white blood cell; RBC, red blood cell; Hb, hemoglobin; Plt, platelet; CRP, C-reactive protein; PCO2, partial pressure of carbon dioxide; PO2, partial pressure of oxygen; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 sec; FVC, forced vital capacity; LAD, left atrial diameter; RAD, right atrial diameter; UA, uric acid.

Construction of diagnostic and prognostic models

A stepwise backward logistic regression analysis was employed to identify key factors for constructing a diagnostic model for the coexistence of COPD and AF and a visually appealing nomogram was generated. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to select factors influencing the prognosis of COPD combined with AF and a prognostic nomogram was constructed using the identified factors. The accuracy of the models was evaluated using the concordance index (c-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC), with higher values indicating superior accuracy. The predictive ability of the models was assessed using calibration curves, where a well-calibrated model would align closely with the 45-degree diagonal line.

Survival analysis

The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to plot the survival curves of the COPD + AF group and the COPD group (20). The log-rank test was utilized to compare the survival differences between these two patient groups.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were described using mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range, depending on the distribution of the data. For variable comparisons, the two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test with continuous correction based on data normality and homogeneity of variance were employed. Categorical data were presented as absolute values and percentages and the χ2 test was used to compare categorical variables between the two groups. Data were organized using Excel 16.0 (Microsoft Corporation) and analyzed using RStudio version 4.1.2(21). In the R software, several packages were employed, including ‘readxl’, ‘car’, ‘autoReg’, ‘dplyr’, ‘officer’, ‘foreign’, ‘moonBook’, ‘rrtable’, ‘survival’, ‘survivalROC’, ‘survminer’, ‘rms’, ‘foreign’, and ‘tableone’. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Baseline data comparison

The present study enrolled a cohort of 286 patients, with a mean age of 77.11±8.67 years, including 226 males. Among them, 87 patients were classified in the AF group, with an average age of 75.36±7.51 years, while the remaining 199 patients were assigned to the non-AF group, with an average age of 69.25±8.50 years. Notably, the AF group exhibited significantly advanced age, elevated levels of UA, pulmonary artery pressure, as well as a higher prevalence of comorbidities such as chronic heart failure, pulmonary hypertension and chronic kidney disease. Moreover, the AF group displayed significantly enlarged LAD and right atrial diameter, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). A comprehensive overview of the baseline demographic characteristics for both groups is presented in Table I.

Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for COPD with AF

To identify potential risk factors associated with COPD and AF, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted for variables demonstrating significant differences between the two groups (age, chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, UA, pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary artery pressure, LAD, right atrial diameter). Following stepwise regression analysis, age, UA and LAD were identified as independent risk factors (Table II).

Table II.

Stepwise logistic regression analysis assessing the risk of AF development in individuals diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease COPD.

  Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Characteristics Total, n Odds Ratio (95% CI) P-value Odds ratio (95% CI) P-value
Age 286 1.095 (1.058-1.133) <0.001 1.072 (1.019-1.128) 0.007
Chronic heart failure 119 5.704 (3.286-9.901) <0.001 2.122 (0.907-4.962) 0.083
Chronic kidney disease 38 4.408 (2.167-8.966) <0.001 2.202 (0.704-6.889) 0.175
UA 271 1.006 (1.003-1.008) <0.001 1.004 (1.001-1.008) 0.010
Pulmonary hypertension 133 5.047 (2.792-9.124) <0.001 2.065 (0.678-6.295) 0.202
Pulmonary artery pressure 200 1.018 (1.002-1.034) 0.025 0.993 (0.964-1.023) 0.649
LAD 286 1.198 (1.143-1.256) <0.001 1.195 (1.098-1.301) <0.001
RAD 286 1.118 (1.081-1.156) <0.001 1.014 (0.945-1.089) 0.691

AF, atrial fibrillation; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CI, confidence interval; LAD, left atrial diameter; RAD, right atrial diameter.

Nomogram model for predicting COPD with AF

The present study developed a nomogram model to predict the occurrence of COPD with AF, incorporating age, UA and LAD as predictors (Fig. 1A). The ROC curve analysis revealed an AUC of 0.886, indicating excellent discriminative ability of the nomogram model (Fig. 1B). Furthermore, the calibration plot demonstrated a close agreement between the predicted and observed probabilities, indicating reliable calibration of the nomogram model (Fig. 1C). Additionally, the decision curve analysis (DCA) curve illustrated the clinical utility of the nomogram model (Fig. 1D).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Performance evaluation of the nomogram model. (A) Nomogram results depicting the diagnostic model's utilization of age, UA and LAD. Each diagnostic factor corresponds to a specific score, which are then aggregated to derive the total score for predicting the risk of atrial fibrillation development in individual chronic 0 obstructive pulmonary disease patients. A linear line is plotted along the total score axis to facilitate risk prediction. (B) Receiver operating characteristic curve illustrating the diagnostic nomogram's performance. (C) Re-calibration curve demonstrating the diagnostic nomogram's accuracy. (D) Decision curve analysis curve. UA, uric acid; LAD, left atrial diameter; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; TPR, true-positive rate; FPR, false-positive rate.

Survival analysis

To assess the effect of AF on the prognosis of COPD patients, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare the all-cause mortality rate between individuals with COPD alone and those with COPD and AF. The findings revealed a significant difference in the all-cause mortality rate between the two groups. Notably, the COPD with AF group exhibited substantially lower survival rates compared to the COPD group (P<0.05; Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with and without AF. AF, atrial fibrillation; HR. hazard ratio.

Prognostic model and nomogram

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify factors influencing the prognosis of patients diagnosed with both COPD and AF. As presented in Table III, both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that levels of uric acid (UA) and LAD were independent prognostic factors for COPD patients with concurrent AF. Based on these significant factors, a prognostic nomogram for COPD with AF was constructed (Fig. 3A), yielding a c-index of 0.886 (95% confidence interval: 0.842-0.930). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for predicting 5-month, 10-month and 15-month survival rates using the nomogram were 0.952, 0.851 and 0.881, respectively (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, the calibration curve demonstrated excellent agreement between the predicted and observed 5-month, 10-month and 15-month survival rates (Fig. 3C).

Table III.

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis predicting the long-term mortality rate associated with atrial fibrillation occurrence in patients diagnosed with COPD.

  Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Characteristics Total, n Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-value
Pulmonary hypertension 77        
     1 58 Reference      
     0 19 1.981 (0.597-6.571) 0.264    
Pulmonary artery pressure 71 1.007 (0.971-1.044) 0.711    
LAD 87 1.120 (1.060-1.183) <0.001 1.104 (1.046-1.165) <0.001
RAD 87 0.989 (0.935-1.047) 0.708    
UA 79 1.006 (1.002-1.010) 0.005 1.004 (1.000-1.008) 0.042
Age 87 1.008 (0.940-1.082) 0.818    
Chronic Heart Failure 87        
     0 26 Reference      
     1 61 1.305 (0.413-4.126) 0.650    
Chronic kidney disease 87        
     0 64 Reference      
     1 23 0.571 (0.158-2.060) 0.392    

COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CI, confidence interval; LAD, left atrial diameter; RAD, right atrial diameter; UA, uric acid.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Construction and validation of the prognostic nomogram model. (A) Nomogram results of the prognostic model using UA and LAD. Each prognostic factor corresponds to a score and the individual scores are summed to obtain the total score for predicting the 5-, 10- and 15-month survival rates of COPD patients with AF. A straight line is drawn on the axis of the total score to predict the survival rates. (B) ROC curve of the prognostic Nomogram for predicting the 5-month, 10-month and 15-month survival rates of COPD patients with AF. (C) Re-calibration curve of the prognostic nomogram for predicting the 5-, 10- and 15-month survival rates of COPD patients with AF. UA, uric acid; LAD, left atrial diameter; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; AF, atrial fibrillation; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; AUC, area under the curve; TPR, true-positive rate; FPR, false-positive rate.

Discussion

The present study collected clinical data of patients with COPD admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical College between January 2020 and May 2022. A practical nomogram was constructed to predict the risk of AF in COPD patients and predicted the 5-, 10- and 15-month survival rates of COPD patients based on available demographic, clinical and hematological parameters. The results showed that the model for predicting AF risk in COPD patients had an AUC of 0.886 and the models for predicting 5-, 10- and 15-month survival had AUCs of 0.952, 0.851 and 0.881, respectively. The present study, for the first time to the best of the authors' knowledge, identified age, UA levels and LAD as independent risk factors for the development of AF in patients with COPD. These findings fill a knowledge gap in the existing literature and provide new guidance for risk assessment of AF in COPD patients.

AF is the most common supraventricular arrhythmia in clinical practice and its prevalence is associated with age and gender. A study (12) indicated that the prevalence of AF in males under 60 years old was 0.43 and 0.44% in females, while in males >60 years old, the prevalence increased to 1.83 and 1.92% in females. A recent survey in China (22) showed that the prevalence of AF reached 10% in individuals >75 years old. Prospective studies from Japan and the United States have also confirmed the relationship between age and the incidence of new-onset AF, with an increased risk of AF with advancing age (23). As age increases, the lung function of COPD patients gradually declines, leading to worsened hypoxia, which is a key mechanism for AF development in COPD, causing atrial structural changes and intimal thickening (24,25). The present study found that COPD patients with AF were significantly older than those without AF and logistic regression analysis indicated age as an independent risk factor for COPD with AF. This finding is consistent with a meta-analysis report in 2020(16), which showed that clinical characteristics of COPD with AF have significant demographic features such as age over 65, male gender and Caucasian ethnicity, indicating a higher risk of AF in these populations. Therefore, it was hypothesized that the risk of COPD with AF increases with age and clinicians should be more vigilant about the occurrence of AF in older COPD patients.

LAD, measured by echocardiography, plays an important role in the occurrence and development of AF (26,27). A cohort study by Vaziri et al (28) showed that for every 5 mm increase in LAD, the risk ratio for AF was 1.39 and LAD enlargement was an independent risk factor for AF. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis results indicated that LAD enlargement was an independent prognostic factor for AF. It has been discovered that changes in the ultrastructure of atrial myocytes and atrial fibrosis are the main forms of atrial remodeling in AF patients (29,30). Enlarged atrial myocardium not only affects atrial mechanical function but also increases the pathological basis for the formation of reentrant arrhythmias in AF, as the enlarged atrial myocardium can accommodate more reentrant wavelets (31,32). Research has found that inflammatory reactions are closely related to pathological processes such as electrical remodeling, structural remodeling and autonomic nervous system remodeling (33,34).

COPD patients experience increased pulmonary vascular resistance due to the positive end-expiratory pressure, which leads to the invasion of the interventricular septum into the left ventricle, impairing left ventricular filling and resulting in elevated left atrial and pulmonary vein pressures (35). This process of left atrial remodeling is particularly pronounced in COPD patients with comorbidities such as AF (36). The inflammatory response triggered by chronic hypoxia in COPD patients contributes to the process of atrial remodeling (37). Once AF occurs, the discordant contraction of atrial muscles further exacerbates atrial remodeling, creating a vicious cycle that promotes the development of AF and ultimately leads to further deterioration of cardiac structure and function (38). In the present study, LAD was found to be an independent risk factor for AF in COPD patients. Therefore, by controlling the pressure on LAD, it may be possible to reduce the risk of AF in COPD patients. Further research could explore interventions such as medication treatment or other measures to reduce pulmonary arterial hypertension or improve left ventricular function, thereby reducing the pressure on LAD and lowering the likelihood of AF in COPD patients.

UA plays an important role in the development and prognosis of COPD. The level of UA is directly proportional to the severity of tissue hypoxia. When tissue hypoxia occurs, ATP synthesis decreases, leading to increased degradation of adenine nucleotides and elevated UA levels (39,40). Plasma UA mainly originates from the metabolism of intracellular purine substances, with most of it being excreted by the kidneys and the remainder being degraded in the digestive tract (41). Existing research has indicated a close relationship between UA and oxidative stress (42). UA acts as a selective antioxidant and plays an important role in the plasma antioxidant mechanism by stabilizing serum vitamin C, preventing the oxidation inactivation of endothelial enzymes and maintaining vascular dilation capacity (43). Studies have found that serum UA levels are associated with inflammatory factors such as CRP, IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α (44-46). UA may induce atrial cell apoptosis and fibrosis through the inflammatory pathway, leading to atrial remodeling and promoting the occurrence of AF. Studies have reported a close relationship between plasma UA levels and the occurrence and adverse prognosis of cardiovascular diseases (47,48). Furthermore, elevated plasma UA levels have been confirmed as an independent risk factor for AF, increasing the risk of AF occurrence (45,49). A study found that elevated plasma UA levels were an independent risk factor for new-onset AF and the plasma UA levels were even higher in patients with persistent AF, suggesting a correlation between UA and the severity and duration of AF (50). The present study found that UA levels were an independent risk factor for AF in COPD patients. Therefore, controlling UA levels may have significance in preventing AF in COPD patients. Further research could explore interventions to lower UA levels, such as medication or dietary adjustments and their impact on the occurrence and prognosis of AF in COPD patients.

The present study discovered that plasma UA levels were significantly higher in COPD patients with AF compared to those without AF and this difference was statistically significant. Furthermore, both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that plasma UA levels were an independent prognostic factor for AF. UA is a routinely measured biochemical marker, easily obtained through simple methods. Therefore, when elevated UA levels are found in COPD patients, it should not be simply interpreted as an increased risk of gout, but rather as a potential indicator for cardiovascular events.

However, the present study had certain limitations. First, the follow-up period was relatively short, only until May 2023, and it is necessary to ensure a sufficiently long follow-up duration. Second, the present study employed a retrospective clinical design with a small sample size, thus requiring larger-scale, multicenter prospective studies to confirm the diagnostic and prognostic efficacy of LAD and UA in COPD with AF. Additionally, the model constructed only validated the predictive performance using the data from the modeling itself and further validation of the model's accuracy is needed using external data. To improve the utility of the nomogram in predicting the risk and long-term prognosis of COPD with AF in clinical practice, more rigorous multicenter prospective studies are necessary to validate the model developed in the present study.

In summary, the present study has developed a nomogram to predict the risk of AF in COPD patients and predict the 5-, 10- and 15-month survival rates of COPD patients with AF. The nomogram can assist clinicians and patients in early identification of COPD with AF and predict their 5-, 10- and 15-month survival rates, providing appropriate clinical information for personalized treatment strategies and improving quality of life for patients.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding Statement

Funding: Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.

Authors' contributions

TH was responsible for conceptualization, methodology, resources, writing the original draft and reviewing and editing. XH was responsible for investigation, formal analysis, writing the original draft, reviewing and editing and supervision. XC was responsible for investigation, supervision and writing. QD was responsible for investigation, supervision, resources and writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. TH, XH, XC and QD confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethical Committee of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University approved the present research (approval no. NO.YJS-2021011). The authors confirmed that all methods conform to the provisions of Helsinki Declaration. All participants signed informed consent.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Halpin DMG, Criner GJ, Papi A, Singh D, Anzueto A, Martinez FJ, Agusti AA, Vogelmeier CF. Global initiative for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease. The 2020 GOLD science committee report on COVID-19 and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;203:24–36. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202009-3533SO. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Labaki WW, Rosenberg SR. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173:ITC17–ITC32. doi: 10.7326/AITC202008040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kim V, Criner GJ. Chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:228–237. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201210-1843CI. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ruvuna L, Sood A. Epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Chest Med. 2020;41:315–327. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2020.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Iheanacho I, Zhang S, King D, Rizzo M, Ismaila AS. Economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): A systematic literature review. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020;15:439–460. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S234942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Negewo NA, Gibson PG, McDonald VM. COPD and its comorbidities: Impact, measurement and mechanisms. Respirology. 2015;20:1160–1171. doi: 10.1111/resp.12642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Decramer M, Janssens W, Miravitlles M. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet. 2012;379:1341–1351. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60968-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lauder L, Mahfoud F, Azizi M, Bhatt DL, Ewen S, Kario K, Parati G, Rossignol P, Schlaich MP, Teo KK, et al. Hypertension management in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:2066–2077. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li Z, Zhao H, Wang J. Metabolism and chronic inflammation: The links between chronic heart failure and comorbidities. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8(650278) doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.650278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Keshishian A, Xie L, Dembek C, Yuce H. Reduction in hospital readmission rates among medicare beneficiaries with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A Real-world Outcomes Study of Nebulized Bronchodilators. Clin Ther. 2019;41:2283–2296. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhou T, Liu P, Dhruva SS, Shah ND, Ramachandran R, Berg KM, Ross JS. Assessment of hypothetical out-of-pocket costs of guideline-recommended medications for the treatment of older adults with multiple chronic conditions, 2009 and 2019. JAMA Intern Med. 2022;182:185–195. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.7457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, Singh D, Rienstra M, Benjamin EJ, Gillum RF, Kim YH, McAnulty JH Jr, Zheng ZJ, et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: A global burden of disease 2010 study. Circulation. 2014;129:837–847. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Romiti GF, Corica B, Pipitone E, Vitolo M, Raparelli V, Basili S, Boriani G, Harari S, Lip GYH, Proietti M. Prevalence, management and impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 4,200,000 patients. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:3541–3554. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab453. AF-COMET International Collaborative Group. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Goudis CA, Konstantinidis AK, Ntalas IV, Korantzopoulos P. Electrocardiographic abnormalities and cardiac arrhythmias in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Cardiol. 2015;199:264–273. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Naser N, Dilic M, Durak A, Kulic M, Pepic E, Smajic E, Kusljugic Z. The impact of risk factors and comorbidities on the incidence of atrial fibrillation. Mater Sociomed. 2017;29:231–236. doi: 10.5455/msm.2017.29.231-236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Huang Q, Xiong H, Shuai T, Zhang M, Zhang C, Wang Y, Zhu L, Lu J, Liu J. Risk factors for new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ. 2020;8(e10376) doi: 10.7717/peerj.10376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wood-Baker R, Cochrane B, Naughton MT. Cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: The impact of bronchodilator treatment. Intern Med J. 2010;40:94–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.02109.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tousoulis D. Biomarkers in atrial fibrillation; From pathophysiology to diagnosis and treatment. Curr Med Chem. 2019;26:762–764. doi: 10.2174/092986732605190422092911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Humbert M, Kovacs G, Hoeper MM, Badagliacca R, Berger RMF, Brida M, Carlsen J, Coats AJS, Escribano-Subias P, Ferrari P, et al. 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2023;61(2200879) doi: 10.1183/13993003.00879-2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ranstam J, Cook JA. Kaplan-Meier curve. Br J Surg. 2017;104(442) doi: 10.1002/bjs.10238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Abraham CR, Li A. Aging-suppressor Klotho: Prospects in diagnostics and therapeutics. Ageing Res Rev. 2022;82(101766) doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Guo Y, Tian Y, Wang H, Si Q, Wang Y, Lip GYH. Prevalence, incidence, and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation in China: New insights into the global burden of atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2015;147:109–119. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Koshiyama M, Tamaki K, Ohsawa M. Age-specific incidence rates of atrial fibrillation and risk factors for the future development of atrial fibrillation in the Japanese general population. J Cardiol. 2021;77:88–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.McDonough JE, Yuan R, Suzuki M, Seyednejad N, Elliott WM, Sanchez PG, Wright AC, Gefter WB, Litzky L, Coxson HO, et al. Small-airway obstruction and emphysema in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1567–1575. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1106955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Guo J, Chen Y, Zhang W, Tong S, Dong J. Moderate and severe exacerbations have a significant impact on health-related quality of life, utility, and lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2020;78:28–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Soeki T, Matsuura T, Tobiume T, Bando S, Matsumoto K, Nagano H, Uematsu E, Kusunose K, Ise T, Yamaguchi K, et al. Clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic parameter combination predicts the onset of atrial fibrillation. Circ J. 2018;82:2253–2258. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Debonnaire P, Joyce E, Hiemstra Y, Mertens BJ, Atsma DE, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ, Delgado V, Marsan NA. Left atrial size and function in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients and risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017;10(e004052) doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vaziri SM, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Echocardiographic predictors of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1994;89:724–730. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.2.724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Alfadhel M, Nestelberger T, Samuel R, McAlister C, Saw J. Left atrial appendage closure-Current status and future directions. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021;69:101–109. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mo BF, Lian XM, Li YG. Current evidence on the safety and efficacy of combined atrial fibrillation ablation and left atrial appendage closure. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2022;37:74–79. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang H, Tang Z, Han Z, Zeng L, Wang C. Role of real time-three dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in left atrial appendage closure with LACBES(®) devices. Exp Ther Med. 2019;17:1456–1462. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.7086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang Q, Wang JF, Dong QQ, Yan Q, Luo XH, Wu XY, Liu J, Sun YP. Evaluation of left atrial volume and function using single-beat real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in atrial fibrillation patients. BMC Med Imaging. 2017;17(44) doi: 10.1186/s12880-017-0215-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sagris M, Vardas EP, Theofilis P, Antonopoulos AS, Oikonomou E, Tousoulis D. Atrial fibrillation: Pathogenesis, predisposing factors, and genetics. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;23(6) doi: 10.3390/ijms23010006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hu YF, Chen YJ, Lin YJ, Chen SA. Inflammation and the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12:230–243. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Khalid K, Padda J, Komissarov A, Colaco LB, Padda S, Khan AS, Campos VM, Jean-Charles G. The coexistence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure. Cureus. 2021;13(e17387) doi: 10.7759/cureus.17387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Canepa M, Franssen FME, Olschewski H, Lainscak M, Böhm M, Tavazzi L, Rosenkranz S. Diagnostic and therapeutic gaps in patients with heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JACC Heart Fail. 2019;7:823–833. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Grymonprez M, Vakaet V, Kavousi M, Stricker BH, Ikram MA, Heeringa J, Franco OH, Brusselle GG, Lahousse L. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the development of atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2019;276:118–124. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.09.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jesel L, Abbas M, Toti F, Cohen A, Arentz T, Morel O. Microparticles in atrial fibrillation: A link between cell activation or apoptosis, tissue remodelling and thrombogenicity. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:660–669. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.03.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu N, Xu H, Sun Q, Yu X, Chen W, Wei H, Jiang J, Xu Y, Lu W. The role of oxidative stress in hyperuricemia and xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR) inhibitors. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021(1470380) doi: 10.1155/2021/1470380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Durmus Kocak N, Sasak G, Aka Akturk U, Akgun M, Boga S, Sengul A, Gungor S, Arinc S. Serum uric acid levels and uric acid/creatinine ratios in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients: Are these parameters efficient predictors of patients at risk for exacerbation and/or severity of disease? Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:4169–4176. doi: 10.12659/msm.897759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Park JH, Jo YI, Lee JH. Renal effects of uric acid: Hyperuricemia and hypouricemia. Korean J Intern Med. 2020;35:1291–1304. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hu L, Hu G, Xu BP, Zhu L, Zhou W, Wang T, Bao H, Cheng X. U-Shaped association of serum uric acid with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in US adults: A cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(dgz068) doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgz068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Uk Kang T, Park KY, Kim HJ, Ahn HS, Yim SY, Jun JB. Association of hyperuricemia and pulmonary hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mod Rheumatol. 2019;29:1031–1041. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2018.1537555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wu ZD, Yang XK, He YS, Ni J, Wang J, Yin KJ, Huang JX, Chen Y, Feng YT, Wang P, Pan HF. Environmental factors and risk of gout. Environ Res. 2022;212(Pt C)(113377) doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Li S, Cheng J, Cui L, Gurol ME, Bhatt DL, Fonarow GC, Benjamin EJ, Xing A, Xia Y, Wu S, Gao X. Cohort study of repeated measurements of serum urate and risk of incident atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(e012020) doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Crawley WT, Jungels CG, Stenmark KR, Fini MA. U-shaped association of uric acid to overall-cause mortality and its impact on clinical management of hyperuricemia. Redox Biol. 2022;51(102271) doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yang Y, Tian J, Zeng C, Wei J, Li LJ, Xie X, Yang T, Li H, Lei GH. Relationship between hyperuricemia and risk of coronary heart disease in a middle-aged and elderly Chinese population. J Int Med Res. 2017;45:254–260. doi: 10.1177/0300060516673923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Perez-Ruiz F, Becker MA. Inflammation: A possible mechanism for a causative role of hyperuricemia/gout in cardiovascular disease. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31 (Suppl 2):S9–S14. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1087980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Li N, Zhang S, Li W, Wang L, Liu H, Li W, Zhang T, Liu G, Du Y, Leng J. Prevalence of hyperuricemia and its related risk factors among preschool children from China. Sci Rep. 2017;7(9448) doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10120-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chao TF, Hung CL, Chen SJ, Wang KL, Chen TJ, Lin YJ, Chang SL, Lo LW, Hu YF, Tuan TC, Chen SA. The association between hyperuricemia, left atrial size and new-onset atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:4027–4032. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.06.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.


Articles from Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES