ABSTRACT
Virus-like particles (VLPs) are protein-based nanoparticles frequently used as carriers in conjugate vaccine platforms. VLPs have been used to display foreign antigens for vaccination and to deliver immunotherapy against diseases. Hemolysin-coregulated proteins 1 (Hcp1) is a protein component of the Burkholderia type 6 secretion system, which participates in intracellular invasion and dissemination. This protein has been reported as a protective antigen and is used in multiple vaccine candidates with various platforms against melioidosis, a severe infectious disease caused by the intracellular pathogen Burkholderia pseudomallei. In this study, we used P22 VLPs as a surface platform for decoration with Hcp1 using chemical conjugation. C57BL/6 mice were intranasally immunized with three doses of either PBS, VLPs, or conjugated Hcp1-VLPs. Immunization with Hcp1-VLPs formulation induced Hcp1-specific IgG, IgG1, IgG2c, and IgA antibody responses. Furthermore, the serum from Hcp1-VLPs immunized mice enhanced the bacterial uptake and opsonophagocytosis by macrophages in the presence of complement. This study demonstrated an alternative strategy to develop a VLPs-based vaccine platform against Burkholderia species.
KEYWORDS: B. pseudomallei, Hcp1, virus-like particles, type 6 secretion system, P22-based nanovaccines, melioidosis
INTRODUCTION
Virus-like particles (VLPs) are non-infectious nanocage architectures and self-assemble particles, which express genome-encoded protein capsids, core, and the viral envelope, but cannot replicate because the genetic material is lacking (1). VLPs are broadly used in medical biotechnology applications including drug delivery, vaccine platforms, gene regulation, gene delivery, and imaging (2). For example, the Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium bacteriophage P22 VLP is approximately 60 nm in size with an icosahedral shape assembled with 420 copies of the 46 kDa coat protein (CP) and 300 copies of the 34 kDa scaffolding protein (SP) (3).
The encapsulation of P22 VLP with proteins of interest has been developed as nanoreactors (or nanocages) and used for drug and vaccine delivery platform against diseases (3–7). The strategy of this method is the fusion of the cloned gene encoding the protein of interest to SP gene followed by recombinant expression together with CP and in vivo assembly to generate a nanoreactor (4). However, this methodology is mostly suitable for soluble protein of interest especially in the protein purification step. For the insoluble protein, it is more difficult and challenging to purify nanoreactors without aggregation. An external decoration of VLPs with target protein is an alternative method by using two classic chimerical vaccine design approaches of genetic insertion and chemical conjugation (8). Genetic insertion is easily achieved by genetic engineering, and antigens are presented on the VLPs surface with high efficiency, but sometimes, they form inclusion bodies and take longer for the production process (9). For the chemical conjugation, covalently attached antigens on the VLPs surface have higher efficiency to induce immune response compared to non-covalent conjugation (10).
Two features, size (20–200 nm) and repetitive surface geometrical structure, of VLPs are critical for their ability to potently activate B cells and elicit strong and long-lasting antibody responses, which are important to their advantages as a vaccine (11, 12). VLPs enter lymphatic vessels and passive drainage to the subcapsular region of lymph nodes and optimal uptake by antigen presenting cells (APCs) (13), following the T helper cells activation and antigen presentation on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules (14). Moreover, trafficking of VLPs to B cell follicles is facilitated through specific interactions between VLPs and complement components or natural IgM antibodies (15). VLPs are highly stable with variation of temperature and other conditions. However, VLPs have been modified to enhance structural stability using engineering techniques such as intersubunit disulfide bonds for thermostability purpose (16–18). The P22 VLP has been reported to elicit a strong protective immune response in mice against influenza viruses without the addition of adjuvants (19).
The hemolysin-coregulated proteins (Hcp) are components of Gram-negative bacterial type 6 secretion systems (T6SS) (20). This protein forms hexameric rings and cooperates with other proteins in the T6SS to puncture neighboring host cells to deliver a cargo molecule. Hcp1 protein of Burkholderia pseudomallei, an intracellular Gram-negative bacterium that causes melioidosis disease, has been reported as a protective antigen (21). Interestingly, this protein has been used to construct various vaccine platforms against pathogenic Burkholderia with different outcomes depending on the platform, including gold-nanoparticles (22–24), glycoconjugate subunits (25), and membrane vesicles (26).
In this study, we develop an approach for exterior decoration of the Hcp1 protein on the P22 VLPs surface by the chemical conjugation method and evaluate the antibody induction following immunization of mice. The conjugation was analyzed under transmission electron microscope (TEM) before immunization. Protein-specific antibody titer was quantified, and the ability of immune serum to promote opsonophagocytic activity by macrophages was further evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Hcp1 expression and purification
Burkholderia-specific protein Hcp1 (BMAA0742) construction and expression were described elsewhere (22, 24) with modifications. The hcp1 gene was cloned into the pET30a(+) containing a kanamycin resistance gene. Protein expression was conducted in an Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) by growing an overnight preculture in Lysogeny Broth (LB) media containing 50 µg/mL kanamycin. Then, a larger LB culture was inoculated with the preculture at a dilution of 1:100 and was incubated at 37°C, 200 rpm (LabLine 3525). The culture was induced with 1 mM of isopropyl-β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) after an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) reached 0.6. After a 4-h induction at 37°C, the culture was centrifuged, and each resulting bacterial pellet was frozen at −80°C. The bacterial pellets were then resuspended in 20 mL of lysis buffer pH 8.0 (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 5 mM Imidazole) containing 1× cOmplete EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche, Germany) and 1 mg/mL lysozyme. The lysate was then sonicated and centrifuged (10,000 × g at 4°C for 30 min), and the supernatant was filtered (0.2-µm pore size; Millipore). Soluble protein fractions were then mixed with pre-equilibrated Ni-NTA agarose resin (Qiagen) and were incubated at 4°C for 1 h with rotation. The incubated resin was loaded into a 5-mL polypropylene column (Qiagen). Subsequently, multiple washes were applied using a wash buffer pH 8.0 (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM Imidazole, and 1× cOmplete EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail) and eluted with an elution buffer pH 8.0 (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 150 mM Imidazole). Fractions containing soluble protein were pooled before dialysis into phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) overnight at 4°C. The protein was concentrated using a 10-kDa MWCO Amicon concentrator device (Millipore). The purified proteins and protein standards were subjected to a colorimetric bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay following the manufacturer’s protocol and were then stored at −80°C until use (Pierce protein assay kit; Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The proteins were visualized by running a 4–20% SDS-PAGE (Bio-Rad) and were stained with Coomassie blue.
P22 VLPs production and purification
E. coli BL21 (DE3) carrying pBAD-P22-SP and pRSF/P22-CP plasmids was grown overnight in LB medium then diluted to 1:100 in terrific broth (TB) medium before incubated at 37°C, 200 rpm (LabLine 3525) until OD600 reached 0.6. The SP expression was induced with 0.125% L-arabinose for 16 h at 27°C, 120 rpm (LabLine 3525), and subsequently, the CP was induced with 0.5 mM IPTG for 4 h at 37°C. The bacterial pellet was collected by centrifugation then resuspended in PBS (pH 7.4) and sonicated. The resulting suspension was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C, and the clear lysate was collected before ultracentrifuged through 35% wt/vol sucrose in PBS at 274,000 × g, 4°C for 1 h in an SW 41 Ti Rotor (Beckman Coulter, Inc). The pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of PBS pH 7.4, centrifuged at 9,300 × g, and further purified using a HiPrep 16/60 Sephacryl S-500 size exclusion column (GE Healthcare) in FPLC (AKTA Pharmacia). Collected fractions containing well-formed VLPs were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and under TEM.
Chemical functionalization of P22 VLPs with Hcp1 protein
Hcp1 proteins were covalently conjugated to P22 VLPs by the carbodiimide crosslinker (18). A total of 53.36 nmol of the purified Hcp1 (18.74 kDa) was mixed with 5,336.00 nmol of (3-Dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) (Sigma) and 5,336.00 nmol N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) (Sigma) (protein: EDC or NHS ratio is 1:100) in PBS pH 5.5, then the mixture was slowly rotated at room temperature (RT) for 30 min. The mixture was filtered through a 10-kDa Amicon concentrator (Millipore) to remove the excess of EDC and NHS. The filtered Hcp1 was mixed with 21.27 nmol P22 VLPs (47 kDa) at a ratio of 1:10, followed by adding each EDC and NHS (VLPs: EDC or NHS ratio is 1:600) in PBS pH 7.4 (Fig. 1). The reaction was kept in a slow rotation at RT for 3 h. Five milliliters of PBS pH 7.4 was added into the reaction mixture to scale up the volume before loading into centrifuge tubes containing 35% sucrose solution. The final Hcp1-VLPs particles were pelletized by ultracentrifugation at 274,000 × g at 4°C for 1 h in an SW 41 Ti Rotor (Beckman Coulter, Inc). The final pellet was resuspended in PBS pH 7.4.
Negative staining and immunogold labeling TEM
Unconjugated VLPs and Hcp1-VLPs conjugated suspension (10 µL) were loaded onto CF200-CU carbon film 200 mesh copper grid (Electron Microscope Science) and were incubated at RT for 10 min. For negative staining, grids were blotted with filter paper before being placed onto 2% aqueous uranyl acetate for 1 min, blotted and dried under the light. For immunogold labeling, grids were placed on the surface of 1:1,000 primary antibody (Mouse monoclonal [HIS.H8] antibody, Abcam) and were incubated for 30 min at RT then washed with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (wt/vol) in Tris-buffered saline (TBS). The grids were stained with 1:20 secondary antibody [6 nm immunogold goat anti-Mouse IgG (H&L), Electron Microscopy Sciences Aurion] for 30 min at RT. After incubation, the grids were washed and fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde for 10 min, then dried before imaging under TEM.
Intranasal immunization and blood collection
Female 6- to 8-week-old C57BL/6 mice (n = 5/group) were intranasally immunized with three doses (one prime and two boosts) of PBS, unconjugated VLPs, or conjugated Hcp1-VLPs (5 or 10 µg). Blood from individual mouse was collected via retro-orbital (RO) bleeding a week before prime (baseline) and 2 weeks after the second boost (post). Blood was stored in Microvette tubes without an anticoagulant (SARSTEDT) and was incubated at room temperature for 30 min to permit clotting before centrifugation. The serum was collected and stored at −80°C until further analysis.
Detection of Hcp1-specific antibodies
The Hcp1-specific IgG, IgG1, IgG2c, and IgA endpoint titers were detected using indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Briefly, high-binding 96-well plates were coated with 1 µg/well of purified Hcp1 protein at 4°C overnight. The coated plates were washed (0.05% Tween 20 in 1 × DPBS) and incubated with blocking buffer [8% heat-inactivated (HI) fetal bovine serum (FBS)] in 1× DPBS) at RT for 2 h. After blocking, the plates were washed and incubated with twofold dilution of baseline or post-sera collected from immunized mice at RT for 2 h. The plates were washed before incubation with 1:5,000 dilution of goat anti-mouse IgG, IgG1, IgG2c, or IgA secondary antibody (Southern Biotech) at RT for 2 h. Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate solution (Invitrogen) was added and incubated for 10 min before adding the stop solution (2 N H2SO4). The plates were read at 450 and 570 nm using a microplate reader (Biotek). The results were reported as the reciprocal of the highest titer giving an OD reading of at least mean 2 SD from the mean baseline sera OD. All assays were performed in triplicate.
Macrophage infection and opsonophagocytosis
RAW 264.7 (ATCC TIB-71) macrophages were routinely grown in complete DMEM (cDMEM) (Gibco) supplemented with 10% HI FBS, sodium pyruvate, non-essential amino acid, and antibiotics (penicillin and streptomycin) at 37°C under an atmosphere of 5% CO2. The day prior to cell infection, RAW 264.7 cells were seeded at a density of 5 × 105 cells/well in 24-well tissue culture plates (Thermo Fisher) for bacterial uptake assay and in 12-well plates with round coverslips for immunofluorescent microscopic analysis. The following day, a 12-h overnight culture of B. pseudomallei K96243 was diluted to 5 × 106 CFU with cDMEM without antibiotic equivalent to a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10. The bacteria were incubated with PBS (no sera) or 10% of sera with and without HI that were pooled from immunized mice (PBS, unconjugated VLPs, 5 or 10 µg of conjugated Hcp1-VLPs) at 37°C for 1 h with slight agitation. The opsonized bacterial suspension was added to pre-washed RAW264.7 monolayers prior to incubation at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 2 h. For bacterial uptake enumeration, the monolayers were washed twice with PBS to remove extracellular bacteria then lysed with 0.2% Triton X-100 (Sigma) in PBS before serial dilution and plating on LB agar. Each experimental group was assayed in triplicate, and three independent experiments were performed.
Immunofluorescent staining and microscopic analysis
Infected RAW 264.7 cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde–PBS for 30 min following the select agent inactivation protocol approved by the UTMB Biosafety Committee. The cells were permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100 in PBS for 7 min at RT before incubation with serum (1:1,000) from B. pseudomallei PBK001 live attenuated vaccine-immunized mice (27). The cells were washed then incubated with 1:5,000 goat anti-mouse IgG, IgM (H+L) secondary antibody conjugated to Alexa 488 (Invitrogen), followed by actin and DNA staining using rhodamine phalloidin (Invitrogen) and DAPI (Sigma) together at 1:10,000 dilutions. The coverslips were mounted using ProLong Gold Antifade (Molecular Probes, Life Technology) and were sealed with a fixative. Stained cells were visualized using an Olympus BX51 upright fluorescence microscope and were analyzed using ImageJ software from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
RESULTS
P22 VLPs production and purification
The P22 VLPs were produced by two-step protein induction. The pBAD-P22-SP plasmid was first induced to obtain P22 scaffold protein, followed by induction of pRSF/P22-CP plasmid for capsid protein. The P22 VLPs were purified from the bacterial suspension using 35% sucrose cushion ultracentrifugation followed by gel filtration chromatography. Two protein-containing fractions were eluted after running through Sephacryl S-500 size exclusion column. Each of these fractions was morphologically characterized via TEM. The TEM imaging indicates that the first fraction contains incompletely assembled VLPs, while the second fraction contains well-formed VLPs (Fig. 1). Peak 1 shows VLPs that are not in the right conformation due to protein aggregations that make these VLPs close to the void volume, which indicates a high number of defective subunits. The aggregation occurs during spontaneous assembly of VLPs inside the expression host, and they may contain desired compound and disassembled form of VLPs, while the elution fraction from peak 2, corresponding to the well-formed VLPs, contains a defined number of subunits folded properly that can be eluted at a different retention volume with a small molecular size. Therefore, the elution fractions from peak 2 containing highly pure assembled VLPs were subsequently used for the protein conjugation step.
Chemical functionalization of P22 VLPs with Hcp1 protein
The free carboxyl group of Hcp1 was activated with carbodiimide and N-hydroxysuccinimide in acidic conditions (pH 5.5) to prevent the self-conjugation of Hcp1 homodimers and to prevent the hydrolysis of the activated functional groups. Hcp1 was subsequently coupled to the free amine groups exposed on P22 VLPs (Fig. 2A). To evaluate the efficiency of conjugation, the conjugated number of conjugated Hcp1 molecules on the surface of the VLPs was quantified using TEM (with 20 fields) as shown in Table S1. The average total conjugation efficiency was about 24%. The purified Hcp1 (19.54 kDa), VLPs capsid protein (47 kDa), before and after chemical conjugation in a different concentration, were visualized on an SDS-PAGE gel followed by Coomassie blue staining (Fig. S1). Negative staining on TEM showed homogeneous hexahedral structures of VLPs with an average diameter of 50 nm (Fig. 2B). To evaluate the successful Hcp1 conjugation to the surface of VLPs, we probed the recombinant Hcp1 with anti-His tag primary antibody followed by 6 nm gold nanoparticle conjugated goat anti-Mouse IgG secondary antibody, and the surface-exposed proteins were labeled (Fig. 2C).
Intranasal immunization of Hcp1-VLPs conjugation induces protein-specific antibody response
The timeline immunization protocol is shown in Fig. 3. The endpoint titers of Hcp1-specific serum IgG, IgG1, IgG2c, and IgA were assessed by ELISA using purified Hcp1 as the coating protein antigen. The ELISA results demonstrated that mice immunized with low (5 µg) and high (10 µg) dose of Hcp1-VLPs conjugation stimulated the production of high titers of IgG (~106), IgG1 (~105–106), IgG2c (~105) subclass, and IgA (~104) without an apparent difference between doses (Fig. 4A through D). In contrast, the serum from mice that received PBS and VLPs showed low titers (50–100) in all detected antibodies.
Serum from Hcp1-VLPs immunized mice enhances opsonized bacterial uptake by macrophages in the presence of complement
To assess the functionality of serum antibodies, we evaluated whether the antibodies promote antibody-mediated bacterial opsonophagocytosis of B. pseudomallei. Pooled serum from different immunization groups was pre-incubated with B. pseudomallei prior to infecting RAW 246.7 macrophages. After infection, percent bacterial uptake in macrophages was quantified by standard dilution and plating method. The results demonstrated that the HI serum from PBS, VLPs, 5 and 10 µg of Hcp1-VLPs group had no significant effect on the percent of bacterial uptake among groups as well as in the no sera control group (Fig. 5). In contrast, the presence of complement in the no-HI serum of both doses of Hcp1-VLPs group increased the bacterial uptake by macrophages, whereas the serum from PBS and VLPs group showed no significant effect compared to the two groups (Fig. 5). Moreover, the results indicated that the high dose (10 µg) of Hcp1-VLPs had a higher ability to enhance bacterial uptake compared to the low dose (5 µg) (Fig. 5). To confirm the bacterial quantification results, the infected cells were fixed, permeabilized, stained then visualized using immunofluorescence microscopy. A higher number of B. pseudomallei were accumulated and internalized by macrophages in the presence of the no-HI serum from animal immunized with 5 and 10 µg of Hcp1-VLPs groups than others, which had less bacteria (Fig. 6). These immunofluorescent images confirmed the bacterial uptake results and demonstrated that the Hcp1-VLPs formulation induced antibody response in promoting opsonophagocytosis that was mediated by complement.
DISCUSSION
VLPs represent a significant advancement in vaccine design, drug delivery, and diagnostics. VLPs are currently used as alternative vaccine platforms to combat emerging infectious diseases mostly targeting viral and parasitic infections but are less frequently used against bacterial infections (28). The use of a VLP-based vaccine platform to increase the immunogenicity of heterologous antigens has been done by genetic insertion, chemical conjugation, or a combination of both techniques (1). For chemical conjugation, there are several methods used to display the foreign proteins and/or peptides on the VLPs surface (29). The carbodiimide chemistry is easy to operate and is a relatively high conjugation efficient method when NHS is included (29). This protocol has been used to conjugate glucose oxidase from Aspergillus niger to the surface of P22-Cytochrome P450 nanoreactors for delivery of chemotherapeutic pro-drugs (30), generate meningococcal group C-tetanus toxoid vaccines (31), and conjugate the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on tobacco mosaic VLPs (32). Moreover, the EDC-NHS amino coupling is widely used for exterior decoration of drugs including folic acid and doxorubicin on cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) for cancer therapeutic applications (33, 34).
We investigated the chemical conjugation of P22 VLPs with the known immunogenic Hcp1 protein and evaluated whether this antigen induces a potent antibody response that recognizes the pathogen B. pseudomallei. The Hcp1 proteins were covalently conjugated to P22 VLPs using EDC-NHS amino coupling. We evaluated the conjugation efficiency by optimizing the VLPs and Hcp1 ratio, as well as the protein and EDC/NHS ratio. The number of the Hcp1 molecules that conjugated to the VLPs surface was counted with TEM using immunogold labeling. The optimal molar ratio of VLPs-Hcp1, EDC/NHS-Hcp1, and EDC/NHS-VLPs were 1:10, 1:100, and 1:600, respectively. The ratio of EDC/NHS to Hcp1 in the first coupling reaction and VLPs in the second coupling reaction affected conjugation efficiency. We determined that low EDC/NHS in reaction reduced conjugation efficiency due to less activated free carboxyl and amine group on Hcp1 and VLPs. In contrast, too high EDC/NHS induced self-conjugation of both proteins and can cause protein clumping. Therefore, the molar ratio of proteins and chemical needs to be optimized.
The conjugated Hcp1-VLPs formulation was evaluated for its capacity to induce antibodies with opsonizing properties. Our data demonstrated high Hcp1-specific IgG and IgA antibodies in the serum of mice immunized with Hcp1-VLPs. Comparable results have been reported in other different Burkholderia vaccine platforms that used Hcp1 protein as antigenic component to develop Burkholderia vaccine candidates. For example, mice receiving three doses of gold nanoparticles conjugated Hcp1-LPS or a combination of other proteins (OmpW, OpcP, OpcP1, FlgL, and hemagglutinin) generated a high titer (105–106 endpoint titer) of Hcp1-specific IgG (22, 24). A subunit vaccine made by conjugating Hcp1 to Burkholderia capsular polysaccharide (CPS) demonstrated a high serum Hcp1-specific IgG antibody titer (~106 endpoint titer) in vaccinated mice after a regimen of three doses (25). In addition, sera from mice immunized with Hcp1 incorporated into staphylococcal membrane vesicle plus adjuvant induced significant specific IgG antibody titer (>51,200) (26).
Serum from Hcp1-VLP-immunized mice was only capable of promoting opsonophagocytosis when complement was present. Furthermore, baseline serum with functional complement did not promote opsonophagocytosis. These results indicate that the classical complement cascade, in which antigen-specific antibodies promote the activation of complement, is responsible for the increase in opsonophagocytsosis observed from the immunization serum. A previous study showed a similar finding that antibody-mediated enhanced uptake of B. pseudomallei was largely through complement activation/deposition (35). It has been previously reported that sera from Hcp1-CPS glycoconjugate vaccination promote opsonophagocytosis (25), and the convalescent melioidosis patient sera promote antibody-dependent bacterial uptake and bacterial clearance (36). Although we were unable to evaluate our vaccine formulation in a murine model of melioidosis disease, immunological evidence suggests that Hcp1-VLPs might be protective against infection. As such, other studies using mouse models of infection also demonstrated that antibodies play a major role in protection against lethal melioidosis (27, 37, 38).
Conclusions
Hcp1 chemically conjugated to P22 VLPs using the EDC/NHS coupling, yielded a stable nanoparticle construct for use in vaccination. This decorated VLPs-based vaccine platform was capable of inducing antibody responses and enhanced opsonophagocytosis against B. pseudomallei infection. This initial proof-of-concept study results provided evidence that using VLPs as a nanovaccine to deliver immunogenic proteins is advantageous, and the efficiency of conjugation can be improved by optimization of VLPs, protein concentration, and chemical ratio. In addition, conjugation of VLPs with multiple immunogenic proteins can enhance the protective immune responses against infectious diseases.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This manuscript was partially supported by NIH NIAID grant AI12660101 and institutional funds from UTMB awarded to A.G.T. N.B-T. is a Pew Latin American Fellow in Biomedical Sciences. A.H.-S. acknowledges financial support from the UNAM DGAPA-PASPA program for his sabbatical stay fellowship. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIAID or NIH.
Footnotes
This article is a direct contribution from Alfredo G. Torres, a member of the Infection and Immunity Editorial Board, who arranged for and secured reviews by Eric R. Lafontaine, University of Georgia, and R. Mark Wooten, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences.
Contributor Information
Alfredo G. Torres, Email: altorres@utmb.edu.
Andreas J. Bäumler, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.00019-24.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Mohsen MO, Bachmann MF. 2022. Virus-like particle vaccinology, from bench to bedside. Cell Mol Immunol 19:993–1011. doi: 10.1038/s41423-022-00897-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Comas-Garcia M, Colunga-Saucedo M, Rosales-Mendoza S. 2020. The role of virus-like particles in medical biotechnology. Mol Pharm 17:4407–4420. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00828 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Prevelige PE, Fane BA. 2012. Building the machines: scaffolding protein functions during bacteriophage morphogenesis. Adv Exp Med Biol 726:325–350. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0980-9_14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Huerta-Saquero A, Chapartegui-González I, Bowser S, Khakhum N, Stockton JL, Torres AG. 2023. P22-based nanovaccines against enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Microbiol Spectr 11:e0473422. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04734-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Essus VA, Souza Júnior GSE, Nunes GHP, Oliveira JDS, de Faria BM, Romão LF, Cortines JR. 2023. Bacteriophage P22 capsid as a pluripotent nanotechnology tool. Viruses 15:516. doi: 10.3390/v15020516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Díaz-Barriga C, Villanueva-Flores F, Quester K, Zárate-Romero A, Cadena-Nava RD, Huerta-Saquero A. 2021. Asparaginase-phage P22 nanoreactors: toward a biobetter development for acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment. Pharmaceutics 13:604. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13050604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Chauhan K, Hernandez-Meza JM, Rodríguez-Hernández AG, Juarez-Moreno K, Sengar P, Vazquez-Duhalt R. 2018. Multifunctionalized biocatalytic P22 nanoreactor for combinatory treatment of ER+ breast cancer. J Nanobiotechnology 16:17. doi: 10.1186/s12951-018-0345-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bárcena J, Blanco E. 2013. Design of novel vaccines based on virus-like particles or chimeric virions. Subcell Biochem 68:631–665. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6552-8_21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Zhang Y, Song S, Liu C, Wang Y, Xian X, He Y, Wang J, Liu F, Sun S. 2007. Generation of chimeric HBc proteins with epitopes in E.coli: formation of virus-like particles and a potent inducer of antigen-specific cytotoxic immune response and anti-tumor effect in vivo. Cell Immunol 247:18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2007.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Venter PA, Dirksen A, Thomas D, Manchester M, Dawson PE, Schneemann A. 2011. Multivalent display of proteins on viral nanoparticles using molecular recognition and chemical ligation strategies. Biomacromolecules 12:2293–2301. doi: 10.1021/bm200369e [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Frietze KM, Peabody DS, Chackerian B. 2016. Engineering virus-like particles as vaccine platforms. Curr Opin Virol 18:44–49. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2016.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Mohsen MO, Gomes AC, Vogel M, Bachmann MF. 2018. Interaction of viral capsid-derived virus-like particles (VLPs) with the Innate immune system. Vaccines (Basel) 6:37. doi: 10.3390/vaccines6030037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Manolova V, Flace A, Bauer M, Schwarz K, Saudan P, Bachmann MF. 2008. Nanoparticles target distinct dendritic cell populations according to their size. Eur J Immunol 38:1404–1413. doi: 10.1002/eji.200737984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Mohsen MO, Zha L, Cabral-Miranda G, Bachmann MF. 2017. Major findings and recent advances in virus-like particle (VLP)-based vaccines. Semin Immunol 34:123–132. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2017.08.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Link A, Zabel F, Schnetzler Y, Titz A, Brombacher F, Bachmann MF. 2012. Innate immunity mediates follicular transport of particulate but not soluble protein antigen. J Immunol 188:3724–3733. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ashcroft AE, Lago H, Macedo JMB, Horn WT, Stonehouse NJ, Stockley PG. 2005. Engineering thermal stability in RNA phage capsids via disulphide bonds. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 5:2034–2041. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2005.507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Fiedler JD, Higginson C, Hovlid ML, Kislukhin AA, Castillejos A, Manzenrieder F, Campbell MG, Voss NR, Potter CS, Carragher B, Finn MG. 2012. Engineered mutations change the structure and stability of a virus-like particle. Biomacromolecules 13:2339–2348. doi: 10.1021/bm300590x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Lu Y, Chan W, Ko BY, VanLang CC, Swartz JR. 2015. Assessing sequence plasticity of a virus-like nanoparticle by evolution toward a versatile scaffold for vaccines and drug delivery. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:12360–12365. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510533112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Patterson DP, Rynda-Apple A, Harmsen AL, Harmsen AG, Douglas T. 2013. Biomimetic antigenic nanoparticles elicit controlled protective immune response to influenza. ACS Nano 7:3036–3044. doi: 10.1021/nn4006544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Coulthurst S. 2019. The type VI secretion system: a versatile bacterial weapon. Microbiology (Reading) 165:503–515. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Burtnick MN, Brett PJ, Harding SV, Ngugi SA, Ribot WJ, Chantratita N, Scorpio A, Milne TS, Dean RE, Fritz DL, Peacock SJ, Prior JL, Atkins TP, Deshazer D. 2011. The cluster 1 type VI secretion system is a major virulence determinant in Burkholderia pseudomallei. Infect Immun 79:1512–1525. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01218-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Tapia D, Sanchez-Villamil JI, Stevenson HL, Torres AG. 2021. Multicomponent gold-linked glycoconjugate vaccine elicits antigen-specific humoral and mixed TH1-TH17 immunity, correlated with increased protection against Burkholderia pseudomallei. mBio 12:e0122721. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01227-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Tapia D, Sanchez-Villamil JI, Torres AG. 2020. Multicomponent gold nano-glycoconjugate as a highly immunogenic and protective platform against Burkholderia mallei. NPJ Vaccines 5:82. doi: 10.1038/s41541-020-00229-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Muruato LA, Tapia D, Hatcher CL, Kalita M, Brett PJ, Gregory AE, Samuel JE, Titball RW, Torres AG. 2017. Use of reverse vaccinology in the design and construction of nanoglycoconjugate vaccines against Burkholderia pseudomallei. Clin Vaccine Immunol 24:e00206-17. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00206-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Burtnick MN, Shaffer TL, Ross BN, Muruato LA, Sbrana E, DeShazer D, Torres AG, Brett PJ, Raffatellu M. 2018. Development of subunit vaccines that provide high-level protection and sterilizing immunity against acute inhalational melioidosis. Infect Immun 86:e00724-17. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00724-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Zhu K, Li G, Li J, Zheng M, Peng X, Rao Y, Li M, Zhou R, Rao X. 2022. Hcp1-loaded staphylococcal membrane vesicle vaccine protects against acute melioidosis. Front Immunol 13:1089225. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1089225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Khakhum N, Bharaj P, Myers JN, Tapia D, Kilgore PB, Ross BN, Walker DH, Endsley JJ, Torres AG. 2019. Burkholderia pseudomallei ΔtonB Δhcp1 live attenuated vaccine strain elicits full protective immunity against aerosolized melioidosis infection. mSphere 4:e00570-18. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00570-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Tariq H, Batool S, Asif S, Ali M, Abbasi BH. 2021. Virus-like particles:revolutionary platforms for developing vaccines against emerging infectious diseases. Front Microbiol 12:790121. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.790121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Lu L, Duong VT, Shalash AO, Skwarczynski M, Toth I. 2021. Chemical conjugation strategies for the development of protein-based subunit nanovaccines. Vaccines 9:563. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9060563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. González-Davis O, Chauhan K, Zapian-Merino S-J, Vazquez-Duhalt R. 2020. Bi-enzymatic virus-like bionanoreactors for the transformation of endocrine disruptor compounds. Int J Biol Macromol 146:415–421. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Lockyer K, Gao F, Francis RJ, Eastwood D, Khatri B, Stebbings R, Derrick JP, Bolgiano B. 2020. Higher mass meningococcal group C-tetanus toxoid vaccines conjugated with carbodiimide correlate with greater immunogenicity. Vaccine 38:2859–2869. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.02.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Royal JM, Simpson CA, McCormick AA, Phillips A, Hume S, Morton J, Shepherd J, Oh Y, Swope K, DeBeauchamp JL, Webby RJ, Cross RW, Borisevich V, Geisbert TW, Demarco JK, Bratcher B, Haydon H, Pogue GP. 2021. Development of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate using plant-based manufacturing and a tobacco mosaic virus-like nano-particle. Vaccines (Basel) 9:1347. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9111347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Aljabali AAA, Shukla S, Lomonossoff GP, Steinmetz NF, Evans DJ. 2013. CPMV-DOX delivers. Mol Pharm 10:3–10. doi: 10.1021/mp3002057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Destito G, Yeh R, Rae CS, Finn MG, Manchester M. 2007. Folic acid-mediated targeting of cowpea mosaic virus particles to tumor cells. Chem Biol 14:1152–1162. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2007.08.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Mulye M, Bechill MP, Grose W, Ferreira VP, Lafontaine ER, Wooten RM. 2014. Delineating the importance of serum opsonins and the bacterial capsule in affecting the uptake and killing of Burkholderia pseudomallei by murine neutrophils and macrophages. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8:e2988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Chaichana P, Kronsteiner B, Rongkard P, Teparrukkul P, Limmathurotsakul D, Chantratita N, Day NPJ, Fletcher HA, Dunachie SJ. 2020. Serum from melioidosis survivors diminished intracellular Burkholderia pseudomallei growth in macrophages: a brief research report. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10:442. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Nieves W, Asakrah S, Qazi O, Brown KA, Kurtz J, Aucoin DP, McLachlan JB, Roy CJ, Morici LA. 2011. A naturally derived outer-membrane vesicle vaccine protects against lethal pulmonary Burkholderia pseudomallei infection. Vaccine 29:8381–8389. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.08.058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Hogan RJ, Lafontaine ER. 2019. Antibodies are major drivers of protection against lethal aerosol infection with highly pathogenic Burkholderia spp. mSphere 4:e00674-18. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00674-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.