Skip to main content
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation: Official Publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc logoLink to Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation: Official Publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc
. 2024 Mar 1;36(2):283–286. doi: 10.1177/10406387241230292

Development and validation of a chemiluminescent western blot assay for glanders (Burkholderia mallei) serodetection

Juanita F Grause 1,1, Mandy C Elschner 2, Nicholas A Ledesma 3, Gleeson Murphy 4
PMCID: PMC10929638  PMID: 38426457

Abstract

Glanders, caused by Burkholderia mallei, is a zoonotic disease of equids. Serologic testing for glanders is required by disease-free countries before international movement of equids. The World Organisation for Animal Health Terrestrial Manual recommends the complement fixation test (CFT) for clearance of individual animals for movement, but the CFT is prone to false-positive results. A colorimetric western blot (WB) assay was developed and validated to resolve false-positive CFT results; however, that assay is relatively time-consuming, and the interpretation is subjective. We present here a procedurally similar chemiluminescent WB assay that performs comparably to the validated colorimetric WB assay and offers noticeable benefits of decreased time-to-result and greater ease of interpretation.

Keywords: chemiluminescent assay, equids, glanders, western blot


Glanders, which is caused by infection with the bacterium Burkholderia mallei, is a zoonotic disease affecting mainly horses, mules, and donkeys. Glanders has been eradicated from Europe and North America; but countries in Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and South America have experienced outbreaks within the past 25 y.2,6,7,9,12,13,18,20,22,24 Disease-free status is maintained through stringent testing of all equids prior to importation. Although the “gold standard” test is culture and isolation of the bacteria from infected animals, this method lacks sensitivity and is not appropriate for the high-speed and high-throughput testing demanded for international trade of equids. 23 For these reasons, serologic assays are preferred for classifying animals as free of disease prior to importation into a disease-free country.

International movement of horses requires highly sensitive and specific serologic assays to maintain the disease-free status of countries accepting these horses. High sensitivity is needed to prevent the introduction of disease from areas experiencing outbreaks and to exclude inapparent carrier horses. Conversely, high specificity is essential to resolve false-positive results from high-throughput screening tests without causing undue delays in animal movement. To date, the complement fixation test (CFT) is the only recommended assay for equine movement according to the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) 25 ; however, the sensitivity and specificity of the CFT are dependent on the antigen used and the incubation temperature.11,12,14 The CFT has been used for decades and has diagnostic sensitivity as high as 1.0. 11 Additionally, the CFT can detect inapparent carriers of disease, which account for as many as 90% of cases. 15 However, antigens for the CFT are crude, whole-cell preparations; consequently, the CFT may yield false-positive results, possibly due to cross-reactions with other bacterial species. 16

In one study, 2 CFT antigens had specificities of 0.965 and 0.975, with 3.5% and 2.5% false-positive rates, respectively. 11 Although these false-positive rates are relatively low, they can still result in an undesirable number of false-positives in countries that import thousands of horses per year. In another study, false-positive rates were as high as 24.3%. 10 False-positives can be expensive and stressful to owners and shippers, may lead to delays in meeting event or competition deadlines, or can result in the euthanasia of high-value animals.

Other serologic assays, including ELISA, agglutination, and polysaccharide microarray, have been developed for glanders and have undergone various degrees of validation, but none are recommended by the WOAH over the CFT.3,8,14,17,19,21,23 A commercial ELISA has been evaluated as a replacement for the CFT because it exhibited considerably fewer false-positives; ELISAs are well-suited for high-throughput laboratories. 4

A colorimetric western blot (WB) assay was developed as a highly specific confirmatory assay to resolve false-positive CFT results. 5 Diagnostic sensitivities for that assay have been reported as 1.0 and 0.97, with corresponding specificities of 1.0 and 0.99.3,5 Interpretation of the colorimetric assay is subjective, requiring visual judgment of bands and banding patterns. The assay requires ~5–6 h to perform, which may not be suitable for fast-paced laboratories providing results for timely release of horses from quarantine. Colorimetric WBs can be overdeveloped, resulting in bands that are difficult to discern or are interpreted as false-positive results. We present here a procedurally similar WB assay with shorter incubation times and a chemiluminescent development system that overcomes the issues with overdevelopment and enhances band visualization.

Group I samples comprised sera from naturally infected glanders-positive animals (n = 224) collected as described previously. 4 Infection with B. mallei was confirmed either by observation of clinical signs paired with positive CFT, or isolation and/or molecular detection of B. mallei. 23 Horses (n = 185), mules (n = 22), ponies (n = 13), and donkeys (n = 4) were represented in the panel of positive sera. Group II samples were negative field sera (n = 100) selected from horse serum samples submitted to the National Veterinary Services Laboratories for routine testing. Geographic origin of the group II horses spanned North America (n = 70), Europe (n = 24), and South America (n = 6). Glanders-negative status of sera was either presumed due to glanders-free status of the country of origin, or the samples tested negative for glanders by CFT.

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) antigens for the WB were prepared as described previously and lyophilized for storage. 5 Lyophilized antigen was reconstituted with 1 mL of sterile water. Reconstituted B. mallei strains Bogor, Mukteswar, and Bahrain1 were combined in equal parts. Antigen was prepared for SDS-PAGE (NuPAGE LDS sample buffer; Thermo Fisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Gel electrophoresis was performed with 200 µL of prepared antigen loaded in a NuPAGE precast 10% polyacrylamide 2D or 4–12% Bis-Tris ZOOM gel (Thermo Fisher) in 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS) buffer (Thermo Fisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Either gel percentage will produce the expected protein banding pattern. Separated antigen was transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (iBlot 2 blotting system; Thermo Fisher), then the membrane was blocked for 30 min in 10% (w/v) non-fat dry milk (NFDM) in PBS with 0.2% (v/v) Tween-20 (PBST). The membrane was removed from the blocking solution and washed 3 times for 20 min using PBST. The membrane was cut into ~3-mm wide strips and stored at −20°C if not used immediately for serum analysis.

For immunoblot analysis, the strips were incubated individually for 30 min in the test serum diluted 1:20 in 10% NFDM-PBST, followed by 5 washes of 5 min in PBST. Next, strips were incubated for 30 min in horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat anti-horse secondary antibody (SeraCare) diluted 1:5,000 in 10% NFDM-PBST, followed by 5 more 5-min PBST washes. Finally, strips were incubated with chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce ECL Plus; Thermo Fisher) for 5 min and visualized in an imaging system (iBright; Thermo Fisher) by using the “smart exposure” feature.

A serum sample was classified as positive if the characteristic LPS ladder pattern was observed between 20 and 60 kDa, and classified as negative if no banding pattern was observed. If a weak signal was observed that did not meet the definition of positive or negative, the serum was considered suspect (Fig. 1). The difference between positive and suspect can be very subtle, and may differ from technician to technician. The distinction between positive and suspect is not as important as the distinction between negative and non-negative.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Interpretation of chemiluminescent western blot assay of known Burkholderia mallei seropositive equine samples. M = marker; N = negative control; P = positive control; 1 = positive; 2 = suspect; 3 = positive; 4 = positive; 5 = positive; 6 = positive; 7 = positive. Numbers to the left indicate molecular weights in kDa.

The colorimetric WB assay was performed as described previously. 5 Briefly, the LPS antigen was separated by gel electrophoresis and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Membrane strips were incubated with serum diluted 1:50, washed, then incubated with alkaline phosphatase–conjugated anti-horse secondary antibody, and washed again. Finally, an enzyme substrate was added to induce color development to visualize the characteristic ladder pattern. The assay was interpreted as described for the chemiluminescent assay.

Agreement between assays was calculated using the Cohen kappa. 1 Calculations were performed using R v.3.5.3 (https://www.r-project.org/).

Both the colorimetric and chemiluminescent WB assays correctly classified 216 of 224 group I samples as positive or suspect, resulting in a diagnostic sensitivity of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.98) for both assays (Tables 1, 2; Fig. 1). All 100 group II samples were negative on the chemiluminescent WB assay, resulting in a diagnostic specificity of 1.0 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.0). Two of the samples in group II were positive on the colorimetric WB assay, which resulted in a diagnostic specificity of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.0). Both blots had almost perfect agreement, with a Cohen kappa value of 0.986 (95% CI: 0.967, 1.000).

Table 1.

Results of chemiluminescent western blot (WB) assay for glanders (Burkholderia mallei) serodetection.

WB result Serologic status Total
Known positive Known negative
Positive 216 0 216
Negative 8 100 108
Total 224 100 324

Table 2.

Results of colorimetric western blot (WB) assay for glanders (Burkholderia mallei) serodetection.

WB result Serologic status Total
Known positive Known negative
Positive 216 2 218
Negative 8 98 106
Total 224 100 324

WB assays for serodetection of glanders antibodies have been evaluated extensively.3,5,10 Our chemiluminescent WB had almost perfect agreement with the colorimetric WB developed and validated previously, indicating that the assays could be used interchangeably. 5 Both WB assays had relatively high diagnostic sensitivity and thus can be trusted to identify glanders positive sera. The chemiluminescent assay demonstrated a slightly higher diagnostic specificity than the colorimetric assay, with no false-positives.

Although both assays performed comparably, the chemiluminescent assay has technical advantages over the colorimetric assay. Notably, the chemiluminescent assay has variable and adjustable exposure times (i.e., the amount of time light is collected by the camera sensor) to avoid overexposing the blot strips. A difficulty of using the colorimetric development system is allowing the color development to proceed for too long, which causes excessive staining that makes the result of the blot difficult to decipher. Additionally, the shorter incubation time (30 min vs. 90 min) of the chemiluminescent assay translates to shorter turnaround times for confirmatory results in a diagnostic laboratory setting. An imaging system is required for visualization of a chemiluminescent WB, which may be a drawback for some laboratories. Imaging equipment may also be needed for documentation of a colorimetric WB, depending on policies of the laboratory.

Although a single assay for glanders testing would be ideal, a 2-assay protocol is presently the best option in terms of sensitivity and specificity. In fact, the CFT and WB assay used in series is the testing algorithm used by the WOAH Reference Laboratory (Friedrich Loeffler Institute, Jena, Germany). In a recent study, using the WB assay to confirm positive or suspect CFT results increased specificity from 0.96 to 0.99; in another study, specificity was increased from 0.97 to 0.99 by addition of the WB assay.3,4

Although the current recommendation of the WOAH for individual animal freedom from infection is CFT alone, CFT in conjunction with one of the described WB assays in series when confirming a suspect or positive result appears to have increased diagnostic sensitivity and specificity compared to the CFT alone. 23

Acknowledgments

We thank Amber Gustafson and Peggy Marten for their conceptualization of the project and excellent technical work on this study.

Footnotes

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.

ORCID iD: Juanita F. Grause Inline graphic https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8947-4637

Contributor Information

Juanita F. Grause, National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ames, IA, USA.

Mandy C. Elschner, Institute for Bacterial Infections and Zoonoses, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Friedrich Loeffler Institute, Jena, Germany

Nicholas A. Ledesma, National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ames, IA, USA

Gleeson Murphy, National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ames, IA, USA.

References

  • 1. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Arun S, et al. Equine glanders in Turkey. Vet Rec 1999;144:255–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Elschner MC, et al. Evaluation of the comparative accuracy of the complement fixation test, Western blot and five enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for serodiagnosis of glanders. PLoS One 2019;14:e0214963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Elschner MC, et al. Validation of a commercial glanders ELISA as an alternative to the CFT in international trade of Equidae. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:628389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Elschner MC, et al. Use of a Western blot technique for the serodiagnosis of glanders. BMC Vet Res 2011;7:4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Elschner MC, et al. Complete genome sequence of a Burkholderia mallei isolate originating from a glanderous horse from the Kingdom of Bahrain. Genome Announc 2016;4:e01296-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ghori MT, et al. Seroprevalence and risk factors of glanders in working equines—findings of a cross-sectional study in Punjab province of Pakistan. Acta Trop 2017;176:134–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Katz J, et al. Procedurally similar competitive immunoassay systems for the serodiagnosis of Babesia equi, Babesia caballi, Trypanosoma equiperdum, and Burkholderia mallei infection in horses. J Vet Diagn Invest 2000;12:46–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Khaki P, et al. Glanders outbreak at Tehran Zoo, Iran. Iran J Microbiol 2012;4:3–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Khan I, et al. Performance of complement fixation test and confirmatory immunoblot as two-cascade testing approach for serodiagnosis of glanders in an endemic region of South East Asia. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2012;125:117–121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Khan I, et al. Comparative evaluation of three commercially available complement fixation test antigens for the diagnosis of glanders. Vet Rec 2011;169:495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Khan I, et al. Effect of incubation temperature on the diagnostic sensitivity of the glanders complement fixation test. Rev Sci Tech 2014;33:869–875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Koirala P, et al. First glanders cases detected in Nepal underscore the need for surveillance and border controls. BMC Vet Res 2022;18:132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Laroucau K, et al. Interlaboratory ring trial to evaluate CFT proficiency of European laboratories for diagnosis of glanders in equids. Vet Rec 2016;178:632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Malik P, et al. Incidence of Burkholderia mallei infection among indigenous equines in India. Vet Rec Open 2015;2:e000129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Naureen A, et al. Comparative evaluation of Rose Bengal plate agglutination test, mallein test, and some conventional serological tests for diagnosis of equine glanders. J Vet Diagn Invest 2007;19:362–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Neubauer H, et al. Human glanders. Rev Int Serv Sante Forces Armees 1997;70:258–265. Cited by: Khan I, et al. Comparative evaluation of three commercially available complement fixation test antigens for the diagnosis of glanders. Vet Rec 2011;169:495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Neubauer H, et al. Serodiagnosis of Burkholderia mallei infections in horses: state-of-the-art and perspectives. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 2005;52:201–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Parthasarathy N, et al. Polysaccharide microarray technology for the detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei antibodies. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2006;56:329–332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Resende CF, et al. Glanders and brucellosis in equids from the Amazon region, Brazil. Acta Trop 2022;231:106429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Singh S, et al. Improvement of recombinant-truncated Burkholderia motility protein A (BimA)-based indirect ELISA for equine glanders. J Immunoassay Immunochem 2018;39:565–575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Singha H, et al. Molecular typing of Burkholderia mallei isolates from equids with glanders, India. Emerg Infect Dis 2021;27:1745–1748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Singha H, et al. Optimization and validation of indirect ELISA using truncated TssB protein for the serodiagnosis of glanders amongst equines. ScientificWorldJournal 2014;2014:469407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wernery U, et al. Natural Burkholderia mallei infection in Dromedary, Bahrain. Emerg Infect Dis 2011;17:1277–1279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH). Chapter 3.6.11. Glanders and melioidosis. In: Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. WOAH, 2024. https://www.woah.org/fileadmin/Home/fr/Health_standards/tahm/3.06.11_GLANDERS.pdf [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation : Official Publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES