Abstract
Surface acoustic waves (SAWs) are excited by femtosecond extreme ultraviolet (EUV) transient gratings (TGs) in a room-temperature ferrimagnetic DyCo5 alloy. TGs are generated by crossing a pair of EUV pulses from a free electron laser with the wavelength of 20.8 nm matching the Co M-edge, resulting in a SAW wavelength of Λ = 44 nm. Using the pump-probe transient grating scheme in reflection geometry, the excited SAWs could be followed in the time range of −10 to 100 ps in the thin film. Coherent generation of TGs by ultrafast EUV pulses allows to excite SAW in any material and to investigate their couplings to other dynamics, such as spin waves and orbital dynamics. In contrast, we encountered challenges in detecting electronic and magnetic signals, potentially due to the dominance of the larger SAW signal and the weakened reflection signal from underlying layers. A potential solution for the latter challenge involves employing soft x-ray probes, albeit introducing additional complexities associated with the required grazing incidence geometry.
I. INTRODUCTION
In recent years, significant advancements have been made in transient grating (TG) spectroscopy techniques, leveraging the capabilities of extreme ultraviolet (EUV) and x rays delivered by free-electron lasers (FELs).1–3 Recent developments in FEL photon sources have enabled new approaches for probing ultrafast dynamics at the nanoscale, such as TGs, which was recently used to study thermoelastic and magnetic dynamics in condensed matter systems.2–10
In EUV TG, coherent FEL beams intersecting at the sample surface give rise to spatially periodic excitation patterns with periods in the tens of nanometer range and time duration on the order of tens of femtoseconds.11 This allows for exploring dynamics at both nanoscale dimensions and ultrafast timescales.
EUV TGs can be used for studying nanoscale magnetic dynamics, provided that the probe is tuned to a magnetic edge, as recently demonstrated in a Gd–Co alloy at the Co M-edge.9 This element-specific tool can help in shedding light on the coupling of magnetic and structural dynamics, inherently intertwined through magnetoelastic interactions.12
The binary intermetallic DyCo5 alloy belongs to the family of binary rare-earth (RE)–transition metal (TM) compounds, renowned for their magnetic properties that find applications in permanent magnet technologies,13 spintronics,14 and ultrafast optical switching.15 Particularly, DyCo5 exhibits remarkable magnetic properties, including a high Curie temperature of approximately 970 K, attributable to the large exchange coupling of Co spins, as well as a high coercive field stemming from a considerably high magnetic anisotropy.16,17 Such properties arise from the antiferromagnetic coupling between the Dy and Co sub-lattices, resulting in a nontrivial magnetic phase diagram, which includes a compensation point at 174 K and a spin-reorientation transition at approximately K.18–20 The presence of a compensation point, a key factor for thermally assisted magnetization switching21,22 making DyCo5, a promising candidate for ultrafast optical manipulation. Moreover, thin films and nanostructures of ferrimagnetic Dy-Co alloys combine magnetic properties, such as perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and room-temperature magnetization, which are relevant for applications in magnetic memory storage23–25 and spintronic devices.26,27
RE–TM alloys are featured by strong magnetoelastic coupling,28,29 making them suited for exploring the interaction between the structural and magnetic dynamics induced by EUV TGs. In the present study, we used EUV TG in reflection geometry with the probe tuned to the Co M-edge to detect nanoscale magnetic and thermoelastic dynamics on the surface of a DyCo5 sample. The analysis revealed a predominance of thermoelastic dynamics driven by surface acoustic waves (SAW). While no discernible signal from magnetization dynamics was observed. This suggests that the signal associated with the magnetization grating either falls below the detection limit or is dominated by the robust signal generated by coherent surface displacements. Consequently, it is inferred that EUV TG in reflection geometry may not be the optimal choice for detecting magnetic dynamics. Nevertheless, the generation and detection of SAWs in thin DyCo5 films hold intrinsic importance. SAWs at nanoscale wavelengths possess various applications in spintronics,30 and the application of EUV TG allows access to this wavelength range without the need for tailored nanostructures on the sample.
II. MATERIALS AND METHODS
A. Synthesis
The 20 nm-thick DyCo5 film was grown onto a Si substrate with a 5 nm-thick Ta buffer by means of magnetron sputtering at room temperature under Ar atmosphere of mbar (with a base pressure of mbar) using the MAGSSY chamber at the Helmholtz–Zentrum Berlin (HZB, Germany). The correct stoichiometry of the alloy was achieved by varying the deposition rate of Co and Dy targets in the co-evaporation scheme. The film was capped by 2 nm of Pt to prevent surface oxidation. More details of the sample growth are given in Ref. 31.
B. X-ray reflectometry
Due to the limited penetration depth of EUV radiation in the material, experiments were performed in reflection geometry, which demands a high-quality (uniform and low roughness) surface of the sample. To assess the surface quality, a characterization of the DyCo5 film was performed using x-ray reflectometry (XRR) (Fig. 1). The XRR measurements were conducted at the x-ray CoreLab facility of the HZB using the PANalytical MPD instrument. The experimental data were obtained in the specular reflection geometry using x rays with a wavelength Å and fitted employing the GenX 3 software32 for precise assessment of the surface and the interlayer roughness.
FIG. 1.

(a) Measured (symbols) and fitted (solid line) x-ray reflectometry (XRR) curves from [Ta (5 nm)/DyCo5 (20 nm)/Pt (2 nm)] sample on a Si substrate. The inset is the zoom-in part of the XRR curve, showing the excellent agreement between the measured data and the fitted model. (b) Reconstructed scattering length density (SLD) depth profile obtained from the XRR model in the units of the classical electron radius Å. The coordinate z = 0 Å corresponds to the Si/Ta interface. (c) X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS, top panel) and x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD, bottom panel) spectra measured from the same sample at room temperature and applied magnetic field of ±2 T by means of the total electron yield. The dashed line in the XAS plot is the step function used in order to correct the spectra for the sum rule analysis.
Oscillations in the XRR curve, known as Kiessig fringes, were observed up to a high angle of 12°, indicative of the high quality of the film33 [Fig. 1(a)]. Fitting the XRR data yielded insight into the structural quality of individual layers (including their thickness and roughness) and enabled reconstruction of the in-depth electronic scattering length density (SLD) profile.33 Figure 1(a) shows a good agreement between XRR data and the best fit curve, which is achieved by assuming well-defined layers of Ta, DyCo5, and Pt on the Si substrate, each one with densities close to their nominal values. The corresponding in-depth (z) SLD distribution within the sample is displayed in Fig. 1(b). The model closely matches the anticipated layer thicknesses, while also suggesting sub-nanometer roughness at the sample surface. This finding attests a good sample quality, thus laying the ground for successful FEL experiments in the EUV regime.
C. X-ray magnetic circular dichroism
The magnetic moment of the sample was probed utilizing soft x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) in the total electron yield (TEY) detection mode. The probing depth of the TEY method extends to a few nanometers from the surface,34 thereby providing valuable insights into the surface quality and potential oxidation state of the sample. X-ray absorption spectra (XAS) were acquired with a 77% degree of right-circular polarization using the VEKMAG instrument at BESSY-II, Berlin, Germany.35 Given that the TG experiment was conducted using EUV radiation at the Co M edge, our focus is limited to the soft x-ray spectroscopy characterization of cobalt. To extract the magnetic contribution from the XAS data, spectra were measured under saturating magnetic fields of ±2T at the Co edges. The XAS and XMCD spectra are depicted in Fig. 1(c).
The absence of multiplet features in the XAS spectra indicates the metallic nature of the DyCo5 film and the absence of surface oxidation. The XMCD signal was observed at both edges (bottom panel in Fig. 1), indicating the fully polarized ferromagnetic state of cobalt at room temperature. Employing sum rule analysis on the XMCD data, the extracted spin and orbital magnetic moments of cobalt are found to be and , respectively. In agreement with the previous study,31 the net moment of Co at the DyCo5 surface probed by TEY is considerably reduced compared to the bulk of the film ( ) as seen in transmission and fluorescence XMCD measurements.19,31
D. X-ray transient grating spectroscopy
The TG experiments were conducted at the EIS-TIMER beamline at the FERMI FEL, Trieste, Italy.2,36 The experimental configuration is described in Refs. 5 and 36 and schematically illustrated in Fig. 2(a), including a variable magnetic field (B) applied to the sample, whose value, was varied in the 0–0.5 T range by adjusting the distance between the sample and a permanent magnet.
FIG. 2.
(a) Sketch of the EUV TG experimental geometry. Circularly polarized extreme ultraviolet (EUV) pump beams A and B (red arrows) are crossed at the sample generating the interference pattern. The probe beam (full blue arrow) transiently diffracted off this pattern in reflection geometry (dashed blue arrow) is the EUV TG signal, which is routed to the CCD detector by the multilayer mirrors. (b) Scanning electron microscopy image of the permanent grating with periodicity of 44 nm permanently generated on the sample surface by the crossed pump beams with the total fluence of 40 mJ/cm2.
Two circularly polarized pump pulses, designated as pump A and pump B in Fig. 2(a), intersected at the sample surface under an angle of to generate an interference pattern with a period of nm, where nm is the excitation wavelength. The time-delayed vertically polarized probe pulse at the same wavelength ( nm; matching the Co M-edge) was directed onto the sample at an angle of 13°. In this configuration, the vertically polarized beam is mainly sensitive to the out-of-plane magnetization component,37 which, in DyCo5 films at room temperature, corresponds to the magnetization direction.23
The probe beam, back-diffracted from the TG, was then reflected by the multilayer mirror onto an in-vacuum two-dimensional charge-coupled device (CCD) detector, using the same setup described in Refs. 5 and 36.
The total fluence of the two pump beams at the sample was 10 mJ/cm2. For each time delay, 1000 FEL shots were accumulated to measure the TG intensity. To mitigate the effects of radiation damage, each time trace was acquired at a different location on the sample.
By increasing the FEL fluence above 20 mJ/cm2, a permanent grating was imprinted onto the film, which involves structural and magnetic changes of the sample.38 The characteristics of the permanent grating were assessed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) utilizing a Zeiss Merlin instrument at the Correlative Microscopy and Spectroscopy CoreLab of the HZB.
The period of the grating observed in SEM, nm, closely aligns with the value calculated from the crossing angle and wavelength of the two pump beams [Fig. 2(b)].39
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Time-dependent EUV TG signals were acquired by scanning the delay between the EUV TG and probe beams in increments of 1 ps. Moreover, to encompass the eventual ultrafast electronic and magnetic responses, a detailed investigation of the first picosecond time window (−0.5 to 0.5 ps) was conducted, with a step size of 0.1 ps.
Upon sample excitation, the application of EUV TG creates a spatially periodic temperature distribution across the surface of the DyCo5 film, with a period Λ. This excitation triggers the rapid thermal expansion and consequent ultrafast generation of counter-propagating SAWs, as described in Ref. 40.
As depicted in Fig. 3(a), the normalized diffracted intensity, as a function of , exhibits discernible periodic oscillations with the period of 12 ps.
FIG. 3.

(a) Time trace of the EUV TG signal. The inset shows the high temporal resolution scan in the ultrafast region (±0.5 ps), where the electronic signal could be expected. Error bars have been calculated using the standard deviation of the signal at negative time delays. (b) Zero-padded Fourier transform of the 20–100 ps part of the spectrum. (c) TG signals measured at zero magnetic field and at B = 0.5 T. The two waveforms were collected in different locations in the sample surface. While the magnitude of the first two oscillations and the signal-to-noise ratio differ from spot to spot, the time dependence of the oscillations at ps is independent of the sample position.
The zero-padded Fourier transform of the time trace in the range ps, where the signal exhibits more regular oscillations, reveals the presence of SAWs. These waves are characterized by two principal phonon harmonics at frequencies ν = 84 and 166 GHz, as depicted in Fig. 3(b).
The lower frequency corresponds to the SAW with a phase velocity of 3700 m/s, comparable to SAW velocities measured in TbCo multilayers.41 The double of the frequency can be attributed to the quadratic dependence of the diffraction intensity I on the surface displacement5
Here, describes the exponential decay of the thermal grating,42 while A, τ, and are, respectively, the amplitude, decay time, and angular frequency of the SAW. At Λ = 44 nm, the SAW oscillations most likely persist without decay within a 100 ps timeframe, and the observed signal corresponds to the gradual intensity decline of the thermal grating, modulated by the SAW.
Surprisingly, within the initial 1 ps time window [as illustrated in the inset of Fig. 3(a)], the ultrafast electronic response from cobalt remains conspicuously absent, as well as the rise of the magnetic response—an observation that contrasts the Gd–Co study conducted in transmission geometry, where electronic and magnetic dynamics are observed within 500 fs after the FEL pulse. This initial response is subsequently followed by a decaying TG signal spanning tens of picoseconds. The magnetic TG signal in the Gd–Co study became evident when comparing data acquired in magnetically saturated and remanent states: the magnetic response was only discernible in the former scenario, attributed to the emergence of multiple magnetic domains in zero field.9 However, in the present study, no significant response to external magnetic fields is observed. In DyCo5, applying a saturation magnetic field of 0.5 T does not cause any noticeable change in dynamics, as shown in Fig. 3(c).
The absence of any magnetic appreciable response in the present EUV study is surprising, since a previous study has demonstrated ultrafast demagnetization via 40 fs infrared (IR) laser pulses with a photon energy of 1.5 eV. At incident laser fluences of a similar magnitude, i.e., 10–15 mJ/cm2, IR photons induced 40% and 80% demagnetization of the Co sub-lattice within the first 2 ps.43 On the other hand, an ultrafast magnetic response to the both IR and EUV pumps was observed in Gd–Co, a system rather similar to DyCo5. The absence of the magnetic TG signal in DyCo5, thus, deserves further discussion. Indeed, it is noteworthy that even a modest increase in the total pump fluence is sufficient to induce the permanent imprint of the grating via radiation damage after about 20 s exposure. Hence, the pump fluence should also be sufficient to induce the change in magnetization.
Assuming that the fluence level was adequate to drive a magnetization grating, the absence of a detectable signal could be due to the experimental geometry. Indeed, the observed backward-diffracted signal arises from both the spatially periodic perturbation of the material's refractive index, which modulates the EUV reflectivity, and from coherent surface displacements arising from the thermal expansion driven by the thermal grating.44 The latter contribution is expected to be relatively weaker in experiments conducted in transmission geometry9 on sample with optimal thickness, since the signal from refractive index modulations increases on crossing the excited thickness of the sample. When the probe resonates with a magnetic edge, refractive index alterations come from electronic population modulation affecting core-hole transitions (electronic grating signal), dichroic component modulation (magnetization grating signal), and density modulation (density grating signal). The latter, featured by longitudinal acoustic phonons but typically weaker due to its dependence on the square of thermal expansion, contrasts with the more pronounced magnetization grating signal, as seen in previous studies.9,10 The transmission geometry is, thus, advantageous in removing the competing signal due to the SAWs, making it in capturing the transient magnetic signal compared to reflection geometry, despite the high structural and magnetic quality of our sample. In addition, by taking into account absorption of Pt, DyCo5, and Ta at the probe wavelength,45 the transmission of the corresponding layers are 70%, 22%, and 64%, respectively. The backscattered intensity from vacuum/Pt, Pt/DyCo5, DyCo5/Ta, and Ta/Si interfaces are estimated as 2%, 0.98%, 0.016%, and 0.0023% of the intensity upstream the sample, respectively, as we estimate by taking into account reflectivity of each interface and absorption of the incoming and reflected beams. Hence, the observed scattering mainly originates from the Pt/vacuum interface, which is expected to be not sensitive to the magnetic state of DyCo5 when the probe wavelength is away from Pt edges, while intensities from DyCo5/Ta and Ta/Si interfaces are two order of magnitude weaker. Therefore, TG experiments in reflection geometry require not only sub-nm roughness of surface and interfaces for ensuring high reflectivity, but also careful selection of the adjacent layers of the material under study. An alternative approach for isolating in reflection geometry a weak magnetic signal out of a strong SAW signal is to use transient polarization gratings, which is possible by employing a special FEL configuration.46 Using L-edge soft x-ray energies to detect the magnetic TG signal could mitigate the issue of absorption losses. However, this approach complicates the experimental geometry since substantial soft x-ray reflectivity is only possible at grazing incidence.44,47
IV. CONCLUSION
This paper presents a study of the coherent generation of SAWs within DyCo5 thin films through the utilization of femtosecond EUV FEL pulses in a transient grating geometry. SAWs hold significant promise for applications in spintronics, offering potential avenues for, e.g., coherent domain wall nucleation, topological structure manipulation,30,48,49 and spin current generation.50
Despite the high quality of the sample used in our study, we did not observe any electronic or magnetic signals. This could potentially be attributed to the significantly larger signal originating from SAWs and the complexities associated with reduces backscattering signal from relevant interfaces within the material. Our findings highlight the challenges encountered when employing EUV TG in reflection geometry, particularly in the context of detecting magnetic dynamics. While this setup potentially expands the applicability of the technique to a wider range of magnetic materials that may not be transparent to EUV radiation, it is essential to carefully consider these factors to ensure the reliable detection of magnetic phenomena. Addressing these challenges will be crucial for advancing our understanding of magnetic dynamics using EUV TG in reflection geometry.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Authors thank FERMI free-electron laser facility for provided beamtime according to the Proposal 20214012. The x-ray spectroscopy experiment was carried out at the beamline PM-2 VEKMAG at BESSY II synchrotron as a part of the Proposal 231-11957. We kindly acknowledge x-ray and correlative microscopy and Spectroscopy CoreLabs of HZB for provided instrumentation and René Gunder for his assistance with the sample characterization. We thank C. David, I. Bykova, J. Raabe, R. Abrudan, and N. Jaouen for fruitful discussions. This study was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF), Grant Nos. 200021_165550/1, 200021_169017, and 200021_196964 as well as the SNSF National Centers of Competence in Research in Molecular Ultrafast Science and Technology (NCCR MUST-No. 51NF40-183615). The research leading to these results has received funding from LASERLAB-EUROPE (Grant Agreement No. 871124, European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme). Authors acknowledge financial support of the VEKMAG end station by the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (Nos. BMBF 05K10PC2, 05K10WR1, and 05K10KE1) by HZB. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 860553.
Contributor Information
Victor Ukleev, Email: mailto:victor.ukleev@helmholtz-berlin.de.
Urs Staub, Email: mailto:urs.staub@psi.ch.
AUTHOR DECLARATIONS
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts to disclose.
Author Contributions
Victor Ukleev: Conceptualization (lead); Data curation (lead); Formal analysis (lead); Investigation (lead); Visualization (lead); Writing – original draft (lead). Ludmila Leroy: Investigation (equal). Riccardo Mincigrucci: Conceptualization (lead); Data curation (equal); Investigation (equal); Validation (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Dario De Angelis: Investigation (equal). Danny Fainozzi: Investigation (equal). Nupur Ninad Khatu: Investigation (equal). Ettore Paltanin: Investigation (equal). Laura Foglia: Investigation (equal). Filippo Bencivenga: Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Validation (equal); Writing – original draft (equal). Chen Luo: Investigation (equal). Florian Ruske: Investigation (equal). Florin Radu: Investigation (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Cristian Svetina: Conceptualization (equal); Funding acquisition (equal); Supervision (equal). Urs Staub: Conceptualization (lead); Funding acquisition (lead); Investigation (equal); Supervision (lead); Writing – review & editing (lead).
DATA AVAILABILITY
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Zenodo repository: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10678880 (Ref. 51).
References
- 1. Bencivenga F., Cucini R., Capotondi F., Battistoni A., Mincigrucci R., Giangrisostomi E., Gessini A., Manfredda M., Nikolov I., Pedersoli E. et al. , “ Four-wave mixing experiments with extreme ultraviolet transient gratings,” Nature 520, 205–208 (2015). 10.1038/nature14341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bencivenga F., Mincigrucci R., Capotondi F., Foglia L., Naumenko D., Maznev A., Pedersoli E., Simoncig A., Caporaletti F., Chiloyan V. et al. , “ Nanoscale transient gratings excited and probed by extreme ultraviolet femtosecond pulses,” Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw5805 (2019). 10.1126/sciadv.aaw5805 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Rouxel J. R., Fainozzi D., Mankowsky R., Rösner B., Seniutinas G., Mincigrucci R., Catalini S., Foglia L., Cucini R., Döring F. et al. , “ Hard x-ray transient grating spectroscopy on bismuth germanate,” Nat. Photonics 15, 499–503 (2021). 10.1038/s41566-021-00797-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Maznev A., Bencivenga F., Cannizzo A., Capotondi F., Cucini R., Duncan R., Feurer T., Frazer T., Foglia L., Frey H.-M. et al. , “ Generation of coherent phonons by coherent extreme ultraviolet radiation in a transient grating experiment,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 221905 (2018). 10.1063/1.5048023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Maznev A., Mincigrucci R., Bencivenga F., Unikandanunni V., Capotondi F., Chen G., Ding Z., Duncan R., Foglia L., Izzo M. et al. , “ Generation and detection of 50 GHz surface acoustic waves by extreme ultraviolet pulses,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 044102 (2021). 10.1063/5.0060575 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Milloch A., Mincigrucci R., Capotondi F., De Angelis D., Foglia L., Kurdi G., Naumenko D., Pedersoli E., Pelli-Cresi J. S., Simoncig A. et al. , “ Nanoscale thermoelasticity in silicon nitride membranes: Implications for thermal management,” ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 4, 10519–10527 (2021). 10.1021/acsanm.1c02034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Svetina C., Mankowsky R., Knopp G., Koch F., Seniutinas G., Rösner B., Kubec A., Lebugle M., Mochi I., Beck M. et al. , “ Towards x-ray transient grating spectroscopy,” Opt. Lett. 44, 574–577 (2019). 10.1364/OL.44.000574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Weder D., von Korff Schmising C., Günther C., Schneider M., Engel D., Hessing P., Strüber C., Weigand M., Vodungbo B., Jal E. et al. , “ Transient magnetic gratings on the nanometer scale,” Struct. Dyn. 7, 054501 (2020). 10.1063/4.0000017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ksenzov D., Maznev A. A., Unikandanunni V., Bencivenga F., Capotondi F., Caretta A., Foglia L., Malvestuto M., Masciovecchio C., Mincigrucci R. et al. , “ Nanoscale transient magnetization gratings created and probed by femtosecond extreme ultraviolet pulses,” Nano Lett. 21, 2905–2911 (2021). 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c05083 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Yao K., Steinbach F., Borchert M., Schick D., Engel D., Bencivenga F., Mincigrucci R., Foglia L., Pedersoli E., De Angelis D. et al. , “ All-optical switching on the nanometer scale excited and probed with femtosecond extreme ultraviolet pulses,” Nano Lett. 22, 4452–4458 (2022). 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Eichler H. J., Günter P., and Pohl D. W., Laser-Induced Dynamic Gratings ( Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986). [Google Scholar]
- 12. Janušonis J., Jansma T., Chang C., Liu Q., Gatilova A., Lomonosov A., Shalagatskyi V., Pezeril T., Temnov V., and Tobey R., “ Transient grating spectroscopy in magnetic thin films: Simultaneous detection of elastic and magnetic dynamics,” Sci. Rep. 6, 29143 (2016). 10.1038/srep29143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Coey J., “ Perspective and prospects for rare earth permanent magnets,” Engineering 6, 119–131 (2020). 10.1016/j.eng.2018.11.034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14. González J. A., Andrés J. P., and López Antón R., “ Applied trends in magnetic rare earth/transition metal alloys and multilayers,” Sensors 21, 5615 (2021). 10.3390/s21165615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Hansen P., Klahn S., Clausen C., Much G., and Witter K., “ Magnetic and magneto-optical properties of rare-earth transition-metal alloys containing Dy, Ho, Fe, Co,” J. Appl. Phys. 69, 3194–3207 (1991). 10.1063/1.348561 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Andreev A. and Zadvorkin S., “ Thermal expansion and spontaneous magnetostriction of RCo5 intermetallic compounds,” Physica B 172, 517–525 (1991). 10.1016/0921-4526(91)90011-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Radwanski R., “ The origin of the basal-plane magnetocrystalline anisotropy in 4f Co-rich intermetallics,” J. Phys. F 17, 267 (1987). 10.1088/0305-4608/17/1/030 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Tie-Song Z., Han-Min J., Guang-Hua G., Xiu-Feng H., and Hong C., “ Magnetic properties of R ions in RCo5 compounds (R=Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, and Er),” Phys. Rev. B 43, 8593 (1991). 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.8593 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Donges A., Khmelevskyi S., Deak A., Abrudan R.-M., Schmitz D., Radu I., Radu F., Szunyogh L., and Nowak U., “ Magnetization compensation and spin reorientation transition in ferrimagnetic DyCo5: Multiscale modeling and element-specific measurements,” Phys. Rev. B 96, 024412 (2017). 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.024412 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Grechishkin R., Ivanova A., Grachev A., Zigert A., and Eguzhokova R., “ Domain structure and spin reorientation in TbCo5 and DyCo5 intermetallics,” IEEE Trans. Magn. 53, 6500704 (2017). 10.1109/TMAG.2017.2697900 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kirilyuk A., Kimel A. V., and Rasing T., “ Ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetic order,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2731 (2010). 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2731 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Radu I., Vahaplar K., Stamm C., Kachel T., Pontius N., Dürr H., Ostler T., Barker J., Evans R., Chantrell R. et al. , “ Transient ferromagnetic-like state mediating ultrafast reversal of antiferromagnetically coupled spins,” Nature 472, 205–208 (2011). 10.1038/nature09901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Radu F., Abrudan R., Radu I., Schmitz D., and Zabel H., “ Perpendicular exchange bias in ferrimagnetic spin valves,” Nat. Commun. 3, 715 (2012). 10.1038/ncomms1728 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ünal A., Valencia S., Radu F., Marchenko D., Merazzo K., Vázquez M., and Sánchez-Barriga J., “ Ferrimagnetic DyCo5 nanostructures for bits in heat-assisted magnetic recording,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 5, 064007 (2016). 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.5.064007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Radu F. and Sánchez-Barriga J., “ Ferrimagnetic heterostructures for applications in magnetic recording,” in Novel Magnetic Nanostructures ( Elsevier, 2018), pp. 267–331. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Chen K., Lott D., Philippi-Kobs A., Weigand M., Luo C., and Radu F., “ Observation of compact ferrimagnetic skyrmions in DyCo3 film,” Nanoscale 12, 18137–18143 (2020). 10.1039/D0NR02947E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Seifert T. S., Martens U., Radu F., Ribow M., Berritta M., Nádvorník L., Starke R., Jungwirth T., Wolf M., Radu I. et al. , “ Frequency-independent terahertz anomalous hall effect in DyCo5, Co32Fe68, and Gd27Fe73 thin films from DC to 40 THz,” Adv. Mater. 33, 2007398 (2021). 10.1002/adma.202007398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. del Moral A., Algarabel P., and Ibarra M., “ Magnetoelastic coupling and spin reorientation in RECo5 uniaxial magnets (RE= Pr, Dy, Ho and Y). II,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 69, 285–298 (1987). 10.1016/0304-8853(87)90255-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Kamarád J., Arnold Z., and Ibarra M., “ Magnetic phase transitions and magnetovolume anomalies in DyCo2 and GdMn2 compounds under pressure,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 140, 837–838 (1995). 10.1016/0304-8853(94)01477-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Puebla J., Hwang Y., Maekawa S., and Otani Y., “ Perspectives on spintronics with surface acoustic waves,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 220502 (2022). 10.1063/5.0093654 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Luo C., Ryll H., Back C. H., and Radu F., “ X-ray magnetic linear dichroism as a probe for non-collinear magnetic state in ferrimagnetic single layer exchange bias systems,” Sci. Rep. 9, 18169 (2019). 10.1038/s41598-019-54356-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Glavic A. and Björck M., “ GenX 3: The latest generation of an established tool,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 55, 1063–1071 (2022). 10.1107/S1600576722006653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Daillant J. and Gibaud A., X-Ray and Neutron Reflectivity: Principles and Applications ( Springer, 2008), Vol. 770. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Stöhr J. and Siegmann H. C., “ Magnetism,” Solid-State Sciences ( Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006), Vol. 5, p. 236. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Noll T. and Radu F. et al. , “ The mechanics of the VEKMAG experiment,” in Proceedings of the MEDSI2016, Barcelona, Spain (JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland, 2016), pp. 370–373. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Mincigrucci R., Foglia L., Naumenko D., Pedersoli E., Simoncig A., Cucini R., Gessini A., Kiskinova M., Kurdi G., Mahne N. et al. , “ Advances in instrumentation for FEL-based four-wave-mixing experiments,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 907, 132–148 (2018). 10.1016/j.nima.2018.03.051 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Paolasini L., “ Resonant and magnetic x-ray diffraction by polarized synchrotron radiation,” Éc. Thématique Soc. Fr. Neutronique 13, 03002 (2014). 10.1051/sfn/20141303002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Ukleev V., Burian M., Gliga S., Vaz C., Rösner B., Fainozzi D., Seniutinas G., Kubec A., Mankowsky R., Lemke H. T. et al. , “ Effect of intense x-ray free-electron laser transient gratings on the magnetic domain structure of Tm: YIG,” J. Appl. Phys. 133, 123902 (2023). 10.1063/5.0119241 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Naumenko D., Mincigrucci R., Altissimo M., Foglia L., Gessini A., Kurdi G., Nikolov I., Pedersoli E., Principi E., Simoncig A. et al. , “ Thermoelasticity of nanoscale silicon carbide membranes excited by extreme ultraviolet transient gratings: Implications for mechanical and thermal management,” ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2, 5132–5139 (2019). 10.1021/acsanm.9b01024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Rogers J. A., Maznev A. A., Banet M. J., and Nelson K. A., “ Optical generation and characterization of acoustic waves in thin films: Fundamental and applications,” Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 30, 117 (2000). 10.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.117 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Zhou H., Talbi A., Tiercelin N., and Bou Matar O., “ Multilayer magnetostrictive structure based surface acoustic wave devices,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 114101 (2014). 10.1063/1.4868530 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Käding O., Skurk H., Maznev A., and Matthias E., “ Transient thermal gratings at surfaces for thermal characterization of bulk materials and thin films,” Appl. Phys. A 61, 253–261 (1995). 10.1007/BF01538190 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Abrudan R., Hennecke M., Radu F., Kachel T., Holldack K., Mitzner R., Donges A., Khmelevskyi S., Deák A., Szunyogh L. et al. , “ Element-specific magnetization damping in ferrimagnetic DyCo5 alloys revealed by ultrafast x-ray measurements,” Phys. Status Solidi RRL 15, 2100047 (2021). 10.1002/pssr.202100047 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Bencivenga F., Capotondi F., Foglia L., Mincigrucci R., and Masciovecchio C., “ Extreme ultraviolet transient gratings,” Adv. Phys.: X 8, 2220363 (2023). 10.1080/23746149.2023.2220363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Thompson A. C. and Vaughan D. et al. , X-Ray Data Booklet ( University of California; Berkeley, CA, 2001), Vol. 8. [Google Scholar]
- 46. Foglia L., Wehinger B., Perosa G., Mincigrucci R., Allaria E., Armillotta F., Brynes A., Cucini R., De Angelis D., De Ninno G. et al. , “ Nanoscale transient polarization gratings,” aarXiv:2310.15734 (2023).
- 47. Foglia L., Mincigrucci R., Maznev A., Baldi G., Capotondi F., Caporaletti F., Comin R., De Angelis D., Duncan R., Fainozzi D. et al. , “ Extreme ultraviolet transient gratings: A tool for nanoscale photoacoustics,” Photoacoustics 29, 100453 (2023). 10.1016/j.pacs.2023.100453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Yokouchi T., Sugimoto S., Rana B., Seki S., Ogawa N., Kasai S., and Otani Y., “ Creation of magnetic skyrmions by surface acoustic waves,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 361–366 (2020). 10.1038/s41565-020-0661-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Chen C., Lin T., Niu J., Sun Y., Yang L., Kang W., and Lei N., “ Surface acoustic wave controlled skyrmion-based synapse devices,” Nanotechnology 33, 115205 (2021). 10.1088/1361-6528/ac3f14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Kobayashi D., Yoshikawa T., Matsuo M., Iguchi R., Maekawa S., Saitoh E., and Nozaki Y., “ Spin current generation using a surface acoustic wave generated via spin-rotation coupling,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 077202 (2017). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.077202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Ukleev V. (2024). “ Transient grating spectroscopy on a DyCo5 thin film with femtosecond extreme ultraviolet pulses,” Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.10678880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Citations
- Ukleev V. (2024). “ Transient grating spectroscopy on a DyCo5 thin film with femtosecond extreme ultraviolet pulses,” Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.10678880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Zenodo repository: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10678880 (Ref. 51).

