Abstract
Objective
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multi-systemic disease with the unknown pathogenic mechanism. DNA demethylation is involved in SLE pathogenesis. Growth arrest and DNA damage inducible 45 alpha (Gadd45a) takes part in the process of DNA demethylation. Gadd45a is a DNA repair-related protein. This study aims to investigate the expressions of some proteins [including activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG), and methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 4 (MBD4)] involving in base excision repair (BER) process in CD4 + T cells in patients with SLE, and to analyze the correlations between the above BER proteins and lupus disease.
Methods
From January 2019 to September 2020, 12 SLE patients and 12 healthy controls were recruited from Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were separated by Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation and then CD4+ T cells were isolated via positive selection using Miltenyi beads. We measured the messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein expressions of AID, TDG, and MBD4 by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blotting, respectively.
Results
In contrast to controls, in SLE CD4+ T cells, the mRNA and protein expressions of AID were elevated (P=0.003, P=0.022, respectively); TDG protein expression was increased (P=0.017); and MBD4 protein level was reduced (P<0.001). No visible distinctions was found in the mRNA expressions of either TDG or MBD4 between the 2 groups (both P>0.05). The mRNA and protein expressions of AID and the protein levels of TDG were positively correlated with SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI). And the mRNA and protein expressions of MBD4 were negatively correlated with SLEDAI.
Conclusion
In SLE CD4+ T cells, the increased expressions of AID and TDG and the decreased MBD4 expression may participate in SLE pathogenic mechanism.
Keywords: base excision repair, DNA demethylation, systemic lupus erythematosus
Abstract
目的
系统性红斑狼疮(systemic lupus erythematosus,SLE)是一种多系统疾病,其发病机制尚不清楚。DNA去甲基化参与SLE的发病机制,生长停滞和DNA损伤诱导型45α(Gadd45a)参与DNA的去甲基化过程。Gadd45a是一种DNA修复相关蛋白,因此,本研究旨在分析参与碱基切除修复(base excision repair,BER)过程的一些蛋白质,包括活化诱导胞嘧啶脱氨基化酶(activation-induced cytidine deaminase,AID)、胸腺嘧啶DNA糖基化酶(thymine DNA glycosylase,TDG)和甲基CpG结合蛋白4(methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 4,MBD4)在SLE患者CD4 + T细胞中的表达,并分析这些BER蛋白与SLE活动之间的相关性。
方法
2019年1月至2020年9月中南大学湘雅二医院收集12例SLE患者和12例健康体检者(对照组)。采用Ficoll-Hypaque密度梯度离心法分离外周血单个核细胞(peripheral blood mononuclear cells,PBMCs),CD4免疫磁珠分离外周血CD4 + T细胞。通过实时反转录聚合酶链反应(real-time RT-PCR)和蛋白质印迹法检测AID、TDG和MBD4信使RNA(mRNA)和蛋白质的表达水平。
结果
与对照组相比,SLE患者CD4 + T细胞中 AID mRNA和蛋白质表达升高( P=0.003, P=0.022)。SLE患者的CD4 + T细胞中TDG蛋白表达升高( P=0.017),MBD4蛋白质表达降低( P<0.001)。两组之间 TDG和 MBD4 mRNA表达水平没有明显差异(均 P>0.05)。 AID mRNA和蛋白水平及TDG蛋白水平与系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动度(SLE disease activity index,SLEDAI)呈正相关, MBD4 mRNA和蛋白水平与SLEDAI呈负相关。
结论
SLE患者CD4 + T细胞中AID和TDG表达增加,MBD4表达降低,它们可能参与了SLE的发病机制。
Keywords: 碱基切除修复, DNA低甲基化, 系统性红斑狼疮
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem involved autoimmune disease characterized by lymphocyte infiltration and autoantibody overproduction [ 1]. Immunocomplex formation and complement activation cause serious inflammation, leading to tissue damage [ 2]. However, the SLE pathogenic mechanism remains unknown. Our preceding research [ 3] found that DNA demethylation participated in SLE pathogenic mechanism and growth arrest and DNA damage inducible 45 alpha (Gadd45a) takes part in the process of DNA demethylation. Gadd45a is also a DNA repair-related protein [ 4]. Rai, et al [ 5] found that Gadd45a interacts with activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), apolipo-protein B RNA-editing catalytic component (Apobec), and methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 4 (MBD4), which contribute to DNA demethylation in zebrafish embryos. In HEK293 cells, thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) can interact with AID and Gadd45a, which promotes DNA demethylation [ 6- 7]. AID, TDG, and MBD4 all take participate in base excision repair (BER) process. BER is a primary pathway in DNA repair of base damage caused by oxidation [ 8].
Many previous studies [ 9- 10] suggested that the abnormality of BER may take part in the underlying mechanism of lupus development. Thus, in this study, we aim to investigate BER protein expression in CD4 + T cells in patients with SLE, including AID, TDG, and MBD4, and analyze the correlations between BER proteins and lupus disease activity.
1. Subjects and methods
1.1. Patients and controls
Twelve SLE subjects [age (38.25±11.33) years] who met at least 4 standards in the classification of SLE listed by American College of Rheumatology [ 11] were recruited from outpatient and inpatient departments of Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University between January 2019 and September 2020. We used SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) to quantify lupus disease activity [ 12]. Patient demographics are given in Table 1. And we recruited 12 healthy controls from the medical personnel in Second Xiangya Hospital. We obtained the signed consent from each patient. The human sample research was evaluated and endorsed by the Human Ethics Committee of Second Xiangya Hospital (No.SADISD 20190220).
1.2. Cell separation
We drew about 50 mL of venous peripheral blood from each subject and then immediately conserved with heparin. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were separated by Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation. We isolated CD4 + T cells via positive selection using Miltenyi beads (Miltenyi, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We incubated the separated cells with CD4 antibody (BD, US) and detected the cells by flow cytometry. The cell purity was higher than 95%.
1.3. RNA isolation and real-time RT-PCR
We extracted the total RNA from CD4 + T cells using TRIzol agentia and synthesized cDNA using PrimeScript RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, Japan). And the cDNA formed by reverse transcription of SLE patients and healthy controls was used as an amplification template to amplify target genes and GAPDH via real-time RT-PCR with a SYBR Premix Ex Taq Kit (Takara, Japan). A LightCycler96 Real time PCR System (Roche, Switzerland) was applied to detect the transcription levels of AID, TDG, MBD4, and GAPDH. We quantified mRNA expressions with a TB Green Premix Ex Taq (Takara, Japan). The 2 -ΔΔCt method (ΔCt=CtBER proteins -CtGAPDH; ΔΔCt =ΔCtSLE-ΔCthealthy controls) was used to determine the value of every cDNA, and these values were then standardized to GAPDH. The primers are exhibited in Table 2.
1.4. Western blotting
Total proteins from CD4 + T cells were isolated using RIPA buffer and detected the concentration with a Pierce BCA Protein Assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, US). Then we performed gel electrophoresis experiments and transferred the samples to PVDF membrane. We used 5% defatted milk to block the membrane. Primary antibodies used included: Anti-AID (1꞉150; Abcam, UK), anti-TDG (1꞉900; Abcam, UK), anti-MBD4 (1꞉200; Abcam, UK), and β-actin (1꞉2 000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, US). We visualized the blots using Developer (Paison, Shanghai, China), and exposed them to X-ray films, then quantified band densities using Image-Pro Plus software. Densitometry was used to normalize protein quantification to β-actin. The ratio of the optical density value of the AID, TDG, and MBD4 proteins to the β-actin protein was used as the relative expression amount of the above protein.
1.5. Statistical analysis
All data were processed using SPSS 25.0 statistical analysis software, and the measurement data were expressed as mean±standard deviation ( ± s). Measurement data were analyzed with the unpaired Student’s t-test (meeting normal distribution and homogeneous variance), otherwise, the Mann-Whitney U test was used. Spearman correlation test was used to analyze the correlations of the mRNA and protein levels of the BER proteins with SLEDAI. P<0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference.
2. Results
2.1. Expressions of AID, TDG, and MBD4 in SLE CD4 + T cells
Compared with the healthy controls, the mRNA and protein expressions of AID in SLE CD4 + T cells were significantly elevated (1.00±0.43 vs 3.37±2.12, P=0.003; 0.35±0.25 vs 0.63±0.28, P=0.022; Figure 1A, 2A, and 2C); TDG protein expression was obviously elevated (0.52±0.23 vs 0.88±0.44, P=0.017; Figure 2A, 2D); and no obvious difference was found in mRNA expression of either TDG or MBD4 between healthy controls and SLE patients (1.00±0.23 vs 1.06±0.69, P=0.776; 1.00±0.43 vs 1.00±0.27, P=0.984; Figure 1B, 1C). Compared with healthy controls, MBD4 protein expression was visibly reduced in CD4 + T cells in SLE subjects (0.90±0.21 vs 0.38±0.12, P<0.001; Figure 2B, 2E).
Figure 1. Relative mRNA expression levels of AID, TDG, and MBD4 in CD4 + T cells measured by real-time RT-PCR ( n=12).
A: Comparison of the AID mRNA expression levels in CD4 + T cells between SLE patients and healthy controls; B: Comparison of the TDG mRNA expression levels in CD4 + T cells between SLE patients and healthy controls; C: Comparison of the MBD4 mRNA expression levels in CD4 + T cells between SLE patients and healthy controls. AID: Activation-induced cytidine deaminase; TDG: Thymine DNA glycosylase; MBD4: Methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 4; SLE: Systemic lupus erythematosus.
Figure 2. Relative protein expression levels of AID, TDG, and MBD4 in CD4 + T cells measured by Western blotting ( n=12).
A, C: Comparison of the AID protein expression levels in CD4 + T cells between SLE patients and healthy controls; A, D: Comparison of the TDG protein expression levels in CD4 + T cells between SLE patients and healthy controls; B, E: Comparison of the MBD4 protein expression levels in CD4 + T cells between SLE patients and healthy controls. SLE: Systemic lupus erythematosus.
2.2. Correlations of the mRNA and protein levels of the BER with lupus disease activity
The mRNA and protein levels of AID were positively correlated with SLEDAI ( r=0.615, P=0.033; r=0.900, P=0.001, respectively; Figure 3A, 4A). No obvious correlation was found between the mRNA level of TDG and SLEDAI, while the protein expression of TDG was positively correlated with SLEDAI ( r=-0.124, P=0.702; r=0.642, P=0.024, respectively; Figure 3B, 4B). The mRNA and protein levels of MBD4 were negatively correlated with SLEDAI ( r=-0.713, P=0.009; r=-0.615, P=0.033, respectively; Figure 3C, 4C).
Figure 3. Correlations of the relative mRNA levels of AID, TDG, and MBD4 with SLEDAI.
A: Correlations between the relative mRNA levels of AID and SLEDAI; B: Correlations between the relative mRNA levels of TDG with SLEDAI; C: Correlations between the relative mRNA levels of MBD4 and SLEDAI. AID: Activation-induced cytidine deaminase; TDG: Thymine DNA glycosylase; MBD4: Methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 4.
Figure 4. Correlations of the relative protein levels of AID, TDG, and MBD4 with SLEDAI.
A: Correlations between the relative protein levels of AID and SLEDAI; B: Correlations between the relative protein levels of TDG with SLEDAI. C: Correlations between the relative protein levels of MBD4 and SLEDAI. AID: Activation-induced cytidine deaminase; TDG: Thymine DNA glycosylase; MBD4: Methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 4.
3. Discussion
In recent years, we have seen some interesting developments in the pathogenesis of SLE, including metabolic disorders, signaling, and biochemical defects in immune cells, and impaired repair of DNA damage [ 13]. Every day, each of our cells faces at least 10 4 DNA damage, and their effective repair is an indispensable biological process to maintain cell survival and function [ 14]. The genomic integrity is maintained through a network of DNA damage responses and repair pathways, which is a comprehensive signaling process that can determine the capacity of cells to repair DNA damage, mutations or apoptosis [ 15]. The diversity of DNA damage types requires a variety of DNA repair pathways. Generally, the main DNA repair pathways remain conservative, containing nucleotide excision repair (NER), BER, mismatch repair (MMR), double-strand break repair (DSBR), and directly reverse multifarious forms of DNA damage [ 16]. DNA repair substantially removes DNA damage, cleavages, and base mismatches, and ultimately restores DNA to its original form [ 16].
BER is a primary pathway in DNA repair of base damage caused by oxidation [ 8]. In the BER system, deamination of CpG by AID involves active DNA demethylation [ 17]. AID deaminates 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) to form U, which causes G/T mismatches [ 18- 19]. Both TDG and MBD4 are primary G꞉T glycosylases that excise the uracil and thymine generated by deamination and mispaired guanine [ 20- 23]. AID, TDG, and MBD4 all play crucial roles in DNA demethylation. In other research, it has also demonstrated that in contrast to healthy controls, the AID expression was obviously higher in PBMCs from SLE subjects [ 24]. Jiang, et al [ 25- 26] found that in contrast to AID wild-type mice, the levels of lupus pathogenic antibodies were visibly decreased, the progress of lupus nephritis was delayed in AID heterozygous MRL/lpr mice, and the lupus nephritis did not occur in AID-deficient MRL/lpr mice. Our study demonstrated that compared with healthy controls, the mRNA and protein expressions of AID were visibly elevated in SLE CD4 + T cells. The mRNA and protein expressions of AID were positively correlated with SLEDAI. These above results indicated that AID may take part in the pathogenic mechanism of SLE.
Currently, there is no relevant research showing the expression of TDG in SLE patients. The TDG gene is hypermethylated in the malignant plasma cell neoplasia multiple myeloma (MM) cell lines compared with normal human plasma cells, resulting in a lower TDG expression and a reduced DNA repair efficiency [ 27]. In the Human Protein Atlas database, the TDG protein nuclear expression in melanoma maintains a medium-to-high expression and high level is related to adverse outcomes. TDG plays crucial roles in DNA demethylation. Current research [ 28] showed several possible mechanisms may underlie active DNA demethylation. First, methylated CpG dinucleotides are directly removed by nucleotide excision repair pathway. Second, 5-mC is directly removed by BER pathway or 5-mC is deaminated by deaminase to form U, which causes G/T mismatches. Third, active DNA demethylation also involves oxidative demethylation. Ten-eleven translocation (TET) proteins can oxidize 5-mC to various forms of compounds, including 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC), 5-formylcytosine (5-fC), and 5-carboxylcytosine (5-CaC). TDG can excise 5-fC and 5-CaC, which triggers subsequent BER [ 29- 30]. Researches [ 7, 31] in HEK293 T cells showed that Gadd45a can activate expression of methylated reporter genes by cooperating with TDG and TET proteins. Demethylation mechanisms in T cells in patients with SLE have always been hot topics in pathogenesis research of lupus erythematosus. Zhao, et al [ 32] noticed an elevated expression of 5-hmC in CD4 + T cells in patients with SLE combined with high level of the TET family proteins. Wu, et al [ 33] found that NaCl induces DNA hypomethylation and enhances hydroxymethylation levels with increased TET2 and TET3 expressions in CD4 + T cells in patients with SLE. Our study demonstrated that compared with healthy controls, the TDG protein expression in SLE CD4 + T cells was elevated and the relative protein level of TDG was positively correlated with SLEDAI. Based on the above results, TDG may participate in SLE pathogenic mechanism, and we need further study to explore whether it is involved in the autoimmunity via accelerating the demethylation process of T cells.
Through the study on MBD4, we found that in CD4 + T cells in patients with SLE, the MBD4 protein expression is visibly lower than healthy controls. Balada, et al [ 34] reported increased MBD4 mRNA level in CD4 + T cells in patients with SLE. However, other studies [ 35- 36] reported opposite results, indicating that, the MBD4 level is lower in CD4 + T cells in patients with SLE than that in healthy controls. The decreased MBD4 protein expression indicated that MBD4 is involved in DNA demethylation [ 36]. Our research also illustrated that the mRNA and protein levels of MBD4 are negatively correlated with SLEDAI. The above results indicated that the decreased MBD4 expression may take part in the pathogenic mechanism of SLE.
In our study, there was no significant difference between TDG and MBD4 mRNA expression of patients and controls, while the TDG and MBD4 proteins levels of patients were more and less than controls, respectively. There may be several reasons for this situation. First, gene expression is consisted of transcription and translation levels, that is, mRNA and protein levels. During the process of gene expression, there is a time and space gap between transcription and translation [ 37]. Second, after transcription, there will be post-transcription processing, translation, and posttrans-lational modification. Hence, the transcription level and translation level are not completely consistent [ 37].
We investigate BER protein expression including AID, TDG, and MBD4 in CD4 + T cells in patients with SLE and analyse the correlations between BER proteins and lupus disease activity, but we did not study how these proteins participate in DNA demethylation mechanism. Further investigates would focus on whether BER proteins coordinate with Gadd45a to promote DNA demethylation in CD4 + T cells in patients with SLE.
Overall, the results showed that BER elements are probable in connection with SLE pathogenic mechanism. Our further study will focus on the demethylation mechanism through BER pathway in CD4 + T cells in patients with SLE.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81472881).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
AUTHORS’CONTRIBUTIONS
ZHOU Xingyu Conducted the sample collection, cell separation, RNA isolation, RT-PCR, Western blotting and statistical analysis, drafted and revised the manuscript; WU Xiaoqi Conducted the sample collection, cell separation, RNA isolation, RT-PCR, and Western blotting; DENG Min, QIU Yueqi, and ZHOU Shengnan Helped with the sample collection; LI Yaping Designed the study, helped with statistical analyses, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Note
http://xbyxb.csu.edu.cn/xbwk/fileup/PDF/2022121655.pdf
References
- 1. Tsokos GC, Lo MS, Costa Reis P, et al. New insights into the immunopathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 2016, 12( 12): 716- 730. 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Santulli-Marotto S, Retter MW, Gee R, et al. Autoreactive B cell regulation: peripheral induction of developmental arrest by lupus-associated autoantigens[J]. Immunity, 1998, 8( 2): 209- 219. 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80473-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Li YP, Zhao M, Yin H, et al. Overexpression of the growth arrest and DNA damage-induced 45alpha gene contributes to autoimmunity by promoting DNA demethylation in lupus T cells[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 2010, 62( 5): 1438- 1447. 10.1002/art.27363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Niehrs C, Schäfer A. Active DNA demethylation by Gadd45 and DNA repair[J]. Trends Cell Biol, 2012, 22( 4): 220- 227. 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Rai K, Huggins IJ, James SR, et al. DNA demethylation in zebrafish involves the coupling of a deaminase, a glycosylase, and gadd45[J]. Cell, 2008, 135( 7): 1201- 1212. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Cortellino S, Xu JF, Sannai M, et al. Thymine DNA glycosylase is essential for active DNA demethylation by linked deamination-base excision repair[J]. Cell, 2011, 146( 1): 67- 79. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Li Z, Gu TP, Weber AR, et al. gadd45a promotes DNA demethylation through TDG[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2015, 43( 8): 3986- 3997. 10.1093/nar/gkv283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Jung HJ, Kim EH, Mun JY, et al. Base excision DNA repair defect in Gadd45a-deficient cells[J]. Oncogene, 2007, 26( 54): 7517- 7525. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Senejani AG, Liu YF, Kidane D, et al. Mutation of POLB causes lupus in mice[J]. Cell Rep, 2014, 6( 1): 1- 8. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Paluri SL, Burak M, Senejani AG, et al. DNA glycosylase deficiency leads to decreased severity of lupus in the Polb-Y265C mouse model[J]. DNA Repair (Amst), 2021, 105: 103152. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 1997, 40( 9): 1725. 10.1002/art.1780400928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Liang MH, Socher SA, Larson MG, et al. Reliability and validity of six systems for the clinical assessment of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 1989, 32( 9): 1107- 1118. 10.1002/anr.1780320909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Lo MS, Tsokos GC. Recent developments in systemic lupus erythematosus pathogenesis and applications for therapy[J]. Curr Opin Rheumatol, 2018, 30( 2): 222- 228. 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Ohnishi T, Mori E, Takahashi A. DNA double-strand breaks: their production, recognition, and repair in eukaryotes[J]. Mutat Res, 2009, 669( 1/2): 8- 12. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Sirbu BM, Cortez D. DNA damage response: three levels of DNA repair regulation[J]. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2013, 5( 8): a012724. 10.1101/cshperspect.a012724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Meas R, Burak MJ, Sweasy JB. DNA repair and systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. DNA Repair (Amst), 2017, 56: 174- 182. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2017.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Bochtler M, Kolano A, Xu GL. DNA demethylation pathways: additional players and regulators[J]. Bioessays, 2017, 39( 1): 1- 13. 10.1002/bies.201600178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Morgan HD, Dean W, Coker HA, et al. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase deaminates 5-methylcytosine in DNA and is expressed in pluripotent tissues: implications for epigenetic reprogramming[J]. J Biol Chem, 2004, 279( 50): 52353- 52360. 10.1074/jbc.M407695200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ying Y, Zhao GQ. Cooperation of endoderm-derived BMP2 and extraembryonic ectoderm-derived BMP4 in primordial germ cell generation in the mouse[J]. Dev Biol, 2001, 232( 2): 484- 492. 10.1006/dbio.2001.0173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Sjolund AB, Senejani AG, Sweasy JB. MBD4 and TDG: multifaceted DNA glycosylases with ever expanding biological roles[J]. Mutat Res, 2013, 743/744: 12- 25. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2012.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ballestar E, Wolffe AP. Methyl-CpG-binding proteins. Targeting specific gene repression[J]. Eur J Biochem, 2001, 268( 1): 1- 6. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2001.01869.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Jørgensen HF, Adie KR, Chaubert P, et al. Engineering a high-affinity methyl-CpG-binding protein[J/OL]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2006, 34( 13): e 96[ 2021-03-02]. 10.1093/nar/gkl527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Hendrich B, Hardeland U, Ng HH, et al. The thymine glycosylase MBD4 can bind to the product of deamination at methylated CpG sites[J]. Nature, 1999, 401( 6750): 301- 304. 10.1038/45843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kaga H, Komatsuda A, Omokawa A, et al. Downregulated expression of miR-155, miR-17, and miR-181b, and upregulated expression of activation-induced cytidine deaminase and interferon-α in PBMCs from patients with SLE[J]. Mod Rheumatol, 2015, 25( 6): 865- 870. 10.3109/14397595.2015.1030102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Jiang CC, Foley J, Clayton N, et al. Abrogation of lupus nephritis in activation-induced deaminase-deficient MRL/lpr mice[J]. J Immunol, 2007, 178( 11): 7422- 7431. 10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.7422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Jiang CC, Zhao ML, Diaz M. Activation-induced deaminase heterozygous MRL/lpr mice are delayed in the production of high-affinity pathogenic antibodies and in the development of lupus nephritis[J]. Immunology, 2009, 126( 1): 102- 113. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02882.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Peng B, Hurt EM, Hodge DR, et al. DNA hypermethylation and partial gene silencing of human thymine-DNA glycosylase in multiple myeloma cell lines[J]. Epigenetics, 2006, 1( 3): 138- 145. 10.4161/epi.1.3.2938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kohli RM, Zhang Y. TET enzymes, TDG and the dynamics of DNA demethylation[J]. Nature, 2013, 502( 7472): 472- 479. 10.1038/nature12750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. He YF, Li BZ, Li Z, et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA[J]. Science, 2011, 333( 6047): 1303- 1307. 10.1126/science.1210944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Maiti A, Drohat AC. Thymine DNA glycosylase can rapidly excise 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine: potential implications for active demethylation of CpG sites[J]. J Biol Chem, 2011, 286( 41): 35334- 35338. 10.1074/jbc.C111.284620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Kienhöfer S, Musheev MU, Stapf U, et al. GADD45a physically and functionally interacts with TET1[J]. Differentiation, 2015, 90( 1/2/3): 59- 68. 10.1016/j.diff.2015.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Zhao M, Wang J, Liao W, et al. Increased 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in CD4(+) T cells in systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. J Autoimmun, 2016, 69: 64- 73. 10.1016/j.jaut.2016.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Wu HJ, Huang X, Qiu H, et al. High salt promotes autoimmunity by TET2-induced DNA demethylation and driving the differentiation of Tfh cells[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 28065. 10.1038/srep28065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Balada E, Ordi-Ros J, Vilardell-Tarrés M. DNA methylation and systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2007, 1108: 127- 136. 10.1196/annals.1422.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Lei W, Luo Y, Lei W, et al. Abnormal DNA methylation in CD4 + T cells from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, and dermatomyositis[J]. Scand J Rheumatol, 2009, 38( 5): 369- 374. 10.1080/03009740902758875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Liao W, Li MY, Wu HJ, et al. Down-regulation of MBD4 contributes to hypomethylation and overexpression of CD70 in CD4 + T cells in systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. Clin Epigenetics, 2017, 9: 104. 10.1186/s13148-017-0405-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. de Sousa Abreu R, Penalva LO, Marcotte EM, et al. Global signatures of protein and mRNA expression levels[J]. Mol Biosyst, 2009, 5( 12): 1512- 1526. 10.1039/b908315d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]