Abstract
Anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) is a subtype of T-cell lymphoma. This disease mainly affects lymph nodes, although extranodal sites may also be involved. Lymphoma in the pancreas is a rare clinical entity whether it manifests as primary or extranodal involvement. We discuss an unusual case of a 29-year-old male patient who presented with epigastric pain and a right neck mass. The patient’s symptoms, physical examination, and laboratory tests prompted further investigation using imaging modalities such as CT, MRI, and endoscopic ultrasound, which revealed the presence of soft tissue masses in the right supraclavicular region and an ill-defined lesion within the pancreatic head. These findings eventually led to the identification of secondary extranodal pancreatic lymphoma. Fine needle biopsy (FNB) established an ultimate diagnosis of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive ALCL.
Keywords: neoplasm of the pancreas, non hodgkin's lymphoma, extranodal lymphomas, pancreas lesion, t-cell lymphoma
Introduction
Lymphoma is a neoplasm of the lymphoid tissues. It is classified into two types: Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). NHL originates from B-cells or T-cells [1]. While NHL usually arises from the lymph nodes, it can also develop in extranodal sites, which include the stomach, skin, lungs, and, infrequently, the pancreas [2]. Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a subtype of NHL and constitutes a rare and heterogeneous group of lymphoid malignancies that arise from mature or precursor T-cells. PTCLs account for approximately 15-20% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas [3].
The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies PTCLs into many categories and subtypes. The classification mainly consists of three large groups: anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), and T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) [4]. ALCL is an aggressive lymphoma that frequently presents with advanced-stage disease (stage III-IV) and systemic symptoms, especially fever. It presents at an advanced stage in 65% of cases, and it manifests systemic symptoms in 75% of cases. It mostly affects lymph nodes, with extranodal involvement observed in 60% of cases. The most common extranodal sites of ALCL are the skin, subcutaneous tissue, bone, and lung [5].
ALCL is characterized by cells that are generally large with abundant cytoplasm and pleomorphic, often horseshoe-shaped, nuclei and wide CD30 expression. It is classified based on the presence or absence of a genetic abnormality involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene. ALK-positive ALCL is typically associated with a better prognosis than ALK-negative ALCL. ALC has three main subtypes: systemic ALCL, primary cutaneous ALCL, and breast implant-associated ALCL. Systemic ALCL can be either ALK-positive or ALK-negative, while primary cutaneous ALCL and breast implant-associated ALCL are typically ALK-negative [6]. Lymphoma in the pancreas is a very rare clinical entity; primary pancreatic lymphoma (PPL) represents <0.5% of pancreatic cancers and 1% of extranodal lymphomas [7].
Case presentation
A 29-year-old male patient presented to the emergency department with a complaint of epigastric pain radiating to the back for three days. He had not passed stool for two days but was passing flatus. He reported no significant weight loss, fever, or night sweats. There was no history of gastrointestinal bleeding and vomiting. He had a history of a right neck mass three months prior, for which he was following up with oncology. His family history was unremarkable.
On physical examination, the patient had mild jaundice and a palpable mass in the right lower cervical region. There was no axillary or inguinal lymph node enlargement and no organomegaly. The remaining examination was unremarkable. Regarding laboratory tests, his complete blood count (CBC) was unremarkable. As for blood chemistry, he had elevated alanine transaminase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), as demonstrated in Table 1. The observed malignancy, immunological, and infectious markers are shown in Table 2.
Table 1. Blood chemistry findings.
ALT: alanine transaminase; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; CK: creatine kinase; GGT: gamma-glutamyl transferase; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate
| Test name | Results | Units |
| Albumin | 41.1 | g/L |
| ALT | 250 | U/L |
| ALP | 199 | U/L |
| AST | N/A | U/L |
| Amylase | 54 | U/L |
| Total bilirubin | 71.0 | umol/L |
| Calcium | 2.24 | mmol/L |
| Chloride | 102 | mmol/L |
| CK | 77 | U/L |
| GGT | 262 | U/L |
| LDH | 355 | U/L |
| Magnesium | 0.81 | mmol/L |
| Phosphorus | 1.23 | mmol/L |
| Potassium | 4.20 | mmol/L |
| Total protein | 70.0 | g/L |
| Random blood glucose | 5.17 | mmol/L |
| Sodium | 140 | mmol/L |
| Urea | 2.9 | mmol/L |
| Creatinine | 78.4 | umol/L |
| D-dimer | 0.37 | mg/dL |
| ESR | 14 | mm/1stHr |
Table 2. Tumor markers and serological and immunological tests.
| Test name | Results | Units |
| Anti-LKM | Negative | % |
| Anti-Smith | Negative | % |
| Anti-mitochondrial antibody | Negative | % |
| Anti-PR3 (C-ANCA) | Negative | uIU/mL |
| Anti-MPO (P-ANCA) | Negative | % |
| Direct Coombs | Negative | % |
| Indirect Coombs | Negative | % |
| Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) | 0.497 | uIU/mL |
| Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) | 1.30 | IU/mL |
| Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) | 2.24 | ng/mL |
| CA 15-3 | 19-50 | U/mL |
| CA 19-9 | 27.93 | U/mL |
| CA 125 | 26.50 | U/mL |
| Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) | Non-reactive | mL |
| HIV1, 2 Ab-Ag ELISA | Non-reactive | mL |
| Cytomegalovirus IgG | Negative | mL |
| Cytomegalovirus IgM | Negative | mL |
| Brucella abortus | Negative | % |
| Brucella melitensis | Negative | % |
| Hepatitis C antibody (HCVAb) | Non-reactive | % |
The patient underwent CT of the neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis with contrast. Chest CT showed two right supraclavicular hypodense soft tissue masses (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Chest CT.
The CT showed two right supraclavicular hypodense soft tissue masses; the larger one (A) measured about 5.4 x 5 x 5 cm at its anteroposterior (AP) x transverse (T) x craniocaudal (CC), respectively. The mass was seen abutting the thyroid gland and common carotid artery with the invasion of the proximal part of the internal jugular vein (IJV). The smaller mass (B) measured about 3.2 x 3.2 x 3.1 cm at its AP x T x CC, respectively. It encroached on the superior mediastinum pushing the trachea to the contralateral side and abutting the brachiocephalic artery
CT: computed tomography
The CT abdomen showed a dilated common bile duct (CBD) with a maximum diameter of 12.7 mm. The patient then underwent a pancreatic MRI to rule out periampullary lesions. It showed a 1.6 x 1.5 cm ill-defined lesion within the pancreatic head (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Pancreatic MRI.
The arrow shows a mass in the pancreatic head
MRI: magnetic resonance imaging
The patient also underwent endoscopic ultrasound (Figure 3), which showed a dilated CBD with a hypoechoic lesion at the head of the pancreas, and a fine-needle biopsy (FNB) was taken. The pancreatic head mass FNB showed T-cell lymphoma. Histology and immunohistochemistry were consistent with a diagnosis of ALCL, ALK-positive.
Figure 3. Endoscopic ultrasound .
The arrow (A) shows a hypoechoic mass at the head of the pancreas. The arrow (B) shows dilated CBD
CBD: common bile duct
An endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was then done. It showed dilated CBD with a distal CBD stricture, but no filling defect or CBD stone was seen. A sphincterotomy was performed. Brush cytology was taken from the stricture and plastic stent was deployed in CBD with good biliary drainage. The bile duct brush/aspirate immunohistochemistry study revealed the following findings: the malignant cells were positive for LCA, ALK1, CD4, CD5, and CD30 (cytoplasmic and Golgi positive), but negative for CD20, PAX5, CKAE1/3, and synaptophysin.
After confirming the diagnosis, the patient received the first cycle of brentuximab CHP chemotherapy without any further complications, and he is currently in good health. He is scheduled to receive six more cycles in six months and will follow up with his remaining five cycles.
Discussion
Lymphoma is a malignancy of the lymphatic system, which includes the lymph nodes, spleen, thymus, and bone marrow [2]. Lymphomas are broadly classified into two types: NHL, which accounts for 90% of cases, and Hodgkin, which makes up 10%. NHL is further divided into two groups according to the cell origin, either B-cells or T-cells. The B-cell presentation is much more common, and it approximately accounts for 90% of NHL [8]. The definitive cause of NHL is still unknown, but it has been hypothesized to be associated with various factors, such as infections (Epstein-Bart virus, hepatitis c virus, Helicobacter pylori infection, and human herpesvirus 8), environmental factors, immunodeficiency states, and chronic inflammation [1]. T-cell lymphomas represent about 10-15% of all NHL; they constitute a heterogeneous and often clinically aggressive group of lymphomas derived from mature T-cells [9].
ALCL is a subtype of T-cell lymphoma, and it accounts for approximately 2-3% of all NHL cases. While this disease mainly affects lymph nodes, extranodal sites may also be involved [10]. ALCL can be subdivided depending on the expression of ALK. The prevalence of ALK-positivity in patients with ALCL is 50-60%. ALK-positivity is usually seen in males younger than 35 years with more systemic symptoms, extranodal disease, and advanced-stage disease (III, IV), whereas ALK-negative patients tend to be older and are unlikely to present with extranodal disease. Age less than 60 years, normal serum LDH, a good performance status [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score <2], less than two extranodal sites of disease, and an International Prognostic Index score <4 are associated with better overall survival [11].
Confirming the ALK positivity is important because it denotes a significantly more favorable prognosis, in contrast to patients with ALK-negative ALCL. Also, the prognosis for ALK-positive and ALK-negative ALCL can be further classified based on CD56 positivity (neural cell-adhesion molecule), which demonstrates a significantly worse outcome when it is expressed in either ALCL subgroup [12]. The lymphatic system, being the source of lymphoma, typically initiates the disease in one of the many lymph nodes, leading to its spread throughout the immune system. This spread may either encompass various locations within the body or remain confined within the lymphatic system [13].
An early clinical indicator of NHL involves painless swelling of one or more of the 600+ lymph nodes in the body. However, crucial clinical attributes, known as "B symptoms," such as fever, night sweats, and unexplained weight loss, aid in distinguishing and diagnosing NHL from other cancers [13]. Extranodal NHL manifests in two forms. Primary extranodal disease arises when NHL originates in tissue within organs outside of the lymphatic system, like the pancreas [14]. On the other hand, extranodal lymphoma is termed secondary when there is lymph node involvement or when there are multiple extranodal sites. While secondary pancreatic involvement is more common than PPL, overall pancreatic involvement is rare [15].
Our case was categorized as secondary extranodal pancreatic lymphoma based on the presence of lymph node metastasis and the involvement of surrounding organs. PPL could be distinguished from secondary by applying the Dawson/Behrns criteria. The PPL must fulfill the following criteria: the absence of superficial or mediastinal adenopathy, normal leukocyte count, and confined peripancreatic disease without the involvement of the liver and spleen [16,17]. Another way to differentiate between them is based on the location of the lesion, as primary pancreatic malignancies typically arise from the head of the pancreas [16].
Pancreatic lymphoma symptoms and its initial imaging findings closely resemble those of other pancreatic tumors, which makes it difficult to diagnose. Several features differentiate extranodal lymphoma from adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, such as the size of the mass and its location. Laboratory values and biopsies are very important in the diagnosis and for initiating appropriate management, especially since treatment for lymphoma is highly different from that for primary pancreatic lesions [16].
Conclusions
The case report highlights the diverse and often nonspecific clinical manifestations of lymphomas and the importance of considering lymphoma in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with atypical symptoms and laboratory findings. Furthermore, the identification of specific subtypes of lymphoma, such as ALCL, and the characterization of their molecular and immunohistochemical features, such as ALK positivity, are crucial for determining the prognosis and guiding treatment decisions. The report also underscores the rarity of secondary extranodal pancreatic lymphoma and emphasizes the need for a comprehensive diagnostic approach, the challenges faced in their diagnosis, and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach involving clinical, laboratory, and imaging assessments to accurately identify and characterize these malignancies. It also sheds light on the significance of understanding the unique features of lymphoma subtypes to optimize patient management and improve outcomes.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Haifa N. Alsaleem, Khaled Alnafisah, Ahmed S. Almuzaini, Ammar M. ALAmmari, Nawaf Almutairi, Ahmed S. AlOmar
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Haifa N. Alsaleem, Khaled Alnafisah, Ahmed S. Almuzaini, Ammar M. ALAmmari, Nawaf Almutairi, Ahmed S. AlOmar
Drafting of the manuscript: Haifa N. Alsaleem, Khaled Alnafisah, Ahmed S. Almuzaini, Ammar M. ALAmmari, Nawaf Almutairi, Ahmed S. AlOmar
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Haifa N. Alsaleem, Khaled Alnafisah, Ahmed S. Almuzaini, Ammar M. ALAmmari, Nawaf Almutairi, Ahmed S. AlOmar
Supervision: Khaled Alnafisah
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Regional Research Ethics Committee issued approval 607-45-10227
References
- 1.Sapkota S, Shaikh H. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a rare presentation involving the pancreas. Cerwin S. https://www.sdms.org/docs/default-source/jdmspdf/extranodal-non-hodgkin-lymphoma-a-rare-presentation-involving-the-pancreas.pdf J Diagn Med Sonogr. 2021;38:4–6. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified - a patient with extranodal pancreatic involvement detected by FDG PET/CT: a case report and review of the literature. Demirel BB, Efetürk H, Uçmak G, Akkas BE, Dogan M, Iskender D. Nucl Med Biomed Imaging. 2022;3:10–12. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Prognostic value of interim and posttherapy 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with mature T-cell and natural killer cell lymphomas. Li YJ, Li ZM, Xia XY, et al. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:507–515. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.110262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Anaplastic large cell lymphoma, ALK-positive. Ferreri AJ, Govi S, Pileri SA, Savage KJ. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2012;83:293–302. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2012.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Small cell variant of anaplastic large cell lymphoma with leukemic presentation: a diagnostic challenge. Zecchini Barrese T, Sagramoso C, Bacci F, Sabattini E. https://www.htct.com.br/en-small-cell-variant-anaplastic-large-articulo-S1516848417300786. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2017;39:269–273. doi: 10.1016/j.bjhh.2017.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Primary pancreatic lymphoma: a rare clinical entity. Dunphy L, Abbas SH, Al Shoek I, Al-Salti W. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13:24–26. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2019-231292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lymphoma. Mugnaini EN, Ghosh N. Prim Care. 2016;43:661–675. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2016.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.A suggested immunohistochemical algorithm for the classification of T-cell lymphomas involving lymph nodes. Vega F, Medeiros LJ. Hum Pathol. 2020;102:104–116. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2020.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Rizvi MA, Evens AM, Tallman MS, Nelson BP, Rosen ST. Blood. 2006;107:1255–1264. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.ALK+ lymphoma: clinico-pathological findings and outcome. Falini B, Pileri S, Zinzani PL, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10194450/ Blood. 1999;93:2697–2706. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Prognostic significance of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) protein expression in adults with anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Gascoyne RD, Aoun P, Wu D, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10339500/ Blood. 1999;93:3913–3921. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.A primary retroperitoneal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a challenging diagnosis. Constantin A, Tănase AD, Săftoiu A, Copăescu C. Curr Health Sci J. 2018;44:392–396. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.44.04.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.New approach to classifying non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: clinical features of the major histologic subtypes. Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Classification Project. Armitage JO, Weisenburger DD. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2780–2795. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.8.2780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.MR features of primary and secondary malignant lymphoma of the pancreas: a pictorial review. Fujinaga Y, Lall C, Patel A, Matsushita T, Sanyal R, Kadoya M. Insights Imaging. 2013;4:321–329. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0242-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.A case of primary pancreatic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Lee MK, Jeon SW, Lee YD, Seo HE, Cho CM, Kim SG, Yoon YK. Korean J Intern Med. 2006;21:123–126. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2006.21.2.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pancreatic lymphoma: a cytologic diagnosis challenge. Savari O, Al-Duwal Z, Wang Z, Ganesan S, Danan-Rayes R, Ayub S. Diagn Cytopathol. 2020;48:350–355. doi: 10.1002/dc.24349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



