Skip to main content
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B logoLink to Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B
. 2023 Oct 13;14(3):1362–1379. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2023.10.004

Engineered extracellular vesicles efficiently deliver CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) to inhibit herpes simplex virus1 infection in vitro and in vivo

Yuanda Wan a, Liren Li a,b, Ruilin Chen a, Jiajia Han a, Qiyun Lei a, Zhipeng Chen a, Xiaodong Tang a, Wenyu Wu c, Shuwen Liu a,d,, Xingang Yao a,d,
PMCID: PMC10934336  PMID: 38486996

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have recently emerged as a promising delivery platform for CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins (RNPs), owing to their ability to minimize off-target effects and immune responses. However, enhancements are required to boost the efficiency and safety of Cas9 RNP enrichment within EVs. In response, we employed the Fc/Spa interaction system, in which the human Fc domain was fused to the intracellular domain of PTGFRN-Δ687 and anchored to the EV membrane. Simultaneously, the B domain of the Spa protein was fused to the C domain of cargos such as Cre or spCas9. Due to the robust interaction between Fc and Spa, this method enriched nearly twice the amount of cargo within the EVs. EVs loaded with spCas9 RNP targeting the HSV1 genome exhibited significant inhibition of viral replication in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, following neuron-targeting peptide RVG modification, the in vivo dosage in neural tissues substantially increased, contributing to the clearance of the HSV1 virus in neural tissues and exhibiting a lower off-target efficiency. These findings establish a robust platform for efficient EV-based SpCas9 delivery, offering potential therapeutic advantages for HSV1 infections and other neurological disorders.

Key words: Extracellular vesicles, CRISPR/Cas9, Ribonucleoproteins, PTGFRN, Fc/Spa, HSV1, Neuron-targeting, Delivery

Graphical abstract

The Fc/Spa system is used to construct spCas9 ribonucleoprotein-enriched extracellular vesicles, which allow for efficient genome editing and neuro targeting, demonstrating the ability to prevent HSV1 infection.

Image 1

1. Introduction

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are produced through the process of outward budding and fission of the plasma membrane or the fusion of multivesicular bodies with the plasma membrane1. These vesicles contain a complex array of components, including lipids, membrane and cytosolic proteins, and various types of nucleic acids such as microRNAs (miRNAs), RNA, and DNA. As a result of their composition, EVs have attracted significant interest and are currently widely used in drug delivery research2.

CRISPR-Cas9 is a powerful genome-editing technology that has the potential to treat various diseases by directly modifying genomes. However, the most commonly used delivery vehicles for this purpose are viral systems, which can elicit immunogenic responses and are readily cleared by the complement system in vivo. Alternative strategies for the in vivo delivery of Cas9 are being explored to achieve more efficient and effective gene editing. An optimal approach for delivering Cas9 proteins or ribonucleoprotein complexes (RNPs) into target cells would involve directly introducing these agents into EVs. EVs have been widely used in CRISPR-Cas9 packaging and delivery in recent years3. Various molecules that anchor to EV membranes are commonly used to enrich specific cargos into EVs, such as platelet-derived growth factor receptor N-terminal domain transmembrane region (PDGFRN-TM, also known as the pDisplay system), prostaglandin F2 receptor negative regulator-Δ687 (PTGFRN-Δ687)4, VSV-G-TM, lysosomal-associated membrane protein 2B (LAMP2B)5, as well as CD63, CD8, and CD91. Dooley and colleagues have pointed out that PTGFRN-Δ687 showed the best surface display efficiency compared to others4. Therefore, we applied PTGFRN-Δ687 in our system4. In our previous study, we modified CD63 and enriched the spCas9 RNP in EVs via the Com/Com system, which relies on the RNA-adaptor interaction, resulting a notable impact on gene editing6. However, it should be noted that Fc (human immunoglobulin fragment crystallizable) and SpA (Staphylococcal protein A) have a robust interaction. Staphylococcus aureus produces a 42 kDa factor, protein A (SpA), that contains five highly homologous extracellular Ig-binding domains in tandem, designated domains E, D, A, B, and C. The B domain of protein A is a three-helix, 59 residue module that binds the Fc-portion of IgGs with a Kd of about 10–50 nmol/L7; domain B was used for subsequent experiments (named Spa in this study for convenience). Since it is Spa derived from bacteria, it was fused to the C-terminal of Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9) to reduce immunogenicity. Given the strong interaction between Fc/Spa and the high dissociation properties under acidic conditions, we hypothesize that this system could efficiently enrich target cargos into EVs produced by cells. Upon uptake by recipient cells, EVs can undergo effective dissociation upon changes in pH, ultimately releasing the cargo into the cytoplasm and exerting its function.

Herpes simplex virus (HSV), a highly prevalent human virus, has two subtypes: HSV-1 and HSV-28. Currently, nucleoside anti-HSV drugs such as acyclovir and valacyclovir are utilized to manage symptoms and recurrence. However, these drugs have increasing adverse reactions and cross-resistance. After primary infection and productive replication in the corneal epithelium, HSV-1 retrogradely travels through ophthalmic nerves to the trigeminal ganglia, establishing a latent reservoir that persists throughout the individual's lifetime. Currently, no strategy can eradicate the existing virus. Addressing these challenges necessitates the elimination of HSV as a critical goal. To the best of our knowledge, several groups have applied CRISPR targeting the HSV genome to eliminate HSV infection. Adeno-associated virus system was used for HSV1-targeting endonuclease delivery in a mouse model, and it observed a clear elimination of HSV genomes and therapeutic efficacy9,10. Recently, another study designed a system to deliver the mRNA of SpCas9 targeting the UL8 and UL29 genes of HSV1, which packaged the sgRNAs with SpCas9 mRNA into a viral particle11. These results support the potential clinical utility of CRISPR-Cas9 for treating HSV infection. One drawback of the system is that it employs a lentivirus-based delivery strategy, which is prone to clearance by the immune system in vivo and lacks neuro-targeting ability. Alternatively, using EV-based delivery systems has the potential to overcome these challenges.

This study presents a novel strategy for the enrichment of EVs based on the Fc/Spa system, resulting in effective cargo enrichment within EVs. The enrichment efficiency of three different EV membrane proteins was also compared through the Cre-LoxP system, and the PTGFRN-Δ687 was the most efficient. The effectiveness of this system was further evaluated in an HSV1 virus infection model in vitro and in vivo.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

The following reagents were obtained from various suppliers: RPIM1640 medium and DMEM medium were purchased from Thermo Fisher (MA, USA); FBS were purchased from Yeasen Biotech (Shanghai, China); Dil and DiO were purchased from Beyotime (Shanghai, China); LysoTracker and Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit was purchased from Thermo Fisher (MA, USA); Puromycin was purchased from Avantor (Radnor, PA, USA); and restriction endonucleases, T4 Polynucleotide Kinase, and T4 DNA Ligase were purchased from NEB (Ipswich, MA, USA). The PMD™ 19-T Vector Cloning Kit and E. coli DH5α Competent Cells were obtained from TAKARA (Ōsaka) (Tokyo, Japan), and 293T cells were purchased from the National Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures (Shanghai, China). The human alpha herpesvirus 1 strain F (HSV1) was a gift from Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health.

2.2. Plasmid construction and sgRNA design

All the plasmids used in this study were described in Table 1 and Table 2 pCAG-CRE-IRES2-GFP, pMSCV-LoxP-dsRed-LoxP-eGFP-Puro-WPRE, pEnCMV-PTGFRN-3 × Flag, LentiV2-SPA, pcDNA3.1a-VSV-G-TM, pCDNA3.1a-RVG-PDGFRN were constructed by GENWIZ (Suzhou, China). LentiCRISPRv2 puro was a gift from Brett Stringer (Addgene plasmid # 98290; http://n2t.net/addgene:98290; RRID: Addgene_98290)12, psPAX2 was a gift from Didier Trono (Addgene plasmid # 12260; http://n2t.net/addgene:12260; RRID: Addgene_12260), pCAG-VSVG was a gift from Ian Wickersham (Addgene plasmid # 64084; http://n2t.net/addgene:64084; RRID: Addgene_64084). pcDNA3.1a-PDGFRN-TM, pcDNA3.1a-VSV-G-TM, pcDNA3.1a-PTGFRN-Δ687-TM, Lenti-CMV-LoxP-red-LoxP-EGFP, pcDNA3.1a-Cre, pcDNA3.1a-Cre-Spa plasmids were generated by this group. They will be made available upon request. All constructs generated were confirmed by Sanger sequencing from GENWIZ and Qingke company (Guangzhou, China). All the primers used in this study are described in Table 3.

Table 1.

List of laboratory-constructed plasmids.

Plasmid Primer (5ʹ–3ʹ) Primer (5ʹ–3ʹ) Restriction site Result
pcDNA3.1a-Cre CTAGCTAGCATGGGCCCAAAGAAGAAGAGAAAGG CCGGAATTCCTAATCGCCATCTTCCAGCAGGC NheI, EcoRI Fig. S1C, Fig. 2E
pcDNA3.1a-Cre-Spa CCGGAATTCGGATCCGGAGGAGGAGGAAG CCGCTCGAGCTTGGGGGCCTGGCTCTCG XhoI, EcoRI Fig. 1D and E; Fig. 2
pDisplay-VSVG-TM ccgTCCGGAgctctattgcctcttttttctttatc ccgGAATTCctttccaagtcggttcatctctatg BspEI, EcoRI Fig. 1
pDisplay-VSVG-TM-Fc GAATTCGGAGGAGGAGGCTCCGGAG TCTAGACTACTTGTCATCGTCATCCTTGTAG EcoRI, XbaI Fig. 1D and E
Lenti-PDGFRN-Fc-puro GACACCGGTCTACTTGTCATCGTCATCCTTGTAG GACTTCGAAGGAGGAGGAGGCTCCGGA AgeI, BstbI Fig. 1D and E
pEnCMV-PTGFRNΔ687-Fc-flag cctatatttaatgcttctgt catggtggcGGTACCAAGCT Circle PCR Fig. 1D and E
pEnCMV-RVG-PTGFRN-Δ687-Fc-flag CTAGCTAGCGGCACCATGGAGACAGACAC TAAGGTACCTCCGGATGCGCCGCTGCCGCCGCC NheI, KpnI Fig. 5
Lenti-LoxP-red- LoxP-EGFP-puro Digest by AgeI-SpeI from two vetors Figure 1, Figure 2

Table 2.

List of plasmids purchased by the company.

Plasmid Cat. No. Company Result
LentiV2-Spa 80-673395549-R1/AA29565-1/M575647 GENEWIZ Fig. 3
pEnCMV-PTGFRN-3 × Flag P24421 MiaoLing Plasmid Platform Fig. 6
lentiCRISPRv2 puro #98290 Addgene Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6
pCAG-VSVG #64084 All Results
pCAG-CRE-IRES2-GFP PM200 Ningbo Naisi Biotechnology Figure 1, Figure 2
pMSCV-loxp-dsRed-loxp-eGFP-Puro-WPRE PM1104

Table 3.

List of primers used in this study.

Primer name Forward primer (5′–3′) Reverse primer (5′–3′) Result
sgRNA-scaffold-R GCACCGACTCGGTGCCACTT Fig. 3F
sgRNA-EGFP CACCGgagctggacggcgacgtaaa AAACtttacgtcgccgtccagctcC Fig. 3
sgRNA-UL8 CACCggacaccgcagatatcgtgt AAACacacgatatctgcggtgtcc Fig. 4A and B
sgRNA-UL29 caccGCGAGCGTACACGTATCCC aaacGGGATACGTGTACGCTCGC Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Fig. S4
UL8-PCR CGCCACAGAGTCGGGTTC GGGGCGGTGAACTTTAGCA Fig. 4B
UL29-PCR CGTCAGTTTCAGGGACACCG cacgcccccaggtaaagtgta Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6
gD gene CCAAATACGCCTTAGCAGACC CACAGTGATCGGGATGCTGG Fig. 4E and 6F
VP16 AATGTGGTTTAGCTCCCGCA+ CCAGTTGGCGTGTCTGTTTC Fig. 4E and 6F
GAPDH TGACCTCAACTACATGGTCTACA CTTCCCATTCTCGGCCTTG All Results

2.3. 293TLoxP-red-LoxP-EGFP and 293TEGFP reporter construct

LoxP-red-LoxP-EGFP reporter cell was transiently transfected into 293T cells, named 293T LoxP-red-LoxP-EGFP, and used for Cre activity validation. The 293TLoxP-red-LoxP-EGFP cells did not express EGFP due to the stop code in the frame of LoxP-red-LoxP. Once the LoxP-red-LoxP sequence was removed by Cre, the cell turned from red fluorescence to green fluorescence, and the number of GFP-positive cells was analyzed by fluorescence microscopy or flow cytometry (BD LSRFortessa X-20, NJ, USA). 293TEGFP reporter cell was used for sgEGFP-Cas9 activity validation. Once in the presence of sgEGFP and SpCas9, the green fluorescence will weaken. The GFP signals were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) or flow cytometry (BD LSRFortessa X-20, NJ, USA).

2.4. Production of engineered EVs

Engineered EVs were produced by co-transfection of three plasmids into 293T cells: PTGFRN-Fc, VSV-G, and the target plasmid expressing Cre or SpCas9 with the respective gene-specific sgRNA. Briefly, 5 million actively proliferating 293T cells grown in 10-cm dishes were incubated with 10 mL of Opti-MEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). 4.5 μg of PTGFRN or PTGFRN-Fc fusion protein-expressing plasmid, 3 μg of VSV-G, and 4.5 μg of target plasmid, such as SpCas9, SpCas9-Spa, Cre, or Cre-Spa, were used for engineered EVs production. In short, these plasmids were mixed in 0.5 mL of Opti-MEM. The amount of 36 μL of polyethyleneimine (PEI, Polysciences, Warrington, PA, USA) were mixed in 0.5 mL of Opti-MEM. These plasmids mixture and the PEI mixture were then mixed and incubated at room temperature for 15 min. The plasmid/PEI mixture was then added to the cells in Opti-MEM. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the medium was changed into 10 mL of Opti-MEM, and the Cas9 RNP-enriched EVs were collected 72 h after transfection.

2.5. EVs isolation

Ultracentrifugation was used to isolate EVs from the tissue culture medium following our published procedures6. Briefly, the cell culture medium was centrifuged at 200 × g for 10 min, 2000 × g for 10 min, and 12,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C to remove cell debris (Eppendorf, 5425, Hamburg, Germany). The supernatant was centrifuged at 120,000 × g for 70 min at 4 °C. The pellet was washed once with PBS and centrifuged again under the same conditions. The resulting pellet containing the EVs was resuspended in PBS. Typically, EVs from 30 mL of supernatants were resuspended in 500 μL (60 × concentration) for in vitro and in vivo experiments.

2.6. Particle size analysis of EVs

Hydrodynamic diameters and concentrations of EVs were measured using the ZetaView (Particle Metrix, Ammersee, Germany), a nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) system to conduct extracellular concentration and size measurements of nanoparticles. This technique is based on the Brownian motion of individual particles and employs the Stokes‒Einstein equation to calculate the hydrodynamic diameter and concentration of the nanoparticles. Subsequently, we also utilized an instrument based on the dynamic light scattering (DLS) principle to perform further testing for the polymer dispersity index (PDI) parameter. Concentrated samples containing EVs were serial diluted 1000-fold in cold PBS. Three independent measurements were obtained for each sample in triplicate. The diameter of the EV is the average of three measurements.

2.7. Quantitation and degradation of SpCas9 in EVs

The amount of 100 μL of EVs (1 × 1011 vesicles/mL) were added to293T cells in 24-well plates (2.5 × 104 cells/well). The cells cultured in Opti-MEM medium were incubated with EVs for 1, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively. Then, these cells were washed three times with PBS buffer and lysed with SDS-lysis buffer for Western blotting assay. The standard SpCas9 protein (Z03389S, GenCrispr, Nanjing, China) was used for the semi-quantitation of packaged SpCas9 in EVs.

2.8. Western blotting

For Western blotting analysis, cell lysate or EVs (50 μL, 1 × 1011 vesicles/mL) were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to the PVDF membrane (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). After incubation with indicated primary antibodies overnight, the membranes were visualized using the Fluor Chem E System Dura detection system (Cleaver-Brooks, 92-14860-00, MN, USA). The primary antibodies used include gD antibody (ab6507), SpCas9 antibody (ab191468), TSG101 antibody (ab125011-10), which were purchased from Abcam Company, UK; GAPDH antibody (D4C6R), CD9 antibody (D801A), CD81 antibody (52892S), CD63 antibody (52090S), VSV-G antibody (E8S5G), Calnexin (CNX, C5C9) antibody were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Boston; PTGFRN antibody (Sino Biological, 101357-T32, Beijing, China), Flag antibody (F1804, Sigma), Cre antibody (Novagen, 69050-3, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), HSV1 ICP8 antibody (10A3, SANTACRUZ) and anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) (CST, 31460, Danvers, MA, USA) secondary antibodies were used in Western blotting. Densitometry (NIH ImageJ, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to quantify protein amount.

2.9. RNA isolation and RT-qPCR analysis

To detect sgRNA in EVs, sgRNA (<200 bp) was purified from collected extracellular vehicles by miRNeasy Micro Kit (QIAGEN, 217084, Düsseldorf, Germany), which could collect RNA molecules from approximately >18 bp upwards. The PrimeScript™ IV strand cDNA Synthesis Mix (Takara, 6215A, Tokyo, Japan) was used to reverse-transcribe the RNA to cDNA. For EGFP sgRNA and UL29 sgRNA detection, sgRNA-EGFP-F, sgRNA-UL29-F, and sgRNA-scaffold were used as primers in SYBLGreen-based RT-qPCR individually. PCR was run on Roche LightCycler® 480. Primer information was included in Table 3. For sgRNA sequencing, the above PCR products were collected and inserted into the PMD 19-T vector using the cloning kit (Takara, 6013, Tokyo, Japan). Then, these clones were analyzed by Sanger sequencing after blue‒white plaque screening.

2.10. Transmission electron microscopy

Transmission electron microscopy was performed at the Southern Medical University Central Laboratory. Collected EVs (about 1.0 × 1011 vehicles/mL) were stained with uranyl acetate. The particles were absorbed on plain carbon grids, dried, and observed under a Hitachi H-7650 electron microscope (HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan).

2.11. T7 endonuclease I (T7EI) cleavage assay and TIDE analysis

The genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated using the Universal Genomic DNA Purification Mini Spin Kit (Beyotime, D0063, Shanghai, China). The resultant gDNA was used as a template for PCR with primers surrounding the sgRNA-UL8 and sgRNA-UL29 target sites. The following two pair primers were used for PCR amplification, named UL8-PCR-F, UL8-PCR-R, UL29-PCR-F, and UL29-PCR-R. Next, the PCR product was incubated with T7 Endonuclease I (T7EI) (NEB, M0302S, Ipswich, MA, USA) according to the specification, and cleavage was visualized with an agarose gel (1.5%). DNA was then digested with 5–10 units of T7EI for 30–60 min at 37 °C and resolved in an agarose gel. Quantification of gene disruption was performed using ImageJ software (NIH49) and calculated using Eqs. (1) and (2):

Mutant gene in the cell population (%)= 100 × (1 − [1−Fraction cleaved]1/2) (1)
Fraction cleaved = Density of cleaved product/ (Density of cleaved product + Density of uncleaved product) (2)

These PCR products were also sequenced by Sanger sequencing and analyzed by Tracking of Indels by Decomposition (TIDE) (https://tide.nki.nl/).

2.12. Proteinase K and RNase a protection assays

EVs derived from cells overexpressing spCas9/sgRNA-EGFP were isolated, as described above. Equal volumes (25 μL, 1 × 1010 vesicl-es/mL) of EVs were treated with or without proteinase K (0.5 μg/mL) and with or without 0.25% Triton X-100 and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Levels of spCas9 in EVs were analyzed by Western blotting. For determining sgRNA content, the digestion mixture was stopped by the addition of an RNA column purification reagent and then subject to RT-qPCR as described above using the following primers: sgRNA-EGFP forward primer: 5′GATCGGAGCTGGACGGCGACGTAAAG3′. sgRNA-scaffold reverse primer 5′GCACCGACTCGGTGCCACTT3′.

2.13. Off-target detection and next-generation sequencing

The off-target of sgRNA was analyzed by Off-Spotter (https://cm.jefferson.edu/Off-Spotter/) and Cas-OFFinder (http://www.rgenome.net/cas-offinder/), the two tolls give similar results. Then, these predicted mismatch genes were analyzed by next-generation sequencing. The DNA region containing the target sequences was amplified by the 2 × PCR Mix (Dye Plus) from Vazyme, Nanjing, China. The purified PCR products were analyzed by next-generation sequencing by GENEWIZ. Analysis of insertions and deletions (INDEL) was done with the online CRISPRESSO213. PCR primers used for amplifying each target sequence are listed in Table 3.

2.14. Cellular toxicity assay

293T, Vero, and Hela cells were plated into 96-well plates (5 × 103 cells/well). The above EVs were diluted into concentration gradients and then added to the cells and cultured for 24 h. Ten microliters of 0.5% solution of 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium ammonium bromide (MTT) was added to each well. Subsequently, after 4 h, the supernatant was aspirated, and DMSO was added to dissolve MTT. The absorbance of each well was then measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader (Tecan, Männedorf Switzerland), and the relative cell viability was calculated.

2.15. CPE assay

Based on our previous report14, 15, 16, Vero cells were cultured in 24-well plates (1 × 104 cells/well) overnight. Then, the indicated plasmids were transfected into these cells. Before the HSV1 virus infection, the serum-containing medium was discarded, and the cells were washed twice with PBS. Then, the virus was diluted with DMEM medium without fetal bovine serum and inoculated with Vero cells for 1 h at 37 °C. The virus was removed, and the indicated EVs were added into the 2% DMEM medium without EVs as a maintained culture. After about 48 h, cellular CPE was observed under a microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

2.16. Plaque formation assay

Vero cells were cultured in a 12-well plate (2.5 × 105 cells/well) overnight17. The supernatant containing the progeny virus was added into the Vero cells and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h and was maintained with a maintenance medium containing 1.6% methylcellulose for nearly 24–36 h until the lesions were visible under a microscope. Next, these cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with crystal violet (Macklin, C805211, Shanghai, China) for 30 min, then washed and photographed by microscope.

2.17. Quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR)

Mouse tissue RNA was extracted using the Animal Total RNA Isolation Kit (Macklin, C805211, Shanghai, China), and cellular RNA was extracted using the Animal Total RNA Isolation Kit (Foregene, RE-03113, Chengdu, China). The reverse-transcribed cDNA was subjected to real-time PCR using PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix (RR036Q, Takara). PCR primers used for amplifying each target sequence are listed in Table 3.

2.18. Cellular uptake assay

EVs were labelled with Dil before the supernatant was collected for ultracentrifugation. Dil (0.1 mg/mL) was added into the supernatant and incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. The subsequent steps were the same as those for ultracentrifugation. Then, the EVs were incubated with the cells flowing labelled with LysoTracker at 37 °C for 5 min. At the indicated time, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and the nucleus was stained with Hoechst 33342 (Yeasen, 40731ES10, Shanghai, China). In the end, the cells were observed under a confocal microscope (LSM 880, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

2.19. Transwell assay

HUVEC cells and HT22 cells were used to generate an in vitro EV penetration model. HUVEC cells (1 × 105 cells/well) were plated on the top side of 0.4-μm pore size Transwell membrane (24-mm Transwell™, Corning, NY, USA), which were pre-coated with gelatin first. HT22 (5 × 104 cells/well) were cultured in the lower chamber. After the trans-endothelial electrical resistance (TEER) of this model reached 150 Ω cm2, Dil-labelled EVs in fresh culture media were added to the top chamber. HUVEC cells (the cell membrane was stained with DiO), HT22 cells (the nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342) as well as XZ images of the Transwell models, were individually captured by CLSM (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) at 24 h incubation.

2.20. In vivo biodistribution and pharmacokinetic characteristics of EVs

The mice were intravenously injected with Dil-labelled EV293T, EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 and EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 (1010 particles/mice). At 12 h after injection, the BALB/c mice (n = 6, male) were anesthetized, and the Dil fluorescence signal imaging of mice organs (brain, heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney) was visualized by In Vivo Imaging Systems (Beckman Coulter, IN, USA) for the in vivo biodistribution. To evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics of EVs, EVs were slowly injected intravenously into BALB/c mice (male) (n = 3). After injection, the serum was collected from the BALB/c mice at different time points (1, 2, 4, 12, 24, 48, or 72 h) and detected Dil signal using a microplate reader (Ex/Em: 549/600 ± 20 nm). The pharmacokinetic characteristics were shown by curves.

2.21. Antiviral assay in vivo

All experimental procedures were executed according to the protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Southern Medical University. BALB/c mice (males) from Southern Medical University were maintained under 12 h light–12 h dark conditions throughout, with food and water continuously available, and were weighed daily. Intranasal infection of BALB/c mice was performed as previously described18. Stocks of HSV1 were produced by Vero cells, and supernatants were aliquoted and frozen. The virus was diluted to 1 × 107 PFU/mL with serum-free DMEM. Mice (n = 6) received 20 μL of either stock into each nostril while anesthetized by isoflurane inhalation (2.5%–5.0%). The male mice were assigned randomly to experimental and control groups. These mice were then injected with 100 μL (1 × 1010 vesicles/mL) of indicated EVs via the tail vein for 7 consecutive days, and the control mice were injected with the same volume of PBS. Mice's behaviour and death were monitored every day. After 15 days, all mice were CO2 euthanized, and the tissues were isolated for further analysis. Kaplan–Meier plots of mouse survival were prepared using a log-rank Mantel-Cox test.

2.22. Hematoxylin and eosin stain (HE stain)

After mice tissues had been collected and fixed, they were embedded in melted paraffin wax. The resulting block was mounted on a microtome and cut into 5-μm thick slices. The slices were affixed to microscope slides, at which point the wax was removed with a solvent, and the tissue slices attached to the slides were rehydrated and ready for staining. Hematoxylin principally colors the nuclei of cells blue. The cytoplasm was eosinophilic and was rendered pink-stained by eosin. The slices were observed under a microscope.

2.23. RVG antibody detection by ELISA

We detected the presence of antibodies to the RVG, and serum was collected from the mice on Day 8 and was diluted at 1:100 and 1:1000. The synthesized RVG peptide (29 aa) was immobilized onto a 96-well plate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 436006, MA, USA), and the bound antibody was detected with a goat anti-mouse Ig-HRP conjugate (CST, 7076S, Danvers, MA, USA). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed using substrate TMB. After the substrate was added, a reaction occurred with the target substance, resulting in a color change. The intensity of this color was then measured using a microreader at a wavelength of 450 nm. This allowed for the quantification and detection of the substance being studied.

2.24. Mice behavioural test

Open field test is a commonly used behavioural test in preclinical research to assess exploratory behaviour, locomotor activity, and anxiety-like behaviour in animal models19. Mice were placed in the corner of a plastic box (36 cm × 29 cm × 23 cm) with the base divided into equal sectors for a 5-min acclimation period. Subsequently, the map, total distance, and ambulatory episode average velocity were recorded for 5 min. A novel object recognition test is a behavioural test commonly used in preclinical research to assess recognition memory in animal models20. The test consisted of three sessions. On the first day, the mice were allowed to freely explore the box in the absence of any object for 5 min. On the second day, they were allowed to explore two identical objects for 5 min. On the third day, one of the objects was replaced by a novel object with a different shape and color, and the mice were allowed to explore the box for 5 min. The recognition index (RI) was calculated by dividing the amount of time spent exploring any one of the two objects or the novel object by the total time spent exploring both objects. The Rotarod test is a common method to assess neuromuscular coordination21. First, mice were positioned on a rotating rod (6 cm diameter) for 30 s and then trained at a constant speed of 12 rpm for 180 s (Nolei Xinda, YLS-31A, Tianjin, China). Sixty minutes after the last training, a mouse was placed on the rod, and the incubation period of its fall was recorded as the endpoint measurement. The average time of three trials was calculated for statistical analysis.

2.25. Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism software free trail (Prism 5, Boston, MA, USA) was used for statistical analyses. In all cases, parametric or nonparametric tests and the appropriate post hoc test were applied. If data conformed to the normality and equivariance (parametric) of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) hypothesis, a one-way ANOVA was performed, followed by a Holm–Sidak multiple comparison post hoc test. Instead, multiple comparisons were performed by a Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA on ranks followed by Dunnett multiple comparisons post hoc test for the data that did not meet ANOVA assumptions (nonparametric). In addition, the Student's t-test was conducted for some cases. All the data are expressed as the Mean ± standard deviation (SD). P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.

3. Results

3.1. PTGFRN-Δ687 mediated Fc-Spa system demonstrates EV cargo-loading capacity

Three types of EV membrane proteins, namely PDGFRN-TM, VSV-G-TM, and PTGFRN-Δ687, have been identified as effective for encapsulating target proteins into EVs. However, the cargo delivery efficiency of these systems is not uniform and varies depending on the specific system used. It is desirable to compare the efficiencies of these systems under identical conditions. For this purpose, we developed a Cre-LoxP reporter system, as recently reported22, in which the plasmid with LoxP-red-LoxP-EGFP sequence was transfected into 293T cells (293TLoxP). EVs can deliver Cre protein to 293TLoxP cells, resulting in a shift from red to green fluorescence signal (Fig. 1A), which can be observed and measured using fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. The effectiveness of the EV-anchoring membrane proteins in cargo delivery can be evaluated by monitoring the change in green fluorescence. Human Fc was fused to the intracellular domain of EV-anchoring proteins, such as PDGFRN-TM, VSV-G-TM or PTGFRN-Δ687 (Fig. 1B). While the Spa7 was fused to the C-terminal domain of Cre, named Cre-Spa (Fig. 1B). The transient transfection of the Cre-Spa plasmid into 293TLoxP cell indicated the modification did not affect the function of Cre to cut LoxP site (Supporting Information Fig. S1A–D). Then, these plasmids were transfected into 293T cells to produce engineered EVs, named EVPDGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa, EVVSVG−Fc/Cre−Spa, and EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa (PTGFRN-Δ687 was abbreviated as PTGFRN for convenience in the flowing), respectively. These EVs were isolated by ultracentrifugation according to MISEV (2017) standard procedures as our previous report23 (Fig. 1C). Immediately, these EVs were incubated with 293TLoxP cells and the green fluorescence cell ratio was quantified by fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 1D and E) and flow cytometry (Fig. 1F and G). The result indicated that EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa showed the highest green fluorescence signal (25.7% by flow cytometry), which demonstrated that PTGFRN-Δ687-based Fc could encapsulate more Cre into EVs through the interaction between Spa and Fc. Therefore, we adopted this system in the follow-up study.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Evaluating the activity of engineered EVs by Cre/LoxP system. (A) Schematic diagram of the Cre-LoxP system for evaluating the efficiency of EV delivery. (B) The diagram of three designed engineered EVs with PDGFRN-TM-Fc, VSV-G-TM-Fc, or PTGFRN-Δ687-Fc, the Spa-B domain, was fused to the C-terminal of Cre. (C) The procedure of EVs collected from 293T cell supernatant. (D and E) The LoxP-red-LoxP-EGFP plasmid was transiently transfected into 293T cells. Cre-Spa plasmid transfection was a positive control. After 8 h, the cell supernatant was changed to the medium without EVs, and the indicated EVs (1 × 1010 vesicles) (EV293T, EVPDGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa, EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa, and EVVSVG−Fc/Cre−Spa) were added to the cells for incubation for 24 h. Scale bar = 100 μm. Then, the red and GFP signals were observed by fluorescence microscope (D and E) and flow cytometry (F and G). (E) The quantitation of fluorescence results. (F) The quantitation results of flow cytometry. Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 3, ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001).

Then, we studied the characteristics of EVs between 293T cell-derived EVs (EV293T), EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre, and EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) results showed that these modifications did not affect the overall shape between EV293T and EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre or EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa (Fig. 2A). Also, the quantity and size of EVs were similar between EV293T, EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre or EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa from nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) and dynamic light scattering (DLS), we got about 1011 EVs from 107 cells, and about one cell produced 104 EVs. From the diameter data through NTA, it can be observed that the overall size is around ∼150 nm, as polymer dispersity index (PDI) data is consistently around ∼0.2 from DLS (Fig. 2B). There was no difference in the Zeta potentials between EV293T and EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre or EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa, which indicated that EVs stability in solution was not affected by engineering (Fig. 2C). Compared with EVs from 293T cells themselves, these modifications did not affect the biomarkers of EVs via Western blotting results, such as CD63, CD9 and TSG101 (Fig. 2D). CNX was used as a negative control. Notably, the Fc/Spa system increased the Cre content in EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa compared with EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre (Fig. 2D). To confirm the specificity of Spa/Fc, we compared the green fluorescence signal between EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa and EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre treatment, it has indicated a 3-fold fluoresce increase by EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa treatment in 293TLoxP by flow cytometry (8.54% vs. 24.5%) (Fig. 2E and F).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Characterization of engineered EVs. (A) The TEM (top panel) and (B) the diameter and PDI parameters of the isolated EVs, EV293T, EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre and EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa, scale bar = 200 nm. (C) Surface Zeta potential of EV293T, EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre, and EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa. (D) The proteins in EVs (5 × 109 vesicles) and cell lysates were detected by Western blotting. (E and F) 293TLoxP cells were incubated with EV293T, EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre, and EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa (1 × 1010 vesicles) for 24 h, then RFP and GFP signals were observed by (E) fluorescence microscope and (F) flow cytometry. Scale bar = 100 μm. (G) The EVs absorption by 293T was observed by confocal microscopy, scale bar = 100 μm. Lysosomes of 293T cells were labelled with lysotracker (green), indicated EVs were labelled with Dil (red), and the nucleus was stained with Hoechst as blue. The yellow color represented the colocalization of fluorescent signals from EVs and lysosomes. Scale bar = 5 μm. Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 3, ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ns, not significant).

Based on our earlier discovery of the critical role of VSV-G in EV delivery, we thought that VSV-G might contribute to the lysosomal escape of cargos24, which could undergo a low-pH-induced conformational change, becoming fusion-competent and enabling fusion between the viral membrane and the endosomal/lysosomal membranes25. So, we compared the intracellular kinetic behaviour of EVVSVG/PTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa or EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa using confocal fluorescence microscopy. As shown in Fig. 2G, for EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa and EVVSVG/PTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa, by using fluorescent dye Dil (red) to label EVs and a LysoTracker-Green dye (green) to label lysosomes, we observed that at the 2 h incubation, EVs partially co-localized with the lysosomes, which appear as yellow spots. After 8 h, they completely co-localized, suggesting that the EVs had successfully entered the lysosomes (Fig. 2G). After incubating for 24 h, the analysis showed a decrease in yellow fluorescence and an increase in red fluorescence in the EVVSVG/PTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa group, suggesting successful lysosomal escape of the EVs. However, EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa was still co-localized with the endosome (Fig. 2G). Moreover, we used ImageJ software to ascertain the Pearson correlation coefficient between lysosomes and EVs, which is changed from 0.73 to 0.85 to 0.15 with the indicated time, indicating a good dissociation of EVVSVG/PTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa. These findings indicated the lysosomal escape ability of VSV-G, leading to its usage in subsequent studies. The Fc/Spa interaction system is acid-sensitive and reversible. To further verify this reversible process, we experimented with using chloroquine to inhibit endosome acidification during EV endocytosis. We found that the addition of chloroquine significantly reduced the ability of EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cre−Spa to enhance EGFP fluorescence on 293TLoxP cells compared to the group without chloroquine incubation (Fig. S1E and 1F). This result demonstrated the Fc/Spa interaction system was acid-sensitive and reversible, emphasizing the crucial role of intracellular acidification in the dissociation of Fc/Spa. The PTGFRN-Fc/Spa system not only effectively packaged targeted cargos into EVs but also allowed for lysosomal clearance avoidance and intact cytoplasmic delivery into recipient cells. This system was thus employed for CRISPR-SpCas9 delivery in subsequent experiments.

3.2. Efficient encapsulation of Cas9/sgRNA-RNP into EVs by Fc/Spa system

We proceeded to determine if the Fc/Spa system exhibited a preference for encapsulating SpCas9 into EVs in 293T cells (Fig. 3A). Spa was fused to the C-terminal of SpCas9 protein named SpCas9-Spa. The transfected plasmids were used to generate engineered EVs by 293T cells, which were then named EV293T, EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9, and EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa. Ultracentrifugation was employed to isolate EVs, as depicted in Fig. 1C. The characteristics of EVs were analyzed, and they exhibited the anticipated cup-like structure with a similar size and Zeta potentials (Supporting Information Fig. S2A and B). The features of EVs were validated through the presence of beneficial EV protein markers (TSG101, CD9, CD81, and CD63) and the lack of calnexin (Fig. 3B). This data suggested that the level of SpCas9 encapsulated within EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa was approximately twice as high as that within EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9 we adopted a semi-quantitative approach by Western blotting as previously reported6. The results showed that the ability of Spa/Fc to promote SpCas9 protein packaging was nearly 4 times that of natural packaging, 41.35 ng vs 9.86 ng (Fig. 3C). The quantification of EV protein content revealed that SpCas9 constituted approximately 1% of the total protein packaged in EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa (Supporting Information Fig. S3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Fc/Spa system enriched SpCas9 into EVs. (A) Schematic illustration of the enrichment of SpCas9 into EV. (B) The proteins in EVs (5 × 109 vesicles) and cell lysates were detected by Western blotting. 1: PTGFRN and spCas9 plasmids transfection; 2: PTGFRN and spCas9-Spa plasmids transfection; 3: PTGFRN-Fc and spCas9-Spa plasmids transfection; 4: PTGFRN-Fc and spCas9-Spa plasmids transfection. (C) SpCas9 in EVs was detected semi-quantitatively by Western blotting. (D) EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa were treated with/without 0.25% Triton X-100 and with/without proteinase K (0.5 μg/mL) for 30 min. Expression levels of SpCas9 and CD9 were determined by Western blotting. (E) EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa were added into 293T cells and incubated for 1, 8, 12, 24, 48 or 72 h, respectively. Expression levels of spCas9, VSVG, and GAPDH were analyzed by Western blotting. (F) The total micro RNAs in EVs (1 × 1010 vesicles) were extracted, and RT-PCR was performed to detect the level of sgRNA-EGFP. The RT-PCR results were shown on the left, and the agarose electrophoresis results were shown on the right. (G) The Sanger sequence of sgRNA-EGFP from (F). (H and I) 293TEGFP cells were incubated with EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9/sgEGFP for 48 h, and then the EGFP signal was observed by fluorescence microscope (H) and flow cytometry (I). Scale bars, 100 μm. Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 3, ∗∗∗P < 0.001).

To distinguish whether the encapsulation of SpCas9/sgRNA complex inside EVs was facilitated by the binding of PTGFRN-Fc and SpCas9-Spa or if it was solely attached to the surface of the isolated EVs, we conducted proteinase K protection assays to isolated from 293T cells were treated with proteinase K with/without Triton X-100. When exposed to proteinase K without detergent, SpCas9 remained intact. However, when Triton X-100 was present, SpCas9 underwent degradation while the membrane protein CD9 was not changed (Fig. 3D). This suggested that SpCas9 was enclosed within EVs (Fig. 3D). To better understand the retention time of EVs carrying SpCas9, we conducted a thorough investigation. Our analysis revealed that the delivery of SpCas9 reached its highest level after 12 h and then gradually decreased over time. After 48 h, the level of SpCas9 became undetectable when analyzed through Western blotting (Fig. 3E).

Next, we assessed the packaging efficacy of sgRNA designed to target EGFP by EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa. By extracting sgRNA from these EVs, RT-qPCR was used to detect the content of sgRNA. The data indicated the content of sgRNA-EGFP level in EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa were approximately 10-fold higher than in EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9 (Fig. 3F), the DNA-gel showed the same results, suggesting that the encapsulation of SpCas9 favors sgRNA encapsulation as well. The sgRNA-EGFP sequence in EVs was cloned to the T vector and confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Fig. 3G). Moreover, the green fluorescence signal in EGFP-stable expressing 293T cells was decreased by 70% with EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgEGFP treatment compared with that of EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9/sgEGFP treatment under microscope (Fig. 3H) and flow cytometry (Fig. 3I and Fig. S2C). Collectively, these data provided solid evidence that the Fc/Spa system efficiently promoted the encapsulation of SpCas9/sgRNA RNP into EVs.

3.3. Cas9/sgRNA-RNP delivered by EVPTGFRN−Fc/Cas9−Spa alleviates HSV1 infection

Considering the remarkable properties of the Fc/Spa systems in the packaging of Cas9 into EVs, we decided to evaluate its efficacy in combatting viral infections. HSV1 is a common DNA virus, and EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa could be a potentially effective way to eradicate the HSV1 genome. First, we applied two sgRNAs against two crucial viral genes, the glycoprotein UL8 and single-stranded DNA binding protein UL29 (alternate name: ICP8) based on previous study26 (Fig. 4A). In vitro transfection of plasmids containing sgUL8-spCas9 or sgUL29-spCas9 displayed promising antiviral effects by reducing cell cytopathic effects (CPE) (Supporting Information Fig. S4A). The targeting efficiency of UL8 and UL29 in disrupting the endogenous gene was confirmed by analyzing the frequencies of indel mutations using a T7E1 cleavage assay. The results showed a mutation frequency of 21.71% for UL29 and 3.25% for UL8 (Fig. 4B). The TIDE analysis indicated similar indel rates of about 18.2% for UL29 (Fig. S4B). Due to the high indel rates of UL29, we thus packed UL29-sgRNA with SpCas9 into the engineering EVs in the following study.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The design of EVs against HSV1. (A) The schematic diagram of the HSV1 genome, sgRNAUL8 targeting the glycoprotein UL8 and sgRNAUL29 targeting single-stranded DNA binding protein UL29 (protein name: ICP8). (B) The gene editing efficiency of sgRNAUL8 and sgRNAUL29 was detected by T7EI. The sgRNA-UL8 and sgRNA-UL29 were transited and infected with HSV-1 in Hela cells as the experimental group, and Hela cells were only infected with HSV-1 as the blank control. (C–G) Vero cell was infected with HSV1 for 1 h, then EV293T, EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9, EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa, EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9/sgUL29 and EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 (1 × 1010 vesicles) were added for 48 h. (C) The CPE results were observed under the microscope. (D) The viral protein levels were analyzed by Western blotting. (E) The gene transcriptional levels of gD and VP16 were analyzed by RT-qPCR. (F) The plaque assay was observed under the microscope. The histogram is a quantification of the viral plaque. (G) The gene editing efficiency was detected by T7EI. Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 3, ∗∗∗P < 0.001).

After transfecting the relevant plasmids into 293T cells, the resulting EVs were assessed for their efficacy in combating HSV1 infection in Vero cells. EV293T, EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9, EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa, were added to EV-free medium after the cells were infected with demonstrated a noteworthy reduction in virus-induced cytopathy compared to other treatment groups in Vero cells (Fig. 4C). Compared with EV PTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9/sgUL29, the advantage of EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 in reducing ICP8 protein could be easily observed, which also inhibited viral gD protein by Western blotting (Fig. 4D) and RT-qPCR (Fig. 4E). The antiviral efficacy of EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 was validated through viral plaque formation assays, the histogram indicated a quantification of the viral plaque showing up to a 90% reduction in the number of progeny plaque formations (Fig. 4F). The endogenous targeted disruption efficiency was evaluated by T7EI assay, which clearly indicated about 17.86% indel frequencies after EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 treatment, compared to 11.01% with EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9/sgUL29 treatment (Fig. 4G), indicating that the indel efficiency was increased about 62% compared to EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9/sgUL29. To test whether EVs activate the type I IFN-dependent innate immune response, we detected the TBK1 phosphorylation and found that EVs did not provoke innate immune activation against HSV1 infection (Fig. S4C). Together, these data suggested that EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 inhibited HSV1 infection through SpCas9-based DNA editing rather than relying on a type I IFN-related innate immune response.

3.4. RVG decoration mediated neuro-targeting of EVs delivery

Given that nervous tissue is particularly susceptible to HSV1 invasion, we aimed to develop EVs containing a neuro-targeting peptide known as rabies virus glycoprotein peptide (RVG29), which has strong neuro-targeting tropism27. This is intended to eliminate the HSV1 virus within nervous tissue. RVG29 was fused to the extracellular domain of PTGFRN-Δ687 with an HA tag, and the IP results confirmed the outside display of RVG-decorated EVs successfully, named EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 (Fig. 5A and B). To further verify whether the RVG modification affects the original anti-HSV1 activity, EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 was added into HSV1-infected Hela cells. The T7E1 assay indicated no difference between the EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 and EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29, the indel rates were 16.98% and 18.11%, respectively, by TIDE analyze (Fig. 5C). In addition, the antiviral ability was similar between the treatment of EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 and EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29, indicated by viral gD protein and HSV1 ICP8 protein via Western blotting assay (Fig. 5D). These data suggested that modification of RVG did not change the antiviral activity of EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Neuro-targeting of EV mediated by RVG. (A) The schematic diagram of RVG-decorated EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9/sgUL29. (B) Western blots of EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9/sgUL29 after EV pulldown with either anti-HA or anti-FLAG beads. Anti-HA beads retain HA-EVs better than anti-HA beads retain HA-EVs. (C) The gene editing efficiency between EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 and EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 was analyzed by T7EI assay. After Hela cells were infected with HSV-1 for 1 h, EV293T, EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29, and EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL2 (1 × 1010 vesicles) were added, respectively, genomic DNA was extracted, and PCR was performed after 24 h. (D) The effects of indicated EVs on viral ICP8 and gD protein were evaluated by Western blotting. (E) Hela cells and HT22 cells were incubated with Dil-labelled EVs (2.5 × 109 vesicles) (Red) for 12 h. Then, the red fluoresce was observed under a microscope, scale bar = 5 μm. (F) The quantitation of (E). (G) The ability of blood vessels penetration of EVs, scale bar = 5 μm. EVs (2.5 × 109 vesicles) (EV293T, EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 and EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29) were added to the up Transwell chamber for 12 h, then fluorescence changes in the Transwell were observed under a fluorescence microscope. Red: EV marked by Dil; Blue: Hoechst labelled nucleus; Green: HUVEC cells labelled with DiO. (H) The quantitation of (G). (I) In vivo distribution of Dil-labelled EVs in mouse organs. Heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney and brain. Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 3, ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ns, not significant).

To examine its neuro-targeting efficiency, neuro HT22 cells were exposed to Dil-labelled EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 and EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29. Compared to the Hela cells, the cell uptake efficiency was increased in HT22 cells, indicated by the red fluorescence signal under a confocal microscope (Fig. 5E and F), supporting a good neuro-targeting ability of RVG-decorated EV. We then evaluated the ability of the EVs to traverse the vascular endothelial cell targeting neuro cells through Transwell assay. Endothelial cells (HUVECs) were seeded to the up cavity, then EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 or EVRVG−PDGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 stained with Dil was added into the up medium (Fig. 5G). Compared to EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29, the results indicated EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 passed through the endothelial cells and entered the underlying HT22 cell, indicated by the red fluorescence signal that represented all the red fluorescence in the picture (Fig. 5G and H).

In pharmacokinetic studies, the distribution and organ accumulation were assessed by ex vivo organ fluorescence in BALB/c mice followed by intravenously injecting with Dil-labelled EV293T, EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 and EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 (1010 particles/mice). Quantitation of fluorescence in the organs showed that the brain accumulation of EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29, which further indicates the neuro-targeting of EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 (Fig. 5I). Quantitative results for other organs were shown in Fig. S4D. In a word, this study indicated that the RVG decoration-mediated neuro-targeting increased the accumulation of EVs in the neuro-enriched brain tissue.

3.5. The pharmacokinetics and safety study of EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29

To study the pharmacokinetics of engineered EVs, we then detected EVs concentration in mice plasma at different time points after tail vein injection of EV293T, EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 and EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 labelled with Dil (Fig. S4E). The maximal fluorescence signal and half-life of EVs in plasma were similar among EV293T, EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29, and EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29, and these EVs went through elimination time with a half-life about 12 h (Fig. S4E). These results indicated that the in vivo pharmacokinetics of the engineered EVs were consistent with those of the natural EVs. Next, we detected the potential toxicity of EVs. The effect of EVs on cell viability was investigated by CCK-8 in vitro. The results displayed low cytotoxicity and hardly affected the cell viability of engineered EVs in three widely used cell lines (Supporting Information Fig. S5A). We also evaluated the biocompatibility and the safety of EVs in vivo. The healthy BALB/c mice were treated with EV293T, EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29, EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29. After 8 consecutive days of EV administration, we continued to observe the status of the mice until the 20th day. During the treatment period, we found no significant loss in body weight for these days (Fig. S5B). HE stain of major organs further revealed that there were no obvious pathological changes after the repeated administration of EVs (Fig. S5C), as compared with control mice. Additionally, on the 20th day, we conducted an open field test (Supporting Information Fig. S6A–C), novel object recognition test (Fig. S6D and E), and rotarod test (Fig. S6F) to investigate the behaviour of the mice after EVs administration19,28. Compared with the PBS group, there were no obvious changes in the EVs administration group, and these findings suggested that the administration of the engineered EVs is safe for mice perceiving and behaving. To address concerns regarding the potential immunogenicity of the RVG peptide, we detected the presence of antibodies to the RVG. No significant differences were observed in the immune response between these groups (Fig. S6G). The small size of the peptides (only 29 aa) renders them non-immunogenic. In brief, these results demonstrated that the administration of EVs for a short duration of 8 consecutive days exhibited a significant level of safety in mice.

3.6. The antiviral ability of EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 in vivo

In consideration of the safety measures for electric vehicle production, we conducted a study on the in vivo antiviral efficacy of modified EVs against HSV1. We used a BALB/c mouse intranasal inoculation model of HSV1 as previously described9, 10, 11,18,29. EV293T, EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa, EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 were administrated by tail vein injection 1 day before HSV1 infection (Fig. 6A) due to the strategy of pre-administering EVs to saturate the macrophage system30. This approach aimed to reduce the subsequent EV phagocytosis. Accordingly, we adopted this strategy in our study. Morphology results indicated the EVs were in good condition (Supporting Information Fig. S7A). Then, EVs injection lasted 7 days after viral infection with 100 μL/day/mice, which contained 3 × 109 particles (Fig. 6A). From the mice survival rates, all mice were sacrificed on the 15th day with EV293T treatment after HSV1 infection. However, the survival rate of mice reached 60% with EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 treatment. After administration of EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29, the survival rate of mice reached 80% (Fig. 6B). In addition, the body weight of the mice continued to decline after HSV1 infection and slowly increased on Day 10. Mice given EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 regained more body weight than those given EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 (Fig. 6C). HSV1 could travel along the nerve in nose after intranasal inoculation, enter the eye and cause damage to the cornea, so we could observe lesions in the eye easily. In mice treated with EV293T, HSV1 induced obvious edema in the eyeballs with hypercellularity of the sclera and detachment of the retina from overall view after administration (Fig. 6D). In contrast, mice treatment with EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 displayed moderate edema in the eyeballs. We also did a pathological assay and found that the EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 or EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 treatment did significantly improve the corneal pathology (Fig. 6D).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The anti-HSV-1 activity of EVs in vivo. (A) Schematic illustration of EVs (1 × 1010 vesicles) for in vivo delivery for the treatment of HSV-1 infection. (B) Survival rates and (C) body weight of mice after the specified treatments. Statistical significance was calculated by log-rank test (Means ± SD, n = 6). (D) Morphological change and HE stain of the eyeball in mice during the experiment. (E) The virus titration of mouse serum by plaque formation assay. Vero cells were plated in 24-well plates at 2 × 105 cells/mL and cultured for 24 h. The serum was added to the cells after 10-fold dilution with blank DMEM medium and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Finally, DMEM solid medium was used for culture for 72 h. (F and G) The viral gene and protein levels were analyzed by RT-qPCR (F) and Western blotting (G). (H) Analysis of gene editing efficiency in liver, lung, and trigeminal nerve by T7EI. (I) Prediction of off-target genes. (J) The off-targets efficacy by deep sequencing analysis. Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 6, ∗∗∗P < 0.001).

Next, the viral titer levels in serum were analyzed. After administration of EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29, the viral titration in serum was significantly reduced compared to other groups (Fig. 6E). The viral gene transcriptional levels were analyzed by RT-qPCR in the lung, liver and trigeminal nerve. The viral protein transcriptional level was similar between EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 and EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 treatment group in the lung and liver. However, the viral protein transcriptional level (gD and VP16) was largely reduced in the EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 treatment group than in EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 treatment group in trigeminal nerve (Fig. 6F). Similar results were also observed in viral protein level (Fig. 6G).

HSV genome editing efficiency was analyzed by T7EI analysis in mouse lung and trigeminal nerve separately. In lung tissue, we observed similar indel efficiencies after EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 and EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 treatment (14.72% vs 16.01%). However, in the trigeminal nerve, the indel mutation after EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 treatment was treatment (19.83% vs 25.28%) (Fig. 6H). Three top mismatch predicted off-target genes from Off-Spotter were analyzed by deep sequencing to determine the off-target effects on the mouse genome, Myoc, Tln2, and Gdf6 (Fig. 6I). The data indicated a low gene indel rate in trigeminal nerve with EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 treatment, Myoc (0.73%), Tln2 (0.13%) and Gdf6 (0.19%) (Fig. 6J and Fig. S7B).

4. Discussion

The establishment of CRISPR/Cas9 technology for eukaryotic gene editing opened up new avenues not only for the analysis of gene function but also for therapeutic interventions31,32. However, the viral delivery system leads to the increase of off-target editing and viral vector integration into the genome of transduced cells33. Therefore, EVs are a natural ideal carrier that can address the issue of virus carrier1, Our and other groups have previously reported several CRISPR-RNP delivery systems utilizing the cellular packaging machinery for inserting cargo into EVs, such as Com/com system, chemical-induced FKBP12 and FRB dimerization system34, protein myristoylation system35, gesicles system36, genome editing with designed extracellular vesicles system37. At the same time, it's still urgent to develop novel delivery systems to meet diverse clinical needs. In this study, we first introduced the Fc/Spa protein interaction system into the engineering EVs for the CRISPR/Cas9 RNP package, which is an active enrichment of RNP in EVs and is an appealing approach for efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Compared with other CRISPR-RNP cellular packaging strategies, the Fc/Spa system has two significant advantages. One is the interaction between Fc and Spa is strong, which recruits about two folds of spCas9 into the engineering EVs. This innovative approach enhances the ease and effectiveness of the enrichment process. The other advantage is the interaction between Fc and Spa could be easily dissociated in an acidic environment of lysosomal during the endocytosis of EVs into cells, which is helpful for the subsequent SpCas9 lysosomal escape process. We also confirmed the role of VSV-G in the escape of the RNPs from the endosome system in recipient cells. Combined with the VSV-G proteins, we observed significant EVs escaping from lysosomes into the cytoplasm. These phenomena indicated the Fc/Spa's ability to actively recruit cargo into EVs. In addition, this model could be readily applied to other CRISPR systems for delivery purposes without the need to modify the structural region of the sgRNA. This eliminates the potential risk of reducing the activity of the CRISPR system. These advantages highlight the versatility and practicality of our model in various gene-editing applications.

Another important finding was that surface modification of EVs with PTGFRN-Fc showed good cargo packaging ability, which is consistent with the previous report4. Cre could be efficiently packaged into EVs by Fc/Spa. Also, Cre protein could be released into the cells intact to turn the cell from red to green fluorescence signal. Besides Cre, SpCas9 could be packaged into the EVs. Our data indicated Fc/Spa packaged 41.1 ng of SpCas9 into EVs, two fold more SpCas9 relative to systems without Fc/Spa tagged versions. Our previous work has shown that SpCas9 protein has a short lifespan (12 h) in recipient cells. This study indicated that SpCas9 protein levels were highest within 8 h and decreased by 24 h in recipient cells. These phenomena coincided with the time when EVs entered the cell. EVs were first attached to the cell surface within 1 h. At 8 h, EVs completely entered the cell, but lysosomes degraded them after 24 h incubation. The median size of EVs derived from the EV-producing cells was around ∼150 nm, which was similar to the EVs incorporated with Fc/Spa. We found that the size of the EVs was not affected by how much it was loaded. Besides the size, the Zeta potentials, shape, as well as marker proteins of Fc/Spa-engineered EVs were not affected. At the same time, we also observed the synchronous rise of the corresponding sgRNA in EVs, suggesting that the enrichment of SpCas9 can also promote the packaging of sgRNA. Since our previous studies and others' studies confirmed that the design of cytoplasmic sgRNA could not increase the sgRNA content in EVs6,34, such as RNA polymerase II promoter-driven sgRNA or ribozyme modified sgRNA, we thus did not apply this strategy in this study.

Following acute infection, HSV establishes latency in sensory neurons, from which it can reactivate and cause recurrent disease. Available antiviral therapies do not affect latent viral genomes; therefore, they do not prevent reactivation following therapy cessation38. One possible curative approach involves the introduction of DNA double-strand breaks in latent HSV genomes by rare-cutting endonucleases, leading to mutagenesis of essential viral genes39, 40, 41. For this purpose, UL29 was chosen for gene editing, which was essential for viral proliferation, and used in replication-defective vaccines with UL29 deleted. RVG (29 aa) was fused to the extracellular domain of PTGFRN-Δ687, which prepared the neural targeting EVs27. Several studies have also employed this strategy to deliver siRNA into the brain for the treatment of Zika virus infection42. We showed this engineering EVs could enter the brain through the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and have therapeutic efficacy in vitro and in vivo models. Considering the issue that RVG modification does not show comparable neuro-targeting efficiency in vivo as in vitro, we hypothesize that two factors may contribute to the slightly weaker in vivo efficacy compared to the in vitro results. Firstly, the presence of the BBB is likely to reduce the EVs entering the trigeminal nerve, thereby diminishing their effectiveness. Secondly, the phagocytic activity of macrophages in the body can significantly impact EVs, as macrophage cells tend to phagocytose EVs. Despite our attempts to reduce the endocytosis of macrophages through the pre-administration of EV treatment, endocytosis of macrophage activity still influences the outcome of EVs. Taking these factors into consideration, the in vitro results surpass the in vivo experiments. However, this understanding provides valuable insights for further optimizing our system. Another limitation of this study is the need for pharmacokinetics of EVs. Evaluating such macromolecules is still challenging and needs further investigation.

Based on metabolism experiments of EVs in 293T cells, we administered a once-a-day dose to mice. The engineered EV system showed a good safety ability from the in vivo safety results, non-toxic to cells, no change in body weight, and no lesions in the organs. In terms of antiviral effects in vivo, EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/UL29 showed a significant effect in preventing the death of HSV1-infected mice. Especially in trigeminal nerve, EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 showed a better gene-editing effect than EVPTGFRN−Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 by T7EI, suggesting EVRVG−PTGFRN-Fc/SpCas9−Spa/sgUL29 is capable of modulating the HSV1 reservoir in the trigeminal nerve with less off-target effects. Taken together, our study supports the engineering of EVs to deliver CRISPR-cas9 for treating HSV infection.

Author contributions

Xingang Yao, Shuwen Liu, and Wenyu Wu conceived and designed the project; Yuanda Wan, Liren Li, and Ruilin Chen conducted experiments; Yuanda Wan, Jiajia Han, Qiyun Lei, Xiaodong Tang, Zhipeng Chen performed data analysis and discussion; Yuanda Wan, Xingang Yao wrote the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2023A1515030057, Xingang Yao) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82373873, Xingang Yao). We also thank Professor Haitao Wang and Yingying Fang's help and suggestion on the mouse behaviour experiments.

Footnotes

Peer review under the responsibility of Chinese Pharmaceutical Association and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

Appendix A

Supporting data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2023.10.004.

Contributor Information

Shuwen Liu, Email: liusw@smu.edu.cn.

Xingang Yao, Email: yaoxingang@smu.edu.cn.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article.

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.pdf (841.1KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Cheng L., Hill A.F. Therapeutically harnessing extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022;21:379–399. doi: 10.1038/s41573-022-00410-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Buzas E.I. The roles of extracellular vesicles in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2022;23:236–250. doi: 10.1038/s41577-022-00763-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhang S., Shen J.T., Li D.L., Cheng Y.Y. Strategies in the delivery of Cas9 ribonucleoprotein for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Theranostics. 2021;11:614–648. doi: 10.7150/thno.47007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dooley K., McConnell R.E., Xu K., Lewis N.D., Haupt S., Youniss M.R., et al. A versatile platform for generating engineered extracellular vesicles with defined therapeutic properties. Mol Ther. 2021;29:1729–1743. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.01.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hung M.E., Leonard J.N. A platform for actively loading cargo RNA to elucidate limiting steps in EV-mediated delivery. J Extracell Vesicles. 2016;5 doi: 10.3402/jev.v5.31027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yao X.G., Lyu P., Yoo K., Yadav M.K., Singh R., Atala A., et al. Engineered extracellular vesicles as versatile ribonucleoprotein delivery vehicles for efficient and safe CRISPR genome editing. J Extracell Vesicles. 2021;10 doi: 10.1002/jev2.12076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Braisted A.C., Wells J.A. Minimizing a binding domain from protein A. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:5688–5692. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.12.5688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McCormick I., James C., Welton N.J., Mayaud P., Turner K.M.E., Gottlieb S.L., et al. Incidence of herpes simplex virus keratitis and other ocular disease: global review and estimates. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2022;29:353–362. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2021.1962919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aubert M., Madden E.A., Loprieno M., DeSilva Feelixge H.S., Stensland L., Huang M.L., et al. In vivo disruption of latent HSV by designer endonuclease therapy. JCI Insight. 2016;1 doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.88468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Aubert M., Strongin D.E., Roychoudhury P., Loprieno M.A., Haick A.K., Klouser L.M., et al. Gene editing and elimination of latent herpes simplex virus in vivo. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4148. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17936-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yin D., Ling S.K., Wang D.W., Dai Y., Jiang H., Zhou X.J., et al. Targeting herpes simplex virus with CRISPR-Cas9 cures herpetic stromal keratitis in mice. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:567–577. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-00781-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stringer B.W., Day B.W., D'Souza R.C.J., Jamieson P.R., Ensbey K.S., Bruce Z.C., et al. A reference collection of patient-derived cell line and xenograft models of proneural, classical and mesenchymal glioblastoma. Sci Rep. 2019;9:4902. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41277-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Clement K., Rees H., Canver M.C., Gehrke J.M., Farouni R., Hsu J.Y., et al. CRISPResso2 provides accurate and rapid genome editing sequence analysis. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:224–226. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0032-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wan Y.H., Wu S.G., Zheng S.C., Liang E., Liu S.W., Yao X.G., et al. A series of octahydroquinazoline-5-ones as novel inhibitors against dengue virus. Eur J Med Chem. 2020;200 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wan Y.H., Wu W.Y., Guo S.X., He S.J., Tang X.D., Wu X.Y., et al. [1,2,4]Triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine derivative (Mol-5) is a new NS5-RdRp inhibitor of DENV2 proliferation and DENV2-induced inflammation. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2020;41:706–718. doi: 10.1038/s41401-019-0316-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wan Y.H., Wu W.Y., Wan Y.D., Li L.R., Zhang J.W., Chen X.G., et al. Brivanib alaninate inhibited dengue virus proliferation through VEGFR2/AMPK pathway. Pharmacol Res. 2021;170 doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen W.H., Zhang J.W., Qi X., Zhao K., Pang X.Y., Lin X.P., et al. p-Terphenyls as anti-HSV-1/2 agents from a deep-sea-derived penicillium sp. J Nat Prod. 2021;84:2822–2831. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.1c00400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pegg C.E., Zaichick S.V., Bomba-Warczak E., Jovasevic V., Kim D., Kharkwal H., et al. Herpesviruses assimilate kinesin to produce motorized viral particles. Nature. 2021;599:662–666. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04106-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Guo H.B., Cheng Y.F., Wu J.G., Wang C.M., Wang H.T., Zhang C., et al. Donepezil improves learning and memory deficits in APP/PS1 mice by inhibition of microglial activation. Neuroscience. 2015;290:530–542. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.01.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Myskiw J.C., Rossato J.I., Bevilaqua L.R., Medina J.H., Izquierdo I., Cammarota M. On the participation of mTOR in recognition memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2008;89:338–351. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2007.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yan Y.Q., Zheng R., Liu Y., Ruan Y., Lin Z.H., Xue N.J., et al. Parkin regulates microglial NLRP3 and represses neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease. Aging Cell. 2023;22 doi: 10.1111/acel.13834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McConnell R.E., Youniss M., Gnanasambandam B., Shah P., Zhang W., Finn J.D. Transfection reagent artefact likely accounts for some reports of extracellular vesicle function. J Extracell Vesicles. 2022;11 doi: 10.1002/jev2.12253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Witwer K.W., Soekmadji C., Hill A.F., Wauben M.H., Buzas E.I., Di Vizio D., et al. Updating the MISEV minimal requirements for extracellular vesicle studies: building bridges to reproducibility. J Extracell Vesicles. 2017;6 doi: 10.1080/20013078.2017.1396823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Florkiewicz R.Z., Rose J.K. A cell line expressing vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein fuses at low pH. Science. 1984;225:721–723. doi: 10.1126/science.6087454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Riedel H., Kondor-Koch C., Garoff H. Cell surface expression of fusogenic vesicular stomatitis virus G protein from cloned cDNA. EMBO J. 1984;3:1477–1483. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb01999.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Muylaert I., Tang K.W., Elias P. Replication and recombination of herpes simplex virus DNA. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:15619–15624. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R111.233981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kumar P., Wu H., McBride J.L., Jung K.E., Kim M.H., Davidson B.L., et al. Transvascular delivery of small interfering RNA to the central nervous system. Nature. 2007;448:39–43. doi: 10.1038/nature05901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Qiu Z.K., Zhang L.M., Zhao N., Chen H.X., Zhang Y.Z., Liu Y.Q., et al. Repeated administration of AC-5216, a ligand for the 18 kDa translocator protein, improves behavioral deficits in a mouse model of post-traumatic stress disorder. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013;45:40–46. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bohannon K.P., Sollars P.J., Pickard G.E., Smith G.A. Fusion of a fluorescent protein to the pUL25 minor capsid protein of pseudorabies virus allows live-cell capsid imaging with negligible impact on infection. J Gen Virol. 2012;93:124–129. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.036145-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Belhadj Z., He B., Deng H.L., Song S.Y., Zhang H., Wang X.Q., et al. A combined "eat me/don't eat me" strategy based on extracellular vesicles for anticancer nanomedicine. J Extracell Vesicles. 2020;9 doi: 10.1080/20013078.2020.1806444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shivram H., Cress B.F., Knott G.J., Doudna J.A. Controlling and enhancing CRISPR systems. Nat Chem Biol. 2021;17:10–19. doi: 10.1038/s41589-020-00700-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Raguram A., Banskota S., Liu D.R. Therapeutic in vivo delivery of gene editing agents. Cell. 2022;185:2806–2827. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.03.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lino C.A., Harper J.C., Carney J.P., Timlin J.A. Delivering CRISPR: a review of the challenges and approaches. Drug Deliv. 2018;25:1234–1257. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2018.1474964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gee P., Lung M.S.Y., Okuzaki Y., Sasakawa N., Iguchi T., Makita Y., et al. Extracellular nanovesicles for packaging of CRISPR-Cas9 protein and sgRNA to induce therapeutic exon skipping. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1334. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14957-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Whitley J.A., Kim S., Lou L., Ye C., Alsaidan O.A., Sulejmani E., et al. Encapsulating Cas9 into extracellular vesicles by protein myristoylation. J Extracell Vesicles. 2022;11 doi: 10.1002/jev2.12196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Campbell L.A., Coke L.M., Richie C.T., Fortuno L.V., Park A.Y., Harvey B.K. Gesicle-mediated delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex for inactivating the HIV provirus. Mol Ther. 2019;27:151–163. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lainscek D., Kadunc L., Keber M.M., Bratkovic I.H., Romih R., Jerala R. Delivery of an artificial transcription regulator dCas9-VPR by extracellular vesicles for therapeutic gene activation. ACS Synth Biol. 2018;7:2715–2725. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Klysik K., Pietraszek A., Karewicz A., Nowakowska M. Acyclovir in the treatment of herpes viruses - a review. Curr Med Chem. 2020;27:4118–4137. doi: 10.2174/0929867325666180309105519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bommareddy P.K., Peters C., Kaufman H.L. Generation and validation of recombinant herpes simplex type 1 viruses (HSV-1) using CRISPR/Cas9 genetic disruption. Methods Enzymol. 2020;635:167–184. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2019.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ni L.Q., Li Y., Wu K., Deng F., Wang H.L., Ning Y.J. Antitumor efficacy of CRISPR/Cas9-engineered ICP6 mutant herpes simplex viruses in a mouse xenograft model for lung adenocarcinoma. J Med Virol. 2022;94:6000–6015. doi: 10.1002/jmv.28069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Russell T.A., Stefanovic T., Tscharke D.C. Engineering herpes simplex viruses by infection-transfection methods including recombination site targeting by CRISPR/Cas9 nucleases. J Virol Methods. 2015;213:18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhang R., Fu Y.X., Cheng M., Ma W.Y., Zheng N., Wang Y.X., et al. sEVs(RVG) selectively delivers antiviral siRNA to fetus brain, inhibits ZIKV infection and mitigates ZIKV-induced microcephaly in mouse model. Mol Ther. 2022;30:2078–2091. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.pdf (841.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES