Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Sex Res. 2023 Sep 14;62(4):433–444. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2023.2254772

Hey ChatGPT, let’s talk about sexual consent

Tiffany Marcantonio 1, Karen E Nielsen 2, Michelle Haikalis 3, Ruschelle M Leone 4, Jacqueline Woerner 5, Elizabeth C Neilson 6, Anne Marie Schipani-McLaughlin 4
PMCID: PMC10937333  NIHMSID: NIHMS1929458  PMID: 37707442

Abstract

Access to sexual health education, such as education on sexual consent, is limited in the US. Artificial intelligence (AI), such as ChatGPT, provides a potential opportunity to increase access to sexual consent information and education. However, what ChatGPT knows about sexual consent and if this aligns with the current evidence-based literature on sexual consent is unclear. The goal of this research commentary was to explore what ChatGPT knows about sexual consent with a focus on: 1) the definition of consent, 2) how consent could be communicated, and 3) the impact that substances have on consent. We also examined the reliability of ChatGPT’s responses by having three different researchers ask ChatGPT the same set of questions. Across our questions, ChatGPT provided similar and comprehensive responses that discussed key features of consent—that consent is freely given or reversible. ChatGPT provided examples of different verbal and nonverbal cues people can use to communicate and interpret consent and discussed the ways that substances can impact consent communication. Overall, ChatGPT could be a potential resource for educators and young people who seek information about sexual consent; however, we should proceed with caution. ChatGPT is not a replacement for an educator but rather a way to increase access to education.

Keywords: sexual consent, ChatGPT, substance use, sexual health education

Introduction

In recent years, discussions around sexual consent have become increasingly prominent in society due to social movements and government initiatives focused on reducing rates of sexual violence victimization and perpetration (e.g., #MeToo, It’s On Us, Affirmative Consent Initiatives; UC San Diego Center on Gender Equity and Health, 2019). Sexual consent has been defined in various ways, and numerous researchers have designed studies to assess how consent is communicated and influenced by contextual factors (Beres et al., 2014; Chin et al., 2019; Hirsch et al., 2019; Holmström et al., 2020; Jozkowski, Peterson, et al., 2014; Marcantonio & Jozkowski, 2021b; Muehlenhard et al., 2016; Willis, Jozkowski, et al., 2021). As sexual consent research continues to develop, there is a growing need for a clear and concise definition and understanding of sexual consent that can be easily understood and applied in educational and intervention initiatives. Recently popularized artificial intelligence (AI) software—such as ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer) may be one way people find accessible information about sexual consent, particularly by adolescents and young adults who often use the internet and social media to gain information about sexual education (Fowler et al., 2022; Gabarron & Wynn, 2016; Simon & Daneback, 2013). Indeed, ChatGPT is uniquely positioned to provide informative responses about sexual consent, drawing on a vast database of language and cultural contexts (OpenAI, 2023). Thus, we examined ChatGPT’s understanding of three aspects of sexual consent with the goal of informing interventions and education efforts that may want to use ChatGPT to communicate and reinforce messages on sexual consent. We asked ChatGPT for the following: 1) the definition of sexual consent, 2) how consent is communicated nonverbally and verbally, and 3) how alcohol use and cannabis can influence sexual consent communication. We also assessed if ChatGPT provided the same response when asked by different users. To conclude we discuss how these responses reflect the current research on sexual consent and the implications for ChatGPT in sexual consent research and education.

What is ChatGPT?

ChatGPT, which launched in November 2022, is an autoregressive language model that uses deep learning to generate human-like responses (Ruby, 2023). More simply put and according to ChatGPT, it is an AI language model designed to understand and generate natural language by using past text to predict future text. It employs a sophisticated machine learning algorithm consisting of artificial neural networks, inspired by the human brain (Yosifova, 2022). ChatGPT has been trained on numerous datasets of language, which enable ChatGPT to respond to questions and generate informative and coherent text. ChatGPT is capable of understanding context and nuances in language and can provide responses to a wide range of queries. The primary functions of ChatGPT are to assist users with finding information, providing guidance, and engaging in conversation with people (OpenAI, personal communication, March 12, 2023; Verma, 2023).

Since ChatGPT launched, people have used ChatGPT for a variety of activities, such as helping with homework (Bowman, 2022), grading written assignments (Roose, 2023), and even assisting with writing TV shows, such as an episode of South Park that was co-written by ChatGPT (Parker & ChatGPT, 2023). Notably, ChatGPT has been suggested as a source of relationship advice or prompted to be a “relationship expert” (Maxwell, 2022). One million users accessed ChatGPT in the first week of its launch. However, this interest grew exponentially as more people became aware of ChatGPT’s capabilities, resulting in an impressive 57 million users in the first month of public access (Ruby, 2023; Sundar, 2023). Moreover, among 300 adolescents aged 12–18, one nationwide poll found that 50% of them had used ChatGPT and 56% reported knowing a friend who used it as well (Common Sense Media, 2023). In another nationwide poll of 1,000 adolescents aged 12–18, 28% reported using ChatGPT (Morning Consult, 2023)—further highlighting the AI’s popularity. Taken together, ChatGPT is an informative AI language model that appears to have mass appeal, with numerous users engaging with the AI in diverse ways.

Why Ask ChatGPT About Sexual Consent?

Given ChatGPT’s popularity, it is a potential avenue for people to learn about, or deepen their understanding of, sexual consent. As with other topics, people may ask ChatGPT questions about sexual consent because of characteristics of the model itself. First, the AI language model has been trained on large databases of language and culture which enables ChatGPT to provide an informative response (OpenAI, personal communication, March 12, 2023). Second, ChatGPT offers an opportunity for individuals to privately seek information without fear of stigma or embarrassment associated with their questions, which may be especially pertinent when asking about sexual health behaviors. Indeed, young people report concerns of embarrassment, being judged, or confidentiality being broken over their sexual health questions as a barrier to asking them (Decker et al., 2021; Miller et al., 2014; van Teijlingen et al., 2007). Third, compared with other search engines, the conversational format of ChatGPT may be less overwhelming to people who want to know more about sexual consent. Specifically, ChatGPT provides quick, succinct responses in simple, straightforward language tailored to each prompt. This format may be appealing to people because it eliminates the cognitive challenges of filtering through a long list of potential resources and determining what is and is not an accurate source. Fourth, the interactive format may also be appealing. Individuals can ask follow-up questions, such as clarifying terminology, and receive help with specific consent scenarios. Finally, ChatGPT’s responses are quickly generated providing responses faster than could be possible in asynchronous formats with human respondents, such as online forums. Collectively, ChatGPT overcomes many barriers to sexual health education, and may meet scholars’ calls for internet-driven innovative sexual education (Barak & Fisher, 2001), if it provides evidence-based information on sexual consent. There are certainly other forms of internet-driven sexual education that come from social media sites, such as TikTok. Yet, TikTok and other social media sites may not always ground their videos in evidence-based science and these videos may perpetuate misinformation surrounding sexual health (Fowler et al., 2022). For this reason, ChatGPT’s use of generating responses from evidence-based information on sexual consent potentially holds promise for an innovative and accessible tool on sexual consent education.

ChatGPT could be particularly valuable to young people whose access to sexual health information is limited in some way. For example, educators and medical professionals report being ill-prepared to have conversations about sexual health (Dickson et al., 2020; Fennell & Grant, 2019). Moreover, many adolescents do not have access to accurate or non-judgmental sexual health education in their schools. Indeed, only 11 states require sexual consent be covered within their sexual health education (Guttmacher Institute, 2023). Despite the lack of accurate sexual health information for many adolescents, rates of sexual activity and sexual assault victimization highlight the fundamental need for understanding of sexual consent. Among high school students, 30–44% have engaged in sexual activity, suggesting they should be communicating sexual consent to one another (Center for Disease Control [CDC], 2017, 2023). Further, rates of sexual assault victimization for adolescent girls and boys have not decreased for nearly 20 years (Marcantonio, Weese, et al., 2022) and 1 in 6 adolescents who reported having sexual intercourse, also experienced sexual violence during the past year (Baiden et al., 2021). Collectively, these findings illustrate the need to educate young people about sexual consent, with an emphasis on ensuring young people understand what sexual consent is and that when sexual assaults do occur, the fault rests with the perpetrator, not the survivor. ChatGPT has the potential to address a barrier in access to sexual consent and health education, assuming the information it provides is reflective of evidence-based literature, comprehensible, and reliable.

Current Study

Given the potential benefits of ChatGPT, exploring the responses it provides to questions related to sexual consent and how they relate to the current body of research is warranted. While sexual consent is a multidimensional construct that includes one’s internal willingness to engage in sexual activity (Jozkowski et al., 2014), their external communication of that willingness, and an interpretation by a sexual partner (Muehlenhard et al., 2016), we are focusing only on external consent communication for this study. We focused on external consent as this behavior can be seen by others—whereas people cannot always see one’s internal consent. Thus, the goal of this study was to review ChatGPT’s responses to five questions related to sexual consent communication and to identify consistencies and discrepancies with the current literature in two formats. First, we asked ChatGPT about sexual consent using language often seen in research articles. We then asked ChatGPT about sexual consent using more colloquial language for sexual activity and consent that may more closely align with the language adolescents/young adults would use. We also aimed to assess the reliability of ChatGPT’s responses by having three different researchers ask ChatGPT the same set of five questions.

Method

Question Development

Within this study, we asked ChatGPT two sets of questions focused on sexual consent communication. Our first set of questions were developed with the intention of reflecting the current sexual consent literature. The first author, an expert in sexual consent communication research, developed the five questions. She then shared them with the research team, comprised of other researchers in sexual violence, sexual health, consent, and technology, who provided additional feedback on the questions and wording. These questions were developed to reflect how researchers assess and discuss sexual consent in peer-reviewed research (e.g., verbal communication, nonverbal communication, definitions of sexual consent). However, during this process, we acknowledged that a person who is younger than us and does not study these topics professionally, may not ask ChatGPT these specific and pointed questions about sexual consent. Instead, a young person may use broader language related to sexual activity or discuss a type of sexual situation (e.g., sex when alcohol is involved) to understand consent. Thus, as a team we workshopped five additional questions which reflected our academic questions but may be more likely to be asked by a typical young person seeking health information online. Our conversations with ChatGPT took place in the US using free accounts and the March 14, 2023 public release version of ChatGPT (which can be accessed at chat.opennai.com).

Academic Questions

Our first question to ChatGPT was can you define sexual consent? We asked about how ChatGPT defines sexual consent as there is no agreed upon definition in research and the definition of sexual consent may vary depending on who is writing it (e.g., researchers vs. non-profit organizations). However, there are key features of sexual consent that researchers and educators tend to emphasize: enthusiastic, on-going, freely given, and reversible (Jozkowski, Peterson, et al., 2014; Planned Parenthood, 2023). Thus, we examined if ChatGPT also mentioned these aspects of sexual consent. Given that ChatGPT’s responses are generated from multiple text databases, this could provide insights into the common definitions of sexual consent.

Next, we asked ChatGPT can sexual consent be communicated nonverbally? and can sexual consent be communicated verbally? We asked about both aspects of consent communication because young people report using both verbal and non-verbal cues to communicate consent (Jozkowski, Sanders, et al., 2014; Jozkowski, Peterson, et al., 2014; Muehlenhard et al., 2016; Willis, Jozkowski, et al., 2021).

Finally, we asked ChatGPT, can sexual consent be communicated when people are drinking alcohol? and can sexual consent be communicated when people are using cannabis? We asked about alcohol and sexual consent because alcohol is considered, within the empirical literature, to be a barrier to communicating and interpreting sexual consent, which may increase risk for sexual violence to occur (Drouin et al., 2018; Hunt et al., 2022; Jozkowski et al., 2022; Marcantonio, Willis, et al., 2022; Marcantonio & Jozkowski, 2021a; Muehlenhard et al., 2016; Willis, Marcantonio, et al., 2021). We asked about cannabis use as, recently, researchers have examined the influence of other substances on sexual consent communication (Marcantonio & Willis, 2022; Willis, Marcantonio, et al., 2021). We also focus on cannabis use as cannabis continues to be legalized across the U.S. (Britannica ProCon, 2022). Further, recent national data suggests that 50% of young people have reported lifetime use of cannabis and 24% have used the substance in the past year (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2021). Responses from a single conversation with ChatGPT can be seen in Table 1.

Table 1.

ChatGPT’s Answers to Questions About Sexual Consent

Hey, ChatGPT! Can you define sexual consent for me?
Of course! Sexual consent is an agreement between two or more people to engage in sexual activity. It involves clear and enthusiastic communication, respect for boundaries, and an understanding that both parties are freely and actively choosing to participate. Consent must be given freely and without coercion, and it can be withdrawn at any time. It is important to remember that sexual activity without consent is considered sexual assault or rape, which are serious criminal offenses.
Thank you. Can sexual consent be communicated nonverbally?
Yes, sexual consent can be communicated nonverbally, but it is important to ensure that the nonverbal communication is clear and unambiguous. Nonverbal cues such as body language, eye contact, and physical touch can be used to convey interest and enthusiasm, but they should not be relied upon as the sole means of obtaining consent. It is always best to ask for verbal confirmation before engaging in sexual activity to ensure that all parties are on the same page and feel comfortable with what is happening. Ultimately, clear communication is key to ensuring that sexual activity is consensual and enjoyable for everyone involved.
Thank you again! Can sexual consent be communicated verbally?
Yes, verbal communication is an important part of obtaining sexual consent. When asking for consent, it’s important to be clear and direct in your communication. Use plain and specific language to ask for permission, and ensure that your partner understands what you’re asking for. For example, you could say “Do you want to have sex with me?” or “Is it okay if I touch you here?”.
It’s also important to listen to your partner’s response and respect their boundaries. If they say “no” or indicate that they’re uncomfortable with a particular activity, stop immediately and respect their decision. If they say “yes”, make sure that they’re fully enthusiastic and that their consent is given freely and without coercion.
Remember that consent is an ongoing process, and it’s important to check in with your partner throughout the sexual experience. If your partner seems uncomfortable or hesitant, stop and ask if they’re okay. Sexual activity should be a consensual and enjoyable experience for everyone involved.
Thank you. Can sexual consent be communicated when people are drinking alcohol?
When alcohol is involved, it can complicate the issue of sexual consent because it can impair a person’s judgment and decision-making abilities. When someone is intoxicated, they may not be able to give informed and enthusiastic consent, and may not be in a state to recognize or communicate their own boundaries clearly.
As a result, it’s essential to obtain explicit verbal consent before engaging in sexual activity, regardless of whether alcohol is involved or not. If you or your partner are drinking, it’s important to be mindful of your limits and be aware of your partner’s limits as well. If you are unsure whether your partner is capable of giving consent due to their level of intoxication, it is best to wait until they are sober before engaging in sexual activity.
It’s also important to note that alcohol is never an excuse for engaging in non-consensual sexual activity. Even if both parties have been drinking, consent is still required and any sexual activity without consent is a form of sexual assault or rape.
Can sexual consent be communicated when people are using cannabis?
Consent is an important aspect of any sexual encounter, and it is crucial that all parties involved give their full and enthusiastic consent before engaging in any sexual activity. However, the use of cannabis can potentially impact a person’s ability to provide clear and informed consent.
While the use of cannabis does not necessarily mean that someone cannot provide consent, it is important to consider how it may affect their judgment and decision-making abilities. Cannabis can impair cognitive function, alter perception, and cause temporary memory loss, which could impact a person’s ability to communicate their desires and boundaries clearly.
Additionally, cannabis use may also impact a person’s physical ability to engage in sexual activity. It can cause dizziness, coordination issues, and reduced motor function, which could increase the risk of injury or discomfort during sexual activity.
Therefore, it is essential to have open and honest communication with sexual partners about the use of cannabis before engaging in any sexual activity. It is important to discuss boundaries, expectations, and any potential risks or concerns before using cannabis and engaging in sexual activity. Both parties should be fully aware and capable of giving their consent before any sexual activity occurs.

Colloquial Language Questions.

After asking these academic questions, we asked ChatGPT about sexual consent using colloquial language for sex. We began a new chat with ChatGPT from a separate IP address located in a different city to minimize the influence that prior questions using the term sexual consent may have on the response. We asked ChatGPT the following: 1) What is sexual consent? 2) How do you know if someone wants to have sex with you? 3) Can people have sex after drinking?4) Can people agree to sex when they are high?

ChatGPT Reliability.

ChatGPT documentation suggests that people should get similar responses across the US (and worldwide) given that it uses the same database for everyone and can produce responses in multiple languages (OpenAI, 2023). To assess the natural variability in responses, three additional members of the team asked ChatGPT the same five academic questions reviewed above and based on consent research (see Appendix). Specifically, three team members began a new chat with ChatGPT and asked the same five academic questions in the same order, with each question asked as a separate query within the same conversation. All team members used the same version of ChatGPT on free accounts. We then compared these additional responses with the initial responses the first author received from ChatGPT.

Research Team Positionality

Within our study, we are interpreting responses from ChatGPT about sexual consent and understanding our positionality and lens of interpretation with this data is warranted. Our team is comprised of seven cisgender women, who identify as White, are US born, and native English speakers. The majority of our team resides and works in the Southeastern part of the US; however, most team members were born and raised in different areas across the US. Additionally, our team is comprised of researchers who study sexual consent, sexual violence etiology, prevention efforts for sexual violence (e.g., bystander behavior), substance use, and AI; all have advanced degrees (PhD) across various disciplines (i.e., Public Health, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Statistics). The team includes researchers who implement public health programs and do clinical work with adolescents and young adults. Within our team, we view sexual consent communication as a potential prevention mechanism to sexual assault. However, we also view sexual consent as having greater implications beyond a mechanism to prevent sexual assaults. We also view sexual consent communication as part of a healthy sexual experience that could potentially, increase satisfaction and pleasure within a sexual encounter.

This was a collaborative team project where all authors worked together to assist with our findings and interpretation. In realizing the homogeneity and positions of privilege within our team structure, team meetings and correspondence throughout the project development, execution, and analyses included discussions of our potential biases. In drafting this manuscript, we engaged in critical discourse to not arrive at one singular “truth” but to be cautious as to the implications of our findings for people who do not share our identities, privilege, or lived experiences.

Results

ChatGPT’s Definition of Sexual Consent

As seen in Table 1, ChatGPT’s definition of sexual consent is reflective of how sexual consent scholars discuss sexual consent. ChatGPT defined consent as an agreement between two or more people that is clear and enthusiastic (Curtis & Burnett, 2017; Jozkowski, Peterson, et al., 2014; Marcantonio & Jozkowski, 2021b; Planned Parenthood, 2023). The AI highlighted that consent should be freely and actively given, without pressure, and that someone can withdraw consent at any time; these are key components of the definition of sexual consent often stressed in educational initiatives (e.g., Planned Parenthood, 2023). Finally, ChatGPT states that sexual activity without consent is considered a sexual assault or rape.

Regarding ChatGPT’s response to our more colloquial question of “what is sexual consent?” the response reflected similar information to our definition question (see Table 2). ChatGPT highlighted that consent involves two or more people willingly, clearly, and enthusiastically agreeing to sexual activity and that all parties should feel safe and comfortable. Further, the response mentioned key terms such as freely given, involving boundaries, and that consent can be withdrawn or revoked.

Table 2.

ChatGPT’s Response to Questions About Sexual Consent Using Colloquial Language

What is sexual consent?
Sexual consent is when two or more individuals willingly agree to engage in sexual activity. It is a clear and enthusiastic agreement to participate in each step of sexual activity, and it is essential for all parties to feel comfortable and safe throughout the experience.
Consent must be freely given, meaning that it is not coerced or obtained through threats, pressure, or manipulation. It must also be specific to the activity in question, and individuals should communicate their boundaries and intentions clearly to ensure that all parties are on the same page.
Consent can be withdrawn at any time, and individuals should respect each other’s boundaries and stop any sexual activity immediately if consent is revoked or if one party is uncomfortable or unwilling to continue. It is important to remember that consent is an ongoing process and must be reaffirmed throughout any sexual encounter.
How do you know if someone wants to have sex with you?
It’s important to understand that you cannot know if someone wants to have sex with you unless they explicitly tell you. Nonverbal cues and body language can sometimes be misleading, and assuming someone wants to have sex with you without their clear and enthusiastic consent is not only inappropriate but can also be illegal.
The only way to know if someone wants to have sex with you is to ask them directly and respect their answer. It’s important to create a safe and comfortable environment where both parties feel free to express their desires and boundaries without fear of judgment or coercion.
It’s also crucial to remember that consent is an ongoing process, and just because someone may have initially expressed an interest in sexual activity does not mean that they cannot change their mind at any point. Therefore, it’s important to communicate throughout the sexual encounter and continually check in with each other to ensure that everyone involved is comfortable and enthusiastic about what is happening.
Can people have sex after drinking?
It’s not recommended to have sex after drinking or while under the influence of drugs. When you drink alcohol or use drugs, it can impair your judgment, affect your ability to communicate and consent, and make you more vulnerable to sexual assault or coercion.
It’s important to be aware that if someone is intoxicated, they may not be able to give informed consent, which means that engaging in sexual activity with them can be considered sexual assault or rape. It’s also important to remember that just because someone is drunk or under the influence of drugs, it does not give anyone the right to take advantage of them.
If you choose to drink alcohol or use drugs, it’s important to be aware of your own limits and to communicate clearly with your partner or partners about your boundaries and intentions. It’s also important to ensure that all parties involved are consenting and able to make informed decisions about sexual activity.
Can people agree to sex when they are high?
It’s important to understand that if someone is under the influence of drugs, it can impair their judgment and their ability to make informed decisions, including giving clear and enthusiastic consent to sexual activity.
Consent must be freely given, which means that it is not obtained through coercion, manipulation, or while under the influence of drugs or alcohol. If someone is high or under the influence of drugs, they may not be able to fully understand the situation, communicate their boundaries, or give enthusiastic consent to sexual activity.
In general, it’s best to avoid engaging in sexual activity while under the influence of drugs or alcohol to ensure that all parties involved can make informed decisions and give enthusiastic consent. If you or someone you know has been the victim of sexual assault or rape while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, it’s important to seek help and support from a trusted individual or organization.

ChatGPT’s Explanation of Nonverbal and Verbal Consent

Sexual consent can be communicated both nonverbally and verbally and ChatGPT also highlighted this. In ChatGPT’s response to our question about nonverbal consent (see Table 1), ChatGPT suggested this was a form of consent communication and that nonverbal communication needed to be clear and unambiguous. The AI provided examples of subtle nonverbal cues that could suggest sexual interest or consent (e.g., “body language, gestures, facial expressions, and sounds”), but that people should not rely on these as the sole way to communicate or interpret sexual consent. ChatGPT suggested that people still use verbal consent, with nonverbal communication, and that clear communication “is key to ensuring that sexual activity is consensual and enjoyable for all parties involved.” Within this response, ChatGPT noted common messages from consent researchers and educators, such as emphasizing that nonverbal cues can be used, but clear communication addresses any ambiguity (Abbey, 2002; Jozkowski et al., 2017, 2018; Jozkowski, Peterson, et al., 2014; Muehlenhard et al., 2016). Additionally, the focus on sexual consent as a component of enjoyable sexual activity is reflective of sex-positive messaging which aims to connect sexual consent with sexual satisfaction (Javidi et al., 2022; Marcantonio et al., 2020).

ChatGPT’s response on verbal consent mentioned the importance of asking about sexual consent and then listening to a partner’s response. ChatGPT began with discussing how to ask for consent, that this should be communicated directly and clearly, and that your partner should understand what you are asking for. ChatGPT then provided two examples of how to ask for sexual consent. Next, the AI emphasized the need to respect someone’s boundaries and be responsive to what the person has said. The AI communicated that a “yes” needs to be fully enthusiastic—which reflects research on moments when someone may “say yes” to sex due to pressure, coercion, wanting to please a partner, or other reasons, but not really mean “yes” (Beres, 2022).

As a closing remark, ChatGPT included components of refusals and the importance of checking in with a partner. Specifically, ChatGPT noted subtle refusal cues, such as hesitance to engage in sex and refusal feelings, such as being uncomfortable; these responses are reflective of research on sexual refusal communication and feelings (Kitzinger & Frith, 1999; Marcantonio et al., 2021; Marcantonio & Jozkowski, 2020; O’Byrne et al., 2006, 2008). Across these responses, ChatGPT has comprehensively summarized and presented key information from numerous researchers and educators on sexual consent (Jozkowski, Peterson, et al., 2014; Planned Parenthood, 2023).

Finally, when asking ChatGPT the colloquial version of this question, ChatGPT did reference both nonverbal and verbal cues can be part of consent communication; however, the AI stressed that nonverbal cues can be misleading, and one should not assume consent from them. Instead, the AI mentions partners should speak with one another, respect boundaries, and realize consent is a process over time (see Table 2).

ChatGPT’s Response to Alcohol, Cannabis, and Consent Communication

Our first three questions to ChatGPT did not include mention of how specific situational circumstances may interact with sexual consent. Therefore, our last two questions to ChatGPT specifically asked about how alcohol and cannabis may interact with sexual consent (see Table 1 and Table 2). For researchers, studying how alcohol use can occur with sexual consent communication is challenging (Leone et al., 2022) because alcohol is often implicated in sexual assault victimization experiences (Abbey, 2002, 2011, 2017; Koss et al., 2022). Young people also report engaging in perceived alcohol-involved consensual sexual experiences (Herbenick et al., 2019; Marcantonio & Jozkowski, 2021a). Thus, there is a continued need to understand when and how alcohol can be involved with sexual activity. ChatGPT’s response communicated that same hesitancy that many researchers and educators start with—alcohol use complicates sexual consent communication. The response directly moves into why alcohol-involved consent communication is concerning because alcohol can alter and impair our decision-making ability. Many researchers have commented on this in their work with alcohol and sexual consent (Hunt et al., 2022; Leone et al., 2022; Marcantonio & Jozkowski, 2021a; Marcantonio & Willis, 2022).

After ChatGPT acknowledged the barrier alcohol use presents sexual consent communication, ChatGPT then provided some tips to navigate this experience—with an emphasis on verbal consent. Researchers also agree that if alcohol is involved with sexual activity, we must move to verbal consent given that alcohol intoxication can impact our interpretation of sexual situations (Hunt et al., 2022; Jozkowski et al., 2022; Marcantonio & Jozkowski, 2021a). Indeed, by relying on non-verbal or implicit cues when intoxicated, people may over-perceive cues as signs of consent or focus solely on cues that confirm their beliefs, rather than challenge them. Thus, the emphasis on verbal consent when alcohol is involved is to ensure that everyone has directly and clearly agreed to the sexual behaviors that will occur and understands what those behaviors are. ChatGPT’s response concluded with a statement researchers and educators often make—alcohol is never an excuse for engaging in sexually aggressive behaviors and that even if both people are drinking, consent is still necessary.

ChatGPT’s response to whether sexual consent can occur with cannabis use was similar to the response with alcohol. In the cannabis question, ChatGPT mentioned that cannabis use did not inherently mean someone could not consent; however, cannabis use could complicate one’s ability to give or interpret sexual consent. Within the response, ChatGPT highlighted symptoms associated with intoxication from cannabis and suggested these symptoms could impact consent communication and interpretation. At the close of the response, ChatGPT again restated that both parties should have an open and clear conversation about boundaries and what they want to happen during sexual activity if cannabis is being used. When asking ChatGPT these questions with more colloquial language, the responses were similar to the ones above (see Table 2), even when consent was not specifically mentioned in the prompt (e.g., “Can people agree to sex when they are high?”).

Reliability Check

When the three members of the research team asked ChatGPT the same questions, we saw many similarities across responses; however, there was some variability (see Appendix). For ChatGPT’s definition of consent, each response did mention consent was an agreement, that needed to be clear, enthusiastic, could be withdrawn at any point, and should not involve coercion. However, ChatGPT did not always mention that sexual activity without consent would result in a sexual assault or rape or that it involved respecting boundaries. In some of the responses the team received from ChatGPT about its definition of consent, the AI mentioned that substance use, or age could impact consent; however, this was not consistently present across responses.

For nonverbal consent, each response did mention that nonverbal cues need to be clear and unambiguous. The responses suggested that nonverbal cues help to understand consent but should not be the only way one interprets or understands consent. Further, ChatGPT stated that verbal and clear communication is best for consent. Across all four responses, ChatGPT mentioned body language as a nonverbal consent cue; however, in some responses, it provided more examples like facial expressions, eye contact, or moaning.

For verbal consent, all responses described verbal consent and gave examples on how to ask for or provide verbal consent outside of a traditional “yes” to sex. Responses to all researchers focused on verbal consent being clear, specific, and easy to understand. Finally, all responses emphasized attending to how a sexual partner responds and respecting their boundaries. Within these responses, only two mentioned that the goal of sex should be to have an enjoyable encounter and highlighted people should attend to both verbal and nonverbal cues during sexual activity.

For alcohol and cannabis use, across responses, ChatGPT emphasized that use of these substances can impact decision making and judgement. ChatGPT noted that, because of alcohol and cannabis’s impact on decision making, this could complicate someone’s ability to provide clear consent. Because of this, ensuring all persons engaging in sex are fully aware of what they are agreeing to is important. Across these responses, ChatGPT sometimes suggested to wait until individuals are sober enough to engage in sexual activity because sexual assaults can occur when substance use is involved. For cannabis, some responses explained how cannabis use could impact judgement and one response specifically stated that cannabis use’s influence on sexual consent is not well understood.

Discussion

Across these questions, ChatGPT provided information related to sexual consent that is generally consistent with what is provided in evidence-based psychoeducation and interventions. ChatGPT’s definition of sexual consent highlighted the key factors of sexual consent: enthusiastic, on-going, freely given, and reversible (Jozkowski, Peterson, et al., 2014; Planned Parenthood, 2023). ChatGPT discussed that sexual consent can be communicated nonverbally and verbally and that people should strive for clear and direct communication with one another—a recommendation often given in research and education initiatives. ChatGPT presented some cautionary remarks with alcohol, cannabis, and sexual consent and then communicated that if alcohol or cannabis and sexual consent were to occur together, sexual consent should be communicated verbally and clearly in these moments. Researchers who take a harm reduction approach with alcohol or cannabis and sexual consent provide similar recommendations (Jozkowski et al., 2022; Marcantonio & Jozkowski, 2021a). Given that ChatGPT provided responses reflective of the larger literature on sexual consent, ChatGPT could have multiple implications for sexual consent and, broadly, sexual health education. Below, we briefly review some of these implications, focusing on sexual consent. We also highlight some of the limitations or words of caution in using ChatGPT and other forms of AI within sexual consent research and education.

ChatGPT Implications for Sexual Consent Research

ChatGPT may have implications for research on sexual consent. First, ChatGPT is available across the US and worldwide, which means people can access this tool and the information provided from it anywhere they have an internet connection. Researchers could examine if, how, and when people are using ChatGPT to learn about sexual consent and the impact this has on someone’s behaviors, attitudes, or feelings. For instance, researchers could assess reasons for seeking information about sexual consent from ChatGPT or what questions people are asking ChatGPT about consent—similar to how people use social media or Google trends data to assess what information people are seeking on the internet. This would provide researchers with further insights into who, where, and why some people are seeking this information and elucidate what information about sexual health populations are seeking. Researchers could also assess what young people are asking ChatGPT about sexual consent or sexual health. For instance, are young people providing ChatGPT with scenarios or situations from their life and asking if they experienced a sexual assault, or are they asking ChatGPT questions similar to the ones posed in this review? Given the conversational nature of ChatGPT, researchers may also be interested in what follow up questions people ask ChatGPT after it provides a response.

Another path for research is assessing if someone asks ChatGPT about how sexual consent is communicated, what do they do with this information? If the behaviors conflict with how the person thinks consent should be communicated, does that change their attitudes around sexual consent? In other words, can ChatGPT be a tool for behavior change related to sexual consent? We are unsure! However, ChatGPT appears to provide another avenue for assessing how consent education could alter consent behaviors and attitudes. Within this area, researchers may also consider exploring the influence of ChatGPT as a tool for psychoeducation compared with more traditional methods of psychoeducation—such as in-person interventions with lectures, group-based discussions, or even online interventions that do not include AIs.

Outside of exploring how ChatGPT influences behaviors, researchers may also want to examine how questions related to sexual consent (and other topics) differ across various AIs. For instance, Microsoft has developed Bing and other companies are working on developing their own AIs. As these AIs continue to be developed and shared with the public, researchers can compare how different AIs respond to questions and explore similarities and differences in responses. This may be particularly helpful as AIs continue to develop, add additional safety parameters (e.g., against hate speech, greater inclusivity), and update the databases they use to generate responses. If one type of AI provides a more comprehensive, inclusive response than other AIs, then researchers, educators, and program developers can collaboratively work together to ensure similar responses occur across other AIs. Indeed, these types of studies will be needed and are an opportunity worth seizing as these AIs are positioned to continue to grow in popularity and access (Verma, 2023).

Responses from ChatGPT are generated from a larger language dataset and cultural contexts—which means ChatGPT reflects some of the current research and cultural conversations around different topics (OpenAI, personal communication, March 13, 2023). However, the software’s most current data sources stop at 2021. Researchers could assess ChatGPT’s responses to different sexual health topics to understand what information is currently available to the public on topics of interest—such as sexual consent—and if or how researchers should include this information in their research or interventions. Moreover, if the responses produced from ChatGPT relating to sexual consent (or any topic) do not reflect evidence-based literature or are misleading, researchers also need to be aware of this and work with OpenAI and other developers to ensure the information produced by AI is grounded within science. We did ask ChatGPT where we could go to learn more about consent and learn more about sex education. The AI did recommend reputable sources such as the CDC, RAINN, Planned Parenthood, and university courses or books to us.

While ChatGPT may have provided us with some reputable websites, we did ask ChatGPT to provide us references for the information it gave us and it created references to works that did not exist. This is a significant limitation of using ChatGPT and important to take into consideration when using ChatGPT for research and within interventions. If researchers want their responses to be evidence-based and include references from peer reviewed literature, they need to use other AI software that does have this capability such as Consensus (Consensus, 2023). Consensus allows users to ask questions (e.g., what is sexual consent?) and they would be directly linked to scientific research papers that are peer- reviewed and published that answer their proposed question. Consensus provides responses that are more reflective of academic language and may not be as accessible to people outside of academia. Whereas ChatGPT is using a variety of databases, and not all are scientific—which contributes to the AI’s more conversational tone when responding to people. In sum, depending on the goal of the study, researchers may choose to use different types of AI models in their research. Consensus may work better for finding articles for research studies or developing programs. ChatGPT may provide greater insight into how the larger public understands and accesses information.

ChatGPT Implications for Sexual Consent Education

From an educational perspective, there are several implications for how ChatGPT can be included in sexual health education and programs. First, sexual health educators can use ChatGPT to generate (potentially) evidence based and current information about sexual health for lesson-planning and providing education to their students. ChatGPT can provide information on a wide range of topics (as we have seen with sexual consent) but also contraception, HIV prevention, or STIs to list a few. Given how long research normally takes to reach the public (Morris et al., 2011), having quicker access to the most current research could ensure people stay informed and perhaps, help to reduce misinformation.

Second, within educators’ programs or lessons, ChatGPT can be used interactively by students to encourage them to ask questions about sexual health (OpenAI, personal communication, March 13, 2023). Students may be more comfortable asking questions of ChatGPT than a human educator, which could reduce barriers to comprehensive information and increase communication among a group. This benefit may be particularly important because some people could be hesitant to ask educators specific questions about what is (or is not) consent or if a certain behavior pushed on someone’s boundaries. ChatGPT can also make sexual health information more accessible to students who may not have access to a sexual health educator or may be too embarrassed to ask questions in person. Regarding sexual consent, this means that people who live in areas without comprehensive sexual health education, or sexual health education that is in line and reflective of their sexual identity, could have access to this information. As evidenced in our colloquial language prompts, questions to ChatGPT do not need to explicitly include consent for ChatGPT to volunteer information about consent. This is important because people with limited sexual health education might not have, or think to use, the vernacular to ask about consent specifically. Indeed, when we asked, “Can people have sex after drinking?” ChatGPT provided information on how alcohol can impact one’s ability to consent.

Third, across our responses, ChatGPT provided some consistent messaging around sexual consent; however, there were some differences as well. The differences seen across responses could be impactful for someone’s education about sexual consent. For instance, some responses from ChatGPT provided specific examples of how sexual consent could be communicated and others did not. Some responses reviewed that sex without consent is a rape or sexual assault and mentioned coercion and the need for consent to be freely given. Thus, when educators or researchers use ChatGPT, they should be mindful that the responses may share an overarching similarity, but depending on the goal of the program or study, some key factors may be missing from ChatGPT’s responses. Despite some of these differences in responses from ChatGPT, the AI may be beneficial to those who do not receive or are losing access to comprehensive and inclusive sexual health education. Indeed, recent legislative moves have been aimed at ensuring topics related to race, gender, and sexual identity are not discussed in classrooms (Cineas, 2023; USAFacts, 2022). Thus, sexual health educators may be unable to discuss certain topics with their students. ChatGPT is not subjected (yet) to the same restrictions on education as K-12 and higher education educators are and may provide a resource to those who need and want this information.

Finally, the focus of this paper has been on sexual consent and sexual relationships; however, ChatGPT could be helpful for broader campus health institutions and even K-12 health classes. For instance, campus health providers and health educators could ask ChatGPT common questions they are provided in classes and see how the AI responds to them to ensure the responses are not misleading. If comfortable with the responses, educators or campus health providers could encourage their students to use AIs and evaluate the responses from them. This would provide young people an opportunity to learn about these devices, learn how to critically evaluate the information provided to them, and provide greater opportunities for students to learn about health topics. Additionally, educators and campus health providers could provide ChatGPT information from their websites, classes, pamphlets, flyers, or other educational materials and ask ChatGPT to review this material for clarity, conciseness, and to generate common questions one may have based on this information. This would then provide health educators with feedback on their created deliverables and develop answers to commonly asked questions prior to introducing the topic to the intended audience.

Cautionary Remarks

Overall, we see ChatGPT as technology that could conceivably increase access to potentially reliable and valid information related to sexual consent, and perhaps other sexual health topics. However, there are a few limitations or points to consider with such AI models. First, as seen in our reliability check, the responses from ChatGPT are not identical across people. While some of the larger or key components of each question were the same, there were slight differences in how much ChatGPT expanded on their responses across three people. Thus, some people may receive more or less information depending on how much ChatGPT expands on the question being asked. Within these responses, ChatGPT also used different words, such as drunk, drinking, or high—without clarification on what constitutes these different behaviors and states of mind. Thus, researchers and educators should be mindful that young people may interpret these words differently and we may need to contextualize responses from ChatGPT further.

Second, ChatGPT and AIs continue to evolve at a rapid pace. This means that responses to questions about sexual consent may change dramatically as new text is used in the training of these models or new parameters are placed on the algorithm. If data sources were to change or expand, then the responses one receives could be less accurate or have a different emphasis. Additionally, the responses one receives from ChatGPT will depend on the questions asked and the level of detail in the question. Thus, our exploration provides only a snapshot of the current state of one such model based on one set of questions. ChatGPT’s responses to our questions were in line with research and current recommendations around sexual consent. Thus, the platform shows promise as a sexual health education tool; however, parents, educators, and researchers should continue to test the current version of the model before suggesting it as a resource to others. The question prompts we provide in this paper can serve as examples for such tests.

Third, the questions provided in this paper are all written in English, by researchers living in the US, and focused on a US understanding of sexual consent. How ChatGPT may respond to these questions in another language or how researchers, educators, and young people interpret those responses in another country should be further examined. While the research team was comprised of experts in sexual consent and health with adult and adolescent populations and we reflected and refined the colloquial language throughout the data collection, it is possible, or likely, that the terminology used and/or phrasing of questions does not reflect what an adolescent would specifically ask ChatGPT. Future research with ChatGPT should be done in collaboration with adolescents to understand how they would ask questions to ChatGPT and what information they would like to learn about from this AI.

Fourth, even though ChatGPT is highly advanced, there are still many cases where the responses are inaccurate or incomplete representations of the empirical literature (OpenAI, personal communication, March 13, 2023). Indeed, when logging onto ChatGPT the user must verify and understand that the responses may not be accurate. Inaccuracies can be due to limitations in the data ChatGPT was trained on or the algorithm. Machine learning AI such as ChatGPT, can also produce racist or sexist responses and OpenAI is working to place parameters within the software which would prevent hate speech (Markov et al., 2022a, 2022b; Verma, 2023). In addition to concerns about hateful speech, AI could also be used for misinformation and propaganda—such as providing inaccurate information on sexual consent or perpetuating victim blaming. OpenAI released a framework for mitigation on concerns for misinformation which involves developing models that are fact-sensitive and collaboration with governments to implement policy to guide what datasets can be used within OpenAI (Goldstein et al., 2023).

In addition to ChatGPT’s potential to produce incomplete, bigoted, or hate speech, there is also concern about the AIs ability to be inclusive and represent diversity in its responses. When we asked ChatGPT about sexual consent, the AI was gender neutral—it did not use pronouns. The AI also used the term “partners” and at times explicitly said consent could be communicated between two or more partners—recognizing that relationships extend beyond just two people. However, these are small steps within inclusivity. Certainly, approaching situations with a gender-neutral framework can increase inclusivity as all people could be “seen” in the response from ChatGPT. Yet, in being gender neutral (or neutral about any social identity) ChatGPT also fails to acknowledge that power is not equally shared among people. There are numerous power imbalances among people, be that through gender, race, sexual identity, immigration status, or native language, that could contribute to whose voice is listened to and acknowledged during sexual activity. Thus, as we continue to use these AI platforms, we may want to be mindful of who is “seen” in these responses and ensuring young people recognize that we still live in a society where everyone is not treated equally.

Fifth, ChatGPT does not have the emotional intelligence that human educators or practitioners possess, and ChatGPT is not sentient (OpenAI, personal communication, March 13, 2023). ChatGPT cannot recognize or respond appropriately to emotions expressed by students or provide empathy in certain situations. The lack of emotional intelligence and response could be particularly important when considering how sexual consent and sexual assault are inexplicably linked. Knowing that sexual consent and sexual assault are related, ensuring young people know that ChatGPT is not sentient is particularly important. Young people may turn to these AIs to assist with understanding sexual experiences that happen to them, such as asking ChatGPT if someone had sex with them while they were drunk, is this rape? Thus, if ChatGPT was to be used in educational programs related to sexual consent, educators should inform students of ChatGPT’s limitations, promote critical thinking, and ensure that if students want to discuss more sensitive issues, such as someone who experienced sexual assault victimization, they should come and speak with their teacher. We do want to highlight though that if someone reports being sexually assaulted to ChatGPT, the AI will provide them referral sources (Ayers et al., 2023).

Finally, there are concerns that ChatGPT could be seen as the “ultimate authority” on a topic or that the response ChatGPT produces is the only truth (Cooper, 2023). However, as scientists, we know that truth is complicated and often there are mixed findings in social science research. Thus, when using ChatGPT, in research or education, we should be mindful that what ChatGPT informs us should be further explored and compared against other research and resources. Further, just because ChatGPT is being informed by multiple databases, does not mean that the answers it provides are the right answer—they are just an answer, and may not always be the best answer. Taken together, just as we inform students in class that they should review multiple sources and develop an educated and informed opinion grounded in science, ChatGPT should be considered as another resource that we all still need to check and weigh against what is already present or known in the literature.

Conclusion

ChatGPT can be an empowering tool for understanding sexual consent. By providing evidence-based information, promoting communication, and increasing accessibility, ChatGPT can help individuals make informed decisions about their sexual health and promote healthy relationships. As technology continues to advance and shape the way we interact with information, recognizing the potential of ChatGPT and other AI-powered tools in supporting sexual consent and sexual health education and inspiring individuals to make positive choices is important. It is vital to stress that ChatGPT is not a replacement for human educators or sexual health professionals, and as similar technologies evolve, there is an ongoing need to ensure adolescents and young adults possess the skills to critically consume and apply information provided to them (Abrams, 2021; Breakstone et al., 2018; Musgrove et al., 2018; Pappas, 2022). In an ideal world, ChatGPT would serve as a valuable supplement to enhance sexual consent education and promote positive sexual experiences for all (OpenAI, personal communication, March 13, 2023). Until then, ChatGPT may a good source of information in areas where sexual education is limited, devalued, misleading, false, or not based in science.

Funding:

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Award Number K01AA028844 (Leone), L30AA028649 (Leone), L30AA031129 (Marcantonio), and K08AA029181 (Haikalis). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Appendix

ChatGPT’s Response to the Same Question Across Three Different Researchers

Question Response 1 Response 2 Response 3
Hey, ChatGPT! Can you define sexual consent for me? Yes, I can help with that!
Sexual consent is an enthusiastic, informed, and voluntary agreement between all parties involved in a sexual activity. It means that each person involved in the activity must clearly and freely communicate their willingness and understanding to engage in that activity.
Consent must be given without coercion, pressure, or manipulation. It must be obtained each time a sexual activity occurs, even if there was previous consent. Consent can also be withdrawn at any time during the activity, and it is the responsibility of all parties involved to respect and honor the withdrawal of consent.
It’s important to note that individuals must have the capacity to give consent, which means they must be of legal age and not under the influence of drugs or alcohol, among other things. Consent must also be given freely and not as a result of fear, intimidation, or threats.
In short, sexual consent is a clear and enthusiastic agreement between all parties involved in a sexual activity, given without coercion, pressure, or manipulation, and it must be obtained each time the activity occurs.
Certainly! Sexual consent is a mutual agreement between all parties involved in a sexual activity. It means that each person involved is willingly and enthusiastically agreeing to participate in the sexual activity without any coercion or pressure from the other party. Consent is given freely and can be revoked at any time. It must be given by individuals who have the capacity to give it, which means that they are of legal age and are not under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Consent should be communicated clearly and directly, and partners should respect each other’s boundaries and stop if someone withdraws their consent. Consent is necessary in all sexual interactions, regardless of the relationship between the parties involved. Sure, I’d be happy to help! Sexual consent refers to the agreement between two or more individuals to engage in sexual activity. It involves clear communication and mutual understanding between all parties involved about the type of sexual activity they want to engage in, and the willingness of each person to participate in it. Consent must be given freely, enthusiastically, and without coercion, pressure, or influence from drugs or alcohol. It is important to note that consent is ongoing and can be withdrawn at any time during sexual activity, and that silence or lack of resistance does not imply consent. All parties must be able to give informed and enthusiastic consent for sexual activity to be considered consensual.
Thank you. Can sexual consent be communicated nonverbally? Yes, sexual consent can be communicated nonverbally. Nonverbal communication can include body language, gestures, facial expressions, and sounds, among other things. For example, someone may initiate or respond to sexual activity through physical touch, or they may express their willingness to engage in a sexual activity through moaning or other sounds. However, it’s important to note that nonverbal communication can be ambiguous, and it may not always be clear or understood by all parties involved. Therefore, it’s crucial to ensure that there is open and clear communication about consent to avoid misunderstandings or confusion. Verbal communication is generally considered the most effective way to ensure that all parties involved have a clear understanding of each other’s intentions and boundaries. Yes, sexual consent can be communicated nonverbally. Nonverbal communication can include body language, facial expressions, and other forms of nonverbal cues that can be used to signal willingness or unwillingness to engage in sexual activity. However, it’s important to note that nonverbal communication can be easily misinterpreted or misunderstood, so it’s crucial to always communicate explicitly and clearly about what you’re comfortable with and what you’re not.
It’s also important to remember that relying solely on nonverbal cues can be risky, especially in situations where power dynamics are at play. In these situations, verbal communication is often necessary to ensure that all parties involved have a clear understanding of each other’s boundaries and intentions. Ultimately, the best way to ensure that everyone involved in a sexual interaction is on the same page is to have an open and honest conversation about what each person is comfortable with and what their boundaries are.
Consent can be communicated nonverbally, but it’s important to remember that it’s not always clear and can be easily misunderstood. While nonverbal cues such as body language, gestures, or facial expressions may indicate interest or attraction, they don’t necessarily mean that someone has given their consent to engage in sexual activity. It’s important to check in with your partner and explicitly ask for their consent before engaging in any sexual activity, even if they appear to be interested. The best way to ensure clear and enthusiastic consent is through open and honest communication with your partner, both verbally and nonverbally.
Thank you again! Can sexual consent be communicated verbally Yes, sexual consent can be communicated verbally. In fact, verbal communication is considered one of the most effective ways to ensure that all parties involved have a clear understanding of each other’s intentions and boundaries. Verbal communication can include explicitly asking for consent and providing affirmative responses, such as saying “yes” or “no” or expressing boundaries or limits. Using clear language and checking in with the other person can help ensure that all parties involved are on the same page and that consent is enthusiastic, informed, and voluntary. It’s important to remember that communication about consent should be ongoing and that individuals can withdraw their consent at any time Yes, verbal communication is a clear and effective way to communicate sexual consent. Verbal consent involves using words to clearly express your willingness to engage in sexual activity. This can include saying things like “yes, I want to have sex with you,” “I’m comfortable with this,” or “I don’t want to do that.” It’s important to be direct and specific in your communication to ensure that there is no confusion or ambiguity about what you’re consenting to.
Verbal communication is particularly important when navigating situations where power dynamics are at play, or when engaging in sexual activity with a new partner. It’s also important to remember that consent can be withdrawn at any time, and it’s essential to respect your partner’s wishes if they indicate that they no longer want to engage in sexual activity.
Overall, clear and direct verbal communication is a crucial part of obtaining and respecting sexual consent in all sexual interactions.
Yes, verbal communication is one of the most effective ways to obtain sexual consent. It’s important to ask for consent clearly and directly, using language that is easy to understand and free from any ambiguity. A simple question like “Is this okay with you?” or “Do you want to do this?” can be an effective way to obtain explicit consent. It’s also important to check in with your partner throughout sexual activity to ensure that they are still comfortable and willing to continue. Remember that consent can be withdrawn at any time, so it’s important to respect your partner’s boundaries and listen to their verbal and nonverbal cues. Effective communication is key to ensuring that sexual activity is consensual and enjoyable for all parties involved.
Thank you. Can sexual consent be communicated when people are drinking alcohol? Consent must be given without coercion, pressure, or manipulation, and it must be obtained each time a sexual activity occurs. When alcohol is involved, it can affect an individual’s judgment, decision-making, and ability to give or receive consent. Therefore, it is important to understand that alcohol and other drugs can impair someone’s ability to give clear and informed consent.
It’s not always easy to determine if someone is capable of giving consent when they have been drinking. A good rule of thumb is that if someone is visibly intoxicated, it’s not a good time to engage in sexual activity with them. If someone is under the influence of alcohol or drugs, they may not be able to give clear or enthusiastic consent, and it’s important to ensure that they are fully capable of making informed decisions before engaging in any sexual activity.
It’s also important to note that even if someone has given verbal or nonverbal consent while under the influence of alcohol, they can still withdraw their consent at any time. Ultimately, it’s important to prioritize clear and ongoing communication to ensure that all parties involved are comfortable and consenting throughout any sexual activity
Consent requires that all parties involved have the capacity to make a voluntary and informed decision, which means that they are not under the influence of drugs or alcohol. When someone is under the influence of alcohol, their judgment, decision-making abilities, and ability to communicate clearly can be impaired, making it difficult for them to give or receive consent.
Therefore, it’s important to be aware of the potential risks associated with engaging in sexual activity while under the influence of alcohol. If you or your partner are drinking, it’s best to wait until you are both sober and able to communicate clearly before engaging in sexual activity.
If you are uncertain about whether someone has given their consent while under the influence of alcohol, it’s important to err on the side of caution and not engage in sexual activity. Sexual activity without clear and enthusiastic consent is considered sexual assault, and it is never acceptable under any circumstances.
The topic of alcohol and sexual consent can be complex, and there is no easy answer. Alcohol consumption can impair judgment, affect decision-making abilities, and alter a person’s ability to give informed consent. While it is possible for someone to give consent while under the influence of alcohol, it’s important to be aware that their decision-making abilities may be compromised. In some cases, a person who has consumed alcohol may not be able to legally give consent, depending on the laws in their jurisdiction.
It’s important to avoid pressuring or coercing someone who has been drinking alcohol into engaging in sexual activity, and to err on the side of caution when it comes to obtaining consent. If you or your partner have been drinking, it’s a good idea to wait until you are both sober before engaging in sexual activity, as this can help ensure that everyone is able to give clear and informed consent.
Overall, communication is key to obtaining consent, regardless of whether alcohol is involved. It’s important to check in with your partner, listen to their verbal and nonverbal cues, and respect their boundaries at all times
Can sexual consent be communicated when people are using cannabis? Similar to alcohol, cannabis use can affect an individual’s judgment, decision-making, and ability to give or receive consent. The use of cannabis can impair cognitive and motor functioning, and it can also affect a person’s ability to communicate clearly. Therefore, it’s important to recognize that cannabis use can potentially impact someone’s ability to give or receive clear and informed consent.
If someone is using cannabis, it’s essential to ensure that they are capable of making informed decisions before engaging in any sexual activity. If they appear to be impaired or struggling to communicate, it’s not an appropriate time to initiate sexual activity. It’s crucial to have clear and ongoing communication about boundaries, expectations, and comfort levels to ensure that all parties involved are comfortable and consenting throughout any sexual activity.
It’s important to remember that consent must be enthusiastic, informed, and voluntary, and it must be obtained each time a sexual activity occurs. It’s also important to recognize that individuals can withdraw their consent at any time, and it’s essential to respect their boundaries and desires.
The issue of cannabis and sexual consent is still somewhat controversial and not well-understood, as the effects of cannabis on individuals can vary widely depending on a variety of factors such as dosage, mode of ingestion, and individual tolerance.
While some people may be able to use cannabis and still have the capacity to make informed and voluntary decisions about sexual activity, others may find that their judgment and ability to communicate clearly are impaired.
As with alcohol, it’s important to be aware of the potential risks associated with engaging in sexual activity while under the influence of cannabis. If you or your partner are using cannabis, it’s best to wait until you are both sober and able to communicate clearly before engaging in sexual activity.
If you are uncertain about whether someone has given their consent while under the influence of cannabis, it’s important to err on the side of caution and not engage in sexual activity. As always, it’s crucial to ensure that all parties involved are fully informed, comfortable, and enthusiastic about the sexual activity before proceeding.
The topic of cannabis and sexual consent is also complex, and it’s important to keep in mind that cannabis can also affect a person’s decision-making abilities and perception of reality, just like alcohol. While cannabis may not necessarily impair judgment or motor function in the same way that alcohol does, it can still have an impact on a person’s ability to give informed consent.
As with any sexual activity, clear and enthusiastic communication is key to obtaining consent when cannabis is involved. It’s important to check in with your partner and ensure that they are comfortable and willing to engage in sexual activity. If you or your partner feel that cannabis may be affecting your decision-making abilities or perception of reality, it may be best to wait until you are both sober before engaging in sexual activity.
It’s also important to remember that the legal status of cannabis varies depending on the jurisdiction, and the laws around consent and intoxication may differ as well. It’s always a good idea to familiarize yourself with the laws in your area and to seek legal advice if you have any questions or concerns.

References

  1. Abbey A (2002). Alcohol-related sexual assault: A common problem among college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement, s14, 118–128. 10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abbey A (2011). Alcohol’s role in sexual violence perpetration: Theoretical explanations, existing evidence and future directions: Alcohol and sexual violence perpetration. Drug and Alcohol Review, 30(5), 481–489. 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00296.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Abbey A (2017). Moving beyond simple answers to complex questions: How does context affect alcohol’s role in sexual assault perpetration? A commentary on Testa and Cleveland (2017). Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 78(1), 14–15. 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Abrams Z (2021). Controlling the spread of misinformation. Monitor on Psychology, 52, 44. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2021/03/controlling-misinformation [Google Scholar]
  5. Affirmative Consent and Respect. (2017). Affirmative consent campus policy report. http://affirmativeconsent.com/consentpolicy/
  6. Ayers JW, Zhu Z, Poliak A, Leas EC, Dredze M, Hogarth M, & Smith DM (2023). Evaluating artificial intelligence responses to public health questions. JAMA Network Open, 6(6), e2317517–e2317517./doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baiden P, Panisch LS, Kim YJ, LaBrenz CA, Kim Y, & Onyeaka HK (2021). Association between first sexual intercourse and sexual violence victimization, symptoms of depression, and suicidal behaviors among adolescents in the United States: Findings from 2017 and 2019 National Youth Risk Behavior Survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15), 7922. 10.3390/ijerph18157922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barak A, & Fisher WA (2001). Toward an internet‐driven, theoretically‐based, innovative approach to sex education. Journal of Sex Research, 38(4), 324–332. 10.1080/00224490109552103 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Beres MA (2022). From ignorance to knowledge: Sexual consent and queer stories. Feminism & Psychology, 32(2), 137–155. 10.1177/09593535211059003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Beres MA, Senn CY, & McCaw J (2014). Navigating ambivalence: How heterosexual young adults make sense of desire differences. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 765–776. 10.1080/00224499.2013.792327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bowman E (2022, December 19). A new AI chatbot might do your homework for you. But it’s still not an A+ student [NPR]. https://www.npr.org/2022/12/19/1143912956/chatgpt-ai-chatbot-homework-academia
  12. Breakstone J, McGrew S, Smith M, Ortega T, & Wineburg S (2018). Why we need a new approach to teaching digital literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(6), 27–32. 10.1177/0031721718762419 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Britannica ProCon. (2022, November 11). State-by-state medical marijuana laws. Britannica ProCon. https://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/legal-medical-marijuana-states-and-dc/ [Google Scholar]
  14. Center for Disease Control [CDC]. (2017). Sexual activity and contraceptive use among teenagers in the United States, 2011–2015 (National Health Statistics Report No. 104). https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/nchs_press_releases/2017/201706_NSFG.htm [PubMed]
  15. Center for Disease Control [CDC]. (2023, March 16). Youth engage in sexual risk behaviors. Sexual Risk Behaviors. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/sexualbehaviors/index.htm
  16. Chin M, Wamboldt A, Mellins CA, Hirsch JS, & Khan SR (2019). The temporal character of sexual consent among college students. Human Organization, 78(4), 335–344. 10.17730/0018-7259.78.4.335 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cineas F (2023, February 28). Ron DeSantis’s war on “woke” in Florida schools, explained. Vox. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/23593369/ron-desantis-florida-schools-higher-education-woke [Google Scholar]
  18. Common Sense Media. (2023). Parents and students are optimistic about AI, but parents have a lot to learn to catch up to their kids – and want rules and ratings to help them. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files/common-sense-ai-polling-memo-may-10-2023-final.pdf
  19. Consensus. (2023). Consensus. https://consensus.app
  20. Cooper G (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Curtis JN, & Burnett S (2017). Affirmative consent: What do college student leaders think about “Yes Means Yes” as the standard for sexual behavior? American Journal of Sexuality Education, 12, 201–214. 10.1080/15546128.2017.1328322 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Decker MJ, Atyam TV, Zárate CG, Bayer AM, Bautista C, & Saphir M (2021). Adolescents’ perceived barriers to accessing sexual and reproductive health services in California: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1), 1263. 10.1186/s12913-021-07278-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dickson E, Parshall M, & Brindis CD (2020). Isolated voices: Perspectives of teachers, school nurses, and administrators regarding implementation of sexual health education policy. Journal of School Health, 90(2), 88–98. 10.1111/josh.12853 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Drouin M, Jozkowski KN, Davis J, & Newsham G (2018). How does alcohol consumption affect perceptions of own and a drink partner’s ability to consent to sexual activity? Journal of Sex Research, 56, 740–753. 10.1080/00224499.2018.1509290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fennell R, & Grant B (2019). Discussing sexuality in health care: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28(17–18), 3065–3076. 10.1111/jocn.14900 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fowler LR, Schoen L, Smith HS, & Morain SR (2022). Sex education on TikTok: A content analysis of themes. Health Promotion Practice, 23(5), 739–742. 10.1177/15248399211031536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gabarron E, & Wynn R (2016). Use of social media for sexual health promotion: A scoping review. Global Health Action, 9(1), 32193. 10.3402/gha.v9.32193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Goldstein JA, Sastry G, Musser M, DiResta R, Gentzel M, & Sedova K (2023). Generative language models and automated influence operations: Emerging threats and potential mitigations. 10.48550/ARXIV.2301.04246 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Guttmacher Institute. (2020). Sex and HIV Education. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/sex-and-hiv-education
  30. Herbenick D, Fu T.-C. (Jane), Dodge B, & Fortenberry JD (2019). The alcohol contexts of consent, wanted sex, sexual pleasure, and sexual assault: Results from a probability survey of undergraduate students. Journal of American College Health, 67, 144–152. 10.1080/07448481.2018.1462827 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hirsch JS, Khan SR, Wamboldt A, & Mellins CA (2019). Social dimensions of sexual consent among cisgender heterosexual college students: Insights from ethnographic research. Journal of Adolescent Health, 64(1), 26–35. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Holmström C, Plantin L, & Elmerstig E (2020). Complexities of sexual consent: Young people’s reasoning in a Swedish context. Psychology & Sexuality, 11(4), 342–357. 10.1080/19419899.2020.1769163 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hunt G, Sanders E, Petersen MA, & Bogren A (2022). “Blurring the Line”: Intoxication, gender, consent, and sexual encounters among young adults. Contemporary Drug Problems, 49(1), 84–105. 10.1177/00914509211058900 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Javidi H, Widman L, Evans-Paulson R, & Lipsey N (2022). Internal consent, affirmative external consent, and sexual satisfaction among young adults. The Journal of Sex Research, 1–11. 10.1080/00224499.2022.2048628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jozkowski KN (2015). “Yes means yes”? Sexual consent policy and college students. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 47(2), 16–23. 10.1080/00091383.2015.1004990 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Jozkowski KN, Manning J, & Hunt ME (2018). Sexual consent in and out of the bedroom: Disjunctive views of heterosexual college students. Women’s Studies in Communication, 41, 117–139. https://doi.org/org/ 10.1080/07491409.2018.1470121 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jozkowski KN, Marcantonio TL, & Hunt ME (2017). College students’ sexual consent communication and perceptions of sexual double standards: A qualitative investigation. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 49(4), 237–244. 10.1363/psrh.12041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jozkowski KN, Marcantonio T, Willis Malachi, & Drouin M (2022). Does alcohol consumption influence people’s perceptions of their own and a drinking partner’s ability to consent to sexual behavior in a non-sexualized drinking context? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 088626052210801. 10.1177/08862605221080149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Jozkowski KN, Peterson ZD, Sanders SA, Dennis B, & Reece M (2014). Gender differences in heterosexual college students’ conceptualizations and indicators of sexual consent: Implications for contemporary sexual assault prevention education. Journal of Sex Research, 51(8), 904–916. 10.1080/00224499.2013.792326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Jozkowski KN, Sanders SA, Peterson ZD, Dennis B, & Reece M (2014). Consenting to sexual activity: The development and psychometric assessment of dual measures of consent. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 437–450. 10.1007/s1058-013-0225-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kitzinger C, & Frith H (1999). Just say no? The use of conversation anaylsis in developing a feminist perspective on sexual refusals. Discourse & Soceity, 10, 293–316. 10.1177/0957926599010003002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Koss MP, Swartout KM, Lopez EC, Lamade RV, Anderson EJ, Brennan CL, & Prentky RA (2022). The scope of rape victimization and perpetration among national samples of college students across 30 years. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(1–2), NP25–NP47. 10.1177/08862605211050103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Leone RM, Marcantonio T, Haikalis M, & Schipani-McLaughlin AM (2022). Barriers to addressing alcohol use in college sexual assault prevention: Where we stand and future steps. Current Addiction Reports, 9(4), 420–431. 10.1007/s40429-022-00455-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Marcantonio TL, & Jozkowski KN (2020). Assessing how gender, relationship status, and item working influence cues used by collge students to decline different sexual behaviors. Journal of Sex Research, 57(2), 260–272. 10.1080/00224499.2019.1659218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Marcantonio TL, & Jozkowski KN (2021a). Do college students feel confident to consent to sex after consuming alcohol? Journal of American College Health, 1–8. 10.1080/07448481.2021.1943413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Marcantonio TL, & Jozkowski KN (2021b). College students’ definition of non-consent and sexual refusals in the age of affirmative consent initiatives. Sex Education, 1–17. 10.1080/14681811.2021.2012446 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Marcantonio TL, Valdez D, & Jozkowski KN (2021). Assessing young adults’ internal feelings related to refusing sexual behavior. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(9), 1184–1193. 10.1080/00224499.2021.1958195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Marcantonio TL, Weese J, & Willis M (2022). Rates of forced sexual experiences among high school students from 2001 to 2019. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(21–22), NP21045–NP21069. 10.1177/08862605211055155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Marcantonio TL, & Willis M (2022). Examining substance-involved sexual experiences and consent communication by sexual identity. Psychology & Sexuality, 1–15. 10.1080/19419899.2022.2106884 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Marcantonio TL, Willis M, & Jozkowski KN (2020). Women’s sexual consent: Potential implications for sexual satisfaction. Current Sexual Health Reports, 12(3), 120–126. 10.1007/s11930-020-00267-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Marcantonio TL, Willis M, & Jozkowski KN (2022). Effects of typical and binge drinking on sexual consent perceptions and communication. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 48(3), 273–284. 10.1080/0092623X.2021.1986445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Markov T, Zhang C, Agarwal S, Eloundou T, Lee T, Adler S, Jiang A, & Weng L (2022a). A holistic approach to undesired content detection in the real world. 10.48550/ARXIV.2208.03274 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Markov T, Zhang C, Agarwal S, Eloundou T, Lee T, Adler S, Jiang A, & Weng L (2022b, August 10). New and improved content moderation tooling. OpenAI. https://openai.com/blog/new-and-improved-content-moderation-tooling [Google Scholar]
  54. Maxwell T (2022, December 20). 11 things you can do with ChatGPT. Make Use Of. https://www.makeuseof.com/things-you-can-do-with-chatgpt/
  55. Miller MK, Wickliffe J, Jahnke S, Linebarger JS, & Dowd D (2014). Accessing general and sexual healthcare: Experiences of urban youth. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 9(3), 279–290. 10.1080/17450128.2014.925170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Morning Consult. (2023). Teens and their schooling perspectives; A national polling report (pp. 1–34). https://edchoice.morningconsultintelligence.com/assets/221187.pdf
  57. Morris ZS, Wooding S, & Grant J (2011). The answer is 17 years, what is the question: Understanding time lags in translational research. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 104(12), 510–520. 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Muehlenhard C, Humphreys T, Jozkowski KN, & Peterson ZD (2016). The complexities of sexual consent among college students: A conceptual and empirical review. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 457–487. 10.1080/00224499.2016.1146651 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Musgrove AT, Powers JR, Rebar LC, & Musgrove GJ (2018). Real or fake? Resources for teaching college students how to identify fake news. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 25(3), 243–260. 10.1080/10691316.2018.1480444 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. O’Byrne R, Hansen S, & Rapley M (2008). “If a girl doesn’t say ‘no’…”: Young men, rape and claims of ‘insufficient knowledge.’ Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 18(3), 168–193. 10.1002/casp.922 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. O’Byrne R, Rapley M, & Hansen S (2006). “You couldn’t say ‘No’, could you?”: Young men’s understandings of sexual refusal. Feminism & Psychology, 16(2), 133–154. 10.1177/0959-353506062970 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. OpenAI. (2023, March 15). Introducing GPT-4, OpenAI’s most advanced system. https://openai.com
  63. Pappas S (2022). Fighting fake news in the classroom. Monitor on Psychology, 53, 87. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2022/01/career-fake-news [Google Scholar]
  64. Parker T, & ChatGPT (Directors). (2023, February 27). ChatGPT, dude (Season 26, Episode 4) [TV show]. Comedy Central. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/12/technology/chatgpt-schools-teachers.html [Google Scholar]
  65. Planned Parenthood. (2023). Sexual consent. Planned Parenthood. https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/relationships/sexual-consent [Google Scholar]
  66. Roose K (2023, January). Don’t ban Chat GPT in schools. Teach with it. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/12/technology/chatgpt-schools-teachers.html [Google Scholar]
  67. Ruby D (2023, February 8). ChatGPT statistics for 2023: Comprehensive facts and data. DemandSage. https://www.demandsage.com/chatgpt-statistics/ [Google Scholar]
  68. Simon L, & Daneback K (2013). Adolescents’ use of the internet for sex education: A thematic and critical review of the literature. International Journal of Sexual Health, 25(4), 305–319. 10.1080/19317611.2013.823899 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2021). 2021 NSDUH Detailed Tables. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2021-nsduh-detailed-tables
  70. Sundar S (2023, March 1). If you still aren’t sure what ChatGPT is, this is your guide to the viral chatbot that everyone is talking about. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about-chat-gpt-2023-1 [Google Scholar]
  71. UC San Diego Center for Gender Equity and Health (2019). Measuring #MeToo: A national study on sexual harassment and assault. https://gehweb.ucsd.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/2019-metoo-national-sexual-harassment-and-assault-report.pdf
  72. USAFacts. (2022, December 7). Which states passed laws restricting school curriculum? https://usafacts.org/articles/which-states-passed-laws-restricting-school-curriculum/
  73. van Teijlingen E, Reid J, Shucksmith J, Harris F, Philip K, Imamura M, Tucker J, & Penney G (2007). Embarrassment as a key emotion in young people talking about sexual health. Sociological Research Online, 12(2), 1–16. 10.5153/sro.1535 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Verma P (2023, March 14). What to know about OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/02/06/what-is-openai-chatgpt/ [Google Scholar]
  75. Willis M, Jozkowski KN, Bridges AJ, Veilleux JC, & Davis RE (2021). Assessing the Within-Person Variability of Internal and External Sexual Consent. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(9), 1173–1183. 10.1080/00224499.2021.1913567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Willis M, Marcantonio TL, & Jozkowski KN (2021). Internal and external sexual consent during events that involved alcohol, cannabis, or both. Sexual Health, 18(3), 260. 10.1071/SH21015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Yosifova A (2022). ChatGPT: How to understand and compete with the AI bot. 365 Data Science. https://365datascience.com/trending/chatgpt-how-to-understand-and-compete-with-the-ai-bot/ [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES