Abstract
Skyrmions hold great promise for low-energy consumption and stable high density information storage, and stabilization of the skyrmion lattice (SkX) phase at or above room temperature is greatly desired for practical use. The topological Hall effect can be used to identify candidate systems above room temperature, a challenging regime for direct observation by Lorentz electron microscopy. Atomically ordered FeGe thin films are grown epitaxially on Ge(111) substrates with ~ 4 % tensile strain. Magnetic characterization reveals enhancement of Curie temperature to 350 K due to strain, well above the bulk value of 278 K. Strong topological Hall effect was observed between 10 K and 330 K, with a significant increase in magnitude observed at 330 K. The increase in magnitude occurs just below the Curie temperature, a similar relative temperature position as the onset of Skx phase in bulk FeGe. The results suggest that strained FeGe films may host a SkX phase above room temperature when significant tensile strain is applied.
Magnetic skyrmions are topologically protected magnetic spin configurations that can have size of ~5 nm or less [1] and yet can be manipulated using ultra-low current densities on the order of ~106 A/m2, much less than that required for driving ferromagnetic domain walls [2–6]. These properties have attracted significant interest for spintronic applications as they could provide high information density at low power in a non-volatile package. However, widespread use of skyrmion technology requires new technological approaches [7] and new materials with sufficient Curie temperature to enable the skyrmions at or just above room temperature. Skyrmions exist in either bulk chiral magnets lacking inversion symmetry or at the interface of magnetic multilayer stacks lacking mirror inversion symmetry [8–12]. Due to inversion symmetry breaking, the neighboring spins evolve at a finite angle with respect to each other to form the non-collinear spin textures [3, 13–16] as a result of competition between the spin-orbit coupling induced Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) interaction and symmetric Heisenberg exchange interaction.
Skyrmion crystal lattice (SkX) phases have been observed directly by a variety of techniques: in B20 FeGe [2] and MnSi [17] using Lorentz transmission electron microscopy (LTEM), FeCoSi [18] and Co8Zn8Mn4 [19] using small-angle neutron scattering (SANS), and in Fe/Ir multilayer stacks using spin-resolved scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) [9]. The potential for skyrmionic behavior can also be detected by topological Hall effect (THE) measurements [20, 21] and ac magnetic susceptibility measurements [22]. Recently, antiskyrmions-analogous to skyrmions, but with opposite topological charge - have been demonstrated by LTEM in Heusler compounds with symmetry well above room temperatures [23]. Although topological Hall effect (THE) measurements are not conclusive, they have the advantage of being widespread, and unlike the previous techniques can be readily performed at room temperature without modification or concerns of thermal signal broadening.
A major obstacle to integrating skyrmions into spintronic devices is their instability in the absence of a magnetic field, since topological protection does not guarantee skyrmion stability against thermal agitation. In thin films with thickness less than or comparable to that of the helical wavelength, the helical ground state is suppressed, favoring skyrmion formation over a wide range of temperatures [2]. Magnetic multilayer stacks are fertile playgrounds to generate skyrmions, as they have high operating temperature [12, 24, 25], but the required current density to drive skyrmions in magnetic multilayer stacks (~1011 A/m2 [24]) is much higher than in B20 compounds (~106 A/m2 [4, 6]). In addition, magnetic multilayer stacks have a longer helical wavelength resulting in lower skyrmion density in the SkX phase [3, 26].
Studies have shown that the ordering temperature, , can be tuned in B20 magnets via substrate-induced strain [27, 28]. FeGe is an obvious candidate as it has the highest known [2–4] within this class. In this letter, we report epitaxial growth of FeGe thin films on Ge(111) substrates, demonstrate strain induced enhancement, and topological Hall resistivity (THE) above transition temperature comparable to those seen previously in SkX phases [20, 27], suggesting potential SkX formation above room temperature.
Epitaxial FeGe films of thickness 18 nm, 72 nm, and 102 nm were grown on Ge(111) substrates in an Ar atmosphere by sputter beam epitaxy, utilizing shuttered and beam-shaped off-axis direct-current (DC) magnetron co-sputtering of elemental Fe and Ge targets [29–31]. Films were grown with base pressure 6.7 × 10−7 Pa (5 × 10−9 Torr), growth pressure 0.7 Pa (5 mTorr), and substrate temperature 300 °C. An Al capping layer (~ 2.7 nm) was deposited at 100 °C in order to prevent intermixing with the FeGe layer.
Energy dispersive x-ray (EDX) spectroscopy and Rutherford back-scattering (RBS) determined the stoichiometry of both films in this study to be 51 % ± 3 % Fe and 49 % ± 3 % Ge. Crystal structure, epitaxial quality, and film thickness were measured with x-ray diffraction (XRD) and x-ray reflectivity (XRR). Fig. 1(a) shows the out of plane x-ray diffraction for 18 nm thick FeGe films (see Supplemental Material [32] for detailed XRD results of all three films). Pronounced Laue oscillations in the XRD patterns indicate a smooth film-substrate interface. The out of plane <111> d-spacing is 2.487(2) Å, 7.9 % smaller than the bulk 2.701 Å and indicative of a high tensile epitaxial strain [33–35]. Off-axis measurements show axial distortion of the (100) peak, suggesting rhombohedral distortion due to epitaxial strain [36]. Measurements taken in the and [201] directions suggest a rhombohedral angle and an in-plane lattice constant of 4.87(4) Å, matching the Ge substrate lattice constant of 5.658 Å with 30° in-plane rotation (4.899 Å). Although the error in estimating an in-plane lattice constant with rhombohedral distortion and mosaic twinning (see below) is significant, the above values are not found to change appreciably in the 72 nm film and so we can safely assume our film maintains the 4.1 % tensile epitaxial strain indicated by the lattice mismatch.
The rocking curve scan of the FeGe(111) peak is shown in Fig. 1(b). A full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 0.06° is measured, with a sharp peak (fit as blue dashed line, FWHM 0.04°) overlaid with a broader mosaic spread peak (black solid line) likely from in-plane (black solid line) likely from in-plane twinned regions in the film. This mosaic feature implies that the FeGe (111) planes are distorted within a small angular range from the substrate (111) plane to compensate for lattice mismatch while maintaining epitaxy.
The 72 nm FeGe film was imaged by aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) (see Supplementary Material [32] for details). The atomic resolution high-angle annular dark-field imaging (HAADF) image in Fig. 2(b) (top) shows the formation of the B20 phase, with its corresponding atomic model [37] and crystallographic orientation in Fig. 2(c) (top). Fig. 2(b) (bottom) shows the Ge(111) substrate and the Ge-FeGe interface, with the corresponding crystal and orientation of Ge(111) substrate shown in Fig. 2(c) (bottom).
We observe a ~ 1 nm thick interfacial layer between the Ge substrate and the FeGe films, as shown in Fig. 2(b) (bottom), possibly due to imperfect epitaxy or defects left on the substrate surface during pre-growth oxide removal by HCl etch. The film also shows small regions of non-uniform crystal orientation (B20) within the film: Fig. 2(d) shows a wide field-of-view HAADF image with two regions highlighted as I (blue) and II (red). The respective fast Fourier transform (FFT) patterns of regions I and II are shown in Fig. 2(e), which suggests different crystal orientation for these two regions. The presence of small twinned volumes is corroborated semiquantatively by 60° offset twinning peaks in XRD Phi () scan (see FIG. S3, Supplemental Material [32]) where the intensity of twinned volumes is ~1 % of that of the primary orientation peak intensities. The different crystal orientation observed in TEM corroborates the twinning observed in XRD and explains the mosaicity spread observed in rocking curve measurements.
Magnetic properties were measured using a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer. Magnetic hysteresis measured in the in-plane and out-of-plane geometry at 10 K to 350 K are shown in Figs. 3(a) and (b) respectively. We obtained a saturation magnetization per formula unit (f.u). at 10 K for the 18 nm thick film. Fig. 3(c) shows an M as a function of T curve for the same film at an applied field of 0.1 T. The transition temperature is found to be 350 K using the Arrott plot technique [38], showing a strong Curie temperature enhancement compared to the bulk value of 278 K [2–4]. While the magnetic spins in bulk FeGe arrange themselves in a conical fashion along the body diagonal [111] crystallographic direction, strain along the body diagonal [111] decreases the distance between the nearest Fe planes, thereby increasing the strength of exchange interaction and favoring strong polarization of magnetic moments. Thus, more thermal energy is required to disrupt the magnetic moments and Curie temperature is enhanced.
Broadband ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) spectroscopy was used to probe the magnetic dynamic properties of strained FeGe films at room temperature. The raw FMR signal was fitted using a Lorentzian line-shape [39] in order to extract the resonance field and peak to peak linewidth, . The out of plane data were fitted using the Kittel formula to determine the gyromagnetic ratio and effective magnetization at RT which were found to be 21.97 ± 0.51 GHz/T and 620 ± 9 kA/m respectively. The observed value for is lower than for typical ferromagnetic materials ( for ), this may be attributed to the fact that the sample is not fully saturated even for the largest field in FMR experiment (1.6 T). FMR measurement in the unsaturated regime can underestimate the value for while at the same time overestimating the effective magnetization [40] for the out of plane configuration. If the samples are not fully saturated, then one may assume, to the first approximation, that effective magnetization has a linear response to the applied field, which would validate the observed lower value of for the out-of-plane configuration. Fig. 4 also shows a nonlinear frequency dependence on for the out-of-plane configuration at fields smaller than 1.2 T. This may be due to the non-collinear spin texture in FeGe film [28].
The effective Gilbert damping parameter, , is determined by fitting the measured linewidths, , as a linear function of the microwave frequency [41–43],
(1) |
assuming there is no field dragging of magnetization, where is the microwave frequency. The extrinsic linewidth for the out of plane configuration was determined to be 0.0251 ± 0.0006 T, less than that observed by Turgut et al. [44]. Similarly, the effective damping parameter, , was found to be 0.01 ± 0.001, which is significantly smaller than ; reported by Beg et al. [45] and smaller than at T = 258 K; observed by Turgut et al. [44] for FeGe film grown on Si(111) substrates.
Topological Hall resistivity data at a series of temperatures (10 K to 330 K) for a field range spanning from negative to positive are shown in Fig. 5. A standard Hall bar structure was patterned from 18 nm thick FeGe film for electrical Hall measurements. Both the longitudinal () and transverse Hall () resistivity measurements were taken using a probe station at 10 K, 100 K, 290 K, 300 K, and 330 K. An electron traversing through the skyrmionic texture follows the local magnetization profile and is deflected by Lorentz force due to an emergent magnetic field, thus giving rise to the topological Hall effect [3, 27, 46–51], a signature of skyrmionic phase [46]. The total Hall effect can be expressed as
(2) |
where is the applied magnetic field, is the out-of-plane magnetization, and are the ordinary and anomalous Hall coefficients, and is the topological Hall resistivity. The ordinary Hall effect scales with , whereas the anomalous Hall effect scales with the magnetization of the sample. Two types of scattering contribute to the anomalous Hall effect; scattering independent mechanism (), and skew-scattering () mechanism caused by impurities and phonons [50]. It can be expressed as
(3) |
where is the longitudinal resistivity. The magnetoresistance, defined as , across all temperatures was found to be less than 0.02 % suggesting to be constant with applied magnetic field. The intrinsic contribution to the anomalous Hall effect depends on the details of the band structure and is largely scattering independent. The total anomalous Hall effect can be approximated to be dominated by scattering independent mechanism and the contribution from the skew scattering mechanism can be ignored [52] as previously shown for FeGe thin films [20, 53, 54]. At fields greater than saturation field, FeGe films are in a field polarized state, meaning . The total Hall resistivity can then be plotted as a function of magnetization, can be quantified - from the intercept, and - from the slope [53]. The topological Hall resistivity () is then obtained by subtracting ordinary and anomalous Hall resistivities from the total Hall resistivity.
As shown in Fig. 5, the 18 nm film exhibits clear topological Hall resistivity hysteresis loops with strong non-zero values at zero fields up to 300 K, demonstrating a non-collinear phase up to RT. A significant topological Hall effect is observed at 10 K which gradually decreases up to 290 K and then sharply increases at 330 K. This temperature, relative to , is consistent with the temperature range expected for skyrmion lattice formation in bulk FeGe and B20 magnets in general [6, 20]. This observed value at 330 K is significantly larger than in metallic multilayers [25] and in unstrained FeGe thin films [20]. Significant directional dependence for the maximum is observed at 330 K at ± 0.4 T when the field is scanned from positive (negative) to negative (positive). It should be noted that competing magnetic phases (e.g. helical and conical) can persist at the low-temperature regime. These phases can potentially contribute to the topological Hall resistivity and cannot be excluded completely. As shown in Fig. 6, the maximum value of remains relatively constant close to RT and then suddenly spikes above RT, whereas the squareness of plummets above 200 K, suggesting a possible metastable SkX phase.
The topological Hall effect is frequently attributed as a signature of the magnetic spin texture and the observed Hall anomaly close to reminiscent of the skyrmion lattice phase. However, it is worth recalling that other mechanisms have been either theorized or observed to contribute to the total Hall effect in chiral magnets with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, e.g. thermal fluctuations of topological excitations [55, 56]. However, the magnitude of observed THE in our film is much larger and so can probably be ruled out as this thermal effect. The increased noise level at 330 K at lower fields departing from the field polarized state can be attributed to low current needed to measure Hall data on a film on narrow-bandgap Ge substrate at elevated temperature without exceeding 2 % leakage current during the measurement. Attempts to perform LTEM at elevated temperature have been unsuccessful as data acquisition is greatly affected above room temperature. Small angle neutron scattering is proposed to resolve this issue and corroborate skyrmion formation in strained FeGe thin films.
In conclusion, we have grown phase-pure epitaxial FeGe films on Ge(111) substrate with coherent ~4 % tensile strain, and demonstrate strain induced enhancement well above room temperature while preserving B20 crystal structure, albeit with slight structural distortions. A small value for the effective Gilbert damping parameter is measured compared to previous reports, critical for potential application in spintronics. Additionally, significant at zero field is observed in a wide temperature window from 10 K to 330 K and a strong at 330 K close to observed with distinct TH peaks at ± 0.4 T. These features can be attributed to the emergent magnetic field caused by the non-collinear spin arrangement and suggest potential skyrmion formation above room temperature.
Acknowledgments
Support is acknowledged from the National Science Foundation grants: NSF-CAREER Grant No. 1452670 (A.S.); DMR-1806147 (A.S.T. and R.M.); DMR-1904446 (M.E.J.); DMR-1905662 (D.H). Support is acknowledged from NASA Grant NASA CAN80NSSC18M0023 (T.M.). The authors (T.J.A, A.D.K.,K.D.H. and J.C.G.) would like to acknowledge the Office of Naval Research. Aberration-corrected STEM experiments were conducted at the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is a Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility, through a user project.
References
- [1].Wang X, Yuan H, and Wang X, A theory on skyrmion size, Communications Physics 1, 1 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- [2].Yu X, Kanazawa N, Onose Y, Kimoto K, Zhang W, Ishiwata S, Matsui Y, and Tokura Y, Near room-temperature formation of a skyrmion crystal in thin-films of the helimagnet FeGe, Nature Materials 10, 106 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Nagaosa N. and Tokura Y, Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions, Nature Nanotechnology 8, 899 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Yu X, Kanazawa N, Zhang W, Nagai T, Hara T, Kimoto K, Matsui Y, Onose Y, and Tokura Y, Skyrmion flow near room temperature in an ultralow current density, Nature Communications 3, 988 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Fert A, Cros V, and Sampaio J, Skyrmions on the track, Nature Nanotechnology 8, 152 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Jonietz F, Mühlbauer S, Pfleiderer C, Neubauer A, Münzer W, Bauer A, Adams T, Georgii R, Böni P, Duine RA, et al. , Spin transfer torques in MnSi at ultralow current densities, Science 330, 1648 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Cheng R, Li M, Sapkota A, Rai A, Pokhrel A, Mewes T, Mewes C, Xiao D, De Graef M, and Sokalski V, Magnetic domain wall skyrmions, Physical Review B 99, 184412 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- [8].Fert A, Reyren N, and Cros V, Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications, Nature Reviews Materials 2, 17031 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- [9].Heinze S, Von Bergmann K, Menzel M, Brede J, Kubetzka A, Wiesendanger R, Bihlmayer G, andBlügel S, Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions, Nature Physics 7, 713 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- [10].Romming N, Hanneken C, Menzel M, Bickel JE, Wolter B, von Bergmann K, Kubetzka A, and Wiesendanger R, Writing and deleting single magnetic skyrmions, Science 341, 636 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Chen G, Ma T, NDiaye AT, Kwon H, Won C, Wu Y, and Schmid AK, Tailoring the chirality of magnetic domain walls by interface engineering, Nature Communications 4, 2671 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Moreau-Luchaire C, Moutafis C, Reyren N, Sampaio J, Vaz C, Van Horne N, Bouzehouane K, Garcia K, Deranlot C, Warnicke P, et al. , Additive interfacial chiral interaction in multilayers for stabilization of small individual skyrmions at room temperature, Nature Nanotechnology 11, 444 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Dzyaloshinsky I, A thermodynamic theory of weak ferro-magnetism of antiferromagnetics, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 4, 241 (1958). [Google Scholar]
- [14].Moriya T, Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev 120, 91 (1960). [Google Scholar]
- [15].Binz B. and Vishwanath A, Theory of helical spin crystals: Phases, textures, and properties, Phys. Rev. B 74, 214408 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Han JH, Zang J, Yang Z, Park J-H, and Nagaosa N, Skyrmion lattice in a two-dimensional chiral magnet, Phys. Rev. B 82, 094429 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- [17].Mühlbauer S, Binz B, Jonietz F, Pfleiderer C, Rosch A, Neubauer A, Georgii R, and Böni P, Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet, Science 323, 915 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Yu X, Onose Y, Kanazawa N, Park J, Han J, Matsui Y, Nagaosa N, and Tokura Y, Real-space observation of a two-dimensional skyrmion crystal, Nature 465, 901 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Karube K, White J, Reynolds N, Gavilano J, Oike H, Kikkawa A, Kagawa F, Tokunaga Y, Rønnow HM,Tokura Y, et al. , Robust metastable skyrmions and their triangular–square lattice structural transition in a hightemperature chiral magnet, Nature Materials 15, 1237 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Gallagher JC, Meng KY, Brangham JT, Wang HL, Esser BD, McComb DW, and Yang FY, Robust Zero-Field Skyrmion Formation in FeGe Epitaxial Thin Films, Phys. Rev. Lett 118, 027201 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Oike H, Kikkawa A, Kanazawa N, Taguchi Y, Kawasaki M, Tokura Y, and Kagawa F, Interplay between topological and thermodynamic stability in a metastable magnetic skyrmion lattice, Nature Physics 12, 62 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- [22].Wilhelm H, Baenitz M, Schmidt M, Rößler U, Leonov A, and Bogdanov A, Precursor phenomena at the magnetic ordering of the cubic helimagnet FeGe, Physical Review Letters 107, 127203 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Nayak AK, Kumar V, Ma T, Werner P, Pippel E, Sahoo R, Damay F, Rößler UK, Felser C, and Parkin SS, Magnetic antiskyrmions above room temperature in tetragonal Heusler materials, Nature 548, 561 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Woo S, Litzius K, Krüger B, Im M-Y, Caretta L, Richter K, Mann M, Krone A, Reeve RM, Weigand M, et al. , Observation of room-temperature magnetic skyrmions and their current-driven dynamics in ultrathin metallic ferromagnets, Nature Materials 15, 501 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Soumyanarayanan A, Raju M, Oyarce AG, Tan AK, Im M-Y, Petrović AP, Ho P, Khoo K, Tran M, Gan C, et al. , Tunable room-temperature magnetic skyrmions in Ir/Fe/Co/Pt multilayers, Nature Materials 16, 898 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Maccariello D, Legrand W, Reyren N, Garcia K, Bouzehouane K, Collin S, Cros V, and Fert A, Electrical detection of single magnetic skyrmions in metallic multilayers at room temperature, Nature Nanotechnology 13, 233 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Li Y, Kanazawa N, Yu XZ, Tsukazaki A, Kawasaki M, Ichikawa M, Jin XF, Kagawa F, and Tokura Y, Robust Formation of Skyrmions and Topological Hall Effect Anomaly in Epitaxial Thin Films of MnSi, Phys. Rev. Lett 110, 117202 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Zhang S, Stasinopoulos I, Lancaster T, Xiao F, Bauer A, Rucker F, Baker A, Figueroa A, Salman Z, Pratt F, et al. , Room-temperature helimagnetism in FeGe thin films, Scientific Reports 7, 123 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Hauser AJ, Williams REA, Ricciardo RA, Genc A, Dixit M, Lucy JM, Woodward PM, Fraser HL, and Yang F, Unlocking the potential of halfmetallic Sr2FeMoO6 films through controlled stoichiometry and double-perovskite ordering, Phys. Rev. B 83, 014407 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- [30].Peters B, Alfonsov A, Blum C, Hageman SJ, Woodward P, Wurmehl S, Büchner B, and Yang F, Epitaxial films of Heusler compound Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5 with high crystalline quality grown by off-axis sputtering, Applied Physics Letters 103, 162404 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- [31].Budhathoki S, Sapkota A, Law KM, Nepal B, Ranjit S, Shambhu K, Mewes T, and Hauser AJ, Low gilbert damping and linewidth in magnetostrictive fega thin films, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 496, 165906 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- [32].Supplemental Material for “Room Temperature Skyrmion Formation in Strain Engineered FeGe thin films”,.
- [33].Wilhelm H, Schmidt M, Cardoso-Gil R, Burkhardt U, Hanfland M, Schwarz U, and Akselrud L, Structural investigations of ε-FeGe at high pressure and low temperature, Science and Technology of Advanced Materials 8, 416 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- [34].Pedrazzini P, Wilhelm H, Jaccard D, Jarlborg T, Schmidt M, Hanfland M, Akselrud L, Yuan H, Schwarz U, Grin Y, et al. , Metallic state in cubic FeGe beyond its quantum phase transition, Physical review letters 98, 047204 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Lebech B, Bernhard J, and Freltoft T, Magnetic structures of cubic FeGe studied by small-angle neutron scattering, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 1, 6105 (1989). [Google Scholar]
- [36].De Graef M. and McHenry ME, Structure of Materials: An Introduction to Crystallography, Diffraction and Symmetry (Cambridge University Press, 2012). [Google Scholar]
- [37].RICHARDSON M, Crystal Structure Refinements of the 20 and Monoclinic (CoGe-type) Polymorphs of FeGe, Acta Chem. Scand 21, 11 (1967). [Google Scholar]
- [38].Arrott A. and Noakes JE, Approximate Equation of State For Nickel Near its Critical Temperature, Physical Review Letters 19, 786 (1967). [Google Scholar]
- [39].Oates C, Ogrin F, Lee S, Riedi P, Smith G, and Thomson T, High field ferromagnetic resonance measurements of the anisotropy field of longitudinal recording thin-film media, Journal of Applied Physics 91, 1417 (2002). [Google Scholar]
- [40].Khodadadi B, Mohammadi JB, Mewes C, Mewes T, Manno M, Leighton C, and Miller CW, Enhanced spin pumping near a magnetic ordering transition, Phys. Rev. B 96, 054436 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- [41].Mewes CK and Mewes T, Relaxation in Magnetic Materials for Spintronics, Handbook of Nanomagnetism, 71 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- [42].Heinrich B, Cochran J, and Hasegawa R, FMR line-broadening in metals due to two-magnon scattering, Journal of Applied Physics 57, 3690 (1985). [Google Scholar]
- [43].McMichael RD, Twisselmann DJ, and Kunz A, Localized Ferromagnetic Resonance in Inhomogeneous Thin Films, Phys. Rev. Lett 90, 227601 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Turgut E, Park A, Nguyen K, Moehle A, Muller DA, and Fuchs GD, Chiral magnetic excitations in FeGe films, Phys. Rev. B 95, 134416 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- [45].Beg M, Albert M, Bisotti M-A, Cortés-Ortuño D, Wang W, Carey R, Vousden M, Hovorka O, Ciccarelli C, Spencer CS, Marrows CH, and Fangohr H, Dynamics of skyrmionic states in confined helimagnetic nanostructures, Phys. Rev. B 95, 014433 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- [46].Neubauer A, Pfleiderer C, Binz B, Rosch A, Ritz R, Niklowitz P, and Böni P, Topological Hall effect in the A phase of MnSi, Physical Review Letters 102, 186602 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Kanazawa N, Onose Y, Arima T, Okuyama D, Ohoyama K, Wakimoto S, Kakurai K, Ishiwata S, and Tokura Y, Large Topological Hall Effect in a Short-Period Helimagnet MnGe, Phys. Rev. Lett 106, 156603 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Zang J, Mostovoy M, Han JH, and Nagaosa N, Dynamics of Skyrmion Crystals in Metallic Thin Films, Phys. Rev. Lett 107, 136804 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Schulz T, Ritz R, Bauer A, Halder M, Wagner M, Franz C, Pfleiderer C, Everschor K, Garst M, and Rosch A, Emergent electrodynamics of skyrmions in a chiral magnet, Nature Physics 8, 301 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- [50].Nagaosa N, Sinova J, Onoda S, MacDonald AH, and Ong NP, Anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys 82, 1539 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- [51].Pfleiderer C. and Rosch A, Condensed-matter physics: Single skyrmions spotted, Nature 465, 880 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Tsymbal EY and Zutic I, Handbook of Spin Transport and Magnetism (CRC press, 2011). [Google Scholar]
- [53].Huang SX and Chien CL, Extended Skyrmion Phase in Epitaxial FeGe(111) Thin Films, Phys. Rev. Lett 108, 267201 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Porter N, Gartside JC, and Marrows C, Scattering mechanisms in textured FeGe thin films: Magnetoresistance and the anomalous Hall effect, Physical Review B 90, 024403 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- [55].Hou W-T, Yu J-X, Daly M, and Zang J, Thermally driven topology in chiral magnets, Physical Review B 96, 140403 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- [56].Wang W, Daniels MW, Liao Z, Zhao Y, Wang J, Koster G, Rijnders G, Chang C-Z, Xiao D, and Wu W, Spin chirality fluctuation in two-dimensional ferromagnets with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, Nature materials, 1 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]