Skip to main content
Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online logoLink to Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online
. 2024 Mar 13;20:11769343231217908. doi: 10.1177/11769343231217908

Draft Genome Sequence of Pantoea sp. Strain MHSD4, a Bacterial Endophyte With Bioremediation Potential

Dimpho Michelle Morobane 1, Khuthadzo Tshishonga 1, Mahloro Hope Serepa-Dlamini 1,
PMCID: PMC10938601  PMID: 38487815

Abstract

Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 is a bacterial endophyte isolated from the leaves of the medicinal plant Pellaea calomelanos. Here, we report on strain MHSD4 draft whole genome sequence and annotation. The draft genome size of Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 is 4 647 677 bp with a G+C content of 54.2% and 41 contigs. The National Center for Biotechnology Information Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline tool predicted a total of 4395 genes inclusive of 4235 protein-coding genes, 87 total RNA genes, 14 non-coding (nc) RNAs and 70 tRNAs, and 73 pseudogenes. Biosynthesis pathways for naphthalene and anthracene degradation were identified. Putative genes involved in bioremediation such as copA, copD, cueO, cueR, glnGm, and trxC were identified. Putative genes involved in copper homeostasis and tolerance were identified which may suggest that Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 has biotechnological potential for bioremediation of heavy metals.

Keywords: Pantoea, whole genome sequencing, bioremediation, bacterial endophyte

Introduction

Endophytes are microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi, that colonize and inhabit plant tissues for all or part of their life cycle without causing harm or damage to the host plant. This community of microbes forms beneficial relationship with their plant host counterpart and exhibit plant growth and development properties through the production of unique and various biochemical compounds.1,2 Of interest in this study are bacterial endophytes, which like fungal endophytes are known to provide nitrogen-fixation benefits to the plant and may secrete secondary metabolites and siderophores, which allow for pathogenic resistance and absorption of iron in host plants. 3 Furthermore, the interactions between endophytic bacteria and plants promote plant’s ability to withstand extreme and unfavorable environmental conditions. 4

Pantoea species are widely distributed in nature and have been isolated from various ecological habitats such as soil, water, animals, the human gut and plants. 5 The genus Pantoea belongs to the family Erwiniaceae and is composed of over 20 recognized species with the genus type species as Pantoea agglomerans. 6 The members of Pantoea are Gram-negative, facultative anaerobic, rod-shaped, commonly motile, and are yellow-pigmented due to the production of carotenoids.7,8 Endophytic Pantoea species produce antimicrobials such as pantocin A and B as well as D-alanylgriseoluteic acid (AGA) and may possess bioremediation potential.6,9

Bioremediation is a cleaning-up technique in polluted environments by transforming enzymes during the biosorption of different toxic metals.10,11 The environmental pollution due to various toxic metals is a serious concern in the food sector because of decreasing crop yields and food quality due to the overuse of fertilizer, mulching, and agricultural pesticides which cause heavy metal pollution of soils. 12 Bioremediation has been identified as a good technique for controlling pollution and treatment of toxins. Several studies have shown that endophytes can be used in bioremediation techniques because of their ability to improve plant response to a range of stressors. 13 Endophytes improve the ability of plants to survive in various environmental conditions such as drought, nitrogen deficiency, pathogens, and salinity, and such impact has a very important contribution to the bioremediation of heavy metals. 14

Whole genome sequence analysis of bacterial endophytes is a valuable tool that is necessary for the identification of genes that are responsible for key endophytic biochemical activities such as nitrogen fixation, nutrient acquisition, and phytohormone production. Individual genome sequences improve the study of plant-microbe interactions as well as data analysis in requisite endophytic metagenomics, proteomics, and transcriptomics studies.15,16 Furthermore, obtained whole genomic sequence data is more useful to advance taxonomical resolution of bacterial species in contrast to more traditional methods such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis. 17 The objective of this study was to sequence, assemble, and annotate the genome of the endophytic bacterium Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 previously isolated from medicinal plant Pellaea calomelanos. 18 Previous unpublished data indicated that strain MHSD4 could degrade tannic acid, thus we hypothesized that the strain has bioremediation capabilities, which could be additionally investigated through in silico analysis.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial sample preparation and genomic DNA extraction

The endophyte, Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 was previously isolated and identified in a study by Mahlangu and Serepa-Dlamini, 18 and the 35% glycerol stock cultures of the endophyte were preserved at −80°C. In this study, the endophyte was re-cultured on tryptic soy agar (TSA) for 48 hours at 28°C. 19 The total genomic DNA of the bacterial culture was extracted from pure colonies using the Nucleospin® Microbial DNA extraction kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The extracted DNA quality and quantity was determined using the Implen Nanophotometer N60 (Implen GmbH, Germany).

Genome sequencing, de novo assembly and annotation

The extracted DNA was sent for whole genome sequencing at the Agriculture Research Council (ARC) in Onderstepoort, South Africa, a commercial service provider. The Illumina HiSeq platform was used, and pair-ended libraries (2 × 150 bp) were created with NextEra DNA library preparation kit. A total of 781 234 paired-end reads at 25× coverage were obtained from this workflow. Pre-annotation analyses were done on the Galaxy web platform (https://usegalaxy.org) using default parameters. 20 The quality of the raw reads obtained was assessed with FastQC v 0.72. The de novo assembly was conducted with Unicycler v 0.4.6.0 followed by the assembly quality assessment with QUAST v 0.4.6.3 both using default settings.21,22 Annotation of the draft genome was done using National Center for Biotechnology Information Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (NCBI-PGAP). 23 The genome was also uploaded and annotated on rapid annotations using subsystems technology (RAST) server. 24

Phylogenomic analyses

The genomic data was uploaded on Type Strain Genome Server (TYGS) (https://tygs.dsmz.de) for whole genome based taxonomic comparison with other published type strains. 25 The average nucleotide identity (ANI) value was determined on the Orthologous Average Nucleotide Identity Tool (OAT) v 0.93.10. 26 Islandviewer 4 Web (https://www.pathogenomics.sfu.ca/islandviewer) was used to identify the genomic islands (GI) by screening the PGAP annotation file obtained from NCBI. 27 The shared and unique genes clusters of strain MHSD4 were determined by comparing it to other closely related species using the EDGAR 2.0 platform. 28

The whole genome shotgun project data has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank with BioProject number PRJNA783158 and BioSample number SAMN23419518 under the accession number JAJNDH000000000. The version presented here is JAJNDH010000000.

Interprepation of Data Set

The assembly of the draft genome produced 41 contigs with N50 value of 550 575 base pairs (bp). The genome size obtained was 4 647 677 bp and the G+C content was 54.2%. The average genome sizes and G+C content of Pantoea species range from 4.6 to 6.3 Mb and 52% to 55%, respectively. 6 This is consistent with Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4. The total number of genes of MHSD4 predicted were 4395 which included 4235 protein-coding genes. The number of RNA genes were 87, 14 non-coding (nc) RNAs and 70 tRNAs, and 73 pseudogenes were also present. The genome attributes of Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Annotated genome statistics of Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4.

Genomic attributes Value
Number of contigs 41
Size (bp) 4 647 677
G+C content (%) 54.2
Contig N50 550 575
Total number of genes 4395
Protein coding genes 4235
Total RNAs 87
ncRNAs 14
tRNAs 70
Pseudogenes 73

Abbreviations: bp, base pairs; ncRNA, non-coding RNA, tRNA, transfer RNA.

Phylogenomic classification of the draft genome Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 was performed using the Type Strain Genome Server for whole genome based taxonomic analysis. The Genome-based taxonomic analysis indicates that MHSD4 was closely related to Pantoea hericii JZB 2120024T as shown in Figures 1 and 2 (Supplemental Data).

Based on 16S rDNA sequences, strain MHSD4 displayed a close relation to Pantoea hericii JZB 2120024T and formed a polyphyletic relationship with Pantoea eucalypti LMG 24197 Figure 2 (Supplemental Data). A multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) study revealed that P. hericii JZB 2120024T which was isolated from fruiting bodies of edible mushrooms, was close phylogenetic relative with P. eucalypti DSM 23077T. 29 Additionally, based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, the novel isolate was closely related to P. eucalypti LMG 24197 which supports the findings shown in Figure 1 (Supplemental Data). 29

Moreover, Figure 2 (Supplemental Data) shows that based on whole genome sequence analysis, strain MHSD4 was closely related to P. eucalypti LMG 24197 and both strains had a polyphyletic relationship with P. hericii JZB 2120024T. Pantoea eucalypti LMG 24197 was isolated from the leaves of eucalyptus plant which has many medicinal benefits. 30 This elucidates that Pantoea strains are widely distributed in the environment and may also be associated with numerous medicinal plants.

Average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) values are both popular methods of discriminating between bacterial taxons and are imperative tools for genomic studies.31,32 The dDDH values calculated with 3 different formulas between Pantoea sp. MHSD4 and P. hericii JZB 2120024T were 81.3%, 93.9%, and 86.3%, respectively, with a G+C content difference of .44% (Table 1, Supplemental Data). Moreover, the dDDH values between strain MHSD4 and P. eucalypti LMG 24197 were 95%, 93.8%, and 96.6%, respectively, and a G+C content difference of .11%. The dDDH values exceeded the threshold of >70% as a criterion to determine the similarity between bacterial strains as well as for the delineation of bacterial species. 33 Furthermore, the lesser G+C content difference between strain MHSD4 and P. eucalypti LMG 24197 may be an indicator that the 2 species are phylogenetically closer in comparison to other type strains. 34

RAST identified a total of 1490 subsystem feature counts (Figure 1) with amino acids and derivatives subsystem category dominant with 23.8% followed by carbohydrate metabolism genes with 20%. The least number of genes identified on the genome were only 2 belonging to the phages, prophages, transposable elements, and plasmids subsystem category. Genes identified within the genome of strain MHSD4 that supported the endophytic lifestyle included siderophore production as well as other iron acquisition and metabolism genes, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium metabolism genes. 21 Furthermore, virulence, disease, and defense, phytohormone production, and stress tolerance genes play a significant role in the host plant growth promotion and development and the symbiotic association between bacterial endophytes and plants.10,35

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The subsystem distribution of Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 genome based on RAST annotation server.

The RAST sequence-based comparative tool was used to compare the genomes of strain MHSD4 to Pantoea stewartii DC283 as a reference strain as shown in Figure 2A and B. There were genome gaps observed (Figure 2A), however there was a protein sequence similarity range of 60% to 99.5% for both forward and reverse hits within the 2 compared strains. The genome gaps may substantiate some gene deletions within the genome of strain MHSD4. 36

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(A) Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 genome compared to Pantoea stewartii DC283 as a reference genome using RAST sequence-based comparative tool. (B) Percentage color coordination of genome comparison. Bidirectional best hit indicates both forward and reverse hits.

Figure 3 shows the different OrthoANI values between various Pantoea genome species. The calculated OrthoANI values exhibited between strain MHSD4 and P. eucalypti LMG 24197 was 99.24%. This value was also the same between strain MHSD4 and P. jilinensis strain D25. The OrthoANI threshold range is approximately 95% to 96%, which was exceeded by both findings. 26 This indicates high similarity between Pantoea sp. MHSD4 and P. eucalypti LMG 24197 and P. jilinensis D25, respectively. The dDDH and ANI values were congruent indicating that strain MSHD4 is closely related to P. eucalypti LMG 24197. In a previous study, P. jilinensis D25 was found to be an effective yet novel biocontrol agent against the crop disease, gray mold. 37 This may suggest that Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 may have valuable and diverse applications given the qualities of its related species.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Heatmap generated with OAT software indicating OrthoANI values of Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 and closely related Pantoea species.

Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 shared 35 common genes with other closely related Pantoea species and only shared 5 genes with Pantoea ananatis LMG2665 (Figure 4). Common genes among Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 and all selected comparison Pantoea species were found to be a total of 2710 (Figure 4). Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 consists of 419 unique genes that encode transport proteins and transcriptional regulators which are important genes for bacterial endophytes that were previously identified in other bacterial species.38,39 Several sets of genes acquired through horizontal gene transfer were found in the genome of Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 (Table 2, Supplemental Data). A total of 8 GI (Figure 5) were identified in Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 genome when aligned to a reference genome Pantoea ananatis LMG 20103. The genomic islands’ genes clustered details are shown in Table 2 (Supplemental Data).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Venn diagram of the unique and shared genes of Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 and selected comparison Pantoea species, 1. Pantoea allii strain LMG24248; 2. Pantoea ananatis LMG2665; 3. Pantoea conspicua strain LMG 24534; 4. Pantoea pleuroti strain JZB 2120015; 5. Pantoe sp. Strain MHSD4.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Genomic islands genes within Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 aligned against reference genome within Pantoea ananatis LMG 20103, complete genome. Islandviewer 4 predicted a total of 8 genetic islands. The genomic islands genes prediction methods are represented by the following colors: IslandPath-DIMOB (blue), integrated detection (red). Contig boundaries are indicated by the gray lines.

Biosynthesis pathways of phytohormones of Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 were determined and found to consist of various essential plant growth promoting hormones such as gibberellins, auxin, abscisic acid, salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, ethylene and cytokinin (Figure 3, Supplemental Data). Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 has shown the ability to degrade naphthalene and anthracene (Figure 3, Supplemental Data), which indicates a critical role in bioremediation as anthracene and naphthalene support the growth of microorganisms (Table 2). 40

Table 2.

Genes responsible for Bioremediation that were identified from Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 genome.

Genes Product Function
copA, Copper-exporting P-type ATPase CopA Exports Cu+ from the cytoplasm to the periplasm and Binds 2 Cu+ ions per monomer, which are transferred to periplasmic copper chaperone CusF upon ATP hydrolysis.41-44
copD Copper homeostasis membrane protein CopD Involved in the uptake of copper to the cytoplasm. 45
cueO Multicopper oxidase CueO involved in copper tolerance under aerobic conditions. 46
cueR Cu(I)-responsive transcriptional regulator activates transcription of the copper tolerance genes copA and cueO41,42
glnG Nitrogen regulation protein NR(I) controls expression of the nitrogen-regulated (ntr) genes in response to nitrogen limitation. 47
trxC Thioredoxin TrxC Performs a major role in surviving under redox stress, generated by the host. 48
arsC Arsenate reductase (glutaredoxin) Involved in resistance to arsenate. It is arsenate reductase enzymes, that transform arsenate to arsenite prior to the extrusion of the latter oxyanion. 49
tusA Sulfurtransferase TusA Function as a sulfurtransferase in tRNA modification and molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis. 50
bfd Bacterioferritin-associated ferredoxin Is an iron storage and detoxification protein that differs from other ferritins by its ability to bind heme cofactors. 51
soxS Superoxide response transcriptional regulator reduce the oxidative stress generated by metal-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) 52

In this study, Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 genome specifically showed a presence of copper resistance genes such as copA, copB and copR which code respectively for a copper-translocating P-type ATPase, copper resistance protein B, and transcriptional activator protein.53,54 A few studies have identified copper-resistant gene clusters and operons in different bacterial species such as Pseudomonas and Xanthomonas.55,56 These genes are induced in varying levels of copper (Cu) ions and attribute to the mechanisms of copper ion transport across bacterial cells and the oxidation of Cu+ to less toxic Cu2+ ions.55,56 Additionally, another significant gene identified, coded for a type of multi-copper oxidase which is also known to play a role in the copper homeostasis of bacterium thus increasing stress tolerance against the heavy metal. 57 Multicopper oxidase encoded by cueO which is involved in copper tolerance under aerobic conditions has been identified. The putative multi-copper oxidase has previously been reported to confer copper tolerance in Escherichia coli. 58 The presence of this gene in the periplasm protected alkaline phosphatase from copper-induced damage. The multi-copper oxidase has been implicated in possession of an extensive methionine-rich region proximal to the copper centers that is reported to be involved in the binding of copper . 58

The presence of these genes may indicate biotechnological potential for this endophytic strain in terms of conferring resistance to host plants or as a biological key player for copper remediation in the environment. 14

High throughput sequencing of bacterial genomes allows for the identification and functional classification of genes within endophytic bacteria. This study reports on the draft genome of the bacterial endophyte, Pantoea sp. strain MHSD4 which was previously isolated from the leaves of the medicinal plant Pellaea calomelanos. Biosynthesis pathways of phytohormones consisting of various essential plant growth-promoting hormones were identified which are significant in supporting the endophytic lifestyle of the bacterium. Further comparative genomic studies will be imperative in providing valuable insights on members of the genus Pantoea as well as bacterial endophyte diversity and their interactions with plant hosts.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-evb-10.1177_11769343231217908 – Supplemental material for Draft Genome Sequence of Pantoea sp. Strain MHSD4, a Bacterial Endophyte With Bioremediation Potential

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-evb-10.1177_11769343231217908 for Draft Genome Sequence of Pantoea sp. Strain MHSD4, a Bacterial Endophyte With Bioremediation Potential by Dimpho Michelle Morobane, Khuthadzo Tshishonga and Mahloro Hope Serepa-Dlamini in Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Footnotes

Author Contributions: Work was planned by S-DMH and executed by MDM, TK assisted with genome assembly, annotation and analysis.

Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of South Africa (Thuthuka Grant No. TTK210216586709).

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD: Mahloro Hope Serepa-Dlamini Inline graphic https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0573-181X

Supplemental Material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

  • 1. Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, Berg G, et al. The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2015;79:293-320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sturz AV, Christie BR, Nowak J. Bacterial endophytes: Potential role in developing sustainable systems of Crop Production. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2000;19: 1-30. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Buddhika UVA, Abeysinghe S. Plant endophytic microorganisms enhancing crop productivity and yield. New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering. Elsevier, 2021, pp.45-53. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Compant S, van der Heijden MG, Sessitsch A, Sessitsch A. Climate change effects on beneficial plant-microorganism interactions. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010;73:197-214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Gao JL, Xue J, Yan H, et al. Pantoea endophytica sp. nov., novel endophytic bacteria isolated from maize planting in different geographic regions of northern China. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2019;42:488-494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Walterson AM, Stavrinides J. Pantoea: insights into a highly versatile and diverse genus within the Enterobacteriaceae. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2015;39:968-984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Delétoile A, Decré D, Courant S, et al. Phylogeny and identification of Pantoea species and typing of Pantoea agglomerans strains by multilocus gene sequencing. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;47:300-310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Smits TH, Rezzonico F, Pelludat C, et al. Genomic and phenotypic characterization of a nonpigmented variant of Pantoea vagans biocontrol strain C9-1 lacking the 530-kb megaplasmid pPag3. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010;308:48-54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Xie J, Shu P, Strobel G, et al. Pantoea agglomerans SWg2 colonizes mulberry tissues, promotes disease protection and seedling growth. Biol Control. 2017;113: 9-17. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Okoduwa SIR, Igiri B, Udeh CB, Edenta C, Gauje B. Tannery effluent treatment by yeast species isolates from watermelon. Toxics. 2017;5:6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Tripathi S, Sharma P, Singh K, Purchase D, Chandra R. Translocation of heavy metals in medicinally important herbal plants growing on complex organometallic sludge of sugarcane molasses-based distillery waste. Environ Technol Innov. 2021;22:101434. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Su C, Jiang L, Zhang W. A review on heavy metal contamination in the soil worldwide: situation, impact and remediation techniques. Environ Skeptics Critics. 2014;3:24-38. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Sharma P, Kumar S. Bioremediation of heavy metals from industrial effluents by endophytes and their metabolic activity: recent advances. Bioresour Technol. 2021;339:125589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Franco-Franklin V, Moreno-Riascos S, Ghneim-Herrera T. Are endophytic bacteria an option for increasing heavy metal tolerance of plants? A meta-analysis of the effect size. Front Environ Sci. 2021;8:603668. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2020.603668 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kaul S, Sharma T, K Dhar M. “Omics” tools for better understanding the plant-endophyte interactions. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hao DC, Xiao PG. Rhizosphere Microbiota and microbiome of medicinal plants: from molecular biology to omics approaches. Chin Herb Med. 2017;9:199-217. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Zong Z. Genome-based taxonomy for bacteria: a recent advance. Trends Microbiol. 2020;28:871-874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Mahlangu SG, Serepa-Dlamini MH. First report of bacterial endophytes from the leaves of Pellaea calomelanos in South Africa. S Afr J Sci. 2018;114:55-63. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Stelmasiewicz M, Świątek Ł, Gibbons S, Ludwiczuk A. Bioactive compounds produced by endophytic microorganisms associated with Bryophytes-The “Bryendophytes.” Molecules. 2023;28:3246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Afgan E, Baker D, Batut B, et al. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W537-W544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13: e1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1072-1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:6614-6624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park SC, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:1100-1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Bertelli C, Laird MR, Williams KP, et al. IslandViewer 4: expanded prediction of genomic islands for larger-scale datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:W30-W35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Blom J, Kreis J, Spänig S, et al. EDGAR 2.0: an enhanced software platform for comparative gene content analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W22-W28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Rong C, Ma Y, Wang S, et al. Pantoea hericii sp. Nov., isolated from the fruiting bodies of Hericium erinaceus. Curr Microbiol. 2016;72:738-743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Brady CL, Venter SN, Cleenwerck I, et al. Pantoea vagans sp. nov., Pantoea eucalypti sp. nov., Pantoea deleyi sp. nov. and Pantoea anthophila sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59:2339-2345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68: 461-466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:19126-19131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:81-91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Wei C, Song Z, Lu Y, Zhao Y, Fan B. Relationship of the pine growth promoting Pantoea eucalypti FBS135 with type strains P. eucalypti LMG 24197T and P. vagans 24199T. Life. 2021;11:608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Egamberdieva D, Wirth SJ, Alqarawi AA, Abd_Allah EF, Hashem A. Phytohormones and beneficial microbes: essential components for plants to balance stress and fitness. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, et al. The SEED and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D206-D214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Zheng L, Zhang J, Wu X, et al. A novel biocontrol strain Pantoea jilinensis D25 for effective biocontrol of tomato gray mold (causative agent Botrytis cinerea). Biol Control. 2021;164:104766. [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Taghavi S, van der Lelie D, Hoffman A, et al. Genome sequence of the plant growth promoting endophytic bacterium Enterobacter sp. 638. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1000943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Ali S, Duan J, Charles TC, Glick BR. A bioinformatics approach to the determination of genes involved in endophytic behavior in Burkholderia spp. J Theor Biol. 2014;343:193-198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Bisht S, Pandey P, Sood A, Sharma S, Bisht NS. Biodegradation of naphthalene and anthracene by chemo-tactically active rhizobacteria of populus deltoides. Braz J Microbiol. 2010;41:922-930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Outten FW, Outten CE, Hale J, O’Halloran TV. Transcriptional activation of an Escherichia coliCopper efflux regulon by the chromosomal MerR homologue, cueR. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:31024-31029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Stoyanov JV, Hobman JL, Brown NL. CueR (YbbI) of Escherichia coli is a MerR family regulator controlling expression of the copper exporter CopA. Mol Microbiol. 2001;39:502-511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Rensing C, Fan B, Sharma R, Mitra B, Rosen BP. CopA: an Escherichia coli Cu(I)-translocating P-type ATPase. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000;97:652-656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Padilla-Benavides T, George Thompson AM, McEvoy MM, Argüello JM. Mechanism of ATPase-mediated Cu+ export and delivery to periplasmic chaperones: the interaction of Escherichia coli CopA and CusF. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:20492-20501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Lawton TJ, Kenney GE, Hurley JD, Rosenzweig AC. The CopC family: Structural and bioinformatic insights into a diverse group of periplasmic copper binding proteins. Biochemistry. 2016;55:2278-2290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Djoko KY, Chong LX, Wedd AG, Xiao Z. Reaction mechanisms of the multicopper oxidase CueO from Escherichia coli support its functional role as a cuprous oxidase. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:2005-2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Reitzer L. Nitrogen assimilation and global regulation in Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2003;57:155-176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Sugandhi S, Rajmane V, Taunk K, et al. The role of thioredoxin proteins in Mycobacterium tuberculosis probed by proteome-wide target profiling. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2023;35:101512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Ben Fekih I, Zhang C, Li YP, et al. Distribution of arsenic resistance genes in prokaryotes. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Liu LJ, Stockdreher Y, Koch T, et al. Thiosulfate transfer mediated by DsrE/TusA homologs from acidothermophilic sulfur-oxidizing archaeon Metallosphaera cuprina. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:26949-26959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Wang Y, Yao H, Cheng Y, et al. Characterization of the bacterioferritin/bacterioferritin associated ferredoxin protein-protein interaction in solution and determination of binding energy hot spots. Biochemistry. 2015;54:6162-6175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Mandal A, Thakur1 JK, Sarkar A, et al. Efficacy of microbial endophytes in bioremediation: Current research and future outlook. Microbial Endophytes and Plant Growth. 2023;283-295. [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Behlau F, Hong JC, Jones JB, Graham JH. Evidence for acquisition of copper resistance genes from different sources in citrus-associated xanthomonads. Phytopathology. 2013;103:409-418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Grünberger F, Reichelt R, Waege I, et al. CopR, a global regulator of transcription to maintain copper homeostasis in Pyrococcus furiosus. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:613532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Adaikkalam V, Swarup S. Characterization of copABCD operon from a copper-sensitive Pseudomonas putida strain. Can J Microbiol. 2005;51:209-216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Behlau F, Gochez AM, Lugo AJ, et al. Characterization of a unique copper resistance gene cluster in Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris isolated in Trinidad, West Indies. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2017;147:671-681. [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Rensing C, Grass G. Escherichia colimechanisms of copper homeostasis in a changing environment. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003;27:197-213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Grass G, Rensing C. CueO is a multi-copper oxidase that confers copper tolerance in Escherichia coli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;286:902-908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

sj-docx-1-evb-10.1177_11769343231217908 – Supplemental material for Draft Genome Sequence of Pantoea sp. Strain MHSD4, a Bacterial Endophyte With Bioremediation Potential

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-evb-10.1177_11769343231217908 for Draft Genome Sequence of Pantoea sp. Strain MHSD4, a Bacterial Endophyte With Bioremediation Potential by Dimpho Michelle Morobane, Khuthadzo Tshishonga and Mahloro Hope Serepa-Dlamini in Evolutionary Bioinformatics


Articles from Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES