Skip to main content
NIST Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIST Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 14.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Rev B. 2019 Feb 12;99:10.1103/PhysRevB.99.085120. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.085120

Low-carrier density and fragile magnetism in a Kondo lattice system

Binod K Rai 1, Iain W H Oswald 2, Wenjing Ban 3, C-L Huang 1,*, V Loganathan 1, A M Hallas 1,4, M N Wilson 4, G M Luke 4,5,6, L Harriger 7, Q Huang 7, Y Li 1, Sami Dzsaber 8, Julia Y Chan 2, N L Wang 3, Silke Paschen 8, J W Lynn 7, Andriy H Nevidomskyy 1, Pengcheng Dai 1, Q Si 1, E Morosan 1,
PMCID: PMC10938852  NIHMSID: NIHMS1616210  PMID: 38487214

Abstract

Kondo-based semimetals and semiconductors are of extensive current interest as a viable platform for strongly correlated states in the dilute carrier limit. It is thus important to explore the routes to understand such systems. One established pathway is through the Kondo effect in metallic nonmagnetic analogs, in the so called half-filling case of one conduction electron and one 4f electron per site. Here, we demonstrate that Kondo-based semimetals develop out of conduction electrons with a low-carrier density in the presence of an even number of rare-earth sites. We do so by studying the Kondo material Yb3Ir4Ge13 along with its closed-4f -shell counterpart, Lu3Ir4Ge13. Through magnetotransport, optical conductivity, and thermodynamic measurements, we establish that the correlated semimetallic state of Yb3Ir4Ge13 below its Kondo temperature originates from the Kondo effect of a low-carrier conduction-electron background. In addition, it displays fragile magnetism at very low temperatures, which in turn, can be tuned to a Griffiths-phase-like regime through Lu-for-Yb substitution. These findings are connected with recent theoretical studies in simplified models. Our results can pave the way to exploring strong correlation physics in a semimetallic environment.

I. INTRODUCTION

The proximity of the f energy level to the Fermi energy EF in rare-earth compounds often causes hybridization of the local moments with the conduction electrons. The resulting Kondo effect gives rise to a broad range of electronic properties, from metallic heavy fermion (HF) systems to Kondo insulators, and intermediate low-carrier Kondo semiconductors or semimetals. Kondo systems have garnered much attention in recent years because of their exotic electronic and magnetic behavior, including quantum criticality, a breakdown of the Fermi-liquid picture, unconventional superconductivity, and topologically protected states [14]. Only a small number of 4f low-carrier HF systems have been reported so far, e.g., CeNiSn and CeRhSb [5,6], CeNi2−δ As2 [7], and Ce3Bi4Pd3 [8]. These compounds realize HF physics in a parameter regime that is separate from the canonical “half-filling” case, and thus alternative low-carrier Kondo systems are called for to broaden our knowledge in such a regime.

Our recent discovery of the six nonmagnetic germanides Y3T4Ge13−x (T = Ir, Rh, Os) and Lu3T4Ge13−x (T = Co, Rh, Os) [9] pointed to a possible generalization of low-carrier behavior in these “3-4-13” germanides, due to the negative temperature coefficients of the electrical resistivity ρ(T ), i.e., /dT < 0, compared to the normal metal behavior (/dT > 0) in the stannide analogs [10]. Here, we report the discovery that the correlated semimetal Yb3Ir4Ge13 (YbIG) [11] emerges from the Kondo effect in a nonmagnetic dilute-carrier system, Lu3Ir4Ge13 (LIG). YbIG exhibits /dT < 0 in the whole measured temperature range from 300 to 0.1 K, including inside a fragile magnetic state below Tmag*=0.9 K. The underlying electronic properties of YbIG are dictated by its nonmagnetic analog LIG, which, remarkably, also shows semimetal-like behavior between 300 and 2.8 K, below which LIG becomes superconducting. This is in stark contrast with the metallic behavior found in the nonmagnetic analogs of other known Kondo semimetals [1216]. Optical conductivity measurements and band-structure calculations reinforce the semimetal-like nature of YbIG and LIG. Moreover, the substitution of nonmagnetic Lu on the Yb site induces Griffiths-phase-like behavior, as evidenced by the power-law temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility M/H and magnetic specific heat Cmag/T at low T. The coexistence of the low-carrier density, the Kondo effect, and the associated semimetal behavior, as well as the fragile magnetism, makes YbIG one of the most complex f -electron systems. We rationalize our finding using a recently developed framework of the Kondo-lattice effect in the dilute-carrier limit [17].

II. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS

Single crystals of (Yb1−xLux)3Ir4Ge13 (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.5, 0.55, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 1) were prepared using a Ge self-flux method [9]. Structure determination was performed using single-crystal x-ray diffraction data collected on a Bruker D8 Quest diffractometer with a Mo-targer IμS microfocus x-ray tube. Powder x-ray diffraction patterns were collected with a Rigaku D/Max diffractometer using Cu radiation. Rietveld analysis was performed using the GSAS software package. The temperature-dependent ac resistivity of bar-shaped crystals was collected in the Quantum Design (QD) Physical Properties Measurement System (PPMS), with current ia. To measure the Hall coefficient, we applied a magnetic field perpendicular to the a axis and measured the transverse voltage. A reverse field was applied to cancel out longitudinal magnetoresistance contributions due to misalignment. dc magnetic susceptibility was measured in a QD Magnetic Properties Measurement System (MPMS) with a 3He insert. Specific heat was collected in a QD PPMS with a 3He insert using a thermal relaxation method. The optical reflectance measurements were performed on Bruker IFS 113v and 80v spectrometers in the frequency range from 30 to 45 000 cm−1. An in situ gold and aluminum overcoating technique was used to obtain the reflectance Ropt(ω). The real part of conductivity σ1(ω) is obtained by the Kramers-Kronig transformation of Ropt(ω). The Hagen-Rubens relation was used for low-frequency extrapolation; at the high-frequency side, a ω−1 relation was used up to 300 000 cm−1, above which ω−4 was applied.

Neutron diffraction experiments were carried out on the BT-7 triple-axis spectrometer [18] and the BT-1 high-resolution powder diffractometer at NIST Center for Neutron Research (NCNR), Gaithersburg, Maryland. The samples were put into an annulus configuration to reduce the neutron absorption. Muon spin relaxation (μSR) measurements were performed on the M15 beamline at the TRIUMF laboratory. The advantage of this technique is that muons are extremely sensitive to their local magnetic environment [19]. A small 10 G longitudinal field was applied to decouple any relaxation from static nuclear dipoles. Several pieces of single crystal were affixed directly to the dilution refrigerator’s silver cold finger using Apiezon N-grease. The muons that land outside the sample (in the silver sample holder or the cryostat tails) produce a temperature-independent contribution to the asymmetry. This temperature-independent component has been fitted and subtracted from the data, leaving only the asymmetry arising from muons that land in the sample. The data were fit using the μSRFIT software package [20].

Electronic band-structure calculations were performed using the DFT method with the linearized augmented plane waves (LAPW) as a basis, as implemented in the WIEN2K code [21]. The generalized gradient approximation (GGA) was used to account for the exchange and correlations [22]. We used a 20 × 20 × 20 k-point grid to sample the full Brillouin zone.

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

A. Crystallography

When using the cubic Pm3¯n space group, which is adopted in a Yb3Rh4Ge13 structure type, we observed weak and unindexed reflections in both powder and single-crystal x-ray diffraction patterns [see the asterisks in Fig. 1(a)]. In the case of Lu3Ir4Ge13, a tetragonal unit cell with cell dimensions a = 17.7674(11) Å and c = 17.8229(13) Å and space group I41/amd account for the weaker reflections and peak splitting of major reflections [Fig. 1(b)]. This model was then used to fit the powder diffraction data for Yb3Ir4Ge13. Rietveld refinement of the data resulted in a model in good agreement with lattice parameters a = 17.74828(15) Å and c = 17.7894(2) Å (Rwp = 7.08%), indicating Lu3Ir4Ge13 and Yb3Ir4Ge13 are isostructural and adopt the tetragonal space group I41/amd (see details in Ref. [10]). The volume trend as a function of dopants remains the same regardless of unit-cell size, as shown in the inset of Fig. 1(b).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Room-temperature measured (black symbols) and calculated (red line) powder x-ray diffraction pattern for Lu3Ir4Ge13, together with the calculated peak positions (blue vertical lines) using space group (a) cubic, Pm3¯n and (b) tetragonal, I41/amd. The tetragonal model fully accounts for the weak reflections [blue asterisks in (a)] that are unaccounted for in the cubic average model. Inset: variation of lattice parameters as a function of x in (Yb1−x Lux)3Ir4Ge13 with a (small) cubic unit-cell model (left axis) and a (large) tetragonal unit-cell model (right axis).

B. Electrical transport properties

Most 4f magnetic systems are metallic [1], while the electrical resistivity ρ of YbIG [red symbols, Fig. 2(a)] shows nonmetallic behavior even at high temperatures (temperature is much higher than the Kondo temperature TK). This cannot be due to incoherent scattering of the conduction electrons by localized f moments, since nonmagnetic LIG exhibits similar /dT < 0 behavior [blue line, Fig. 2(a)]. Below 150 K, the magnetic resistivity ρmag = ρYbIGρLIG, as shown in the inset of Fig. 2(a), increases with decreasing temperature, implying the opening of some pseudogap in the underlying electronic band structure. Upon cooling below 10 K, ρmag follows −lnT behavior, which is a signature of incoherent Kondo scattering. Below 0.9 K, ρmag tends to saturate due to some loss of spin disorder when magnetic correlations set in. We will discuss the magnetic properties of YbIG in detail later in Sec. IIIE. On the other hand, in LIG a monotonic increase of ρ(T) is observed down to 2.8 K, below which LIG becomes superconducting (see the Appendix). Similar semiconducting ρ(T) behavior in LIG has recently also been reported by Kumar et al. [23]. However, they grew the crystal by using the Czochralski method and reported a different crystal structure Pm3¯n. This reflects the fact that reaction conditions and synthesis methods could lead to slightly different polymorphs.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

(a) Zero-field temperature-dependent electrical resistivity ρ of R3Ir4Ge13, R = Yb and Lu. A sudden drop of ρ(T) in Lu3Ir4Ge13 is due to a superconducting transition at 2.8 K. The left inset shows a semilogarithmic plot of magnetic electrical resistivity ρmag = ρYbIGρLIG. The right inset shows the crystal structure of R3Ir4Ge13. Parts (b) and (c) show temperature-dependent Hall coefficients RH(T) measured at μ0H = 9 T for Yb3Ir4Ge13 and Lu3Ir4Ge13, respectively. Black stars are data measured in a field sweep mode at a constant T. The error bar represents a difference between cooling and warming measurements. A picture of a crystal is shown in the inset of (b).

The Hall coefficient data RH(T) for YbIG are shown down to 16 K (above TK), below which the anomalous Hall effect dominates [Fig. 2(b)], while the data for LIG are shown down to 2 K [Fig. 2(c)]. The Hall resistance ρH(H) was measured at several temperatures, and the RH values, obtained from linear fits [black stars in Figs. 2(b) and 2(c)], are consistent with the RH(T) data. A sign change of RH(T) indicates a change in effective carrier type from electrons at high temperatures to holes at low temperatures for both systems.

C. Optical conductivity

Such a gap feature, however, is not seen in our optical conductivity data. Overall, similar optical properties are registered for YbIG [Figs. 3(a) and 3(b)] and LIG [Figs. 3(c) and 3(d)], in both the optical reflectance Ropt(ω) and the real part of the optical conductivity σ1(ω). Note that all data for YbIG are taken at T > TK ~ 3.5 K, estimated by specific-heat measurements. Both compounds show a nominally metallic frequency dependence at all measured temperatures: Ropt(ω) at low energy increases rapidly with decreasing frequency and approaches unity in the zero-frequency limit. As a result, a reflectance edge, though overdamped, is seen in the measured Ropt(ω) below 4000 cm−1, and a Drude-like peak is seen at low frequency in the σ1(ω) spectra. For both compounds, the low-frequency reflectance Ropt(ω) values decrease with decreasing temperature [Figs. 3(a) and 3(c)], leading to a drop of the conductivity in the low-frequency regime. The temperature dependence of σ1(ω) for YbIG and LIG is consistent with the semimetal-like evolution of ρ(T). A striking observation is that the reflectance edge is located at a rather low energy [ω = (3–4) × 103 cm−1] compared with ordinary metals, indicating that both compounds have very low plasma frequencies or carrier densities. The estimated values of the plasma frequency at 10 K are 4.8 × 103 cm−1 for YbIG and 5.7 × 103 cm−1 for LIG, which correspond to small carrier densities n ≈ 2.6 × 1020(m*/me) cm−3 for YbIG and ≈ 3.6 × 1020(m*/me) cm−3 for LIG, where m* is the effective mass and me is the free-electron mass. Furthermore, the low-frequency spectral weight is suppressed with decreasing temperature, leading to the formation of a minimum of σ1 with an energy scale of about 1000 cm−1 for both compounds.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Optical reflectance Ropt and optical conductivity σ1 as a function of frequency ω of Yb3Ir4Ge13 (a,b) and Lu3Ir4Ge13 (c,d) at different temperatures T = 10, 100, 200, and 300 K.

D. DFT calculations

To substantiate the conclusion of the low-carrier nature of YbIG and LIG, we have performed the density-functional theory (DFT) calculations, focusing on LIG, where the absence of f -electron bands near the Fermi level allows us to better understand the underlying mechanism for low-carrier density. Shown in Fig. 4(a) is the band structure plotted along high-symmetry lines in the Brillouin zone, from which it follows that there are a total of five pseudospin degenerate bands that cross the Fermi level. Of these five bands, the most significant ones are two holelike bands and one electronlike band, whereas the remaining two electronlike bands form tiny electron pockets near the M point and contribute very little to the carrier density [see Fig. 4(a)]. The individual band carrier densities are summarized in Table I, with the total carrier density equal to 1.91 × 1021 cm−3. This value matches well with the density inferred from the optical conductivity, provided the average effective mass m* ≈ 5me. Calculations of the effective masses from DFT are unavailable, given the multiple bands and their nonparabolic nature near the Fermi level. Nevertheless, the semiquantitative agreement with the optical data is encouraging. Within the DFT framework, we find that LIG is a fully compensated semimetal, with an equal total number of electronlike and holelike carriers. The band structure contains a nearly flat band close to the Γ point, which nearly touches the Fermi level. This band contributes to a van Hove singularity in the density of states (DOS), at ≈ 4 meV below the chemical potential, as shown in Fig. 4(b). This finding indicates that LIG should be very sensitive to hole doping; the DOS at the Fermi level could be increased by about 50% if the chemical potential were shifted to coincide with the van Hove peak. Such a substantial enhancement of the DOS signals that this system may have a propensity toward magnetic ordering, based on a Stoner criterion-type argument.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

(a) DFT band structure of Lu3Ir4Ge13, showing the bands in the vicinity of the Fermi level along the high-symmetry directions. The blue indicates the three bands that cross the Fermi level and contribute most to the carrier density. (b) Corresponding density of states (DOS), exhibiting a narrow van Hove singularity about 4 meV below the Fermi level.

TABLE I.

Carrier densities corresponding to the dominant hole-like and electronlike bands crossing the Fermi level calculated using DFT.

Bands h1 h2 e1 e2 e3

Carrier density (×1020 cm−3) 1.96 7.61 9.43 0.12 0.01

E. Magnetic properties and μSR measurements

We have so far demonstrated the low-carrier-density properties of YbIG and LIG, and we turn next to the magnetic properties of YbIG. The single-ion Kondo temperature TK ≈ 3.5 K for YbIG, which is estimated from the magnetic entropy, i.e., Smag(0.5TK) = 0.4R ln2 [inset of Fig. 5(a)], implies that above T = 50 K, YbIG can be regarded as a local-moment system. Indeed, an effective moment μeffexp=4.2μB/molYb, close to the Yb3+ free-ion value of μeffcalc=4.54μB/molYb, is obtained from the Curie-Weiss fit of the inverse magnetic susceptibility H/M [open symbols, right axis in Fig. 5(b)]. The fit results in a Weiss temperature θW =−18 K, suggesting antiferromagnetic correlations. Upon further cooling, these antiferromagnetic correlations result in a phase-transition-like feature at Tmag*=0.9 K as seen from the peaks in M/H (circles, left axis) and Cp/T (squares, right axis) shown in Fig. 5(a), and the local minimum in /dT (not shown). However, the magnetism appears to be very fragile, as indicated by the neutron diffraction and muon spin relaxation (μSR) measurements discussed next. While neutron diffraction measurements (not shown) clearly observe the diffraction pattern of the crystal structure, no magnetic peaks were found down to 80 mK. This might reflect the fact that the ordered moment of YbIG below Tmag* is smaller than can be resolved from neutron diffraction (typically ⩽ 0.1μB).

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

(a) Low-T M/H vs T (left, circle) and zero-field specific heat Cp/T vs T (right, square) of Yb3Ir4Ge13. The inset shows the temperature dependence of magnetic entropy Smag, which is calculated from the 4f -moment contribution to the specific heat. (b) Magnetic susceptibility M/H vs T (left), where M is the magnetization and H is the magnetic field, and inverse magnetic susceptibility H/M vs T (right) of Yb3Ir4Ge13. The solid and dashed lines show a Curie-Weiss fit. Note that 1 emu = 1 G cm3 = 10−3 A m2.

To better understand the nature of the magnetic state in YbIG below Tmag*=0.9 K, we performed μSR measurements between 0.1 and 2 K. Several representative muon polarization spectra are presented in the inset of Fig. 6. As the sample is cooled below Tmag*, there are no spontaneous oscillations in the decay asymmetry. However, there is a continuous evolution in the asymmetry that is well described by a phenomenological stretched exponential function, Pz(t) = exp(−λt)β, where λ is the relaxation rate and β is the stretching parameter. The temperature dependence of the fitted parameters λ and β is presented in Fig. 6. Above Tmag*, the stretching parameter is close to β = 1 and the relaxation rate is relatively small, less than 0.5 μs−1. As the sample is cooled below Tmag*, both the relaxation rate and the stretching parameter increase monotonically down to the lowest measured temperature, 0.1 K. The increase in the relaxation rate indicates a continuous slowing of the Yb3+ spin fluctuations. Our recent inelastic neutron scattering measurements on YbIG down to 0.6 K reveal nontrivial dynamic magnetic correlations between Yb moments [24]. At 0.1 K, most of the moments become static on the muon timescale, as evidenced by β ≈ 2. Thus, it is clear that, though fragile, the Tmag* feature has a magnetic origin.

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6.

Temperature dependence of the muon spin relaxation rate, λ (filled circles), and the stretching parameter, β (open diamonds), for Yb3Ir4Ge13, indicating a magnetic response correlated with T* = 0.9 K. Inset: selection of representative μSR spectra, where the solid lines are the fits to the data with a stretched exponential function. The error bars represent one standard deviation.

At first glance, the sister compound Ce3Co4Sn13 might appear synonymous with YbIG: specific-heat measurements reveal a broad peak at 0.8 K in Ce3Co4Sn13 [25,26] below which elastic neutron scattering data do not show signs of long-range magnetic order [27], even though inelastic neutron scattering data reveal antiferromagnetic correlations below 15 K [28]. However, the electrical resistivity data on polycrystalline and single crystalline Ce3Co4Sn13 show a sample dependence [26,29,30], and the infrared spectroscopy study on the single crystalline sample indicates good metallic response [31], unlike the present evidence for low-carrier semimetallic behavior in YbIG and its nonmagnetic analog LIG. Therefore, the fragile magnetism in YbIG and Ce3Co4Sn13 are likely of different origins.

F. Substitution series (Yb1−xLux)3Ir4Ge13

Next we study the substitution series (Yb1−xLux)3Ir4Ge13 (YLIG) to further explore the fragile magnetism of YbIG. From /dT, Cp/T, and M/H we summarized Tmag* values as a function of x in YLIG, as shown in Fig. 7(d). Increasing x gradually reduces Tmag* to zero temperature at the critical composition xc ~ 0.6. The broad hump around 40 K in ρmag for YbIG, which originates from the opening of some pseudogap in the underlying electronic band structure [Fig. 2(a)], gradually vanishes with increasing x [Fig. 7(a)], because x = 0.6–0.7 ρmag is not observed to saturate and instead obeys ρmag ~−lnT from 10 K down to the lowest measured temperature. Because of the underlying semimetallic character, this cannot be directly compared with metallic diluted Kondo systems, where a Kondo minimum is observed in the resistivity [32]. The magnetic susceptibility M/H and the magnetic specific heat, Cmag/T = C/T (YLIG) −C/T(LIG), both show a power-law temperature dependence close to xc [Figs. 7(b) and 7(c), respectively]. This behavior is reminiscent of the exotic infinite-randomness quantum critical point accompanied by a quantum Griffiths phase, which results in power-law singularities of thermodynamic observables, e.g., C/T ~ M/H ~ Tλ−1 (Ref. [33]). The values of the exponent λ obtained from specific heat and magnetic susceptibility for x = 0.55–0.7 in YLIG are summarized in Table II. However, these values are not consistent with the predicted trend of λ for a Griffiths phase, where λ = 0 at the quantum critical point and it increases moving away from the critical point [34]. A Griffiths phase is formed by chemical substitution of a nonmagnetic element into a parent compound with long-range magnetic order. Therefore, the fact that our parent compound, YbIG, does not exhibit long-range magnetic order implies that the power-law dependence of C/T and M/H is only of some relevance to the physics of the Griffith phase.

FIG. 7.

FIG. 7.

(a) Zero-field temperature-dependent magnetic electrical resistivity ρmag of (Yb1−xLux)3Ir4Ge13. (b) Low-temperature magnetic susceptibility M/H vs T at μ0H = 0.01T∥a axis. (c) Zero-field magnetic specific heat Cmag/T of (Yb1−xLux)3Ir4Ge13 with conduction-electron and phonon contributions being subtracted. (d) T vs Lu concentration, x, phase diagram. The dashed line separates the low-T fragile magnetic state from the high-T paramagnetic state. SC stands for the superconducting state for LIG.

TABLE II.

The exponent λ obtained from M/H ~ Tλ−1 and Cmag/T ~ Tλ−1 for x = 0.55–0.7 in (Yb1−xLux)3Ir4Ge13.

x in (Yb1−xLux)3Ir4Ge13 0.55 0.6 0.7

λ in M/H ~ Tλ−1 0.58 0.42 0.36
λ in Cmag/T ~ Tλ−1 0.42 0.32 0.17

A recent theoretical model is aimed at describing the dilute-carrier Kondo limit in a honeycomb lattice [17]. In this context, the crystallographic details of YbIG become relevant: Given the even number of Yb atoms/sites (48) in one unit cell [inset of Fig. 2(a)], YbIG has the structural framework for which to employ the even-site-per-unit-cell Kondo-lattice model in the dilute-carrier limit. The theoretical study of such a model has shown that the Kondo effect in this regime gives rise to semimetallic behavior [17]. Although the theoretical model describes a honeycomb lattice symmetry instead of the tetragonal crystal system observed here, the essential physics of the even-site low-carrier framework is unambiguously the same. The ρ(T) behavior we have observed in the low-temperature regime of YbIG is compatible with this mechanism. At the same time, the RKKY interaction in this regime is expected to be long-ranged and thus inherently frustrated. This renders the fragile magnetism we have observed in YbIG a rather natural consequence. As such, we have not only discovered another regime of the Kondo effect and magnetic correlations in YbIG, but our work has also revealed how such effects can be tuned through the Lu-for-Yb substitution in YLIG, leading to Griffiths-phase-like properties.

IV. SUMMARY

In summary, YbIG is a low-carrier semimetal with Kondo behavior arising from a low-carrier nonmagnetic reference compound, LIG, and it displays fragile magnetism. The complex intertwinement of low-carrier character and magnetism in YLIG may lead to an exploration of the strong correlation effects in a semimetallic environment.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank B. S. Hitti for assistance with the μSR measurements, and J. M. Santiago for assistance with the neutron diffraction measurements. We thank K. Iwasa and M. S. Foster for fruitful discussions. B.K.R., C.-L.H., and E.M. acknowledge support from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation EPiQS Initiative through Grant No. GBMF 4417. N.L.W. is supported by the National Science Foundation of China (No. 11888101) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFA0300902 and No. 2017YFA0302904). A.M.H., M.N.W., and G.M.L. acknowledge support from NSERC of Canada. The neutron scattering work at Rice is supported by the U.S. DOE, BES under Contract No. DE-SC0012311 (P.D.). A part of the material characterization work at Rice is supported by the Robert A. Welch Foundation Grant No. C-1839 (P.D.). The theoretical work at Rice University was supported by NSF CAREER Grant No. DMR-1350237 (A.H.N.) and the Robert A. Welch Foundation Grant No. C-1818 (V.L. and A.H.N.), as well as by the NSF Grant No. DMR-1611392 and the Robert A. Welch Foundation Grant No. C-1411 (Q.S.), with travel support provided by the ARO Grant No. W911NF-14-1-0525. UT Dallas acknowledges support from NSF DMR-1700030. S.D. acknowledges Junior Short Award ICAM-I2CAM QuantEmX scientific report. S.D. and S.P. gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Austrian Science Funds (FWF doctoral program W1243 and FWF I2535-N27) and the U.S. Army research office (Grant No. W911NF-14-1-0496). The identification of any commercial product or trade name does not imply endorsement or recommendation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

APPENDIX

Figure 8 shows the low-temperature data of Lu3Ir4Ge13 to demonstrate its superconductivity with a transition temperature of 1.4 K. The dimensionless ΔCe/γTc = 1.11 suggests that the superconductivity of Lu3Ir4Ge13 is in the weak-coupling regime. From the resistivity ρ(T) plot in different fields, we determine the values of Tcon  below which ρ deviates from its normal-state value [dashed line in Fig. 8(c)]. The critical field μ0Hc2 versus Tcon plot is shown in Fig. 8(d), where μ0Hc2(Tcon) can be well described by the conventional Werthamer-Helfand-Hohenberg (WHH) theory, implying BCS-like superconductivity in Lu3Ir4Ge13.

FIG. 8.

FIG. 8.

Superconducting properties of Lu3Ir4Ge13. (a) Zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) magnetic susceptibility as a function of temperature at μ0H = 0.001 T. (b) Zero-field specific heat Cp/T vs T 2. The dashed line is the normal-state contribution. Two solid lines indicate local entropy conservation from which dimensionless ΔCeTc is determined. (c) Low-temperature resistivity with various magnetic fields. The violet dashed line represents the normal-state resistivity. (d) Critical field μ0Hc2vsTcon  plot. The red dashed line is a theoretical WHH curve.

References

  • [1].Stewart G, Rev. Mod. Phys 73, 797 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Pfleiderer C, Rev. Mod. Phys 81, 1551 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Takabatake T, Iga F, Yoshino T, Echizen Y, Katoh K, Kobayashi K, Higa M, Shimizu N, Bando Y, Nakamoto G, Fujii H, Izawa K, Suzuki T, Fujita T, Sera M, Hiroi M, Maezawa K, Mock S, Löhneysen HV, Brückl A, Neumaier K, and Andres K, J. Magn. Magn. Mater 177–181, 277 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Si Q and Steglich F, Science 329, 1161 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Takabatake T, Nakamoto G, Yoshino T, Fujii H, Izawa K, Nishigori S, Goshima H, Suzuki T, Fujita T, Maezawa K, Hiraoka T, Okayama Y, Oguro I, Menovsky AA, Neumaier K, Brückl A, and Andres K, Physica B 223, 413 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Nishigori S, Goshima H, Suzuki T, Fujita T, Nakamoto G, Tanaka H, Takabatake T, and Fujii H, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 65, 2614 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Luo Y, Ronning F, Wakehama N, Lu X, Park T, Xu Z-A, and Thompson JD, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 112, 13520 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Dzsaber S, Prochaska L, Sidorenko A, Eguchi G, Svagera R, Waas M, Prokofiev A, Si Q, and Paschen S, Phys. Rev. Lett 118, 246601 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].K Rai B, Oswald IWH, Wang JK, McCandless GT, Chan JY, and Morosan E, Chem. Mater 27, 2488 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Oswald IWH, Rai BK, McCandless GT, Morosan E, and Chan J, Cryst. Eng. Commun 19, 3381 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Rai BK, Oswald IWH, Chan JY, and Morosan E, Phys. Rev. B 93, 035101 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Malik SK, Menon L, Ghosh K, and Ramakrishnan S, Phys. Rev. B 51, 399 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Echizen Y, Umeo K, and Takabatake T, Solid State Commun. 111, 153 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Luo Y, Bao J, Shen C, Han J, Yang X, Lv C, Li Y, Jiao W, Si B, Feng C, Dai J, Cao G, and Xu Z-A, Phys. Rev. B 86, 245130 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Tafti FF, Gibson QD, Kushwaha SK, Haldolaarachchige N, and Cava RJ, Nat. Phys 12, 272 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Sun S, Wang Q, Guo P-J, Liu K, and Lei H, New J. Phys 18, 082002 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Feng X-Y, Zhong H, Dai J, and Si Q, arXiv:1605.02380. [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Lynn JW, Chen Y, Chang S, Zhao Y, Chi S, Ratcliff W II, Ueland BG, and Erwin RW, J. Res. NIST 117, 61 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Blundell SJ, Contemp. Phys 40, 175 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Suter A and Wojek B, Phys. Proc 30, 69 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Blaha P, Schwarz K, Madsen G, Kvasnicka D, and Luitz J, An Augmented Plane Wave + Local Orbitals Program for Calculating Crystal Properties (Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria, 2001). [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Perdew JP, Burke K, and Ernzerhof M, Phys. Rev. Lett 77, 3865 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Kumar A, Matteppanavar S, Thamizhavel A, and Ramakrishnan S, DAE Solid State Physics Symposium 2017, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 1942 (AIP, New York, 2018), p. 130060. [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Iwasa K, Huang C-L, Rai BK, Morosan E, Ohira-Kawamura S, and Nakajima K, arXiv:1810.11238. [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Cornelius AL, Christianson AD, Lawrence JL, Fritsch V, Bauer ED, Sarrao JL, Thompson JD, and Pagliuso PG, Physica B 378, 113 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Slebarski A, White BD, Fijalkowski M, Goraus J, Hamlin JJ, and Maple MB, Phys. Rev. B 86, 205113 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Chrisianson AD, Gardner JS, Kang HJ, Chung J-H, Bobev S, Sarrao JL, and Lawrence JM, J. Magn. Magn. Mater 310, 266 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Iwasa K, Otomo Y, Suyama K, Tomiyasu K, Ohira-Kawamura S, Nakajima K, and Mignot J-M, Phys. Rev. B 95, 195156 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Thomas EL, Lee H-O, Bankston AN, MaQuilon S, Klavins P, Moldovan M, Young DP, Fisk Z, and Chan JY, J. Solid State Chem 179, 1642 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Lue CS, Liu HF, Hsu SL, Chu MW, Liao HY, and Kuo YK, Phys. Rev. B 85, 205120 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Ban WJ, Luo JL, and Wang NL, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 405603 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Winzer K, Solid State Commun. 16, 521 (1975). [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Vojta T and Schmalian J, Phys. Rev. B 72, 045438 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Ubaid-Kassis S, Vojta T, and Schroeder A, Phys. Rev. Lett 104, 066402 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES