Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2024 Mar 14;132(3):037702. doi: 10.1289/EHP13984

Benzoyl Peroxide Drug Products Form Benzene

Kaury Kucera 1,, Nicola Zenzola 1, Amber Hudspeth 1, Mara Dubnicka 1, Wolfgang Hinz 1, Christopher G Bunick 2, Arash Dabestani 3, David Y Light 1
PMCID: PMC10939128  PMID: 38483533

Introduction

Benzoyl peroxide (BPO) is a diacyl peroxide with bactericidal activity used in topical drug products up to 10% concentration and is available through prescription or over-the-counter (OTC) for treatment of acne vulgaris (acne).1 Acne drug treatments commonly include topical creams, gels, or other drug product formulations that are left on the skin daily. Wash-away cleansers are also available, as are microencapsulated formulations that aim to stabilize benzoyl peroxide.2 Most products are applied daily and consistent use ranges from months to years where patients are chronically exposed to drug products with BPO.

BPO, produced as a crystalline powder, is known to thermally decompose to form two molecules of benzoyloxy radicals that can further decompose to benzoic acid or phenyl radicals with liberation of carbon dioxide. Depending on the chemical environment, the phenyl radicals produce end products that include benzene, phenyl benzoate, and biphenyl.3 A degradation mechanism from BPO ((C6H5CO)2O2) to benzene (C6H6) is shown below:

(C6H5CO)2O22C6H5CO2C6H5CO2C6H5+CO2C6H5+H+C6H6

There is no safe level of benzene exposure to humans and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance specifies that drug products should not contain benzene because of its unacceptable toxicity and benzene is permissible up to 2 ppm only for products where benzene is required for manufacturing.4 Since 2021, independent studies identifying benzene contamination have led to global recalls of consumer drug products, including hand sanitizers, sunscreens, antifungal sprays, and antiperspirants.5

To investigate both benzene concentrations produced within the topical drug products and gaseous benzene released into the surrounding air, orthogonal analytical techniques of gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and selected-ion flow-tube MS (SIFT-MS) were used. Incubation temperature of 37°C (98.6°F) was used to evaluate effect of standard body temperature, 50°C (122°F) was used to evaluate shelf-life performance as an accelerated stability testing temperature for pharmaceuticals,6 and 70°C (158°F) was used to evaluate transportation/passenger vehicle excursion temperature.7

Materials and Methods

Single lots of seven differently formulated and branded BPO products were selected based on availability from national retailers. The products used are listed with their packaged volume and unique product codes (UPCs) for a) GC-MS studies: Equate Beauty 2.5% BPO cleanser 4 oz (118 mL) UPC 681131200066, Neutrogena 10% BPO cleanser 5 oz (148 mL) UPC 070501024638, CVS Health 10% BPO face wash 6.6 oz (195 mL) UPC 050428326930, Walgreens 10% BPO cream 1.12 oz (33 mL) UPC 049022657021, Clean & Clear 10% BPO cleanser 5 oz (148 mL) UPC 38137-0032892; and b) SIFT-MS: Equate Beauty 10% BPO acne wash 5.5 oz (163 mL) UPC 681131436496, and Proactiv 2.5% BPO cleanser 4 oz (118 mL) UPC 842944102170.

GC-MS

GC-MS methodology in this investigation followed that previously used by Valisure’s laboratory for the analysis of benzene in consumer products, including the use of solvent blanks and isotopically labeled benzene in representative samples of consumer products.8 Benzene-13C6 (99.8% Sigma-Aldrich) was used for BPO studies. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; GC headspace grade, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for sample preparation and was separately tested with up to 10% BPO (98% Sigma-Aldrich) or benzoic acid (99.5% Sigma-Aldrich), and no benzene was observed following incubation up to 10 d at 37°C. The lower limit of detection (LLOD) was 10 ng (equivalent to 0.02 ppm in products), and the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was 25 ng. The measurement uncertainty was determined to be 20%.

Stability testing in a laboratory oven (Precision Freas Mechanical Convection Oven 605, Thermo Electron Corporation) was performed on five BPO products at 37°C for 4 wk and at 50°C for 3 wk.

Selected-Ion Flow-Tube MS

A Syft Technologies Voice200ultra mass spectrometer equipped with a high-performance inlet was used for measurement of benzene in real time from an environmental chamber.8 Two common BPO products were separately incubated at 70°C for 16.7 h using a 2-L DuoBath (Benchmark Scientific) that was placed in the chamber and filled with metallic Lab Armor Beads. The BPO products were removed from their external carboard packaging, if present, and caps on the primary BPO product containers were not removed.

The two product ions, C6H6·NO+ and C6H6+, with the respective masses of 108 and 78, were used to measure the concentration of benzene before and during the incubation of BPO products in the environmental chamber with 3-s measurement cycles.

System sensitivity was determined using two separate reference gasses (Don Wolf & Associates and GASCO) where benzene was contained at a known concentration of 5 ppm. The gasses were injected at known volumes into the chamber generating a 7-point curve with R2 values >0.995 and absolute concentrations within the expected variability of the reference standards. The LLOD and the LLOQ of benzene were calculated from the two separate reference gas calibration curves and resulted in Don Wolf & Associates LLOD of 1.55 ppb and LLOQ of 4.70 ppb and GASCO LLOD of 1.64 ppb and LLOG of 4.97 ppb.

Results

Screening for the presence of benzene via GC-MS analysis was performed on a representative selection of BPO acne treatment products. Product formulation matrix effects were accounted for using carbon-13 benzene, which has the same characteristics of benzene in recovery tests but can be differentiated by mass. All BPO products could form benzene, whereas no such evidence was observed in acne treatment products without BPO (detection below LLOD). The results of stability testing at 37°C and 50°C are shown in Figure 1. Testing products incubated at 70°C was discontinued due to package ruptures in the first week of incubation.

Figure 1.

Figures 1A and 1B are line graphs, plotting benzene concentration (parts per million), ranging from 0.0 to 60.0 in increments of 20.0 and 0 to 1,200 in increments of 400 (y-axis) across days of incubation, ranging from 0 to 30 in increments of 5 and 0 to 25 in increments of 5 (x-axis) for the following benzoyl peroxide drug products Equate Beauty, Neutrogena, Clean & Clear, C V S Health, and Walgreens, showing data fits (Figure 1A) Linear (Equate Beauty), Linear (Neutrogena), Linear (Clean & Clear), Linear (C V S Health), and Linear (Walgreens) and showing (Figure 1B) Linear (Equate Beauty), Exponential (Neutrogena), Exponential (Clean & Clear), Linear (C V S Health), and Linear (Walgreens).

Five common benzoyl peroxide (BPO) drug products incubated at (A) 37°C for 28 d and at (B) 50°C for 21 d and periodically sampled for benzene analysis. Results are displayed in parts per million. Depending on the pattern of benzene formation, either an exponential (Expon) or linear fit was applied.

Two common OTC BPO products were separately incubated at 70°C for 16.7 h and monitored in real time using SIFT-MS for the presence of benzene in the surrounding environment. No visible product container ruptures were observed in these tests. Results are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2 is a line graph, plotting Benzene, 1-minute average (parts per billion), ranging from 0 to 3,000 in increments of 500 (y-axis) across time incubated at 70 degrees Celsius, ranging from 0 to 18 (hours) in increments of 2 (x-axis) for Equate Beauty and Proactive benzoyl peroxide drug products.

Benzene levels detected in real-time by selected-ion flow-tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) during 70°C incubation of two benzoyl peroxide (BPO) drug products. Benzene concentration is displayed in parts per billion and as a moving average of 1-min detection intervals. Both products were incubated without modification from primary packaging; notably caps were not opened.

Discussion

This study raises substantial concerns about the safety of BPO products currently on the market, which appear to form benzene, a known human carcinogen and environmental hazard. Benzene was detected in all BPO product samples tested and levels increased during incubation at body and shelf-life performance temperatures to >2 ppm, which is the conditionally restricted FDA limit for benzene for drug products.3 Furthermore, BPO was detected in the environment surrounding two unopened primary product containers, which suggests that BPO products could emit substantial amounts of benzene from their original packaging prior to use. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has determined that a lifetime exposure to 0.4 ppb of benzene in air can lead to one additional cancer case in 100,000 exposed persons.9 If the benzene concentration detected in this study in a 528-L environmental chamber were formed in the 3,000L of air in a hot passenger vehicle, benzene concentration could exceed 400 ppb, or over 1,000 times this US EPA limit.

Solid BPO at purities up to 75% is known to be thermally stable to 98°C10 and various pharmaceutical additives are known to destabilize BPO.3 Therefore, reformulation with attention to benzene formation, could lead to BPO drug products that will not form benzene over time. Further investigation of BPO stability should be undertaken and regulatory actions should be considered in the interest of protecting public health.

Acknowledgments

Valisure is an independent laboratory accredited to International Organization for Standardization (ISO/IEC) 17025:2017 standards for chemical testing. Valisure’s mission is to help ensure the safety and quality of medications and health care products before they reach consumers. We thank Syft Technologies for providing expertise and instrument time to this study.

Conclusions and opinions are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the policies or views of EHP Publishing or the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

References


Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES