Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Mar 14;19(3):e0298414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298414

Enhancing farmed striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) robustness through dietary β-glucan

Sheeza Bano 1, Noor Khan 1, Mahroze Fatima 1, Anjum Khalique 2, Murat Arslan 3, Sadia Nazir 1, Muhammad Asghar 1, Ayesha Khizar 1, Simon John Davies 4, Alex H L Wan 4,*
Editor: Ishtiyaq Ahmad5
PMCID: PMC10939287  PMID: 38483918

Abstract

β-glucan is a well-documented feed additive for its potent immunostimulatory properties in many farmed fish species. This study examined how it can also be a promising growth promoter, modulate antioxidant enzyme activities, and act as an anti-stress agent in striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus). A 12-week feeding experiment was untaken to determine the effects of dietary β-glucan supplementation at graded levels (0, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 g kg-1). Measured indicators suggest that a dietary inclusion level of 1.5 g kg-1 β-glucan gave the highest positive responses: weight gain (120.10 g fish-1), survival (98.30%), and lower FCR (1.70) (P<0.05). Whole body proximate analysis had only revealed that crude protein was significantly affected by the dietary inclusion of β-glucan (P<0.05), with the highest protein content (19.70%) being in fish that were fed with 1.5 g kg-1 β-glucan. Although other inclusion levels (i.e., 0.5 and 1 g kg-1) of β-glucan did not enhance body protein content (P>0.05). The assessment of fatty acid composition in muscle, liver, and adipose tissues showed modifications with the inclusion of β-glucan. Antioxidative-related enzyme activities (inc. catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase) that were measured in the liver had higher levels when fed with β-glucan inclusion diets (P<0.05). Following the feed trial, fish were subjected to crowding stress treatment. It was subsequently found that catfish fed with β-glucan-based diet groups had lower levels of blood stress-related indicators compared to the control group with no dietary β-glucan. The use of 1.5 g kg-1 of dietary β-glucan resulted in the lowest measured levels of cortisol (43.13 ng mL-1) and glucose (50.16 mg dL-1). This study has demonstrated that the dietary inclusion of β-glucan can have functional benefits beyond the immunological enhancements in striped catfish. Furthermore, its use can increase production levels and mitigate the stress associated with intensive farming practices.

1. Introduction

As the human population grows, there is a greater need for food, but there is also a need for the food to be sustainably produced, limiting its impact on the environment and natural resources. Given their high feed conversion efficiencies and tolerance to intensive farming practices (e.g., higher stock densities) can provide a sustainable proteinous food source. However, intensive fish farming practices can induce a number of stressors on the animals during the production cycle, e.g., handling, hierarchy, and environmental stressors. These stressors can directly or indirectly affect fish health and compromise its ability to tolerate further stress [1]. Glucans (β-glucan) are a group of high molecular weight glucose polymers that are commercially used as an immune stimulatory feed additive [24]. These highly functional polysaccharides can be derived from yeast, fungi, algae, bacteria, and cereals. The immunological stimulatory bioactivity relates to the chemical similarities to fungal and bacteria cell wall signally molecules that are recognised by the immune system. The recognition of β-glucan by cell receptors in the gastrointestinal tract stimulates an inflammatory cascade response, increasing antibody production and resistance to pathogens [5, 6]. Other functional benefits to farmed fish have also been shown in β-glucan. For example, the compound can increase the activity of antioxidative-related enzymes (e.g., catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase) and subsequently lead to a reduction of measured reactive oxygen species (ROS) [7].

Past studies have shown that dietary use of β-glucan can enhance disease resistance in commercially important farmed species, such as common carp (Cyprinus carpio [8]), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss [9]), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar [10]), and sea bream (Sparus aurata, [11] and are employed in commercial aquafeeds. The response from the fish to dietary β-glucan can be variable depending on the farmed species, age class, and the duration of the compound being used. Depending on the β-glucan source, the molecular structure and binding abilities to the cell receptors in the fish. This would bring about different physiological responses in the animal [12]. Furthermore, these differences can result in variability in the optimal inclusion level to achieve the highest desired response [13].

Wild striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) are found in tropical freshwater environments in the Mekong River, Vietnam and Chao Phraya River, Thailand [14]. It is also a commercially farmed species, and in 2021, over 2.5 million tonnes of striped catfish were estimated to have been produced [15]. Due to its high growth rate, ease of rearing, and ability to take in oxygen from the air, the farming of this species has spread to include nations such as those in the Middle East. It is now a growing farmed fish species with the potential to provide a sustainable food source for the region. However, the need for sustainable food sources can comprise animal health and productivity rates. The present study seeks to understand how β-glucan can benefit farmed striped catfish other than its well-documented immunostimulation effect on the fish. The study will examine how β-glucan can influence fish growth performance, proximate composition, fatty acid profile, enzyme activities and relating to the antioxidative response. A post-feed trial study was also undertaken to understand further whether β-glucan can benefit farmed striped catfish after crowding stress.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Test feed design and production

The design of the feed trial was to establish the optimum level of β-glucan. A previous study by Bano et al. [16] showed that 1 g kg-1 elicited a positive response. Similarly, other studies found the best level was 1 g kg-1 compared to other lowest or highest levels [1721]. Therefore, the following graded levels were tested: 0 (G0), 0.5 (G0.5), 1.0 (G1.0), and 1.5 (G1.5) g kg-1 using β-glucan derived from yeast (Food Chem, Huzhou, China). Test diets were prepared from a basal diet formulation (30% crude protein) with the graded levels of β-glucan. The basal diet formulation and proximate composition of the basal diet and fatty acid profiles are presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. All feed ingredients were ground to a particle size of less than 1.0 mm using an electric mixer. Feed ingredients were mixed thoroughly, and feeds were pelletised using a meat extruder (ANEX Model AG3060, Kowloon, Hong Kong). Feed pellets (3.0 mm diameter) were air-dried, packed, and stored at -20°C for later use and analysis.

Table 1. Diet formulation and proximate composition of the basal diet (%, dry weight).

Diet formulation
Fish meala 30.00
Soybean meala 16.00
Corn glutena 11.00
Wheat flourb 20.00
Rice polish 15.00
Sunflower oil 6.00
Vitamin premixc 1.00
Mineral premixd 1.00
Nutritional composition
Moisture 8.00
Protein 29.72
Lipid 9.92
Ash 10.00
Fibre 3.10
Energy, MJ kg-1 19.52
Protein/Energy ratio, mg kJ-1 16.01

a Fish meal (50% CP), soybean meal (45% CP), corn gluten (60% CP), and rice polish Purchased from Aqua Feeds Pvt Ltd Muktan, Pakistan.

b Family Flour Mill, Pattoki, Pakistan.

c Vitamin mixture: Vitamin A 3,500,000 IU kg-1, vitamin B1 3,500 mg kg-1, Vitamin D3 1,750,000 IU kg-1, Zn gluconate 40 g kg-1, vitamin E 3.500 mg kg-1, vitamin PP (nicotinamide) 30 g kg-1, sorbitol 20 g kg-1 (Fivevet, Central Veterinary Medicine JSC No. 5, Ha Noi, Vietnam).

d Mineral mixture: Ferrous sulphate 25 g kg-1, calcium phosphate 397 g kg-1, calcium lactate 327 g kg-1, magnesium sulphate 137 g kg-1, sodium chloride 60 g kg-1, potassium chloride 50 g kg-1, potassium iodide 150 mg kg-1, manganese oxide 800 mg kg-1, copper sulphate 780 mg kg-1, zinc oxide 1.5 g kg-1, cobalt carbonate 100 mg kg-1, manganese oxide 800 mg kg-1, sodium selenite 20 mg kg-1 (Fivevet, Central Veterinary Medicine JSC No. 5, Ha Noi, Vietnam).

Table 2. Fatty acid composition of the basal diet (% of the total fatty acids).

14:0 0.80
16:0 6.30
16:1n-7 0.10
18:0 3.10
18:1n-9 32.80
18:2n-6 55.50
18:3n-3 0.10
20:0 <0.05
20:2n-6 <0.05
20:4n-6 <0.05
20:5n-3 0.10
22:6n-3 1.20
ΣSFA 10.20
ΣMUFA 32.80
ΣPUFA 56.90
Σn3 1.40
Σn6 55.60
n3/n6 0.03

2.2 Fish and trial facility

Striped catfish (~250 g fish-1 initial weight; ~seven months; fed with a 30% crude protein commercial diet) was sourced from the Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (Ravi Campus, Pattoki, Pakistan). Fish were kept in concrete tanks for two weeks before the commencement of the feed trial. Fish were then transferred and acclimated into an earthen pond (half an acre with 1.2 m depth). Groups of fifteen fish (250.37 ± 0.82 g fish-1) were randomly allocated into twelve cages [hapas, 245 (L) ×180 (W) × 90 (D) cm] and placed into the pond. The hapas were made of synthetic green nylon net and designed to have two nested compartments tied to a bamboo pole frame. The inner compartment had a mesh size of 1.1 cm that held the fish. Uneaten pellets pass to the outer compartment, composed of a finer mesh netting (1.5 mm). The top of the cages was covered with another net to prevent escape and predation.

Allocation of each test feed was randomly assigned to each cage to give a triplicate treatment design (n = 3). Water exchanges were performed daily on the pond to prevent excess build-up of waste nutrients using well water. Paddle wheels were used to maintain aeration in the pond system cages. The water quality parameters were measured at 08:00 am, before feeding, including the water temperature (30 ±0.31°C, standard deviation, SD), pH (6.32 ±0.17, SD), dissolved oxygen (5.60 ±0.25 mg L-1, SD) and total dissolved solids (1320 ±0.11 mg L-1, SD) using the Hanna HI 9828/4-01 multi-parameter (Chelmsford, UK). The fish were fed twice daily (09:00 and 16:00) at 3% of the body weight. After twenty minutes of giving the feed ration, the uneaten feed was collected from the outer compartment of hapas to ascertain net feed consumption. Fish were weighed fortnightly, and the feed rations to each cage were adjusted to reflect the biomass increase.

2.3 Animal ethics

The research protocols and procedures used on this fish trial was approved by the animal use and animal care committee of the University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan (DR/161, 26-04-2021).

2.4 Growth performance, survival, and feed utilisation

After the twelve-week feed trial, feed rations were withheld for 24 hr to allow gut clearance, counted, and weighed for the following calculations.

Weightgain,gfish1=finalweightginitialweightg (1)
FeedconversionratioFCR=feedconsumedg/wetweightgainedg (2)
SpecificgrowthrateSGR,%day1=100×lnfinalweightglninitialweightg/days (3)
Survival,%=100×numberofsurvivedfish/initialnumberoffish (4)

2.5 Proximate composition

Samples of formulated feed and experimental fish were examined for moisture, crude protein, crude fat, and ash by following the protocol of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists [22]. For sample collection, two fish from each cage were randomly captured and euthanised with clove oil (0.40 mL L-1) and stored samples at -20°C until the analysis. For the moisture content, whole-body fish samples were oven-dried (Universal Oven UN260, Memmert, Germany) at 105°C until a constant weight was obtained. The protein content (N × 6.25) was ascertained by the Kjeldahl apparatus (Kjeltec 8100, FOSS, Hilleroed, Denmark). Crude fat was extracted by using the Soxhlet apparatus (R106S, Behr Labor-Technik, Dusseldorf, Germany), and ash contents were determined by using a muffle furnace at 550°C (TMF-3100, Eyela Co., Tokyo, Japan).

2.6 Fatty acid profile

At the end of the trial, two additional fish from each cage were randomly sampled and euthanised with clove oil (0.40 mL L-1). The fish were then dissected to obtain the muscle, liver, and adipose tissues. Samples were grounded and stored at -80°C until it was later used for fatty acids analysis. Lipid extraction of test diets and fish samples was performed according to the procedure of [23] by homogenising the samples in a solution of chloroform:methanol (2:1, v/v). Samples were then esterified into fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) [24], and subsequently analysed on a gas chromatography flame ionisation detector (Agilent 6890N, Santa Clara, USA). Fatty acids were identified by comparing the known fatty acids standards (Supelco 37 Component FAME Mix, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany).

2.7 Antioxidant enzyme activity

At the end of the experiment, two additional fish were randomly sampled from each cage and euthanised using clove oil (0.40 mL L-1). The euthanised fish were sampled for the liver, and muscle tissues were removed and kept at -80°C until later analysis on antioxidant enzyme activity. The tissue samples (1/4, w/v) were homogenised in nine volumes of 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH, 7.4), 0.1% Triton X-100, and 1 mM EDTA. The homogenates were centrifuged for 10 minutes (860 g at 4 ºC) to remove the solid particulates (5810R, Eppendorf centrifuge, Hamburg, Germany) and the supernatant was removed and stored at -80 ºC for later analysis [25]. Catalase enzyme activity (CAT; EC 1.11.1.6) activity was accessed by following the protocol [26]. Glutathione peroxidase activity (GPx; EC 1.11.1.9) was evaluated according to Flohé and Günzler methodology [27]. Superoxide dismutase activity (SOD; EC 1.15.1.1) was measured following the method described by Giannopolitis and Ries [28].

2.8 Crowding stress assessment

After the twelve-week feeding trial, blood samples were collected from two fish per cage as a baseline indicator before the fish were subjected to a crowding stress assessment. The remaining fish from each rearing cage was then transferred to 12 test tanks (6 or 7 survival) corresponding to the dietary treatments. For stress induction, fish were exposed to stress for 2 hr by reducing 90% of the water level at a depth of 50 cm [29]. After 2 hr of stress, the blood was collected from 2 fish per tank (6 per treatment) at the end of this period. Then, the water was returned to the normal level and continuously aerated to maintain the dissolved oxygen at 5.8 mg L-1. Blood samples from two fish in each tank were collected randomly and sampled after 8 hr and 24 h of stress induction. Fish sampled after each blood sampling (2, 8, and 24 hr) were kept in a separate tank and a new fish was sampled subsequently. Fish were anaesthetised with clove oil (0.20 ml L-1) before blood samples were taken at the caudal ventral vein 5 min after capture. Blood samples were kept at room temperature for 1 hr to allow clotting and centrifuged at 3,000 g at 4 ºC for 15 min. Separated serum was removed for storage and kept at -80 ºC for later analysis on cortisol and glucose levels as indicators to stress [30]. For serum cortisol, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit was used to determine cortisol levels (DKO00, Diametra, Milano, Italy [31]). Measurements of the serum glucose levels were based on the biuret method and were performed through a commercial assay kit (Pars Azmun, Tehran, Iran).

2.9 Statistical analysis

The results were presented as mean values with the corresponding standard deviation. Datasets were assessed for statistical significance using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Posthoc Tukey test was undertaken to identify statistical differences between dietary treatments (SAS 9.1 Software package, Cary, North Carolina, U.S.A). Two-way ANOVA was used to determine the statistical significance of diet, time, and diet x time on stress indicators- glucose and cortisol, and posthoc Tukey test was conducted to discern treatment x time effect. A principal component analysis was undertaken to visualise and discern possible relationships in the measured fatty acids. Differences were considered statistically significant when was P<0.05 [32].

3. Results

3.1 Growth performance, feed utilisation, and survival

At the end of the feeding trial, growth performance, feed conversion ratio (FCR), and survival were significantly influenced by the dietary treatments (P<0.05). There was a trend where growth performance indicators were enhanced as the dietary β-glucan dosage increased. The highest mean final weight, weight gain, and specific growth rate were observed in fish fed with 1.5 g kg-1 β-glucan diet. While fish fed with the dietary control had the lowest growth measurements, e.g., weight gain (90 g), specific growth rate (3.74%), and feed conversion ratio (2.11). Fish fed with a β-glucan inclusion level of 1.5 g kg-1 had the lowest FCR, and the control group had the highest values, which were 1.70 and 2.11, respectively. Fish fed with dietary β-glucan supplementation, regardless of the inclusion levels, had significantly higher growth and lower FCR in comparison to the control fish (P<0.022). Although the survival rate was not influenced by the dietary treatments and on average, the survival was 96.1% (Table 3).

Table 3. Growth performance and feed utilisation of striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) fed with graded levels of β-glucan for 12 weeks (n = 3).

Test diets
G0 G0.5 G1.0 G1.5 P-value
Mean initial weight; g fish-1 250.20±0.50 250.26±1.00 250.50±1.50 250.50±0.50 0.860
Mean final weight; g fish-1 340.50±5.70c 354.60±2.80b 363.00±2.00ab 370.30±5.90a <0.001
Mean weight gain; g fish-1 90.00±6.20c 104.33±1.80b 112.50±3.50ab 120.10±6.10a <0.001
SGR; % day-1 3.74±0.05c 3.86±0.01b 3.92±0.07b 4.01±0.04a 0.020
FCR 2.11±0.05a 1.90±0.03b 1.81±0.04c 1.70±0.02d 0.022
Survival; % 93.30±0.00 95.60±3.80 97.80±3.80 97.80±3.80 0.100

Data are presented as mean values with ± SD. Different superscripts on the same row indicate there is a significant difference (P<0.05, ANOVA). SGR: specific growth rate; FCR: feed conversion ratio. Dietary treatments: 0, (G0); 0.5 (G0.5); 1.0 (G1.0); 1.5 (G1.5) g kg-1 β-glucan inclusion level.

3.2 Proximate composition

With the exception of the crude protein content (P<0.05), dietary treatments did not significantly influence the proximate body composition in striped catfish (Table 4, P>0.05). Fish fed with a 1.5 g kg-1 β-glucan diet had the highest crude protein content (19.70%), while those fed the control diet had the lowest value (17.60%).

Table 4. Proximate composition of striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) fed with graded levels of β-glucan for 12 weeks (n = 3, % of wet weight).

Test diets
G0 G0.5 G1.0 G1.5 P-value
Moisture 73.91±0.10 73.24±0.10 73.12±0.10 72.90±0.20 0.086
Crude protein 17.60±0.40b 18.10±0.60b 18.70±0.80ab 19.70±0.40a 0.014
Crude fat 6.20±0.60 6.40±0.50 5.90±0.10 5.08±0.60 0.500
Ash 1.30±0.10 1.30±0.00 1.20±0.00 1.10±0.00 0.076

Data are presented as mean values with ± SD. Different superscripts on the same row indicate there is a significant difference (P<0.05). Dietary treatments: 0, (G0); 0.5 (G0.5); 1.0 (G1.0); 1.5 (G1.5) g kg-1 β-glucan inclusion level.

3.3 Fatty acid profile

The test diets did not significantly influence the fatty acid profile in either the muscle, liver, and adipose tissues (Tables 57). Saturated fatty acids (SFA) were highest in the liver, while monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) were dominant in adipose and muscle, respectively. The n3/n6 ratio was 0.05, 0.10, and <0.01 in muscle, liver, and adipose tissues. Linoleic acid (LA; 18:2n-6) was the most abundant fatty acid in muscle and liver. The fatty acid profile of adipose tissue was dominated by linoleic acid and oleic acid (OA; 18:1n-9). Both eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA; 20:5n-3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; 22:6n-3) were highest in the liver (0.90 and 2.90%, respectively) and lowest in adipose (< 0.05%). Muscle EPA and DHA levels were 0.30 and 1.30%, respectively. PCA on the fatty acid composition showed there was no discrete grouping between dietary groups amongst the muscle, liver, and adipose tissues (Fig 1).

Table 5. Fatty acid profile of muscle in striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) fed with graded levels of β-glucan for 12 weeks (%, n = 3).

Test diets
G0 G0.5 G1.0 G1.5
14:0 1.50±0.30 1.05±0.30 1.60±0.40 1.50±0.20
16:0 25.20±0.5 25.01±0.70 25.20±0.20 25.30±0.40
16:1n-7 2.30±0.10 2.20±0.30 2.30±0.20 2.20±0.30
18:0 3.30±0.20 3.40±0.40 3.30±0.50 3.50±0.40
18:1n-9 29.40±0.50 29.30±0.60 29.30±0.80 29.40±0.30
18:2n-6 33.50±0.40 33.80±0.70 33.50±0.50 33.40±0.60
18:3n-3 0.10±0.10 0.20±0.20 0.10±0.00 0.10±0.00
20:0 0.20±0.20 0.20±0.00 0.20±0.00 0.20±0.10
20:2n-6 1.20±0.20 1.10±0.20 1.20±0.10 1.20±0.20
20:4n-6 1.60±0.30 1.50±0.20 1.50±0.30 1.50±0.10
20:5n-3 0.30±0.20 0.30±0.10 0.30±0.10 0.30±0.00
22:6n-3 1.30±0.20 1.30±0.10 1.40±0.30 1.30±0.20
ΣSFA 30.20±0.40 30.20±0.50 30.30±0.50 30.60±0.40
ΣMUFA 31.70±0.50 31.50±0.10 31.60±0.60 31.60±0.40
ΣPUFA 38.10±0.20 38.30±0.30 38.10±0.60 37.80±0.70
n3 1.80±0.10 1.80±0.20 1.80±0.10 1.80±0.10
n6 36.30±0.30 36.50±0.20 36.20±0.20 36.00±0.40
n3/n6 0.05±0.01 0.05±0.01 0.05±0.00 0.05±0.01

Data are presented as mean values with ± SD. Dietary treatments: 0, (G0); 0.5 (G0.5); 1.0 (G1.0); 1.5 (G1.5) g kg-1 β-glucan inclusion level.

Table 7. Fatty acid profile of adipose in striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) fed with graded levels of β-glucan for 12-weeks (%, n = 3).

Test diets
G0 G0.5 G1.0 G1.5
14:0 2.40±0.20 2.50±0.30 2.30±0.20 2.40±0.20
16:0 16.50±0.30 16.50±0.30 16.40±0.40 16.30±0.20
16:1n-7 2.30±0.10 2.30±0.00 2.30±0.00 2.30±0.00
18:0 4.60±0.00 4.60±0.10 4.70±0.1 4.70±0.00
18:1n-9 34.80±0.20 34.80±0.10 34.90±0.20 34.90±0.20
18:2n-6 35.80±0.20 35.90±0.20 35.80±0.20 35.80±0.10
18:3n-3 0.10±0.00 0.10±0.00 0.10±0.00 0.10±0.00
20:0 3.30±0.20 3.30±0.10 3.30±0.10 3.30±0.00
20:2n-6 0.10±0.00 0.10±0.00 0.10±0.00 0.10±0.00
20:4n-6 0.10±0.00 0.10±0.00 0.10±0.00 0.10±0.00
20:5n-3 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
22:6n-3 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
ΣSFA 26.80±0.20 26.80±0.30 26.70±0.20 26.60±0.20
ΣMUFA 37.20±0.10 37.30±0.20 37.20±0.20 37.20±0.20
ΣPUFA 36.00±0.20 36.00±0.20 36.10±0.10 36.10±0.20
n3 0.10±0.00 0.10±0.00 0.10±0.00 0.10±0.00
n6 35.90±0.20 35.90±0.10 36.00±0.20 36.00±0.20
n3/n6 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

Data are presented as mean values with ± SD. Dietary treatments: 0, (G0); 0.5 (G0.5); 1.0 (G1.0); 1.5 (G1.5) g kg-1 β-glucan inclusion level.

Fig 1. Principal component analysis of the fatty acid composition in striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) after being fed with β-glucan supplemented diets- first and second component.

Fig 1

A) Muscle; B) Liver; C) Adipose tissue. Dietary treatment: ● 0, (G0); ■, 0.5, (G0.5); ♦ 1.0, (G1.0); ▲1.5, (G1.5) g kg-1 glucan inclusion level. The first and second component explains 71.60, 69.60, and 51.80% of the cumulative error in the fatty acid composition of muscle, liver and adipose tissue, respectively.

Table 6. Fatty acid profile of liver in striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) fed with graded levels of β-glucan for 12 weeks (%, n = 3).

Test diets
G0 G0.5 G1.0 G1.5
14:0 3.40±0.30 3.50±0.20 3.20±0.40 3.50±0.30
16:0 26.40±0.40 26.30±0.30 26.60±0.50 26.40±0.30
16:1n-7 1.80±0.20 2.00±0.20 1.90±0.10 2.00±0.20
18:0 2.60±0.20 2.60±0.10 2.60±0.10 2.50±0.20
18:1n-9 25.20±0.50 25.00±0.60 24.90±0.40 25.00±0.50
18:2n-6 31.50±0.40 31.20±0.20 31.20±0.50 31.40±0.30
18:3n-3 0.80±0.20 0.90±0.30 0.90±0.30 0.80±0.20
20:0 0.40±0.20 0.40±0.10 0.30±0.10 0.30±0.20
20:2n-6 1.70±0.20 1.80±0.30 1.80±0.50 1.90±0.40
20:4n-6 2.60±0.20 2.60±0.20 2.50±0.30 2.50±0.20
20:5n-3 0.80±0.20 0.90±0.30 1.00±0.30 0.90±0.20
22:6n-3 2.90±0.20 2.80±0.20 2.90±0.10 2.90±0.20
ΣSFA 32.80±0.20 32.80±0.10 32.80±0.10 32.70±0.20
ΣMUFA 27.00±0.30 26.90±0.50 26.80±0.50 27.00±0.30
ΣPUFA 40.20±0.40 40.20±0.30 40.40±0.30 40.40±0.40
n3 4.50±0.20 4.60±0.30 4.90±0.50 4.60±0.60
n6 35.80±0.40 35.60±0.30 35.50±0.20 35.80±0.30
n3/n6 0.10±0.00 0.10±0.00 0.10±0.00 0.10±0.00

Data are presented as mean values with ± SD. Dietary treatments: 0, (G0); 0.5 (G0.5); 1.0 (G1.0); 1.5 (G1.5) g kg-1 β-glucan inclusion level.

3.4 Antioxidant enzymes activities

At the end of the feed trial, antioxidative-related enzyme activities in the liver were significantly influenced by dietary β-glucan supplementations (P<0.05; Fig 2). The highest and lowest catalase activities were observed in fish fed G1.5 (71.20 U mg-1) and G0 (control) diets (54.10 U mg-1), respectively. Fish fed β-glucan supplemented diets had significantly higher CAT activities than those fed on the control diet in all circumstances. Glutathione peroxidase activity was significantly higher in the G1.5 dietary fish group (61.30 U mg-1) than in those fed the other three experimental diets. Fish fed with the control diet had lower GPx activity (45.00 U mg-1) than those fed β-glucan supplemented diets, while G0.5 and G1.0 fed fish exhibited similar GPx activities. Superoxide dismutase activity was significantly lower in fish-fed with the control diet in comparison to those fed β-glucan supplemented diets, which had similar SOD activities.

Fig 2. Effect of β-glucan supplementation on antioxidant enzymes in muscle (A, B, and C) and liver (D, E, and F) of striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus).

Fig 2

Results are presented as mean ±SD. Bars with different letters are significantly different (P<0.05). Dietary treatments: 0, (G0); 0.5 (G0.5); 1.0 (G1.0); 1.5 (G1.5) g kg-1 β-glucan inclusion level.

Regarding muscle antioxidant enzymes, CAT and GPx activities were significantly influenced by the dietary treatments (P<0.05), while there were no significant changes observed in SOD activity (Fig 2). Fish fed with G1.0 and G1.5 diets had significantly higher CAT activities in comparison to G0 and G0.5 dietary groups. Similar to the liver results, muscle GPx activity was the highest in the G1.5 dietary fish group (37.40 U mg-1) compared to the other three test diets. Fish fed with the dietary control had significantly lower GPx activity (27.90 U mg-1) than those fed β-glucan supplemented diets, while G0.5 and G1.0 fed fish exhibited similar GPx activities.

3.5 Crowding stress response

Test diets had significantly affected both serum cortisol and glucose levels in both fish pre and post-crowding stress (P<0.001, Table 8). Prior to the crowding stress, the lowest serum cortisol and glucose levels were found in fish fed with the G1.5 diet, while fish in the G0 (control) group had the highest measured values. These differences are inverse dose dependence relationships, where increasing β-glucan inclusion leads to decreasing stress indicator levels.

Table 8. Cortisol and glucose levels in striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) pre and post crowd stressing (n = 3).

hr Diet P-value
G0 G0.5 G1.0 G1.5 Diet Time Diet*Time
Cortisol [ng dL-1]
0 55.73±2.45d,e,f 48.8±2.02f,g,h 45.46±2.19g,h 43.20±2.48h <0.001 <0.001 0.022
2 75.5±2.92a 69.86±2.01a,b 63.73±1.27b,c,d 62.33±1.45b,c,d
8 74.57±4.16a 68.23±2.82a,b,c 63.71±3.49b,c,d 60.40±3.07c,d,e
24 67.86±3.37a,b,c 52.42±2.43e,f,g 46.63±4.74g,h 43.13±1.20h
Glucose [mg dL-1]
0 61.16±2.02f,g 59.33±1.15g,h 53.67±1.53i,j 52.47±1.48i,j <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
2 73.50±1.40a 68.20±1.62b,c,d 74.3±2.29a 71.35±2.11ab
8 67.43±2.00b,c 67.26±2.52c,d,e 59.50±1.17g,h 58.4±2.23g,h
24 57.28±1.20d,e,f 55.8±1.37e,f 51.75±1.62h,i 50.16±0.76j

Two-way ANOVA. Different superscripts represent the differences between groups and time (P<0.05).

The effect of time did reduce the measured stress indicators (P<0.001). After inducing crowding stress (2 hr), fish in the G1.5 diet group had a difference of 17.48% lower cortisol when compared to fish fed with the G0 diet, while glucose levels were 21.12% lower. These trends were repeated in both 8 hr and 24 hr measurements. There was a stepwise decrease in mean cortisol and glucose levels. Only the dietary β-glucan treatment groups had returned to their pre-stress levels after 8 hr post crowding stress. In contrast, the control group did not return to their pre-stress levels at 24 hr of crowding. Two-way ANOVA showed an interaction effect between diet and time in cortisol and glucose levels, P = 0.022 and P<0.001, respectively.

4. Discussion

In the present study, dietary β-glucan had significantly improved growth performance and feed utilisation indices, body crude protein content, and antioxidant enzyme activities in striped catfish. The effects were most pronounced at the dosage of 1.5 g kg-1. In comparison, β-glucan supplementation also improved the growth rate of other farmed aquatic species, including the Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei [33]) and freshwater gangetic mytus catfish (Mystus cavasius [34]). In contrast, other studies reported that dietary β-glucan had no influence on growth performance in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus, [35]) and channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) [36]. The exact mechanism by which β-glucan promotes growth is not fully understood. However, there is some indication that somatic growth is increased due to the glucanase synthesis that degrades the β-glucans to produce energy [37]. While the increase in growth and survival may be due to improved digestive function resulting in better nutrient absorption to meet greater dietary needs [38]. The attributing factor may result from selective fermentation in the polysaccharide by probiotic bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract. This can subsequently lead to better gut health and greater nutrient bioavailability. In the present study, dietary treatments did not affect the survival rate. Likewise, dietary β-glucan also did not influence the survival rate in juvenile Persian sturgeon (Acipenser persicus [21]). Although β-glucan supplementation did increase the survival rate of pompano fish (Trachinotus ovatus) when fed at an inclusion level of 1.0 g kg-1 [39].

The whole-body fish composition is directly related to the composition of their feed and its nutritional value [40]. The dietary β-glucan supplementation did not modify the proximate composition except for crude protein in the current study. The present study found an increasing trend in the body protein content with increasing dietary β-glucans inclusion. In comparison, by adding β-glucan into to red sea bream (Pagrus major) diet, the fish body content also increased [41]. β-glucan supplementation in Caspian kutum (Rutilus frisii kutum) diet, the authors reported an improved crude protein content. Although the moisture, lipid, and ash contents were unchanged [42].

Modifying the fish fillet fatty acid profile by incorporating feed supplements is important because of its potential health benefits to consumers [43, 44]. The present study is the first to investigate the dietary effects of β-glucan on the fatty acid composition in fish tissue. Although in a previous study, dietary β-glucan modified the proportions of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids, which improved the meat flavour and quality in finishing pigs [45]. Compared to the current study, β-glucan supplementation did not influence the fatty acid profile in the muscle, liver, or adipose tissues.

It has been documented that there is a correlation between the stress the farmed fish experiences and its impact on its health status. Mitigating metabolic and physiological stress using functional feed ingredients, such as antioxidants, can modulate the fish’s antioxidant enzymes and immune response [46]. While enhancing the antioxidative capacity without the need for antioxidants is also possible. This was observed in the current study, where both CAT, SOD, and GPx antioxidant enzymes measured in the fish liver and muscle were enhanced with increasing levels of dietary β-glucan. However, the dosages used in the present trial were insufficient to ascertain an optimum inclusion. This is due to no downward trend observed in the higher β-glucan inclusion levels. Some past studies have shown an optimum inclusion level based on antioxidative-related assays, such as in red sea bream (Pagrus major), where the dietary level was at 0.5 g kg-1 β-glucan [41]. Other studies have also observed that β-glucan addition can increase antioxidative levels, including CAT, SOD, and GPx, even after disease or stimulated disease-challenged [4750]. Furthermore, even crude forms of β-glucan can also enhance antioxidative capacity. For example, using yeast cell walls partly composed of β-glucan can enhance the antioxidant enzyme activities [51, 52].

In the present study, the measured SOD activity was affected by dietary treatments in the muscle, where the activity level was significantly higher in β-glucan supplemented diets. Although there was no apparent change in the liver. Comparing this to past studies, this trend was found to be the opposite. For instance, the use of β-glucan had increased SOD activity levels in both Pacific red snapper (Lutjanus peru) [47] and gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) [53].

Stress is a condition in which animal homeostasis is disturbed by intrinsic and extrinsic stimuli [54]. Serum cortisol and glucose levels are common parameters used as a measure of stress response in many animal studies [55]. Cortisol is the glucocorticoid where the circulating levels in the blood can increase dramatically under stressful conditions [56]. In the current study, the cortisol levels in the fish fed β-glucan supplemented diets were lower than the control, regardless of the sampling time interval. Crowding challenge increased the cortisol level in all treatments. The return to prestress levels was only observed in β-glucan dietary groups, while glucose levels also showed a similar trend. Past studies have shown a similar trend of β-glucan having the ability to lower cortisol in farmed fish species, including striped catfish that was fed with only 4 weeks of β-glucan [17, 57]. It was suggested that the use of β-glucan was suppressing some part of the immune function, though subsequent disease challenges did not find this to be the case [57]. Furthermore, in some species, the use of dietary β-glucan does not have an effect on cortisol levels, e.g., tilapia [58]. While in matrinxã (Brycon amazonicus), another freshwater species, dietary β-glucan had increased cortisol production and immune function [59]. This disparity and knowledge gap warrants further investigation, such as the systematic comparison of species through taxa and natural habitats using molecular biomarkers responsible for cortisol production and glucogensis.

It is important to note that the β-glucan used in the present study was based on the indicative levels from previous studies [16, 17, 20, 21]. These had focused on improving health parameters rather than the current study’s metrics. Therefore, there is a probability that the optimal/maximal level is not attained, which is the case in the present study. Testing higher dietary inclusion levels could identify this level. As such, it warranted on the basis of scientific completeness and addressing the practical question of whether the farmer would benefit from a higher production yield if they used a higher β-glucan level in the aquafeed. By identifying this maximal level, further data analysis could be of benefit to this question and draw an economic maximal level as well (i.e., the highest level to give the greatest economic benefit) including the establishment of a complete dose-response curve/model using linear regression and/or polynomial orthogonal contrast.

5. Conclusion

β-glucan is a potent and effective functional feed ingredient often used in aquafeeds as an elicitor for increasing immunological response. The present study assessed whether dietary β-glucan can offer additional benefits in farmed striped catfish. Using a dietary inclusion level of 1.5 g kg-1 β-glucan in the feed produced the highest beneficial response in growth performance, feed utilisation, body protein accretion, and indicators of antioxidative function. More importantly, the greatest advantage of using dietary β-glucan in striped catfish is its ability to reduce the impact of husbandry stress indicators. However, the tested levels of β-glucan in the present study did not establish the maximal efficacy threshold. Therefore, there is an opportunity for further optimisation in striped catfish.

Supporting information

S1 File. Morphometric, fatty acid, proximate composition, stress indicator and liver antioxidative activity data.

(XLSX)

pone.0298414.s001.xlsx (26.7KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to the Faculty of Fisheries, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey, for the technical support in the fatty acids analysis.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by Punjab Agricultural Research Board (PARB), Pakistan- Project: Interactive Effects of Manipulated Artificial Feeds on Growth and Breeding Potential of Channa spp. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Open access was funded by IREL.

References

  • 1.Guimarães IG, Lim C, Yildirim-Aksoy M, Li MH, Klesius PH. Effects of dietary levels of vitamin A on growth, hematology, immune response and resistance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) to Streptococcus iniae. Ani Feed Sci Tech. 2014;188:126–136. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.12.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barsanti L, Passarelli V, Evangelista V, Frassanito AM, Gualtieri P. Chemistry, physico-chemistry and applications linked to biological activities of β-glucans. Nat prod rep. 2011;28(3):457–466. doi: 10.1039/C0NP00018C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pionnier N, Falco A, Miest J, Frost P, Irnazarow I, Shrive A, et al. Dietary β-glucan stimulate complement and C-reactive protein acute phase responses in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) during an Aeromonas salmonicida infection. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2013;34(3):819–831. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2012.12.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Newaj-Fyzul A, Austin B. Probiotics, immunostimulants, plant products and oral vaccines, and their role as feed supplements in the control of bacterial fish diseases. J Fish Dis. 2015;38(11):937–955. doi: 10.1111/jfd.12313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Maqsood S, Singh P, Samoon MH, Munir K. Emerging role of immunostimulants in combating the disease outbreak in aquaculture. Int Aquat Res. 2011;3(3). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Petit J, de Bruijn I, Goldman MR, van den Brink E, Pellikaan WF, Forlenza M, et al. β-Glucan-Induced immuno-modulation: A role for the intestinal microbiota and short-chain fatty acids in common carp. Front Immunol. 2022;12:761820. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.761820 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yu C, Chen H, Du D, Lv W, Li S, Li D, et al. β-Glucan from Saccharomyces cerevisiae alleviates oxidative stress in LPS-stimulated RAW264. 7 cells via Dectin-1/Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2021;26:629–637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pionnier N, Falco A, Miest JJ, Shrive AK, Hoole D. Feeding common carp Cyprinus carpio with β-glucan supplemented diet stimulates C-reactive protein and complement immune acute phase responses following PAMPs injection. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2014; 9(2):285–295. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2014.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kunttu HM, Valtonen ET, Suomalainen LR, Vielma J, Jokinen IE. The efficacy of two immunostimulants against Flavobacterium columnare infection in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2009;26(6):850–857. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2009.03.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Paulsen SM, Engstad RE, Robertsen B. Enhanced lysozyme production in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) macrophages treated with yeast β-glucan and bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2001;11(1):23–37. doi: 10.1006/fsim.2000.0291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rodrıguez A, Cuesta A, Ortuno J, Esteban MA, Meseguer J. Immunostimulant properties of a cell wall-modified whole Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain administered by diet to seabream (Sparus aurata L.). Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 2003;96(3–4):183–192. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2003.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Han B, Baruah K, Cox E, Vanrompay D, Bossier P. Structure-functional activity relationship of β-glucans from the perspective of immunomodulation: a mini-review. Front Immunol. 2020;11:658. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Murphy EJ, Rezoagli E, Major I, Rowan NJ, Laffey JG. β-glucan metabolic and immunomodulatory properties and potential for clinical application. Journal of Fungi. 2020;6(4):356. doi: 10.3390/jof6040356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.FAO. Fisheries and aquaculture resources, in Rome Italy. FAO. 2020. http://www.fao.org/fishery/culturedspecies/Pangasius_hypophthalmus/en.
  • 15.FAO. Global aquaculture production quantity (1950–2020), in Rome, Italy. FAO 2022. https://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics-query/en/aquaculture/aquaculture_quantity
  • 16.Bano S, Khan N, Fatima M, Khalique A, Arslan M, Wan A.H. Mitigating the impact of winter temperatures on striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) using functional feed additives. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society. 2023. doi: 10.1111/jwas.13010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nguyen TK, Tran MP, Duong TM, Tran ST, Do TT. Effect of beta-glucans on hematological, immunoglobulins and stress parameters of striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) fingerling. Can Tho Uni J Sci. 2016;(04):105–113. doi: 10.22144/ctu.jen.2016.050 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hoang DH, Lam HS, Nguyen CV. Efficiency of dietary β-glucan supplementation on growth, body composition, feed, and nutrient utilisation in juveniles of pompano fish (Trachinotus ovatus, Linnaeus, 1758). Isr J Aquac.- Bamidgeh. 2018;70. http://www.aquaculturehub.org. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Meshram S, Murthy HS, Swain H, Ali H, Jagadeesh T, Dhamgaye H. Effects of dietary beta-glucan on growth and body composition of Macrobrachium rosenbergii. The Bioscan. 2014;9:543–546. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Domenico JD, Canova R, Soveral LDF, Nied CO, Costa MM, Frandoloso R, et al. Immunomodulatory effects of dietary β-glucan in silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen). Pesqui Vet. 2017;37:73–78. doi: 10.1590/S0100-736X2017000100012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Aramli MS, Kamangar B, Nazari RM. Effects of dietary β-glucan on the growth and innate immune response of juvenile Persian sturgeon, Acipenser persicus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015;47(1):606–610. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2015.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.AOAC. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 2006: Method number 1125, Gaithersburg, United State.
  • 23.Folch J, Lees M, Sloane-Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957;226:497–509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Metcalfe L, Schmitz A. The rapid preparation of fatty acid esters for gas chromatographic analysis. Anal Chem. 1961;33:363–364. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhu Y, Chen Y, Liu Y, Yang H, Liang G, Tian L. Effect of dietary selenium level on growth performance, body composition and hepatic glutathione peroxidase activities of largemouth bass Micropterus salmoide. Aqua Res. 2012;43(11):1660–1668. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.02972.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chance B, Maely A. Assay of catalase and peroxidase methods. Enzymology, 1955;2:755–784. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Flohé L, Günzler WA. Assays of glutathione peroxidase, in Methods in enzymology. 1984:114–120. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(84)05015-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Giannopolitis CN, Ries SK. Superoxide dismutases: I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 1977;59(2):309–314. doi: 10.1104/pp.59.2.309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yousefi M, Shabunin SV, Vatnikov YA, Kulikov EV, Adineh H, Hamidi MK, et al. Effects of lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) extract inclusion in diet on growth performance, innate immunity, immune-related gene expression, and stress response of common carp, Cyprinus carpio. Aquaculture. 2020;515:734588. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734588 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Refaey MM, Li D. Transport stress changes blood biochemistry, antioxidant defense system, and hepatic HSPs mRNA expressions of channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1628. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Uiuiu P, Lațiu C, Păpuc T, Craioveanu C, Ihuț A, Sava A, et al. Multi-approach assessment for stress evaluation in rainbow trout females, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum, 1792) from three different farms during the summer season. Animals. 2021;11(6):1810. doi: 10.3390/ani11061810 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dinkey DA. The principles and the procedures of Statistics. 2nd Ed. McGraw Hill Book Co. Singapore. 1996:627. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xu H, Turchini GM, Francis DS, Liang M, Mock TS, Rombenso A, et al. Are fish what they eat? A fatty acid’s perspective. Progress in lipid research. 2020;80:101064. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2020.101064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Banu MR, Akter S, Islam MR, Mondol MN, Hossain MA. Probiotic yeast enhanced growth performance and disease resistance in freshwater catfish Gulsa tengra, Mystus cavasius. Aquac Rep. 2020;16:100237. doi: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2019.100237 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Whittington R, Lim C, Klesius PH. Effect of dietary β-glucan levels on the growth response and efficacy of Streptococcus iniae vaccine in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture. 2005;248(1–4):217–225. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.04.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Welker TL, Lim C, Yildirim-Aksoy M, Shelby R, Klesius PH. Immune response and resistance to stress and Edwardsiella ictaluri challenge in channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, fed diets containing commercial whole-cell yeast or yeast subcomponents. J World Aquac Soci. 2007;38(1):24–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2006.00070.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.López N, Cuzon G, Gaxiola G, Taboada G, Valenzuela M, Pascual C, et al. Physiological, nutritional, and immunological role of dietary β 1–3 glucan and ascorbic acid 2-monophosphate in Litopenaeus vannamei juveniles. Aquaculture. 2003;224(1–4):223–243. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00214-X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lam KL, Cheung PC. Non-digestible long chain beta-glucans as novel prebiotics. Bioactive carbohydrates and dietary fibre. 2013;2(1):45–64. doi: 10.1016/j.bcdf.2013.09.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Do Huu H, Sang HM, Thuy NTT. Dietary β-glucan improved growth performance, Vibrio counts, haematological parameters and stress resistance of pompano fish, Trachinotus ovatus Linnaeus, 1758. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016;54:402–410. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2016.03.161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Orban E, Nevigato T, Masci M, Di Lena G, Casini I, Caproni R, et al. Nutritional quality and safety of European perch (Perca fluviatilis) from three lakes of Central Italy. Food Chem. 2007;100(2):482–490. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.09.069 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dawood MA, Koshio S, Ishikawa M, Yokoyama S, El Basuini MF, Hossain MS, et al. Dietary supplementation of β-glucan improves growth performance, the innate immune response and stress resistance of red sea bream, Pagrus major. Aquac Nutr. 2017;23(1):148–159. doi: 10.1111/anu.12376 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rufchaie R, Hossein Hoseinifar S. Effects of dietary commercial yeast glucan on innate immune response, hematological parameters, intestinal microbiota and growth performance of white fish (Rutilus kutum) fry. Ribarstvo Croat J Fish. 2014;72(4):156–163. doi: 10.14798/72.4.772 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bell JG, Waagbø R. Safe and nutritious aquaculture produce: benefits and risks of alternative sustainable aquafeeds. Aquac Eco. 2008:185–225. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jafari SM, Rabbani M, Emtyazjoo M, Piryaei F. Effect of dietary Spirulina platensis on fatty acid composition of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fillet. Aquaculture international. 2014;22:1307–1315. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Luo J, Zeng D, Cheng L, Mao X, Yu J, Yu B, et al. Dietary β-glucan supplementation improves growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of finishing pigs. Anim Nutr. 2019;5(4):380–385. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2019.06.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Naderi M, Keyvanshokooh S, Ghaedi A, Salati AP, et al. Interactive effects of dietary Nano selenium and vitamin E on growth, haematology, innate immune responses, antioxidant status and muscle composition of rainbow trout under high rearing density. Aquac Nutr. 2019;25(5):1156–1168. doi: 10.1111/anu.12931 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Guzmán-Villanueva LT, Ascencio-Valle F, Macías-Rodríguez ME, Tovar-Ramírez. Effects of dietary β-1, 3/1, 6-glucan on the antioxidant and digestive enzyme activities of Pacific red snapper (Lutjanus peru) after exposure to lipopolysaccharides. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2014;40:827–837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hunt AO, Berkoz M, Ozkan F, Yalin S, Ercen Z, Erdogan E, et al. Effects of organic selenium on growth, muscle composition, and antioxidant system in rainbow trout. Isr J Aquac-Bamidgeh. 2011;63(562):10. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kim YS, Ke F, Zhang QY. Effect of β-glucan on activity of antioxidant enzymes and Mx gene expression in virus infected grass carp. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2009;27(2):336–340. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2009.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dalmo RA, Bøgwald J. ß-glucans as conductors of immune symphonies. Fish & shellfish immunology. 2008;25(4):384–396. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2008.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bu X, Lian X, Wang Y, Luo C, Tao S, Liao Y, et al. Dietary yeast culture modulates immune response related to TLR2-MyD88-NF-kβ signaling pathway, antioxidant capability and disease resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila for Ussuri catfish (Pseudobagrus ussuriensis). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019;84:711–718. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2018.10.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhang AW, Lee BD, Lee SK, Lee KW, An GH, Song KB, et al. Effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cell components on growth performance, meat quality, and ileal mucosa development of broiler chicks. Poult Sci. 2005;84(7):1015–1021. doi: 10.1093/ps/84.7.1015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Reis B, Gonçalves AT, Santos P, Sardinha M, Conceição LE, Serradeiro R, et al. Immune status and hepatic antioxidant capacity of gilthead seabream Sparus aurata juveniles fed yeast and microalga derived β-glucans. Marine Drugs. 2021;19(12):653. doi: 10.3390/md19120653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chrousos GP, Gold PW. The concepts of stress and stress system disorders: overview of physical and behavioral homeostasis. Jama. 1992;267(9):1244–1252. doi: 10.1001/jama.1992.03480090092034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Pacheco M, Santos MA. Biotransformation, endocrine, and genetic responses of Anguilla anguilla L. to petroleum distillate products and environmentally contaminated waters. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2001;49(1):64–75. doi: 10.1006/eesa.2000.2025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Aluru N, Vijayan MM. Stress transcriptomics in fish: a role for genomic cortisol signaling. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2009;164(2–3):142–150. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.03.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lopes LM, de Mello MM, Urbinati EC. β-Glucan reduces cortisol plasma levels, enhances innate immune system after A. hydrophila inoculation, and has lipolytic effects on the pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus). Aquaculture. 2022. Jan 15;546:737411. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737411 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Abd El Hakim Y, Neamat-Allah AN, Baeshen M, Ali HA. Immune-protective, antioxidant and relative genes expression impacts of β-glucan against fipronil toxicity in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2019. Nov 1;94:427–33. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.09.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Montoya LN, Martins TP, Gimbo RY, Zanuzzo FS, Urbinati EC. β-Glucan-induced cortisol levels improve the early immune response in matrinxã (Brycon amazonicus). Fish & shellfish immunology. 2017;60:197–204. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2016.11.055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ishtiyaq Ahmad

6 Sep 2023

PONE-D-23-19595Enhancing farmed striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) robustness using dietary β-glucanPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Wan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 21 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ishtiyaq Ahmad, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

“The authors would like to thank the Punjab Agricultural Research Board (PARB) for providing financial assistance for sample analysis, feed, and experimental fish under the Project: Interactive Effects of Manipulated Artificial Feeds on Growth and Breeding Potential of Channa spp. Special thanks to the Faculty of Fisheries, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey, for the technical support in the fatty acids analysis. Open access funding  for the publication of this research manuscript was provided by IReL open access scholarship.”

We note that you have provided funding information that is currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

“This study was funded by Punjab Agricultural Research Board (PARB), Pakistan- Project: Interactive Effects of Manipulated Artificial Feeds on Growth and Breeding Potential of Channa spp. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Open access was funded by IREL.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Data indicates that higher dietary glucan levels enhance growth performance. However, the authors limited the beta glucan inclusion to 1.5%, necessitating justification for this choice.

Please condense and enhance the conclusion section for clarity.

Kindly ensure the addition of references on Pangasiodon in the reference section

Reviewer #2: I have made a preliminary review of your manuscript and see that the manuscript requires fundamental revisions before it may be reconsidered by reviewers. That is because one-way ANOVA and mean separation is not appropriate analysis for quantitative independent variable such as graded levels of MOS. A more appropriate analysis is to analyze all of the responses using polynomial orthogonal contrasts so you can indicate whether there are significant linear or quadratic responses. The data presented do not support a conclusion or advice for an optimum dose. I strongly recommend reanalysis using either broken line analysis or a linear plateau approach and thus complete revision of the paper for all analyzed parameters. Subsequently, the abstract, results, and discussion sections should be revised and edited to reveal the dose dependent effects of MOS on striped catfish performances.

Furthermore the title of this article does not attract readers’ interest. I found that the author has studied many indicators in this research, but not all indicators must appear in the title.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Amit Ranjan

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 14;19(3):e0298414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298414.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


31 Dec 2023

Review Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: Data indicates that higher dietary glucan levels enhance growth performance. However, the authors limited the beta glucan inclusion to 1.5%, necessitating justification for this choice.

Authors’ response: The following justification was added at line 97

‘The design of the feed trial was to establish the optimum level of β-glucan. Previous study by [16], had shown that 1 g kg-1 was able to elicit a positive response and similarly, other studies had found the optimum level was 1 g kg-1 as compared to other lowest or highest levels [17-21]. Therefore, the following graded levels were tested 0 (G0), 0.5 (G0.5), 1.0 (G1.0), and 1.5 (G1.5) g kg-1 using β-glucan derived from yeast (Food Chem, Huzhou, China).’ However, when tested in the present study, this was not the case, and the upper threshold was not established. The merit of attaining this level is discussed in the discussion section in line 423-432.

Reviewer #1: ‘Please condense and enhance the conclusion section for clarity.

Reviewer’s response: As requested, we have revised the conclusion to the following:

Line 426-434

‘β-glucan is a potent and effective functional feed ingredient often used in aquafeeds as an elicitor for increasing immunological response. The present study assessed whether dietary β-glucan can offer additional benefits in farmed striped catfish. Using a dietary inclusion level of 1.5 g kg-1 β-glucan in the feed produced the highest beneficial response in growth performance, feed utilisation, body protein accretion, and indicators of antioxidative function. More importantly, the greatest advantage of using dietary β-glucan in striped catfish is its ability to reduce the impact of husbandry stress indicators. However, the tested levels of β-glucan in the present study did not establish the maximal efficacy threshold. Therefore, there is an opportunity for further optimisation in striped catfish.’

.

Kindly ensure the addition of references on Pangasiodon in the reference section

Authors’ response: The name Pangasius is often used for this species as the genus. However, the correct genus name is Pangasiodon and there are papers already cited [14, 16 and 17] under the Pangasiodon species already. In addition, we noticed that Pangasius was used in certain sections of the text instead of the current name- Pangasiodon. We have since made these changes, and are highlighted in the track changes.

Reviewer #2: I have made a preliminary review of your manuscript and see that the manuscript requires fundamental revisions before it may be reconsidered by reviewers. That is because one-way ANOVA and mean separation is not appropriate analysis for quantitative independent variable such as graded levels of MOS. A more appropriate analysis is to analyze all of the responses using polynomial orthogonal contrasts so you can indicate whether there are significant linear or quadratic responses. The data presented do not support a conclusion or advice for an optimum dose. I strongly recommend reanalysis using either broken line analysis or a linear plateau approach and thus complete revision of the paper for all analyzed parameters. Subsequently, the abstract, results, and discussion sections should be revised and edited to reveal the dose dependent effects of MOS on striped catfish performances.

Authors’ response: We wish to clarify to the reviewer and editor that the test ingredient used in the present study was beta glucan, not MOS- mannooligosaccharide (a prebiotic feed additive). The recommendation of using polynomial orthogonal contrasts is warranted in many dose-response series studies, however, the current study hasn’t established an upper threshold (maximal efficacy). As such, we are unsure whether this would add to the resolution/robustness of the statistical analysis through the use of polynomial orthogonal contrast. Furthermore, this same issue also applies to linear regression analysis. We have added an additional sentence in the discussion line 422-432, stating this.

‘Furthermore the title of this article does not attract readers’ interest. I found that the author has studied many indicators in this research, but not all indicators must appear in the title.’

Authors’ response: We are unsure what the reviewer is referring to in the manuscript title- ‘studied many indicators in this research, but not all indicators must appear in the title’. Our original submitted title was ‘Enhancing farmed striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) robustness using dietary β-glucan’, which does not list the measured indicators. We believe the proposed title is overarching to reflect the comprehensive nature of the paper.

Decision Letter 1

Ishtiyaq Ahmad

19 Jan 2024

PONE-D-23-19595R1Enhancing farmed striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) robustness through dietary β-glucanPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Wan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 04 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ishtiyaq Ahmad, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: The title of this article does not attract readers’ interest. I found that the author has studied many indicators in this research, but not all indicators must appear in the title.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 14;19(3):e0298414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298414.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


24 Jan 2024

In response to point 6 of the Reviewer's response, I believe Reviewer 2 has mistaken the current proposed manuscript with another one. The Reviewer refers to the manuscript title as having excess performance bioindicators but the proposed title doesn't list any indicators, instead it is a concise and informative title. Therefore, I feel that the title doesn't warrant any changes. However, if Reviewer 2 elaborates further or proposes a more suitable title, I would accommodate the suggestion.

Decision Letter 2

Ishtiyaq Ahmad

25 Jan 2024

Enhancing farmed striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) robustness through dietary β-glucan

PONE-D-23-19595R2

Dear Dr. Alex,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ishtiyaq Ahmad, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Acceptance letter

Ishtiyaq Ahmad

5 Mar 2024

PONE-D-23-19595R2

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Wan,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Ishtiyaq Ahmad

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Morphometric, fatty acid, proximate composition, stress indicator and liver antioxidative activity data.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0298414.s001.xlsx (26.7KB, xlsx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES