Skip to main content
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2024 Mar 15;103(11):e37521. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037521

Research status and challenges of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children: A bibliometric and visualization analysis from 2011 to 2023

Congcong Liu a, Rui Wang a, Shuyi Ge a, Binding Wang a, Siman Li a, Bohua Yan a,*
PMCID: PMC10939570  PMID: 38489686

Abstract

Background:

Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP) infections occur in regional outbreaks every 3 to 7 years, lasting up to 2 years. Since this fall, there has been a significant rise in MP infections among children in China, indicating a regional epidemiological trend that imposes an increased national public health burden. To date, bibliometric methods have not been applied to studies on MP infection in children.

Methods:

We searched for all relevant English publications on MP pneumonia in children published from 2011 to 2023 using Web of Science. Analytical software tools such as Citespace and VOSviewer were employed to analyze the collected literature.

Results:

993 articles on MP pneumonia in children were published in 338 academic journals by 5062 authors affiliated with 1381 institutions across 75 countries/regions. China led in global productivity with 56.19%. Among the top 10 prolific organizations, 8 were Chinese institutions, with Soochow University being the most active, followed by Capital Medical University and Zhejiang University. Zhimin Chen from Zhejiang University School of Medicine exhibited the highest H-index of 32. Keyword co-occurrence network analysis revealed 7 highly relevant clusters.

Conclusion:

The current research hotspots and frontiers in this field are primarily MP pneumonia, refractory MP pneumonia, lactate dehydrogenase, asthma, and biomarker. We anticipate that this work will provide novel insights for advancing scientific exploration and the clinical application of MP pneumonia in children.

Keywords: bibliometric analysis, children, CiteSpace, Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia, VOSviewer

1. Introduction

Mycoplasma pneumoniae(MP) stands out as a common culprit behind both upper and lower respiratory tract infections in humans.[1] In children, MP is responsible for 10% to 40% of cases of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), a figure that can escalate to 20% to 70% during pandemics.[24]A decade-long national surveillance of acute respiratory infections indicates that MP exhibits the highest detection rate among atypical pathogens in Chinese children aged 5 to 7.[5] MPP, resulting from MP, is a prevalent respiratory infection in children.

MP infections manifest in regional outbreaks every 3 to 7 years, persisting up to 2 years. Notably, China has witnessed a nationwide surge in pediatric mycoplasma infections, particularly during the fall and winter months. While MPP is typically self-limiting with mild symptoms such as fever, cough, and dyspnea, it can lead to pulmonary complications like occlusive bronchitis, bronchiectasis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and necrotizing pneumonia. Moreover, an array of extrapulmonary manifestations, including pulmonary embolism, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, cardiomyopathy, and meningitis, is on the rise.[6,7]

Bibliometric analysis serves as a valuable tool for understanding productivity levels, publication trends, and features by providing statistical descriptions of publications.[8] Widely-used bibliometric applications such as CiteSpace[9] and VOSviewer[10] are commonly utilized to depict literature review findings, extensively applied in the medical sector. Remarkably, bibliometric methods have not been applied to studies of pediatric mycoplasma pneumonia. Nevertheless, clarity is still needed on the mechanism of pediatric mycoplasma pneumonia, with diagnostic methods varying among healthcare providers. Optimal treatment guidelines have yet to be established, and further knowledge must be gleaned from pertinent references. Thus, the aim of this study is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of publications on pediatric mycoplasma pneumonia from 2011 to 2023, shedding light on the current state of research and emerging themes in the field to guide future research and clinical decisions.

The pathogenesis remains unclear, with diagnostic methods varying across primary care settings, and treatment complexities escalating due to the widespread misuse of macrolide-resistant M pneumoniae (MRMP), particularly in China. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of publications on MPP in children from 2011 to 2023. This analysis aims to identify the current state of research and emerging themes in the field to inform future research and clinical decision-making.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Data sources and search strategies

In this study, the Science Citation Index Expanded and Social Sciences Citation Index within Web of Science (WoS), an internationally recognized scientific research database, were utilized to explore M pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP) in children. The search employed keywords limited to English, including TS = (“Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia” OR “Mycoplasma pneumonia”) AND (“children” OR “child” OR “childhood” OR “pediatric”) AND “Language = English.” To mitigate daily data updates’ bias, the search period spanned from January 1, 2011, to December 20, 2023, yielding 1054 documents. Only original articles and reviews using normal peer review processes were considered eligible. The 993 documents were exported and saved as full records and cited references in the “RefWorks” format. To ensure data consistency and avoid discrepancies due to database updates, all data were gathered within a single day.

Following independent manual screening and discussion among 3 authors to eliminate repetitive, withdrawn, and irrelevant literature, a total of 993 articles on MP pneumonia in children from 2011 to 2023 were published in 338 academic journals by 5062 authors affiliated with 1381 institutions across 75 countries/regions. The specific operational flowchart is depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Data filtration flowchart.

2.2. Data analysis and visualization

VOS viewer 1.6.18, Scimago Graphica 1.0.36, and CiteSpace 6.2.R6 software were employed for data analysis and visualization. CiteSpace’s search parameters included a time slice from January 1, 2011, to December 20, 2023, with 1 year per slice. The g-index and TopN of keywords, references were defaulted. VOS viewer facilitated the visualization of co-authorship among countries/regions, authors, institutions, co-cited references, and keywords. Scimago Graphica 1.0.36 was utilized to construct a map illustrating cooperation relations between countries, providing further insights into international collaboration.

3. Result

3.1. Annual publications and citations

Figure 2 presents the annual count of publications and citations for MPP in children. The number of publications and citations experienced a consistent increase from 2011 to 2022, demonstrating a rapid developmental trend. The zenith occurred in 2021 and 2022, reaching 133 and 136 publications, respectively. By December 20, 2023, an additional 94 papers had been released. Anticipatedly, with the ongoing impact of the epidemic in China during the current autumn and winter, the literature volume is expected to continue its ascent.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

MPP publications and citations over time.

3.2. Contributions and cooperation among the top 10 producer countries

In VOSviewer, 26 countries were identified, with a minimum appearance threshold set to 5. Table 1 outlines the top 10 contributors to these publications. China led with 558 publications (56.19%), followed by the United States (n = 109, 10.97%), and Japan (n = 72, 7.25%). Chinese articles accumulated the highest number of citations (6159 times), while articles from the United Kingdom had the highest average citation rate (68.87 times per article). Figure 3A illustrates the collaborative endeavors of international researchers in conducting studies on MPP in children, with the line thickness denoting the degree of closeness between countries. China emerged as a significant collaborator, engaging extensively with the United States, Japan, Korea, Australia, Switzerland, the Netherlands, and Italy. This collaboration pattern aligns with China’s status as the leading producer of articles and its prominent role in international cooperation.

Table 1.

The top 10 countries by publications on MPP in children.

Rank Country Publications Total citations Average citations Total link strength Centrality
1 China 558 6159 11.03 2534 0.23
2 United States 109 4091 37.53 1257 0.44
3 Japan 72 1533 21.29 765 0.00
4 South Korea 61 826 13.54 715 0.00
5 Italy 36 728 20.22 233 0.09
6 Netherlands 26 790 30.38 338 0.17
7 Switzerland 24 411 17.12 296 0.04
8 United Kingdom 24 1653 68.87 294 0.21
9 India 21 405 19.28 157 0.08
10 Australia 18 477 26.5 142 0.05

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Leading countries/regions. (A) Visual map using VOSviewer network. (B) Distribution of publications and collaborations among countries/regions.

Utilizing Scimago Graphica to generate a visualization map of country cooperation, marks were set to map, and cooperation intensity was represented by orange and red hues. In Figure 3B, the collaboration between China and the United States emerges as the strongest, with varying degrees of cooperation intensity denoted by color.

3.3. Authors analysis

Figure 4 illustrates the collaboration networks between authors in the field of MPP in children. Tables 2 and 3 delineate the top 10 authors based on the total citations and most publications, respectively. These tables objectively reflect the researcher’s contribution to the academic field. Notably, Zhengrong Chen from the Children’s Hospital of Soochow University led with the most articles (24 papers), followed closely by Wei Ji and Yongdong Yan from the same hospital, each with 22 papers. Zhimin Chen from Zhejiang University School of Medicine demonstrated the highest H-index at 32. Ouchi kazunobu’s articles received the most citations (424 times), while Yang Liu had the highest average citations (58.66 times). The node diameter represents the productivity of each author, with the lines indicating relationships between authors and the line thickness denoting the intensity of communication. The minimum number of papers per author was set as 5. Of the remaining 127 authors, there were several communities, with each community clustering near 2 or 3 frequently published authors. Connections among various communities were notably limited, suggesting a lack of solid collaboration among research groups/labs engaged in MPP studies.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Collaborative network of authors.

Table 2.

The top 10 authors with the most total citations on MPP in children.

Rank Author Publications Total citations Average citations Country Total link strength H-index
1 Ouchi Kazunobu 17 424 24.94 Japan 527 20
2 Zhimin Chen 18 387 21.5 United States 708 32
3 Wei Ji 22 360 16.36 China 163 26
4 Xiao Li 5 357 71.4 China 97 5
5 Yongdong Yan 22 353 16.04 China 525 18
6 Yang Liu 6 352 58.66 China 414 0
7 Zhengrong Chen 24 347 14.45 China 504 22
8 Akaike Hiroto 11 344 31.27 Japan 94 5
9 Winchell Jonas M. 10 344 34.4 United States 146 25
10 Miyashita Naoyuki 9 327 36.33 Japan 24 21

Table 3.

The top 10 authors with the most publications on MPP in children.

Rank Author Total citations Publications Average citations Country Total link strength H-index
1 Zhengrong Chen 24 347 14.45 China 504 22
2 Wei Ji 22 360 16.36 China 481 29
3 Yongdong Yan 22 353 16.04 China 525 18
4 Zhimin Chen 18 387 21.5 United States 708 32
5 Chuangli Hao 17 181 10.64 China 384 14
6 Ouchi Kazunobu 17 424 24.94 Japan 527 20
7 Yuqing Wang 16 251 15.68 China 372 3
8 Huang Li 15 239 15.93 China 448 20
9 Choi Eun Hwa 12 294 24.5 South korea 441 22
10 Van Rossum Annemarie M. C. 12 295 24.58 Netherlands 304 0

3.4. Institutions analysis

In VOSviewer, 53 institutions were identified, with a minimum appearance threshold set to 6. Table 4 outlining the top 10 institutions in terms of MPP in children, predominantly universities. Soochow University led with 45 publications, followed by Capital Medical University (n = 44), Zhejiang University (n = 44), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (n = 35), Fudan University(n = 26), and Nanjing Medical University (n = 26). Interestingly, we found that the top 3 authors in terms of the number of papers published were affiliated with the institutions with the highest number of publications, which indicated a high level of contribution and activity of the Soochow University in this area. Among the top 10 institutions, 8 are Chinese, one is South Korean, and one is Japan.

Table 4.

The top 10 institutions on MPP in children.

Rank Organization Publications Total citations Average citations Total link strength Country
1 Soochow University 45 578 12.84 431 China
2 Capital Medical University 44 633 14.38 507 China
3 Zhejiang University 44 758 17.22 650 China
4 Shanghai Jiao Tong University 35 344 9.82 361 China
5 Fudan University 26 715 27.5 481 China
6 Nanjing Medical University 26 212 8.15 250 China
7 Chang Gung University 23 448 19.47 427 China
8 Seoul National University 18 374 20.77 379 South Korea
9 China Medical University 17 173 10.17 185 China
10 Kawasaki Medical School 17 424 24.94 276 Japan

Figure 5 illustrates the collaboration networks between institutions in the field of MPP in children. Collaborative efforts among different organizations play a crucial role in mitigating geographic bias and enhancing the reliability of trial results. This collaboration, in turn, provides robust evidence for evidence-based medicine, guiding the development of clinical guidelines. Notably, a robust partnership is evident among various institutions, with a particularly close collaboration observed between China, the United States, Japan, and South Korea.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Collaborative network of institutions. (A) Visual map using VOSviewer network among institutions.

3.5. Analysis of top co-cited references

Figure 6A illustrates the co-citation relationships among 180 publications that have been cited no less than 20 times, whereas Table 5 provides insights into the top 10 most co-cited articles in the study of MPP in children. Co-cited literature is a crucial indicator in academic research, reflecting the influence, academic value, and research hotspots of specific publications. Figure 6B displays the top 25 references with the strongest citation bursts. The blue line represents the observed time interval from 2011 to 2023, while the red line represents the burst duration. Several articles, including “Mycoplasma pneumoniae from the Respiratory Tract and Beyond,” “Mycoplasma pneumoniae Among Children Hospitalized With Community-acquired Pneumonia,” “Clinical manifestations in infants and children with M pneumoniae infection,” “Macrolide-Resistant M pneumoniae Infections in Pediatric Community-Acquired Pneumonia” “Impact of viral coinfection and macrolide-resistant mycoplasma infection in children with refractory M pneumoniae pneumonia,” and “Extra-pulmonary diseases related to M pneumoniae in children: recent insights into the pathogenesis.” show continuous citation bursts. This suggests that these topics remain research hotspots and may represent potential frontiers in the field of MPP in children. The paper with the strongest burstiness (strength = 28.47) was entitled “Mycoplasma pneumoniae from the Respiratory Tract and Beyond,” published by Clin Microbiol Rev in 2017, with citation bursts from 2019 to 2023.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

References co-citation network. (A) Knowledge map of co-cited references network. (B) Top 25 references with the strongest citation bursts.

Table 5.

The top 10 cited references of publications on MPP in children.

Rank Frequency Centrality Title Journal Author Year
1 112 0.16 Mycoplasma pneumoniae from the Respiratory Tract and Beyond[6] Clin Microbiol Rev Waites KB 2017
2 89 0.13 Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among U.S. children[3] N Engl J Med Jain S 2015
3 66 0.10 Mycoplasma pneumoniae Among Children Hospitalized with Community-acquired Pneumonia[7] Clin Infect Dis Kutty PK 2019
4 49 0.12 Antimicrobial therapy of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children[11] Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther Lee H 2018
5 45 0.03 The Clinical Characteristics and Predictors of Refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia in Children[12] PLoS One Zhang YY 2016
6 39 0.08 Infection with and Carriage of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Children[13] Front Microbiol Sauteur PMM 2016
7 35 0.02 Clinical manifestations in infants and children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection[14] PLoS One Sondergaard MJ 2018
8 35 0.01 The epidemiology of pediatric Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in North China: 2006 to 2016[15] Epidemiol Infect Gao LW 2019
9 33 0.02 Mycoplasma pneumoniae: Current Knowledge on Macrolide Resistance and Treatment[16] Front Microbiol Pereyre S 2016
10 32 0.16 Rapid effectiveness of minocycline or doxycycline against macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in a 2011 outbreak among Japanese children[17] Clin Infect Dis Waites KB 2017

3.6. Analysis of hotspots and frontiers

The analysis of co-occurring keywords through knowledge map analysis is a crucial aspect of bibliometrics research, providing clear insights into primary directions and research hotspots in a specific domain. In the co-occurrence analysis using VOSviewer, 52 keywords were identified, with a minimum appearance threshold set to 15. Table 6 presents the most frequent keywords in this study, including “Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia,” “child” “infections,” “community-acquired pneumonia,” “pneumonia,” “epidemiology,” and “real-time pcr.” Additionally, other top-ranking keywords like “macrolide resistance,” “pathogenesis,” and “azithromycin” reflect the current hotspots in the field.

Table 6.

The top 20 keywords on the research of MPP in children.

Rank Keyword Occurrences Total link strength Rank Keyword Occurrences Total link strength
1 mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia 577 2392 11 pathogenesis 80 443
2 child 550 2395 12 etiology 68 359
3 infections 332 1557 13 Chlamydophila pneumoniae 61 339
4 community-acquired pneumonia 290 1550 14 virus 58 294
5 pneumonia 169 832 15 assay 56 325
6 epidemiology 148 806 16 Streptococcus pneumoniae 54 289
7 real-time PCR 144 831 17 strains 50 288
8 diagnosis 139 658 18 disease 48 227
9 macrolide resistance 98 548 19 therapy 47 228
10 clinical characteristics 84 448 20 azithromycin 44 161

As depicted in Figure 7B, keywords with high burst intensity play a crucial role in identifying what is currently hot, cutting-edge, and the latest trend in research. The analysis highlights the top 25 keywords with the strongest burst strength. Notably, keywords such as “Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia,” “refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia,” “lactate dehydrogenase,” “asthma,” and “biomarker.” continue to experience citation explosions until 2023. This suggests that these research directions have gained increased attention from clinicians and academics over the last 2 years and are likely to become prominent research topics in the future. The timeline view of the clustering plot is shown in Figure 7C, which aids identification of emerging research hotspots of MPP in children. Utilizing CiteSpace parameters, a network of 235 nodes with 2033 connections was generated (Fig. 7A). Term co-occurrence analysis revealed 7 primary clusters represented by different colors, including “#0 risk factor,” “#1 prospective cohort study,” “#2 macrolide resistance,” “#3 wheezing disease,” “#4 respiratory tract infection,” “#5 community-acquired pneumonia,” and “#6 stevens-johnson syndrome.”

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Keywords visualization on MPP in children. (A) Keywords co-occurrence network. (B) Top 25 keywords with the strongest citation bursts. (C) The timeline view of the keywords co-citation network.

The “#0 risk factor” cluster mainly includes infection, resistance, clinical features, pathogenesis, lactate dehydrogenase, plastic bronchitis, immunoglobulin, inflammatory factors, risk factors, cytokines, inflammation, refractory M pneumoniae pneumonia, bronchoalveolar lavage procedures, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, lavage bronchoalveolar, biomarker, nomogram model, vitamin A, chemokine, CARDS toxin, and Th 17.

The “#1 prospective cohort study” cluster mainly includes transmission, epidemiology, diagnostic, tetracyclines, quinolones, glycylcycline tigecycline, macrolides, pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, laboratory techniques, M pneumoniae igm, M pneumoniae iga, real-time polymerase chain reaction, multiplex polymerase chain reaction, virus, community-acquired pneumonia, severe pneumonia, vaccine, and identification.

The “#2 macrolide resistance” cluster mainly includes metagenomic next-generation sequencing, macrolide resistance, 23S rRNA, epidemiology, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), pathogens, risk factors, pneumonia, antibody, assays, severe M pneumoniae pneumonia, seasonality, serological tests, lower respiratory tract infection, tract infection, cytokines, and lactate dehydrogenase.

The “#3 wheezing disease” cluster mainly includes repeated wheezing, asthma, gut microbiota, bacteria, azithromycin, minocycline, and efficacy.

The “#4 respiratory tract infection” cluster mainly includes respiratory syncytial virus, human bocavirus, bacterial pathogens, human adenovirus, respiratory infection, virus, identification, viral infection, respiratory virus, parainfluenza viruses, respiratory pathogens, antibiotic, influenza virus, respiratory microbiome chlamydia pneumoniae, and lactate dehydrogenase.

The “#5 community-acquired pneumonia” cluster mainly includes community-acquired pneumonia, lung, culture, serological assays,activation, acute exacerbation, c-reactive protein, multiplex polymerase chain reaction, procalcitoninconjugate vaccine, procalcitonin, assay, bacterial and severity.

The “#6 stevens-johnson syndrome” cluster mainly includes management,risk, erythema multiforme, stevens-johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, classification, antinuclear antibodies.

4. Discussion

4.1. General information

Analysis of data from the WoSCC database covering the period 2011 to 2023 reveals a total of 993 publications on MPP in children. These were distributed across 338 academic journals, involving 5062 authors affiliated with 1381 institutions spanning 75 countries/regions. A consistent upward trend in global publications is observed, peaking at 136 in 2022. Although 2023 data is incomplete, it is anticipated that the literature output will continue to rise, likely influenced by the recent epidemic outbreak in China. Turning points in annual growth and total annual citations occurred in 2016 and 2021. MPP may manifest in regional epidemics every 3 to 7 years, lasting up to 2 years. Previous research indicates a global surge in MPP cases among children during 2015 to 2016.[11,12,18] A noteworthy finding from a study involving 34 research centers in 20 countries reveals a substantial decline in MPP incidence among children following the implementation of preventive measures (e.g., mask-wearing and social activity restrictions) employed to control COVID-19. Equally noteworthy is the sustained reduction in MPP cases among children in 2021 to 2022, despite the easing of social restrictions during this period.[13] Literature on RMMP, macrolide-resistant M pneumoniae (MRMP), and Severe MPP (SMPP) has surged in the past 2 years. This surge suggests an alarming rise in children exhibiting macrolide resistance, leading to co-infections and the development of RMMP and SMPP. This trend is raising concerns among researchers and clinicians.

According to Table 1 and Figure 1, China dominates the MPP research landscape, contributing 56.19% (558 publications) of the total publications and citations. China also leads in collaborative networks, particularly with the United States, Japan, Korea, India, and the Netherlands. Despite China’s numerical dominance, the United Kingdom maintains a superior position in terms of average article citations. Among the top 10 institutions contributing to MPP publications, 8 are Chinese, one is South Korean, and one is Japan. Soochow University led with 45 publications, followed by Capital Medical University and Zhejiang University (n = 44). A close interconnection is observed among various countries and institutions. Fostering robust collaboration and dialogue between nations and organizations is crucial to overcoming academic barriers and promoting advancements in MPP-related research.

Zhengrong Chen, with 24 publications, stands out as the foremost author in M pneumoniae research, followed closely by Wei Ji and Yongdong Yan, each with 22 publications. This underscores their significant contributions to the field. Zhimin Chen from Zhejiang University School of Medicine boasts the highest h-index, a comprehensive quantitative metric reflecting a researcher’s scholarly output and academic impact.[14] Zhimin Chen focuses on the clinical characteristics and risk factors of M pneumoniae pneumonia.[15,16]

Co-cited literature serves as a crucial indicator in academic research, reflecting the influence, academic value, and research focus of specific works.[17] The most-cited publication, a 2017 article in Clin Microbiol Rev by Waites KB et al, titled “Mycoplasma pneumoniae from the Respiratory Tract and Beyond,” boasts 112 citations and exhibits the most robust citation burst during 2019 to 2023.[9] In this study, Waites KB et al provide a comprehensive review of recent developments in MP, including the publication of full genome sequences of additional strains, offering deeper insights into pathogenic mechanisms. Notably, there is a global emergence of clinically significant acquired macrolide resistance, leading to the standardization of in vitro susceptibility testing methodologies. Additionally, several new drugs effective against MP are in development.

4.2. Hotspots and frontiers

The utilization of keyword clustering can unveil the underlying research structure in the field of MPP. Through careful examination of these analyses, a wealth of valuable information can be gleaned, including but not limited to risk factor, prospective cohort study, macrolide resistance, wheezing disease, respiratory tract infection, community-acquired pneumonia, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. In subsequent sections we will discuss their profound significance for this area of research as well as potential implications for future directions.

4.2.1. Analysis of risk factor.

Plastic bronchitis (PB) as an acute and critical lung disease is an important factor to make MPP refractory.[19] Fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) and bronchoalveolar lavage procedures (BAL) are effective in the management of PB, so early identification of patients at high risk for PB in children with Refractory MPP (RMPP) is important. In the recent 2 years, as a new type of predictive model with easy clinical application, strong discriminatory ability and high accuracy, the nomogram model has been confirmed in several retrospective studies for its validity as an early identification of RMPP.[1923] However, the variability of the indicators included in different studies has led to a lack of consistency in the nomogram model, and external validation by prospective multicenter studies is needed for its clinical application.

Recent studies reveal a negative correlation between serum vitamin A levels and the severity of MPP, suggesting adequate serum vitamin A as an independent protective factor against RMPP. This protective effect may be attributed to vitamin A’s pleiotropic role in maintaining a normal mucosal barrier, preventing invasive pathogens, enhancing lung immune function, and modulating inflammation.[24] Inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-18, and IL-10), D-dimer, C-reactive protein (CRP), and lactate dehydrogenase have proven to be reliable predictors of RMPP in several studies.[2528]

The pro-inflammatory chemokine CXCL10 may serve as a potential predictor of SMPP in children. The mechanism could be the development of autoimmune inflammation through antigenic cross-reactivity, leading to autoimmune diseases in multiple organ systems.[29]

Expression levels of CARDS toxin and the inflammatory factor IFN-γ/CXCL9 positively correlate with the severity of MPP, emerging as new biological indicators for early prediction and clinical detection of MPP.[30,31] Recent research suggests that CARDS toxin stimulates a Th1-type immune-inflammatory reaction in the lungs. Subsequently, the JAK/STAT 1 signaling pathway, activated by IFN-γ, promotes CXCL9 secretion. CXCL9 facilitates the movement of more Th1 cells to the center of the inflammatory response, creating a positive feedback loop that amplifies the inflammatory cascade and exacerbates immunity-related injury in lung tissue.[32]

Recent research has shown that the co-stimulatory molecule B7-H3 played an important role in the immune-inflammatory response of MPP through the over-regulation of Th 17 differentiation and the enhancement of IL-17 secretion. sB 7-H3 and IL-17 levels were elevated in the peripheral blood of children with MPP, while the expression of miR-29 c was lowered, and the expression of sB 7-H3 and IL-17 were positively correlated. Targeting miR-29c and B7-H3 could be a novel approach in preventing and treating MPP, potentially serving as innovative biomarkers for prognostic evaluation.[33]

4.2.2. Analysis of prospective cohort study and community-acquired pneumonia.

Since these 2 keyword clusters have a high degree of overlap, we will analyze and discuss them in the same section.

CAP is a pulmonary infection affecting the parenchyma or pleura, contracted outside a hospital setting, which poses a significant global risk to public health.[34] MP is a significant contributor to CAP, with a global incidence in pediatric patients ranging from 10% to 40%.[35,36] However, during epidemics, this organism is responsible for 20% to 40% of CAP cases in the general populace, escalating to 70% in closed populations.[37,38]

The substantial impact of MPP on children’s health emphasizes the need for accurate MPP case recognition and prevalence reduction, which relies heavily on precise diagnostic techniques.

While most MPP cases are mild and self-limiting, the incidence of RMPP and SMPP is increasing due to rising pathogen resistance and an uptick in co-infections in recent years. Some children experience severe intrapulmonary and extrapulmonary complications.[39]

Despite the increased resistance of MP to macrolides in recent years, macrolides are still the preferred drugs for the clinical treatment of pediatric MPP, such as azithromycin. The tetracyclines, quinolones, and glycylcycline tigecycline are alternatives for the treatment of MRMP, but all have different adverse effects. With the growth and global spread of macrolide resistance in MP, the development of new drugs to prevent infection or improve symptoms is of increasing interest. The solithromycin is a 4th generation macrolide antimicrobial in development, belonging to the ketolides, and it is the most effective antimicrobial agent tested against MP to date.[40] Lefamulin, also known as BC-3781, a recently approved novel antibacterial, is accessible in both intravenous and oral forms, showing strong efficacy against numerous Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and is presently under clinical trials for CAP therapy.[41] In the published prescribing information for lefamulin, there are gaps in the data on the safety and efficacy of the drug in children. A current report showed that anticancer and anticancer and antiviral nucleoside and nucleobase analogs inhibit MP growth, demonstrating that enzymes involved in nucleotide biosynthesis are potential future targets for new drugs in the treatment of MPP.[42]

Current laboratory techniques for detecting MP infection include culture, serological assays, and nucleic acid amplification tests. However, each method has limitations. Culture, while the gold standard, is hindered by long processing times, additional species identification procedures, and low sensitivity, limiting its routine clinical application.[43] Serological tests targeting immunoglobulin A, immunoglobulin G, and immunoglobulin M may yield false results, as antibodies can persist post-infection, potentially leading to unnecessary antibiotic use.[44] Infants’ underdeveloped immune systems and potential cross-reactivity with other pathogens may result in false-negative or false-positive serum antibodies.[45,46] According to the Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of M pneumoniae Pneumonia in Children (2023 edition), an accurate serologic diagnosis requires a single serum MP antibody titer ≥ 1:160 or a 4-fold increase in MP antibody titer in 2 sera (at least 2 weeks apart) during the course of the disease.[47] However, the logistical challenge of repeated blood collection over 2 weeks and the demonstrated missed diagnosis rates for MP antibody titers ≥ 1:160 pose significant challenges in clinical settings. PCR, with its various methods such as routine, nested, real-time, multiplex, and isothermal amplification, is considered the new gold standard for its high sensitivity and specificity. However, it cannot distinguish between MP colonization and true infection.[4851] The Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification technique, valued for its sensitivity, specificity, rapidity, and simplicity, is now the preferred diagnostic method for acute MP diagnosis in Japan. A novel Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification-LFB assay targeting Community-Acquired Respiratory Distress Syndrome (CARDS) toxin genes, boasting a 2-minute detection time, requires no additional instrumentation, and exhibits high sensitivity, is poised for widespread clinical use.

In recent years, various serum molecular markers, including procalcitonin and CRP, have been developed to assess the severity of Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) in children. The use of an elevated CRP to procalcitonin ratio as a predictor for M pneumonia in adults has been explored, but evidence in pediatric cases is still limited.[5254]

Following the widespread use of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, M pneumoniae has emerged as the predominant bacterial culprit in lower respiratory tract infections in children.[55] Currently, there is no vaccine available to prevent M pneumoniae infections, but a variety of MP vaccines are under development, including whole-cell vaccines (inactivated and live-attenuated vaccines), subunit vaccines (involving M pneumoniae protein P1, protein P30, protein P116 and CARDS toxin) and DNA vaccines.[56,57] live vector vaccines have unique advantages, such as high safety, can induce humoral and mucosal immunity for a long period of time, and be produced as a multivalent vaccine, which makes it a potential vaccine candidate and one of the most promising genetically engineered vaccines at present.[58] Single-antigen protein formulated with vaccine adjuvant and multi-epitope fusion protein rank high as potential candidates for vaccines.[57]

4.2.3. Analysis of macrolide resistance.

Macrolides, serving as primary drugs for treating MPP and commonly administered in outpatient settings, face a rising epidemic of MRMP worldwide, particularly in East Asia.[19] MRMP rates are strikingly high, reaching 90% to 100% in China, 87% in Japan, and 84.6% in Korea. Substantial increases are also observed in Italy (26%), Scotland (19%), and the United States (13%).[11,59,60] The prevalence of MRMP in East Asia significantly differs from that reported in North America or Europe.

An increasing number of reports employ diverse molecular techniques to understand the dissemination of MRMP in Asia. Some studies, utilizing multilogues variable-number tandem-repeat analysis as the molecular typing method, suggest a polyclonal dissemination of M pneumoniae.[61,62] However, recent reports from South Korea and Japan, employing multilogue sequence typing as the diagnostic technique, reveal a correlation between the extensive dissemination of MRMP and the clonal expansion of the resistant ST3 clone.[63,64] Future investigations may benefit from whole-genome sequencing as a more effective and comprehensive approach to address discrepancies and explore the evolutionary patterns of MP.

The reduced efficacy of macrolides in treating MRMP prompts ongoing debate regarding whether resistant strains lead to more severe illnesses. Numerous studies suggest that MRMP in children is associated with increased instances of refractory M pneumoniae pneumonia (RMPP), extrapulmonary complications (encephalitis, myocarditis, or hepatitis), and more severe clinical symptoms and radiological signs.[65,66] Conversely, randomized studies indicate that approximately 30% of patients infected with macrolide-resistant strains can still be effectively treated with macrolides.[67,68] While MP infection is typically self-restricted, the use of ineffective antimicrobial agents leads to delayed treatment and a heightened risk of persistent fever and serious complications. Therefore, prompt diagnosis following disease onset is crucial for preventing deterioration.

Commonly employed molecular biology methods aid in identifying MRMP strains.[15] Research indicates that MRMP exhibits specific mutations in the peptidyl transferase loop of 23S rRNA, along with insertions or deletions in ribosomal proteins L4 and L22.[46] In China, primary MRMP sources are variants in the 23S rRNA gene’s domain V, predominantly featuring an A2063G mutation, where P1 type 1 and type 2 lineages co-circulate.[65]

Compared with traditional pathogenicity testing, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) as a new molecular diagnostic technology, can detect multiple pathogens at the same time, shorten the detection time, clarify the cause of infection as early as a possible, and detect the drug resistance genes of pathogens, thus avoiding the misuse of antibiotics. However, limitations such as the interference of nucleic acids in the host background and the expensive cost have led to a great limitation of the application in the clinical setting.

Currently, commercial PCR kits are available, facilitating point-of-care identification of MP genes, antigens, and drug resistance mutations concurrently, streamlining MRMP diagnosis.[6971]

Feng Huang et al have identified Circular RNAs as novel Long non-coding RNAs that could serve as valuable biomarkers for early RMPP detection.[72]

MRMP poses challenges for pediatricians, especially in pandemic areas. Tetracyclines (TCs) and fluoroquinolones (FQs) are recommended as viable substitutes.[73] However, TCs are contraindicated in children under 8 due to detrimental effects on bone development, tooth enamel hypoplasia, and permanent tooth discoloration.[39] Doxycycline, a second-generation TC with a broad therapeutic spectrum, is recommended by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as an alternative drug for MRMP in children under 8 due to its lower adverse effects.[43] While FQs are generally well-tolerated, long-term treatment poses a risk of joint and tendon damage.[44,45] Therefore, FQ use is generally limited to patients with complicated infections or those without suitable alternative antibiotics, considering the risks of tendinopathy and other adverse events (e.g., peripheral neuropathy and exacerbation of myasthenia gravis).[61]

4.2.4. Analysis of wheezing disease.

A significant number of children suffering from MPP experience repeated wheezing and diminished small airway functionality once their clinical signs subside, which often results in asthma.[74] The pathogenesis of MP in asthma is unclear. However, in recent years, the important role of intestinal microecological changes in lung infections has attracted more and more attention from researchers. Jiang et al[75] found a link between blood inflammatory elements and the presence of Ruminococcus flavefaciens and Clostridium butyricum in children suffering from MPP, alongside a notable reduction in these bacteria in their intestinal tract, potentially exacerbating the inflammatory response in those with wheezing MPP. Achieving equilibrium in the gut microecology could be a forward-looking approach in preventing asthma and, broadly, respiratory illnesses in children suffering from MPP. A latest study found that azithromycin upregulated the expression of IL-10 in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with wheezing by inhibiting the NF-κB signaling pathway and downregulation of EZH2-mediated histone H3K27me3 hypermethylation thereby attenuating wheezing following lung inflammation, which may contribute to the development of new approaches for the prevention and treatment of wheezing caused by inflammatory lung diseases in children.[76]

4.2.5. Analysis of respiratory tract infection.

Recent reports have demonstrated that the imbalanced respiratory microbiome is associated with the severity of acute respiratory infections, such as MPP.[7779]

Reduced alpha diversity and significantly increased Haemophilus abundance in the lower respiratory tract (LRT) microbiome of children with severe MPP compared to those with mild MPP. The abundance of MP aligned with the disease’s intensity, encompassing the complications and distinct blood markers of organ harm.[80]

The 16S rRNA gene sequencing has a potential diagnostic role in analyzing respiratory specimens for infectious diseases. However, 16S rRNA gene profiles do not reflect the activity of the microbiota and antibiotic treatment often affects the diversity of the microbiota, so larger datasets will be needed in the future to further investigate the role of live and dead bacteria in inducing inflammation in infectious diseases, and consideration should also be given to assessing the degree to which changes in respiratory microbial community structure over time or with antibiotic treatment affect the MPP.[81]

The most common pathogen among co-infected children with MPP was Chlamydia pneumoniae, and the predominant co-infecting bacterium was S pneumoniae, followed by H influenzae and Staphylococcus aureus. Human Bocavirus (HBV), human Rhinovirus, and syncytial virus were the most common sources of viral co-infections.[82,83] However, controversy exists regarding whether viral coinfection is the cause of Refractory MPP in children, and there is no international consensus on RMPP treatment options.

A retrospective study found that children with MPP co-infected with human adenovirus (HAdV) experienced longer hospital stays and fever, higher rates of respiratory distress, oxygen therapy, and noninvasive continuous positive airway pressure use, along with higher rates of severe pneumonia.[84] Previous studies have reported elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase levels in patients with refractory MPP, including children requiring steroid therapy, and this elevation has been observed in children with MPP combined with HAdV.[8587]

This underscores the need for clinicians managing MPP to be vigilant about the potential co-infection with HAdV in the presence of respiratory distress. Timely administration of oxygen therapy and isolation of HAdV-infected children are crucial to prevent serious complications associated with nosocomial infections in MPP-afflicted children. Several Chinese studies have indicated a high detection rate of MPP co-infections with Parainfluenza viruses and Influenza virus. However, clinical symptoms in children with MPP co-infection were statistically indistinguishable from those with MPP infection alone.[88,89] Children with RMPP and co-infections exhibited a prolonged febrile course, elevated white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, and a higher prevalence of pneumothorax or diffuse massive lung inflammation.

Discrepancies between studies highlight the impact of co-infection with different viral infections on the outcome of MPP infection and the clinical manifestations of MPP in children. However, the majority of these studies are retrospective, with either small sample sizes or significant differences in detection rates of viral pathogens due to variations in testing methods. Therefore, there is an imperative need for multicenter, large-sample prospective studies on MPP co-infection with specific viruses to elucidate the relationship between RMPP and viral co-infections. Such studies can provide reliable evidence-based medical insights for clinical guidelines on RMPP in children.

4.2.6. Analysis of Stevens-Johnson syndrome.

In 2015, Canavan et al described M pneumoniae-induced rash and mucositis (MIRM) as a rare disease with pathogenesis and clinical manifestations different from erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).[90] Due to reports of MIRM are relatively rare, there are no evidence-based medical guidelines to guide clinicians in the management of MIRM.[9093] The pathogenesis of SJS is unclear, and it may be that polyclonal B cells proliferate and produce specific antibodies and immune complexes after MP infection and are deposited in the skin, after which stimulated cytotoxic T-cells induce skin injury.[9496] Typically, the progression of MIRM is milder compared to drug-related SJS-TEN, making supportive care a viable choice. Nonetheless, vigilant observation of mucous membranes is crucial due to the occurrence and severity of the same side effects observed in SJS-TEN. Research indicates that the total IgE levels in the serum of patients exhibiting MIRM symptoms surpass those in children with only MPP, which may be related to an immune imbalance.[97] A study found higher antinuclear antibodies titers in patients with MIRM, suggesting that MIRM may predispose to inflammatory autoimmune diseases.[98] Therefore, anti-inflammatory immunosuppressive therapy should be considered, especially early in the acute phase.

5. Strengths and limitations.

Bibliometric visualization analysis surpasses conventional literature reviews in terms of intuitiveness and thoroughness.[99] As far as we know, this research is the first comprehensive bibliometric analysis of related literature in the field of M pneumoniae pneumonia in children. By analyzing the highly cited literature, reference outbreaks, keyword co-occurrence, clustering and outbreaks, the knowledge structure of this research field was described, and the research frontiers and hot directions of MG research were explored.[100] However, this research has its own set of constraints. Firstly, given the WoSCC database’s status as the predominant resource in bibliometric studies,[101,102] our analysis was limited to the WoSCC database and enforced specific limitations on the types of languages and documents, which may have resulted in the exclusion of pertinent literature from alternative sources.[103] Additionally, owing to the ongoing refreshment of the database, the dataset for this year remains unfinished, and the latest high-quality literature was excluded from this research. Thirdly, due to the time-dependent nature of citation metrics, bibliometrics are unable to evaluate the level of individual studies, suggesting that newer articles might receive less citations than their predecessors, primarily because of their publication dates.

6. Conclusion

By analyzing countries, institutions, original articles, authors, co-cited references, and keywords, this study has delineated the knowledge base of M pneumoniae pneumonia in children research findings over the past 13 years. It reveals future trends, offering researchers and clinicians valuable insights for research directions and clinical decisions.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Congcong Liu.

Data curation: Congcong Liu, Rui Wang, Shuyi Ge, Binding Wang, Siman Li.

Formal analysis: Congcong Liu, Rui Wang, Shuyi Ge, Binding Wang, Siman Li.

Visualization: Congcong Liu, Rui Wang, Shuyi Ge, Binding Wang, Siman Li.

Writing – original draft: Congcong Liu.

Writing – review & editing: Congcong Liu, Bohua Yan.

Abbreviations:

ARDS
acute respiratory distress syndrome
CAP
community-acquired pneumonia
CARDS
Community-Acquired Respiratory Distress Syndrome
CRP
C-reactive protein
CRP
C-reactive protein
FQs
fluoroquinolones
HAdV
human adenovirus
HBV
Human Bocavirus
MIRM
Mycoplasma pneumoniae-induced rash and mucositis
MP
Mycoplasma pneumoniae
MPP
Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia
MRMP
macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae
PCR
Polymerase Chain Reaction
RMPP
Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia
SJS
Stevens-Johnson Syndrome
SMPP
severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia
TCs
Tetracyclines
TEN
toxic epidermal necrolysis
WoS
Web of Science

Bibliometric analysis does not require ethical approval.

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

How to cite this article: Liu C, Wang R, Ge S, Wang B, Li S, Yan B. Research status and challenges of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children: A bibliometric and visualization analysis from 2011 to 2023. Medicine 2024;103:11(e37521).

Contributor Information

Congcong Liu, Email: liucongcong0906@163.com.

Rui Wang, Email: wangbind2023@163.com.

Shuyi Ge, Email: 545998853@qq.com.

Binding Wang, Email: wangbind2023@163.com.

Siman Li, Email: lisiman@stu.cdutcm.edu.cn.

References

  • [1].Zhou J, Xiao F, Fu J, et al. Rapid, ultrasensitive and highly specific diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae by a CRISPR-based detection platform. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1147142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Vervloet LA, Marguet C, Camargos PA. Infection by Mycoplasma pneumoniae and its importance as an etiological agent in childhood community-acquired pneumonias. Braz J Infect Dis. 2007;11:507–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Jain S, Williams DJ, Arnold SR, et al.; CDC EPIC Study Team. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among U.S. children. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:835–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Li L, Ma J, Guo P, et al. Molecular beacon based real-time PCR p1 gene genotyping, macrolide resistance mutation detection and clinical characteristics analysis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in children. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22:724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Li ZJ, Zhang HY, Ren LL, et al.; Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Etiology of Respiratory Infection Surveillance Study Team. Etiological and epidemiological features of acute respiratory infections in China. Nat Commun. 2021;12:5026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Fan F, Lv J, Yang Q, et al. Clinical characteristics and serum inflammatory markers of community-acquired mycoplasma pneumonia in children. Clin Respir J. 2023;17:607–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Kutty PK, Jain S, Taylor TH, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae among children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68:5–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Wilson M, Sampson M, Barrowman N, et al. Bibliometric analysis of neurology articles published in general medicine journals. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e215840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Yeung AWK, Tzvetkov NT, Balacheva AA, et al. Quantitative analysis of the research literature. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Synnestvedt MB, Chen C, Holmes JH. CiteSpace II: visualization and knowledge discovery in bibliographic databases. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:724–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Yamazaki T, Kenri T. Epidemiology of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in japan and therapeutic strategies for macrolide-resistant M pneumoniae. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Yan C, Sun H, Zhao H. Latest surveillance data on Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in children, suggesting a new epidemic occurring in Beijing. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:1400–1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Meyer Sauteur PM, Chalker VJ, Berger C, et al.; ESGMAC and the ESGMAC–MyCOVID study group. Mycoplasma pneumoniae beyond the COVID-19 pandemic: where is it? Lancet Microbe. 2022;3:e897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:16569–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Tong L, Huang S, Zheng C, et al. Refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children: early recognition and management. J Clin Med. 2022;11:2824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Zhang Y, Zhou Y, Li S, et al. The clinical characteristics and predictors of refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0156465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Di Donato I, Bianchi S, De Stefano N, et al. Cerebral Autosomal Dominant Arteriopathy with Subcortical Infarcts and Leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) as a model of small vessel disease: update on clinical, diagnostic, and management aspects. BMC Med. 2017;15:41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Brown RJ, Nguipdop-Djomo P, Zhao H, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae epidemiology in England and Wales: a national perspective. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Zhao L, Zhang T, Cui X, et al. Development and validation of a nomogram to predict plastic bronchitis in children with refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. BMC Pulm Med. 2022;22:253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Bi Y, Zhu Y, Ma X, et al. Development of a scale for early prediction of refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in hospitalized children. Sci Rep. 2021;11:6595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Cheng S, Lin J, Zheng X, et al. Development and validation of a simple-to-use nomogram for predicting refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020;55:968–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Shen F, Dong C, Zhang T, et al. Development of a nomogram for predicting refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:813614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Li M, Wei X, Zhang SS, et al. Recognition of refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia among Myocoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in hospitalized children: development and validation of a predictive nomogram model. BMC Pulm Med. 2023;23:383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Li Y, Guo Z, Zhang G, et al. The correlation between vitamin a status and refractory Mycoplasma Pneumoniae pneumonia (RMPP) incidence in children. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20:359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Guo L, Liu F, Lu MP, et al. Increased T cell activation in BALF from children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015;50:814–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Zhang Y, Mei S, Zhou Y, et al. Cytokines as the good predictors of refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in school-aged children. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Liu B, Chang X, Yan N. Clinical analysis of the epidemiology and changes in inflammatory indexes of Mycoplasma pneumonia in acute and recovery stage pediatric patients. Transl Pediatr. 2022;11:1645–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Fu BB, Zhong LL, Ye TT, et al. [Value of autotaxin in predicting refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children and its correlation with inflammatory cytokines]. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2022;24:765–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Li M, Chen Y, Li H, et al. Serum CXCL10/IP-10 may be a potential biomarker for severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21:909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Su X, You X, Luo H, et al. Community-acquired respiratory distress syndrome toxin: unique exotoxin for M pneumoniae. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:766591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Li G, Fan L, Wang Y, et al. High co-expression of TNF-α and CARDS toxin is a good predictor for refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Mol Med. 2019;25:38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Wang T, Sun H, Lu Z, et al. The CARDS toxin of Mycoplasma pneumoniae induces a positive feedback loop of type 1 immune response. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1054788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Li QL, Wu YY, Sun HM, et al. The role of miR-29c/B7-H3/Th17 axis in children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Ital J Pediatr. 2019;45:61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Zhu YG, Tang XD, Lu YT, et al. Contemporary situation of community-acquired pneumonia in China: a systematic review. J Transl Int Med. 2018;6:26–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Marchello C, Dale AP, Thai TN, et al. Prevalence of atypical pathogens in patients with cough and community-acquired pneumonia: a meta-analysis. Ann Fam Med. 2016;14:552–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Bénet T, Sánchez Picot V, Messaoudi M, et al.; Global Approach to Biological Research, Infectious Diseases and Epidemics in Low-income Countries (GABRIEL) Network. Microorganisms associated with pneumonia in children <5 years of age in developing and emerging countries: the GABRIEL pneumonia multicenter, prospective, case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:604–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Jacobs E, Ehrhardt I, Dumke R. New insights in the outbreak pattern of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Int J Med Microbiol. 2015;305:705–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Loens K, Goossens H, Ieven M. Acute respiratory infection due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae: current status of diagnostic methods. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;29:1055–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Esposito S, Argentiero A, Gramegna A, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae: a pathogen with unsolved therapeutic problems. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021;22:1193–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Waites KB, Crabb DM, Duffy LB. Comparative in vitro susceptibilities of human mycoplasmas and ureaplasmas to a new investigational ketolide, CEM-101. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:2139–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Adhikary S, Duggal MK, Nagendran S, et al. Lefamulin: a new hope in the field of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Curr Pharmacol Rep. 2022;8:418–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Balish MF, Distelhorst SL. Potential molecular targets for narrow-spectrum agents to combat Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection and disease. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Xiao F, Zhou J, Sun C, et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification coupled with nanoparticle-based biosensor: a rapid and sensitive method to detect Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:882855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Tang M, Wang D, Tong X, et al. Comparison of different detection methods for Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in children with community-acquired pneumonia. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21:90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Chang HY, Chang LY, Shao PL, et al. Comparison of real-time polymerase chain reaction and serological tests for the confirmation of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in children with clinical diagnosis of atypical pneumonia. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2014;47:137–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Waites KB, Xiao L, Liu Y, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae from the respiratory tract and beyond. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017;30:747–809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].PRC NHCot. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumoniae in children (2023 edition). Chin J Ration Drug Use. 2023;20:16–24. [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Ratliff AE, Duffy LB, Waites KB. Comparison of the illumigene Mycoplasma DNA amplification assay and culture for detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:1060–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Zhao F, Cao B, He LH, et al. Evaluation of a new real-time PCR assay for detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in clinical specimens. Biomed Environ Sci. 2012;25:77–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Schmitt BH, Sloan LM, Patel R. Real-time PCR detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in respiratory specimens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;77:202–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Li J, Sun L, Wu X, et al. Early diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children: Simultaneous Amplification and Testing (SAT) is the key. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Agnello L, Bellia C, Di Gangi M, et al. Utility of serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in severity assessment of community-acquired pneumonia in children. Clin Biochem. 2016;49:47–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Li F, Kong S, Xie K, et al. High ratio of C-reactive protein/procalcitonin predicts Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection among adults hospitalized with community acquired pneumonia. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2021;81:65–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Neeser OL, Vukajlovic T, Felder L, et al. A high C-reactive protein/procalcitonin ratio predicts Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;57:1638–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Kuo CY, Tsai WC, Lee HF, et al.; Taiwan Pediatric Infectious Disease Alliance (TPIDA). The epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and macrolide susceptibility of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children in Southern Taiwan, 2019-2020. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2022;55:611–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Linchevski I, Klement E, Nir-Paz R. Mycoplasma pneumoniae vaccine protective efficacy and adverse reactions--Systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine. 2009;27:2437–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Jiang Z, Li S, Zhu C, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections: pathogenesis and vaccine development. Pathogens. 2017;12:e0171687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Ding C, Ma J, Dong Q, et al. Live bacterial vaccine vector and delivery strategies of heterologous antigen: a review. Immunol Lett. 2018;197:70–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Pereyre S, Goret J, Bébéar C. Mycoplasma pneumoniae: current knowledge on macrolide resistance and treatment. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Zhao F, Liu G, Wu J, et al. Surveillance of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Beijing, China, from 2008 to 2012. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:1521–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Pereyre S, Charron A, Hidalgo-Grass C, et al. The spread of Mycoplasma pneumoniae is polyclonal in both an endemic setting in France and in an epidemic setting in Israel. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Suzuki Y, Seto J, Shimotai Y, et al. Polyclonal spread of multiple genotypes of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in semi-closed settings in Yamagata, Japan. J Med Microbiol. 2019;68:785–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Ando M, Morozumi M, Adachi Y, et al. Multilocus sequence typing of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Japan, 2002–2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:1895–901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Lee JK, Lee JH, Lee H, et al. Clonal expansion of macrolide-resistant sequence type 3 Mycoplasma pneumoniae, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:1465–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Sheng Y, et al. More complications occur in macrolide-resistant than in macrolide-sensitive Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:1034–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Yang TI, Chang TH, Lu CY, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae in pediatric patients: do macrolide-resistance and/or delayed treatment matter? J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2019;52:329–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Suzuki S, Yamazaki T, Narita M, et al. Clinical evaluation of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:709–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Matsubara K, Morozumi M, Okada T, et al. A comparative clinical study of macrolide-sensitive and macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in pediatric patients. J Infect Chemother. 2009;15:380–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Kakiuchi T, Miyata I, Kimura R, et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel point-of-care assay to detect Mycoplasma pneumoniae and associated macrolide-resistant mutations. J Clin Microbiol. 2021;59:e0324520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Morinaga Y, Suzuki H, Notake S, et al. Evaluation of GENECUBE Mycoplasma for the detection of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J Med Microbiol. 2020;69:1346–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Wagner K, Imkamp F, Pires VP, et al. Evaluation of Lightmix Mycoplasma macrolide assay for detection of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in pneumonia patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25:383.e5–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Huang F, Fan H, Yang D, et al. Ribosomal RNA-depleted RNA sequencing reveals the pathogenesis of refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. Mol Med Rep. 2021;24:761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].Diaz MH, Winchell JM. The evolution of advanced molecular diagnostics for the detection and characterization of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Zhao C, Liu J, Yang H, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae-associated bronchiolitis obliterans following acute bronchiolitis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:8478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Jiang Y, Bao C, Zhao X, et al. Intestinal bacteria flora changes in patients with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia with or without wheezing. Sci Rep. 2022;12:5683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [76].Wu S, Tian X, Mao Q, et al. Azithromycin attenuates wheezing after pulmonary inflammation through inhibiting histone H3K27me3 hypermethylation mediated by EZH2. Clin Epigenetics. 2023;15:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [77].Hasegawa K, Mansbach JM, Ajami NJ, et al.; the MARC-35 Investigators. Association of nasopharyngeal microbiota profiles with bronchiolitis severity in infants hospitalised for bronchiolitis. Eur Respir J. 2016;48:1329–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [78].Hasegawa K, Linnemann RW, Mansbach JM, et al. Nasal airway microbiota profile and severe bronchiolitis in infants: a case-control study. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017;36:1044–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [79].Dai W, Wang H, Zhou Q, et al. The concordance between upper and lower respiratory microbiota in children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7:92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [80].Wang Y, Yu X, Liu F, et al. Respiratory microbiota imbalance in children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2023;12:2202272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [81].Pittet LF, Bertelli C, Scherz V, et al. Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children with cystic fibrosis: impact on bacterial respiratory microbiota diversity. Pathog Dis. 2021;79:ftaa074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [82].Chen LL, Cheng YG, Chen ZM, et al. [Mixed infections in children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia]. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2012;50:211–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [83].Zhang X, Chen Z, Gu W, et al. Viral and bacterial co-infection in hospitalised children with refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Epidemiol Infect. 2018;146:1384–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [84].Gao J, Xu L, Xu B, et al. Human adenovirus coinfection aggravates the severity of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20:420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [85].Peng L, Zhong LL, Huang Z, et al. Clinical features of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia with adenovirus infection in children. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2021;23:1033–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [86].Lu A, Wang C, Zhang X, et al. Lactate dehydrogenase as a biomarker for prediction of refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. Respir Care. 2015;60:1469–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [87].Youn YS, Lee KY. Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. Korean J Pediatr. 2012;55:42–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [88].Guo Q, Li L, Wang C, et al. Comprehensive virome analysis of the viral spectrum in paediatric patients diagnosed with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Virol J. 2022;19:181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [89].Zheng YX, Chen J, Kong DC, et al. [Pathogenic characteristics of hospitalized severe acute respiratory infections in Shanghai, China, 2015-2017]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2019;40:911–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [90].Canavan TN, Mathes EF, Frieden I, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae-induced rash and mucositis as a syndrome distinct from Stevens-Johnson syndrome and erythema multiforme: a systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72:239–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [91].Kunimi Y, Hirata Y, Aihara M, et al. Statistical analysis of Stevens-Johnson syndrome caused by Mycoplasma pneumonia infection in Japan. Allergol Int. 2011;60:525–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [92].Mayor-Ibarguren A, Feito-Rodriguez M, González-Ramos J, et al. Mucositis secondary to chlamydia pneumoniae infection: expanding the mycoplasma pneumoniae-induced rash and mucositis concept. Pediatr Dermatol. 2017;34:465–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [93].Bressan S, Mion T, Andreola B, et al. Severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae-associated mucositis treated with immunoglobulins. Acta Paediatr. 2011;100:e238–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [94].Meyer Sauteur PM, Theiler M, Buettcher M, et al. Frequency and clinical presentation of mucocutaneous disease due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in children with community-acquired pneumonia. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156:144–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [95].Chaudhry R, Ghosh A, Chandolia A. Pathogenesis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae: an update. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2016;34:7–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [96].Chen N, Li M. Case report and literature review: clinical characteristics of 10 children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae-induced rash and mucositis. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:823376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [97].Poddighe D, Comi EV, Brambilla I, et al. Increased total serum immunoglobulin E in children developing Mycoplasma pneumoniae-related extra-pulmonary diseases. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018;17:490–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [98].Poddighe D. Extra-pulmonary diseases related to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children: recent insights into the pathogenesis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2018;30:380–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [99].Hou Z, Wang W, Su S, et al. Bibliometric and visualization analysis of biomechanical research on lumbar intervertebral disc. J Pain Res. 2023;16:3441–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [100].Yang J, Wu J, Han T, et al. Global research hotspots and frontiers of myasthenia gravis from 2002 to 2021: a bibliometric study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102:e34002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [101].Li F, Zhang D, Chen J, et al. Research hotspots and trends of brain-computer interface technology in stroke: a bibliometric study and visualization analysis. Front Neurosci. 2023;17:1243151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [102].Lu H, Han T, Li F, et al. Global trends and hotspots in research of robotic surgery in oncology: a bibliometric and visual analysis from 2002 to 2021. Front Oncol. 2022;12:1055118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [103].Hou Z, Jiang P, Su S, et al. Hotspots and trends in multiple myeloma bone diseases: a bibliometric visualization analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1003228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES