Abstract
Gestational hyperandrogenism is a risk factor for adverse maternal and offspring outcomes with effects likely mediated in part via disruptions in maternal lipid homeostasis. Using a translationally relevant sheep model of gestational testosterone (T) excess that manifests maternal hyperinsulinemia, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), and adverse offspring cardiometabolic outcomes, we tested if gestational T excess disrupts maternal lipidome. Dimensionality reduction models following shotgun lipidomics of gestational day 127.1 ± 5.3 (term 147 days) plasma revealed clear differences between control and T-treated sheep. Lipid signatures of gestational T-treated sheep included higher phosphoinositides (PI 36:2, 39:4) and lower acylcarnitines (CAR 16:0, 18:0, 18:1), phosphatidylcholines (PC 38:4, 40:5) and fatty acids (linoleic, arachidonic, Oleic). Gestational T excess activated phosphatidylethanolamines (PE) and PI biosynthesis. The reduction in key fatty acids may underlie IUGR and activated PI for the maternal hyperinsulinemia evidenced in this model. Maternal circulatory lipids contributing to adverse cardiometabolic outcomes are modifiable by dietary interventions.
Keywords: Lipidome, Ovine, Pregnancy, Hyperandrogenism, Lipid markers
Subject terms: Developmental biology, Biomarkers, Endocrinology, Risk factors
Introduction
Prenatal period is not only important for optimal development of the fetus but also in preparing how individuals respond to their environment for life after birth. Metabolic adaptations via changes in glucose, fatty acids and hormones occur to meet the demands of pregnancy, ensure sufficient energy stores, and provide optimal environment for optimal growth of fetus1. The routes of maternal communication with the fetus include endocrine, metabolic and immune signals1. Any compromise in this communication network will have detrimental impact on the developmental trajectory of the fetus resulting in poor birth outcomes and life-long health issues1. Prevailing evidence indicates that insults during pregnancy that lead to adverse consequences can stem from hormonal imbalances from disease states2, nutritional imbalances3,4, stress5,6 drugs7–9 and infectious agents10–12.
A hyperandrogenic state is one such insult13–18. Pregnant women are exposed inappropriately to excess androgens during critical periods of fetal organ differentiation through a variety of sources and disease states such as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)15–21, congenital adrenal hyperplasia22, preeclampsia23–25 or exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals that increase maternal androgen levels26–28. Our decades of research using sheep as a model system found that early- to mid-gestational testosterone (T) treatment virilizes the female fetus, leads to intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), low birth weight, and metabolic and reproductive pathologies in the offspring29,30. Metabolic pathologies in the prenatal T-treated female offspring are manifested as peripheral and tissue-specific insulin resistance31, liver steatosis32, adipose defects33–37 and hypertension38. Reproductive pathologies are evidenced as irregular or absent estrous cycles39,40, multifollicular ovarian morphology41, follicular persistence42, and compromised fertility43. The bidirectional communication between the mother and fetus influenced predominantly by disruptions in the maternal milieu likely contributes to the observed adverse phenotypic outcomes in the offspring. For instance, evidence points to hyperandrogenic states such as PCOS being associated with perturbations in the maternal lipid44 and inflammatory milieu45,46. A thorough understanding of the biomolecular perturbations that occur in the maternal milieu in response to excess androgen exposure is therefore essential to identify mediators of adverse pregnancy and fetal outcomes to serve as biomarkers of adverse offspring outcomes and develop interventions.
In this regard, precocial animal models such as sheep which have a similar developmental trajectory as humans47 provide a valuable resource for understanding the impact of exposure to excess androgens on the maternal milieu and link to adverse metabolic perturbations occurring at the maternal level48. These include maternal hyperinsulinemia and decrease in acyl carnitines-fatty acid metabolites involved in many cellular energy metabolism pathways48.
Lipids, including acyl carnitines which are perturbed in the maternal milieu following gestational T treatment48, are essential metabolites that mediate several key cellular functions and fetal metabolic programming49. To ensure the health of the mother and meet the growth and developmental demands of the fetus, significant changes in lipid metabolism occur. As such, it is essential to expand upon our initial findings of a decrease in acyl carnitines48 to identify alterations in the multitude of lipids serving various key functions. Lipids fall under 8 major classes50. These include fatty acyls that include fatty acids; glycerolipids such as triglycerides that are essential for caloric storage; glycerophospholipids- structural lipids; sphingolipids such as ceramide involved in inflammation and infection; sterol lipids such as cholesterol that serve as steroid precursors hence key developmental programmers; prenol lipids that include carotenoids with antioxidant properties, saccharolipids such as lipid A, a component of lipopolysaccharide; and polyketides with immune-suppressing and anti-inflammatory activity.
Considering the key involvement of lipids in fetal growth and development and our initial finding pointing to an effect of testosterone excess on acyl carnitines, we undertook an untargeted lipidomics analysis of maternal plasma samples collected approximately a month after cessation of T treatment. We hypothesized gestational exposure to excess testosterone will perturb the maternal lipid homeostasis at several levels.
Results
Overall nine lipid classes showed differences in percentage of total lipids at the class level including free fatty acids (FFA), acylcarnitines (CAR), N-acyl lysophosphatidylethanolamine (LNAPE), phosphatidylinositols (PI), ether linked phosphatidylcholines (PC-O), lyso-phosphatidylethanolamines (LPE), lysophosphatidylcholines (LPC), ceramides (Cer) and ether linked diacylglycerols/diglycerides (DG-O) (t-test p < 0.05). Of these, FFA and CAR (showing lower levels) and LNAPE (showing higher levels) also met the FDR (false discovery rate) adjusted t-test p value criteria of < 0.05 (Fig. 1 left, panel A). Other classes showing differences including PI, PC-O, LPE, LPC, Cer and DG-O showed higher levels in the treated group compared to the controls (Fig. 1 right, panel B).
Figure 1.
Differences in lipid classes after gestational T-treatment: Panel A: Scatter plot of all classes are shown on the top. The three lipid classes which were significant and met the FDR cutoff are shown in the bottom. Panel B: Other lipid classes which were significantly different between control and gestational T-treated sheep. Asterisks depict significance (* = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001).
Unsupervised PCA performed to get the overview of the lipidome data showed separation of the C and T groups in the 2D score plot, which was further improved in the 3D score plot indicative of distinct differences in lipidome profiles (Fig. 2, top, panels A and B). Supervised PLS DA and OPLS DA models validated this and showed distinct C and T groupings (Fig. 2, top panels C and D). Lipid species with higher VIP values above 1 indicating importance to the model for OPLS DA model were used for the enrichment analysis. The majority of the lipids enriched at the super-class level were glycerophospholipids, sphingolipids and glycerolipids (Fig. 2 bottom, panel E). The lipids with high enrichment ratio in the main classes included sterol esters, glycerophosphocholines, sphingomyelins (SM) and glycerophosphoethanolamines, substantiating the contribution of these lipid classes for the differences in lipidome profiles between C and T groups. Quinones and hydroquinones had high enrichment ratio but lower statistical significance (Fig. 2, bottom, panel F). At the sub-class level LPC, SM, 1-alkyl, 2-acylglycerophosphoethanolamines, diacylglycerophosphocholines, PC, acyl carnitines, 1 alkyl-2 acylglycerophosphocholines, N-acylsphingosines, LPE, ether linked PC, monoalkylglycerophosphocholines, N-acylsphinganines were among the top lipids based on statistical significance. Among these LPC, 1-alkyl, 2-acylglycerophosphoethanolamines, acyl carnitines, 1 alkyl-2acylglycerophosphocholines, N-acylsphingosines, LPE, monoalkylglycerophosphocholines and N-acylsphinganines had enrichment ratio above 100 (Fig. 2, bottom, panel G).
Figure 2.
Effects of gestational T treatment on maternal lipidome profiles: Top: 2D PCA (A) and 3D PCA (B), PLS DA (C) and OPLS DA (D) score plots. For 2D and 3D PCA, principal component 1 is on X-axis and principal component 2 on Y-axis. PLS-DA plot is plotted with component 1 on X-axis and component 2 on Y-axis. OPLS DA is plotted with predictive component on X-axis and orthogonal component on Y-axis. Each dot represents one animal. Bottom: Lipid classes responsible for the sex-specific separation based on enrichment analysis. Left (E): pie chart representing contribution of Super-classes. Middle (F): enrichment ratio on the X-axis and the main classes on the Y-axis. Color gradients indicate significance range. Right (G): -log 10(p value) on X-axis and lipid Sub-classes on Y-axis. Color gradients indicate significance range with size of the dot indicating enrichment ratio.
Top lipid species and lipid metabolism pathways perturbed by gestational testosterone excess: The top 50 lipid species accounting for differences in lipidome profiles based on student’s t distribution are shown in Heatmap (Fig. 3, left, panel A), the t-statistic, t-test p value and FDR adjusted p- values for top 50 lipid species are shown in Supplementary Table 1. Among these top 50 species, only few lipids including some phosphoinositide species- PI 36:2, 39:4, sphingomyelin SM 43:2;3O, ether linked PC- PC-O-21:3, ether linked LPC- LPC O-24:1 and TG 35:0 were found to be higher in the T group compared to controls. In contrast, a large number of lipid species were present in lower levels in the T group compared to controls. Among the lower ones were key unsaturated FFA, linoleic acid (18:2), arachidonic acid (20:4), oleic acid (18:1), unsaturated FFA 20:1, 22:3, 22:2, 24:1, 20:5, 18:2, and saturated FFA- 20:0, 16:0, 22:0, 24:0. Several acylcarnitine species including CAR 20:0, 14:1, 18:1, 18:0, 16:0, were lower in the T-treated group. Some phosphatidylcholine species were also in lower concentration in the T group, namely PC 40:5, 38:4, 41:5, 36:4 and ether linked PC species PC-O 39:5 and 40:5. Additionally, many unknown lipid species specifically unknown fatty acid esters of hydroxy fatty acids (FAHFA) species were present in lower levels in the T group compared to C group (Fig. 3 left, panel A).
Figure 3.
Lipid species and metabolic reactions affected by T-treatment during pregnancy: Panel A: Heatmap showing top 50 scaled relative abundance of lipid species based on student’s t distribution. Red represents higher levels and blue represents lower levels. Panel B: Active and suppressed reactions in T-treated compared to control pregnant ewes. Green circles represent significant reactions. Z score above 1.645 p < 0.05 represent significance.
Pathway analysis performed with BioPAN on LIPID MAPS platform found at the subclass level, conversion of PE from DG (z-score = 1.666, p < 0.05) and conversion of PI from phosphatidic acid (z-score = 1.807, p < 0.05) to be the activated reactions in the T group compared to controls (Fig. 3, panel B, top right). Barring marginal suppression of biosynthesis of PC from PE (z-score = 1.092) (Fig. 3, panel B, bottom right), no significant suppressed reactions were evident. Significant lipid species level active and suppressed pathways of relevance, along with pathway classification, are listed in Supplementary Table 2. Cumulative level analyses found the biosynthesis PE from DG was the activated sub class level pathway (cumulative z score of 1.66, p < 0.05). All significant lipid species active reactions are listed in Supplementary Table 3 and suppressed reactions in Supplementary Table 4.
Potential lipid signatures of gestational T excess: VIP plot (Fig. 4, top panel A) and S-plot (Fig. 4 bottom, panel B) from the OPLS DA multivariate model were used to identify the potential lipid biomarkers of gestational T treatment. Higher VIP value of the lipids are more relevant to the multivariate model and responsible for the separation of two groups in the OPLS DA score plot. The selected lipids with higher VIP values are labeled and colored orange in the VIP plot (Fig. 4, top, panel A). The identified potential lipid signatures along with VIP values are listed in Table 1.
Figure 4.
Potential signatures of gestational T-treated sheep: Panel A: OPLS DA VIP plot showing lipid signatures with high VIP values in orange. Panel B: OPLS DA S-plot with potential biomarkers of T treatment. Purple represents higher and light blue represents lower levels in T-treated ewes. Each point on S-plot represents individual lipid species.
Table 1.
Potential Lipid signatures of excess T treatment.
| Lipid Species | VIP values |
|---|---|
| PC 40:5 | 2.19501 |
| Unknown PC 40: 5@7.38 | 2.19501 |
| PI 36:2 | 2.20725 |
| CAR 18:0 | 2.34932 |
| CAR 18:1 | 2.29046 |
| SM 40:1;2O | 2.16227 |
| PC 38:4 | 1.98383 |
| CAR 16:0 | 2.46837 |
| Unknown PC 38: 6@4.72 | 1.93587 |
| Unknown_FAHFA 36:4 | 2.04743 |
| FFA (16:0) | 2.00447 |
| FFA (18:0) | 2.19848 |
| FFA (18:2) | 2.54704 |
| FFA (20:0) | 2.05644 |
| FFA (22:0)- | 2.38108 |
| FFA (24:0) | 2.02 |
| Unknown_FAHFA 37:3 | 2.37958 |
| Unknown_FAHFA 40:3 | 2.01014 |
| FFA (20:4) | 2.38678 |
| CerP 42:2;2O | 2.01651 |
| Unknown_FAHFA 35:0 | 2.22794 |
| FFA (18:1) | 2.51922 |
| FFA (20:1) | 2.29104 |
| FFA (24:1) | 2.03395 |
| Unknown_FAHFA 36:1 | 2.45766 |
| Unknown_FAHFA 40:4 | 2.40434 |
| PC O-40:5 | 1.99348 |
| Unknown_FAHFA 32:3 | 2.06427 |
| Unknown_FAHFA 34:0 | 2.42309 |
| Unknown_FAHFA 38:4 | 2.42614 |
Specific signatures with high magnitude and significance were identified using S-plot (Fig. 4, bottom, panel B). The lipids on the bottom left side of the S-plot representing lipids which were found to be higher in T group compared to C group included three lipid species, PI 36:2 and 39:4, and LPC O-24:1. On the other hand the lipid species at top right corner represents lipid markers lower in the T group which included, L-palmitoylcarnitine (CAR 16:0), and unsaturated FFA (linoleic acid, 18:2; arachidonic, 20:4; Oleic,18:1) and saturated FFA 22:0. Several unknown lipids belonging to FAHFA species were also found to be at lower levels in the T treated group compared to C group. The significance of all the potential lipid biomarkers identified by the S-plot were confirmed by the confidence interval of loadings.
Retrospective power analysis of the lipid signatures found all the potential signatures to have good power (with alpha set at 0.05) with 11 T animals and 5 controls. Power around 0.8 (80% chance to detect statistically significant differences) and above is considered good acceptable power to reject the null hypothesis. The power of lipid markers that are higher in the T-treated group included, PI 36:2 = 0.936 and PI 39:4 = 0.800, and LPC O-24:1 = 0.786. The lipid markers that are lower in the T-treated group included CAR 16:0 = 1, PC 38:4 = 0.812, unsaturated FFA -linoleic acid, 18:2 = 0.998; arachidonic, 20:4 = 0.995; Oleic,18:1 = 1 and saturated FFA 22:0 = 0.998.
PI 36:2 and PC 38:4 ratio: Two of the lipid markers of T treatment with high VIP values were PI 36:2 and PC 38:4 (Fig. 4, top panel A) and PI 36:2 was also confirmed as a potential biomarker by S-plot for the T treatment (Fig. 4, bottom, panel B). PI 36:2 was upregulated in the T treatment whereas the PC 38:4 was downregulated in T group (Fig. 3, left panel A). The ratio of PI 36:2/PC 38:4 was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the T group compared to the C group (Fig. 5, bar graph on the right).
Figure 5.
Schematic summary of T-treatment effects on maternal lipidome profile: T-treatment led to lower levels of key fatty acids and activated biosynthesis of PI and PE. Gestational T-treatment also resulted in higher PI 36:2 and 38:4 ratio, a feature reported to be related to increased cardiovascular disease risk. These perturbations in the lipid metabolism can be contributing factors to IUGR and adverse cardio-metabolic outcome evidenced in their offspring.
Discussion
Findings from this study expand upon our earlier findings of reduced acylcarnitines48 and addresses the adverse impact of T excess on the lipid metabolism in a precocial translationally relevant model for the development of PCOS phenotype in offspring. Our detailed profiling of maternal lipidome reveals that the major impact of the gestational T excess was exerted at the level of glycerophospholipids, glycerolipids and SMs. The key findings are (1) significantly lower levels of key fatty acids and acylcarnitines, and higher levels LNAPE at the class level and (2) activation of biosynthesis of phosphoinositides and phosphatidylethanolamine pathways. The schematic overview of the overall impact of excess T exposure on the maternal lipidome is summarized in Fig. 5.
The perturbations at the level of glycerophospholipids, glycerolipids, sphingolipids stemming from gestational testosterone treatment are similar to other pregnancy pathologies such as gestational diabetes (GDM)51 and preeclampsia52,53. The enrichment of glycerolipids and diglycerides at main and subclass level in the gestational T-treated sheep (this study) is also an aspect associated with GDM54. Similarly, sphingosine and ceramide, lipid subclasses that were enriched after T-treatment have also been reported to be enriched in preeclamptic pregnancies55. Of relevance to this study of gestational T excess, these pregnancy pathologies are also associated with higher androgen levels (GDM56; preeclampsia57,58). Other commonalities between gestational T-treated sheep and these pregnancy pathologies include maternal hyperinsulinemia (GDM59, preeclampsia60,61 and risk of intrauterine growth restriction (gestational T-treated sheep62,63; GDM64; preeclampsia65).
Maternal nutrient status and metabolism play key roles for proper growth and development of the fetus. Carnitines and acylcarnitines are fatty acid metabolites involved in many cellular energy metabolism pathways: fatty acid oxidation, energy metabolism, mitochondrial activity, insulin sensitivity, and oxidative stress66. The comprehensive lipidomics approach in addition to confirming our earlier findings of lower acylcarnitines at the class level48 has helped identify specific acylcarnitine markers that are likely contributors to intrauterine growth restriction and low birth weight evidenced in this model62,67–69. The disruptions in these metabolites may also be contributing factors to the hyperinsulinemic status evidenced in the gestational T-treated mothers48. Consistent with this premise, one study using targeted metabolomics of 400 pregnant women of European ancestry at 28 weeks of gestation found acylcarnitines to be associated with altered insulin sensitivity and newborn size70. This finding was later confirmed in a larger group of 800 pregnant women71. Specific acylcarnitine species found to be lower in maternal plasma in this study were also found to be lower in the offspring of gestational T treated lambs indicating long term effects on the fetal acylcarnitine metabolism exposed to excess T during pregnancy72.
Maternal fatty acids are important for placental development, feto-placental function and normal progression of pregnancy73. Lower levels of maternal fatty acids observed in the gestational T-treated mothers may have contributed to the placental insufficiency62 and compromised placental differentiation and function62,74 in this model. As key regulators of cell growth, cell signaling, and brain development, fatty acids are key regulators of fetal growth and development. A recent study reported increased levels of fatty acids (including saturated, monounsaturated and n-6 polyunsaturated acids) supportive of their higher requirement during pregnancy75. Of relevance to our findings, lower levels of fatty acids have been found to restrict fetal growth and development75,76. As such, the overall reduction in fatty acids levels evidenced in the gestational T-treated sheep likely limited supply of these key lipids to the developing fetus culminating in the IUGR and low birth weight offspring evidenced in this model62,68.
LNAPE and LPE: LNAPE and LPE, are lysoPE, which are formed after diacylation of PE by partial hydrolysis; although present in minute amounts in cell membranes, are important for cell signaling and lipid mediated responses77–79. There is limited information available about the role and function of these lipids in pregnancy. Our previous clinical study found LPE to be related to gestational weight gain and birth weight80.
PI biosynthesis pathway was found to be activated by gestational T excess. PIs are involved in protein–protein interactions, regulation of proteins, cholesterol transport and take part in key signaling pathways81–83. PI plays a role in fetal lung maturation and surfactant production84,85. PIs are key regulators of insulin signaling and energy metabolism86. The positive effects of inositides as insulin sensitizers87,88 suggest that activation of the PI biosynthesis pathway observed in this study could be a compensatory response to overcome the hyperinsulinemic status of gestational T-treated sheep, a risk factor for offspring health outcomes89,90.
Another pathway that was activated by gestational T excess was PE biosynthesis pathway. PE are one of the most abundant lipids classes91 and serve an important role in membrane permeability and fusion, mitochondrial function, oxidative phosphorylation and lipid transport. PE also serve as the substrate for biosynthesis of PC and the balance of PC and PE is important for liver function92. Activation of PE biosynthesis can lead to accumulation of PE and altered ratio of PE and PC, leading to membrane dysfunction, and ER stress91,92. Of interest, activation of PE biosynthesis pathway after T treatment during pregnancy may be one of the developmental programming effects of prenatal excess T as this pathway was also found to be affected in the newborn lambs after prenatal T treatment72.
Several key fatty acids were identified as potential biomarkers of gestational T excess. Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) namely linoleic acid and arachidonic acid and the mono-unsaturated omega-9 fatty acid oleic, were identified as potential biomarkers of T exposure, with lower levels found in the T treated sheep. Arachidonic acid is important for proper functioning of cell membrane, immune and inflammatory systems and along with DHA is required for fetal brain development76,93. Linoleic acid is a precursor for biosynthesis of Arachidonic acid. As such, at times of linoleic acid deficiency, arachidonic acid becomes conditionally essential fatty acid93. Interestingly, PUFAs are reported to be lower in PCOS women94,95 a hyperandrogenic disorder the characteristics of which the female offspring of gestational T-treated sheep used in this study mimic29–37. While the mechanisms are unclear, several studies reported beneficial effects of PUFA supplementation in PCOS women96,97.
PI 36:2 and 38:4 were identified as the potential signatures of T excess during pregnancy in our sheep model. In addition to activation of the PI biosynthesis pathway, a higher ratio of PI 36:2 and 38:4 characterized the gestational T-treated sheep (Fig. 5). Lower PC 38:4 is likely the result of lower arachidonic acid and both PI 36:2 and 38:4 are linked to visceral fat metabolism98. These two lipids were reported recently as the lipid metabolism biomarkers for adverse cardiovascular outcome99. The same study also reported the negative association of arachidonic acid (also identified as potential biomarker of T excess in this study) and positive association of phosphoinositide species with adverse cardiovascular outcomes99. While we have not assessed the maternal cardiovascular consequences of gestational T treatment during pregnancy, we have found adverse sex-specific cardiac programming in their offspring100,101. Our preliminary findings also indicate adverse maternal cardiac remodeling during the postpartum period (Vyas, Padmanabhan, unpublished data). A review of literature indicates compromised maternal cardiac dysfunction in hyperandrogenic conditions102.
Strengths and limitations: The strengths of the study are the use of a well-established precocial model of translational relevance to hyperandrogenic disorders such as PCOS; pregnant sheep are highly sought out model to investigate maternal–fetal physiology103. Another strength is the use of the state-of-the-art plasma lipidome profiling that can be safely undertaken during pregnancy. There are several limitations to this study: (1) Although the blood sample for the lipidome analysis was procured during rapid growth phase of the fetus, the single time point estimate only provides a snap-shot view of lipid changes occurring at that time. Because lipid profiles are likely to vary at different gestational time points reflective of pregnancy-associated hormonal changes and consequent impact on lipid metabolism, the findings from this study while of interest only provides a snap-shot view that points to the need for undertaking more in-depth lipid profiling across multiple time points during gestation. (2) Because this was not set up as a feeding trial and the controls and testosterone-treated groups were housed and group-fed together, differences in feeding behavior, if any, cannot be accounted for. (3) The untargeted lipidome profiling used in this study, while offering a screening approach to assess relative abundances of various lipids, does not address causal relationships. (4) Levels of testosterone achieved in this sheep model are much higher than evidenced in human hyperandrogenic disorders. (5) There is potential for differences in lipid metabolism between ruminants and humans. Although digestion and absorption of dietary components will vary between ruminant and human and species differences in circulating concentrations of nutrients will exist, metabolism (i.e. the actual chemical reactions/metabolic pathways) are similar in mammals once carbohydrates, fats, proteins are broken down into glucose, lipids, and amino acids104. Of importance, ruminants are still glucose dependent except that they just require an extra step compared to non-ruminants (ruminal microbes convert carbohydrates to short chain fatty acids which is converted to glucose by the liver for utilization by target tissues). By the time lipids reach the small intestine, absorption into enterocytes and packaging is similar to that of non-ruminants104.
Future studies are needed to delineate the functional relationship of the lipids identified and their contributions throughout pregnancy and offspring outcomes as well as to address the potential contribution from changes in placental or fetal metabolism.
In summary, findings from this study provide evidence of the detrimental impact of gestational T excess in perturbing the maternal lipidome, a key component of maternal metabolism and fetal growth and development and hence a potential contributor to the IUGR and offspring cardiometabolic risk evidenced in this model (Fig. 5). The findings are of translational relevance to hyperandrogenic disorders such as PCOS, the characteristics of whom the offspring of gestational T-treated sheep mimic.
Methods
Study design (Fig. 6): All study procedures were performed in accordance with the National Research Council’s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the University of Michigan Animal Care and Use Committee. Time-mated pregnant sheep were administered twice weekly injections of 100 mg testosterone (T) propionate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in 2 ml corn oil intramuscularly from days 30 to 90 of gestation (Term = 147days). Controls (C) were injected with 2 ml corn oil intramuscularly for the same duration in the same frequency. Pregnant ewes (control and testosterone-treated) were housed under a natural photoperiod and group-fed with a daily maintenance diet of 1.25 kg alfalfa/brome mix hay/ewe. To avoid transient effects of testosterone treatment, and focus on the rapid fetal growth period, blood samples (3 mL) were collected by jugular venipuncture at around day 127.12 ± 5.32 day (term 147 days) using BD vacutainer tubes (purple cap—EDTA tubes, Becton, Dickinson and Company, NJ), centrifuged at 3000g for 15 min, plasma separated and stored at -20°C until lipidomics analysis. Twice the number of breeder animals were assigned to the testosterone-treatment group in anticipation of considerable pregnancy loss, but most carried their pregnancy. Samples were collected from all available control and gestational testosterone-treated animals that were carrying their pregnancy, before their morning feed to avoid acute responses from food intake. This study was conducted and reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines105.
Figure 6.
Experimental design: T propionate was injected subcutaneously twice weekly from days 30–90 of gestation. Plasma samples from ~ day 127 of gestation were subjected to Shotgun Lipidomics and data analyzed using multivariate dimensionality reduction modeling, feature identification and metabolic pathway analysis.
Lipidome analysis
Shotgun Lipidomics was performed on plasma samples (N = 17, C = 5 and T = 12) at the University of Michigan Metabolomics Core. Plasma samples were spiked with internal standards and lipids were extracted using modified Bligh-Dyer method106 using a 2:2:2 ratio volume of methanol:water:dichloromethane at room temperature. The collected organic layer was dried under nitrogen. The dried extract of lipids was reconstituted in 100 μL of 10 mM ammonium acetate containing buffer (10:85:5 ACN/IPA/H2O). Data dependent Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) was used to measure lipid species. Shimadzu CTO-20A Nexera X2 UHPLC systems (Canby, OR, USA). ABSCIEX 5600(AB Sciex, Concord, Canada) were used for chromatographic separation and triple Time of Flight Mass spectrometry (TOF MS) was used for Mass spectrometry. Both positive and negative ionization modes with a DuoSpray ion source (AB Sciex, Concord, Canada) were used for data acquisition to provide good separation of all the lipid classes. Lipid species were identified by data-dependent MS/MS product ion formation of plasma lipid species. Fatty acids composition was determined in the negative mode. After every 10 samples quality control (QC-pooled plasma) samples were injected at the beginning and end of each analysis. The raw data was converted to mgf data format using proteoWizard software107. The converted files were searched against LipidBlast library108 using NIST MS PepSearch Program libraries in batch mode109,110. Lipid species identified were from lipid classes PC, PE, PI, LPC, phosphatidylserines (PS), phosphatidylglycerols (PG), SM, Cer, triglycerides (TG), DG and monoglycerides (MG). Lipids were quantified using Multiquant and normalized by internal standards. Lipids detected in the study had 20.8% average coefficient of variation. All species within the lipid subclasses were combined and percentage of each class was calculated by relative abundance of each class against the sum of all lipid classes. Univariate Students’s t-test was used to calculate mean differences in lipid class analysis and raw p values and false discovery rate adjusted p-values (FDR adjusted) were calculated using Prism v10.1 (GraphPad, La Jolle, CA, USA) and MetaboAnalyst v5.0 (Canada).
Dimensionality reduction modeling
Dimensionality reduction multivariate modeling was performed using SIMCA version 17 (Sartorius Stedim Data Analytics AB) to visualize the normalized lipidomics abundance data. Briefly, the normalized abundance data scaled using unit variance scaling (mean centered and divided by standard deviation). Unsupervised and supervised models were investigated for the clustering and patterns in the lipidomics data. Principal component analysis (PCA- unsupervised) was used for the overview and to identify patterns in the data for controls and gestational T-treated sheep. The model of first and second principal components explaining maximum variation in the data was used for the overview analysis, and two dimensional and 3 dimensional models were developed. Supervised models including partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS DA) and orthogonal partial least square discriminant analysis also known as orthogonal projections to latent structures (OPLS DA)111 were used to investigate C and T groupings and to identify potential biomarkers of T excess during pregnancy. To obtain information about grouping variables, PLS DA uses multivariate regression to obtain linear combinations of X variables (lipidomics data) with outcome Y variable (C and T groups). OPLS DA uses a technique where models are rotated to get the information about the outcome Y grouping variable in the first predictive component with all other variance explained in the orthogonal components111,112. Hotelling’s T2 tolerance ellipse (multivariate generalization of t distribution) was used to identify strong outliers. One outlier was detected in the PLS DA and OPLS DA models and the new multivariate models were developed after removing the outlier. All supervised models including PLS DA and OPLS DA models reported in this study had good model fit and predictability based on R2X and Q2 values indicating model fit and predictive ability, the supervised models used had R2Y (values above 0.95) and Q2 (values ≥ 0.45). The first two components of the PLS DA model and predictive component which represents data related to the outcome and the first orthogonal components for the OPLS DA were used to develop models. PLS-DA and OPLS-DA loadings and variable importance in projection (VIP) scores were used investigate lipid species responsible for the separation. Variables with loadings away from the center and with smaller confidence interval are responsible for the separation in the score plot. VIP values are weighted sum of squares of the PLS and OPLS loadings with the amount of Y-variation explained in each dimension. OPLS DA models provide information about the lipid species related to the outcome variable (in this case C and T groups) by separating unrelated information in the orthogonal component. These identified lipid species have the potential to serve as reliable biomarkers. Potential signatures of T excess during pregnancy were identified using VIP values and S-plots (OPLS DA). Lipid species with higher VIP values are important to the model and responsible for the separation of groups in the model. The S-plot provides information about the significant important lipid species by plotting model covariance against model correlations. The variables on the lower left and upper right corners have high significance and high magnitude change and these variables have the potential to serve as reliable biomarkers. Ratio of PI 36:2 and 38:4 was calculated using normalized abundancies and t statistics was used to test significance (p value < 0.05) in the difference between the C and T groups. Retrospective power analysis of the lipid signatures (identified by the OPLS DA S-plot) was performed using PS program (Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA).
Enrichment analysis
Metabolite Set Enrichment Analysis (MSEA) was performed using MetPA, MetaboAnalyst v5.0 (Canada)113. MSEA identifies biological and functional patterns based on their significant enrichment in lipidome data. For the enrichment analysis, variables with VIP above 1, indicating their importance to the model, were selected. Enrichment analysis to identify lipid Superclass, Main classes, and Subclasses responsible for the separation of the C and T groups was performed. The list of lipid species with VIP above 1 was imported in the MetaboAnalyst enrichment analysis online tool and Over Representation Analysis (ORA) was performed. Overrepresentation analysis uses a hypergeometric test to estimate if certain Super classes, Main classes and/or Subclasses of lipids were represented more than expected by chance within the list of lipid species. The online tool uses compounds available in the MetaboAnalyst database and the lipid species which were not detected in the database were removed by the software and not included in the enrichment analysis. One tailed p-values were calculated after adjusting for multiple testing (false discovery rate adjusted P-value). MetaboAnalyst was also used to generate Heatmaps to investigate the top fifty lipid species based on Student’s t-test statistics.
Pathway analysis
Lipid metabolism pathways were investigated using Bioinformatics Methodology for Pathway Analysis (BioPAN) on LIPID MAPS platform. For this analysis normalized lipid abundancies were imported to the online platform. Pathway analysis at the subclass and individual lipid species level were performed.
Differences in lipid metabolism pathways
To align the uploaded dataset with the BIOPAN nomenclature, the dataset was aligned to the software database by LipidLynxX. The lipid species were mapped in the uploaded lipidome data and lipid pathways were investigated to understand differences in C and T groups. A total of 738 lipid species were mapped by the software, of which 147 were found to be active in lipid metabolism reactions. For pathway analysis and lipid metabolism reactions p value of 0.05 was set as a threshold and lipid subclass and lipid species level analyses were performed. The pathway and reaction z scores were calculated and z score of 1.645 (p value 0.05) and above were considered significant. Pathways and reactions were investigated in reference to activation or suppression in the T-treatment group. Higher z scores indicated a shift towards more product of the pathway, which may lead to lower levels of the substrate reactants. Pathway active and suppressed reactions graphs with z scores were developed where green filled circles indicate significant pathways and reactions. Detailed perturbed pathways and reactions by testosterone excess with predicted genes involved in these pathways are represented in table format.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
Author contributions
N.S. Methodology, Formal Analysis, Visualization, Writing—original draft, review & editing B.P. Methodology, Writing—review & editing J.C. Methodology, Writing—review & editing A.V.—Resources, Writing—review & editing V.P.—Funding acquisition, Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Supervision, Writing—original draft, review & editing.
Funding
Research reported in this publication was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01 HD099096, R01 HL139639 and the Molecular Phenotyping Core, Michigan Nutrition and Obesity Center P30 DK089503.
Data availability
The supplementary data and the dataset generated and/or used for the analysis and interpretation of the results is available at the following link. Pease contact corresponding author (Vasantha Padmanabhan at vasantha@umich.edu) with any queries.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-56886-6.
References
- 1.Bowman CE, Arany Z, Wolfgang MJ. Regulation of maternal-fetal metabolic communication. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2021;78:1455–1486. doi: 10.1007/s00018-020-03674-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kumar P, Magon N. Hormones in pregnancy. Niger. Med. J. 2012;53:179–183. doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.107549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Armitage JA, Khan IY, Taylor PD, Nathanielsz PW, Poston L. Developmental programming of the metabolic syndrome by maternal nutritional imbalance: How strong is the evidence from experimental models in mammals? J. Physiol. 2004;561:355–377. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.072009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wu G, Bazer FW, Cudd TA, Meininger CJ, Spencer TE. Maternal nutrition and fetal development. J. Nutr. 2004;134:2169–2172. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.9.2169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Eberle C, Fasig T, Bruseke F, Stichling S. Impact of maternal prenatal stress by glucocorticoids on metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes in their offspring: A systematic scoping review. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0245386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Traylor CS, Johnson JD, Kimmel MC, Manuck TA. Effects of psychological stress on adverse pregnancy outcomes and nonpharmacologic approaches for reduction: An expert review. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM. 2020;2:100229. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lo JO, Hedges JC, Girardi G. Impact of cannabinoids on pregnancy, reproductive health, and offspring outcomes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022;227:571–581. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang X, et al. Prenatal exposure to benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in humans and risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in offspring: A systematic review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2022;137:104647. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Qu W, Liu L, Miao L. Exposure to antibiotics during pregnancy alters offspring outcomes. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2021;17:1165–1174. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2021.1974000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Adams Waldorf KM, McAdams RM. Influence of infection during pregnancy on fetal development. Reproduction. 2013;146:R151–162. doi: 10.1530/REP-13-0232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gibbs LC, Fairfax KC. Altered offspring immunity in maternal parasitic infections. J. Immunol. 2022;208:221–226. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2100708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.San Martin-Gonzalez N, et al. Maternal respiratory viral infections during pregnancy and offspring's neurodevelopmental outcomes: A systematic review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2023;149:105178. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hakim C, Padmanabhan V, Vyas AK. Gestational hyperandrogenism in developmental programming. Endocrinology. 2017;158:199–212. doi: 10.1210/en.2016-1801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mossa F, Latham KE, Ireland JJ, Veiga-Lopez A. Undernutrition and hyperandrogenism during pregnancy: Role in programming of cardiovascular disease and infertility. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2019;86:1255–1264. doi: 10.1002/mrd.23239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Abbott DH, Dumesic DA, Levine JE. Hyperandrogenic origins of polycystic ovary syndrome—implications for pathophysiology and therapy. Expert Rev. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019;14:131–143. doi: 10.1080/17446651.2019.1576522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Noroozzadeh M, et al. Maternal androgen excess increases the risk of metabolic syndrome in female offspring in their later life: A long-term population-based follow-up study. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2023;308:1555–1566. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07132-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Farhadi-Azar M, et al. Maternal androgen excess increases the risk of pre-diabetes mellitus in male offspring in later life: A long-term population-based follow-up study. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2023;46:1775–1785. doi: 10.1007/s40618-022-01972-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tian S, et al. Prevalence of prediabetes risk in offspring born to mothers with hyperandrogenism. EBioMedicine. 2017;16:275–283. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dumesic DA, Goodarzi MO, Chazenbalk GD, Abbott DH. Intrauterine environment and polycystic ovary syndrome. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2014;32:159–165. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1371087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Andræ F, et al. Sustained maternal hyperandrogenism during PCOS pregnancy reduced by metformin in non-obese women carrying a male fetus. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020;105:3762–3770. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Risal S, et al. Prenatal androgen exposure and transgenerational susceptibility to polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat. Med. 2019;25:1894–1904. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0666-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lo JC, Grumbach MM. Pregnancy outcomes in women with congenital virilizing adrenal hyperplasia. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 2001;30:207–229. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8529(08)70027-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Salamalekis E, Bakas P, Vitoratos N, Eleptheriadis M, Creatsas G. Androgen levels in the third trimester of pregnancy in patients with preeclampsia. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2006;126:16–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Serin IS, et al. Androgen levels of preeclamptic patients in the third trimester of pregnancy and six weeks after delivery. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2001;80:1009–1013. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.801107.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Baksu A, Gürarslan H, Göker N. Androgen levels in pre-eclamptic pregnant women. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2004;84:247–248. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(03)00318-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Palioura E, Diamanti-Kandarakis E. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2015;16:365–371. doi: 10.1007/s11154-016-9326-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Banker M, et al. Association of maternal-neonatal steroids with early pregnancy endocrine disrupting chemicals and pregnancy outcomes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021;106:665–687. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hu Y, et al. The association between the environmental endocrine disruptor bisphenol A and polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2018;34:370–377. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1405931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Padmanabhan V, Veiga-Lopez A. Reproduction Symposium: Developmental programming of reproductive and metabolic health. J. Anim. Sci. 2014;92:3199–3210. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cardoso RC, Padmanabhan V. Prenatal steroids and metabolic dysfunction: Lessons from sheep. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2019;7:337–360. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-020518-115154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Puttabyatappa M, Padmanabhan V. Prenatal testosterone programming of insulin resistance in the female sheep. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017;1043:575–596. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-70178-3_25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Puttabyatappa M, et al. Developmental programming: Impact of gestational steroid and metabolic milieus on mediators of insulin sensitivity in prenatal testosterone-treated female sheep. Endocrinology. 2017;158:2783–2798. doi: 10.1210/en.2017-00460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Veiga-Lopez A, et al. Developmental programming: impact of prenatal testosterone excess on insulin sensitivity, adiposity, and free fatty acid profile in postpubertal female sheep. Endocrinology. 2013;154:1731–1742. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-2145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cardoso RC, et al. Developmental programming: Impact of gestational steroid and metabolic milieus on adiposity and insulin sensitivity in prenatal testosterone-treated female sheep. Endocrinology. 2016;157:522–535. doi: 10.1210/en.2015-1565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Puttabyatappa M, et al. Developmental programming: Impact of prenatal testosterone excess on steroidal machinery and cell differentiation markers in visceral adipocytes of female sheep. Reprod. Sci. 2018;25:1010–1023. doi: 10.1177/1933719117746767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Puttabyatappa M, Ciarelli JN, Chatoff AG, Singer K, Padmanabhan V. Developmental programming: Adipose depot-specific changes and thermogenic adipocyte distribution in the female sheep. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2020;503:110691. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2019.110691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dou J, Puttabyatappa M, Padmanabhan V, Bakulski KM. Developmental programming: Adipose depot-specific transcriptional regulation by prenatal testosterone excess in a sheep model of PCOS. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2021;523:111137. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2020.111137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.King AJ, et al. Hypertension caused by prenatal testosterone excess in female sheep. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007;292:E1837–1841. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00668.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Birch RA, Padmanabhan V, Foster DL, Unsworth WP, Robinson JE. Prenatal programming of reproductive neuroendocrine function: Fetal androgen exposure produces progressive disruption of reproductive cycles in sheep. Endocrinology. 2003;144:1426–1434. doi: 10.1210/en.2002-220965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Veiga-Lopez A, Lee JS, Padmanabhan V. Developmental programming: insulin sensitizer treatment improves reproductive function in prenatal testosterone-treated female sheep. Endocrinology. 2010;151:4007–4017. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-0124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.West C, Foster DL, Evans NP, Robinson J, Padmanabhan V. Intra-follicular activin availability is altered in prenatally-androgenized lambs. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2001;185:51–59. doi: 10.1016/s0303-7207(01)00632-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Manikkam M, Steckler TL, Welch KB, Inskeep EK, Padmanabhan V. Fetal programming: Prenatal testosterone treatment leads to follicular persistence/luteal defects; partial restoration of ovarian function by cyclic progesterone treatment. Endocrinology. 2006;147:1997–2007. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-1338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Steckler TL, Roberts EK, Doop DD, Lee TM, Padmanabhan V. Developmental programming in sheep: Administration of testosterone during 60–90 days of pregnancy reduces breeding success and pregnancy outcome. Theriogenology. 2007;67:459–467. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Palomba S, et al. Lipid profile in nonobese pregnant women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a prospective controlled clinical study. Steroids. 2014;88:36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2014.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Stokkeland LMT, et al. Changes in serum cytokines throughout pregnancy in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022;107:39–52. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Palomba S, et al. Low-grade chronic inflammation in pregnant women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A prospective controlled clinical study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;99:2942–2951. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-1214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Padmanabhan V, Veiga-Lopez A. Sheep models of polycystic ovary syndrome phenotype. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2013;373:8–20. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2012.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Abi Salloum B, Veiga-Lopez A, Abbott DH, Burant CF, Padmanabhan V. Developmental programming: Exposure to testosterone excess disrupts steroidal and metabolic environment in pregnant sheep. Endocrinology. 2015;156:2323–2337. doi: 10.1210/en.2014-2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kabaran S, Besler HT. Do fatty acids affect fetal programming? J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2015;33:14. doi: 10.1186/s41043-015-0018-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Fahy E, et al. A comprehensive classification system for lipids. J. Lipid. Res. 2005;46:839–861. doi: 10.1194/jlr.E400004-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chen Q, Francis E, Hu G, Chen L. Metabolomic profiling of women with gestational diabetes mellitus and their offspring: Review of metabolomics studies. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2018;32:512–523. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Korkes HA, et al. Lipidomic assessment of plasma and placenta of women with early-onset preeclampsia. PLoS One. 2014;9:e110747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jääskeläinen T, et al. A non-targeted LC-MS metabolic profiling of pregnancy: longitudinal evidence from healthy and pre-eclamptic pregnancies. Metabolomics. 2021;17:20. doi: 10.1007/s11306-020-01752-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rahman ML, et al. Plasma lipidomics profile in pregnancy and gestational diabetes risk: a prospective study in a multiracial/ethnic cohort. BMJ. Open Diabetes Res. Care. 2021 doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Patanapirunhakit P, et al. Sphingolipids in HDL—Potential markers for adaptation to pregnancy? Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids. 2021;1866:158955. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2021.158955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mustaniemi S, et al. Associations of low sex hormone-binding globulin and androgen excess in early pregnancy with fasting and post-prandial hyperglycaemia, gestational diabetes, and its severity. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2023;39:e3599. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lan KC, et al. Levels of sex steroid hormones and their receptors in women with preeclampsia. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2020;18:12. doi: 10.1186/s12958-020-0569-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Keya SL, et al. Relationship between free testosterone and Preeclampsia. Mymensingh. Med. J. 2019;28:574–581. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hill M, et al. Steroids, steroid associated substances and gestational diabetes mellitus. Physiol. Res. 2021;70:S617–S634. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.934794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Salzer L, Tenenbaum-Gavish K, Hod M. Metabolic disorder of pregnancy (understanding pathophysiology of diabetes and preeclampsia) Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2015;29:328–338. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kaaja R. Insulin resistance syndrome in preeclampsia. Semin. Reprod. Endocrinol. 1998;16:41–46. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1016251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Beckett EM, Astapova O, Steckler TL, Veiga-Lopez A, Padmanabhan V. Developmental programing: Impact of testosterone on placental differentiation. Reproduction. 2014;148:199–209. doi: 10.1530/REP-14-0055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Crespi EJ, Steckler TL, Mohankumar PS, Padmanabhan V. Prenatal exposure to excess testosterone modifies the developmental trajectory of the insulin-like growth factor system in female sheep. J. Physiol. 2006;572:119–130. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.103929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Mistry SK, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and adverse pregnancy outcome in South Asia: A systematic review. Endocrinol. Diabetes Metab. 2021;4:e00285. doi: 10.1002/edm2.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ashraf UM, Hall DL, Rawls AZ, Alexander BT. Epigenetic processes during preeclampsia and effects on fetal development and chronic health. Clin. Sci. Lond. 2021;135:2307–2327. doi: 10.1042/CS20190070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Dambrova M, et al. Acylcarnitines: Nomenclature, biomarkers, therapeutic potential, drug targets, and clinical trials. Pharmacol. Rev. 2022;74:506–551. doi: 10.1124/pharmrev.121.000408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Veiga-Lopez A, et al. Developmental programming: impact of excess prenatal testosterone on intrauterine fetal endocrine milieu and growth in sheep. Biol. Reprod. 2011;84:87–96. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.086686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Manikkam M, et al. Fetal programming: Prenatal testosterone excess leads to fetal growth retardation and postnatal catch-up growth in sheep. Endocrinology. 2004;145:790–798. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-0478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Steckler T, Wang J, Bartol FF, Roy SK, Padmanabhan V. Fetal programming: prenatal testosterone treatment causes intrauterine growth retardation, reduces ovarian reserve and increases ovarian follicular recruitment. Endocrinology. 2005;146:3185–3193. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-1444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Sandler V, et al. Associations of maternal BMI and insulin resistance with the maternal metabolome and newborn outcomes. Diabetologia. 2017;60:518–530. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-4182-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Jacob S, et al. Targeted metabolomics demonstrates distinct and overlapping maternal metabolites associated with BMI, glucose, and insulin sensitivity during pregnancy across four ancestry groups. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:911–919. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Saadat N, Ciarelli J, Pallas B, Padmanabhan V, Vyas AK. Sex-specific perturbation of systemic lipidomic profile in newborn lambs impacted by prenatal testosterone excess. Endocrinology. 2023 doi: 10.1210/endocr/bqad187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Duttaroy AK, Basak S. Maternal fatty acid metabolism in pregnancy and its consequences in the feto-placental development. Front. Physiology. 2022;20(12):787848. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.787848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Kelley AS, et al. Prenatal testosterone excess disrupts placental function in a sheep model of polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocrinology. 2019;160:2663–2672. doi: 10.1210/en.2019-00386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Aparicio E, et al. Changes in fatty acid levels (saturated, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated) during pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:778. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04251-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Duttaroy AK, Basak S. Maternal fatty acid metabolism in pregnancy and its consequences in the feto-placental development. Front. Physiol. 2021;12:787848. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.787848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Yamamoto Y, et al. Lysophosphatidylethanolamine affects lipid accumulation and metabolism in a human liver-derived cell line. Nutrients. 2022 doi: 10.3390/nu14030579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Đukanović N, et al. Lipids and antiplatelet therapy: Important considerations and future perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021 doi: 10.3390/ijms22063180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Makide K, Kitamura H, Sato Y, Okutani M, Aoki J. Emerging lysophospholipid mediators, lysophosphatidylserine, lysophosphatidylthreonine, lysophosphatidylethanolamine and lysophosphatidylglycerol. Prostaglandins. Other Lipid. Mediat. 2009;89:135–139. doi: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2009.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.LaBarre JL, et al. Maternal lipid levels across pregnancy impact the umbilical cord blood lipidome and infant birth weight. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:14209. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71081-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Cocco L, Follo MY, Manzoli L, Suh PG. Phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C in health and disease. J. Lipid. Res. 2015;56:1853–1860. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R057984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Epand RM. Features of the phosphatidylinositol cycle and its role in signal transduction. J. Membr. Biol. 2017;250:353–366. doi: 10.1007/s00232-016-9909-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.De Craene JO, Bertazzi DL, Bär S, Friant S. Phosphoinositides, major actors in membrane trafficking and lipid signaling pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017 doi: 10.3390/ijms18030634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Merritt TA, Curbelo V, Gluck L, Clements RS., Jr Alterations in fetal lung phosphatidylinositol metabolism associated with maternal glucose intolerance. Biol. Neonate. 1981;39:217–224. doi: 10.1159/000241440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Anceschi MM, et al. Inositol and glucocorticoid in the development of lung stability in male and female rabbit fetuses. Pediatr. Res. 1988;24:617–621. doi: 10.1203/00006450-198811000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Bridges D, Saltiel AR. Phosphoinositides: Key modulators of energy metabolism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1851;857–866:2015. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Lagana AS, et al. Metabolism and ovarian function in PCOS women: A therapeutic approach with inositols. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2016;2016:6306410. doi: 10.1155/2016/6306410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Fedeli V, Catizone A, Querqui A, Unfer V, Bizzarri M. The role of inositols in the hyperandrogenic phenotypes of PCOS: A re-reading of Larner's results. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023 doi: 10.3390/ijms24076296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Burlina S, Dalfra MG, Lapolla A. Short- and long-term consequences for offspring exposed to maternal diabetes: A review. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2019;32:687–694. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1387893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Girardi G, Bremer AA. The intersection of maternal metabolic syndrome, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and future metabolic health for the mother and offspring. Metab. Syndr. Relat. Disord. 2022;20:251–254. doi: 10.1089/met.2021.0124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Calzada E, Onguka O, Claypool SM. Phosphatidylethanolamine metabolism in health and disease. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2016;321:29–88. doi: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2015.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.van der Veen JN, et al. The critical role of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine metabolism in health and disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1859;1558–1572:2017. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Szczuko M, et al. The role of arachidonic and linoleic acid derivatives in pathological pregnancies and the human reproduction process. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020 doi: 10.3390/ijms21249628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Li S, et al. Discovery of novel lipid profiles in PCOS: Do insulin and androgen oppositely regulate bioactive lipid production? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017;102:810–821. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-2692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Prabhu YD, Gopalakrishnan AV. Can polyunsaturated fatty acids regulate polycystic ovary syndrome via TGF-β signalling? Life Sci. 2021;1(276):119416. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.O'Connor A, Gibney J, Roche HM. Metabolic and hormonal aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome: the impact of diet. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2010;69:628–635. doi: 10.1017/S0029665110002016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Kasim-Karakas SE, et al. Metabolic and endocrine effects of a polyunsaturated fatty acid-rich diet in polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metabol. 2004;89:615–620. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-030666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Blandin A, et al. Lipidomic analysis of adipose-derived extracellular vesicles reveals specific EV lipid sorting informative of the obesity metabolic state. Cell Rep. 2023;42:112169. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Jayawardana KS, et al. Changes in plasma lipids predict pravastatin efficacy in secondary prevention. JCI Insight. 2019 doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.128438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Vyas AK, Hoang V, Padmanabhan V, Gilbreath E, Mietelka KA. Prenatal programming: Adverse cardiac programming by gestational testosterone excess. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:28335. doi: 10.1038/srep28335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Ramamoorthi Elangovan V, Saadat N, Ghnenis A, Padmanabhan V, Vyas AK. Developmental programming: adverse sexually dimorphic transcriptional programming of gestational testosterone excess in cardiac left ventricle of fetal sheep. Sci. Rep. 2023;13:2682. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29212-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Alkhatib B, Salimi S, Jabari M, Padmanabhan V, Vyas AK. Impact of adverse gestational milieu on maternal cardiovascular health. Endocrinology. 2023 doi: 10.1210/endocr/bqad060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Barry JS, Anthony RV. The pregnant sheep as a model for human pregnancy. Theriogenology. 2008;69:55–67. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.09.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Wu, G. Principles of animal nutrition. (Taylor & Francis, 2018).
- 105.Percie du Sert N, et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. J. Cerebral Blood Flow Metabol. 2020;40(9):1769–1777. doi: 10.1177/0271678X20943823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 1959;37:911–917. doi: 10.1139/o59-099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Chambers MC, et al. A cross-platform toolkit for mass spectrometry and proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012;30:918–920. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Kind T, et al. LipidBlast in silico tandem mass spectrometry database for lipid identification. Nat. Methods. 2013;10:755–758. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Kind T, et al. Qualitative analysis of algal secretions with multiple mass spectrometric platforms. J. Chromatogr. A. 2012;1244:139–147. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.04.074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Meissen, J. K. et al. Induced pluripotent stem cells show metabolomic differences to embryonic stem cells in polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholines and primary metabolism. (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 111.Lamichhane S, Sen P, Dickens AM, Hyötyläinen T, Orešič M. An overview of metabolomics data analysis: Current tools and future perspectives. Compr. Anal. Chem. 2018;82:387–413. [Google Scholar]
- 112.Trygg J, Wold S. Orthogonal projections to latent structures (O-PLS) J. Chemom. J. Chemom. Soc. 2002;16:119–128. [Google Scholar]
- 113.Sumner LW, et al. Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis: chemical analysis working group (CAWG) metabolomics standards initiative (MSI) Metabolomics. 2007;3:211–221. doi: 10.1007/s11306-007-0082-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The supplementary data and the dataset generated and/or used for the analysis and interpretation of the results is available at the following link. Pease contact corresponding author (Vasantha Padmanabhan at vasantha@umich.edu) with any queries.






