Skip to main content
MedEdPublish logoLink to MedEdPublish
. 2024 Apr 30;14:3. Originally published 2024 Jan 9. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/mep.19901.2

12 tips for developing Educational Conferences for Physicians

Kelly McCoy 1, Lisa Fore-Arcand 1,2,a
PMCID: PMC10940845  PMID: 38495780

Version Changes

Revised. Amendments from Version 1

The new version of this article provides clarification and grammatical changes as suggested by reviewers.

Abstract

The education of a physician is a life-long process that starts in medical school and extends throughout their career. Healthcare is a dynamic field characterized by continuous advancements in medicine, evolving treatment options, changing regulations, care models, and technology. Physicians must keep up-to-date with new practices, procedures, medications, and diseases and fulfill the educational requirements to maintain their medical licensure. Continuing education for physicians serves the essential purpose of nurturing lifelong learning, ensuring that medical practices align with the latest standards, and ultimately enhancing the quality of patient care and outcomes. In a broader context, physician education encompasses all activities designed to enhance skills, professional performance, and relationships that physicians employ to provide services to patients and the public and to improve collaborations within the field. This paper outlines a step-by-step plan for designing high-quality educational conferences for practicing physicians in any field. It aims to assist in developing ongoing education, aligning physician practices with the latest medical care standards, and optimizing their clinical performance to improve patient and community health.

Keywords: Physician Education, CME, Curriculum Development

Introduction

Throughout a physician’s career, healthcare is continuously changing ( Thompson, 2014). With advances and updates in medicine, treatment options, guidelines and regulations, models of care, and technology, physicians must stay abreast of these changes, not only for the care and safety of their patients, but to maintain licensure and certifications. ( HealthStream, 2021). This can be accomplished through physician continuing education, which facilitates lifelong learning to enhance their skills, knowledge, and performance, build stronger interdisciplinary relationships, and increase patient communications and outcomes ( VanNieuwenborg et al., 2016).

Following are 12 tips for developing strong medical education conferences to ensure that physicians are current with medical knowledge and obtain the credits necessary to maintain their medical licensure. This guide was developed by physician educators with more than 30 combined years of medical education experience, and is based on office procedures and accreditation compliance, to assist planners of medical education and professional development activities. The steps do not need occur in this specific order and should serve as a guide to developing physician educational activities.

Tip 1

Design the gap analysis

When developing physician education, it is essential to identify the problem or professional practice gap to be addressed. The difference between current and ideal performance and/or outcomes is known as the professional practice gap. The problem can address anything in healthcare that relates to a physician’s knowledge, competence, or performance, to patient outcomes, or non-clinical issues such as wellness, coding/billing, and faculty development. Once the problem is identified, determine the ideal performance and/or outcome ( Thomas et al., 2016). To do this, ask what the physician needs to learn or do differently to close the gap. Once this step is complete, you can craft the learning objectives. When doing so, ask what will the learner be able to do as a result of attending the activity. These are learning objectives that link to the educational need and should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timebound (SMART) ( Orr et al., 2022). Using the information gathered, identify the desired results that reflect how the learner can implement the education/information into clinical practice. Table 1 shows an example of a planning tool used to collect and plan an educational activity.

Table 1. An example of a planning tool used to collect and plan an educational activity.

Professional Practice Gap Educational Needs Designed to Change Learning
Objectives
Desired Results
Example:
The number of older people
with HIV is increasing to
include those younger
adults who were perinatally
infected. This aging
population is experiencing
an increased burden of age
associated comorbidities in
an era where antiretroviral
therapy is effective
( Sangarlangkarn et al., 2021).
Example:
Physicians may not be
informed of updated
guidelines in the
treatment of geriatric
patients with HIV
(PWH).

Physicians do not
receiving enough
training regarding the
treatment and care of
aging PWH.

There are unique
challenges and barriers
for older PWH who
receive care to include:
sexual health, self-
care, psychosocial and
cognitive issues.
_X__ Learner Knowledge/
Competence
_X__ Learner Performance
____ Patient Health
____ Community/Population
Health
Example:
‘As a result of
attending this
activity, the learner
should be able to...’

Within 60 days of completing this
educational activity, the learner
will . . .

Recommend and implement
at least two treatment options
based on updated guidelines for
geriatric PWH.

Implement
clinical and
practice strategies
incorporating current
guidelines.

Develop at least three strategies
addressing the unique challenges
and barriers faced by older PWH.
Example:
(i.e. Improved
knowledge, increased
competence, increased
performance, increased
patient outcomes.)

Improve selection
and prescription of
medications and
treatment for aging
HIV patients.

Improve knowledge
in the implementation
of current guidelines
regarding HIV patient
care.

Tip 2

Choose a planning committee

Consider having a diverse and interprofessional representation of stakeholders interested in the education being developed. The individuals should provide expertise on choosing the best topics to cover and speakers to deliver the content. This group will provide feedback regarding the educational need, conference goals and learning objectives, and provide input regarding the budget and assessment ( Gross et al., 2013).

Tip 3

Define your target audience

Who should attend this activity? This is the target audience. The target audience can be as broad or as specific as you’d like, but should have a direct interest in the educational content. While physicians are your primary focus, additional audiences, such as advanced practice providers, nurses, and allied health professionals, should be welcomed with the understanding that the content was developed to meet the target audience’s needs. ( Bowser, 2015).

Tip 4

Decide what educational format is best suited to meet the educational goals

The method of delivery is essential to ensuring the success of the activity. Consider the generational gap of your audience and which teaching methodologies are best for achieving the key learning points of this activity. ( Biddle & Huffman, 1994; Bowser, 2015) For instance, online learning formats are optimal for developing educational conferences designed to reach a broader audience and adapt to the time constraints of physicians. If developing a conference to enhance skills, a simulated or hands-on environment might be the most appropriate method for learners to obtain hands-on instruction, practice techniques, and receive feedback.

Tip 5

Identify core competencies

Core competencies will help you categorize what type of change the learner can expect from attending the activity. Some examples of competencies are patient care, professionalism, interpersonal and communication, and quality improvement. For instance, after reviewing patient feedback, physicians have received low marks regarding their bedside manners. Plan an activity focused on interpersonal and communication core competencies. If the event addresses improving patient diagnosis, management and treatment, the activity will align with patient care ( Eno et al., 2020).

Tip 6

Develop the agenda

Based on the gap analysis, learning objectives, and target audience, describe the content that should be covered to close the identified professional gap. The planning committee should choose topics that will meet the activity’s learning objectives. When building the agenda, remember to add time for question and answer sessions, breaks, meals, reflection, and evaluation ( Gross et al., 2013). For long, full-day conferences, vary the delivery method to maintain the learner’s interest. Content can be delivered by didactic lectures, panel discussions, simulations, and hands-on workshops.

Tip 7

Confirm faculty

To determine the most appropriate speaker to deliver the content, research experts familiar with the clinical practice issues and problems related to the field(s) being addressed. Choose speakers based on the specifically determined criteria that will fulfill the educational needs of the target audience. The potential speaker should be engaging and highly regarded by the medical community ( Muroff, 2005). It is essential to review their curriculum vitae, financial disclosures and, if available, any previously recorded lectures.

Within the formal invitation, communicate the target audience, the educational need, and the learning objectives to ensure the educational content is designed appropriately.

Tip 8

Assessing potential barriers

When developing educational activities, plan to address potential barriers and have alternative options. Expense and time have been identified as the most common barriers to obtaining continuing education ( Pott et al., 2021). Other barriers to consider are staffing or institutional restrictions, accessibility, and convenience regarding time of day and/or location. Addressing barriers early in the planning will support developing education that accommodates learners of all abilities. A couple of examples of adapting to barriers would be pivoting to the design of online learning for physicians during the pandemic when in-person gatherings were prohibited and ensuring accessibility through services such as closed captioning (CC) or interpreters to accurately communicate content.

Tip 9

Create a budget

Consider the financial goal of the activity. List all possible expenses to help determine the registration fees and how much is needed from outside support, including educational grants and exhibitor fees ( Muroff, 2005). The following are just a few expenses to consider when developing the budget: honorarium, speaker travel, accreditation costs, venue fees, food and beverage, and marketing.

Tip 10

Promote the activity

Develop a marketing timeline and itemized budget to help stay on track. Analyze the demographics of the intended audience to help determine the promotional methods. Consider electronic or physical mailings, whether to purchase a mailing list, and what social media platforms to use, if any.

Tip 11

Evaluate and measure change

One objective of continuing education is to close the identified gap. It is essential to measure change in physician knowledge, competence, performance, and patient outcomes. There are several ways to measure change, pre- and post-tests, subjective evaluations, and evaluations with feedback are a few examples. Make sure you choose a method that best measures if the learning objectives and outcomes were achieved and how well, and when possible, provides feedback to the physician to reinforce their learning and to the presenters to evaluate their teaching skills ( Thomas et al., 2016).

Tip 12

Debrief

A step that can often be forgotten, but is critical to developing future educational activities, is debriefing. Debriefing allows for reflection among the planning committee where they can discuss strengths, weaknesses, learner evaluation and feedback, and discuss future changes to improve the learning activity and/or outcomes. It is a vital step for improving performance and clinical outcomes. Debriefing is intended to boost critical thinking and advance future clinical practice and improve future educational activities ( Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 2021).

Limitations and conclusion

It is critical to provide quality physician education that is dynamic and engaging to ensure that medical care provided worldwide reflects the most up-to-date information and training. Limitations to providing physician education can include time constraints, cost, industry influence, impact assessment, and limited interactivity ( Pott et al., 2021). Mitigating these limitations is imperative to providing quality unbiased education. Solutions can include on-line learning, restricting industry support, designing comprehensive post activity evaluations, and designing interactive learning formats. Planning and implementing quality continuing medical education can be challenging, but given the structure provided by these step-by-step tips, apprehension can be reduced. Physicians never stop learning and providing structured opportunities for them to learn can be rewarding. Continuing education facilitates life-long learning for physicians to provide the best medical care to their patients. Future planning for physician education might address changes to state and national guidelines, pharmaceutical updates, and quality and safety topics such as initiatives and best practices, and should consider accreditation compliance, when necessary.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

[version 2; peer review: 5 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

Data availability

No data are associated with this article.

References

  1. Biddle S, Huffman B: Continuing medical education handbook: a resource for CME practices.The Upjohn Company. Kalamazoo, Michigan,1994. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowser AD: Generational shift in the physician workforce: what are the implications for CME? A Clinical Care Options (CCO) white paper.2015; (accessed 2022 Sept 22). Reference Source
  3. Eno C, Correa R, Stewart NH, et al. : ACGME milestones guidebook for residents and fellows.Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AGCME),2020;2–4. Reference Source
  4. Gross JA, Fisher CW, Thapa MM: Practical considerations to Setting up a radiology CME conference: how we do it. Acad Radiol. 2013;20(3):382–386. 10.1016/j.acra.2012.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HealthStream: The value of lifelong learning throughout a healthcare career.2021; (accessed 2022 Sept 28). Reference Source
  6. Institute for Healthcare Improvement: Linking quality, safety, and wellness through health care debriefing.2021; (accessed 2022 Sept 20). Reference Source
  7. Muroff LR: The anatomy of an outstanding CME meeting. J Am Coll Radiol. 2005;2(6):534–40. 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. O'Brien Pott M, Blanshan AS, Huneke KM, et al. : Barriers to identifying and obtaining CME: a national survey of physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1): 168. 10.1186/s12909-021-02595-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Orr RB, Csikari MM, Freeman S, et al. : Writing and using learning objectives. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022;21(3): fe3. 10.1187/cbe.22-04-0073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sangarlangkarn A, Yamada Y, Ko FC: HIV and aging: overcoming challenges in existing HIV guidelines to provide patient-centered care for older people with HIV. Pathogens. 2021;10(10):1332. 10.3390/pathogens10101332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, et al. : Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach 3rd Ed. Johns Hopkins University Press,2016. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  12. Thompson AE: A physician’s education continues throughout his or her entire career. JAMA. 2014;312(22):2456. 10.1001/jama.2014.16394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. VanNieuwenborg L, Goossens M, De Lepeleire J, et al. : Continuing Medical Education for general practitioners: a practice format. Postgrad Med J. 2016;92(1086):217–222. 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 May 14. doi: 10.21956/mep.21824.r36731

Reviewer response for version 2

Peirce W Johnston 1

I have no new comments.

Thank you,

Peirce Johnston MD

If evidence from practice is presented, are all the underlying source data available to ensure full reproducibility?

Not applicable

Is the topic of the practical tips discussed accurately in the context of the current literature

Yes

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?

Yes

Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature and/or the authors’ practice?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Limited researcher but my areas are in Medical Student Education and PsychOncology

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 May 9. doi: 10.21956/mep.21824.r36732

Reviewer response for version 2

Ritcha Saxena 1

No further comments.

If evidence from practice is presented, are all the underlying source data available to ensure full reproducibility?

Not applicable

Is the topic of the practical tips discussed accurately in the context of the current literature

Yes

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?

Yes

Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature and/or the authors’ practice?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Medical Education, AI, Technology-enhanced Education

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 May 9. doi: 10.21956/mep.21824.r36730

Reviewer response for version 2

Rie Raffing 1

Thank you for your response to the review.

I do not have furhter comments.

If evidence from practice is presented, are all the underlying source data available to ensure full reproducibility?

Not applicable

Is the topic of the practical tips discussed accurately in the context of the current literature

Partly

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

No

Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?

Yes

Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature and/or the authors’ practice?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Medical education

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 May 9. doi: 10.21956/mep.21824.r36734

Reviewer response for version 2

Anita Kablinger 1, Alexandra Toloczko 2

No further comments

If evidence from practice is presented, are all the underlying source data available to ensure full reproducibility?

Not applicable

Is the topic of the practical tips discussed accurately in the context of the current literature

Partly

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?

Partly

Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature and/or the authors’ practice?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Medical and research education.

We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 May 7. doi: 10.21956/mep.21824.r36733

Reviewer response for version 2

Anne M Messman 1

No new comments.

If evidence from practice is presented, are all the underlying source data available to ensure full reproducibility?

Not applicable

Is the topic of the practical tips discussed accurately in the context of the current literature

Yes

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?

Yes

Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature and/or the authors’ practice?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

medical education

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Mar 25. doi: 10.21956/mep.21317.r36110

Reviewer response for version 1

Ritcha Saxena 1

The article provides 12 general recommendations for planning physician education. It emphasizes the importance of lifelong learning in the medical field and the necessity for physicians to stay updated with advancements in medicine and technology. Here are a few suggestions that could significantly enhance the quality of the paper.

  • Consider including a section discussing the importance of considering accessibility and inclusivity when deciding on educational formats. Guidance on how to accommodate diverse learning needs, including those of different age groups and learning preferences can be helpful to ensure maximum engagement and effectiveness of the educational activities.  

  • Also, in Tip 7, it could be beneficial to provide specific examples or case studies illustrating the selection criteria for speakers. This would help readers apply the recommendations effectively in real-world scenarios  

  • It might also help to emphasize the importance of selecting speakers who not only possess expertise in the subject matter but also demonstrate effective teaching skills. If possible, examples of criteria for evaluating potential instructors can be described in a table, such as their ability to engage learners, to convey complex information clearly, and to facilitate interactive learning experiences.

Grammatical errors: It is advisable to proofread the article to ensure grammatical accuracy. A few errors are mentioned here –

  • Tip 4: The repetition of the word "address" should be corrected.

  • Tip 11: The goal of continuing education to close the professional gap. -> This should be - The goal of continuing education is to close the professional gap.

  • It is an essential to measure change in physician knowledge, competence, performance, and patient outcomes. -> This should be: It is essential to measure change in physician knowledge, competence, performance, and patient outcomes.

  • There are several ways to measure change,; pre- and post- tests and subjective evaluations and feedback are a couple... -> Remove the semicolon after "change"

Thank you for the opportunity to review.

If evidence from practice is presented, are all the underlying source data available to ensure full reproducibility?

Not applicable

Is the topic of the practical tips discussed accurately in the context of the current literature

Yes

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?

Yes

Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature and/or the authors’ practice?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Medical Education, AI, Technology-enhanced Education

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Apr 22.
Lisa Fore-Arcand 1

Thank you for reviewing and providing detailed feedback on our paper.  We addressed your suggestions below in our revised paper.

  1. We added content to Tip 8 - Assessing potential barriers, to address accessibility and inclusivity.

  2. In Tip 7 we added content highlighting the importance of selecting speakers.

  3. Regarding grammatical edits – we have address all.

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Mar 25. doi: 10.21956/mep.21317.r36114

Reviewer response for version 1

Ghaith Al-Eyd 1

Thank you for the opportunity to review this interesting manuscript. In this article, the authors highlight the importance of continuing medical education (CME) as a vital lifelong learning activity for physicians and other health professionals. The authors designed a 12-step process to plan, develop, deliver, and evaluate a CME program. T

he introduction section briefly addressed the role of CME to enhance physician skills and improve patient outcomes. However, it would be more effective if the introduction also addressed, using relevant cited references, the importance of nurturing lifelong learning skills across the medical education continuum (undergraduate and graduate) as a base for a successful future CME.

Although it is explained in the introduction that the proposed 12 steps do not need to happen in a specific order, a logical sequence could be still needed to ensure a smooth flow of the design and to avoid overlaps across different steps.  Currently, there are some overlaps in the sub steps within some tips that makes some steps appear to be repetitive or need to be merged, e.g. designing the gap analysis for physician education (Tip 1) and then another step includes defining the target audience (Tip 3). Also, it’s not clear if the “planning Committee” (Tip 2) would also have a role in designing the gap analysis (Tip 1). Similarly, identifying the activity learning objectives was addressed in the first tip (Tip 1); those identified objectives would be more relevant if they were crafted based on the related core competencies (Tip 5). Furthermore, a CEM activity that targets, in addition to physicians, other health professionals, should address core competencies that are essential for the non-physician audience as well.

In order to measure the effectiveness of the CME program (Tip 11), the identified outcome measures for the CME activity should evaluate whether the program objectives/outcomes have been achieved, and how well.

It would be more effective if the manuscript also includes a “discussion” section that addresses the authors’ experience leading to the proposed 12 tips. The discussion could include examples of delivered CME activities and their related outcome evaluation results as well as related challenges and limitations and approaches used to address them.

Please consider the followings clarifications and suggestions:

Tip 1: Grammatical editing is needed for “Once the problem is identified, determine the ideal performance and/or outcome is”. Suggested edit: “once the professional practice gap is identified, the ideal performance related to that gap needs to be determined next”?

Tip 2:

  • Specify that the identified speakers are “experienced in the field of the selected CME topic”.

  • Guided by the principles of adult learning, this committee will also identify the best ways to attract the target audience to attend the educational activity.

Tip 4: Consider the working/lifestyle and availability of the target audience when identifying the program delivery method that best ensures maximum participation.

Tip 8: Plan to “address” potential barriers

Tip 9: To clarify that the CME has no financial return goal, please consider editing “financial goal” to “determine the projected total expenses of organizing and delivering the activity” or any other similar clarification.

Tip 11: Typo (comma and semicolon) in “change,;”

Limitations and Conclusion:

  • Please consider citing some references for the reported example challenges, here are some examples:

  • Reis T, Faria I, Serra H, Xavier M. Barriers and facilitators to implementing a continuing medical education intervention in a primary health care setting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):638. Published 2022 May 13. doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08019-w

  • O’Brien Pott, M., Blanshan, A.S., Huneke, K.M. et al. Barriers to identifying and obtaining CME: a national survey of physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants. BMC Med Educ 21, 168 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02595-x

  • Add “continuing” to “quality medical education” so it will be” quality continuing medical education”.

  • The statement that describes the CME topic areas includes areas that are commonly identified for CME. That statement could be edited, e.g. “The future planning for CME usually addresses common areas related to state and national guidelines, pharmaceutical updates, and quality and safety topics such as initiatives and best practices. However, ongoing CME planning might also address emerging gaps and needs identified by central health authorities and organizations as well as by need analysis surveys”. 

Thank you again for this opportunity to review this manuscript that addresses an important topic on the lifelong learning required for physicians and other health care professionals.

If evidence from practice is presented, are all the underlying source data available to ensure full reproducibility?

Not applicable

Is the topic of the practical tips discussed accurately in the context of the current literature

Partly

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?

Partly

Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature and/or the authors’ practice?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Medical Education, Pathology

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Apr 22.
Lisa Fore-Arcand 1

Thank you for your detailed feedback and time in reviewing our manuscript. We have incorporated the following changes, in our revised paper, based on your suggestions.

  1. Based on your suggestion to add information on the importance of lifelong learning we added a sentence to the abstract. The abstract cannot include references.

  2. Tip 11 – we reworded Tip 11 to address if the learning objectives and outcomes were achieved and how well.

  3. We added brief content in the Introduction highlighting our years of experience.

  4. Regarding grammatical edits – we have address all.

  5. Tip 7 - addressed selecting expert speakers in the first sentence.

  6. Tip 10 - highlights marketing and promotion of the activity.

  7. Tip 4 - covers addressing selecting the best teaching methods while considering all factors.

  8. Tip 8 - we changed plan ‘for’ to plan ‘to address’ protentional barriers based on your comments.

  9. Tip 9 - we made minor adjustments to the paragraph. We did not change ‘financial goal’ because this describes all types of budgets.

  10. Limitations and conclusions: we added ‘continuing’ to quality medical education and added a reference to support this section.

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Mar 25. doi: 10.21956/mep.21317.r36113

Reviewer response for version 1

Rie Raffing 1

This manuscript presents 12 tips for developing Physician Education and aims to provide support for designing education for physicians both in relation to the recent medical care standards as well ac clinical performance. 

These 12 tips are all relevant and important to consider and take into practical application when developing a medical education curriculum for physicians. 

Several of the tips are discussed in context of current and relevant literature, however some tips are unreferenced. It would strengthen the manuscript to do so. For example, "Curriculum Development for Medical Education" edited by Patricia A. Thomas et.al. could be relevant. 

I believe it would strengthen Tip 3 to include a targeted needs assessment, after defining the target audience, in order to make sure to cover the needs of the future course participants.

I believe it would strengthen Tip 12 to include feedback from the learners to the teachers, for example regarding communication skills, student involvement and subject knowledge. 

Lastly, in cases where it is possible, I believe it is important to evaluate if the training programme result in the targeted outcomes in a clinical context. For example if the older people with HIV experiences a difference as a result  of the educational activity described in Table 1. Please see "The Kirkpatrick model" for inspiration (level 4). 

Thank you for well written and easy-to-go-to tips for developing Physician Education.

If evidence from practice is presented, are all the underlying source data available to ensure full reproducibility?

Not applicable

Is the topic of the practical tips discussed accurately in the context of the current literature

Partly

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

No

Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?

Yes

Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature and/or the authors’ practice?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Medical education

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

References

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Apr 22.
Lisa Fore-Arcand 1

Thank you for taking time to review and provide detailed comments on our manuscript. We appreciate your time. We have incorporated the following changes in our revised paper, based on your suggestions.

  1. We added references to most tips.

  2. The last sentence of the introduction states that these tips do not have to occur in this specific order. We address the needs assessment in Tip 1 – Design the gap analysis.

  3. Based on your comment to provide feedback to the teachers we added it to Tip 11 - Evaluate and Change.

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Mar 14. doi: 10.21956/mep.21317.r35834

Reviewer response for version 1

Peirce W Johnston 1

Drs. McCoy and Fore–Arcand have proposed tips for educators to improve medical education. Their 12 tips itemize and describe articulate & well-reasoned steps for medical educators to "stay abreast of [healthcare] changes......to enhance their skills, knowledge, and performance."  

The strength of these 12 tips lie in their capacity to assist physician educators, either in a stepwise fashion (1 through 12) or else to draw upon only those tips which apply to their project. Each tip discusses an important subject within the goals of physician education: designing the "gap analysis" (Tip 1); identifying the requisite "core competencies (Tip 5); examining financial needs (Tip 9);  and quantifying/measuring change (Tip 11). 

Drs. McCoy and Fore–Arcand have supported their proposed tips with pertinent literature. The paragraph on Limitations wisely recognizes barriers to physician education, including "time constraints, cost, industry, influence, impact assessment, and limited interactivity," impediments that physician educators face on a daily basis, project to project. This paragraph to me represents a clear-eyed recognition of barriers to limitations that will help physician educators build more robust projects. 

I don't have any specific advice for how to improve upon Drs. McCoy 's and Fore–Arcand's paper. I feel it answers questions existing within physician education and helps to guide physician educators with practical advice and examples.  Their Table 1, for instance, is an excellent means for outlining plans for an educational activity.   I applaud its succinct and eminently practical format.  I wish Drs. McCoy and Fore–Arcand the best and would be happy to answer any questions my peer review raises. Thank you for this opportunity, Dr. Peirce Johnston, MD

If evidence from practice is presented, are all the underlying source data available to ensure full reproducibility?

Not applicable

Is the topic of the practical tips discussed accurately in the context of the current literature

Yes

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?

Yes

Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature and/or the authors’ practice?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Limited researcher but my areas are in Medical Student Education and PsychOncology

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Apr 22.
Lisa Fore-Arcand 1

Thank for you time and positive feedback.

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Mar 5. doi: 10.21956/mep.21317.r36112

Reviewer response for version 1

Anne M Messman 1

This article presents 12 general recommendations aimed at those that would be planning a continuing education session for physicians. The tips are general and somewhat helpful, although seem targeted towards those that would be planning a larger educational intervention, specifically one with funding, not really for an intervention that would be performed on a smaller scale. It would be helpful if the title and abstract reflected this. Specific thoughts/recommendations are below:

Tip 1 - table is helpful.

Tip 4 - a table with examples of different teaching methodologies would be helpful.

Tip 7 - grammatical error in second sentence (should say "Choose a speaker..." rather than "Choose speaker...").

Tip 8 - an overlooked area that the authors should address is ensure that the activity is accessible to all learners, including those with disabilities.

Tip 11 - multiple grammatical errors (first sentence should say "The goal of continuing education is to..." rather than "The goal of continuing education to..."; second sentence should say "It is essential..." rather than "It is an essential..."; third sentence has both a comma and a semicolon next to each other, need to get rid of comma).

If evidence from practice is presented, are all the underlying source data available to ensure full reproducibility?

Not applicable

Is the topic of the practical tips discussed accurately in the context of the current literature

Yes

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?

Yes

Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature and/or the authors’ practice?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

medical education

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Apr 22.
Lisa Fore-Arcand 1

Thank you for your thoughtful review of our manuscript. We have incorporated the following changes, in our revised paper, based on your suggestions. 

  1. Regarding your suggestion to specify ‘what type of education we are describing’ we added to the title to reflect educational conferences.

  2. We did not add a table with examples as recommend, but edited tip 4 to provide two examples of teaching formats when designing educational conferences.

  3. Regarding grammatical edits – we have addressed all.

  4. On Tip 8 we included content regarding accessibility.

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Feb 16. doi: 10.21956/mep.21317.r35836

Reviewer response for version 1

Anita Kablinger 1, Alexandra Toloczko 2

McCoy and Fore-Arcand provide 12 general tips for developing physician education. These tips are easy to read and important to consider when approached with developing physician education. To make the paper stronger, the reviewers recommend identifying the goal of the paper and the specified audience with greater detail. The paper "outlines a step-by-step plan for designing high-quality education programs for physicians", but in what context? Academic, private, community programs? All specialties? The audience appears to be physicians, but the introduction includes "other health care providers".  The tips are practical yet not specific. Tip 1 should describe "SMART" objectives with the appropriate references. Table 1 provides a good example of a planning tool, but the learning objectives are vague and, thus, the desired results are vague and are unable to be quantified. One of the greatest difficulties with CME education and implementation is the ability to confirm that the knowledge was received, and that the physician behavior reflects the new information. Describing methods to assess the backend of educational initiatives for knowledge implementation into healthcare, would be beneficial. Updated references would be welcome for each tip.

Grammatical:

Please revise this sentence within Tip 1 for grammar and flow:  "Once the problem is identified, determine the ideal performance and/or outcome is."

Tip 7: "Choose speaker s based on the specifically determined criteria that will fulfill the educational needs of the target audience."

Tip 11: "The goal of continuing education is to close the professional gap."

Although Table 1 is a good addition to this practical brief paper, the reviewers recommend an example of a full Tip 1-12 idea for the reader's benefit.

Thank you for allowing us to review this manuscript.

If evidence from practice is presented, are all the underlying source data available to ensure full reproducibility?

Not applicable

Is the topic of the practical tips discussed accurately in the context of the current literature

Partly

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?

Partly

Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature and/or the authors’ practice?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Medical and research education.

We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however we have significant reservations, as outlined above.

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Apr 22.
Lisa Fore-Arcand 1

We really appreciate you taking time to review and provide detailed feedback. Following are the changes we made, in our revised paper, based on your feedback:

  1. For your suggestion to ‘identify the goal to the paper and specify audience with greater detail’ we updated the last paragraph of the abstract to strengthen the goal of the paper and specify the audience.

-This paper outlines a step-by-step plan for designing high-quality education programs for practicing physicians in any field. It aims to assist in developing ongoing education, aligning physician practices with the latest medical care standards, and optimizing their clinical performance to improve patient and community health. -

  1. ‘Other healthcare providers’ was removed from the introduction.

  2. Regarding the learning objectives, we addressed designing SMART objectives.

  3. We updated most tips to include references.

  4. Regarding grammatical edits – we have address all.

  5. Regarding your suggestion to develop a table illustrating tips 1-12, we respectfully decline because of the brief nature of this paper and time constraints.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    No data are associated with this article.


    Articles from MedEdPublish are provided here courtesy of Association for Medical Education in Europe

    RESOURCES