Abstract
In this educational landscape, the pervasive issue of stress among higher secondary students has emerged as a serious matter. Acknowledging the challenges posed by educational stress, this research explores holistic and accessible interventions, with a focus on the promising avenue of deep breathing exercises known for their effectiveness in promoting relaxation and reducing stress. The study employs a quasi-experimental design, comparing an experimental group engaged in daily deep breathing exercises with a control group following a regular routine. Sixty higher secondary students in Visnagar participate through purposive sampling, adhering to specific inclusion criteria. The intervention includes a pre-tested questionnaire to assess stress levels, the implementation of daily deep breathing exercises in the experimental group, and a post-intervention stress level reassessment in both groups. The findings reveal a notable reduction in stress levels post-intervention, particularly in the experimental group practicing deep breathing exercises. Statistically significant reductions in mean stress scores underscore the effectiveness of this intervention, with the experimental group demonstrating a significantly lower mean stress score compared to the control group. This study contributes vital insights into stress management strategies for higher secondary students, highlighting the efficacy of incorporating deep breathing exercises into their routine. The observed reductions in stress levels emphasize the potential benefits of practical stress reduction techniques within the educational milieu.
Keywords: Educational stress, higher secondary students, deep breathing exercises
Background:
In the educational settings, the prevalence of academic stress among higher secondary students has become more common and main core of concern. [1] The demanding academic environment, coupled with societal expectations, places a significant burden on students, potentially hindering their overall well-being and academic performance. [2] Recognizing the need for effective stress management strategies, this study investigates the impact of deep breathing exercises as a potential intervention to alleviate educational stress. [3] The educational journey of higher secondary students is often marked by rigorous academic demands, competitive atmospheres, and the need to excel across diverse domains. [4] In the pursuit of academic excellence, students frequently encounter stressors that can adversely affect their mental and emotional health. Educational stress has been associated with various negative outcomes, including reduced cognitive functioning, compromised mental health, and impaired academic performance. [5] Addressing the challenges posed by educational stress necessitates the exploration of holistic and accessible interventions. Deep breathing exercises, renowned for their effectiveness in promoting relaxation and reducing stress, emerge as a promising avenue for intervention. [6] Therefore, it is of interest to assess the educational stress levels among higher secondary students and evaluate the effectiveness of incorporating deep breathing exercises into their routine.
Methodology:
Design:
Quasi-experimental design comparing an experimental group (deep breathing exercises) with a control group
Participants:
60 higher secondary students from Nootan Sarv Vidhyalaya in Visnagar
Sampling:
Purposive sampling with specific inclusion criteria
Intervention:
Experimental group engages in daily deep breathing exercises; control group follows regular routine.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria:
Participants meeting the inclusion criteria, i.e., higher secondary students from Nootan Sarv Vidhyalaya in Visnagar, were considered for the study. Inclusion criteria encompassed students willing to participate in the deep breathing exercise intervention. Exclusion criteria involved individuals with pre-existing respiratory conditions or those unwilling to engage consistently in the prescribed activities. This ensured a homogeneous sample for a focused investigation into the effectiveness of deep breathing exercises on educational stress.
Data Collection:
[1] Assessment: Pre-tested questionnaire measuring educational stress.
[2] Implementation: Deep breathing exercises in the experimental group.
[3] Post-Intervention: Re-assessment of stress levels in both groups.
Analysis:
Descriptive and inferential statistics, including t-tests.
Ethics:
Adherence to ethical principles, with approval from the ethical review board.
Results:
Table 1 provides an insightful breakdown of the demographic composition of the study participants from NootanSarvVidhyalaya in Visnagar. Among the higher secondary students, the age distribution reveals that the majority (56.7%) fall within the 16-17 age group, with a relatively even gender distribution. Religiously, all participants identified as Hindu. Socio-economic status predominantly leans towards the medium category, and the majority of students reported studying for 3-4 hours daily due to parental force. Interestingly, more than half of the participants in both groups had previous experiences of educational stress. In the experimental group, 26.7% reported low stress, 50.0% mild stress, and 70.0% moderate stress post-intervention. Similarly, the control group experienced reductions, with 26.7% in low stress, 50.0% in mild stress, and 63.3% in moderate stress. Statistically significant reductions in mean stress scores were observed. The control group exhibited a significant decrease from 120.60 to 107.10 (p < 0.05), and the experimental group showed a highly significant drop from 123.10 to 74.97 (p < 0.05). Importantly, the experimental group, engaged in deep breathing exercises, achieved a notably lower mean stress score (48.13) compared to the control group (13.50), indicating a more pronounced effect of the intervention. This significant difference (p < 0.05) underscores the effectiveness of deep breathing exercises in reducing educational stress. Table 2 examined the association between occurrences of academic stress and demographic variables in both the experimental and control groups. In the control group, a significant link was found between sex and stress (χ² = 7.48, df = 2, p < 0.05), suggesting gender-specific aspects of stress. Socio-economic status also showed significance (χ² = 1.24, df = 2, p < 0.05) in the control group, indicating its influence on academic stress. However, these associations were not present in the experimental group, hinting at the potential mitigating effect of deep breathing exercises on gender and socio-economic influences on academic stress. The lack of significance in the experimental group for sex (χ² = 4.19, df = 2, p > 0.05) and socio-economic status (χ² = 0.172, df = 2, p > 0.05) suggests that deep breathing exercises may offer equitable stress relief, regardless of gender or economic background.
Table 1. distribution of sample as per demographic variables.
Subcategory | Experimental (Frequency, Percentage) | Control (Frequency, Percentage) |
Age | ||
15 - 16 | 5 (16.7%) | 7 (23.3%) |
16 - 17 | 17 (56.7%) | 21 (70.0%) |
17 - 18 | 8 (26.7%) | 2 (6.7%) |
Sex | ||
Male | 15 (50.0%) | 12 (40.0%) |
Female | 15 (50.0%) | 18 (60.0%) |
Religion | ||
Hindu | 30 (100.0%) | 30 (100.0%) |
Socio-Economic Status | ||
High | 3 (10.0%) | 2 (6.7%) |
Medium | 27 (90.0%) | 28 (93.3%) |
Hours of Study | ||
3 - 4 Hours | 26 (86.7%) | 28 (93.3%) |
4 - 6 Hours | 4 (13.3%) | 1 (3.3%) |
Study Due to Parental Force | ||
Yes | 14 (46.7%) | 18 (60.0%) |
No | 16 (53.3%) | 12 (40.0%) |
Previous Exp. of Edu. Stress | ||
Yes | 17 (56.7%) | 18 (60.0%) |
No | 13 (43.3%) | 12 (40.0%) |
Table 2. Association between Occurrences of Academic Stress and Demographic Variables.
Demographic Variable | Control Chi-Square Value | Control DF | Experimental Chi-Square Value | Experimental DF |
Age in Year | 1.37 (Non-significant) | 4 | 3.392 (Non-significant) | 4 |
Sex | 7.48 (significant) | 2 | 4.19 (Non-significant) | 2 |
Religion | - | - | - | - |
Socio-Economic Status | 1.24 (Non-significant) | 2 | 0.172 (Non-significant) | 2 |
Hours of Study | 1.24 (Non-significant) | 4 | 1.36 (Non-significant) | 4 |
Study Due to Parental Force | 3.84 (Non-significant) | 2 | 9.265 (significant) | 2 |
Previous Exp. of Edu. Stress | 0.111 (Non-significant) | 2 | 2.56 (Non-significant) | 2 |
At 0.05 level of significant |
Discussion:
Our study, focused on evaluating the effectiveness of deep breathing exercises on educational stress among higher secondary students at NootanSarvVidhyalaya in Visnagar, unveils crucial insights into stress management strategies. The objectives encompassed assessing educational stress prevalence, gauging the impact of deep breathing exercises, and drawing comparisons between an experimental group exposed to the exercises and a control group. Our findings resonate with the work of Sandal et al., 2017, revealing a 47% prevalence of educational stress among higher secondary students. This consistency underscores the persistent nature of educational stress and aligns with broader literature in the field. [7,8, ] Implementation of deep breathing exercises demonstrated positive outcomes, showcasing a significant decrease in stress levels. These results parallel those of Valentina et al. reinforcing the potential efficacy of deep breathing exercises in alleviating educational stress among higher secondary students.[10]
Upon comparing the experimental and control groups, notable differences emerged, indicating that deep breathing exercises have a discernible impact on reducing academic stress compared to traditional methods (Figure 1). This outcome supports and extends the findings of Naik et al., 2018 and hopper et al., 2019] [11,12], who reported similar results in their study. These variations may stem from differences in sample size, methodology, or demographic characteristics, highlighting the need for nuanced interpretations and potential avenues for future research. Regarding age, no significant association with academic stress in either group, echoing findings from studies such as Siti et al. 2020 and Mona et al. 2020, which similarly reported a lack of correlation between age and stress levels [13]. This suggests that the experience of academic stress transcends age groups, emphasizing the necessity of interventions tailored to the individual needs of students, irrespective of their age. Socio-economic status emerged as a notable factor, showing a significant association with academic stress in the control group but not in the experimental group. This aligns with findings from Wu et al. 2022, suggesting that socio-economic factors can influence stress levels [14]. The lack of this association in the experimental group may signify the effectiveness of interventions specifically designed to mitigate socio-economic influences on academic stress. In examining the hours of study, no significant association was found in the experimental group, in contrast to studies like Yuwei et al. 2022, which reported such associations. This discrepancy may stem from variations in study methodologies or differences in the demographics of the student populations under investigation. [15]
Figure 1.
Pre/post stress scores in control and experimental groups
Conclusion:
Daily deep breathing exercises proved highly effective in significantly reducing educational stress among higher secondary students, as evidenced by a lower mean stress score in the experimental group. These findings highlight the practical utility of incorporating accessible stress reduction techniques in educational settings. The observed benefits underscore the potential impact of such interventions on the overall well-being of students. Implementing similar strategies could contribute to more comprehensive stress management approaches in educational environments.
Edited by P Kangueane
Citation: Mahalackshmi et al. Bioinformation 20(2):156-159(2024)
Declaration on Publication Ethics: The author's state that they adhere with COPE guidelines on publishing ethics as described elsewhere at https://publicationethics.org/. The authors also undertake that they are not associated with any other third party (governmental or non-governmental agencies) linking with any form of unethical issues connecting to this publication. The authors also declare that they are not withholding any information that is misleading to the publisher in regard to this article.
Declaration on official E-mail: The corresponding author declares that official e-mail from their institution is not available for all authors.
License statement: This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
Comments from readers: Articles published in BIOINFORMATION are open for relevant post publication comments and criticisms, which will be published immediately linking to the original article without open access charges. Comments should be concise, coherent and critical in less than 1000 words.
Bioinformation Impact Factor:Impact Factor (Clarivate Inc 2023 release) for BIOINFORMATION is 1.9 with 2,198 citations from 2020 to 2022 taken for IF calculations.
Disclaimer:The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the views or opinions of Bioinformation and (or) its publisher Biomedical Informatics. Biomedical Informatics remains neutral and allows authors to specify their address and affiliation details including territory where required. Bioinformation provides a platform for scholarly communication of data and information to create knowledge in the Biological/Biomedical domain.
References
- 1.Al-Shahrani MM, et al. Healthcare. . 2023;11:2029. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jiang M, et al. Front Psychol. . 2022;13:954330. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Toussaint L, et al. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med ECAM. . 2021;2021:5924040. doi: 10.1155/2021/5924040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Needham BL, et al. Soc Probl. . 2004;51:569. doi: 10.1525/sp.2004.51.4.569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mofatteh M. AIMS Public Health. . 2020;8:36. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rentala S, et al. J Educ Health Promot. . 2019;8:253. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_233_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sandal RK, et al. J Fam Med Prim Care. . 2017;6:405. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.219988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sivasubramanian N, et al. Bioinformation . 2022;18:791. doi: 10.6026/97320630018791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sivasubramanian N, et al. Bioinformation . 2022;18:786. doi: 10.6026/97320630018786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Perciavalle V, et al. Neurol Sci off J Ital Neurol Soc Ital Soc Clin Neurophysiol. . 2017;38:451. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hopper SI, et al. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. . 2019;17:1855. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Naik GS, et al. Int J Yoga. . 2018;11:53. doi: 10.4103/ijoy.IJOY_41_16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Al-Qahtani MF, et al. J Multidiscip Healthc. . 2020;13:477. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S255781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wu W, et al. Front Psychol. . 2022;13:844173. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.844173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Deng Y, et al. Front Psychiatry. . 2022;13:869337. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.869337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]