Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Feb 18;58(11):1579–1586. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu085

Campylobacter fetus Infections in Humans: Exposure and Disease

Jaap A Wagenaar 1,2,3, Marcel A P van Bergen 2,3, Martin J Blaser 4, Robert V Tauxe 5, Diane G Newell 6, Jos P M van Putten 1,3
PMCID: PMC10942002  NIHMSID: NIHMS1973047  PMID: 24550377

Abstract

Campylobacter fetus can cause intestinal illness and, occasionally, severe systemic infections. Infections mainly affect persons at higher risk, including elderly and immunocompromised individuals and those with occupational exposure to infected animals. Outbreaks are infrequent but have provided insight into sources. Source attribution of sporadic cases through case-control interviews has not been reported. The reservoirs for C. fetus are mainly cattle and sheep. Products from these animals are suspected as sources for human infections. Campylobacter fetus is rarely isolated from food, albeit selective isolation methods used in food microbiology are not suited for its detection. We hypothesize that the general population is regularly exposed to C. fetus through foods of animal origin, cross-contaminated foodstuffs, and perhaps other, as yet unidentified, routes. Campylobacter fetus infection should be suspected particularly in patients with nonspecific febrile illness who are immunocompromised or who may have been occupationally exposed to ruminants.

Keywords: Campylobacter fetus, food safety, exposure, immunocompromised


Most Campylobacter infections present as diarrheal illness. However, in about 0.15% of cases, intestinal campylobacteriosis leads to bacteremia, often with infection involving distant organs [1]. The symptoms of such invasive campylobacteriosis will then vary with the affected organ. Although the majority (>90%) of cases of intestinal campylobacteriosis are caused by Campylobacter jejuni or Campylobacter coli [2], a small proportion is caused by Campylobacter fetus. In one Irish study, the DNA of C. fetus was detected in only 2.4% of cases of intestinal campylobacteriosis [3]. In contrast, C. fetus is the most commonly detected pathogen causing Campylobacter bacteriemia (19%–53%, dependent on the study) [46]. The fatality rate of such invasive C. fetus infections is reported at 14% [7]. Given the worldwide high incidence of campylobacteriosis, these data suggest that C. fetus infections are not uncommon and may constitute a public health issue. Nevertheless, relatively little is known about the infection sources and the people at risk. In this manuscript, we review the current knowledge of C. fetus infections in humans, the characteristics of those people who may be at risk, and the role of food as a potential source of infection.

CHARACTERISTICS OF C. FETUS

Campylobacter fetus is one of 24 currently recognized species within the genus Campylobacter (http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/c/campylobacter.html). It is a microaerophilic, gram-negative, spiral-shaped bacterium that grows between 25°C and 37°C. In contrast to the thermotolerant C. jejuni and C. coli, not all C. fetus isolates grow at 42°C. Campylobacter fetus comprises 2 subspecies: C. fetus subspecies fetus and C. fetus subspecies venerealis, which includes the biovar intermedius [8]. The subspecies are genetically very closely related but have different habitats.

To date, C. fetus has been most often recognized as an infectious agent of animals [9]. The primary reservoir of C. fetus subsp fetus is the gastrointestinal tracts of cattle and sheep; however, this subspecies can also be isolated from the feces of other animal species [8, 9]. In contrast, the natural niche of C. fetus subsp venerealis is the bovine genital tract, where it can cause infection in cows, resulting in infertility or abortion [10].

A newly proposed subspecies, C. fetus subsp testudinum, which has a specific association with reptiles, has also been isolated from ill humans [11], but is not considered further in this review.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION OF HUMAN C. FETUS INFECTION

The first documented human C. fetus infection, which in this case led to an abortion, was reported in 1947 [12]. In 1957, in the first systematic study, 19 cases of campylobacteriosis enabled differentiation between Vibrio fetus (now termed C. fetus) causing systemic illness and “related Vibrio” (now recognized as C. jejuni and C. coli) causing diarrheal disease [13].

The clinical signs of human C. fetus infection vary from an acute diarrheal illness to systemic illness [14, 15]. The presentations of the latter vary with the localization of the disseminated pathogen. Septicemia, with fever but without apparent localized infection, is reported in 24%–41% of cases [5, 7]. Other manifestations may be the result of neurological infections (meningitis, meningoencephalitis, subdural empyema, or brain abscesses), osteomyelitis, lung abscesses, arthritis, and perinatal infections (eg, infection in utero, abortion, or placentitis) [15]. Campylobacter fetus infections may also cause vascular pathology (mycotic aneurysms, endocarditis, vasculitis, thrombophlebitis, or pericarditis).

Campylobacter fetus infections of pregnant women have been described from early stages in the pregnancy up to a full-term birth [16]. The clinical signs in the mother are fever, sometimes accompanied by diarrhea, but spontaneous abortions, without other clinical signs, have also been reported. In those cases in which living infants were born, many of those infants suffered from C. fetus sepsis, frequently leading to meningitis. In a study of 14 cases of infant C. fetus sepsis, 9 had a fatal outcome, underlining the severity of neonatal infections [16]. Perinatal infections are most often associated with a confirmed C. fetus infection in the mother [16].

Nearly all C. fetus infections in humans are reported to be caused by C. fetus subsp fetus. The few reported cases of C. fetus subsp venerealis involved isolates from vaginal discharges [17]. This parallels bovine infections where this subspecies colonizes the genital tract. However, subspecies identification is rarely performed by human clinical laboratories, and data on the ratio of C. fetus subsp fetus to C. fetus subsp venerealis in human isolates are limited. Identification of subspecies is recommended to obtain greater insights into the epidemiology of these infections [18].

INDIVIDUALS AT RISK FOR C. FETUS INFECTION

Several studies have shown that the majority (62%–74%) of patients with C. fetus bacteremia have a defined underlying disease [5, 7], indicating that the organism is mainly an opportunistic human pathogen. Predisposing factors for C. fetus infection include conditions that result in immunosuppression (eg, infection with human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], hematological malignancy, or splenectomy), cardiovascular disease with valve abnormalities, liver disease (eg, cirrhosis due to alcohol abuse), diabetes mellitus, and medical device implants. Elderly people and pregnant women, without any underlying disease, are also at risk [5, 16]. Some studies report an association between dental disease or tooth extraction in combination with raw meat consumption leading to C. fetus infection, suggesting a possible direct invasion route from the oral cavity [13, 19]. Systemic infections in healthy young hosts are rarely reported (Table 1), and such infections, when they occur, are generally associated with occupational contact with live animals or abattoir work, suggesting that such exposure increases the risk of infection. Prior treatment with antimicrobials has not been identified as a specific risk factor. However, as most patients have underlying disease, treatment with antimicrobials may be higher in this group compared with otherwise healthy patients. Demographic data on differences in the incidence of C. fetus infection between rural and urban areas are lacking.

Table 1.

Sporadic Cases of Campylobacter fetus Infections

Case Sex/Age, y Previous Health Status Likely Exposure Clinical Signs and Origin of Isolate Microbiological Results Reference
1 Male No specific remarks on the health status, but no visit of physician was reported Occupational; laboratory worker engaged in the study of C. fetus Isolated from pustule on the cheek Phenotypically most likely C. fetus Ward, 1948 [20]
2 Male/39 Healthy Occupational; livestock trucker Cough, abdominal discomfort, fever. Isolated from blood C. fetus King, 1957 [13]
3 Male/31 Healthy Occupational; butcher in abattoir Cough, nausea, diarrhea, blurred vision, dizzy, fever, chills, headache, enlarged lymph nodes. Isolated from blood C. fetus King, 1957 [13]
4 Male/53 Impared fasting glucose but otherwise healthy Occupational; farmer 6-day acute febrile illness. Isolated from blood and bone marrow aspirate C. fetus subsp fetus Zonios et al, 2005 [21]
5 Male/40 No health problems reported Occupational; farmer Meningitis, headache, fever. Isolated from cerebrospinal fluid C. fetus subsp fetus Gubina et al, 1976 [22]
6 Several members of Hutterite colony (average age 21.8) No health problems reported Working in abattoir was identified as risk factor; consumption of raw milk and cheese; unchlorinated water Diarrhea (7 isolates from 15 stool samples) C. fetus subsp fetus Rennie et al, 1994 [23]
7 Male/54 No past medical problems Occupational; slaughterhouse worker Pleuritic chest pain, lethargy, fever. Isolated from blood C. fetus subsp fetus Ganeshram et al, 2000 [24]
8 Male/65 Heart problems, infected residual teeth Occupational; farmer Fever, chills, weight loss, enlarged spleen, diarrhea. Isolated from blood C. fetus King, 1957 [13]
9 Male/40 Brucellosis Occupational; abattoir worker Diarrhea, fever, chills, headache. Isolated from blood C. fetus King, 1957 [13]
10 Male/48 Previous alcohol overuse Occupational; abattoir worker Fever, endocarditis. Isolated from blood C. fetus subsp fetus Wong et al, 2003 [25]
11 Male/46 Chronic alcoholism, malnutrition Occupational; farmer Coughing, gastrointestinal problems, headaches. Isolated from blood C. fetus subsp fetus Gubina et al, 1976 [22]
12a Male/62 Postnecrotic cirrhosis, possible liver transplantation Exposure to diseased calves Cellulitis, fever C. fetus subsp fetus Nadir et al, 1994 [26]
13 Male/75 Healthy Frequent consumption of smoked sheep cheese from unpasteurized milk Undulating fever, abscesses upper jaw. Isolated from blood C. fetus subsp fetus and C. lari Krause et al, 2002 [27]
14 2 male/1 and 7; 1 female/5 Healthy Milk consumption Diarrhea. Isolated from stool C. fetus subsp fetus Klein et al, 1986 [14]
15 Male/28 Healthy Khat chewing Fever, diarrhea, headache, photophobia. Isolated from blood C. fetus subsp fetus Martinez-Balzano et al, 2013 [28]
16 Male/37 Healthy Unknown Fever, low back pain, Pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Isolated from blood C. fetus Tanaka et al, 2012 [29]

Cases reported in previously healthy persons who were occupationally exposed (cases 1–7), persons with other illnesses who were occupationally exposed (cases 8–12), and previously healthy persons who were not occupationally exposed (cases 13–16). Cases in pregnant women are excluded. One additional healthy case has been reported in the literature [30], but this publication was followed by a discussion in the same journal and the apparently healthy status was questioned.

a

This case was reported as a patient who showed no overt evidence of immune incompetence, but the clinical description suggested that this patient did not fit in the group of previously healthy individuals.

PATHOGENESIS OF C. FETUS INFECTIONS IN HUMANS

Human C. fetus infection most likely begins with oral ingestion of the bacterium followed by intestinal colonization. Impaired gastric acidity may facilitate the passage through the stomach [31]. About 30% of colonized individuals develop diarrhea [1, 5, 31]. The bacterial virulence factors that cause the diarrhea have not yet been identified. Clearly some individuals develop diarrhea and C. fetus–positive stools without clinical signs of systemic disease [23], suggesting that the infection can be limited to the intestinal tract. The incidental isolation or detection of DNA of C. fetus from stools of healthy people, in some cases contacts of C. fetus patients, indicates that intestinal colonization may also occur without diarrhea [23, 32]. The limited ability of C. fetus to breach the host defenses in otherwise healthy individuals may explain why dissemination of infection is mainly observed in immunocompromised or preconditioned individuals. The role of immunity in C. fetus infections is complex. Clearly, individual immunocompetence is very important. The underlying diseases that constitute risk factors include those specifically involving compromised cell-mediated (eg, HIV) and humoral (eg, hypogammaglobulinemia) immunity, indicating that both major arms of the acquired immune system are required for resistance to infection [7, 33]. In addition, the organism has evolved specific mechanisms to evade both host innate and adaptive immunity, which may enable the establishment and persistence of infection (see discussion of S-layer proteins below). The role of other C. fetus virulence-related genes is largely unexplored. For example, C. fetus clearly demonstrates a preference for endovascular surfaces and is associated with thrombosis, but the presence of virulence factors, such as heparinases, that may be involved has yet to be described. With whole-genome sequence analysis of 22 C. fetus strains, considerable variation in genomic content was identified, including in putative virulence-related genes [34]. Differences in the gene content of strains might contribute to differences in the clinical outcome of infections.

RELAPSING AND PERSISTENT C. FETUS INFECTIONS

Invasive C. fetus infections may relapse or persist from 20 days to 7 years after the initial diagnosis [24, 35, 36]. The frequency of relapse and its possible relationship with septic thrombosis have not been systematically investigated. The persistence of infection may reflect the presence of adaptive mechanisms in C. fetus that aid bacterial survival in the bloodstream and enable evasion of the host immune system. These mechanisms are based on characteristics of a surface layer (S-layer), which forms a capsule-like structure comprised of an array of S-layer proteins (SLPs).

The S-layer confers resistance to complement-mediated killing by preventing the binding of antibodies and the complement component C3b to the bacterial surface [37]. This inhibits phagocytosis and the subsequent killing of the bacterium by phagocytic cells during the acute phase of the infection, before the acquisition of adaptive responses.

The S-layer proteins also exhibit antigenic variation. This antigenic variation is based on DNA recombination of a family of SLP-encoding genes (sap genes), generating a range of protein variants with different antigenic properties [38]. The resulting continuous switching of the antigenic properties of the surface coat of the bacterium, first demonstrated during ovine abortion [39], enables evasion from generated SLP-specific antibodies. The relative “invisibility” to important innate mechanisms involved in serum and phagocytosis resistance, as well as its ability to alter surface structures recognized by adaptive immunity, provides an explanation for the repeated C. fetus isolations from patients with relapsing infections [36]. As in bovine and ovine infections, genetic and protein variation in patients with relapsing infection has been defined [36, 39, 40]. Campylobacter fetus is an accidental pathogen of humans, unlike ungulates to which it has evolved. Its intrinsic mechanisms for avoiding host immunity are not sufficient per se for causing human infections, but the combination of its immune avoidance and the presence of host immunodeficiencies can be sufficient for the establishment of infection and multiple relapses.

DIAGNOSIS OF C. FETUS INFECTIONS IN HUMANS

As the clinical manifestations of invasive C. fetus infections are diverse, diagnosis remains a challenge. A key factor is the awareness that the pathogen may be the cause of intestinal disease as well as of severe or relapsing febrile illness. Diagnosis requires bacterial culture using appropriate culture methods. Campylobacter species are fastidious microorganisms that require microaerobic growth conditions. Isolation from stool samples may require selective media with antimicrobial supplements or, alternatively, a filter technique in combination with nonselective media. Diagnostics for Campylobacter in human stools usually focus on C. jejuni and C. coli. The incubation temperature of 42°C, which is often routinely used to isolate these Campylobacter species, precludes the recovery of at least 20% of C. fetus isolates that do not grow at this temperature (Dr C. Fitzgerald, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, personal communication). Similarly, the use of cefoperazone- or cephalothin-containing media, for the selective isolation of C. jejuni and C. coli, inhibits growth of C. fetus [31]. However, even with optimal culture methods, 2 large studies on diarrheal stool samples, using the nonselective filter method and incubation at appropriate atmosphere and temperature, did not detect C. fetus in 1980 and 1376 analyzed samples from the Netherlands and Denmark, respectively [41, 42]. In contrast, in a recent Irish study using molecular techniques, 8 of 7194 diarrheal stool samples tested positive for C. fetus DNA [3]. The difference in prevalence between these studies may be explained by a higher sensitivity of the molecular assay compared with culture, or by geographical differences. These studies indicate the prevalence of C. fetus as between 0% and 0.1% compared with 3%–8% for C. jejuni/C. coli [3, 41, 42]. Currently available culture-independent enzyme immunoassay–based diagnostic tests for Campylobacter in human stools will detect C. jejuni and C. coli, but not C. fetus.

Samples from extraintestinal infections, for example, blood or cerebrospinal fluid, will have fewer contaminating organisms, which may allow detection at a permissive temperature and using a microaerobic atmosphere without the use of selective media. Samples from extraintestinal infections that have an increased risk of contaminants (eg, bronchoscopy samples) should be cultured on selective media. The routine blood culture methods used in clinical microbiology should allow C. fetus growth; however, the efficacy of recovery from such approaches is unknown [43].

Once a suspected C. fetus isolate is obtained, phenotypic or molecular methods can be used to confirm the species. Reliable subspecies identification requires molecular analysis [8]; subspecies differentiation has no direct clinical relevance but might support a better understanding of the epidemiology.

RESERVOIRS OF C. FETUS

The sources for, and routes of, transmission of C. fetus to humans remain uncertain. The organism is mostly recognized as a veterinary pathogen causing fertility problems in cattle and sheep. A study of C. fetus antibodies in sheep in New Zealand showed that 48% of animals and 89% of flocks were positive [44]. Similarly, C. fetus was isolated from 9.5% of cattle fecal pats in the United Kingdom [9]. Such carriage in livestock can obviously constitute a potential source of human infection.

Unlike for C. jejuni/C. coli, poultry and pigs are not considered to be a source of C. fetus. In an experimental model, poultry appeared not to be susceptible to C. fetus [45], which probably reflects the hostile body temperature of birds for the organism. One study on turkeys reported that only 1 of 988 Campylobacter strains isolated was C. fetus [46]. In a 2-year study on Campylobacter in turkeys in Denmark, not a single C. fetus isolate was found (Dr B. Borck, Danish Technical University, personal communication).

It seems reasonable to assume that C. fetus is frequently shed, via animal feces, into the environment. Specific data are lacking on the extent of survival of C. fetus in manure and surface waters. Such surface waters could be contaminated by runoff from cattle fields and may be used in the irrigation of food crops. Extrapolation of data from C. jejuni and C. coli suggests that survival may be up to 10 months in cattle manure [47]. However, the survival profile of C. fetus subsp fetus is apparently quite different from that of the thermotolerant Campylobacter species [48], so such an extrapolation must be done with care. The level of exposure of humans from environmental sources cannot be reliably estimated.

CAMPYLOBACTER FETUS IN THE FOOD CHAIN AND SOURCE ATTRIBUTION

Food products from cattle and sheep are the most likely routes of transmission. Several studies report C. fetus contamination of food items (Table 2), mainly of liver and, to a lesser extent, red meat products. However, quantitative data on the C. fetus counts and on the effect of storage are not available, limiting risk assessment of exposure to the consumer. In food microbiology, the focus is on the detection of C. jejuni and C. coli and, once again, the choice of media and incubation temperature are not optimal for the detection of C. fetus. Depending on the procedure, there might be a selection for cephalosporin-resistant strains that grow at 42°C. Therefore, there may be underdetection of C. fetus in food samples.

Table 2.

Campylobacter fetus Isolated From Food Itemsa,b

Product Animal Species Prevalence Method(s) Country Reference
Liver and bile Cattle 45% (bile) and 5% (liver); 50% isolates C. fetusc Preston enrichment; mCCDA plates Japan Enokimoto et al, 2007 [49]
Liver Lamb 2.1% Preston enrichment; direct plating from enrichment: mCCDA UK Kramer et al, 2000 [50]
Liver Cattle 12.5% Preston enrichment; direct plating from enrichment: mCCDA UK Kramer et al, 2000 [50]
Liver Pig 3% Preston enrichment; direct plating from enrichment: mCCDA UK Kramer et al, 2000 [50]
Carcass at slaughter Turkey <1% (publication does not give exact percentage; probably 1 isolate of 988 strains) Preston enrichment; CCDA US Logue et al, 2003 [46]
Meat Lamb 12/90 isolates Bolton enrichment; CCDA UK Little et al, 2008 [51]
Meat Pork 1/68 isolates Bolton enrichment; CCDA UK Little et al, 2008 [51]
Vegetables 1.9% from 1 shop Bolton enrichment; CCDA plating Malaysia Chai et al, 2007 [52]
Milk (filter) Dairy cattle 1/196 inline filters Bolton enrichment; CCDA, Preston, Skirrow plating Italy Serraino et al, 2012 [53]
a

One Campylobacter fetus subsp fetus isolate was reported by Kuana et al [54] from broilers, but there was uncertainty about the correct identification of the species.

b

One study from Germany [55] reported 29.2% prevalence of “presumptive C. fetus” in turkey meat. Identification could not be confirmed as strains were not available (G. Klein, Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, personal communication).

c

Quantitatively: log10 3–7 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL bile and log10 1–2 CFU/g liver.

Most liver and meat products are cooked before consumption and, therefore, would not pose a risk for humans. Nevertheless, a small fraction of meat and liver is consumed not fully cooked, or even raw, and once Campylobacter arrives in the kitchen there is a risk of cross-contamination to other foodstuffs that are consumed without further processing. Raw milk is a well-documented source of human C. jejuni infections and might also act as a potential vehicle for C. fetus [14]. As there are no surveillance systems implemented for C. fetus infections, a possible higher incidence in those countries that allow the retail of unpasteurized milk products cannot be identified. Cheese has been implicated in an outbreak [56]. Campylobacter fetus has also been isolated from vegetables in one study from Malaysia [52].

Evidence that contaminated food may be a source of human C. fetus infection comes from epidemiological investigations of outbreaks and sporadic C. fetus illnesses. There is no direct evidence of food samples being the cause of C. fetus infection. However, in one unusual outbreak, 10 clinic-based patients, all with severe underlying illness, acquired C. fetus infection. They developed bacteremia and one patient died. All 10 had consumed raw calf liver, fresh fruit, and vegetable juices from a nutritional therapy clinic in Mexico [57]. Unfortunately, the food items were not available for culture. In addition, a milk-borne outbreak with both C. jejuni and C. fetus infections has been described, in which individuals, consuming raw cow’s milk intended for horses, developed gastroenteritis with one or the other pathogen, supporting the likely role of raw milk as the vehicle [14]. In another outbreak in a nursing home in Ohio, 13 of 220 residents were infected with C. fetus [56]. Commercial cottage cheese from one dairy was strongly implicated epidemiologically as the source, and the dairy was noted to be experiencing quality problems at the time, although cultures of cheese produced 2 months later did not yield the organism [56]. In several sporadic cases, various foods have been suspected as the source, although C. fetus has not been isolated from these food items. Two outbreaks in neonatal care units, involving 4 cases in each unit, were described after the birth of an infected neonate [32, 58], suggestive of human-to-human transmission. These observations highlight the importance of routine hygienic measures to prevent transmission within facilities housing people at risk.

Source attribution of human disease can generally be performed by microbiological or epidemiological approaches. For C. jejuni, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) has been used successfully for the microbiological source attribution of human disease [59]. For C. fetus, an MLST scheme also is available, but the limited genetic diversity in this species may hamper source attribution studies using this approach. Source attribution by epidemiological methods (eg, a case-control study of sporadic cases) has not been reported for C. fetus.

EXPOSURE OF THE GENERAL POPULATION TO C. FETUS

The presence of C. fetus in liver and meat from swine and cattle suggests that the general population may be repeatedly exposed to viable organisms. This parallels the epidemiology of C. jejuni for which serological surveys and risk assessment studies suggest that exposure is common, although only a fraction of the population becomes ill [60]. Recent studies on C. jejuni suggest a considerable role for non–poultry meat transmission routes [61]. These alternative, as yet unidentified, routes should also be considered for C. fetus. Examples of such routes include contact with contaminated surface water or surface-watered crops. However, there is currently no evidence of asymptomatic C. fetus carriage in the general population.

The sporadic C. fetus infections in seemingly healthy individuals who have occupational exposure (Table 1) suggest that infection depends on both infective dose and the immune status of the individual. When immune status becomes impaired, protection decreases and the risk for contracting illness might increase after (even relatively low) exposure through food or other routes. In contrast, when occupational exposure involves a high dose, even a healthy immune system may be overwhelmed. However, the development of immunity due to chronic exposure may limit the risk in such individuals. The development of tools to measure specific immunity against C. fetus is needed to establish the immune status of the general population and of heavily exposed individuals such as sheep farmers.

CONCLUSIONS

Campylobacter fetus infection in humans is rare, but is often invasive and is sometimes fatal. Campylobacter fetus infection should be suspected particularly in those patients with nonspecific febrile illness, those who may have been occupationally at risk, or those who are immunocompromised by underlying diseases that affect their innate or acquired, humoral or cellular immune status. There is no evidence for underdetection of C. fetus in stools from diarrheal patients, but laboratory diagnosis tends to be carried out with selective culture conditions that inhibit the growth of C. fetus. A seroepidemiological study may complement these findings and correct for possible misdiagnosis, but this awaits development of a C. fetus–specific seroassay. Campylobacter fetus infection appears to be primarily zoonotic, with sheep and cattle as major reservoirs. Direct animal contact is an important route, especially for some professions, such as farming or veterinary work. We hypothesize that humans are exposed to C. fetus through contaminated bovine and ovine products, particularly liver. Following this exposure, mainly immunocompromised individuals are at risk of becoming clinically ill. Exposure assessment studies await appropriate detection of C. fetus in food items. A systematic study on environmental samples using appropriate culture and molecular analysis tools will provide essential information to assess the environmental risks of human infection. Human-to-human transmission of C. fetus is suggested to occur among highly susceptible neonates and urges implementation of strict hygienic measures.

Acknowledgments.

We thank Linda van der Graaf-Van Bloois, BSc, for her contribution to the search, collection, and verification of scientific content of the manuscript.

Financial support.

This work was supported in part by the Diane Belfer Program in Human Microbial Ecology.

Footnotes

Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts.

All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

References

  • 1.Skirrow MB, Jones DM, Sutcliffe E, Benjamin J. Campylobacter bacteraemia in England and Wales, 1981–91. Epidemiol Infect 1993; 110:567–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gillespie IA, O’Brien SJ, Frost JA, et al. A case-case comparison of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni infection: a tool for generating hypotheses. Emerg Infect Dis 2002; 8:937–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bullman S, Corcoran D, O’Leary J, O’Hare D, Lucey B, Sleator RD. Emerging dynamics of human campylobacteriosis in southern Ireland. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2011; 63:248–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fernandez-Cruz A, Munoz P, Mohedano R, et al. Campylobacter bacteremia: clinical characteristics, incidence, and outcome over 23 years. Medicine (Baltimore) 2010; 89:319–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pacanowski J, Lalande V, Lacombe K, et al. Campylobacter bacteremia: clinical features and factors associated with fatal outcome. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 47:790–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Guerrant RL, Lahita RG, Winn WC Jr, Roberts RB. Campylobacteriosis in man: pathogenic mechanisms and review of 91 bloodstream infections. Am J Med 1978; 65:584–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gazaigne L, Legrand P, Renaud B, et al. Campylobacter fetus bloodstream infection: risk factors and clinical features. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2008; 27:185–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.van Bergen MA, Dingle KE, Maiden MC, et al. Clonal nature of Campylobacter fetus as defined by multilocus sequence typing. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43:5888–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Duncan JS, Leatherbarrow AJ, French NP, Grove-White DH. Temporal and farm-management-associated variation in faecal-pat prevalence of Campylobacter fetus in sheep and cattle. Epidemiol Infect 2013; 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mshelia GD, Amin JD, Woldehiwet Z, Murray RD, Egwu GO. Epidemiology of bovine venereal campylobacteriosis: geographic distribution and recent advances in molecular diagnostic techniques. Reprod Domest Anim 2010; 45:e221–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gilbert MJ, Miller WG, Yee E, et al. Whole genome sequencing for taxanomic positioning of Campylobacter fetus testudinum spp. nov. In: American Society for Microbiology General Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 16–19 June 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vinzent R, Dumas J, Picard N. Septicemie grave au cours de la grossesse, due a un vibrian. Avortement consecutif. Bull Acad Nat Med 1947; 131:90–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.King EO. Human infections with Vibrio fetus and a closely related vibrio. J Infect Dis 1957; 101:119–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Klein BS, Vergeront JM, Blaser MJ, et al. Campylobacter infection associated with raw milk. An outbreak of gastroenteritis due to Campylobacter jejuni and thermotolerant Campylobacter fetus subsp fetus. JAMA 1986; 255:361–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Man SM. The clinical importance of emerging Campylobacter species. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 8:669–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fujihara N, Takakura S, Saito T, Iinuma Y, Ichiyama S. A case of perinatal sepsis by Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus infection successfully treated with carbapenem—case report and literature review. J Infect 2006; 53:e199–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Holst E, Wathne B, Hovelius B, Mardh PA. Bacterial vaginosis: microbiological and clinical findings. Eur J Clin Microbiol 1987; 6:536–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kalka-Moll WM, Van Bergen MA, Plum G, Kronke M, Wagenaar JA. The need to differentiate Campylobacter fetus subspecies isolated from humans. Clin Microbiol Infect 2005; 11:341–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Haruyama A, Toyoda S, Kikuchi M, et al. Campylobacter fetus as cause of prosthetic valve endocarditis. Tex Heart Inst J 2011; 38:584–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ward BQ. The apparent involvement of Vibrio fetus in an infection of man. J Bacteriol 1948; 55:113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zonios DI, Panayiotakopoulos GD, Kabletsas EO, Tzima EL, Stefanou I, Archimandritis AJ. Campylobacter fetus bacteraemia in a healthy individual: clinical and therapeutical implications. J Infect 2005; 51:329–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gubina M, Zajc-Satler J, Mehle J, et al. Septicaemia and meningitis with Campylobacter fetus subspecies intestinalis. Infection 1976; 4:115–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rennie RP, Strong D, Taylor DE, Salama SM, Davidson C, Tabor H. Campylobacter fetus diarrhea in a Hutterite colony: epidemiological observations and typing of the causative organism. J Clin Microbiol 1994; 32:721–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ganeshram KN, Ross A, Cowell RP, Cefai C, Woodward MJ. Recurring febrile illness in a slaughterhouse worker. Postgrad Med J 2000; 76:790–1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wong PL, Fedder G, Heilmann FG. A man with Campylobacter endocarditis, treatable as Campylobacter fetus following identification. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2003; 147:399–403. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nadir A, Wright HI, Nadir F, Van Thiel DH. Campylobacter fetus presenting as a septic pleural effusion: a case report. J Okla State Med Assoc 1994; 87:267–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Krause R, Ramschak-Schwarzer S, Gorkiewicz G, et al. Recurrent septicemia due to Campylobacter fetus and Campylobacter lari in an immunocompetent patient. Infection 2002; 30:171–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Martinez-Balzano C, Kohlitz PJ, Chaudhary P, Hegazy H. Campylobacter fetus bacteremia in a young healthy adult transmitted by khat chewing. J Infect 2013; 66:184–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tanaka A, Takahashi J, Hirabayashi H, et al. A case of pyogenic spondylodiscitis caused by Campylobacter fetus for which early diagnosis by magnetic resonance imaging was difficult. Asian Spine J 2012; 6:274–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Remacha MA, Esteban A, Gonzalez-Castaneda C, Fernandez-Natal I, Echeita A. Campylobacter fetus bacteremia in immunocompetent patient. An Med Interna 2003; 20:439–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Blaser MJ. Campylobacter fetus-emerging infection and model system for bacterial pathogenesis at mucosal surfaces. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 27:256–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Morooka T, Takeo H, Takeshita S, Mimatsu T, Yukitake K, Oda T. Nosocomial meningitis due to Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus in a neonatal intensive care unit. Eur J Pediatr 1988; 148:89–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Brah S, Chiche L, Brun M, Schleinitz N, Harle JR, Durand JM. Campylobacter fetus bacteremia revealed by cellulitis without gastrointestinal symptoms in the context of acquired hypogammaglobulinemia: a report of three cases. Case Rep Gastrointest Med 2011; 2011:628902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.van der Graaf-van Bloois L, Miller WG, Yee E, Duim B, Wagenaar JA. Whole genome sequencing of Campylobacter fetus subspecies. In: American Society for Microbiology General Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 16–19 June 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Neuzil KM, Wang E, Haas DW, Blaser MJ. Persistence of Campylobacter fetus bacteremia associated with absence of opsonizing antibodies. J Clin Microbiol 1994; 32:1718–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tu ZC, Gaudreau C, Blaser MJ. Mechanisms underlying Campylobacter fetus pathogenesis in humans: surface-layer protein variation in relapsing infections. J Infect Dis 2005; 191:2082–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Blaser MJ, Smith PF, Repine JE, Joiner KA. Pathogenesis of Campylobacter fetus infections. Failure of encapsulated Campylobacter fetus to bind C3b explains serum and phagocytosis resistance. J Clin Invest 1988; 81:1434–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dworkin J, Blaser MJ. Molecular mechanisms of Campylobacter fetus surface layer protein expression. Mol Microbiol 1997; 26:433–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Grogono-Thomas R, Blaser MJ, Ahmadi M, Newell DG. Role of S-layer protein antigenic diversity in the immune responses of sheep experimentally challenged with Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus. Infect Immun 2003; 71:147–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Garcia MM, Lutze-Wallace CL, Denes AS, Eaglesome MD, Holst E, Blaser MJ. Protein shift and antigenic variation in the S-layer of Campylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis during bovine infection accompanied by genomic rearrangement of sapA homologs. J Bacteriol 1995; 177:1976–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Endtz HP, Ruijs GJ, Zwinderman AH, van der Reijden T, Biever M, Mouton RP. Comparison of six media, including a semisolid agar, for the isolation of various Campylobacter species from stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29:1007–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Engberg J, On SL, Harrington CS, Gerner-Smidt P. Prevalence of Campylobacter, Arcobacter, Helicobacter, and Sutterella spp. in human fecal samples as estimated by a reevaluation of isolation methods for Campylobacters. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38:286–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang WL, Blaser MJ. Detection of pathogenic Campylobacter species in blood culture systems. J Clin Microbiol 1986; 23:709–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dempster RP, Wilkins M, Green RS, de Lisle GW. Serological survey of Toxoplasma gondii and Campylobacter fetus fetus in sheep from New Zealand. N Z Vet J 2011; 59:155–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kempf I, Dufour-Gesbert F, Hellard G, Prouzet-Mauleon V, Megraud F. Broilers do not play a dominant role in the Campylobacter fetus contamination of humans. J Med Microbiol 2006; 55(pt 9):1277–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Logue CM, Sherwood JS, Elijah LM, Olah PA, Dockter MR. The incidence of Campylobacter spp. on processed turkey from processing plants in the midwestern United States. J Appl Microbiol 2003; 95:234–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Inglis GD, McAllister TA, Larney FJ, Topp E. Prolonged survival of Campylobacter species in bovine manure compost. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010; 76:1110–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Thomas C, Mabey M. The survival of Campylobacter spp. in water. In: Campylobacter, Helicobacter and related organisms. New York: Plenum Press, 1996:169–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Enokimoto M, Kubo M, Bozono Y, Mieno Y, Misawa N. Enumeration and identification of Campylobacter species in the liver and bile of slaughtered cattle. Int J Food Microbiol 2007; 118:259–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kramer JM, Frost JA, Bolton FJ, Wareing DR. Campylobacter contamination of raw meat and poultry at retail sale: identification of multiple types and comparison with isolates from human infection. J Food Prot 2000; 63:1654–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Little CL, Richardson JF, Owen RJ, de Pinna E, Threlfall EJ. Campylobacter and Salmonella in raw red meats in the United Kingdom: prevalence, characterization and antimicrobial resistance pattern, 2003–2005. Food Microbiol 2008; 25:538–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chai LC, Robin T, Ragavan UM, et al. Thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in salad vegetables in Malaysia. Int J Food Microbiol 2007; 117:106–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Serraino A, Bardasi L, Riu R, et al. Visual evaluation of cattle cleanliness and correlation to carcass microbial contamination during slaughtering. Meat Sci 2012; 90:502–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kuana SL, Santos LR, Rodrigues LB, et al. Occurrence and characterization of Campylobacter in the Brazilian production and processing of broilers. Avian Dis 2008; 52:680–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Atanassova V, Reich F, Beckmann L, Klein G. Prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in turkey meat from a slaughterhouse and in turkey meat retail products. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2007; 49:141–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Koehler J, Kellerman S, Patton C, et al. A foodborne outbreak of Campylobacter fetus subspecies fetus in a kosher nursing home. In: 33rd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, New Orleans, Louisiana, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Campylobacter sepsis associated with “nutritional therapy”—California. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1981; 30:294–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Maertzdorf WJ, Mouton RP. Vibrio foetus infections in an infant ward [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1974; 118:609–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wagenaar JA, French NP, Havelaar AH. Preventing Campylobacter at the source: why is it so difficult? Clin Infect Dis 2013; 57:1600–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Havelaar AH, van Pelt W, Ang CW, et al. Immunity to Campylobacter: its role in risk assessment and epidemiology. Crit Rev Microbiol 2009; 35:1–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Friesema IH, Havelaar AH, Westra PP, Wagenaar JA, van Pelt W. Poultry culling and campylobacteriosis reduction among humans, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis 2012; 18:466–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES