Skip to main content
Lippincott Open Access logoLink to Lippincott Open Access
. 2024 Jan 24;17(3):e013448. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013448

Prospective Multicenter International Registry of Ultrasound-Facilitated Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Intermediate-High and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism (KNOCOUT PE)

Keith M Sterling 1,, Samuel Z Goldhaber 2, Andrew SP Sharp 3, Nils Kucher 4, Noah Jones 5, Robert Maholic 6, Nicolas Meneveau 7, David Zlotnick 8, Sameh Sayfo 9, Stavros V Konstantinides 10, Gregory Piazza 2
PMCID: PMC10942169  PMID: 38264938

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Prior clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of ultrasound-facilitated catheter-directed thrombolysis (USCDT) for the treatment of acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) using reduced thrombolytic doses and shorter infusion durations. However, utilization and safety of such strategies in broader PE populations remain unclear. The KNOCOUT PE (The EKoSoNic Registry of the Treatment and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Pulmonary Embolism) registry is a multicenter international registry designed to study the treatment of acute PE with USCDT, with focus on safety outcomes.

METHODS:

The KNOCOUT PE prospective cohort included 489 patients (64 sites internationally) with acute intermediate-high or high-risk PE treated with USCDT between March 2018 and June 2020. Principal safety outcomes were independently adjudicated International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major bleeding at 72 hours post-treatment and mortality within 12 months of treatment. Additional outcomes included change in right ventricular/left ventricular ratio and quality of life measures over 12 months.

RESULTS:

Mean alteplase (r-tPA [recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator]) infusion duration was 10.5 hours. Mean total r-tPA dose was 18.1 mg, with 31.0% of patients receiving ≤12 mg. Major bleeding events within 72 hours occurred in 1.6% (8/489) of patients. One patient experienced worsening of a preexisting subdural hematoma after USCDT and therapeutic anticoagulation, which ultimately required surgery. All-cause mortality at 30 days was 1.0% (5/489). Improvement in PE quality of life score was observed with a 41.1% (243/489, 49.7%) and 44.2% (153/489, 31.3%) mean relative reduction by 3 and 12 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

In a prospective observational cohort study of patients with intermediate-high and high-risk PE undergoing USCDT, mean r-tPA dose was 18 mg, and the rates of major bleeding and mortality were low.

REGISTRATION:

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03426124.

Keywords: mortality, pulmonary embolism, quality of life, standard of care, ultrasound-facilitated catheter-directed thrombolysis


WHAT IS KNOWN

  • Patients with acute intermediate and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) may experience increased mortality, poor quality of life, and post-PE syndrome.

  • Treatment of the patients with low-dose, short-infusion duration ultrasound-facilitated catheter-directed thrombolysis has been associated with reduction of right ventricular dysfunction similar to higher dose and longer duration trials. Incidence of major bleeding in the previously published OPTALYSE PE trial (Optimum Duration of Acoustic Pulse Thrombolysis Procedure in Acute Intermediate-Risk PE) was 4%.

WHAT THE STUDY ADDS

  • The prospective observational KNOCOUT PE study (The EKoSoNic Registry of the Treatment and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With PE) describes the largest single prospective cohort study of r-tPA (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator) with ultrasound-facilitated catheter-directed thrombolysis in intermediate-high-risk and high-risk PE patients.

  • KNOCOUT PE also observed a low major bleeding rate for ultrasound-facilitated catheter-directed thrombolysis in intermediate-high-risk and high-risk PE patients.

Selection of reperfusion therapy for intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) requires consideration of the individual patient’s risk for adverse outcomes as well as major bleeding, in particular intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).1 While systemic thrombolysis has been proven to be a lifesaving intervention in patients with intermediate and high-risk PE,2,3 the clinical benefit may be at least partially offset by increased major bleeding (6.3% with peripherally administered thrombolytic therapy compared with 1.5% for anticoagulation alone).4 The most feared complication of systemic thrombolysis is potentially life-threatening and disabling ICH with a frequency approaching 2% in a clinical trial population4 and 5% in observational studies.5 Concern for ICH has resulted in decreased utilization of systemic thrombolysis worldwide and has increased utilization of catheter-based techniques that employ reduced doses of thrombolytic drug or no thrombolytic agent.

Ultrasound-facilitated catheter-directed thrombolysis (USCDT) has been cleared for treatment of acute PE since May 21, 2014 and has been evaluated in several prospective clinical studies, including 3 randomized trials, over the past decade.69 ULTIMA (Ultrasound Accelerated Thrombolysis of PE), a European prospective randomized controlled trial of 59 patients with intermediate PE, demonstrated that a surrogate outcome of PE mortality, right ventricular (RV)-to-left ventricular (LV) diameter ratio, improved to a greater extent at 24 hours with USCDT compared with anticoagulation alone.6 The US-based SEATTLE II trial (A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multicenter Trial of EkoSonic Endovascular System and Activase for Treatment of Acute PE) showed an improvement in the RV-to-LV ratio at 48 hours after USCDT using 24 mg of alteplase (r-tPA [recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator]) over 12 to 24 hours in patients with either intermediate- or high-risk PE with a major bleeding rate of 10% and no ICH.7 The OPTALYSE PE trial (Optimum Duration of Acoustic Pulse Thrombolysis Procedure in Acute Intermediate-Risk PE) showed that the RV/LV ratio reduction from baseline computed tomography angiography (CTA) to 48 hours after USCDT with lower r-tPA doses was similar to that of previous studies with higher doses and had a major bleeding rate of 4%.10 RV dysfunction by echocardiography, functional status, and quality of life improved over the course of the study observation, though it is unclear whether this improvement is attributable to USCDT because OPTALYSE did not include an anticoagulation-only control group.8

The multicenter, international KNOCOUT PE registry was launched to evaluate a larger cohort of patients receiving USCDT than was previously studied, with the goal of further assessing safety and dosing patterns.

METHODS

Study Design

The KNOCOUT PE study (EKoSoNic Registry of the Treatment and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With PE) was a prospective multi-center international registry across North America (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03426124) and Europe (EudraCT: 2018-001235-46). KNOCOUT PE was designed by the study steering committee in collaboration with the study sponsor (BTG/Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA). The aim of the study was to evaluate a large cohort of patients with intermediate-high and high-risk PE treated with USCDT with regard to the dose and duration of r-tPA delivered and frequency of major bleeding.

Study Population

Enrollment for the Prospective arm of KNOCOUT PE took place from March 2018 through June 2020; each patient’s participation in the registry was expected to last 12 months. A total of 489 patients were enrolled across 64 sites throughout North America (United States and Canada) and Europe (Austria, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom). The protocol was approved by each site’s institutional review board or ethics committee, and patients at each site were required to provide informed consent before enrollment in the registry. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Patients enrolled were risk-stratified and determined to have either intermediate-high risk or high-risk PE. Intermediate-high risk PE was defined by evidence of RV dysfunction (RV/LV >1.0) on either echocardiogram or computed tomography, and troponin elevation per the site’s clinical laboratory protocol. High-risk PE was defined as having sustained hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg for at least 15 minutes or requiring inotropic support). The study included patients who had already been selected for treatment with the EKOS device and were 18 to 80 years old, had RV/LV >1.0 measured by CTA or echocardiogram, PE symptom duration ≤14 days, troponin elevation ≥upper limit of normal per the institution’s assay, and signed informed consent. Exclusion criteria were life expectancy <1 year and the clinician deeming the patient high-risk for catastrophic bleeding, per International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasias criteria (defined as fatal or associated with any of the following: [1] a fall in Hb of 2 g/dL or more or transfusion of at least 2 units of red blood cells or [2b] involvement of a critical anatomic site).11

Of note, sites were allowed to complete inform consent in lieu of patients in KNOCOUT PE following USCDT if the patient had a severe presentation (such as high-risk PE) such that delay for obtaining consent was clinically inappropriate. Sites were encouraged to maintain screening logs but were not required to do so.

Intervention

USCDT was performed by a trained endovascular specialist in an angiographic suite or hybrid operating room with digital angiographic equipment using the EkoSonic (EKOS) Endovascular System (EKOS/BTG/Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA) in conjunction with r-tPA (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator) administration. Treatment dose and duration were determined by the individual investigator’s judgment. The EKOS catheter was inserted into the pulmonary artery using standard ultrasound and fluoroscopic-guidance techniques; the venous access site was selected by the treating physician. In the case of a unilateral filling defect in 1 main or proximal lobar pulmonary artery, only 1 device was placed. In the case of a bilateral filling defect in both main or proximal lobar pulmonary arteries, as determined by CTA, 2 devices were placed (one in each of the involved main or proximal pulmonary arteries).

Postintervention Follow-Up and Data Collection

Post-procedure, patients were followed per the investigator’s usual clinical practice. At a minimum, health status checks were completed during the hospital stay, before discharge, and at 3 and 12 months post-treatment (Table 1). Safety data were to be collected and reported through 12 months post-treatment. An on-site visit with echocardiography was recommended at 3 months for patients with an abnormal echocardiogram post-treatment to allow for evaluation of chronic pulmonary hypertension, and at 12 months for all patients. Additionally, matched echocardiograms were required (ie, a patient could not have an echocardiogram at 1 visit and a CTA at the next). The availability of imaging-based assessment could vary across patients and centers due to differences in follow-up protocol employed at each center (Figure S1).

Table 1.

Post-USCDT Follow-Up

graphic file with name hcv-17-e013448-g001.jpg

Data were collected via an electronic data capture system (DATATRAK International Inc, Mayfield Heights, OH) and were site-reported.

Outcome Measures

Safety outcome measures collected included frequency and severity of serious adverse events related to the device or procedure; recurrent venous thromboembolism, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasias–defined major bleeding, and mortality during index hospitalization and the first 12 months post-procedure. A third-party independent physician medical monitor, blinded to details of the dosing and duration protocol, adjudicated safety outcomes and reviewed all major bleeding events and serious adverse events.

An additional outcome measure of interest was a change in RV/LV ratio, as assessed by matched echocardiogram or CTA from baseline to between 24 and 48 hours after the start of the USCDT procedure. Additional outcomes are in Table S1.

Quality of life data were collected, as measured using the PE quality of life, the visual analog scale, and EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level instruments at 3 and 12 months posthospitalization visits (Misery, Utility, and Composite scores; Table S2).1215

Statistical Analyses

In this single-arm study, sample size was based on the expected enrollment per site, based on estimated cases per physician across total number of study sites with no formal hypothesis testing. Up to 550 patients would be enrolled to collect data on current EKOS use at up to 100 sites. For baseline and procedure characteristics and safety outcomes, all patients who received the USCDT procedure were included. For the outcomes of RV/LV ratio, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, estimated RV systolic pressure and patient-reported outcomes, all patients who met eligibility criteria and received the USCDT procedure were included and changed from baseline was assessed using 2-sided P values from a t test. Sensitivity analyses were conducted post hoc to determine whether significant differences existed in major bleeding rate and mortality between patients who were consented before treatment versus after treatment by excluding the patients who consented after treatment; 2-sided P values were produced from Fisher exact test.

Continuous data were summarized with means, medians, SDs, minima and maxima, unless otherwise specified. Categorical data were summarized with observed counts and percentages for each category. Percentages were based on the total number of patients for all analysis. There was no imputation for missing values. Posthoc multivariable logistic regression models were performed to assess if the following fixed effects had an impact on mortality and major bleeding events: treatment center, body mass index, age, sex, whether the patient had active cancer and whether the patient was at a high or intermediate risk for PE. A P<0.05 would indicate the effect was impactful. In the event there were too few patients (<5) in a treatment center, the center’s data was combined with other center(s) to achieve at least 5 patients. The combining of treatment centers was accomplished by ranking the sites that did not have at least 5 patients, with ties broken by treatment center number. The centers with the largest number of patients were combined with the smallest center as necessary until there were 5 patients. The process was repeated among the remaining centers. Centers were only combined within geographic region (United States versus outside the United States). A sensitivity analysis of the post hoc multivariable logistic regression models was also performed by excluding any centers with <5 patients.

RESULTS

Demographics and Baseline Disease Characteristics

A total of 489 patients were included in the prospective KNOCOUT PE cohort (Table 2; Table S3). Of the enrolled patients, 93.3% (456/489) were consented before enrollment; 6.7% (33/489) were consented post-procedure. Eleven sites had received the waiver to consent patients post-procedure in an effort to include more high-risk PE patients. Of the 33 patients consented post-procedure, 24 of the 33 were from 2 sites (1 United States and 1 non-United States).

Table 2.

Demographics and Baseline Characteristics of the Patients With Intermediate-High and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism Treated With Ultrasound-Facilitated Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the KNOCOUT PE Prospective Registry Study (N=489)

graphic file with name hcv-17-e013448-g002.jpg

Of the 489 patients, 463 (94.7%) were classified as intermediate-high risk and 26 (5.3%) were classified as high-risk (Table 3). Simplified PE severity index (sPESI) and Bova scores were calculated for patients based upon information in the database. Within the study population, 55.6% had an sPESI score greater than or equal to 1 (median=1.0; interquartile range, 0.0–1.0). For patients with systolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg (N=477), the mean Bova score was 4.4 (SD=0.61).

Table 3.

Clinical Presentation of Patients With Intermediate-High and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism Treated With Ultrasound-Facilitated Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the KNOCOUT PE Prospective Registry Study (N=489)

graphic file with name hcv-17-e013448-g003.jpg

Procedure Characteristics

Procedural success, defined as having all catheters successfully placed and treatment administered, was 99.8% (488/489 patients; Table 4). Median length of hospital stay was 4.0 days (interquartile range, 3.0–6.0; Table 4). Of the 393 patients treated in the United States, 90.8% had a stay in the intensive care unit (ICU); of the 90 patients treated outside of the United States, 45.6% had an ICU stay as part of their treatment. For the entire patient population, the mean time in the ICU was 48.9 hours (SD=47.4). Decisions regarding triage post-procedure (ICU, step-down unit, general floor) were made according to each site’s policies and procedures along with the clinical team.

Table 4.

Procedural Characteristics From Patients With Intermediate-High and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism Treated With Ultrasound-Facilitated Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the KNOCOUT PE Prospective Registry Study (N=489)

graphic file with name hcv-17-e013448-g004.jpg

The mean r-tPA dose was 18.1 mg (SD=7.4). Three patients outside of the United States received tenecteplase with doses between 19.8 and 20 mg; these patients were not included in r-tPA dose calculations. Of those who received r-tPA for whom complete dosing data were available, 69.5% received 20 mg or less; 31.0% of patients received 12 mg or less (Table 4; Figure S1). Mean duration of thrombolytic therapy overall was 10.5 hours (SD=5.4). In the United States, mean duration of thrombolytic therapy was 9.8 hours (SD=4.9); outside of the United States, it was 13.4 hours (SD=6.4).

Safety

Bleeding

Among the 489 patients, there were 8 major bleeding events within the first 72 hours post-treatment (1.6%; Table 5). One patient with bilateral subdural hematomas underwent bilateral craniotomies and developed postoperative PE. However, the patient had residual subdural hematomas; s/he was treated with both USCDT and therapeutic anticoagulation and developed worsening of the left-sided subdural hematomas, which ultimately required repeat surgical decompression. Other than this event, no other ICH events were reported. A sensitivity analysis showed no significant difference in major bleeding rates within the first 72 hours post-treatment when patients who were consented after intervention were removed from the population (1.5% [7/456] versus 1.6% [8/489] for the total study population (2-sided P=1.0). Additionally, there were no meaningful differences in major bleeding in United States and outside of US patients. A post hoc regression analysis and a sensitivity analysis showed that none of the collected risk factors impacted the number of major bleeding events (Tables S4 and S5).

Table 5.

Major Bleeding Events in Patients With Intermediate-High and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism Treated With Ultrasound-Facilitated Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the KNOCOUT PE Prospective Registry Study (N=489)

graphic file with name hcv-17-e013448-g005.jpg

Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism

Two of the 489 patients suffered recurrent PE (0.4%; Table 5). Both occurred within the first 30 days following treatment; one of the patients was noted to be subtherapeutic on anticoagulation while transitioning from unfractionated heparin to oral anticoagulation; the other patient with a preexisting iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis experienced recurrence 3 days after completion of USCDT.

Mortality

Five patients died during the initial 30 days post-treatment (1.0%); all were intermediate-high risk patients (Table 5). Of the 26 patients with high-risk PE who were enrolled in KNOCOUT PE, there were no deaths. A sensitivity analysis showed no significant difference in mortality rates within the first 30 days post-treatment, when patients who consented after intervention were removed from the population (0.9% [4/456] versus 1.0% [5/489] for the whole population; 2-sided P=1.0). Additionally, there were no meaningful differences in mortality in United States and outside of US patients. A post hoc regression analysis and a sensitivity analysis showed that none of the collected risk factors impacted the mortality rate (Tables S4 and S5).

Imaging Assessments

Of the patients included in the prospective KNOCOUT PE registry, 176 (36%) had postprocedure-matched echocardiograms before discharge (Figure; Table 6). Mean baseline RV/LV ratio was 1.35 (SD=0.32). Of the 176 patients, 77 had a matched echocardiogram between 24 hours and up to 48 hours post-procedure, with a mean RV/LV ratio of 0.98 (SD=0.27); the mean relative reduction from this postprocedure time point as compared with baseline was 24.57% (2-sided P<0.0001; Table 6).

Table 6.

Imaging Assessments (RV/LV, TAPSE, and eRSVP) in Patients in the KNOCOUT PE Prospective Registry Who Had Postprocedure-Matched Echocardiograms Before Discharge

graphic file with name hcv-17-e013448-g006.jpg

Figure.

Figure.

Change in right ventricular/left ventricular (RV/LV) ratio on echocardiogram in patients with intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism treated with ultrasound-facilitated catheter-directed thrombolysis in the KNOCOUT PE (The EKoSoNic Registry of the Treatment and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Pulmonary Embolism) prospective registry study. For each boxplot, the upper and lower part of the blue box show the upper and lower quartiles; the upper line shows the maximum observation below the upper fence (+1.5×IQR); the lower line shows the minimum observation below the lower fence (−1.5×IQR); the horizontal line within the box shows the median; the diamond shape within the box shows the mean.

Another exploratory parameter was tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion. At baseline, mean tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion was 16.50 (SD=17.91) among the 67 patients evaluated (Table 6). The mean tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion among 36 patients assessed 24 to 48 hours post-procedure was 18.74 (SD=6.4); mean relative change was 82.58% (SD=232.95, 2-sided P=0.04; Table 6).

We also assessed the mean change in estimated right ventricular systolic pressure (mm Hg) on ECHO. At baseline, the mean estimated RV systolic pressure in the 62 patients evaluated was 50.35 mm Hg (SD=15.34). Mean estimated RV systolic pressure between 24 and 48 hours post-procedure in the 31 patients evaluated was 35.77 mm Hg (SD=16.73); mean relative reduction was 28.55% (SD=31.37; 2-sided P<0.0001; Table 6).

Patient-Reported Assessments

Patient-reported data were available for 243 (49.7%) patients at 3 months post-treatment and for 153 (31.3%) patients at 12 months post-treatment (Table 7). The mean PEmb-Quality of life score 3 months post-procedure in 243 patients evaluated was 16.0 (SD=17.7), compared with 38.5 (SD=22.1) at baseline (41.1% change; 2-sided P<0.0001; Table 7; Table S2). Similarly, mean visual analog scale score improved from 63.1 (SD=23.0) to 75.5 (SD=19.8) from post-procedure to the 3-month time point in 242 patients evaluated (56.0% change; 2-sided P=0.0008; Table 7). The composite EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level Misery score was reduced from a mean of 10.2 (SD=4.2) immediately post-procedure to 7.4 (SD=3.5) at 3 months (17.8% change, 2-sided P<0.0001) in 243 patients (Table 7). The composite EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level Utility score also showed improvement, from a mean of 0.64 (SD=0.31) immediately post-procedure to 0.83 (SD=0.24) at 3 months (0.2, 2-sided P<0.0001) across the 243 patients assessed (Table 7). Improvement across all instruments was maintained through the 12-month follow-up period (Table 7).

Table 7.

Quality of Life Outcomes Assessed in Patients With Intermediate-High and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism Treated With Ultrasound-Facilitated Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the KNOCOUT PE Prospective Registry Study Over 12 Months Posttreatment Follow-Up

graphic file with name hcv-17-e013448-g008.jpg

DISCUSSION

The prospective multicenter, international KNOCOUT PE registry was designed to study a larger cohort of patients treated with USCDT following the OPTALYSE PE trial, with an emphasis on safety and dosing patterns. Across all patients enrolled in KNOCOUT PE, the mean total r-tPA dose administered was 18.1 mg, with a mean infusion duration of 10.5 hours. Both major bleeding within 72 hours post-procedure and all-cause mortality within 30 days of intervention were low (1.6% and 1.0%, respectively). Aside from the worsening of a preexisting subdural hematoma in 1 patient after initiation of anticoagulation and USCDT, no other ICH events were reported. The echocardiographic outcome measure of change in RV/LV ratio demonstrated a mean relative reduction of 22.6% post-procedure and 41.8% 1-month post-procedure.

Previously published bleeding complication rates in some studies of USCDT have reported major bleeding rates approaching 10%.7 In KNOCOUT PE, an International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasias major bleeding rate of 1.6% was observed—lower than those previously reported in the ULTIMA and SEATTLE II studies, and comparable to that observed in OPTALYSE PE.68,10 This is notable because the specific dosing and duration regimen were not prescribed, and there was no compulsory anticoagulation protocol. The low frequency of major bleeding in KNOCOUT PE reflected the procedure’s safety in practice and was similar to rates of major bleeding reported with mechanical thrombectomy.1618 The reduction in the frequency of these serious adverse events may be attributable to multiple changes in practice, including the increased adoption of ultrasound for venous access, greater experience with the procedural technique, and the reduction in dose and duration of thrombolytic therapy.

In intermediate-high and high-risk patients, Bova and sPESI are 2 scoring systems used to predict short-term mortality at 30 days post-PE.1922 In KNOCOUT PE, 55.6% of patients had an sPESI score ≥1, which correlates with a 30-day mortality rate of 10.9%. Of the 477 patients in KNOCOUT PE with intermediate-high risk PE for whom Bova scores could be calculated, the mean score was 4.4 (SD=0.61); a Bova score of >4 correlates with 42% of patients experiencing PE-related complications and a 10% PE-related mortality. The 30-day mortality rate in the KNOCOUT PE prospective study was 1.0%, which is lower than would be predicted by the Bova and sPESI scoring systems; however, this may reflect the study population enrolled and selection bias. Furthermore, none of the patients who presented with high-risk PE died. These low mortality rates occurred during a time of increased implementation of organized PE response teams, increased use of catheter-based reperfusion strategies, and local protocolization of anticoagulation regimens.23,24 Time in the ICU and length of hospital stay are also key considerations in evaluating interventional therapies for PE. In KNOCOUT PE, 90.8% of US patients and 45.6% of patients outside of the US required an ICU stay, with a mean ICU stay of 48.9 hours for the entire patient cohort. Although the patients in KNOCOUT PE had a mean thrombolytic infusion time of 10.5 hours, their longer stay in the ICU may be attributable to having clinically more severe PE (intermediate-high or high-risk PE) Additionally, decisions regarding patient placement in an ICU setting are subject to policies of individual hospitals and nursing competencies and not solely related to reperfusion therapy.

The mean RV/LV reduction of 22.6% on postprocedure echocardiogram was similar to observations in other single-arm prospective thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis trials (22.6%–34.9%).610,16,18 In the stratified analyses by time of imaging post-intervention, the RV/LV ratio continues to improve and then stabilizes. Further reduction in RV/LV ratio was noted at 1-month post-intervention (41.8% mean improvement).

Limitations include those typically associated with an observational study, such as susceptibility to bias and confounding as well as uncertainty about causality. A major limitation is that, while screening logs were encouraged in KNOCOUT PE, they were not mandated. Without complete screening logs from each site, we were limited in ascertaining the extent of selection bias that may have occurred. The lack of follow-up echocardiographic data from some institutions was also a limitation. Conclusions regarding outcomes in improvement in echocardiographic measures are therefore exploratory. An additional limitation is that there was no core laboratory adjudication of imaging. Finally, the enrolled study population was predominantly White (60.5%), limiting the ability to generalize the study findings to other demographic populations.

CONCLUSIONS

USCDT is part of an increasingly diverse scope of interventional therapies for PE. This prospective study provides data on current practice and safety, which may be used by clinicians as part of the decision-making and consent processes when considering reperfusion for PE. Prospective randomized controlled trials, such as the currently enrolling HI-PEITHO (NCT04790370) and PE-TRACT trials (NCT05591118), support the evolution of evidence-based guidelines and clinical practice.25

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Janiece Rutherford, MBA (Boston Scientific Corporation) and Alissa Garman for study support; Binal Patel, MPH (Boston Scientific Corporation) for statistical support; and Alexandra J. Greenberg-Worisek, PhD, MPH, CMPP (Boston Scientific Corporation) for medical writing assistance.

Sources of Funding

KNOCOUT PE (The EKoSoNic Registry of the Treatment and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Pulmonary Embolism) was funded by the EKOS Corporation, a BTG International group company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Boston Scientific Corporation.

Disclosures

At the time of KNOCOUT (The EKoSoNic Registry of the Treatment and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Pulmonary Embolism) and writing of this article, Dr Sterling was a consultant to Boston Scientific, Access Vascular Inc, and vizai. Dr Sterling is now an employee of Boston Scientific. Dr Piazza has received research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer Alliance, Bayer, Janssen, Alexion, Amgen, and Boston Scientific Corporation, and consulting fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer Alliance, Boston Scientific Corporation, Janssen, NAMSA, Penumbra, Prairie Education and Research Cooperative, Boston Clinical Research Institute, and Amgen. Dr Sharp was a Consultant to Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Recor Medical, Penumbra, Philips. Dr Kucher received consulting and lecture fees from Concept Medical, Boston Scientific, Bayer, and INARI; institutional grants from the Swiss National Foundation, Bard, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Concept Medical, and Sanofi; not related to the present work. Dr Goldhaber received Research Support from Bayer, BMS, Boston Scientific, Janssen, NHLBI, and Pfizer. Dr Meneveau was a consultant at Abbott Medical, Bayer Health Care, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, Terumo, Inari, Boston Scientific. Fees: Abbott Medical, AstraZeneca, Bayer Health Care, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Terumo. Dr Zlotnick participated in Speaker’s Bureau: Abiomed, Inari Medical; Consultant/Speaker’s Bureau: Angiodynamics. Dr Sayfo was consultant with Boston Scientific. Dr Konstantinides received institutional grants from Bayer AG, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Boston Scientific; consulting or lecture fees from Bayer AG, Daiichi Sankyo, Boston Scientific, Penumbra, MSD, Pfizer, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. The other authors report no conflicts.

Supplemental Material

Tables S1–S5

Figure S1

Supplementary Material

hcv-17-e013448-s001.pdf (249.1KB, pdf)

Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms

CTA
computed tomography angiography
ICH
intracranial hemorrhage
ICU
intensive care unit
KNOCOUT PE
The EKoSoNic Registry of the Treatment and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Pulmonary Embolism
LV
left ventricular
OPTALYSE PE
Optimum Duration of Acoustic Pulse Thrombolysis Procedure in Acute Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism trial
PE
pulmonary embolism
QoL
quality of life
r-tPA
recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator
RV
right ventricular
SDH
subdural hematoma
SEATTLE II
A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multicenter Trial of EkoSonic Endovascular System and Activase for Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism
sPESI
simplified pulmonary embolism severity index
TNK
tenecteplase
ULTIMA
ultrasound accelerated thrombolysis of pulmonary embolism
USCDT
ultrasound-facilitated catheter-directed thrombolysis

For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 237.

Contributor Information

Samuel Z. Goldhaber, Email: sgoldhaber@partners.org.

Nils Kucher, Email: nils.kucher@usz.ch.

Noah Jones, Email: noahj4@gmail.com.

Robert Maholic, Email: maholicrl@upmc.edu.

Nicolas Meneveau, Email: nicolas.meneveau@univ-fcomte.fr.

David Zlotnick, Email: davidzlo@buffalo.edu.

Sameh Sayfo, Email: Sameh.Sayfo@bswhealth.org.

Gregory Piazza, Email: gpiazza@bwh.harvard.edu.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Piazza G. Advanced management of intermediate- and high-risk pulmonary embolism: JACC focus seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:2117–2127. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chatterjee S, Chakraborty A, Weinberg I, Kadakia M, Wilensky RL, Sardar P, Kumbhani DJ, Mukherjee D, Jaff MR, Giri J. Thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism and risk of all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2014;311:2414–2421. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.5990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Marti C, John G, Konstantinides S, Combescure C, Sanchez O, Lankeit M, Meyer G, Perrier A. Systemic thrombolytic therapy for acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:605–614. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Meyer G, Vicaut E, Danays T, Agnelli G, Becattini C, Beyer-Westendorf J, Bluhmki E, Bouvaist H, Brenner B, Couturaud F, et al. ; PEITHO Investigators. Fibrinolysis for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1402–1411. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1302097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fiumara K, Kucher N, Fanikos J, Goldhaber SZ. Predictors of major hemorrhage following fibrinolysis for acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:127–129. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.07.117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kucher N, Boekstegers P, Müller OJ, Kupatt C, Beyer-Westendorf J, Heitzer T, Tebbe U, Horstkotte J, Müller R, Blessing E, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 2014;129:479–486. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Piazza G, Hohlfelder B, Jaff MR, Ouriel K, Engelhardt TC, Sterling KM, Jones NJ, Gurley JC, Bhatheja R, Kennedy RJ, et al. ; SEATTLE II Investigators. A prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial of ultrasound-facilitated, catheter-directed, low-dose fibrinolysis for acute massive and submassive pulmonary embolism: the SEATTLE II study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1382–1392. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.04.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Piazza G, Sterling KM, Tapson VF, Ouriel K, Sharp ASP, Liu PY, Goldhaber SZ. One-year echocardiographic, functional, and quality of life outcomes after ultrasound-facilitated catheter-based fibrinolysis for pulmonary embolism. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:e009012. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Avgerinos ED, Jaber W, Lacomis J, Markel K, McDaniel M, Rivera-Lebron BN, Ross CB, Sechrist J, Toma C, Chaer R; SUNSET sPE Collaborators. Randomized trial comparing standard versus ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis for submassive pulmonary embolism: the SUNSET sPE trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:1364–1373. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.04.049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tapson VF, Sterling K, Jones N, Elder M, Tripathy U, Brower J, Maholic RL, Ross CB, Natarajan K, Fong P, et al. A randomized trial of the optimum duration of acoustic pulse thrombolysis procedure in acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: the OPTALYSE PE trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:1401–1410. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rodeghiero F, Tosetto A, Abshire T, Arnold DM, Coller B, James P, Neunert C, Lillicrap D; ISTH/SSC joint VWF and Perinatal/Pediatric Hemostasis Subcommittees Working Group. ISTH/SSC bleeding assessment tool: a standardized questionnaire and a proposal for a new bleeding score for inherited bleeding disorders. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:2063–2065. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03975.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Akaberi A, Klok FA, Cohn DM, Hirsch A, Granton J, Kahn SR. Determining the minimal clinically important difference for the PEmbQoL questionnaire, a measure of pulmonary embolism-specific quality of life. J Thromb Haemost. 2018;16:2454–2461. doi: 10.1111/jth.14302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Foundation ER. EQ-5D-5L user guide. Accessed Mar 23. https://euroqol.org/publications/user-guides. 2019.
  • 14.Geraerds A, Bonsel GJ, Janssen MF, de Jongh MA, Spronk I, Polinder S, Haagsma JA. The added value of the EQ-5D with a cognition dimension in injury patients with and without traumatic brain injury. Qual Life Res. 2019;28:1931–1939. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02144-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Valerio L, Barco S, Jankowski M, Rosenkranz S, Lankeit M, Held M, Gerhardt F, Bruch L, Ewert R, Faehling M, et al. Quality of life 3 and 12 months following acute pulmonary embolism: analysis from a prospective multicenter cohort study. Chest. 2021;159:2428–2438. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sista AK, Horowitz JM, Tapson VF, Rosenberg M, Elder MD, Schiro BJ, Dohad S, Amoroso NE, Dexter DJ, Loh CT, et al. ; EXTRACT-PE Investigators. Indigo aspiration system for treatment of pulmonary embolism: results of the EXTRACT-PE trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:319–329. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Toma C, Jaber WA, Weinberg MD, Bunte MC, Khandhar S, Stegman B, Gondi S, Chambers J, Amin R, Leung DA, et al. Acute outcomes for the full US cohort of the FLASH mechanical thrombectomy registry in pulmonary embolism. EuroIntervention. 2023;18:1201–1212. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00732 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tu T, Toma C, Tapson VF, Adams C, Jaber WA, Silver M, Khandhar S, Amin R, Weinberg M, Engelhardt T, et al. ; FLARE Investigators. A prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial of catheter-directed mechanical thrombectomy for intermediate-risk acute pulmonary embolism: the FLARE study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:859–869. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.12.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rodrigues T, Silva BV, Plácido R, Mendonça C, Urbano ML, Rigueira J, Almeida AG, Pinto FJ. Comparison of 5 acute pulmonary embolism mortality risk scores in patients with COVID-19. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022;39:100984. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.100984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bova C, Sanchez O, Prandoni P, Lankeit M, Konstantinides S, Vanni S, Jiménez D. Identification of intermediate-risk patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Eur Respir J. 2014;44:694–703. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00006114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fernández C, Bova C, Sanchez O, Prandoni P, Lankeit M, Konstantinides S, Vanni S, Fernández-Golfín C, Yusen RD, Jiménez D. Validation of a model for identification of patients at intermediate to high risk for complications associated with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2015;148:211–218. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-2551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aujesky D, Obrosky DS, Stone RA, Auble TE, Perrier A, Cornuz J, Roy PM, Fine MJ. Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;172:1041–1046. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200506-862OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rosovsky R, Chang Y, Rosenfield K, Channick R, Jaff MR, Weinberg I, Sundt T, Witkin A, Rodriguez-Lopez J, Parry BA, et al. Changes in treatment and outcomes after creation of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT), a 10-year analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2019;47:31–40. doi: 10.1007/s11239-018-1737-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sutton LH, Tellor BR, Pope HE, Riney JN, Weaver KL. Evaluation of time to therapeutic anticoagulation and associated outcomes in critically Ill, obese patients with pulmonary embolism receiving unfractionated heparin. J Pharm Pract. 2021;34:438–444. doi: 10.1177/0897190019878073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Klok FA, Piazza G, Sharp ASP, F NA, Jaff MR, Chauhan N, Patel B, Barco S, Goldhaber SZ, Kucher N, et al. Ultrasound-facilitated, catheter-directed thrombolysis vs anticoagulation alone for acute intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism: rationale and design of the HI-PEITHO study. Am Heart J. 2022;251:43–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

hcv-17-e013448-s001.pdf (249.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES