Abstract
Obesity reflects an imbalance in nutrient storage resulting in excess fat accumulation. The molecules that tissues use to regulate nutrient storage are not well understood. A previously published genetic screen using Drosophila melanogaster larvae identified Glut1 , a transmembrane glucose transporter, as a potential obesity gene. To identify the adipose-specific functions of this gene, Glut1 levels were decreased using RNAi targeted to fly fat tissue. Adult Glut1 RNAi flies have lower glycogen and triglyceride levels, as well as decreased FASN1 RNA expression. This suggests that Glut1 functions to promote glycogen and triglyceride storage and fatty acid synthesis in Drosophila adipose tissue.
Figure 1. Glut1 RNAi in Drosophila fat tissue reduces triglyceride and glycogen storage .

(A) Glycogen normalized to protein, and (B) triglyceride normalized to protein were measured in Cg-Gal4> Glut1 RNAi-TRiP and Cg-Gal4> Glut1 RNAi-VDRC flies and compared to Cg-Gal4>LUC RNAi and Cg-Gal4>GFP RNAi controls, respectively (n=20-36). (C) Food consumption after 24 hours was measured in one week old females using a capillary feeding assay. (D-E) qPCR was used to measure the expression of (D) glucose and glycogen metabolism genes (Hexokinase C ( HexC ), Glycogen Synthase ( GlyS ), Glycogen Phosphorylase ( GlyP )) and (E) lipid metabolism genes (Fatty acid Synthase 1 ( FASN1 ), Acetyl CoA Carboxylase ( ACC ), withered ( whd ), and brummer ( bmm )) in cuticles with fat bodies attached dissected from one week old female Cg-Gal4> Glut1 RNAi-VDRC flies and compared to Cg-Gal4>GFP RNAi controls. Expression levels were measured and divided to rp49 levels and are displayed with the controls set to 1 and the levels of each gene in the Glut1 RNAi normalized relative to the controls (n=11-12). Values are mean ± standard error. **, P < 0.01, *, P<0.05 by two-tailed Student's t test.
Description
Obesity is a metabolic disease that affects both men and women of all ages on a global scale; nearly one-third of the world population is now classified as overweight or obese (Chooi et al. 2019) . Obesity is the result of an imbalance of energy output and storage within the body causing an excess of stored triglycerides. The study of the mechanisms behind macromolecule storage and use is becoming increasingly necessary as the rate of obesity and its related diseases, type II diabetes and heart disease, all continue to rise (Hruby et al, 2015) . The study of the genes and mechanisms that impact energy homeostasis may be integral to countering the rise in obesity.
The fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster , has been identified as an excellent model organism to study metabolism because metabolic pathways are highly conserved, and fruit flies provide a lens into the overall balance of triglyceride and glycogen storage and usage (Heier et al, 2018; Musselman and Kuhnlein, 2018) . There are a vast number of genes involved in regulating metabolism; however, most of these genes are either not yet known or their functions are not well understood. To identify genes important for triglyceride storage, genetic screens have been performed using the Drosophila system. One potential gene important for regulating triglyceride storage identified in a buoyancy screen in Drosophila larvae is Glut1 (Reis et al, 2010) . Glut1 is a transmembrane glucose transporter and is homologous to human Glut1 -5 genes (Escher et al, 1999) . Drosophila have two glucose transporters, Glut1 and Glut3 ; Glut3 is expressed only in testes, while Glut1 has a more ubiquitous expression pattern (Chintapalli et al. 2007) . Ubiquitously overexpressing Glut1 results in glucose uptake in vivo in Drosophila imaginal discs (Volkenhoff et al. 2018) . In addition, targeting Glut1 overexpression to neurons can rescue some of the neurodegenerative effects of a fly model of amyloid beta toxicity suggesting that Glut1 is important for neuronal function (Niccoli et al. 2016) . Despite this knowledge of Glut1 function in neurons , the role of Glut1 , and the ramifications of a reduction in Glut1 in fat tissue has not been explored.
In this study, Glut1 expression was decreased specifically in the fat body using RNAi and glycogen storage, triglyceride storage, and feeding were characterized. Glut1 was knocked down in the fat body by combining the fat body specific Cg-Gal4 line with two distinct Glut1 RNAi lines (TRiP and VDRC). Triglycerides, glycogen, and free glucose were measured in whole animals and normalized to total protein content. The glycogen/protein ( Fig. 1A ) and triglyceride/protein ( Fig. 1B ) ratios in fat-body specific Glut1 RNAi flies were decreased compared to the appropriate control. This decrease in nutrient storage could be due to a decrease in food consumption in Glut1 RNAi flies. To test this hypothesis, feeding was measured over a 24-hour period using a CAFÉ assay. Contrary to this hypothesis, relative food consumption did not decrease in Glut1 RNAi flies ( Fig. 1C ). This suggests that the decrease in triglyceride and glycogen storage is not due to altered food consumption; however, since Cg-Gal4 is expressed during the development it is possible that food consumption could have been altered during the larval stage and further experimentation is necessary to address this possibility.
To further understand the nutrient storage phenotypes observed in Glut1 RNAi flies, genes integral for glycogen and triglyceride storage and breakdown were analyzed via qPCR using dissected abdomen cuticles with fat bodies attached. The genes integral for glycogen metabolism analyzed were the glycolytic enzyme hexokinase C ( HexC ), the glycogen synthesis enzyme glycogen synthase ( GlyS ), and the glycogen breakdown enzyme glycogen phosphorylase ( GlyP ). There were no changes in the levels of any of these glycogen regulating genes (Fig 1D), suggesting that the decrease in glycogen storage in Glut1 RNAi flies is not due to changes in the expression of these genes. It is possible that this glycogen phenotype may be due to less glucose entering the cell via Glut1 ; it is also possible that there are non-transcriptional changes in these glycogen regulating genes. Additional experiments are necessary to distinguish between these possibilities.
Genes that regulate triglyceride storage were also analyzed. We measured the expression of acetyl-CoA carboxylase ( ACC ) and fatty acid synthase 1 ( FASN1 ), two enzymes important for the synthesis of fatty acids . We also measured the expression of the triglyceride lipase brummer ( bmm) and withered (whd ), the Drosophila homologue of carnitine acyltransferase 1 ( CPT1) which is integral to escorting free fatty acids into the mitochondria to be used for beta-oxidation . The levels of ACC , bmm and whd were similar in Glut1 RNAi flies and controls; however, FASN1 was decreased in Glut1 RNAi flies (Fig 1E). This decrease in FASN1 expression suggests that less fatty acids are being made when Glut1 is knocked down and could contribute to the decrease in triglyceride storage in these flies.
Despite the lack of knowledge about the function of Glut1 to regulate Drosophila metabolism, the functions of glucose transporters in mammals are better characterized . Homozygous Glut1 knockout mice are embryonic lethal and Glut1 heterozygotes have decreased brain glucose uptake (Heilig et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2006) , but the function of Glut1 in mammalian adipose tissue is not well understood. However, the function of another glucose transporter, Glut4, has been studied in mammalian fat tissue. Adipose-specific Glut4 knockout mice have significant reductions in glucose uptake, glycolysis, and glycogen synthesis (Abel et al. 2001) . We show here that this decrease in glycogen synthesis is conserved from Drosophila to mice, potentially due to less glucose uptake and thus less substrate to form glycogen. Interestingly, adipose-specific Glut4 knockout mice have no change in fat pad size or weight, suggesting little change in triglyceride storage (Abel et al., 2001) . However, triglyceride levels in isolated adipose tissue were not measured, so it is possible that triglyceride storage is altered in these mice and this triglyceride storage phenotype may also be conserved from flies to mammals.
The genetic screen that identified Glut1 as a potential anti-obesity gene in Drosophila showed that Glut1 mutants have increased buoyancy, suggesting that loss of Glut1 increases triglyceride storage (Reis et al., 2010) . This contrasts with the results shown here that inducing RNAi towards Glut1 specifically in fat tissue results in less triglycerides. It is possible that Glut1 acts in multiple tissues and loss of Glut1 throughout the entire animal in the Glut1 mutants used in the buoyancy screen may alter organismal lipid storage differently compared to when Glut1 expression is decreased only in fat tissue. Another possibility is that Glut1 functions differently in fat tissue in larvae and adult flies. A recent study has shown that male larvae store more triglycerides than female larvae which is the opposite of the sexual dimorphism seen in fat storage in adult flies (Diaz et al., 2023) . Therefore, it is possible that the apparent contrasting triglyceride storage phenotypes in Glut1 mutant larvae and adult flies where Glut1 is decreased specifically in fat tissue may be due to underlying differences in lipid metabolism in fat cells in larvae and adult flies. Future experimentation is necessary to address these possibilities.
Previous studies have shown that Drosophila larvae upregulate the levels of FASN1 mRNA in response to being fed a high sugar diet (Musselman et al., 2013; Sassu et al. 2012; Zinke et al., 2002) . Therefore, it is possible that altering sugar levels in Glut1 RNAi fat cells could regulate the levels of FASN1 mRNA and potentially lead to the blunted triglyceride storage observed in these flies. However, the mechanism of how decreasing Glut1 leads to both decreased triglyceride storage and FASN1 levels needs to be elucidated. In addition, whether other enzymes important for the storage of glycogen or triglycerides are altered in Glut1 RNAi fat cells and whether Glut1 functions in other metabolic tissues such as muscle and intestine to regulate metabolism in flies are still open questions. Together, the results of this study expand our knowledge of the genes important for regulating the storage of nutrients in Drosophila and further our understanding of the role of glucose transport in fat tissue metabolic function.
Methods
Fly Genetics - Virgin GAL4 females were crossed to UAS males and crosses were grown at 25°C on a 12h:12h light: dark cycle. Flies were grown on standard sugar-cornmeal-yeast medium (9 g Drosophila agar (Genesee Scientific), 100 mL Karo Lite Corn Syrup, 65 g cornmeal, 40 g sucrose, and 25 g whole yeast in 1.25 L water).
Triglyceride, Glycogen, and Protein Measurements - One-week-old female flies were used throughout this study. Two whole flies were homogenized in lysis buffer (140 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.1% Triton-X, and 1X protease inhibitor (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA)). Triglyceride, glycogen, and protein were measured using the Infinity Triglyceride Reagent kit (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA), Glucose Oxidase reagent kit (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA), and Pierce BCA Protein Assay kit (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA), respectively, accordingly to manufacturer's instructions and as described previously (Bennick et al., 2019) .
CAFÉ Assay - Food consumption was measured using the capillary feeding (CAFÉ) assay (Ja et al., 2007) . Briefly, three 1-week-old female flies were housed in a vial with 1% agar as a water source. Flies were fed with a dyed 5% sucrose in a Drummond 5 μL capillary tube (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) capped with mineral oil, as their sole food source. Flies were kept at 25 ºC and the amount of sucrose consumed was measured after 24 h. Vials without flies were used to account for any sucrose evaporation.
Gene Expression Analysis - Abdomen cuticles with fat bodies attached were dissected from 15 one-week-old female flies and were homogenized in TRIzol RNA Extraction Reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) according to manufacturer's instructions. Five μg of extracted RNA samples was DNase treated using DNA- free DNA Removal Kit (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). Then, 0.25 μg of DNase treated RNA was reverse transcribed using qScript Ultra Supermix (QuantaBio, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) according to manufacturer's instructions. qPCR reactions were generated using 1 μL of cDNA, 200 nM primers, and 1 × Perfecta SYBR Green (Quanta Biosciences, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) in a 25 μL reaction. qPCR was performed on a StepOnePlus instrument using the following cycling conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, 40 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 60 s at 60°C and 30 s at 72°C followed by a standard melt curve. Expression of all genes were normalized to rp49 . Primer sequences used were:
HexC (For 5′-TCGAGGCGGTTACAACTAAGA-3′ and Rev 5′-ACGTACGTGGGAAAACACTTG-3′), GlyS (For 5′-CGCGAGGCTATAAAATCCAC-3′ and Rev 5′- GGCAATCATAAAGCCAAGGA-3′), GlyP (For 5′-AACTTCCAGCGCAATGTAGC-3′ and Rev 5′-TGGGATCCTTCTTGATCCTG-3′), FASN1 (For 5′-CTGGCTGAGCAAGATTGTGTG-3′ and Rev 5′-TCGCACAACCAGAGCGTAGTA), ACC (For 5′- AGATGCAGAACGATGTCCGC -3′ and Rev5′- CTCTTTGTGAAGCAGCTCCG -3′), bmm (For 5′-ACGTGATCATCTCGGAGTTTG-3′ and Rev 5′-ATGGTGTTCTCGTCCAGAATG-3′), whd (For 5′-GCCAATGTGATTTCCCTGCTTC-3′ and Rev 5′-CTTTGCCCTTCAGGATTTCCTC-3′) and rp49 (For 5′-GACGCTTCAAGGGACAGTATCTG-3′ and Rev 5′-AAACGCGGTTCTGCATGAG-3′).
Statistics - The results were expressed as mean ± standard error (SE) and average values were compared between Glut1 RNAi and the appropriate control flies using a two-tailed Student's t-test as calculated in Microsoft Excel. p < 0.05 was used as the cut off for statistical significance.
Reagents
|
Strain |
Genotype |
Available from |
|
Cg-Gal4 |
w[1118]; P{w[+mC]=Cg-GAL4.A}2 |
Bloomington Stock Center #7011 |
|
UAS-GFP RNAi |
w1118; UAS-GFP RNAi |
Bloomington Stock Center #9330 |
|
UAS-Glut1 RNAi-VDRC |
w1118; UAS- Glut1 RNAi |
VDRC #13326 |
|
UAS-Glut1 RNAi-TRiP |
y[1] v[1]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.JF03060}attP2 |
Bloomington Stock Center #28645 |
|
UAS-LUC RNAi |
y[1] v[1]; P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.JF01355}attP2 |
Bloomington Stock Center #31603 |
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
Stocks obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (NIH P40OD018537) and the Vienna Drosophila Resource Center were used in this study.
Funding Statement
<p>Internal funds from Penn State Berks were used to support this research.</p>
References
- Abel ED, Peroni O, Kim JK, Kim YB, Boss O, Hadro E, Minnemann T, Shulman GI, Kahn BB. Adipose-selective targeting of the GLUT4 gene impairs insulin action in muscle and liver. Nature. 2001 Feb 8;409(6821):729–733. doi: 10.1038/35055575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bennick RA, Nagengast AA, DiAngelo JR. The SR proteins SF2 and RBP1 regulate triglyceride storage in the fat body of Drosophila. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019 Jul 2;516(3):928–933. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.06.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chintapalli VR, Wang J, Dow JA. Using FlyAtlas to identify better Drosophila melanogaster models of human disease. Nat Genet. 2007 Jun 1;39(6):715–720. doi: 10.1038/ng2049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chooi YC, Ding C, Magkos F. The epidemiology of obesity. Metabolism. 2018 Sep 22;92:6–10. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diaz AV, Stephenson D, Nemkov T, D'Alessandro A, Reis T. Spenito-dependent metabolic sexual dimorphism intrinsic to fat storage cells. Genetics. 2023 Nov 1;225(3) doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyad164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Escher SA, Rasmuson-Lestander A. The Drosophila glucose transporter gene: cDNA sequence, phylogenetic comparisons, analysis of functional sites and secondary structures. Hereditas. 1999;130(2):95–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1999.00095.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heier C, Kühnlein RP. Triacylglycerol Metabolism in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2018 Dec 1;210(4):1163–1184. doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.301583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heilig CW, Saunders T, Brosius FC 3rd, Moley K, Heilig K, Baggs R, Guo L, Conner D. Glucose transporter-1-deficient mice exhibit impaired development and deformities that are similar to diabetic embryopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Dec 12;100(26):15613–15618. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2536196100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hruby A, Hu FB. The Epidemiology of Obesity: A Big Picture. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Jul 1;33(7):673–689. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0243-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ja WW, Carvalho GB, Mak EM, de la Rosa NN, Fang AY, Liong JC, Brummel T, Benzer S. Prandiology of Drosophila and the CAFE assay. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 9;104(20):8253–8256. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702726104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Musselman LP, Fink JL, Ramachandran PV, Patterson BW, Okunade AL, Maier E, Brent MR, Turk J, Baranski TJ. Role of fat body lipogenesis in protection against the effects of caloric overload in Drosophila. J Biol Chem. 2013 Jan 25;288(12):8028–8042. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.371047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Musselman LP, Kühnlein RP. Drosophila as a model to study obesity and metabolic disease. . J Exp Biol. 2018 Mar 7;221(Pt Suppl 1) doi: 10.1242/jeb.163881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niccoli T, Cabecinha M, Tillmann A, Kerr F, Wong CT, Cardenes D, Vincent AJ, Bettedi L, Li L, Grönke S, Dols J, Partridge L. Increased Glucose Transport into Neurons Rescues Aβ Toxicity in Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2016 Aug 11;26(17):2291–2300. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reis T, Van Gilst MR, Hariharan IK. A buoyancy-based screen of Drosophila larvae for fat-storage mutants reveals a role for Sir2 in coupling fat storage to nutrient availability. PLoS Genet. 2010 Nov 11;6(11):e1001206–e1001206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sassu ED, McDermott JE, Keys BJ, Esmaeili M, Keene AC, Birnbaum MJ, DiAngelo JR. Mio/dChREBP coordinately increases fat mass by regulating lipid synthesis and feeding behavior in Drosophila. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012 Aug 12;426(1):43–48. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.08.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Volkenhoff A, Hirrlinger J, Kappel JM, Klämbt C, Schirmeier S. Live imaging using a FRET glucose sensor reveals glucose delivery to all cell types in the Drosophila brain. J Insect Physiol. 2017 Jul 18;106(Pt 1):55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2017.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang D, Pascual JM, Yang H, Engelstad K, Mao X, Cheng J, Yoo J, Noebels JL, De Vivo DC. A mouse model for Glut-1 haploinsufficiency. Hum Mol Genet. 2006 Feb 23;15(7):1169–1179. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zinke I, Schütz CS, Katzenberger JD, Bauer M, Pankratz MJ. Nutrient control of gene expression in Drosophila: microarray analysis of starvation and sugar-dependent response. EMBO J. 2002 Nov 15;21(22):6162–6173. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
