Skip to main content
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine logoLink to Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
. 2024 Mar 17;28(7):e18140. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.18140

GDF11: An emerging therapeutic target for liver diseases and fibrosis

Pardis Habibi 1,2, Kimia Falamarzi 1,2, Niloofar Dehdari Ebrahimi 2, Mohammad Zarei 3,4, Mahdi Malekpour 1,2,, Negar Azarpira 2,
PMCID: PMC10945076  PMID: 38494851

Abstract

Growth differentiation factor 11 (GDF11), also known as bone morphogenetic protein 11 (BMP11), has been identified as a key player in various biological processes, including embryonic development, aging, metabolic disorders and cancers. GDF11 has also emerged as a critical component in liver development, injury and fibrosis. However, the effects of GDF11 on liver physiology and pathology have been a subject of debate among researchers due to conflicting reported outcomes. While some studies suggest that GDF11 has anti‐aging properties, others have documented its senescence‐inducing effects. Similarly, while GDF11 has been implicated in exacerbating liver injury, it has also been shown to have the potential to reduce liver fibrosis. In this narrative review, we present a comprehensive report of recent evidence elucidating the diverse roles of GDF11 in liver development, hepatic injury, regeneration and associated diseases such as non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), liver fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. We also explore the therapeutic potential of GDF11 in managing various liver pathologies.

Keywords: GDF11, growth differentiation factor 11, HCC, MAFLD, NAFLD

1. BACKGROUND

The liver is a vital organ that plays an essential role in various functions within the body, including metabolism, food digestion, detoxification and vitamin storage. 1 It is subject to various chronic diseases caused by metabolic syndromes, obesity, excessive alcohol consumption, viral hepatitis and other chronic conditions. These diseases can lead to liver fibrosis, steatohepatitis, liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). 2 , 3 Globally, liver diseases cause two million deaths each year and can result in severe disabilities. 4 Metabolic disorders can induce fatty liver diseases. Approximately 25% of people worldwide have metabolic‐associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD).

Despite the importance and burden of liver diseases, the main ways to prevent chronic liver diseases (CLDs) are preventive approaches such as reducing weight, proper vaccination against hepatitis viruses and decreasing alcohol consumption. 5 Although studies have discovered new therapeutic targets for curing CLDs, enough proper therapeutics have not yet been discovered. Growth differentiation factor 11 (GDF11) protein is one of the emerging targets with beneficial effects on reducing liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. 3 , 6 , 7

GDF11, also known as bone morphogenetic protein 11 (BMP11), is a member of the transforming growth factor‐β (TGF‐β) family. 8 Recent studies have demonstrated that recombinant GDF11 is an effective anti‐aging agent for the heart, brain and muscles. 9 Additionally, GDF11 has an impact on liver development 10 , 11 and liver‐associated diseases like MAFLD and NAFLD, 7 , 12 HCC 13 and liver fibrosis. 7

In previous studies, GDF11 was shown to have controversial effects on liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. 14 While some studies indicated that GDF11 could impair liver regeneration 15 and exacerbate liver injury, 16 others found that GDF11 could inhibit liver fibrosis 7 , 17 and might protect against HCC. 13 These controversies could be due to misunderstandings caused by the complexity of biological systems and the different roles of GDF11. 18 In this study, we aim to explain the molecular effects of GDF11 and its roles in liver‐associated diseases and the possibility of utilizing GDF11 as a drug target for these diseases.

1.1. The physiological roles of GDF11 in the body

GDF11, is a part of BMP family that is a subfamily of the TGF‐β superfamily that secretes important signalling components essential for human development. 19 In humans, the GDF11 gene is located on chromosome 12q13.2 and encodes a protein with 407 amino acids that is inactive after transcription. 9 The GDF11 protein must be cleaved by the pro‐protein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 5 (PCSK5), a signal peptidase, and then activated by the BMP1/Tolloid family of metalloproteases. 9 As a secretory protein, GDF11 is expressed in most human body tissues, including the liver, kidneys, heart, pancreas, intestines, skeletal muscles and nervous system. 20 , 21 GDF11 induces the recruitment of activin receptor I (ActRI) by binding to activin receptor II (ActRII), leading to the formation of a complex that activates the downstream pathway with kinase functions. 9 The GDF11‐ActR complex activates various molecules, mainly consisting of suppressors of mothers against decapentaplegic (SMAD) and non‐SMAD pathways. SMAD proteins can translocate to the nucleus and transduce signalling as transcription factors. 22 SMAD mediators play crucial roles in the TGF‐β signalling pathway, which is tissue‐specific. TGF‐β signalling can regulate the pluripotency of stem cells during embryonic development via BMP pathways and SMAD mediators. 23 Non‐SMAD proteins are also various components that can be affected by GDF11 like mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K)/AKT, and Rho‐like GTPase. Activation of non‐SMAD pathways can contribute to many biological processes such as regulating inflammation and cell nucleus size. 9 GDF11 regulates gene expression in different tissues via activating SMAD and non‐SMAD pathways. 9

GDF11 affects various biological functions including reducing inflammation, 24 lipid homeostasis, 25 angiogenesis 26 and anti‐fibrotic properties. 14 Moreover, GDF11 participates in the pathogenesis of various disorders such as diabetes mellitus, 27 cardiovascular diseases, 28 metabolic disorders, 29 cancer 18 and aging. 30 Figure 1 illustrates some of the physiopathologic roles of GDF11 in the body.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

The contribution of GDF11 in different aspects of the pathophysiology of the human body.

GDF11 can be regarded as an anti‐aging factor with anti‐fibrotic properties. 14 , 30 In different organs including the skin, neurological system, and heart, GDF11 exhibits anti‐aging and regenerative properties. Its anti‐aging effects may arise from features such as neurogenic and angiogenic features. 31 Additionally, GDF11 can induce rejuvenation processes in tissues by stimulating stem cells. 32 On the other hand, GDF11 may influence the stemness capacity of some cancer cells thereby increasing their aggressiveness. 18

Several studies have reported substantial roles of GDF11 in regulating lipid and glucose homeostasis. 21 , 27 , 33 GDF11 maintains insulin secretion, β‐cell function, and survival in mouse models of Type 2 diabetes (T2D). 27 GDF11 inhibits glucose‐induced β‐cell apoptosis and decreases glucagon secretion by activating TGF‐β/SMAD2 and PI3K‐AKT‐B‐forkhead box protein O1 (PI3K‐AKT‐FoxO1) pathways, resulting in enhanced glucose homeostasis. 21 Furthermore, GDF11 inhibits adipogenesis via phosphorylation of SMAD2/3 and activation of the wingless‐related integration site (WNT)/β‐catenin pathway in pre‐adipocytes. It also inhibits adipogenesis by increasing adiponectin expression and glucose uptake in mature adipocytes by affecting the activin receptor‐like kinase 5 (ALK5)‐SMAD2/3 signalling pathway. 34 Consequently, GDF11 improves glucose and insulin homeostasis and reduces weight gain and white adipocyte (WAT) size. 34 Walker et al. reported that administration of GDF11 reduces weight gain and improves glucose tolerance in aged mice on a high‐fat diet (HFD). 33 However, the precise mechanism for this enhancement in glucose uptake has not been determined but it was not due to an increase in β‐cell proliferation or insulin secretion. 33 Therefore, further investigations are needed to discover the exact roles of GDF11 in glucose and lipid metabolism.

GDF11 is also capable of serving as a therapeutic agent. Recombinant GDF11 has been used to rejuvenate different organs including the heart, brain, and skeletal muscles. In this process, different results were observed and different explanations were offered to explain them. Various reasons were proposed including the diversity of folding and refolding of GDF11, the variety of sources and quality of recombinant GDF11, and the concentrations of GDF11 used. 35

2. GDF11 IN LIVER DEVELOPMENT, SENESCENCE AND REGENERATION

2.1. GDF11 in liver development

GDF11 plays an extensive role in embryonic development. It participates in anterior/posterior patterning of the spinal cord, development of skeletal muscle, bone, nervous system and the urogenital system as well as digestive system glands, retinal development, and erythropoiesis. 9 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 GDF11 has inhibitory effects on zebrafish liver development since its overexpression resulted in a smaller liver phenotype, probably due to inhibition of hepatocyte proliferation. 9 , 11 GDF11 is a target of histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3), an essential factor for GDF11 promoter inactivation. HDAC3 inhibition leads to GDF11 upregulation. 40 HDAC3 knockout mice showed defects in liver regeneration and hepatocyte proliferation arrest in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. 41 Although to the best of our knowledge, GDF11's role in liver formation has not been studied in mammals, previous studies on other species (zebrafish) and different cell lines suggested that GDF11 exerted its effects on liver development through direct action on hepatocyte precursor (hepatoblast) proliferation. 11 , 13 , 18 , 40 Therefore, further investigations are necessary to determine the precise roles of GDF11 in inhibiting liver development and hepatocyte proliferation.

A recent study revealed that serum and hepatic expression of GDF11 increased in mouse models of partial hepatectomy. Moreover, treatment with recombinant GDF11 and adeno‐associated viruses‐GDF11 led to severe impairment of liver regeneration while suppressing GDF11 activity‐ameliorated liver regeneration. 15 Accordingly, GDF11 induced cell cycle arrest and suppressed liver cell proliferation via activating the TGF‐β‐SMAD2/3 signalling pathway resulting in impairment of liver regeneration. 15

2.2. GDF11 in liver senescence

GDF11 also contributes to the senescence process. 10 Senescence is a biological process that shows the permanent arrest of the cell cycle and is associated with regeneration disruption, inflammation, and tumorigenesis. 42 Aging is accompanied by decreased cellular autophagy which leads to the accumulation of damaged intracellular components and thereby disruption of homeostasis. 43 Autophagy is an intracellular homeostatic process that results in lysosome‐dependent degradation of intracellular components. 44

According to Sun et al., GDF11 may downregulate liver cell autophagy by inducing the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1). 10 mTORC1 is an intracellular component that suppresses autophagy via inhibiting transcription factor EB (TFEB). 45 Overexpression of GDF11 in aged mice resulted in increased expression of p16, one of the indicators of cellular senescence in hepatic cells. 10 GDF11 indirectly decreased autophagosome‐lysosome fusion, lysosome production and lysosome proteolytic activity resulting in increased cellular senescence. 10 Also, knockdown of GDF11 decreased cellular senescence and increased liver proliferation due to increased autophagic flux. 10

2.3. GDF11 in liver ischaemia–reperfusion injury

Ischaemia–reperfusion injury (IRI) is a complicated process that occurs during liver transplantation, trauma, shock and hepatic surgery. 46 , 47 IRI occurs when damage caused by hypoxia and ischaemia worsens after blood flow restoration and oxygen delivery. 48 , 49 Mitochondrial impairment, calcium overload, oxidative stress, Kupffer cell and neutrophil activation and proinflammatory cytokine release are among the processes implicated in hepatic IRI. 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 Serum and hepatic levels of GDF11 elevated in liver IRI in both young and aged mice. Also, administration of recombinant GDF11 resulted in aggravation of liver histologic status and liver regeneration defect. 16 Cyclin D1, cyclin E1, cyclin‐dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) and CDK2 accelerate cell cycle progression from G1 to the S‐phase. GDF11 could downregulate these factors by increasing p16 (inhibitor of CDK4/6) and p27Kip1 (inhibitor of CDK2) thus suppressing hepatocyte regeneration. 16 Zhang et al. discovered that GDF11 improved recovery of tubular regeneration and renal function after kidney IRI in elderly mice. 54 Also, another study performed by Du et al. showed that targeted delivery of the GDF11 gene to the myocardium rejuvenated the aged mouse heart and improved myocardial regeneration after IRI. 55 These studies demonstrated protective effects of GDF11 in the kidney and heart after IRI in contrast to its roles in liver IRI suggesting that GDF11 expression and function may be tissue‐specific. 16 , 54 , 55

3. GDF11 IN LIVER‐ASSOCIATED DISEASES

3.1. GDF11 in NAFLD and MAFLD

NAFLD is one of the world's major causes of liver disease and affects about one‐quarter of the world's population. 56 NAFLD is characterized by fat accumulation in more than 5% of liver weight, while other liver diseases, for example, drug‐induced liver injury, excessive alcohol intake and viral hepatitis, are excluded. 56 , 57 NAFLD is found to be associated with cardiovascular and metabolic disorders, such as obesity, hypertension, insulin resistance (IR), T2D and dyslipidemia. 58 Due to the association of NAFLD with metabolic diseases, NAFLD can be counted as the hepatic indicator of metabolic syndrome. 58 Regarding the strong link between NAFLD and metabolic syndrome, experts have established a new term, MAFLD, defined by the presence of hepatic steatosis with confirmed T2D, obesity, or metabolic dysregulation. 58 To attribute metabolic dysregulation to someone, at least two metabolic abnormalities are required, including increased waist circumference, prediabetes, abnormal plasma triglycerides (TG), high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), blood pressure, high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP), and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR). 58

During NAFLD, hepatic steatosis occurs due to an imbalance in lipid input and export. 59 Increased dietary intake, decreased mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation and decreased hepatic lipid export can result in hepatic steatosis. 59 Some genetic variants, for example missense variants in transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 (TM6SF2) and in patatin phospholipase‐like domain containing protein 3 (PNPLA3) are associated with lipid imbalance resulting in inducing hepatic steatosis. 60 , 61 Moreover, inflammation occurs during hepatic steatosis, which can lead to NAFLD progression. 62 NAFLD might also progress to non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), characterized by evidence of hepatocyte injury with histological findings of steatohepatitis. 56 Individuals suffering from NASH are at an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases and HCC. Chronicity of hepatocytes injury during NASH might eventually cause fibrosis and cirrhosis. 63 Nowadays, NASH is among the leading causes of liver cirrhosis and is the second cause of liver transplantation in the United States. 56 , 64 Because MAFLD and NASH are highly burdensome, much effort has been focused on understanding their pathophysiological mechanisms. 65 In this regard, GDF11 is one of the many molecules that can interfere with pathways involved in the pathogenesis of NAFLD. 12 , 65

Dai et al. discovered a higher expression of GDF11 in patients with NAFLD than in the normal population. 7 On the other hand, GDF11 expression was not altered in mice fed a HFD. 7 Hence, Dai et al. hypothesized that GDF11 would only increase in response to fibrosis, and in the case of HFD mice, there was neither an increase in fibrosis nor an increase in GDF11. 7 GDF11 treatment of the genetically modified (ob/ob) mice neither resulted in overt hepatic lipid accumulation nor increased liver inflammation and injury. GDF11 administration in ob/ob mice could only increase activated hepatocyte stellate cells (HSCs) via influencing ALK5/SMAD2/3/AKT‐dependent signalling pathways and might lead to mild profibrogenic effects in vivo; yet, GDF11 administration didn't result in an increased liver inflammation or injury. A decrease in Kupffer cell number (with an inflammatory role) was also achieved after GDF11 treatment of ob/ob mice. 12 In summary, these data indicated that GDF11 may trigger the first stages of NASH development and fibrosis by HSCs activation and deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) components in the absence of liver injury and inflammation. 12 Additionally, Frohlich et al. demonstrated a considerably positive correlation between GDF11 mRNA levels and expression of genes that participated in NAFLD progression like peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) and carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1 (CPT1). 12

On the contrary, Xu et al. found that decreased levels of GDF11 have been associated with NAFLD, increased body mass index (BMI), increased diastolic blood pressure, TG, low‐density lipoprotein (LDL), HOMA‐IR, fasting blood sugar (FBS), and two‐hour postprandial glucose (2hpp), as well as metabolic syndrome‐related morbidity in Chinese population. 29 GDF11 exhibited a stronger inverse relationship with the metabolic profile in men. 29 GDF11 administration in HFD mice significantly reduced NAFLD activity score (NAS), FBS, insulin level, lipid content and the expression of some genes involved in gluconeogenesis. 7 A mild but significant decrease in body weight was also observed using GDF11 in HFD mice. 7 Together, these data indicate that overexpression of GDF11 prevents the development of NASH in HFD mice. 7 Another study on HFD mice showed that GDF11 administration increased glucose tolerance, reduced food intake, and prevented weight gain in HFD mice, but GDF11 could not inhibit age‐ or HFD‐induced hepatosteatosis despite the improvement observed in other metabolic parameters. 33 Although GDF11 involves in pancreatic development and β‐cells survival, an improvement in glucose tolerance following GDF11 treatment wasn't associated with pancreatic β‐cell replication or increased insulin secretion. 27 , 33 , 66 , 67

In addition to improved glucose tolerance, insulin resistance, gluconeogenesis reduction, and weight gain inhibition, GDF11 administration decreased the number and size of lipid droplets in the hepatocytes of HFD mice and resulted in hepatic steatosis reduction. 21 In HFD mice, GDF11 administration contributed to the recruitment of lipids in brown adipose tissue (BAT). 21 GDF11 also increased proteins in charge of energy expenditure and thermogenesis in BAT of the HFD mice, resulting in a 0.4°C increase in rectal temperature. 21 Furthermore, GDF11 prevented inflammation and macrophage infiltration in the epididymal white adipose tissue (WAT) of the HFD mice. 21 In HFD mice, expression of the genes involved in fatty acid β‐oxidation was not altered after GDF11 treatment. 21 One possibility was that GDF11 reduced hepatocyte fat intake by altering lipid distribution and entering the lipids into the thermogenesis pathway. 21 Another possibility was that GDF11 reduced metabolic disorders by decreasing inflammation, which is responsible for many metabolic complications such as obesity. 21 Therefore, GDF11 increased thermogenesis, energy expenditure, and regulated glucose and lipid metabolism through TGF‐β/SMAD2, PI3K/AKT/FoxO1 and AMPK pathways, which might eventually lead to the prevention of obesity and other metabolic disorders. 21

The summary of the effects of GDF11 on the NAFLD models can be seen in Table 1. Regarding the impact of the GDF11 molecule in various metabolic pathways GDF11 is a promising target for the prevention and treatment of MAFLD and other metabolic disorders in the future. However, there are several inconsistencies among the results of previous investigations; Hence, more research is required to determine the different aspects of its therapeutic and potentially harmful effects.

TABLE 1.

GDF11 effects on the NAFLD models.

GDF11 analogue Species Hepatic fat content/inflammation Hepatic fibrosis Glycaemic control Serum lipid profile Body weight References
AAV.GDF11 HFD‐fed mice Decrease NAS score and lipid content Decrease liver fibrosis Decrease fasting glucose and insulin levels Decrease body weight 7
rGDF11 HFD‐fed mice No changes in hepatosteatosis Improved GTT, reduced blood glucose Decrease body weight 33
rGDF11 Ob/ob mice No changes in lipid accumulation, no induction of liver injury or inflammation Activated HSC cells, triggered liver fibrosis Decrease body weight 12
Plasmid carrying GDF11 HFD‐fed mice Suppressed hepatic fat accumulation Decreased fasting glucose and insulin level, improved GTT and insulin sensitivity Decreased serum TG and total cholesterol Prevented weight gain 21

3.2. GDF11 in liver fibrosis

Liver fibrosis, with a prevalence of 0.7%–25.7%, is one of the leading causes of global morbidity and mortality. Untreated fibrosis can result in cirrhosis and other complications including HCC. 68 , 69 , 70 Even though liver fibrosis is reversible, there is currently no confirmed treatment for it. 71 , 72 , 73 Therefore, understanding the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis and finding possible diagnostic and therapeutic markers is essential. 73 Excessive alcohol consumption, viral infections, and MAFLD are among the leading causes of hepatic fibrosis. 14

Liver fibrosis is thought to be caused by the interaction of various cells including hepatocytes, HSCs, and Kupffer cells as well as the infiltration of immune cells. 74 As a result of persistent and chronic liver injury, profibrotic and inflammatory cytokines increase which cause the activation of HSCs. Activated HSCs can transform into myofibroblasts which enhance the production and deposition of extracellular matrix components resulting in fibrosis. 14 , 75 Chronic hepatic injury, inflammatory cytokine release, recruitment of inflammatory cells, and excessive ECM production (mainly collagen type I) are critical mechanisms in liver fibrosis. 73 Additionally, chronic liver injury is associated with the proliferation of leucine‐rich repeat‐containing G‐protein‐coupled receptor 5+ (LGR5+) liver progenitor cells (LPCs) which are absent in normal livers. These LGR5+ LPCs can attenuate liver fibrosis. 7 , 76

Administration of GDF11, which is elevated in human and mice fibrotic livers, enhanced the expansion of LGR5+ cells in mouse and human liver organoids. 7 In mouse models of hepatic fibrosis, LGR5+ LPCs treated with GDF11 suppressed fibrogenesis. 7 , 76 Overexpression of GDF11 in hepatic myofibroblasts may act as a growth factor to preserve LGR5+ progenitor proliferation. 7 Following transplantation of LGR5+ cells into the mice spleen, expanded LGR5+ cells reversed activated HSCs to quiescent HSC phenotype cells by downregulating actin alpha 2 (ACTA2) (a fibrogenic gene and marker of activated HSCs). 7 This process may explain the underlying mechanism through which GDF11‐induced LGR5+ cells decrease liver fibrosis. 7 Another possibility about the beneficial effects of GDF11 in liver injury is that a GDF11‐enriched environment might promote the secretion of chemokines from progenitor cells resulting in scar‐resolving immune subset recruitment. 76 , 77 , 78 Contrary to these results, Frohlich et al. showed that in obese (ob/ob) or lean wild‐type mice GDF11 enhanced profibrogenic program in HSCs worsened collagen deposition and increased α smooth muscle actin (αSMA) staining in the liver without affecting hepatic damage or inflammation. 12 The observed controversy regarding outcomes might result from different models employed in‐vitro and in‐vivo investigation procedures and route and dosage of GDF11 administration. 14 Consequently, further investigations are required to determine the exact mechanism and potential therapeutic effects of GDF11 in liver fibrosis.

3.3. GDF11 and liver cancer

HCC is the most common primary liver cancer and the third most common cancer in terms of mortality. 79 , 80 Despite the advances in recognition of HCC and its aetiologies, 5‐year survival rate of this cancer is only 21%. 81 Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, alcoholic cirrhosis, aflatoxin‐contaminated food consumption, NASH, metabolic disorders and MAFLD are among the significant risk factors of HCC. 82 , 83 The risk factors of HCC usually contribute to liver injury by inducing chronic liver inflammation. The chronicity of liver injuries results in liver cirrhosis which contains focal areas of immature and abnormal hepatocytes; consequently, these dysplastic precancerous areas might develop HCC. 82 In some cases, HCC can be generated in a non‐cirrhotic liver. Non‐cirrhotic HCC is more prevalent among HCC patients with NAFLD bases. 46 Due to the late diagnosis of NAFLD‐induced HCC, prognostic outcomes are usually worse. 84 Therefore, understanding the molecular mechanisms contributing to HCC development can help manage HCC better. GDF11 is suggested to be a regulator of differentiation in cells that retain stemness capacity, like HCC cells, so these cells are potential targets for GDF11. 13 , 18 Previously, the downregulation of GDF11 expression was discovered in patients with HCC. 85 The altered expression of GDF11 in HCC models suggested that GDF11 might contribute to HCC development. 86 Also, genetic mutations in TGF‐β core genes, including GDF11, play an important role in HCC pathogenesis. 87 , 88 Previous studies discovered tumour suppressive roles of GDF11 in HCC by reducing HCC cell proliferation, clonogenic capacity, cellular function, and aggressiveness, as well as causing dysregulation of cancer cell metabolism. 13 , 18 , 85 , 89

Gerardo‐Ramírez et al. found that GDF11 inhibits tumour progression via suppression of cellular proliferation and doesn't affect HCC cell viability. 13 Additionally, cell proliferation of tumour cells was also inhibited by GDF11 in other studies. 89 , 90 Another study mentioned a reduction in HCC cells' viability in addition to proliferation inhibition after GDF11 treatment. 85 GDF11 increased HCC cells' sensitivity to cisplatin. 91 Tumour aggressiveness, stemness markers, and mesenchymal markers of HCC cells also decreased after GDF11 treatment in Gerardo‐Ramírez's study. 13 Also, epithelial markers and cell‐to‐cell connections increased after GDF11 treatment of the HCC cells. 13 As a result, GDF11 made a cytostatic condition and caused a decrement in epithelial to mesenchymal transition, resulting in decreased tumour aggressiveness and invasion. 13

Frohlich et al. declared that treatment of HCC cells with GDF11 resulted in increased expression of genes that participated in fatty acid β‐oxidation lipid droplet formation and growth regulating fatty acid storage and steatosis. 90 More lipid droplets with larger sizes were found in HCC cells. So an increase in lipid synthesis and a decrease in cell apoptosis were observed during GDF11 treatment. Whereas GDF11 reduced HCC cell apoptosis and served them with lipid energy GDF11 reduced tumour progression by inhibiting cell proliferation. 90

On the contrary, in Sharik Hernandez et al.'s study, GDF11 administration in HCC cells impaired both glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation. 89 GDF11 suppressed the expression of genes involved in lipogenesis and the AKT/mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) pathway which participates in lipid homeostasis in HCC cells. 89 Both neutral lipids and cholesterol content of the HCC cells were diminished and changes in their mitochondria such as disarrangement of cristae partial cristolysis electron‐lucent matrix and reduced mitochondria size were observed. Results from this study indicated that GDF11 caused impairment of cancer cell lipid and glucose metabolism and induced defects in mitochondrial functions. Therefore, the tumour suppressive property of GDF11 was concomitant to the decrease in cholesterol transport activity and cholesterol homeostasis. 89

Tumour‐associated macrophages are macrophages that reside in the tumour microenvironment. 92 These macrophages predominantly shift to the M2 type in the HCC microenvironment and due to their immune‐suppressive phenotype are related to poorer prognosis of cancers. 93 GDF11 treatment of the THP‐1‐macrophage cell line in the HCC model resulted in an increase in polarization of macrophages to M1 macrophages. It was concluded that GDF11 treatment of HCC might inhibit tumour progression by inducing polarization of macrophages to M1. 94

An additional type of primary liver cancer cholangiocarcinoma arises from the epithelium of intra‐ or extrahepatic bile ducts. 95 , 96 The incidence of cholangiocarcinoma is less than 6 cases per 100,000 people. Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare but highly fatal cancer and its incidence rate has increased worldwide during the past decade. 96 Cholangiocarcinoma is mostly asymptomatic at early stages and thus is diagnosed at advanced stages leading to poor prognosis and a 5‐year survival of 7%–20%. 97 , 98 Hence, finding new biomarkers for diagnostic and therapeutic means is of great importance.

A recent study has shown upregulation of PCSK5 and GDF11 in cholangiocarcinoma patients. 13 Exosomes of patients with cholangiocarcinoma exhibited elevated miR‐3124‐5p levels which contribute to cancer cell proliferation migration and angiogenesis through downregulation of GDF11 expression. Consequently, downregulation of GDF11 may be responsible for enhancing cholangiocarcinoma aggression. 99

Table 2 summarizes the effects of GDF11 on cancers of the liver. Based on the results of the above investigations targeting GDF11 might represent a therapeutic option in the future for liver cancers. Therefore, more investigation is needed to elucidate the exact function of GDF11 in HCC.

TABLE 2.

Effects of GDF11 on liver cancer cells.

GDF11 analogue Species Effects on tumorigenesis Effects on cancer cell metabolism References
rGDF11 Human hepatic cancer cell lines Decreased cell proliferation, no apoptosis induction Increased lipid accumulation 90
rGDF11 Human HCC cell lines Decreased cell proliferation Decreased cholesterol content, impaired glycolysis 89
rGDF11 THP‐1‐macrophages cell line No effects on cell proliferation, induce anti‐tumour macrophages response Decreased lipid content 94
rGDF11 HCC cell lines Decreased cell proliferation, decreased stemness and aggressiveness‐related genes 13
rGDF11 HepG2 cell line Decreased cell viability and inhibited proliferation 85
rGDF11 HCC cell line Increased sensitivity to chemotherapy treatment 91
GDF11 downregulation Serum exosomes of cholangiocarcinoma patients Cholangiocarcinoma development 99

4. THE ROLE OF GDF11 ANALOGUES AND LIVER‐ASSOCIATED DISEASES

Several studies have investigated the possible therapeutic roles of GDF11 in various pathological conditions including skeletal muscle injury, aging, stroke, and Alzheimer's disease. 35 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 Moreover, the potential therapeutic effects of GDF11 on metabolic disorders such as obesity, T2D, glucose and insulin homeostasis dysregulation, and energy imbalance were recently evaluated. 21 , 27 , 33 Additionally, GDF11 analogues play pivotal roles in liver‐associated diseases like NAFLD, HCC and liver fibrosis. 7 , 12 , 13 However, there are inconsistencies in the impacts of GDF11 analogues on liver diseases which might be due to diversity in GDF11 dosage or the methods used for increasing GDF11 (such as recombinant GDF11 or GDF11 overexpression by plasmid or viral vectors). 33 , 35 Also, different protein refolding efficiencies, protein sources, and concentrations might result in different recombinant GDF11 concentrations and consequent disparities in study outcomes. 35 , 104

The promising effects of GDF11 analogues on metabolic disorders (such as obesity and T2D) and liver diseases like NAFLD, liver fibrosis, and HCC are still in early preclinical stages. Further studies are required to evaluate their efficacy and possible adverse effects. 35 However, the use of GDF11 in clinics is questionable due to its low production efficiency, conflicting results about GDF11's rejuvenating effects, and the risk of inducing fibrosis. 18 , 35 , 104 Table 3 summarizes the latest findings regarding the effects of GDF11 analogues on liver and metabolic disorders.

TABLE 3.

The usage of GDF11 analogues in liver diseases.

GDF11 analogue Diseases Species Results References

rGDF11

AAV.GDF11

Liver fibrosis

Mouse and human liver organoids

Mouse models of liver fibrosis

Attenuated liver fibrosis

7
rGDF11 NAFLD and liver fibrosis ob/ob mouse models of obesity‐dependent NAFLD

Increased activated HSCs and liver fibrosis

Reduced Kupffer cells and macrophages

12
rGDF11 Obesity Human adipose‐derived stromal cells (HADSCs) Inhibited adipogenic differentiation 105
Intraperitoneal injection of rGDF11 Metabolic disorders Aged mice Induced healthy weight loss 106
rGDF11 Metabolic disorders (Obesity)

ob/ob mice

3 T3‐L1 pre‐adipocytes

3T3‐L1 mature adipocytes

Decreased weight gain and WAT size

Improved insulin sensitivity

Inhibited adipogenesis

Increased adiponectin levels and glucose uptake by mature 3 T3‐L1 adipocytes

34
rGDF11 HCC Human hepatic cancer cell lines HepG2 and Hep3B

Enhanced lipogenic gene expression and lipid accumulation

Decreased cell proliferation and apoptosis rate

90
rGDF11 HCC Hepatocellular carcinoma‐derived cell lines

Impaired lipid metabolism, glycolysis, mitochondria function

Decreased cells proliferation

89
rGDF11 HCC HCC cell lines

Decreased cell proliferation

Induced cell cycle arrest

Decreased HCC cells invasion

13
rGDF11 Liver IRI Mouse models of IRI

Worsened liver injury

Enhanced liver regeneration impairment

16

rGDF11

AAV.GDF11

Liver injury Mouse models of partial hepatectomy Impaired liver regeneration 15

AAV.GDF11

Adenovirus‐small hairpin RNA‐GDF11

Liver senescence Aged mice Accelerated liver senescence 10

5. CONCLUSION

This study sheds light on the crucial role of GDF11 in liver development and pathophysiology of associated liver diseases including liver cancers and MAFLD. Despite limited knowledge about the role of GDF11 in liver development and diseases, its important role in the liver has been confirmed by many studies. In this study, we attempted to gather comprehensive knowledge about GDF11. However, further studies are needed to determine the exact role of GDF11 in liver‐associated diseases and its potential for use in targeted therapies.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Pardis Habibi: Investigation (equal); writing – original draft (lead); writing – review and editing (equal). Kimia Falamarzi: Data curation (equal); writing – original draft (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Niloofar Dehdari Ebrahimi: Data curation (equal); writing – original draft (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Mohammad Zarei: Supervision (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Mahdi Malekpour: Data curation (equal); writing – original draft (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Negar Azarpira: Supervision (equal); writing – review and editing (equal).

FUNDING INFORMATION

This work has no funding.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Not applicable.

Habibi P, Falamarzi K, Ebrahimi ND, Zarei M, Malekpour M, Azarpira N. GDF11: An emerging therapeutic target for liver diseases and fibrosis. J Cell Mol Med. 2024;28:e18140. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.18140

Pardis Habibi and Kimia Falamarzi contributed equally to this work and share the first authorship.

Contributor Information

Mahdi Malekpour, Email: mahdimalekpour77@gmail.com.

Negar Azarpira, Email: negarazarpira@gmail.com.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Kalra A, Yetiskul E, Wehrle CJ, Tuma F. Physiology, liver. StatPearls; 2018. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Lim Y‐S, Kim WR. The global impact of hepatic fibrosis and end‐stage liver disease. Clin Liver Dis. 2008;12(4):733‐746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Falamarzi K, Malekpour M, Tafti MF, Azarpira N, Behboodi M, Zarei M. The role of FGF21 and its analogs on liver associated diseases. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:967375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Asrani SK, Devarbhavi H, Eaton J, Kamath PS. Burden of liver diseases in the world. J Hepatol. 2019;70(1):151‐171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Cheemerla S, Balakrishnan M. Global epidemiology of chronic liver disease. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2021;17(5):365‐370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zhang J, Liu Q, He J, Li Y. Novel therapeutic targets in liver fibrosis. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:766855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Dai Z, Song G, Balakrishnan A, et al. Growth differentiation factor 11 attenuates liver fibrosis via expansion of liver progenitor cells. Gut. 2020;69(6):1104‐1115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Nakashima M, Toyono T, Akamine A, Joyner A. Expression of growth/differentiation factor 11, a new member of the BMP/TGFβ superfamily during mouse embryogenesis. Mech Dev. 1999;80(2):185‐189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zhang Y, Wei Y, Liu D, et al. Role of growth differentiation factor 11 in development, physiology and disease. Oncotarget. 2017;8(46):81604‐81616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sun J, Li Y, Yang X, et al. Growth differentiation factor 11 accelerates liver senescence through the inhibition of autophagy. Aging Cell. 2022;21(1):e13532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Farooq M, Sulochana K, Pan X, Sheng D, Gong Z, et al. Histone deacetylase 3 (hdac3) is specifically required for liver development in zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2008;317(1):336‐353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Frohlich J, Kovacovicova K, Mazza T, et al. GDF11 induces mild hepatic fibrosis independent of metabolic health. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(20):20024‐20046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Gerardo‐Ramírez M, Lazzarini‐Lechuga R, Hernández‐Rizo S, et al. GDF11 exhibits tumor suppressive properties in hepatocellular carcinoma cells by restricting clonal expansion and invasion. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol basis Dis. 2019;1865(6):1540‐1554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Frohlich J, Vinciguerra M. Candidate rejuvenating factor GDF11 and tissue fibrosis: friend or foe? GeroScience. 2020;42(6):1475‐1498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wang W, Yang X, Yang J, et al. GDF11 impairs liver regeneration in mice after partial hepatectomy. Clin Sci. 2019;133(20):2069‐2084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Liu A, Dong W, Peng J, et al. Growth differentiation factor 11 worsens hepatocellular injury and liver regeneration after liver ischemia reperfusion injury. FASEB J. 2018;32(9):5186‐5198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Dai Z, Song G, Balakrishnan A, et al. Growth differentiation factor 11 mitigates liver fibrosis via expansion of liver progenitor cells. Z Gastroenterol. 2020;58(01):1.28:1104‐1115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Simoni‐Nieves A, Gerardo‐Ramírez M, Pedraza‐Vázquez G, et al. GDF11 implications in cancer biology and metabolism. Facts and controversies. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ducy P, Karsenty G. The family of bone morphogenetic proteins. Kidney Int. 2000;57(6):2207‐2214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Uhlén M, Fagerberg L, Hallström BM, et al. Proteomics. Tissue‐based map of the human proteome. Science. 2015;347(6220):1260419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Lu B, Zhong J, Pan J, et al. Gdf11 gene transfer prevents high fat diet‐induced obesity and improves metabolic homeostasis in obese and STZ‐induced diabetic mice. J Transl Med. 2019;17(1):1‐16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ma Y, Liu Y, Han F, et al. Growth differentiation factor 11: a "rejuvenation factor" involved in regulation of age‐related diseases? Aging (Albany NY). 2021;13(8):12258‐12272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Massagué J. TGFβ signalling in context. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13(10):616‐630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Li W, Wang W, Liu L, et al. GDF11 antagonizes TNF‐α‐induced inflammation and protects against the development of inflammatory arthritis in mice. FASEB J. 2019;33(3):3317‐3329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Gerardo‐Ramírez M, German‐Ramirez N, Escobedo‐Calvario A, et al. The hepatic effects of GDF11 on health and disease. Biochimie. 2022;208:129‐140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Yu X, Chen X, Zheng XD, et al. Growth differentiation factor 11 promotes abnormal proliferation and angiogenesis of pulmonary artery endothelial cells. Hypertension. 2018;71(4):729‐741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Li H, Li Y, Xiang L, et al. GDF11 attenuates development of type 2 diabetes via improvement of islet β‐cell function and survival. Diabetes. 2017;66(7):1914‐1927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Harper SC, Johnson J, Borghetti G, et al. GDF11 decreases pressure overload–induced hypertrophy, but can cause severe cachexia and premature death. Circ Res. 2018;123(11):1220‐1231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Xu B, Huang Y, Zhang R, et al. Serum growth differentiation factor 11 is closely related to metabolic syndrome in a Chinese cohort. J Diabetes Investig. 2021;12(2):234‐243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Egerman MA, Glass DJ. The role of GDF11 in aging and skeletal muscle, cardiac and bone homeostasis. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2019;54(2):174‐183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Rochette L, Dogon G, Rigal E, Zeller M, Cottin Y, Vergely C. Growth differentiation factor 11: a proangiogenic drug as a potential antiaging regulating molecule. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2022;11:41‐46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Conboy IM, Conboy MJ, Rebo J. Systemic problems: a perspective on stem cell aging and rejuvenation. Aging (Albany NY). 2015;7(10):754‐765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Walker RG, Barrandon O, Poggioli T, et al. Exogenous GDF11, but not GDF8, reduces body weight and improves glucose homeostasis in mice. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):4561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Frohlich J, Kovacovicova K, Raffaele M, et al. GDF11 inhibits adipogenesis and improves mature adipocytes metabolic function via WNT/β‐catenin and ALK5/SMAD2/3 pathways. Cell Prolif. 2022;55(10):e13310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Suh J, Lee YS. Similar sequences but dissimilar biological functions of GDF11 and myostatin. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52(10):1673‐1693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. McPherron AC, Lawler AM, Lee S‐J. Regulation of anterior/posterior patterning of the axial skeleton by growth/differentiation factor 11. Nat Genet. 1999;22(3):260‐264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Shi Y, Liu J‐P. Gdf11 facilitates temporal progression of neurogenesis in the developing spinal cord. J Neurosci. 2011;31(3):883‐893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Mallo M. Reassessing the role of Hox genes during vertebrate development and evolution. Trends Genet. 2018;34(3):209‐217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Jamaiyar A, Wan W, Janota DM, Enrick MK, Chilian WM, Yin L. The versatility and paradox of GDF 11. Pharmacol Ther. 2017;175:28‐34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Zhang X, Wharton W, Yuan Z, Tsai S‐C, Olashaw N, Seto E. Activation of the growth‐differentiation factor 11 gene by the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor trichostatin a and repression by HDAC3. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24(12):5106‐5118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Lu X‐F, Cao X‐Y, Zhu Y‐J, et al. Histone deacetylase 3 promotes liver regeneration and liver cancer cells proliferation through signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(3):398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Hernandez‐Segura A, Nehme J, Demaria M. Hallmarks of cellular senescence. Trends Cell Biol. 2018;28(6):436‐453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Rubinsztein DC, Mariño G, Kroemer G. Autophagy and aging. Cell. 2011;146(5):682‐695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Rubinsztein DC, Codogno P, Levine B. Autophagy modulation as a potential therapeutic target for diverse diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11(9):709‐730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Martina JA, Chen Y, Gucek M, Puertollano R. MTORC1 functions as a transcriptional regulator of autophagy by preventing nuclear transport of TFEB. Autophagy. 2012;8(6):903‐914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Pinyopornpanish K, Khoudari G, Saleh MA, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with or without cirrhosis: a population‐based study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021;21(1):1‐7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Selzner N, Rudiger H, Graf R, Clavien P‐A. Protective strategies against ischemic injury of the liver. Gastroenterology. 2003;125(3):917‐936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Lee SH, Culberson C, Korneszczuk K, Clemens MG. Differential mechanisms of hepatic vascular dysregulation with mild vs. moderate ischemia‐reperfusion. American journal of physiology‐gastrointestinal and liver. Phys Ther. 2008;294(5):G1219‐G1226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Zhou J, Chen J, Wei Q, Saeb‐Parsy K, Xu X. The role of ischemia/reperfusion injury in early hepatic allograft dysfunction. Liver Transpl. 2020;26(8):1034‐1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Cannistrà M, Ruggiero M, Zullo A, et al. Hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury: a systematic review of literature and the role of current drugs and biomarkers. Int J Surg. 2016;33:S57‐S70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Mao XL, Cai Y, Chen YH, et al. Novel targets and therapeutic strategies to protect against hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury. Front Med. 2022;8:757336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Montalvo‐Jave EE, Escalante‐Tattersfield T, Ortega‐Salgado JA, Piña E, Geller DA. Factors in the pathophysiology of the liver ischemia‐reperfusion injury. J Surg Res. 2008;147(1):153‐159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Weigand K, Brost S, Steinebrunner N, Büchler M, Schemmer P, Müller M. Ischemia/reperfusion injury in liver surgery and transplantation: pathophysiology. HPB Surg. 2012;2012:1‐8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Zhang Y, Li Q, Liu D, et al. GDF11 improves tubular regeneration after acute kidney injury in elderly mice. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):1‐15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Du G‐Q, Shao Z‐B, Wu J, et al. Targeted myocardial delivery of GDF11 gene rejuvenates the aged mouse heart and enhances myocardial regeneration after ischemia–reperfusion injury. Basic Res Cardiol. 2017;112:1‐14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease—meta‐analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64(1):73‐84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Juo Y‐Y, Livingston EH. Testing for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. JAMA. 2019;322(18):1836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Godoy‐Matos AF, Silva Júnior WS, Valerio CM. NAFLD as a continuum: from obesity to metabolic syndrome and diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2020;12(1):1‐20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Attia SL, Softic S, Mouzaki M. Evolving role for pharmacotherapy in NAFLD/NASH. Clin Transl Sci. 2021;14(1):11‐19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Luo F, Smagris E, Martin SA, et al. Hepatic TM6SF2 is required for Lipidation of VLDL in a pre‐Golgi compartment in mice and rats. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;13(3):879‐899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Luo F, Oldoni F, Das A. TM6SF2: a novel genetic player in nonalcoholic fatty liver and cardiovascular disease. Hepatol Commun. 2022;6(3):448‐460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Gao B, Tsukamoto H. Inflammation in alcoholic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: friend or foe? Gastroenterology. 2016;150(8):1704‐1709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Heyens LJ, Busschots D, Koek GH, Robaeys G, Francque S. Liver fibrosis in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease: from liver biopsy to non‐invasive biomarkers in diagnosis and treatment. Front Med. 2021;8:615978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Wong RJ, Aguilar M, Cheung R, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the second leading etiology of liver disease among adults awaiting liver transplantation in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2015;148(3):547‐555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Berlanga A, Guiu‐Jurado E, Porras JA, Auguet T. Molecular pathways in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2014;7:221‐239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Dichmann DS, Yassin H, Serup P. Analysis of pancreatic endocrine development in GDF11‐deficient mice. Dev Dyn. 2006;235(11):3016‐3025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Harmon EB, AsA A, Smart NG, Gu X, Osborne DH, Kim SK. GDF11 modulates NGN3+ islet progenitor cell number and promotes β‐cell differentiation in pancreas development. Development. 2004;131:6163‐6174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Marcellin P, Kutala BK. Liver diseases: a major, neglected global public health problem requiring urgent actions and large‐scale screening. Liver Int. 2018;38:2‐6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Parola M, Pinzani M. Liver fibrosis: pathophysiology, pathogenetic targets and clinical issues. Mol Asp Med. 2019;65:37‐55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Harris R, Harman DJ, Card TR, Aithal GP, Guha IN. Prevalence of clinically significant liver disease within the general population, as defined by non‐invasive markers of liver fibrosis: a systematic review. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2(4):288‐297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Brenner DA. Reversibility of liver fibrosis. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2013;9(11):737‐739. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Aydın MM, Akçalı KC. Liver fibrosis. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2018;29(1):14‐21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Kisseleva T, Brenner D. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of liver fibrosis and its regression. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18(3):151‐166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Acharya P, Chouhan K, Weiskirchen S, Weiskirchen R. Cellular mechanisms of liver fibrosis. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:671640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Tanwar S, Rhodes F, Srivastava A, Trembling PM, Rosenberg WM. Inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases including non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatitis C. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(2):109‐133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Breitkopf‐Heinlein K, Syn W‐K. Harnessing liver progenitors in the treatment of liver fibrosis: a step in the right direction? Gut. 2020;69(6):975‐976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Coombes J, Swiderska‐Syn M, Dollé L, et al. Osteopontin neutralisation abrogates the liver progenitor cell response and fibrogenesis in mice. Gut. 2015;64(7):1120‐1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Machado MV, Diehl AM. Hedgehog signalling in liver pathophysiology. J Hepatol. 2018;68(3):550‐562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Kew MC. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and risk factors. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2014;1:115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Weinmann A, Koch S, Niederle IM, et al. Trends in epidemiology, treatment, and survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients between 1998 and 2009: an analysis of 1066 cases of a German HCC registry. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;48(3):279‐289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17‐48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Dhanasekaran R, Bandoh S, Roberts LR. Molecular pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma and impact of therapeutic advances. F1000Res. 2016;5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Zunica ER, Heintz EC, Axelrod CL, Kirwan JP. Obesity management in the primary prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 2022;14(16):4051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Chrysavgis L, Giannakodimos I, Diamantopoulou P, Cholongitas E. Non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical challenges of an intriguing link. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28(3):310‐331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Zhang YH, Pan LH, Pang Y, et al. GDF11/BMP11 as a novel tumor marker for liver cancer. Exp Ther Med. 2018;15(4):3495‐3500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Yang M‐H, Chen M, Mo H‐H, et al. Utilizing experimental mouse model to identify effectors of hepatocellular carcinoma induced by HBx antigen. Cancer. 2020;12(2):409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Ohshiro K, Chen J, Srivastav J, Mishra L, Mishra B. Alterations in TGF‐β signaling leads to high HMGA2 levels potentially through modulation of PJA1/SMAD3 in HCC cells. Genes Cancer. 2020;11(1–2):43‐52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Thuault S, Valcourt U, Petersen M, Manfioletti G, Heldin C‐H, Moustakas A. Transforming growth factor‐β employs HMGA2 to elicit epithelial–mesenchymal transition. J Cell Biol. 2006;174(2):175‐183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Hernandez S, Simoni‐Nieves A, Gerardo‐Ramírez M, et al. GDF11 restricts aberrant lipogenesis and changes in mitochondrial structure and function in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J Cell Physiol. 2021;236(5):4076‐4090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Frohlich J, Mazza T, Sobolewski C, Foti M, Vinciguerra M. GDF11 rapidly increases lipid accumulation in liver cancer cells through ALK5‐dependent signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2021;1866(6):158920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. German‐Ramirez N, Domínguez‐Gómez G, Simoni‐Nieves A, et al. Chemosensitizing effects of GDF11 in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Ann Hepatol. 2022;27:100634. [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Troy TC, Turksen K. Commitment of embryonic stem cells to an epidermal cell fate and differentiation in vitro. Dev Dyn. 2005;232(2):293‐300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Wang C, Ma C, Gong L, et al. Macrophage polarization and its role in liver disease. Front Immunol. 2021;5381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Escobedo‐Calvario A, Chávez‐Rodríguez L, Souza V, et al. The effect of growth differentiation factor 11 (GDF11) on the response of tumor‐associated macrophages in hepatocellular carcinoma derived cells. Ann Hepatol. 2022;27:100631. [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Ruzzenente A, Fassan M, Conci S, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma heterogeneity revealed by multigene mutational profiling: clinical and prognostic relevance in surgically resected patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1699‐1707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Banales JM, Cardinale V, Carpino G, et al. Expert consensus document: Cholangiocarcinoma: current knowledge and future perspectives consensus statement from the European network for the study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS‐CCA). Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(5):261‐280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Cambridge WA, Fairfield C, Powell JJ, et al. Meta‐analysis and meta‐regression of survival after liver transplantation for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2021;273(2):240‐250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Bertuccio P, Malvezzi M, Carioli G, et al. Global trends in mortality from intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2019;71(1):104‐114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Gao H, He Z, Gao C, et al. Exosome‐transmitted miR‐3124‐5p promotes cholangiocarcinoma development via targeting GDF11. Front Oncol. 2022;12:936507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Sinha M, Jang YC, Oh J, et al. Restoring systemic GDF11 levels reverses age‐related dysfunction in mouse skeletal muscle. Science. 2014;344(6184):649‐652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Roh JD, Hobson R, Chaudhari V, et al. Activin type II receptor signaling in cardiac aging and heart failure. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(482):eaau8680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Katsimpardi L, Litterman NK, Schein PA, et al. Vascular and neurogenic rejuvenation of the aging mouse brain by young systemic factors. Science. 2014;344(6184):630‐634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Zhang W, Guo Y, Li B, et al. GDF11 rejuvenates cerebrovascular structure and function in an animal model of Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;62(2):807‐819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Poggioli T, Vujic A, Yang P, et al. Circulating growth differentiation factor 11/8 levels decline with age. Circ Res. 2016;118(1):29‐37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Lin S, Zhong L, Chen J, et al. GDF11 inhibits adipogenesis of human adipose‐derived stromal cells through ALK5/KLF15/β‐catenin/PPARγ cascade. Heliyon. 2023;9:e13088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Katsimpardi L, Kuperwasser N, Camus C, et al. Systemic GDF11 stimulates the secretion of adiponectin and induces a calorie restriction‐like phenotype in aged mice. Aging Cell. 2020;19(1):e13038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES