Significance
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen, renowned for its ability to adapt to challenging conditions. In this study, we elucidated how the activity of a single gene orchestrates pathogenicity. To achieve this, we integrated systems-level transcriptomic, ribosome profiling, and proteomic data, along with virulence datasets from over 400 clinical isolates. Our investigation focuses on the post-transcriptional consequences of GidA-dependent carboxymethylaminomethyl modifications in specific transfer RNAs (tRNAs). Through this research, we demonstrate how alterations in tRNA modifications exert control over gene expression programs. Consequently, we shed light on mechanistic insights into how bacteria govern cellular proteomic shifts, leading to pathogenic and well-adapted physiological states. This finding opens up exciting opportunities for developing pathoblockers to combat life-threatening diseases caused by highly problematic pathogens.
Keywords: translation, riboseq, tRNA modification, epitranscriptomics, pathogenicity
Abstract
The success of bacterial pathogens depends on the coordinated expression of virulence determinants. Regulatory circuits that drive pathogenesis are complex, multilayered, and incompletely understood. Here, we reveal that alterations in tRNA modifications define pathogenic phenotypes in the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We demonstrate that the enzymatic activity of GidA leads to the introduction of a carboxymethylaminomethyl modification in selected tRNAs. Modifications at the wobble uridine base (cmnm5U34) of the anticodon drives translation of transcripts containing rare codons. Specifically, in P. aeruginosa the presence of GidA-dependent tRNA modifications modulates expression of genes encoding virulence regulators, leading to a cellular proteomic shift toward pathogenic and well-adapted physiological states. Our approach of profiling the consequences of chemical tRNA modifications is general in concept. It provides a paradigm of how environmentally driven tRNA modifications govern gene expression programs and regulate phenotypic outcomes responsible for bacterial adaption to challenging habitats prevailing in the host niche.
Comparative genomic approaches have enabled the identification of previously unknown determinants of bacterial pathogenicity and resulted in an impressive amount of data on candidate virulence genes (1, 2). However, even within single bacterial species, the pathogenic potential of different strains may vary substantially despite the fact that they share most, if not all genes (3). Likewise, it has been demonstrated for Pseudomonas aeruginosa that genes essential for pathogenicity of one strain are neither required nor predictive for the pathogenicity of others. Virulence of this important opportunistic pathogen is both multifactorial and combinatorial (4). A pool of pathogenicity-associated genes interacts in various combinations in different environments and genetic backgrounds, complicating the development of anti-virulence drugs as new options to combat problematic, often multi-drug resistant, pathogens.
A considerable diversity of mechanisms is found among bacteria to regulate expression of virulence genes in response to conditions prevailing in the host (5–7). Numerous conserved and species-specific regulatory proteins have been identified, including global transcriptional regulators of virulence networks such as those involved in inter-bacterial communication (quorum sensing) (8–11). In addition, advances in high-throughput sequencing have facilitated the identification of regulatory non-coding RNAs that added multiple layers of post-transcriptional control on virulence-related pathways (12–14). Furthermore, it has recently been discovered that tRNA modifications play important roles in the regulation of bacterial pathogenicity (15–18).
The decoding properties of tRNAs are influenced by posttranscriptional modifications particularly of the anticodon (at the wobble base position 34) and/or critical positions (e.g., position 37) of the anticodon-stem loop (19, 20). As most amino acids are encoded by two or up to six codons, codon choice can affect decoding specificity and thus modulate translation efficiency of selected genes (21). tRNA modifications have key roles in stress responses (22–24) Lack of modifications leads to complex pathologies in eukaryotes (25–33) and affect expression of virulence genes in prokaryotes (34–38). A prominent example of a bacterial tRNA modifying enzyme is GidA (MnmG), which acts in concert with MmnE to modify the anticodon wobble position in selected tRNAs of Escherichia coli (39). In P. aeruginosa, GidA was demonstrated to be involved in the regulation a major quorum sensing regulator (RhlR) (37, 40, 41), and more recently, it has been shown that GidA-dependent tRNA modification is crucial for oxidative stress response and biofilm formation (42). However, the influence of tRNA modifications on the regulatory circuits of pathogenicity mechanisms has not been fully elucidated for a wide array of bacterial infectious diseases.
In the present work, we quantified GidA-dependent tRNA modifications in total and purified tRNAs and integrated transcriptomic, ribosome profiling, and proteomic data to demonstrate the post-transcriptional consequences of the absence of carboxymethylaminomethyl (cnmn) modifications in selected tRNAs on the virulence of P. aeruginosa. Our results show that modulation of tRNA modification adds another layer of regulation in the transfer of information from DNA to protein and determines very complex phenotypes, such as bacterial pathogenicity.
Results
GidA Function in Host–Pathogen Interaction.
To study the function of GidA in P. aeruginosa pathogenicity, we employed a PA14 gidA transposon mutant (PA14 gidA::MrT7, tngidA) (43) and characterized its virulence-associated phenotypes in comparison to a reference strain bearing the same transposon, inserted in a non-functional gene (PA14 ladS::MrT7, tnladS) (44). First, we tested the pathogenic potential of the two strains by infecting larvae of the wax moth Galleria mellonella. The defense system of G. mellonella larvae shows functional similarities to the human innate immune system and has therefore been increasingly used as a surrogate to study host–pathogen interactions with a range of microorganisms (45–47). We found that the wild-type (WT) like reference strain tnladS killed 75% of the larvae within 48 h. In contrast, tngidA was almost avirulent. Complementing gidA (tngidA::gidA) in trans under control of a constitutive promoter led to increased mortality rates. More than 90% of the larvae were dead after 24 h (Fig. 1A), suggesting that GidA is essentially involved in the pathogenicity of P. aeruginosa.
Fig. 1.
GidA is essential for P. aeruginosa fitness and virulence in vivo and in vitro. (A), Galleria mellonella survival assay. Ten G. mellonella larvae per replicate were infected with 100 bacteria of the PA14 tngidA and the tnladS reference harboring the empty vector, and the tngidA mutant complemented with gidA on the pUCP20 vector in trans (tngidA::gidA). PBS served as a control. Dead larvae were counted at indicated time points following incubation of the larvae at 37 °C. Shown are mean values from triplicates. (B) Experimental design of the in vivo competition assay. A 1:1 mixture of overnight (O/N) grown tnladS reference and tngidA was used to inoculate LB medium (in vitro condition) and to infect BALB/c mice harboring a subcutaneous CT26 tumor (in vivo condition). Dilutions of the mixed LB-culture or homogenized CT26 tumors were plated on LB agar plates and colonies were subjected to colony PCR. (C) Ratios of tnladS/tngidA mutant colonies were calculated for in vivo (n = 9) and in vitro (n = 5) conditions. (D), Cytotoxicity of P. aeruginosa on RAW 264.7 cells. RAW cells were infected at a MOI of 1 for 4 h. PBS served as a negative control and 10% (v/v) Triton-X100 as killing control. Cell viability at each time point was determined by measuring the LDH activity in the supernatant, and expressed as a percentage of the activity in the killing control. Mean ± SD is displayed. ****P < 0.0001 in one-way ANOVA, with the post hoc Dunnett test.
To confirm this finding in an in vivo system that also involves an adaptive immune system, we tested the tngidA mutant in our established mouse tumor model (48). In this model, intravenously injected P. aeruginosa colonize solid tumors and form biofilms within the cancerous tissue. In this host niche, P. aeruginosa triggers a transcriptional response similar to that of P. aeruginosa cells in cystic fibrosis lungs (49). In pilot experiments, we observed that the tngidA and tnladS strain showed no difference in their ability to colonize mouse tumors. Thus, we proceeded with competition experiments. Tumor-bearing mice were infected with a 1:1 mixture of the tngidA and tnladS strains (Fig. 1B). A competitive disadvantage of the tngidA mutant was already apparent in the in vitro LB co-culture, with over 10-fold difference in the recovery of the tngidA mutant versus the tnladS strain. However, in vivo the effect was much more pronounced, with 80-fold more tnladS colonies recovered after infection compared to tngidA (Fig. 1C). In an in vitro model using a murine macrophage cell line (RAW 264.7), we also observed that tngidA was significantly less cytotoxic than the reference strain (Fig. 1D). Thus, inactivation of gidA severely interferes with the virulence and in vivo fitness of P. aeruginosa.
In vitro, the growth of tngidA was slightly affected (SI Appendix, Fig. S1A), corroborating earlier observations (37). In contrast, at late growth phase, the tngidA mutant displayed higher OD600 values (SI Appendix, Fig. S1A) and produced significantly more colony-forming units (CFU) than the reference strain (SI Appendix, Fig. S1B). The tngidA mutant was also affected in motility, namely twitching, swimming, and swarming (Fig. 2 A–C) Overexpression of gidA in trans did not fully restore motility. Interestingly, it was observed earlier that both ablation and forced overproduction of the tRNA-modifying enzyme MiaA induced proteome changes in E. coli due to stimulated translational frameshifting (50). The two RhlR-regulated virulence factors, pyocyanin and rhamnolipid, were produced at lower amounts in the tngidA mutant (Fig. 2 D and E). The latter effect was expected, as GidA is known to impact the expression of RhlR, which upon binding of its cognate autoinduced butanoyl-homoserine lactone (C4-HSL), controls expression of quorum sensing genes (37).
Fig. 2.
Phenotypic characterization of the PA14 tngidA mutant. Motility of the tngidA (■), tnladS (●), and complemented tngidA (▲). (A) Twitching area measured after 48 h (n = 16, from three independent biological replicates). (B) Swimming area measured after 48 h on 0.3% agar BM2 medium (n = 36, from three independent biological replicates). (C) Swarming area measured after 24 h on 0.5% agar BM2 medium (n = 16, from three independent biological replicates). Images are representative of one replicate from each experiment. Mean ± SD is displayed. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 in one-way ANOVA (with the post hoc Dunnett test). (D) Pyocyanin and (E) rhamnolipid concentration normalized to OD600 were measured. (F) Biofilm images were taken after 48 h incubation by confocal microscopy using the LIVE/DEAD staining kit (BacLight Bacterial Viability kit, Molecular Probes/Invitrogen). Living (green) and dead (red) cells are visualized using the IMARIS software package (version 5.7.2, Bitplane). The central image shows the top view; Lower and Right images display the side view of the biofilm. Representative images (image section of 290.63 µm × 290.63 µm) for each strain are depicted. (G) Biofilms were grown for 24 h in microtiter plates and subjected for additional 24 h to ciprofloxacin at the indicated concentrations. The responsiveness toward the antibiotic was monitored by determining the CFU. Ctrl: control without antibiotic treatment; IsoP: isopropanol treatment; dotted gray line corresponds to the detection limit (CFU ≤ 100 cells/mL). Data are mean ± SD (n = 3). ****P < 0.0001 in two-way ANOVA (with post-hoc test Tukey). (H) GidA protein expression was determined by targeted LC–MS/MS based single reaction monitoring (SRM) analysis following growth of PA14 tnladS cells under different culture conditions. The tngidA mutant and the gidA overexpressing strain (PA14 tngidA::gidA) were grown in LB for 7.5 h. Data are mean (horizontal line) ± SD (n = 3 for conditions and n = 2 for control samples). * indicates significantly altered values with a P-value ≤ 0.05 and *** indicates P-value ≤ 0.001 as determined by Student’s t test.
Confocal microscopy imaging of live/dead stained biofilms showed that disruption of gidA altered the structure of P. aeruginosa biofilms, resulting in more dead bacteria at the bottom of the biofilm (Fig. 2F). More importantly, the quinolone antibiotic ciprofloxacin was markedly more effective against tngidA biofilms compared to the control or the complemented strain (Fig. 2G).
Finally, we determined the protein expression level of GidA under various culture conditions (Fig. 2H). Expression levels were stable during exponential and early stationary growth phases, while they significantly decreased at late stationary phase. No significant GidA protein level changes were observed under various types of environmental stress. Thus, GidA protein levels are subject to a dynamic expression throughout the growth phases.
Identification of P. aeruginosa GidA-Dependent tRNA Modifications by Multiple Reaction Monitoring.
In E. coli, the GidA homologue targets six tRNAs harboring a uridine at the wobble position (U34) of the anticodon: tRNALysUUU, tRNAGluUUC tRNAGlnUUG, tRNALeuUAA tRNAArgUCU, and tRNAGlyUCC (51). We therefore investigated GidA-dependent alterations of tRNA modifications in P. aeruginosa using a targeted LC–MS-based multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) approach. The total RNA fraction was isolated from tngidA and tnladS, enriched for small RNAs and digested to single nucleotides. The relative quantities of modified uridines were then quantified using chemically synthesized modified uridines as a reference (Fig. 3A and SI Appendix, Table S1). This confirmed that GidA is required for addition of the cmnm modifications to uridine, since inactivation of gidA resulted in a marked loss of cmnm5U and the related modifications mnm5U and mnm5s2U (Fig. 3B). Of note, modified uridine s2U was significantly increased in the gidA-deficient mutant (Fig. 3B), as previously observed for E. coli and P. aeruginosa (42, 52). Expression of gidA in trans in P. aeruginosa tngidA restored cmnm5U residues almost to levels of the reference strain (Fig. 3B).
Fig. 3.

Targeted LC–MS/MS based quantification of modified tRNA uridine derivatives and characterization of their impact on translation efficiency. (A) Schematic overview of the workflow for LC–MS/MS-based quantification of modified uridines. (B) The quantities of modified ribonucleosides shown as modification per 1,000 nucleosides were quantified for the PA14 tngidA (■) and the tnladS (●) (both harboring the pUCP20 empty vector), and the tngidA complemented (tngidA::gidA,▲). s2U = 2-thiouridine, mnm5U = 5-methylaminomethyluridine, mnm5s2U = 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridine, cmnm5U = 5-carboxymethylaminomethyluridine. The dotted red line corresponds to a value < lower limit of quantification (LLOQ). (C) Quantities of GidA-dependent modifications in tRNAGlnUUG, tRNAGlyUCC, and tRNAArgUCU from PA14 tnladS. The quantities of modified ribonucleosides for each individual tRNA were analyzed by MRM external standard calibration. The modification level (modified ribonucleoside (fmol] × number of parent ribonucleoside in tRNA sequence/parent ribonucleoside [fmol] + detected modified ribonucleosides that descends from the respective parent nucleosides [fmol]) was determined according to Grobe et al. (53).
We next measured the level of GidA-dependent cmnm modifications of uridines in single tRNAs. We purified three individual tRNAs (tRNAGlnUUG, tRNAArgUCU, and tRNAGlyUCC) from the small RNA-enriched fraction of total RNA using complementary DNA oligonucleotides attached to magnetic beads. GidA-dependent modifications of purified tRNAs were quantified using a LC–MS-based MRM approach with external standard calibration and synthetic standard as references. In all three tRNAs, cmnm modification of uridines was detected following their isolation from the PA14 tnladS. Thereby, the GidA-dependent wobble modification mnm5s2U was identified as the final derivative in tRNAGlnUUG and tRNAArgUCU, whereas, in tRNAGlyUCC, cmnm5U was the dominant derivative in addition to low levels of mnm5s2U (Fig. 3C). We could also show that the GidA-dependent cmnm5U, mnm5s2U and the related s2U derivatives were absent in tRNAGlnUUG and tRNAGlyUCC isolated from tngidA, while the level of the other modifications was the same as compared to tnladS (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 A and B).
GidA Modulates Translation Efficiency at Selected Codons.
Based on work in E. coli (51) and our finding that GidA is responsible for the posttranscriptional modification of uridines at the wobble U34 position of selected tRNAs, we hypothesized that the decoding properties of the respective tRNAs would be affected in the absence of these modifications. To test this hypothesis, we first ensured that the lack of modifications does not affect the tRNA abundance (e.g., because of a changed tRNA half-life). To this end, we quantified the native tRNAs from our control and tngidA strains using the Nano-tRNA-seq method (54). We found that our biological replicates had low variability (SI Appendix, Fig. S3). Notably, the tRNA levels were similar between both strains (Fig. 4A), suggesting that the lack of modification does not alter the abundance of tRNAs (55, 56). We then constructed reporter plasmids that encoded consecutive stretches of four arginine, glycine, or leucine codons directly after the start codon and in frame of the GFP gene (Fig. 4B). To explore the impact of U34 modifications, we used synonymous codons relying on either wobble base pairing (U-G) or a Watson and Crick (U-A) interaction at this position (Fig. 4C). Codons involving U-A pairing, namely Arg AGA, Gly GGA, and Leu UUA, led to a significantly lower fluorescence produced in the tngidA strain (Fig. 4D). Complementation of the gidA mutation restored GFP levels or in some cases produced higher GFP signals (Fig. 2H). In contrast, in reporters where the U34 of the anticodon needs to establish a wobble interaction with guanosine, the effects were either weaker (Arg AGG, Gly GGG), or no variation of fluorescence was detected (Leu UUG). We also designed reporters harboring combinations of either different gidA-dependent codons (AGA, GGA) or of different gidA-independent codons (CGU, GGU), which showed a reduced or unchanged translation efficiency in the tngidA mutant, respectively (Fig. 4D). Furthermore, a combination of all six codons that are decoded by tRNAs harboring a modified U34 in E. coli (e.g., the AGA-GGA-UUA-AGG-GGG-UUG stretch) revealed an overall reduced translation efficiency in the tngidA mutant, albeit to a lower extent compared to stretches composed solely of the arginine AGA and leucine UUA codons (Fig. 4D). Together, our findings establish the GidA-dependent impact on translation efficiency of specific codons.
Fig. 4.

GidA modulates translation efficiency at selected codons. (A) Volcano plot depicting tRNA abundance in the tngidA strain compared to the control tnladS strain. We determined significance as an adjusted log10 P < 0.01 and an absolute log2-fold change greater than ±0.6 (gray lines on the x and y axes, respectively). (B) Schematic overview of GFP-based reporter on the IPTG-inducible pME6032 vector with AGA as exemplary GidA-dependent codon. The reporters were introduced in trans into PA14 tngidA, the tnladS reference strain and the complemented tngidA mutant harboring gidA on the pUCP20 plasmid. GFP expression was normalized to the OD600 value. (C) Schematic overview of the analyzed codons with the corresponding tRNA isoacceptor and the anticodon-codon binding with either on a Watson–Crick interaction (A-U) or a wobble interaction (G-U). (D) Translation efficiency of four consecutive arginine, glycine, or leucine codons as well as a selection of mixed codons are depicted. Mean ± SD of three biological replicates are shown, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA (with the post hoc Dunnett test).
Post-Transcriptional Regulatory Impact of GidA.
Since we observed that the absence of gidA affects the translation of AGA and UUA codons (Fig. 4D), we used ribosome profiling (RiboSeq) to shed light on the global effect of GidA across all translated transcripts (also named “translatome”) (57). We inferred the position of actively translating ribosomes through deep-sequencing of ribosome-protected mRNA footprints (RPF) generated by nucleolytic digestion of ribosome-mRNA complexes (58). A multidimensional scaling analysis (MDS), allowing clustering of the samples based on pairwise distances between the top 500 genes (Fig. 5 A, Left), revealed a low variability between biological replicates. Furthermore, the RiboSeq profiles were clearly different from RNASeq profiles (dimension 1, X-axis), which were recorded under the same culture conditions, thus highlighting differences between translational and transcriptional programs. The difference between the tngidA and the tnladS strains was best captured by their translatomes (dimension 2, y-axis).
Fig. 5.
Decreased ribosome occupancy at AGA codons in P. aeruginosa tngidA. (A) Left: MDS plot indicates a stronger difference between tngidA and tnladS in RPFs (read length 25 to 42) than in RNAseq data. Right: Codon enrichment (codon presence versus absence) in transcript groups with higher or lower translation efficiency (the ratio of ribosome footprints to mRNA), respectively in the tngidA mutant compared to tnladS. Translation efficiency was computed for each transcript in the tngidA and tnladS strains and the top 25% genes whose log2 fold change was higher in the tngidA vs. tnladS (translation efficiency tngidA > tnladS, in gray) and vice versa (translation efficiency tnladS > tngidA, in blue) were selected. The codon enrichment factor (y axis) of each of the two gene groups was quantified as the ratio of transcripts containing a specific codon as compared to those lacking that codon (enrichment factor). Significance was determined using hypergeometric testing. Codons with a codon enrichment score < 1.01 are not shown (Materials and Methods). AGA and UUA also had the strongest enrichment in an independent repetition experiment. Asterisks indicate Benjamini and Hochberg adjusted P values: *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001. (B) Average ribosome occupancy plot (Left) of genes aligned at their stop codons (UAA, UAG, UGA) using the 3′-assignment (A site) of 40 and 41 nt long reads from P. aeruginosa. The barplot (Right) illustrates the decrease in periodicity after the stop codon. For the region from −50 nt to the stop codon (including the stop codon), the reads are mainly on the first frame (mean value), which applies for all replicates (staged barplots). This effect disappears from nt 1 to 50 after the stop codon. (C) Same as B using centered proline codons (CCC, CCG, CCT, CCA). (D) Changes in ribosome occupancy at nt position 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21 up- and downstream of AGA, UUA, CGU, and UUG codons. Each point represents the ribosome occupancy (y axis, log2) of a single codon in tngidA (cyan) and tnladS (cyan). 1 to 3 denote different replicate with its median (horizontal red/cyan line) and mean values (black points); the black horizontal line represents the mean for each codon and mutant strain group. The P values were calculated comparing the region up- and downstream of each codon. (E) Left: position of AGA (blue) and UUA (orange) codons within genes (%) of P. aeruginosa UCBPP-PA14. UUA codons accumulated at close proximity (up to 10 codons distance) of the start codons of core genes, AGA codons—at close proximity to start and stop codons, with mainly three codons distance to stop codons (see inserted plot). Right: AGA codons with up to 10 codons distance from start/stop codons. The VENN diagram indicates that AGA codons are either with high proximity to the start (228 AGA codons) or stop codon (100 AGA codons) of genes only six transcripts are with both.
We next computed the translation efficiency (TE, i.e., the ratio of ribosomal footprints/mRNA, also referred to as ribosome density) for each transcript in tngidA and compared it to tnladS by computing a codon enrichment factor (Fig. 5 A, Right). In agreement with our translational reporter approach (Fig. 4), genes containing one or more UUA or AGA exhibited an overall reduced TE. We noted that the TE of transcripts containing ACA codons also decreased. Importantly, we observed no variation of TE at isoencoders UUG and AGG codons, indicating that this effect is independent of the amino acid encoded but instead depends on the nature of the cognate tRNA. We also observed that the genes containing one or more GUU, AAA, AAU, and AAG codons showed a higher TE. The decreased (ACA) or increased (GUU, AAA, AAU, and AAG) codon-dependent variation of TE was not due to altered tRNA abundance (Fig. 4A) and therefore could be the result of global variations in the translational program (Fig. 5 A, Left) in the absence of GidA-dependent modifications affecting translation of UUA and AGA codons.
To explore the impact of tRNA modifications on translation in the tngidA mutant further, we compared the ribosome occupancy at each codon. The ribosome occupancy at a codon in the ribosomal A site (that is, the site accepting aminoacyl-tRNAs) is inversely proportional to the codon’s translational speed (59, 60). Therefore, in order to measure ribosome occupancy with single codon precision, we first calibrated the RPFs at the ribosomal A site, inferring the position of the A-site codon for each RPF, using the 3′end of the reads as established previously for bacterial RPFs (61). We considered 2,233 transcripts that passed our quality control criteria (Materials and Methods) and aligned them at their stop codons (UAA, UAG, UGA), resulting in a defined peak at the stop codon (position 0, Fig. 5 B, Left). We also observed a well-defined 3-nucleotide (nt) periodicity across the coding sequences followed by a loss of periodicity and a ribosome occupancy decline downstream of the stop codon (after position +25, Fig. 5B)—both features of genuine translation. We observed higher ribosome occupancy at proline codons (CCA, CCU, CCG, and CCC; Fig. 5 C, Left), corroborating commonly observed stalling at these codons (62, 63). As expected, these sites did not result in a drop of periodicity (Fig. 5 C, Right).
Overall, our analyses did not show a detectable variation of the ribosome occupancy at GidA-dependent codons (SI Appendix, Fig. S4 A and B). However, we rationalized that our analysis does not account for translation abortion events following the codons analyzed (64). To explore this, we assessed the ribosome occupancy in the flanking regions, i.e., downstream and upstream of the codons of interest (A site calibrated at ± 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21 nt distance, SI Appendix, Fig. S4 C and D). In the absence of U34 modification of the cognate tRNA (tngidA strain), the ribosome occupancy downstream of a single codon, the AGA codon, decreased markedly, indicative of ribosomal drop-off and aborted translation (Fig. 5D). We did not observe a tngidA dependent drop off after UUA codons, but rather an increased ribosome occupancy in both the tngidA and the tnladS strains. Of note, AGA and UUA are both rare codons, occurring only 1,101 and 763 times, corresponding to a genome-wide frequency of 0.6 and 0.4 per 1,000 codons, respectively. Furthermore, we performed the same analysis on all codons (SI Appendix, Fig. S4 C and D). The leucine UUG codon has been defined as target of the GidA homologue (MnmG) in E. coli. However, its translation was not affected in our GFP reporter assay (Fig. 4C), nor did we observe any differences in ribosome occupancy up- or downstream of the UUG codon. Surprisingly, we detected an increased ribosome occupancy at isoleucine AUA codons in tngidA (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 C and D). In E. coli, rare AGA codons have been reported to accumulate at the beginning of crucial genes (65). Likewise, AGA and, to a lesser extent, UUA codons clustered at the beginning of genes in P. aeruginosa PA14 (Fig. 5E). We also noted an accumulation of AGA codons preceding stop codons, with the highest prevalence at position −3 codons. These phenomena occur in core genes and do not apply to accessory genes. This observation may signify a form of codon usage fine-tuning to regulate protein production within the specific context of the translation machinery in P. aeruginosa. Furthermore, AGA codons appear either in close proximity to start or to stop codons, (Fig. 5E, VENN diagram). Of note, six genes with AGA codons located close to the start and/or stop codon, belong to the PseudoCAP function “Motility & Attachment” (P value ≤ 0.05). Together, our data suggest that impaired GidA-dependent modifications cause translation aberrancies preferably at AGA and not at UUA codons. The higher clustering of AGA codons and their higher usage than the UUA codon, might be the reason for the detectable global effects only at AGA codons.
Impact of GidA on Protein Expression.
To determine the consequences of GidA-dependent tRNA modifications on protein composition, we employed the stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) approach (66). This proteomic technique detected and quantified in total 2,334 proteins, of which 1,348 proteins were shared among all three replicates of the tnladS and tngidA mutants. Of these, 227 proteins were upregulated, and 628 proteins downregulated in tngidA versus tnladS (Fig. 6, FC ≤0.83 or ≥1.2 and FDR ≤ 0.05). Virulence and motility associated proteins were significantly less abundant in GidA-deficient cells. These included transport of small molecules, secreted factors (toxins, enzymes, and alginate), chemotaxis, and two component regulatory systems (Fig. 6A and Dataset S1). Additionally, the virulence and quorum sensing–related transcriptional regulators RhlR and LasR were downregulated in the tngidA mutant. Highly abundant proteins in the tngidA mutant strain were enriched for functional categories involved in basic cellular functions, such as transcription and translation (i.e. FDR ≤ 0.05). Of note, the latter two categories and the secreted factors were also enriched in the transcriptome (Fig. 6B). Chaperones and genes belonging to the biosynthesis of cofactors were up-regulated in the transcriptome only, whereas genes belonging to carbon compound catabolism were down-regulated.
Fig. 6.

GidA-dependent global changes of protein and mRNA levels in P. aeruginosa. Volcano plots depicting the fold changes in protein (A) and mRNA (B) levels, comparing the PA14 tngidA mutant and the tnladS reference strain (n = 3). Proteins were considered differentially regulated at a ratio of tngidA/tnladS ≤ 0.83 or ≥1.2 (vertical lines) and Student’s t test P adjusted ≤ 0.05 (horizontal line). Transcripts were considered differentially regulated at a ratio of tngidA/tnladS ≤ 2 or ≥2 (vertical lines) and P adj. ≤ 0.05 (horizontal line). Functional PseudoCAP categories, significantly overrepresented in the group of differentially regulated proteins, are highlighted. Downregulated proteins were enriched in Chemotaxis, TwoComp (Two component regulatory systems), and SmallTrans (Transport of small molecules). Transcripts belonging to the enriched functions TranslEtc (translation, post-translational modification, degradation) and TranscRNA (transcription, RNA processing, and degradation) were upregulated in both, protein and transcript data, Secreted (secreted factors) genes were downregulated. The remaining enriched functions were only significant for the upregulated mRNAs (CCatab, ChapHsp, and cofactor). (C) Codon enrichment at gene groups level in proteome versus mRNA. Codon enrichment in protein groups with higher or lower protein versus mRNA levels, respectively in the tngidA mutant compared to tnladS strains. We generated lists of the top 25% genes with log twofold change of protein versus mRNA level higher in the tngidA vs. tnladS (tngidA > tnladS, in gray) and vice versa (tnladS > tngidA, in blue). The codon enrichment factor (y axis) is the ratio of genes containing a specific codon as compared to genes lacking that codon (enrichment factor). Significance was determined using hypergeometric testing. Codons with a codon enrichment score < 1.01 are not shown (Materials and Methods). AGA and UUA also had the strongest enrichment in an independent repetition experiment. Asterisks indicate Benjamini and Hochberg adjusted P values: *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001.
To evaluate the role of specific codons, we considered the codon usage in the CDS of the proteins which were differentially expressed in the tngidA and calculated an enrichment score (i.e. codon presence versus absence, Fig. 6C). We reasoned that codons that are abundant in proteins with a high protein-transcript-ratio (PTR, high translation efficiency: Enrichment score >1) would be less frequent in genes with a low PTR (low translation efficiency: enrichment score < 1), and vice versa. Indeed, the codons UUA, UCU, and AGA have an enrichment score > 1 for genes with a low PTR and an enrichment score of <1 for genes with a high PTR. However, this trend was not statistically significant.
In conclusion, our results support the notion that protein levels are modulated by the codon usage and the levels of modified tRNAs in the cell.
Importance of gidA Gene Expression for the Virulence Phenotype of Clinical P. aeruginosa Isolates.
We previously described that the virulence phenotype of 414 P. aeruginosa clinical isolates varies considerably in the G. mellonella (67). Given the strong impact of GidA on P. aeruginosa virulence in two in vivo models used in this study (Fig. 1), we evaluated whether variations in gidA expression levels (Fig. 7A) could explain differences in pathogenicity (Fig. 7B) (57). We built on previous work and took advantage of extensive transcriptome data that have been recorded for the 414 clinical isolates in early stationary phase (68, 69) and correlated gidA gene expression values with the virulence phenotype. Clearly, the clinical isolates that expressed low levels of gidA were generally more virulent (Fig. 7C), indicating that low gidA expression during early stationary growth phase is associated with higher pathogenicity. In light of our finding that the GidA protein is constitutively expressed throughout exponential growth and early stationary phase, but downregulated in late stationary growth (Fig. 2H), we analyzed gidA expression during the course of a G. mellonella infection. As depicted in Fig. 7D, gidA expression remained stable within the first 16 h of the larvae infection, but experienced a downshift after 18 h, suggesting that a dynamic expression, from a high expression in early infection to a downregulation at later time points, is important for the full pathogenicity phenotype.
Fig. 7.

Importance of gidA expression on the virulence phenotype of clinical P. aeruginosa isolates. (A) Expression level of gidA in the transcriptome of 414 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa isolates (OD 2 in LB) were sorted in ascending order. Gene expression was normalized (using trimmed mean of M-values and counts per million from the R package edgeR). (B) Survival rates of infected G. mellonella larvae 48 h pi (67). Clinical isolates marked in red correspond to virulent isolates (0 to 24% survival), isolates marked in blue correspond to intermediate virulent isolates (25 to 74% survival) and avirulent isolates are shown in green (75 to 100% survival). (C) The G. mellonella survival rates of those 100 clinical isolates, which expressed gidA at the highest and the lowest levels, respectively, are depicted. (D) Transcriptional activity of gidA ex vivo (after G. mellonella infection) measured by qRT-PCR relative to three housekeeping genes (PA14_07700, PA14_55650 and PA14_56080). Asterisks indicate P values as determined by the Mann–Whitney test: *P value ≤ 0.05.
In conclusion, our data indicate that not only the presence but also the dynamics in expression of gidA might be important for the establishment of the full P. aeruginosa pathogenicity. During early stages of infections, GidA seems to drive virulence factor production, while its downregulation at later stages facilitates translation of genes that are essential for bacterial survival and maintenance of infection.
Discussion
The outrageous severity of acute infections, the increasing threat of multi-drug resistant isolates, and the recalcitrance of chronic biofilm-associated infections drives morbidity and determines mortality in the affected patients. In light of antibiotic refractory infections and non-sufficient effector mechanisms of the host immune system, the development of rational strategies to treat P. aeruginosa infections is urgently needed. Understanding the virulence mechanisms and their regulatory cascades is crucial in this context.
P. aeruginosa pathogenicity is multifactorial and affected by the conditional expression of a plethora of virulence genes. This presents a challenge to our efforts to pinpoint the most relevant virulence factors and, as a result, to search for innovative anti-virulence targets (pathoblockers). In this study, we highlight the essential role of gidA for P. aeruginosa pathogenicity in two in vivo model systems, thus corroborating previous observations on the impact of GidA on bacterial pathogenicity (34–38, 42). We found that the GidA-activated gene set is essential for the orchestration of the production of virulence determinants, cytotoxicity toward macrophages, biofilm recalcitrance, motility, and the adaptation to the stressful environment within the eukaryotic host. The gidA gene expression levels correlates with clinical isolates’ virulence in G. mellonella, underscoring the dominant contribution of gidA in determining pathogenicity and thus its importance as a promising pathoblocker target. However, since GidA is highly structurally homologous to the human mitochondrial enzyme MTO1, with relatively modest homology at the amino acid level (46.8%), further structural, functional, and medicinal chemistry studies are needed to ensure the specificity of putative novel antibacterial compounds.
Post-transcriptional chemical modifications are key modulators of tRNA decoding properties. Dependent on their specific modification and position in the tRNA molecule, they can have different effects. While modifications in the tRNA body mainly affect tRNA stability, tRNA modifications in the anticodon and anticodon loop influence both decoding efficiency and accuracy (20, 70, 71). Thus, synonymous codon choice greatly affects translation efficiency and influences protein levels hence the function of a gene (30, 72, 73). The codon bias and the impact of U34 tRNA modifications have been extensively studied in eukaryotic cells (20, 31, 33, 60, 72, 74, 75). Mounting evidence places hypomodified tRNAs and changes in tRNA abundance more centrally in establishment and progression of human pathologies, such as cancer, diabetes, and neurological disorders (30–33, 74, 76–78). In contrast, there have been limited attempts to unravel the link between tRNA modifications and bacterial phenotypes via their tuning effects on gene expression (79, 80).
Our approach, which combines mass spectrometry to identify tRNA modification and the use of translational reporter fusions, with cell-wide approaches to analyze codon usage and gene expression (i.e., measurement of translation with codon precision by ribosome profiling and quantification of mRNA and protein levels by RNA-Seq and proteomics, respectively), led to the finding that GidA alters the translation efficiency at selected P. aeruginosa codons. As a result, proteins that are enriched with gidA-dependent codons, such as AGA and UUA, are significantly less abundant in the proteome of the gidA-deficient cells. Among them were many virulence- and motility-associated proteins.
We did not observe any increase of ribosome occupancy at AGA or UUA positions in the absence of GidA. The low codon usage of these codons may mask the effect on translatome-wide scale. However, we observed a ribosomal drop-off at AGA codons. We further show that AGA codons are located mainly in the downstream vicinity of start and upstream of stop codons. AGA codons in the start codon vicinity could trigger an early abortion of translation and a resource-saving mechanism. It has been described that translation termination fidelity requires a ribosomal slow-down upstream of the stop and that sequence context in the close proximity of the native stop codons defines the fidelity of termination (81). Specifically, codons encoding for bulky positively charged amino acids, such as arginine, are preferred at positions −2 upstream of the stop codon (82). An improper decoding of AGA at such impactful position may impair translation termination and consequently lead to C-terminally extended aberrant proteins.
We observed a modest decrease in ribosome occupancy of UUA containing mRNA, but no gidA-dependent changes in ribosome occupancy at the codon level. We also did not observe a drop off after UUA codons. This could be explained by the much lower abundance of UUA codons and consequently compared to AGA their lower enrichment in regions crucial for translation. Nevertheless, we observed a lower abundance of proteins enriched in UUA codons. Lack of posttranslational tRNA modifications fails to maintain a proper reading frame and triggers frameshifting (83). Since we cannot detect this in the RiboSeq data, we cannot exclude the possibility that frameshifting contributes to the production of aberrant proteins.
Overall, our results suggest that although both codons, AGA and UUA, rely on GidA for translation, the transcript outcome varies considerably depending on the codon identity and its position in the genome. In the same line, the magnitude of ribosome stalling triggered by hypomodified tRNAs differs between organisms. For example, loss of mcm5U34 or ncm5U34 modification had minor effects in yeast both during normal growth and when exposed to stress but exhibited much larger effects in nematodes (32). The effects of subtle ribosome stalling may be amplified by additional species-specific factors, such as tRNA abundance, mRNA structure, or genomic background. This obviously includes the uneven distribution of AGA and UUA codons, which was also previously described for E. coli (65). In this context, it is interesting to note that the unequal codon distribution at the beginning and at the end of the genes is mainly found in the P. aeruginosa core genes and to a much lesser extent in the horizontally acquired genes of the P. aeruginosa accessory genome. This implicates a fine-tuned post-transcriptional control of gene expression based on the species-specific use of rare codons, whose decoding depends on the activity of gidA, which itself is subject to regulation.
We show that the GidA enzyme is stably expressed across a number of different environmental conditions, while we observed a down-shift in its expression levels during stationary growth. We also found a stable high gidA gene expression during early phases of a G. mellonella infection. While this may drive the establishment of the infection via a positive impact on virulence factor production, the downregulation of gidA at later stages might facilitate translation of genes that are essential for bacterial survival and thus maintenance of the infection. In this context, it is interesting to note that we found a significant correlation of low gidA levels in in vitro stationary phase cultures of clinical isolates with a high G. mellonella killing activity. This indicates that especially the down-shift of gidA expression levels at later stages plays a key role in determining the pathogenicity potential. This appears to vary among clinical isolates, raising the possibility of evolving the pathogenicity capacities by dynamically changing GidA levels.
Taken together, our study outlines emerging mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation that involves modulation of tRNA modifications to alter expression of drivers of bacterial pathogenicity in a codon-biased fashion. We found that tRNA modifications that impact decoding of specific codons directly modulate the expression efficiency of target transcripts which are enriched for those codons. Of note, we have focused on GidA-mediated P. aeruginosa phenotypes. However, our approach of profiling the consequences of chemical tRNA modifications is wide-reaching for others yet uncharacterized tRNA modifications in P. aeruginosa and in other bacterial species. Studies on how we can interfere with bacterial adaptation to the host niche will continue to be of importance, as misuse of valuable antibiotics has resulted in increased levels of resistance, a major global health issue. Targeting the GidA-orchestrated molecular pathways that drive disease outcome might provide a unique opportunity to spur clinical pipelines for development of innovative treatment options and alternative antimicrobial therapies.
Materials and Methods
Detailed information on the materials and methods used for bacterial culture conditions, motility, G. mellonella virulence, biofilm formation, antibiotic susceptibility testing, and cytotoxicity assays can be found in SI Appendix. Protocols for our transcriptional, proteomic, nano-tRNA-seq, and ribosome profiling experiments are also provided as well as the methods describing LC–MS analysis for the quantification of total or purified individual tRNAs modifications. Methods for the quantification of GidA protein (by multiple reaction monitoring) and gidA (by ex vivo RT-PCR) can be found as well as the description of assays to measure translation efficiency.
Supplementary Material
Appendix 01 (PDF)
Dataset S01 (XLSX)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by an ERC Consolidator Grant (COMBAT 724290 to S.H.), a HIRI (Helmholtz Institute of RNA-Based Infection Research, Würzburg, Germany) seed grant (Project-No 24) through funds from the Bavarian Ministry of Economic Affairs and Media, Energy, and Technology (grant allocation numbers 0703/68674/5/2017 and 0703/89374/3/2017) (to S.H. and C.M.S.), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) grant Sh580/7-1 and 7.2 within the priority program SPP2002 (to C.M.S.) the DFG grant (RA3259/2-1) (to Z.I.), and the Hamburg Innovation grant C4T635 (to Z.I.). Furthermore, S.H. received funding from the DFG in the DFG SPP 1879 program, under Germany’s Excellence Strategy – EXC 2155 “RESIST”—Project ID 390874280, from the Lower Saxony Ministry for Science and Culture (BacData ZN3428), and from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF 18OC0033946). Many thanks go to Sandy Pernitzsch and Ann-Janine Imsiecke for help on ribosome profiling protocols and Annette Garbe and Anna-Lena Hagemann for LC–MS/MS analyses. We furthermore thank Jörg Vogel (HIRI Würzburg) for fruitful discussions and Stephan Hemri from the Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss at Zurich-Airport in Switzerland for helpful advice in statistical analyses regarding the ribosomal footprints. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author contributions
S.W., V.K., A.P., Z.I., and S.H. designed research; J.K., M.P., N.O.G., Y.N.F., S.D., A.L., A.K., S.G., M.M., D.P.D., and S.L.S. performed research; S.W., V.K., A.P., C.M.S., and Z.I. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; J.K., M.P., N.O.G., Y.N.F., S.D., A.L., A.K., S.G., M.M., D.P.D., S.L.S., S.W., V.K., A.P., C.M.S., and Z.I. analyzed data; and J.K., M.P., N.O.G., Z.I., and S.H. wrote the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Footnotes
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Contributor Information
Zoya Ignatova, Email: zoya.ignatova@uni-hamburg.de.
Susanne Häussler, Email: susanne.haeussler@helmholtz-hzi.de.
Data, Materials, and Software Availability
RNA-seq, Nano-tRNAseq, Scripts used for base calling, alignment, and subsequent processing steps data have been deposited in NCBI GEO database (GSE149306) (57), European Nucleotide Archive (PRJEB69610) (55); GitHub (https://github.com/DepledgeLab/tRNA-studies) (56), respectively.
Supporting Information
References
- 1.Sassetti C., Rubin E. J., Genomic analyses of microbial virulence. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 5, 27–32 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Salama N. R., Falkow S., Genomic clues for defining bacterial pathogenicity. Microbes Infect. 1, 615–619 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Griswold A., Genetic origins of microbial virulence. Nat. Educ. 1, 81 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lee D. G., et al. , Genomic analysis reveals that Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence is combinatorial. Genome Biol. 7, R90 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mekalanos J. J., Environmental signals controlling expression of virulence determinants in bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 174, 1–7 (1992). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Buckner M. M., Finlay B. B., Host-microbe interaction: Innate immunity cues virulence. Nature 472, 179–180 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Croxen M. A., Finlay B. B., Molecular mechanisms of Escherichia coli pathogenicity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 26–38 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bassler B. L., Losick R., Bacterially speaking. Cell 125, 237–246 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Whiteley M., Diggle S. P., Greenberg E. P., Progress in and promise of bacterial quorum sensing research. Nature 551, 313–320 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schulz S., et al. , Elucidation of sigma factor-associated networks in Pseudomonas aeruginosa reveals a modular architecture with limited and function-specific crosstalk. PLoS Pathog. 11, e1004744 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Antunes L. C., et al. , Quorum sensing in bacterial virulence. Microbiology 156, 2271–2282 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Waters L. S., Storz G., Regulatory RNAs in bacteria. Cell 136, 615–628 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Papenfort K., Vogel J., Small RNA functions in carbon metabolism and virulence of enteric pathogens. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 4, 91 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gottesman S., Storz G., Bacterial small RNA regulators: Versatile roles and rapidly evolving variations. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3, a003798 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pollo-Oliveira L., de Crecy-Lagard V., Can protein expression be regulated by modulation of tRNA modification profiles? Biochemistry 58, 355–362 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chionh Y. H., et al. , tRNA-mediated codon-biased translation in mycobacterial hypoxic persistence. Nat. Commun. 7, 13302 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Aubee J. I., Olu M., Thompson K. M., The i6A37 tRNA modification is essential for proper decoding of UUX-Leucine codons during rpoS and iraP translation. RNA 22, 729–742 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Aubee J. I., Olu M., Thompson K. M., TrmL and TusA are necessary for rpoS and MiaA is required for hfq expression in Escherichia coli. Biomolecules 7, 39 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Krutyholowa R., Zakrzewski K., Glatt S., Charging the code—tRNA modification complexes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 55, 138–146 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kirchner S., Ignatova Z., Emerging roles of tRNA in adaptive translation, signalling dynamics and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 98–112 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Endres L., Dedon P. C., Begley T. J., Codon-biased translation can be regulated by wobble-base tRNA modification systems during cellular stress responses. RNA Biol. 12, 603–614 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dewe J. M., et al. , TRMT1-catalyzed tRNA modifications are required for redox homeostasis to ensure proper cellular proliferation and oxidative stress survival. Mol. Cellular Biol. 37, e00214 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pan T., Adaptive translation as a mechanism of stress response and adaptation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 47, 121–137 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Babosan A., et al. , Nonessential tRNA and rRNA modifications impact the bacterial response to sub-MIC antibiotic stress. microLife 3, uqac019 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Xu F., Bystrom A. S., Johansson M. J. O., SSD1 suppresses phenotypes induced by the lack of elongator-dependent tRNA modifications. PLoS Genet. 15, e1008117 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gupta R., Laxman S., tRNA wobble-uridine modifications as amino acid sensors and regulators of cellular metabolic state. Curr. Genet. 66, 475–480 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Buratti E., Bhardwaj A., Editorial: Role of RNA modification in disease. Front. Genet. 10, 920 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhang K., et al. , An intellectual disability-associated missense variant in TRMT1 impairs tRNA modification and reconstitution of enzymatic activity. Hum. Mutat. 41, 600–607 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhang J., et al. , tRNA queuosine modification enzyme modulates the growth and microbiome recruitment to breast tumors. Cancers 12, 628 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Goodarzi H., et al. , Modulated expression of specific tRNAs drives gene expression and cancer progression. Cell 165, 1416–1427 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Deng W., et al. , Trm9-catalyzed tRNA modifications regulate global protein expression by codon-biased translation. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005706 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nedialkova D. D., Leidel S. A., Optimization of codon translation rates via tRNA modifications maintains proteome integrity. Cell 161, 1606–1618 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chan C. T. Y., et al. , Highly predictive reprogramming of tRNA modifications is linked to selective expression of codon-biased genes. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 28, 978–988 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shippy D. C., et al. , Biological and virulence characteristics of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium following deletion of glucose-inhibited division (gidA) gene. Microb. Pathog. 50, 303–313 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shippy D. C., et al. , Virulence characteristics of Salmonella following deletion of genes encoding the tRNA modification enzymes GidA and MnmE. Microb. Pathog. 57, 1–9 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kinscherf T. G., Willis D. K., Global regulation by gidA in Pseudomonas syringae. J. Bacteriol. 184, 2281–2286 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gupta R., Gobble T. R., Schuster M., GidA posttranscriptionally regulates rhl quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 191, 5785–5792 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rehl J. M., et al. , GidA expression in Salmonella is modulated under certain environmental conditions. Curr. Microbiol. 67, 279–285 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Moukadiri I., et al. , The output of the tRNA modification pathways controlled by the Escherichia coli MnmEG and MnmC enzymes depends on the growth conditions and the tRNA species. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 2602–2623 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kostylev M., et al. , Evolution of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing hierarchy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 7027–7032 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Williams P., Camara M., Quorum sensing and environmental adaptation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A tale of regulatory networks and multifunctional signal molecules. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 12, 182–191 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Srimahaeak T., et al. , Pseudomonas aeruginosa GidA modulates the expression of catalases at the posttranscriptional level and plays a role in virulence. Front. Microbiol. 13, 1079710 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Liberati N. T., et al. , An ordered, nonredundant library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 transposon insertion mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 2833–2838 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mikkelsen H., McMullan R., Filloux A., The Pseudomonas aeruginosa reference strain PA14 displays increased virulence due to a mutation in ladS. PLoS One 6, e29113 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Miyata S., et al. , Use of the Galleria mellonella caterpillar as a model host to study the role of the type III secretion system in Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 71, 2404–2413 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Insua J. L., et al. , Modeling Klebsiella pneumoniae pathogenesis by infection of the wax moth Galleria mellonella. Infect. Immun. 81, 3552–3565 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Jander G., Rahme L. G., Ausubel F. M., Positive correlation between virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants in mice and insects. J. Bacteriol. 182, 3843–3845 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Pawar V., et al. , In vivo efficacy of antimicrobials against biofilm-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 4974–4981 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Komor U., et al. , Biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in solid murine tumors—A novel model system. Microbes Infect. 14, 951–958 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Fleming B. A., et al. , A tRNA modifying enzyme as a tunable regulatory nexus for bacterial stress responses and virulence. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 7570–7590 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Armengod M. E., et al. , Enzymology of tRNA modification in the bacterial MnmEG pathway. Biochimie 94, 1510–1520 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Moukadiri I., et al. , Evolutionarily conserved proteins MnmE and GidA catalyze the formation of two methyluridine derivatives at tRNA wobble positions. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 7177–7193 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Grobe S., et al. , Identification and quantification of (t)RNA modifications in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. ChemBioChem 20, 1430–1437 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lucas M. C., et al. , Quantitative analysis of tRNA abundance and modifications by nanopore RNA sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 72–86 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Krueger J., et al. , tRNA epitranscriptome determines pathogenicity of the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. European Nucleotide archive. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB69610. Deposited 21 November 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 56.Depledge D. P., tRNA_epitranscriptome_determines_pathogenicity_of_P_aeruginosa. GitHub. https://github.com/DepledgeLab/tRNA-studies/tree/main/tRNA_epitranscriptome_determines_pathogenicity_of_P_aeruginosa. Deposited 26 October 2023.
- 57.Krueger J., et al. , Dynamic modification of tRNAs determines pathogenicity in the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), NCBI. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE149306. Deposited 31 May 2023.
- 58.Ingolia N. T., et al. , Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 324, 218–223 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ingolia N. T., Ribosome profiling: New views of translation, from single codons to genome scale. Nat. Rev. Genet 15, 205–213 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zhang G., Ignatova Z., Folding at the birth of the nascent chain: Coordinating translation with co-translational folding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 21, 25–31 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Mohammad F., Green R., Buskirk A. R., A systematically-revised ribosome profiling method for bacteria reveals pauses at single-codon resolution. eLife 8, e42591 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Woolstenhulme C. J., et al. , Nascent peptides that block protein synthesis in bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, E878–E887 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Buskirk A. R., Green R., Biochemistry. Getting past polyproline pauses. Science 339, 38–49 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Sin C., Chiarugi D., Valleriani A., Quantitative assessment of ribosome drop-off in E. coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 2528–2537 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Chen G. T., Inouye M., Role of the AGA/AGG codons, the rarest codons in global gene expression in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 8, 2641–2652 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Krueger J., et al. , Unravelling post-transcriptional PrmC-dependent regulatory mechanisms in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 3583–3592 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kordes A., et al. , Establishment of an induced memory response in Pseudomonas aeruginosa during infection of a eukaryotic host. ISME J. 13, 2018–2030 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hornischer K., et al. , BACTOME—A reference database to explore the sequence- and gene expression-variation landscape of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D716–D720 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Khaledi A., et al. , Predicting antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa with machine learning-enabled molecular diagnostics. EMBO Mol. Med. 12, e10264 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Allner O., Nilsson L., Nucleotide modifications and tRNA anticodon-mRNA codon interactions on the ribosome. RNA 17, 2177–2188 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Grosjean H., Westhof E., An integrated, structure- and energy-based view of the genetic code. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 8020–8040 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Gingold H., Dahan O., Pilpel Y., Dynamic changes in translational efficiency are deduced from codon usage of the transcriptome. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 10053–10063 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Zhou M., et al. , Non-optimal codon usage affects expression, structure and function of clock protein FRQ. Nature 495, 111–115 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Chan C. T., et al. , Reprogramming of tRNA modifications controls the oxidative stress response by codon-biased translation of proteins. Nat. Commun. 3, 937 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Little R. H., et al. , Adaptive remodeling of the bacterial proteome by specific ribosomal modification regulates Pseudomonas infection and Niche colonisation. PLoS Genet. 12, e1005837 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Patil A., et al. , Translational infidelity-induced protein stress results from a deficiency in Trm9-catalyzed tRNA modifications. RNA Biol. 9, 990–1001 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Rezgui V. A., et al. , tRNA tKUUU, tQUUG, and tEUUC wobble position modifications fine-tune protein translation by promoting ribosome A-site binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 12289–12294 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Fredrick K., Ibba M., How the sequence of a gene can tune its translation. Cell 141, 227–229 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Yan Q., et al. , The rare codon AGA Is Involved in regulation of pyoluteorin biosynthesis in Pseudomonas protegens Pf-5. Front. Microbiol. 7, 497 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Godeke J., Pustelny C., Haussler S., Recycling of peptidyl-tRNAs by peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase counteracts azithromycin-mediated effects on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 1617–1624 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Wangen J. R., Green R., Stop codon context influences genome-wide stimulation of termination codon readthrough by aminoglycosides. eLife 9, e52611 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Bjornsson A., Mottagui-Tabar S., Isaksson L. A., Structure of the C-terminal end of the nascent peptide influences translation termination. EMBO J. 15, 1696–1704 (1996). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Urbonavicius J., et al. , Transfer RNA modifications that alter +1 frameshifting in general fail to affect −1 frameshifting. RNA 9, 760–768 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Appendix 01 (PDF)
Dataset S01 (XLSX)
Data Availability Statement
RNA-seq, Nano-tRNAseq, Scripts used for base calling, alignment, and subsequent processing steps data have been deposited in NCBI GEO database (GSE149306) (57), European Nucleotide Archive (PRJEB69610) (55); GitHub (https://github.com/DepledgeLab/tRNA-studies) (56), respectively.



