Skip to main content
Molecular Biology Research Communications logoLink to Molecular Biology Research Communications
. 2024;13(2):55–63. doi: 10.22099/MBRC.2024.48723.1894

Phylogenetic position inferred on SSU rDNA sequence gene and description of a new parasitic cnidarian (Endocnidozoa: Myxobolidae) infecting Markiana nigripinnis (Teleostei: Stevardiinae) from a small marginal lake floodplain, Brazil

Maria EBP Mota 1, Patrik D Mathews 2,*, Tiago Milanin 3, Omar Mertins 4, Fernando Paiva 1, Carina E Oliveira 5, Luiz ER Tavares 1
PMCID: PMC10946550  PMID: 38504784

Abstract

Herein, a detailed molecular phylogeny analysis was developed to determine the phylogenetic position of a new freshwater histozoic myxosporean cnidarian, Henneguya markiana sp. nov. from the world’s largest tropical wetland area, Pantanal, Brazil. The new species is described using an integrative taxonomy approach including morphology, biological traits and molecular data. Phylogenetic analysis inferred by Maximum Likehood method showed the new Henneguya species in a well-supported clade of myxosporean gill parasites of South American characids fishes. In this same clade, the new Henneguya described appeared in a sub-clade clustering with H. lacustris and H. chydadea. Nevertheless, the sequences of the new species and H. lacustris and H. chydadea have a large genetic divergence of 10.4% (148 nucleotides-nt) and 10.5% (147 nt) respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a cnidarian myxosporean species parasitizing a fish from Stevardiinae from South America. In the light of the differences observed from the integrative taxonomy, we are confident that this isolate is a new species of Henneguya, increasing the knowledge of diversity of this enigmatic group of cnidarians.

Key Words: Myxosporean, Gill parasites, Phylogeny, Tetra fish, Biodiversity

INTRODUCTION

Floodplain environments are characterized by the existence of several aquatic and transitional habitats between those that are terrestrial and aquatic [1]. Among these diverse environments, marginal lakes of river-floodplain systems are widely recognized for their importance for maintaining integrity of fish diversity and regional biodiversity [2, 3]. Indeed, marginal lakes serve as nurseries for fish and/or constitute areas of growth and recovery of adult fish stocks [3]. At the same time, there is growing awareness of sensitivity and vulnerability to anthropogenic disturbances of theses aquatic habitats. Thus, fauna and flora knowledge that live in marginal lakes and their interactions are important for conservation strategies and polices in maintaining biodiversity [4]. In this context, this study describes a new freshwater cnidarian myxosporean and their interaction with the tetra fish Markiana nigripinnis Perugia, 1891 living in a floodplain small marginal lake from the Pantanal wetland biome, one the main biodiversity hotspots.

Cnidarian myxosporean are an enigmatic group of eukaryotic organisms during many decades considered protozoans. They are obligate parasitic of worldwide distribution, which represent about 20% of presently known cnidarian biodiversity [5]. Myxosporean have a complex life cycle that diverged during the Cambrian era from free-living cnidarians [5, 6]. Among myxosporeans, members of the genus Henneguya Thelodan, 1892, are predominantly histozoic parasites recognized for their strict or high host and tissue specificity [7]. with some members being highly pathogenic for their host, causing severe henneguyosis [8-10]. Although South America contains one of the highest concentration of fish species living in a dynamic aquatic system composed of different freshwater habitats [11], there is scarce information about myxosporean cnidarian diversity.

In this study, we provide detailed phenotypic and genotypic aspects of a new histozoic Henneguya cnidarian as well as their phylogenetic relationships and position among other myxobolids cnidarian members.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fish and Myxosporean collection: A total of 58 specimens of M. nigripinnis (ranging from 6.5 to 8.2 cm in length) were collected by fishing net from a floodplain marginal lake (19°34.576´S, 57°,00.823´W), located in the sub-region of the Pantanal Miranda-Abobral, Municipality of Corumbá, State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Fish were transported live in boxes containing dechlorinated water and artificial aeration to the Animal Parasitology Laboratory at Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, where they were housed in aquariums with dechlorinated water at a constant temperature of 27°C using thermostat systems (Hopar Aquarium Heater) and constant filtration and aeration (Aquatech FE25 Filtration System, prior to parasitological examination. Fish were euthanized in a benzocaine solution overdose (400 mg L−1) to carry out dissection all organs were examined under stereo and optical microscopes. Fish were identified according to Britski et al., [12] and current status such as valid species name or synonym were reviewed using FishBase [13]. Myxosporean cysts were carefully removed from the gills of fresh necropsied fish with aid of a Nikon SMZ1000 stereomicroscope and an Olympus BX53 microscope.

Morphological analysis: Mature myxospores isolated from cysts, which were post-fixed in 10% formalin were used to performed morphometric analysis following the criteria outlined by Lom and Arthur [14]. Measurements of myxospores dimensions (spore length, thickness, polar capsule length, width, and caudal appendage length) were taken from 30 randomly selected mature fish, using a computer equipped with Axiovision 4.1 image capture software coupled to an Axioplan 2 Zeiss microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany). Myxospores dimensions were evaluated in micrometers (μm) and expressed as a mean ± standard deviation, followed by the range in parentheses where appropriate. Smears containing free myxospores were air-dried, fixed with methanol and stained with Giemsa stain to mount on permanent slides. These were deposited in the cnidarian collection of the Zoology Museum at the University of São Paulo – USP, São Paulo, Brazil (Hapantotype slide no. MZUSP 8695). Partial SSU rDNA sequence gene was deposited in GenBank under accession number (GenBank accession number: OR470748). The gill plasmodial index (GPI) was determined based on the criteria outlined by Kaur and Katock [15] and categorization of plasmodia on the basis of size follows Kaur and Attri [16].

Molecular characterization, Genetic divergence and Phylogenetic analysis: Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from a cyst preserved in absolute ethanol using a DNeasy® Blood & Tissue Kit (animal tissue protocol) (Qiagen Inc., California, USA), in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The gDNA concentration was measured using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, USA). Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were performed in accordance with Mathews et al., [17] and using primer routinely chosen for myxobolids molecular analysis (Table 1). PCRs were performed in the Mastercycler® nexus (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) and conducted in a final volume reaction of 25 μL, comprising 10–50 ng of extracted DNA, 0.2 pmol for each primer, 12.5 μL of Dream Taq Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Scientific) and nuclease-free water. Thermal cycling amplification consisted of initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles at 95°C for 60 s, 64°C (ERIB1, Barta et al., [18] -ACT1r, Hallet and Diamant [19]) or 58 °C (Myxgen4F, Diamant et al., [20]; ERIB10, Barta et al., [18]) for 60 s, 72°C for 120 s, and then final elongation at 72°C for 5 min. PCR products were electrophoretically under 2.0% agarose gel (BioAmerica, Irvine, California USA), in the presence of Sybr Safe DNA gel stain (Invitrogen by Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California USA) and analyzed with a Stratagene 2020E trans illuminator (Stratagene San Diego, California, USA). A1Kb Plus DNA weight ladder (Invitrogen by Life Technologies) was used to estimate of size of the amplicons. PCR products were purified using USB® ExoSap-IT® (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was performed using the same PCR primers plus two additionally MC5 and MC3 primers [21] and using a BigDye® Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems Inc., California, USA) in an ABI 3130 automatic DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems Inc.™). Sequences obtained were assembled in BioEdit 7.1.3.0 [22]. An alignment search based on small subunit rDNA sequences (SSU rDNA) was performed to evaluate the similarity of newly sequenced and all sequences of myxobolids available in the GenBank [23]. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using Maximum likelihood (ML) and it was done in the PhyML 3.0 with Smart Model Selection [24]. Bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates was employed to assess the robustness of the branches in the phylogenetic tree. Two South American freshwater myxosporean sequences, Ceratomyxa amazonenses KX236169 and Ceratomyxa vermiformes KX278420 were selected as outgroups. The genetic distance between Henneguya/Myxobolus species clustering together with the new sequence obtained was evaluate through pairwise comparison using MEGA 6.0 [25].

Table 1.

Primers used in the amplification and sequencing of the SSU rDNA gene of Henneguya markiana sp. nov

Primer Sequences (5´–3´) Reference
MC5 CCTGAGAAACGGCTACCACATCCA Molnar et al., [21]
MC3 GATTAGCCTGACAGATCACTCCACGA Molnar et al., [21]
ERIB10 CTTCCGCAGGTTCACCTACGG Barta et al., [18]
Myxgen4F GTGCCTTGAATAAATCAGAG Diamant et al., [20]
ACT1r AATTTCACCTCTCGCTGCCA Hallett and Diamant [19]
ERIB1 ACCTGGTTGATCCTGCCAG Barta et al., [18]

RESULTS

Out of 58 wild specimens of M. nigripinnis examined, 18 (31%) had gill lamellae infected by a new cnidarian myxosporean species of the genus Henneguya described herein. The specific name Henneguya markiana sp. nov. is based on host genus. The gill plasmodium index (GPI) correspondent to 1 (light infection) and category of plasmodium correspondent to Type A (visible under light microscope, size range 40–65 µm). Cysts were browned and rounded in shape, measuring 62.4 μm (58.3-64.1μm) in diameter (Fig. 1A). Mature myxospores were fusiform in shape from the frontal view, measuring 25.1 ± 0.6 μm (24.5–25.7 μm) in total length, 8.9 ± 0.4 μm (8.5-9.3 μm) in spore body length, 2.7 ± 0.2 μm (2.5 ± 2.9 μm) in with, 2.3 ± 0.4 μm (1.9 -2.7 μm) in thickness. Bifurcate caudal appendage, measuring 16.4 ± 0.4 μm (16–16.8 μm) in length (Fig. 1B). Two elongated polar capsules, occupying a little more than half the body, measuring, 4.6 ± 0.5 μm (4.1-5.1μm) in length and 1.9 ± 0.3 μm (1.6-2.2 μm) in with. Polar tubule had five coils (Fig. 1A-C).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Gill lamellae infected with Henneguya markiana sp. nov. (A) Gill filament (Gf) showing a cyst (black arrow) in their lamellae (Gl). Scale bar: 30 µm (B) Unstained, compressed, ruptured cyst (cy), showing out myxospores (white arrows). Scale bar: 10 µm. (C) Mature myxospores in frontal view showing fusiform body with two equal polar capsules and bifurcate caudal appendage. Scale bar: 10 µm. (D) A schematic drawing of mature myxospore in ventral view

Partial SSU rDNA gene sequence obtained of the newly Henneguya species resulted in 1434 nucleotides with a Cytosine-Guanine content of 49.6%. The BLASTn search (nucleotide Basic Local Alignment) revealed that the new sequence of this isolate did not match any other myxozoans available in GenBank and its sequence similarity with other Henneguya species was low (≤ 90%) with the highest similarity from Henneguya lacustris Mirandola, Rangel, Tagliavini, Abdallah, Santos, Azevedo, 2020 (query coverage 99%, maximum identities 89.8%), reported in the gills of Astyanax lacustris Lütken, 1875 from the Tietê river, State of São Paulo, Brazil [26]. Phylogenetic analysis inferred by ML method showed in the tree topology Henneguya spp. clustering with member of genus Myxobolus. The same ML tree evidenced a strong tendency among myxosporean species to cluster according to the taxonomic affinity of the fish. In the phylogenetic tree, the new sequence appeared in a clade of myxosporean gill parasites of South American characids fish. In this clade, the newly Henneguya sequence appeared in a sub-clade as the basal species cluster with H. lacustris and H. chydadea Barassa, Cordeiro, Arana, 2003, both parasites of the lambari-tambiú A. lacustris [26, 27]. Pairwise comparisons between the newly-obtained Henneguya sequence and the closest relatives resulted in genetic divergence of 10.4% (148 nucleotides-nt) to Henneguya lacustris, 10.5% (147 nt) to H. chydadea, 14.6 (207 nt) to H. rotunda Moreira, Adriano, Silva, Ceccarelli, Maia, 2014 and 14.3 (201 nt) to Myxobolus pantanalis Carriero, Adriano, Silva, Ceccarelli, Maia, 2013.

DISCUSSION

Although myxosporean represent about one fifth of the cnidarian biodiversity [5], there are biomes in many geographical areas for which there is a gap in the knowledge of myxosporean diversity [28-30], with the Pantanal wetland biome being a remarkable example. Indeed, from the Pantanal biome, a biodiversity hotspot harboring several potential host-fish, only four Henneguya species have been described to date [31, 32]. In the present study, we describe for the first time a myxosporean infecting fish of the subfamily Stevardiinae. We are also the first to report that these parasites infect fish from a genus Markiana from South America which increases our knowledge of the diversity of this group of parasite cnidarians.

Due to current discrepancies between the spore-morphology based classification and molecular taxonomy based on the small subunit ribosomal RNA [33-35], morphological traits are accompanied regularly by DNA sequences for description of new myxosporean species. At the same time, is highly recommended to integrate other non-DNA based characters for discriminating species such as the host and tissue infected [36]. Following the integrative taxonomy approach, morphological comparison was made considering all Henneguya species previously described to infect fish from the Pantanal wetland biome [32, 37], however, our comparison showed large numbers of noticeable morphometric differences as shown in Table 1. Furthermore, differences related to the host and tissue infected have been observed (Table 2). This result is in accordance with the high specificity of host and tissue, two biological characters widely recognized for freshwater histozoic myxobolids species [36]. The morphology of the new species described herein also was compared with closely related Henneguya spp. identified by a BLASTn search, however, noticeable morphologic differences were observed from these myxobolids (Table 2).

Table 2.

Comparative data of Henneguya markiana sp. nov. with all Henneguya spp. described in fishes from Pantanal wetland biome, including closely Henneguya species identified by a BLASTn search

Species TL BL APCL SW ST PLC PCW NCT Site of infection Fish species
Henneguya markiana sp.nov. 25.1±0.6 8.9±0.4 16.4±0.4 2.7±0.2 2.3±0.4 4.6±0.5 1.9±0.3 5 Gill lamellae Markiana nigripinnis
Henneguya multiplasmodialis 30.8±1.3 14.7±0.5 15.4±1.3 5.2±0.3 4.4±0.1 6.1±0.1 1.4±0.1 6-7 Gill arch Pseudoplatystoma corrucans
Henneguya eirasi 37.1±1.8 12.9±0.8 24.6±2.2 3.4±0.3 3.1 ± 0.1 5.4±0.5 0.7±0.1 12-13 Gill filaments Pseudoplatystoma fasciatum
Henneguya corrucans 27.6 14.3 13.7 5.0 - 6.8 (6–7) 2.0 5-6 Interlamellar space Pseudoplatystoma corrucans
Henneguya maculosus 31.2 13.7±0.6 17.5±0.5 4.1±0.2 3.0±0.3 5.6±0.5 1.6±0.2 6-7 Gill filaments Pseudoplatystoma corrucans
Henneguya Chydadea 17.6-20.0 8.8-11.2 8.0-9.6 3.2-5.6 - 3.2-4.4 1.2-1.6 9-10 Gill lamellae epithelium Astyanax lacustris
Henneguya lacustris 18.3±2.2 10.4±1.6 7.2±2.5 4.9±0.9 - 4.8±0.3 1.5±0.2 6-8 Between
the secondary lamellae
Astyanax lacustris
Henneguya rotunda 23.6±1.1 7.1±0.2 16.4±1.2 5.6±0.2 3.7± 0.1 3.4±0.2 1.8±0.1 6-7 Gill arch Salminus brasiliensis

TL: total length; BL: body length; APCL: caudal appendage length; SW: spore width; ST: spore thickness; PCL: polar capsule length; PCW: polar capsule width; NCT: number of coils of polar tubules. Source: Rangel et al., [32], Eiras and Adriano [37].

Performed molecular phylogenetic analysis shows Henneguya species clustering with Myxobolus species (Fig. 2). This result agrees with previous published phylogenetic studies based on analyses of ribosomal genes that demonstrated absence of phylogenetic separation between both genus [33,38,39] and they concluded that the caudal appendages of Henneguya spp. do not represent a valid character for a characterization of the genus. Although no clear line exists that separates Henneguya and Myxobolus genera, currently Henneguya is still valid taxonomically within myxosporean classification. Thus, we designated the isolated obtained herein as a new member of Henneguya genus based on their spore-morphology with presence of typical two caudal appendages [40]. Our phylogenetic analysis also showed (in all parts of the topology tree) strong relationships among Henneguya and Myxobolus species clustering in correlation with the fish taxonomic classification. This finding corroborates previous studies conducted in South America and other geographical regions [29, 38, 39, 41-43]. Conversely, our analysis also showed (in some clades in the phylogenetic tree, Henneguya and Myxobolus species) clustering according to their fish host tissue tropism, corroborating the observations offered by other authors [38, 39, 44]. This was largely noticeable in the clade from which the new sequence was obtained composed exclusively of myxobolid species that parasitize the gills of South American characids fish (Fig. 2). As pointed out by Carriero et. al. [38] tissue tropism has more evolutionary influence within clades that are formed by myxosporeans that infect fish hosts that are phylogenetically close. Thus, myxosporean species has tendency to clustered primarily by host affinity and in a second step, by the tissue infected. Since fish host group is a strong evolutionary signal within the Myxobolidae [38, 39], the correct host identification is highly recommended for description of new freshwater histozoic myxobolid species.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree, based of SSU rDNA sequences of Henneguya markiana sp. nov. and other closely related myxobolid species based on BLAST. The tissue tropism and host taxonomy family are shown along the tree. The numbers above the nodes indicate bootstrap confidence levels. Bootstrap values below 40 are indicated in brackets. GenBank accession numbers are given for each species and in front of its

Finally, pairwise analysis showed a large genetic divergence between myxosporean that clustering in the same subclade with the new sequence obtained. This finding can be attributed to the host infected by these parasites with the new Henneguya from a Stevardiinae fish with the other species parasitizing fish belonging to the Astyanax genus. Indeed, previous studies have demonstrated by cytogenetic phylogeny as well as studies of sperm ultrastructure that M. nigripinnis (fish examined herein) is a very divergent species when compared with fish species from Astyanax genera [45-47]. It is important to point out that this is the first myxosporean sequence from a fish belong Stevardiinae. In the future, there is a need to sequence more myxobolid species from other fish taxa to demonstrate the accurate phylogenetic position. This will enable a better understanding about the evolutionary context of this new Henneguya species described herein.

Acknowledgment:

M.E.B.P. Mota thanks CAPES for their MSc fellowship. P.D. Mathews thanks the São Paulo Research Foundation, FAPESP, for young researcher financial support (grant no. 2022/12376-4). L.E.R. Tavares was funded by CNPq (313292/2018-3, FUNDECT/CAPES: 59/ 300.134/2016). O.M. thanks CNPq for a research productivity grant. The authors are grateful to Kassia Capodifoglio, Antonio Maia and Márcia Ramos Monteiro da Silva for the support in laboratory analysis. The authors thank Dr. Christopher George Berger from Occidental College in Los Angeles, California for revision of the English language.

Conflict of Interest:

The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists.

Authors’ Contribution:

P.D.M., O.M. and T.M.: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, data curation, writing—original draft, revision. M.E.B.P. M.: collected and processed fish samples. F.P. and C.E.O: formal analysis. L.E.R. T.: Supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Marques AMMS, Moscheta IS. Anatomy of the root of eight species of emergent aquatic macrophytes from the upper Paraná River, Paraná State, Brazil floodplain. Acta Sci Biol Sci. 2010;32:297–304. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Agostinho AA, Thomaz SM, Minte-Vera CV, Winemiller KO. Biodiversity in the high Paraná River floodplain. In: Gopal B, Junk WJ, Davis JA, editors. Biodiversity in wetlands: assessment, function and conservation. Vol. 1. Netherlands : Backhuys Publishers; pp. 89–2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Petry AC, Agostinho AA, Gomes LC. Fish assemblages of tropical floodplain lagoons: exploring the role of connectivity in a dry year. Neotrop Ichthyol. 2003;1:111–119. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tondato KK, Fantin-Cruz I, Pedrollo OC, Súarez YR. Spatial distribution of fish assemblages along environmental gradients in the temporary ponds of Northern Pantanal, Brazil. J Limnol. 2013;72:95–102. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Atkinson SD, Bartholomew JL, Lotan T. Myxozoans: ancient metazoan parasites find a home in phylum Cnidaria. Zoology(Jena) 2018;129:66–68. doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2018.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Okamura B, Gruhl A, Bartholomew J. An introduction to Myxozoan evolution, ecology and development. In: Okamura B, Gruhl A, Bartholomew JL, editors. Myxozoan Evolution, Ecology and Development. Cham : Springer; 2015. pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Atkinson SD, Bartosova-Sojkova P, Whipps CM, Bartholomew JL. Approaches for characterizing myxozoan species. In: Okamura B, Gruhl A, Bartholomew JL, editors. Myxozoan Evolution. Ecology and Development. Springer ; 2015 . pp. 111–123. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pote LM, Hanson LA, Shivaji R. Small subunit ribosomal RNA sequences link the cause of proliferative gill disease in channel catfish to Henneguya n sp (Myxozoa: myxosporea) J Aquat Anim Health. 2000;12:230–240. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dyková I, Buron I, Roumillat W, Fiala I. Henneguya cynoscioni sp n (Myxosporea: Bivalvulida), an agent of severe cardiac lesions in the spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus (Teleostei: Sciaenidae) Folia Parasitol (Praha) 2011;58:169–177. doi: 10.14411/fp.2011.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang B, Tu X, Gu  Z. Henneguyosis: A novel threat to the exotic channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus cultivated in China. Aquaculture. 2023;576:739831. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Florentino AC, Penha J. High beta diversity of fishes in vegetated littoral zones of floodplain lakes in the Cuiaba River Basin, northern Pantanal, Brazil. Hydrobiologia. 2011;671:137–146. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Britski HA, Silimon KZS, Lopes BS, Peixes do Pantanal. Manual de Identificação. Embrapa Informação Tecnológica: Corumbá ; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Froese R, Pauly D. FishBase . 2023. [accessed 28 Sep 2023]. http://www.fishbase.org .
  • 14.Lom J, Arthur JR. A guideline for the preparation of species descriptions in Myxosporea. J Fish Dis. 1989;12:151–156. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kaur H, Katoch A. Prevalence, site and tissue preference of myxozoan parasites infecting gills of cultured fish in Punjab (India) Dis Aquat Org. 2016;118:129–137. doi: 10.3354/dao02959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kaur H, Attri R. Morphological and molecular characterization of Henneguya bicaudi n sp (Myxosporea: myxobolidae) infecting gills of Cirrhinus mrigala (Ham ) in Harike Wetland, Punjab (India) Parasitol Res. 2015;114:4161–4167. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4647-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mathews PD, Mertins O, Espinoza LL, Milanin T, Alama-Bermejo G, Audebert F, Morandini AC. Taxonomy and 18S rDNA-based phylogeny of Henneguya multiradiatus n p (Cnidaria: Myxobolidae) a parasite of Brochis multiradiatus from Peruvian Amazon. Microb Pathog. 2020;147:104372. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Barta JR, Martin DS, Liberator PA, Dashkevicz M, Anderson JW, Feighner SD, Elbrecht A, Perkins-Barrow A, Jenkins MC, Danforth D, Ruff MD, Profous-Juchelka H. Phylogenetic relationships among eight Eimeria species infecting domestic fowl inferred using complete small subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. J Parasitol. 1997;83:262–271. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hallett SL, Diamant A. Ultrastructure and small-subunit ribosomal DNA sequence of Henneguya lesteri n sp (Myxosporea) a parasite of sand whiting Sillago analis (Sillaginidae) from the coast of Queensland, Australia. Dis Aquat Organ . 2001;46:197–212. doi: 10.3354/dao046197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Diamant A, Whipps CM, Kent ML. A new species of Sphaeromyxa (Myxosporea: Sphaeromyxina: Sphaeromyxidae) in devil firefish, Pterois miles (Scorpaenidae), from the northern Red Sea: morphology, ultrastructure, and phylogeny. J Parasitol. 2004;90:1434–1442. doi: 10.1645/GE-336R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Molnar K, Eszterbauer E, Szekely C, Dan A, Harrach B. Morphological and molecular biological studies on intramuscular Myxobolus spp of cyprinid fish. J Fish Dis. 2002;25:643–652. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp. 1999;41:95–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang JH, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3 0. Syst Biol. 2010;59:307–321. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6 0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vieira DHMD, Rangel LF, Tagliavini VP, Abdallah VD, Santos MJ, de Azevedo RK. A new species, Henneguya lacustris n sp (Cnidaria: Myxosporea), infecting the gills of Astyanax lacustris from Brazil. Parasitol Res. 2020;119:4259–4265. doi: 10.1007/s00436-020-06871-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Milanin T, Mathews PD, Mertins O, Tavares LER, Silva MRM, Maia AAM. Molecular phylogeny of the gill parasite Henneguya (Myxosporea: Myxobolidae) infecting Astyanax lacustris (Teleostei: Characidae) from fish farm in Brazil. Microb Pathog. 2018;123:372–376. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.07.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Okamura B, Hartigan A, Naldoni J. Extensive uncharted biodiversity: the parasite dimension. Integr Comp Biol. 2018;58:1132–1145. doi: 10.1093/icb/icy039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mathews PD, Bonillo C, Rabet N, Lord C, Causse R, Keith P, Audebert F. Phylogenetic analysis and characterization of a new parasitic cnidarian (Myxosporea: Myxobolidae) parasitizing skin of the giant mottled eel from the Solomon Islands. Infect Genet Evol. 2021;94:104986. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2021.104986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mathews PD, Mertins O, Flores-Gonzales APP, Espinoza LL, Aguiar JC, Milanin T. Host–Parasite Interaction and Phylogenetic of a new Cnidarian myxosporean (Endocnidozoa: Myxobolidae) Infecting a valuative commercialized ornamental fish from Pantanal wetland biome, Brazil. Pathogens. 2022;11:1119. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11101119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Adriano EA, Oliveira OMP. Myxobolidae in Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil. PNUD. 2023. [Accessed 5 October 2023]. http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/fauna/faunadobrasil/152860 .
  • 32.Rangel LF, Santos MJ, Rocha S. Synopsis of the species of Henneguya Thélohan, 1892 (Cnidaria: Myxosporea: Myxobolidae) described since 2012. Syst Parasitol. 2023;100:291–305. doi: 10.1007/s11230-023-10088-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kent ML, Andree KB, Bartholomew JL, El-Matbouli M, Desser SS, Devlin RH, Feist SW, Hedrick RP, Hoffman RW, Khattra J, Hallett SL, Lester RJG, Longshaw M, Palenzeula O, Siddall ME, Xiao C. Recent advances in our knowledge of the myxozoa. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2001;48:395–413. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2001.tb00173.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fiala I. The phylogeny of Myxosporea (Myxozoa) based on small subunit ribosomal RNA gene analysis. Int J Parasitol. 2006;36:1521–1534. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fiala I, Bartošová P. History of myxozoan character evolution on the basis of rDNA and EF-2 data. BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10:228. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Molnár K, Eszterbauer E. Specificity of Infection Sites in Vertebrate Hosts. In: Okamura B, Gruhl A, Bartholomew JL, editors. Myxozoan Evolution, Ecology and Development. Vol. 1. Switzerland : Springer; 2015. pp. 295–313. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Eiras JC, Adriano EA. Checklist of the species of the genus Henneguya Thélohan, 1892 (Myxozoa, Myxosporea, Myxobolidae) described between 2002 and 2012. Syst Parasitol. 2012;83:95–104. doi: 10.1007/s11230-012-9374-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Carriero MM, Adriano EA, Silva MRM, Ceccarelli PS, Maia AAM. Molecular phylogeny of the Myxobolus and Henneguya genera with several new South American species. PLoS One. 2013;8:e73713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu Y, Lovy A, Gu Z, Fiala I. Phylogeny of Myxobolidae (Myxozoa) and the evolution of myxospore appendages in the Myxobolus clade. Int J Parasitol. 2019;49:523–530. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2019.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lom J, Dykova I. Myxozoan genera: definition and notes on taxonomy: life-cycle terminology and pathogenic species. Folia Parasitol. 2006;53:1–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mathews PD, Mertins O, Milanin T, Espinoza LL, Flores-Gonzales AP, Audebert F, Morandini AC. Molecular Phylogeny and taxonomy of a new Myxobolus species from the endangered ornamental fish, Otocinclus cocama endemic to Peru: A host-parasite coextinction approach. Acta Trop. 2020;210:105545. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rajesh SC, Banerjee S, Patra A, Dash G, Abraham TJ. Molecular characterization of Myxobolus cuttacki (Myxozoa, Myxosporea, Bivalvulida) infecting gill lamellae of minor carp Labeo bata (Ham ) Mol Biol Res Commun. 2014;3:231–239. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Abraham TJ, Banerjee S, Patra A, Sarkar A, Adikesavalu H, Dash G. Molecular phylogeny of Myxobolus orissae (Myxosporea: Myxobolidae) infecting the gill lamellae of mrigal carp Cirrhinus mrigala (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae) Mol Biol Res Commun. 2015;4:15–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Banerjee S, Patra A, Adikesavalu H, Mondal A, Jawahar Abraham TJ. The phylogenetic position of Myxobolus carnaticus (Myxozoa, Myxosporea, Bivalvulida) infecting gill lamellae of Cirrhinus mrigala (Hamilton, 1822) based on 18S rRNA sequence analysis. Mol Biol Res Commun. 2015;4:125–132. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Baicere-Silva CM, Ferreira KM, Malabarba LR, Benine RC, Quagio-Grassiotto I. Spermatic characteristics and sperm evolution on the subfamily Stevardiinae (Ostariophysi: Characiformes: Characidae) Neotrop Ichthyol. 2011;9:377–392. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mirande JM. Morphology, molecules and the phylogeny of Characidae (Teleostei, Characiformes) Cladistics. 2018;35:282–300. doi: 10.1111/cla.12345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Monteiro ABGF, Takagui FH, Baldissera JNDC, Jerep FC, Giuliano-Caetano L. Classical and molecular cytogenetics of  Markiana nigripinnis (Pisces- Characiformes) from brazilian Pantanal: a comparative analysis with cytotaxonomic contributions. Biologia . 2022;77:2371–2382. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Biology Research Communications are provided here courtesy of Shiraz University

RESOURCES