Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 Jul 1;81(3):e92–e94. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002055

Perceived acceptability of a facility-based HIV self-test intervention in outpatient waiting-spaces among adult outpatients in Malawi: a formative study

Frackson Shaba 1, O Agatha Offorjebe 2,3, Khumbo Phiri 1, Eric Lungu 1, Pericles Kalande 1, Mike Nyirenda 1, Risa M Hoffman 4, Sundeep Gupta 1,4, Kathryn Dovel 1,4
PMCID: PMC10947243  NIHMSID: NIHMS1525175  PMID: 31194705

Abstract

Background:

Facility-based HIVST offered to outpatients in clinic waiting spaces provides an ideal opportunity to take HIVST to scale in low-resource settings. We explore if outpatients are willing to use HIVST kits in outpatient waiting spaces before they receive routine services in Malawi.

Methods:

A formative qualitative study was conducted to inform the design of a multi-arm clustered randomized trial. In-depth interviews were conducted with 36 adults (≥ 15 years) seeking outpatient services at five high-burden health facilities in Central and Southern Malawi. Outpatients were purposively sampled on the day of clinic visit. Before the interview, research staff described a hypothetical facility-based HIVST intervention. Data were analyzed using constant comparison analyses.

Findings:

The vast majority of respondents believed facility-based HIVST in outpatient waiting spaces was acceptable and desired, especially among men. Participants believed the strategy may decrease potential stigma associated with testing due to an opt-out approach, and may increase clients’ willingness to test again in the near future because it will help overcome fears related to an unknown HIV test result. The strategy was also seen as confidential and convenient. A minority of clients believed private spaces for conducting HIVST in facilities were needed.

Conclusion:

Facility-based HIVST in outpatient waiting spaces is acceptable and desired among adult outpatients in Malawi. Notably, few respondents were concerned about lack of privacy.

Keywords: facility-based HIV self-testing, outpatients, provider initiated testing and counseling, sub-Saharan Africa, qualitative study


To the editors:

Approximately 70% of people living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa know their status,1 with only 25% of adults testing for HIV in the past 12-months.2 HIV self-testing (HIVST) is associated with increased coverage of HIV testing, especially among hard-to-reach populations such as men and adolescents.1012 HIVST largely overcomes common barriers related to traditional testing strategies by increasing testing privacy, confidentiality, and convenience.4, 13

Facility-based HIVST among individuals attending outpatient departments provides an ideal opportunity to take HIVST to scale in resource-strained settings. Facility-based HIV testing is low cost and is scalable.17 Facility-based HIVST may be particularly effective in crowded outpatient waiting spaces where clients can use HIVST while waiting for routine health services. No studies to date have examined the acceptability of facility-based HIVST. Examining perceived acceptability of this strategy is critical to advancing HIVST in sub-Saharan Africa.

We conducted a formative qualitative study on the acceptability of facility-based HIVST, and key components for the intervention’s success, to inform the design of a cluster randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Semi-structured, in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted with 36 adult outpatients (≥15 years of age) at 5 health facilities in Malawi between May 26 - June 26, 2017. Outpatients in clinic waiting spaces received a group demonstration of HIVST and a description of a hypothetical facility-based HIVST experience. The mock experience included six components: (1) 10-minute health talk about the importance of HIV testing; (2) 15-minute demonstration of Oraquick HIVST kits ©; (3) HIVST distribution in the outpatient waiting space whereby each adult outpatient was offered opt-out HIVST; (4) HIVST use in the outpatient waiting space whereby outpatients would use the HIVST kit and store the kit in the opaque bag while waiting for results to process; (5) private spaces for outpatients to interpret final HIVST results before they received routine heath consultations; and (6) optional post-test counseling and linkage to care for outpatients who chose to disclose their HIVST result.

After completing the mock HIVST demonstration, outpatients were purposively sampled by sex and age for in-depth interviews. IDIs lasted approximately 20 minutes and were conducted in a private location at the health facility in the local language (Chichewa) by trained interviewers. Interviewers were matched with sex of respondents. The interview guide explored respondent perceptions of group facility-based HIVST, with a specific focus on perceptions of group HIVST demonstration, distribution, and use; as well as location of private spaces for HIVST interpretation at the outpatient clinic.

Data were analyzed using ATLAS.ti v.8. Inductive and deductive coding were applied using constant comparison methods [21] by four investigators (FS, KP, PK and OO). Ethical approval was granted by the Malawi National Health Sciences Research Committee and the University of California Los Angeles Institutional Review Board.

RESULTS

Thirty-six clients participated in an IDI (18 males and 18 females). Men were older than women (median age 35.5 years for men and 29.5 years for women). We found that the vast majority of respondents believed facility-based HIVST in outpatient waiting spaces was acceptable, with most respondents reporting that they wanted to use the strategy and they would recommend the strategy to friends and family. Table 1 presents major themes related to the primary reasons driving acceptability of the strategy.

Table 1:

Reasons for acceptability of Facility-based HIVST in outpatient waiting spaces

Reason Quotation
Acceptable With facility-based HIVST… I would encourage my friends that they could test him or herself for HIV and their test results would be confidential. I believe that my friends will be very happy when they hear about HIVST and I know they would like to use the method. … I would love if you told me when this [the intervention] will happen so I can come with them on that day and get tested. (Southern Malawi, Male, 17 Years)
Stigma Reduction …….but HIVST here at the outpatient department will not be a shameful thing because even the test tool will not be something new which you would feel ashamed of holding. (Central Malawi, Male, 27 Years)
Prepare clients for Additional HIV Testing I can encourage others to use HIVST at the outpatient [clinic] because it’s the only method that you can use when you feel that going to the doctor to get the shocking news [a test result] is hard. Self-testing is better because you know yourself and you are encouraged. (Southern Malawi, Female, 56 Years),
I think it [facility-based HTC] is good because before you enter the doctor’s room [HTC clinic] you will be sure of your status. Most times we are worried to hear the results from the doctor. (Southern Malawi, Male, 30 Years)
Confidentiality I remember this other day, we agreed with my four friends to come and get tested but one of them refused because he suggested that he would prefer being tested in private. When he said this, we all didn’t go for the test. So, I would encourage these friends about this strategy [facility-based HIVST.] (Southern Malawi, Male, 17 Years)
Convenience [With traditional HTC clinics] you are expected to go to the outpatient doctor’s office and then after that, you should go to the HTC clinic. So basically, this [facility-based HIVST] is the simplest method and I would encourage others to use it because they will test themselves at the outpatient clinic, avoiding multiple trips between the outpatient and HTC clinics. (Central Malawi, Male, 25 Years),
The [facility-based] HIVST procedure does not require a lot of time while waiting to receive drugs or testing [for outpatient services]. At the HTC clinic you can wait up to 1 hour [before being tested], but using this method you might need 30 minutes and you can test yourself while waiting to be assisted with other services. (Central Malawi, Male, 40 Years)

Stigma Reduction

Respondents believed facility-based HIVST could decrease stigma associated with HIV testing. By creating a universal opt-out environment for outpatients where HIVST kits are distributed openly, HIV testing could be considered normal and part of routine services. Participants felt that the group opt-out approach of demonstrating and distributing HIVST kits could help change community-level perceptions that HIV testing should be secretive and shameful.

Prepare clients for additional HIV testing

Respondents believed facility-based HIVST would help them prepare for testing at traditional HIV testing clinics. By completing a HIVST test, clients can prepare emotionally for traditional testing, and the result they should expect.

Confidentiality

Facility-based HIVST was perceived as more private and confidential because clients could test themselves and interpret their own results, effectively removing the need to involve health care providers who they feared may disclose their status to others within the community. This was a dominant theme across most respondents, despite the fact that HIVST kit distribution would take place in a group setting at outpatient waiting spaces.

Convenience

Facility-based HIVST was perceived as quick and convenient compared to traditional HIV testing, which often required multiple hours to wait for the next available health care worker. The strategy was especially appealing since HIVST could be used while waiting for other health services. Convenience was mentioned primarily by male respondents who had other demands on their time.

Key Components of Facility-Based HIVST

Respondents identified several key components for the intervention that they felt would be important in a real-world scenario: private spaces for kit interpretation within outpatient waiting spaces; detailed HIVST demonstrations and group pre-counseling; and community sensitization, so individuals coming to the facility would be emotionally prepared to use HIVST. Notably, very few clients were concerned about using HIVST in the outpatient waiting space – the vast majority believed they could use the test in the public waiting space and then go to a private space to interpret their results once it had processed. Some respondents believed that one-on-one demonstrations and post-counseling should also be available for clients who needed additional assistance.

DISCUSSION

Facility-based HIVST is perceived as highly acceptable. We found two novel benefits of the strategy. First, facility-based HIVST was believed to reduce stigma related to HIV testing. Universal opt-out testing with HIV education and HIVST kit distribution in an open, group environment was believed by some to help change perceptions that HIV testing is shameful and should be secretive, thus normalizing routine testing. Similar findings have been reported from Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission (PMTCT) programs where all female antenatal clients are expected to test for HIV, regardless of risk behavior.25, 26

A second potential benefit of facility-based HIVST is to prepare clients for future testing by helping them overcome fears related to an unknown HIV test result. Studies have reported that individuals are not willing to test for HIV because of the fear of receiving or being told a positive HIV result from a health care worker.7 In our hypothetical intervention, some outpatients believed that by completing a HIVST test at the outpatient waiting space and interpreting their results on their own, clients can prepare emotionally for traditional HTC and the expected result. In sub-Saharan Africa, adults overestimate their risk for HIV infection.32 This overestimation may prevent individuals from testing due to fears of an assumed positive test result.33 Our findings indicate that HIVST may help alleviate fears and empower clients to know their status.

Consistent with community-based HIVST13,24,34 facility-based HIVST was perceived to be acceptable because it is both confidential and convenient. Outpatients believed the ability to interpret their own test results would decrease unwanted result disclosure, a common fear in Malawi and a major barrier to testing.7 Outpatients believed facility-based HIVST would also decrease wait times associated with testing, another dominant barrier to service utilization.21,22

Clients in our study highlighted the importance of HIVST demonstration and one-on-one support as a component of a testing experience, and this finding has been shown in other HIVST studies, specifically for accurate use and interpretation of test results.29, 36

Facility HIVST in outpatient waiting spaces was perceived to be highly acceptable. This strategy may provide a high-impact, sustainable, and scalable approach for improving HIV testing throughout sub-Saharan Africa. Further research is needed to understand real-world acceptability and use of the strategy.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank all study participants, regional study supervisors, and health facilities where the study was conducted.

FUNDING

Supported by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) under Cooperative Agreement AID-OAA-A-15–00070. OO’s time was supported by the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Award Number D43TW009343 and the University of California Global Health Institute (UCGHI). KD’s time was partially funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) through T32MH080634–10. KD and RH receive support from the UCLA CFAR grant AI028697 and the UCLA AIDS Institute. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of funders.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest and Sources of Funding: There are no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.UNAIDS. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. The gap report [Internet]. UNAIDS; Geneva; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Ending AIDS: Progress Towards the 90-90-90 Targets. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kranzer K, Govindasamy D, Ford N, et al. Quantifying and addressing losses along the continuum of care for people living with HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Journal of the International AIDS Society 2012;15(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ortblad K, Kibuuka Musoke D, Ngabirano T, et al. Direct provision versus facility collection of HIV self-tests among female sex workers in Uganda: A cluster-randomized controlled health systems trial. PLOS Medicine 2017;14(11):e1002458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Haber N, Tanser F, Bor J, et al. From HIV infection to therapeutic response: a population-based longitudinal HIV cascade-of-care study in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. The Lancet HIV 2017;4(5):e223–e230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Weber M, Barrett A, Finnerty F, et al. Identifying barriers to HIV testing in hospital admissions to improve HIV testing. Journal of Public Health 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mohlabane N, Tutshana B, Peltzer K, et al. Barriers and facilitators associated with HIV testing uptake in South African health facilities offering HIV Counselling and Testing. Health SA Gesondheid 2016;21:86–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wong VJ, Murray KR, Phelps BR, et al. Adolescents, young people, and the 90–90–90 goals: a call to improve HIV testing and linkage to treatment. AIDS (London, England) 2017;31(Suppl 3):S191–S194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Armstrong-Hough M, Ggita J, Ayakaka I, et al. Brief Report: “Give Me Some Time” Facilitators of and Barriers to Uptake of Home-Based HIV Testing During Household Contact Investigation for Tuberculosis in Kampala, Uganda. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2018;77(4):400–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Napierala Mavedzenge S, Sibanda E, Mavengere Y, et al. Acceptability, feasibility, and preference for HIV self-testing in Zimbabwe. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Choko AT, MacPherson P, Webb EL, et al. Uptake, accuracy, safety, and linkage into care over two years of promoting annual self-testing for HIV in Blantyre, Malawi: a community-based prospective study. PLoS medicine 2015;12(9):e1001873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Corbett E Intensified HIV/TB prevention linking home-based HIV testing, including the option of self-testing, with HIV care. ISRCTN02004005 London: ISRCTN Registry; 2012;10. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Krause J, Subklew-Sehume F, Kenyon C, et al. Acceptability of HIV self-testing: a systematic literature review. BMC public health 2013;13(1):735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ganguli I, Bassett IV, Dong KL, et al. Home testing for HIV infection in resource-limited settings. Current HIV/AIDS Reports 2009;6(4):217–223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Helleringer S, Kohler H-P, Frimpong JA, et al. Increasing uptake of HIV testing and counseling among the poorest in sub-Saharan countries through home-based service provision. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) 2009;51(2):185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Joel N, James W, Patrick M, et al. Feasibility, acceptability and cost of home-based HIV testing in rural Kenya. Tropical Medicine & International Health 2009;14(8):849–855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mwenge L, Sande L, Mangenah C, et al. Costs of facility-based HIV testing in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe. PloS one 2017;12(10):e0185740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.National Statistical Office (NSO) [Malawi] and ICF. Malawi Demographic and Health Survey 2015–16. Zomba, Malawi, and Rockville, Maryland, USA. NSO and ICF. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.UNAIDS. DATA 2017. 2017.
  • 20.©2018 by ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International journal of qualitative methods 2006;5(1):80–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Choko AT, MacPherson P, Webb EL, et al. Uptake, Accuracy, Safety, and Linkage into Care over Two Years of Promoting Annual Self-Testing for HIV in Blantyre, Malawi: A Community-Based Prospective Study. PLOS Medicine 2015;12(9):e1001873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mokgatle MM, Madiba S High Acceptability of HIV Self-Testing among Technical Vocational Education and Training College Students in Gauteng and North West Province: What Are the Implications for the Scale Up in South Africa? PLOS ONE 2017;12(1):e0169765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kalibala S, Tun W, Cherutich P, et al. Factors associated with acceptability of HIV self-testing among health care workers in Kenya. AIDS and Behavior 2014;18(4):405–414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Creek TL, Ntumy R, Seipone K, et al. Successful Introduction of Routine Opt-Out HIV Testing in Antenatal Care in Botswana. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2007;45(1):102–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rutenberg N, Baek C, Kalibala S, et al. Evaluation of United Nations-supported pilot projects for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. Overview of findings. 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Agnes M, Zimba C, Kamanga E, et al. Prevention of mother-to-child transmission: Program changes and the effect on uptake of the HIVNET 012 regimen in Malawi. 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sulat JS, Prabandari YS, Sanusi R, et al. The impacts of community-based HIV testing and counselling on testing uptake: A systematic review. Journal of Health Research 2018;32(2):152–163. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wood BR, Ballenger C, Stekler JD. Arguments for and against HIV self-testing. HIV/AIDS (Auckland, NZ) 2014;6:117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Myers JE, El-Sadr WM, Zerbe A, et al. Rapid HIV self-testing: long in coming but opportunities beckon. Aids 2013;27(11):1687–1695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Napierala Mavedzenge S, Baggaley R, Corbett EL. A Review of Self-Testing for HIV: Research and Policy Priorities in a New Era of HIV Prevention. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2013;57(1):126–138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Anglewicz P, Kohler H-P. Overestimating HIV Infection: The Construction and Accuracy of Subjective Probabilities of HIV Infection in Rural Malawi. 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Qiao S, Zhang Y, Li X, et al. Facilitators and barriers for HIV-testing in Zambia: A systematic review of multi-level factors. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pai NP, Sharma J, Shivkumar S, et al. Supervised and unsupervised self-testing for HIV in high-and low-risk populations: a systematic review. PLOS medicine 2013;10(4):e1001414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Organization WH. Consolidated Guidelines on HIV Testing Services: 5Cs: consent, confidentiality, counselling, correct results and connection 2015. 2015. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mugo PM, Micheni M, Shangala J, et al. Uptake and Acceptability of Oral HIV Self-Testing among Community Pharmacy Clients in Kenya: A Feasibility Study. PLOS ONE 2017;12(1):e0170868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES