Abstract
Pregnancy complications adversely impact both mother and/or fetus throughout the lifespan. Fetal growth restriction (FGR) occurs when a fetus fails to reach their intrauterine potential for growth, it is the second highest leading cause of infant mortality, and leads to increased risk of developing non-communicable diseases in later life due ‘fetal programming’. Abnormal placental development, growth and/or function underlies approximately 75% of FGR cases and there is currently no treatment save delivery, often prematurely. We previously demonstrated in a murine model of FGR that nanoparticle mediated, intra-placental human IGF-1 gene therapy maintains normal fetal growth. Multiple models of FGR currently exist reflecting the etiologies of human FGR and have been used by us and others to investigate the development of in utero therapeutics as discussed here. In addition to the in vivo models discussed herein, utilizing human models including in vitro (Choriocarcinoma cell lines and primary trophoblasts) and ex vivo (term villous fragments and placenta cotyledon perfusion) we have demonstrated robust nanoparticle uptake, transgene expression, nutrient transporter regulation without transfer to the fetus. For translational gene therapy application in the human placenta, there are multiple avenues that require investigation including syncytial uptake from the maternal circulation, transgene expression, functionality and longevity of treatment, impact of treatment on the mother and developing fetus. The potential impact of treating the placenta during gestation is high, wide-ranging across pregnancy complications, and may offer reduced risk of developing associated cardio-metabolic diseases in later life impacting at both an individual and societal level.
1. Introduction
Pregnancy complications can adversely affect both the mother and/or the fetus. In the United States, a 16.4% increase in pregnancy complications and a 31.5% increase in women who experienced pregnancy and childbirth complications between 2014 and 2018 has been reported [1]. Some of the most common pregnancy complications include fetal growth restriction (FGR), preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, preterm labor, and stillbirth/miscarriage, and are all associated with defective placentation and/or abnormal placental function. The placenta is the interface in which nutrient and waste exchange between maternal and fetal circulations occurs [2]. In many cases, defective placentation is caused by abnormal placental invasion of the uterine wall which leads to improper placenta perfusion and subsequent placenta hypoxia, and/or issues within the fetal villi [3,4].
2. Fetal growth restriction
FGR is defined as estimated fetal weight <10th percentile and/or abdominal circumference <10th percentile [5]. In the developed world this occurs in 5–10% of all live births, and this rate is up to 6x greater in developing countries with roughly 30 million cases annually [6,7]. An important distinction of FGR from constitutively small fetuses or those with low birth weight, is a pathological condition causing an impaired supply of nutrients and/or oxygen that prevents adequate growth. This can be due to pregnancy complications like those previously mentioned, or physical and/or functional anomalies of the placenta preventing nutrient transfer, or genetic abnormalities impeding transfer of nutrients/oxygen from the placenta [8]. Furthermore, FGR has been associated with the developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) hypothesis in which insults, like inadequate nutrient supply, during critical developmental periods result in “fetal programming” that have life-long effects on health [9]. Specifically, in childhood, those affected by FGR are at higher risk for continued poor growth and reduction in neurological function. Into adulthood, these individuals are predisposed to many noncommunicable diseases (NCD) including hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and coronary artery disease [8,10].
Diagnosis and differentiation of FGR from constitutively small fetuses has long been difficult without adequate tests and parameters. Current procedures for diagnosis and outcome predictors utilize Doppler ultrasonography to measure the Doppler cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), or the ratio of the middle artery pulsatility index (PI) to the umbilical artery doppler PI. This is a non-invasive procedure that assesses vascular resistance. This in combination with an estimated fetal weight has proven to more reliably diagnose FGR and predict poor outcomes in pregnancies [11,12]. However, there is currently no treatment for FGR during pregnancy. The potential for maternal supplementation with nutrients such as antioxidants, omega-three fatty acids and calcium/vitamin D have been trialed but with mixed success (see review [13]). The only true intervention is delivery, often prematurely which carries its own risks, and postnatal emphasis on nutrition intake [14].
FGR infants are significantly more likely to spend extended time in the NICU and demonstrate feeding difficulties leading to increased mental and financial stress for the parents [15]. Increased NICU stay alone has been associated with impaired cognitive and socioemotional development of children, and has even been equated to complex trauma from repeated exposure to stressors [16,17]. Hence, there is much need for therapeutic approaches to treat FGR in utero in order to prevent preterm birth and the complications associated with this form of intervention, as well as potentially alleviate or prevent the predisposition of many NCD’s and the lifelong burden on individuals and healthcare systems. Given impaired placental function is often an underlying cause of FGR, specifically targeting the deficiencies within the placenta, such as nutrient transport or placental vascular development, may allow for increased length of time in utero as well as continued, appropriate fetal growth and development. In order for such treatments to be developed, appropriate animal and human models must be utilized.
3. Animal models of fetal growth restriction
3.1. Mice and rats
The use of rodents to study FGR has many advantages for mechanistic understanding during restriction, especially at a cellular or molecular level [18]. Their small size and short gestation periods (mice: 19–21 days, and rats: 21–23 days) mean they are relatively inexpensive compared to many other animal models, and studies can be conducted much faster. However, placental development and structure does not reflect humans as wells as other laboratory species. Mouse and rat placentas are haemotrichorial with one layer of cytotrophoblasts and two layers of syncytiotrophoblast separating maternal and fetal circulation, and exhibit relatively shallow invasion into the uterine wall compared to humans [19,20]. Furthermore, unlike the human placenta in which the exchange region develops into cotyledons, the exchange region of mice and rats develops as a labyrinth [19]. In terms of fetal development, offspring are born altricial and many organs like the kidneys continue to develop after birth [18]. These developmental differences between rodents and humans limit their utilization for DoHAD related studies.
Despite differences in placental and fetal development, many studies using transgenic knockout mice have elucidated factors within the placenta that are necessary for normal fetal development and when gene expression is removed/inhibited, produce FGR (see review [20]). Some examples include the eNos−/− [21,22], Vegf+/− [23], Igf-1+/− [24], and Egfl7−/− [25] mouse models. Each of these knockout models demonstrates an FGR phenotype via different mechanisms. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNos) knockout mice (global knockout) display hypertension, uterine artery constriction, and FGR with hypoxic placentas [21,22]. Vascular endothelial growth factor (Vegf) knockout embryos show abnormal blood vessel formation and defective extraembryonic vasculature illuminating the necessity of Vegf for the supply of blood from mother to placenta and the proper connection of yolk sac/placenta to fetus for nutrient and oxygen transport [23]. Homozygous insulin-like growth factor 1 (Igf-1) knockout fetuses, obtained by crossing heterozygous knockout parents, showed significantly decreased placental efficiency, fetal/placental weight ratios and FGR compared to wildtype litter mates [26]. Epidermal growth factor-like protein 7 (Egfl7) knockout fetuses show reduced placental vascularization and a deficiency in endothelial cell migration and cord formation when compared to wildtype litter mates [25]. In addition to models based on genetic modification, there are other models of FGR in rodents caused by external inducible factors which pregnant women are exposed to. For example, recent rat studies have examined the consequences of commonly inhaled substances that could lead to FGR such as tetrahydrocannabinol and ozone [27]. Overall, each of these different rodent models mentioned can be utilized to study the potential etiologies of FGR in humans and aids in identification of possible therapeutic targets.
3.2. Rabbits
While rabbits experience a short gestation period (31–33 days) like those of rodents mentioned previously, there are facets that make them more reflective of the human. The rabbit genome is more similar to humans [28], and they experience similar hemodynamic changes during pregnancy [29,30]. Some aspects of fetal development such as brain and lung development are similar to human fetal development [30]. However, the rabbit’s short gestation period leads to the occurrence of neonatal development/maturation of some organ systems instead of during gestation as they would in humans with much longer gestation time. Similar to rodents and humans, the rabbit placenta is hemochorial meaning maternal blood is in direct contact with trophoblast, however rabbits placentas are haemodichorial with two trophoblastic layers separating maternal and fetal circulation, and more reflective of human placenta structure in early pregnancy [30]. Nutrient restriction, caloric restriction, recreational drug administration/inhalant studies, and surgical studies have been very well characterized in rabbits to model and study FGR. Along with these induced models of FGR, rabbits have a natural propensity to develop a growth restricted runt in their litters [31]. Pups in the middle of the uterine horn are farther from the uterine arteries connecting blood supply and usually have FGR which makes for a natural model of FGR.
3.3. Guinea pigs
Unlike rodents and rabbits, the guinea pig offers a unique advantage in developing in utero treatments because they have similar developmental milestones to humans throughout gestation and following birth [32,33]. The guinea pig placenta, like humans, is haemomonochorial with one trophoblastic layer separating maternal and fetal circulation [34] and placental development involves deeper trophoblast invasion [35]. Furthermore, their precocial offspring are more developed at time of birth reflecting humans. Guinea pigs experience a longer gestation time (65–70 days) than other rodents and rabbits. While this does lead to more expensive animal costs both due to length of time and increase in size compared to that of rodents, it is beneficial for evaluation of interventions and therapeutics. The most common models of FGR in the guinea pig are uterine artery ligations and maternal nutrient/caloric restriction [18,36,37]. There are now many studies into the effects of FGR in the fetus during pregnancy, through adolescence, and during adulthood (reviewed in Ref. [32]). Recent studies have looked at the consequences of this condition on different fetal organs and long-term effects on the affected fetus. These guinea pig FGR studies have identified increased cardiovascular and renal disease [38], decreased maturation of myelin sheaths [39], and altered liver transcript levels [40]. In the brain alone, FGR has been linked to increased apoptosis of the white matter and hippocampus, reduced brain size [41], and decreased granule cell proliferation and purkinje cell development creating impaired cerebellar development [42].
3.4. Sheep
Sheep models are consistently used to study FGR because fetal developmental milestones are similar to those of human fetuses, and their longer gestation (144–151 days) is advantageous to performing serial measurements, for example imaging and/or blood sampling, in mother and fetus during pregnancy in live animals. Their propensity to have single or twin pregnancies/offspring also mimics that of humans, and they offer several different ways to model FGR [43]. FGR models include surgical removal of endometrial caruncles [44], umbilical artery ligation [45], maternal hyperthermia [46,47], and nutrient/diet change [48–50]. Each of these models have led to new findings in the adaptations and outcomes of growth restriction in the placenta and fetus. These studies have identified several factors that are decreased in times of restriction such as Igf-1 and 2, Vegf, prolactin, and suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 as well as overall decreases in myoblast function, reduced muscle mass, and protein accretion. Increases in cortisol levels and fat deposition have also been reported. Each of these deficient factors plays a key role in the growth and development of the fetus, so naturally this leads to many complications in utero and after birth. High cortisol levels are also unsurprising with high stress caused by the restriction [51]. While there are many advantages to the sheep model, placentation is significantly different from the human [18,43]. Sheep are classified to have synepitheliochorial placentation where there are multiple placentation sites, known as placentomes, throughout the uterus [52]. Each placentome is then comprised of trophoblast-rich cotyledon tissue in contact with a caruncle. Thus, their usefulness to the development of treatments for FGR that target the placenta is limited.
3.5. Non-human primates
Research utilizing non-human primates (NHP) is highly regulated, and expensive which leads to low replication numbers, but they are the closest model to humans in almost every aspect making them an excellent pre-clinical model. The most commonly used non-human primates in FGR studies are baboons and rhesus macaques [53]. While these studies are long due to gestation time (rhesus macaques: 166 days, baboons: 185 days) and life span, the translational relevance to humans’ aids understanding of short-term and long-term effects of FGR on mother, placenta, and affected offspring. NHP have a haemomonochorial placenta with cotyledons containing villous structures just like humans [54], setting them apart from all other species previously mentioned. Serial measurements like imaging, chorionic villous sampling and/or blood sampling can also easily be performed. Models of reduced amino acid transport, restricted placenta vasculature, and maternal nutrient restriction have all lead to FGR in NHP models [55–58]. Studies in these models have elucidated long term effects of FGR on hypothalamic arcuate nuclei which control appetite [59], impaired right ventricle [58], and cardiac remodeling [60]. These different models contribute to the understanding of FGR development in the human, all have a similar phenotype – FGR or fetal demise in extreme cases, and offer pre-clinical models of impaired placenta. Furthermore, preliminary studies utilizing NHP models are underway to determine the clinical relevance of placental gene therapies and potential adverse effects of such treatments [61,62].
4. Human models for therapeutic development
In addition to animal models, researchers often implement human ex vivo and in vitro models that can be used to mimic metabolism and transport within the human placenta. Furthermore, these techniques can aid in the development of treatments for FGR. Given the placenta is discarded at birth, it is relatively easy to obtain primary tissue to use for scientific purposes. The ex vivo human placenta perfusion model offers the ability to study placenta storage, vascularization, metabolism, and maternal-fetal transfer [63]. Furthermore, it is the only model that retains the full structure of the placenta [64]. However, experiments utilizing the ex vivo perfusion approach are limited by the model’s short-lasting performance and laborious set-up procedures [65]. In terms of in vitro approaches, several immortalized cell lines exist, including BeWo choriocarcinoma cells, Jeg3 and HTR8s, to study trophoblast biology. Furthermore, primary cells and/or tissue explants can be isolated and cultured for research purposes. More recently, the development of a ‘placenta-on-a-chip’ has been allowing for the in vitro study of human placenta physiology and functionality [66]. Such devices present the fetal endothelium and trophoblastic endothelium in a manner that replicates the placental barrier thus providing a cost-effective way of testing transfer of factors like nutrients and pharmaceuticals [63]. Finally, organoid techniques are offering methods of studying the human placenta in vitro in three-dimensions [67], although such technologies are still being optimized.
5. Therapeutic target identification
Human and animal studies have all led to identifying key factors that are altered in the placenta of FGR pregnancies. This knowledge in turn, is now being used to develop potential in utero treatments, and several are being tested to determine their relevance in alleviating the growth restricted phenotype.
EGF is an endogenous placental growth factor that increases proliferation and differentiation of cytotrophoblasts, and secretion of human chorionic gonadotropin [68]. In women with pregnancies complicated by FGR, urine EGF is lower [69]. Targeted delivery of EGF to normal human placenta explants has been shown to significantly enhance nutrient transport, and increased down-stream phosphorylation signaling [70], as well as protect against apoptosis induced by oxidative stress [71]. However, the ability for EGF to elicit similar responses in placental explants from FGR pregnancies is conflicting, possibly because of the multifactorial nature of FGR, and therefore hypothesized to be a good candidate for those FGR cases caused by abnormal trophoblast development, but not vascular defects or uteroplacental perfusion [70].
The IGF system regulates placental growth, regulation, invasion and angiogenesis [72]. Trophoblasts produce both IGF-1 and IGF-2 throughout pregnancy [73]. Transgenic mice with mutations in either IGF1 or IGF2 show a 60% reduction in size compared to wild-type litter mates [74], and it is well established that IGF-1, its receptor, and its binding partners are downregulated in FGR [75]. There is a growing body of evidence that targeted delivery of IGF-1 or IGF-2 successfully improves fetal growth in FGR models. We have demonstrated that placental IGF-1 gene therapy, through multiple mechanisms, maintains fetal weight in FGR fetuses [76], increases placental glucose and amino acid transporter expression [77–79], increases fetal glucose concentrations and reduces interhaemal distance in the placenta [40]. Similarly, targeted delivery of the IGF2 protein to the placenta in the P0 mouse model of FGR, led to an increase in placenta weight and a reduced number of FGR fetuses [80].
During pregnancy, VEGF is produced by the placenta trophoblast cells [81], and regulates vascular endothelial cell growth and proliferation in the placenta [82]. Additionally, maternal serum levels of VEGF have been shown to be lower in women with FGR pregnancies [83,84]. Targeted delivery of VEGF locally to uteroplacental circulation has been shown to increase fetal weight at term in models of FGR [85,86] as well as improve uterine blood flow [87–89]. Along with this, fetal lungs, livers, and brains were found to be significantly larger with VEGF delivery than without [85]. Uterine artery activity was also found to be positively altered with VEGF delivery with increased relaxation and decreased tension compared to untreated FGR models [85].
Nitric oxide is required for trophoblast function, nutrient transport, uterine artery relaxation, and proper growth of the fetus [21,90]. More recently, the use of nitric oxide donors as potential targets to improve fetal growth has been investigated as nitric oxide regulates placental expression of growth factors including EGFl7 [91]. EGFl7 is a secreted protein which regulates vasculogenesis and angiogenesis [92], as well as placental vascularization [25]. Nitric oxide induced increased EGFl7 expression in the placenta increases NOTCH1 expression which controls development of extravillous trophoblasts in the placenta, and notch target genes such as HEY1 and HEY2 [91]. Similarly, targeted delivery of the nitric oxide donor SE175 to the placenta has been shown to increase fetal weight and reduced placental oxidative stress in the eNOS−/− mouse model of FGR [93]. In ovine fetoplacental artery endothelial cells another nitric oxide donor, sodium nitroprusside, s upregulates activation of the ERK pathway [94]. Overall, these studies highlight the potential to use nitric oxide donors or downstream targets for treatment of those FGR cases caused by abnormalities in placental and arterial remodeling.
6. Therapeutic development in humans
Several factors have now been identified as potential targets for the treatment of FGR, but delivering therapeutics in a safe and effective way with the desired outcomes is the next step to developing in utero therapy options. Research into several mechanisms to target the placenta and deliver these targets are currently in preliminary testing. These include targeted liposomes, adenoviral vectors and adeno-associated virus delivery, and polymer nanoparticle delivery.
Liposomes are fluid vesicular structures that can envelope many different types of molecules with low immune response at an inexpensive cost. Hence, there are several types of liposomes currently on the market and in clinical trials for a number of different uses: from anticancer and anti-fungal treatments to anesthetics [95]. Additionally, modifications such as poly-ethylene glycol can be made to the liposomes to help increase circulation time and decrease toxicity and immune response [96]. These liposomes can be coupled with targeting components such as a ligand with a receptor on a specific cell type [97]. In terms of placental targeting, Harris et al. have used this liposome technology to target the placenta through peptide sequences specific to the placenta and uterine vasculature [80]. These liposomes have been used to deliver IGF-2 [80], EGF [70], and SE175 [93] in various animal and human in vitro models to test their ability to correct FGR. In the animal studies, liposomes were administered intravenously in the female. Most importantly, these studies consistently showed effective delivery of the liposome and cargo it contained to the placenta with no adverse effects on maternal or fetal health, and highlights the therapeutic potential of liposomes with further studies.
Adenoviral vectors are increasingly popular delivery mechanisms for gene therapy. These viral vectors are single stranded DNA genomes surrounded by protein shells. In recombinant vectors the viral DNA is replaced with the transgene of interest under the control of tissue specific promoters [98,99]. In terms of targeting the maternal-fetal interface, David et al. have previously shown an increase in fetal weight with adenoviral vector delivery of VEGF in a guinea pig growth restriction model [85]. The adenoviral vector was applied in a thermosensitive gel directly to the exposed uterine and radial arteries. Additionally, using the same adenoviral vector expressing VEGF but injected directly into the proximal part of the uterine artery, they demonstrated increased uterine blood flow and vasodilation in a sheep model counteracting the abnormalities in FGR [100]. Direct placental injection of adenoviral vectors containing eight different growth factor transgenes have also been performed to examine the effects of overexpressing genes including IGF-1, placental growth factor (PGF) and angiopoietin 2 (ANG-2) on placental and fetal growth [101]. Following on from this study, we performed intraplacental delivery, through direct injection of the placenta, of adenoviral vectors containing IGF-1 have been performed in various animal [76,102] and in vitro human models [77,78] with positive effects on fetal growth and placental nutrient transport. Whilst these early studies clearly demonstrate efficient delivery of factors to the placenta and positive effects on placental function and fetal growth, there are major concerns regarding immunogenicity and off-target effects [103] that need to be considered.
Non-viral, polymer-based nanoparticles are widely studied in cancer therapeutics [104]. They offer a controlled delivery system with easy manipulation of release time and interactions. These can be natural or synthetic polymers, conjugated with targeting molecules to enhance specificity, and used for drug or gene delivery [105]. Synthetic polymer-based nanoparticles can serve as carriers for plasmid DNA, siRNAs, mRNAs, proteins and oligonucleotides [106–109] - improving transfection, therapeutic effects, and evoking less immune response than viral delivery [110,111]. Our laboratory has been using a PHPMA115-b-PDMEAMA115 co-polymer to deliver a plasmid containing the IGF-1 gene under a trophoblast specific promoter (CYP19A1 or PLAC1) in human placental cells and ex vivo placenta cotyledons [79], and intraplacentally in mice [76,90], and guinea pig studies [40]. These studies have shown effective delivery to the placenta, regulation of placental signaling mechanisms, maintenance of birth weight of offspring affected by FGR, and increased glucose transport in vitro and in vivo. Most importantly, we have achieved effective delivery to the placenta without plasmid passing to the fetus, while having significant effects on placental structure, IGF-1 signaling, fetal organ development and fetal growth. Future pre-clinical model studies have the potential to verify therapeutic potential and move towards in utero human placenta gene therapies.
With multiple target proteins and multiple modes of delivery being studied, gene therapy targeting the placenta for FGR treatment may soon be a reality. Additionally, the vast number of animal and in vitro human models contributes significantly towards the ability to effectively study potential treatments for FGR. Hence, with continual research support there is the potential for reducing prenatal mortality rates, NICU admission, and many long-term health effects in children and adults.
Acknowledgments
HNJ and RLW are supported by NICHD Eunice Kennedy Shriver R01HD090651.
References
- [1].Shield B.C.a.B., Trends in Pregnancy and Childbirth Complications in the U.S, JUne 17, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- [2].Malassine A, Frendo JL, Evain-Brion D, A comparison of placental development and endocrine functions between the human and mouse model, Hum. Reprod. Update 9 (6) (2003) 531–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Silasi M, Cohen B, Karumanchi SA, Rana S, Abnormal placentation, angiogenic factors, and the pathogenesis of preeclampsia, Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. N. Am 37 (2) (2010) 239–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Scifres CM, Nelson DM, Intrauterine growth restriction, human placental development and trophoblast cell death, J. Physiol 587 (14) (2009) 3453–3458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Combs CA, Castillo R, Webb G, Del Rosario A, 65 New SMFM definition of fetal growth restriction: impact of adding AC< 10th percentile, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 224 (2) (2021) S46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].de Onis M, Blössner M, Villar J, Levels and patterns of intrauterine growth retardation in developing countries, Eur. J. Clin. Nutr 52 (Suppl 1) (1998) S5–S15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Nardozza LM, Caetano AC, Zamarian AC, Mazzola JB, Silva CP, Marçal VM, Lobo TF, Peixoto AB, Araujo Júnior E, Fetal growth restriction: current knowledge, Arch. Gynecol. Obstet 295 (5) (2017) 1061–1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Brodsky D, Christou H, Current concepts in intrauterine growth restriction, J. Intensive Care Med 19 (6) (2004) 307–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Godfrey KM, Barker DJ, Fetal programming and adult health, Publ. Health Nutr. 4 (2B) (2001) 611–624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Hanson M, Gluckman P, Developmental origins of noncommunicable disease: population and public health implications, Am. J. Clin. Nutr 94 (suppl_6) (2011) 1754S–1758S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Figueras F, Gratacós E, Update on the diagnosis and classification of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol, Fetal Diagn. Ther 36 (2) (2014) 86–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Figueras F, Caradeux J, Crispi F, Eixarch E, Peguero A, Gratacos E, Diagnosis and surveillance of late-onset fetal growth restriction, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 218 (2, Supplement) (2018) S790–S802, e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Kinshella M-LW, Omar S, Scherbinsky K, Vidier M, Magee LA, von Dadelszen P, Moore SE, Elango R, Group PCFW, Effects of maternal nutritional supplements and dietary interventions on placental complications: an umbrella review, meta-analysis and evidence map, Nutrients 13 (2) (2021) 472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Spiroski AM, Oliver MH, Harding JE, Bloomfield FH, Intrauterine intervention for the treatment of fetal growth restriction, Curr. Pediatr. Rev 12 (3) (2016) 168–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Malhotra A, Allison BJ, Castillo-Melendez M, Jenkin G, Polglase GR, Miller SL, Neonatal morbidities of fetal growth restriction: pathophysiology and impact, Front. Endocrinol 10 (2019) 55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Lean RE, Rogers CE, Paul RA, Gerstein ED, NICU hospitalization: long-term implications on parenting and child behaviors, Curr Treat Options Pediatr 4 (1) (2018) 49–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Boynton-Jarrett N.M.a.R. Impacts of NICU Stay on Infant Development and Child-Parent Relationship, Attachment and Trauma Network, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- [18].Swanson AM, David AL, Animal models of fetal growth restriction: considerations for translational medicine, Placenta 36 (6) (2015) 623–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Watson ED, Cross JC, Development of structures and transport functions in the mouse placenta, Physiology 20 (3) (2005) 180–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Woods L, Perez-Garcia V, Hemberger M, Regulation of placental development and its impact on fetal growth—new insights from mouse models, Front. Endocrinol (2018) 570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Kusinski LC, Stanley JL, Dilworth MR, Hirt CJ, Andersson IJ, Renshall LJ, Baker BC, Baker PN, Sibley CP, Wareing M, Glazier JD, eNOS knockout mouse as a model of fetal growth restriction with an impaired uterine artery function and placental transport phenotype, Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol 303 (1) (2012) R86–R93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Mills V, Plows JF, Zhao H, Oyston C, Vickers MH, Baker PN, Stanley JL, Effect of sildenafil citrate treatment in the eNOS knockout mouse model of fetal growth restriction on long-term cardiometabolic outcomes in male offspring, Pharmacol. Res 137 (2018) 122–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Carmeliet P, Ferreira V, Breier G, Pollefeyt S, Kieckens L, Gertsenstein M, Fahrig M, Vandenhoeck A, Harpal K, Eberhardt C, Declercq C, Pawling J, Moons L, Collen D, Risau W, Nagy A, Abnormal blood vessel development and lethality in embryos lacking a single VEGF allele, Nature 380 (6573) (1996) 435–439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Martín-Estal I, Fajardo-Ramírez OR, De León MB, Zertuche-Mery C, Rodríguez-Mendoza D, Gómez-Álvarez P, Galindo-Rangel M, López AL, Castilla-Cortázar I, Torres FC, Ethanol consumption during gestation promotes placental alterations in IGF-1 deficient mice, F1000Research 10 (1284) (2021) 1284. [Google Scholar]
- [25].Lacko LA, Hurtado R, Hinds S, Poulos MG, Butler JM, Stuhlmann H, Altered feto-placental vascularization, feto-placental malperfusion and fetal growth restriction in mice with Egfl7 loss of function, Development 144 (13) (2017) 2469–2479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Baker J, Liu J-P, Robertson EJ, Efstratiadis A, Role of insulin-like growth factors in embryonic and postnatal growth, Cell 75 (1) (1993) 73–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Natale BV, Gustin KN, Lee K, Holloway AC, Laviolette SR, Natale DRC, Hardy DB, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol exposure during rat pregnancy leads to symmetrical fetal growth restriction and labyrinth-specific vascular defects in the placenta, Sci. Rep 10 (1) (2020) 544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Graur D, Duret L, Gouy M, Phylogenetic position of the order Lagomorpha (rabbits, hares and allies), Nature 379 (6563) (1996) 333–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Polisca A, Scotti L, Orlandi R, Brecchia G, Boiti C, Doppler evaluation of maternal and fetal vessels during normal gestation in rabbits, Theriogenology 73 (3) (2010) 358–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Lopez-Tello J, Arias-Alvarez M, Gonzalez-Bulnes A, Sferuzzi-Perri AN, Models of Intrauterine growth restriction and fetal programming in rabbits, Mol. Reprod. Dev 86 (12) (2019) 1781–1809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Flake AW, Villa RL, Adzick NS, Harrison MR, Transamniotic fetal feeding II. A model of intrauterine growth retardation using the relationship of “Natural runting” to uterine position, J. Pediatr. Surg 22 (9) (1987) 816–819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Morrison JL, Botting KJ, Darby JRT, David AL, Dyson RM, Gatford KL, Gray B, Herrera EA, Hirst JJ, Kim B, Kind KL, Krause BJ, Matthews SG, Palliser HK, Regnault TRH, Richardson BS, Sasaki A, Thompson LP, Berry MJ, Guinea pig models for translation of the developmental origins of health and disease hypothesis into the clinic, J. Physiol 596 (23) (2018) 5535–5569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Kunkele J, Trillmich F, Are precocial young cheaper? Lactation energetics in the Guinea pig, Physiol. Zool 70 (5) (1997) 589–596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Enders AC, Blankenship TN, Comparative placental structure, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev 38 (1) (1999) 3–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Mess A, The Guinea pig placenta: model of placental growth dynamics, Placenta 28 (8–9) (2007) 812–815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Elias AA, Ghaly A, Matushewski B, Regnault TR, Richardson BS, Maternal nutrient restriction in Guinea pigs as an animal model for inducing fetal growth restriction, Reprod. Sci 23 (2) (2016) 219–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Sohlstrom A, Katsman A, Kind KL, Roberts CT, Owens PC, Robinson JS, Owens JA, Food restriction alters pregnancy-associated changes in IGF and IGFBP in the Guinea pig, Am. J. Physiol 274 (3) (1998) E410–E416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Briscoe TA, Rehn AE, Dieni S, Duncan JR, Wlodek ME, Owens JA, Rees SM, Cardiovascular and renal disease in the adolescent Guinea pig after chronic placental insufficiency, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 191 (3) (2004) 847–855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Tolcos M, Bateman E, O’Dowd R, Markwick R, Vrijsen K, Rehn A, Rees S, Intrauterine growth restriction affects the maturation of myelin, Exp. Neurol 232 (1) (2011) 53–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Wilson RL, Stephens KK, Lampe K, Gupta MK, Duvall CL, Jones HN, Nanoparticle-mediated transgene expression of insulin-like growth factor 1 in the Guinea pig placenta differentially affects fetal liver gene expression depending on maternal nutrient status, 2021.06, bioRxiv 24 (2021), 449769. [Google Scholar]
- [41].Ghaly A, Maki Y, Nygard K, Hammond R, Hardy DB, Richardson BS, Maternal nutrient restriction in Guinea pigs leads to fetal growth restriction with increased brain apoptosis, Pediatr. Res 85 (1) (2019) 105–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Tolcos M, McDougall A, Shields A, Chung Y, O’Dowd R, Turnley A, Wallace M, Rees S, Intrauterine growth restriction affects cerebellar granule cells in the developing Guinea pig brain, Dev. Neurosci 40 (2) (2018) 162–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Beede KA, Limesand SW, Petersen JL, Yates DT, Real supermodels wear wool: summarizing the impact of the pregnant sheep as an animal model for adaptive fetal programming, Animal Frontiers 9 (3) (2019) 34–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Zhang S, Barker P, Botting KJ, Roberts CT, McMillan CM, McMillen IC, Morrison JL, Early restriction of placental growth results in placental structural and gene expression changes in late gestation independent of fetal hypoxemia, Physiological reports 4 (23) (2016), e13049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Supramaniam VG, Jenkin G, Loose J, Wallace EM, Miller SL, Basic science: chronic fetal hypoxia increases activin A concentrations in the late-pregnant sheep, BJOG An Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol 113 (1) (2006) 102–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Brown LD, Rozance PJ, Bruce JL, Friedman JE, Hay WW Jr., Wesolowski SR, Limited capacity for glucose oxidation in fetal sheep with intrauterine growth restriction, Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol 309 (8) (2015) R920–R928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Macko AR, Yates DT, Chen X, Shelton LA, Kelly AC, Davis MA, Camacho LE, Anderson MJ, Limesand SW, Adrenal demedullation and oxygen supplementation independently increase glucose-stimulated insulin concentrations in fetal sheep with intrauterine growth restriction, Endocrinology 157 (5) (2016) 2104–2115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Eifert AW, Wilson ME, Vonnahme KA, Camacho LE, Borowicz PP, Redmer DA, Romero S, Dorsam S, Haring J, Lemley CO, Effect of melatonin or maternal nutrient restriction on vascularity and cell proliferation in the ovine placenta, Anim. Reprod. Sci 153 (2015) 13–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Lemley CO, Meyer AM, Camacho LE, Neville TL, Newman DJ, Caton JS, Vonnahme KA, Melatonin supplementation alters uteroplacental hemodynamics and fetal development in an ovine model of intrauterine growth restriction, Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol 302 (4) (2012) R454–R467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Carr DJ, Aitken RP, Milne JS, David AL, Wallace JM, Fetoplacental biometry and umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in the overnourished adolescent model of fetal growth restriction, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 207 (2) (2012) 141, e6–141. e15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Morrison JL, Sheep models of intrauterine growth restriction: fetal adaptations and consequences, Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol 35 (7) (2008) 730–743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Wooding F, The synepitheliochorial placenta of ruminants: binucleate cell fusions and hormone production, Placenta 13 (2) (1992) 101–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Stouffer RL, Woodruff TK, Nonhuman primates: a vital model for basic and applied research on female reproduction, prenatal development, and women’s health, ILAR J. 58 (2) (2017) 281–294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Grigsby PL, Animal models to study placental development and function throughout normal and dysfunctional human pregnancy, Thieme Medical Publishers, Semin. Reprod. Med 34 (1) (2016) 11–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Rosario FJ, Kramer A, Li C, Galan HL, Powell TL, Nathanielsz PW, Jansson T, Reduction of in vivo placental amino acid transport precedes the development of intrauterine growth restriction in the non-human primate, Nutrients 13 (8) (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Pantham P, Rosario FJ, Weintraub ST, Nathanielsz PW, Powell TL, Li C, Jansson T, Down-regulation of placental transport of amino acids precedes the development of intrauterine growth restriction in maternal nutrient restricted baboons, Biol. Reprod 95 (5) (2016) 98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Roberts VHJ, Räsänen JP, Novy MJ, Frias A, Louey S, Morgan TK, Thornburg KL, Spindel ER, Grigsby PL, Restriction of placental vasculature in a non-human primate: a unique model to study placental plasticity, Placenta 33 (1) (2012) 73–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Kuo AH, Li C, Huber HF, Schwab M, Nathanielsz PW, Clarke GD, Maternal nutrient restriction during pregnancy and lactation leads to impaired right ventricular function in young adult baboons, J. Physiol 595 (13) (2017) 4245–4260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Li C, McDonald TJ, Wu G, Nijland MJ, Nathanielsz PW, Intrauterine growth restriction alters term fetal baboon hypothalamic appetitive peptide balance, J. Endocrinol 217 (3) (2013) 275–282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Kuo AH, Li C, Li J, Huber HF, Nathanielsz PW, Clarke GD, Cardiac remodelling in a baboon model of intrauterine growth restriction mimics accelerated ageing, J. Physiol 595 (4) (2017) 1093–1110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Mehta V, Abi-Nader KN, Carr D, Wallace J, Coutelle C, Waddington SN, Peebles B, David AL, Monitoring for potential adverse effects of prenatal gene therapy: use of large animal models with relevance to human application, Methods Mol. Biol 891 (2012) 291–328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Mattar CN, Nathwani AC, Waddington SN, Dighe N, Kaeppel C, Nowrouzi A, McIntosh J, Johana NB, Ogden B, Fisk NM, Davidoff AM, David A, Peebles D, Valentine MB, Appelt JU, von Kalle C, Schmidt M, Biswas A, Choolani M, Chan JK, Stable human FIX expression after 0.9G intrauterine gene transfer of self-complementary adeno-associated viral vector 5 and 8 in macaques, Mol. Ther 19 (11) (2011) 1950–1960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Pemathilaka RL, Reynolds DE, Hashemi NN, Drug transport across the human placenta: review of placenta-on-a-chip and previous approaches, Interface Focus 9 (5) (2019), 20190031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Conings S, Amant F, Annaert P, Van Calsteren K, Integration and validation of the ex vivo human placenta perfusion model, J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 88 (2017) 25–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Myllynen P, Mathiesen L, Weimer M, Annola K, Immonen E, Karttunen V, Kummu M, Mørck TJ, Nielsen JKS, Knudsen LE, Preliminary interlaboratory comparison of the ex vivo dual human placental perfusion system, Reprod. Toxicol 30 (1) (2010) 94–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Zhu Y, Yin F, Wang H, Wang L, Yuan J, Qin J, Placental barrier-on-a-chip: modeling placental inflammatory responses to bacterial infection, ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng 4 (9) (2018) 3356–3363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Cui Y, Zhao H, Wu S, Li X, Human female reproductive system organoids: applications in developmental biology, disease modelling, and drug discovery, Stem Cell Reviews and Reports 16 (6) (2020) 1173–1184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Morrish DW, Bhardwaj D, Dabbagh LK, Marusyk H, Siy O, Epidermal growth factor induces differentiation and secretion of human chorionic gonadotropin and placental lactogen in normal human placenta, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 65 (6) (1987) 1282–1290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Lindqvist P, Grennert L, Maršál K, Epidermal growth factor in maternal urine—a predictor of intrauterine growth restriction? Early Hum. Dev 56 (2–3) (1999) 143–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Renshall LJ, Beards F, Evangelinos A, Greenwood SL, Brownbill P, Stevens A, Sibley CP, Aplin JD, Johnstone ED, Teesalu T, Harris LK, Targeted delivery of epidermal growth factor to the human placenta to treat fetal growth restriction, Pharmaceutics 13 (11) (2021) 1778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Moll SJ, Jones CJ, Crocker IP, Baker PN, Heazell AE, Epidermal growth factor rescues trophoblast apoptosis induced by reactive oxygen species, Apoptosis 12 (9) (2007) 1611–1622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Sferruzzi-Perri AN, Sandovici I, Constancia M, Fowden AL, Placental phenotype and the insulin-like growth factors: resource allocation to fetal growth, J. Physiol 595 (15) (2017) 5057–5093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Bowman CJ, Streck RD, Chapin RE, Maternal-placental insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling and its importance to normal embryo-fetal development, Birth Defects Res. Part B Dev. Reproductive Toxicol 89 (4) (2010) 339–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Forbes K, Westwood M, The IGF axis and placental function. a mini review, Horm. Res 69 (3) (2008) 129–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Martín-Estal I, de la Garza RG, Castilla-Cortázar I, Intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) as a novel condition of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) deficiency, Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol 170 (2016) 1–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Abd Ellah N, Taylor L, Troja W, Owens K, Ayres N, Pauletti G, Jones H, Development of non-viral, trophoblast-specific gene delivery for placental therapy, PLoS One 10 (10) (2015), e0140879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Jones H, Crombleholme T, Habli M, Regulation of amino acid transporters by adenoviral-mediated human insulin-like growth factor-1 in a mouse model of placental insufficiency in vivo and the human trophoblast line BeWo in vitro, Placenta 35 (2) (2014) 132–138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Jones HN, Crombleholme T, Habli M, Adenoviral-mediated placental gene transfer of IGF-1 corrects placental insufficiency via enhanced placental glucose transport mechanisms, PLoS One 8 (9) (2013), e74632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Wilson RL, Owens K, Sumser EK, Fry MV, Stephens KK, Chuecos M, Carrillo M, Schlabritz-Loutsevitch N, Jones HN, Nanoparticle mediated increased insulin-like growth factor 1 expression enhances human placenta syncytium function, Placenta 93 (2020) 1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80].King A, Ndifon C, Lui S, Widdows K, Kotamraju VR, Agemy L, Teesalu T, Glazier JD, Cellesi F, Tirelli N, Aplin JD, Ruoslahti E, Harris LK, Tumorhoming peptides as tools for targeted delivery of payloads to the placenta, Sci. Adv 2 (5) (2016), e1600349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Andraweera P, Dekker G, Laurence J, Roberts C, Placental expression of VEGF family mRNA in adverse pregnancy outcomes, Placenta 33 (6) (2012) 467–472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Carmeliet P, Angiogenesis in health and disease, Nat. Med 9 (6) (2003) 653–660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Savvidou MD, Christina KY, Harland LC, Hingorani AD, Nicolaides KH, Maternal serum concentration of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and vascular endothelial growth factor in women with abnormal uterine artery Doppler and in those with fetal growth restriction, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 195 (6) (2006) 1668–1673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Bersinger NA, Ødegård RA, Serum levels of macrophage colony stimulating, vascular endothelial, and placenta growth factor in relation to later clinical onset of pre-eclampsia and a small-for-gestational age birth, Am. J. Reprod. Immunol 54 (2) (2005) 77–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].Swanson AM, Rossi CA, Ofir K, Mehta V, Boyd M, Barker H, Ledwozyw A, Vaughan O, Martin J, Zachary I, Sebire N, Peebles DM, David AL, Maternal therapy with ad.VEGF-A(165) increases fetal weight at term in a Guinea-pig model of fetal growth restriction, Hum. Gene Ther 27 (12) (2016) 997–1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Carr DJ, Wallace JM, Aitken RP, Milne JS, Mehta V, Martin JF, Zachary IC, Peebles DM, David AL, Uteroplacental adenovirus vascular endothelial growth factor gene therapy increases fetal growth velocity in growth-restricted sheep pregnancies, Hum. Gene Ther 25 (4) (2014) 375–384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [87].Mehta V, Abi-Nader K, Peebles D, Benjamin E, Wigley V, Torondel B, Filippi B, Shaw S, Boyd M, Martin J, Long-term increase in uterine blood flow is achieved by local overexpression of VEGF-A165 in the uterine arteries of pregnant sheep, Gene Ther. 19 (9) (2012) 925–935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [88].Mehta V, Abi-Nader KN, Shangaris P, Shaw SS, Filippi E, Benjamin E, Boyd M, Peebles DM, Martin J, Zachary I, Local over-expression of VEGF-DΔNΔC in the uterine arteries of pregnant sheep results in long-term changes in uterine artery contractility and angiogenesis, PLoS One 9 (6) (2014), e100021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [89].David AL, McIntosh J, Peebles DM, Cook T, Waddington S, Weisz B, Wigley V, Abi-Nader K, Boyd M, Davidoff AM, Nathwani AC, Recombinant adeno-associated virus-mediated in utero gene transfer gives therapeutic transgene expression in the sheep, Hum. Gene Ther 22 (4) (2011) 419–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [90].Wilson RL, Troja W, Sumser EK, Maupin A, Lampe K, Jones HN, Insulin-like growth factor 1 signaling in the placenta requires endothelial nitric oxide synthase to support trophoblast function and normal fetal growth, Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol 320 (5) (2021) R653–R662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [91].Massimiani M, Tiralongo GM, Salvi S, Fruci S, Lacconi V, La Civita F, Mancini M, Stuhlmann H, Valensise H, Campagnolo L, Treatment of pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction with nitric oxide donors increases placental expression of Epidermal Growth Factor-Like Domain 7 and improves fetal growth: a pilot study, Transl. Res 228 (2021) 28–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [92].Fitch MJ, Campagnolo L, Kuhnert F, Stuhlmann H, Egfl7, a novel epidermal growth factor-domain gene expressed in endothelial cells, Dev. Dynam.Off. Publ. Am.Assoc. Anat 230 (2) (2004) 316–324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [93].Cureton N, Korotkova I, Baker B, Greenwood S, Wareing M, Kotamraju VR, Teesalu T, Cellesi F, Tirelli N, Ruoslahti E, Selective targeting of a novel vasodilator to the uterine vasculature to treat impaired uteroplacental perfusion in pregnancy, Theranostics 7 (15) (2017) 3715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [94].Zheng J, Wen Y, Austin JL, Chen D.-b., Exogenous nitric oxide stimulates cell proliferation via activation of a mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in ovine fetoplacental artery endothelial cells, Biol. Reprod 74 (2) (2006) 375–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [95].Allen TM, Cullis PR, Liposomal drug delivery systems: from concept to clinical applications, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev 65 (1) (2013) 36–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [96].Knop K, Hoogenboom R, Fischer D, Schubert US, Poly (ethylene glycol) in drug delivery: pros and cons as well as potential alternatives, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 49 (36) (2010) 6288–6308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [97].Balazs DA, Godbey W, Liposomes for use in gene delivery, J Drug Deliv 2011 (2011), 326497–326497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [98].Naso MF, Tomkowicz B, Perry WL 3rd, Strohl WR, Adeno-associated virus (AAV) as a vector for gene therapy, BioDrugs 31 (4) (2017) 317–334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [99].Ricobaraza A, Gonzalez-Aparicio M, Mora-Jimenez L, Lumbreras S, Hernandez-Alcoceba R, High-Capacity adenoviral vectors: expanding the scope of gene therapy, Int. J. Mol. Sci 21 (10) (2020) 3643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [100].David AL, Torondel B, Zachary I, Wigley V, Nader KA, Mehta V, Buckley SMK, Cook T, Boyd M, Rodeck CH, Martin J, Peebles DM, Local delivery of VEGF adenovirus to the uterine artery increases vasorelaxation and uterine blood flow in the pregnant sheep, Gene Ther. 15 (19) (2008) 1344–1350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [101].Katz AB, Keswani SG, Habli M, Lim FY, Zoltick PW, Midrio P, Kozin ED, Herlyn M, Crombleholme TM, Placental gene transfer: transgene screening in mice for trophic effects on the placenta, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 201 (5) (2009) 499–e1, 499. e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [102].Keswani SG, Balaji S, Katz AB, King A, Omar K, Habli M, Klanke C, Crombleholme TM, Intraplacental gene therapy with Ad-IGF-1 corrects naturally occurring rabbit model of intrauterine growth restriction, Hum. Gene Ther 26 (3) (2015) 172–182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [103].Ahi YS, Bangari DS, Mittal SK, Adenoviral vector immunity: its implications and circumvention strategies, Curr. Gene Ther 11 (4) (2011) 307–320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [104].Wilson RL, Jones HN, Targeting the dysfunctional placenta to improve pregnancy outcomes based on lessons learned in cancer, Clin. Therapeut 43 (2) (2021) 246–264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [105].Avramovic N, Mandic B, Savic-Radojevic A, Simic T, Polymeric nanocarriers of drug delivery systems in cancer therapy, Pharmaceutics 12 (4) (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [106].Alinejad V, Hossein Somi M, Baradaran B, Akbarzadeh P, Atyabi F, Kazerooni H, Samadi Kafil H, Aghebati Maleki L, Siah Mansouri H, Yousefi M, Co-delivery of IL17RB siRNA and doxorubicin by chitosan-based nanoparticles for enhanced anticancer efficacy in breast cancer cells, Biomed. Pharmacother 83 (2016) 229–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [107].Navarro G, Pan J, Torchilin VP, Micelle-like nanoparticles as carriers for DNA and siRNA, Mol. Pharm 12 (2) (2015) 301–313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [108].Teo PY, Cheng W, Hedrick JL, Yang YY, Co-delivery of drugs and plasmid DNA for cancer therapy, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev 98 (2016) 41–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [109].Duvall CL, Convertine AJ, Benoit DS, Hoffman AS, Stayton PS, Intracellular delivery of a proapoptotic peptide via conjugation to a RAFT synthesized endosomolytic polymer, Mol. Pharm 7 (2) (2010) 468–476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [110].Sharma R, Lee JS, Bettencourt RC, Xiao C, Konieczny SF, Won YY, Effects of the incorporation of a hydrophobic middle block into a PEG-polycation diblock copolymer on the physicochemical and cell interaction properties of the polymer-DNA complexes, Biomacromolecules 9 (11) (2008) 3294–3307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [111].Andersen MO, Howard KA, Paludan SR, Besenbacher F, Kjems J, Delivery of siRNA from lyophilized polymeric surfaces, Biomaterials 29 (4) (2008) 506–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
