Skip to main content
PLOS Global Public Health logoLink to PLOS Global Public Health
. 2024 Mar 18;4(3):e0002991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002991

Predictors of neonatal mortality in Ethiopia: Cross sectional study using 2005, 2010 and 2016 Ethiopian demographic health survey datasets

Yirgalem Shibiru Baruda 1,*, Mark Spigt 2, Andrea Gabrio 3, Lelisa Fikadu Assebe 4
Editor: Vinay Nair Kampalath5
PMCID: PMC10947717  PMID: 38498496

Abstract

Ethiopia is among the countries that have highest neonatal mortality in the world. Despite efforts to reduce neonatal mortality, the country has faced challenges in achieving national and global targets. The study aims to determine the trends and predictors of change in neonatal mortality in Ethiopia for the past 15 years. The study used Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey Datasets (EDHS) from 2005, 2011, and 2016. All live births of reproductive-age women in Ethiopia were included in the study. Multivariate decomposition analysis for the nonlinear response variable (MVDCMP) based on the logit link function was employed to determine the relative contribution of each independent variable to the change in neonatal mortality over the last 15 years. The neonatal mortality rate has decreased by 11 per 1,000 live births, with an annual reduction rate of 2.8% during the survey period. The mortality rate increased in the pastoralist regions of the country from 31 per 1,000 live births to 36 per 1,000 live births, compared to the city and agrarian regions. Maternal ANC visits in 2005 and 2016 (AOR [95%CI] = 0.10 [0.01, 0.81]; 0.01 [0.02, 0.60]) were significantly associated with decreased neonatal mortality. In addition, the decomposition analysis revealed that increased birth interval of more than 24 months and early breastfeeding initiation contributed to the reduction of neonatal mortality by 26% and 10%, respectively, during the survey period. The study found that neonatal mortality is a public health problem in the country, particularly in pastoralist communities. Tailor made maternal and child healthcare interventions that promote early breastfeeding initiation, increased birth intervals and ANC utilization should be implemented to reduce neonatal mortality, particularly in pastoralist communities.

Introduction

Neonatal mortality is defined as the death of a newborn occurring within the first 28 days of life. It is further classified as early neonatal mortality when the death occurs before the age of seven days, and late neonatal mortality, when the death occurs between the ages of seven and twenty-eight days [1]. Moreover, neonatal mortality accounts for nearly half of all under-five mortality, indicating that the neonatal period is the most high-risk time for child survival [2]. The global average annual rate of reduction in neonatal mortality rate was 2.6 percent, which was lower than the 3.6 percent decline in children aged 1–59 months [3]. According to UNICEF, 61 countries will fail to meet the SDG3 target of reducing the mortality rate to 12 or fewer deaths per 1,000 live births by 2030, despite the fact that around 75% of neonatal mortality in LMICs, including sub–Saharan African countries, can be prevented [4].

In addition, almost a third of all neonatal deaths occur during the first day of life and nearly three-quarters occur within the first week [2]. Sub-Saharan Africa has the highest neonatal mortality rate, with 27 deaths per 1,000 live births, in the world [5]. Ethiopia has the highest neonatal mortality, although the neonatal mortality reduced from 49 to 28 per 1,000 live births between 2000 and 2016 [6]. The mortality rate varies across the regions in the country, the Benishangul Gumuz region had the highest mortality rate at 55 per 1,000 live births compared to Addis Ababa city, which had the lowest mortality rate [6].

Poor maternal utilization of health care services during pregnancy and childbirth is considered to be an important factor to the high prevalence of preventable neonatal mortality in LMICs [7]. Previous studies have shown that antenatal care (ANC) visits during pregnancy [8], institutional delivery [9, 10], and postnatal care [11] reduce the risk of neonatal mortality in LMICs. In addition, failure to initiate breastfeeding early, within 1 hour of birth, predisposes the newborns to infection, resulting in an increased risk of neonatal mortality [12, 13]. Similarly, lack of sufficient birth intervals also contributed to inadequate time for mothers to recover from nutritional depletion, leading to poor newborn health outcomes and deaths [14, 15]. The WHO recommends spacing childbirths at least 24–36 months apart [16]. Moreover, previous studies conducted in Angola [17], Uganda [18] and other LMICs [19] have shown that place of residence, maternal age at first birth, birth weight, household wealth index, and maternal education were all significantly associated with neonatal mortality.

Previous studies have shown the influence of several factors in alleviating neonatal mortality in Ethiopia [2022]. However, little evidence is available about the factors’ contribution to the reduction of neonatal mortality over the past decades. Thus, this study aims to examine the contribution of these factors to the change in neonatal mortality over time in Ethiopia.

Methods

Study area and setting

Ethiopia is located in the Horn of Africa and, after Nigeria, it is Africa’s second-most populous country. It had 115 million people in 2020 and is expected to grow at a 3.09 percent annual rate [23]. Children under 15 make up 47% of the population, while people aged 15 to 65 make up 49%. The sex ratio between males and females is almost equal, and women of reproductive age constitute about 23% of the population [24]. Nearly 80% of the population live in rural areas and depend mainly on subsistence agriculture. Also, the agriculture sector employed around 70% of the population [25].

Study design and data source

Cross-sectional studies were conducted in Ethiopia in 2005, 2010, and 2016. The surveys collected nationally representative data. The data was collected by the Central Statistical Agency (CSA) in collaboration with the Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) and the Minister of Health (MoH). This study used the subsamples of the 2005, 2011, and 2016 EDHS datasets.

Study population and sample

The sampling in the EDHS was a stratified, two-stage sampling procedure to recruit a nationally representative sample for the surveys. Each region was stratified into urban and rural areas, resulting in enumeration areas (EAs), the sampling stratum for the surveys. In the first stage, 645 EAs in EDHS 2005, 624 EAs in EDHS 2011, and 645 EAs in EDHS 2016 were randomly selected proportional to their EA size, and on average, 27 to 32 households per EA were chosen in the second stage. The sample unit for the reported study was all live births reported from each survey. As a result, the birth recodes (BR) 2005, 2010, and 2016 datasets were used for the analysis because they contain birth history data of interviewed women, including pregnancy, delivery, and post-natal care, as well as nutrition and health data for newborns in the last five years. A weighted sample of 33,976 (11,163 in the EDHS 2005, 11,872 in the EDHS 2011, and 10,941 in the EDHS 2016) live births who were born in the five years preceding the surveys were considered for the analysis.

Study variables and measures

The dependent variable for the study, neonatal mortality, was classified dichotomously as “1 or 0” 1 death of a child at the ages 0 to 28 days and 0 if the child was alive. The following independent variables were coded as categorical nominal variables: ANC visit (yes or no), mode of delivery (vaginal or cesarean delivery), place of delivery (home or health institution, other) and early initiation of breastfeeding (yes and no), maternal marital status (never married, married, divorced/widow); maternal religion (orthodox, muslim, protestant, catholic, and others), place of residence (urban and rural), the regions of residence were categorized based on the living habits according to the ministry of health’s classification: agrarian (Tigray, Amhara, Oromia, SNNPR), pastoralist (Somali, Afar, Benishangul, Gambella), and city (Harari, Addis Ababa, and Dire Dawa) [26] In addition, other independent variables were recoded as ordinal categorical variables: birth size (large, appropriate, small); maternal age at first birth (<20, 20–29, 30–39, 40–49 years), birth order (coded as 1, 2–4, ≥ 5), birth interval (<24 or ≥24 months), maternal education (no education, primary, and secondary and higher) and household wealth index (coded as poor, middle and rich).

Statistical analysis

Data weighting was done to adjust the representativeness of the different regions in the survey and to obtain reliable statistical estimates. Descriptive statistics of independent and dependent variables were presented as frequency distributions and percentages. In addition, a multi-collinearity check was carried out using collinearity diagnostics with the variance inflation factor. The datasets were appended using the extracted data from 2005, 2011, and 2016, after maintaining similar variables across the surveys, to do trend analysis for neonatal mortality. The statistical analysis was done using the svyset (analysis plan) command to adjust the analysis for multi-stage sampling. Sampling weight variable, primary sampling unit, and strata were used to create the svyset command. STATA software version 17 was used to analyze the data.

A multivariate decomposition analysis for the nonlinear response variable (MVDCMP) based on the logit link function was employed to identify the relative contribution of each independent variable to the change in neonatal mortality over the last 15 years. The analysis model is defined as a logistic regression model for neonatal mortality where the estimated logit of mortality for neonate i in year j:

Y=F(Xβ)=logit(Y_ij)=X_ijβ_j

where logit refers to logistic function; β is the regression coefficient on the logit scale of each selected independent variable X [27]. Using this model, the proportion difference in Y between survey in year j = 2005 and survey in year j = 2016 of successive EDHS surveys for the neonatal mortality can be shown to be decomposed as (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Compositional differences between groups and differences in the effects of characteristics between groups.

Fig 1

E represents a counterfactual comparison of the change in neonatal mortality from group 2005’s perspective (that is, the anticipated change in neonatal mortality if survey 2005 was given survey 2016’s distribution of Xs). C is a counterfactual comparison of neonatal mortality from survey 2016’s perspective (the predicted change in neonatal mortality if survey 2016 experienced survey 2005’s characteristics pattern or effect (β) to X).

Data access and ethical consideration

The dataset was officially accessed on March 31, 2022, after a request outlining the purpose of the study had been submitted to the Demographic Health Survey Program (https://dhsprogram.com/data/new-use-registration.cfm). In addition, ethical clearance was secured from the ethical committee from the Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences at Maastricht University.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of children

The socio-demographic characteristics of births in the five years preceding the survey are shown in Table 1. A total of 33,976 live births were included in the study. The geographical distribution of the births across the surveys remained similar; more than 92% of the live births were from rural and agrarian regions. Also, the Oromia region, specifically, accounted for 40% of live births. Regarding the mothers’ educational status, the percentage of mothers who could not read and write decreased from 79.1% in 2005 to 66% in 2016. Similarly, mothers’ secondary and higher education levels increased steadily from 4.2% in 2005 to 7.2% in 2016. In all surveys, almost 50% of the mothers were aged between 20 and 29 years.

Table 1. Frequency and percentage of the respondents and their children socio–demographic characteristics among children born in the five years preceding the survey, EDHS 2005, 2011 and 2016.


Variables
EDHS2005
(N = 11,163)
EDHS 2011 (N = 11,872) EDHS 2016
(N = 10,941)
Weighted N (%) Weighted N (%) Weighted N (%)
Regions Tigray 698(6.3) 753 (6.3) 710 (6.5)
Afar 107(1.0) 121(1.0) 114 (1.0)
Amhara 2,621(23.5) 2,656 (22.4) 2,054 (18.8)
Oromia 4,411(39.5) 5,014 (42.2) 4,817 (44.0)
Somali 477(4.3) 364 (3.1) 507 (4.6)
Benishangul 105(0.9) 140 (1.2) 121 (1.1)
SNNPR 2,500 (22.4) 2,494 (21.0) 2,278 (20.8)
Gambela 31(0.3) 40 (0.3) 27 (0.2)
Harari 22(0.2) 29 (0.2) 26 (0.2)
Addis Ababa 153(1.4) 222 (1.9) 241 (2.2)
Dire Dawa 37(0.3) 39 (0.3) 47 (0.4)
Regional Agrarian 10,229 (91.6) 10,916 (92.0) 9,859 (90.1)
Context pastoralist 721 (6.5) 666 (5.6) 768 (7.0)
City 213 (1.9) 289 (2.4) 314(2.9)
Place of residence Urban 815(7.3) 1,528 (12.9) 1,205 (11.0)
Rural 10,348 (92.7) 10,344 (87.1) 9,736 (89.0)
Religions Orthodox 4,674 (41.9) 4,519 (38.1) 3,742 (34.2
Catholic 121 (1.1) 108 (0.9) 103 (0.9)
Protestant 2,217 (19.9) 2,758 (23.2) 2,314 (21.2)
Muslim 3,875 (34.7) 4,214 (35.5) 4,532 (41.4)
Traditional 173 (1.6) 124 (1.0) 142 (1.3)
Other 102 (0.9) 142 (1.2) 107 (1.0)
Educational attainment No education 8,838 (79.2) 8227 (69.3) 7,221 (66.0)
Primary education 1,855 (16.6) 3,211 (27.1) 2,937 (26.9)
Secondary and higher education 470 (4.2) 434 (3.7) 782 (7.2)
Wealth Status Poor 4,796 (43.0) 5,368 (45.2) 5,111 (46.7)
Middle 2,486 (22.3) 2437 (20.5) 2263 (20.7)
Rich 3,882 (34.8) 4067 (34.3) 3567 (32.6)
Mother’s age <20 575 (5.2) 492 (4.1) 378 (3.5)
20–29 5,415 (48.5) 6,158 (51.9) 5,388 (49.3)
30–39 4,019 (36.0) 4,166 (35.1) 4,221 (38.6)
≥40 1,154 (10.3) 1,057 (8.9 953 (8.7)
Current marital Status Currently Married or Union 1,0518 (94.2) 10,989 (92.6) 10,381 (94.9)
not currently Married or Union 645 (5.8) 883 (7.4) 560 (5.1)

Trend and difference in neonatal mortality by the predictors

In this section, the trends in neonatal mortality are examined over time for each predictor and the decline in neonatal mortality for each predictor is assessed between 2011 and 2005, 2016 and 2011, 2016 and 2005.

As shown in Table 2, the mortality rate increased among children born in the pastoralist region between 2005 and 2016, from 31 per 1,000 live births to 36 per 1000 live births, but declined in city and agrarian regions. Similarly, neonatal mortality fell from 39 per 1,000 live births to 30 per 1,000 live births among children born to mothers with no education and from 44 per 1,000 live births to 24 per 1,000 live births among those with primary education between 2005 and 2016.

Table 2. Neonatal mortality rate (NMR) (five-year rate) and the difference in NMR between surveys by socio- demographic characteristics of the respondents, EDHS 2005, 2011 and 2016.

EDHS 2005 EDHS 2011 EDHS 2016 2011–2005 2016–2011 2016–2005
Variables NMR NMR NMR NMR difference between surveys
Regions Tigray 26.9 41.3 27.1 14.4 -14.2 0.2
Afar 29.2 18.9 26.4 -10.3 7.5 -2.8
Amhara 52.1 46.5 32.4 -5.6 -14.1 -19.7
Oromia 38.5 34.1 27.7 -4.4 -6.4 -10.8
Somali 30.1 28.7 40.9 -1.4 12.2 10.8
Benishangul 37.9 47.9 28.8 10 -19.1 -9.1
SNNPR 33.6 35.4 24.8 1.8 -10.6 -8.8
Gambela 23.6 36.5 28.2 12.9 -8.3 4.6
Harari 22.2 40.8 31.5 18.6 -9.3 9.3
Addis Ababa 28.5 21.7 21.0 -6.8 -0.7 -7.5
Dire Dawa 26.9 16.4 30.0 -10.5 13.6 3.1
Regional Context Agrarian 39.9 37.9 27.9 -2 -10 -12
pastoralist 30.8 31.3 36.3 0.5 5 5.5
City 27.5 22.8 23.1 -4.7 0.3 -4.4
Place of residence Urban 43.7 41.3 34.1 -2.4 -7.2 -9.6
Rural 38.8 36.6 27.7 -2.2 -8.9 -11.1
Religion Orthodox 42.2 42.9 31.0 0.7 -11.9 -11.2
catholic 33.8 81.8 5.8 48 -76 -28
protestant 37.1 28.9 24.0 -8.2 -4.9 -13.1
Muslim 37.9 35.5 30.1 -2.4 -5.4 -7.8
traditional 16.5 4.8 3.0 -11.7 -1.8 -13.5
other 33.7 61.4 16.7 27.7 -44.7 -17
Educational attainment No Edu 38.8 38.1 29.8 -0.7 -8.3 -9
Primary 44.7 35.7 24.1 -9 -11.6 -20.6
Sec and higher 23.8 31.4 31.6 7.6 0.2 7.8
Wealth status poor 30.7 44.7 22.5 14 -22.2 -8.2
middle 55.3 29.9 31.0 -25.4 1.1 -24.3
rich 39.2 31.7 35.1 -7.5 3.4 -4.1
Mother’s age <20 58.0 78.8 18.0 20.8 -60.8 -40
20–29 44.4 36.1 26.5 -8.3 -9.6 -17.9
30–39 27.0 33.3 29.1 6.3 -4.2 2.1
≥40 47.5 39.8 40.3 -7.7 0.5 -7.2
Current Marital Status Currently Married or Union 38.1 36.8 28.4 -1.3 -8.4 -9.7
not currently Married or Union 57.0 42.1 28.9 -14.9 -13.2 -28.1

Table 3 displays that in all surveys, neonatal mortality was higher among children born to mothers who delivered their first child under 18 than mothers older than 18. Similarly, the mortality was significantly higher (more than five times) among children with multiple births, two or more birth, compared to single births. The mortality rate was twice as high for newborns from mothers who had a birth interval of less than 24-months. Neonatal mortality was also significantly lower among newborns who were breastfed within the first hour of life; 2005, 13 per 1000 live birth, and in 2016, 6.5 per 1000 live birth.

Table 3. Neonatal mortality rate (NMR) (five-year rate) and the difference in NMR between surveys by selected child characteristics and nutritional factors in 2005, 2011 and 2016 EDHS.

EDHS
2005
EDHS
2011
EDHS
2016
2011–2005 2016–2011 2005–2016
Variables NMR NMR NMR NMR difference between surveys
Age at first birth <18 46.4 38.8 34.8 -7.6 -4 -11.6
18–34 33.5 35.7 24.2 2.2 -11.5 -9.3
≥35 0.0 209.4 0.0 209.4 -209.4 0
Type of birth Single birth 36.6 34.0 25.3 -2.6 -8.7 -11.3
Twin birth 181.2 172.9 142.7 -8.3 -30.2 -38.5
Preceding birth interval <24mths 55.7 39.1 50.2 -16.6 11.1 -5.5
≥24mths 26.6 32.4 24.4 5.8 -8 -2.2
Sex of child Male 45.6 45.3 39.4 -0.3 -5.9 -6.2
female 32.4 28.4 16.5 -4 -11.9 -15.9
Birth order 1 59.8 46.0 22.9 -13.8 -23.1 -36.9
2–4 31.2 37.2 26.7 6 -10.5 -4.5
≥5 38.7 32.7 33.0 -6 0.3 -5.7
Early initiation of BF yes 13.0 11.9 6.5 -1.1 -5.4 -6.5
no 15.3 6.7 9.3 -10.6 3.4 -7.2
Birth weight Small 46.8 51.3 33.0 4.5 -18.3 -13.8
Appropriate 33.1 25.1 21.4 -8 -3.7 -11.7
Large 36.2 32.1 31.0 -4.1 -1.1 -5.2

There was no difference in neonatal mortality among children whose mothers had no ANC visits between 2005 and 2016. However, the mortality rate was reduced among children born to mothers who received ANC visits in the same period. Also, the mortality rate increased among children delivered through cesarean delivery compared to those vaginally delivered between 2005 and 2016 (Table 4).

Table 4. Neonatal mortality rate (NMR) (five-year rate) and the difference in NMR between surveys, by selected maternal health-seeking behavioral factors, EDHS 2005, 2011 and 2016.

Variables EDHS
2005
EDHS
2011
EDHS
2016
2011–2005 2016–2011 2005–2016
NMR NMR NMR NMR difference between surveys
Antenatal visits during pregnancy no visit 27.8 25.0 27.9 -2.8 2.9 0.1
1–4 visits 35.4 27.6 18.5 -7.8 -9.1 -16.9
≥ 5 visits 35.1 27.0 11.6 -8.1 -15.4 -23.5
Place of delivery Home 37.7 35.2 26.1 -2.5 -9.1 -11.6
Health Inst 57.8 51.1 34.0 -6.7 -17.1 -23.8
Others 49.6 125.7 43.0 76.1 -82.7 -6.6
Mode of delivery Vaginal 38.9 36.9 27.3 -2 -9.6 -11.6
C- section 67.4 54.7 83.4 -12.7 28.7 16
Time postnatal check took place within 24hrs 145.6 100.8 27.8 -44.8 -73 -117.8
after 24hrs 1.9 8.0 1.1 6.1 -6.9 -0.8

Binary logistic regression on socio-demographic, health seeking, fertility and nutritional predictors on neonatal mortality

The multivariable logistic regression analysis shows those who were born in the cities, were less likely to die in their first month of life than children born in agrarian and pastoralist regions in 2011 (AOR [95%CI] = 0.11[0.02, 0.46]). Newborns whose mothers had five or more ANC visits were also less likely to die in the first month in 2005 and 2016 (AOR [95%CI] = 0.10[0.01, 0.81]; AOR [95%CI] = 0.01[0.02, 0.60]) than children from mothers who did not have ANC visits. Likewise, compared to children whose mothers had no visits, those whose mothers had one to four ANC visits were also less likely to die in the first 28 days in 2016 (AOR [95%CI] = 0.38[0.16, 0.89]). Neonatal mortality was lower among children born with a birth interval of more than 24 months than those born with less than 24 months interval in 2005 (AOR [95%CI] = 0.44[0.21, 0.92]) (Table 5).

Table 5. Adjusted effects of selected socio-demographic, health seeking and fertility factors, among children born in the five years preceding the surveys, EDHS 2005, 2011 and 2016.

EDHS 2005 EDHS 2011 EDHS 2016
Variables AOR 95% Cl P value AOR 95% Cl P value AOR 95% Cl P value
LB UB LB UB LB UB
Regional Context Agrarian 1.00 1.00 1.00
pastoralist 0.59 0.27 1.30 0.18 0.58 0.26 1.30 0.22 1.38 0.61 3.10 0.48
City 0.60 0.14 2.53 0.53 0.12 0.02 0.73 0.02 0.70 0.18 2.78 0.62
Educational attainment No Edu 1.00 1.00
Primary 0.49 0.17 1.44 0.19 1.53 0.44 3.03 0.39 1.70 0.44 6.63 0.44
Sec and higher 1.00 0.06 0.01 0.46 0.02 7.02 0.55 89.96 0.13
Wealth status poor 1.00 1.00 1.00
middle 1.66 0.80 3.45 0.16 0.63 0.19 2.05 0.42 1.16 0.36 3.76 0.79
rich 1.12 0.50 2.51 0.46 0.71 0.24 2.08 0.49 0.33 0.03 3.18 0.34
Age at first birth <18 1.00 1.00 1.00
18–34 0.56 0.26 1.23 0.10 0.94 0.42 2.44 0.85 0.93 0.26 1.65 0.88
≥35
Antenatal visits during pregnancy no visit 1.00 1.00 1.00
1–4 visits 1.01 0.45 2.28 0.82 1.80 0.74 4.38 0.17 0.38 0.16 0.89 0.10
≥5 visits 0.10 0.01 0.81 0.03 0.51 0.08 3.18 0.08 0.10 0.02 0.60 0.01
Place of delivery Home 1.00 1.00 1.00
Health Inst 1.83 0.37 9.02 0.41 0.74 0.13 4.25 0.74 1.42 0.59 6.61 0.55
others 1.00 1.00 1.00
Preceding birth interval <24mths 1.00 1.00 1.00
≥24mths 0.48 0.24 0.98 0.03 1.68 0.48 5.92 0.53 2.12 0.62 7.85 0.23
Early initiation of BF yes 1.00 1.00 1.00
no 1.27 0.72 3.43 0.57 0.35 0.12 1.01 0.06 1.50 0.44 5.10 0.51
Birth weight Large 1.00 1.00 1.00
appropriate 0.76 0.31 1.64 0.45 0.43 0.14 1.23 0.14 1.89 0.58 6.14 0.28
Small 0.97 0.37 2.18 0.87 1.01 0.38 2.69 0.92 2.12 0.65 7.06 0.21

Multivariate decomposition analysis of selected predictors in the difference of neonatal mortality

The decomposition analysis shows that the increased birth intervals contributed to a 26% decline in the neonatal mortality rate between 2005 and 2016. This means that keeping the birth interval constant at the 2005 level would have raised the neonatal mortality rate by 26% between 2005 and 2016. Similarly, a compositional change toward initiation of breastfeeding within one hour (early initiation breastfeeding), which is an improvement in the percentage of early initiation of breastfeeding, could decrease neonatal mortality by 10% between 2005 and 2016. Also, the model showed that the change in the effect of an individual intervention/predictor that individual children received did not contribute to the decrement in neonatal mortality rate between 2005 and 2016 (Table 6).

Table 6. Multivariate decomposition of selected socio demographic, health seeking, fertility factors related differences in the NMR, EDHS 2005, 2011, and 2016.

Due to Difference in Characteristics (E) Due to Difference in Coefficients (C)
Neonatal death Coef. 95% Conf. Interval P
value
Pct (%)
Coef.

95% Conf. Interval

Pct (%)
P
value
LB UB LB UB
Regional Context
Agrarian 0.000034692 -0.0017879 0.0018572 0.97 2.00 0.001398 -0.014243 0.01704 80.63 0.86
pastoralist 0.00004363 -0.0016642 0.0017516 0.96 2.51 0.001233 -0.011654 0.014122 71.14 0.85
City 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Educational attainment
No Edu 0.00022787 -0.0015236 0.0019794 0.79 13.13 0.001239 -0.023642 0.026121 71.45 0.92
Primary -0.00012728 -0.0016354 0.0013809 0.86 -7.34 -0.00099 -0.011094 0.0091072 -57.28 0.85
Sec and higher 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wealth status
poor 0.00042714 -0.000363 0.0012173 0.29 24.63 -0.005002 -0.038211 0.028206 -288.4 0.76
middle 0.00016142 -0.0001753 0.0004981 0.35 9.31 -0.00013 0.0032853 0.003026 -7.46 0.94
Rich 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Age at first birth
<18 0.00031339 2.2317E-05 0.0006491 0.07 18.07 0.00074 0.0060741 0.007555 42.72 0.83
≥ 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Antenatal visits during pregnancy
no visit 0.001751 -0.0014911 0.0049931 0.29 100.9 0.00727 -0.056888 0.042335 -419.54 0.77
1–4 visits 0.00039175 -0.0019741 0.0027577 0.75 22.59 0.00389 -0.025991 0.033787 224.76 0.79
≥ 5 visits 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Place of delivery
home 0.00031339 -0.0031629 0.0030112 0.96 -4.37 0.011685 -0.063629 0.086999 673.78 0.76
Health Inst 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Preceding birth interval
<24 months -0.00045579 -0.0007326 -0.0001790 0.01 -26.28 0.0034131 -0.018003 0.024829 196.8 0.75
≥24 months 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Early initiation of BF
Yes 0.00017701 8.2654E-05 0.0002713 <0.01 10.21 0.00077 -0.013706 0.015253 44.58 0.92
No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Birth weight
Large 4.08E-08 1.2657E-07 2.08E-07 0.63 0.01 -0.00266 -0.020548 0.015224 -153.5 0.77
Average 0.00002141 2.2607E-06 0.0000450 0.07 1.23 0.000732 0.0085547 0.01002 42.23 0.88
Small 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Over all .0028905 -.00079551 .0065765 0.12 166.6 -.001156 -.0073623 .0050499 -66.67 0.71

Discussion

The study used nationally representative population-based survey data to analyze and identify the predictors of neonatal mortality and to estimate their contribution to the observed mortality reduction over 15 years in Ethiopia. Multivariate analysis showed that regional context, where newborns lived, and maternal ANC utilization were determinants for neonatal mortality in Ethiopia. Decomposition analysis also indicated that early initiation of breastfeeding and birth interval contributed to reducing neonatal mortality in the country during the survey period.

The study showed that neonatal mortality in Ethiopia remains higher than the average for the sub-Saharan region, which is 27 per 1,000 live births, according to the World Health Organization [2]. This is despite the fact that the country has implemented community based and essential newborn care interventions under the national newborn and child survival strategy to overcome neonatal mortality for two decades. Community based newborn care aimed at actively engaging communities in promoting and preventing newborn healthcare through health extension workers (HEWs) and health development army’s (HDAs) at the community level. Essential newborn care services are services addressing the specific needs of newborns from birth up to 28 days and provided at health facilities level [28]. We observed that between 2005 and 2016, the country’s mortality rate was reduced by 11 per 1,000 live births, from 39 per 1000 live births in 2005 to 28 per 1000 in 2016, but still there is a need to improve neonatal mortality to meet the SDG3 target of <12 per 1,000 live birth. There were also differences in neonatal mortality between regions of the country; for example, neonatal mortality has increased in the pastoralist region over the past 15 years. As a result, children born in the pastoralist region have the highest neonatal mortality compared to those born in the agrarian region and cities. This finding is supported by previous studies conducted in the pastoralist regions of Ethiopia [29, 30]. The potential reason for the finding is that the absence of health service delivery systems that are tailored to pastoralist lifestyles and setting may amplify the number of unmet demands and deter women in pastoralist communities from seeking healthcare during pregnancy and childbirth, resulting in low utilization of maternal and child healthcare, and contributing to high neonatal mortality in the regions [31]. Furthermore, low vaccine coverage and high incidence of infectious diseases in pastoralist regions leads to neonatal mortality to get worse in the regions [30].

Newborns whose mothers had antenatal care visits during pregnancy had lower odds of dying in the first month of life. This finding is supported by other studies conducted in Kenya and Uganda [32] and a meta-analysis among sub-Saharan Africa studies [8]. The possible mechanism for this finding is that mothers who had ANC visits received health information from health care providers about healthy behaviors and possible medical complications during and after pregnancy, including newborn care. Also, the mothers are screened for health problems and receive curative and preventive health care services, such as tetanus immunization and iron and folic acid supplementation, to improve newborn health [33].

Another significant predictor of neonatal mortality was the previous birth interval. Neonatal mortality was higher among children with a preceding birth interval of less than 24 months. Similar findings have been reported in Nigeria [34] and Bangladesh [15]. The possible explanation for this finding could be that mothers with birth intervals of less than 24 months might not get enough time to replenish their nutritional status that had been depleted from the previous pregnancy [14]. Poor maternal nutritional status during pregnancy may affect fetal growth, leading to poor newborn health outcomes. Also, mothers with short birth intervals might not go for ANC visits due to their young children, resulting in mothers not getting the recommended maternal healthcare services during pregnancy, contributing to an unfavorable health status for the newborns.

The decomposition analysis indicated that the preceding birth interval had a significant effect on the reduction of neonatal mortality. The decrease in number of women with a birth interval of less than 24 months, resulted in a decline in neonatal mortality in the survey period. Early initiation of breastfeeding was another endowment factor that significantly reduced neonatal mortality. The increase in the prevalence of early initiation of breastfeeding is related to a reduction in neonatal mortality between 2005 and 2016. The possible reason might be that early initiation of breastfeeding could decrease the risk of newborns ingesting infectious agents, reducing the infection that causes neonatal mortality. Besides, the first breastmilk, colostrum, is full of immunoglobulin and lymphocytes, stimulating the newborns’ immune systems to prevent infection [12]. The finding is consistent with prior studies on newborn survival and early initiation of breastfeeding in Ghana [35] and India [13].

Neonatal mortality can be preventable, but it remains a major public health issue in Ethiopia, particularly in pastoralist communities, due to low access and utilization maternal and child healthcare services in pastoralist regions. This emphasized the importance of improving access and barriers to maternal healthcare services to reduce neonatal mortality in the regions. Therefore, efforts are needed to prevent neonatal mortality that targets pastoralist communities. Besides, reducing preventable neonatal mortality in pastoralist communities can help the country achieve national and global targets. It is also an essential target of the Sustainable Development Goals.

Among the potential limitations of this study, there is a possibility of recall bias from DHS surveys on events that happened in the past and based on other retrospective data. The study used secondary data, and there might be an unexplained association among variables due to confounders. Finally, it is a cross-sectional study, making it difficult to establish a causal relationship between predictors and neonatal mortality.

Conclusion

The study revealed that neonatal mortality is still a major public health concern in Ethiopia. There is a need to strengthen a tailor-made maternal and child healthcare services that consider the pastoralist regions context, to enhance the access and utilization of maternal and child healthcare services in the pastoralist communities. Moreover, early breastfeeding initiation and a birth interval of more than 24 months are crucial preventive measures to reduce neonatal mortality. Thus, healthcare providers should educate mothers about these measures during their ANC visits to ensure newborn health.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the contributions of DHS program staff technical assistance.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are publicly available and can access through (https://dhsprogram.com/data/new-useregistration.cfm).

Funding Statement

The author did not receive any grants for conducting the research, except for the publication fee provided by the University of Bergen.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. The Globa Health Observatory. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organization. Newborn: improving survival and well-bieng. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.UNICEF. Level & Trend in Child Mortality. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.UNICEF. Ending Preventable Newborn Deaths and Stillbirths By 2030. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Grady SC, Frake AN, Zhang Q, Bene M, Jordan DR, Vertalka J, et al. Neonatal mortality in East Africa and West Africa: A geographic analysis of district-level demographic and health survey data. Geospat Health. 2017;12(1). doi: 10.4081/gh.2017.501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Central Statistical Agency [Ethiopia], ICF International. Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lassi ZS, Middleton P, Bhutta ZA, Crowther C. Health care seeking for maternal and newborn illnesses in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of observational and qualitative studies:. Vol. 8, F1000Research. F1000 Research Ltd; 2019. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17828.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tekelab T, Chojenta C, Smith R, Loxton D. The impact of antenatal care on neonatal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019. Sep 1;14(9). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222566 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fink G, Ross R, Hill K. Institutional deliveries weakly associated with improved neonatal survival in developing countries: Evidence from 192 Demographic and Health Surveys. Int J Epidemiol. 2015. Dec 1;44(6):1879–88. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Altman R, Sidney K, De Costa A, Vora K, Salazar M. Is Institutional Delivery Protective Against Neonatal Mortality Among Poor or Tribal Women? A Cohort Study From Gujarat, India. Matern Child Health J. 2017. May 1;21(5):1065–72. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2202-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Singh K, Brodish P, Chowdhury ME, Biswas TK, Kim ET, Godwin C, et al. Postnatal care for newborns in Bangladesh: The importance of health-related factors and location. J Glob Health. 2017. Dec 20;7(2). doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.020507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Raihana SI, Dibley ID MJ, Masudur Rahman MI, TahsinaID T, Abu Bakkar SiddiqueID M, Sadequr Rahman Q, et al. Early initiation of breastfeeding and severe illness in the early newborn period: An observational study in rural Bangladesh. PLoS Med [Internet]. 2019;16(8). Available from: doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Phukan D, Ranjan M, Dwivedi LK. Impact of timing of breastfeeding initiation on neonatal mortality in India. Int Breastfeed J. 2018. Jul 3;13(27). doi: 10.1186/s13006-018-0162-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Houweling TAJ, Van Klaveren D, Das S, Azad K, Tripathy P, Manandhar D, et al. A prediction model for neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries: An analysis of data from population surveillance sites in India, Nepal and Bangladesh. Int J Epidemiol. 2019. Feb 1;48(1):186–98. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Molitoris J. Heterogeneous Effects of Birth Spacing on Neonatal Mortality Risks in Bangladesh. Stud Fam Plann. 2018. Mar 1;49(1):3–21. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yaya S, Uthman OA, Ekholuenetale M, Bishwajit G, Adjiwanou V. Effects of birth spacing on adverse childhood health outcomes: evidence from 34 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2020. Oct 17;33(20):3501–8. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1576623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yaya S, Zegeye B, Ahinkorah BO, Oladimeji O, Shibre G. Regional variations and socio-economic disparities in neonatal mortality in Angola: A cross-sectional study using demographic and health surveys. Vol. 37, Family Practice. Oxford University Press; 2021. p. 785–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ogbo FA, Ezeh OK, Awosemo AO, Ifegwu IK, Tan L, Jessa E, et al. Determinants of trends in neonatal, post-neonatal, infant, child and under-five mortalities in Tanzania from 2004 to 2016. BMC Public Health. 2019. Sep 9;19(1). doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7547-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lohela TJ, Nesbitt RC, Pekkanen J, Gabrysch S. Comparing socioeconomic inequalities between early neonatal mortality and facility delivery: Cross-sectional data from 72 low- and middle-income countries. Sci Rep. 2019. Dec 1;9(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45148-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tekelab T, Akibu M, Tagesse N, Tilhaun T, Yohanes Y, Nepal S. Neonatal mortality in Ethiopia: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tesfay N, Tariku R, Zenebe A, Dejene Z, Woldeyohannes F. Cause and risk factors of early neonatal death in Ethiopia. PLoS One [Internet]. 2022;17(9 September):1–22. Available from: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mitiku HD. Neonatal mortality and associated factors in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional population-based study. BMC Womens Health [Internet]. 2021;21(1):1–9. Available from: 10.1186/s12905-021-01308-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.World Population Review. Ethiopian Population 2022. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Ministry of Health. Mini demographic and health survey 2019. Addis Ababa; 2021. May. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.The World Bank. Ethiopia Poverty Assesment. Addis Ababa; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.FMoH. Disease Prevention and Control. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Powers DA, Yoshioka H, Yun MS. mvdcmp: Multivariate decomposition for nonlinear response models. Vol. 11, The Stata Journal. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Federal Ministry of Health. Natioal Strategy for Newborn and Child survival In Ethiopia. Addis Ababa; 2015. Jun. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Woday Tadesse A, Mekuria Negussie Y, Aychiluhm SB. Neonatal mortality and its associated factors among neonates admitted at public hospitals, pastoral region, Ethiopia: A health facility based study. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0242481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Antehunegn G, Worku MG. Individual-and community-level determinants of neonatal mortality in the emerging regions of Ethiopia: a multilevel mixed-effect analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. Dec 1;21(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jebena MG, Tesfaye M, Abashula G, Balina S, Jackson R, Assefa Y, et al. Barriers and facilitators of maternal health care services use among pastoralist women in Ethiopia: Systems thinking perspective. Pastoralism. 2022. Dec;12(1). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Arunda MO, Agardh A, Asamoah BO. Determinants of continued maternal care seeking during pregnancy, birth and postnatal and associated neonatal survival outcomes in Kenya and Uganda: Analysis of cross-sectional, demographic and health surveys data. BMJ Open. 2021. Dec 1;11(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tiruye G, Shiferaw K, Shunu A, Sintayeu Y, Seid AM. Antenatal Care Predicts Neonatal Mortality in Eastern Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies. Vol. 36, Journal of Neonatology. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2022. p. 42–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ezeh OK, Agho KE, Dibley MJ, Hall J, Page AN. Determinants of neonatal mortality in Nigeria: Evidence from the 2008 demographic and health survey. BMC Public Health. 2014. May 29;14(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Edmond KM, Zandoh C, Quigley MA, Amenga-Etego S, Owusu-Agyei S, Kirkwood BR. Delayed breastfeeding initiation increases risk of neonatal mortality. Pediatrics. 2006. Mar;117(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002991.r001

Decision Letter 0

Vinay Nair Kampalath

12 Dec 2023

PGPH-D-23-02158

Predictors of Neonatal Mortality in Ethiopia: Cross Sectional Study Using 2005, 2010 and 2016 Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey Demographic Health Survey Datasets

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Dr. Baruda,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 11 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Vinay Nair Kampalath, MD, DTMH

Guest Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

1. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

2. Please amend your detailed Financial Disclosure statement. This is published with the article. It must therefore be completed in full sentences and contain the exact wording you wish to be published.

a. State the initials, alongside each funding source, of each author to receive each grant.

b. State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

c. If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders.

If you did not receive any funding for this study, please simply state: “The authors received no specific funding for this work.”

3. Please include a title page at the beginning of your manuscript file that lists full author names and institute addresses.  This should not be uploaded as a separate file.  

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Please do respond to the comments and revisions suggested by the two reviewers. We invite you to resubmit after the comments/revision suggestions have been addressed.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I don't know

Reviewer #2: I don't know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Please see attached file. Main concerns include:

1. Cited reference does not confirm Ethiopia has the highest NMR in the world

2. Some clarification of language

3. More explanation and/or clarification for discrepant data is requested

4. Numbering of tables is incorrect

Reviewer #2: The article is well prepared, it needs minor edits on most of the points. I storngly suggest that the results presented are too much and crowded to viewwers, if you can work on that and make it easy to look and understand, also if you can use alternative methods other than table, that would make it better.

The other strong comment i have is on the conclusion, It needs to be done again, for me it lost the strenght when i reach to the conclusion. Also if you can include recommendation that can be applicabel it would be a good contribution, since you used a national data.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Predictors of Neonatal Mortality in Ethiopia.docx

pgph.0002991.s001.docx (17.5KB, docx)
Attachment

Submitted filename: PGPH-D-23-02158.docx

pgph.0002991.s002.docx (93.7KB, docx)
PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002991.r003

Decision Letter 1

Vinay Nair Kampalath

14 Feb 2024

Predictors of Neonatal Mortality in Ethiopia: Cross Sectional Study Using 2005, 2010 and 2016 Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey Demographic Health Survey Datasets

PGPH-D-23-02158R1

Dear Mr Baruda,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Predictors of Neonatal Mortality in Ethiopia: Cross Sectional Study Using 2005, 2010 and 2016 Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey Demographic Health Survey Datasets' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Global Public Health.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact globalpubhealth@plos.org.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Global Public Health.

Best regards,

Vinay Nair Kampalath, MD, DTMH

Guest Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

***********************************************************

Thank you for addressing the reviewers' comments. We accept this manuscript for publication.

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I don't know

Reviewer #2: I don't know

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The Authors have addressed almost all of my previous comments. For which they haven't they have given a reasonable explanation.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Predictors of Neonatal Mortality in Ethiopia.docx

    pgph.0002991.s001.docx (17.5KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PGPH-D-23-02158.docx

    pgph.0002991.s002.docx (93.7KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    pgph.0002991.s003.docx (25.3KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are publicly available and can access through (https://dhsprogram.com/data/new-useregistration.cfm).


    Articles from PLOS Global Public Health are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES