ABSTRACT
Neural connections of the seventh cranial nerve with its neighboring nerves are common and well documented; however, communication with ansa cervicalis is as yet unknown. We present a case with such a connection found during cadaveric dissection, with hitherto unknown consequences. In this specimen, after giving the marginal mandibular and cervical branches, the cervicofacial division continued distally to communicate with the distal loop of ansa cervicalis. Presence of such connection may result in facial muscle paralysis on injury to the ansa or strap muscle paralysis on injury to the facial nerve, depending on the direction of nerve fibers. Such unusual connections bring to light the need for extreme care during surgeries in the neck to safeguard any such connections and when using the ansa as donor.
KEY WORDS: Anatomical variant, ansa hypoglossi, descending cervical, descending hypoglossal
Introduction
Ansa cervicalis is formed as a loop with contributions to the superior root from C1, C2 ventral rami and to the inferior root from C2, C3 ventral rami. The superior root travels with the hypoglossal nerve and supplies the superior belly of omohyoid, sternohyoid, and sternothyroid muscles before joining the inferior root to complete the loop. It is responsible for innervation of the infrahyoid musculature.[1,2] Facial nerve arises from the pontomedullary sulcus and after coursing through the internal auditory meatus to reach the medial wall of tympanic cavity, it exits the cranium via stylomastoid foramen.[3]
The seventh nerve and its branches have known communications to various nerves present in proximity. Incidence varies from 20% to 82.3%.[4] Some of these arborizations include the following:
Main trunk with glossopharyngeal nerve
Main facial nerve with the auricular branch of vagus
Upper division with auriculotemporal nerve
Marginal mandibular branch with mental nerve
Marginal mandibular branch with sensory transverse cervical nerve
Classifications of ansa according to its various neural connections with vagus and hypoglossal nerves (Jelev’s classification)[1,6] have been described.
An anastomosis of facial nerve with ansa cervicalis or a direct communication with ventral rami of C2–C3 cervical nerves, however, has never been described, to the best of our knowledge. A systematic review of eight articles by Hwang et al.[4] after a literature search of 832 articles, regarding communications between the facial and vestibulocochlear, glossopharyngeal nerves and the cervical plexus, did not mention any such findings. Even Bergman’s Comprehensive Encyclopedia makes no mention of any such connections.[3,7]
Case Report
This unusual anatomical variant was found on dissection of a cadaveric head in our Department of Anatomy, carried out to study the anatomy of extratemporal facial nerve after obtaining ethical clearance from the Institutional Ethics Committee (No.: INT/IEC/2020/SL1590). Dissection was carried out under magnification, using a modified Blair’s incision with Al-kayat–Bramley’s C-shaped extension.
It was dissected bilaterally. On complete dissection of facial nerve on the right, from its exit from the stylomastoid foramen up to its branches innervating the facial mimetic muscles, various anomalies and anatomic variations were noted. Figure 1 shows the dissection in progress.
Figure 1.

Dissection under progress
Length of the main facial nerve trunk was 19.6 mm. Two minor trunks were present. The main trunk trifurcated within the parotid gland and divided into further branches – two temporal, one zygomatic, three buccal, three marginal mandibular, and two cervical branches. The middle division of the main trunk subsequently joined branches of the temporofacial division. An arborization pattern not fitting the classical six Davis patterns was found.[8] There were communications between the branches of upper and lower divisions among themselves, but not between the divisions.
The anomalies and anatomic variations noted were as follows:
A cervical branch to the platysma, running in a more superficial plane than the rest of the branches. The cervical branch also crossed the angle of mandible, running 6 mm anterior to it.
A branch from the main trunk joining a temporal branch distally
Trifurcation of the main nerve trunk with branches of middle division joining the branches of upper division
Two accessory trunks
Cervical branch with a communicating nerve with the ansa cervicalis.
These can be seen in Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Dissected right hemiface with facial nerve and its branches painted for better visualization. The top of the image is the cranial end of the cadaver and the sub-superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) skin flap is retracted medially towards the nose. The anomalies noted are marked as: (A) a cervical branch to the platysma, running in a more superficial plane than the rest of the branches, crossing lower border of mandible; (B) a branch from the main trunk joining a temporal branch distally; (C) trifurcation of the main trunk with branches of middle division joining branches of upper division; (D) a communicating nerve with ansa cervicalis: The lower division after giving the marginal mandibular and cervical branches is seen to continue inferiorly into the neck. When traced distally, it is seen to join the inferior root of ansa cervicalis
After dividing into three marginal mandibular and two cervical branches, the cervicofacial division continued distally to communicate with the inferior loop of ansa cervicalis, as seen in Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Same specimen showing detailed course of the communicating branch. The top of the image is the cranial end of the cadaver. Dashed red line drawn along the continuation of lower division of facial nerve coursing inferiorly towards the neck. It was seen to join the inferior root of ansa cervicalis formed from C2 and C3 ventral rami. Labels: (1) sub-SMAS skin flap retracted; (2) lobule of pinna retracted superiorly; (3) sternocleidomastoid muscle, divided in the middle and upper half retracted medially, label placed on lower half; (4) deep lobe of parotid gland, superficial lobe removed to visualize facial nerve
The classical loop of ansa is seen in Figure 4.
Figure 4.

The image shows the dissected right hemiface and neck with the top of the image being the cranial end of the cadaver. Pinna seen at top loft corner of image. Distal course of the facial nerve branch communicating with ansa cervicalis is seen in same specimen. The classical loop of ansa is seen, marked with red dashed line, into which the communicating branch is seen to join (blue dotted line)
Discussion
Even though rare descriptions of neural connections between the branches of facial nerve and transverse cervical sensory nerve are present, a connection with ansa cervicalis is unknown to the best of our knowledge.[3,5,7]
Shoja et al. published an extensive review of literature about neural interconnections between the trigeminal, facial, vestibulocochlear, glossopharyngeal, vagus, accessory, and hypoglossal nerves and the C1–C4 spinal nerves. They described presence of connections of facial nerve with cutaneous branches of cervical plexus like greater occipital, lesser occipital, greater auricular, and transverse cervical nerves.[5]
A review article by Hwang et al. elucidating connections between the facial nerve and the cervical plexus found seven articles mentioning such connections including the marginal mandibular and cervical branches to transverse cervical and greater auricular nerves. However, no arborization with ansa cervicalis was found.[4]
The third edition of Bergman’s Comprehensive Encyclopedia, which is considered an exhaustive reference on human anatomical variations, does not mention about this anomalous connection either.[3,7]
Similarly, there are no documented innervations to strap muscles from any cranial nerve nucleus.[6]
In adults, the ansa cervicalis is derived from the first, second, and third cervical spinal nerves, which supply the infrahyoid muscles of the neck. Embryologically, during the fourth week of development, the second pharyngeal arch develops in the neck region. It contributes significantly to the formation of neck and facial structures. These structures migrate to a higher level in later part of development. Facial nerve is the neural component of the second pharyngeal arch, and hence, this might have possibly caused nerve fibers to communicate between the facial nerve and ansa cervicalis in early embryogenesis.[9]
Presence of neural interconnections of facial with other nerves is not routinely considered in surgical training. Unusual connections, as seen in this case, bring to light the need for extreme vigilance during dissection, to safeguard any anomalous arborizations, injury to which may result in muscle paralysis. However, it must be mentioned that communication of nerve branches does not allow any statement about a possible fiber exchange or fiber quality (motor, sensory) per se. Therefore, even though predicting the consequences of injury is currently a speculation, it does not undermine the need for prudence.
Variations in contributing roots, course, and distribution of ansa require modifications in the procedures relating to this nerve.[10] Ansa is used as a donor nerve for facial reanimation as well as for laryngeal reanimation in patients of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy because of redundancy in supply to strap muscles of the neck, as well as no discernable loss of function or cosmetic concern.[1,6,11,12,13] Iatrogenic injury to ansa can occur during various surgeries including thyroplasty, cervical lymph node dissection, arytenoid adduction, carotid endarterectomy, facial reanimation, and infrahyoid myocutaneous flap reconstruction.[1,13]
However, in case of presence of such connections, wherein the ansa may be contributing to innervation of facial mimetic muscles, using it as donor nerve or inadvertent injury during surgery, must be avoided to prevent complications.[14,15] A nerve stimulator may be able to elicit such contribution intraoperatively. In case redundancy is detected however, such connections can be useful as donors, providing an extra length of nerve.
Also, the clinical features and examination after nerve injury may yield unexpected findings due to these neural arborizations.
Awareness of the variant presented and knowledge of other neural connections are crucial for surgeons working in the neck region. This lends itself to patient and vigilant dissection to prevent chances of any postoperative morbidities.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that appropriate patient consent was obtained.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to those who donated their bodies to science, thereby allowing anatomical research. Results from such research can potentially increase mankind’s overall knowledge and contribute to improved patient care.
References
- 1.Kikuta S, Jenkins S, Kusukawa J, Iwanaga J, Loukas M, Tubbs RS. Ansa cervicalis: A comprehensive review of its anatomy, variations, pathology, and surgical applications. Anat Cell Biol. 2019;52:221–5. doi: 10.5115/acb.19.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Henry G, Susan S. Gray's Anatomy. 41th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2021. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shoja MM, Tubbs RS. Bergman's Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Human Anatomic Variation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2016. Facial Nerve; pp. 1005–33. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hwang K, Song JS, Yang SC. Communications between the facial nerve and the vestibulocochlear nerve, the glossopharyngeal nerve, and the cervical plexus. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26:2190–2. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shoja MM, Oyesiku NM, Griessenauer CJ, Radcliff V, Loukas M, Chern JJ, et al. Anastomoses between lower cranial and upper cervical nerves: A comprehensive review with potential significance during skull base and neck operations, part I: Trigeminal, facial, and vestibulocochlear nerves. Clin Anat. 2014;27:118–30. doi: 10.1002/ca.22340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhu A, Mohan S, Richmon JD, Jowett N. An anatomic variant of the ansa cervicalis precluding its use as a donor nerve. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020;129:78–81. doi: 10.1177/0003489419875975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kocabiyik N. Bergman's Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Human Anatomic Variation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2016. Cervical Plexus; pp. 1062–7. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Davis RA, Anson BJ, Budinger JM, Kurth LR. Surgical anatomy of the facial nerve and parotid gland based upon a study of 350 cervicofacial halves. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1956;102:385–412. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sadler TW. Langman's Medical Embryology. 15th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Souza A, Ray B. Study of the formation and distribution of the ansa cervicalis and its clinical significance. Eur J Anat. 2010;14:143–8. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang W, Chen D, Chen S, Li D, Li M, Xia S, et al. Laryngeal reinnervation using ansa cervicalis for thyroid surgery-related unilateral vocal fold paralysis: A long-term outcome analysis of 237 cases. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Steiner HH, von Haken MS, Steiner Milz HG, Albert FK, Hamer J, editors. Intracerebral Hemorrhage Hydrocephalus malresorptivus Peripheral Nerves. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1993. The Ansa Cervicalis Hypoglossal — Facial Anastomosis for Indirect Facial Nerve Reconstruction. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Loukas M, Thorsell A, Tubbs RS, Kapos T, Louis R, Vulis M, et al. The ansa cervicalis revisited. Folia Morphol. 2007;66:120–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Woltmann M, Faveri R, Sgrott EA. Anatomosurgical study of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve for submandibular surgical approach. Braz Dent J. 2006;17:71–4. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402006000100016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Potgieter W, Meiring JH, Boon JM, Pretorius E, Pretorius JP, Becker PJ. Mandibular landmarks as an aid in minimizing injury to the marginal mandibular branch: A metric and geometric anatomical study. Clin Anat. 2005;18:171–8. doi: 10.1002/ca.20099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
