Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Mar 18;19(3):e0298364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298364

Linkages between maternal experience of intimate partner violence and child nutrition outcomes: A rapid evidence assessment

Silvia Bhatt Carreno 1, Manuela Orjuela-Grimm 2, Luissa Vahedi 3, Elisabeth Roesch 4, Christine Heckman 4, Andrew Beckingham 4, Megan Gayford 4, Sarah R Meyer 5,*
Editor: Pradeep Kumar6
PMCID: PMC10947923  PMID: 38498450

Abstract

Background

A strong evidence base indicates that maternal caregivers’ experience of intimate partner violence [IPV] impacts children’s health, cognitive development, and risk-taking behaviors. Our objective was to review peer-reviewed literature describing the associations between a child’s indirect exposure to IPV and corresponding nutrition outcomes, with a particular focus on fragile settings in low and middle-income countries [LMICs].

Methods

We conducted a rapid evidence assessment to synthesize quantitative associations between maternal caregivers’ IPV experience and children’s nutrition/growth outcomes (birthweight, feeding, and growth indicators). We included peer-reviewed research, published in English or Spanish after the year 2000, conducted in fragile settings in LMICs.

Results

We identified 86 publications that fit inclusion criteria. Amongst all associations assessed, a maternal caregiver’s experience of combined forms of IPV (physical, sexual and emotional) or physical IPV only, were most consistently associated with lower birthweight, especially during pregnancy. Women of child-bearing age, including adolescents, exposed to at least one type of IPV showed a decreased likelihood of following recommended breastfeeding practices. Lifetime maternal experience of combined IPV was significantly associated with stunting among children under 5 years of age in the largest study included, though findings in smaller studies were inconsistent. Maternal experience of physical or combined IPV were inconsistently associated with underweight or wasting in the first five years. Maternal experience of sexual IPV during pregnancy appeared to predict worsened lipid profiles among children.

Conclusion

Maternal caregivers’ experience of IPV is significantly associated with low birthweight and suboptimal breastfeeding practices, whereas studies showed inconsistent associations with child growth indicators or blood nutrient levels. Future research should focus on outcomes in children aged 2 years and older, investigation of feeding practices beyond breastfeeding, and examination of risk during time periods physiologically relevant to the outcomes. Programmatic implications include incorporation of GBV considerations into nutrition policies and programming and integrating GBV prevention and response into mother and child health and nutrition interventions in LMIC contexts.

Introduction

Deficiencies in children’s growth and nutrition are multifactorial in origin, but potential contributors include social inequalities in food distribution [1] and gender inequality [2]. Intimate partner violence [IPV], defined as “behavior by an intimate partner or ex-partner that causes physical, sexual or psychological harm, including physical aggression, sexual coercion, psychological abuse and controlling behaviors” [3] may also influence children’s nutrition outcomes. Different types of IPV are physical IPV (which includes slapping, hitting, kicking and beating [4]), sexual IPV (which includes forced sexual intercourse and other forms of sexual coercion, whether using physical force or other forms of coercion) [4], emotional or psychological IPV (which includes insults, belittling, humiliation, and intimidation [4]), and controlling behaviors (which includes actions such as a partner limiting respondent’s contact with family or friends or monitoring and restricting money management, movement, education, employment or medical care) [5, 6]. Male perpetration of IPV against women and girls is highly prevalent globally [7], and in fragile settings and humanitarian emergencies, the risk factors increase [8]. A 2011 systematic review of population-based studies focused on prevalence of all forms of violence against women and girls in complex emergencies indicated that IPV is one of the most common forms of violence experienced by women and girls in humanitarian contexts [9]; limited evidence confirms that IPV prevalence increases in conflict-affected areas compared to non-conflict settings [10].

Children–defined as anyone from birth until age 18, as per international definitions–can be indirectly exposed to IPV, which can include witnessing, being aware of, or secondarily affected by the presence of violence against a maternal caregiver in the household. Children’s indirect exposure to IPV is associated with lower rates of vaccination and with later adolescent and adult risk-taking behaviors [11]. There is robust literature on indirect IPV exposure and children’s adverse mental health outcomes, such as externalizing symptoms, (e.g. aggression, impulsivity, or anti-social behavior) [11]. Evidence indicates that pre-school aged children who witness IPV in childhood may experience detrimental effects on their later mental, social and physical health during adolescence and adulthood. Some children develop traumatic stress symptoms, mood anxiety disorders, depression, alcohol use, and have higher rates of violence perpetration [1215]. A recent review of IPV against a maternal caregiver and child development outcomes in 11 low- and middle-income countries [LMICs] identified associations between IPV exposure and literacy, numeracy, and cognitive, physical and socioemotional development for children aged 36 to 59 months [16]. For example, a study conducted in South Africa showed that emotional IPV was associated with lower language development, motor development and cognitive scores in children at age 2, while physical IPV was associated with lower motor scores [17], and in a study conducted in Kenya, maternal exposure to IPV was associated with poorer child behavioral outcomes [18]. Girls and boys may experience different patterns of direct and indirect exposure to IPV, however, the limited research exploring these differences is mixed [19, 20], and there are also gender differences in mental health impacts of childhood IPV exposure [21]. The evidence-base concerning the impacts of childhood indirect exposure to IPV on children’s health outcomes is outside of mental health disorders and risk-taking behaviors is limited.

Nutritional vulnerabilities pose particular challenges in countries defined as ‘fragile or extremely fragile,’ which can be defined as countries “where the state power is unable and/or unwilling to deliver core functions to the majority of its people: security, protection of property, basic public services and essential infrastructure” [22]. Countries where there is national and/or regional fragility are more likely to have high levels of anemia, and those countries deemed as extremely fragile are more likely to have high levels of anemia as well as high levels of stunting and wasting (both markers of chronic malnutrition) [23, 24]. For example, of the estimated 45.4 million children under 5 globally who suffer from wasting, one in four live in humanitarian contexts [24]. Existing evidence gaps illustrate that nutrition indicators are especially challenging to study and address in fragile settings. Indeed, Yount et al.’s review, published a decade ago, focused on presenting a possible framework for pathways between IPV and child growth and nutrition in the first 36 months, primarily included studies based on data gathered in HIC settings, and, to a much lesser degree, LMIC and “fragile” settings [25].

Several evidence syntheses have addressed the question of the association between children’s indirect exposure to IPV (against a maternal caregiver) and child nutrition outcomes. Yount et al.’s review found that IPV “may affect early childhood growth and nutrition through biological and behavioral pathways,” and that the strongest evidence available concerned the association between IPV and low birth weight [LBW], an association this review indicated is likely mediated by maternal prenatal risk behaviors, mental health and poor weight gain during pregnancy [25]. Other relevant reviews have focused on in-utero exposure to IPV rather maternal experience of IPV at other time points; Hill et al. found associations between IPV during pregnancy and LBW and preterm birth [26] and Donovan et al. found associations between IPV during pregnancy and pre-term birth, LBW and small for gestational age babies [27]. Experience of IPV can influence maternal care practices relating to child nutrition; a review of observational studies found that 8 of 12 included studies reported an association between IPV and breastfeeding practices (lower breastfeeding intention, breastfeeding initiation and exclusive breastfeeding) [28]. These existing evidence analyses focus on specific periods of experiencing IPV (in-utero), or a limited range of nutrition indicators (LBW, breastfeeding). To address existing evidence gaps, we conducted a rapid evidence assessment [REA] focusing on all forms of indirect experience of IPV, during any exposure period, and including nutritional/growth outcomes reported as a) fetal growth (measured indirectly with birth weight), b) infant feeding practices, as well as indicators of c) child growth (using anthropometry) and d) nutrient blood markers in order to examine acute and chronic malnutrition during infancy, early childhood (0 to 39 months, including those focused on children under 2 or under 5 years), and middle childhood (after the early growth spurt). Examining pathways concerning children’s indirect exposure to IPV against a maternal caregiver and childhood nutrition and growth can highlight how IPV adversely impacts child health and inform policies and programs at the nexus of IPV and nutrition. Our objective was to review and synthesize the current quantitative literature describing the associations between IPV against a maternal caregiver and children’s nutrition outcomes, with a particular focus on those studies carried out in LMICs and fragile settings.

Methods

The REA was conducted utilizing an adapted systematic review methodology [29]. Specifically, title/ abstract review was conducted by a single reviewer, and inclusion/ exclusion criteria (specifically, regarding the location of studies for inclusion) was determined iteratively. We developed and implemented a structured search of three databases: Medline, Embase, and Global Health. The initial search was conducted in July 2021, and updated in October 2022. The full search strategy is included in S1 Appendix. For further details on search methodology, see [blinded for peer review] et al. In brief, the search terms included the following fields: i) intimate partner violence, ii) nutritional outcomes, and iii) quantitative study design, with specific terms and MeSH headings tailored to each database.

The eligibility criteria were structured using the PECO framework–Population, Exposure, Context and Outcome [30] (see Table 1). The timepoints considered were during infancy, early childhood (including those outcomes specific to children under 2 or under 5 years), middle childhood and adolescence (after puberty or above age 10 years). Other inclusion criteria were that the manuscript was published in peer-reviewed literature, published in English or Spanish, after the year 2000. Spanish was chosen as a second language for the review due to the language capacity of the team. Any quantitative methodology studies were included, along with mixed methods studies if quantitative findings were separately reported.

Table 1. Inclusion criteria.

Population Boys or girls, under the age of 18
Exposure Any indirect exposure to IPV (in-utero and/ or household IPV exposures). IPV included physical, sexual or psychological violence or controlling behaviors, perpetrated against a maternal caregiver.
Context A country in receipt of United Nations Central Emergency Response Funding any time during 2006–2021
Outcome a) fetal growth (measured indirectly with birth weight), b) breastfeeding, including infant feeding practices, c) indicators of child growth (using anthropometry), and d) nutrient blood markers.

All records identified through the database searches were downloaded to Covidence, a systematic review software. Screening occurred in two stages: (i) title and abstract; and (ii) full text review. Title/ abstracts were each screened by one reviewer [one of SBC, MOG, LV or SRM]. During the full text screening, sources were assessed independently by two reviewers vis-à-vis the inclusion/ exclusion criteria [two of SBC, MOG, LV or SRM]. A third independent reviewer resolved any discord between the first two reviewers.

Data extraction and assessment of quality of included studies

We extracted data pertaining to general study characteristics, study design and sampling, measurement of experience of IPV as well as nutrition outcomes, and summary of results (see Supplementary Materials for data extraction materials). The data extraction was completed by a single reviewer [one of SBC or SRM] and checked for consistency and accuracy by a second reviewer [MOG or SRM]. The quality assessment measure included a series of questions that aim to assess methodological rigor including sources of poor measurement, bias, and degree to which results are externally valid. Due to the variability in study designs the team decided to use questions from four quality assessment tools: Mixed Methods Assessment Tool [MMAT] [31], Appraisal Tool for Cross Sectional Studies (AXIS) [32], Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) [33], and the National Institutes of Health assessment tool for observational cohort and cross sectional studies [34]. Specifically, the items whether the research objective was clearly stated, valid measurement of exposure (IPV) and outcome (nutrition) variables, and inclusion of relevant confounders were drawn from the NIH instrument, external validity (representativeness of sampling) and internal validity (non-response rates) items were drawn from the NOS instrument, an item about inclusion and exclusion criteria is drawn from the AXIS tool, and an item focused on sampling strategy is drawn from MMAT. This combination of items best fit the review objectives and included studies; previous systematic reviews have similarly combined quality assessment instruments [35].

Data synthesis

Following data extraction and quality assessment, the team reviewed the included studies for patterns and summarized findings using tables and aggregate descriptive statistics (count frequencies and percentages). Data synthesis also included developing harvest plots to visually represent the associations identified in studies; the method was adapted to the purposes of this review, whereby associations were not weighted by study quality [36, 37].

Results

There were 6493 sources imported to Covidence. Duplicates (1516) were removed, yielding 4977 citations for screening. During title and abstract screening, 4461 sources were excluded and 468 full texts were assessed for eligibility. During full text review, 450 sources were excluded for various reasons outlined in Fig 1. Specific characteristics of the 86 articles included are listed in Table 2. There were 57 cross-sectional studies, 23 prospective cohort studies, 5 case-control studies, one observational cohort study, and one prospective case-control study. About 50% of the included studies were published in the past five years, with 20 studies published in 2021 or 2022, indicating a rapidly expanding evidence-base. Study results are in displayed in S1 Table.

Fig 1. PRISMA flow chart.

Fig 1

Table 2. Study characteristics–Indirect pathway.

Article Research Question Country, Region Study design Used secondary data Yes/ no If yes, which dataset?
Frith (2017) To investigate the effect of breastfeeding counseling on the association between DV and EBF duration. Bangladesh, SEAR Longitudinal No
Khan (2020) To explore the impact of adverse maternal circumstances on LBW. Bangladesh, SEAR Cross sectional Yes–DHS
Neamah (2018) To explore how maternal experiences of IPV and depression impact a child’s development and nutrition outcomes. Tanzania, AFR Cross sectional No
Vo (2019) To examine the association between DV during pregnancy and pre-term birth or LBW. Vietnam, WPR Cross sectional No
Tran (2020) To investigate how postpartum IPV and IPV experienced during pregnancy influences maternal mental health outcomes and breastfeeding practices. Bangladesh, SEAR Cross sectional No
Madsen (2019) To examine if IPV affects early termination of EBF. Tanzania, AFR Prospective cohort No
Salazar (2012) To examine association between exposure to IPV during pregnancy and linear growth of the child. Nicaragua, AMR Prospective cohort No
Caleyachetty (2019) To investigate how exposure to IPV affects initiation of early breastfeeding and EBF. Afghanistan, Angola, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Chad, Colombia, Comoros, Cote d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Dominican Republic, Egypt, Ethiopia, Gabon, Ghana, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, India, Jordan, Kenya, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Malawi, Maldives, Mali, Moldova, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Nigeria, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Rwanda, Sao Tome and Principe, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Timor Leste, Togo, Uganda, Ukraine, Zambia, Zimbabwe
AFR, AMR, EMR, EUR, SEAR, WPR
Cross sectional Yes–DHS
Hoang (2016) To examine how exposure to IPV impacts the risk of adverse birth outcomes. Vietnam, WPR Prospective cohort No
Kana (2020) To analyze the association between exposure to IPV and birth weight. Nigeria, AFR Cross sectional No
Rahman (2012) To explore the association between physical and sexual IPV and nutritional outcomes such as being underweight, stunting and wasting. Bangladesh, SEAR Cross sectional Yes–DHS
Ariyo (2021) To examine the association between pregnancy, postpartum IPV and EBF. Nigeria, AFR Cross sectional Yes–DHS
Shirin Ziaei (2014) To investigate the association between ever married women experiencing IPV and nutrition outcomes in their children under five years old. Bangladesh, SEAR Cross sectional Yes–DHS
Ziaei (2019) To investigate how maternal exposure to DV impacts child lipid biomarkers. Bangladesh, SEAR Longitudinal No
Ferdos (2017) To explore the association between experience of maternal IPV and LBW. Bangladesh, SEAR Cross sectional No
Batool (2018) To explore the impact of IPV on child mortality and health in Pakistan. Pakistan, EMR Cross sectional Yes–DHS
Asling-Monemi (2009) To explore the association between women’s exposure to violence, the risk of fetal and early childhood malnutrition and the risk of under-five mortality. Bangladesh, SEAR Longitudinal Yes–Prenatal food and micronutrient supplementation trial
Valladares (2002) To explore the association between experiences of maternal physical violence and LBW in infants. Nicaragua, AMR Case Control No
Valladares (2009) To study the neuroendocrine release of cortisol in response to perceived stress among pregnant women exposed to partner violence and how this affects the duration of pregnancy and the intrauterine growth of the infant. Nicaragua, AMR Cross-sectional No
Rahman (2021) To explore how different types of IPV can affect birth outcomes such as LBW. India, SEAR Cross sectional Yes–DHS National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-4
Marimuthu (2019) To explore the association between spousal support/abuse in pregnancy and LBW. India, SEAR Case Control No
Tiwari (2018) To explore the relationship between exposure to lifetime partner emotional abuse and reproductive outcomes and behaviors in Indian women. India, SEAR Cross sectional Yes–DHS NFHS-3
Sabu (2020) To assess inequality of using the Composite index of anthropometric failure (CIAF) between tribal communities in Kerala and identify individual, parental and household factors affecting child undernutrition. India, SEAR Cross sectional No
Subramanian (2008) To explore the association between DV and malnutrition. India, SEAR Cross sectional Yes–DHS NFHS-3
Boyce (2017) To explore the relationship between IPV and postnatal health practices with the goal of helping guide interventions promoting neonatal survival. India, SEAR Cross sectional Yes–Data from Ananya program created to increase maternal and child health care utilization
Young (2020) To examine multiple influences such as maternal, household, community and health service, on breastfeeding. India, SEAR Cross sectional Yes–Data from a household survey done in 2017 collected for a maternal nutrition programme evaluation study
Zureick-Brown (2015) To examine the association between physical or sexual IPV and feeding practices for newborns and infants within 24 hrs of birth. India, SEAR Cross sectional Yes–DHS NFHS
Misch (2014) To assess the impact of physical, sexual and/or emotional maternal IPV victimization on early and exclusive breastfeeding practices in infants in different African countries. Ghana, Kenya, Liberia, Malawi, Nigeria, Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe, AFR Cross sectional Yes–DHS
Kaye (2006) To determine the relationship between DV and LBW/maternal ill health among pregnant women. Uganda, AFR Prospective cohort No
Sigalla (2017) To investigate the relationship between IPV during pregnancy, preterm birth and LBW in Tanzania. Tanzania, AFR Prospective cohort No
Musa (2021) To examine the relationship between LBW, preterm birth and IPV during pregnancy. Ethiopia, AFR Cross sectional No
Tsedal (2021) To investigate the relationship between maternal IPV and diet among their children aged 6–23 months. Ethiopia, AFR Cross sectional Yes–DHS
Walters (2021) To investigate the relationship between physical, sexual and emotional violence and controlling behaviors on early initiation of breastfeeding and continued breastfeeding. Malawi, Tanzania, Zambia, AFR Cross sectional Yes–DHS
Shamu (2018) To analyze the relationship between IPV at different points in the mother’s life and maternal and child health effects, including LBW. Zimbabwe, AFR Cross sectional No
Laelago (2017) To investigate the relationship between IPV during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes in a region of Ethiopia. Ethiopia, AFR Cross sectional No
Taft (2015) To investigate how violence impacts women’s reproductive health and infant/child mortality and health in Timor-Leste. Timor Leste, SEAR Cross sectional Yes–DHS
Jaraba (2019) To investigate the relationship between violence during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes such as LBW and preterm birth. Colombia, AMR Cross sectional Yes–DHS
Assefa (2012) To identify factors which contribute to LBW in rural Ethiopian communities. Ethiopia, AFR Observational cohort study No
Alemu (2019) To determine factors impacting LBW in the Kambata-Tembaro region of Ethiopia. Ethiopia, AFR Cross sectional No
Sobkoviak (2012) To examine the relationship between maternal exposure to DV and anthropometric data in children under five in Liberia. Liberia, AFR Cross sectional Yes–DHS
Berhanie (2019) To investigate the relationship between IPV and adverse neonatal outcomes in Ethiopia. Ethiopia, AFR Case Control No
Rico (2011) To examine the relationship between IPV among mothers and child stunting and mortality in five LMICs. Egypt, Honduras, Kenya, Malawi, Rwanda, EMR, AMR, AFR Cross sectional Yes–DHS
Chai (2016) To assess the relationship between maternal IPV and their children’s nutritional outcomes from 29 different countries. Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Cameroon, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Gabon, Ghana, Haiti, Honduras, India, Kenya, Liberia, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Nepal, Nigeria, Peru, Republic of Moldova, Rwanda, Sao Tome and Principe, Timor-Leste, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe, AFR, AMR, SEAR Cross sectional Yes–DHS
Abujilban (2017) To investigate how IPV during pregnancy impacts the risk of negative birth outcomes among women in Jordan. Jordan, EMR Case Control No
Khan (2021) To identify the socio-demographic risk factors correlated with severe child malnutrition among children younger than five in Bangladesh. Bangladesh, SEAR Cross sectional Yes–DHS
Eno (2014) To explore how DV impacts pregnancy outcomes. Nigeria, AFR Prospective case-control No
Hampanda (2016) To investigate how IPV against HIV-positive women impacts infant feeding practices Zambia, AFR Cross sectional No
Islam (2017) To investigate the relationship between psychosocial factors, such as IPV, on EBF among Bangladeshi mothers. Bangladesh, SEAR Cross sectional No
Pun (2019) To assess the relationship between DV, LBW and preterm birth among women in Nepal. Nepal, SEAR Cross sectional No
Das (2020) To investigate the determinants of stunting among children younger than 2 years. India, SEAR Cross sectional Yes–Trial to evaluate impact of community resource centres on maternal and child health and nutrition
Mezmur (2021) To examine adverse fetal outcomes (including LBW) among pregnant teenagers and women in rural East Africa. Ethiopia (Eastern), AFR Cross sectional No
Arcos (2001) To document the impact of prior and concurrent maternal exposure to DV on intrauterine growth, birth outcomes in a cohort of women followed longitudinally from pregnancy through delivery. Chile, AMR Prospective cohort No
Arcos (2003) To document the impact of pre and intra pregnancy exposure to DV on infant growth outcomes at age 11 months in children born to women who were followed longitudinally from pregnancy through delivery. Chile, AMR Prospective cohort No
Ruiz Grosso (2014) To assess the association between IPV and chronic malnutrition in children under five years old. Peru, AMR Cross sectional Yes–DHS
Faramarzi (2005) To assess the incidence of self-reported physical, emotional and sexual violence in pregnancy and describe the association with maternal complication and birth outcomes. Iran, EMR Cross sectional No
Ferraro (2017) To determine if there is a measurable association between
combined psychosocial factors, specifically DV and mental disorders, and birth outcomes,
specifically birth nutritional status and preterm delivery.
Brazil, AMR Prospective cohort No
Hasselmann (2016) To investigate the role of IPV in the early interruption of EBF in the first three
months of life
Brazil, AMR Prospective cohort No
Dolatian (2016) To determine the economic and psychological determinants of birthweight. Iran, EMR Prospective cohort No
Lobato (2018) To evaluate whether psychological IPV during pregnancy is a risk factor for intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Brazil, AMR Cross sectional No
Mahmoodi (2019) To determine the factors that predict LBW. Iran, EMR Prospective cohort No
Nojomi (2006) To determine the prevalence of physical abuse in pregnant women and to assess association between
physical violence during pregnancy and maternal complications and birth outcomes.
Iran, EMR Cross sectional No
Hasselmann (2006) To explore the role of IPV among caregivers as an independent risk factor for severe and acute malnutrition. Brazil, AMR Case Control No
Mezzavilla (2016) To investigate the association between physical IPV and LBW. Brazil, AMR Cross sectional No
Nejatizade (2017) To assess the prevalence of DV in pregnant women and maternal and infants’
outcomes.
Iran, EMR Cross sectional No
Nunes (2011) To estimate the prevalence of psychological, physical and sexual violence during current pregnancy and at any time in life; to identify demographic, obstetric, behavioral characteristics
and depressive symptoms of those at most risk; and, to assess the impact of violence during pregnancy on newborn outcomes.
Brazil, AMR Prospective cohort No
Nasreen (2019) To investigate the independent effect of maternal Antepartum depressive and anxiety symptoms on
LBW, preterm birth and CS or instrumental delivery among women in east and west coasts of Malaysia.
Malaysia, WPR Prospective cohort No
Moraes (2011) To investigate the role of severe physical violence during pregnancy between intimate partners in early cessation of exclusive breast-feeding. Brazil, AMR Cross sectional No
Ribeiro (2021) To verify whether recurrent violence, violence with pregnancy complications, and IPV against pregnant women are associated with shorter exclusive breastfeeding up to the infant’s 6th month and breastfeeding up to the 12th month of life. Brazil, AMR Prospective cohort Yes–Brazilian Ribeirão Preto and São Luís Birth
Cohort Studies (BRISA)
Caprara (2020) To examine the influence of DV against pregnant women on early complementary feeding and associated factors. Brazil, AMR Longitudinal No
Abdollahi (2015) To determine the prevalence of physical violence against women by an intimate partner during pregnancy, and to assess the impact of this physical violence on pregnancy outcomes. Iran, EMR Prospective cohort No
Khodakarami (2009) To assess the pregnancy outcomes of abused vs non-abused women. Iran, EMR Cross sectional No
Abadi (2013) To investigate associations of birth weight with sociodemographic variables, domestic violence, ways of coping, social support, and general mental health of Iranian mothers. Iran, EMR Cross sectional No
Aristizabal 2022 To explore the relationship between IPV and breastfeeding practice in Colombia Colombia, AMR Cross sectional Yes-DHS
Barnett 2022 To explore the relationship between IPV and IPV subtypes and growth. Exploring mediators in the IPV growth relationship. South Africa, AFR Longitudinal- prospective cohort Yes- South Africa birth cohort on child health study
Chandra 2021 To explore the relationship between antenatal anxiety, depression, and IPV and birth weight. India, SEAR Longitudinal- prospective cohort Yes- India Maternal Mental Health Study established at the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, in Bangalore India
Avci 2022 To explore the relationship between domestic violence during pregnancy and cortisol hormone, preterm birth, low birth weight and breastfeeding. Turkey, EUR Cross sectional No
Chowdhury 2021 To observe the risk factors for malnutrition in children under 5 and the socio-demographic determinants. Bangladesh, SEAR Cross sectional Yes-DHS
Debele 2022 To determine the relationship between LBW and physically demanding work during pregnancy along with others factors such as IPV and household food insecurity. Ethiopia, AFR Cross sectional No
Doke 2021 To explore the relationship between adverse pregnancy outcomes and risk factors including domestic violence and others. To assess the rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes and compare tribal vs not tribal and cases vs controls. India, SEAR Cross sectional No
Fonseka 2022 To explore the relationship between child marriage and maternal IPV exposure to stunting in children under 5. Also explored the role as moderator distance to conflict plays in the relationship between maternal child marriage and stunting, and maternal IPV and stunting separately. Sri Lanka, SEAR Cross sectional Yes-DHS
Issah 2022 To explore the relationship between IPV and women and child nutrition in Nigeria. Nigeria, AFR Cross sectional Yes- DHS
Woldetensay 2021 To explore the relationship between depressive symptoms and IPV and social support and infant feeding practices. Ethiopia, AFR Longitudinal, prospective cohort No
Okunola 2021 To explore the relationship between IPV during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes in south western Nigeria. Nigeria, AFR Prospective cohort No
Tesfa 2021 To explore the prevalence of fetal malnutrition in Ethiopia and factors related to fetal malnutrition. Ethiopia, AFR Cross sectional No
UysalYalcin 2022 To explore the relationship between intimate partner violence and child growth for children under 5. Turkey, EUR Cross sectional No
Vachhani 2022 To explore the health impact on women’s and children’s health for those women who experience domestic violence and to look at health seeking behavior of those women. India, SEAR Cross sectional No

AFR, African Region; AMR, Region of the Americas; SEAR, South-East Asian Region; EUR, European Region; EMR, Eastern Mediterranean Region; WPR, Western Pacific Region

Table 3 displays results from the quality assessment. All individual quality assessment results are included in S2 Table. The sampling approach was highly variable, with 39.5% utilizing probability-based sampling methods and just over half (53.5%) including convenience sampling of women (typically women attending prenatal care or women who had given birth in facility/ hospital). Studies that utilized probability-based sampling methods were secondary analyses of Demographic and Health Surveys [DHS] data. In 40.7% of studies had a response rate of more than 90%. In 50.0% (n = 43) of studies, there was no description of the response rate and/ or any differences in characteristics between respondents and non-respondents. Despite these limitations, a high proportion of studies were categorized by the review team as having utilized rigorous measurement of IPV, i.e. questions that address acts-based items, rather than general questions about IPV experience (91.9%), and a similarly high proportion (87.2%) of studies included a rigorous measure of the nutrition outcomes (e.g. Z scores).

Table 3. Quality assessment.

Quality assessment item Possible responses n = 86 Percent
Introduction
Was the research question or objective in this paper clearly stated? Yes 85 99%
Methods
Representativeness of the sample Truly representative of the average in the target population (all subjects or random sampling) 34 39.5%
Somewhat representative of the average in the target population. (non-random sampling) 4 4.70%
Selected group (i.e. clinic-based sampling in hospital) 46 53.5%
Was the target/reference population clearly defined? Yes 77 89.5%
Is the sampling strategy relevant to address the research question? Yes 70 81.4%
Non-Respondents (1) Comparability between respondents and non-respondents’ characteristics is established and the response rate is satisfactory 35 40.7%
(2) The response rate is unsatisfactory or the comparability between respondents and non-respondents is unsatisfactory 8 9.30%
(3) No description of the response rate or the characteristics of the responders and the non-responders. 43 50.0%
Is the violence exposure measured rigorously? Yes 79 91.9%
Results
Is the nutrition outcome measured rigorously? (Internal validity) Yes 75 87.2%
Were key potential confounding variables measured and adjusted statistically for their impact on the relationship between exposure(s) and outcome(s)? Yes 73 84.9%
Statistical test The statistical test used to analyze the data is clearly described and appropriate and the measurement of the association is presented including confidence intervals and the probability level (p value) 83 96.5%
The statistical test is not appropriate not described or incomplete. 3 3.50%

The REA findings are reported here by child developmental stages in the following sections: Low Birth Weight, Feeding Practices including Breastfeeding, and Indicators of Undernutrition (i.e. stunting, or wasting/underweight). The associations between maternal experience of IPV (lifetime, past year, and during pregnancy, wherein the affected child was in utero) and child nutrition and growth outcomes are shown the harvest plot in Fig 2. IPV was assessed separately (i.e. physical IPV only, sexual IPV only, emotional/ psychological/ verbal IPV only and controlling behaviors only) and as combined IPV, defined as physical, sexual and emotional, physical and sexual, or combined IPV–physical, sexual and emotional, physical and sexual, or any combination of IPV types. For each type of outcome, we include details from select studies that illustrate the associations found.

Fig 2. Harvest plot of maternal experience of IPV and child nutrition and growth outcomes.

Fig 2

Harvest plot depiction of associations between maternal exposure to IPV and child outcomes related to growth and nutritional status, by timepoint of exposure. The figure below the plot shows a life-course and outcome timeline. (a) Shows associations with low birthweight. (b) Shows associations with feeding practices including breastfeeding. (c) Shows associations with stunting, linear growth and growth velocity. (d) Shows associations with underweight/ wasting/ severe malnutrition. (e) Shows associations with lipid biomarkers. The blue bar in the graphs depict maternal lifetime exposure to IPV, the orange bar depicts exposure to IPV in the past year and the gray bar depicts exposure to IPV during pregnancy.

Associations with low birth weight (LBW)

Fig 2A shows the associations found between lifetime experience of IPV, experience of IPV in the past year, or experience of IPV during pregnancy, and LBW. One study did not specify a time period for IPV experience and indicated a positive association [38].

A relationship between lifetime experience of any type of IPV and LBW was examined in twelve studies. Higher experience of lifetime physical IPV was significantly associated with LBW in all four studies that examined this association [3942]. Positive associations were also found in six of seven studies examining lifetime combined IPV and LBW [3945]. Of the two studies that looked at lifetime sexual IPV and LBW, one found a significant association [39, 40]. Of the two studies that looked at lifetime emotional/psychological/verbal IPV and LBW, one found a significant association [39, 41].

Thirteen studies examined the association between any type of IPV experience in the past year and LBW, of which one found a significant association of increased risk for LBW among children born to mothers reporting physical IPV [46]. No other associations were found for LBW and other types of IPV individually or combined for experiencing IPV in the past year.

Twenty-five studies examined the association between experience of any type of IPV during pregnancy and LBW. An overwhelming majority of studies (10 of 13) that examined experience of physical IPV during pregnancy and LBW, found a significantly increased risk of LBW [6, 4758]. Similarly, ten of thirteen studies examining experience of combined IPV during pregnancy and LBW found that gestational experience of combined IPV significantly increased risk of LBW [6, 4749, 5967]. Experience of sexual IPV during pregnancy was significantly associated with increased risk of LBW in three of ten studies that examined this association [6, 4750, 52, 53, 56, 57, 68]. Four out of the nine studies that examined experience of emotional or psychological IPV or controlling behaviors found significantly increased risk of LBW [6, 4750, 52, 55, 56, 68].

Associations with breastfeeding practices

Fig 2B shows the associations found between experience of any type of IPV, in a lifetime, in the past year, or during pregnancy and feeding practices, with n = 18 focused on breastfeeding, one focused on minimum acceptable diet and one on infant feeding practices which included breastfeeding 0 to 6 months and feeding practices 6 to 12 months measured every three months.

Seven studies examined lifetime experience of physical IPV and suboptimal breastfeeding practices, of which five found significant positive associations. Two, which were multi-country studies, found positive associations in some countries and not others [5, 6974]. Of eight studies examining combined IPV and suboptimal breastfeeding practices, significant associations were reported in five studies [69, 70, 7375]. Lifetime experience of sexual IPV and measures for suboptimal breastfeeding practices were examined in six studies, of which five found significant positive associations [5, 6971, 73, 74]. In six of 14 associations explored, a positive association was found between suboptimal breastfeeding practices and experience of emotional/ psychological/ verbal IPV or controlling behavior. Associations varied depending on country where the study took place [5, 6974, 76].

Six studies examined the association between experience of any type of IPV in the past year and suboptimal breastfeeding practices. One out of the two that assessed physical IPV in the past year found significant association with suboptimal breastfeeding [77, 78]. Sexual IPV was significantly associated in the two studies to examine the association [77, 78]. Of the three studies examining experience of combined IPV in the past year and suboptimal breastfeeding, three studies reported a positive association, where one study looked at pre-lateral and delayed initiation of breastfeeding separately and found a negative and positive association respectively [7779]. Both studies examining emotional/ psychological/ verbal/ and controlling behavior with sub-optimal breastfeeding, had a positive association [77, 78].

Two of the four studies that examined the impact of experiencing physical IPV during pregnancy on breastfeeding practices, showed that delayed initiation of breastfeeding and lack of exclusive breastfeeding were significantly associated with experience of physical IPV [72, 77, 80, 81]. Three studies examined associations between experiencing combined IPV during pregnancy and suboptimal breastfeeding practices. Two showed no association and one reported a statistically significant negative z score, where women who experienced combined IPV during pregnancy had less confidence in their breastfeeding practices [65, 72, 77], while breastfeeding and experience of sexual IPV during pregnancy showed positive significant associations in one of three studies that examined that association [72, 77, 80]. An association between experience of emotional/ psychological/ verbal IPV and suboptimal breastfeeding practices was found in one of three studies [72, 77, 80] with none looking at controlling behavior during pregnancy and breastfeeding.

Associations with feeding practices in infancy and second year of life

Two studies examined feeding practices beyond breastfeeding, where one analyzed data collected through the Ethiopian 2016 DHS, examining the association of maternal caregivers’ experience of combined IPV (including physical, sexual and emotional violence) on minimum acceptable diet (a composite of the UNICEF indicators for minimal dietary diversity and minimal meal frequency) in children ages 6–23 months and found a significant association between maternal IPV and poorer minimum acceptable diet [82]. The other study, also based in Ethiopia, but using data from the Improve Nutrition and Economic (ENGINE) opportunities birth cohort study, found the maternal experience of combined IPV increased the risk to poorer infant feeding practices [83].

Associations with indicators of undernutrition

Stunting, linear growth and growth velocity

Fig 2C shows the associations between a maternal caregiver’s experience of any type of IPV and stunting, severe stunting, decreased linear child growth, or growth velocity in children, as examined in fifteen studies. Overall, maternal experience of any type of IPV was significantly associated with a child’s stunting, with the strongest findings among those studies examining maternal lifetime experience of any type of IPV, rather than to a mother’s experiencing any type of IPV (only) during the last year as might be expected given the chronicity of the malnutrition represented by stunting.

Maternal lifetime experience of physical IPV was associated with a child’s stunting or decreased growth velocity in three out of the five studies that examined this association [42, 8487] and was associated with severe stunting in the one study that explored this association, although there was no association in the same study but for other locations [85]. In the six studies that examined lifetime experience of combined IPV and stunting during childhood, four found that risk of stunting was significantly elevated among children whose maternal caregiver reported a lifetime experience of combined IPV [42, 8488]. Similarly, in the two studies that examined maternal lifetime experience of combined IPV and a child’s risk of severe stunting, one found significantly increased risk of severe stunting [38, 85], and the same experience significantly predicted decreased growth velocity (height) in the only study in which it was examined [44]. Maternal caregivers’ lifetime experience of sexual IPV was associated with a child’s stunting in four of five studies [8487, 89]. Lifetime experience of emotional/ psychological/ verbal or controlling behavior was not analyzed with any of the stunting or linear growth outcomes.

Three studies examined maternal caregivers’ experience of physical IPV in the past year and stunting, of which two demonstrated a significant association with stunting [9092]. Of two studies to analyze an association between experience of combined IPV in the past year with stunting, one reported a significant association [89, 91]. Two studies looked at an association with experience of sexual IPV in the past year but no significant association was found [91, 92]. One study explored the association between stunting and maternal past year experience of emotional/ psychological/ verbal or controlling behavior and found no significant association [92].

Two studies examined the association between experience of any type of IPV during pregnancy, and linear child growth using height for age z scores. An association was found for physical IPV in one study [93]. There was no association found for experience of sexual, or emotional/psychological/verbal IPV, however, both controlling behaviors and combined IPV were significantly associated with a child’s decreased height for age in two studies [93, 94].

Underweight/wasting/severe malnutrition

Fig 2D shows the associations between maternal caregivers’ experience of any type of IPV and child growth indicators such as underweight, growth velocity, wasting, severe malnutrition, low BMI, fetal malnutrition, overweight and the composite index of anthropometric failure [CIAF] that were analyzed in fifteen studies.

Several studies of lifetime experience of any type of IPV and growth indicators showed no significant associations: physical IPV and underweight [42, 84, 86], and lifetime experience of sexual IPV and underweight [89]. Lifetime experience of combined IPV and underweight showed one positive significant association out of two studies that analyzed this relationship [84, 88]. The only study to look at experience of combined lifetime IPV and growth velocity in weight found a significant association [44]. The two studies that looked at associations between physical IPV and wasting found no significant associations [42, 86]. Three studies found non-significant associations between lifetime experience of combined IPV and wasting [42, 86, 88]. A significant association was found in the one study to look at combined IPV and CIAF [95]. The two studies to analyze lifetime combined IPV and severe malnutrition found no significant association [38], and there were no associations between lifetime experience of sexual IPV and wasting in the two studies exploring this association [84, 86].

Two studies examined maternal caregivers’ experience to physical IPV in the past year and a child being underweight; neither found a significant association [90, 91]. Of the two studies that explored associations between past year physical IPV and wasting, one of them found a significant association [90, 91]. A significant association was found in the only study to analyze a relationship between past year experience of physical IPV and low BMI [90]. Experience of combined IPV in the past year and being underweight yielded a significant association in one of two studies that assessed this association [89, 91]. One of two studies looking at past year experience of combined IPV and wasting found a significant association [89, 91]. Maternal caregivers’ experience of sexual IPV in the past year and a child being underweight was significant in one of two studies to examine this association [89, 91], and showed no association with wasting in the two studies to explore this relationship [89, 91]. No studies looked at an association between underweight/ wasting outcomes with maternal past year experience of emotional/ psychological/ verbal or controlling behavior.

The only study to explore a relationship between maternal caregivers’ experience to physical IPV during pregnancy and a child being underweight found a significant association [68]. A significant association was found between experience of physical IPV during pregnancy and wasting in the single study to explore this relationship [93]. Experience of combined IPV during pregnancy and fetal malnutrition yielded a significant association in the one study that analyzed this relationship [96]. Maternal experience of sexual IPV during pregnancy and a child being underweight was not found to be significant in the one study to examine this association [68]. The one study to examine maternal experience of emotional/psychological and verbal IPV during pregnancy and underweight found a significant association [68], the relationship with the same type of IPV and wasting was also found to be significant for the one study to analyze it [93]. One study analyzed the relationship between overweight and maternal experience of emotional/psychological and verbal IPV and controlling behavior separately and found significant associations for both relationships [93].

Associations with blood-based biomarkers

Four studies included measures of blood-based markers of child nutrient intake. Fig 2E shows the associations between maternal experience of any type of IPV and anemia, or lipid profiles in children. One large longitudinal study by Ziaei et al., 2019, in Bangladesh found that children’s lipid profiles collected at age 10 years were significantly worsened among children whose mothers reported lifetime experiences of physical, sexual, controlling behaviors or combined forms of IPV [97]. The association of child lipid profiles with maternal IPV differed depending on the type of IPV as well as by whether the maternal experience was prenatal, or occurred postnatally during 10 years after the child’s birth [97]. Some lipids appeared more sensitive to specific forms of IPV. For example, triglyceride levels increased with physical but no other forms of IPV, regardless whether exposure was pre- or postnatal. ApoA levels worsened (decreased) with prenatal maternal exposure to combined IPV, isolated sexual IPV, and controlling behaviors and LDL/HDL ratios worsened (increased) among children whose mothers were exposed to sexual, but not other forms of IPV [97]. Controlling behaviors were associated with worsened lipid profiles if the mother experienced them prenatally, but surprisingly, when mothers’ exposure to controlling behaviors was postnatal, children had improved lipid profiles (lower LDL, LDL/HDL and cholesterol) at age 10, which was hypothesized to result from the paradoxical effect of mothers’ increased time at home with their children [97].

In the two studies that examined a child’s anemia as an outcome, none found an association with maternal caregivers’ experience of IPV. However, the studies that examined this association only examined the maternal experience of IPV during the past year, or lifetime, rather than examining the maternal exposure during a time period that would correspond more directly to the temporality of a single measure of hemoglobin. Additionally, the studies did not examine other markers that would permit differentiation of iron deficiency from other types of anemia. Examining experience of physical IPV in the past year and child’s anemia showed no association in the only study to look at the relationship [90]. Lifetime experience of combined IPV was not associated with childhood anemia in children 6 to 59 months in the only study that assessed this relationship [42]. No other associations of anemia were reported with any other type of maternal IPV or combined IPV experience in the past year. No other associations were reported between maternal caregivers’ experience of IPV during pregnancy and child anemia or lipid biomarker outcomes.

One study analyzed the relationship between caregivers’ experience of physical IPV during pregnancy and increased cortisol levels in the child and did not find a significant association. However, this same study looked at the associations between a caregivers’ experience of combined IPV, sexual IPV and emotional/psychological and verbal IPV and found cortisol levels to be significantly higher for babies where mothers had experienced these types of violence during pregnancy [65].

Discussion

This REA represents an important update to prior reviews focusing on the association between a maternal caregivers’ experience of any type of IPV and children’s nutrition outcomes. While the global evidence-base remains biased towards evidence gathered in high-income contexts, our review indicates that the past decades of research and analysis has generated significant insights into the associations between IPV and various nutrition outcomes in LMICs in all regions.

In examining potential mechanisms for how IPV can contribute to each of the groups of outcomes, LBW, feeding practices and various indicators of child growth and malnutrition, there is scope for hypothesizing causal pathways between experience of IPV by a maternal caregiver and nutritional/growth outcomes. Based on the data gathered from multiple studies for this review, there is a suggestion of a linear impact of experience of IPV during pregnancy on physiological pathways affecting fetal growth. This is supported by the strong and consistent associations between mothers’ experience of physical or combined IPV and LBW, while the impact of emotional/psychological IPV or sexual IPV may work through an intermediary in the pathway to LBW.

Although thirteen studies assessed the association between maternal experience of any type of IPV and LBW in the past year, only one study found a positive association with physical IPV [46]. In contrast, positive associations were found in six of seven studies examining lifetime combined IPV and LBW [3945]. Similarly, 19 of 25 studies found a positive association between maternal experience of any type of IPV during pregnancy and LBW. The notable difference between experience of any type of IPV during a lifetime and during pregnancy vs experience of any type of IPV in the past year indicate the importance of taking into account timing of when a maternal caregiver experiences IPV to understand causal pathways to child nutrition outcomes.

Our findings find a significant association between mother’s experience of IPV and breastfeeding. The evidence-base confirms the hypothesis that women who have experienced IPV face psychological or physical barriers to breastfeeding, known as the deficit hypothesis, as opposed to the compensatory hypothesis, whereby women who have experienced IPV may be more sensitive or responsive to their children’s needs and therefore have higher odds of early initiation of breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding and/ or continued breastfeeding than women not exposed to IPV [75]. Unfortunately, most studies did not specifically focus on IPV occurring between birth and the interview. This is an important period to examine in new research, given that the peak risk periods during which experience of IPV experience can impact adherence to recommended practices in breastfeeding could be immediately following delivery as well as during pregnancy. Breastfeeding is critical for child health and growth, and contributes improved long-term health, including cognitive capacity and survival [98100]. Among its multiple benefits are protection from infections during infancy, as well as providing hygienic food in settings with limited potable water (especially relevant in humanitarian settings), in fragile settings, the life-saving protection of breastfeeding is thus especially critical. Conflicts, natural disasters and epidemics contribute to forced migration resulting in heightened food insecurity, limited access to clean water, and disruptions to basic services, leaving women and children especially vulnerable. In these settings, breastfeeding guarantees a safe, nutritious and accessible food source for infants and a protective shield against infectious disease and death [100]. Preventing, managing or mitigating IPV can improve breastfeeding practices. Initiation of breastfeeding promotion interventions that reach mothers even before conception and recognizing the impact of a maternal experience of IPV on her breastfeeding practices, can impact child health indicators throughout childhood. Although some literature shows that breastfeeding is affected by sex feeding preference, where the mother may breastfeed a male more than a female child [101, 102], no articles on feeding preference and IPV were identified that met the inclusion criteria for this review. In addition, we found a surprising lack of sex disaggregation of child nutrition outcomes, which prevents proper analysis on sex based preferential breastfeeding and other feeding practices.

Findings indicate that experience of IPV by a maternal caregiver is associated with impaired child growth and indicators of acute and chronic malnutrition. Despite some lack of comparability of associations, the studies included in this review suggest that maternal experience of IPV affects several growth indicators in preschool children, however, the literature is extremely limited in its examination of time intervals that can fully inform our understanding of any potential underlying mechanism. Despite this, the literature that includes stunting as an outcome does suggest that maternal caregivers’ lifetime experience of IPV is more predictive of stunting than past year experience of IPV. This is suggestive of a pathway consistent with evidence where lifetime IPV can lead to inadequate nutrition and reduced care practice. The literature reviewed suggested that maternal caregivers’ experience of physical alone, sexual alone or combined IPV posed a greater risk for a child’s stunting, rather than other types of IPV. For more acute growth indicators, other types of IPV (physical) and a shorter period (past year) appear to pose greater risk. To better examine the pathways through which stunting and underweight may result from maternal caregivers’ experience of IPV, further work should examine underlying potential mechanisms, including examination of feeding patterns. The finding of stunting and lifetime maternal experience of IPV, may be particularly amenable to earlier intervention and strategies for prevention. In particular, capturing reporting of lifetime experience shows an underlying chronicity of exposure and long developmental window for stunting, which may have a physiologically different impact.

Though few studies examined maternal caregivers’ experience of IPV alongside children’s nutrient biomarkers in blood, the results from the one study suggests a potential causal pathway for lipid dysregulation (at age 10) leading to metabolic syndrome and contributing to later obesity resulting from maternal caregivers’ experience of physical and sexual IPV [97]. One other study found an increase in cortisol levels for newborns where the maternal caregiver had experienced several types of IPV during pregnancy [65] and in another study, a higher cortisol level in the mother, as well as the baby, was associated with lower birth weight [103]. Notably absent from the literature were studies examining the impact of maternal caregiver IPV on a child’s anemia during early childhood when children are reliant on caregiver feeding. Similarly, examination of maternal caregiver exposure to IPV and child measures of lipid dysregulation during puberty and adolescence may further elucidate potential pathways contributing to a child’s less healthy food choices later in life.

Results of the REA indicate the importance of context in associations between maternal caregiver experiencing IPV and child nutrition outcomes. In some multi-country studies, associations were found in one context and not another. For example, Misch et al., reported significant associations between physical IPV and delayed initiation of breastfeeding in Tanzania, Malawi and Zimbabwe and no association in Ghana, Liberia, Nigeria, Zambia and Kenya. Further supporting this example they found an association between sexual IPV experience and delayed initiation in Zambia but not in other countries [71]. Despite consistent use of methodology, IPV recall period and measurement of both IPV and nutrition outcomes in this multi-country study, the variation in results between contexts indicates that important, and likely unmeasured, contextual factors influence the association between indirect IPV exposure and child nutrition outcomes. Variance in associations occurred in a number of multi-country studies. In addition, intra-country variation in single-country studies may be substantially masked by country-level analyses of DHS data, in particular.

The REA also identified significant but addressable knowledge gaps, one, in the examination of risk during time periods preceding occurrence of the outcomes, and secondly in considering time periods that would be physiologically and developmentally meaningful for the progression of the underlying processes measured in the outcomes chosen. For example, although a large number of studies examined risk associated with experience of IPV during pregnancy, no studies considered the relevance of timing during pregnancy considering fetal development when examining the association between experience of IPV against a maternal caregiver and a child’s LBW. Additionally, studies examining the impact of physical IPV did not differentiate physical IPV involving direct abdominal trauma. Similarly, in those studies examining experience of IPV and breastfeeding, there was no documentation of IPV occurring during the child’s infancy (i.e. post-natal). Studies examining stunting or growth velocity similarly did not disaggregate maternal caregivers’ experience of IPV after the child was born. Many of these limitations may be due to the reliance on secondary data from large standardized regional/ national surveys. Studies reporting primary data collection though smaller were generally more able to provide insight into underlying processes.

Other gaps in the evidence-base identified in the REA include that only one study considered impact on young children by considering feeding practices in children above 6 months old, and using the UNICEF indicators for minimal acceptable diet (a composite of minimal dietary diversity, and age specific minimal meal frequency) [82]. These data are available in DHS datasets, and there is potential to conduct several secondary analyses of DHS data, including cross-country comparisons, to illustrate the associations between IPV and minimal acceptable diet. Studies in infants, children, and adolescents should include measures of diet diversity and diet adequacy as this is understudied (or completely unstudied). Given our findings regarding associations of IPV with breastfeeding, as well as the evidence from the two studies that examined minimal acceptable diet, it is highly plausible that feeding/ patterns of dietary intake in children older than 6 months will also be affected by either direct or indirect exposure to IPV. Strategies to prevent or remediate poor growth in infancy could be directly informed by including measures of the impact of IPV on dietary adequacy in infants and children.

A notable limitation of the evidence-base is the reliance on cross-sectional study designs as they do not allow for follow up to other outcomes as the child grows. The measurement and categorization of confounders, and inclusion of confounders, varied widely between studies, limiting direct comparison of results even if studies were using the same exposure and outcome measures. While measurement of IPV across the evidence-base was generally of high quality, inconsistency in grouping of types of IPV and different use of recall periods (lifetime, past year and during pregnancy) across studies led to lack of comparability of many associations identified in the studies. The secondary data analyses have inherent limitations because the studies are not designed to examine the association of specific types of IPV against a maternal caregiver with specific child outcomes. Many of the datasets could be used to examine these potential pathways with more precision by restricting the analyses to those in whom the time period of measured exposure corresponds to, a time period that is biologically and plausibly relevant for the outcome of interest.

There are various programmatic implications resulting from the REA. The evidence highlights the potential for greater synergies across GBV, nutrition, and maternal and child health programs. By identifying entry points within nutrition programs to provide support to survivors and refer them to specialized GBV services, such programs could improve well-being for both women and children. Equally, there are also opportunities to integrate more information on nutrition into GBV services to ensure that women who experience GBV are able to access nutrition services when their children are at risk. The evidence provides further support for advancing GBV prevention, given the potential lifelong impacts of IPV on child nutrition, and therefore, health and wellbeing. Effective approaches, such as UNICEF’s Communities Care model, hold promise to reduce GBV and thereby also contribute to better nutrition outcomes [104]. The findings of the assessment illustrate that incorporating GBV considerations into nutrition policies and programming is relevant to the protection and promotion of child health. Taking action to proactively identify and mitigate GBV-related risks helps make nutrition programming more effective especially in humanitarian contexts where the risk of GBV is higher.

Limitations

The results of the REA should be interpreted in light of some limitations, including that we conducted single screening of titles and abstracts (a single reviewer determined whether to include or exclude), and that data extraction was conducted by a single reviewer for each article. This methodology is in line with recent guidance regarding how to adapt systematic review methodology to the purposes of a rapid evidence assessment [105]. A second team member checked the data extraction for completeness and accuracy, and title/ abstract screening was conducted after 10% of the sample was double-screened, to ensure inter-rater reliability and consistency in application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies in languages other than English and Spanish were excluded from the review due to language limitations of the team. The most significant limitation in interpretation of the results is that we did not weight studies according to quality or sample size. This level of quality assessment was beyond the scope of the REA in terms of timeline and resources. The findings regarding type and direction of associations, and patterns of associations between specific types of IPV and specific nutrition outcomes, should therefore be interpreted with this limitation in mind. Despite these limitations, this review represents an important update to prior evidence synthesis of the associations between maternal IPV and child growth and nutrition. By capturing the past few years of research, which has seen an enormous growth in published analyses, represents a comprehensive and up-to-date synthesis of this literature.

Conclusion

Our review identified maternal caregivers’ experience of IPV to be directly associated with low birthweight and breastfeeding practices, and also significantly associated with impaired fetal, infant, and child growth and indicators of acute and chronic malnutrition. There are opportunities that could be more strategically leveraged to better understand how experience of IPV can impact child growth indicators. Future studies could be designed to specifically evaluate experience of IPV during periods of risk relevant to specific growth outcomes, and to disaggregate analysis of outcomes by child sex. Despite some lack of comparability of associations identified in the studies, and differing patterns between specific types of IPV and different nutrition outcomes, there is ample evidence that IPV negatively affects a broad range of child nutrition outcomes. Acknowledging IPV as a risk factor within nutrition and child health programs holds the potential to significantly improve the nutrition, health and well-being of both children and women. Linking maternal caregivers’ experience of IPV to child malnutrition and growth pathways creates a space for conversations around integrated program models and the specific need for more development, testing and refinement of these models in LMIC settings. Approaches including targeted IPV screening of women whose children are undergoing treatment for malnutrition through supplementary feeding programs, training pre-natal health care workers and lactation specialists to identify signs of IPV amongst women, and strengthening referral networks between health and nutrition services and IPV response services are all key actions that can be explored in LMICs.

Supporting information

S1 Appendix. Search domains and terms for all databases.

(DOCX)

pone.0298364.s001.docx (41.9KB, docx)
S1 Table. Study results.

(DOCX)

pone.0298364.s002.docx (74.6KB, docx)
S2 Table. Quality assessment.

(DOCX)

pone.0298364.s003.docx (58KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

We thank Lily Coll for her support in data extraction.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The rapid evidence assessment was funded by the Safe from the Start grant to UNICEF, from Bureau of Population and Migration The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.D’Odorico P, Carr JA, Davis KF, Dell’Angelo J, Seekell DA. Food Inequality, Injustice, and Rights. BioScience. 2019;69(3):180–90. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biz002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Coll CV, Ewerling F, García-Moreno C, Hellwig F, Barros AJ. Intimate partner violence in 46 low-income and middle-income countries: an appraisal of the most vulnerable groups of women using national health surveys. BMJ global health. 2020;5(1):e002208. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.WHO. Violence against women 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women.
  • 4.WHO. Understanding and addressing violence against women: Intimate partner violence. World Health Organization, 2012.
  • 5.Walters CN, Rakotomanana H, Komakech JJ, Stoecker BJ. Maternal experience of intimate partner violence is associated with suboptimal breastfeeding practices in Malawi, Tanzania, and Zambia: insights from a DHS analysis. International breastfeeding journal. 2021;16(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13006-021-00365-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Berhanie E, Gebregziabher D, Berihu H, Gerezgiher A, Kidane G. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: A case-control study. Reproductive Health. 2019;16(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0670-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sardinha L, Maheu-Giroux M, Stöckl H, Meyer SR, García-Moreno C. Global, regional, and national prevalence estimates of physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence against women in 2018. The Lancet. 2022;399(10327):803–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Interagency Standing Committee. Guidelines for Integrating Gender-Based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action ‐ Thematic Area Guide: Nutrition Geneva: Interagency Standing Committee 2015.
  • 9.Stark L, Ager A. A systematic review of prevalence studies of gender-based violence in complex emergencies. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2011;12(3):127–34. Epub 2011/04/23. doi: 10.1177/1524838011404252 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brown D, Meinhart M, Poulton C, Stark L. The Economic Burden of Intimate Partner Violence in Colombia: Estimated Health Costs Among Females Aged 13–24. J Interpers Violence. 2022: 8862605221104531. Epub 20220525. doi: 10.1177/08862605221104531 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Evans SE, Davies C, DiLillo D. Exposure to domestic violence: A meta-analysis of child and adolescent outcomes. Aggression and Violent Behaviour. 2008;13:131–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Graham‐Bermann SA, Castor LE, Miller LE, Howell KH. The impact of intimate partner violence and additional traumatic events on trauma symptoms and PTSD in preschool‐aged children. Journal of traumatic stress. 2012;25(4):393–400. doi: 10.1002/jts.21724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wathen CN, MacMillan HL. Children’s exposure to intimate partner violence: Impacts and interventions. Paediatrics & Child Health. 2013;18(8):419–22. doi: 10.1093/pch/18.8.419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chisholm CA, Bullock L, Ferguson JE. Intimate partner violence and pregnancy: epidemiology and impact. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017;217(2):141–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wood SL, Sommers MS. Consequences of intimate partner violence on child witnesses: a systematic review of the literature. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2011;24(4):223–36. Epub 2011/11/03. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6171.2011.00302.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jeong J, Adhia A, Bhatia A, McCoy DC, Yousafzai AK. Intimate Partner Violence, Maternal and Paternal Parenting, and Early Child Development. Pediatrics. 2020;145(6). Epub 2020/05/20. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2955 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Barnett W, Halligan SL, Wedderburn C, MacGinty R, Hoffman N, Zar HJ, et al. Maternal emotional and physical intimate partner violence and early child development: investigating mediators in a cross-sectional study in a South African birth cohort. BMJ Open. 2021;11(10):e046829. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Laurenzi CA, Skeen S, Sundin P, Hunt X, Weiss RE, Rotheram-Borus MJ, et al. Associations between young children’s exposure to household violence and behavioural problems: Evidence from a rural Kenyan sample. Global Public Health. 2020;15(2):173–84. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2019.1656274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hietamäki J, Huttunen M, Husso M. Gender Differences in Witnessing and the Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence from the Perspective of Children in Finland. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(9). Epub 20210428. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094724 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8125222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Asagba RB, Noibi OW, Ogueji IA. Gender Differences in Children’s Exposure to Domestic Violence in Nigeria. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma. 2022;15(2):423–6. doi: 10.1007/s40653-021-00386-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Howell KH, Barnes SE, Miller LE, Graham-Bermann SA. Developmental variations in the impact of intimate partner violence exposure during childhood. J Inj Violence Res. 2016;8(1):43–57. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v8i1.663 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4729333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cammack D, McLeod D, Menocal A, Christiansen K. Donors and the ‘Fragile States’ Agenda: A Survey of Current Thinking and Practice. London: Overseas Development Institute, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Development Initiatives. 2020 Global Nutrition Report: Action on equity to end malnutrition. Bristol, UK: Development Initiatives, 2020.
  • 24.UNICEF. No time to waste: Improving diets, services and practices for the prevention, early detection and treatment of wasting in early childhood. New York UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund 2021.
  • 25.Yount KM, DiGirolamo AM, Ramakrishnan U. Impacts of domestic violence on child growth and nutrition: a conceptual review of the pathways of influence. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(9):1534–54. Epub 2011/04/16. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.042 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hill A, Pallitto C, McCleary-Sills J, Garcia-Moreno C. A systematic review and meta-analysis of intimate partner violence during pregnancy and selected birth outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;133(3):269–76. Epub 2016/04/04. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.10.023 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Donovan BM, Spracklen CN, Schweizer ML, Ryckman KK, Saftlas AF. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and the risk for adverse infant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bjog. 2016;123(8):1289–99. Epub 2016/03/10. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13928 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mezzavilla RS, Ferreira MF, Curioni CC, Lindsay AC, Hasselmann MH. Intimate partner violence and breastfeeding practices: a systematic review of observational studies. Jornal de pediatria. 2018;94(3):226–37. Epub 2017/09/11. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2017.07.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Med. 2021;18(3):e1003583. Epub 2021/03/30. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8007028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Morgan RL, Whaley P, Thayer KA, Schünemann HJ. Identifying the PECO: A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes. Environ Int. 2018;121(Pt 1):1027–31. Epub 20180827. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.015 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6908441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hong Q, Pluye P, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, et al. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Downes MJ, Brennan ML, Williams HC, Dean RS. Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS). BMJ Open. 2016;6(12):e011458. Epub 2016/12/10. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011458 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5168618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M. The Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality if Nonrandomized Studies in Meta‐Analyses. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.NIH. Study Quality Assessment Tools: NIH; n.d. [25/5/21].
  • 35.Ranganathan M, Wamoyi J, Pearson I, Stöckl H. Measurement and prevalence of sexual harassment in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2021;11(6):e047473. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ogilvie D, Fayter D, Petticrew M, Sowden A, Thomas S, Whitehead M, et al. The harvest plot: A method for synthesising evidence about the differential effects of interventions. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2008;8(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Crowther M, Avenell A, MacLennan G, Mowatt G. A further use for the Harvest plot: a novel method for the presentation of data synthesis. Research Synthesis Methods. 2011;2(2):79–83. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Khan HTA, Chowdhury MRK, Mondal MNI, Kabir R. Socio-demographic risk factors for severe malnutrition in children aged under five among various birth cohorts in Bangladesh. Journal of biosocial science. 2021;53(4):590–605. Epub doi: 10.1017/S0021932020000425 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rahman M, Uddin H, Lata LN, Uddin J. Associations of forms of intimate partner violence with low birth weight in India: findings from a population-based Survey. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2021;((Rahman) Department of Sociology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh(Uddin) Department of Sociology, East West University, Dhaka, Bangladesh(Lata) School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia(Uddin) Department of Epidemi). doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1940129. [DOI]
  • 40.Ferdos J, Rahman MM. Maternal experience of intimate partner violence and low birth weight of children: A hospital-based study in Bangladesh. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(10):e0187138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Batool S, Naz S, Sehar Un N, Gul I, Husain G. Impact of spousal violence on child health and life prospects: Evidence from Pakistan demographic health survey 2012–13. Pakistan Paediatric Journal. 2018;42(3):202–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Taft AJ, Powell RL, Watson LF. The impact of violence against women on reproductive health and child mortality in Timor-Leste. Australian and New Zealand journal of public health. 2015;39(2):177–81. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pun KD, Rishal P, Darj E, Infanti JJ, Shrestha S, Lukasse M, et al. Domestic violence and perinatal outcomes ‐ a prospective cohort study from Nepal. BMC public health. 2019;19(1):671. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6967-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Asling-Monemi K, Persson LA, Naved RT. Violence against women and the risk of fetal and early childhood growth impairment: A cohort study in rural Bangladesh. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2009;94(10):775–9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.144444 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Debele EY, Dheresa M, Tamiru D, Wadajo TB, Shiferaw K, Sori LA, et al. Household food insecurity and physically demanding work during pregnancy are risk factors for low birth weight in north Shewa zone public hospitals, Central Ethiopia, 2021: a multicenter cross-sectional study. BMC pediatrics. 2022;22(1):1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mezzavilla RdS, Hasselmann MH. Physical intimate partner violence and low birth weight in newborns from primary health care units of the city of Rio de Janeiro. Revista de Nutricao. 2016;29(3):357–66. doi: 10.1590/1678-98652016000300006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kana MA, Safiyan H, Yusuf HE, Musa ASM, Richards-Barber M, Harmon QE, et al. Association of intimate partner violence during pregnancy and birth weight among term births: A cross-sectional study in Kaduna, Northwestern Nigeria. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):e036320. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Musa A, Chojenta C, Loxton D. The association between intimate partner violence and low birth weight and preterm delivery in eastern Ethiopia: Findings from a facility-based study. Midwifery. 2021;92((Musa) College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia; Research Centre for Generational Health and Ageing, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia(Chojenta, Loxton) Research Centre for Ge):102869. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102869. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 49.Vo TM, Tran VTN, Cuu TNT, Do TTH, Le TM. Domestic violence and its association with preterm or low birthweight delivery in Vietnam. International Journal of Women’s Health. 2019;11((Vo, Tran) Department of Obstetrics and Gyneacology, Ho Chi Minh City University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam(Cuu) Department of Obstetrics and Gyneacology, Tu Du Obstetric and Gynecology Hospital, Hochiminh City, Vietnam(Do) Facult):501–10. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S216608. [DOI]
  • 50.Hoang TN, Van TN, Thuy HNT, Gammeltoft T, Meyrowitsch DW, Rasch V. Association between intimate partner violence during pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Vietnam: A prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(9):e0162844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162844 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Valladares E, Ellsberg M, Pena R, Hogberg U, Persson LA. Physical partner abuse during pregnancy: A risk factor for low birth weight in Nicaragua. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002;100(4):700–5. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02093-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sigalla GN, Mushi D, Manongi R, Meyrowitsch DW, Rogathi JJ, Gammeltoft T, et al. Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and its association with preterm birth and low birth weight in Tanzania: A prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(2):e0172540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Assefa N, Berhane Y, Worku A. Wealth status, mid upper arm circumference (MUAC) and Ante Natal Care (ANC) are determinants for low birth weight in Kersa, Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(6):e39957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Abujilban S, Mrayan L, Al-Modallal H, Isaa Ea. Effects of Intimate Partner Physical Violence on Newborns’ Birth Outcomes Among Jordanian Birthing Women. Journal of interpersonal violence. 2017;32(24):3822–38. doi: 10.1177/0886260515603975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Marimuthu Y, Sarkar S, Kattimani S, Krishnamoorthy Y, Nagappa B. Role of Social Support and Spouse Abuse in Low Birth Weight: A Case-control Study from Puducherry, India. Indian journal of community medicine: official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. 2019;44(1):12–6. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_114_18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Shamu S, Munjanja S, Zarowsky C, Shamu P, Temmerman M, Abrahams N. Intimate partner violence, forced first sex and adverse pregnancy outcomes in a sample of Zimbabwean women accessing maternal and child health care. BMC public health. 2018;18(1):595. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5464-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ferraro AA, Grisi SJFE, Polanczyk GV, Argeu A, Miguel EC, Fleitlich-Bilyk B, et al. The specific and combined role of domestic violence and mental health disorders during pregnancy on new-born health. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017;17(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1438-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Jaraba SMR, Garces-Palacio IC. Association between violence during pregnancy and preterm birth and low birth weight in Colombia: Analysis of the demographic and health survey. Health care for women international. 2019;40(11):1149–69. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2019.1566331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Laelago T, Belachew T, Tamrat M. Effect of intimate partner violence on birth outcomes. African Health Sciences. 2017;17(3):681–9. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v17i3.10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Alemu A, Abageda M, Assefa B, Melaku G. Low birth weight: Prevalence and associated factors among newborns at hospitals in kambata-tembaro zone, southern Ethiopia 2018. Pan African Medical Journal. 2019;34((Alemu, Abageda, Assefa) Department of Midwifery, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wachamo University Hosana, Ethiopia(Melaku) Department of Midwifery, College of Health Science and Medicine, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia):68. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.34.68.18234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 61.Eno EE, Fawole AA, Aboyeji AP, Adesina KT, Adeniran AS. Domestic violence and obstetric outcome among pregnant women in Ilorin, North Central Nigeria. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2014;125(2):170–1. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kaye DK, Mirembe FM, Bantebya G, Johansson A, Ekstrom AM. Domestic violence during pregnancy and risk of low birthweight and maternal complications: A prospective cohort study at Mulago Hospital, Uganda. Tropical Medicine and International Health. 2006;11(10):1576–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01711.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Doke PP, Palkar SH, Gothankar JS, Patil AV, Chutke AP, Pore PD, et al. Association between adverse pregnancy outcomes and preceding risk factors: a cross-sectional study from Nashik District, India. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2021;21(1):1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Okunola TO, Awoleke JO, Olofinbiyi BA, Rosiji BO, Omoya S, Olubiyi AO. Adverse birth outcomes among women exposed to intimate partner violence in pregnancy in Ikere-Ekiti, South-west Nigeria: A prospective cohort study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2021;267:186–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.11.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Avcı S, Ortabag T, Ulusal H, Taysi S. The effect of domestic violence during pregnancy on cortisol hormone release, breastfeeding, and newborn. Journal of interpersonal violence. 2023;38(1–2):NP905-NP30. doi: 10.1177/08862605221087690 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Khodakarami N, Naji H, Dashti MG, Yazdjerdi M. Woman abuse and pregnancy outcome among women in Khoram Abad, Islamic Republic of Iran. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2009;15(3):622–8. doi: 10.26719/2009.15.3.622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Chandra PS, Bajaj A, Desai G, Satyanarayana VA, Sharp HM, Ganjekar S, et al. Anxiety and depressive symptoms in pregnancy predict low birth weight differentially in male and female infants—findings from an urban pregnancy cohort in India. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology. 2021;56(12):2263–74. doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02106-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Barnett W, Nhapi R, Zar HJ, Halligan SL, Pellowski J, Donald KA, et al. Intimate partner violence and growth outcomes through infancy: A longitudinal investigation of multiple mediators in a South African birth cohort. Maternal & Child Nutrition. 2022;18(1):e13281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Caleyachetty R, Uthman OA, Marais D, Coles J, Steele B, Bekele HN, et al. Maternal exposure to intimate partner violence and breastfeeding practices in 51 low-income and middle-income countries: A population-based cross-sectional study. PLoS Medicine. 2019;16(10):e1002921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Boyce SC, McDougal L, Silverman JG, Raj A, Atmavilas Y, Dhar D, et al. Associations of intimate partner violence with postnatal health practices in Bihar, India. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017;17(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1577-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Misch ES, Yount KM. Intimate partner violence and breastfeeding in Africa. Maternal and child health journal. 2014;18(3):688–97. doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1294-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ariyo T, Jiang Q. Intimate partner violence and exclusive breastfeeding of infants: analysis of the 2013 Nigeria demographic and health survey. International breastfeeding journal. 2021;16(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13006-021-00361-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Tran LM, Nguyen PH, Menon P, Naved RT. Intimate partner violence is associated with poorer maternal mental health and breastfeeding practices in Bangladesh. Health policy and planning. 2020;35(1 Supplementement). doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Frith AL, Ziaei S, Ekstrom E-C, Naved RT, Khan AI, Kabir I. Breast-feeding counselling mitigates the negative association of domestic violence on exclusive breast-feeding duration in rural Bangladesh. The MINIMat randomized trial. Public health nutrition. 2017;20(15):2810–8. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Zureick-Brown S, Lavilla K, Yount KM. Intimate partner violence and infant feeding practices in India: A cross-sectional study. Maternal and Child Nutrition. 2015;11(4):792–802. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Tiwari S, Gray R, Carson C, Jenkinson C. Association between spousal emotional abuse and reproductive outcomes of women in India: findings from cross-sectional analysis of the 2005–2006 National Family Health Survey. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology. 2018;53(5):509–19. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1504-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Madsen FK, Holm-Larsen CE, Wu C, Rogathi J, Manongi R, Mushi D, et al. Intimate partner violence and subsequent premature termination of exclusive breastfeeding: A cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(6):e0217479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hampanda K. Intimate Partner Violence Against HIV-Positive Women is Associated with Sub-Optimal Infant Feeding Practices in Lusaka, Zambia. Maternal and child health journal. 2016;20(12):2599–606. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2087-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Young MF, Nguyen P, Kachwaha S, Menon P, Avula R, Tran Mai L, et al. It takes a village: An empirical analysis of how husbands, mothers-in-law, health workers, and mothers influence breastfeeding practices in Uttar Pradesh, India. Maternal and Child Nutrition. 2020;16(2):e12892. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12892 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Islam MJ, Mazerolle P, Baird K, Broidy L. Exploring the influence of psychosocial factors on exclusive breastfeeding in Bangladesh. Archives of Women’s Mental Health. 2017;20(1):173–88. doi: 10.1007/s00737-016-0692-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Aristizábal LYG, Filha MMT. Physical violence against women by their intimate partner during pregnancy and its relationship with breastfeeding. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant 2022;22. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Tsedal DM, Yitayal M, Abebe Z, Tsegaye AT. Effect of intimate partner violence of women on minimum acceptable diet of children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia: evidence from 2016 Ethiopian demographic and health survey. BMC nutrition. 2020;6(101672434):28. doi: 10.1186/s40795-020-00354-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Woldetensay YK, Belachew T, Ghosh S, Kantelhardt EJ, Biesalski HK, Scherbaum V. The effect of maternal depressive symptoms on infant feeding practices in rural Ethiopia: community based birth cohort study. International Breastfeeding Journal. 2021;16:1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ziaei S, Ekstrom E-C, Naved RT. Women’s exposure to intimate partner violence and child malnutrition: Findings from demographic and health surveys in Bangladesh. Maternal and Child Nutrition. 2014;10(3):347–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2012.00432.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Rico E, Fenn B, Abramsky T, Watts C. Associations between maternal experiences of intimate partner violence and child nutrition and mortality: Findings from demographic and health surveys in Egypt, Honduras, Kenya, Malawi and Rwanda. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2011;65(4):360–7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.081810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Chai J, Fink G, Danaei G, Fawzi W, Lienert J, Kaaya S, et al. Association between intimate partner violence and poor child growth: Results from 42 demographic and health surveys. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2016;94(5):331–9. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.152462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Neamah HH, Fawzi MCS, Sudfeld C, Fink G, McCoy DC, Danaei G, et al. Intimate partner violence, depression, and child growth and development. Pediatrics. 2018;142(1):e20173457. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Issah A-N, Yeboah D, Kpordoxah MR, Boah M, Mahama AB. Association between exposure to intimate partner violence and the nutritional status of women and children in Nigeria. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(5):e0268462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Sobkoviak RM, Yount KM, Halim N. Domestic violence and child nutrition in Liberia. Social Science and Medicine. 2012;((Sobkoviak) SAND International, United States(Yount) Hubert Department of Global Health and Department of Sociology, Emory University, United States(Halim) Department of International Health, Boston University, United States). doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.10.024. [DOI]
  • 90.Subramanian SV, Ackerson LK. Domestic violence and chronic malnutrition among women and children in India. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2008;167(10):1188–96. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Rahman M, Poudel KC, Yasuoka J, Otsuka K, Yoshikawa K, Jimba M. Maternal exposure to intimate partner violence and the risk of undernutrition among children younger than 5 years in Bangladesh. American journal of public health. 2012;102(7):1336–45. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Fonseka RW, McDougal L, Raj A, Reed E, Lundgren R, Urada L, et al. Measuring the impacts of maternal child marriage and maternal intimate partner violence and the moderating effects of proximity to conflict on stunting among children under 5 in post-conflict Sri Lanka. SSM ‐ Population Health. 2022;18:101074. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Uysal Yalçın S, Zonp Z, Dinç S, Bilgin H. An examination of effects of intimate partner violence on children: A cross‐sectional study conducted in a paediatric emergency unit in Turkey. Journal of Nursing Management. 2022;30(6):1648–57. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Salazar M, Hogberg U, Valladares E, Persson L-A. Intimate partner violence and early child growth: A community-based cohort study in Nicaragua. BMC Pediatrics. 2012;12((Salazar, Valladares) Center for Demography and Health Research, Nicaraguan National Autonomous University, Leon, Nicaragua(Salazar, Hogberg) Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umea University, Umea, Sweden():82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 95.Sabu KU, Sundari Ravindran TK, Srinivas PN. Factors associated with inequality in composite index of anthropometric failure between the Paniya and kurichiya tribal communities in wayanad district of Kerala. Indian journal of public health. 2020;64(3):258–65. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_340_19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Tesfa D, Teshome F, Ambaw B. Fetal Malnutrition and Associated Factors among Term Newborn Babies at Birth in South Gondar Zone Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia. International Journal of Pediatrics. 2021;2021. doi: 10.1155/2021/5005365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Ziaei S, Ekstrom E-C, Naved RT, Rahman A, Raqib R. Maternal experience of domestic violence, associations with children’s lipid biomarkers at 10 years: Findings from MINIMat study in rural BAngladesh. Nutrients. 2019;11(4):910. doi: 10.3390/nu11040910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Breastfeeding: World Health Organization; 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/breastfeeding#tab=tab_1.
  • 99.Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, Franca GV, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387(10017):475–90. Epub 2016/02/13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.UNICEF. Early childhood nutrition preventing malnutrition in infants and young children. [cited 2022]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/nutrition/early-childhood-nutrition.
  • 101.Jayachandran S, Kuziemko I. Why do mothers breastfeed girls less than boys? Evidence and implications for child health in India. Q J Econ. 2011;126(3):1485–538. Epub 2011/12/08. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjr029 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Hafeez N, Quintana-Domeque C. Son preference and gender-biased breastfeeding in Pakistan. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 2018;66(2):179–215. [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Valladares E, Pena R, Ellsberg M, Persson LA, Hogberg U. Neuroendocrine response to violence during pregnancy ‐ Impact on duration of pregnancy and fetal growth. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2009;88(7):818–23. doi: 10.1080/00016340903015321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Glass N, Perrin N, Marsh M, Clough A, Desgroppes A, Kaburu F, et al. Effectiveness of the Communities Care programme on change in social norms associated with gender-based violence (GBV) with residents in intervention compared with control districts in Mogadishu, Somalia. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3):e023819. Epub 2019/03/16. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023819 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6429733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Garritty C, Gartlehner G, Kamel C, King V, Nussbaumer-Streit B, Stevens A, et al. Cochrane Rapid Reviews. Interim Guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. 2020. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Pradeep Kumar

Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present.

17 Aug 2023

PONE-D-23-02037Linkages between maternal experience of intimate partner violence and child nutrition outcomes: A rapid evidence assessmentPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Meyer,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please note that, we have received only one reviewer comments on your manuscript. We invited other reviewer but could not get positive response. Therefore, we are making decision based on reviewer and my comments. Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 01 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Pradeep Kumar, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please identify your study as "systematic review" in the title of your manuscript.

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

Additional Editor Comments:

Abstract:

Line number: 52-58: The authors should provide a programmatic implications/policy with the special focus on low and middle-income countries.

Introduction:

Overall observation:

  • Within the children which particular age group author focuses, its is missing in the introduction section.

  • It would be good if author provide few literatures on gender wise differentiation on any child nutrition, IPV.

  • Overall in whole introduction section need to provide country specific example it would and matched with low and middle-income countries.

Line number: 89-93: It’s better to cite recent systematic review study with the special focus on low and middle-income countries. Try to include systematic review which was published after 2020.

Line number: 94-98: Author provides the reference of first three line (line number: 94-96) also need to brief the sentences. No need to elaborate one single statement into different references. 

Line number: 100-103: The statement related to mental health among adolescents are very crude, Author should provide country specific case study or evidence also remove the word ‘Some children’ try to include better and clear words. 

Methods:

Line number: 155-156: I would suggest to use 'PICOTS' framework to summaries the eligibility criteria.

Line number: 157-160: It is good to provide the search terms in these three Medline, Embase, and Global Health electronic databases. This can be added as an Appendix A. Provide the search strategy with proper keywords, output and date of search. Overall appendix A need to revised and prepared as per the proper systematic review protocol.

Line number: 157-160: No need to provide ‘IPV’ definition in this section, either it is better to include in introduction section.

Line number: 176-179: Did the researchers use an application to support and track the screening process of the identified 3037 studies. If yes, please state what was used and how. Who is ‘one reviewer’, ‘two reviewers’, ‘third independent reviewer’? It would be better to provide the short indication name of the author after using these words.

  • It would be clear, if researcher prepare the conceptual framework and include in the methods section.

Data extraction and assessment of quality of included studies:

How was the data extracted and validated between the researchers.

Line number: 187-190: How researcher was used four quality assessment tools in a single study? How did you validate your quality assessment based on using different questions? How did you calculate quality score? Overall, this section needs to revised and write very carefully and provide full explanation of how researcher uses these four different quality assessment tools? Is there any previous systematic review or rapid review that used same method of quality assessment if yes provide the references?

  • Author should attach quality assessment of each study and their score in a single file and attach in a supplementary file.

  • Risk of bias also missing in the method as well as result section, try to incorporate, in the revised manuscript.

Results

Line number: 204-205: S2 Table. Study Results should be categorized into four different categorise, namely:

a) Fetal growth

b) Infant feeding

c) Child growth

d) Nutrient blood markers

Overall, the result section is satisfactory.

Discussion

Line number: 460: Replace the word ‘room’ with other synonym word

Line number: 469-472: For this particular line “the studies suggest that maternal experience  of IPV affects several growth indicators in preschool children, however, the literature is extremely limited in its examination of time intervals that can fully inform our understanding of any potential underlying mechanism” provide the reference.

Line number: 488-489: For this particular line “In contrast, there were seven out of twelve studies that found a positive association between maternal lifetime experience of any type of IPV and LBW” provide the reference.

Line number: 495-496: Need to reframe this line “Regarding the association between a mother's experience of IPV and breastfeeding, our findings indicate a significant impact.”

Line number: 577-578: If this line is indicating the limitation then it should be under the limitation section.

Line number: 584-585: If this line is indicating the limitation then it should be under the limitation section.

  • In the discussion section, uniformity is missing, try to accumulate your finding based on your key outcome (Fetal growth, Infant feeding, Child growth, Nutrient blood markers). Also, I observed that between the discussion few line are highlighting the limitation and suggestion try to remove these lines and add those lines in the proper order.

  • Try to add ew lines on strength of this study except only writing the limitation section.

Conclusion

  • The authors should provide a programmatic implications/policy with the special focus on low and middle-income countries. 

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: At the outset, I would like to congratulate the team to work on the relevant topic of IPV of maternal caregivers and child nutrition outcomes which though have been researched several times, needs periodic re-examination. Moreover, the approach to the study i.e., applying REA makes the study unique. It is an extremely well written & well researched article. Although I have a few minor queries, I would be happy to see it published.

1. Define LMIC.

2. Why to include adolescents?

3. Please elaborate line number 159-160

4. Methodology adopted to plot Harvest plot should be explained. Perhaps, after data synthesis (line no. 191- 194), the authors can add a section on the methodology adopted in the article.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reviewer comments.docx

pone.0298364.s004.docx (13.1KB, docx)
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 18;19(3):e0298364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298364.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


5 Nov 2023

Authors’ response to reviewers

Manuscript title:

Linkages between maternal experience of intimate partner violence and child nutrition outcomes: A rapid evidence assessment, PONE-D-23-02037

To the Editors, PLOSOne

Thank you for the recognition of the contribution of our manuscript, “Linkages between maternal experience of intimate partner violence and child nutrition outcomes: A rapid evidence assessment.” In response to the reviewer and editor’s comments, several changes have been made, as detailed below. We feel that the suggestions have helped improve the manuscript. The comments are addressed point-by-point in turn below.

1. Editor’s comments:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

We have reviewed and ensured that the manuscript meets at style requirements.

2. Please identify your study as "systematic review" in the title of your manuscript.

The review is not a systematic review, rather a rapid evidence assessment. Therefore, we have retained the original title.

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016.

We have added the ORCID iD for the corresponding author.

Abstract:

4. Line number: 52-58: The authors should provide a programmatic implications/policy with the special focus on low and middle-income countries.

We have added an additional programmatic implication and specified that it is for LMICs. The text now reads: “Programmatic implications include incorporation of GBV considerations into nutrition policies and programming and integrating GBV prevention and response into mother and child health and nutrition interventions in LMIC contexts.”

Introduction:

5. Within the children which particular age group author focuses, its is missing in the introduction section.

We have added a definition of the age group of children, which is “defined as anyone from birth until age 18, as per international definitions.”

6. It would be good if author provide few literatures on gender wise differentiation on any child nutrition, IPV.

We have added consideration of gendered exposure and impacts of IPV. Regarding nutrition impacts, this is a gap that is identified in this systematic review and discussed in the Discussion section. We have added the following text: “Girls and boys may experience different patterns of direct and indirect exposure to IPV, however, the limited research exploring these differences is mixed [17, 18], and there are also gender differences in mental health impacts of childhood IPV exposure [19].”

7. Overall in whole introduction section need to provide country specific example it would and matched with low and middle-income countries.

We have added the following sentences in response to this comment: “For example, a study conducted in South Africa showed that emotional IPV was associated with lower language development, motor development and cognitive scores in children at age 2, while physical IPV was associated with lower motor scores [17], and in a study conducted in Kenya, maternal exposure to IPV was associated with poorer child behavioral outcomes [18].”

8. It’s better to cite recent systematic review study with the special focus on low and middle-income countries. Try to include systematic review which was published after 2020.

The systematic review cited is focused on LMICs. Unfortunately, there are no more recent systematic reviews that focus on prevalence of GBV in humanitarian settings, which is the issue we are discussing in that sentence.

9. Line number: 94-98: Author provides the reference of first three line (line number: 94-96) also need to brief the sentences. No need to elaborate one single statement into different references.

We have edited the sentence to shorten it. The sentence now reads: “Children – defined as anyone from birth until age 18, as per international definitions – can be indirectly exposed to IPV, which can include witnessing, being aware of, or secondarily affected by the presence of violence against a maternal caregiver in the household.”

10. The statement related to mental health among adolescents are very crude, Author should provide country specific case study or evidence also remove the word ‘Some children’ try to include better and clear words.

We have edited this sentence. We do not understand the editor’s preference to remove the phrase “some children,” and feel that it accurately reflects the data and evidence in this field. The sentence now reads: “Evidence indicates that pre-school aged children who witness IPV in childhood may experience detrimental effects on their later mental, social and physical health during adolescence and adulthood.”

Methods:

11. I would suggest to use 'PICOTS' framework to summaries the eligibility criteria.

The PICOTS framework is not directly relevant to this systematic review as we do not have an I – intervention, that we are studying. However, we found the editor’s suggestion of using a framework to summarise eligibility criteria useful, and therefore, we have summarized the eligibility criteria using the PECO framework – Population, Exposure, Context, Outcomes. This section now reads: “The eligibility criteria were structured using the PECO framework – Population, Exposure, Context and Outcome [25]. The population was boys or girls under the age of 18 years. The exposure was any indirect exposures to IPV (in-utero and/ or household IPV exposures). IPV was defined as physical, sexual or psychological (including emotional and verbal) violence or controlling behaviors, perpetrated against a maternal caregiver. The context was a country in receipt of United Nations Central Emergency Response Funding during 2006-2021 [26], which we refer to as “humanitarian countries.” The outcomes were a) fetal growth (measured indirectly with birth weight), b) breastfeeding, including infant feeding practices, c) indicators of child growth (using anthropometry), and d) nutrient blood markers. The timepoints considered were during infancy, early childhood (including those outcomes specific to children under 2 or under 5 years), middle childhood and adolescence (after puberty or above age 10 years).”

12. Line number: 157-160: It is good to provide the search terms in these three Medline, Embase, and Global Health electronic databases. This can be added as an Appendix A. Provide the search strategy with proper keywords, output and date of search. Overall appendix A need to revised and prepared as per the proper systematic review protocol.

We have updated Appendix A and it now includes the search terms for these three databases.

13. No need to provide ‘IPV’ definition in this section, either it is better to include in introduction section.

The IPV definition is included in the introduction, and also here to specify that the eligibility criteria include any form of IPV. Some reviews focus only on specific types of IPV, so it is important to keep this here to adhere to reporting requirements for the review.

14. Did the researchers use an application to support and track the screening process of the identified 3037 studies. If yes, please state what was used and how. Who is ‘one reviewer’, ‘two reviewers’, ‘third independent reviewer’? It would be better to provide the short indication name of the author after using these words.

We have indicated that we used Covidence and the initials of reviewers for clarity. This section now reads: “All records identified through the database searches were downloaded to Covidence, a systematic review software. Screening occurred in two stages: (i) title and abstract; and (ii) full text review. Title/ abstracts were each screened by one reviewer [one of SBC, MOG, LV or SRM]. During the full text screening, sources were assessed independently by two reviewers vis-à-vis the inclusion/ exclusion criteria [two of SBC, MOG, LV or SRM]. A third independent reviewer resolved any discord between the first two reviewers.”

15. It would be clear, if researcher prepare the conceptual framework and include in the methods section.

In our experience conducting systematic reviews, scoping reviews and rapid evidence assessments, a conceptual framework is not required or usually included. This review was not conducted according to a specific conceptual framework, therefore we have not added one.

16. How was the data extracted and validated between the researchers.

We have added the following sentence to explain this: “The data extraction was completed by a single reviewer [one of SBC or SRM] and checked for consistency and accuracy by a second reviewer [MOG or SRM].”

17. How researcher was used four quality assessment tools in a single study? How did you validate your quality assessment based on using different questions? How did you calculate quality score? Overall, this section needs to revised and write very carefully and provide full explanation of how researcher uses these four different quality assessment tools? Is there any previous systematic review or rapid review that used same method of quality assessment if yes provide the references?

We have added more detail on the specific items used in the quality assessment tool and the scales that each items was drawn from. We have found several systematic reviews that have used combined quality assessment tools in the way that we implemented it, and have cited one for the reader’s reference. We have added the following detail: “Specifically, the items whether the research objective was clearly stated, valid measurement of exposure (IPV) and outcome (nutrition) variables, and inclusion of relevant confounders were drawn from the NIH instrument, external validity (representativeness of sampling) and internal validity (non-response rates) items were drawn from the NOS instrument, an item about inclusion and exclusion criteria is drawn from the AXIS tool, and an item focused on sampling strategy is drawn from MMAT. This combination of items best fit the review objectives and included studies; previous systematic reviews have similarly combined quality assessment instruments [for example, 34].”

18. Author should attach quality assessment of each study and their score in a single file and attach in a supplementary file.

We have included this as a supplementary file.

19. Risk of bias also missing in the method as well as result section, try to incorporate, in the revised manuscript.

The quality assessment tool that we implemented reflects risk of bias, therefore the discussion that is currently included in the results section is sufficient for the purposes of this rapid evidence assessment.

Results

20. Line number: 204-205: S2 Table. Study Results should be categorized into four different categorise, namely: a) Fetal growth, b) Infant feeding, c) Child growth and d) Nutrient blood markers.

We have revised S2 Table in line with this comment.

Discussion

21. Replace the word ‘room’ with other synonym word

We have replaced the word room with scope.

22. Line number: 469-472: For this particular line “the studies suggest that maternal experience of IPV affects several growth indicators in preschool children, however, the literature is extremely limited in its examination of time intervals that can fully inform our understanding of any potential underlying mechanism” provide the reference.

By “the studies” and “literature” in this sentence, we are referring to the included studies in this review, all of which are referenced in the review. We have edited the sentence to clarify this: “the studies included in this review suggest that maternal experience of IPV affects several growth indicators in preschool children, however, the literature is extremely limited in its examination of time intervals that can fully inform our understanding of any potential underlying mechanism.”

23. For this particular line “In contrast, there were seven out of twelve studies that found a positive association between maternal lifetime experience of any type of IPV and LBW” provide the reference.

We have added the references to these studies.

24. Need to reframe this line “Regarding the association between a mother's experience of IPV and breastfeeding, our findings indicate a significant impact.”

We have rephrased the sentence to read: “Our findings find a significant association between mother's experience of IPV and breastfeeding.”

25. If this line is indicating the limitation then it should be under the limitation section.

This is a limitation of the evidence-base that we identified, not a limitation of the systematic review itself. Therefore, we have retained its location in the discussion section.

26. If this line is indicating the limitation then it should be under the limitation section.

As per the previous response, this sentence indicates a limitation of the data analyses used in the included studies, not a limitation of this systematic review.

27. In the discussion section, uniformity is missing, try to accumulate your finding based on your key outcome (Fetal growth, Infant feeding, Child growth, Nutrient blood markers). Also, I observed that between the discussion few line are highlighting the limitation and suggestion try to remove these lines and add those lines in the proper order.

We have restructured the Discussion section to reflect the order suggested by the editor, so the Discussion now focuses first on fetal growth, then feeding, then child growth and finally nutrient blood markers. As noted above, the lines about limitations throughout the discussion section refer to limitations in the evidence-base that were identified in the systematic review, not of the systematic review itself.

28. Try to add ew lines on strength of this study except only writing the limitation section.

We appreciate this comment, and have added the following sentence in response: “Despite these limitations, this review represents an important update to prior evidence synthesis of the associations between maternal IPV and child growth and nutrition. By capturing the past few years of research, which has seen an enormous growth in published analyses, represents a comprehensive and up-to-date synthesis of this literature.”

29. The authors should provide a programmatic implications/policy with the special focus on low and middle-income countries.

We have added the following in response to this comment: “Approaches including targeted IPV screening of women whose children are undergoing treatment for malnutrition through supplementary feeding programs, training pre-natal health care workers and lactation specialists to identify signs of IPV amongst women, and strengthening referral networks between health and nutrition services and IPV response services are all key actions that can be explored in LMICs.”

Reviewer 1:

1. Define LMIC.

We have added a definition of LMIC the first time that it is mentioned.

2. Why to include adolescents?

Adolescents fall under the definition of children, and the review sought to include all relevant data on children.

3. Please elaborate line number 159-160.

We have added a sentence elaborating on the search strategy: “In brief, the search terms included the following fields: i) intimate partner violence, ii) nutritional outcomes, and iii) quantitative study design, with specific terms and MeSH headings tailored to each database.”

4. Methodology adopted to plot Harvest plot should be explained. Perhaps, after data synthesis (line no. 191- 194), the authors can add a section on the methodology adopted in the article.

Thank you for this comment, we agree that description of the harvest plot would be useful for the reader. We have added the following sentence: “Data synthesis also included developing harvest plots to visually represent the associations identified in studies; the method was adapted to the purposes of this review, whereby associations were not weighted by study quality [34, 35].”

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

pone.0298364.s005.docx (36.8KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Pradeep Kumar

4 Jan 2024

PONE-D-23-02037R1Linkages between maternal experience of intimate partner violence and child nutrition outcomes: A rapid evidence assessmentPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Meyer

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 18 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Pradeep Kumar, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed.

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: The revisions that author(s) made to the manuscript effectively address all the comments/suggestions. I decide to accept the manuscript with minor acceptance.

Comment 1.

Line Number: 169 – 184 (PECO framework): convert into tabulation form.

Comment 2.

Line Number 195 -197: This line will start after the sentences of data extraction. Start from data extraction sentences after completion then author writes the quality assessment sentences.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Comment_Suggestion.docx

pone.0298364.s006.docx (12.5KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Pradeep Kumar

24 Jan 2024

Linkages between maternal experience of intimate partner violence and child nutrition outcomes: A rapid evidence assessment

PONE-D-23-02037R2

Dear Dr. Meyer,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Pradeep Kumar, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Acceptance letter

Pradeep Kumar

6 Mar 2024

PONE-D-23-02037R2

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Meyer,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Pradeep Kumar

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Appendix. Search domains and terms for all databases.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0298364.s001.docx (41.9KB, docx)
    S1 Table. Study results.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0298364.s002.docx (74.6KB, docx)
    S2 Table. Quality assessment.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0298364.s003.docx (58KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewer comments.docx

    pone.0298364.s004.docx (13.1KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    pone.0298364.s005.docx (36.8KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Comment_Suggestion.docx

    pone.0298364.s006.docx (12.5KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    pone.0298364.s007.docx (12.6KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES