Skip to main content
Frontiers in Immunology logoLink to Frontiers in Immunology
. 2024 Mar 5;15:1305701. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1305701

Association between systemic immune-inflammation index and psoriasis: a population-based study

Xiya Zhao 1,2,3, Junqin Li 2,3, Xinhua Li 2,3,*
PMCID: PMC10948528  PMID: 38504983

Abstract

Background

The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII),as measured by lymphocyte, neutrophil and platelet counts in peripheral blood, is regarded as a favorable indicator of both inflammatory state and immune response. Psoriasis is an immune-mediated disease notable for its chronic inflammation of the entire system. Our research sought to explore the latent link between psoriasis and SII.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional investigation utilizing data extracted from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2009-2014). Employing multivariate linear regression models and subgroup analysis, we sought to uncover the association between SII and psoriasis.

Results

This study enrolled a total of 17,913 participants as part of its research cohort. Our multivariate linear regression analysis revealed a notable and positive correlation between SII and psoriasis [1.013 (1.000, 1.026)]. As SII tertiles increased, the risk of psoriasis demonstrated an upward trend. The significant dependence on this positive association were maintained in women, BMI(≥ 30 kg/m2),non-stroke and non-cancer subjects in subgroup analysis and interaction tests. Furthermore, we identified a significant association between SII and psoriasis, characterized by two consecutive inverted U-shaped patterns. Notably, the analysis revealed the most prominent inflection point at a specific value of 797.067.

Conclusions

The results indicate a significant correlation between elevated SII levels and the presence of psoriasis. However, to corroborate and strengthen these results, additional large-scale prospective studies are required.

Keywords: systemic immune-inflammation index, psoriasis, PASI, NHANES, stroke

1. Background

Psoriasis, a genetic skin disorder mediated by the immune system, impacts approximately 2-3% of the global population (1, 2). It typically affects the skin, but may also affects different organ systems such as the joints (3). The risk factors of psoriasis can be divided into extrinsic(trauma, drugs, infections, vaccination, lifestyle)and intrinsic(obesity, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertension, mental stress)groups with a view to prevent (4). Innate and adaptive immune responses are involved in the progression of psoriatic inflammation (5). Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), such as LL-37, β-defensin and S100 protein, trigger and maintain inflammatory pathways in psoriasis (6). In the maintenance phase of psoriasis, the TNF-α/IL-23/IL-17 axis assumes a crucial role (7).

Recent studies have reported that psoriasis shares an underlying chronic inflammatory basis with comorbidities such as metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease (811). Uncovering the role of adipose inflammation in psoriasis is being intensively investigated (12, 13). Biologics such as efolizumab can delay the onset of systemic inflammatory psoriasis (14, 15). Other studies have suggested that clinical parameters of plasma cytokines and inflammation may serve as novel strategies to monitor the progression of psoriasis (16, 17). Elevated levels of various inflammatory and immune-based indices, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) have been observed and found to correlate with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores in individuals with psoriasis (18, 19).

SII has become a prognostic biomarker for a variety of malignant tumors, including gastric cancer (20, 21), non-small cell lung cancer (22, 23), esophageal cancer (24, 25) and colorectal cancer (26). It provides a comprehensive reflection of the body’s equilibrium between inflammatory factors and immune responses. Besides, the new score has been established as an effective predictive indicator of cardiovascular events (27). Some recent findings suggest that elevated SII levels are associated with hepatic steatosis and increased urinary albumin excretion (28, 29). The differences in this study are, first, that the study population was a sample of NHANES and that the sample size was increased, as were confounders for psoriasis or general health. Second, SII and the likelihood of psoriasis were plotted as a curve-fitted graph for analysis.

As a result, our objective was to investigate the correlation between the SII and psoriasis within the United States population. To accomplish this, we utilized the NHANES dataset in this study.

2. Methods

2.1. Study population

The NHANES is a comprehensive survey conducted biennially by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), providing cross-sectional data that represents the entire US population. The survey using the continuous cycle NHANES data set of 2009-2014.Initially, a cohort of 30,468 participants was enrolled for the study. We excluded 5,219 participants with missing SII data (neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet count) and 7,336 with missing psoriasis data. The study ultimately included 17913 eligible participants. Figure 1 presents the visual representation of our sample selection process.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow chart of participants selection. NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

2.2. Definition of systemic immune-inflammation index

The Systemic Immunoinflammatory Index (SII), a new biomarker of local immune response and systemic inflammation throughout the body, has been shown to correlate with the prognosis of cancer patients. Regarded as a continuous variable, The calculation of SII for each participant was performed utilizing the formula:

SII=plateletcount×neutrophilcountlymphocytecount

Lymphocyte, neutrophil and platelet count using automatic hematology analysis equipment (Coulter ® DxH analyzer 800) determination of complete blood count, expressed as x 103 cells/ml. we designated SII as the exposure variable and psoriasis condition as an outcome variable in this study. Since the effect size was not significant, SII/100 was used to amplify the effect size by a factor of 100.

2.3. Selection of covariates

The covariates considered in this study encompassed various factors, including sex (men/women), age (years), race (Mexican American/other Hispanic/non-Hispanic White/non-Hispanic Black/other races), educational attainment (less than high school, high school or equivalent/above high school), body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), smoking status (yes/no), alcohol consumption (yes/no), presence of coronary artery disease (yes/no), diabetes mellitus (yes/no), congestive heart failure (yes/no), history of stroke (yes/no), and presence of cancer (yes/no). Individuals were categorized into three groups based on their body mass index (BMI):<25 kg/m2 indicating normal weight, 25-29.9 kg/m2 indicating overweight, and ≥30 kg/m2 indicating obesity.

2.4. Statistical analysis

The statistical analyses were carried out following the guidelines of the Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), taking into account the appropriate NHANES sampling weights and employing complex multi-stage cohort surveys. Continuous variables are expressed as means with standard deviation (SD) and categorical variables as proportions. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis between SII and psoriasis to construct multivariate tests that resulted in beta values and 95% confidence intervals. The multivariate test involved three models: model 1 (unadjusted), model 2 (adjusted for gender, age, and race), and model 3 (adjusted for all covariates).Smooth curve fitting was performed simultaneously by adjusting the variables. A threshold effect analysis model was used to investigate the relationship and inflection point between SII and psoriasis. Subgroup analysis of the SII-psoriasis relationship was conducted considering stratification factors including gender (man/woman), BMI (normal weight/overweight/obesity), stroke (yes/no), cancer (yes/no). In the process, we used the statistical calculation and graphics software R(version 4.1.3) and the Irrigation Statistics Software (version 2.0) for statistical research. Significance was established at a threshold of P< 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline characteristics

This study involved 17913 participants with a mean age of (46.02 ± 19.26) years. Of these, 48.67% were men and 51.33% were women. Among these participants, 14.98% were Mexican American, 9.84% were other Hispanic,41.87% were non-Hispanic white, 22.33%were non-Hispanic black, and 12.10% were from other races. The mean SII score was (520.20 ± 388.94) for all participants. In comparison to the no history of psoriasis group, the history of psoriasis group is significantly more likely to be older and have comorbidities including stroke, coronary artery disease,diabetes,congestive heart failure and cancer with a higher proportion of non-Hispanic white and education above high school; with higher smoking and alcohol status; and higher levels of BMI and SII.The statistical analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference in gender and stroke between the two groups (p > 0.05) ( Table 1 ).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of patients with and without psoriasis.

Variable History of Psoriasis
(n = 474 [2.6%])
No History of Psoriasis
(n = 17439 [97.4%])
P Value
Age (years) 50.970 ± 17.662 45.885 ± 19.288 <0.001
Gender (%) 0.802
 Men 48.101 48.684
 Women 51.899 51.316
Race (%) <0.001
 Mexican American 8.650 15.150
 Other Hispanic 9.283 9.851
 Non-Hispanic White 59.072 41.407
 Non-Hispanic Black 10.549 21.504
 Other Races 12.447 12.088
Education level(%) 0.003
 Less than high school 24.262 32.192
 High school or GED 22.363 19.869
 Above high school 53.376 47.830
 Others 0.000 0.109
Smoking(%) 56.863 43.464 <0.001
Alcohol use(%) 22.432 16.746 0.038
BMI (kg/m2) 29.829 ± 7.058 28.676 ± 7.017 <0.001
Comorbidities(%)
 Diabetes 16.667 11.038 <0.001
 Congestive heart failure. 5.470 2.996 <0.001
 Coronary artery disease 7.659 3.800 <0.001
 Stroke 4.376 3.634 0.603
 Cancer 14.880 9.027 <0.001
SII (1,000 cells/µl) 577.261 ± 320.458 518.651 ± 390.534 <0.001

Mean ± SD for continuous variables: the p-value was calculated by weighted linear regression model. % for categorical variables: the p-value was calculated by a weighted chi-square test. BMI, body mass index; SII, systemic immune-inflammation index.

3.2. Association between systemic immune-inflammation index and psoriasis

Our findings suggest that the higher the SII, the greater the likelihood of developing psoriasis. This association remained significant in both our crude model (OR=1.016; 95% CI, 1.003–1.029, p<0.05) and minimally adjusted model (OR=1.013; 95% CI, 1.000–1.026, p<0.05). However, after adjusting all covariates, this significant positive correlation became insignificant in model 3 (OR=1.009; 95% CI, 0.992–1.026,p>0.05). We further transformed SII for sensitivity analysis from continuous variables to categorical variables (quartiles). Participants in the highest quartile (OR=1.645; 95% CI, 1.261–2.145, p<0.05) of SII had a statistically significant 64.5% increased risk of developing psoriasis when contrasted with those situated in the lowest SII quartile. Participants belonging to SII quartile 2 and 3 displayed an increased risk of psoriasis in comparison to the lowest quartile; however, this association did not attain statistical significance ( Table 2 ).

Table 2.

The association between SII and psoriasis.

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR(95% CI) P value OR(95% CI) P value OR(95% CI) P value
SII/100 1.016 (1.003, 1.029)
0.01702
1.013 (1.000, 1.026)
0.04364
1.009 (0.992, 1.026)
0.32130
SII quartiles
 Quartile
 1
Reference Reference Reference
 Quartile
 2
1.174 (0.881, 1.565)
0.27441
1.084 (0.812, 1.448)
0.58442
1.035 (0.740, 1.448)
0.84087
 Quartile
 3
1.315 (0.993, 1.741)
0.05616
1.159 (0.873, 1.539)
0.30870
1.078 (0.777, 1.494)
0.65331
 Quartile
 4
1.944 (1.497, 2.524)<0.00001 1.645 (1.261, 2.145)
0.00024
1.433 (1.052, 1.952)
0.02263
 P for
 trend
<0.00001 0.00003 0.00750

Model 1, no covariates were adjusted. Model 2, age, sex, and race were adjusted. Model 3, age, sex, race, education level, smoking status, drinking status, BMI, diabetes, congestive heart failure,coronary artery disease, stroke and cancer were adjusted.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to calculate beta values and 95% confidence intervals.

95% CI, 95% confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; SII, systemic immunity-inflammation index.

p< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Further subgroup analysis revealed inconsistent associations between SII and psoriasis, as shown in Table 3 . In subgroup analyses by gender stratification, our results revealed an independent and significantly positive association between SII and psoriasis exclusively among women (OR = 1.031; 95% CI, 1.002−1.061, p<0.05) but not statistically significant in all models for men. When examining subgroups by degree of body mass index, we observed a robust positive correlation between SII and the obese group (≥ 30 kg/m2) in both the unadjusted and partially adjusted models. A significant relationship between SII with psoriasis was detected in non-cancer subjects (OR = 1.014, 95% CI 1.001−1.026, p<0.05). The interaction test indicated that no significant dependence was observed for the positive correlations between sex, age, body mass index, and cancer with SII and psoriasis (p for interaction >0.05).Only in the stroke stratification the association between SII and psoriasis was significantly different.

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis for the association between SII and psoriasis.

SII/100 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
gender
 Men 1.011 (0.998, 1.025)
0.1012
1.009 (0.993, 1.026)
0.2843
1.005 (0.979, 1.031)
0.7196
 Women 1.038 (1.010, 1.066)
0.0066
1.031 (1.002, 1.061)
0.0339
1.024 (0.985, 1.065)
0.2262
P for interaction 0.1100 0.2021 0.4107
Race
 Mexican American 0.967 (0.860, 1.088)
0.5814
0.970 (0.863, 1.090)
0.6062
0.968 (0.849, 1.102)
0.6222
 Other Hispanic 1.070 (0.980, 1.167)
0.1298
1.070 (0.980, 1.168)
0.1310
1.064 (0.951, 1.192)
0.2800
 Non-Hispanic White 1.036 (1.008, 1.064)
0.0110
1.030 (1.002, 1.059)
0.0352
1.026 (0.994, 1.058)
0.1091
 Non-Hispanic Black 1.029 (0.976, 1.085)
0.2832
1.024 (0.972, 1.080)
0.3716
1.1 (0.900, 1.114)
1.2 0.9866
 Other Races 1.031 (0.966, 1.102)
0.3551
1.031 (0.966, 1.100)
0.3639
1.028 (0.945, 1.117)
0.5202
P for interaction 0.2210 0.3125 0.6347
BMI
 <25 1.023 (0.981, 1.066)
0.2857
1.008 (0.959, 1.059)
0.7635
1.008 (0.955, 1.063)
0.7736
 >=25,<30 1.010 (0.995, 1.024)
0.1851
1.011 (0.994, 1.028)
0.2126
1.007 (0.982, 1.032)
0.5833
 >=30 1.056 (1.019, 1.094)
0.0024
1.045 (1.007, 1.085)
0.0201
1.027 (0.982, 1.074)
0.2358
P for interaction 0.0857 0.2823 0.7365
STROKE
 YES 0.824 (0.678, 1.002)
0.0518
0.803 (0.659, 0.978)
0.0290
0.830 (0.669, 1.031)
0.0920
 NO 1.017 (1.003, 1.031)
0.0172
1.015 (1.003, 1.028)
0.0183
1.011 (0.996, 1.026)
0.1634
P for interaction 0.0111 0.0048 0.0339
CANCER
 YES 1.007 (0.943, 1.075)
0.8366
1.1 (0.937, 1.072)
1.2 0.9503
0.996 (0.921, 1.077)
0.9187
 NO 1.015 (1.002, 1.028)
0.0227
1.014 (1.001, 1.026)
0.0351
1.000 (1.000, 1.000)
0.2222
P for interaction 0.8075 0.7380 0.7286

Model 1: no covariates were adjusted. Model 2: age, gender, and race were adjusted. Model 3: age, sex, race, education level, smoking status, drinking status, BMI, diabetes, congestive heart failure,coronary artery disease, stroke and cancer were adjusted.

In the subgroup analysis stratified by gender and age, the model is not adjusted for sex and age, respectively.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to calculate beta values and 95% confidence intervals.

95% CI, 95% confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; SII, systemic immunity-inflammation index;BMI, body mass index.

p< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Because people with SII greater than 2000 are more discrete, data with SII greater than 2000 are removed from the curve fitting. We fitted smoothed curves to characterize the nonlinear relationship between SII and psoriasis ( Figure 2 ). We found two consecutive inverted U-shaped relationships between SII and psoriasis, with the most significant inflection point of 797.067.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The nonlinear associations between SII and psoriasis. The solid red line represents the smooth curve fit between variables. Blue bands represent the 95% of confidence interval from the fit.

4. Discussion

The study sample utilized in our research is representative of the American population at a national level. We observed that the higher the SII participants with the greater the chance of psoriasis. Prominently, two consecutive inverted U-shaped relationships between SII and psoriasis was revealed for the first time.The risk was highest when SII was 797.067. Interestingly, the significant positive correlation between SII and psoriasis was only observed among non-Hispanic whites. Additionally, gender or weight status may have played a moderating role in the association between psoriasis and SII. There was an association in women, but not in men. The association was observed only in the obese group. In fact, Model 3 was built based on a comprehensive adjustment for all possible relevant variables, which included various factors that may influence inflammatory status, such as age, BMI, co-morbidities, and so on. If adjustments for these variables are able to attenuate or eliminate differences in SII among psoriasis patients, then the results may become less significant.

As far as we know, it is the first NHANES-based investigation of the relationship between SII and psoriasis. The link here reported regarding SII and psoriasis is similar to those previously reported, with one study from Turkey (30) showing that SII of psoriasis patients was considerably greater than that of control group and patients with moderate/severe psoriasis had higher SII than with mild psoriasis. More recently, Sugimoto et al. also demonstrated a positive correlation between SII and PASI scores and found that patients with higher SII scores had lower persistence of treatment with conventional systemic medications (31). Dincer Rota et al. reported that significantly elevated SII values were observed in both the subgroup with PASI ≥ 4.5 and among patients experiencing nail and genital involvement (32). Moreover, it has been discovered that the mean SII was lower in the patients receiving biologic treatment compared to the untreated patients (33, 34). According to an observational retrospective study, SII was positively correlated with disease severity and was an independent prognostic factor for mild and moderate psoriasis (35).

Our findings are closely related to the evidence that psoriasis is a systemic inflammatory disease (3640). Recent research has revealed that the pathogenesis of psoriasis and its complications are related to systemic inflammatory pathways.Observations from the 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed Tomography study also confirmed the hypothesis that psoriasis is a systemic inflammatory disease (41). In multiple studies, in addition to marked increases in systemic arterial and subcutaneous inflammation, subclinical inflammation was also observed in the liver, joints, and tendons for individuals with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, and in the aorta of patients with mild psoriasis (42). Furthermore, insulin resistance may be more helpful in predicting subclinical atherosclerosis than traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors, and femoral artery ultrasonography better detects subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (43, 44). Serum levels of several proinflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α,IFN-γ,IL-6,IL-8,IL-12,IL-17A and IL-18 were elevated in individuals diagnosed with psoriasis compared to healthy controls, suggesting that psoriasis develops systemically (45).

Furthermore, the positive correlation between SII and psoriasis exhibits significant variations in relation to stroke occurrence. Extensive research has demonstrated that individuals with psoriasis face an elevated risk for cerebrovascular disease(stroke)which is attributed to the severity of their psoriasis condition (4649). In addition, the incidence of ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disease increased in patients with psoriasis combined with depression (50). Numerous studies have sought to establish a causal link between psoriasis and cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular risk factors such as dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, metabolic syndrome and obesity have also increased in psoriasis patients (51). Atherosclerosis is the main pathologic change that precedes myocardial infarction and stroke. Notably, individuals with psoriasis have been found to have higher arterial stiffness than healthy controls, with arterial stiffness positively correlating with psoriasis duration (52, 53). Multiple studies measured by imaging techniques have reported a higher prevalence and greater severity of coronary artery calcification and atherosclerosis among individuals diagnosed with psoriasis in comparison to their healthy counterparts (5456). The association between psoriasis and cardiometabolic disorders can be attributed to various mechanisms, involving the secretion of adipokines, oxidative stress, insulin resistance, angiogenesis, microparticles, hypercoagulability and common inflammatory pathways (51). Thus, the administration of effective systemic anti-inflammatory drugs may prove beneficial in reducing cardiovascular risk in psoriasis patients (57).

Platelet, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts constitute SII. The pathogenic role of neutrophils, the most abundant innate immune cells, is associated with chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases (58). The abundant presence of neutrophils in psoriatic lesions is a distinctive histopathological characteristic of psoriasis (59). Recent reports have proposed that neutrophils play a role in psoriasis pathophysiology through processes such as respiratory burst, degranulation, and the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps, influencing psoriatic immunity and clinical outcomes (60). In addition, patients with psoriasis continue to consume platelets due to an enhanced coagulation response (61). Platelets play an important role in cardiovascular disease as mediators of hemostasis and thrombotic inflammation (62). Numerous studies have reported elevated levels of platelet activation biomarkers in individuals with psoriasis when compared to healthy controls. These biomarkers include platelet-derived microparticles (PDMPs) and mean platelet volume (MPV). Interestingly, a positive correlation has been observed between the levels of these biomarkers and PASI scores (63). The core pathogenesis of psoriasis involves aberrant function of multiple T-cell subsets, including regulatory T cells (Tregs), T helper (Th)1 cells, Th2 cells, Th17 cells, and Th22 cells, accompanied by aberrant release of associated cytokines, such as IFN-γ, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and members of the IL-23 and IL-17 families (45).

In recent years, with the advent of biologics, the effectiveness and safety of psoriasis treatments have greatly improved. A major challenge and limitation is to find better predictors of treatment response to determine which patients are more likely to benefit from specific biologics. SII is positively correlated with PASI scores (3032), and the correlation with treatment response (31, 33, 34) has been confirmed by some studies. In addition, correlations have been found between SII and metabolic syndrome (64), cardiovascular disease (65), and depression (66) in psoriasis comorbidities. Taken together, SII appears to be a possible biomarker associated with psoriasis disease activity, treatment response, and the development of comorbidities, thus helping patients to develop more personalized and effective treatment strategies.

Our study has several limitations worth noting. Firstly, due to the cross-sectional design of our research, we cannot establish causality. Second, relying on self-reported questionnaire data without clinical assessment by healthcare professionals to determine the presence or absence of psoriasis may lead to misdiagnosis or underestimation of psoriasis cases, especially mild or atypical psoriasis cases. Recall bias may also affect the validity of study results. Moreover, the NHANES database does not differentiate between the various types of psoriasis and fails to obtain information on which period of disease progression (progressive/quiescent/degenerative) a psoriasis patient is in, whereas different types of psoriasis at different stages may interact biologically with SII in different ways. As it is well known that the inflammatory response is a dynamic process, high (or low) values of SII observed at a single time point may not fully reflect the complexity and dynamics of systemic inflammation. However, the interaction between inflammation and psoriasis is complex. Although we controlled for some confounders, other confounders, such as duration of psoriasis, types of psoriasis complications not included, use of biologics, and history of long-term use of anti-inflammatory medications to treat complications, may still have had an impact on the study results. Because NHANES did not document these factors, we were unable to include them in our analysis. Therefore, our results may not fully reflect the complete picture.

5. Conclusion

Our results establish a connection between elevated SII levels and psoriasis. SII may be a simple, practical, and easily accessible tool for monitoring disease activity and treatment efficacy in patients with psoriasis. To validate our findings, additional extensive prospective studies are warranted.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was not required for the study involving humans in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent to participate in this study was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author contributions

XZ: Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JL: Writing – original draft. XL: Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all participants in this study.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Taiyuan Science and Technology Project Program (No.202213), Shanxi Provincial Medical Key Scientific Research Project (No.2020XM20) and Central Guided Local Science and Technology Development Special Funds Program (No.YDZX20191400004470).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1. Armstrong AW, Mehta MD, Schupp CW, Gondo GC, Bell SJ, Griffiths CEM. Psoriasis prevalence in A dults in the United States. JAMA Dermatol. (2021) 157:940–6. doi:  10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ghoreschi K, Balato A, Enerbäck C, Sabat R. Therapeutics targeting the IL-23 and IL-17 pathway in psoriasis. Lancet. (2021) 397:754–66. doi:  10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00184-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Rendon A, Schäkel K. Psoriasis pathogenesis and treatment. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:1475. doi:  10.3390/ijms20061475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kamiya K, Kishimoto M, Sugai J, Komine M, Ohtsuki M. Risk factors for the development of psoriasis. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:4347. doi:  10.3390/ijms20184347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Griffiths CEM, Armstrong AW, Gudjonsson JE, Barker JNWN. Psoriasis. Lancet. (2021) 397:1301–15. doi:  10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32549-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Petit RG, Cano A, Ortiz A, Espina M, Prat J, Muñoz M, et al. Psoriasis: from pathogenesis to pharmacological and nano-technological-based therapeutics. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:4983. doi:  10.3390/ijms22094983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Singh R, Koppu S, Perche PO, Feldman SR. The cytokine mediated molecular pathophysiology of psoriasis and its clinical implications. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:12793. doi:  10.3390/ijms222312793 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Boehncke WH. Systemic inflammation and cardiovascular comorbidity in psoriasis patients: causes and consequences. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:579. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2018.00579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Tashiro T, Sawada Y. Psoriasis and systemic inflammatory disorders. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23:4457. doi:  10.3390/ijms23084457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Patrick MT, Li Q, Wasikowski R, Mehta N, Gudjonsson JE, Elder JT, et al. Shared genetic risk factors and causal association between psoriasis and coronary artery disease. Nat Commun. (2022) 13:6565. doi:  10.1038/s41467-022-34323-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Saalbach A, Kunz M. Impact of chronic inflammation in psoriasis on bone metabolism. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:925503. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2022.925503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Herbert D, Franz S, Popkova Y, Anderegg U, Schiller J, Schwede K, et al. High-fat diet exacerbates early psoriatic skin inflammation independent of obesity: saturated fatty acids as key players. J Invest Dermatol. (2018) 138:1999–2009. doi:  10.1016/j.jid.2018.03.1522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Barros G, Duran P, Vera I, Bermúdez V. Exploring the links between obesity and psoriasis: A comprehensive review. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23:7499. doi:  10.3390/ijms23147499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Gjersvik P. Biologics: targeting systemic inflammation in psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. (2018) 179:247–8. doi:  10.1111/bjd.16775 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Korman NJ. Management of psoriasis as a systemic disease: what is the evidence? Br J Dermatol. (2020) 182:840–8. doi:  10.1111/bjd.18245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Gao W, Wang Z, Li W, Li Y, Liu M. Biomarkers and biologics related with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Int Immunopharmacol. (2023) 122:110646. doi:  10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110646 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Armstrong AW, Read C. Pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment of psoriasis: A review. JAMA. (2020) 323:1945–60. doi:  10.1001/jama.2020.4006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Asahina A, Kubo N, Umezawa Y, Honda H, Yanaba K, Nakagawa H. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio and mean platelet volume in Japanese patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Response to therapy with biologics. J Dermatol. (2017) 44:1112–21. doi:  10.1111/1346-8138.13875 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Paliogiannis P, Satta R, Deligia G, Farina G, Bassu S, Mangoni AA, et al. Associations between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios and the presence and severity of psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Med. (2019) 19:37–45. doi:  10.1007/s10238-018-0538-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Liu YY, Ruan GT, Ge YZ, Li QQ, Zhang Q, Zhang X, et al. Systemic inflammation with sarcopenia predicts survival in patients with gastric cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. (2022) 148:3925–6. doi:  10.1007/s00432-022-03925-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. He K, Si L, Pan X, Sun L, Wang Y, Lu J, et al. Preoperative systemic immuneinflammation index (SII) as a superior predictor of long-term survival outcome in patients with stage I-II gastric cancer after radical surgery. Front Oncol. (2022) 12:829689. doi:  10.3389/fonc.2022.829689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Liu J, Li S, Zhang S, Liu Y, Ma L, Zhu J, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio can predict clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab. J Clin Lab Anal. (2019) 33:e22964. doi:  10.1002/jcla.22964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Huang W, Luo J, Wen J, Jiang M. The relationship between systemic immune inflammatory index and prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Front Surg. (2022) 9:898304. doi:  10.3389/fsurg.2022.898304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Jomrich G, Paireder M, Kristo I, Baierl A, Ilhan-Mutlu A, Preusser M, et al. High systemic immune-inflammation index is an adverse prognostic factor for patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. (2021) 273:532–41. doi:  10.1097/SLA.0000000000003370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Han R, Tian Z, Jiang Y, Guan G, Sun X, Yu Y, et al. Prognostic significance of systemic immune-inflammation index and platelet-albumin-bilirubin grade in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing radical surgery. Gland Surg. (2022) 11:576–87. doi:  10.21037/gs-22-117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Chen JH, Zhai ET, Yuan YJ, Wu KM, Xu JB, Peng JJ, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index for predicting prognosis of colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. (2017) 23:6261–72. doi:  10.3748/wjg.v23.i34.6261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Yang YL, Wu CH, Hsu PF, Chen SC, Huang SS, Chan WL, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) predicted clinical outcome in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur J Clin Invest. (2020) 50:e13230. doi:  10.1111/eci.13230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Qin Z, Li H, Wang L, Geng J, Yang Q, Su B, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index is associated with increased urinary albumin excretion: A population-based study. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:863640. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2022.863640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Xie R, Xiao M, Li L, Ma N, Liu M, Huang X, et al. Association between SII and hepatic steatosis and liver fibrosis: A population-based study. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:925690. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2022.925690 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Yorulmaz A, Hayran Y, Akpinar U, Yalcin B. Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) predicts increased severity in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Curr Health Sci J. (2020) 46:352–7. doi:  10.12865/CHSJ.46.04.05 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sugimoto E, Matsuda H, Shibata S, Mizuno Y, Koyama A, Li L, et al. Impact of pretreatment systemic inflammatory markers on treatment persistence with biologics and conventional systemic therapy: A retrospective study of patients with psoriasis vulgaris and psoriatic arthritis. J Clin Med. (2023) 12:3046. doi:  10.3390/jcm12083046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Dincer Rota D, Tanacan E. The utility of systemic-immune inflammation index for predicting the disease activation in patients with psoriasis. Int J Clin Pract. (2021) 75:e14101. doi:  10.1111/ijcp.14101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Kvist-Hansen A, Kaiser H, Krakauer M, Gørtz PM, Wang X, Becker C, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the systemic immune-inflammation index as potential biomarkers of effective treatment and subclinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. (2023) 37:e586–9. doi:  10.1111/jdv.18860 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Albayrak H. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and systemic immune-inflammation index in psoriasis patients: response to treatment with biological drugs. J Clin Med. (2023) 12:5452. doi:  10.3390/jcm12175452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Tiucă OM, Morariu SH, Mariean CR, Tiucă RA, Nicolescu AC, Cotoi OS. Impact of blood-count-derived inflammatory markers in psoriatic disease progression. Life (Basel). (2024) 14:114. doi:  10.3390/life14010114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Lowes MA, Suárez-Fariñas M, Krueger JG. Immunology of psoriasis. Annu Rev Immunol. (2014) 32:227–55. doi:  10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Grän F, Kerstan A, Serfling E, Goebeler M, Muhammad K. Current developments in the immunology of psoriasis. Yale J Biol Med. (2020) 93:97–110. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Ayala-Fontánez N, Soler DC, McCormick TS. Current knowledge on psoriasis and autoimmune diseases. Psoriasis (Auckl). (2016) 6:7–32. doi:  10.2147/PTT.S64950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Benhadou F, Mintoff D, Del Marmol V. Psoriasis:Keratinocytes or immune cells-which is the trigger? Dermatology. (2019) 235:91–100. doi:  10.1159/000495291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Girolomoni G, Griffiths CE, Krueger J, Nestle FO, Nicolas JF, Prinz JC, et al. Early intervention in psoriasis and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: A hypothesis paper. J Dermatolog Treat. (2015) 26:103–12. doi:  10.3109/09546634.2014.880396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Kim BS, Lee WK, Pak K, Han J, Kim GW, Kim HS, et al. Ustekinumab treatment is associated with decreased systemic and vascular inflammation in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: Feasibility study using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2019) 80:1322–31. doi:  10.1016/j.jaad.2018.03.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Mehta NN, Yu Y, Saboury B, Foroughi N, Krishnamoorthy P, Raper A. et al Systemic and vascular inflammation in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis as measured by [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT): a pilot study. Arch Dermatol. (2011) 147:1031–9. doi:  10.1001/archdermatol.2011.119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Gonzalez-Cantero A, Gonzalez-Cantero J, Sanchez-Moya AI, Perez-Hortet C, Arias-Santiago S, Schoendorff-Ortega C, et al. Subclinical atherosclerosis in psoriasis. Usefulness of femoral artery ultrasound for the diagnosis, and analysis of its relationship with insulin resistance. PloS One. (2019) 14:e0211808. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0211808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. González-Cantero A, Gonzalez-Cantero J, Sanchez-Moya AI, Perez-Hortet C, Arias-Santiago S, Martin-Rodriguez JL, et al. Femoral artery ultrasound for improving the detection of atherosclerosis in psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2019) 80:784–6. doi:  10.1016/j.jaad.2018.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Hu P, Wang M, Gao H, Zheng A, Li J, Mu D, et al. The role of helper T cells in psoriasis. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:788940. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2021.788940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Kaye JA, Li L, Jick SS. Incidence of risk factors for myocardial infarction and other vascular diseases in patients with psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. (2008) 159:895–902. doi:  10.1111/bjd.2008.159.issue-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Li WQ, Han JL, Manson JE, Rimm EB, Rexrode KM, Curhan GC, et al. Psoriasis and risk of nonfatal cardiovascular disease in U.S. women: a cohort study. Br J Dermatol. (2012) 166:811–8. doi:  10.1111/bjd.2012.166.issue-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Chiang CH, Huang CC, Chan WL, Huang PH, Chen YC, Chen TJ, et al. Psoriasis and increased risk of ischemic stroke in Taiwan: a nationwide study. J Dermatol. (2012) 39:279–81. doi:  10.1111/j.1346-8138.2011.01401.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Siegel D, Devaraj S, Mitra A, Raychaudhuri SP, Raychaudhuri SK, Jialal I. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and psoriasis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. (2013) 44:194–204. doi:  10.1007/s12016-012-8308-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Egeberg A, Khalid U, Gislason GH, Mallbris L, Skov L, Hansen PR. Association between depression and risk of atrial fibrillation and stroke in patients with psoriasis: a Danish nationwide cohort study. Br J Dermatol. (2015) 173:471–9. doi:  10.1111/bjd.13778 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Hu SC, Lan CE. Psoriasis and cardiovascular comorbidities: focusing on severe vascular events, cardiovascular risk factors and implications for treatment. Int J Mol Sci. (2017) 18:2211. doi:  10.3390/ijms18102211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Gisondi P, Fantin F, Del Giglio M, Valbusa F, Marino F, Zamboni M, et al. Chronic plaque psoriasis is associated with increased arterial stiffness. Dermatology. (2009) 218:110–3. doi:  10.1159/000182256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Choi BG, Kim MJ, Yang HS, Lee YW, Choe YB, Ahn KJ. Assessment of arterial stiffness in Korean patients with psoriasis by cardio-ankle vascular index. Angiology. (2017) 68:608–13. doi:  10.1177/0003319716652284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Bissonnette R, Cademartiti F, Maffei E, Tardif JC. Increase in coronary atherosclerosis severity and the prevalence of coronary artery mixed plaques in patients with psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. (2017) 176:800–2. doi:  10.1111/bjd.14797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Zeb I, Budoff M. Coronary artery calcium screening: does it perform better than other cardiovascular risk stratification tools? Int J Mol Sci. (2015) 16:6606–20. doi:  10.3390/ijms16036606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Eckert J, Schmidt M, Magedanz A, Voigtländer T, Schmermund A. Coronary CT angiography in managing atherosclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. (2015) 16:3740–56. doi:  10.3390/ijms16023740 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Roubille C, Richer V, Starnino T, McCourt C, McFarlane A, Fleming P, et al. The effects of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors, methotrexate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids on cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. (2015) 74:480–9. doi:  10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Liew PX, Kubes P. The neutrophil's role during health and disease. Physiol Rev. (2019) 99:1223–48. doi:  10.1152/physrev.00012.2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Murphy M, Kerr P, Grant-Kels JM. The histopathologic spectrum of psoriasis. Clin Dermatol. (2007) 25:524–8. doi:  10.1016/j.clindermatol.2007.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Chiang CC, Cheng WJ, Korinek M, Lin CY, Hwang TL. Neutrophils in psoriasis. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:2376. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2019.02376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Visser MJE, Tarr G, Pretorius E. Thrombosis in psoriasis: cutaneous cytokine production as a potential driving force of haemostatic dysregulation and subsequent cardiovascular risk. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:688861. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2021.688861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Herster F, Karbach S, Chatterjee M, Weber ANR. Platelets: underestimated regulators of autoinflammation in psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol. (2021) 141:1395–403. doi:  10.1016/j.jid.2020.12.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Jiang Z, Jiang X, Chen A, He W. Platelet activation: a promoter for psoriasis and its comorbidity, cardiovascular disease. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1238647. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2023.1238647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Zhao Y, Shao W, Zhu Q, Zhang R, Sun T, Wang B, et al. Association between systemic immune-inflammation index and metabolic syndrome and its components: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2016. J Transl Med. (2023) 21:691. doi:  10.1186/s12967-023-04491-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Ye Z, Hu T, Wang J, Xiao R, Liao X, Liu M, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index as a potential biomarker of cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2022) 9:933913. doi:  10.3389/fcvm.2022.933913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Cui S, Li J, Liu Y, Yao G, Wu Y, Liu Z, et al. Correlation of systemic immune-inflammation index and moderate/major depression in patients with depressive disorders: a large sample cross-sectional study. Front Psychiatry. (2023) 14:1159889. doi:  10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1159889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/.


Articles from Frontiers in Immunology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES