Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2023 Dec 18;484(2):289–319. doi: 10.1007/s00428-023-03713-4

Molecular pathology of endocrine gland tumors: genetic alterations and clinicopathologic relevance

Antonio De Leo 1,2, Martina Ruscelli 1, Thais Maloberti 1,2, Sara Coluccelli 1,2, Andrea Repaci 3, Dario de Biase 2,4, Giovanni Tallini 1,2,
PMCID: PMC10948534  PMID: 38108848

Abstract

Tumors of the endocrine glands are common. Knowledge of their molecular pathology has greatly advanced in the recent past. This review covers the main molecular alterations of tumors of the anterior pituitary, thyroid and parathyroid glands, adrenal cortex, and adrenal medulla and paraganglia. All endocrine gland tumors enjoy a robust correlation between genotype and phenotype. High-throughput molecular analysis demonstrates that endocrine gland tumors can be grouped into molecular groups that are relevant from both pathologic and clinical point of views. In this review, genetic alterations have been discussed and tabulated with respect to their molecular pathogenetic role and clinicopathologic implications, addressing the use of molecular biomarkers for the purpose of diagnosis and prognosis and predicting response to molecular therapy. Hereditary conditions that play a key role in determining predisposition to many types of endocrine tumors are also discussed.

Keywords: Molecular pathology, Endocrine gland tumors, PitNET, Thyroid tumors, Parathyroid tumors, Adrenal cortical tumors, Paraganglionic tumors 

Introduction

The endocrine system includes several organs all devoted to the physiologic role of maintaining homeostasis and mediating medium- to long-term reactions of the human body to adapt it to external modifications. Tumors of the main endocrine glands, anterior pituitary (adenohypophysis), thyroid and parathyroid glands, adrenal cortex, adrenal medulla, and paraganglia are the object of this review. Tumors of the diffuse neuroendocrine system are not included, excellent reviews have comprehensively covered the topic [1]. A variety of tumors and nodules develop in endocrine glands, with different pathologic features and clinical behavior. Some are very common. Indeed, small indolent foci of papillary carcinoma are found in ~ 35% of well-sampled thyroid glands at autopsy. Others, like parathyroid carcinoma, are very aggressive, but also very rare. A significant minority of endocrine gland tumors develop in the context of inherited syndromes and paraganglionic tumors of the adrenal medulla and paraganglia have the highest degree of hereditability among human neoplasms. Table 1 summarizes inherited syndromes of endocrine tumors [218]. Our knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of endocrine gland tumors has exploded in the recent past due to the application of high-throughput molecular analysis. These studies show a remarkable correlation between genotype and histologic phenotype. They are also allowing us to refine risk stratification for prognostic purposes, as well as providing targets for molecular therapy in the case of aggressive endocrine gland carcinomas. The purpose of this review is to summarize the principal findings and innovations in the field of endocrine gland tumors in order to provide a state-of-the-art outline of molecular alterations and their clinicopathologic relevance.

Table 1.

Hereditary syndromes associated with endocrine tumors

Gene(s) Germline molecular alteration Syndrome MIM number Inheritance transmission Phenotype Reference(s)
AIP Missense mutations Familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA) 102200 Autosomal dominant (variable penetrance) Endocrine tumors: isolated pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET, pituitary adenoma) (usually somatotroph Beckers et al. [2]
CDC73 Inactivating mutations or deletions Hyperparathyroidism jaw tumor (HPTJT) syndrome 145001 Autosomal dominant

Endocrine tumors: parathyroid tumor

Non-endocrine tumors: jaw, renal and uterine tumors (uncommon)

Clinical features: primary hyperparathyroidism

Masi et al. [3]; Sarquis et al. [4]
CDKN1B Missense mutations, frameshift, and nonsense alterations in 5′ UTR Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4 610755 Autosomal dominant

Endocrine tumors: parathyroid, pancreatic, PitNET

Clinical features: hyperparathyroidism

Alrezk et al. [5]; Frederiksen et al. [6]
DICER1 Inactivating frameshift, nonsense, splice-site mutations or deletions DICER1 syndrome

138800

601200

180295

Autosomal dominant

Endocrine tumors: multiple benign and malignant thyroid nodules/tumors and pituitary blastoma

Non-endocrine tumors, including: pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB), cystic nephroma (CN), embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS) of the uterine cervix, ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor (SLCT)

de Kock et al. [7]
MAX Nonsense and missense variants, large deletions Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 5 171300 Autosomal dominant

Endocrine tumors: nodules/tumors at multiple sites, including adrenal cortex, adenohypophysis, pancreas, and parathyroid

Non-endocrine tumors: renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma, breast, lung, and endometrial carcinomas

Burnichon et al. [8]; Korpershoek et al. [15]; Cascoń and Robledo [9]
MEN1 Premature truncation, frameshift, nonsense mutations, and large deletions (including intronic areas damage with splice site defects) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 131100 Autosomal dominant

Endocrine tumors: nodules/tumors at multiple sites, including parathyroid, adenohypophysis, pancreas and duodenum, adrenal cortex

Clinical features: hyperparathyroidism, the most common manifestation

Brandi et al. [10]
NF1 Heterozygous variants Neurofibromatosis type 1 162200 Autosomal dominant

Endocrine tumors: pheochromocytoma

Non-endocrine tumors: neurofibromas at multiple sites, gliomas, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, gastrointestinal NET

Clinical features: pigmentation (including choroidal freckling), Lisch nodules

Ferner et al. [11]

PRKAR1A

PDE8B

PDE11A

Inactivating mutations, typically affecting PRKAR1A (sometimes large PRKAR1A deletions) Carney Complex 160980 Autosomal dominant

Endocrine tumors: primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease (PPNAD)

Non-endocrine tumors: myxoma and pigmented schwannoma

Clinical features: spotty skin pigmentation

Stratakis [12]
RET

MEN 2A

-Activating mutation (usually codons 609, 611, 618, 620 or 634)

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A 171400 Autosomal dominant Endocrine tumors: medullary thyroid carcinoma, pheochromocytoma, parathyroid nodules/tumors, or isolated medullary carcinoma (condition formerly known as Familial medullary carcinoma) Wells et al. [13]; Moline and Eng [14]

MEN 2B

-Activating mutation (usually M918T)

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B 162300 Autosomal dominant

Endocrine tumors: early onset, highly aggressive medullary carcinoma, pheochromocytoma, oral and intestinal neuromas

Clinical features: marfanoid habitus

SDHA

SDHB

SDHC

SDHD

SDHAF2

Missense mutations involving genes of one of the Succinate dehydratase subunits Succinate dehydratase (SDH) deficient neoplasia

606864

601650

614165

605373

606764

168000

171300

Autosomal dominant

Endocrine tumors: paraganglionic tumors (paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma, PPGL)

Non-endocrine tumors: gastrointestinal stroma tumors and SDH-deficient renal carcinoma

Korpershoek et al. [15]; Gill [16]
VHL Missense mutations, deletions or truncating mutations (less frequently) Von Hippel Lindau syndrome 193300 Autosomal dominant

Endocrine tumors: PPGL, pancreatic NET

Non-endocrine tumors: angiomas and hemangioblastomas, clear cell renal cell carcinoma, serous pancreatic cystadenoma, tumors of endolymphatic sac, epididymis, broad ligament and mesosalpinx

Lubensky et al. [17]; Salama et al. [18]

MIM Mendelian Inheritance in Man

PitNET (pituitary adenoma): molecular pathology and correlation with clinicopathologic features

Pituitary adenomas, now termed pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET), originate from the six neuroendocrine hormone-secreting cell types derived from three main lineages: SF1-lineage gonadotrophs, TPIT-lineage corticotrophs, PIT1-lineage somatotrophs, lactotrophs, mammosomatotrophs, and thyrotrophs. Examples of PitNET are illustrated in Fig. 1 [225]. Table 2 is a summary of the main genes mutated in PitNET [1924, 26].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

PitNET (pituitary adenoma). GH-producing densely granulated PitNET (A, hematoxylin and eosin; B, GH immunohistochemistry): GNAS1 mutations occur in a subset of GH-producing pituitary adenoma, more frequently in densely granulated tumors. PRL-producing sparsely granulated PitNET with Golgi pattern PRL staining, the tumor was mitotically active and eventually metastasized to the brainstem and cerebellum (C, hematoxylin and eosin; D, PRL immunohistochemistry): the molecular pathogenesis of metastatic PitNET is still unclear

Table 2.

Somatic genetic alterations of PitNET (Pituitary adenoma) and their clinicopathologic relevance

Gene(s) Molecular pathology PitNET (Pituitary Adenoma) type(s) Clinicopathologic implications Reference(s)
ATRX Nonsense mutations, frameshift indels, and rarely intragenic deletions inactivate ATRX, promoting telomere instability and cells immortality Corticotroph Aggressive, recurrent, metastatic disease [27]
GHR Hetherozygous substitution of a single codon of GHR exon 4 affects the stability and/or processing of the GH-receptor Sparsely granulated somatotroph Therapeutic implications: response to GH-antagonists [2830]
GNAS Missense mutations at Arg201 or Gln227 result in constitutive activity of Gs-alpha subunit (Gsα) which increases c-AMP levels Densely granulated somatolactotroph

Florid acromegaly

Small tumors

Hypointensity on MRI T2 sequences

Therapeutic implications: response to somatostatin analogues

[28, 31]
USP48 Missense mutations of USP48, including M415I/V substitution, result in enhanced proopiomelanocortin (POMC) gene’s promoter activity Densely granulated USP8- wild-type corticotroph Therapeutic implications: response to Pasireotide (due to high SSTR5 expression) [32]
USP8 Missense mutations, primarily in exon 14, of the Ubiquitin Specific Peptidase gene determine ACTH degradation and increased deubiquitination of EGFR Densely granulated corticotroph

Florid Cushing disease

Small tumors

Therapeutic implications: response to Pasireotide (due to high SSTR5 expression)

[3337]

Although the majority of PitNET lacks known recurrent driver mutations, several — sometimes involving hormone synthesis pathways — have been identified in subsets of sporadic tumors. In addition, a small percentage of PitNET affects patients with inherited predisposition due to germline genetic alterations (Table 1). In some instances, these alterations can be inferred by immunohistochemistry but need to be confirmed by sequence analysis. An example is the immunohistochemical loss of Menin in the tumors of patients with MEN1 syndrome [3840]. To date, morphologic classification, together with clinical and radiologic data, continues to be the best predictor of patient prognosis and therapy response. The relevance of genetic profiling for the diagnostic process is still being defined [1925]. Epigenetic alterations, particularly those connected to chromatin remodeling and cell cycle regulation [25], play a major role in the development of PitNET, independently of the hormone-producing phenotype of the tumor. Genes frequently dysregulated by epigenetic modifications include the following: CDKN2A, RB1, DAPK1, GADD45G, THBS1, RASSF1A, FGFR2, MGMT, CASP8, TP73, HMGA1, HMGA2 [41]. In general, chromosomal abnormalities do not correlate with prognosis but are more common in hormone-producing tumors compared with those not associated with hormone production (silent PitNET) [23].

Activating GNAS mutations have been reported in 40–60% of sporadic densely granulated somatotroph PitNET and are present as a mosaic in the 10–15% of patients with McCune–Albright syndrome that have excess GH, usually due to GH-producing cell hyperplasia and less commonly to a GH-producing PitNET [42]. Mammosomatotrope PitNET also exhibits GNAS-related alterations [23]. Conversely, in sparsely granulated somatotroph tumors, somatic mutations of the GH receptor (GHR) altering GH autoregulation and STAT signaling have been reported [20, 25].

In corticotroph PitNET, ATRX mutations correlate with aggressive biological behavior and distant metastasis [43]. Densely granulated biochemically functioning corticotroph tumors harbor USP8 [44], USP48, and less frequently BRAF p.V600E mutations [22]. The role of these changes and their potential therapeutic implications are still controversial [24].

The distinctive molecular signature of lactotroph PitNET includes epigenomic alterations such as high expression of MYC targets and dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) [23]. However, the SF3B1 p.R625H hotspot mutation has been recently discovered in some lactotroph tumors characterized by high prolactin levels and short progression-free survival [45]. Furthermore, somatic SDHA mutations and SDHD loss of heterozygosity have been reported in rare spontaneous PRL-producing macrotumors [16, 46].

The molecular pathogenesis of metastatic PitNETs is still unclear, due to the rarity of these tumors. ATRX [19, 47] and PTEN [43] mutations have all been reported in some metastatic PitNETs.

Thyroid tumors: molecular pathology and correlation with clinicopathologic features

Tumors of the thyroid gland enjoy a remarkable correlation between histologic phenotype and genotype. This correlation has contributed to refining the current classification scheme. The vast majority of tumors arising in the thyroid are of follicular cell derivation, most are benign, and when endowed with malignant potential, usually follow a very favorable clinical course. This generally favorable course is due to the first effective form of a molecularly targeted therapy, radioactive iodide treatment [48]. A small proportion of tumors are neuroendocrine, originating from parafollicular cells (C-cells). Since they always have malignant potential, they are classified as medullary carcinoma, which represents ~ 3–5% of all carcinomas of the thyroid gland. Up to 25% of medullary carcinoma is inherited in the context of MEN syndromes (Table 1).

Based on clinical outcome, malignant tumors of follicular cells are broadly divided into three groups: those that have a favorable prognosis, anaplastic (undifferentiated) thyroid carcinoma characterized by a very poor prognosis, and a third group of tumors that have intermediate prognosis. While tumors in the first group are histologically well differentiated with clearly defined papillary or follicular architecture or are composed of clearly recognizable oncocytic cells, tumors with very poor prognosis are undifferentiated (i.e., anaplastic). Tumors in the group with intermediate prognosis are often poorly differentiated but may also retain conventional histologic differentiation (papillary, follicular, oncocytic). Under the microscope, they have in common with the prognostically favorable tumor group at least some degree of histologic differentiation, while they share with anaplastic carcinoma high-grade features, i.e., the presence of high mitotic activity and/or tumor necrosis. This classification scheme for thyroid carcinoma of follicular cells based on prognosis is clinically relevant and has been endorsed by the latest 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) scheme (Table 3). The group of tumors that are well differentiated is in turn histologically divided into three subgroups. The first subgroup is composed of tumors that are follicular patterned, which include follicular adenoma and follicular carcinoma (follicular carcinoma when there is the invasion of tumor capsule or of blood vessels), as well as tumors of the encapsulated follicular variant papillary carcinoma family: encapsulated follicular variant papillary carcinoma when there is the invasion of tumor capsule or of blood vessels, and NIFTP (non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features) when no invasion can be identified [49]. These tumors have a RAS-like molecular signature following the 2014 TCGA molecular classification scheme [50] as discussed in the next paragraph. The second subgroup is that of conventional (i.e., not encapsulated follicular variant type) papillary carcinoma, characterized by the well-known alterations of nuclear morphology (nuclear clearing, irregular contours of the nuclear membrane, grooves, and pseudoinclusions) [49]. These tumors are characterized by infiltrative growth and typically make papillae, although sometimes they can have less typical features, such as infiltrative follicular or solid/trabecular growth, or other less common features that characterize the numerous papillary carcinoma subtypes [51]. These tumors have a BRAF p.V600E-like molecular signature following the 2014 TCGA molecular classification scheme [50], as discussed in the next paragraph. The third subgroup is that in which tumor cells are oncocytic and lack the nuclear alterations of papillary carcinoma. These tumors are characterized by homoplasmic mtDNA mutations [52] associated with dramatic DNA copy-number alterations with widespread loss of heterozygosity [53], as discussed in the next paragraph.

Table 3.

Prognostically relevant classification of tumors of follicular cell origin

Outcome Proliferative grading (mitoses and/or tumor necrosis) Histologic differentiation (growth pattern) Histotype
Favorable Low Present, good (papillae, follicles) Papillary carcinoma
Follicular carcinoma
Oncocytic carcinoma
Intermediate High Differentiated high grade thyroid carcinoma (papillary, follicular, oncocytic)
Present, poor (solid/trabecular/insular patterns) Poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma
Poor Absent (u(ndifferentiated growth) Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma

Modified from Table #28677, Prognostic risk-based classification of follicular cell derived carcinomas of the thyroid gland, in WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board: Endocrine and Neuroendocrine tumours, vol. 8. 5th edn. (International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2022) https://tumourclassification.iarc.who.int]

Medullary thyroid carcinoma is the primary neuroendocrine tumor of the thyroid gland. In spite of the remarkable variability of cell morphology and growth patterns (none of which is prognostically relevant), the only subtype recognized by the current WHO 5th edition is the medullary microcarcinoma, i.e., a tumor measuring less than 10 mm (or less than 5 mm according to some authors) scheme. The WHO 5th edition emphasizes the importance of proliferative grading for medullary carcinoma, following the International Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Grading System (IMTCGS) [54]. The IMTCGS, based on the evaluation of mitotic count and tumor necrosis (Table 4), is in line with the classification framework of neuroendocrine neoplasms [55].

Table 4.

International Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Grading System (IMTCGS)

IMTCGS grading Tumor necrosis Cell proliferation
Mitoses Ki67 index
Low grade No  < 5 mitoses/2 mm2  < 5%
High grade At least one of the following: ≥ 5 mitoses/2 mm2, Ki67 ≥ 5%, tumor necrosis

Modified from Xu B et al. International Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Grading System: A Validated Grading System for Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jan 1;40(1):96–104. 10.1200/JCO.21.01329. Epub 2021 Nov 3. PMID: 34731032; PMCID: PMC8683221

The molecular landscape of thyroid tumors, particularly that of follicular cell derivation, has come into focus also thanks to next-generation sequencing and other high-throughput methods. One of the forces driving these studies has been the need to identify genomic alterations that can be targeted by pathway-specific molecular drugs in aggressive carcinomas that do not respond to conventional radioiodine therapy [54, 5658]. Table 5 is a summary of the main genes involved in thyroid tumor development and progression and of their clinicopathologic relevance. Overall, results are very consistent and converge on several important points:

  • i.

    Genetic alterations include “Early/Driver” molecular changes and “Late/Progression associated” events [28, 50, 62, 63, 79]. These are illustrated in Figs. 2 and 3. Examples of tumors with “Early/Driver” alterations are shown in Fig. 4.

  • ii.

    “Early/Driver” alterations are mutually exclusive [28, 50, 62, 63, 79]. They are commonly used for molecular analysis of preoperative fine needle aspiration specimens. The features as well as the pros and cons of the starting material for this type of analysis are summarized in Table 6.

  • iii.

    “Late/Progression associated” alterations are found in combination with “Early/Driver” changes, consistent with a general model of multi-step progression from well-differentiated to undifferentiated carcinoma. In cases where poorly or undifferentiated areas are associated with a well-differentiated component, “Early/Driver” alterations are identified in both areas, while “Late/Progression associated” changes are restricted to the less differentiated portions of the tumor [80]. Thus, the number of mutations per tumor increases from well-differentiated to undifferentiated carcinoma. Mutation burden is highest in anaplastic carcinoma, lowest in conventional papillary carcinoma, and intermediate in aggressive/advanced papillary and follicular carcinoma [81]. Examples of tumors with “Late/Progression associated” alterations are shown in Fig. 4.

  • iv.

    RAS mutations or equivalent molecular alteration (RAS-like tumors) are “Early/Driver” events (see paragraph (ii)) for follicular patterned tumors (Figs. 2, 3, and 4 and Table 5). RAS-like tumors have a homogeneous molecular profile, low MAPK-signaling (because of ERK to RAF monomer negative feedback), high differentiation score, and are malignant only if there is an invasion of the tumor capsule or blood vessels [50].

  • v.

    BRAF p.V600E mutation or equivalent molecular alterations (BRAF p.V600E-like tumors) are “Early/Driver” events (see paragraph (ii)) for conventional papillary carcinoma (Figs. 2, 3, and 4 and Table 5). BRAF p.V600E-like tumors have a heterogeneous molecular profile, high MAPK-signaling (because of the lack of ERK to RAF monomer negative feedback), and low differentiation score (based on the level of expression of 16 thyroid metabolism and function genes, e.g., TG, TPO, PAX8).

  • vi.

    Coexistence of mtDNA mutations with severe DNA copy-number alterations represents the “Early/Driver” event (see paragraph (ii)) for oncocytic tumors (Figs. 2, 3, and 4 and Table 5). Mutations of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) are homoplasmic mtDNA and mostly affect mitochondrial genes encoding Complex I of the respiratory chain [52]. DNA copy-number alterations are dramatic, with widespread loss of heterozygosity and loss of chromosomal DNA, following genome-wide DNA haploidization and copy-number-neutral uniparental disomy [53, 82, 83]. This pathway is unique to oncocytic tumors, which typically do not carry conventional BRAF-like or RAS-like alterations [8284]. While mtDNA mutations are responsible for the oncocytic phenotype [52], the loss of chromosomal DNA is linked to tumor development, since genome haploidization-type DNA copy-number changes are more common in cases diagnosed histologically as oncocytic carcinoma as opposed to oncocytic adenomas and are rare in hyperplastic oncocytic nodules. This has potentially important implications for molecular testing of preoperative fine needle aspiration, since conventional BRAF-like or RAS-like alterations are commonly absent in oncocytic tumors, while Bethesda category III and IV with oncocytic changes have a higher prevalence of DNA copy-number alterations compared with the same categories without cytologically identified oncocytic morphology [85].

  • vii.

    “Late/Progression-associated” alterations include mostly somatic mutations of TP53, TERT promoter, and dysregulation of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway (Figs. 2 and 3 and Table 5). Mutations of CDKN2A, of SWI/SNF (switch/sucrose non-fermentable) chromatin remodeling complex genes (ARID1A, ARID1B, ARID2, ARID5B, SMARCB1, PBRM1, ATRX), of Histone methyltransferase genes (KMT2A, KMT2C, KMT2D, SETD2), and of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes (MSH2, MSH6, and MLH1) have also been reported [56, 62, 63]. “Late/Progression-associated” changes, in particular TERT promoter mutations, can be utilized for risk stratification, also using preoperative fine needle aspiration specimens [57].

  • viii.

    TERT promoter mutations are more frequent and have higher mutated allelic fraction in poorly differentiated, anaplastic, and aggressive/advanced cancers (including high-grade papillary carcinoma) compared with well-differentiated carcinoma [56, 62, 63].

  • ix.

    TERT promoter and particularly its co-mutation with BRAF p.V600E or RAS is a powerful marker of poor outcome. Aggressive/advanced papillary carcinomas, many of which are histologically high-grade, have at least one of three genetic alterations: duplication of chromosome 1q, duplication of chromosome 5 p harboring the TERT genomic locus, and TERT promoter mutation (THYT1 signature) [57].

  • x.

    TP53 mutation has the highest prevalence in anaplastic carcinoma compared to all forms of advanced/aggressive thyroid carcinoma, including both poorly differentiated and high-grade papillary carcinoma [56, 62, 63, 66].

  • xi.

    Rearrangements — such as RET/PTC, NTRK1, NTRK3, and PAX8-PPRG not rare in well-differentiated tumors — are uncommon [56, 62, 63].

Table 5.

Genetic alterations of thyroid tumors and their clinicopathologic relevance

Gene(s) Molecular pathology Thyroid tumor type Clinicopathologic implications Reference(s)
ALK ALK is a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase involved in the development of the central and peripheral nervous systems. It becomes constitutively expressed in follicular cells as a consequence of ALK rearrangements, the most common involving STRN and EML4

Papillary carcinoma (< 5%), classic (typically follicular predominant growth pattern), or diffuse sclerosing

High-grade non-anaplastic carcinoma of follicular cells, typically poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (< 5%)

Anaplastic carcinoma (< 5%)

ALK fusion more common in papillary carcinoma from children/young adults

Therapeutic implications: patients with ALK-rearranged tumors respond to targeted therapy with ALK inhibitors

Kelly et al. [59]; Chou et al. [60]; Godbert et al. [61]; Xu et al. [62]; Xu et al. [63]
BRAF

BRAF is a serine/threonine kinase of the MAPK signaling pathway that regulates cell differentiation, proliferation, and survival

Activating mutations

Hotspot mutations in exon 15; the most common substitution (95% of cases) is c.1799 T > A (p.V600E). BRAF p.V600E is the prototype of the BRAF p.V600E-like mutated tumor group (2014 TCGA molecular classification scheme)

Other mutations include c.1801A > G (p.K601E) and small deletions or insertions close to codon 600; these mutations generally belong to the RAS-like mutated tumor group (2014 TCGA molecular classification scheme)

Rearrangement

AKAP9::BRAF is an intrachromosomal rearrangement (7q) with fusion of the first eight AKAP9 exons to the C-terminal region of BRAF (exons 9–18). The rearrangement leads to constitutive BRAF activation with BRAF p.V600E-like molecular features (2014 TCGA classification)

BRAF p.V600E

-Papillary carcinoma (40–80%): BRAF p.V600E is virtually specific for conventional papillary carcinoma, i.e., classic papillary carcinoma and other subtypes, with the exclusion of tumors belonging to the Encapsulated follicular variant papillary carcinoma family that belongs to the RAS-like mutated group

-High-grade non-anaplastic carcinoma of follicular cells: high-grade papillary carcinoma, often belonging to aggressive papillary carcinoma subtypes (e.g., tall cell, hobnail) (> 50%)

-Anaplastic carcinoma (10–50%)

AKAP9::BRAF

Papillary carcinomas that are radiation-induced or that develop in children

BRAF p.V600E is widely used as a diagnostic papillary carcinoma marker for preoperative fine needle aspiration molecular typing of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules

Prognosis: BRAF p.V600E has been linked to extrathyroid tumor extension and to an increased risk of PTC recurrence. However, its overall relevance for risk stratification is probably limited when other parameters like stage and histologic typing are taken into account

Anaplastic and aggressive radioactive iodide refractory BRAF p.V600E mutated thyroid carcinomas respond to a combination of RAF and MEK kinase inhibitors

Ciampi et al. [64]; Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network [50]; Acquaviva et al. [28]; de Biase et al. [65, 66]; Xu et al. [62]; Xu et al. [63]; Subbiah et al. [67]
CTNNB1

CTNNB1 encodes beta-catenin, a cell adhesion molecule and a transcription factor of WNT signaling

Mutations may affect all exons, but those that involve the phosphorylation site lead to protein stabilization. Oncogenic activity is due to CTNNB1 mutations that stabilize the protein by preventing its degradation, followed by the transfer of beta-catenin to the nucleus where it dysregulates transcription. Exon 3 mutations are the most common

Cribriform morular thyroid carcinoma is characterized by crucial mutations in the WNT signaling pathway that are phenotypically equivalent: APC, CTNNB1, AXIN1. In familial adenomatous polyposis patients, the tumor develops due to germline APC mutation typically followed by additional APC mutations or mutations in CTNNB1 that cause biallelic gene alteration of WNT signaling. In sporadic cases, biallelic oncogenic alteration of WNT signaling is due to a combination of somatic mutations that most commonly affect CTNNB1, associated with APC, or AXIN1 mutations

Beta-catenin accumulation in the cytoplasm and strong nuclear immunoreactivity are the hallmark of oncogenic WNT signaling

All patients with cribriform morular thyroid carcinoma should be evaluated for germline APC mutations, since the diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma may predate that of familial adenomatous polyposis in up to ~ 40% of cases

Cameselle-Teijeiro et al. [68]
DICER1

DICER1 encodes an RNA endonuclease (Dicer) involved in the post-transcriptional gene expression of over 30% of protein-coding genes by modulating microRNA (miRNA) and small interfering RNA (siRNA) maturation. DICER1 mutations are mutually exclusive with other RAS-like and BRAF p.V600E-like mutations

-Acquired somatic mutations in nucleotides that encode the catalytic RNase IIIb domain of DICER1 (Exons24-25) in allele 1: mutations preferentially clustered at 5 specific “hotspot” codons within the RNase IIIb domain that have a key role for miRNA processing

-Loss-of-function variant in allele 2 (either germline or somatic): mutations span the coding region of the gene

Thyroid nodules/tumors: ~ 1–2% of cases (overall), but common in children/young adults; abundant colloid, “intermediate” type nuclei with features in between those of follicular adenoma/carcinoma and papillary carcinoma (nuclei are round with coarsely granular chromatin); follicular patterned but may have papillary architecture. DICER1 mutations are not found in conventional papillary carcinoma

High-grade non-anaplastic carcinoma of follicular cells in children, typically poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (up to ~ 80%)

Thyroblastoma: pathogenic somatic DICER1 mutations in all tested cases

DICER1 syndrome (OMIM 601200) is an autosomal dominant tumor predisposition syndrome caused by germline DICER1 mutation characterized by a wide spectrum of tumors (including pleuropulmonary blastoma, cystic nephroma, Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor); thyroid nodules/tumors are the most prevalent clinical manifestation of DICER1 syndrome and usually occur by age 40

DICER1 syndrome should be suspected in children/young adults with thyroid nodules/tumors thyroid tumors that are follicular patterned or with papillary architecture

Rooper et al. [30]; Chernock et al. [69]; Agaimy et al. [70]; Chong et al. [27]; González et al. [29]
EIF1AX EIF1AX encodes a protein that mediates the transfer of Met-tRNAf to 40S ribosomal subunits to form the 40S preinitiation complex for protein translation. Mutations of residues on the RNA-binding surface of EIF1AX are reported to cause defects in proper 43S and 48S preinitiation complex formation. EIF1AX mutations belong to the RAS-like mutated tumor group (2014 TCGA molecular classification scheme)

Follicular pattered thyroid nodules/tumors (follicular adenoma and carcinoma, encapsulated follicular variant papillary carcinoma and NIFTP, hyperplastic nodules of follicular nodular disease/multinodular hyperplasia/thyroid goiter (< 10%))

High-grade non-anaplastic carcinoma of follicular cells, typically poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (5–15%)

Anaplastic carcinoma (5–15%)

EIF1AX mutations coexist with RAS mutations in aggressive thyroid carcinoma types (high-grade anaplastic and non-anaplastic carcinoma) Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network [50]; Xu et al. [62]; Xu et al. [54, 63]
GLIS1 and GLIS3 GLIS1 and GLIS3 (Glioma-associated oncogene, GLI-similar) are genes belonging to a subfamily of Krüppel-like zinc finger transcription factors that regulate the transcription of a variety of genes in physiological and pathological conditions. GLIS3 is involved with the activation of the Sonic Hedgehog pathway and regulates thyroid hormone synthesis. Both genes are fused with PAX8, in both instances fusion is in-frame and downstream of exon 2 of PAX8: the breakpoint involves exon 3 of GLIS3 and exon 2 of GLIS1 Hyalinizing trabecular tumor (~ 100%). PAX8::GLIS3 represents > 90% of all GLIS rearrangements

GLIS rearrangements are highly specific and are not identified in other tumor types

GLIS rearrangement detected in preoperative fine needle aspiration is virtually diagnostic for Hyalinizing trabecular tumor

GLIS fusions induce GLIS overexpression that can be identified by immunohistochemistry

Nikiforova [32]
EZH1 EZH1 (enhancer of zeste homologue 1) encodes a catalytic subunit of the polycomb complex mediating methylation of histone H3 and functioning in the maintenance of embryonic stem cell pluripotency and plasticity. A recurrent hotspot mutation (c.1712A > G; p.G571R) occurs with high frequency in hyperfunctional thyroid nodules/adenomas of adult patients. EZH1 mutation is almost always found in combination with TSHR or GNAS mutations or with other presumed alterations in cAMP pathway genes Hyperfunctional thyroid nodules/adenomas often featuring papillary architecture, so-called “Plummer adenoma”(~ 30%), typically in association with GNAS or TSHR mutation EZH1 mutation does not seem to occur in thyroid carcinomas Calebiro et al. [31]
GNAS Activated by G-protein-coupled receptors, such as the TSH receptor, GNAS (stimulatory G-protein α-subunit, Gs-alpha) proteins activate membrane-bound adenylate cyclase to produce cAMP. Mutational hotspots in codons 201 and 227, corresponding to the GTP-binding domain, cause constitutive activation of the protein. May be associated with EZH1 mutations Hyperfunctional thyroid nodules/adenomas often featuring papillary architecture, so-called “Plummer adenoma” (~ 5%) GNAS activating mutation germline mosaicism occurs in patients with McCune Albright syndrome Lumbroso et al. [34]; Krohn et al. [33]; Calebiro et al. [31]
NTRK1 and NTRK3 Both are transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinases. NTRK1 binds NGF, NTRK3 (a.binds NT3). Both are expressed in the nervous system, where they regulate neuronal differentiation and survival. They are not normally expressed in follicular cells. The tyrosine kinase domain of NTRK1 is fused to the 5′-terminal regions of heterologous genes (TMP3, TPR, and TFG), and that of NTRK3 (exon 14) is typically fused to the heterologous gene ETV6 (exon 4). Rearrangements cause NTRK1 and NTRK3 tyrosine kinase expression in follicular cells in a constitutively active form

Conventional papillary carcinoma (up to ~ 5%, overall). Common in papillary carcinoma of children and young adults (NTRK3 fusion, ~ 15%; NTRK1 fusion, ~ 5%). ETV6::NTRK3 common in radiation-associated papillary carcinoma. Tyrosine kinase fusion papillary carcinoma, in particular NTRK and RET fusion carcinomas, are characterized by multilobulated/multinodular growth, intratumoral fibrosis, complex papillary architecture with glomerulid papillae and/or solid-trabecular growth, and prominent invasion of vascular spaces, particularly lymphatics

Gene fusions (mostly RET, NTRK, ALK) are identified in a minority of aggressive thyroid carcinomas: 5–25% of high-grade non-anaplastic carcinoma — typically high-grade papillary carcinoma, up to ~ 5% of anaplastic carcinomas

Secretory carcinoma of the thyroid characterized by ETV6::NTRK3 (~ 100%)

Papillary carcinoma is one of the few epithelial cancers that develop in children, where it is strongly linked to chromosomal rearrangements (mostly RET, NTRK3, and NTRK1 fusion), even in the absence of a known history of radiation exposure. In spite of aggressive clinical presentation, papillary carcinoma in children is typically associated with excellent prognosis

Therapeutic implications: patients with NTRK1 and NRTK3-rearranged tumors respond to targeted therapy with NTRK inhibitors

Prasad et al. [71]; Dogan et al. [36]; Pekova et al. [37]; Chu et al. [35]
PIK3CA PIK3CA encodes the p110α-alpha catalytic subunit of class IA PI3K; PI3Ks are signal transducer enzymes that phosphorylate the position 3 hydroxyl group of the inositol ring of PIP3. PIP3 then activates AKT in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway. Activating PIK3CA mutations p.E542K, p.E545K, and p.H1047R are clustered in the helical domain (exon 9) or in the kinase domain (exon 20)

Follicular carcinoma (< 10%)

High-grade non-anaplastic carcinoma of follicular cells (< 15%)

Anaplastic carcinoma (5–25%)

“Late” molecular event associated with tumor progression Xu et al. [62]; Xu et al. [54, 63]
PPARG PPARG is a nuclear receptor protein. The complex formed by PPARG receptor, RXRs, and other cofactors activates the transcription of target genes. PAX8–PPARG is involved in tumorigenesis as a consequence of rearrangements with genes that drive the expression of the chimeric PPARG fusion oncoprotein. Other genes may be fused with PPARG, such as CREB3L2. PPARG fusion genes belong to the RAS-like mutated tumor group (2014 TCGA molecular classification scheme)

Follicular adenoma (5–20%)

Follicular carcinoma (10–50%)

Encapsulated follicular variant papillary carcinoma, invasive and non-invasive (i.e., NIFTP) (0–30%)

PPARG fusions induce PPARG overexpression that can be identified by immunohistochemistry

Typically found in follicular pattered thyroid tumors (follicular adenoma and carcinoma and encapsulated follicular variant papillary carcinoma family). Uncommon in aggressive thyroid tumors (high-grade anaplastic and non-anaplastic carcinoma)

Kroll et al. [72]
PTEN PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) is a tumor suppressor phosphatase that inhibits AKT activity converting PIP3 to PIP2 and thus negatively regulates the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway. The gene is inactivated by mutations, deletions, and epigenetic modifications. Decreased mRNA or protein levels due to epigenetic modifications are more frequent than gene mutations

Follicular carcinoma (< 10%)

High-grade non-anaplastic carcinoma of follicular cells is more common in poorly differentiated carcinoma (5–20%) than in high-grade papillary carcinoma (< 5%)

Anaplastic carcinoma (10–15%)

“Late” molecular event associated with tumor progression

PTEN inactivation can be identified by immunohistochemistry

Cowden syndrome (OMIM 158350) is an inherited, autosomal dominant hamartomatous disorder characterized by an increased risk for the development of breast, thyroid, and endometrial carcinoma. It is caused by germline inactivation of PTEN. Patients with Cowden syndrome develop hyperplastic/adenomatous follicular-patterned thyroid nodules/tumors including follicular adenoma and carcinoma

Cowden syndrome should be suspected in children/young adults with thyroid nodules/tumors that are follicular patterned

Liaw et al. [73]; Harach et al. [74]; Xu et al. [62]; Xu et al. [54, 63]
RAS HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS are G-proteins that have a critical role in the intracellular transduction of signals from the cell membrane. They activate the MAPK pathway, upstream of RAF proteins including (BRAF). Activating RAS mutations occur at hotspots in exon 2 (codons 12 and 13) and exon 3 (codon 61). Mutations in the GTPase domain (codon 61) or in the GTP-binding domain (codons 12 and 13) lock the protein in the active GTP-bound form. Mutations occur in any of the RAS genes (NRAS > HRAS > KRAS in nodules/tumors of follicular cells, HRAS > KRAS > NRAS in medullary carcinoma). In tumors of follicular cells, mutations most frequently affect NRAS codon 61, and RAS mutations are the prototype of the RAS-like mutated tumor group (2014 TCGA molecular classification scheme)

Follicular adenoma (20–40%)

Follicular carcinoma (30–50%)

Encapsulated follicular variant papillary carcinoma, invasive and non-invasive (i.e., NIFTP) (25–45%)

High-grade non-anaplastic carcinoma of follicular cells (20–50%) is more common in poorly differentiated carcinoma than in high-grade papillary carcinoma

Anaplastic carcinoma (10–50%)

Medullary carcinoma (10–20% of sporadic cases, rare in cases with germline RET mutation)

RAS mutations can occur in any follicular pattered thyroid nodule/tumor. The presence of RAS mutation is generally considered molecular evidence of neoplasm, although mutations are found in a minor subset of histologically hyperplastic nodules of follicular nodular disease/multinodular hyperplasia/thyroid goiter

RAS mutations are widely used as diagnostic markers for preoperative fine needle aspiration molecular typing of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. The identification of RAS mutations indicates that the nodule is likely neoplastic, but by no means not necessarily malignant — as a matter of fact, after thyroid lobectomy, most RAS-mutated nodules are diagnosed as benign: hyperplastic nodule, follicular adenoma, or NIFTP

Ciampi [75]; Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network [50]; Acquaviva et al. [28]; de Biase et al. [65, 66]; Xu et al. [62]; Xu et al. [63]
RET

RET is a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase that binds ligands of the glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor ligand family (GDNF, neurturin, artemin, and persephin) in conjunction with coreceptors, to form a cell surface complex (RET dimer–ligand-coreceptor) that activates downstream signaling, including the MAPK and PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathways. It is expressed in parafollicular calcitonin-producing thyroid C cells. It is not normally expressed (or is expressed at very low levels) in follicular cells

Activating mutations

Somatic and germline mutations in exons 8–11 and 13–16 are found in medullary carcinoma, familial medullary carcinoma, and MEN2A and MEN2B syndromes. Mutations involve the extracellular cysteine-rich domain (e.g., p.C634R), the intracellular domain (e.g., p.S891A), or the intracellular kinase domain (e.g., p.M918T), causing constitutive activation of RET as protein dimers and/or monomers

Rearrangement

RET fusion genes are due to rearrangements that involve the RET locus at 10q11.2. Rearrangements can be intrachromosomal, such as those that produce the two most common forms of RET fusion CCDC6::RET (RET/PTC1) and NCOA4::RET (RET/PTC3), or interchromosomal, such as PRKAR1A::RET (RET/PTC2) and other less common forms. RET rearrangement causes RET tyrosine kinase expression in follicular cells in a constitutively active form. RET fusion carcinomas belong to the BRAF p.V600E-like mutated tumor group (2014 TCGA molecular classification scheme)

RET mutation

RET mutations are present in 40–50% of sporadic medullary carcinoma (RET p.M918T in ~ 70–80% of the RET-mutated cases) and often occur in advanced tumors with poor prognosis. Somatic RET mutations are rare in medullary carcinoma of patients with germline RET mutation

RET rearrangement

-Conventional papillary carcinoma (5–25%, overall). Common in papillary carcinoma of children and young adults and in radiation associated papillary carcinoma. Tyrosine kinase fusion papillary carcinoma, in particular, NTRK and RET fusion carcinomas are characterized by multilobulated/multinodular growth, intratumoral fibrosis, complex papillary architecture with glomeruloid papillae and/or solid-trabecular growth, and prominent invasion of vascular spaces, particularly lymphatics

-Gene fusions (mostly RET, NTRK, ALK) are identified in a minority of aggressive thyroid carcinomas: 5–25% of high-grade non-anaplastic carcinoma — typically high-grade papillary carcinoma, up to ~ 5% of anaplastic carcinomas

All patients with medullary carcinoma must undergo germline screening for RET mutation to rule out familial medullary carcinoma, MEN2A (OMIM 171400 for both conditions) or Men2B (OMIM 162300)

There is a strong genotype–phenotype correlation between the type of RET mutation and clinical manifestations, and depending on the type of RET mutation identified, prophylactic thyroidectomy must be considered for the relatives of the proband with RET germline mutation

Papillary carcinoma is one of the few epithelial cancers that develop in children, where it is strongly linked to chromosomal rearrangements (mostly RET, NTRK3, and NTRK1 fusion), even in the absence of a known history of radiation exposure. In spite of aggressive clinical presentation, papillary carcinoma in children is typically associated with excellent prognosis

Therapeutic implications: patients with RET-mutated medullary carcinoma or with RET-rearranged carcinomas of follicular cells respond to targeted therapy with RET inhibitors

Pekova et al. [37]; Wells et al. [13]
TERT TERT is the enzyme core protein of the telomerase complex responsible for telomere elongation, which prevents cell senescence and maintains chromosomal integrity and genome stability. TERT is expressed in germ cells and somatic stem cells. It is not normally expressed (or is expressed at very low levels) in most somatic cells. Hotspot mutations in the TERT promoter are at positions –124 (C228T) and –146 (C250T) upstream of the TERT translation start site; TERT C228T is much more common than TERT C250T. Mutations create a novel binding site for transcription factors of the ETS family, which increase TERT transcription and telomerase expression

Follicular carcinoma (10–35%)

Papillary carcinoma, conventional (5–15%)

Encapsulated follicular variant papillary carcinoma (5–15%)

High-grade non-anaplastic carcinoma of follicular cells (20–50%), equally common in poorly differentiated carcinoma and high-grade papillary carcinoma

Anaplastic carcinoma (30–75%)

“Late” molecular event associated with tumor progression

TERT promoter mutations are clonal and highly prevalent in aggressive carcinomas, while they are uncommon and often subclonal in conventional papillary and follicular carcinoma. Tumors where TERT promoter mutation coexists with RAS and BRAF p.V600E have worse prognosis

Powerful indicator of poor prognosis in carcinomas of follicular cells, independent of histologic typing/subtyping and other relevant clinicopathologic parameters

Landa et al. [56]; Xu [62]; Xu et al. [63]; Park et al. [76]
TP53 TP53 is a transcription factor involved in the control of the cell cycle, apoptosis, and maintenance of genetic stability. Its levels are controlled by proteasome-dependent degradation. It is the tumor suppressor gene most commonly inactivated in human cancers. Most mutations are missense and affect the DNA binding domain of the protein. Small nucleotide changes in TP53 are typically located in residues 92–292; exons 5–9 are those usually screened for mutation analysis. The inactive protein is not able to arrest the proliferation of cells with DNA damage

High grade non anaplastic carcinoma of follicular cells (10–35%), more common in poorly differentiated carcinoma compared to high grade papillary carcinoma

Anaplastic carcinoma (40–80%)

TP53 mutations have been reported in a minority of oncocytic carcinomas in the absence of high-grade/poorly differentiated features

“Late” molecular event associated with tumor progression, strongly associated with anaplastic carcinoma Evangelisti et al. [77]; Landa et al. [56]; Xu et al. [62]; Xu et al. [63]
TSHR

TSHR is a member of the G-protein-coupled receptor family. It has a complex structure, with a serpentine transmembrane domain with seven loops. Expressed in thyroid follicular cells

Mutated TSHR and GNAS (stimulatory G-protein α-subunit) proteins are constitutively active, resulting in increased intracellular cAMP levels and continuous stimulation of thyroid hormone synthesis and secretion. May be associated with EZH1 mutations

Hyperfunctional thyroid nodules/adenomas often featuring papillary architecture, so-called “Plummer adenoma” (50–80%) Inactivating TSHR gene mutations are a cause of familial congenital hypothyroidism with thyroid dysgenesis/hypoplasia Parma et al. [78]; Krohn et al. [33]; Calebiro et al. [31]

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Genetic alterations of thyroid tumors. Genetic alterations include “Early/Driver” molecular changes (BRAF p.V600E-like for conventional papillary carcinoma, RAS-like for follicular patterned tumors, and coexistence of mtDNA mutations with severe DNA copy-number alterations for oncocytic tumors) as well as “Late/Progression-associated” molecular changes such as TERT promoter mutation, TP53 mutation, alterations of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway in high-grade non-anaplastic carcinoma of follicular cells, and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. PDTC, poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma; DHGTC, differentiated high-grade non-anaplastic thyroid carcinoma; GH-CNV, genome haploidization-type DNA copy number variation leading to copy number neutral uniparental disomy.

Modified from: Acquaviva G. et al. [28]

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Driver molecular alterations, tumor type, and progression in thyroid tumors of follicular cells. PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; E-FVPTC, encapsulated follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma; PDTC, poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma; GH-CNV, genome haploidization-type DNA copy number variation leading to uniparental disomy/aneuploidy.

Modified from: Volante et al. [79]

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Thyroid tumors. NIFTP (A, hematoxylin and eosin): follicular patterned tumors such as NIFTP have RAS-like molecular signature. Papillary carcinoma (B, hematoxylin and eosin): conventional papillary carcinoma has BRAF p.V600E-like molecular signature, this case featuring glomeruloid papillae harbors a TPR::NTRK1 rearrangement. Oncocytic carcinoma (C, hematoxylin and eosin): oncocytic tumors have both mtDNA mutations and severe DNA copy number alterations. High-grade non-anaplastic papillary carcinoma with tumor necrosis (D, hematoxylin and eosin), poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (E, hematoxylin and eosin), and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (F, hematoxylin and eosin): these aggressive high-grade tumors harbor early/driver molecular alterations and additional mutations associated with tumor progression affecting TERT promoter and PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway genes; inactivating TP53 mutations are typically associated with anaplastic carcinoma

Table 6.

Starting material for preoperative molecular analysis of thyroid nodules

Starting material Pros Cons
Liquid-based cytology

• Good quality of nucleic acid

• The Cytological Smears used for morphological diagnosis can be archived

• No evaluation of lesional cells in the analyzed specimen

• Usually small amount of starting mater

• Not feasible for in situ technique

Cytological smears

• Good quality of nucleic acid

• Evaluation of lesional cells in the analyzed specimen

• Commonly available for thyroid lesions

• Cover-slide has to be removed

• No residual material for archives

• Small amount of starting material

Cell block

• Good quality of nucleic acid

• Storable in anatomic pathology archives

• In situ techniques can be performed

• Small amount of starting material
Surgical FFPE specimen

• Huge amount of material

• Representative of the lesions

• Storable in anatomic pathology archives

• In situ techniques can be performed

• Degradation of nucleic acids due to formalin fixation
Liquid biopsy

• Minimally invasive method

• Serially repeatable during follow-up

• Need of very high-sensitive technique

• Not feasible for in situ techniques

• Technical variability in the pre-analytical and analytical steps

Parathyroid tumors: molecular pathology and correlation with clinicopathologic features

The spectrum of parathyroid tumors includes adenoma, atypical tumor (neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential, previously defined as “atypical parathyroid adenoma”), and carcinoma. These tumors can arise in any gland including ectopic ones or areas where embryonic parathyroid remnants may be found [86]. The majority of them cause primary hyperparathyroidism, with adenomas accounting for at least 85% of cases [87, 88].

In general, immunohistochemistry is not necessary for diagnostic purposes. However, it may be useful to screen for hereditary conditions associated with inactivation of genes such as CDC73 and MEN1, causing hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor (HPTJT) and MEN1 syndrome, respectively [89]. These hereditary conditions usually present with multiglandular involvement and/or multinodular tumors. Parathyroid tumors that arise in the context of hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor (HPTJT) syndrome feature eosinophilic cytoplasm, perinuclear clearing, nuclear expansion, micro-cystic structures, and sheet-like growth pattern [90].

The main genes mutated in parathyroid tumors are summarized in Table 7 and illustrated in Fig. 5. Examples of parathyroid tumors are shown in Fig. 6. The molecular pathogenesis underlying the majority of sporadic parathyroid adenoma remains unknown. Syndromic parathyroid adenomas constitute ~ 10% of cases [91], found in MEN1, MEN2, MEN4, HPTJT, and isolated familial hyperparathyroidism (FIHP). These syndromes have recently been complemented by MEN5, associated with hereditary mutations of MAX [92] (Table 1). In these inherited conditions, the parathyroid glands contain multiple clonal adenomas which mimic the clinical appearance of cases traditionally diagnosed as parathyroid hyperplasia [93, 94].

Table 7.

Somatic genetic alterations of parathyroid tumors and their clinicopathologic relevance

Gene(s) Molecular pathology Parathyroid tumor type(s) Clinicopathologic implications Reference(s)
CCND1 Rearrangement of CCND1 or gene overexpression induced by epigenetic changes increase Cyclin D1 expression, thus promoting cellular proliferation Parathyroid adenoma Therapeutic implications: potential response to CDK4/6 inhibitors [95]
CDC73 Mutations in addition or loss of heterozygosity of the parafibromin encoding gene alter its nuclear-tumor-suppressing function Parathyroid carcinomas

Genomic instability

Unfavorable, prognosis, tumor recurrence

[96102]
MEN1 LOH or inactivating intragenic mutations (nonsense mutations, frameshift deletions or insertions, in-frame deletions or insertions, splice-site mutations, and missense mutations) cause loss of MEN1 Parathyroid adenoma MEN1 loss is rare in parathyroid carcinoma [103, 104]

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Genetic alterations of parathyroid tumors. MEN1 loss of function represents the most common alteration in parathyroid adenoma. The most common alteration of parathyroid carcinoma is CDC73 inactivation, also found in a minority of atypical parathyroid tumors

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Parathyroid carcinoma. There is mitotic activity, nuclear pleomorphism (A, hematoxylin and eosin), and parafibromin expression is lost (B, parafibromin immunohistochemistry)

In sporadic adenoma, the most common somatic alteration is inactivation of MEN1. This is caused by loss of heterozygosity (LOH) due to large deletions or genetic recombination at 11q13 (where MEN1 is located) found in ~ 35% of all parathyroid adenoma and/or MEN1 inactivating mutations found in up to ~ 20% of cases [105]. In addition to LOH and somatic mutations, other mechanisms can lead to the inactivation of MEN1, including epigenetic silencing. Interestingly, biallelic MEN1 inactivation occurs in approximately 50% of cases in which LOH at 11q13 is detected, raising the hypothesis that other genes on 11q may also play a role in tumor development.

Cyclin D1 (also located at 11q13) is overexpressed in 10–40% of parathyroid adenomas due to aberrant promoter methylation of different cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs), while rearrangement of the Cyclin D1 gene (CCND1) occurs in up to ~ 10% of parathyroid adenomas [105].

Other somatic mutations involving CDKN1B (encoding p27), EZH2 (encoding the zinc-finger protein X-linked transcription factor), ASXL3, and MTOR have been reported in a small minority of parathyroid adenomas [105107]. Somatic CDC73 mutations are rare in adenomas. They have been reported only in atypical parathyroid tumors, in some adenomas in the context of HPTJT, and in a small number of cystic adenomas [108]. Interestingly, parathyroid nodules in secondary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism — typically associated with chronic renal failure — harbor different somatic changes compared with those of adenomas in primary hyperparathyroidism [106].

Parathyroid carcinoma is rare and the majority of cases are sporadic. Parathyroid carcinoma develops in 10–15% of patients with HPJT and FIHP (Table 1), while it is uncommon in other inherited conditions [90, 109, 110]. Only a few studies have been conducted on the molecular pathogenesis of sporadic carcinomas. Contrary to parathyroid adenomas, parathyroid cancer rarely exhibits MEN1 mutations [111]. Inactivating CDC73 alterations have been reported in 40–80% of sporadic cases [111113]. CDC73 alterations include truncating or frameshift mutations, as well as missense mutations leading to the loss of parafibromin immunoreactivity [114]. CDC73-mutant parathyroid carcinomas exhibit higher genomic instability with DNA copy number changes, greater mutational burden, and worse patient outcomes compared with wild-type cases [115].

Loss of TP53 and RB1 alleles, CCND1 (encoding Cyclin D1) amplification, and TERT promoter mutations have been reported [116, 117]. PTEN, NF1, KDR, and PIK3CA mutations may represent potential targets for molecular therapy [118]. Metastatic parathyroid carcinoma has a different expression profile compared with non-metastatic parathyroid carcinoma and parathyroid adenoma [119, 120]. Several epigenetic alterations have been discovered in parathyroid carcinomas, including aberrant methylation of APC and of the cell cycle regulators CDKN2A and CDKN2B [121].

Adrenal cortical tumors: molecular pathology and correlation with clinicopathologic features

The spectrum of endocrine tumors of the adrenal cortex includes adrenocortical nodular disease, adrenal cortical adenoma, and adrenal cortical carcinoma. Recently, molecular insights have led to modify the terminology related to adrenocortical nodular disease [122] which currently includes several types of clonal benign proliferations: sporadic nodular adrenocortical disease (a common condition), micronodular adrenocortical disease (a rare condition), and bilateral macronodular adrenocortical disease (a rare condition). Micronodular and bilateral macronodular adrenocortical diseases are often associated with germline pathogenic mutations of several genes [123125]. Our understanding of genomic and hormonal landscapes of adrenal cortical adenoma has also advanced significantly [126], and genotype–phenotype correlations have been proposed for both aldosterone-producing [127, 128] and cortisol-secreting adenomas [129]. Importantly, it is not uncommon for a single alteration to affect different functional pathways, as has been demonstrated for KCNJ5 mutations [130]. Concerning the pathogenesis of cortical carcinoma, several main pathways of tumorigenesis have been discovered, involving cell cycle regulation, Wnt signaling, chromosome maintenance/chromatin remodeling, and the PKA pathway [131] (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Genetic alterations of adrenal cortical tumors. Adenomas arise as a result of mutations affecting two main groups of genes: the aldosterone-producing adenomas harbor most frequently mutations for KCNJ5 or the ion channel encoding genes, while cortisol-producing adenomas often develop due to alterations in the PKA pathway, typically PRKACA. Genetic alterations of carcinomas mainly involve TP53 but also genes commonly mutated in non-functioning adenomas

Furthermore, integrated analysis of these findings with transcriptomic data, epigenetic findings, and copy number changes has led to the identification of three main classes of adrenal cortex carcinoma, with important clinical and prognostic implications [132134].

Adrenocortical nodular disease

Nodular adrenocortical disease with bilateral involvement of the adrenal cortex rarely occurs in young patients, but when present, it is frequently associated with germline conditions (Table 1). Germline variants of PRKAR1A, PRKACA, PDE11A, PDE8B, and 2p16 CNC2 locus alterations are frequently reported in micronodular adrenocortical disease with bilateral involvement of adrenal cortex, which typically affects children and young adults [135] (Table 1). Germline PRKAR1A mutations (less frequently of PDE8B and PDE11A) cause Primary Pigmented Nodular Adrenocortical Disease, a distinct subtype of bilateral micronodular adrenocortical disease typically found in association with Carney’s complex [136]. The bilateral macronodular adrenocortical disease is caused by pathogenic ARMC5 variants (~ 50% of cases). Further alterations may involve the following genes: MEN1, FH (Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Cancer), APC (Familial Adenomatosis Polyposis), GNAS (McCune Albright Syndrome), and the rarely mutated PDE11A, PDE8B, and 2p16 CNC2 locus [123, 125, 132, 136, 137]. Variable patterns of Cushing syndrome are typical clinical manifestations of both micro- and macronodular adrenocortical disease.

Adrenal cortical adenoma

Cortical adenomas are the most common tumors of the adrenal cortex.

Alterations of distinctive pathways (active under normal conditions) involved in the physiologic production of aldosterone and cortisol are typical of the corresponding hormone-producing adenoma. Indeed, functioning adenomas that cause primary aldosteronism harbor specific somatic mutations of several ion channel genes which lead to both cellular proliferation and increased aldosterone production in the cells of the zona glomerulosa [126]. They are mutually exclusive and involve KCNJ5 (K + channel) [138], ATP1A1 (Na + /K + channel) [139], ATP2B3 (Ca2 + channel) [139], CACNA1D (Ca2 + channel), CACNA1H (Ca2 + channel) [140], and CLCN2 (Cl- channel) [95, 141]. KCNJ5 mutated adenomas account for the large majority of the cases (~ 40% of aldosterone-producing adenomas) and tend to mainly affect young female patients [137, 142]. Recurrent phenotypic and clinical characteristics have been identified in ion channel gene mutated adenomas [127, 128]. As shown in Table 8, these include the expression of steroidogenic enzymes, cytomorphology, and lateralization index of the adrenal vein sampling (AVS). Interestingly, ion channel genes such as KCNJ5, CACNA1H, CACNA1D, or CLCN2 may also be mutated in the germline, causing familial aldosteronism [126]. Somatic mutations of CTNNB1 — encoding the Wnt-pathway effector beta-catenin — occur in ~ 5% of sporadic aldosterone-producing adenomas and have been correlated to delayed disease onset and female prevalence [96].

Table 8.

Genetic alterations of adrenal cortical tumors and their clinicopathologic relevance

Gene(s) Molecular pathology Adrenal cortical tumor type(s) Clinicopathologic implications Reference(s)
ARMC5 Frequently germline missense mutations or, rarely, deletion of ARMC5 inactivate its oncosuppressive function Bilateral macronodular adrenocortical disease

Adult onset

High level of cortisol secretion compared to ARMC5 wild type disease

Adrenal enlargement

 [136]
CTNNB1 Activating mutations of Beta-catenin lead to its accumulation in the nucleus and downstream activation of the Wnt pathway

Adrenal cortical carcinomas (ACCs)

Silent adenomas

ACCs: worst outcomes

Silent adenomas: great dimension

 [132]
GNAS Somatic mosaicism of GNAS or somatic activating mutations promote tumor development

Cortisol-producing adenomas

Bilateral macronodular adrenocortical disease (PBMAH)

Adenoma: young patients; pronounced hypercortisolism; small, small tumors

PBMAH: McCune-Albright Syndrome; childhood onset; pronounced hypercortisolism and other endocrinopathies

[96102]
KCNJ5 Nucleotide substitutions, insertions, or deletions at the selective site for K+ exit cause membrane depolarization, as in the physiological response to angiotensine with aldostereone excess and cell cycle activation Aldosterone-producing adenomas

High aldosterone levels than in wild type tumors

Female patients

High dimensions

Descending lateralization index response to cosyntropin at AVS

 [138]
PRKACA Germline or, more frequently, somatic activating mutations of PKA-C lead to transcription of genes promoting proliferation and cortisol-production

Cortisol-producing adenomas

Micronodular adrenocortical disease (MAD)

Adenomas: younger patients; overt Cushing; smaller tumors

MAD: early age of onset; multiple small “bead-like” nodules at imaging; paradoxical cortisol response on Liddle’s test; variable degrees of hypercortisolism

 [132]
TP53 Inactivating mutations cause loss of function of the p53 protein Adrenal cortical carcinomas (ACCs)

Unfavorable prognosis

Advanced stage disease

 [100, 132]

Functioning adenomas that produce cortisol feature genetic alterations of the protein kinase A (PKA) pathway active under normal conditions in the production of cortisol. The PKA pathway is physiologically activated by ACTH so that PKA catalytic subunits (PKA-C) can enter the nucleus of zona fasciculata cells enhancing transcription of genes that promote cell proliferation and synthesis of cortisol [126]. PKA pathway genetic alterations of cortisol-producing adenomas affect most frequently the following genes: PRKACA (~ 40% of cases), PRKAR1A, GNAS, or PRKACB [97, 98]. As for sexual steroid-producing adenomas, the molecular pathogenesis remains largely unknown. CTNNB1 mutations are the most frequent molecular alterations of cortical adenomas not associated with hormone production (silent adenomas), particularly in large-sized tumors [129].

Adrenal cortical carcinoma

Adrenal cortical carcinoma is rare and mostly associated with somatic genetic changes (Figs. 7 and 8). Common clinical presentations include Cushing or adrenogenital (virilization-feminization) syndromes due to hormone production [99, 122]. Hereditary cases typically affect children, with up to 80% of pediatric cases carrying germline mutations. The most common mutation affects TP53 (Li-fraumeni syndrome), followed by alterations of the mismatch repair system (Lynch syndrome) [100, 101]. Additional hereditary conditions include Beckwith-Wideman syndrome and MEN1 [100]. Genes frequently altered in benign conditions such as PRKAR1A, MSH2, APC, MEN1, and NF1 are mutated only in small subsets of carcinomas [132]. The most common genetic signatures affect the cell cycle, Wnt signaling, and chromatin remodeling. TP53 mutations found in ~ 20% of adrenal cortical carcinomas are the most common changes [143]. Recurrent somatic genetic alterations affect other cell cycle regulatory genes such as RB1, CDK2NA [132], MDM2, and CDK4 [131, 133]. Wnt signaling is dysregulated by CTNNB1 mutations, ZNRF3 mutations, and deletions [132, 143]. Importantly, TP53 or Wnt pathway mutations are typically mutually exclusive but similarly associated with poor prognosis [132, 133, 143]. Dysregulation of chromatin remodeling is caused by the alteration of several genes, such as ATRX and DAXX [132].

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Adrenal cortical tumors. Adrenal cortical adenoma composed by lipid-rich cells resembling the zona fasciculata with low mitotic activity (A, hematoxylin and eosin): cortisol-producing adenoma such as the one shown in the picture has PKA pathway alterations. Adrenal cortical carcinoma with nuclear pleomorphism, mitotic activity, and trabecular growth pattern (B, hematoxylin and eosin): TP53 is the gene most commonly mutated

Furthermore, structural alterations (rearrangements and deletions) in tumor DNA at 11p15 are a frequent finding and can cause loss of imprinted H19 tumor suppressor gene and overexpression of the IGF2 oncogene [103]. IGF2 overexpression in adrenal cortical carcinoma can be identified by immunohistochemistry and may be useful in the differential diagnosis with adenoma [104].

Chromosomal alterations are heterogeneous and have been clustered into three groups: those with extensive chromosome loss (~ 50%), those with variable levels of ploidy (~ 40% — the group of chromosomal changes with worse prognosis), and those with limited chromosomal DNA alteration (~ 10%).

Comprehensive molecular classification of adrenal cortical carcinoma is evolving [126, 143]. Over the years, evidence provided by mutation analysis, chromosomal, methylation, and transcriptome profiling has been integrated to define prognostic groups for risk stratification [126, 133, 134, 144]. According to an important study by Assié et al., there are two main types of adrenal cortical carcinoma [132]. The set of “CpG island methylator phenotype-low” (CIMP-low) carcinomas has infrequent alterations in TP53 or Wnt pathways, mRNA expression pattern predictive of less severe prognosis, chromosome loss, and low rate of disease progression. “CIMP-high” carcinomas typically have alterations of TP53 or Wnt pathway, mRNA expression pattern predictive of poor prognosis, whole-genome duplication, and high rate of disease progression. The TCGA has built on this experience and has proposed an integrated molecular classification model based on DNA copy number, DNA methylation, mRNA expression, and miRNA expression profiles [132134]. This classification model has three groups — termed Cluster-1, -2, -3 — which have been defined after Cluster of Cluster (CoC) analysis. Each CoC cluster is highly relevant for patient prognosis, with Cluster 3 being associated with worse outcome [132134].

Paraganglionic tumors (tumors of the adrenal medulla and of extra-adrenal paraganglia): molecular pathology and correlation with clinicopathologic features

The main genes mutated in paraganglionic tumors are illustrated in Fig. 9. An example of a paraganglionic tumor is shown in Fig. 10.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Genetic alterations of paraganglionic tumors. Genetic alterations in PPGL have been grouped into three main groups reflecting three different mechanisms of tumorigenesis: the Cluster 1-pseudohypoxia pathway, characterized by genetic alterations of the HIF1-alpha-activated response to hypoxia pathway and of other similar hypoxia-inducible factor gene pathways; the Cluster 2-Kinase signaling, including the most common alterations identified in paraganglionic tumors such as NF1 mutations; the more recently described Cluster 3-Wnt/Sonic Hedgehog pathway. *Germline and somatic alterations. **Only somatic alterations

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Paraganglionic tumors. Cells resembling normal chromaffin cells with abundant granular cytoplasm are arranged in well-defined nests (A, hematoxylin and eosin). Head and neck paraganglioma, such as the one shown in the picture, often has inactivating SDHD mutations. If any of the subunits of the SDH complex is altered, the entire complex becomes unstable and immunohistochemical SDHB expression is lost (B, SDHB immunohistochemistry)

Paraganglionic tumors are neuroendocrine neoplasms that develop from neural crest-derived progenitors in the adrenal medulla (Pheochromocytoma) and paraganglia (Paraganglioma), respectively. In the latest WHO classification of endocrine tumors, they are considered malignant, although the overall proportion of cases that metastasize is low, ~ 10% of cases. Paragangliomas are further classified in sympathetic and parasympathetic neoplasms according to cell origin and localization. In particular, sympathetic paraganglioma arises within sympathetic nerve plexuses, fibers, and pre- and paravertebral sympathetic chains — thus abdominal cavity, retroperitoneum, pelvis, and thorax are the most prevalent sites. The majority of parasympathetic paraganglioma develops from parasympathetic glomera, and tumors are typically found in the head and neck region, while pheochromocytoma develops in the adrenal medulla. Paraganglionic tumors share the same embryonic origin and are frequently associated with inherited germline mutations (Table 1). Indeed, paraganglionic tumors have the highest degree of hereditability among human neoplasms, with germline mutations in up to ~ 40–80% of cases (vs. ~ 10% in other tumor types) [145147]. Most cases of sympathetic paraganglionic tumors are functional due to catecholamine production, causing hypertension in the majority of patients [148], while parasympathetic paraganglioma typically presents as asymptomatic masses. Sympathetic paraganglionic tumors in children account for up to 20% of cases [149, 150] and most are associated with germline mutations [102, 150]. Conversely, parasympathetic paragangliomas rarely affect children [102, 150, 151]. Germline mutations are an important risk factor for the development of all types of paraganglionic tumors, occurring in up to ~ 40 of adult cases and in up to 80% of pediatric ones. Patients with germline mutation often develop synchronous or metachronous multicentric tumors [102, 150, 152, 153].

Germline mutations mainly affect the following genes: RET, NF1, VHL, TMEM127, SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, SDHAF2, FH, MAX, EPAS1, DLST, MDH2, GOT2, and DNMT3A (Table 1).

SDH (succinate dehydrogenase, complex II of the mitochondrial respiratory chain) consists of four subunits (SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD), and the genes encoding SDHB and SDHD are those more frequently mutated in the germline [153]. SDHD mutations cause the majority of paragangliomas of the head and neck region and typically present with single or multifocal tumors exclusively located in the head and neck. On the other hand, thoracoabdominal tumors more frequently harbor SDHB mutations. Paraganglionic tumors can also be found in association with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and pulmonary chondromas in the so-called Carney triad, a nonhereditary condition characterized by epigenetic alterations of SDHC [154, 155]. Interestingly, somatic NF1, RET, and VHL are also found in sporadic tumors, with NF1 representing the gene most commonly mutated ( ~ 20% of cases) [156, 157]. Additional somatic mutations, not found in the germline, affect HRAS, BRAF, SETD2, FGFR1, TP53, ATRX, ARNT, IDH1, H3F3A, MET, and CSDE1 [146].

Paraganglionic tumors have been divided into three molecular clusters that are also recognized by the TCGA [145]. Cluster 1 tumors have a response to hypoxia pathway dysregulation (pseudohypoxia) characterized by increased transcription of genes targeted by hypoxia-inducible factors (HIF1-alpha and other factors) which promote angiogenesis, cell proliferation, survival, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition [158]. Of note, in SDH-/FH-deficient and mutant IDH tumors, oncometabolite accumulation induces DNA hypermethylation and other epigenetic changes. Cluster 2 tumors feature abnormal activation of RAS/RAF/ERK, PI3K/PTEN/AKT, and MYC/MAX/MXD1 pathways. They also exhibit a hypomethylated phenotype and frequent somatic copy number changes [146]. Cluster 3 tumors are characterized by dysregulation of Wnt and Sonic Hedgehog pathways. Indeed, sporadic MAML3 fusions and CSDE1 mutations in paraganglionic tumors that activate Wnt and Sonic Hedgehog pathways have been discovered to be major driving factors in tumor development [145]. Given the high hereditability of paraganglionic tumors, genetic screening is recommended, particularly in pediatric patients [150, 159]. In this respect, immunohistochemistry is a very useful screening test: if any of the subunits of the SDH complex is lost due to mutations or epigenetic alterations, the entire complex becomes unstable and the SDHB subunit is degraded in the cytoplasm. Loss of the SDHB protein can be demonstrated by SDHB immunohistochemistry, pointing to the need for SDH sequencing to confirm SDH subunit germline mutation [38]. This type of so-called “molecular-immunohistochemistry” can be applied not only to anticipate the genetic background of individual paraganglioma tumors but also to prevent erroneous diagnostic conclusions in the case of multiple lesions mimicking metastatic disease [146, 147].

Author contribution

Conception and design: GT, ADL; administrative support: GT; provision of study materials or patients: ADL, MR, DdB; collection and assembly of data: ADL, MR, TM, SC, AR; manuscript writing: ADL, MR, DdB, GT; final approval of manuscript: all authors.

Funding

Ministero della Salute, RC-2022-2773478.

Declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Antonio De Leo and Martina Ruscelli share first authorship. Dario de Biase and Giovanni Tallini share senior authorship.

The original online version of this article was revised: The missing keywords has been added.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

1/26/2024

A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1007/s00428-024-03738-3

References

  • 1.Rindi G, Mete O, Uccella S, et al. Overview of the 2022 WHO classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endocr Pathol. 2022;33:115–154. doi: 10.1007/s12022-022-09708-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beckers A, Aaltonen LA, Daly AF, Karhu A. Familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA) and the pituitary adenoma predisposition due to mutations in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) gene. Endocr Rev. 2013;34:239–277. doi: 10.1210/ER.2012-1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Masi G, Barzon L, Iacobone M, et al. Clinical, genetic, and histopathologic investigation of CDC73-related familial hyperparathyroidism. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2008;15:1115–1126. doi: 10.1677/ERC-08-0066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sarquis MS, Silveira LG, Pimenta FJ et al (2008) Familial hyperparathyroidism: surgical outcome after 30 years of follow-up in three families with germline HRPT2 mutations. Surgery 143. 10.1016/j.surg.2007.12.012 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 5.Alrezk R, Hannah-Shmouni F, Stratakis CA. MEN4 and CDKN1B mutations: the latest of the MEN syndromes. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2017;24:T195–T208. doi: 10.1530/ERC-17-0243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Frederiksen A, Rossing M, Hermann P, et al. Clinical features of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4: novel pathogenic variant and review of published cases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104:3637–3646. doi: 10.1210/JC.2019-00082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.de Kock L, Wu MK, Foulkes WD. Ten years of DICER1 mutations: provenance, distribution, and associated phenotypes. Hum Mutat. 2019;40:1939–1953. doi: 10.1002/HUMU.23877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Burnichon N, Cascón A, Schiavi F, et al. MAX mutations cause hereditary and sporadic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:2828–2837. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cascon A, Robledo M. MAX and MYC: a heritable breakup. Cancer Res. 2012;72:3119–3124. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brandi ML, Agarwal SK, Perrier ND, et al. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: latest insights. Endocr Rev. 2021;42:133–170. doi: 10.1210/ENDREV/BNAA031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ferner RE, Huson SM, Thomas N, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of individuals with neurofibromatosis 1. J Med Genet. 2007;44:81–88. doi: 10.1136/JMG.2006.045906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stratakis CA. Carney complex: a familial lentiginosis predisposing to a variety of tumors. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2016;17:367–371. doi: 10.1007/S11154-016-9400-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wells SA, Asa SL, Dralle H, et al. Revised American Thyroid Association guidelines for the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 2015;25:567–610. doi: 10.1089/THY.2014.0335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moline J, Eng C. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2: an overview. Genet Med. 2011;13:755–764. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0B013E318216CC6D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Korpershoek E, Favier J, Gaal J et al (2011) SDHA immunohistochemistry detects germline SDHA gene mutations in apparently sporadic paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96. 10.1210/JC.2011-1043 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 16.Gill AJ. Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient neoplasia. Histopathology. 2018;72:106–116. doi: 10.1111/HIS.13277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lubensky IA, Pack S, Ault D, et al. Multiple neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas in von Hippel-Lindau disease patients: histopathological and molecular genetic analysis. Am J Pathol. 1998;153:223–231. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65563-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Salama Y, Albanyan S, Szybowska M, et al. Comprehensive characterization of a Canadian cohort of von Hippel-Lindau disease patients. Clin Genet. 2019;96:461–467. doi: 10.1111/CGE.13613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Casar-Borota O, Boldt H, Engström B, et al. Corticotroph aggressive pituitary tumors and carcinomas frequently harbor ATRX mutations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106:1183–1194. doi: 10.1210/CLINEM/DGAA749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Asa SL, Ezzat S. Genomic approaches to problems in pituitary neoplasia. Endocr Pathol. 2014;25:209–213. doi: 10.1007/S12022-013-9276-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Weinstein LS, Yu S, Warner DR, Liu J. Endocrine manifestations of stimulatory G protein alpha-subunit mutations and the role of genomic imprinting. Endocr Rev. 2001;22:675–705. doi: 10.1210/EDRV.22.5.0439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen J, Jian X, Deng S et al (2018) Identification of recurrent USP48 and BRAF mutations in Cushing’s disease. Nat Commun 9. 10.1038/s41467-018-05275-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 23.Neou M, Villa C, Armignacco R et al (2020) Pangenomic classification of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer Cell 37. 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 24.Hayashi K, Inoshita N, Kawaguchi K, et al. The USP8 mutational status may predict drug susceptibility in corticotroph adenomas of Cushing’s disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;174:213–226. doi: 10.1530/EJE-15-0689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Asa SL, Mete O, Ezzat S. Genomics and epigenomics of pituitary tumors: What Do Pathologists Need to Know? Endocr Pathol. 2021;32:3–16. doi: 10.1007/S12022-021-09663-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Endocrine and neuroendocrine tumours [Internet]. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2022 [cited 2023, October, 12]. (WHO classification of tumours series, 5th ed.; vol. 10). Available from: https://tumourclassification.iarc.who.int/chapters/53
  • 27.Chong AS, Nikiforov YE, Condello V et al (2021) Prevalence and spectrum of DICER1 mutations in adult-onset thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 106. 10.1210/clinem/dgab025 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 28.Acquaviva G, Visani M, Repaci A, et al. Molecular pathology of thyroid tumours of follicular cells: a review of genetic alterations and their clinicopathological relevance. Histopathology. 2018;72:6–31. doi: 10.1111/HIS.13380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.González IA, Stewart DR, Schultz KAP, et al. DICER1 tumor predisposition syndrome: an evolving story initiated with the pleuropulmonary blastoma. Mod Pathol. 2022;35:4–22. doi: 10.1038/s41379-021-00905-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rooper LM, Bynum JP, Miller KP et al (2020) Recurrent DICER1 hotspot mutations in malignant thyroid gland teratomas: molecular characterization and proposal for a separate classification. Am J Surg Pathol 44. 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001430 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 31.Calebiro D, Grassi ES, Eszlinger M et al (2016) Recurrent EZH1 mutations are a second hit in autonomous thyroid adenomas. J Clin Investig 126. 10.1172/JCI84894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 32.Nikiforova MN, Nikitski A V., Panebianco F et al (2019) GLIS rearrangement is a genomic hallmark of hyalinizing trabecular tumor of the thyroid gland. Thyroid 29. 10.1089/thy.2018.0791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 33.Krohn K, Führer D, Bayer Y, et al. Molecular pathogenesis of euthyroid and toxic multinodular goiter. Endocr Rev. 2005;26:504–524. doi: 10.1210/ER.2004-0005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lumbroso S, Paris F, Sultan C. Activating Gsalpha mutations: analysis of 113 patients with signs of McCune-Albright syndrome–a European Collaborative Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:2107–2113. doi: 10.1210/JC.2003-031225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chu YH, Wirth LJ, Farahani AA et al (2020) Clinicopathologic features of kinase fusion-related thyroid carcinomas: an integrative analysis with molecular characterization. Mod Pathol 33. 10.1038/s41379-020-0638-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 36.Dogan S, Wang L, Ptashkin RN et al (2016) Mammary analog secretory carcinoma of the thyroid gland: a primary thyroid adenocarcinoma harboring ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. Mod Pathol 29. 10.1038/modpathol.2016.115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 37.Pekova B, Sykorova V, Dvorakova S et al (2020) RET, NTRK, ALK, BRAF, and MET fusions in a large cohort of pediatric papillary thyroid carcinomas. Thyroid 30. 10.1089/thy.2019.0802 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 38.Oudijk L, Gaal J, de Krijger RR. The role of immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis of succinate dehydrogenase in the diagnosis of endocrine and non-endocrine tumors and related syndromes. Endocr Pathol. 2019;30:64–73. doi: 10.1007/S12022-018-9555-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Asa SL, Mete O. Immunohistochemical biomarkers in pituitary pathology. Endocr Pathol. 2018;29:130–136. doi: 10.1007/S12022-018-9521-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Thakker RV. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) and type 4 (MEN4) Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2014;386:2–15. doi: 10.1016/J.MCE.2013.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pease M, Ling C, Mack WJ et al (2013) The role of epigenetic modification in tumorigenesis and progression of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review of the literature. PLoS One 8. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0082619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 42.Yang I, Park S, Ryu M, et al. Characteristics of gsp-positive growth hormone-secreting pituitary tumors in Korean acromegalic patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 1996;134:720–726. doi: 10.1530/EJE.0.1340720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Guo F, Wang G, Wang F et al (2018) Identification of novel genes involved in the pathogenesis of an ACTH-secreting pituitary carcinoma: a case report and literature review. Front Oncol 8. 10.3389/FONC.2018.00510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 44.Ballmann C, Thiel A, Korah HE, et al. USP8 mutations in pituitary cushing adenomas-targeted analysis by next-generation sequencing. J Endocr Soc. 2018;2:266–278. doi: 10.1210/JS.2017-00364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Li C, Xie W, Rosenblum JS et al (2020) Somatic SF3B1 hotspot mutation in prolactinomas. Nat Commun 11. 10.1038/S41467-020-16052-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 46.Papathomas TG, Gaal J, Corssmit EPM, et al. Non-pheochromocytoma (PCC)/paraganglioma (PGL) tumors in patients with succinate dehydrogenase-related PCC-PGL syndromes: a clinicopathological and molecular analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;170:1–12. doi: 10.1530/EJE-13-0623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tanizaki Y, Jin L, Scheithauer BW, et al. P53 gene mutations in pituitary carcinomas. Endocr Pathol. 2007;18:217–222. doi: 10.1007/S12022-007-9006-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.No authors listed Radio-iodine halts one type of cancer: radioactive chemical brings about history-making recovery of patient dying from thyroid tumors. Life Mag. 1949;27:54–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tallini G, Tuttle RM, Ghossein RA. The history of the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102:15–22. doi: 10.1210/JC.2016-2976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cancer Genome Atlas Research N Integrated genomic characterization of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cell. 2014;159:676–690. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Baloch ZW, Asa SL, Barletta JA, et al. Overview of the 2022 WHO classification of thyroid neoplasms. Endocr Pathol. 2022;33:27–63. doi: 10.1007/S12022-022-09707-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gasparre G, Porcelli AM, Bonora E, et al. Disruptive mitochondrial DNA mutations in complex I subunits are markers of oncocytic phenotype in thyroid tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:9001–9006. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.0703056104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Corver WE, Ruano D, Weijers K et al (2012) Genome haploidisation with chromosome 7 retention in oncocytic follicular thyroid carcinoma. PLoS One 7. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0038287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 54.Xu B, Fuchs TL, Ahmadi S, et al. International medullary thyroid carcinoma grading system: a validated grading system for medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:96–103. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Rindi G, Klimstra DS, Abedi-Ardekani B, Asa SL, Bosman FT, Brambilla E, Busam KJ, de Krijger RR, Dietel M, El-Naggar AK, Fernandez-Cuesta L, Kloppel G, McCluggage WG, Moch H, Ohgaki H, Rakha EA, Reed NS, Rous BA, Sasano H, Scarpa A, Scoazec JY, Travis WD, Tallini G, Trouillas J, van Krieken JH, Cree IA. A common classification framework for neuroendocrine neoplasms: an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and World Health Organization (WHO) expert consensus proposal. Mod Pathol. 2018;31:1770–1786. doi: 10.1038/s41379-018-0110-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Landa I, Ibrahimpasic T, Boucai L, et al. Genomic and transcriptomic hallmarks of poorly differentiated and anaplastic thyroid cancers. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:1052–1066. doi: 10.1172/JCI85271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gandolfi G, Ragazzi M, de Biase D, et al. Genome-wide profiling identifies the THYT1 signature as a distinctive feature of widely metastatic Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas. Oncotarget. 2017;9:1813–1825. doi: 10.18632/ONCOTARGET.22805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chen H, Luthra R, Routbort MJ, et al. Molecular profile of advanced thyroid carcinomas by next-generation sequencing: characterizing tumors beyond diagnosis for targeted therapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2018;17:1575–1584. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kelly LM, Barila G, Liu P et al (2014) Identification of the transforming STRN-ALK fusion asa potential therapeutic target in the aggressive forms of thyroid cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111. 10.1073/pnas.1321937111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 60.Chou A, Fraser S, Toon CW et al (2015) A detailed clinicopathologic study of ALK-translocated papillary thyroid carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 39. 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 61.Godbert Y, De Figueiredo BH, Bonichon F, et al. Remarkable response to crizotinib in woman with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:e84–e87. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.6596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Xu B, Fuchs T, Dogan S, et al. Dissecting anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: a comprehensive clinical, histologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular study of 360 cases. Thyroid. 2020;30:1505–1517. doi: 10.1089/THY.2020.0086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Xu B, David J, Dogan S, et al. Primary high-grade non-anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective study of 364 cases. Histopathology. 2022;80:322–337. doi: 10.1111/HIS.14550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ciampi R, Knauf JA, Kerler R et al (2005) Oncogenic AKAP9-BRAF fusion is a novel mechanism of MAPK pathway activation in thyroid cancer. J Clin Investig 115. 10.1172/JCI23237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 65.De Biase D, Acquaviva G, Visani M et al (2020) Molecular diagnostic of solid tumor using a next generation sequencing custom-designed multi-gene panel. Diagnostics (Basel) 10. 10.3390/DIAGNOSTICS10040250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 66.de Biase D, Torricelli F, Ragazzi M, et al. Not the same thing: metastatic PTCs have a different background than ATCs. Endocr Connect. 2018;7:1370–1379. doi: 10.1530/EC-18-0386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Subbiah V, Kreitman RJ, Wainberg ZA et al (2022) Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant anaplastic thyroid cancer: updated analysis from the phase II ROAR basket study. Ann Oncol 33. 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.12.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 68.Cameselle-Teijeiro JM, Peteiro-González D, Caneiro-Gómez J, et al. Cribriform-morular variant of thyroid carcinoma: a neoplasm with distinctive phenotype associated with the activation of the WNT/?-catenin pathway. Mod Pathol. 2018;31:1168–1179. doi: 10.1038/s41379-018-0070-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Chernock RD, Rivera B, Borrelli N et al (2020) Poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma of childhood and adolescence: a distinct entity characterized by DICER1 mutations. Mod Pathol 33. 10.1038/s41379-020-0458-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 70.Agaimy A, Witkowski L, Stoehr R et al (2020) Malignant teratoid tumor of the thyroid gland: an aggressive primitive multiphenotypic malignancy showing organotypical elements and frequent DICER1 alterations—is the term “thyroblastoma” more appropriate? Virchows Archiv 477. 10.1007/s00428-020-02853-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 71.Prasad ML, Vyas M, Horne MJ et al (2016) NTRK fusion oncogenes in pediatric papillary thyroid carcinoma in northeast United States. Cancer 122. 10.1002/cncr.29887 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 72.Kroll TG, Sarraf P, Pecciarini L, et al. PAX8-PPARgamma1 fusion oncogene in human thyroid carcinoma [corrected] Science. 2000;289:1357–1360. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5483.1357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Liaw D, Marsh DJ, Li J et al (1997) Germline mutations of the PTEN gene in Cowden disease, an inherited breast and thyroid cancer syndrome. Nat Genet 16. 10.1038/ng0597-64 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 74.Harach HR, Soubeyran I, Brown A et al (1999) Thyroid pathologic findings in patients with Cowden disease. Ann Diagn Pathol 3. 10.1016/S1092-9134(99)80011-2 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 75.Ciampi R, Mian C, Fugazzola L et al (2013) Evidence of a low prevalence of ras mutations in a large medullary thyroid cancer series. Thyroid 23. 10.1089/thy.2012.0207 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 76.Park H, Shin HC, Yang H et al (2022) Molecular classification of follicular thyroid carcinoma based on TERT promoter mutations. Mod Pathol 35. 10.1038/s41379-021-00907-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 77.Evangelisti C, de Biase D, Kurelac I et al (2015) A mutation screening of oncogenes, tumor suppressor gene TP53 and nuclear encoded mitochondrial complex I genes in oncocytic thyroid tumors. BMC Cancer 15. 10.1186/s12885-015-1122-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 78.Parma J, Duprez L, Van Sande J, et al. Somatic mutations in the thyrotropin receptor gene cause hyperfunctioning thyroid adenomas. Nature. 1993;365:649–651. doi: 10.1038/365649a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Volante M, Lam AK, Papotti M, Tallini G. Molecular pathology of poorly differentiated and anaplastic thyroid cancer: what do pathologists need to know? Endocr Pathol. 2021;32:63–76. doi: 10.1007/s12022-021-09665-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Ragazzi M, Torricelli F, Donati B et al (2021) Coexisting well-differentiated and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma in the same primary resection specimen: immunophenotypic and genetic comparison of the two components in a consecutive series of 13 cases and a review of the literature. Virchows Arch 478. 10.1007/S00428-020-02891-9 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 81.Pozdeyev N, Gay LM, Sokol ES, et al. Genetic analysis of 779 advanced differentiated and anaplastic thyroid cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:3059–3068. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Tallini G, Hsueh A, Liu S, et al. Frequent chromosomal DNA unbalance in thyroid oncocytic (Hurthle cell) neoplasms detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Lab Investig. 1999;79:547–555. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Gopal RK, Kübler K, Calvo SE et al (2018) Widespread chromosomal losses and mitochondrial DNA alterations as genetic drivers in Hürthle cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell 34. 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.06.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 84.Nikiforova MN, Lynch RA, Biddinger PW, et al. RAS point mutations and PAX8-PPAR gamma rearrangement in thyroid tumors: evidence for distinct molecular pathways in thyroid follicular carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:2318–2326. doi: 10.1210/JC.2002-021907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Abi-Raad R, Prasad ML, Adeniran AJ, Cai G (2022) Copy number variations identified in thyroid FNA specimens are associated with Hürthle cell cytomorphology. Cancer Cytopathol 130. 10.1002/cncy.22569 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 86.Xin Y, Zhao T, Wei B, et al. Intrapericardial parathyroid carcinoma: a case report. Endocrine. 2020;69:456–460. doi: 10.1007/S12020-020-02283-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Perren A, Mete O, Williams MD, Johnson SJ, Juhlin CC (2022) Parathyroid adenoma. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Endocrine and neuroendocrine tumours, 5th ed. IARC, Lyon. Available from: https://tumourclassification.iarc.who.int/chapters/53
  • 88.DeLellis RA. Parathyroid tumors and related disorders. Mod Pathol. 2011;24(Suppl 2):S78–93. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Erickson LA, Mete O. Immunohistochemistry in diagnostic parathyroid pathology. Endocr Pathol. 2018;29:113–129. doi: 10.1007/S12022-018-9527-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Gill AJ, Lim G, Cheung VKY, et al. Parafibromin-deficient (HPT-JT Type, CDC73 Mutated) parathyroid tumors demonstrate distinctive morphologic features. Am J Surg Pathol. 2019;43:35–46. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Thakker RV. Genetics of parathyroid tumours. J Intern Med. 2016;280:574–583. doi: 10.1111/JOIM.12523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Seabrook AJ, Harris JE, Velosa SB, et al. Multiple endocrine tumors associated with germline MAX mutations: multiple endocrine neoplasia type 5? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106:1163–1182. doi: 10.1210/CLINEM/DGAA957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Turchini J, Gill AJ. Hereditary parathyroid disease: sometimes pathologists do not know what they are missing. Endocr Pathol. 2020;31:218–230. doi: 10.1007/S12022-020-09631-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Brandi ML, Gagel RF, Angeli A, et al. Guidelines for diagnosis and therapy of MEN type 1 and type 2. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:5658–5671. doi: 10.1210/JCEM.86.12.8070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Rege J, Nanba K, Blinder AR, et al. Identification of somatic mutations in CLCN2 in aldosterone-producing adenomas. J Endocr Soc. 2020;4:1–9. doi: 10.1210/JENDSO/BVAA123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Åkerström T, Maharjan R, Sven Willenberg H et al (2016) Activating mutations in CTNNB1 in aldosterone producing adenomas. Sci Rep 6. 10.1038/SREP19546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 97.Di Dalmazi G, Kisker C, Calebiro D, et al. Novel somatic mutations in the catalytic subunit of the protein kinase A as a cause of adrenal Cushing’s syndrome: a European multicentric study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:E2093–E2100. doi: 10.1210/JC.2014-2152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Beuschlein F, Fassnacht M, Assié G, et al. Constitutive activation of PKA catalytic subunit in adrenal Cushing’s syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1019–1028. doi: 10.1056/NEJMOA1310359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Fassnacht M, Dekkers OM, Else T, et al. European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of adrenocortical carcinoma in adults, in collaboration with the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;179:G1–G46. doi: 10.1530/EJE-18-0608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Kamilaris CDC, Hannah-Shmouni F, Stratakis CA. Adrenocortical tumorigenesis: lessons from genetics. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;34:101428. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2020.101428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Raymond VM, Everett JN, Furtado LV, et al. Adrenocortical carcinoma is a lynch syndrome-associated cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3012–3018. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.0988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Virgone C, Andreetta M, Avanzini S et al (2020) Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas in children: data from the Italian Cooperative Study (TREP). Pediatr Blood Cancer 67. 10.1002/PBC.28332 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 103.Henry I, Jeanpierre M, Couillin P, et al. Molecular definition of the 11p15.5 region involved in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and probably in predisposition to adrenocortical carcinoma. Hum Genet. 1989;81:273–277. doi: 10.1007/BF00279003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Schmitt A, Saremaslani P, Schmid S, Rousson V, Montani M, Schmid DM, Heitz PU, Komminoth P, Perren A. IGFII and MIB1 immunohistochemistry is helpful for the differentiation of benign from malignant adrenocortical tumours. Histopathology. 2006;49:298–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02505.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Brewer K, Costa-Guda J, Arnold A. Molecular genetic insights into sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2019;26:R53–R72. doi: 10.1530/ERC-18-0304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Hong YA, Park KC, Kim BK, et al. Analyzing genetic differences between sporadic primary and secondary/tertiary hyperparathyroidism by targeted next-generation panel sequencing. Endocr Pathol. 2021;32:501–512. doi: 10.1007/S12022-021-09686-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Costa-Guda J, Marinoni I, Molatore S et al (2011) Somatic mutation and germline sequence abnormalities in CDKN1B, encoding p27Kip1, in sporadic parathyroid adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96. 10.1210/JC.2010-1338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 108.Sulaiman L, Haglund F, Hashemi J et al (2012) Genome-wide and locus specific alterations in CDC73/HRPT2-mutated parathyroid tumors. PLoS One 7. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0046325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 109.Korpi-Hyövälti E, Cranston T, Ryhänen E, et al. CDC73 intragenic deletion in familial primary hyperparathyroidism associated with parathyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:3044–3048. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-1481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Bricaire L, Odou MF, Cardot-Bauters C et al (2013) Frequent large germline HRPT2 deletions in a french national cohort of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98. 10.1210/jc.2012-2789 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 111.Haven CJ, Van Puijenbroek M, Tan MH et al (2007) Identification of MEN1 and HRPT2 somatic mutations in paraffin-embedded (sporadic) parathyroid carcinomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 67. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02894.x [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 112.Cetani F, Ambrogini E, Viacava P, et al. Should parafibromin staining replace HRTP2 gene analysis as an additional tool for histologic diagnosis of parathyroid carcinoma? Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;156:547–554. doi: 10.1530/EJE-06-0720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Hunt JL, Carty SE, Yim JH et al (2005) Allelic loss in parathyroid neoplasia can help characterize malignancy. Am J Surg Pathol 29. 10.1097/01.pas.0000166368.68459.99 [PubMed]
  • 114.Gill AJ, Clarkson A, Gimm O, et al. Loss of nuclear expression of parafibromin distinguishes parathyroid carcinomas and hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor (HPT-JT) syndrome-related adenomas from sporadic parathyroid adenomas and hyperplasias. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30:1140–1149. doi: 10.1097/01.PAS.0000209827.39477.4F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Hu Y, Zhang X, Wang O, et al. The genomic profile of parathyroid carcinoma based on whole-genome sequencing. Int J Cancer. 2020;147:2446–2457. doi: 10.1002/IJC.33166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Cryns VL, Rubio MP, Thor AD et al (1994) p53 abnormalities in human parathyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78. 10.1210/jcem.78.6.8200932 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 117.Pandya C, Uzilov A V., Bellizzi J et al (2017) Genomic profiling reveals mutational landscape in parathyroid carcinomas. JCI Insight 2. 10.1172/jci.insight.92061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 118.Kang H, Pettinga D, Schubert AD et al (2019) Genomic profiling of parathyroid carcinoma reveals genomic alterations suggesting benefit from therapy. Oncologist 24. 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 119.Haven CJ, van Puijenbroek M, Karperien M, et al. Differential expression of the calcium sensing receptor and combined loss of chromosomes 1q and 11q in parathyroid carcinoma. J Pathol. 2004;202:86–94. doi: 10.1002/PATH.1489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Condello V, Cetani F, Denaro M et al (2021) Gene expression profile in metastatic and non-metastatic parathyroid carcinoma. Endocr Relat Cancer 28. 10.1530/ERC-20-0337 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 121.Starker LF, Svedlund J, Udelsman R, et al. The DNA methylome of benign and malignant parathyroid tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2011;50:735–745. doi: 10.1002/GCC.20895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Hodgson A, Pakbaz S, Mete O. A diagnostic approach to adrenocortical tumors. Surg Pathol Clin. 2019;12:967–995. doi: 10.1016/j.path.2019.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Carney JA, Hruska LS, Beauchamp GD, Gordon H (1986) Dominant inheritance of the complex of myxomas, spotty pigmentation, and endocrine overactivity. Mayo Clin Proc 61. 10.1016/S0025-6196(12)61843-6 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 124.Assié G, Libé R, Espiard S et al (2013) ARMC5 mutations in macronodular adrenal hyperplasia with cushing’s syndrome. N Engl J Med 369. 10.1056/nejmoa1304603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 125.Matyakhina L, Freedman RJ, Bourdeau I et al (2005) Hereditary leiomyomatosis associated with bilateral, massive, macronodular adrenocortical disease and atypical cushing syndrome: a clinical and molecular genetic investigation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90. 10.1210/jc.2004-2377 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 126.Juhlin CC, Bertherat J, Giordano TJ, et al. What did we learn from the molecular biology of adrenal cortical neoplasia? From histopathology to translational genomics. Endocr Pathol. 2021;32:102–133. doi: 10.1007/s12022-021-09667-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Wannachalee T, Zhao L, Nanba K, et al. Three discrete patterns of primary aldosteronism lateralization in response to cosyntropin during adrenal vein sampling. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104:5867–5876. doi: 10.1210/JC.2019-01182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Azizan EAB, Lam BYH, Newhouse SJ et al (2012) Microarray, qPCR, and KCNJ5 sequencing of aldosterone-producing adenomas reveal differences in genotype and phenotype between zona glomerulosa- and zona fasciculata-like tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97. 10.1210/JC.2011-2965 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 129.Faillot S, Foulonneau T, Néou M et al (2021) Genomic classification of benign adrenocortical lesions. Endocr Relat Cancer 28. 10.1530/ERC-20-0128 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 130.Mulatero P, Schiavi F, Williams TA, et al. ARMC5 mutation analysis in patients with primary aldosteronism and bilateral adrenal lesions. J Hum Hypertens. 2016;30:374–378. doi: 10.1038/JHH.2015.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.de Krijger RE, Bertherat J. 5th International ACC Symposium: Classification of adrenocortical cancers from pathology to integrated genomics: real advances or lost in translation? Horm Cancer. 2016;7:3–8. doi: 10.1007/s12672-015-0242-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Assié G, Letouzé E, Fassnacht M et al (2014) Integrated genomic characterization of adrenocortical carcinoma. Nat Genet 46. 10.1038/ng.2953 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 133.Zheng S, Cherniack AD, Dewal N, et al. Comprehensive pan-genomic characterization of adrenocortical carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2016;29:723–736. doi: 10.1016/J.CCELL.2016.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Assié G, Jouinot A, Fassnacht M, et al. Value of molecular classification for prognostic assessment of adrenocortical carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:1440–1447. doi: 10.1001/JAMAONCOL.2019.1558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Juhlin CC, Villablanca A, Sandelin K et al (2007) Parafibromin immunoreactivity: its use as an additional diagnostic marker for parathyroid tumor classification. Endocr Relat Cancer 14. 10.1677/ERC-07-0021. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 136.Espiard S, Drougat L, Libé R et al (2015) ARMC5 mutations in a large cohort of primary macronodular adrenal hyperplasia: clinical and functional consequences. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100. 10.1210/jc.2014-4204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 137.Espiard S, Vantyghem MC, Assié G et al (2020) Frequency and incidence of carney complex manifestations: a prospective multicenter study with a three-year follow-up. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105. 10.1210/clinem/dgaa002 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 138.Choi M, Scholl UI, Yue P, et al. K+ channel mutations in adrenal aldosterone-producing adenomas and hereditary hypertension. Science. 2011;331:768–772. doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.1198785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Beuschlein F, Boulkroun S, Osswald A, et al. Somatic mutations in ATP1A1 and ATP2B3 lead to aldosterone-producing adenomas and secondary hypertension. Nat Genet. 2013;45:440–444. doi: 10.1038/NG.2550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Scholl UI, Stölting G, Nelson-Williams C, et al. Recurrent gain of function mutation in calcium channel CACNA1H causes early-onset hypertension with primary aldosteronism. Elife. 2015;4:e06315. doi: 10.7554/ELIFE.06315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Scholl UI, Stölting G, Schewe J, et al. CLCN2 chloride channel mutations in familial hyperaldosteronism type II. Nat Genet. 2018;50:349–354. doi: 10.1038/S41588-018-0048-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Lenzini L, Rossitto G, Maiolino G, et al. A meta-analysis of somatic KCNJ5 K(+) channel mutations in 1636 patients with an aldosterone-producing adenoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:E1089–E1095. doi: 10.1210/JC.2015-2149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Juhlin CC, Goh G, Healy JM, et al. Whole-exome sequencing characterizes the landscape of somatic mutations and copy number alterations in adrenocortical carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:E493–E502. doi: 10.1210/JC.2014-3282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Giordano TJ, Kuick R, Else T, et al. Molecular classification and prognostication of adrenocortical tumors by transcriptome profiling. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:668–676. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Fishbein L, Leshchiner I, Walter V, et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Cancer Cell. 2017;31:181–193. doi: 10.1016/J.CCELL.2017.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Papathomas TG, Suurd DPD, Pacak K, et al. What have we learned from molecular biology of paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas? Endocr Pathol. 2021;32:134–153. doi: 10.1007/S12022-020-09658-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Turchini J, Cheung VKY, Tischler AS, et al. Pathology and genetics of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Histopathology. 2018;72:97–105. doi: 10.1111/HIS.13402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Ebbehoj A, Stochholm K, Jacobsen SF, et al. Incidence and clinical presentation of pheochromocytoma and sympathetic paraganglioma: a population-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106:E2251–E2261. doi: 10.1210/CLINEM/DGAA965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Bholah R, Bunchman TE (2017) Review of pediatric pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Front Pediatr 5. 10.3389/FPED.2017.00155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 150.de Tersant M, Généré L, Freyçon C et al (2020) Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma in children and adolescents: experience of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology (SFCE). J Endocr Soc 4. 10.1210/JENDSO/BVAA039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 151.Erickson D, Kudva YC, Ebersold MJ, et al. Benign paragangliomas: clinical presentation and treatment outcomes in 236 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:5210–5216. doi: 10.1210/JCEM.86.11.8034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Dannenberg H, van Nederveen FH, Abbou M, et al. Clinical characteristics of pheochromocytoma patients with germline mutations in SDHD. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1894–1901. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Smith JD, Harvey RN, Darr OA, et al. Head and neck paragangliomas: a two-decade institutional experience and algorithm for management. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2017;2:380–389. doi: 10.1002/LIO2.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Bernardo-Castiñeira C, Valdés N, Sierra MI, et al. SDHC promoter methylation, a novel pathogenic mechanism in parasympathetic paragangliomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103:295–305. doi: 10.1210/JC.2017-01702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Settas N, Faucz FR, Stratakis CA. Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) deficiency, Carney triad and the epigenome. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2018;469:107–111. doi: 10.1016/J.MCE.2017.07.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Burnichon N, Buffet A, Parfait B, et al. Somatic NF1 inactivation is a frequent event in sporadic pheochromocytoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:5397–5405. doi: 10.1093/HMG/DDS374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Welander J, Larsson C, Bäckdahl M, et al. Integrative genomics reveals frequent somatic NF1 mutations in sporadic pheochromocytomas. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:5406–5416. doi: 10.1093/HMG/DDS402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Dahia PLM, Ross KN, Wright ME, et al. A HIF1alpha regulatory loop links hypoxia and mitochondrial signals in pheochromocytomas. PLoS Genet. 2005;1:0072–0080. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PGEN.0010008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Boedeker CC, Hensen EF, Neumann HPH, et al. Genetics of hereditary head and neck paragangliomas. Head Neck. 2014;36:907–916. doi: 10.1002/HED.23436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Virchows Archiv are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES