Skip to main content
Journal of Insect Science logoLink to Journal of Insect Science
. 2024 Mar 19;24(2):12. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieae026

Limited genetic variability and spatial population structure in grasshoppers between natural and metal-contaminated areas in Egypt

Mustafa Soliman 1,, Abdulrhman Almadiy 2, Rasha Al-Akeel 3, Thomas Hesselberg 4,5, Amr Mohamed 6,7,
Editor: Russell Jurenka
PMCID: PMC10949439  PMID: 38501856

Abstract

Pollutants in an environment can have long-term implications for the species living there, resulting in local adaptations with implications for their genetic structure. Heavy metal pollutants infiltrate soils and groundwater, bioaccumulate in food webs, and negatively impact biota. In this study, we investigated the degree to which the genetic structure and variability of the slender green-winged grasshopper (Aiolopus thalassinus (Fabricius) (Orthoptera: Acrididae)) were impacted by heavy metal pollution and distance. We used the random amplified polymorphic DNA-polymerase chain reaction (RAPD-PCR) method to examine the genetic variability of populations in 3 heavy metal-polluted and 3 unpolluted locations across varying geographical distances in Egypt. The heavy metal concentrations of cadmium, copper, lead, and zinc were measured from the grasshopper tissue and soils. Sixty-nine unique and polymorphic bands were produced by 4 primers. Cluster and principal component analyses separated the populations inside and outside Cairo into 2 main branches, which were further divided into smaller branches corresponding to their geographical regions. We found no differences in the Shannon genetic diversity index between populations or with increasing heavy metal concentrations in either the soil or the grasshopper tissue. Our results showed a greater genetic variation among populations than between populations within the same location, indicating populations within locations were less differentiated than those between locations. The moderate correlation between genetic similarity and spatial distance suggests geographical isolation influenced grasshopper population differentiation. Based on the RAPD analysis, environmental pollutants and geographical distances impact the A. thalassinus population structure, potentially restricting gene flow between sites even at small spatial scales.

Keywords: RAPD-PCR, genetic variability, Aiolopus thalassinus, heavy metal pollution, geographical distances

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Wide-ranging effects of environmental pollution include contaminating the atmosphere, soil, and water, as well as exposing all living things to a wide range of potential stressors, including heavy metal and metalloid contaminants (Wasi et al. 2013). The impacts of heavy metal contamination on different environmental settings and living systems are detailed elsewhere (Wu et al. 2016). Heavy metal contaminants are highly reactive and frequently toxic in low concentrations and have been shown to be able to travel long distances (Briffa et al. 2020). This implies that habitats and species from less anthropogenically disturbed regions—that is, places with less agriculture, developed industries, or urbanization—are also susceptible to pollution. Overall, the significant changes that humans have brought about to ecosystems include the fast loss of biodiversity, the geographic relocation of species, and biotic homogenization (Sigmund et al. 2023). These factors, taken together, may cause the sixth mass extinction to occur on Earth (Cowie et al. 2022).

A straightforward and efficient way to track down the sources of heavy metal pollution involves first conducting a sampling analysis in the areas (geolocations) where pollution sources are present. Geographic information system techniques are used to map specific areas or settings for contamination (Hou et al. 2017). These include using the global positioning system to obtain longitude and latitude coordinates and may involve advanced remote sensing techniques. The geostatistical method can then effectively and usefully describe the spatial variation of the source data by interpolating a number of data points. Spatial variation function models (exponential function models, Gauss, spherical, etc.) and spatial interpolation techniques (such as kriging, ordinary, and simple) are among the models the geostatistical method comprises (Hou et al. 2017, Kumar et al. 2019). The impact of pollution sources (source distance and buffering zones, land use, urban industry layouts, transportation roads, waste irrigation, mining areas, landfills, etc.) on soil heavy metal pollution is extensively studied through this type of research, which has shown enormous progress (Weissmannová and Pavlovský 2017, Wang et al. 2021). For example, monitoring studies on soil heavy metal contamination indicated that the distance between the sampling sites and the sources of pollution is a crucial parameter (Soliman et al. 2022). The amount of heavy metal pollution will typically decrease exponentially with distance from the source. Chemometric methods like correlation and principal component analysis (PCA) methods are used to identify pollution sources (Inobeme et al. 2022). Various studies have linked genetic and geographic distances effectively using the geolocation approach (Lagisz et al. 2010, Vidal et al. 2019, Li et al. 2023). But focusing solely on geolocation would only highlight patterns of isolation based on distance; adding pollution as a covariate enables researchers to examine the additional ways that anthropogenic environmental change affects gene flow and population connectivity (Pedrosa et al. 2017, Gouin et al. 2019).

Genetic changes in natural populations represent subtle outcomes of anthropogenic toxicants in the environment, with substantial long-term implications (Li et al. 2019). Various forms of pollution can significantly alter the genetic composition of populations and influence genetic variation through 4 primary mechanisms: (i) increased mutation rates; (ii) directional selection favoring tolerant genotypes; (iii) genetic bottlenecks; and (iv) altered migration patterns (Mussali-Galante et al. 2014). Numerous studies have examined contaminant exposure effects on the genetics of both terrestrial (Grzywacz et al. 2012, Giska et al. 2015, Renault et al. 2023) and aquatic (Gouin et al. 2019, 2023, Švara et al. 2022) populations. In addition to toxicants, natural phenomena like mutations, selection, stochastic processes, and migration can modify the genetic variability of populations (Mussali-Galante et al. 2014). Notably, gene flow is augmented through individual movement between populations, hybridization, and nucleotide substitutions, contributing to the complex dynamics shaping genetic variability (Ringbauer et al. 2018).

Comparing genotypes of the same species from polluted and unpolluted sites can reveal altered gene frequencies with physiological or ecological implications (Grzywacz et al. 2012). Advances in techniques directly revealing genetic variation at the DNA level have enabled exploring relationships between genetics and ecotoxicology for risk assessment (Williams et al. 1990, Babu et al. 2013, da Silva et al. 2023). The discovery that PCR with a single arbitrary primer can amplify varyingly sized DNA fragments in any genome facilitated the development of genetic markers (Williams et al. 1990, Babu et al. 2013). This technique has been widely used to identify polymorphisms in various organisms, including grasshoppers (Chapco et al. 1992, Silveira et al. 1998, Zhang and Kang 2005, Sesarini and Remis 2008, Miño et al. 2010, Jamal et al. 2020).

The popularity of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) stems from its ability to generate numerous polymorphic loci from minimal DNA without prior template knowledge (Babu et al. 2013). RAPD markers effectively distinguish geographically and genetically isolated populations within species, elucidating populations arising through drift or selection under varying conditions (Vaughn and Antolin 1998, González et al. 2007, Kil 2015, Mohammadi Sharif et al. 2022). In Egypt, Aiolopus thalassinus is a predominant grasshopper species with wide Palearctic, Afrotropical, Oriental, and Australian distribution (Hollis 1968, GBIF Secretariat 2023). Both nymphs and adults occur year-round, feeding on plants and providing food for diverse predators (Schmidt 1986, Mückstein and Vlk 2015).

This study investigates heavy metal accumulation in A. thalassinus across an industrial pollution gradient. A previous study has shown that A. thalassinus serves as an ecological bioindicator for Cd, Pb, Cu, and Zn pollution (Yousef et al. 2017). Stable populations at contaminated sites suggest a remarkable heavy metal tolerance through efficient detoxification and/or adaptation. However, the extent of genetic variation remains unknown. Therefore, the present study aimed to analyze genetic diversity among A. thalassinus populations from polluted and unpolluted locations across geographical distances. Through this first exploration of the genetics of A. thalassinus, we further aimed to determine whether the genetic similarity between populations correlates with their proximity and to identify any associations between genetic diversity and environmental pollution levels.

Materials and Methods

Sampling Sites

Specimens of the slender green-winged grasshopper (A. thalassinus) were sampled from 6 metapopulations with varying heavy metal pollution. Three populations were situated in areas associated with higher pollution in Greater Cairo: Al-Tebbin (31.293547°N, 29.762689°E), El-Gabal El-Asfar (31.374058°N, 30.217489°E), and Abou Katada (31.195571°N, 30.031577°E). Three additional populations from other governorates—Wadi El-Natroon (30.303553°N, 30.424499°E) in Al-Beheira, Serapium (32.23665°N, 30.48085°E) in Ismailiya, and El-Manzala (31.792649°N, 31.387418°E) in Dakahlieh—were considered relatively unpolluted (Fig. 1). Greater Cairo encompasses 928 km2 near the Nile River within Cairo, Giza, and Qaliubiah governorates (El Araby 2002).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

A map of Egypt displays the locations where populations were collected.

Collection and Preparation of Samples

Using insect nets, 200 adult A. thalassinus specimens of both sexes were collected from agroecosystems during the summer season. Specimens were transported to the laboratory alive, killed by freezing, and then stored at −20 °C for 6 months before analysis. Concurrently, upper soil samples (0–15 cm) were randomly obtained from each site, thoroughly mixed, and stored in plastic bags. Insect and soil samples were dried at 70 °C to a constant mass, ground to a fine powder, and stored at room temperature. Before grounding insect samples, one leg was dissected from the first thoracic segment of each insect specimen for DNA extraction. We used sterile dissection tools, cleaned with a 10% sodium hypochlorite solution, followed by 70% ethanol between each sample to prevent cross-contamination.

Trace Metals Analysis

Aiolopus thalassinus samples were digested according to Soliman et al. (2022). After predigestion with 10 ml of 65% HNO3 for 24 h at room temperature, 0.5 g of insect samples were further digested and evaporated at 90 °C to near dryness. Then, 2 ml of 30% H2O2 was added and reheated to near dryness. Flask walls were washed with 10 ml of ultrapure water, filtered through Whatman #41 filter paper into a 25-ml volumetric flask, diluted, and stored at 4 °C until analysis. Soil samples underwent similar digestion but stood for 24 h with a 12 ml of 37% HCl:65% HNO3 (3:1) mixture. Then, 2.5 ml of 37% HCl and 2.5 ml of 30% H2O2 were added to complete digestion before dilution to 50 ml. Metal (Cd, Pb, Cu, and Zn) concentrations were determined by inductively coupled plasma (ICP-AES). All glassware was acid-washed prior to use. Chemicals were analytical grade (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).

DNA Extraction and RAPD Amplification

The recommendations of Black and DuTeau (1997) for efficient RAPD-PCR analysis in genetic studies involving insect populations were closely followed. To prevent contamination, DNA extraction and PCR setup were performed in separate, dedicated rooms using dedicated pipettes. Filter tips were used for all pipetting. Genomic DNA was pooled and extracted from 9 to 20 legs/population to avoid cross-contamination with foreign DNA using the QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) per the manufacturer. Twenty RAPD primers (Operon Technologies, Alameda, California, USA) were tested (Supplementary Material 1). Amplification was performed using GoTaq Flexi DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). Reaction mixtures contained 50 ng DNA, 5× Green Buffer, 0.75 mM MgCl2, 1.25 U polymerase, 30 pmol primer, and 0.5 mM dNTPs in a 25-μl total volume. Thermocycling comprised initial denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min, then 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 45 s, annealing at 36 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 2 min, followed by final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. Amplified products were separated by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gels alongside a 100-bp ladder (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), stained with GelRed (Biotium, Fremont, California, USA), and visualized under UV. Images were digitally captured (BioRad Gel Doc; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., California, USA).

Data Analysis

Each DNA fragment generated using RAPD primers was regarded as a binary unit character. A score of “1” was assigned for the presence of a fragment, while “0” denoted its absence. To assess the informativeness of these primers, the discriminatory power percentage was computed as the ratio of the number of unique bands produced by each primer to the total number of unique bands across all primers, following the methodology outlined by Grundmann et al. (1995). Furthermore, the Shannon genetic diversity index was calculated for the amplified nucleotide fragments within each population, employing 4 distinct primers, namely OP N-02, OP H-08, OP J-11, and OP D-08. The computational analysis was performed using BioNumerics software version 7.5 (Applied Maths NV, Belgium).

Shannon diversity index Hs was calculated as:

Hs=ni=1hiHlnhiH

Here, “n” represents the total number of bands within the population, “hi” signifies the intensity of each individual band “i,” and “H” denotes the cumulative intensity of all bands in the population. Since its implementation in population genetics research in the 1970s, the Shannon index has been extensively utilized and validated as a metric of genetic diversity across populations (Konopiński 2020). Jaccard’s coefficient of similarity was also calculated using BioNumerics version 7.5 based on the presence and absence of amplified DNA fragments. The formula for Jaccard’s coefficient is as follows:

J=aa+b+c

where “a” is the number of bands present in both populations, “b” is the number of bands present only in population 1, and “c” is the number of bands present only in population 2. Subsequently, a dendrogram was constructed to visually represent the relationships among all populations and subpopulations based on scorable bands from primer OPN-02. This dendrogram was generated using the unweighted pair group method of arithmetic mean (UPGMA). For a more comprehensive understanding of the genetic variation at 2 hierarchical levels, namely the population and subpopulation, an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was carried out using the Arlequin software version 3.5 (Excoffier and Lischer 2010). Principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted on all populations and subpopulations to assess their geographical relationships. The Shannon genetic diversity index was compared between populations of polluted and control sites with a linear mixed effect model (LMM) with the site as a random variable using the lmer() function in R (R version 4.2.2; 2022). P-values were estimated with the Type II Wald chi-square tests. Similar LMMs were developed to test the relationship between heavy metal pollution levels (in both soil and grasshopper tissue) and Shannon genetic diversity index values. The Kruskal-Wallis H-test was employed to assess significant variations in metal concentrations (in both soil and tissue) among the 6 locations. This analysis was then followed by conducting pairwise comparisons using the Mann–Whitney U-test. The nonparametric Spearman’s rank correlation test was used between geographical distances and Jaccard’s similarity coefficients for the populations. PCA, Kruskal–Wallis H-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and correlation analyses were executed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 27 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results and Discussion

Trace Metal Accumulation

Metal concentrations were generally lower in grasshopper tissues than in corresponding soil samples, except for Cu and Zn at most sites (Fig. 2). However, statistically significant differences in metal concentrations occurred between the 6 locations for both soil and tissue samples (H = 12.485–15.690, P < 0.05 for soil; H = 12.789–15.418, P < 0.05 for tissues). Focusing on specific geographical areas, Al-Tebbin and El-Gabal Al-Asfar in Greater Cairo exhibited higher heavy metal levels in soil and grasshopper tissues compared to other sites. This was especially evident for Al-Tebbin. Alternatively, locations outside Cairo (Wadi El-Natroon, Serapium, and El-Manzala) showed relatively lower concentrations, with Wadi El-Natroon having the lowest levels. Previous research thoroughly documented heavy metal exposure in these polluted areas. Al-Tebbin lies in an industrial zone south of Cairo (Fig. 1) with metallurgical, chemical, and cement production (Gomaa et al. 2020). Since 1923, El-Gabal Al-Asfar has received irrigation from wastewater effluent (Gemail 2012). Heavy metal accumulation in these soils poses major environmental threats.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Metal concentrations in soils and grasshoppers. Data are presented as mean ± SD in mg/kg dry weight. Boxes followed by different black letters denote significant differences in metal concentrations in soils between the 6 locations (Mann–Whitney U-test, P ≤ 0.05). Boxes followed by different orange letters denote significant differences in metal concentrations in grasshopper tissues between the different sites (Mann–Whitney U-test, P ≤ 0.05).

RAPD-PCR Analysis of the A. thalassinus Populations

Twenty carefully selected primers were used to evaluate polymorphism among 14 A. thalassinus populations. Only 4 primers produced clear amplification, while 16 failed to amplify. Consequently, all populations were analyzed with OP N-02, OP H-08, OP J-11, and OP D-08 (Supplementary Material 1). Each primer underwent duplicate amplification, considering only bright, reproducible bands. These 4 primers generated 69 scorable polymorphic bands within 190–2,111 bp, averaging 17 bands per primer and effectively discriminating populations. Primer OP N-02 produced the most bands (23), while OP D-08 yielded the fewest (9). Primer OP J-11 generated the largest band (2111 bp), and OP H-08 produced the smallest (189.71 bp). All primers consistently detected polymorphisms (100% success rate). In terms of discriminatory power, percentages were 33.3% for OP N-02, 28.9% for OP H-08, 24.6% for OP J-11, and 13.0% for OP D-08. With 23 polymorphic bands, OP N-02 was the most informative primer and was selected for comparing A. thalassinus populations, which showed distinct band patterns.

Genetic Diversity and Differentiation of A. thalassinus Populations

The potential impacts of toxicants on genetic diversity within natural populations encompass a wide spectrum (Mussali-Galante et al. 2014, Dornbos and LaPres, 2018, Li et al. 2023). It has been documented that populations exposed to heavy metal pollution can exhibit varying responses, leading to either an increase or decrease in their genetic variation. An illustrative case can be found in the long-horned groundhopper, Tetrix tenuicornis (Sahlberg) (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae), where individuals collected from metal-polluted regions in Boleslaw, Poland, displayed reduced genetic variability compared to populations from unpolluted areas (Grzywacz et al. 2012). Conversely, in a study by Giska et al. (2015), the highest genetic diversity was observed in the rove beetle, Staphylinus erythropterus Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae), populations inhabiting a heavily metal-polluted site in southern Poland. However, our study did not find any differences in genetic diversity between heavy metal-polluted sites and control sites (LMM: χ2 = 1.33, df = 1, P = 0.25), except that the control site Wadi El-Natroon appeared to have lower genetic diversity than other sites (Fig. 3). Similarly, none of the metals analyzed in both soil and A. thalassinus showed a significant correlation with population genetic diversity (all linear mixed effect models had P > 0.05) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

The genetic diversity index of Aiolopus thalassinus populations averaged per site (N = 3 populations per site, except for El-Manzala and Serapium, which had N = 1 population each). The first 3 sites (colored red) are the polluted sites, while the last 3 (colored blue) are the nonpolluted sites. The Shannon genetic diversity index was calculated for the amplified nucleotide fragments of each population in the 4 primers (OP N-02, OP H-08, OP J-11, and OP D-08).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

The relationship between the Shannon genetic diversity index of Aiolopus thalassinus populations and metal concentrations (measured in mg metal per kg dry mass). The figures on the left hand show the metal concentration in soil, and the figures on the right hand show the metal concentration in grasshopper tissue (N = 14 for each). The symbols indicate the different sites (stars—Wadi El-Natroon, crosses—El-Manzala, squares—El-Gabal Al-Asfar, ticked squares—Serapium, circles—Abou Katada, triangles—Al-Tebbin). The Shannon genetic diversity index was calculated for the amplified nucleotide fragments of each population in the 4 primers (OP N-02, OP H-08, OP J-11, and OP D-08).

Based on RAPD markers, a UPGMA dendrogram was constructed using Jaccard’s similarity coefficient to visually depict the interrelationships among populations of A. thalassinus (Supplementary Material 2). Six populations formed 5 major branches, closely corresponding to their respective geographical distributional regions: Al-Tebbin, Abou Katada, El-Gabal, Wadi El-Natroon and Serapium, and El-Manzala. Subsequent exploration of gene flow among A. thalassinus populations was undertaken by analyzing population genetic structures. An AMOVA analysis revealed that genetic variation among populations (67.6%) was greater than the variation between subpopulations (32.4%), indicating less genetic differentiation between populations within regions compared to those between regions (Table 1).

Table 1.

AMOVA (molecular analysis of variance) output for 4 geographic populations of Aiolopus thalassinus (K, T, G, and N) relying on RAPD markers

Source of variation df SSD Variance component % total variance P-value
Among populations 3 26.28 2.73 67.60 <0.0001
Among subpopulations 7 9.16 1.30 32.40 <0.0001
Total 10 35.45 4.04

Statistics included degrees of freedom (df), sum of squared differences (SSD), variance component estimates, percentages of total variance (% total variance) contributed by the variance component, and the probability (P) of obtaining a more extreme component estimate by chance. The P-value is estimated from 1,023 sampling permutations.

Migration likely played an important role in gene flow and genetic diversity across geographical populations. Thus, the relatively high genetic variance among populations in our study could be explained by the absence or short-distance migration of A. thalassinus (Heifetz and Applebaum 1995). Our findings were similar to those for the redlegged grasshopper Melanoplus femurrubrum (De Geer) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) (Chapco et al. 1992), where genetic variability between populations was slightly higher than within populations. However, this contrasts with the migratory locust Locusta migratoria (Linnaeus) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) (Zhang and Kang 2005), which showed no difference in genetic variability between populations, likely due to its migratory nature.

Geographic isolation is a key factor contributing to population differentiation, as greater geographical distances between populations lead to decreased gene flow and increased differentiation (Liu et al. 2019). However, in the present study, clustering analysis divided the 6 regional populations into 2 primary clusters: The first cluster comprised populations from Greater Cairo (Al-Tebbin, El-Gabal, and Abou Katada), while the second cluster consisted of populations located outside of Cairo (Wadi El-Natroon, Serapium, and El-Manzala) (Supplementary Material 2). Despite the limited geographical area encompassed, all of the Cairo populations exhibited differentiation from one another, indicating constrained gene flow between them. Furthermore, the populations of Wadi El-Natroon and Serapium, which are situated relatively far apart from each other yet in proximity to the Cairo populations (Fig. 1), clustered with the northern population of El-Manzala in the UPGMA dendrogram. This implies that local conditions such as pollution, in addition to geographical distances, exert a substantial influence on the A. thalassinus population structure and may profoundly impact gene flow between sites, even on a very small spatial scale. Moreover, inhabiting an anthropogenic environment, such as an urban landscape, can potentially impact the dispersal ability of organisms. Urban areas often present barriers to dispersal, such as buildings, roads, and other infrastructure, which can limit gene flow between populations (Johnson and Munshi-South 2017). In contrast, rural areas may provide a more conserved and interconnected environment, facilitating gene flow and reducing genetic differentiation between populations.

Alterations in genetic variability can also result from adaptation to contaminated environments and prolonged exposure to genotoxic chemical agents (Mussali-Galante et al. 2014, Gouin et al. 2019). Mutations that impede primer binding or otherwise interfere with the amplification process can reveal this variation when using the RAPD technique (Butovskaia et al. 2009). By evaluating DNA polymorphism, researchers can identify population genetic responses to toxicant exposure (Grzywacz et al. 2012, Babu et al. 2013). Therefore, the RAPD analysis employed in this study has the potential to detect genetic changes in A. thalassinus related to adaptation and response to pollution and contamination in their habitats. As per the World Health Organization (2006), Cairo has gained recognition as one of the most severely air-polluted cities globally. Studies carried out by the National Environmental Board have revealed that the annual average of the air quality index in Cairo surpasses the maximum acceptable tolerance level by 3-fold (UNCT 2022). Considering this significant environmental challenge, it is plausible to speculate that a portion of the observed genetic variation in A. thalassinus populations can be attributed to the selective pressures exerted by the presence of environmental pollutants in Cairo. Principal component analysis (PCA) provided additional support for the population division observed in the cluster analysis (Fig. 5). The PCA results revealed notable distinctions between populations within and outside Cairo. Moreover, the population of Al-Tebbin, recognized as one of Egypt’s most significant industrial zones, exhibited discernible dissimilarity from the other 2 populations within Cairo.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Principal components chart for 13 geographic populations and subpopulations of the Aiolopus thalassinus: Abou Katada (K1, K2, and K3), Al-Tebbin (T1, T2, and T3), El-Gabal Al-Asfar (G1 and G2), Wadi El-Natroon (N1, N2, and N3), Serapium (S), and El-Manzala (E).

Our RAPD analysis suggests the occurrence of gene flow among the 3 populations located outside the Greater Cairo area. In contrast, our observations indicate that gene flow within the populations of Greater Cairo may be relatively constrained. To investigate the potential geographic distribution of genetic diversity, we conducted Spearman’s rank correlation analysis between genetic similarity and geographical distances. This analysis aims to shed light on the influence of geographic separation on genetic diversity patterns within these populations. The results revealed a moderate level of correlation in the primer examined (r = –0.403, P < 0.001) (Fig. 6). These results suggest that population differentiation cannot be solely attributed to the degree of geographical isolation. While geographical distances may play a role, environmental pollutants likely contribute to the reduction of genetic variability in the A. thalassinus population.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

The correlation between Jaccard’s similarity coefficients of Aiolopus thalassinus populations based on scorable bands from primer OPN-02 and their corresponding geographic distances. The values of the Spearman’s rank-order correlation coefficient test (r), degree of freedom (df), and probability (P) are listed above.

The present findings provide supporting evidence for the assessment of interpopulation variability using RAPD analysis. Contrary to the hypotheses put forth by Ross et al. (2002), Zhiyi and Haowen (2004), and Maes et al. (2005), our data did not reveal a clear correlation between heavy metal pollution and genetic diversity. It is important to note that since multiple pollutants coexist in the environment, the individual impact of each metal on genetic diversity may not be easily discernible. Rather, the combined and synergistic effects of these pollutants may exert diverse levels of stress on populations. Therefore, in contrast to the conclusions drawn by these authors, it appears that both geographical distances and environmental pollutants, in general, influence the genetic diversity of A. thalassinus populations. Findings would aid in the genetic monitoring and ecological risk assessment of terrestrial ecosystems facing contamination. Further multiseasonal sampling and high-resolution genetic analysis of A. thalassinus across broader spatial scales would augment our understanding of adaptation, migration, and gene flow.

Supplementary Material

ieae026_suppl_Supplementary_Materials_1
ieae026_suppl_Supplementary_Materials_2

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Prof. James L. Nation, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences and Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, USA, for his diligent proofreading of this article. Amr Mohamed (A.M.) is a research fellow—not a formal employee—at the King Saud University Museum of Arthropods (KSMA), King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. A.M. acknowledges Prof. Hathal M. Al Dhafer, the curator of the KSMA, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia, and the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University, for their kind support of the work. The authors also thank Applied Maths NV for kindly providing us with the BioNumerics v7.5 software package.

Contributor Information

Mustafa Soliman, Department of Entomology, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt.

Abdulrhman Almadiy, Department of Biology, College of Science and Arts, Najran University, Najran 1988, Saudi Arabia.

Rasha Al-Akeel, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.

Thomas Hesselberg, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Department for Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Amr Mohamed, King Saud University Museum of Arthropods, Plant Protection Department, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, 200 Central Park West, New York, NY 10024, USA.

Funding

This work was financially supported in part by the Scientific Research Sector at Cairo University.

Author Contributions

Mustafa Soliman (Conceptualization [lead], Data curation [lead], Formal analysis [lead], Funding acquisition [equal], Investigation [lead], Methodology [equal], Software [lead], Validation [equal], Writing—original draft [lead], Writing—review & editing [equal]), Abdulrhman Almadiy (Funding acquisition [supporting], Investigation [supporting], Resources [supporting], Validation [supporting], Writing—review & editing [supporting]), Rasha Al-Akeel (Formal analysis [supporting], Funding acquisition [supporting], Investigation [supporting], Resources [supporting], Validation [supporting]), Thomas Hesselberg (Conceptualization [supporting], Data curation [equal], Formal analysis [supporting], Methodology [equal], Software [equal], Validation [supporting], Writing—review & editing [equal]), and Amr Mohamed (Conceptualization [supporting], Formal analysis [lead], Funding acquisition [supporting], Investigation [lead], Project administration [supporting], Resources [supporting], Validation [equal], Writing—original draft [equal], Writing—review & editing [lead])

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and its supplementary information files.

References

  1. Babu KN, Rajesh MK, Samsudeen K, Minoo D, Suraby EJ, Anupama K, Ritto P.. Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and derived techniques. Methods Mol Biol. 2013:1115:191–209. 10.1007/978-1-62703-767-9_10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Black WC, DuTeau NM.. RAPD-PCR and SSCP analysis for insect population genetic studies. In: Crampton J, Beard CB, Louis C, editors. The molecular biology of disease vectors: a methods manual. New York (NY): Chapman & Hall; 1997. p. 361–171. 10.1007/978-94-009-1535-0_31 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Briffa J, Sinagra E, Blundell R.. Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans. Heliyon. 2020:6(9):e04691. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Butovskaya PR, Pavlova GV, Martirosyan IA, Sukhikh GT, Ryskov AP.. Somatic mosaicism in mice revealed by the RAPD-PCR method. Mol Genet Microbiol Virol. 2009:24:1–6. 10.3103/S0891416809010017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chapco W, Ashton NW, Martel RK, Antonishyn N, Crosby WL.. A feasibility study of the use of random amplified polymorphic DNA in the population genetics and systematics of grasshoppers. Genome. 1992:35(4):569–574. 10.1139/g92-085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cowie RH, Bouchet P, Fontaine B.. The Sixth Mass Extinction: fact, fiction or speculation? Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022:97(2):640–663. 10.1111/brv.12816 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. da Silva AA, Amorim EM, Pereira MG, Santana SL, Silva MAD, Lira AFA, Rohde C.. Genotoxic effects of anthropogenic environments in the leaf litter-dwelling scorpion Tityus pusillus Pocock, 1893 (Scorpiones; Buthidae). Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2023:887:503585. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2023.503585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dornbos P, LaPres JJ.. Incorporating population-level genetic variability within laboratory models in toxicology: from the individual to the population. Toxicology. 2018:395:1–8. 10.1016/j.tox.2017.12.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. El Araby M. Urban growth and environmental degradation: the case of Cairo, Egypt. Cities. 2002:19(6):389–400. 10.1016/s0264-2751(02)00069-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Excoffier L, Lischer HE.. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010:10(3):564–567. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. GBIF Secretariat. Aiolopus thalassinus (Fabricius, 1781). GBIF backbone taxonomy. Checklist dataset. GBIF.org; 2023. [accessed 2024 Jan 24]. https://www.gbif.org/species/1713317 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gemail KMS. Monitoring of wastewater percolation in unsaturated sandy soil using geoelectrical measurements at Gabal el Asfar farm, northeast Cairo, Egypt. Environ Earth Sci. 2012:66(3):749–761. 10.1007/s12665-011-1283-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Giska I, Babik W, van Gestel CA, van Straalen NM, Laskowski R.. Genome-wide genetic diversity of rove beetle populations along a metal pollution gradient. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015:119:98–105. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.04.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gomaa MM, Melegy A, Metwaly H, Hassan S.. Geochemical and electrical characterization of heavy metals in contaminated soils. Heliyon. 2020:6(9):e04954. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. González R, Wilkerson R, Suárez MF, García F, Gallego G, Cárdenas H, Posso CE, Duque MC.. A population genetics study of Anopheles darlingi (Diptera: Culicidae) from Colombia based on random amplified polymorphic DNA-polymerase chain reaction and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007:102(3):255–262. 10.1590/s0074-02762007005000037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gouin N, Bertin A, Espinosa MI, Snow DD, Ali JM, Kolok AS.. Pesticide contamination drives adaptive genetic variation in the endemic mayfly Andesiops torrens within a semi-arid agricultural watershed of Chile. Environ Pollut. 2019:255(Pt 2):113099. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gouin N, Notte AM, Kolok AS, Bertin A.. Pesticide exposure affects DNA methylation patterns in natural populations of a mayfly. Sci Total Environ. 2023:864:161096. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Grundmann H, Schneider C, Hartung D, Daschner FD, Pitt TL.. Discriminatory power of three DNA-based typing techniques for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.. J Clin Microbiol. 1995:33(3):528–534. 10.1128/jcm.33.3.528-534.1995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Grzywacz B, Warchalowska-Sliwa E, Banach Z, Pyza E.. Genetic variability and changes of elemental concentrations in cells of Tetrix tenuicornis (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae) from polluted and unpolluted areas. Folia Biol. (Krakow). 2012:60(1-2):17–25. 10.3409/fb60_1-2.17-25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Heifetz Y, Applebaum SW.. Density‐dependent physiological phase in a non‐migratory grasshopper Aiolopus thalassinus. Entomol Exp Appl. 1995:77(3):251–262. 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1995.tb02322.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hollis D. A revision of the genus Aiolopus Fieber (Orthoptera: Acridoidea). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist (Ent). 1968:22(7):307–355. [accessed 2024 Jan 24] http://www.archive.org/details/bulletinofbritis22entolond. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hou D, O’Connor D, Nathanail P, Tian L, Ma Y.. Integrated GIS and multivariate statistical analysis for regional scale assessment of heavy metal soil contamination: a critical review. Environ Pollut. 2017:231(Pt 1):1188–1200. 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Inobeme A, Nayak V, Mathew TJ, Okonkwo S, Ekwoba L, Ajai AI, Bernard E, Inobeme J, Mariam Agbugui M, Singh KR.. Chemometric approach in environmental pollution analysis: a critical review. J Environ Manage. 2022:309:114653. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jamal ZA, El-Deeb N, Ghareeb A, Ibrahim HAM.. Identification of specific DNA markers for two isolated populations of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Afr Entomol. 2020:28(1):95–105. 10.4001/003.028.0095 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Johnson MTJ, Munshi-South J.. Evolution of life in urban environments. Science. 2017:358(6363):eaam8327. 10.1126/science.aam8327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kil VI. Use of high-specific RAPD-primers for PCR-analysis of harmful and beneficial insect populations. Russ Agric Sci. 2015:41(1):21–25. 10.3103/s1068367415010103 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Konopiński MK. Shannon diversity index: a call to replace the original Shannon’s formula with unbiased estimator in the population genetics studies. PeerJ. 2020:8:e9391. 10.7717/peerj.9391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kumar V, Sharma A, Kaur P, Singh Sidhu GP, Bali AS, Bhardwaj R, Thukral AK, Cerda A.. Pollution assessment of heavy metals in soils of India and ecological risk assessment: a state-of-the-art. Chemosphere. 2019:216:449–462. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lagisz M, Wolff K, Sanderson RA, Laskowski R.. Genetic population structure of the ground beetle, Pterostichus oblongopunctatus, inhabiting a fragmented and polluted landscape: evidence for sex-biased dispersal. J Insect Sci. 2010:10:105. 10.1673/031.010.10501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Li DM, Guo T, Xu YJ.. The effects of impulsive toxicant input on a single-species population in a small polluted environment. Math Biosci Eng. 2019:16(6):8179–8194. 10.3934/mbe.2019413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Li J, Mao Y, Li K, Chen W, Sun L, Zhang B.. Genetic connectivity constrained by natural barriers in a key agricultural pest: insights from mitochondrial DNA analysis. Front Ecol Evol. 2023:11:1257453. 10.3389/fevo.2023.1257453 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu Y, Dietrich CH, Wei C.. Genetic divergence, population differentiation and phylogeography of the cicada Subpsaltria yangi based on molecular and acoustic data: an example of the early stage of speciation? BMC Evol Biol. 2019:19(1):5. 10.1186/s12862-018-1317-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Maes G, Raeymaekers J, Pampoulie C, Seynaeve A, Goemans G, Belpaire C, Volckaert FAM.. The catadromous European eel Anguilla anguilla (L.) as a model for freshwater evolutionary ecotoxicology: relationship between heavy metal bioaccumulation, condition and genetic variability. Aquat Toxicol. 2005:73(1):99–114. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2005.01.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Miño CI, Gardenal CN, Bidau CJ.. Morphological, genetic, and chromosomal variation at a small spatial scale within a mosaic hybrid zone of the grasshopper Dichroplus pratensis Bruner (Acrididae). J Hered. 2010:102(2):184–195. 10.1093/jhered/esq119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mohammadi Sharif M, Graily-Moradi F, Mojtahedzadeh Farabi M.. Genetic variation in Iranian populations of citrus cottony scale (Pulvinaria aurantii Cockerell) based on RAPD, mitochondrial DNA and RFLP markers. Arch Phytopathol. 2022:55(7):833–850. 10.1080/03235408.2022.2047378 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mückstein P, Vlk R.. Record of Aiolopus thalassinus (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in the Žďárské vrchy protected landscape area (Bohemian-Moravian Highlands, Czech Republic). Acta Rerum Nat. 2015:18:1–2. https://actarerumnaturalium.cz/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/ARN_2015__2.pdf [Google Scholar]
  37. Mussali-Galante P, Tovar-Sánchez E, Valverde M, Rojas E.. Genetic structure and diversity of animal populations exposed to metal pollution. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2014:227:79–106. 10.1007/978-3-319-01327-5_3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Pedrosa JA, Machado AL, Cocchiararo B, Soares AM, Nowak C, Pestana JL.. Assessing the suitability of genetic diversity of Chironomus riparius (Meigen) as an indicator of environmental pollution. Ecol Indic. 2017:78:115–124. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Renault D, Elfiky A, Mohamed A.. Predicting the insecticide-driven mutations in a crop pest insect: evidence for multiple polymorphisms of acetylcholinesterase gene with potential relevance for resistance to chemicals. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023:30(7):18937–18955. 10.1007/s11356-022-23309-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ringbauer H, Kolesnikov A, Field DL, Barton NH.. Estimating barriers to gene flow from distorted isolation-by-distance patterns. Genetics. 2018:208(3):1231–1245. 10.1534/genetics.117.300638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ross K, Cooper N, Bidwell JR, Elder J.. Genetic diversity and metal tolerance of two marine species: a comparison between populations from contaminated and reference sites. Mar Pollut Bull. 2002:44(7):671–679. 10.1016/s0025-326x(01)00333-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Schmidt GH. Use of grasshoppers as test animals for the ecotoxicological evaluation of chemicals in the soil. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 1986:16(3):175–188. 10.1016/0167-8809(86)90003-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sesarini C, Remis MI.. Molecular and morphometric variation in chromosomally differentiated populations of the grasshopper Sinipta dalmani (Orthopthera: Acrididae). Genetica. 2008:133(3):295–306. 10.1007/s10709-007-9213-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sigmund G, Ågerstrand M, Antonelli A, Backhaus T, Brodin T, Diamond ML, Erdelen WR, Evers DC, Hofmann T, Hueffer T, et al. Addressing chemical pollution in biodiversity research. Glob Chang Biol. 2023:29(12):3240–3255. 10.1111/gcb.16689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Silveira EB, Al-Janabi SM, Magalhães BP, Carvalho LJ, Tigano MS.. Polymorphism of the grasshopper Schistocerca pallens (Thunberg) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) and its natural pathogen Metarhizium flavoviride Gams & Rozsypal (Hyphomycetes), revealed by RAPD analysis. An Soc Entomol Bras. 1998:27(1):91–99. 10.1590/S0301-80591998000100012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Soliman MM, Hesselberg T, Mohamed AA, Renault D.. Trophic transfer of heavy metals along a pollution gradient in a terrestrial agro-industrial food web. Geoderma. 2022:413:115748. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115748 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Švara V, Michalski SG, Krauss M, Schulze T, Geuchen S, Brack W, Luckenbach T.. Reduced genetic diversity of freshwater amphipods in rivers with increased levels of anthropogenic organic micropollutants. Evol Appl. 2022:15(6):976–991. 10.1111/eva.13387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. UNCT. Egypt UNCT results report 2022. 2022. [accessed 2023 Feb 12]. https://egypt.un.org/sites/default/files/2023-07/2022%20UNCT%20Annual%20Report%20-s.pdf.
  49. Vaughn T, Antolin M.. Population genetics of an opportunistic parasitoid in an agricultural landscape. Heredity. 1998:80:152–162. 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00248.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Vidal MC, Quinn TW, Stireman JO 3rd, Tinghitella RM, Murphy SM.. Geography is more important than host plant use for the population genetic structure of a generalist insect herbivore. Mol Ecol. 2019:28(18):4317–4334. 10.1111/mec.15218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang N, Guan Q, Sun Y, Wang B, Ma Y, Shao W, Li H.. Predicting the spatial pollution of soil heavy metals by using the distance determination coefficient method. Sci Total Environ. 2021:799:149452. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wasi S, Tabrez S, Ahmad M.. Toxicological effects of major environmental pollutants: an overview. Environ Monit Assess. 2013:185(3):2585–2593. 10.1007/s10661-012-2732-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Weissmannová HD, Pavlovský J.. Indices of soil contamination by heavy metals—methodology of calculation for pollution assessment (minireview). Environ Monit Assess. 2017:189(12):616. 10.1007/s10661-017-6340-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Williams JG, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV.. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990:18(22):6531–6535. 10.1093/nar/18.22.6531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. World Health Organization (WHO), World Health Organization (Regional Office for Europe). Air quality guidelines: global update 2005: particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2006. [accessed 2023 Feb 12]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-SDE-PHE-OEH-06.02. [Google Scholar]
  56. Wu X, Cobbina SJ, Mao G, Xu H, Zhang Z, Yang L.. A review of toxicity and mechanisms of individual and mixtures of heavy metals in the environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016:23(9):8244–8259. 10.1007/s11356-016-6333-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Yousef HA, Abdelfattah EA, Augustyniak M.. Evaluation of oxidative stress biomarkers in Aiolopus thalassinus (Orthoptera: Acrididae) collected from areas polluted by the fertilizer industry. Ecotoxicology. 2017:26(3):340–350. 10.1007/s10646-017-1767-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhang M, Kang L.. Genetic divergence among geographical populations of the migratory locust in China. Sci China C Life Sci. 2005:48(6):551–564. 10.1360/062004-103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhiyi R, Haowen Y.. A method for genotoxicity detection using random amplified polymorphism DNA with Danio rerio. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2004:58(1):96–103. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2003.09.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ieae026_suppl_Supplementary_Materials_1
ieae026_suppl_Supplementary_Materials_2

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and its supplementary information files.


Articles from Journal of Insect Science are provided here courtesy of University of Wisconsin Libraries

RESOURCES