Skip to main content
mSystems logoLink to mSystems
. 2024 Feb 7;9(3):e00967-23. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00967-23

A novel mechanism for dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium in Acididesulfobacillus acetoxydans

Reinier A Egas 1, Julia M Kurth 1,2, Sjef Boeren 3, Diana Z Sousa 1,4, Cornelia U Welte 5, Irene Sánchez-Andrea 1,6,
Editor: Liyuan Ma7
Reviewed by: Sukhwan Yoon8, Zhe-Xue Quan9
PMCID: PMC10949509  PMID: 38323850

ABSTRACT

The biological route of nitrate reduction has important implications for the bioavailability of nitrogen within ecosystems. Nitrate reduction via nitrite, either to ammonium (ammonification) or to nitrous oxide or dinitrogen (denitrification), determines whether nitrogen is retained within the system or lost as a gas. The acidophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium (aSRB) Acididesulfobacillus acetoxydans can perform dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA). While encoding a Nar-type nitrate reductase, A. acetoxydans lacks recognized nitrite reductase genes. In this study, A. acetoxydans was cultivated under conditions conducive to DNRA. During cultivations, we monitored the production of potential nitrogen intermediates (nitrate, nitrite, nitric oxide, hydroxylamine, and ammonium). Resting cell experiments were performed with nitrate, nitrite, and hydroxylamine to confirm their reduction to ammonium, and formed intermediates were tracked. To identify the enzymes involved in DNRA, comparative transcriptomics and proteomics were performed with A. acetoxydans growing under nitrate- and sulfate-reducing conditions. Nitrite is likely reduced to ammonia by the previously undescribed nitrite reductase activity of the NADH-linked sulfite reductase AsrABC, or by a putatively ferredoxin-dependent homolog of the nitrite reductase NirA (DEACI_1836), or both. We identified enzymes and intermediates not previously associated with DNRA and nitrosative stress in aSRB. This increases our knowledge about the metabolism of this type of bacteria and helps the interpretation of (meta)genome data from various ecosystems on their DNRA potential and the nitrogen cycle.

IMPORTANCE

Nitrogen is crucial to any ecosystem, and its bioavailability depends on microbial nitrogen-transforming reactions. Over the recent years, various new nitrogen-transforming reactions and pathways have been identified, expanding our view on the nitrogen cycle and metabolic versatility. In this study, we elucidate a novel mechanism employed by Acididesulfobacillus acetoxydans, an acidophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium, to reduce nitrate to ammonium. This finding underscores the diverse physiological nature of dissimilatory reduction to ammonium (DNRA). A. acetoxydans was isolated from acid mine drainage, an extremely acidic environment where nitrogen metabolism is poorly studied. Our findings will contribute to understanding DNRA potential and variations in extremely acidic environments.

KEYWORDS: DNRA, nitrite reduction, acidophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria, acid mine drainage, asrABC, nitrosative stress, NirA, transcriptome, proteome

INTRODUCTION

Our insight into the biogeochemical nitrogen cycle has increased in recent years with the discovery of numerous new microbial nitrogen-transforming redox reactions and pathways (1). Under oxygen limitation, two reactions in the nitrogen cycle control the bioavailability of nitrogen in its most oxidized form, nitrate (NO3) (2). These are denitrification, the reduction of nitrate to dinitrogen gas (N2), and the dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium, (DNRA). DNRA is ecologically relevant to avoid nitrogen loss in nitrogen-depleted environments. In the last decade, DNRA has proven to be remarkably versatile, with novel mechanisms identified and even additional intermediates such as hydroxylamine (NH2OH) proposed (38). Studying microorganisms performing DNRA while lacking classical DNRA enzymes could reveal alternative reactions and enzymes involved in DNRA. This will increase the understanding of both nitrogen metabolism and the nitrogen cycle (1, 2).

DNRA canonically proceeds via two steps: the initial two-electron reduction of nitrate to nitrite, followed by the six-electron reduction of nitrite to ammonia. Novel mechanisms were recently identified for both steps. For the first step, two canonical membrane-bound dissimilatory nitrate reductases are recognized, the Nap- and Nar-type nitrate reductases (9). The periplasmic-oriented Nap-type (NapAB) has its active site in the periplasmic NapA subunit, whereas the bacterial cytoplasmic-oriented Nar-type (NarGHI) has its active site in the cytoplasmic NarG subunit (10, 11). Recently, a third dissimilatory nitrate reductase has been identified, the cytoplasmic nitrite oxidoreductase multiprotein complex (NxrABC) (5). However, the precise mechanism through which NxrABC controls the direction of the electron flow is still unclear.

The best described dissimilatory nitrite reductase is the periplasmic NrfAH (12). Recently, three additional dissimilatory nitrite reductases have been identified: (i) the epsilonproteobacterial hydroxylamine oxidoreductase (Hao); (ii) the octaheme nitrite reductase (ONR) from Thioalkalivibrio nitratireducens; and (iii) the octaheme tetrathionate reductase (OTR) from Shewanella oneidensis (3, 13, 14). For both ONR and OTR, it is unclear if their physiological contribution is to detoxify or to respire either nitrite or hydroxylamine. In addition to these dissimilatory mechanisms, NasB, NirA, and NirB can assimilate nitrite into ammonium during assimilatory nitrite reduction (15, 16). Regardless of their involvement in assimilatory or dissimilatory nitrite reduction, all described enzymes only use nitrite as a free intermediate in DNRA. Hydroxylamine was suggested as an intermediate in DNRA, and although detected during nitrate reduction, it has never been measured as a free intermediate (6). The role of hydroxylamine in DNRA and, therefore, in other redox transformations in the nitrogen cycle remains enigmatic (6, 7). To understand the physiological role and function of candidate genes and enzymes, an in-depth analysis is needed to confirm the utilized mechanisms and produced intermediates during DNRA.

In this study, we elucidate an alternative DNRA pathway present in the acidophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium (aSRB) Acididesulfobacillus acetoxydans, isolated from acid mine drainage sediment (17). These are extreme environments given their low pH (<3) and high metal concentrations. A. acetoxydans reduces nitrate to ammonia, and while encoding a Nar-type nitrate reductase, it does not encode any of the seven known nitrite reductases (NrfAH, NirA, NirB, NasB, HaoA, ONR, and OTR). To identify the enzymes involved in DNRA, we performed comparative transcriptomics and proteomics with sulfate and nitrate as electron acceptors. We also measured all potential nitrogen intermediates during the cultivation of A. acetoxydans while reducing nitrate to ammonia. Resting cell experiments were performed to investigate the biotic transformation of nitrate, nitrite, and hydroxylamine by A. acetoxydans. We demonstrate that the DNRA pathway of A. acetoxydans proceeds via enzymes not previously associated with DNRA and provide data-driven hypotheses which reactions and enzymes are involved in both DNRA and coping with nitrosative stress.

RESULTS

A. acetoxydans performs DNRA while accumulating nitrite and nitric oxide

To verify the reduction in nitrate, A. acetoxydans was grown in cultures with 10 mM nitrate and 5 mM glycerol (Fig. 1A). Nitrate reduction to ammonia was observed, accompanied by the accumulation of nitrite, which was subsequently almost entirely reduced to ammonia (Fig. 1B). Nitric oxide was measured in nanomolar concentrations throughout the cultivation, increasing to micromolar concentrations at the end of the cultivation (maximum 3.6 µM). In all nitrate-reducing cultures, both growth and metabolic activity halted at ∼0.8–1 mM nitrite, despite abundant glycerol and nitrate present (File S1). At this point, the present resorufin, the reduced form of resazurin, changed bottles’ appearance from transparent to pink. This was likely the consequence of nitrite accumulation as it is a potent oxidant. After this color shift, the transfer of the cultures to the fresh medium was unsuccessful (no growth). For the cultivations shown in Fig. 1, a shift in medium color was observed shortly after the last liquid sampling point at 174 hours. From these cultures, another gas phase sample was taken, 76 hours after the last liquid sampling point, which showed a 10-fold increase in nitric oxide from 3.6 to 37.7 µM. No nitrogen loss was observed at any point in the cultivation, excluding additional end products. In these cultivations, yeast extract (0.1 g/L) was present, which contains nitrogenous compounds yet no interference was detected on the nitrogen balances. Chemical controls with 10 mM nitrate showed no nitrite or nitric oxide evolution. However, chemical controls with 10 mM nitrate and 0.5 mM nitrite produced 14 and 25 µM of nitric oxide after 24 and 48 hours, respectively. Concomitantly, nitrite decreased from 468 to 386 and 356 µM, and nitrate increased from 10.16 to 10.25 and 10.35 mM. No increase in ammonia was observed. Hydroxylamine was not detected as an intermediate in any of the cultivations.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Growth of A. acetoxydans under nitrate-reducing conditions. (A) Growth curve of A. acetoxydans correlated to glycerol uptake and acetate production. (B) Nitrogen compound consumption and production during the growth of A. acetoxydans. Nitrate is partially reduced to ammonium, while nitrite accumulates; during the cultivation, nitric oxide was produced up to micromolar concentrations. No nitrogen loss was observed, excluding other major end products or intermediates. Error bars represent the SD of biological replicates (n = 5).

Nitrite and hydroxylamine are reduced to ammonia

Resting cell experiments were performed to study intermediates of nitrate reduction. The resting cell experimental set-up was verified with 1 mM of nitrate, which was nearly completely reduced to ammonia in 9 hours (File S2). After 6 hours, nitrate reduction halted, and the accumulated nitrite was completely reduced to ammonia. No hydroxylamine was observed as intermediate in all tested conditions; due to technical limitations, nitric oxide was not measured. The nitrogen balance was completely closed at each timepoint. The addition of high concentrations of nitrite (1 mM) to the resting cell experiments resulted in no metabolic activity, which is in line with previous observations for these cultures. The addition of 0.5 mM nitrite resulted in the accumulation of ammonia, confirming that A. acetoxydans can reduce nitrite to ammonia (File S2). Although no hydroxylamine was detected as an intermediate, its reduction was tested, and 0.5 mM hydroxylamine was completely reduced to ammonia in 3 hours (File S2). Chemical controls with 1 mM hydroxylamine showed no decrease in hydroxylamine, excluding abiotic reduction. Based on these resting cell experiments, nitrate, nitrite, and hydroxylamine are all reduced by A. acetoxydans to ammonia.

Comparative transcriptomics and proteomics revealed multiple candidates for DNRA

Comparative transcriptomics and proteomics were performed to identify candidate genes and proteins, respectively, for DNRA in A. acetoxydans. Cultures of A. acetoxydans performing sulfate reduction were used as control. Differentially expressed genes were identified as genes with an expression change of at least fourfold and an adjusted P value of ≤0.01 (File S3). Unsurprisingly, no changes were observed in the central carbon metabolism. Under nitrate-reducing conditions, the dissimilatory sulfate reduction pathway was still expressed even though no sulfate was present for over 10 successive transfers. This indicates that the sulfate reduction pathway genes are constitutively expressed in A. acetoxydans (Fig. 2). Comparative transcriptomics showed differential expression of 327 genes, of which 163 were upregulated during nitrate reduction.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Heatmaps showing the A. acetoxydans comparative transcriptomics with normalized counts (left) and proteomics with label free quantitation (LFQ) values (right) comparing nitrate (N1 to N4) to sulfate (S1 to S4) reduction conditions. Heatmap color codes represent z-score normalized values per row comparing across reduction conditions. Depicted genes are grouped by their putative corresponding pathways. Identified candidates are depicted as DNRA candidates. The asterisk indicates the locus tag DEACI. The gray blocks in the proteome (NorBC, DsrJ, and DsrP) indicate that these were not detected.

Nitrate is likely imported into the cell through a putative nitrate/nitrite transporter encoded by the sixfold upregulated narK (DEACI_1354). For the first step of DNRA, nitrate reduction to nitrite, NarGHI is most likely responsible as the narGHI gene cluster (DEACI_1355-1357) was eightfold upregulated to an average of 204 transcripts per million (TPM).

From the upregulated genes, three cytoplasmic candidates for involvement in DNRA were identified: (i) a putative sulfite reductase (DEACI_1836), whose corresponding gene was upregulated 16-fold with 3,475 TPM; (ii) an anaerobic sulfite reductase asrABC (DEACI_4025-4027), whose corresponding genes were upregulated on average 29-fold with 822 TPM; and (iii) hydroxylamine reductase encoded by hcp (DEACI_0275), which was upregulated 30-fold with 4,675 TPM. All candidates lack transmembrane helices or twin-arginine translocation system signals, the latter is a part of a signal peptide for protein export.

Comparative proteomics was performed to confirm the translation of expressed candidate genes (File S3). In total, 1,938 proteins were identified, and obtained trends for DNRA candidates aligned with the transcriptome (Fig. 2). Changes in protein abundance of the candidate proteins were even more pronounced than changes in their gene expression. Here, fold change was expressed as the ratio of averaged LFQ values of a protein across all replications between the two conditions. The abundance of the nitrate reductase NarGHI increased 22-fold. Of the identified nitrite transformation candidates, DEACI_1836 increased 29-fold in abundance, AsrABC increased 195-fold, and Hcp increased 52-fold and, strikingly, had the fourth highest LFQ intensity.

Although DEACI_1836 is annotated as a sulfite reductase, the assigned annotation is doubted as a protein homology search could not provide definitive results on its function. DEACI_1836 encodes a 300 amino acid containing protein with two known domains: a nitrite- and sulfite-reductase ferredoxin-like half domain (PF03460) and a nitrite- and sulfite-reductase [4Fe4S] domain (PF01077). The two genes flanking DEACI_1836 encode a hypothetical protein (DEACI_1835) and a ferredoxin putatively containing one [4Fe4S] cluster (DEACI_1837), which were upregulated to 3,500 and 850 TPM, respectively. However, neither was detected in the proteome.

In addition to the cytoplasmic candidates, multiple membrane-embedded proteins potentially involved in the conversion of nitrous oxides were identified, as these were upregulated during nitrate reduction: the NosZDFY and PetABC complexes. These are combined on one operon (DEACI_0711-0719) containing the nitrous oxide reductase NosZ (DEACI_0711), a putative ABC transporter consisting of NosDFY (DEACI_0713-0715), and a three-subunit cytochrome bc1-cy complex PetABC (DEACI_0717-0719). In this operon, nosZ expression increased 127-fold to 1,361 TPM aligning with the proteome, where NosZ increased 423-fold. Although all the protein complexes contain one or more transmembrane helices, except NosY (DEACI_0715) and the cytochrome b subunit PetB (DEACI_0718), all were detected at significantly increased abundance in the proteome. The nitric oxide reductase encoded by norBC (DEACI_2320-2321) was slightly expressed (<50 TPM) in the transcriptome in all conditions. However, norBC did not change in expression level, and neither was NorBC detected in the proteome.

Upregulation of molybdopterin-containing oxidoreductases

Two gene clusters, DEACI_2560-2564 and DEACI_3268-3271, were upregulated ~13-fold when nitrate was used as the final electron acceptor (File S4). The annotation of either set of genes was not clear, but both operons encode NrfD-like subunit-containing molybdopterin oxidoreductase complexes, which are proteins involved in ion translocation. Functional annotation of these oxidoreductases is difficult, considering the metabolic versatility of the oxidoreductases and the modularity of their subunits (18, 19). They are not identified as nitrite reductase candidates, given their lack of distinct homology to any nitrite reductase, nor are their expression and abundance levels equal to the identified candidates.

Export and uptake of potential intermediates and end products

Transporters for identified and potential intermediates were detected: uptake of nitrate and export of formed nitrite were likely performed by the nitrate–nitrite transporter NarK (DEACI_1355). Interestingly, a sulfate permease protein (DEACI_0281) was 17-fold upregulated under nitrate-reducing conditions to 605 TPM (although it was not identified in the proteome). For the three potential intermediates, nitric oxide, nitrous oxide, and hydroxylamine, no dedicated transporters were encoded. Formed ammonia, and potentially hydroxylamine, might be exported through the ammonia transporter Amt (DEACI_0023). Upstream there were two highly upregulated hypothetical protein-encoding genes, DEACI_0021 and DEACI_0022, which increased 13- and 16-fold, respectively. Only DEACI_0023 was detected in the proteome, where it significantly decreased under nitrate-reducing conditions.

Distribution of DNRA candidates in aSRB and neutrophilic type strains

The distribution of identified candidates was inspected in other phylogenetically closely related SRB, with an emphasis on aSRB, through a protein homology search using the protein basic local alignment search tool (BlastP). An identity score ≥30% and a total score ≥100 were implemented as cutoff criteria (Table 1). As a reference, NarG, NapA, NrfA, NirB, AsrA, and Hcp of Escherichia coli strain K12 and NosZ of Paracoccus denitrificans were used.

TABLE 1.

Prevalence of identified candidates for DNRA in aSRBa

Name Nitratereduction Nitritereduction NarK DEACI_1354 NarG DEACI_1355 DEACI_1836 AsrA DEACI_4025 AsrB DEACI_4026 AsrC DEACI_4027 Hcp DEACI_0275 NosZ
DEACI_0711
NarG1 NapA1 NrfA1 NirB1 AsrA1 Hcp1 NosZ2 Reference
Acididesulfobacillus acetoxydansT + + 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 52% 34% 43% 43% 34% This study
Thermodesulfobium narugenseT + + 52% 50% 35% 44% 55% 34% 47% (20)
Thermodesulfobium acidiphilumT 52% 49% 36% 43% 56% 33% 46% (21)
Desulfosporosinus acidiphilusT + + 76% 54% 55% 72% 82% 35% 41% 45% (22)
Desulfosporosinus acididuransT + + 82% 77% 74% 56% 54% 73% 81% 52% 37% 44% 43% (23)
Desulfosporosinus metalliduransT + ND 30% 76% 82% 35% 43% (24)
Desulfosporosinus sp. I2 + 31% 76% 32% 80% 35% 35% 43% (25)
Desulfosporosinus sp. BG ND ND 77% 55% 53% 72% 81% 36% 43% 42% (26)
Desulfosporosinus sp. OT ND ND 77% 54% 53% 71% 81% 36% 44% 43% (27, 28)
Desulfosporosinus orientisT 75% 81% 36% 44% (29, 30)
Desulfosporosinus hippeiT ND 30% 76% 82% 36% 35% 43% (31)
Desulfosporosinus meridieiT ND 76% 81% 46% 37% 34% 43% 37% (30)
Desulfosporosinus fructosivoransT ND 30% 73% 79% 35% 34% 43% (32, 33)
Desulfosporosinus lacusT 74% 80% 36% 35% 43% (34)
Desulfosporosinus youngiaeT 76% 81% 43% 36% 35% 43% 36% (35)
Desulfitobacterium dehalogenansT + 75% 34% 82% 45% 39% 34% 36% 45% 36% (36)
Desulfitobacterium hafnienseT + + 76% 31% 82% 43% 34% 36% 44% 35% (37)
Desulfitobacterium metallireducensT 78% 80% 33% 44% (38)
Desulfitobacterium chlororespiransT ND 67% 75% 31% 82% 43% 53% 39% 33% 34% 44% 35% (39)
a

Of the closest genera to Acididesulfobacillus: Desulfosporosinus and Desulfitobacterium, the neutrophilic type strains are included (depicted in bold). Nitrate and nitrite reduction indicates the reported ability to reduce the compound. Hits with both a total score of >100 and identity percentage >30% are listed. For Ds. meridiei, the initial characterization paper did not observe nitrate reduction, whereas later on nitrate reduction was reported (24). Reference sequences were taken from 1Escherichia coli strain K12 and 2Paracoccus denitrificans.

Considering aSRB, nitrate and subsequent nitrite reduction was only previously reported for Thermodesulfobium narugense (20), Desulfosporosinus acididurans (23), and Ds. acidiphilus (23), whereas nitrate reduction was reported for Ds. metallidurans (24) and Ds. sp. I2 (25). Two neutrophilic type strains, Db. dehalogenans and Db. hafniense, encoded NapA and NrfA in addition to NarG yet only Db. hafniense is able to reduce nitrate to ammonia, while Db. dehalogenans can reduce nitrate to nitrite without ammonification (36). Interestingly, Db. chlororespirans encoded NarG and NapA but is unable to reduce nitrate (39).

DEACI_1836 was identified in all strains, with a >70% identity score in most of the strains. AsrABC was detected in Ds. acidiphilus, Ds. acididurans, Ds. sp. BG, and Ds. sp. OT. Only T. narugense in this genome comparison is reported as being able to perform nitrite reduction without encoding AsrABC but does encode a putative nirB. Unfortunately, for both Ds. sp. BG and Ds. sp. OT, no physiological data on nitrate or nitrite reduction are available. Interestingly, in none of the neutrophilic strains, AsrA was detected. In contrast to the high Hcp prevalence, NosZ was only detected in Ds. meridiei, Ds. youngiae, Ds dehalogenans, Ds. hafniense, and Db. chlororespirans. None of these strains were tested for nitric oxide, nitrous oxide, or hydroxylamine production or reduction.

DISCUSSION

A. acetoxydans reduces nitrate forming ammonia as a major end product, with the transient accumulation of nitrite and nitric oxide. While no nitrogen conversion activity was measured in abiotic controls with 10 mM nitrate, supporting the biological character of nitrite formation observed in A. acetoxydans cultures, abiotic controls with 10 mM nitrate and 0.5 mM nitrite resulted in concomitant nitrite concentration decrease and increase in nitric oxide and nitrate. Resting cell experiments showed the reduction of nitrate, nitrite, and hydroxylamine to ammonia.

The main question addressed in this study is the conversion of formed nitrite in the absence of known nitrite-reducing enzymes encoded in the genome of A. acetoxydans. Nitrite is a potent oxidant and known to be highly reactive (40). Cultivations of A. acetoxydans that accumulated 0.8–1 mM nitrite stopped metabolic activity, although nutrients were present in excess. We observed that 0.5 mM nitrite was effectively reduced to ammonia. At low pH, nitrite is partially present in its undissociated form, nitrous acid (HNO2, pKa=3.29). Under anoxic conditions, nitrous acid can disproportionate to nitrate and nitric oxide (equation 1) (41, 42), explaining the chemical formation of nitric oxide with the concomitant loss of nitrite in the 10 mM nitrate and 0.5 mM nitrite abiotic controls. In these chemical controls, no decrease in nitric oxide was observed nor a transformation to either ammonia or hydroxylamine. This excludes additional chemically formed intermediates from nitrite and nitric oxide in this experimental setup.

3 HNO2NO3+2 NO+H2O+H+ (1)

Nitrite is produced by the nitrate reductase NarG; a known side activity of NarG is the reduction of nitrite to nitric oxide in the cytoplasm (43, 44). The percentage of produced nitric oxide through this mechanism differs significantly per organism as it is highly dependent on the extracellular and intracellular concentrations of nitrite, nitrate, and nitric oxide (45). While we did not measure nitrous oxide and dinitrogen gas, the fact that nitrogen balances in our experiments could be closed suggests that those are not major end products.

This study initially identified multiple candidates for the missing step for DNRA in A. acetoxydans, three located in the cytoplasm (AsrABC, Hcp, and DEACI_1836) and one in the periplasm (NosZ). None of these have been previously described as nitrite reductases. The trimeric anaerobic sulfite reductase AsrABC is an NADH-linked reductase induced by sulfite (46, 47). During sulfate reduction, A. acetoxydans reduces sulfite via the dissimilatory sulfite reductase complex DsrAB (DEACI_0668-0669) to DsrC-trisulfide (DEACI_0677), which is then reduced with the electrons received from the DsrMKJOP membrane complex (DEACI_0672-0676). Sulfate reduction takes place without the involvement of AsrABC, as confirmed by both proteome and transcriptome, suggesting either redundancy or another function for AsrABC. However, its upregulation during nitrate reduction points toward another function for AsrABC. Sulfite reductases have been linked to nitrite reduction, and it has been suggested that all sulfite reductases can reduce nitrite to ammonia (48). Interestingly, the asrABC deletion mutants of Salmonella typhimurium (43%, 40%, and 42% protein identity scores to A. acetoxydans, respectively) were still capable of nitrite reduction, whereas sulfite reduction halted (47). This indicates a role of this specific AsrAB in sulfite reduction, rather than nitrite metabolism; to complicate the interpretation of these results further, S. typhimurium encodes NrfA, a known nitrite-ammonifying enzyme (47). Heterologous expression of S. typhimurium asrABC in E. coli resulted in the ability of E. coli to reduce sulfite to sulfide (47). AsrABC has not been purified, and therefore, enzyme assays with either nitrite, nitric oxide, or hydroxylamine have not been performed; therefore, its physiological role, potential, and versatility remain enigmatic (49).

DEACI_1836 contains both the nitrite and sulfite reductase ferredoxin-like half domain (PF03460) and a nitrite and sulfite reductase 4Fe-4S domain (PF01077). These domains are characteristic of two types of nitrite reductases: the NADH-dependent NirB and the ferredoxin-dependent NirA (50, 51). Compared to NirB, DEACI_1836 lacks a flavine-adenine-dinucleotide prosthetic group (FAD) that facilitates electron transfer from NADH. Although DEACI_1836 shows higher homology to NirB than NirA (identity score <25%), both domains of NirA are conserved. An amino acid alignment of DEACI_1836 to described NirA sequences shows the conservation of the four cysteine residues that coordinate the four iron ions of the [4Fe4S] cluster and additionally coordinate the iron of the siroheme cofactor (File S5). The active site is preserved, which facilitates electron transfer from ferredoxin to the [4Fe4S] cluster (52, 53). In addition, next to DEACI_1836, a ferredoxin is encoded, which is highly upregulated in the transcriptome. Based on these observations, we hypothesize that DEACI_1836 reduces nitrite to ammonia with reduced ferredoxin as an electron donor. Reduced ferredoxin is generated during glycerol oxidation by decarboxylation of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA with the pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase Pfor (DEACI_1130, DEACI_1144). Unsurprisingly, Pfor is highly abundant in both sulfate- and nitrate-reducing conditions. NirA from P. aeruginosa could reduce nitrite and sulfite in enzymatic assays using methyl viologen as an electron donor. Nitrite was reduced to ammonia in a 1:1 ratio, excluding nitric oxide or hydroxylamine production. Additionally, NirA of P. aeruginosa could not use hydroxylamine as an electron acceptor in the presence of methyl viologen (54). Interestingly, the chloroplast NirA from Spinacia oleracea and Cucurbita pepo showed both nitrite and hydroxylamine reduction to ammonia coupled to methyl viologen oxidation although hydroxylamine was not considered the physiological electron acceptor (55, 56). NirB mutants of S. typhimurium, which encode both NarG and NapA, were used to test whether NirB could reduce nitrite to nitric oxide. No change was observed in nitric oxide production, ruling out nitric oxide production by NirB (43). This demonstrates that siroheme-containing nitrite reductases do not form nitric oxide from nitrite but could potentially reduce hydroxylamine besides its potential role in DNRA.

The hydroxylamine reductase Hcp was the fourth most abundant protein although no hydroxylamine was detected in any of the cultivations. Based on resting cell experiments, A. acetoxydans can reduce hydroxylamine to ammonia; however, the physiological role of Hcp and annotation as hydroxylamine reductase is controversial. Recent studies showed that although Hcp can reduce hydroxylamine, the actual physiological function is that of a high-affinity nitric oxide reductase (44, 57). As a nitric oxide reductase, Hcp can convert nitric oxide stoichiometrically into nitrous oxide under physiologically relevant conditions (57, 58). Likely, Hcp is a major contributing protein for handling nitrosative stress, as shown by the increased sensitivity to nitrosative stress of Hcp mutants of S. typhimurium, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Desulfovibrio gigas (42%, 65%, and 48% protein identity scores to A. acetoxydans, respectively) (5961). This is in line with the transcriptome of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans, which showed increased expression of hcp (69% protein identity score to A. acetoxydans) under nitrosative stress caused by supplemented nitric oxide (7.5 µM) under both sulfate- and nitrate-reducing conditions (62). In A. acetoxydans, nitric oxide could also be converted by the nitric oxide reductases NorBC. However, norBC was hardly expressed in the transcriptome and did not change expression level, potentially the expression of NorB was repressed by active DNRA (63). Probably, Hcp is the protein converting nitric oxide to nitrous oxide in the cytoplasm, preventing the accumulation of nitric oxide and minimizing nitrosative stress. This hypothesis is in line with the chemical data obtained in this study, which shows decreased nitric oxide accumulation in the nitrate-reducing cultures compared to the chemical control with nitrite. Furthermore, nitric oxide increases after metabolic activity halts. This aligns with the unexpected upregulation of the operon encoding the nitrous oxide reductase NosZ and ABC transporter NosDFY required for NosZ formation (64, 65). Increased nitrous oxide concentrations were shown to hamper DNRA upon oxic-to-anoxic transition in Bacillus sp. DNRA2, which could be alleviated by timely activated NosZ (43% protein identity score to A. acetoxydans) (66). In a similar fashion, the build-up of nitrous oxide from nitric oxide can also hamper DNRA activity in A. acetoxydans, explaining the role of NosZ during DNRA (66). Hence, the produced nitrous oxide is subsequently reduced to dinitrogen gas by NosZ with electrons supplemented from PetABC, although additional electron transfer pathways might be involved (67). The detected concentration of nitric oxide was in the micromolar range, whereas the other main conversion products including ammonia were in the millimolar range with closing nitrogen balances. Hence, this reductive nitric oxide flux seems to be minor in terms of nitrogen flux, yet important to maintain the viability of A. acetoxydans during nitrate reduction.

All combined, we propose a hypothetical pathway of dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium in A. acetoxydans (Fig. 3). After the uptake of nitrate by NarK, nitrate is reduced to nitrite by NarG. From nitrite, the observed pathway splits into the ammonification route and the nitric oxide route. Nitrite is likely reduced to ammonia by the previously undescribed nitrite reductase activity of the NADH utilizing AsrABC or by the ferredoxin-dependent DEACI_1836 or both. Produced ammonia (pKa = 9.25) is mainly present in its charged ammonium form at cytoplasmic pH, requiring active transport, which could be carried out by an Amt-type ammonium transporter. The nitric oxide route can start extracellularly or cytoplasmically. Extracellular nitrite disproportionates into nitric oxide, which can freely permeate the membrane and enter the cell. Cytoplasmic nitrite can be converted (as side activity) by NarG into nitric oxide. Cytoplasmic nitric oxide can be reduced to nitrous oxide by Hcp, which is subsequently reduced to dinitrogen gas by NosZ (and NosFYD) with PetABC.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Overview of the DNRA (top) and denitrification (bottom) pathways employed by A. acetoxydans. Nitrate is reduced to ammonium while accumulating nitrite and nitric oxide. The nitrogen balance closed completely, excluding the formation of other major end products or intermediates. The ferredoxin (DEACI_1837) potentially donating the electrons to DEACI_1836 can only transport a single electron as it contains a single [4Fe4S] cluster domain. The asterisk depicts the potential side nitrite reductase activity of NarG, and the dashed lines indicate abiotic steps.

Distribution of potential nitrite conversion pathways in sulfate-reducing bacteria

The ability to reduce nitrate is broadly distributed among the different phyla of SRB (62, 68, 69). SRB encoding a known nitrite reductase are more numerous than those encoding a known nitrate reductase, which is attributed to handling nitrosative stress caused by nitrite produced in their environmental vicinity (69, 70). However, the small number of studies on SRB examining either nitrite reduction or DNRA limits the understanding and prevalence of nitrite conversion pathways in aSRB. Based on the performed genome comparison, the combination of the projected DNRA and denitrification pathway is only present in A. acetoxydans. The reductive route from nitric oxide to dinitrogen gas is only conserved in a few SRB, none of which are acidophilic. Interestingly, it seems that DEACI_1836 is conserved in the majority of SRB although the similarity to sulfite reductases and lack of described NirA make it difficult to assign functional homology. Further study is required to understand the role of NirA, as currently described NirA are from phylogenetically very distinct organisms, which complicates functional interpretation. In contrast, AsrABC is only conserved in A. acetoxydans and four acidophilic Desulfosporosinus. The common trait of these strains is the source of isolation, all were isolated from acid mine drainage environments. However, AsrA is also detected in neutrophils, such as E. coli and S. typhimurium; hence, this trait cannot be ascribed to being acidophilic or isolated from acid mine drainage environments. Aside from nitrite reduction, the most crucial step in tackling nitrosative stress is performed by Hcp, which was detected in all checked aSRB (44, 58, 71). Given the chemical disproportionation of nitrite into nitric oxide in anoxic acidic environments, perhaps Hcp is advantageous for handling nitrosative stress. The role of Hcp in anoxic acidic conditions is an interesting target for microbial physiology studies.

This study highlights the fact that DNRA is structurally and functionally more diverse than previously thought. These findings can help interpretation of (meta)genome data from various ecosystems on their DNRA potential and the nitrogen cycle.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strain used and cultivation conditions

A. acetoxydans DSM 29876T was retrieved from our own culture collection at the Laboratory of Microbiology (Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands). All A. acetoxydans cultures were statically cultivated at 30°C using 217 mL serum vials containing 100 mL anoxic medium at pH 5.0. The medium is a modification of the medium used by Stams et al. (72) and consisted of (g/L): Na2HPO4 · 2H2O, 0.53; KH2PO4, 0.41; NH4Cl, 0.3; NaCl, 0.3; MgCl2 · 6H2O, 0.1; and CaCl2 · H2O, 0.11. As a redox indicator, 0.5 mg/L resazurin was added to the medium. Furthermore, acid and alkaline trace element solutions (1 mL/L) and a vitamin solution (0.2 mL/L) were added. The acid trace element solution consisted of (mM) H3BO4, 1; CoCl2, 0.5; CuCl2, 0.1; FeCl2, 7.5; NiCl2, 0.1; MnCl2, 0.5; ZnCl2, 0.5; and HCl, 50. The alkaline trace element solution consisted of (mM) Na2MoO4, 0.1; Na2SeO3, 0.1; Na2WO4, 0.1; and NaOH, 50. The vitamin solution consisted of (g/L) biotin, 0.02; cyanocobalamin, 0.1; niacin, 0.2; p-aminobenzoic acid, 0.1; pantothenic acid, 0.1; pyridoxine, 0.5; riboflavin, 0.1; and thiamine, 0.2. Chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) unless otherwise stated. Medium was supplemented with 5 mM glycerol, 0.1 g/L yeast extract, 1.5 mM of Na2S as a reducing agent, and either 20 mM NaNO3 (nitrate) or 20 mM NaSO4 (sulfate) as an electron acceptor. The headspace was filled with N2/CO2 (1.5 atm, 80:20, vol/vol) as a gas phase. All compounds were autoclaved except the vitamins, which were filter-sterilized through a 0.22-µM pore size polyethersulfone filter (Advanced Microdevices, Tepla, India). A. acetoxydans was transferred at least 10 times to ensure complete adaptation to either nitrate or sulfate as a sole electron acceptor. To obtain growth curves and transcriptomic and proteomic data, a 1% (vol/vol) inoculum was used, and experiments were performed in quadruplicate unless stated otherwise.

Resting cell experiments

For resting cell experiments, 100 mL of cell culture was harvested from cultivations in mid-exponential phase in an anaerobic tent (Coy, Grass Lake, MI, USA). The cell culture was centrifuged at 6,000 × g for 10 min (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and washed with mineral salt medium (MSM) not containing nitrate, glycerol, yeast extract, or vitamins. The pellet was resuspended in this MSM to 10% of the original volume and transferred to sterile 27 mL Hungate tubes, in which the gas phase was exchanged with N2/CO2 (80:20, vol/vol). To each tube, 2 mM glycerol was added as an electron donor, and to start the experiment, either NaNO3 (1 mM), NaNO2 (0.5 mM), or NH2OH · HCl (hydroxylamine hydrochloride, 0.5 mM) were added as an electron acceptor.

Analytical methods

Liquid and gas samples were taken from cultures growing under sulfate- and nitrate-reducing conditions and from the resting cell experiments. Liquid samples were taken to determine pH, optical density at 600 nm (OD600), and the concentrations of glycerol, organic acids, sulfate, nitrate, nitrite, hydroxylamine, and ammonium. Growth was monitored by OD600 using a spectrophotometer UV-1800 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Glycerol and organic acids were determined with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a Shimadzu LC2030c plus (Shimadzu) with a differential refractive index detector Shimadzu RID-20A (Shimadzu) and equipped with a Shodex SH1821 column (Shodex, Kyoto, Japan) operated at 45°C. As eluent, 5 mM sulfuric acid was used at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. Sulfate and nitrate were measured by anion exchange chromatography (IC) on a Dionex ICS-2100 (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) equipped with a Dionex IonPac AS19 column (Dionex) operated at 30°C. As eluent, KOH 22% (wt/vol) was used in a gradient ranging from 10 to 40 mM at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. For both HPLC and IC, the lower detection limit of measured compounds was 100 µM. Nitrite was measured using the Griess assay. In technical triplicates, 100 µL of supernatant was transferred to a 96-well plate containing 100 µL of Griess reagent, consisting of 50 µL 1% (wt/vol) sulfanilic acid in 1 M HCl and 50 µL of 0.1% (wt/vol) naphthylethylene diamine dihydrochloride. After 10 min incubation at room temperature, the absorbance was measured at 540 nm with a SpectraMax 190 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). Hydroxylamine was measured using a colorimetric hydroxylamine assay (73). To a 2 mL Eppendorf (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), 20 µL 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7), 160 µL demineralized H2O, 200 µL sample, 40 µL 12% (wt/wt) trichloroacetic acid, 200 µL 1% (wt/wt) 8-hydroxyquinoline, and 200 µL 1 M Na2CO3 were added. The solution was incubated at 100°C for 1 min and afterward incubated at room temperature for 15 min. In technical duplicates, the absorbance was measured at 705 nm. Ammonium was measured using the colorimetric Spectroquant Ammonium Test (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The absorbance was measured at 690 nm in technical duplicates. The lower detection limits for nitrite, hydroxylamine, and ammonium were 2.5, 10, and 100 µM, respectively. Gas samples were taken to determine nitric oxide using a NOA 280i nitric oxide analyzer (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). For all gas analyses, 100 µL gas samples were injected in the nitric oxide analyzer with a suction rate of 11.6 mL/min. The lower detection limit of nitric oxide was ~0.5 parts per million (ppm).

RNA extractions and sequencing

For transcriptomics, 100 mL of cell culture was harvested from cultivations in mid-exponential phase in an anaerobic tent (Coy). The cell culture was added to 200 mL of ice-cold sterile reduced medium, followed by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C (ThermoFisher Scientific). After centrifugation, the pellet was resuspended in 10 mL tris-EDTA (TE) buffer, transferred to sterile 50 mL tubes (Greiner, Frickenhausen, Germany), and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. The obtained pellet was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. For RNA isolation, the cells were lysed, and the proteins precipitated by using the MasterPure Gram Positive DNA Purification kit (Epicentre, Madison, WI, USA), without the RNAse step. β-mercaptoethanol was added to the lysis solution. RNA was extracted by using the Maxwell 16 LEV simplyRNA Purification kit on the Maxwell 16 platform (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA). Samples were sent to Novogene (Novogene, Cambridge, UK) for quality control. At Novogene, rRNA depletion was performed using the Illumina Ribo-Zero Plus rRNA Depletion Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and sequenced using the NovaSeq6000 (Illumina) resulting in paired-end reads of 150 bp.

Transcriptomics data analysis

Raw sequence data were trimmed for Illumina adapters and paired by using Trimmomatic 0.38 (74) with the following settings: SLIDINGWINDOW: four bases, quality ≥20, average read score >5, MINLEN: 100. Quality trimmed paired-end reads were checked by using FastQC 0.11.9 and MultiQC 1.11 (75, 76). The reads were mapped against the reference genome of A. acetoxydans (NCBI accession number: SAMEA6497484) using BWA-MEM 0.7.17 (77). Before mapping, 66 structural RNA (rRNA, sRNA, and tRNA) genes were removed from the data set. Count matrices with mapped reads were obtained by using featureCounts 2.0.1 with paired-end reads enabled (78). Mapping quality was assessed with SAMtools (flagstat) 2.0.4 (79). Mapped reads were converted into TPM to compare expression levels within samples. To test for significant statistical differences in gene expression between groups, we analyzed the read counts with the R package DESeq2 1.30.1 (80) using R 4.2.1. Heatmaps of both transcriptome and proteome were generated with the R package pheatmap and for visualization scaled per row. Differentially expressed genes were identified as genes with an expression change of at least fourfold and an adjusted P value of ≤0.01.

Protein extractions

For proteomics, 100 mL of cell culture was harvested of cultivations in mid-exponential phase in an anaerobic tent (Coy). Cultures were harvested by centrifuging at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Pellets were washed twice and resuspended in 1 mL of 100 mM Tris-HCL (pH 8). Solution was sonicated using a bandelin sonicator (Bandelin, Berlin, Germany) and a MS72 microtip probe (Bandelin, Berlin, Germany) sonicating at 40% amplitude for 5 min with cycles of 3 s pulse and 3 s pause while cooling on ice. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 10,000 × g at 4°C, and the protein concentration of the supernatant was determined using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific) using a bovine serum albumin standard. The supernatant was reduced with 15 mM dithiothreitol and incubated at 45°C for 30 min. Proteins were unfolded with 6 M urea and alkylated in 20 mM acrylamide and incubated at 21°C for 30 min. The pH was adjusted to 7 using 10% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). Protein aggregation capture was used to capture proteins by adding 1-µm-diameter magnetic carboxylate-modified beads (GE Healthcare) (81, 82). Protein aggregation was induced by the addition of 2.5 times the working volume of acetonitrile followed by 20 min shaking at room temperature. The solution was allowed to settle for 5 min and, during this and the consequent steps, beads were retained using a magnet, and after 60 s, the supernatant was removed. Beads were washed in sequence with 70% ethanol and acetonitrile. Proteins were digested by adding 0.5 µg sequencing grade trypsin in 100 µL of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate and incubated overnight at room temperature. Peptides were acidified to pH 3 using 10% TFA. Afterward, samples were pulse-centrifuged and the supernatant filtered through a double-layered C8 solid-phase extraction disk (CDS Analytical, Oxford, PA, USA). Trapped peptides in the extraction disk were eluted with a 50% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid solution. Peptides were concentrated using a Concentrator plus (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) to evaporate the organic solvent.

Proteomics

Per sample, 0.5 µg of protein was loaded directly onto a 0.10- × 250-mm ReproSil-Pur 120 C18-AQ 1.9-µm beads analytical column (beads prepared in-house, column from Dr. Maisch, Germany) at a constant pressure of 82.5 MPa (flow rate of circa 600 nL/min) with 1% formic acid in water and eluted at a flow of 0.5 µL/min with a 50 min linear gradient from 9% to 34% acetonitrile in water and 1% formic acid with a Thermo EASY nanoLC1000 (ThermoFisher Scientific). An electrospray potential of 3.5 kV was applied directly to the eluent via a stainless-steel needle fitted into the waste line of a micro cross that was connected between the nLC and the analytical column. On the connected Orbitrap Exploris 480 (ThermoFisher Scientific), mass spectrometry (MS) and tandem mass spectrometry (MSMS) automatic gain control targets were set to 300% and 100%, respectively, or maximum ion injection times of 50 ms (MS) and 30 ms (MSMS) were used. Higher energy collisional dissociation (HCD) fragmented (isolation width 1.2 m/z and 28% normalized collision energy) MSMS scans in a cycle time of 1.1 recording the most abundant 2–5+ charged peaks in the MS scan in a data-dependent mode (Resolution 15000, threshold 2e4, 15 s exclusion duration for the selected m/z ± 10 ppm). Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MSMS) runs with all MS/MS spectra obtained were analyzed with MaxQuant 1.6.3.4 (83). Peptides and proteins were considered reliable for further analysis when they had a false discovery rate <1% and when at least two peptides of a protein were identified of which at least one was unique and one unmodified. Data analysis was performed using Perseus version 1.6.2.1 (84). The relative protein abundances were represented as log10-transformed LFQ values. Student's t test was performed using the “LFQ intensity” columns obtained with a significance level of P ≤ 0.05 and S0 = 0.1. The nano-liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry system and data quality were checked with PTXQC using the MaxQuant result files (85).

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments
reviewer-comments.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Ida Peterse for the technical support in nitrite and nitric oxide measurements. We thank Arjan Pol for his advice on the nitrogen metabolism and suggestions for potentially formed intermediates.

This work was financed by the Soehngen Institute for Anaerobic Microbiology Gravitation Program (SIAM 024.002.002), a Gravitation grant of the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science.

Contributor Information

Irene Sánchez-Andrea, Email: irene.sanchez@ie.edu.

Liyuan Ma, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.

Sukhwan Yoon, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea.

Zhe-Xue Quan, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The raw RNA-Seq data sets have been deposited to the European Nucleotide Archive: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena, under accession number PRJEB64595. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride, with the data set identifier PXD045135 (86).

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00967-23.

File S1. msystems.00967-23-s0001.docx.

Growth of Acididesulfobacillus acetoxydans with nitrate and glycerol.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00967-23.SuF1
File S2. msystems.00967-23-s0002.docx.

Resting cell experiments of Acididesulfobacillus acetoxydans.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00967-23.SuF2
File S3. msystems.00967-23-s0003.xlsx.

Transcriptome and proteome data.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00967-23.SuF3
File S4. msystems.00967-23-s0004.docx.

Upregulated molybdopterin containing oxidoreductases.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00967-23.SuF4
File S5. msystems.00967-23-s0005.docx.

Multiple sequence alignment of NirA and DEACI_1836.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00967-23.SuF5
OPEN PEER REVIEW. reviewer-comments.pdf.

An accounting of the reviewer comments and feedback.

reviewer-comments.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00967-23.SuF6

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Kuypers MMM, Marchant HK, Kartal B. 2018. The microbial nitrogen-cycling network. Nat Rev Microbiol 16:263–276. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2018.9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Rütting T, Boeckx P, Müller C, Klemedtsson L. 2011. Assessment of the importance of dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium for the terrestrial nitrogen cycle. Biogeosciences 8:1779–1791. doi: 10.5194/bg-8-1779-2011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Haase D, Hermann B, Einsle O, Simon J. 2017. Epsilonproteobacterial hydroxylamine oxidoreductase (εHao): characterization of a 'missing link' in the multihaem cytochrome c family. Mol Microbiol 105:127–138. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13690 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Wise BR, Roane TM, Mosier AC. 2020. Community composition of nitrite reductase gene sequences in an acid mine drainage environment. Microb Ecol 79:562–575. doi: 10.1007/s00248-019-01420-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Chicano TM, Dietrich L, de Almeida NM, Akram M, Hartmann E, Leidreiter F, Leopoldus D, Mueller M, Sánchez R, Nuijten GHL, Reimann J, Seifert K-A, Schlichting I, van Niftrik L, Jetten MSM, Dietl A, Kartal B, Parey K, Barends TRM. 2021. Structural and functional characterization of the intracellular filament-forming nitrite oxidoreductase multiprotein complex. Nat Microbiol 6:1129–1139. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-00934-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Hanson TE, Campbell BJ, Kalis KM, Campbell MA, Klotz MG. 2013. Nitrate ammonification by Nautilia profundicola AmH: experimental evidence consistent with a free hydroxylamine intermediate. Front Microbiol 4:180. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Soler-Jofra A, Pérez J, van Loosdrecht MCM. 2021. Hydroxylamine and the nitrogen cycle: a review. Water Res 190:116723. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116723 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Sorokin DY, Tikhonova TV, Koch H, van den Berg EM, Hinderks RS, Pabst M, Dergousova NI, Soloveva AY, Kuenen GJ, Popov VO, van Loosdrecht MCM, Lücker S. 2023. Trichlorobacter ammonificans, a dedicated acetate-dependent ammonifier with a novel module for dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonia. ISME J 17:1639–1648. doi: 10.1038/s41396-023-01473-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Grimaldi S, Schoepp-Cothenet B, Ceccaldi P, Guigliarelli B, Magalon A. 2013. The prokaryotic Mo/W-bisPGD enzymes family: a catalytic workhorse in bioenergetic. Biochim Biophys Acta 1827:1048–1085. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.01.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Rothery RA, Workun GJ, Weiner JH. 2008. The prokaryotic complex iron-sulfur molybdoenzyme family. Biochim Biophys Acta 1778:1897–1929. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Arnoux P, Sabaty M, Alric J, Frangioni B, Guigliarelli B, Adriano JM, Pignol D. 2003. Structural and redox plasticity in the heterodimeric periplasmic nitrate reductase. Nat Struct Biol 10:928–934. doi: 10.1038/nsb994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Haveman SA, Greene EA, Stilwell CP, Voordouw JK, Voordouw G. 2004. Physiological and gene expression analysis of inhibition of Desulfovibrio vulgaris hildenborough by nitrite. J Bacteriol 186:7944–7950. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.23.7944-7950.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Atkinson SJ, Mowat CG, Reid GA, Chapman SK. 2007. An octaheme c-type cytochrome from Shewanella oneidensis can reduce nitrite and hydroxylamine. FEBS Lett 581:3805–3808. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Tikhonova TV, Slutsky A, Antipov AN, Boyko KM, Polyakov KM, Sorokin DY, Zvyagilskaya RA, Popov VO. 2006. Molecular and catalytic properties of a novel cytochrome c nitrite reductase from nitrate-reducing haloalkaliphilic sulfur-oxidizing bacterium Thioalkalivibrio nitratireducens. Biochim Biophys Acta 1764:715–723. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2005.12.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Yukioka Y, Tanahashi T, Shida K, Oguchi H, Ogawa S, Saito C, Yajima S, Ito S, Ohsawa K, Shoun H, Sasaki Y. 2017. A role of nitrite reductase (NirBD) for NO homeostatic regulation in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). FEMS Microbiol Lett 364:241. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnw241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Stewart V. 1994. Regulation of nitrate and nitrite reductase synthesis in enterobacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 66:37–45. doi: 10.1007/BF00871631 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Sánchez-Andrea I, van der Graaf CM, Hornung B, Bale NJ, Jarzembowska M, Sousa DZ, Rijpstra WIC, Sinninghe Damsté JS, Stams AJM. 2022. Acetate degradation at low pH by the moderately acidophilic sulfate reducer Acididesulfobacillus acetoxydans gen. nov. sp. nov. Front Microbiol 13:816605. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.816605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Calisto F, Pereira MM. 2021. The ion-translocating NrfD-like subunit of energy-transducing membrane complexes. Front Chem 9:663706. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.663706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Magalon A, Fedor JG, Walburger A, Weiner JH. 2011. Molybdenum enzymes in bacteria and their maturation. Coord Chem Rev 255:1159–1178. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.12.031 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Mori K, Kim H, Kakegawa T, Hanada S. 2003. A novel lineage of sulfate-reducing microorganisms: Thermodesulfobiaceae fam. nov., Thermodesulfobium narugense, gen. nov., sp. nov., a new thermophilic isolate from a hot spring. Extremophiles 7:283–290. doi: 10.1007/s00792-003-0320-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Frolov EN, Kublanov IV, Toshchakov SV, Samarov NI, Novikov AA, Lebedinsky AV, Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA, Chernyh NA. 2017. Thermodesulfobium acidiphilum sp. nov., a thermoacidophilic, sulfate-reducing, chemoautotrophic bacterium from a thermal site. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:1482–1485. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Alazard D, Joseph M, Battaglia-Brunet F, Cayol JL, Ollivier B. 2010. Desulfosporosinus acidiphilus sp. nov.: a moderately acidophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from acid mining drainage sediments. Extremophiles 14:305–312. doi: 10.1007/s00792-010-0309-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Sánchez-Andrea I, Stams AJM, Hedrich S, Ňancucheo I, Johnson DB. 2015. Desulfosporosinus acididurans sp. nov.: an acidophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from acidic sediments. Extremophiles 19:39–47. doi: 10.1007/s00792-014-0701-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Panova IA, Ikkert O, Avakyan MR, Kopitsyn DS, Mardanov AV, Pimenov NV, Shcherbakova VA, Ravin NV, Karnachuk OV. 2021. Desulfosporosinus metallidurans sp. nov., an acidophilic, metal-resistant sulfate-reducing bacterium from acid mine drainage. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 71:004876. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004876 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Mardanov AV, Panova IA, Beletsky AV, Avakyan MR, Kadnikov VV, Antsiferov DV, Banks D, Frank YA, Pimenov NV, Ravin NV, Karnachuk OV. 2016. Genomic insights into a new acidophilic, copper-resistant Desulfosporosinus isolate from the oxidized tailings area of an abandoned gold mine. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 92:fiw111. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Karnachuk OV, Kadnikov VV, Panova IA, Mardanov AV, Beletsky AV, Danilova EV, Avakyan MR, Ravin NV. 2017. Genome sequence of the copper resistant and acid-tolerant Desulfosporosinus sp. BG isolated from the tailings of a molybdenum-tungsten mine in the Transbaikal area. Genom Data 11:106–108. doi: 10.1016/j.gdata.2016.12.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Abicht HK, Mancini S, Karnachuk OV, Solioz M. 2011. Genome sequence of Desulfosporosinus sp. OT, an acidophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium from copper mining waste in Norilsk, Northern Siberia. J Bacteriol 193:6104–6105. doi: 10.1128/JB.06018-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Mancini S, Kumar R, Abicht HK, Fischermeier E, Solioz M. 2016. Copper resistance and its regulation in the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfosporosinus sp. OT. Microbiology (Reading) 162:684–693. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Adams ME, Postgate JR. 1959. A new sulphate-reducing vibrio. J Gen Microbiol 20:252–257. doi: 10.1099/00221287-20-2-252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Robertson WJ, Bowman JP, Franzmann PD, Mee BJ. 2001. Desulfosporosinus meridiei sp. nov., a spore-forming sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from gasolene-contaminated groundwater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:133–140. doi: 10.1099/00207713-51-1-133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Vatsurina A, Badrutdinova D, Schumann P, Spring S, Vainshtein M. 2008. Desulfosporosinus hippei sp. nov., a mesophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from permafrost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:1228–1232. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65368-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Vandieken V, Niemann H, Engelen B, Cypionka H. 2017. Marinisporobacter balticus gen. nov., sp. nov., Desulfosporosinus nitroreducens sp. nov. and Desulfosporosinus fructosivorans sp. nov., new spore-forming bacteria isolated from subsurface sediments of the Baltic Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:1887–1893. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001883 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Hausmann B, Pjevac P, Huemer M, Herbold CW, Pester M, Loy A. 2019. Draft genome sequence of Desulfosporosinus sp. strain Sb-LF, isolated from an acidic peatland in Germany. Microbiol Resour Announc 8:e00428-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00428-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ramamoorthy S, Sass H, Langner H, Schumann P, Kroppenstedt RM, Spring S, Overmann J, Rosenzweig RF. 2006. Desulfosporosinus lacus sp. nov., a sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from pristine freshwater lake sediments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:2729–2736. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63610-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Lee YJ, Romanek CS, Wiegel J. 2009. Desulfosporosinus youngiae sp. nov., a spore-forming, sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from a constructed wetland treating acid mine drainage. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:2743–2746. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.007336-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Utkin I, Woese C, Wiegel J. 1994. Isolation and characterization of Desulfitobacterium dehalogenans gen. nov., sp. nov., an anaerobic bacterium which reductively dechlorinates chlorophenolic compounds. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44:612–619. doi: 10.1099/00207713-44-4-612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Christiansen N, Ahring BK. 1996. Desulfitobacterium hafniense sp. nov., an anaerobic, reductively dechlorinating bacterium. Int J Syst Bacteriol 46:442–448. doi: 10.1099/00207713-46-2-442 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Finneran KT, Forbush HM, VanPraagh CVG, Lovley DR. 2002. Desulfitobacterium metallireducens sp. nov., an anaerobic bacterium that couples growth to the reduction of metals and humic acids as well as chlorinated compounds. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1929–1935. doi: 10.1099/00207713-52-6-1929 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Sanford RA, Cole JR, Löffler FE, Tiedje JM. 1996. Characterization of Desulfitobacterium chlororespirans sp. nov., which grows by coupling the oxidation of lactate to the reductive dechlorination of 3-chloro-4-hydroxybenzoate. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:3800–3808. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.10.3800-3808.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Maia LB, Moura JJG. 2014. How biology handles nitrite. Chem Rev 114:5273–5357. doi: 10.1021/cr400518y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Samouilov A, Kuppusamy P, Zweier JL. 1998. Evaluation of the magnitude and rate of nitric oxide production from nitrite in biological systems. Arch Biochem Biophys 357:1–7. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1998.0785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Schreiber F, Wunderlin P, Udert KM, Wells GF. 2012. Nitric oxide and nitrous oxide turnover in natural and engineered microbial communities: biological pathways, chemical reactions, and novel technologies. Front Microbiol 3:372. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00372 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Rowley G, Hensen D, Felgate H, Arkenberg A, Appia-Ayme C, Prior K, Harrington C, Field SJ, Butt JN, Baggs E, Richardson DJ. 2012. Resolving the contributions of the membrane-bound and periplasmic nitrate reductase systems to nitric oxide and nitrous oxide production in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Biochem J 441:755–762. doi: 10.1042/BJ20110971 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Cole JA. 2021. Anaerobic bacterial response to nitric oxide stress: widespread misconceptions and physiologically relevant responses. Mol Microbiol 116:29–40. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Maia LB, Moura JJG. 2015. Nitrite reduction by molybdoenzymes: a new class of nitric oxide-forming nitrite reductases. J Biol Inorg Chem 20:403–433. doi: 10.1007/s00775-014-1234-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Huang CJ, Barrett EL. 1991. Sequence analysis and expression of the Salmonella typhimurium asr operon encoding production of hydrogen sulfide from sulfite. J Bacteriol 173:1544–1553. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.4.1544-1553.1991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Huang CJ, Barrett EL. 1990. Identification and cloning of genes involved in anaerobic sulfite reduction by Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol 172:4100–4102. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.7.4100-4102.1990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Hermann B, Kern M, La Pietra L, Simon J, Einsle O. 2015. The octahaem MccA is a haem c-copper sulfite reductase. Nature 520:706–709. doi: 10.1038/nature14109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Simon J, Kroneck PMH. 2013. Microbial sulfite respiration. Adv Microb Physiol 62:45–117. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-410515-7.00002-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Simon J, Klotz MG. 2013. Diversity and evolution of bioenergetic systems involved in microbial nitrogen compound transformations. Biochim Biophys Acta 1827:114–135. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Moreno-Vivián C, Cabello P, Martínez-Luque M, Blasco R, Castillo F. 1999. Prokaryotic nitrate reduction: molecular properties and functional distinction among bacterial nitrate reductases. J Bacteriol 181:6573–6584. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.21.6573-6584.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Schnell R, Sandalova T, Hellman U, Lindqvist Y, Schneider G. 2005. Siroheme- and [Fe4-S4]-dependent NirA from Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a sulfite reductase with a covalent Cys-Tyr bond in the active site. J Biol Chem 280:27319–27328. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M502560200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Swamy U, Wang M, Tripathy JN, Kim SK, Hirasawa M, Knaff DB, Allen JP. 2005. Structure of spinach nitrite reductase: implications for multi-electron reactions by the iron-sulfur:siroheme cofactor. Biochemistry 44:16054–16063. doi: 10.1021/bi050981y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Fenn S, Dubern J-F, Cigana C, De Simone M, Lazenby J, Juhas M, Schwager S, Bianconi I, Döring G, Elmsley J, Eberl L, Williams P, Bragonzi A, Cámara M. 2021. NirA is an alternative nitrite reductase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa with potential as an antivirulence target. mBio 12:e00207-21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00207-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Jackson RH, Cornish-Bowden A, Cole JA. 1981. Prosthetic groups of the NADH-dependent nitrite reductase from Escherichia coli K12. Biochem J 193:861–867. doi: 10.1042/bj1930861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Vega JM, Kamin H. 1977. Spinach nitrite reductase. Purification and properties of a siroheme-containing iron-sulfur enzyme. J Biol Chem 252:896–909. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Hagen WR. 2019. EPR spectroscopy of putative enzyme intermediates in the NO reductase and the auto-nitrosylation reaction of Desulfovibrio vulgaris hybrid cluster protein. FEBS Lett 593:3075–3083. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Wang J, Vine CE, Balasiny BK, Rizk J, Bradley CL, Tinajero-Trejo M, Poole RK, Bergaust LL, Bakken LR, Cole JA. 2016. The roles of the hybrid cluster protein, Hcp and its reductase, Hcr, in high affinity nitric oxide reduction that protects anaerobic cultures of Escherichia coli against nitrosative stress. Mol Microbiol 100:877–892. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Kim CC, Monack D, Falkow S. 2003. Modulation of virulence by two acidified nitrite-responsive loci of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Infect Immun 71:3196–3205. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.6.3196-3205.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Boutrin MC, Wang C, Aruni W, Li X, Fletcher HM. 2012. Nitric oxide stress resistance in Porphyromonas gingivalis is mediated by a putative hydroxylamine reductase. J Bacteriol 194:1582–1592. doi: 10.1128/JB.06457-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. da Silva SM, Amaral C, Neves SS, Santos C, Pimentel C, Rodrigues-Pousada C. 2015. An HcpR paralog of Desulfovibrio gigas provides protection against nitrosative stress. FEBS Open Bio 5:594–604. doi: 10.1016/j.fob.2015.07.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Cadby IT, Faulkner M, Cheneby J, Long J, van Helden J, Dolla A, Cole JA. 2017. Coordinated response of the Desulfovibrio desulfuricans 27774 transcriptome to nitrate, nitrite and nitric oxide. Sci Rep 7:16228. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16403-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Heo H, Kwon M, Song B, Yoon S, Nojiri H. 2020. Involvement of NO3- in ecophysiological regulation of dissimilatory nitrate/nitrite reduction to ammonium (DNRA) is implied by physiological characterization of soil DNRA bacteria isolated via a colorimetric screening method. Appl Environ Microbiol 86:e01054-20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01054-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Zhang L, Wüst A, Prasser B, Müller C, Einsle O. 2019. Functional assembly of nitrous oxide reductase provides insights into copper site maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:12822–12827. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903819116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Müller C, Zhang L, Zipfel S, Topitsch A, Lutz M, Eckert J, Prasser B, Chami M, Lü W, Du J, Einsle O. 2022. Molecular interplay of an assembly machinery for nitrous oxide reductase. Nature 608:626–631. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05015-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Yoon S, Heo H, Han H, Song D-U, Bakken LR, Frostegård Å, Yoon S. 2023. Suggested role of NosZ in preventing N2O inhibition of dissimilatory nitrite reduction to ammonium. mBio 14:e0154023. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01540-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Fu H, Jin M, Ju L, Mao Y, Gao H. 2014. Evidence for function overlapping of CymA and the cytochrome bc1 complex in the Shewanella oneidensis nitrate and nitrite respiration. Environ Microbiol 16:3181–3195. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Marietou A. 2016. Nitrate reduction in sulfate-reducing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 363:155. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnw155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Greene EA, Hubert C, Nemati M, Jenneman GE, Voordouw G. 2003. Nitrite reductase activity of sulphate-reducing bacteria prevents their inhibition by nitrate-reducing, sulphide-oxidizing bacteria. Environ Microbiol 5:607–617. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00446.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Rabus R, Venceslau SS, Wöhlbrand L, Voordouw G, Wall JD, Pereira IAC. 2015. A post-genomic view of the ecophysiology, catabolism and biotechnological relevance of sulphate-reducing prokaryotes. Adv Microb Physiol 66:55–321. doi: 10.1016/bs.ampbs.2015.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Rodionov DA, Hebbeln P, Gelfand MS, Eitinger T. 2006. Comparative and functional genomic analysis of prokaryotic nickel and cobalt uptake transporters: evidence for a novel group of ATP-binding cassette transporters. J Bacteriol 188:317–327. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.1.317-327.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Stams AJM, Van Dijk JB, Dijkema C, Plugge CM. 1993. Growth of syntrophic propionate-oxidizing bacteria with fumarate in the absence of methanogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:1114–1119. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.4.1114-1119.1993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Frear DS, Burrell RC. 1955. Spectrophotometric method for determining hydroxylamine reductase activity in higher plants. Anal Chem 27:1664–1665. doi: 10.1021/ac60106a054 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Andrews S, Krueger F, Seconds-Pichon A, Biggins F, Wingett S. 2015. FastQC. A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Available from: http://www.bioinformatics.bbsrc.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
  • 76. Ewels P, Magnusson M, Lundin S, Käller M. 2016. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics 32:3047–3048. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Li H, Durbin R. 2010. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26:589–595. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. 2014. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30:923–930. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup . 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Batth TS, Tollenaere MX, Rüther P, Gonzalez-Franquesa A, Prabhakar BS, Bekker-Jensen S, Deshmukh AS, Olsen JV. 2019. Protein aggregation capture on microparticles enables multipurpose proteomics sample preparation. Mol Cell Proteomics 18:1027–1035. doi: 10.1074/mcp.TIR118.001270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Hughes CS, Foehr S, Garfield DA, Furlong EE, Steinmetz LM, Krijgsveld J. 2014. Ultrasensitive proteome analysis using paramagnetic bead technology. Mol Syst Biol 10:757. doi: 10.15252/msb.20145625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Cox J, Hein MY, Luber CA, Paron I, Nagaraj N, Mann M. 2014. Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol Cell Proteomics 13:2513–2526. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.031591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Tyanova S, Temu T, Sinitcyn P, Carlson A, Hein MY, Geiger T, Mann M, Cox J. 2016. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat Methods 13:731–740. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Bielow C, Mastrobuoni G, Kempa S. 2016. Proteomics quality control: quality control software for MaxQuant results. J Proteome Res 15:777–787. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Perez-Riverol Y, Bai J, Bandla C, García-Seisdedos D, Hewapathirana S, Kamatchinathan S, Kundu DJ, Prakash A, Frericks-Zipper A, Eisenacher M, Walzer M, Wang S, Brazma A, Vizcaíno JA. 2022. The PRIDE database resources in 2022: a hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences. Nucleic Acids Res 50:D543–D552. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Reviewer comments
reviewer-comments.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
File S1. msystems.00967-23-s0001.docx.

Growth of Acididesulfobacillus acetoxydans with nitrate and glycerol.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00967-23.SuF1
File S2. msystems.00967-23-s0002.docx.

Resting cell experiments of Acididesulfobacillus acetoxydans.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00967-23.SuF2
File S3. msystems.00967-23-s0003.xlsx.

Transcriptome and proteome data.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00967-23.SuF3
File S4. msystems.00967-23-s0004.docx.

Upregulated molybdopterin containing oxidoreductases.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00967-23.SuF4
File S5. msystems.00967-23-s0005.docx.

Multiple sequence alignment of NirA and DEACI_1836.

DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00967-23.SuF5
OPEN PEER REVIEW. reviewer-comments.pdf.

An accounting of the reviewer comments and feedback.

reviewer-comments.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00967-23.SuF6

Data Availability Statement

The raw RNA-Seq data sets have been deposited to the European Nucleotide Archive: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena, under accession number PRJEB64595. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride, with the data set identifier PXD045135 (86).


Articles from mSystems are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES