Skip to main content
mSystems logoLink to mSystems
. 2024 Feb 20;9(3):e01050-23. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01050-23

Metagenomic assembled genomes indicated the potential application of hypersaline microbiome for plant growth promotion and stress alleviation in salinized soils

Kiran Dindhoria 1,2, Raghawendra Kumar 1, Bhavya Bhargava 1, Rakshak Kumar 1,2,
Editor: Rup Lal3
Reviewed by: Shashi Kant Bhatia4, Mukesh Kumar Awasthi5
PMCID: PMC10949518  PMID: 38377278

ABSTRACT

Climate change is causing unpredictable seasonal variations globally. Due to the continuously increasing earth’s surface temperature, the rate of water evaporation is enhanced, conceiving a problem of soil salinization, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. The accumulation of salt degrades soil quality, impairs plant growth, and reduces agricultural yields. Salt-tolerant, plant-growth-promoting microorganisms may offer a solution, enhancing crop productivity and soil fertility in salinized areas. In the current study, genome-resolved metagenomic analysis has been performed to investigate the salt-tolerating and plant growth-promoting potential of two hypersaline ecosystems, Sambhar Lake and Drang Mine. The samples were co-assembled independently by Megahit, MetaSpades, and IDBA-UD tools. A total of 67 metagenomic assembled genomes (MAGs) were reconstructed following the binning process, including 15 from Megahit, 26 from MetaSpades, and 26 from IDBA_UD assembly tools. As compared to other assemblers, the MAGs obtained by MetaSpades were of superior quality, with a completeness range of 12.95%–96.56% and a contamination range of 0%–8.65%. The medium and high-quality MAGs from MetaSpades, upon functional annotation, revealed properties such as salt tolerance (91.3%), heavy metal tolerance (95.6%), exopolysaccharide (95.6%), and antioxidant (60.86%) biosynthesis. Several plant growth-promoting attributes, including phosphate solubilization and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production, were consistently identified across all obtained MAGs. Conversely, characteristics such as iron acquisition and potassium solubilization were observed in a substantial majority, specifically 91.3%, of the MAGs. The present study indicates that hypersaline microflora can be used as bio-fertilizing agents for agricultural practices in salinized areas by alleviating prevalent stresses.

IMPORTANCE

The strategic implementation of metagenomic assembled genomes (MAGs) in exploring the properties and harnessing microorganisms from ecosystems like hypersaline niches has transformative potential in agriculture. This approach promises to redefine our comprehension of microbial diversity and its ecosystem roles. Recovery and decoding of MAGs unlock genetic resources, enabling the development of new solutions for agricultural challenges. Enhanced understanding of these microbial communities can lead to more efficient nutrient cycling, pest control, and soil health maintenance. Consequently, traditional agricultural practices can be improved, resulting in increased yields, reduced environmental impacts, and heightened sustainability. MAGs offer a promising avenue for sustainable agriculture, bridging the gap between cutting-edge genomics and practical field applications.

KEYWORDS: hypersaline ecosystems, metagenomic assembled genomes, salt stress, heavy metal stress, plant growth promotion, salinized soil

INTRODUCTION

Hypersaline environments are frequently referred to as “poly-extreme ecosystems” because of their exposure to multiple stress conditions such as high salinities, high osmotic pressure, low water availability, and environmental variables such as temperature, pH, and dissolved oxygen (1). They pose several challenges to life due to their harsh conditions. Despite their hostile conditions, they are capable of supporting a surprising diversity of specialized organisms, including halotolerant and halophilic microorganisms. All three domains of life, Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya, have halophilic and extremely halotolerant members that live in hypersaline ecosystems containing salt concentrations at or above the NaCl saturation point. These halophilic or extremely salt-tolerant microorganisms employ various methods to resist high salt concentrations and, in many cases, modify their physiology in response to variations in salt concentrations in their surroundings. To maintain the osmotic pressure, halophiles generally use “salt in strategy,” in which inorganic ions Cl and K+ ions are accumulated inside the cell (2). In these conditions, the proteome of the microorganisms requires a high internal salt content for efficient folding and operation of both enzymes and proteins. The intake or synthesis of osmolytes is another method used by hypersaline bacteria. It is sometimes referred to as the compatible solute or low-salt-in strategy. Osmolytes/compatible solutes are small chemical molecules that do not impact cellular metabolism (3). Sugars, polyols, amino acids, and their derivatives are the most common osmolytes. Microorganisms synthesize compatible solutes such as glycine, betaine, ectoine, glycerol, trehalose, sucrose, etc., when the environment contains high salt content (4, 5). They are strong water structure formers that are probably excluded from proteins’ hydration shells, lowering water activity coefficients and stabilizing the hydration shell (6). In addition to assisting the hypersaline microflora in maintaining regular metabolic processes and osmotic balance maintenance, the compatible solutes also prevent microbial proteins from denaturation, increasing their capacity to withstand significant changes in the surrounding saline environment (7). Since hypersaline microflora are well adapted to extreme salt conditions, they have garnered significant interest in various biotechnological applications (811). Their diverse metabolic capabilities and resilience to extreme environments have made them valuable candidates. There are several reports exploring the microbial and metabolic diversity of various hypersaline ecosystems. In 2021, Bueno de Mesquita and colleagues uncovered a new genus, Methanosalis, during their investigation of the salt pond in San Francisco (12). In addition, the research group of Chakraborty and Kurth delved into the xenobiotic-degrading and carbon fixation capabilities of Lonar Lake in India and La Brava and Tebenquiche lakes in Salar de Atacama, Chile, respectively (13, 14). Collectively, these studies contribute to our understanding of the unique microbial communities and metabolic processes present in hypersaline environments across different geographical locations. The hypersaline microbes also break down complex organic matter, releasing nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus that are needed for plant growth. The biogeochemical functions of hypersaline microflora have been the subject of numerous studies (15, 16). The halophiles from hypersaline niches can promote the sustainable cultivation of crops in highly saline soils as they are capable of thriving under extreme salt stresses.

In recent years, salt-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizosphere (PGPR) microorganisms have been used as bioinoculants for the improvement of crop productivity and soil fertility in salt-affected areas. There are several literature reports indicating their positive influence on the growth and yield of various crops under saline conditions (1720). The PGPRs isolated from saline areas are well adapted to high salt concentrations due to the presence of specialized transporters in their membranes and the synthesis of osmoprotectants for the maintenance of osmotic equilibrium (21). Many PGPRs isolated from the rhizosphere of the plants growing in hypersaline environments have been reported to enhance the growth of plants (22, 23). Although there are several reports on the application of microorganisms isolated from plant rhizosphere of hypersaline ecosystems (22, 23), comprehensive information on the distribution of plant growth-promoting properties across their entire microbial ecosystems is still lacking. Therefore, in the present study, metagenomic analysis of two hypersaline ecosystems, namely Sambhar Lake and Drang Mine, has been carried out with the aim of (i) studying the adaptational strategies evolved by the microflora of two hypersaline ecosystems to cooperate with prevalent stresses; (ii) investigate the distribution of plant growth promoting attributes for their potential application in saline agricultural lands; and (iii) recovering high-quality MAGs and observe the genetic evidence for various adaptations and plant growth promotion.

RESULTS

Metagenomic assembly and binning

Samples for shotgun sequencing were collected from Drang Mine and Sambhar Lake, located in Himachal Pradesh and Rajasthan, respectively (see Fig. S1 at https://figshare.com/s/5e0dbdb113e1249742cb). In our previous study, the physicochemical analysis revealed distinct differences between the samples from Sambhar Lake and Drang Mine. Specifically, the Sambhar Lake samples exhibited a higher temperature of 29.8°C ± 0.7°C, an alkaline pH of 9.1 ± 0, lower levels of Na+ ions at 32985.92 ± 437 ppm, higher concentrations of Mg2+ ions at 29.55 ± 0.21 ppm, and elevated K+ ion levels at 117.3 ± 1.83 ppm. In contrast, the Drang Mine samples had a lower temperature of 20.4°C ± 0.56°C, a neutral pH of 7.1 ± 0.14, higher Na+ ion concentrations at 50829.30 ± 781.4 ppm, no detectable Mg2+ ions, and lower K+ ion levels at 68.07 ± 3.0 ppm (15). The high-quality sequences from all the samples were co-assembled with the help of assembly tools, namely Megahit, MetaSpades, and IDBA-UD (see Fig. S2 at https://figshare.com/s/5e0dbdb113e1249742cb). The assembly through Megahit gives 29059 contigs, with a total length of 147,360,110 bp and an N50 value of 5844 bp. MetaSpades assembly 26166 contigs, a total of 146,369,712 bp with N50 value of 7136 bp. Meanwhile, IDBA-UD gave 19,844 contigs with a total size of 127,969,138 bp and N50 of 8,793 bp (see Fig. S3 at https://figshare.com/s/5e0dbdb113e1249742cb). Binning of each co-assembled sample was first done by MaxBin, MetaBat, CONCOCT and then optimized by DAStool, resulting in 15 MAGs from Megahit, 26 MAGs from MetaSpades, and 26 MAGs from IDBA-UD (see Fig. S6 at https://figshare.com/s/5e0dbdb113e1249742cb). Collectively, 23.52% and 68.6% of the MAGs were contributed by Drang Mine and Sambhar Lake samples, respectively (see Table S1 at https://figshare.com/s/5e0dbdb113e1249742cb).

In total, 67 MAGs were recovered using three individual assembly tools. The genome size of Megahit ranged from 779,377 bp - 4,099,527 bp with N50 values from 4,182 bp to 145,163 bp, MetaSpades ranged from 586,252 bp to 6,720,040 bp with N50 values from 3,153 bp to 68,824 bp, and IDBA-UD ranged from 457,442 bp to 3,417,808 bp with N50 values from 2,150 bp to 54,825 bp. The completeness and the contamination of the MAGs obtained from Megahit, Metaspades, and IDBA-UD varied from 53.29% to 92.73% and 0.09%–26.04%, 12.95%–96.56% and 0%–8.65%, and 26.74%–97.67% and 0%–26.55%, respectively. MAGs meeting the criteria of completion exceeding 90% and contamination below 5% were categorized as high quality. Those falling within the range of completion greater than or equal to 50% and contamination less than 10%, as well as MAGs with completion less than 50% and contamination less than 10%, were designated as medium-quality and low-quality MAGs, respectively, in accordance with the specified criteria outlined by reference 24. Accordingly, the tool Megahit delivered 3 low-quality, 11 medium-quality, and only 1 high-quality MAGs. MetaSpades provided 3 low-quality, 14 medium-quality, and 9 high-quality MAGs. On the other hand, IDBA-UD delivered 5 low-quality, 12 medium-quality, and 9 high-quality MAGs. The CheckM tool assesses the basic statistics of MAGs and assigns the lineages by utilizing their clade-specific marker genes. Among the MAGs assembled by Megahit, seven were from the bacterial, and eight were from the archaeal lineages. The Metaspades delivered 8 MAGs belonging to bacteria and 18 to Archaea. Meanwhile, IDBA-UD assembled 7 MAGs, which were bacteria, and 19 MAGs, which were Archaea (Fig. 1).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

of the reconstructed MAGs. (A) Heatmap showing the different values of MAGs quality: completeness, contamination, genome size, and N50 values. (B) Phylogenetic visualization of recovered MAGs, where black-colored branches represent low-quality, pink-colored branches represent medium-quality, and blue-colored branches show high-quality MAGs.

Microbial taxonomic assignment and functional annotation of medium- and high-quality MAGs

The medium- and high-quality groups of the MAGs were aligned against the GTDB database for taxonomic assignment. Out of all the MAGs obtained from three assembly tools after binning, 71.43% and 28.57% of MAGs were assigned to the domains Archaea and Bacteria, respectively. Five of the 12 mid- and high-quality MAGs recovered from the Megahit assembly were classified as genus Salinarchaeum. In bacteria, only two MAGs were classified to genera level, one to Longimonas and the other to Massilia. From assembly carried out by MetaSpades, five MAGs classified as genus Salinarchaeum, four MAGs as Natronomonas, one as Halorubrum, one as Halovenus, and one as Halalkaliarchaeum belonging to the domain Archaea were recovered. On the other hand, from the domain Bacteria, one Massilia, one Spiribacter, one Pseudomonas, and one Longimonas genera were recovered. By contrast, in the IDBA-UD assembly, five MAGs were assigned to genera Salinarchaeum, four MAGs to Natronomonas, two to Halorubrum, one to Halovenus, and one to Halalkaliarchaeum. Meanwhile, in Bacteria, only two MAGs belonging to the genera Spiribacter and Longimonas were obtained (Fig. 2). To understand the putative functions of the dominant bacteria in hypersaline ecosystems, the medium- and high-quality MAGs were functionally annotated using the KEGG database (25). The functional profiling revealed the prevalence of salt-tolerant and heavy metal-tolerant strategies in their residential microflora. Approximately 83.33% of the MAGs recovered by Megahit, 91.3% by MetaSpades, and 95.23% by IDBA-UD showed genes related to salt stress. The MAGs IDBA_002, IDBA_013, IDBA_026, Megahit_013, and Metaspades_012 exhibited the presence of all the selected salt-tolerant genes (Fig. 2). The heavy metal stress tolerance-associated genes were found across all the MAGs obtained from Megahit, 95.65% of the MAGs obtained from MetaSpades, and 95.23% of the MAGs obtained from IDBA-UD. In addition, some other adaptations, such as exopolysaccharide biosynthesis and antioxidant production, were shown by 96.42% and 64.28% of the total mid- and high-quality MAGs, respectively. The plant growth-promoting (PGP) attributes were observed to be uniformly distributed within the microbiome of hypersaline niches. Specifically, the potential for phosphate solubilization was identified in 100% of the MAGs obtained from both Megahit and MetaSpades, while IDBA-UD revealed this capability in 95.23% of the MAGs.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Taxonomic classification and functional annotation of medium- and high-quality MAGs. The functional analysis revealed genetic evidence for salt tolerance, heavy metal tolerance, and plant growth-promoting potential of hypersaline microflora. The right side of the heatmap displays the hierarchical clustering of the MAGs based on the occurrence of the different genetic attributes.

The iron acquisition was observed in 91.07%, nitrogen fixation in 71.42%, potassium solubilizing in 85.71%, and IAA synthesizing capacity in 98.21% of the total selected MAGs recovered from three different assemblers (see Table S5 at https://figshare.com/s/fe705dbf825508f6d8a3).

Pangenomic analysis and functional profiling of the selected MAGs)

The MAGs, IDBA_017, Metaspades_003, and Metaspades_015, showing an average nucleotide identity (ANI) of >95%, were then analyzed through pangenome analysis. Upon analysis, IDBA_017 and Metaspades_003 gave the ANI value of 97.62 and 97.6, respectively, to Natronomonas pharaonis (Fig. 3A). On the other hand, Metaspades_015 showed an ANI value of 95.01 with Spiribacter 2438 (Fig. 3B). The phylogenetic analysis of IDBA_017 and MetaSpades_003 revealed their taxonomic classification as Natronomonas pharaonis DSM 2160. In addition, the analysis identified the phylogenetic placement of MetaSpades_015 as Spiribacter 2438. The MAGs IDBA_017, Metaspades_003, and Metaspades_015 exhibited a varied number of genes, as shown in Tables S2-S4 (see Tables S2-S4 at https://figshare.com/s/5e0dbdb113e1249742cb). The pangenome analysis of IDBA_017 and Metaspades_003 with the genome of genus Natronomonas indicated the pangenome of 16,025 genes, core genome of 691 genes, Shell genome of 3,670 genes, and cloud genome of 11,664 genes (see Fig. S7 at https://figshare.com/s/5e0dbdb113e1249742cb). A total of 136 and 156 number of unique genes were found in IDBA_017 and Metaspades_003, respectively. Similarly, the pangenome analysis of Metaspades_015 with the genomes present in the genus Spiribacter pointed toward a pangenome of 8,711 genes, core genome of 516 genes, Shell genome of 1,625 genes, and cloud genome of 6,570 genes (see Fig. S8 at https://figshare.com/s/5e0dbdb113e1249742cb). Around, 333 unique genes were found in Metaspades_015. Both of the pangenomes were found to be open, which means more genomes can be added.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Pan-genome and average nucleotide identity (ANI) visualization of MAGs with the genome of their respective genera. (A) Comparison of IDBA_017 and Metaspades_003 with the genomes of the genus Natronomonas. The MAGs IDBA_017 and Metaspades_003 showed ANI values of 97.62 and 97.6 for Natronomonas pharaonis, respectively. (B) Comparison of the MAG Metaspades_015 to the genomes of the genus Spiribacter. Metaspades_015 showed the ANI value of 95.01 with Spiribacter 2438. (C) Illustration of various salt tolerance, heavy metal stress tolerance, and plant growth-promoting genetic features of IDBA_017, Metaspades_003 (D), and Metaspades_015 (E).

Upon the functional annotation of the MAGs IDBA_017, Metaspades_003, and Metaspades_015 by the KEGG database, several putative genes related to salt stress tolerance, heavy metal tolerance, and plant growth promotion were observed. The salt-tolerant genes such as ktrA, ktrB, yrbG, ybaL, mrpBDEFG, and F-type ATPases were present in IDBA_017. In Metaspades_003 ktrA, ktrB, yrbG, ybaL, and mrpBDEFG salt-tolerant genes were obtained, whereas, in Metaspades_015, an additional gene nhaP2 was detected. The rest of the genes were similar to those of Metaspades_003. In IDBA_017, resistance to zinc, iron, and arsenic was found, while in Metaspades_003, resistance to metal zinc, copper, and arsenic was noted. Metaspades_015 exhibited tolerance to zinc, copper, iron, and arsenic. Furthermore, all of these MAGs, IDBA_017, Metaspades_003, and Metaspades_015 possessed potential PGP attributes to various extents (Fig. 3C through E)

DISCUSSION

Hypersaline environments, characterized by salt concentrations equal to or exceeding the point of salt saturation, harbor diverse microorganisms. Most of their inhabitants are halotolerant or moderate halophiles, with some being extreme halophiles capable of withstanding up to 2.5M NaCl. The microflora residing in hypersaline ecosystems have evolved various adaptive strategies to cope with challenges such as high salt concentrations, osmotic pressure, oligotrophy, and temperature variations, essential for their growth and survival. Notably, these microbes actively contribute to the biogeochemical cycling of different elements, as highlighted in recent studies (15, 16), implying their potential role in promoting plant growth. Given the remarkable ability of halophiles from hypersaline niches to thrive under extreme salt stresses, there is growing interest in exploring their potential for enhancing the sustainable cultivation of crops in highly saline soils. Therefore, the objective of the present study is to investigate the occurrence of various survival mechanisms and the distribution of PGP attributes within the microbial communities of two distinct hypersaline ecosystems, Sambhar Lake and Drang Mine (15), as shown in Fig. S1 (see Fig. S1 at https://figshare.com/s/5e0dbdb113e1249742cb), through genome resolved metagenomic analysis approach.

The genomes from the co-assembled samples of Drang Mine and Sambhar Lake ecosystems were reconstructed via assembly through three advanced metagenomic assembly tools: Megahit, MetaSpades, and IDBA-UD, all of which are de Bruijn graph-based assemblers and iteratively analyze k-mer lengths to find the optimal value. In metagenomic studies, the read assembly is a very crucial step for subsequent analysis. The integrity, contiguity, and accuracy of these assemblers vary in relation to many factors, such as the genetic diversity and the sequencing depth (26), so a suitable assembler for a specific data set is necessary to optimize at first. In the current study, the highest assembly length was observed in the case of MetaSpades (146,369,712 bp) as compared to that of Megahit (147,360,110 bp) and IDBA-UD (127,969,138 bp). Although the assembly length was found to be improved in MetaSpades, the N50 value was highest in IDBA-UD (8793 bp) (see Fig. S3 at https://figshare.com/s/5e0dbdb113e1249742cb). The subsequent genome recovery from each assembly was carried out by frequently used binning tools such as MaxBin2, MetaBat2, and CONCOCT. Finally, the bins were optimized by the DAS tool, resulting in the reconstruction of 15 genomes from Megahit, 26 genomes from MetaSpades, and 26 genomes from IDBA-UD assemblies. It was shown that using a variety of binning techniques and combining them can help to rebuild more and higher-quality MAGs from metagenomic data sets (27). DAStool, which selects the best genome from a group of contig-to-bin mappings based on 51 bacterial- and 38 archaeal-specific single-copy marker genes, depends on an iterative dereplication, aggregation, and scoring method. It integrates and optimizes the output from a combination of binning algorithms, which in the present study were MaxBin2, MetaBat2, and CONCOCT (see Fig. S6 at https://figshare.com/s/5e0dbdb113e1249742cb). It generally uses a consensus approach to select non-redundant and high-quality bins (27). The quality of the reconstructed genome or MAG in terms of completeness and contamination level was assessed by employing CheckM (28). It checks the genome quality by inspecting the marker genes specific to the position of a genome within a reference genome tree. It indicated the recovery of MAGs having the highest quality by MetaSpades followed by IDBA-UD and Megahit assembly according to the standard developed by the Genomic Standards Consortium (24). The obtained number of good quality MAGs simply showed better efficiency of MetaSpades in genome reconstruction over IDBA-UD but high efficiency of both MetaSpades and IDBA-UD over Megahit (Fig. 1). Previously also in a study conducted by Wang and his coworkers, MetaSpades exhibited best performance when compared with other assemblers in comparative metagenomics analysis (26). Another experiment conducted by Van Der Walt and his group also showed a similar kind of observation, so the assembly results obtained in the present study are in accordance with the available literature (29).

The taxonomic classification revealed that the higher numbers of the recovered MAGs comprised of Archaea as compared to Bacteria in the co-assembled Drang Mine and Sambhar Lake samples (Fig. 1). The majority of the MAGs designated to bacterial lineage were classified under phylum Proteobacteria. Zhao et al. also observed Proteobacteria as the dominant phylum in 18 soda-saline lakes in inner Mongolia (30). The Longimonas, Spiribacter, Massila, and Pseudomonas were some of the obtained bacterial genera (Fig. 2). The genus Pseudomonas possesses a variety of plant growth-enhancing characteristics production of phytohormones (auxins, gibberellins, indole-3-acetic acid), enzymes (aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase), phosphate & potassium solubilization, and phytopathogen control activities (31). It also plays a crucial role in the metabolism of carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, and arsenic (32, 33). The multifaceted role of Pseudomonas extends beyond plant-microbe interactions, encompassing essential functions in various elemental cycles. Spiribacter, another genus of interest, demonstrates a specific involvement in the uptake and metabolism of phosphates and phosphonates. Phosphonates are organophosphorus compounds characterized by the presence of a carbon-phosphorus bond and are important in plant growth promotion (34). Furthermore, the genus Massila has been identified as possessing lignin-degrading abilities, as demonstrated by Wang and his group (35). The microbial enzymes produced by Massila act on lignin, releasing its fractions into the soil. This process not only enhances soil fertility but also provides a nutrient source for neighboring microbes, establishing a collaborative ecosystem within the soil. On the other hand, among Archaea, the majority of the MAGs corresponded to the phylum Euryarcheota. Zhao and his coworkers also found Euryarcheota to be a prevalent group (30). Moreover, the study carried out by Narasingarao and her group also pointed toward the dominance of the Archaeal lineage in hypersaline ecosystems, especially the Euryarcheota phylum (36). The archaea are highly adaptable to harsh conditions and easily attain a stable community structure. The most common archaeal genera observed were Salinarchaeum, Natronomonas, Halorubrum, Halovenus, and Halalkaliarchaeum. The genus Salinarchaeum is well known for its chitinase activity (37). Chitinases play a crucial role in degrading chitin, a polysaccharide present in the exoskeleton of yeast, fungi, and insects. These enzymes contribute to the generation of carbon and nitrogen in ecosystems and find applications in agriculture for controlling various plant pathogens (38). In addition, the genera Natronomonas and Halorubrum are involved in the metabolism of nitrogen and sulfur (39, 40). In a study conducted by Garcia-Rolden and her coworkers, they observed a complete dissimilatory nitrate reduction pathway to ammonia in species N. pharaonic along with an almost complete assimilatory sulfate reduction pathway converting inorganic sulfate to sulfide in N. salina (40). Chen and his group explored the genus Halorubrum and identified genes associated with both nitrogen and sulfur metabolism (39). The adequate amount of nitrogen and sulfur has been linked to increased plant growth. Furthermore, the genus Halorubrum is known to produce carotenoids and poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) with diverse biotechnological applications (41, 42). The species Halovenus aranensis and Halovenus carboxidivorans have exhibited the production of carotenoids and carbon monoxide oxidizing capacity (43, 44). The genus Halalkaliarchaeum, known as sulfur-respiring alkaliphilic haloarchaea, is prevalent in sulfur-rich ecosystems. This genus utilizes elemental sulfur as an electron acceptor to oxidize CO2 through anaerobic carboxydotrophy (45).

Since the microbial diversity in hypersaline ecosystems needs to adjust to different types of stress conditions, it has acquired various types of salt-tolerant mechanisms. The presence of very high salt concentrations in hypersaline niches acts as a driving force for the development of salt-tolerant mechanisms in their residential microbiome. They display a variety of molecular and physiological modifications to inhibit water loss from their cells and maintain osmotic equilibrium with the outside environment. The acquisition of different types of ion-transporting proteins such as Na+ transporters, Na+/H+ antiporters, Na+/solute symporters, K+ transporters, K+/H+ antiporters, and K+/solute symporters in their membranes (46). They prevent the unnecessary accumulation of ions inside their cytoplasm, regulating their osmotic pressure and normal functioning. The synthesis of compatible solutes is another crucial strategy developed by halophilic microorganisms. The compatible solutes such as glycine, betaine, ectoine, trehalose, etc., not only regulate the osmotic pressure of the cells but also inhibit the denaturation of macromolecules like proteins, DNA, and RNA at higher salt concentrations (7). Upon investigation, 83.33% of the MAGs recovered by Megahit, 91.3% by MetaSpades, and 95.23% by IDBA-UD assembly possessed genes responsible for salt homeostasis, ensuring their survivability under saline and hypersaline conditions (Fig. 2, see Table S5 at https://figshare.com/s/fe705dbf825508f6d8a3 ). In a previous analysis Sun et al. also noted a variety of salt-tolerant approaches (47). In the present study, the ability of the microbes to tolerate salt stress is accompanied by their heavy metal bioremediation attributes. Approximately 83.33% of the MAGs obtained by Megahit, 86.95% by MetaSpades, and 90.47% by IDBA-UD contained both salt homeostasis and heavy metal tolerance capacity. Some of the earlier studies also reported the coexistence of these properties, improving the environmental fitness and the survivability chances of the microorganisms in highly saline habitats (48).

In addition, the exopolysaccharide and antioxidant biosynthetic potential was also observed in the MAGs obtained from Drang Mine and Sambhar Lake ecosystems (Fig. 2). The exopolysaccharide and antioxidant biosynthesis are also related to the occurrence of stress conditions in hypersaline niches and improve the fitness of their residential microbes. The production of exopolysaccharide (EPS) helps microorganisms to form biofilm and get attached to different types of surfaces. In environments consisting of high concentrations of heavy metals, the extra polymeric substances secreted by the microorganisms adsorb heavy metals and aid in their bioremediation (49, 50). The stressful environmental conditions induce an oxidative response in microorganisms, upregulating the expression of antioxidant genes such as peroxidase, catalase, and superoxide dismutase. The occurrence of different types of ions, minerals, and metals stimulated the hypersaline microflora for active biogeochemical cycling of methane, nitrogen, sulfur cycle, etc., as well (15, 16). The microorganisms in such niches also possess a variety of PGP properties; for instance, in the present study, the microflora displayed iron acquisition, phosphate solubilizing, potassium solubilizing, and IAA synthesizing ability (Fig. 2, see Table S5 at https://figshare.com/s/5e0dbdb113e1249742cbhttps://figshare.com/s/fe705dbf825508f6d8a3). Iron, phosphate, and potassium are important nutrients playing an important role in plant growth, and their enhanced uptake promotes plant growth and yield. In the literature, some reports related to the prevalence of phosphate solubilizing capacity of hypersaline habitats are also present (51, 52). IAAs serve as an auxin regulating plant growth and development. Several examples of the rhizosphere halophiles exhibiting siderophore production, potassium solubilization, and IAA synthesis were also observed (53, 54). The production of EPS is also a crucial PGP attribute because it facilitates the initial root colonization by microbes and the production of a water-rich polysaccharide layer around roots, which acts as a barrier preventing them from excess ionic salts. This layer also serves as a site for symbiotic association with other microorganisms and nutrient cycling (55). EPS also aggregates soil particles together, enhances the water absorption capacity of the soil, quorum sensing and maintains the diversity of microorganisms in high salinity conditions (56). The stressed conditions stimulate the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) both in microbes and plants. In such conditions, to enhance the tolerance of ROS species in plants, the PGP microorganisms trigger the defense system of the plant, leading to the synthesis of enzymes such as peroxidase, catalase, and superoxide. The IDBA_017 and Metaspades_003 showed >95% ANI value with Natronomonas pharaonis upon classification by GTDB toolkit. Their phylogenetic and pangenome analyses with other genomes identified them as Natronomonas pharaonis DSM 2160 (Fig. 3A). Similarly, Metaspades_015 showed >95% ANI with Spiribacter and was identified as Spiribacter 2438 (Fig. 3B). Both constructed pangenomes were open type, and more genomes are simply needed to sequence (see Fig. S8 at https://figshare.com/s/5e0dbdb113e1249742cb). The detailed functional analysis of the MAGs IDBA_017 and Metaspades_003, and Metaspades_015 also showed the presence of a number of adaptations as illustrated (Fig. 3C through E). The genes ktrA, ktrB, ybaL, and potassium-chloride symporters were observed for the exchange of K+ and Cl as reported previously (57). The yrbG or nhaP and mrpBDEFG are involved in the transportation of Na+ ions (58, 59). Besides, several genes related to the resistance against zinc, copper, iron, arsenic, and plant growth enhancement were also observed further supporting earlier findings of the present study.

Overall, it can be said that microorganisms of the hypersaline habitats have developed several different adaptational strategies against salt and heavy metal stresses. The genes providing tolerance to both these stresses co-occur in halophiles. The hypersaline microflora is also rich in genes responsible for plant growth promotion; hence, they can act as a significant bio-stimulating agent. The present study has provided insights into various adaptational strategies and the application of the hypersaline microflora, encouraging their utilization for reclamation and enhanced plant productivity in salinized soils. Furthermore, the utilization of a MAGs-based approach to study environments, such as hypersaline ecosystems, may open new opportunities for exploring and understanding diverse microbial niches and their biotechnological applications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection and DNA extraction

The halite fragments were collected from Drang Mine (31.80443° N 76.94636° E) in October 2021. The sediment samples were collected from Sambhar Lake (26.92961° N 75.17642° E) in May 2020. Approximately five samples were collected from each sampling site in sterilized plastic bottles. The samples were transported to the laboratory in an icebox for analysis. The extraction of DNA was carried out according to the protocol mentioned in our previous study (15). Briefly, the halite fragments were crushed with the help of a sterilized mortar and pestle. Each sample was taken in 5 g (halite and sediment) and sieved to remove any larger particles. After that, 15 mL of the extraction buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM sodium phosphate, 1.5 M NaCl, 1% CTAB, and pH 8.0) was added, and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 2 hours at 120 rpm. The FastDNA spin kit (MP Biomedical, USA) was used to extract DNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA extracted from each sample’s replicates was pooled to constitute a homogenous and representative bacterial diversity of a sampling site (60). DNA quality and quantity estimation was performed using NanoDrop One (Thermofisher Scientific, USA) and Qubit Fluorimeter v.3.0 (Thermofisher Scientific, USA). The integrity of the extracted DNA was checked by Nanodrop and on a 2% agarose gel. The physicochemical properties of the samples, such as temperature, pH, electrical conductivity, sodium, potassium, and magnesium ions, were investigated in our previous research (15). Briefly, the individual samples were combined, and the temperature of each sample was documented on-site using the MAXTECH Multi thermometer during the sampling process. In addition, the pH and electrical conductivity (EC) of the samples were measured in the laboratory, utilizing the Cyberscan 510 pH meter (Thermo Fischer Scientific, US) and a Century digital conductivity meter. Furthermore, the concentrations of sodium, magnesium, potassium, and calcium ions in the samples were determined using a QTEGRA-ICP-MS instrument (Thermo Fischer Scientific, USA).

Library preparation and metagenomic sequencing

The paired-end library preparation of the extracted DNA was carried out using the TrueSeq Nano library preparation kit (Illumina, USA) for 2 × 150 bp chemistry according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, 250 ng of the DNA was sheared by passing it through an M220 tube (Covaris, USA) to generate a fragment of approximately 350 bp. The 3′ and the 5′ end overhangs of the sheared DNA were subjected to end-repair followed by adaptor ligation, ensuring lower rates of the chimera generation. The size selection of the ligated product was done using AMPure XP beads. The size-selected products were then amplified through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the help of index primers. The PCR-enriched libraries were analyzed on 4200 Tape Station (Agilent Technologies, USA) using high sensitivity D1000 Screen tape. After obtaining the appropriate Qubit concentration and the mean peak sizes from the Tape station, the prepared libraries were loaded to Novaseq 6000 for cluster generation and sequencing. The paired-end sequencing allowed the template fragments to sequence in both forward and reverse directions. The samples were then allowed to bind the complementary oligos on the flow cell. The adaptors were designed to allow selective cleavage of the forward strand after re-synthesis of the reverse strand during sequencing. The copied reverse strand was then used to sequence the opposite end of the fragment.

Quality control and binning of (MAGs)

The files obtained after sequencing were demultiplexed using an in-house script. The raw read files were first checked for their quality by FastQC (61). From FastQC output, quality visualization reads properties like base quality score distribution, sequence quality score distribution, average base content per read, GC distribution in the reads, PCR amplification issue, over-represented sequences, and adapter contamination were accessed. Based on the quality report of FastQC, quality filtering, and trimming were carried out with the help of the FASTX toolkit (62). The quality filtration step allows the retention of only high-quality reads (Phred value ≥30). At the same time, quality trimming was necessary to remove adaptors from the reads. Furthermore, any vector or contamination from other sources, occurring generally while sequencing, was done using FastQ Screen (63). The assembly of the reads was carried out through three different individual tools: MEGAHIT v1.2.9 (64), MetaSpades v3.15.3 (65), and IDBA-UD v1.1.3 (66). The binning of the assembled reads was performed by MaxBin v2 (67), MetaBAT v2 (68), and CONCOCT (69). The bins of each assembly obtained from these tools were then aggregated for subsequent optimization by DAStool (27). The genome quality and completeness were assessed by CheckM (28) with default parameters. The statistics of MAGs and the number of contigs were analyzed using QUAST (70).

Taxonomic classification and functional annotation of (MAGs)

The phylogenetic classification of the selected medium- and high-quality MAGs was done using the GTDB toolkit (71). It utilizes a set of 120 bacterial gene markers to place MAGs on a specific position of the reference tree constructed using the GTDB database (72) by employing both FastANI (73) and pplacer (74). The prediction of the genes was done by Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) version 3.1 (75) and Prokka (76). The software Barrnap (77) was used to predict the 16S rRNA gene from MAGs. The annotation of the predicted genes was done by implementing the KEGG database (78). The specific functional gene and their functional IDs were filtered manually for further analysis. The MAGs with average nucleotide Identity (ANI) >95% were subjected to pangenome analysis to assess the pan, core, and unique genes. The selected MAGs and the genomes of respective Natronomonas and Spiribacter genera were imported in anvi'o 7.1 (79). The average nucleotide identities (ANIs) among genomes were calculated by “anvicompute-genome-similarity” with PyANI (80). The database of all the genomes was generated using “anvi-gen-genomes-storage,” and the pangenome was constructed using “anvi-pan-genome.” The visualization of the pan-genome was done with “anvi-display-pan.” The functional annotation was carried out using the KEGG database (25) in each genome and obtained through “anvi-summarize.”

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments
reviewer-comments.pdf (499.7KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

K.D. is thankful to CSIR, Govt. of India for the "Research Fellowship" Grant CSIR-NET JRF award no: 31/054(0139)/2019-EMR-I/CSIR-NET JRF JUNE 2017. R.K. acknowledges Science and Engineering Research Board Start-up research grant no. SRG/2019/001071, DST-TDT project no. DST/TDT/WM/2019/43, and CSIR In-House project MLP 0201 for support in conducting research work.

The authors are grateful for the assistance provided by Kishan Kharka, Rahul Kumar for sample collection and Ayush Lepcha for manuscript editing.

This paper represents CSIR-IHBT communication no. 5479.

Contributor Information

Rakshak Kumar, Email: rakshak@ihbt.res.in.

Rup Lal, University of Delhi, India.

Shashi Kant Bhatia, Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India.

Mukesh Kumar Awasthi, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang, China.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The fastq files generated in this analysis were submitted to Sequence Read Archive (SRA), NCBI, to obtain the SRA with accession numbers SRR24060162 and SRR23595080.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.01050-23.

OPEN PEER REVIEW. reviewer-comments.pdf.

An accounting of the reviewer comments and feedback.

reviewer-comments.pdf (499.7KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01050-23.SuF1

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Saccò M, White NE, Harrod C, Salazar G, Aguilar P, Cubillos CF, Meredith K, Baxter BK, Oren A, Anufriieva E, Shadrin N, Marambio-Alfaro Y, Bravo-Naranjo V, Allentoft ME. 2021. Salt to conserve: a review on the ecology and preservation of hypersaline ecosystems. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 96:2828–2850. doi: 10.1111/brv.12780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Oren A. 2008. Microbial life at high salt concentrations: phylogenetic and metabolic diversity. Saline Syst 4:1–13. doi: 10.1186/1746-1448-4-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Liu M, Liu H, Shi M, Jiang M, Li L, Zheng Y. 2021. Microbial production of ectoine and hydroxyectoine as high-value chemicals. Microb Cell Fact 20:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12934-021-01567-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. DasSarma S, Arora P. 2001. Halophiles. e LS. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bougouffa S, Radovanovic A, Essack M, Bajic VB. 2014. DEOP: a database on osmoprotectants and associated pathways. Database 2014:bau100. doi: 10.1093/database/bau100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Held C, Neuhaus T, Sadowski G. 2010. Compatible solutes: thermodynamic properties and biological impact of ectoines and prolines. Biophys Chem 152:28–39. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2010.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Saum SH, Müller V. 2008. Regulation of osmoadaptation in the moderate halophile Halobacillus halophilus: chloride, glutamate and switching osmolyte strategies. Saline Syst 4:1–15. doi: 10.1186/1746-1448-4-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Amoozegar MA, Safarpour A, Noghabi KA, Bakhtiary T, Ventosa A. 2019. Halophiles and their vast potential in biofuel production. Front Microbiol 10:1895. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Ruginescu R, Purcărea C, Dorador C, Lavin P, Cojoc R, Neagu S, Lucaci I, Enache M. 2019. Exploring the hydrolytic potential of cultured halophilic bacteria isolated from the Atacama desert. FEMS Microbiol Lett 366:fnz224. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnz224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Oren A. 2010. Industrial and environmental applications of halophilic microorganisms. Environ Technol 31:825–834. doi: 10.1080/09593330903370026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ali S, Cai R, Feng H, Xie J, Zhang Y, Wang H. 2022. Identification of antibacterial metabolites produced by a marine bacterium Halobacillus marinus HMALI004. J Appl Microbiol 133:3030–3040. doi: 10.1111/jam.15764 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Bueno de Mesquita CP, Zhou J, Theroux SM, Tringe SG. 2021. Methanogenesis and salt tolerance genes of a novel halophilic methanosarcinaceae metagenome-assembled genome from a former solar saltern. Genes 12:1609. doi: 10.3390/genes12101609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Chakraborty J, Rajput V, Sapkale V, Kamble S, Dharne M. 2021. Spatio-temporal resolution of taxonomic and functional microbiome of lonar soda lake of India reveals metabolic potential for bioremediation. Chemosphere 264:128574. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kurth D, Elias D, Rasuk MC, Contreras M, Farías ME. 2021. Carbon fixation and rhodopsin systems in microbial mats from hypersaline lakes brava and tebenquiche, salar de atacama, Chile. PLoS One 16:e0246656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Dindhoria K, Jain R, Kumar R, Bhargava B, Kumar R, Kumar S. 2023a. Microbial community structure analysis of hypersaline niches and elucidation of their role in the biogeochemical cycling of nitrogen, sulphur and methane. Ecological Informatics 75:102023. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Liu Y-H, Mohamad OAA, Gao L, Xie Y-G, Abdugheni R, Huang Y, Li L, Fang B-Z, Li W-J. 2023. Sediment prokaryotic microbial community and potential biogeochemical cycle from saline lakes shaped by habitat. Microbiol Res 270:127342. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2023.127342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. James N, Umesh M, Sarojini S, Shanmugam S, Nasif O, Alharbi SA, Lan Chi NT, Brindhadevi K. 2023. Unravelling the potential plant growth activity of halotolerant Bacillus licheniformis NJ04 isolated from soil and its possible use as a green bioinoculant on Solanum lycopersicum L. Environ Res 216:114620. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Nawaz A, Shahbaz M, Imran A, Marghoob MU, Imtiaz M, Mubeen F. 2020. Potential of salt tolerant PGPR in growth and yield augmentation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under saline conditions. Front Microbiol 11:2019. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.02019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Shabaan M, Asghar HN, Zahir ZA, Zhang X, Sardar MF, Li H. 2022. Salt-tolerant PGPR confer salt tolerance to maize through enhanced soil biological health, enzymatic activities, nutrient uptake and antioxidant defense. Front Microbiol 13:901865. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.901865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Sharma K, Sharma S, Vaishnav A, Jain R, Singh D, Singh HB, Goel A, Singh S. 2022. Salt-tolerant PGPR strain Priestia endophytica SK1 promotes fenugreek growth under salt stress by inducing nitrogen assimilation and secondary metabolites. J Appl Microbiol 133:2802–2813. doi: 10.1111/jam.15735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Dindhoria K, Manyapu V, Ali A, Kumar R. 2023b. Unveiling the role of emerging metagenomics for the examination of hypersaline environments. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev:1–39. doi: 10.1080/02648725.2023.2197717 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Mukhtar S, Malik KA, Mehnaz S. 2019. Microbiome of halophytes: diversity and importance for plant health and productivity. Microbiology and Biotechnology Letters 47:1–10. doi: 10.4014/mbl.1804.04021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Wu X, Xie Y, Qiao J, Chai S, Chen L. 2019. Rhizobacteria strain from a hypersaline environment promotes plant growth of Kengyilia thoroldiana. Microbiology 88:220–231. doi: 10.1134/S0026261719020127 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Bowers RM, Kyrpides NC, Stepanauskas R, Harmon-Smith M, Doud D, Reddy TBK, Schulz F, Jarett J, Rivers AR, Eloe-Fadrosh EA, et al. 2017. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat Biotechnol 35:725–731. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kanehisa M. 2002. The KEGG database, p 91–103. In ‘‘In Silico’Simulation of biological processes: Novartis foundation symposium 247. Wiley Online Library. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Wang Z, Wang Y, Fuhrman JA, Sun F, Zhu S. 2020. Assessment of metagenomic assemblers based on hybrid reads of real and simulated metagenomic sequences. Brief Bioinform 21:777–790. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbz025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Sieber CMK, Probst AJ, Sharrar A, Thomas BC, Hess M, Tringe SG, Banfield JF. 2018. Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy. Nat Microbiol 3:836–843. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0171-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. van der Walt AJ, van Goethem MW, Ramond J-B, Makhalanyane TP, Reva O, Cowan DA. 2017. Assembling metagenomes, one community at a time. BMC Genomics 18:521. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3918-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Zhao D, Zhang S, Xue Q, Chen J, Zhou J, Cheng F, Li M, Zhu Y, Yu H, Hu S, Zheng Y, Liu S, Xiang H. 2020. Abundant taxa and favorable pathways in the microbiome of soda-saline lakes in inner mongolia. Front Microbiol 11:1740. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01740 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sah S, Krishnani S, Singh R. 2021. Pseudomonas mediated nutritional and growth promotional activities for sustainable food security. Curr Res Microb Sci 2:100084. doi: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Guo H, Chen C, Lee D-J. 2019. Nitrogen and sulfur metabolisms of Pseudomonas sp. C27 under mixotrophic growth condition. Bioresour Technol 293:122169. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Koechler S, Arsène-Ploetze F, Brochier-Armanet C, Goulhen-Chollet F, Heinrich-Salmeron A, Jost B, Lièvremont D, Philipps M, Plewniak F, Bertin PN, Lett M-C. 2015. Constitutive arsenite oxidase expression detected in arsenic-hypertolerant Pseudomonas xanthomarina S11. Res Microbiol 166:205–214. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2015.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. López-Pérez M, Ghai R, Leon MJ, Rodríguez-Olmos Á, Copa-Patiño JL, Soliveri J, Sanchez-Porro C, Ventosa A, Rodriguez-Valera F. 2013. Genomes of “Spiribacter”, a streamlined, successful halophilic bacterium. BMC Genomics 14:787. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Wang L, Nie Y, Tang Y-Q, Song X-M, Cao K, Sun L-Z, Wang Z-J, Wu X-L. 2016. Diverse bacteria with lignin degrading potentials isolated from two ranks of coal. Front Microbiol 7:1428. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Narasingarao P, Podell S, Ugalde JA, Brochier-Armanet C, Emerson JB, Brocks JJ, Heidelberg KB, Banfield JF, Allen EE. 2012. De novo metagenomic assembly reveals abundant novel major lineage of archaea in hypersaline microbial communities. ISME J 6:81–93. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.78 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Minegishi H, Enomoto S, Echigo A, Shimane Y, Kondo Y, Inoma A, Kamekura M, Takai K, Itoh T, Ohkuma M, Ihara K, Takahashi-Ando N, Fukushima Y, Ishii S, Yoshida Y, Usami R. 2017. Salinarchaeum chitinilyticum sp. nov., a chitin-degrading haloarchaeon isolated from commercial salt. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:2274–2278. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001941 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Hamid R, Khan MA, Ahmad M, Ahmad MM, Abdin MZ, Musarrat J, Javed S. 2013. Chitinases: an update. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 5:21–29. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.106559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Chen L, Hong T, Wu Z, Song W, Chen SX, Liu Y, Shen L. 2023. Genomic analyses reveal a low-temperature adapted clade in Halorubrum, a widespread haloarchaeon across global hypersaline environments. BMC Genomics 24:508. doi: 10.1186/s12864-023-09597-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. García-Roldán A, Durán-Viseras A, de la Haba RR, Corral P, Sánchez-Porro C, Ventosa A. 2023. Genomic-based phylogenetic and metabolic analyses of the genus natronomonas, and description of Natronomonas aquatica sp. nov. Front Microbiol 14:1109549. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1109549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Karray F, Ben Abdallah M, Baccar N, Zaghden H, Sayadi S, Spring S. 2021. Production of poly (3-Hydroxybutyrate) by Haloarcula, Halorubrum, and Natrinema haloarchaeal genera using starch as a carbon source. Archaea 2021:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2021/8888712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Ma Y-C, Gao M-R, Yang H, Jiang J-Y, Xie W, Su W-P, Zhang B, Yeong Y-S, Guo W-Y, Sui L-Y. 2023. Optimization of C50 carotenoids production by open fermentation of Halorubrum sp. HRM-150. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 195:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s12010-023-04319-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Mozaheb N, Arefian E, Aliyan A, Amoozegar MA. 2022. Induction of the antioxidant defense system using long-chain carotenoids extracted from extreme halophilic archaeon, Halovenus aranensis. Int Microbiol 25:165–175. doi: 10.1007/s10123-021-00198-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Myers MR, King GM. 2020. Halobacterium bonnevillei sp. nov., Halobaculum saliterrae sp. nov. and Halovenus carboxidivorans sp. nov., three novel carbon monoxide-oxidizing halobacteria from saline crusts and soils. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:4261–4268. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Sorokin DY, Merkel AY, Messina E, Tugui C, Pabst M, Golyshin PN, Yakimov MM. 2022. Anaerobic carboxydotrophy in sulfur-respiring haloarchaea from hypersaline lakes. ISME J 16:1534–1546. doi: 10.1038/s41396-022-01206-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Gunde-Cimerman N, Plemenitaš A, Oren A. 2018. Strategies of adaptation of microorganisms of the three domains of life to high salt concentrations. FEMS Microbiol Rev 42:353–375. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuy009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Sun X, Zhao J, Zhou X, Bei Q, Xia W, Zhao B, Zhang J, Jia Z. 2022. Salt tolerance-based niche differentiation of soil ammonia oxidizers. ISME J 16:412–422. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01079-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Rathore P, Joy SS, Yadav R, Ramakrishna W. 2021. Co-occurrence and patterns of phosphate solubilizing, salt and metal tolerant and antibiotic-resistant bacteria in diverse soils. 3 Biotech 11:356. doi: 10.1007/s13205-021-02904-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Rajivgandhi G, Vimala RTV, Maruthupandy M, Alharbi NS, Kadaikunnan S, Khaled JM, Manoharan N, Li W-J. 2021. Enlightening the characteristics of bioflocculant of endophytic actinomycetes from marine algae and its biosorption of heavy metal removal. Environ Res 200:111708. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Sardar UR, Bhargavi E, Devi I, Bhunia B, Tiwari ON. 2018. Advances in exopolysaccharides based bioremediation of heavy metals in soil and water: a critical review. Carbohydr Polym 199:353–364. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.07.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Couto-Rodríguez RL, Montalvo-Rodríguez R. 2019. Temporal analysis of the microbial community from the crystallizer ponds in Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico, using metagenomics. Genes 10:422. doi: 10.3390/genes10060422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Fernández AB, Ghai R, Martin-Cuadrado A-B, Sánchez-Porro C, Rodriguez-Valera F, Ventosa A. 2014. Prokaryotic taxonomic and metabolic diversity of an intermediate salinity hypersaline habitat assessed by metagenomics. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 88:623–635. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Ashfaq M, Hassan HM, Ghazali AHA, Ahmad M. 2020. Halotolerant potassium solubilizing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria may improve potassium availability under saline conditions. Environ Monit Assess 192:1–20. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08655-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Gao Y, Han Y, Li X, Li M, Wang C, Li Z, Wang Y, Wang W. 2022. A salt-tolerant Streptomyces paradoxus D2-8 from rhizosphere soil of Phragmites communis augments soybean tolerance to soda saline-alkali stress. Pol J Microbiol 71:43–53. doi: 10.33073/pjm-2022-006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Kumar Arora N, Fatima T, Mishra J, Mishra I, Verma S, Verma R, Verma M, Bhattacharya A, Verma P, Mishra P, Bharti C. 2020. Halo-tolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for improving productivity and remediation of saline soils. J Adv Res 26:69–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.07.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Moshabaki Isfahani F, Tahmourespour A, Hoodaji M, Ataabadi M, Mohammadi A. 2019. Influence of exopolysaccharide-producing bacteria and SiO 2 nanoparticles on proline content and antioxidant enzyme activities of tomato seedlings (Solanum lycopersicum L.) under salinity stress. Pol J Environ Stud 28:153–163. doi: 10.15244/pjoes/81206 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Yin Z, Wang X, Hu Y, Zhang J, Li H, Cui Y, Zhao D, Dong X, Zhang X, Liu K, Du B, Ding Y, Wang C. 2022. Metabacillus dongyingensis sp. nov. is represented by the plant growth-promoting bacterium BY2G20 isolated from saline-alkaline soil and enhances the growth of Zea mays L. under salt stress. mSystems 7:e0142621. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01426-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Patiño-Ruiz M, Ganea C, Călinescu O. 2022. Prokaryotic Na+/H+ exchangers—transport mechanism and essential residues. IJMS 23:9156. doi: 10.3390/ijms23169156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Swartz TH, Ikewada S, Ishikawa O, Ito M, Krulwich TA. 2005. The Mrp system: a giant among monovalent cation/proton antiporters?. Extremophiles 9:345–354. doi: 10.1007/s00792-005-0451-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Dindhoria K, Kumar S, Kumar R. 2021. Taxonomic and functional analysis of proglacial water bodies of Triloknath glacier ecosystem from North-Western Himalayas. Ecological Informatics 64:101365. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101365 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data
  • 62. Gordon A, Hannon GJ. 2010. Fastx-toolkit. FASTQ/A short-reads preprocessing tools 433
  • 63. Wingett SW, Andrews S. 2018. FastQ screen: a tool for multi-genome mapping and quality control. F1000Res 7:1338. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15931.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Li D, Liu C-M, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam T-W. 2015. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31:1674–1676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA. 2017. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res 27:824–834. doi: 10.1101/gr.213959.116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Peng Y, Leung HCM, Yiu SM, Chin FYL. 2012. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics 28:1420–1428. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Wu Y-W, Simmons BA, Singer SW. 2016. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 32:605–607. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, Wang Z. 2019. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7:e7359. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Alneberg J, Bjarnason BS, de Bruijn I, Schirmer M, Quick J, Ijaz UZ, Lahti L, Loman NJ, Andersson AF, Quince C. 2014. Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nat Methods 11:1144–1146. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH, Hancock J. 2020. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 36:1925–1927. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Chaumeil P-A, Hugenholtz P. 2022. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res 50:D785–D794. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. 2018. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Matsen FA, Kodner RB, Armbrust EV. 2010. pplacer: linear time maximum-likelihood and bayesian phylogenetic placement of sequences onto a fixed reference tree. BMC Bioinformatics 11:1–16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Zhao Y, Wu J, Yang J, Sun S, Xiao J, Yu J. 2012. PGAP: pan-genomes analysis pipeline. Bioinformatics 28:416–418. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr655 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Seemann T. 2013. Barrnap 0.9: rapid ribosomal RNA prediction. Google Scholar. [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Kanehisa M, Goto S. 2000. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28:27–30. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Eren AM, Esen ÖC, Quince C, Vineis JH, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, Delmont TO. 2015. Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for ‘omics data. PeerJ 3:e1319. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Pritchard L, Cock P, Esen Ö. 2019. Pyani V0. 2.8: average nucleotide identity (ANI) and related measures for whole genome comparisons

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Reviewer comments
reviewer-comments.pdf (499.7KB, pdf)
OPEN PEER REVIEW. reviewer-comments.pdf.

An accounting of the reviewer comments and feedback.

reviewer-comments.pdf (499.7KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01050-23.SuF1

Data Availability Statement

The fastq files generated in this analysis were submitted to Sequence Read Archive (SRA), NCBI, to obtain the SRA with accession numbers SRR24060162 and SRR23595080.


Articles from mSystems are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES