Correction : Syst Rev 12, 99 (2023)
10.1186/s13643-023-02269-3
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported a typo error in Table 6 wherein the headings ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ were interchanged. The correct table is given below.
Table 6.
Associations between presence of spin in the abstract and characteristics of the systematic review
| Item | Variable insertion in the model | Description | No (%) | Yes (%) | OR | Lower 95%CI | Upper 95%CI | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal | Categorical | Cochrane | 4 (40.0%) | 6 (60.0%) | 1 | - | - | - |
| EJO | 18 (64.3%) | 10 (35.7%) | 0.37 | 0.08 | 1.63 | 0.19 | ||
| AJODO | 14 (70.0%) | 6 (30.0%) | 0.29 | 0.06 | 1.39 | 0.12 | ||
| AO | 14 (60.9%) | 9 (39.1%) | 0.43 | 0.09 | 1.95 | 0.27 | ||
| KJO | 1 (33.3%) | 2 (66.7%) | 1.33 | 0.09 | 20.11 | 0.84 | ||
| O&C | 7 (50.0%) | 7 (50.0%) | 0.67 | 0.13 | 3.45 | 0.63 | ||
| Year of publication | Continuous | 1.03 | 0.9 | 1.16 | 0.7 | |||
| 2009 | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||||||
| 2010 | 1 (33.3%) | 2 (66.7%) | ||||||
| 2011 | 5 (71.4%) | 2 (28.6%) | ||||||
| 2012 | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||||||
| 2013 | 6 (66.7%) | 3 (33.3%) | ||||||
| 2014 | 3 (33.3%) | 6 (66.7%) | ||||||
| 2015 | 9 (75.0%) | 3 (25.0%) | ||||||
| 2016 | 5 (55.6%) | 4 (44.4%) | ||||||
| 2017 | 5 (55.6%) | 4 (44.4%) | ||||||
| 2018 | 6 (46.2%) | 7 (53.8%) | ||||||
| 2019 | 3 (75.0%) | 1 (25.0%) | ||||||
| 2020 | 7 (58.3%) | 5 (41.7%) | ||||||
| 2021 | 5 (62.5%) | 3 (37.5%) | ||||||
| Number of authors | Continuous | 0.93 | 0.71 | 1.21 | 0.59 | |||
| 2 | 3 (50.0%) | 3 (50.0%) | ||||||
| 3 | 7 (50.0%) | 7 (50.0%) | ||||||
| 4 | 16 (69.6%) | 7 (30.4%) | ||||||
| 5 | 15 (55.6%) | 12 (44.4%) | ||||||
| 6 | 8 (53.3%) | 7 (46.7%) | ||||||
| 7 | 6 (66.7%) | 3 (33.3%) | ||||||
| 8 | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||||||
| 9 | 1 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | ||||||
| Conflict of interest reported | Categorical | Yes | 32 (56.1%) | 25 (43.9%) | 0.74 | 0.32 | 1.68 | 0.47 |
| No | 26 (63.4%) | 15 (36.6%) | 1 | - | - | - | ||
| Conflict of interest present | Not reported | 26 (63.4%) | 15 (36.6%) | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| No | 32 (56.1%) | 25 (43.9%) | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
| Funding reported | Categorical | Yes | 23 (56.1%) | 18 (43.9%) | 0.8 | 0.35 | 1.81 | 0.6 |
| No | 35 (61.4%) | 22 (38.6%) | 1 | - | - | - | ||
| Type of orthodontic interventiona | Categorical | 1 | 41 (59.4%) | 28 (40.6%) | 1 | - | - | - |
| 2 | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
| 3 | 16 (57.1%) | 12 (42.9%) | 1.1 | 0.45 | 2.67 | 0.84 |
aType 1 orthodontic interventions: Orthodontic interventions to move teeth or change the jaw size or position for orthodontic purposes. Type 2 orthodontic interventions: Orthodontic interventions with additional surgical, pharmacological, or vibratory interventions. Type 3 orthodontic interventions: Orthodontic interventions to maintain or stabilize orthodontic results
Incorrect Table 6:
Table 6.
Associations between presence of spin in the abstract and characteristics of the systematic review
| Item | Variable insertion in the model | Description | Yes (%) | No (%) | OR | Lower 95%CI | Upper 95%CI | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal | Categorical | Cochrane | 4 (40.0%) | 6 (60.0%) | 1 | - | - | - |
| EJO | 18 (64.3%) | 10 (35.7%) | 0.37 | 0.08 | 1.63 | 0.19 | ||
| AJODO | 14 (70.0%) | 6 (30.0%) | 0.29 | 0.06 | 1.39 | 0.12 | ||
| AO | 14 (60.9%) | 9 (39.1%) | 0.43 | 0.09 | 1.95 | 0.27 | ||
| KJO | 1 (33.3%) | 2 (66.7%) | 1.33 | 0.09 | 20.11 | 0.84 | ||
| O&C | 7 (50.0%) | 7 (50.0%) | 0.67 | 0.13 | 3.45 | 0.63 | ||
| Year of publication | Continuous | 1.03 | 0.9 | 1.16 | 0.7 | |||
| 2009 | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||||||
| 2010 | 1 (33.3%) | 2 (66.7%) | ||||||
| 2011 | 5 (71.4%) | 2 (28.6%) | ||||||
| 2012 | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||||||
| 2013 | 6 (66.7%) | 3 (33.3%) | ||||||
| 2014 | 3 (33.3%) | 6 (66.7%) | ||||||
| 2015 | 9 (75.0%) | 3 (25.0%) | ||||||
| 2016 | 5 (55.6%) | 4 (44.4%) | ||||||
| 2017 | 5 (55.6%) | 4 (44.4%) | ||||||
| 2018 | 6 (46.2%) | 7 (53.8%) | ||||||
| 2019 | 3 (75.0%) | 1 (25.0%) | ||||||
| 2020 | 7 (58.3%) | 5 (41.7%) | ||||||
| 2021 | 5 (62.5%) | 3 (37.5%) | ||||||
| Number of authors | Continuous | 0.93 | 0.71 | 1.21 | 0.59 | |||
| 2 | 3 (50.0%) | 3 (50.0%) | ||||||
| 3 | 7 (50.0%) | 7 (50.0%) | ||||||
| 4 | 16 (69.6%) | 7 (30.4%) | ||||||
| 5 | 15 (55.6%) | 12 (44.4%) | ||||||
| 6 | 8 (53.3%) | 7 (46.7%) | ||||||
| 7 | 6 (66.7%) | 3 (33.3%) | ||||||
| 8 | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||||||
| 9 | 1 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | ||||||
| Conflict of interest reported | Categorical | Yes | 32 (56.1%) | 25 (43.9%) | 0.74 | 0.32 | 1.68 | 0.47 |
| No | 26 (63.4%) | 15 (36.6%) | 1 | - | - | - | ||
| Conflict of interest present | Not reported | 26 (63.4%) | 15 (36.6%) | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| No | 32 (56.1%) | 25 (43.9%) | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
| Funding reported | Categorical | Yes | 23 (56.1%) | 18 (43.9%) | 0.8 | 0.35 | 1.81 | 0.6 |
| No | 35 (61.4%) | 22 (38.6%) | 1 | - | - | - | ||
| Type of orthodontic interventiona | Categorical | 1 | 41 (59.4%) | 28 (40.6%) | 1 | - | - | - |
| 2 | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
| 3 | 16 (57.1%) | 12 (42.9%) | 1.1 | 0.45 | 2.67 | 0.84 |
aType 1 orthodontic interventions: Orthodontic interventions to move teeth or change the jaw size or position for orthodontic purposes. Type 2 orthodontic interventions: Orthodontic interventions with additional surgical, pharmacological, or vibratory interventions. Type 3 orthodontic interventions: Orthodontic interventions to maintain or stabilize orthodontic results
Correct Table 6:
The original article has been corrected.
Reference
- 1.Steegmans PAJ, Di Girolamo N, Meursinge Reynders RA. Spin on adverse effects in abstracts of systematic reviews of orthodontic interventions: a cross-sectional study (part 2) Syst Rev. 2023;12:99. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02269-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]