Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cell. 2024 Feb 1;187(3):733–749.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.12.037

Xist ribonucleoproteins promote female sex-biased autoimmunity

Diana R Dou 1, Yanding Zhao 1, Julia A Belk 1, Yang Zhao 1, Kerriann M Casey 2, Derek C Chen 1, Rui Li 1, Bingfei Yu 1, Suhas Srinivasan 1, Brian T Abe 1, Katerina Kraft 1, Ceke Hellström 3, Ronald Sjöberg 3, Sarah Chang 4, Allan Feng 4, Daniel W Goldman 5, Ami A Shah 5, Michelle Petri 5, Lorinda S Chung 4, David F Fiorentino 6, Emma K Lundberg 7,8, Anton Wutz 9, Paul J Utz 4,10, Howard Y Chang 1,11,*
PMCID: PMC10949934  NIHMSID: NIHMS1961931  PMID: 38306984

SUMMARY

Autoimmune diseases disproportionately affect females more than males. The XX sex chromosome complement is strongly associated with susceptibility to autoimmunity. Xist long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) is expressed only in females to randomly inactivate one of the two X chromosomes to achieve gene dosage compensation. Here, we show that the Xist ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex, comprised of numerous autoantigenic components, is an important driver of sex-biased autoimmunity. Inducible transgenic expression of a non-silencing form of Xist in male mice introduced Xist RNP complexes and sufficed to produce autoantibodies. Male SJL/J mice expressing transgenic Xist developed more severe multiorgan pathology in pristane-induced model of lupus than wild-type males. Xist expression in males reprogrammed T and B cell population and chromatin states to more resemble wild type females. Human patients with autoimmune diseases displayed significant autoantibodies to multiple components of XIST RNP. Thus, a sex-specific lncRNA scaffolds ubiquitous RNP components to drive sex-biased immunity.

In Brief

The Xist RNA protein complex, present only in females, is immunogenic and may underlie female-biased autoimmunity.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1961931-f0008.jpg

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune diseases are the third-most prevalent disease category, outpaced only by cancer and heart disease1. Four out of five patients with autoimmune diseases are female. For instance, in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the ratio of patient sex is 9:1 females to males; the ratio in Sjogren’s disease is 19:1 female to male patients2,3. Although hormones have been extensively studied4, the dosage of X chromosome appears to be a major driver of autoimmune risk irrespective of sex or hormonal status in humans and mice58. Patients with Klinefelter syndrome (XXY) are phenotypically males, have male hormonal pattern, but have an elevated risk of autoimmune disease equivalent to females. Specific X-linked genes, such as TLR7, that can escape X inactivation have been nominated as contributors to specific autoimmune diseases58. The genetic risk underlying autoimmune diseases from the second X chromosome in aggregate remain unresolved. In addition, identical twin studies have also shown varying degrees of autoimmune disease penetrance, suggesting a genetic disposition that is also reliant on environmental factors9,10. Hence, adjuvant triggers11 in addition to genetic predisposition may be initiators of autoimmune disease development.

Mammalian females have a XX genotype and males have a XY genotype. To make the gene expression output roughly equivalent between females and males, every cell in a female’s body epigenetically silences one of two X chromosomes via the action of the long noncoding RNA Xist. Xist is a ~17 kb lncRNA (19 kb in human) that is transcribed only from the inactive X chromosome, and thus not expressed in males. Xist is critical for the establishment of X chromosome inactivation (XCI) spreading from the X-inactivation center and coating the entire inactive X in association with its protein partners. During XCI establishment in mouse embryonic stem cells, Xist associates with 81 unique binding proteins to form an RNP complex, 10 through direct RNA-protein interaction and others through indirect protein-protein interaction12,13. Xist is widely expressed in adult somatic tissues and associates additional tissue-specific proteins14. Several Xist binding proteins were previously noted to be autoantigens12. Studies in SLE patients and mice demonstrated that DNA-autoantibody and RNA-autoantigen immune complexes, such as Sm/RNP and U1A, activate the TLR7, TLR8 and TLR9 pathways of the innate immune system1517. The XIST RNP, comprised of a lncRNA, bound RNA binding proteins, and tethered to pieces of genomic DNA, presents qualities resembling nucleic acid-autoantigen immune complexes.

In order to study the impact of the XIST RNP in autoimmune predilection independent of sex chromosome or hormonal background, we utilized an inducible and non-silencing allele of Xist introduced into an autosome in the autoimmune-resistant C57BL/6J and autoimmune-prone SJL/J strain backgrounds. Inducing transgenic Xist RNP formation in male animals allowed the study of this female-specific lncRNA in a male background using a chemically-induced SLE model. Both increased disease severity and elevated autoreactive lymphocyte pathway signatures were observed in the mouse models of pristane-induced SLE. Concurrently, we designed an antigen array to test autoimmune patient seroactivity to XIST-associating proteins and detected significant reactivity towards multiple components of the XIST RNP. Altogether, our data point to a significant role for the Xist RNP as a driver for autoimmunity that may underly the sex-biased female preponderance for developing autoimmune diseases.

RESULTS

Xist RNPs as autoantigens in human disease

A defining feature of many autoimmune diseases is the development of antibodies against self proteins, termed autoantibodies. Many autoantibodies are directed toward nuclear RNA binding proteins, and the nature and titer of such autoantibodies define the type and severity of autoimmune diseases in clinical practice. We and others have identified the constellation of RNA binding proteins associated with Xist RNA in several cell types1214. Bibliomic analysis revealed that 30 proteins of Xist RNP constituents have been reported as the targets of autoantibodies (i.e. autoantigens) in one or more human diseases (Figure S1, Table S1). This observation stimulated the hypothesis that Xist RNP may promote female-biased autoimmunity.

Developing the TetOP-ΔRepA-Xist transgenic mouse to model autoimmune diseases

To test Xist ribonucleoprotein as a potential trigger of autoimmunity, we developed a TetOP-ΔRepA-Xist transgenic mouse that enables inducible expression of Xist in male animals. Because Xist expression from an autosome silences the chromosome in cis and is often cell lethal, we chose to use ΔRepA-Xist, a truncation of Xist that removes the A-repeat (RepA) element required for gene silencing activity of Xist18, but does not ablate chromosome coating or Xist RNP formation. Previous study indicated that 78 of 81 proteins in the Xist RNP associates with ΔRepA-Xist12. Expression of the ΔRepA mutant Xist is controlled through the Tet-operon promoter (TetOP), and the transgenic cassette is inserted in the Col1A1 locus on chromosome 11 (Figure 1A). Since Xist is expressed on only 1 of the 2 X chromosomes, we used mice heterozygous for TetOP-ΔRepA-Xist (denoted as tgXist onwards) in our studies. After only 2 weeks of doxycycline administration in heterozygous tgXist male mice, expression of tgXist was detectable through Xist qRT-PCR in multiple tissues and as single punctate foci in the nucleus reminiscent of Barr body, as evidenced by RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) (Figure 1B,C). We note that in the absence of induction, tgXist has low level of expression that is detectable by qRT-PCR and by FISH; upon induction, tgXist level increases ~100-fold to approximate the level of endogenous Xist in female tissues (Figure 1BD). tgXist did not reduce chromatin accessibility or RNA expression locally at the locus of transgene insertion or across chromosome 11 (Figure S2AD), consistent with the notion that ΔRepA-Xist is functionally null for gene silencing19. Backcrossing of the inducible tgXist transgene into common mouse strains enables the study of Xist in male animals in multiple autoimmune disease models.

Figure 1: tgXist-mice inducibly express ΔrepA-Xist under doxycycline exposure.

Figure 1:

(A) Transgene construct of truncated ΔrepA Xist under tet-o-promoter in mice. (B) qRT-PCR and (C) FISH of Xist expression in tgXist-mice after 2 weeks of doxycycline administered in drinking water. (D) qRT-PCR comparison of basal tgXist levels in tgXist male mice without doxycycline exposure and WT male mice. For B and D, number of tgXist Female = 3, tgXist Male (no dox) = 3, tgXist Male + dox = 4, Wt Male = 5. (E) Schematic of tissue collection in pristane-induced SLE model in the C57/BL6J strain. (F) Cohorts in the induced SLE model. See also Figure S2

Effect of genetic background on tgXist and autoimmunity

The pristane model of SLE has a well-documented female bias in disease penetrance and severity in the permissive SJL/J genetic background. In contrast, C57BL/6J mice20,21, the most widely used genetic background, are autoimmune resistant, and male mice are not expected to develop pristane-induced SLE20. The level at which pristane-induced phenotypes are halted is unclear. We first tested the effect of tgXist expressing on surrogate markers of autoimmunity to understand whether the tgXist transgene changed the requirement for genetic background in this mouse model of autoimmunity. Male and female C57BL/6J mice heterozygous for the ΔRepA-Xist transgene were injected with pristane to chemically induce systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)20,2224 and evaluated for disease (Figure 1E). The pristane-injected transgenic cohorts consisted of a female control untreated for doxycycline (female), male control untreated for doxycycline (tg male), and the test group of male mice continuously treated with doxycycline to induce tgXist expression (male+dox) (Figure 1F). Pristane-treated and untreated wild-type males of the same background were included as additional wild-type male controls. The rationale for each treatment cohort and comparison control is detailed in Table S2.

We found that pristane treated tgXist male mice in C57/BL6 background do not exhibit disease even after 1 year, which is three times the duration for severe disease induction in SJL/J background (16 weeks). While tgXist mice developed anti-nuclear antibodies (ANAb), none of the specific autoantibodies examined were significantly different between tgXist male +pristane vs. WT male+ pristane mice of the same age (Figure S3AB). A subset of the tgXist male + pristane animals developed autoantibodies to smRNP, Smith proteins, U1-A, and U1–68, but the levels were heterogeneous. These results indicate that in the nonpermissive C57/BL6 background, these animals have a low propensity to develop autoantibody or organ disease after an inflammatory challenge, and tgXist did not bypass this genetic barrier.

Transgenic Xist drives males to female-like changes in T cell profiles

While pristane treatment in C57BL/6J mice did not manifest disease, splenic CD4+ T cells (an important cell type for balancing and driving autoimmunity2527) from tgXist-expressing male mice showed molecular changes more similar to females than to control (tgXist-non-induced/wild-type) males at several levels. Potential changes in the transcriptional regulation and gene expression of CD4+ splenic T cells were assessed using ATAC-seq and RNA-seq of multiple animals per cohort at 52 weeks post-treatment (Figure 2A, Figure S3CE). Global comparison of ATAC-seq differential peaks showed several differences between non-tgXist/Xist-expressing animals compared to tgXist-expressing males and wild-type Xist-expressing females, but very few differential peaks between females compared to males expressing tgXist (Figure 2B). PCA comparison of female mice, male mice, and male tgXist-expressing mice (male+dox) showed a separation of mice most highly correlated with sex (Figure 2C). Three of six tgXist-expressing male mice showed female-like skewing (circled in Figure 2C), in keeping with the expected female penetrance percentage.

Figure 2: Bulk ATAC- and RNA-sequencing of splenic CD4+ T-cells from C57BL/6J mice reveal closer correlation between tgXist- and Xist-expressing mice in the pristane-induced SLE model.

Figure 2:

(A) Table of treatment cohorts: colors correspond to each treatment cohort and numbers indicate the number of ATAC- and RNA-seq samples. *Due to library quality, 1 of the ATAC-seq libraries was excluded. (B) MA plots comparing differential regions of genomic accessibility in transgenic cohorts. (C) Poly Component Analysis (PCA) plots of ATAC-seq libraries from all mice in the study. Heatmap of (D) ATAC-seq Z-scores and (F) RNA-seq differential gene expression. Differential peak and gene lists generated from comparisons of the Tg Female+ Pristane, WT Male (mock treatment), and Tg Male + Pristane (no dox) groups to WT Male + Pristane cohort. (E) Top 15 differential reactomes associated with cluster 2 genomic regions. (G) CIBERSORT prediction of T-cell subset composition from CD4+ T-cells RNA-seq gene expression libraries. See also Figure S3 and Table S2

ATAC-seq revealed distinct clusters of accessibility corresponding to tgXist/Xist-expressing and non-expressing mice (Figure 2D). tgXist-induced and pristane-injected males displayed similar chromatin accessibility to pristane-injected female positive control mice, with higher accessibility in cluster 2, and were distinct from male negative control groups (tgXist non-induced and wild-type) that displayed higher accessibility in cluster 1 (Figure 2D). Interestingly, the top Reactome categories in Cluster 2, associated with tgXist-expressing males and Xist-expressing females, displayed high TLR pathway signatures (Figure 2E) not present in Cluster 1 (Figure S3D). Tlr9, encoding a pathogen sensor in the innate immune pathway that is highly active in SLE, is significantly more accessible in females and tgXist-induced males (Figure S3E). RNA-seq profiles of gene expression displayed a similar trend and clustering grouped by tgXist/Xist expression with some variability within cohorts (Figure 2F, Figure S3C), suggesting that ATAC-seq provides a more consistent profile of cells in transition. Comparison of dysregulated genes from ATAC- and RNA-seq revealed an overlap of 364 genes (Figure 2G). CIBERSORT28 deconvolution of gene expression signatures also identified a clear segregation of Xist-expressing and non-expressing mice. In particular, tgXist or Xist-expressing males and wild type females, respectively, contained more CD4 memory T-cells while control males expressed greater proportions of naïve T-cells (Figure 2G).

Xist expression in males promotes multi-organ autoimmune pathology

We next tested the effect of tgXist expression in the autoimmune-prone SJL/J mouse background, a widely used strain in multiple autoimmune disease models22,29,30. Pristane-induced SLE in SJLJ/J mice exhibit many characteristics of human SLE, such as autoantibody development, TLR7 upregulation, multi-organ involvement, and demonstrate a strong female bias10,22. SJL/J female mice display earlier mortality, more severe nephritis, higher levels of autoantibodies, and are 3.4x more likely to die than male mice 22. This disease model is also more reflective of most human patients than spontaneous SLE models that are restricted to specific genetic mutations3134.

We administered a one-time 0.5 mL intraperitoneal injection of pristane to 8–10 week old mice to induce SLE in tgXist and wild-type (WT) mice and continuous ingestion of doxycycline was supplied in drinking water to activate tgXist in selected mice (Figure 3A). The experimental cohorts include the wild-type female pristane-treated positive control, negative controls of mock-injected tgXist- and WT males, the WT male treatment control, and the test group of tgXist-expressing pristane-treated males (Figure 3B, Table S2). Since previous literature determined that WT SJL/J females display mortality as early as 16 weeks post-pristane injection22,22, we selected the terminal timepoint of 16 weeks post-injection to avoid premature loss of mice.

Figure 3: Increased phenotypic changes in pathophysiology and autoantigen levels in tgXist- and Xist-expressing mice in the SJL/J strain in the pristane-induced SLE model.

Figure 3:

(A) Schematic of pristane-induced SLE and strategy for histopathology, serum and sequencing analysis in the SJL/J strain. (B) Treatment cohorts in the SJL/J strain. (C) Table of the mean severity of damage across multiple tissue sites and mice. (D) Representative H&E images of (i) glomeruli (kidney) and (ii) liver sections from each treatment cohort. Arrows demarcate mesangial thickening. (E) Graph of total sum of pathophysiology damage scores. Significance calculated using the Fisher’s Exact Test and FDR<0.05. (F) Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) of serum reactivity to autoantigens using a bead-based lupus antigen array after 16 weeks of treatment. Significance calculated using the unpaired Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test and values displayed at FDR < 0.05. Number of mouse serum samples, listed from left to right: wild-type Female + pristane =18, wild-type Male negative control=13, tgXist Male+dox (tgXist control) =11, wild-type Male treatment =12, tgXist Male treatment=10. P-values are indicated; NS indicates not significant or not meeting FDR<0.05. See also Figure S4 and Tables S2 and S7

As SLE is a systemic disease, we used H&E staining to assess the pathology of multiple affected organs at the terminal collection time on a disease scale of 0–5 for each individual organ (Figure 3C,D). In all pristane-treated cohorts, pristane injection caused lipogranulomas in adipose tissues, lymph node hyperplasia and medullary plasmocytosis, as well as varying degrees of extramedullary hematopoiesis and lymphoid expansion in the spleen. However, pristane injection coupled with tgXist expression in males or Xist in WT female resulted in greater incidence and severity of glomerulonephritis (kidney), hepatic lipogranulomas (liver), and pulmonary hemorrhage and lymphohistiocytic alveolitis (lung), which is reflective of disease damage in the kidney, liver, and lungs observed in severe SLE patients35 (Figure 3C). Manifestation of mild signs of early SLE in some pristane-injected male controls was not unexpected because WT SJL/J males are expected to develop milder disease and display later mortality at 24 weeks post-injection22.

To assess whether Xist expression induced female-level autoimmune disease, we summed the disease scores across 6 organs in individual animals, and chose the total pathology score of 10 as the cutoff for severe disease, which clearly distinguished wild type female mice treated with pristane (positive control) vs. wild type male mice treated with pristane (treatment control). Every female mouse had a score of 10 or above; none of the male wild type mice treated with pristane met this cutoff (p =2.01E-6, Fisher’s exact test). In tgXist males treated with pristane, the total pathology increased in a bimodal fashion compared to WT males: 5 of 8 mice achieved female level pathology (score ≥ 10) while 3 animals had much less disease severity (p=0.009, FDR<0.05, Figure 3E). Concordantly, the greatest statistical difference was observed in the comparison between the female positive controls and the pristane-treated WT males (p=2.01E-6), and the significance lessened in the comparison between females and tgXist males treated with pristane (p=0.042, FDR<0.05) (Figure 3E). Thus, a majority of tgXist male mice experienced female level severe pathology in the pristane induced SLE model.

Sera collected at treatment start (day 0, baseline) and terminally (16 weeks post-treatment) were assessed for reactivity to known SLE and SSc antigens using the Luminex bead-based antigen array36. We found 4 known autoantibodies (RIBO P0, RIBO P2, CENPA, CENPB) that are elevated in female WT mice vs. male WT mice treated with pristane. The mean level is increased for all four autoantibodies in tgXist male mice + pristane vs. WT male mice + pristane, but with different degrees of variance. Anti-CENPB is significantly elevated in tgXist male mice treated with pristane vs. WT male mice treated with pristane (p=0.02, FDR<0.05), and the former is no longer significantly different from WT female mice. The other three antibodies showed an intermediate picture. They are elevated in only a subset of tgXist male + pristane animals: they are no longer significantly different from WT female animals with disease, but they are not statistically significant compared to WT male control (Figure 3F). The heterogeneity of known autoantibodies may track with disease severity; all five of animals in the tgXist male + pristane cohort with severe disease had the highest level of anti-RIBO P2 (Figure 3F, Figure S4).

Single-cell ATAC analysis reveals distinct cell type clustering and consistent reformatting of the chromatin landscape in pristane-treated SJL/J animals

To gain insight to the genes and cellular processes underpinning the heightened autoimmunity in tgXist and Xist-expressing mice, we created single cell ATAC+ gene expression libraries of CD45+ (pan-hematopoietic) sorted splenic cells from pristane-injected mice in the SJL/J strain. A key advantage of the single cell multiomics approach is the ability to interrogate all the hematopoietic lineages within the spleen in a single assay. While our bulk ATAC- and RNA-sequencing in the C57BL/6J strain was restricted to CD4+ T-cells, the single cell libraries encompass the whole CD45+ splenic population.

Using the total lowest observed pathology score in female mice (10) as the cutoff (Figure 3B,D), we divided the pristane-induced tgXist-expressing males into disease high (total pathology score ≧ 10) and low (<10) disease groups. Sequencing libraries were made from representative mice selected from the tgXist male high disease (tgM high, n=4), tgXist male low disease (tgM low, n=4), and two pristane-injected control groups: wild-type females (Wt F, n=4) and wild-type males (Wt M, n=3). Due to high mitochondrial/ribosomal RNA content, 2 of the wild-type females were excluded from the gene expression analysis. To maintain consistency, we included only cells with both ATAC and gene expression reads.

The single cell ATAC UMAP formed 19 clusters (Figure S5A) and were assigned cell type identities using imputation of key marker genes (Figure 4A, Figure S5C). The four pristine-treated mouse group were generally evenly distributed across all clusters, although tgM high mice contained a higher fraction of cells within the CD4 Tcell cluster (Figure 4B). TgM high cells also formed a visually separate CD4_Tcell and Bcell_1 group on the UMAP (Figure 4A, 4C), but comparison of distinguishing markers did not show prominent differences from the adjacent CD4_Tcell and Bcell_1 populations. As expected, the tgXist male mice and female mice all showed peaks in the first Xist exon region (the Xist transcription start site is absent in the Xist transgene) that are lacking in the wild-type control males (Figure 4D).

Figure 4: Single cell ATAC comparisons of splenic CD45+ hematopoietic cells from pristane-treated mice in the SJL/J strain.

Figure 4:

(A) UMAP of cell type cluster identities and (B) corresponding cell type composition within each pristane-treated mouse group. (C) UMAP clustering and (D) Xist peak tracks from pristane-treated mouse groups (features FDR ≦ 0.1 and Log2FC ≧ 0.5). Pristane-treated mouse groups shown: tgXist male disease high (n=4), tgXist male disease low (n=4), wild-type male (n=3), and wild-type female (n=2). See also Figure S5

Interestingly, Wt F and tgM high cells appear to overlap in the main Bcell_2 cluster (Figure 4A, 4C), which colocalizes Cd19 with the atypical B-cell marker Zeb2 (Figure S5C). However, pairwise comparisons between the mouse groups did not identify significant differences in the chromatin landscape within the main lymphocyte clusters even when comparing the most distinct positive disease control (Wt F) to the males with the lowest disease scores (Wt M and tgM low) (S Figure S5D). Aside from a higher CD4T cell fraction in the tgM high mice and atypical B cell activation markers, there were few noticeable distinguishing features in the single cell ATAC comparisons between the pristane-treated mouse groups, suggestive that all of the pristine-treated mice in the autoimmune-prone SJL/J model may have already undergone epigenetic remodeling preceding physiological disease onset at the time of investigation (16 weeks post-injection).

Single-cell gene expression analysis reveals elevation of atypical B-cells and suppression of T-cell modulators in diseased tgXist animals

We next interrogated the pristane-treated SJL/J groups by single cell gene expression, which may reflect cell states with greater immediacy. The single cell gene expression UMAP formed 12 distinct clusters and were segregated clearly into B-cell, T-cell, NK cell, myeloid and erythroid lineages based on key transcription factors and markers (Figure 5A, Figure S6A). The cellular type identities assigned to cells in the gene expression clusters closely matched the ATAC cell type identities (Figure S5B), further validating the consistency of the assigned cellular identities in both the ATAC and gene expression datasets.

Figure 5: Single cell gene expression comparisons of splenic CD45+ hematopoietic cells from pristane-treated mice in the SJL/J strain.

Figure 5:

(A) Cell type cluster identities and (B) pristine-treated mouse groups displayed on the single cell gene expression clustering UMAP. (C) Metrics of differentially expressed B-cell cluster genes of tgXist Male high disease and wild-type female compared to wild-type males. (D) Representative gene expression plots of atypical B cell genes from the Bcell_3 cluster and (E) Metrics of differentially expressed T cell cluster genes of tgXist Male high disease and wild-type female compared to wild-type males. (F) T-cell cluster highlighting significant differentially expressed genes. Pristane-treated mouse groups shown: tgXist male disease high (n=4), tgXist male disease low (n=4), wild-type male (n=3), and wild-type female (n=2). Significance was calculated using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. See also Figures S6 and S7

Within the B cell cluster, the tgXist male high disease group overlay with the female wild-type mice, distinct from the wild type male and the relatively unaffected tgXist male low disease animals (Figure 5B, Figure S6B, Figure S7AD). Since B cells produce the majority of autoantibodies and proinflammatory cytokines that characterize autoimmune pathogenesis37,38, the high correlation of B-cells, specifically, of the tgXist- diseased males with those from positive disease control females provides another layer of support for the hypothesis that Xist complexes mediate an environment of higher autoimmunity. The tgXist low disease and wild-type males grouped closely together and most of the differences between the tgXist high disease and wild-type female mice lay in the sex chromosomes or ribosomal protein genes. Inspection of the differentially expressed genes comparing the disease-affected tgXist male and female mice with the wild-type males (Figure S6C) revealed that the majority of both downregulated and upregulated genes were shared between the first two groups (Figure 5C). Particularly significant genes included the upregulation of the atypical B-cell marker, Zeb2 (tgM high vs WT M, p = 3.08E-69, WT F vs WT M, p = 1.17E-35) and CD22 (tgM high vs WT M, p = 7.63E-46, WT F vs WT M p = 2.59E-36), a receptor associated with pathogenic B cells39 critical for B-cell proliferation and B cell receptor signaling (Figure S6D). Concurrently, Siglec-g, encoding a receptor associated with promoting B-cell self-tolerance, deficiency of which is associated with increased B-1 cells and multiple autoimmune diseases4042, was significantly downregulated (tgM high vs WT M, p = 1.73E-101, WT F vs WT M, p = 1.01E-43) (Figure S6D). Also downregulated were complement receptor 2 (Cr2, tgM high vs WT M, p = 1.30E-153, WT F vs WT M p =3.70E-44) and the paralog to its alternatively spliced form, Cr1l (tgM high vs WT M, p = 4.41E-33, WT F vs WT M, p = 1.35E-33), both of which are important for suppressing autoimmunity43,44.

Within the B cell clusters, WT F and tgM high uniquely overlapped in a region of Bcell_3 not populated by either WT M or tgM low disease groups (Figure S7AD). Cluster Bcell_3 contained the highest correlation of gene expression signatures of atypical B-cell markers45 (Figure S7E, highlighted in orange), including upregulation of Cd19, Ms4a1 (gene encoding Cd20), Zeb2, and Fcrl5, a defining marker of atypical memory B-cells in both mice and humans46, as well as downregulation of Cr2 (Cd21), Cd27, and Cxcr547,48. Furthermore, Bcell_3 cluster cells from the gene expression data matched solely to the independently clustered multiome ATAC UMAP Bcell_2 cell clusters (Figure S5B), the ATAC clusters imputed to have atypical B-cell characteristics (Figure S5C, Zeb2 imputation). Closer examination of the gene expression Bcell_3 cluster showed significant elevation of Zeb2 (tgM high vs WT M, p = 6.12E-74, WT F vs WT M, p = 8.53E-9) and downregulation of Cr2 (tgM high vs WT M, p = 1.75E-89, WT F vs WT M, p =3.03E-14) and Cxcr5 (tgM high vs WT M, p = 5.65E-23, WT F vs WT M, p = 2.61E-18) in high disease compared to relatively unaffected mouse groups (representative plots, Figure 5D). CD21CD27 double negative are typical distinguishers of atypical B cells while loss of CXCR5 in CD21 effector B cells is a hallmark of atypical B cells in SLE pathogenesis in patients47,48.

While the UMAP within the T cell clusters was less distinctly demarcated than the B-cell cluster (Figure 5B, Figure S6E), the overall pattern was clear in the shared downregulated programs (Figure 5E). Multiple key T cell regulation and self-tolerance genes were downregulated in the tgXist male high disease and female cohorts compared to the wild-type males. Among the significantly downregulated genes were the glucocorticoid receptor Nr3c1 (tgM high vs WT M, p = 1.37E-33, WT F vs WT M, p = 1.33E-63) involved in Treg modulation of inflammation49, Cd37 (tgM high vs WT M, p = 4.60E-12, WT F vs WT M, p = 1.81E-10) which regulates proliferation50 and complement-mediated apoptosis of autoreactive T-cells50, the CD4 T-cell immune regulator Cd5251 (tgM high vs WT M, p = 7.24E-13, WT F vs WT M, p = 2.22E-72), and invariant chain Cd74 involved in training antigen immunity in T cells52 (tgM high vs WT M, p = 8.15E-37, WT F vs WT M p = 2.27E-96) (representative plots, Figure 5F).

Our multiome sequencing identified clusters suggestive of atypical B cells overlapping closely in both ATAC and gene expression. At the single cell gene expression level, the severity of disease in tgXist-/Xist-expressing animals may be driven by increased atypical B cell activity and decreased immune modulatory programs in both B and T cells. Combined with the heightened pathophysiology scores and increased autoantigen levels, the gene expression data corroborates a role for Xist RNPs in the development of increased and/or more severe autoimmunity in the pristane-induced SLE model.

Autoimmune patients and mice display multiple autoantibodies to the XIST RNP

The imperfect association of known autoantibodies with tgXist-enhanced disease motivated us to consider whether novel autoantibodies to Xist RNP itself exist in human patients. To test whether the XIST RNP is immunogenic in humans, we obtained de-identified sera from patients with dermatomyositis (DM), scleroderma (SSc) and SLE to test for reactivity to XIST complex proteins12,14. We used protein fragments produced by the Human Protein Atlas for 130 of XIST-associated proteins of interest (selection described in Methods) and 52 for control proteins used as clinical markers for DM, SSc and SLE. Three of the clinical protein antigens overlapped with the XIST ChIRP-MS lists (SSB, SNRPD2, SRP14). When possible, multiple fragments spanning different regions of each protein were used (Figure 6A).

Figure 6: Autoimmune disease individuals experience increased serum reactivity towards antigens of the XIST RNP.

Figure 6:

(A) Table of the XIST complex-associated antigen array design showing the number of total unique proteins and corresponding protein fragments counts drawn from XIST ChIRP-MS, clinical disease panel, and control protein lists; and sample numbers of autoimmune patient and general population serum. (B) Volcano plot of serum reactivity of all autoimmune patients and (C) sera grouped by DM, SSc, and SLE patients compared to general population baseline of serum from blood donors. Significant differentially reactive antigens, defined as padj < 0.05 and MAD difference > 0, labeled in red. Significance calculated using the Student’s T-test. (D) Metrics of unique antigens from the array with significant elevated serum activity in autoimmune patients compared to the general population. (E) Serum reactivity (MAD) plots of representative antigens significantly reactive in all three autoimmune patient cohorts grouped by disease type and colored by sex (red=female, blue=male). See also Tables S1 and S5

As a general population control, we obtained serum from anonymous donations to the Stanford Blood Center. However, since the mean and median age of these donors were 58 and 61 years at the time of donation, these donors may express some autoreactivity due to advanced age. Nevertheless, autoimmune patients were significantly more reactive to 55 proteins, 16 of which were disease markers, 1 of which overlapped with XIST RNP (SSB), and the remaining 39 antigens from the XIST RNP list (Figure 6B, Table S5). Distinct reactive antigens for each autoimmune disease arose when grouped by disease (Figure 6C) and 9 antigens were shared among all 3 diseases (Figure 6D, Table S5). Of these, TRIM33, or TIF1-γ, is a clinical marker for autoimmune disease (DM)53. The other 8 were XIST RNP components, several of which have recently discovered roles in autoimmunity. HMGB1 was recently identified as an autoantigen in SLE/Sjögren that may be another SS-protein in the SS-A/SS-B family54,55, HNRNPK is an autoantigen in a subset of Raynaud’s disease56,57 and aplastic anemia, SAFB is a novel autoantigen in connective tissues detected in interstitial lung disease, and XPO5 is in the SSB/La processing pathway58.

In sum, the 3 disease groups were significantly reactive to 79 unique proteins in the array compared to the general population control. Of these 79 proteins, 27 were disease controls, and 53 were associated with the XIST RNP (SSB is also a disease control marker). 37 of the 53 XIST-associated proteins were part of the group of 118 high confidence published XIST RNP complex proteins14. Of these 37 high confidence XIST complex proteins, 28 have not been described in the current published literature as autoantigens associated with autoimmune disease and are potentially novel biomarkers (Table S5). These results show multiple proteins from the XIST RNPs are novel autoantigens in patients with DM, SSc, and SLE.

Finally, we turned to our mouse model to probe the drivers of autoantibodies to Xist RNP. Using our Xist RNP array, we analyzed sera from the tgXist mice of the SJL/J background to examine the effect of tgXist and pristane induced lupus. We compared sera of each animal longitudinally at 0, 4, 12, and 16 weeks after treatment across 5 mouse cohorts, allowing us to infer a causal relationship between perturbation and autoantibodies to Xist RNP. We compared the autoantibodies in tgXist mice to autoantibodies to the same proteins in human patients with SLE, which grounds the mouse results with human disease relevance (Fig. 7A). First, we observed that female WT mice treated with pristane induced dozens of autoantibodies to Xist RNP by 12 weeks that persist through 16 weeks. These Xist RNP autoantibodies significantly overlap autoantibodies to Xist RNP in human patients with SLE (p= 0.001, Fig. 7B). Second, tgXist expression in males treated with pristane induced many of the same antibodies against Xist RNP, which are at higher levels than in WT male mice treated with pristane at both 12 weeks and 16 weeks (p=6e-11 and p=1e-29 respectively, revised Fig 7BD). Third, high levels of Xist RNP antibodies are only observed in pristane treated mice, indicating a key role for tissue damage and inflammation. Moreover, wild type female mice had higher Xist RNP antibodies than tgXist male mice (both treated with pristane) at 12 weeks after treatment (p<7e-37); tgXist male mice only reached female level of Xist RNP antibodies at 16 weeks (revised Fig. 7C,D). These results show that tgXist expression in males can promote autoantibodies to Xist RNP in the context of tissue damage, but this occurs with slower kinetics than wild type females.

Figure 7. Model of XIST RNP in autoimmune progression.

Figure 7.

(A) Schematic using the Xist antigen array to identify autoantibodies shared in SLE patients and tgXist/Xist-expressing SJL/J mice with/without pristane-induced SLE. (B) Antibody reactivity (MFI normalized to bare bead baseline) against Xist RNP members is shown for the five indicated mouse cohorts across time points. Xist RNP members that are also autoantigens in human SLE patients are indicated on left bar (SLE_antigens). Each row is a Xist RNP member; each column is a mouse serum sample. (C) Quantification of Xist RNP autoantibody reactivity at 12 weeks after treatment, and (D) at 16 weeks after treatment. Significant p-values are indicated (Wilcoxon rank sum test, all with FDR<0.05); non-significant differences are indicated with “NS”. Heat map and box plot visualization plots capped at 1000 MFI to account for outliers. Number of mouse serum samples: wild-type Female + pristane =18, wild-type Male mock treatment =13, tgXist Male PBS+Dox =11, wild-type Male Dox+Pristane =12, tgXist Male Dox+Pristane=10. (E) Autoreactivity to Xist RNPs first causes changes in the chromatin landscape impacting genomic accessibility and changes in lymphocyte gene expression programs prefacing the development of autoantibodies and cascade to prolonged autoreactive activity damaging organs in the final stages of autoimmunity. See also Figure S1 and Table S5

DISCUSSION

Xist lncRNA as a polymeric antigen scaffold in female-biased autoimmunity

Our study nominates Xist ribonucleoprotein complexes as antigenic triggers underlying the greater prevalence of autoimmune diseases in females. Although it is a well-documented fact that females are more prone to autoimmune diseases than males, previous studies primarily examined differences in gene dosage and hormonal background. While prior studies of Xist address altered X-inactivation and the subsequent impact of XCI escape of X-linked genes14,59,60, this study investigated the immunogenicity of Xist RNP complex itself. We have shown that expression of Xist RNPs in male mice is sufficient to increase disease severity and change the expression and epigenomic profiles of both the B-cell and T-cell effectors of SLE pathogenesis.

Physicians and scientists have long noted that many autoantibodies target large nucleic acid protein complexes, such as chromatin or RNP, in human autoimmune diseases. This feature was exploited by molecular biologists to use patient sera to identify components of the centromere (recognized by autoantibodies in CREST syndrome) or spliceosome (SLE, DM). Immunologists have explained this phenomenon with the idea that large nucleic acid-protein complexes are polymeric, and if exposed in the extracellular space, can cluster and activate immunoreceptors. We propose that the XIST RNP is one such dominant antigenic array that is unique to females. Every cell in a woman’s body has XIST, which is a long polymer (19 kb) and coats the entire inactive X chromosome in the condensed Barr body (an even larger polymer). When a female cell dies due to tissue injury, XIST RNPs will invariably be exposed to the immune system. Our data further suggests a model where XIST contributes to several steps in the progression to autoimmune disease (Figure 7C). In a genetically autoimmune resistant background, low level of XIST, even in the presence of tissue injury, leads to only changes in T cell subsets and chromatin states but no frank organ pathology. These epigenetic changes in accessibility are then subsequently reflected in the gene expression programs upregulating autoreactivity and downregulating immune modulation. Finally, in the context of a permissive genetic background and repeated tissue injury, the presence of XIST RNP exacerbates full blown end organ pathology and activation of multiple immune cell types. Longitudinal studies of sera reactivity and autoimmune disease in humans are consistent with this model 61.

Opportunities for disease diagnosis and therapy

There are more than 100 known autoimmune diseases that in aggregate afflict ~50 million Americans and comprise one of the top ten leading causes of death for women under the age of 6562. Worryingly, cases are increasing yearly on a global scale and recent serologic studies revealed a steep rise of increasing ANA reactivity63,64. Understanding the risk factors and drivers of autoimmunity has become even more critical in the race to develop effective therapies and sensitive diagnostics specific to each autoimmune disease. However, the high heterogeneity within autoimmune diseases and overlapping traits across diseases have limited our ability to tailor effective therapies and sensitive diagnostics specific to each autoimmune disease65. Our discovery of seropositivity towards multiple XIST-associating proteins in autoimmune patients introduces a novel antigen set with clinical potential for enhancing disease detection and monitoring, as autoantibodies are often detected prior to or early in disease onset61,66. In addition, studies in SSc have also demonstrated the effectiveness of autoantigen analysis in patient stratification and identifying pathogenic pathways67,68. Profiling the XIST RNP in primary cells, both healthy and diseased, may be useful in advancing our understanding of the aberrant autoreactivity towards proteins within the complex and identify more potential autoantigens.

Currently, there are few targeted therapies for autoimmune diseases available. The most common therapies involve B-cell depletion but are not always effective. There remains a need for more specific pathogenic leukocyte targets. We identified atypical B cells as a population of immune cells that accumulate as a consequence of Xist RNP expression. Atypical B cells (also known as age-associated B cells) are a unique population of B cells that expand with increased TLR7 signaling69,70 and in female-biased autoimmunity71. Notably, atypical B cells accumulate in aged female mice but not in age-matched male mice69, and atypical B cells are enriched in human or mouse B cells that escape XCI and re-express TLR714,72. Thus, atypical B cells appears as the immunological nexus of two potential consequences of mammalian dosage compensation--autoreactivity to Xist RNP and escape from XCI—and suggest that these consequences may synergize to promote female biased immunity. Future studies should address whether and how atypical B cells or other cell types evoked by Xist RNP contribute to autoimmunity.

Limitations of the study

This study employs a truncated Xist missing the A-repeat to model Xist RNP action in male mice. The detection of autoantibodies to Xist RNP in female patients and wild type female mice indicate that tgXist models important aspects of full length Xist in females. Although we have confirmed that immune cell subsets, autoantibodies, and disease penetrance of autoimmunity of tgXist males are at an intermediate level between WT male and WT female, arguing against a neomorphic effect of Xist-ΔA-repeat, it is formally possible that Xist-ΔA-repeat differentially impacts other features of autoimmunity. Fragmentation of cell-free Xist RNP is the inevitable consequence as the complex is released from dying cells and eventually cleared, and this interpretation is fully compatible with our model for female biased immunity. Our transgenic model expressed Xist ubiquitously in male animals, and the role of individual tissues or cell types most responsible the observed phenotypes and the required time window of Xist RNP exposure should be dissected in future studies. Additionally, a known limitation of Tet-regulated expression cassettes is that they can be leaky or silenced over time in vivo7376. Thus, there is likely variability or decline of tgXist expression in our transgenic model during the experiment; and the level of Xist required to confer female-level autoimmune risk is unclear. Similarly, this work has not addressed whether fluctuations in Xist level in female individuals may impact autoimmunity. Finally, this study employed a modest number of animals and patient samples, and several results showed large variation between test subjects. Future studies with larger numbers and a detailed focus on exactly which XIST related antigens contribute to female biased immunity will be valuable.

STAR★Methods

Resource Availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Howard Y. Chang (howchang@stanford.edu).

Materials availability

All requests should be directed to the lead contact, except ΔRepA-Xist transgenic mice are available upon request with a completed Materials Transfer Agreement with Anton Wutz (awutz@ethz.ch).

Data and code availability

  • Bulk ATAC- and RNA-seq and single cell multiomic data have been deposited in GEO. Accession numbers can be found in the Key Resources Table. The autoantigen array raw data files are included in Supplemental Information. Additional can be found in the Key Resources Table.

  • Analysis details are provided in STAR Methods. No original code was generated in this paper.

  • Additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the Lead Contact upon request.

Key resources table

REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER
Antibodies
7-AAD BD Biosciences Cat # 559925, RRID:AB_2869266
FITC anti-mouse CD4 (clone GK1.5) BioLegend Cat # 100406, RRID:AB_312690
TruStain FcX PLUS (anti-mouse CD16/32, clone S17011E) BioLegend Cat # 156604, RRID:AB_2783137
APC anti-mouse CD45 (clone 30-F11) BioLegend Cat # 103112, RRID:AB_312977
Mouse Xist Stellaris® FISH Probes with Quasar® 570 Dye LGC Biosearch Technologies SMF-3011-1, RRID: AB_3076254
R-Phycoerythrin labelled Goat anti-Human IgG Fc Invitrogen 12-4998-82; AB_465926
Bacterial and virus strains
Biological samples
Human whole blood (healthy control serum) Stanford Blood Center https://stanfordbloodcenter.org/researchlabs/research-productsand-services/bloodproducts/
SLE patient sera This paper; Johns Hopkins NA
DM patient sera This paper; Stanford University NA
SSc patient sera This paper; Johns Hopkins, Stanford University NA
Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins
Pristane Sigma-Aldrich P9622-10X1ML
PBS 1x Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat # 10010049
Doxycyline hyclate Sigma-Aldrich D9891-5G
DNAse I Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 18068015
O.C.T. Compound Tissue-Tek Cat# 4583
Fisherbrand Superfrost Plus Microscope Slides Fisher Scientific Cat# 12-550-15
Paraformaldehyde Fisher Scientific Cat# 50-980-487
TritonX-100 Acros Organics AC327371000
Ethanol Gold Shield Cat# 412804
Stellaris® RNA FISH Wash Buffer A LGC Biosearch Technologies SMF-WA1-60
Stellaris® RNA FISH Hybridization Buffer LGC Biosearch Technologies SMF-HB1-10
VECTASHIELD Mounting Medium with DAPI Vector Laboratories H-1200
VWR® Micro Cover Glasses VWR 48366-227
HypoThermosol FRS BioLifeSolutions Cat# 101102
CellTrics® Disposable Cell Strainers Sysmex 04-004-2327
eBioscience 1X RBC Lysis Buffer Thermo Fisher
Scientific
Cat# 00-4333-57
BAMBANKER Wako Cat# 203-14681
Fetal Bovine Serum Thermo Fisher Scientific A3160502
Protector RNase Inhibitor Sigma-Aldrich Cat# 3335399001
Critical commercial assays
EasySep Mouse CD4+ T cell Isolation Kit STEMCELL Technologies Cat# 19852
Mouse Anti-Nuclear Antibody Kit MyBioSource.com MBS731183
RNeasy Plus Mini Kit Qiagen Cat# 74136
High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit Applied Biosystems Cat# 4368814
TruSeq® Stranded mRNA Library Prep Illumina Cat# 20020594
Chromium Single Cell Multiome ATAC + Gene Expression Reagent Bundle 10x Genomics PN-1000283
Chromium Next GEM Chip J Single Cell Kit 10x Genomics PN-1000234
Single Index Kit N Set A, 96 rxns 10x Genomics PN-1000212
Dual Index Kit TT Set A, 96 rxns 10x Genomics PN-1000215
Deposited data
Raw and processed sequencing data (single cell) This paper GEO database: GSE249830
Raw and processed bulk ATAC-seq data This paper GEO database: GSE249830
Raw and processed bulk RNA-seq data This paper GEO database: GSE249830
Raw and processed SLE antigen array data This paper Table S3
Raw and processed XIST antigen array data (patients) This paper Table S4
Raw and processed XIST antigen array data (mouse) This paper Table S6
Experimental models: Cell lines
Experimental models: Organisms/strains
SJL/J mouse Jackson Laboratories Strain# 000686; RRID:IMSR_JAX:000686
C57BL6/J mouse Jackson Laboratories Strain# 000664; RRID:IMSR_JAX:000664
ΔRepA-Xist transgenic mouse This paper Anton Wutz
Oligonucleotides
Mouse Xist Forward (qRT-PCR) GACAACAATGGGAGCTGGTT Elim Biopharmaceuti cals, Inc. Custom Oligos
Mouse Xist Reverse (qRT-PCR) GCAACCCCAGCAATAGTCAT Elim Biopharmaceuti cals, Inc. Custom Oligos
Mouse GAPDH Forward (qRT-PCR) TGTGCAGTGCCAGCCTCGTC Elim Biopharmaceuti cals, Inc. Custom Oligos
Mouse GAPDH Reverse (qRT-PCR) TGCCACTGCAAATGGCAGCC Elim Biopharmaceuti cals, Inc. Custom Oligos
Neomycin Forward (genotyping) AGGATCTCCTGTCATCTCACCTTGCTCCTG Elim Biopharmaceuti cals, Inc. Custom Oligos
Neomycin Reverse (genotyping) AAGAACTCGTCAAGAAGGCGATAGAAGGCG Elim Biopharmaceuti cals, Inc. Custom Oligos
CMV (genotyping, Forward) GCTGGTTTAGTGAACCGTCAG Elim Biopharmaceuti cals, Inc. Custom Oligos
Mouse Xist (genotyping, Reverse) ACAAAGATTGGGCTGTCGAG Elim Biopharmaceuti cals, Inc. Custom Oligos
Recombinant DNA
Software and algorithms
Cellranger 10x Genomics https://support.10xgenomics.com/single-cellgeneexpression/software/overview/welcome
Prism Graphpad https://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/software/prism/
CIBERSORT Newman et al.28 https://cibersortx.stanford.edu/cshome.php
STAR Dobin et al.86 https://github.com/alexdobin/STAR
RSEM Li et al.87 https://github.com/deweylab/RSEM
Bowtie2 Langmead and Salzberg88 http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/bowtie2/index.shtml
Samtools Li et al.89 http://www.htslib.org/
MACS2 Zhang et al.90 https://github.com/macs3-project/MACS
DESeq2 Love et al.92 https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq2.html
g:profiler Raudvere et al.93 https://biit.cs.ut.ee/gprofiler/gost
Seurat Hao et al.94 https://satijalab.org/seurat/
ArchR Granja JM, Corces MR et al.95 https://www.archrproject.com/

Experimental Models and Study Participant Details

Mouse Strains

All mouse work was conducted under Stanford’s approved animal protocol APLAC-14046. Wild-type C57BL/6J (000664) and SJL/J (000686) mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories. Inducible ΔRepA-Xist transgenic mice: A transgene of tetO linked to Xist cDNA deleted for the A repeat (SacII-XhoI is deleted, appx. 500nt) was targeted to the Col1a1 locus on chromosome 11 in A9 129/Bl6 hybrid ES cells. To insert the ΔRepA-Xist transgene, a homing cassette was first inserted into the 3’-region of Col1a1 using homologous recombination. This homing cassette consisted of a hygromycin (pPGK-hygro-PA) resistance marker, a loxP recombinase site, and a truncated neomycin resistance gene (3’neo-PA). Subsequently, the pPGK-loxP-ΔRepA-Xist cDNA was inserted by Cre mediated recombination followed by G418 selection18,77. Transgenic mice were generated by injection of the modified ES cells into Bl6 8-cell embryos78. Resulting transgenic mice were crossed to a mouse line carrying the R26/N-nlsrtTA doxycycline regulated transactivator78,79. Mice carrying the tet-O-ΔRepA-Xist and rtTA constructs were backcrossed into the C57BL/6J or SJL/J mice for multiple generations. Tail tips were collected from 5–7 female mice from each generation for speed congenics selection using Charles Rivers’ MAX-BAX 384 SNP panel. The two females with the highest match in the desired background from each generation were selected as breeders. The tgXist-C57BL6/J mice used in this study are > 80% in the C57BL/6J background. The tgXist-SJL/J mice are > 99.99% in the SJL/J strain background. Mice were genotyped for both the Neomycin resistant cassette and from the CMV promoter into the truncated Xist transgene. Studies in the SJL/J background used both mice heterozygous for tgXist and wild-type littermates while studies involving SJL/J mice while wild-type control C57BL/6J mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories. Genotyping primers are listed in the Key Resources Table.

Clinical Cohorts

All human patient samples were de-identified in this study and obtained under the respective institutions’ IRB-approved protocols.

The biological sex of human serum samples used in this study is indicated in the text and raw data tables in Table S4 in the “SAMPLES” description sheet. All patients were adults. Information regarding age, ancestry, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status were not provided in the de-identified clinical patients to the Lead Author in this study and so were not included in the analysis. Due to the small number “n” of male patients, sex was not a separately analyzed variable due to lack of statistical power. Analysis was, instead, separated into disease groups.

General Population

Donated whole blood from a total of 9 male and 8 female donors were obtained from the Stanford Blood Bank following IRB-approved protocols (IRB #13942) with confirmed assent for use in research. Serum was collected as described above in the mouse serum section and frozen in −80°C for long-term storage. During data analysis, 1 of the 9 male samples was filtered out for high IgG background.

Dermatomyositis (Stanford)

Serum from 1 male and 3 female dermatomyositis patients were used in this study. All samples were collected from patients seen at the Stanford outpatient clinics under an IRB-approved protocol (IRB #12047), and all patients provided informed consent to participate. The dermatomyositis cohort has been described previously80. All patients met probable or definite DM by 2017 ACR/EULAR IIM Classification Criteria81. All sera used in the study were also known to contain antibodies against TIF1-γ which was assayed as previously described82.

Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma, Stanford)

Serum from 24 patients (2 male and 22 female) with systemic sclerosis (SSc) were included in this study from the Stanford cohort. All samples were collected from patients seen at the Stanford outpatient clinics under an IRB-approved protocol (IRB #12047), and all patients provided informed consent to participate. All patients fulfilled 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc. Twelve patients had diffuse and 12 had limited cutaneous SSc. Seven patients had the Scl-70 antibody, 5 had the anti-centromere antibody, 2 patients had RNA polymerase III, 2 had nucleolar ANA, 2 had PM/Scl, and 1 had U1RNP, with the remainder having positive ANA but no known SSc-specific autoantibody.

Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma, Johns Hopkins)

Samples were previously collected and stored at −80°C as part of the Hopkins Scleroderma Center cohort protocol (NA_00039566). Serum from 9 males and 31 females were shipped on dry ice to Stanford. Patients were enrolled in the IRB-approved Johns Hopkins Scleroderma Center Research Registry. Scleroderma participants in the registry meet at least one of the following criteria for systemic sclerosis: 1) 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for scleroderma, 2) 1980 ACR classification criteria, 3) having at least 3 of 5 features of the CREST syndrome (calcinosis, Raynaud’s phenomenon, esophageal dysmotility, sclerodactyly, telangiectasia), or 4) having definite Raynaud’s phenomenon, abnormal nailfold capillaries and a scleroderma-specific autoantibody.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (Johns Hopkins)

Patients provided written informed consent to participate in the Hopkins Lupus Cohort (IRB study number NA_00039294). Blood was drawn at the time of a clinical blood draw, serum collected and kept in a −80 freezer for long term storage. For this study, 40 serum samples (3 males and 37 females) were randomly selected from patients who were ever: 1) ANA positive with a titer of at least 1:320; and 2) positive to the dsDNA autoantigen. Patients enrolled in the Hopkins Lupus Cohort met either the revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR)83 or Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)84 criteria for SLE. Samples were shipped on dry ice to Stanford and stored at –80°C.

Method Details

Induction and evaluation of pristane-induced SLE in mice

Pristane-induction of SLE

Wild-type and tg-Xist mice were injected with a one-time injection of 0.5 mL of pristane (Sigma-Aldrich, P9622–10X1ML) at 8–10 weeks old (SJL/J strain) or 12–14 weeks old (C57BL/6J studies). Control animals were injected with PBS 1x (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 10010049).

Induction of transgene (tgXist)

Simultaneous to the injection date, doxycycline hyclate (Sigma-Aldrich, D9891–5G) was continuously administered at 0.2 g/mL in drinking water to select mice until the terminal timepoint.

For the tgXist expression validation studies, tgXist+/− and wild-type mice in the C57BL/6J strain were administered doxycycline for 2 weeks and tissues were harvested for qRT-PCR and FISH analysis.

Xist qRT-PCR

Mechanically dissociated thymus, spleen, kidney, and liver cells harvested from tgXist+/− and wild-type mice in the C57BL/6J were strained through a cell filter, pelleted, and frozen in RLT Buffer with 0.1% BME. RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, 74106), genomic DNA was removed using amplification grade DNAse I (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 18068015). RNA concentration was quantified on a Nanodrop. cDNA was made from 1 ug of RNA/sample using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, 4368814). Each Ct value was measured using Lightcycler 480 (Roche) and each mean dCt was averaged from triplicate qRT-PCR reactions. Relative Xist RNA levels was calculated by ddCt method compared to GAPDH controls. Statistical significance was calculated using the Student’s t-test. Primer sequences are listed in the Key Resources Table.

Xist FISH

Mice organs frozen in O.C.T. compound (Tissue-Tek, 4583) were sectioned on a crysostat to 15 μm onto microscope slides (Fisher Scientific, 12–550-15). Sections were washed once with PBS 1x, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature, washed twice with PBS 1x for 2–5 min each, then permeabilized on ice with ice cold 0.5% TritonX-100 in PBS for 10 min.

Slides were then rinsed once with PBS and dehydrated sequentially in 70%, 90% and 100% Ethanol (Gold Shield, 412804) for 5 minutes each. Sectioned slides were then allowed to air dry before immersion in freshly made Stellaris® RNA FISH Wash Buffer A (SMF-WA1–60) for 2–5 minutes at room temperature. Sections were then hybridized overnight for 16–18 hours in the dark at 42C in 250 nM of Mouse Xist Stellaris® FISH Probes with Quasar® 570 Dye (LGC Biosearch Technologies, SMF-3011–1) in Stellaris® RNA FISH Hybridization Buffer (SMF-HB1–10). The next day, slides were incubated twice in Wash Buffer A for 30 minutes at 37C followed by immersion in Stellaris® RNA FISH Wash Buffer B for 2–5 minutes at 27C, mounted in VECTASHIELD Mounting Medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, H-1200) and sealed with cover glass (VWR, 48366–227) and nail polish clear coat. Sectioned organs were imaged on the Zeiss Observer Z.1 using the 63x oil objective, X-Cite Series120 laser, and AxioVision Rel. 4.8 software.

Mouse sera collection

Mice were sedated with isofluorane and retro-orbitally bled immediately prior to the injection and viably bled every 4 weeks until the terminal date. On the terminal date, blood was collected through cardiac puncture. Blood was allowed to clot for 2 hours at room temperature, then spun for 15 minutes at 1500xg at room temperature. Serum was immediately collected, flash-frozen on dry ice and stored at −80C.

ANAb ELISA

Serum ANAb levels were measured using the Mouse Anti-Nuclear Antibody Kit (MyBioSource.com, MBS731183) and assessed on an ELISA plate reader at an optical density of 450 nm. Titration curves and values were calculated using a Four Parameter Logistic Curve.

Tissue collection and preparation of pristane-induced SLE studies

Mice were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation and cardiac exsanguination at the terminal timepoints of 16- or 52-weeks post-injection. Terminal cardiac blood was aliquoted into EDTA tubes (400 ml per mouse) and Eppendorf tubes (for serum collection). Total body weights were obtained, and the following organs were weighed individually: thymus, heart, liver, spleen, testes. Gross necropsies were performed on all mice (Table S7). The caudate and papillary liver lobes, left kidney, one half of the thymus and one half of the spleen were dissected and placed on ice in HypoThermosol FRS (BioLifeSolutions, 101102) until all dissections concluded and were either mechanically dissociated using clean scalpels and syringes or frozen in O.C.T. Compound (Tissue-Tek, 4583) at −80C on the same day. The remaining tissues were immersion-fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 72 hours for downstream histology analysis. Dissociated cells were passed through cell filters (Sysmex, 04-004-2327), pelleted at 300xg, incubated for 1 minute at room temperature in eBioscience 1X RBC Lysis Buffer (00-4333-57) to remove red blood cells, and quenched with 10x the volume of PBS 1X. For viable stocks, dissociated cells were frozen in BAMBANKER (Wako, #203-14681) and stored in liquid nitrogen.

CD4+ isolation

CD4+ cells were isolated from freshly dissociated mouse spleen using the EasySep Mouse CD4+ T cell Isolation Kit (STEMCELL Technologies, 19852). CD4+ cells were then immediately used for bulk ATAC-seq, frozen in RLT Buffer Plus, or viably frozen in BAMBANKER. A small aliquot of cells were stained in PBS 1x with the viability marker 7-AAD (BD Biosciences, 559925) and T-cell marker CD4 FITC (clone GK1.5, BioLegend, 100406) to assess purity and viability on a FACS analyzer.

CD45+ isolation

Viable cells frozen in BAMBANKER were thawed at 37C in a bead bath, resuspended in RPMI, and spun at 300xg to pellet and remove the buffer. Cells were incubated with TruStain FcX PLUS (anti-mouse CD16/32, clone S17011E, Biolegend, 156604) to block non-specific binding of immunoglobulin and stained with the pan-hematopoietic marker CD45 APC (clone 30-F11, BioLegend, 103112) and 7-AAD for viability. Viable CD45+ cells were sorted on the BD FACSAria II sorter using a 70 uM nozzle into chilled FBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, A3160502) with 1% Protector RNAse inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich, 3335399001) in the Stanford Shared FACS Facility. Sorted cells were then immediately used to prepare sequencing libraries.

Histopathology

Formalin-fixed tissues were processed routinely, embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 5 μm, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. All tissues were evaluated blindly by a board-certified veterinary pathologist (KMC). An ordinal histopathologic grading scale (score 0–4) was designed to evaluate glomerulonephritis, hepatic lipogranulomas, pulmonary lymphohistiocytic alveolitis, and splenic extramedullary hematopoiesis. A binary histopathologic grading scale (score 0 or 1) was used to evaluate for intraabdominal lipogranuloma formation and ectopic lymphoid tissue, pulmonary hemorrhage, hemosiderosis, and/or vascular thrombosis, splenic lymphoid hyperplasia and plasmacytosis, and lymph node hyperplasia and medullary plasmacytosis. A total composite score was derived for each mouse. The Fisher’s Exact Test was used to calculate significance between treatment groups. Due to facility and equipment difficulties during the COVID-19 pandemic, some mice are missing scores for kidney or spleen. Only mice with all organs correctly processed and assessed were used to calculate the composite score and included in the final analysis (shown in Figure 3). Complete scores for all SJL/J mice used in the pristane-induced lupus study can be found in the Table S7.

Statistical Analysis of histopathology scores

The Fisher’s Exact Test was used to calculate significance between treatment groups in the histopathology studies. Because the lowest positive female control total body disease score was 10, we set 10 as the cutoff total body disease score to distinguish between low disease and high disease scores.

Sequencing Library Preparation

Bulk sequencing

ATAC-seq libraries of freshly isolated CD4+ cells were prepared using the Omni-ATAC protocol85. RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, 74136). TruSeq® Stranded mRNA Library Prep (Illumina, 20020594) was used to generate polyA-selected RNA-sequencing libraries, cleanup performed on magnets with AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, A63880). The bulk ATAC-seq and RNA-seq libraries were sequenced with paired-end 75 bp read lengths on in the Stanford Functional Genomics Facility an Illumina HiSeq 4000 that was purchased with funds from NIH under award number S10OD018220.

Single cell sequencing

The Chromium Single Cell Multiome ATAC + Gene Expression (10x Genomics) was used to prepare libraries for CD45+ sorted cells with a target of 10,000 cells/sample. Libraries were sent to Novogene for Bioanalyzer trace quality control check and sequencing. Libraries were sequenced on the NovaSeq 6000 at a depth of 20,000 paired reads per cell for gene expression libraries and 25,000 paired reads per cell for ATAC libraries.

Computational Analysis of Sequencing Libraries

Bulk sequencing

The bulk RNA-seq data was aligned to mm10 using STAR86. The gene expression read counts was generated using RSEM87. The adaptor of paired-end ATAC-seq data was trimmed and aligned to mm10 genome using bowtie288. The mitochondrial reads and reads with low alignment score (<10) were removed. The aligned sam files were converted to bam files and sorted by Samtools89. Picard was used to remove duplicate reads and MACS290 was used to call peaks. BEDtools91 was used to generate read counts from called peaks. Each ATAC-seq peak was annotated by its nearby genes using GREAT under the basal plus extension default setting.

The raw bulk RNA-seq and ATAC-seq read counts were then normalized and analyzed using DESeq292. The differentially expressed genes and ATAC-seq peaks were identified using the negative binomial models. Benjamini hochberg procedure was used to adjust for multiple hypothesis testing. Peaks with FDR < 0.2 and absolute fold change larger than 1.5 were selected as significant. Bioinformatics tool g:Profiler93 was used for pathway enrichment analysis. CIBERSORT28 was used to estimate the abundance of immune cells based on normalized RNA-seq data.

Single cell multiomics sequencing

The single-cell paired RNA and ATAC-seq reads were aligned to the mm10 reference genome using cellranger-arc count (10x Genomics, version 2.0.1).

Gene expression data was filtered to include only barcodes that had nFeature > 500 and pct.mt < 12. Two female samples (F100 and F113) were excluded because, even after stringent filtering, cells from these samples had lower quality metrics than other samples. R v4.1.3 Seurat v4.1.194 and ggplot2 v3.3.6 were used for downstream analysis and visualization. After filtering, clustering and dimensionality reduction was performed using the top 10 principal components (dims=1:10) and a clustering resolution of 0.25. Differential gene expression analysis was performed using Seurat function “FindMarkers” with default settings.

Single cell ATAC data was processed with ArchR v1.0.195. ATAC-seq data was subsetted using the subsetArchRProject function to include only cells with matched gene expression cell IDs and clustered at resolution=0.7 with default settings. Gene imputation features of defining cell type markers were visualized from the GeneScoreMatrix using default settings. Cellular subsets were subsequently subsetted and analyzed with getMarkerFeatures from the PeakMatrix using default settings and maxcells=5000 and k=1000.

Calculation of Chr11 accessibility and gene expression

The aforementioned Chromium Single Cell Multiome ATAC + Gene Expression (10x Genomics) libraries were used in the analysis of Chr11 between the three treatment groups (Wt F+ Pristane, tgXist M + Pristane + Dox, and Wt M + Pristane + Dox).

Chr11 track analysis

The bigwig files for each mouse treatment group were generated using the getGroupBW function in the archR package. Boxplots were visualized in the rtracklayer package in R using bigwig files containing normalized ATAC-seq counts. Genome position-wide scATAC track visualization was obtained using the plotBrowserTrack function in the archR package. The FindMarkers function in the Seurat package was used to identify the differential expressed genes between the pristane+dox treated groups: Wt M versus and tgXist M. A hypergeometric test was then applied to examine whether the genes on chr11 are more likely to be down regulated compared with the genome wide scale.

SLE autoantigen Panel Array

Assay

Mouse serum was assessed using the SLE autoantigen panel and array as previously described36. Serum from the baseline timepoint of 0 weeks (injection start) and terminal timepoints (16 weeks for SJL/J and 52 weeks for C57BL/6J strains) were run in the same assay (sample-matched). Serum was stored long-term at –80°C and prepared as previously described36. Raw MFI values and mouse serum sample information can be found in Table S3.

Analysis

Raw MFI scores were first normalized by subtracting the baseline value of bare bead, with a minimum differential limit set at 0 to account for values below baseline. The difference between terminal and baseline timepoints was then calculated using the normalized values, with a minimum differential limit set at 0 as “depletion” of autoantibodies is not expected to occur over time. Values were plotted in GraphPad Prism and the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test was used to test for statistical significance. The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure was used to calculate FDR and correct for multiple comparisons.

XIST Autoantigen Array

Autoantigen list

Available recombinant proteins were chosen from a set of XIST-associating proteins of interest from published XIST ChIRP datasets12,14 at a stringency of log2(EXP/RNAse) > 1 and peptide EXP Sum ≥ 10. Due to the limited availability of recombinant proteins, this criteria is less stringent than that used for the bibliomics analysis in order to include a larger set of XIST-associating proteins of interest. Autoantigens clinically used to screen for DM53, SLE or SSc96,97 were included as positive controls. 16 exploratory proteins were included from unpublished XIST ChIRP-MS lists. Each protein was represented by one or more protein fragments (20–151 amino acids long) produced within the Human Protein Atlas project (https://www.proteinatlas.org/)98,99. The full list of autoantigens and their categorization can be found in Tables S4 and S6.

Sample preparation

25 uL of serum per sample were aliquoted in a pre-determined randomized order onto 96-well plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific, AB800150) with mouse and human samples on separate plates. Thermal sealed plates were shipped on dry ice to SciLifeLab in Sweden and stored at –80C upon arrival.

Suspension Bead Array Assay (SciLifeLab)

The antigens were immobilized on color coded magnetic beads (MagPlex, Luminex Corp., Austin, TX) and the assay was run as previously described, with minor alterations100. The samples were diluted directly before running the assay, prior to adding the secondary antibody the beads incubated for 10 minutes in 0.2% paraformaldehyde to fixate any bound antibodies, and the secondary antibody used was R-Phycoerythrin labelled Goat anti-Human IgG Fc (eBioscience™; 12–4998-82, Invitrogen).

Data handling and analysis

All data processing from the suspension bead array was performed using R version 4.1.1. Antigen specific background was adjusted for by centering and scaling the 10th percentile of the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) value for each antigen to a common value (10th percentile of the whole dataset). The antigen percentile adjusted MFI values were transformed per sample into the number of “median absolute deviations” (MADs) around the sample, represented as: MADsag,sample = (MFIadjag,sample − mediansample) / MADsample. Raw MFI values can be found in Tables S4 and S6.

For the general population and patient disease comparison analyses, the difference in reactivity was calculated as the difference between the mean of the MAD scores of the comparison groups and significance was calculated using the Student’s T-Test. To remove farlying outliers, MAD scores were first “trimmed” to quantile (0.1, 0.9). Since each protein often contained multiple protein fragments in the assay, the list was next filtered to remove duplicate counts and generate a unique list of reactive proteins. The reactive protein lists were then compared between patient disease groups (Figure 6D,E, Table S5).

Selection of enriched proteins

To find shared reactive proteins in two heterogeneous datasets (pristane-induced SLE mouse and autoimmune disease patients), the difference in MAD scores was calculated in patients as the difference between SLE patient reactivity and the general population (healthy control) and in mice as the difference between 16 weeks and 0 weeks (treatment start baseline) for each group. Protein fragments were considered reactive in patients if MADsdiff > 0 in the quantile “trimmed” set and MADsdiff > 2.5 in the raw datasets. Protein fragments were considered reactive in mice if MADsdiff > 2.5 between 16 and 0 weeks. Since each protein often contained multiple protein fragments in the assay, the list was next filtered to remove duplicate counts and generate a unique list reactive proteins. The enriched protein lists were then compared between the pristane-induced SLE mouse groups and SLE patients (Table S5).

Quantification and Statistical Analyses

All statistical analysis and quantification were conducted in R or GraphPad Prism. Three standardized comparisons are made across mouse cohorts in Figs. 35 and 7: (1) WT female mice treated with pristane vs. WT male mice treated with pristane (positive vs. negative control); (2) tgXist male mice +Dox + pristane vs. WT male mice + pristane (test vs. negative control); (3) WT female mice + pristane vs. tgXist male mice + Dox + pristane (positive control vs. test). The p-values are indicated on the figures; multiple hypothesis testing is controlled for using the Benjamini-Hochberg method to estimate false discovery rate (FDR). All indicated significant p-values have a FDR< 0.05 accounting for multiple hypothesis testing. Non-significant comparisons, including those rejected based on FDR, are indicated with “NS” on the figure. Figure legends state the statistical details of the experiments and assays, including exact “n” values, statistical tests, comparisons, and cutoffs specifically used in each figure.

Supplementary Material

1

Figure S1: Established autoantigenic associations of XIST RNPs, Related to Figure 7. Summary of XIST RNP complex proteins with known association as autoantigens in autoimmune disease grouped by disease (Red=positive hit). Full bibliomics information available in Table S1.

2

Figure S2: Chromosome-wide comparison of tgXist transgene insertion in Col1A1 safe harbor locus on Chr11, Related to Figures 1 and 4. (A) Chromatin accessibility at Chr11 assessed using single cell ATAC-seq data (B) ATAC-seq accessibility tracks in the Col1A1 insertion locus (C) Gene expression profile at Chr11 using single cell RNA-seq data (D) Fraction of up- and down-regulated genes on Chr11 and genome-wide comparing tgXist males and Wt male mice. All plot values obtained from single cell multiomic data normalized to sequencing depth from pristane-treated SJL/J mice: number of tgXist M+ Dox + Pristane= 8, Wt M+Dox+Pristane= 3, Wt F + Pristane= 2. Significance was calculated using Fisher’s Exact test.

3

Figure S3: Serum autoantibodies and ATAC and RNA sequencing from pristane-treated mice in the C57BL/6J background, Related to Figure 2. (A) ELISA of Serum ANAb levels, number of tgXist Female = 5, tgXist Male (no dox) = 4, tgXist Male + dox = 6. ANAb of WT male animals were done but did not meet quality control standards and therefore not shown. (B) Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) of serum reactivity to representative autoantigens using a bead-based lupus antigen array after 52 weeks of treatment. (A-B) From left to right tgXist Female control to tgXist Male test, number of animals in serum studies: n=5, n=4, n=4, n=6, n=6. (A-B) Statistical significance calculated with Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, FDR < 0.05. (C) PCA plots of RNA-seq libraries of all five mouse cohorts. (D) Top 15 differential reactomes associated with ATAC-seq cluster 1 genomic regions. (E) Comparison of Fragments Per-Kilobase per-Million mapped fragments (FPKM) in the TLR9 gene region. Significance calculated using the Student’s T-test. * indicated p < 0.05. (C-E) Number of mice used: Wt F+ Pristane = 5, tgXist M+Pristane+Dox=6, tgXist M+Pristane=2, Wt M+Pristane=4, Wt M mock treatment=4.

4

Figure S4: Serum autoantibodies in pristane-treated mice in the SJL/J background, Related to Figure 3. Heatmap of the MFI values at 16 weeks (normalized to 0 weeks) of autoantigens displayed in Figure 3F. Color labels correspond to the mouse treatment group. Each row is an autoantibody; each column is an individual mouse. In the tgXist M+ Dox + pristane group, male mice with female-level total pathology score (score ≥ 10 in Fig 3E) are shown with underlined sample id numbers. However, the autoantibody response are heterogeneous; the four antibodies are a group are not significantly different between tgXist M + Dox + pristane vs Wt M + Dox+ pristane. Number of mouse serum samples, listed from left to right: wild-type Female + pristane =18, wild-type Male negative control=13, tgXist Male+dox (tgXist) control=11, wild-type Male treatment =12, tgXist Male treatment=10.

5

Figure S5, Related to Figure 4: Splenic CD45+ hematopoietic cells single-cell ATAC from pristane-induced SLE mice of the SJL/J strain: (A) Original single-cell ATAC clusters and (B) matched single cell gene expression-determined cell identities displayed on the single cell ATAC UMAP. (C) Localization of defining markers, calculated by imputation from ATAC data, used to determine cell type identity. Imputation scale Log2(NormCounts+1) (D) Pairwise comparison metrics of differential peaks between WT female (positive disease control) and the low disease male control groups (WT Male and tgXist Male low disease) across the four main cellular subsets shown for features FDR ≦ 0.1 and Log2FC ≧ 0.5. Pristane-treated mouse groups shown: tgXist male disease high (n=4), tgXist male disease low (n=4), wild-type male (n=3), and wild-type female (n=2). Significance was calculated using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test.

6

Figure S6: Splenic CD45+ hematopoietic cells single-cell gene expression from pristine-induced SLE mice of the SJL/J strain, Related to Figure 5: (A) Localization of defining expression markers used to determine immune cell type identities of UMAP clusters. (B) Individual mice displayed on the single cell gene expression clustering UMAP. Individual mouse labels displayed as: transgenic status_sex_total disease damage score_mouse colony ID. (C) Volcano plots of differentially expressed B cell cluster genes comparing tgXist Male high disease and WT Female to WT Male. (D) Representative violin plots of B-cell marker genes from the combined B cell clusters. (E) T cell cluster genes comparing tgXist Male high disease and WT Female to WT Male. Pristane-treated mouse groups shown: tgXist male disease high (n=4), tgXist male disease low (n=4), wild-type male (n=3), and wild-type female (n=2). Significance was calculated using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test.

7

Figure S7: Distribution of pristane-treated mouse cohorts and atypical B cells, Related to Figure 5. UMAP distribution of cells from (A) Wt female, (B) tgXist Male high disease, (C) Wt Male and (D) tgXist Male low diseases. Blue circles indicate shared overlapping regions in Wt female and tgXist Male high disease pristane-treated mouse groups corresponding to Bcell_3. (E) Dot plot of atypical B-cell marker expression in gene expression clusters. Pristane-treated mouse groups shown: tgXist male disease high (n=4), tgXist male disease low (n=4), wild-type male (n=3), and wild-type female (n=2).

8

Table S1: XIST Bibliomics, Related to Figure 6. Identification of known autoantigens in the XIST RNP and their associated autoimmune diseases and publications. 1) XIST-associated proteins were drawn from published and validated XIST ChIRP-MS datasets. 2) XIST-associated proteins classified as reactive or enriched from the XIST antigen array that were not included in the prior ChIRP-MS lists of high stringency validated XIST RNP proteins.

9

Table S2: Pristane-induced SLE mouse study controls and design, Related to Figures 2 and 3. Study design and appropriate matched control comparisons of each tgXist and wild-type mouse treatment cohort in the 1) C57BL/6J and 2) SJL/J backgrounds.

10

Table S3: Pristane-induced SLE antigen array, Related to Figures 2 and 3. Raw Mean Fluorescence intensity (MFI) values and mouse serum sample information of pristane-induced SLE studies to SLE autoantigens in wild-type and tgXist 1), 2) C57/BL6J and 3), 4) SJL/J mice.

11

Table S4: XIST Antigen Array in patients, Related to Figures 6 and 7. 1) Description and IDs of antigens used in the array to evaluate patient sera reactivity. Rows are labeled with “Gene name_Antigen name”, columns describe association (assay control, clinical disease autoantibody, XIST ChIRP, or Exploratory XIST), gene names, IDs in public databases, control or test status, multiplicity of targets for each fragment (also indicated as a “*” in the row labels as “Gene name*_Antigen name”), and fragment sequence for each antigen. 2) Sample disease and biological sex information. 3) Raw Mean Fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of patient serum reactivity to antigens.

12

Table S5: Reactive Antigens in Autoimmune Disease Patients, Related to Figures 6 and 7. Lists of all reactive antigens in 1) all autoimmune disease patients (All_Patients) and 2) separated by the three autoimmune disease cohorts (By_Disease) evaluated in this study and known status as autoantigens. 3) List of all antigens enriched in SLE patients with outlier-trained MAD difference > 0 and raw MAD difference >2.5-fold MAD scores compared to general population (Described in Methods). XIST RNP complex proteins in blue text. Highlighted antigens correspond to the published high confidence XIST RNP complex proteins14. “Autoantigen Record” indicates status of the antigen as a known disease control (Control), present in Table S1 XIST Bibliomics publications (Known), or not present in included Bibliomics publications (Unknown). Type of significantly reactive autoimmune disease cohorts indicated in “Array Reactivity”.

13

Table S6: XIST Antigen Array in SJL/J mice, Related to Figure 7. 1) Description and IDs of antigens used in the array to evaluate mouse sera reactivity. Rows are labeled with “Gene name_Antigen name”, columns describe association (assay control, clinical disease autoantibody, XIST ChIRP, or Exploratory Xist), gene names, IDs in public databases, control or test status, multiplicity of targets for each fragment (also indicated as a “*” in the row labels as “Gene name*_Antigen name”), and fragment sequence for each antigen. 2) Sample treatment, timepoint and sex information for each mouse. 3) Raw Mean Fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of mouse sera reactivity to antigens.

14

Table S7: Pristane-induced SLE in SJL/J Mice Histology, Related to Figure 3. Complete full body organ histology scores for all SJL/J mice in the study. Due to pandemic difficulties, a subset of mice were “affected by processing” that rendered the isolated kidney unusable for downstream analysis (indicated as “Y” in the column and “?” under glomerulonephritis) and some mice were missing splenic and lymph node scores. Only mice with all organ scores (in bold text) were included in the final Figure 3 Total Organ Pathology statistical analysis.

HIGHLIGHTS.

  • Transgenic mouse models inducibly express Xist in male animals.

  • Xist expression in males induce autoantibodies and autoimmune pathology.

  • Xist in males reprograms T and B cell populations to female-like patterns.

  • Autoantibodies to Xist RNP characterize female-biased autoimmune diseases in patients.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank members of the Chang and Utz labs for discussion and Adrianne Woods and Gwendolyn Leatherman for assistance with serum compilation from Johns Hopkins. We thank Greg S. Nelson for assistance with mouse blood collection, the Stanford Veterinary Service Center and the Stanford Breeding Colony Management Services for assistance with animal husbandry and welfare, the Stanford Comparative Medicine Services for histology preparation, the Stanford Transgenic, Knockout and Tumor Model Research Center for tissue sample preparation, the Stanford Functional Genomics Facility for bulk sequencing assistance, and the Stanford Shared FACS Facility for assistance in cell sorting. This work was supported by Scleroderma Research Foundation (H.Y.C.), NIAMS T32 AR007422 and NIAMS K99/R00 (D.R.D.), and NIAMS T32 AR050942 (B.T.A.). J.A.B. is a Hanna Gray Fellow of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. The Hopkins Lupus Cohort is supported by a grant from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases under award R01-AR069572. H.Y.C. is an Investigator and J.A.B. is a Hanna Gray Fellow of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

DECLARATION OF INTERESTS

H.Y.C. is a co-founder of Accent Therapeutics, Boundless Bio, Cartography Biosciences, Orbital Therapeutics, and an advisor to 10x Genomics, Arsenal Biosciences, Chroma Medicine, and Spring Discovery. A.A.S. receives research grant funding from the following companies to support clinical trials in SSc: Arena Pharmaceuticals, Eicos Sciences, Kadmon Corporation, Medpace.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Fairweather D, and Rose NR (2004). Women and autoimmune diseases. Emerging infectious diseases 10, 2005–2011. 10.3201/eid1011.040367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Libert C, Dejager L, and Pinheiro I. (2010). The X chromosome in immune functions: when a chromosome makes the difference. Nat Rev Immunol 10, 594–604. 10.1038/nri2815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fairweather D, Frisancho-Kiss S, and Rose NR (2008). Sex differences in autoimmune disease from a pathological perspective. The American journal of pathology 173, 600–609. 10.2353/ajpath.2008.071008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moulton VR (2018). Sex Hormones in Acquired Immunity and Autoimmune Disease. Front Immunol 9, 2279. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Syrett CM, Sierra I, Beethem ZT, Dubin AH, and Anguera MC (2020). Loss of epigenetic modifications on the inactive X chromosome and sex-biased gene expression profiles in B cells from NZB/W F1 mice with lupus-like disease. J Autoimmun 107, 102357. 10.1016/j.jaut.2019.102357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Syrett CM, Sindhava V, Sierra I, Dubin AH, Atchison M, and Anguera MC (2018). Diversity of Epigenetic Features of the Inactive X-Chromosome in NK Cells, Dendritic Cells, and Macrophages. Front Immunol 9, 3087. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Subramanian S, Tus K, Li Q-Z, Wang A, Tian X-H, Zhou J, Liang C, Bartov G, McDaniel LD, Zhou XJ, et al. (2006). A Tlr7 translocation accelerates systemic autoimmunity in murine lupus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103, 9970–9975. 10.1073/pnas.0603912103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Christensen SR, Shupe J, Nickerson K, Kashgarian M, Flavell RA, and Shlomchik MJ (2006). Toll-like receptor 7 and TLR9 dictate autoantibody specificity and have opposing inflammatory and regulatory roles in a murine model of lupus. Immunity 25, 417–428. 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Scofield RH, Bruner GR, Namjou B, Kimberly RP, Ramsey-Goldman R, Petri M, Reveille JD, Alarcón GS, Vilá LM, Reid J, et al. (2008). Klinefelter’s syndrome (47,XXY) in male systemic lupus erythematosus patients: support for the notion of a gene-dose effect from the X chromosome. Arthritis Rheum 58, 2511–2517. 10.1002/art.23701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Smith-Bouvier DL., Divekar AA., Sasidhar M., Du S., Tiwari-Woodruff SK., King JK., Arnold AP., Singh RR., and Voskuhl RR. (2008). A role for sex chromosome complement in the female bias in autoimmune disease. J Exp Med 205, 1099–1108. 10.1084/jem.20070850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Awate S, Babiuk LA, and Mutwiri G. (2013). Mechanisms of action of adjuvants. Front Immunol 4, 114. 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chu C, Zhang QC, da Rocha ST, Flynn RA, Bharadwaj M, Calabrese JM, Magnuson T, Heard E, and Chang HY (2015). Systematic discovery of Xist RNA binding proteins. Cell 161, 404–416. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McHugh CA, Chen CK, Chow A, Surka CF, Tran C, McDonel P, Pandya-Jones A, Blanco M, Burghard C, Moradian A, et al. (2015). The Xist lncRNA interacts directly with SHARP to silence transcription through HDAC3. Nature 521, 232–236. 10.1038/nature14443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yu B, Qi Y, Li R, Shi Q, Satpathy AT, and Chang HY (2021). B cell-specific XIST complex enforces X-inactivation and restrains atypical B cells. Cell 184, 1790–1803.e1717. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lau CM, Broughton C, Tabor AS, Akira S, Flavell RA, Mamula MJ, Christensen SR, Shlomchik MJ, Viglianti GA, Rifkin IR, and Marshak-Rothstein A. (2005). RNA-associated autoantigens activate B cells by combined B cell antigen receptor/Toll-like receptor 7 engagement. J Exp Med 202, 1171–1177. 10.1084/jem.20050630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Busconi L, Lau CM, Tabor AS, Uccellini MB, Ruhe Z, Akira S, Viglianti GA, Rifkin IR, and Marshak-Rothstein A. (2006). DNA and RNA autoantigens as autoadjuvants. J Endotoxin Res 12, 379–384. 10.1179/096805106X118816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Means TK, Latz E, Hayashi F, Murali MR, Golenbock DT, and Luster AD (2005). Human lupus autoantibody-DNA complexes activate DCs through cooperation of CD32 and TLR9. J Clin Invest 115, 407–417. 10.1172/JCI23025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wutz A, Rasmussen TP, and Jaenisch R. (2002). Chromosomal silencing and localization are mediated by different domains of Xist RNA. Nat Genet 30, 167–174. 10.1038/ng820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Giorgetti L, Lajoie BR, Carter AC, Attia M, Zhan Y, Xu J, Chen CJ, Kaplan N, Chang HY, Heard E, and Dekker J. (2016). Structural organization of the inactive X chromosome in the mouse. Nature 535, 575–579. 10.1038/nature18589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Graham KL, Thibault DL, Steinman JB, Okeke L, Kao PN, and Utz PJ (2005). Granzyme B is dispensable for immunologic tolerance to self in a murine model of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 52, 1684–1693. 10.1002/art.21092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Izui S, Higaki M, Morrow D, and Merino R. (1988). The Y chromosome from autoimmune BXSB/MpJ mice induces a lupus-like syndrome in (NZW x C57BL/6)F1 male mice, but not in C57BL/6 male mice. Eur J Immunol 18, 911–915. 10.1002/eji.1830180612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Smith DL, Dong X, Du S, Oh M, Singh RR, and Voskuhl RR (2007). A female preponderance for chemically induced lupus in SJL/J mice. Clin Immunol 122, 101–107. 10.1016/j.clim.2006.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Satoh M., Richards HB., Shaheen VM., Yoshida H., Shaw M., Naim JO., Wooley PH., and Reeves WH. (2000). Widespread susceptibility among inbred mouse strains to the induction of lupus autoantibodies by pristane. Clin Exp Immunol 121, 399–405. 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01276.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Reeves WH, Lee PY, Weinstein JS, Satoh M, and Lu L. (2009). Induction of autoimmunity by pristane and other naturally occurring hydrocarbons. Trends in immunology 30, 455–464. 10.1016/j.it.2009.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Luckheeram RV, Zhou R, Verma AD, and Xia B. (2012). CD4⁺T cells: differentiation and functions. Clin Dev Immunol 2012, 925135. 10.1155/2012/925135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Barron L, and Wynn TA (2011). Fibrosis is regulated by Th2 and Th17 responses and by dynamic interactions between fibroblasts and macrophages. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 300, G723–728. 10.1152/ajpgi.00414.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Palmer MT, and Weaver CT (2010). Autoimmunity: increasing suspects in the CD4+ T cell lineup. Nature Immunology 11, 36–40. 10.1038/ni.1802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Newman AM, Steen CB, Liu CL, Gentles AJ, Chaudhuri AA, Scherer F, Khodadoust MS, Esfahani MS, Luca BA, Steiner D, et al. (2019). Determining cell type abundance and expression from bulk tissues with digital cytometry. Nature Biotechnology 37, 773–782. 10.1038/s41587-019-0114-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Storer JB (1966). Longevity and gross pathology at death in 22 inbred mouse strains. J Gerontol 21, 404–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Constantinescu CS, Farooqi N, O’Brien K, and Gran B. (2011). Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) as a model for multiple sclerosis (MS). Br J Pharmacol 164, 1079–1106. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01302.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Celhar T, and Fairhurst A-M (2016). Modelling clinical systemic lupus erythematosus: similarities, differences and success stories. Rheumatology 56, i88–i99. 10.1093/rheumatology/kew400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Morel L. (2004). Mouse models of human autoimmune diseases: essential tools that require the proper controls. PLoS biology 2, E241–E241. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bender AT, Wu Y, Cao Q, Ding Y, Oestreicher J, Genest M, Akare S, Ishizaka ST, and Mackey MF (2014). Assessment of the translational value of mouse lupus models using clinically relevant biomarkers. Translational Research 163, 515–532. 10.1016/j.trsl.2014.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Perry D, Sang A, Yin Y, Zheng Y-Y, and Morel L. (2011). Murine Models of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 2011, 271694. 10.1155/2011/271694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cojocaru M, Cojocaru IM, Silosi I, and Vrabie CD (2011). Manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. Maedica (Bucur) 6, 330–336. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Degn SE, van der Poel CE, Firl DJ, Ayoglu B, Al Qureshah FA, Bajic G, Mesin L, Reynaud CA, Weill JC, Utz PJ, et al. (2017). Clonal Evolution of Autoreactive Germinal Centers. Cell 170, 913–926.e919. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Musette P, and Bouaziz JD (2018). B Cell Modulation Strategies in Autoimmune Diseases: New Concepts. Front Immunol 9, 622. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lee DSW, Rojas OL, and Gommerman JL (2021). B cell depletion therapies in autoimmune disease: advances and mechanistic insights. Nat Rev Drug Discov 20, 179–199. 10.1038/s41573-020-00092-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Clark EA, and Giltiay NV (2018). CD22: A Regulator of Innate and Adaptive B Cell Responses and Autoimmunity. Front Immunol 9, 2235. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Müller J, Lunz B, Schwab I, Acs A, Nimmerjahn F, Daniel C, and Nitschke L. (2015). Siglec-G Deficiency Leads to Autoimmunity in Aging C57BL/6 Mice. J Immunol 195, 51–60. 10.4049/jimmunol.1403139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Brzezicka KA, and Paulson JC (2022). Impact of Siglecs on autoimmune diseases. Mol Aspects Med, 101140. 10.1016/j.mam.2022.101140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Poe JC, and Tedder TF (2012). CD22 and Siglec-G in B cell function and tolerance. Trends Immunol 33, 413–420. 10.1016/j.it.2012.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Holers VM, and Boackle SA (2004). Complement receptor 2 and autoimmunity. Curr Dir Autoimmun 7, 33–48. 10.1159/000075686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Song WC (2006). Complement regulatory proteins and autoimmunity. Autoimmunity 39, 403–410. 10.1080/08916930600739647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sutton HJ., Aye R., Idris AH., Vistein R., Nduati E., Kai O., Mwacharo J., Li X., Gao X., Andrews TD., et al. (2021). Atypical B cells are part of an alternative lineage of B cells that participates in responses to vaccination and infection in humans. Cell Rep 34, 108684. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li H, Dement-Brown J, Liao PJ, Mazo I, Mills F, Kraus Z, Fitzsimmons S, and Tolnay M. (2020). Fc receptor-like 4 and 5 define human atypical memory B cells. Int Immunol 32, 755–770. 10.1093/intimm/dxaa053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jenks SA, Cashman KS, Zumaquero E, Marigorta UM, Patel AV, Wang X, Tomar D, Woodruff MC, Simon Z, Bugrovsky R, et al. (2018). Distinct Effector B Cells Induced by Unregulated Toll-like Receptor 7 Contribute to Pathogenic Responses in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Immunity 49, 725–739.e726. 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gao X, and Cockburn IA (2022). The development and function of CD11c. Front Immunol 13, 979060. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.979060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Engler JB, Kursawe N, Solano ME, Patas K, Wehrmann S, Heckmann N, Lühder F, Reichardt HM, Arck PC, Gold SM, and Friese MA (2017). Glucocorticoid receptor in T cells mediates protection from autoimmunity in pregnancy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114, E181–E190. 10.1073/pnas.1617115114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Oostindie SC, van der Horst HJ, Lindorfer MA, Cook EM, Tupitza JC, Zent CS, Burack R, VanDerMeid KR, Strumane K, Chamuleau MED, et al. (2019). CD20 and CD37 antibodies synergize to activate complement by Fc-mediated clustering. Haematologica 104, 1841–1852. 10.3324/haematol.2018.207266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Toh BH, Kyaw T, Tipping P, and Bobik A. (2013). Immune regulation by CD52-expressing CD4 T cells. Cell Mol Immunol 10, 379–382. 10.1038/cmi.2013.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mensali N, Grenov A, Pati NB, Dillard P, Myhre MR, Gaudernack G, Kvalheim G, Inderberg EM, Bakke O, and Wälchli S. (2019). Antigen-delivery through invariant chain (CD74) boosts CD8 and CD4 T cell immunity. Oncoimmunology 8, 1558663. 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1558663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Satoh M, Tanaka S, Ceribelli A, Calise SJ, and Chan EK (2017). A Comprehensive Overview on Myositis-Specific Antibodies: New and Old Biomarkers in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 52, 1–19. 10.1007/s12016-015-8510-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chen M, Zhou Y, Xue M, Zhu R, Jing L, Lin L, He C, and Qin Y. (2022). Anti-HMGB1 antibody is a potential characteristic autoantibody for Sjögren’s syndrome. Sci Rep 12, 6020. 10.1038/s41598-022-10007-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Takeuchi A, Matsushita T, Kaji K, Okamoto Y, Yasui M, Hirata M, Oishi N, Higashi A, Seishima M, Asano T, et al. (2017). Autoantibody to scaffold attachment factor B (SAFB): A novel connective tissue disease-related autoantibody associated with interstitial lung disease. J Autoimmun 76, 101–107. 10.1016/j.jaut.2016.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yang L., Fujimoto M., Murota H., Serada S., Honda H., Yamada K., Suzuki K., Nishikawa A., Hosono Y., Yoneda Y., et al. (2015). Proteomic identification of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K as a novel cold-associated autoantigen in patients with secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Rheumatology (Oxford) 54, 349–358. 10.1093/rheumatology/keu325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Qi Z, Takamatsu H, Espinoza JL, Lu X, Sugimori N, Yamazaki H, Okawa K, and Nakao S. (2010). Autoantibodies specific to hnRNP K: a new diagnostic marker for immune pathophysiology in aplastic anemia. Ann Hematol 89, 1255–1263. 10.1007/s00277-010-1020-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hasler D, Lehmann G, Murakawa Y, Klironomos F, Jakob L, Grässer FA, Rajewsky N, Landthaler M, and Meister G. (2016). The Lupus Autoantigen La Prevents Mis-channeling of tRNA Fragments into the Human MicroRNA Pathway. Mol Cell 63, 110–124. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mousavi MJ, Mahmoudi M, and Ghotloo S. (2020). Escape from X chromosome inactivation and female bias of autoimmune diseases. Molecular Medicine 26, 127. 10.1186/s10020-020-00256-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Syrett CM, Paneru B, Sandoval-Heglund D, Wang J, Banerjee S, Sindhava V, Behrens EM, Atchison M, and Anguera MC (2019). Altered X-chromosome inactivation in T cells may promote sex-biased autoimmune diseases. JCI Insight 4. 10.1172/jci.insight.126751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Arbuckle MR, McClain MT, Rubertone MV, Scofield RH, Dennis GJ, James JA, and Harley JB (2003). Development of autoantibodies before the clinical onset of systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 349, 1526–1533. 10.1056/NEJMoa021933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Walsh SJ, and Rau LM (2000). Autoimmune diseases: a leading cause of death among young and middle-aged women in the United States. Am J Public Health 90, 1463–1466. 10.2105/ajph.90.9.1463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lerner A, Patricia W, and Matthias T. (2015). The World Incidence and Prevalence of Autoimmune Diseases is Increasing. International Journal of Celiac Disease 3, 151–155. 10.12691/ijcd-3-4-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Dinse GE, Parks CG, Weinberg CR, Co CA, Wilkerson J, Zeldin DC, Chan EKL, and Miller FW (2020). Increasing Prevalence of Antinuclear Antibodies in the United States. Arthritis Rheumatol 72, 1026–1035. 10.1002/art.41214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jury EC, D’Cruz D, and Morrow WJW (2001). Autoantibodies and overlap syndromes in autoimmune rheumatic disease. Journal of Clinical Pathology 54, 340–347. 10.1136/jcp.54.5.340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rosen A, and Casciola-Rosen L. (2016). Autoantigens as Partners in Initiation and Propagation of Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases. Annu Rev Immunol 34, 395–420. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032414-112205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Dou DR, Zhao Y, Abe B, Li R, Zaba LC, Aren K, Carns M, Chung LS, Hinchcliff M, and Chang HY (2021). Distinct T cell chromatin landscapes in scleroderma subtypes. bioRxiv, 2021.2001.2010.426131. 10.1101/2021.01.10.426131. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Xu GJ, Shah AA, Li MZ, Xu Q, Rosen A, Casciola-Rosen L, and Elledge SJ (2016). Systematic autoantigen analysis identifies a distinct subtype of scleroderma with coincident cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, E7526–E7534. 10.1073/pnas.1615990113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rubtsov AV, Rubtsova K, Fischer A, Meehan RT, Gillis JZ, Kappler JW, and Marrack P. (2011). Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7)-driven accumulation of a novel CD11c⁺ B-cell population is important for the development of autoimmunity. Blood 118, 1305–1315. 10.1182/blood-2011-01-331462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Brown GJ, Cañete PF, Wang H, Medhavy A, Bones J, Roco JA, He Y, Qin Y, Cappello J, Ellyard JI, et al. (2022). TLR7 gain-of-function genetic variation causes human lupus. Nature 605, 349–356. 10.1038/s41586-022-04642-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Cancro MP (2020). Age-Associated B Cells. Annu Rev Immunol 38, 315–340. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-092419-031130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ricker E, Manni M, Flores-Castro D, Jenkins D, Gupta S, Rivera-Correa J, Meng W, Rosenfeld AM, Pannellini T, Bachu M, et al. (2021). Altered function and differentiation of age-associated B cells contribute to the female bias in lupus mice. Nat Commun 12, 4813. 10.1038/s41467-021-25102-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gödecke N, Zha L, Spencer S, Behme S, Riemer P, Rehli M, Hauser H, and Wirth D. (2017). Controlled re-activation of epigenetically silenced Tet promoter-driven transgene expression by targeted demethylation. Nucleic Acids Res 45, e147. 10.1093/nar/gkx601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Oyer JA, Chu A, Brar S, and Turker MS (2009). Aberrant epigenetic silencing is triggered by a transient reduction in gene expression. PLoS One 4, e4832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kues WA., Schwinzer R., Wirth D., Verhoeyen E., Lemme E., Herrmann D., Barg-Kues B., Hauser H., Wonigeit K., and Niemann H. (2006). Epigenetic silencing and tissue independent expression of a novel tetracycline inducible system in double-transgenic pigs. The FASEB journal 20, 1200–1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Pankiewicz R, Karlen Y, Imhof MO, and Mermod N. (2005). Reversal of the silencing of tetracycline-controlled genes requires the coordinate action of distinctly acting transcription factors. The Journal of Gene Medicine: A cross-disciplinary journal for research on the science of gene transfer and its clinical applications 7, 117–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Beard C, Hochedlinger K, Plath K, Wutz A, and Jaenisch R. (2006). Efficient method to generate single-copy transgenic mice by site-specific integration in embryonic stem cells. Genesis 44, 23–28. 10.1002/gene.20180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ohhata T, Senner CE, Hemberger M, and Wutz A. (2011). Lineage-specific function of the noncoding Tsix RNA for Xist repression and Xi reactivation in mice. Genes Dev 25, 1702–1715. 10.1101/gad.16997911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Savarese F, Flahndorfer K, Jaenisch R, Busslinger M, and Wutz A. (2006). Hematopoietic precursor cells transiently reestablish permissiveness for X inactivation. Mol Cell Biol 26, 7167–7177. 10.1128/MCB.00810-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Fiorentino DF, Mecoli CA, Rosen MC, Chung LS, Christopher-Stine L, Rosen A, and Casciola-Rosen L. (2022). Immune responses to CCAR1 and other dermatomyositis autoantigens are associated with attenuated cancer emergence. J Clin Invest 132. 10.1172/JCI150201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lundberg IE, Tjärnlund A, Bottai M, Werth VP, Pilkington C, de Visser M, Alfredsson L, Amato AA, Barohn RJ, Liang MH, et al. (2017). 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Adult and Juvenile Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies and Their Major Subgroups. Arthritis Rheumatol 69, 2271–2282. 10.1002/art.40320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Fiorentino DF, Gutierrez-Alamillo L, Hines D, Yang Q, and Casciola-Rosen L. (2019). Distinct dermatomyositis populations are detected with different autoantibody assay platforms. Clin Exp Rheumatol 37, 1048–1051. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Hochberg MC (1997). Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 40, 1725. 10.1002/art.1780400928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Petri M, Orbai AM, Alarcón GS, Gordon C, Merrill JT, Fortin PR, Bruce IN, Isenberg D, Wallace DJ, Nived O, et al. (2012). Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 64, 2677–2686. 10.1002/art.34473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Corces MR., Trevino AE., Hamilton EG., Greenside PG., Sinnott-Armstrong NA., Vesuna S., Satpathy AT., Rubin AJ., Montine KS., Wu B., et al. (2017). An improved ATAC-seq protocol reduces background and enables interrogation of frozen tissues. Nat Methods. 10.1038/nmeth.4396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Dobin A, and Gingeras TR (2015). Mapping RNA-seq reads with STAR. Current protocols in bioinformatics 51, 11.14. 11–11.14. 19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Li B, and Dewey CN (2011). RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 323. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Langmead B, and Salzberg SL (2012). Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9, 357–359. 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, and Subgroup GPDP (2009). The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, Eeckhoute J, Johnson DS, Bernstein BE, Nusbaum C, Myers RM, Brown M, Li W, and Liu XS (2008). Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol 9, R137. 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Quinlan AR, and Hall IM (2010). BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Love MI, Huber W, and Anders S. (2014). Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15, 550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Raudvere U, Kolberg L, Kuzmin I, Arak T, Adler P, Peterson H, and Vilo J. (2019). g:Profiler: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and conversions of gene lists (2019 update). Nucleic Acids Research 47, W191–W198. 10.1093/nar/gkz369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Hao Y, Hao S, Andersen-Nissen E, Mauck WM 3rd, Zheng S, Butler A, Lee MJ, Wilk AJ, Darby C, Zager M, et al. (2021). Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184, 3573–3587.e3529. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Granja JM, Corces MR, Pierce SE, Bagdatli ST, Choudhry H, Chang HY, and Greenleaf WJ (2021). ArchR is a scalable software package for integrative single-cell chromatin accessibility analysis. Nature Genetics 53, 403–411. 10.1038/s41588-021-00790-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Balboni I, Chan SM, Kattah M, Tenenbaum JD, Butte AJ, and Utz PJ (2006). Multiplexed protein array platforms for analysis of autoimmune diseases. Annu Rev Immunol 24, 391–418. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.24.021605.090709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Thibault DL, Graham KL, Lee LY, Balboni I, Hertzog PJ, and Utz PJ (2009). Type I interferon receptor controls B-cell expression of nucleic acid-sensing Toll-like receptors and autoantibody production in a murine model of lupus. Arthritis Res Ther 11, R112. 10.1186/ar2771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Nilsson P, Paavilainen L, Larsson K, Ödling J, Sundberg M, Andersson A-C, Kampf C, Persson A, Szigyarto CA-K, Ottosson J, et al. (2005). Towards a human proteome atlas: High-throughput generation of mono-specific antibodies for tissue profiling. PROTEOMICS 5, 4327–4337. 10.1002/pmic.200500072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Tegel H, Steen J, Konrad A, Nikdin H, Pettersson K, Stenvall M, Tourle S, Wrethagen U, Xu L, Yderland L, et al. (2009). High-throughput protein production – Lessons from scaling up from 10 to 288 recombinant proteins per week. Biotechnology Journal 4, 51–57. 10.1002/biot.200800183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Neiman M., Hellström C., Just D., Mattsson C., Fagerberg L., Schuppe-Koistinen I., Gummesson A., Bergström G., Kallioniemi O., Achour A., et al. (2019). Individual and stable autoantibody repertoires in healthy individuals. Autoimmunity 52, 1–11. 10.1080/08916934.2019.1581774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

Figure S1: Established autoantigenic associations of XIST RNPs, Related to Figure 7. Summary of XIST RNP complex proteins with known association as autoantigens in autoimmune disease grouped by disease (Red=positive hit). Full bibliomics information available in Table S1.

2

Figure S2: Chromosome-wide comparison of tgXist transgene insertion in Col1A1 safe harbor locus on Chr11, Related to Figures 1 and 4. (A) Chromatin accessibility at Chr11 assessed using single cell ATAC-seq data (B) ATAC-seq accessibility tracks in the Col1A1 insertion locus (C) Gene expression profile at Chr11 using single cell RNA-seq data (D) Fraction of up- and down-regulated genes on Chr11 and genome-wide comparing tgXist males and Wt male mice. All plot values obtained from single cell multiomic data normalized to sequencing depth from pristane-treated SJL/J mice: number of tgXist M+ Dox + Pristane= 8, Wt M+Dox+Pristane= 3, Wt F + Pristane= 2. Significance was calculated using Fisher’s Exact test.

3

Figure S3: Serum autoantibodies and ATAC and RNA sequencing from pristane-treated mice in the C57BL/6J background, Related to Figure 2. (A) ELISA of Serum ANAb levels, number of tgXist Female = 5, tgXist Male (no dox) = 4, tgXist Male + dox = 6. ANAb of WT male animals were done but did not meet quality control standards and therefore not shown. (B) Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) of serum reactivity to representative autoantigens using a bead-based lupus antigen array after 52 weeks of treatment. (A-B) From left to right tgXist Female control to tgXist Male test, number of animals in serum studies: n=5, n=4, n=4, n=6, n=6. (A-B) Statistical significance calculated with Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, FDR < 0.05. (C) PCA plots of RNA-seq libraries of all five mouse cohorts. (D) Top 15 differential reactomes associated with ATAC-seq cluster 1 genomic regions. (E) Comparison of Fragments Per-Kilobase per-Million mapped fragments (FPKM) in the TLR9 gene region. Significance calculated using the Student’s T-test. * indicated p < 0.05. (C-E) Number of mice used: Wt F+ Pristane = 5, tgXist M+Pristane+Dox=6, tgXist M+Pristane=2, Wt M+Pristane=4, Wt M mock treatment=4.

4

Figure S4: Serum autoantibodies in pristane-treated mice in the SJL/J background, Related to Figure 3. Heatmap of the MFI values at 16 weeks (normalized to 0 weeks) of autoantigens displayed in Figure 3F. Color labels correspond to the mouse treatment group. Each row is an autoantibody; each column is an individual mouse. In the tgXist M+ Dox + pristane group, male mice with female-level total pathology score (score ≥ 10 in Fig 3E) are shown with underlined sample id numbers. However, the autoantibody response are heterogeneous; the four antibodies are a group are not significantly different between tgXist M + Dox + pristane vs Wt M + Dox+ pristane. Number of mouse serum samples, listed from left to right: wild-type Female + pristane =18, wild-type Male negative control=13, tgXist Male+dox (tgXist) control=11, wild-type Male treatment =12, tgXist Male treatment=10.

5

Figure S5, Related to Figure 4: Splenic CD45+ hematopoietic cells single-cell ATAC from pristane-induced SLE mice of the SJL/J strain: (A) Original single-cell ATAC clusters and (B) matched single cell gene expression-determined cell identities displayed on the single cell ATAC UMAP. (C) Localization of defining markers, calculated by imputation from ATAC data, used to determine cell type identity. Imputation scale Log2(NormCounts+1) (D) Pairwise comparison metrics of differential peaks between WT female (positive disease control) and the low disease male control groups (WT Male and tgXist Male low disease) across the four main cellular subsets shown for features FDR ≦ 0.1 and Log2FC ≧ 0.5. Pristane-treated mouse groups shown: tgXist male disease high (n=4), tgXist male disease low (n=4), wild-type male (n=3), and wild-type female (n=2). Significance was calculated using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test.

6

Figure S6: Splenic CD45+ hematopoietic cells single-cell gene expression from pristine-induced SLE mice of the SJL/J strain, Related to Figure 5: (A) Localization of defining expression markers used to determine immune cell type identities of UMAP clusters. (B) Individual mice displayed on the single cell gene expression clustering UMAP. Individual mouse labels displayed as: transgenic status_sex_total disease damage score_mouse colony ID. (C) Volcano plots of differentially expressed B cell cluster genes comparing tgXist Male high disease and WT Female to WT Male. (D) Representative violin plots of B-cell marker genes from the combined B cell clusters. (E) T cell cluster genes comparing tgXist Male high disease and WT Female to WT Male. Pristane-treated mouse groups shown: tgXist male disease high (n=4), tgXist male disease low (n=4), wild-type male (n=3), and wild-type female (n=2). Significance was calculated using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test.

7

Figure S7: Distribution of pristane-treated mouse cohorts and atypical B cells, Related to Figure 5. UMAP distribution of cells from (A) Wt female, (B) tgXist Male high disease, (C) Wt Male and (D) tgXist Male low diseases. Blue circles indicate shared overlapping regions in Wt female and tgXist Male high disease pristane-treated mouse groups corresponding to Bcell_3. (E) Dot plot of atypical B-cell marker expression in gene expression clusters. Pristane-treated mouse groups shown: tgXist male disease high (n=4), tgXist male disease low (n=4), wild-type male (n=3), and wild-type female (n=2).

8

Table S1: XIST Bibliomics, Related to Figure 6. Identification of known autoantigens in the XIST RNP and their associated autoimmune diseases and publications. 1) XIST-associated proteins were drawn from published and validated XIST ChIRP-MS datasets. 2) XIST-associated proteins classified as reactive or enriched from the XIST antigen array that were not included in the prior ChIRP-MS lists of high stringency validated XIST RNP proteins.

9

Table S2: Pristane-induced SLE mouse study controls and design, Related to Figures 2 and 3. Study design and appropriate matched control comparisons of each tgXist and wild-type mouse treatment cohort in the 1) C57BL/6J and 2) SJL/J backgrounds.

10

Table S3: Pristane-induced SLE antigen array, Related to Figures 2 and 3. Raw Mean Fluorescence intensity (MFI) values and mouse serum sample information of pristane-induced SLE studies to SLE autoantigens in wild-type and tgXist 1), 2) C57/BL6J and 3), 4) SJL/J mice.

11

Table S4: XIST Antigen Array in patients, Related to Figures 6 and 7. 1) Description and IDs of antigens used in the array to evaluate patient sera reactivity. Rows are labeled with “Gene name_Antigen name”, columns describe association (assay control, clinical disease autoantibody, XIST ChIRP, or Exploratory XIST), gene names, IDs in public databases, control or test status, multiplicity of targets for each fragment (also indicated as a “*” in the row labels as “Gene name*_Antigen name”), and fragment sequence for each antigen. 2) Sample disease and biological sex information. 3) Raw Mean Fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of patient serum reactivity to antigens.

12

Table S5: Reactive Antigens in Autoimmune Disease Patients, Related to Figures 6 and 7. Lists of all reactive antigens in 1) all autoimmune disease patients (All_Patients) and 2) separated by the three autoimmune disease cohorts (By_Disease) evaluated in this study and known status as autoantigens. 3) List of all antigens enriched in SLE patients with outlier-trained MAD difference > 0 and raw MAD difference >2.5-fold MAD scores compared to general population (Described in Methods). XIST RNP complex proteins in blue text. Highlighted antigens correspond to the published high confidence XIST RNP complex proteins14. “Autoantigen Record” indicates status of the antigen as a known disease control (Control), present in Table S1 XIST Bibliomics publications (Known), or not present in included Bibliomics publications (Unknown). Type of significantly reactive autoimmune disease cohorts indicated in “Array Reactivity”.

13

Table S6: XIST Antigen Array in SJL/J mice, Related to Figure 7. 1) Description and IDs of antigens used in the array to evaluate mouse sera reactivity. Rows are labeled with “Gene name_Antigen name”, columns describe association (assay control, clinical disease autoantibody, XIST ChIRP, or Exploratory Xist), gene names, IDs in public databases, control or test status, multiplicity of targets for each fragment (also indicated as a “*” in the row labels as “Gene name*_Antigen name”), and fragment sequence for each antigen. 2) Sample treatment, timepoint and sex information for each mouse. 3) Raw Mean Fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of mouse sera reactivity to antigens.

14

Table S7: Pristane-induced SLE in SJL/J Mice Histology, Related to Figure 3. Complete full body organ histology scores for all SJL/J mice in the study. Due to pandemic difficulties, a subset of mice were “affected by processing” that rendered the isolated kidney unusable for downstream analysis (indicated as “Y” in the column and “?” under glomerulonephritis) and some mice were missing splenic and lymph node scores. Only mice with all organ scores (in bold text) were included in the final Figure 3 Total Organ Pathology statistical analysis.

Data Availability Statement

  • Bulk ATAC- and RNA-seq and single cell multiomic data have been deposited in GEO. Accession numbers can be found in the Key Resources Table. The autoantigen array raw data files are included in Supplemental Information. Additional can be found in the Key Resources Table.

  • Analysis details are provided in STAR Methods. No original code was generated in this paper.

  • Additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the Lead Contact upon request.

Key resources table

REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER
Antibodies
7-AAD BD Biosciences Cat # 559925, RRID:AB_2869266
FITC anti-mouse CD4 (clone GK1.5) BioLegend Cat # 100406, RRID:AB_312690
TruStain FcX PLUS (anti-mouse CD16/32, clone S17011E) BioLegend Cat # 156604, RRID:AB_2783137
APC anti-mouse CD45 (clone 30-F11) BioLegend Cat # 103112, RRID:AB_312977
Mouse Xist Stellaris® FISH Probes with Quasar® 570 Dye LGC Biosearch Technologies SMF-3011-1, RRID: AB_3076254
R-Phycoerythrin labelled Goat anti-Human IgG Fc Invitrogen 12-4998-82; AB_465926
Bacterial and virus strains
Biological samples
Human whole blood (healthy control serum) Stanford Blood Center https://stanfordbloodcenter.org/researchlabs/research-productsand-services/bloodproducts/
SLE patient sera This paper; Johns Hopkins NA
DM patient sera This paper; Stanford University NA
SSc patient sera This paper; Johns Hopkins, Stanford University NA
Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins
Pristane Sigma-Aldrich P9622-10X1ML
PBS 1x Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat # 10010049
Doxycyline hyclate Sigma-Aldrich D9891-5G
DNAse I Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 18068015
O.C.T. Compound Tissue-Tek Cat# 4583
Fisherbrand Superfrost Plus Microscope Slides Fisher Scientific Cat# 12-550-15
Paraformaldehyde Fisher Scientific Cat# 50-980-487
TritonX-100 Acros Organics AC327371000
Ethanol Gold Shield Cat# 412804
Stellaris® RNA FISH Wash Buffer A LGC Biosearch Technologies SMF-WA1-60
Stellaris® RNA FISH Hybridization Buffer LGC Biosearch Technologies SMF-HB1-10
VECTASHIELD Mounting Medium with DAPI Vector Laboratories H-1200
VWR® Micro Cover Glasses VWR 48366-227
HypoThermosol FRS BioLifeSolutions Cat# 101102
CellTrics® Disposable Cell Strainers Sysmex 04-004-2327
eBioscience 1X RBC Lysis Buffer Thermo Fisher
Scientific
Cat# 00-4333-57
BAMBANKER Wako Cat# 203-14681
Fetal Bovine Serum Thermo Fisher Scientific A3160502
Protector RNase Inhibitor Sigma-Aldrich Cat# 3335399001
Critical commercial assays
EasySep Mouse CD4+ T cell Isolation Kit STEMCELL Technologies Cat# 19852
Mouse Anti-Nuclear Antibody Kit MyBioSource.com MBS731183
RNeasy Plus Mini Kit Qiagen Cat# 74136
High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit Applied Biosystems Cat# 4368814
TruSeq® Stranded mRNA Library Prep Illumina Cat# 20020594
Chromium Single Cell Multiome ATAC + Gene Expression Reagent Bundle 10x Genomics PN-1000283
Chromium Next GEM Chip J Single Cell Kit 10x Genomics PN-1000234
Single Index Kit N Set A, 96 rxns 10x Genomics PN-1000212
Dual Index Kit TT Set A, 96 rxns 10x Genomics PN-1000215
Deposited data
Raw and processed sequencing data (single cell) This paper GEO database: GSE249830
Raw and processed bulk ATAC-seq data This paper GEO database: GSE249830
Raw and processed bulk RNA-seq data This paper GEO database: GSE249830
Raw and processed SLE antigen array data This paper Table S3
Raw and processed XIST antigen array data (patients) This paper Table S4
Raw and processed XIST antigen array data (mouse) This paper Table S6
Experimental models: Cell lines
Experimental models: Organisms/strains
SJL/J mouse Jackson Laboratories Strain# 000686; RRID:IMSR_JAX:000686
C57BL6/J mouse Jackson Laboratories Strain# 000664; RRID:IMSR_JAX:000664
ΔRepA-Xist transgenic mouse This paper Anton Wutz
Oligonucleotides
Mouse Xist Forward (qRT-PCR) GACAACAATGGGAGCTGGTT Elim Biopharmaceuti cals, Inc. Custom Oligos
Mouse Xist Reverse (qRT-PCR) GCAACCCCAGCAATAGTCAT Elim Biopharmaceuti cals, Inc. Custom Oligos
Mouse GAPDH Forward (qRT-PCR) TGTGCAGTGCCAGCCTCGTC Elim Biopharmaceuti cals, Inc. Custom Oligos
Mouse GAPDH Reverse (qRT-PCR) TGCCACTGCAAATGGCAGCC Elim Biopharmaceuti cals, Inc. Custom Oligos
Neomycin Forward (genotyping) AGGATCTCCTGTCATCTCACCTTGCTCCTG Elim Biopharmaceuti cals, Inc. Custom Oligos
Neomycin Reverse (genotyping) AAGAACTCGTCAAGAAGGCGATAGAAGGCG Elim Biopharmaceuti cals, Inc. Custom Oligos
CMV (genotyping, Forward) GCTGGTTTAGTGAACCGTCAG Elim Biopharmaceuti cals, Inc. Custom Oligos
Mouse Xist (genotyping, Reverse) ACAAAGATTGGGCTGTCGAG Elim Biopharmaceuti cals, Inc. Custom Oligos
Recombinant DNA
Software and algorithms
Cellranger 10x Genomics https://support.10xgenomics.com/single-cellgeneexpression/software/overview/welcome
Prism Graphpad https://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/software/prism/
CIBERSORT Newman et al.28 https://cibersortx.stanford.edu/cshome.php
STAR Dobin et al.86 https://github.com/alexdobin/STAR
RSEM Li et al.87 https://github.com/deweylab/RSEM
Bowtie2 Langmead and Salzberg88 http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/bowtie2/index.shtml
Samtools Li et al.89 http://www.htslib.org/
MACS2 Zhang et al.90 https://github.com/macs3-project/MACS
DESeq2 Love et al.92 https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq2.html
g:profiler Raudvere et al.93 https://biit.cs.ut.ee/gprofiler/gost
Seurat Hao et al.94 https://satijalab.org/seurat/
ArchR Granja JM, Corces MR et al.95 https://www.archrproject.com/

RESOURCES