Abstract
Background
Cholangiohydatidosis (CH) is an evolutionary complication of hepatic cystic echinococcosis, associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to describe the available evidence regarding clinical characteristics of CH, postoperative complications and hospital mortality.
Methodology/Principal findings
Systematic review. Studies related to CH with no language or publication restriction were included. Sensitive searches were performed in Trip Database, SciELO, BIREME-BVS, WoS, PubMed, EMBASE and SCOPUS. MeSH and free terms were used, including articles up to April 2023. The main outcome variables were postoperative complications and hospital mortality; the secondary ones were publication year, origin and design of primary studies, main clinical manifestation, anatomical location and type of cysts, hospital stay, surgical procedure performed, reinterventions; and methodological quality of primary studies, which was assessed using MInCir-T and MInCir-P scales. Descriptive statistics, calculation of weighted averages and their comparison by least squares logistic regression were applied. 446 studies were retrieved from the searches performed, 102 of which met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The studies analyzed represent 1241 patients. The highest proportion of articles was published in the last decade (39.2%). Reports are mainly from Turkey (28.4%), Greece (9.8%), Morocco and Spain (8.8% each). With a weighted mean of 14.3 days of hospital stance; it was verified that 26.2% of patients developed postoperative complications (74,3% Clavien y Dindo III y IV), 6.7% needed re-interventions, and 3.7% died. When comparing the variables age, postoperative complications, hospital mortality, and reinterventions in two periods of time (1982–2006 vs. 2007–2023), no statistically significant differences were found. When applying the MInCir-T and MInCir-P scales, the methodological quality of the primary studies was 9.6±1.1 and 14.5±4.3 points, respectively.
Conclusion/Significance
CH is associated with severe postoperative complications and significant hospital mortality, independent of the development of therapeutic support associated with the passage of time.
Author summary
Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a zoonotic neglected tropical disease which predominantly affects poor pastoral communities globally. The parasite cycles between farm dogs and livestock and is associated with livestock farming and feeding of infected offal to dogs. Human morbidity and mortality occur due to cyst formation in body organs, especially in the liver. One of the evolutionary complications of hepatic CE is the passage of parasitic structures, characteristic of CE (germ or pieces thereof, daughter vesicles or both), inside the bile duct, causing total or intermittent biliary obstruction, with or without secondary infection which is known as cholangiohydatidosis (CH), considered the most frequent evolutionary complication of CE, associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and worsened prognosis of the disease. This review aims to describe the available evidence regarding clinical characteristics of CH, postoperative complications and hospital mortality.
Introduction
Echinococcus granulosus and its various genotypes (preferably G1-G3 and G6-G7), is the etiological agent of cystic echinococcosis of the liver (CEL). This infection manifests itself three weeks after ingesting the egg and can reach 2 to 3 cm. in diameter in the liver parenchyma, three months after the infection occurred [1,2].
As CEL progresses, intracystic pressure reaches values of up to 80 cm H2O, producing atrophy and fibrosis of the liver parenchyma due to compression which eventually leads to biliary tree obstruction. This occurrence happens namely in those cysts located in the center of the liver. Similarly, the increase in intracystic pressure and the fragility of the cyst wall, can generate a rupture of the cyst towards the lumen of the bile ducts, developing a cysto-biliary communication (CBC); However, even if there is no cyst rupture into the bile ducts, it can manifest biochemically and radiologically as an obstructive syndrome of the bile duct, secondary to compression [3].
Consequently, the evidence suggests that the most frequent evolutionary complication of CEL, is CBC development, with a reported incidence of up to 42% [4–6]. These communications, in relation to the diameter, can be classified as minor (or simple) and major (or frank intrabiliary rupture). Minor ones, which affect between 10% and 37% of patients with CEL, are small communications between the cyst wall and the bile ducts, where there is no passage of daughter vesicles or pieces of germinative membrane to the bile ducts. Nevertheless, in these cases fluid, protoscolex, or hydatid grit may enter the bile ducts without causing obstruction. Being asymptomatic, pre-surgical diagnosis is unlikely and minor CBCs are detected during surgery, by visualizing bile leakage or bile fistulas [6].
In contrast, major CBCs, with an incidence of 3% to 17% of patients with CEL, are characterized by broad communication between the cyst wall and biliary tree. They are frequently detected preoperatively and typically during surgery. In these cases, the contents of the cyst can spontaneously drain into the bile duct, causing total or intermittent biliary obstruction [7], expressing itself clinically as biliary colic, obstructive jaundice and cholangitis [8]; (Fig 1). Such events can progress to sepsis, liver abscess formation, acute cholecystitis and even acute pancreatitis [9–14]. All of the above are situations that significantly increase the probability of developing postoperative complications [15].
Fig 1. Diagram of pathogenic stages of cholangiohydatidosis.
a) Hepatic cystic echinococcosis open into a bile duct. b) Incomplete cystic evacuation into the bile duct. c) Complete cystic evacuation into the bile duct.
Based on the pathogenic phenomena previously described, cholangiohydatidosis (CH) is defined as the presence of parasitic structures, characteristic of CEL (germ or pieces thereof, daughter vesicles or both), inside the bile duct, causing total or intermittent biliary obstruction, with or without secondary infection [8,16].
As such, it is an evolutionary complication of CEL, with a wide range of clinical manifestations that make preoperative diagnosis difficult at best. The reported prevalence is between 15.1% and 55.6%; and a cumulative incidence estimated at 0.07 cases in 5 years. It is furthermore associated with postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality of 23% and 7% respectively [15–18].
The aim of this study was to describe the available evidence regarding the clinical features of cholangiohydatidosis, postoperative complications, and hospital mortality.
Methods
This manuscript was written following the PRISMA guideline statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses).
Study protocol
PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews, NIHR) ID: CRD42023406867.
Study design
A systematic review was conducted following the Updated guideline PRISMA statement [19].
Eligibility criteria
Primary studies related to cholangiohydatidosis were included; without language restriction or year of publication. Editorials, letters to the editor, narrative reviews, consensus documents and discussions, and articles contaminated with patients infected with E. multilocularis, E. vogelii, or other parasites were excluded.
Information sources
The following metasearch engines, libraries, and databases were reviewed: Trip Database, SciELO, BIREME-BVS, Web of Science (WoS), PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS. The search and recruitment of articles closed on April 25, 2023.
Search criteria
This was carried out using the PECO components (population study [P], exposure [E], comparator [C], and result [O]). Studies related to hepatic echinococcosis (P), with cholangiohydatidosis (E), without comparator (C), postoperative complications and hospital mortality (O). Sensitive searches were carried out using MeSH, DeCS and free terms (Echinococcosis; Cystic Echinococcosis; hydatidosis; echinococcus granulosus infection; Hepatic Hydatid Cyst; Liver Hydatid Cyst; Liver Hydatidosis; Hepatic hydatidosis; Cholangitis; cholangiohydatidosis; Hospital Mortality; mortality and Postoperative Complications); and boolean connectors (AND and OR), with strategies adapted to each database (Table 1). A manual and cross-reference search was also carried out.
Table 1. Search strategies and results obtained for each source of information used (N = 357).
| Meta search engines, libraries, and databases | Search strategies |
|---|---|
| Trip Database (n = 4) | (echinococcosis OR "cystic echinococcosis" OR hydatidos* OR "echinococcus granulosus infection*" OR "infection*, echinococcus granulosus" OR "hepatic hydatid cyst" OR "liver hydatid cyst" OR "liver hydatidosis" OR "hepatic hydatidosis"), (cholangit* OR cholangiohydatidosis), ("hospital mortality" OR mortality OR "postoperative complications") |
| SciELO (n = 3) | (echinococcosis OR "Cystic Echinococcosis" OR hydatidos* OR "Echinococcus Granulosus Infection*" OR "Infection*, Echinococcus Granulosus" OR "Hepatic Hydatid Cyst" OR "Liver Hydatid Cyst" OR "Liver Hydatidosis" OR "Hepatic hydatidosis") AND (cholangit* OR cholangiohydatidosis) |
| WoS (n = 24) | (TS = (Echinococcosis OR "Cystic Echinococcosis" OR Hydatidos* OR "Echinococcus Granulosus Infection*" OR "Infection*, Echinococcus Granulosus" OR "Hepatic Hydatid Cyst" OR "Liver Hydatid Cyst" OR "Liver Hydatidosis" OR "Hepatic hydatidosis")) AND (TS = (Cholangit* OR Cholangiohydatidosis)) AND (TS = ("Hospital Mortality" OR Mortality OR "Postoperative Complications")) |
| PubMed (n = 44) | ("Echinococcosis"[MeSH Terms] OR "Echinococcosis"[All Fields] OR "Cystic Echinococcosis"[All Fields] OR "hydatidos*"[All Fields] OR "echinococcus granulosus infection*"[All Fields] OR "infection echinococcus granulosus"[All Fields] OR "Hepatic Hydatid Cyst"[All Fields] OR "Liver Hydatid Cyst"[All Fields] OR "Liver Hydatidosis"[All Fields] OR "Hepatic hydatidosis"[All Fields]) AND ("Cholangitis"[MeSH Terms] OR "cholangit*"[All Fields] OR "cholangiohydatidosis"[All Fields]) AND ("Hospital Mortality"[MeSH Terms] OR "mortality"[MeSH Terms] OR "Postoperative Complications"[MeSH Terms]) |
| EMBASE (n = 95) | (’liver hydatid cyst’/exp OR ’echinococcosis’/exp) AND ’cholangitis’/exp AND (’mortality’/exp OR ’hospital mortality’/exp OR ’postoperative complication’/exp) |
| SCOPUS (n = 117) | (TITLE-ABS-KEY(Echinococcosis OR "Cystic Echinococcosis" OR Hydatidos* OR "Echinococcus Granulosus Infection*" OR "Infection*, Echinococcus Granulosus" OR "Hepatic Hydatid Cyst" OR "Liver Hydatid Cyst" OR "Liver Hydatidosis" OR "Hepatic hydatidosis")) AND (TITLE-ABS-KEY(Cholangit* OR cholangiohydatidosis)) AND (TITLE-ABS-KEY("Hospital Mortality" OR Mortality OR "Postoperative Complications")) |
| Bireme BVS (n = 70) | ((echinococcosis OR "Cystic Echinococcosis" OR hydatidos* OR "Echinococcus Granulosus Infection*" OR "Infection*, Echinococcus Granulosus" OR "Hepatic Hydatid Cyst" OR "Liver Hydatid Cyst" OR "Liver Hydatidosis" OR "Hepatic hydatidosis") AND ("Hospital Mortality" OR mortality OR "Postoperative Complications")) |
Study selection
Identified documents in each information source were filtered by duplication between databases. They were subsequently examined by title and abstract, applying eligibility criteria. The articles were then extensively analyzed by 3 reviewers (CM, JR and CR), all experienced in searching and analyzing biomedical studies. Discrepancy situations were resolved by consensus.
Data collection
Critical review of each selected article, as well as the data extraction and its subsequent verification, was carried out by 3 researchers (CM, JR, and CR). Then, data was collected in an Excel spreadsheet (Mac Excel, version 15.24; 2016 Microsoft Corporation).
Outcomes
Primary outcome variables were "postoperative complications", dichotomized in yes or no, classifying its according to Clavien & Dindo’s proposal [20], and “hospital mortality”, dichotomized in yes or no. Secondary outcome variables were year of publication, geographical origin of the studies, designs of primary studies, number of patients considered in each study, main clinical manifestation, anatomical location and type of cyst, hospital stay, a surgical procedure performed, reinterventions, and a different kind of associated therapeutics.
Statistics
Descriptive statistics was applied with calculation of frequencies, averages, standard deviations and weighted averages.
Additional analyses
Meta-analysis was performed comparing the behavior of the variables under study in two periods of time (1982–2006, period A vs. 2007–2023, period B), applying a weighted least squares regression model (the weights were the number of patients of each scientific article). Methodological quality of primary studies was determined applying MInCir scales for therapeutic procedures and prognosis [21,22]. Dichotomization was decided because during the exploratory analysis of the data, we verified that this point divided the sample under study into two equal parts. Both used scales for determine methodologic quality (MQ), are valid (face and content validity, and construct validity for extreme groups) and reliable (interobserver reliability). MInCir-T scale, composed of 3 domains and 6 items: the first related to the study design; the second to the population sample size, and the third related to the methodology used; according to which, a score which represents the sum of the 3 domains is generated, with a final score that can vary between 6 and 36 points (6 points being the worst MQ study and 36 being the best), with a cut-off point to define the construct of 18 points [21]. And MInCir-P scale, composed of 4 domains and 11 items (study design, population sample size, methodology used, analysis and conclusions); according to which, a score which represents the sum of the 4 domains is generated, with a final score that can vary between 7 and 60 points (7 points being the worst MQ study and 60 being the best), with a cut-off point to define the construct of 33 points [22]. Then data were entered to a spreadsheet and calculation of weighted means was applied, and its comparison applying a weighted least squares regression model (Fig 2).
Fig 2.
MInCir-T (A), MInCir-P (B), and weighted average formula (C), to determine methodological quality.
Risk of bias in individual studies
The likelihood of inaccuracy in the estimate of causal effect in primary studies was assess applying MInCir scales [21,22], in both time periods.
Ethics
In order to reduce selection and analysis biases masking of authors and study centers was implemented.
Results
Study selection
357 studies were retrieved from the search, and 89 were obtained from cross-searches. Of these, 446 articles, 201 were eliminated due to duplication of information sources. 245 were examined by title and abstract, 109 of which were discarded because they were considered "not related" to the research; leaving 136 articles to evaluate eligibility by reading the full text (2 were not retrieved). An in-depth analysis of the selected studies was then performed, excluding 32 studies based on the review criteria. Finally, 102 studies correspond to the study sample of this review (Fig 3) [4,7,8,10,12,16,17,23,25–118].
Fig 3. Flowchart of participating studies.
Figure created with BIORENDER.COM, accessed on 30 November 2022.
Study characteristics
39.2% of the included studies were published in the last decade (Table 2). Turkey had the highest number of publications (n = 29, 28.4%; Table 3). Most included studies were case reports and case series (64.7% and 33.3% respectively [Table 4]), representing 1241 patients, with a weighted mean age of 43.7 years, 50.6% male (Table 5).
Table 2. Year of publication of the included studies (N = 102).
| Year of publication | N° studies | % |
|---|---|---|
| 2018–2023 | 17 | 16.7 |
| 2013–2017 | 4 | 3.9 |
| 2012–2016 | 19 | 18.6 |
| 2007–2011 | 12 | 11.8 |
| 2002–2006 | 17 | 16.7 |
| 1997–2001 | 15 | 14.7 |
| 1992–1996 | 6 | 5.9 |
| 1987–1991 | 7 | 6.9 |
| 1982–1986 | 5 | 4.9 |
| T o t a l | 102 | 100 |
Table 3. Origen of included studies (N = 102).
| Study origin | N° studies | % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 29 | 28.4 |
| Greece | 10 | 9.8 |
| Spain | 9 | 8.8 |
| Morocco | 9 | 8.8 |
| Tunisia | 7 | 6.9 |
| India | 6 | 5.9 |
| Italy | 5 | 4.9 |
| Germany | 3 | 2.9 |
| Chile | 3 | 2.9 |
| Iran | 3 | 2.9 |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 2.0 |
| Israel | 2 | 2.0 |
| Pakistan | 2 | 2.0 |
| U.S.A | 2 | 2.0 |
| Others * | 10 | 9.8 |
| T o t a l | 102 | 100 |
*: Belgium, China, Croatia, Netherlands, England, Libya, Moldova, Peru, Portugal, and Romania; one of each.
Table 4. Characteristics of the included studies and patients.
| Variables | N° cases | % |
|---|---|---|
| Study design (n = 102) | ||
| Case report | 66 | 64.7 |
| Case series | 34 | 33.3 |
| Historic cohort | 2 | 2.0 |
| Clinical presentation (n = 1244) | ||
| Obstructive jaundice | 639 | 51.4 |
| Acute suppurative cholangitis | 530 | 42.6 |
| Acute pancreatitis | 73 | 5.9 |
| Cholangitis and acute pancreatitis | 2 | 0.2 |
| Findings in the bile duct (n = 102) | ||
| Daughter vesicle | 40 | 39.2 |
| Germinative membrane | 30 | 29.4 |
| Both | 32 | 31.4 |
| Type of cysts, WHO classification (n = 102) | ||
| CE2 | 31 | 30.4 |
| CE3A | 13 | 12.7 |
| CE3B | 41 | 40.3 |
| CE4A | 9 | 8.8 |
| CE4B | 8 | 7.8 |
| Cholangiohydatidosis treatment (n = 1088) | ||
| Choledocostomy with Kehr tube | 669 | 61.5 |
| Endoscopic surgery | 292 | 26.8 |
| Choledochoduodenum anastomosis | 83 | 7.6 |
| Suture of CQB | 36 | 3.3 |
| Percutaneous drainage | 8 | 0.7 |
| Cyst treatment (n = 1156) | ||
| Partial cystectomy | 713 | 61.7 |
| Pericystectomy | 216 | 18.7 |
| Nothing | 123 | 10.6 |
| Liver resection | 86 | 7.4 |
| Cystostomy | 18 | 1.6 |
| Associated pharmacotherapy (n = 639) | ||
| Albendazole | 290 | 45.4 |
| Antibiotics | 272 | 42.6 |
| Antibiotics + Albendazole | 58 | 9.1 |
| Mebendazole | 16 | 2.5 |
| Antibiotics + Mebendazole | 3 | 0.5 |
Table 5. Clinical characteristics of patients and studies, and behavior of some variables in the two evaluated periods of time.
| Variables | Weighted mean (N° studies = 102) (N° cases = 1241) |
1982–2006 (N° studies = 52) (N° cases = 592) |
2007–2023 (N° studies = 50) (N° cases = 649) |
p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 43.7±7.4 | 44.3±27.6 | 43.2±23.5 | 0.380 |
| Postoperative complications (%) | 26.2±19.1 | 25.6±63.1 | 27.0±81.2 | 0.732 |
| Hospital mortality (%) | 3.7±5.1 | 3.7±18.8 | 3.7±17.3 | 0.942 |
| Re-interventions (%) | 6.7±9.5 | 8.4±33.4 | 6.4±66.8 | 0.704 |
| Total leukocytes (10e3/uL) | 13208±4405 | 11407±14470 | 14540±7837 | 0.016 |
| Total bilirubin (mg/dL) | 5.5±3.5 | 5.1±9.6 | 5.9±7.1 | 0.403 |
| Gamma-glutamyl transferase (U/L) | 455±179 | 368±190 | 464±390 | 0.449 |
| Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) | 698±343 | 651±1060 | 743±669 | 0.406 |
| ASAT (U/L) | 263±232 | 295±811 | 241±197 | 0.420 |
| ALAT (U/L) | 301±170 | 270±613 | 328±253 | 0.271 |
| Hospital stance (days) | 14.4±6.3 | 13.5±20.1 | 16.1±24.6 | 0.107 |
| Common bile duct diameter (mm) | 16.3±6.7 | 20.3±15.8 | 13.8±15.3 | 0.001 |
| Cysto-biliary communications (N°) | 26.0±46.5 | 25.1±44.8 | 30.8±48.4 | 0.181 |
| Cyst diameter (cm) | 12.9±3.3 | 13.2±7.9 | 12.7±12.8 | 0.544 |
| Follow-up (months) | 67.9±51.0 | 70.6±154.8 | 66.2±141.9 | 0.791 |
| MQ applying MInCir-T scale (points) | 9.6±1.1 | 9.6±1.0 | 9.6±1.2 | 0.961 |
| MQ applying MInCir-P scale (points) | 12.9±3.3 | 14.2±2.3 | 14.8±5.7 | 0.918 |
ASAT: aspartate aminotransferase
ALAT: alanine aminotransferase
MQ: Methodological quality
Synthesis of results
Weighted means of the common bile duct and cyst diameter were 16.3 mm and 12.9 cm, respectively (Table 5). Clinical presentation was obstructive jaundice, acute suppurative cholangitis, acute pancreatitis and a mixture of cholangitis with acute pancreatitis. In the common bile duct, daughter vesicles and germinative membrane were found. CE2 and CE3B were the most frequent types founded (Table 4). CH most frequent treatment was choledocostomy with a Kehr tube, and hydatid cyst’s most common treatment was partial cystectomy. Associated pharmacotherapy with benzimidazoles and antibiotics was utilized (Tables 5 and 6).
Table 6. Postoperative complications (n = 191).
| Postoperative complication | Clavien & Dindo | N° patients | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surgical wound infection | I | 32 | 16.8 |
| Biliary fistula | IIIa | 30 | 15.7 |
| Biliary fistula | IIIb | 21 | 11.0 |
| Subphrenic abscess | IIIb | 15 | 7.9 |
| Atelectasis | II | 14 | 7.3 |
| Intra-abdominal abscess | IIIb | 9 | 4.7 |
| Infected residual cavity | IIIa | 8 | 4.2 |
| Pneumonia | IVa | 8 | 4.2 |
| Metabolic decompensation | IVa | 6 | 3.1 |
| Pleural empyema | IIIa | 6 | 3.1 |
| Sepsis | IVb | 6 | 3.1 |
| Bile duct stricture | IIIb | 6 | 3.1 |
| Bilioma formation | IIIb | 5 | 2.6 |
| Intestinal occlusion | IIIb | 4 | 2.1 |
| Evisceration | IIIb | 4 | 2.1 |
| Acute pancreatitis | IIIb | 3 | 1.6 |
| Cholangitis | IIIb | 3 | 1.6 |
| Atrial fibrillation | IIIa | 3 | 1.6 |
| Upper gastrointestinal bleeding | II | 3 | 1.6 |
| Infected residual cavity | IIIb | 2 | 1.0 |
| Anaphylaxis | IVb | 2 | 1.0 |
| Cyst rupture | IVa | 1 | 0.5 |
| T o t a l | 191 | 100 |
Clavien I: 16.8%
Clavien II: 8.9%
Clavien III: 62.3% (IIIa: 24.6% and IIIb: 37.7%)
Clavien IV: 12.0% (IVa: 7.8% and IVb: 4.1%)
With a weighted mean of 14.4 days of hospital stance, it was verified that 26.2% of patients developed postoperative complications (74.3% Clavien and Dindo III and IV), 6.7% needed re-interventions, and 3.7% died (Table 5). The etiology and Clavien & Dindo distribution of postoperative complications is summarized in Table 6.
MQ of primary studies was 9.6±1.1 applying MInCir-Therapy scale (minimum 8 and maximum 15 points), and 14.5±4.3 applying MInCir-Prognosis scale (minimum 13 and maximum 53 points). When measuring methodological quality in the time periods under study, no statistical differences were observed (Table 5). Thus, the likelihood of inaccuracy in the estimate of causal effect in primary studies is high.
Finally, when comparing different in-study variables in two different time-periods, statistical difference in total leukocytes (p = 0.0163) and common bile duct diameter (p = 0.001) was observed. However, no differences were verified in postoperative complications, re-interventions or hospital mortality (Table 5).
Possible biases in the review process
Additional information was requested from the authors to expand or verify some study data, unfortunately there was no response. Therefore, missing data may introduce bias in this review. The risk of missing studies was reduced by searching for cross references.
Risk of bias between studies
There may be publication bias, given the concentration of studies from a few countries, and the paucity of studies from other geographic areas, places, and countries (Table 3).
Discussion
Summary of the evidence
This is the first SR that summarizes the available evidence concerning CH. There are one SR refers to gallbladder echinococcosis, based on 20 studies that include 22 cases [119].
The information of this SR was recovered from systematic searches carried out in 7 information sources (metasearch engines, libraries, and databases), including information of the last 40 years, and represents a compilation of 102 primary articles that represent 1241 patients treated in different countries, but preferably in Turkey, Greece, Morocco, and Spain.
The first drawback of the selection of MeSH terms and free words in order to define the search strategies, was the need to highlight that the CH concept is either unclear or is generally not well-known given that the number of publications found where CH appears in the title or abstract, is extremely limited (only 5 primary studies in this SR).
Most primary articles with which we worked had other types of denominations, such as “frank biliary communication”, “frank intrabiliary rupture”, “frank cysto-biliary communication”, “ruptured liver hydatid cyst”, “opening in the biliary tract”, “complicated hepatic hydatid disease”, etc., articulated with the concept "role of ERCP". Considering such, it is important to note that all these concepts, only define the existence of communications between a hydatid cyst and the bile duct, but do not consider necessarily the presence of hydatid material (daughter vesicles, germinal membrane, or a part thereof), inside the biliary tree. On the other hand, the use of different definitions for the same concept may represent a source of selection and information biases.
It was very interesting to note that in two different time periods, the variables of postoperative complications, re-interventions and hospital mortality showed very similar behavior, though without statistically significant differences. Consequently, it could be purported that the need for re-interventions, the morbidity and mortality associated with CH have not changed despite continuous advancements in technology, suggesting that CH is an aggressive disease itself.
In patients with sepsis due to cholangitis secondary to CH, who require emergency surgery, taking the patient directly to the operating room would seem indicated to repair the cysto-biliary communication, without previous ERCP, given that ERCP is an invasive procedure that should be performed by an experienced team, which is not always on site or available in emergency centers around the world [23].
On the other hand, is possible that type of cyst and or size has impact on the development of CH. For example, CE2 or CE3B type, has a higher rate of CH based on findings in bile duct (daughter vesicle and germinate membrane + daughter vesicle, reach 70.6%, because daughter cysts were present only in CE2 and CE3B). So, I it is possible could be a relationship between cyst size and/or type of cyst with CH.
Moreover, the variables that were found to be associated with the development of postoperative complications were as follows: common bile duct diameter (weighted average of 16.6 mm), main cyst diameter (weighted average of 13.2 cm), leukocytosis (weighted average of 13,469 10e3/uL), total bilirubin (weighted average of 5.5 mg/dL), alkaline phosphatase (weighted average of 799 U/L), and transaminases (weighted averages of 296 and 335 U/L).
In addition, the variables that were found to be associated with mortality were: common bile duct diameter (weighted average of 18.7 mm), main cyst diameter (weighted average of 13.8 cm), leukocytosis (weighted average of 14,546 10e3/uL), total bilirubin (weighted average of 4.8 mg/dL), alkaline phosphatase (weighted average of 621 U/L), and transaminases (weighted averages of 200 and 255 U/L).
We devised an alternative methodology for meta-analyzing data derived from studies of different design studies (especially in systematic reviews in which series of cases are the most frequent design founded in the searches). This approach involves the utilization of weighted averages, with weights assigned based on the methodological quality of the studies contributing to each datum [24].
Limitations
The available evidence on CH was obtained only from level 4 studies (case reports, retrospective case series and historical cohorts, with reduced casuistry). On the other hand, methodological quality of primary studies was low: 9.6±1.1 for MInCir-Therapy and 14.5±4.3 for MInCir-Prognosis scales, which cutoff-points are 18 and 33 respectively [21,22].
Conclusion
The available evidence related with CH is indicative that this evolutionary complication of EHQ is prone to severe postoperative complications, the need of reinterventions, and high hospital mortality rates, despite the passage of time.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Mrs. Ingrid Obrecht for providing language help and writing assistance.
Data Availability
All data are in the manuscript.
Funding Statement
This study was partially financed by the following grants: DIUFRO DI23-0020. Dirección de Investigación, Universidad de La Frontera. CM. DIUFRO DI23-0073. Dirección de Investigación, Universidad de La Frontera. CR-P. Núcleo Milenio de Sociomedicina, SocioMed (ANID - MILENIO - NCS2021_013). TO. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Dolay K, Akbulut S. Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of hepatic hydatid disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:15253–61. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i41.15253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Manterola C, Rojas C, Totomoch-Serra A, García-Méndez N, Riffo-Campos ÁL. Echinococcus granulosus genotypes verified in human hydatid disease around the world. Systematic review. Rev Chilena Infectol. 2020;37:541–9. 10.4067/S0716-10182020000500541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.El Malki HO, El Mejdoubi Y, Souadka A, Mohsine R, Ifrine L, Abouqal R, Belkouchi A. Predictive model of biliocystic communication in liver hydatid cysts using classification and regression tree analysis. BMC Surg. 2010;10:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-10-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zaouche A, Haouet K, Jouini M, El Hachaichi A, Dziri C. Management of liver hydatid cysts with a large biliocystic fistula: multicenter retrospective study. Tunisian Surgical Association. World J Surg. 2001;25:28–39. 10.1007/s002680020005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Akcan A, Sozuer E, Akyildiz H, Ozturk A, Atalay A, Yilmaz Z. Predisposing factors and surgical outcome of complicated liver hydatid cysts. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:3040–8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i24.3040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Manterola C, Vial M, Sanhueza A, Contreras J. Intrabiliary rupture of hepatic echinococcosis, a risk factor for developing postoperative morbidity: a cohort study. World J Surg. 2010;34:581–6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0322-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Galati G, Sterpetti AV, Caputo M, Adduci M, Lucandri G, Brozzetti S, Bolognese A, Cavallaro A. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for intrabiliary rupture of hydatid cyst. Am J Surg. 2006;191:206–10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.09.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Manterola C, Otzen T. Cholangiohydatidosis: an Infrequent Cause of Obstructive Jaundice and Acute Cholangitis. Ann Hepatol. 2017;16:436–41. doi: 10.5604/16652681.1235487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Castillo S, Manterola C, Grande L, Rojas C. Infected hepatic echinococcosis. Clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic aspects. A systematic review. Ann Hepatol. 2021;22:100237. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2020.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ben Mahmoud A, Atri S, Rebai W, Maghrebi H, Makni A, Kacem MJ. Acute pancreatitis as an uncommon complication of hydatid cyst of the liver: A case report and systematic literature review. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021;62:341–6. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Manterola C, Urrutia S; MINCIR GROUP. Infected Hepatic Echinococcosis: Results of Surgical Treatment of a Consecutive Series of Patients. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015;16:553–7. doi: 10.1089/sur.2014.054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bektaş M, Dökmeci A, Cinar K, Halici I, Oztas E, Karayalcin S, et al. Endoscopic management of biliary parasitic diseases. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:1472–8. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-0850-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Prousalidis J, Kosmidis C, Kapoutzis K, Fachantidis E, Harlaftis N, Aletras H. Intrabiliary rupture of hydatid cysts of the liver. Am J Surg. 2009;197:193–8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.10.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tomuş C, Iancu C, Pop F, Al Hajjar N, Puia C, Munteanu D, et al. Intrabiliary rupture of hepatic hydatid cysts: results of 17 years’ experience. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2009;104:409–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Manterola C, Urrutia S; Grupo MINCIR. Post surgery morbidity in patients with complicated hepatic hydatidosis. Rev Chilena Infectol. 2015;32:43–9. 10.4067/S0716-10182015000200010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Manterola C, Losada H, Carrasco R, Muñoz S, Bustos L, Vial M, Innocenti G. Cholangiohydatidosis. An evolutive complication of hepatic hydatidosis. Bol Chil Parasitol. 2001;56:10–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Goumas K, Poulou A, Dandakis D, Tyrmpas I, Georgouli A, Sgourakis G, et al. Role of endoscopic intervention in biliary complications of hepatic hydatid cyst disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:1113–9. doi: 10.1080/00365520701234318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Manterola C, Moraga J, Urrutia S. Aspectos clínico-quirúrgicos de la hidatidosis hepática, una zoonosis de creciente preocupación. Rev Chil Cir. 2011;63:641–9. 10.4067/S0718-40262011000600017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;134:178–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Manterola C, Cartes-Velasquez R, Otzen T. Instructions for the Use of MInCir Scale to Assess Methodological Quality in Therapy Studies. Int J Morphol. 2015;33:1463–7. 10.4067/S0717-95022015000400045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Manterola C, Cartes-Velasquez R, Otzen T. Instructions for the Use of MInCiR Scale to Assess Methodological Quality in Prognosis Studies. Int J Morphol. 2015;33:1553–8. 10.4067/S0717-95022015000400059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Borahma M, Afifi R, Benelbarhdadi I, Ajana FZ, Essamri W, Essaid A. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in ruptured liver hydatid cyst. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2015;34: 330–4. doi: 10.1007/s12664-015-0585-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Manterola C, Vial M, Pineda V, Sanhueza A. Systematic review of literature with different types of designs. Int J Morphol. 2009;27:1179–86. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Abou-Khalil S, Smith BM, MacLean JD, Poenaru D, Fried GM, Bret P. Acute cholecystitis and cholangitis caused by Echinoccocus granulosus. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91:805–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Aghajanzadeh M, Ashoobi MT, Hemmati H, Samidoust P, Delshad MSE, Pourahmadi Y. Intrabiliary and abdominal rupture of hepatic hydatid cyst leading to biliary obstruction, cholangitis, pancreatitis, peritonitis and septicemia: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2021;15:311. doi: 10.1186/s13256-021-02822-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ahmad BS, Afzal A, Ashraf P, Abubakar SA, Munir A. Manifestation of hydatid cyst of liver with pancreatitis, cholangitis and jaundice: A case report. J Pak Med Assoc. 2018;68:1097–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Akaydin M, Erozgen F, Ersoy YE, Birol S, Kaplan R. Treatment of hepatic hydatid disease complications using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures. Can J Surg. 2012;55:244–8. doi: 10.1503/cjs.036010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Akkis H, Akinoglu A, Colakoglu S, Demiryurek H, Yagmur O. Endoscopic management of biliary hydatid disease. Can J Surg. 1996;39:287–92. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Alhan E, Calik A, Küçüktülü U, Cìinel A. The intrabiliary rupture of hydatid cyst of the liver. Nihon Geka Hokan. 1994;63:3–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Al Karawi MA, Yasawi MI, El-Shieck-Mohamed AR. Endoscopic management of biliary hydatid disease: Report of six cases. Endoscopy. 1991;23:278–81. 10.1055/s-2007-1010686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Alper A, Ariogul O, Emre A, Uras A, Okten A. Choledochoduodenostomy for intrabiliary rupture of hydatid cysts of liver. Br J Surg. 1987;74:243–5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800740405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Al-Toma AA, Vermeijden RJ, Van De Wiel A. Acute pancreatitis complicating intrabiliary rupture of liver hydatid cyst. Eur J Intern Med. 2004;15:65–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2003.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Alvizuri-Escobedo JM, Sánchez-Mercado M. Cholangiohydatidosis. Rev Soc Peru Med Interna. 2011;24:149. http://medicinainterna.net.pe/revista/revista_24_3_2011/colangiohidatidosis.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Arifuddin R, Baichi M, Ullah A, Maliakkal B. Cystic echinococcus—a rare presentation of acute biliary obstruction and pancreatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40:763–4. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200609000-00020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Atli M, Kama NA, Yuksek YN, Doganay M, Gozalan U, Kologlu M, Daglar G. Intrabiliary rupture of a hepatic hydatid cyst: associated clinical factors and proper management. Arch Surg. 2001;136:1249–55. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.11.1249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Avcu S, Ünal Ö, Arslan H. Intrabiliary rupture of liver hydatid cyst: a case report and review of the literature. Cases J. 2009;2:6455. doi: 10.1186/1757-1626-2-6455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Aydin A, Ersoz G, Tekesin O, Mentes A. Hydatid acute pancreatitis: a rare complication of hydatid liver disease. Report of two cases. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997;9:211–4. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199702000-00020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Badea R, Badea G, Draƒühici A, Cazacu M, Porr PJ. Ultrasonic diagnosis of echinococcal cholangitis. Ultraschall Med. 1987;8:147–8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1011679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Baraket O, Feki MN, Chaari M, Saidani A, Ben Moussa M, Moussa M, Bouchoucha S. Hydatid cyst open in biliary tract: therapeutic approaches. Report of 22 cases. J Visc Surg. 2011;148:e211–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2011.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Basbous S, Hayette MP, Léonard P, Louis E, Loly JP, Detry O. Liver hydatidosis causing obstructive cholangitis: a case report. Rev Med Liege. 2021;76:575–8. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bayhan Z, Yılmaz S, Tiryaki Ç, Kargı C, Ucar BI. Acute pancreatitis due to rupture of the hydatid cyst into the biliary tract: A case report. NJMR. 2014:2249–4995. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Becker K, Frieling T, Saleh A, Haussinger D. Resolution of hydatid liver cyst by spontaneous rupture into the biliary tract. J Hepatol. 1997;2:1408–12. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(97)80479-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Belkouch A, Mouhsine A. Hydatid cyst ruptured in the biliary duct: an exceptional cause of acute pancreatitis. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;18:298. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2014.18.298.5147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bellara IL, Amara H, Hablani N, Harzallah L, Abbassi DB, Kraiem C. Hydatic acute pancreatitis: a case report. Ann Chir. 2004;129:372–5. 10.1016/j.anchir.2004.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Beltsis A, Chatzimavroudis G, Iliadis A, Tsavdaridis I, Vasiliadis I, Papaziogas B, Katsinelos T. Intrabiliary rupture of hepatic hydatid cyst presenting as acute pancreatitis and treatment with endoscopic sphincterotomy: report of two cases. Ann. Gastroenterol. 2005;18:353–6. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bilgi Kırmacı M, Akay T, Özgül E, Yılmaz S. Cholecysto-Hydatid Cyst Fistula: A Rare Cause of Cholangitis. Am J Case Rep. 2020;21:e921914. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.921914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Busić Z, Amić E, Servis D, Predrijevac M, Stipancić I, Busić D. Common bile duct obstruction caused by the hydatid daughter cysts. Coll Antropol. 2004;28:325–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cakır OO, Ataseven H, Demir A. Hydatid acute pancreatitis. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2012;36:251–3. 10.5152/tpd.2012.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chaudhary A, Upadhyaya AC, Kankanala VV, Kumar A, Joshi N, Kumar M, et al. Intrabiliary rupture of hepatic hydatid cyst with impacted hydatid membranes at ampulla of Vater presenting as acute pancreatitis. Trop Gastroenterol. 2013;34:43–4. doi: 10.7869/tg.2012.93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Cicek B, Parlak E, Disibeyaz S, Oguz D, Cengiz C, Sahin B. Endoscopic therapy of hepatic hydatid cyst disease in preoperative and postoperative settings. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52:931–5. doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-9426-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Coşkun O, Ödemiş B, Alpua M, et al. Endoscopic cyst evacuation as a treatment for liver hydatic cysts in patients who present with acute pancreatitis. Endosc Gastrointest. 2017;25:49–51. 10.17940/endoskopi.339876. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Daali M, Fakir Y, Hssaida R, Hajji A, Had A. Hydatid cysts of the liver opening in the biliary tract. Report of 64 cases. Ann Chir. 2001;126:242–5. 10.1016/s0003-3944(01)00507-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Dadoukis J, Gamvros O, Aletras H. Intrabiliary rupture of the hydatid cyst of the liver. World J Surg. 1984;8:786–90. doi: 10.1007/BF01655782 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Daldoul S, Ben Dhaou A, Ben Tahar A, Baccari A, Khemir A, Ben Safta Y, Ben Moussa M. Internal transfistulary drainage for intrabiliary rupture of hydatid cyst of the liver: Analysis of the indications and the results. Report of 50 cases. Tunis Med. 2017;95:10–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Davidson B, Ezaki T, Habib N. Controversy in the management of cholangitis secondary to hydatid daughter cysts. HPB Surg. 1991;4:321–9. doi: 10.1155/1991/58262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Dumas R, Le Gall P, Hastier P, Buckley MJ, Conio M, Delmont JP. The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of hepatic hydatid disease. Endoscopy. 1999;31:242–7. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-14209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Elbir O, Gundogdu H, Caglikulekci M, Kayaalp C, Atalay F, Savkilioglu M, Seven C. Surgical treatment of intrabiliary rupture of hydatid cysts of liver: comparison of choledochoduodenostomy with T-tube drainage. Dig Surg. 2001;18:289–93. doi: 10.1159/000050154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.el Idrissi HD, Ridai M, Zerouali NO. Pancreatitis of hydatid origin. Presse Med. 1996;25:2022–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ghidirim, Mişin I, Guţu E, Gagauz I, Danci A, Vozian M, Zastavniţchi GH. Intrabiliary rupture of the hydatic cyst complicated with acute pancreatitis. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2006;101:429–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Giordano G, Ialongo P, Amoruso M, Rizzo MI, Di Venere B, Bonomo GM. Obstructive jaundice caused by hydatid cyst rupture in main bile duct. Ann Ital Chir. 1999;70:763–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Giouleme O, Nikolaidis N, Zezos P, Budas K, Katsinelos P, Vasiliadis T, Eugenidis N. Treatment of complications of hepatic hydatid disease by ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:508–10. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.118256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.González-Arboleda F, Pizarro F, Lindner C, Caqueo F. Therapeutic approach of complicated hydatid disease: role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in cholangiohydatidosis. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2023;35:e1699. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020220002e1699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hafeez M, Hussain T, Salamat A, Hassan F, Farooq A, Saeed F. Ruptured hydatid cyst in biliary tract. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2012;22:663–5. doi: 10.2012/JCPSP.663665 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Jaén-Torrejimeno I, Latorre-Fragua R, López-Guerra D, Rojas-Holguín A, Manuel-Vázquez A, Blanco-Fernández G, Ramia JM. Jaundice as a clinical presentation in liver hydatidosis increases the risk of postoperative biliary fistula. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021;406:1139–47. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-02070-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.João M, Silva M, Perdigoto D, Mendes S. Cholangiohydatidosis: an uncommon cause of acute cholangitis. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2020;112:881–2. doi: 10.17235/reed.2020.7063/2020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Katsinelos P, Chatzimavroudis G, Fasoulas K, Kamperis E, Katsinelos T, Terzoudis S, et al. Acute pancreatitis caused by impaction of hydatid membranes in the papilla of Vater: a case report. Cases J. 2009;2:1–4. 10.4076/1757-1626-2-7374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Khoshbaten M, Farhang S, Hajavi N. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for intrabiliary rupture of hydatid cyst. Dig Endosc. 2009;21:277–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2009.00907.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kitchens WH, Liu C, Ryan ET, Fernandez-del Castillo C. Hepatic hydatid cyst: a rare cause of recurrent pancreatitis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:2057–9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2630-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kırmacı MB, Akay T, Özgül E, Yılmaz S. Cholecysto-Hydatid Cyst Fistula: A Rare Cause of Cholangitis. Am J Case Rep. 2020;21:e921914. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.921914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Koksal N, Muftuoglu T, Gunerhan Y, Uzun MA, Kurt R. Management of intrabiliary ruptured hydatid disease of the liver. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;48:1094–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kornaros SE, Aboul-Nour TA. Frank intrabiliary rupture of hydatid hepatic cyst: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183:466–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Lahmidani FZ, Hamdoun H, Abid M, El Yousfi DA, Benajah M, El Abkari SA, Ibrahimi. Acute pancreatitis as a rare complication of rupture of hydatid liver cyst: review of 16 cases. PAMJ Clin Med. 2019;1:1–5. 10.11604/pamj-cm.2019.1.17.20944. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Mahmoudi A, Zouari K. A rare complication of hydatid cyst of the liver: acute pancreatitis. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;21:247. 10.11604/pamj.2015.21.247.7600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Manouras A, Genetzakis M, Antonakis PT, Lagoudianakis E, Pattas M, Papadima A, et al. Endoscopic management of a relapsing hepatic hydatid cyst with intrabiliary rupture: a case report and review of the literature. Can J Gastroenterol. 2007;21:249–53. doi: 10.1155/2007/410308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Mathur SK, Shah RR, Samsi AB, Kelkar MD. Hydatid cyst as a cause of common bile duct obstruction (a case report). J Postgrad Med. 1983;29:262–6. https://www.jpgmonline.com/text.asp?1983/29/4/262/5502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.McCorkell SJ. Echinococcal cysts in the common bile duct: an uncommon cause of obstruction. Gastrointest Radiol. 1985;10:390–3. doi: 10.1007/BF01893138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Medina E, Orti E, Canelles P, Calvo MA, Molina E. Complicated hepatic hydatid cyst and acute pancreatitis. Value of ERCP and treatment with endoscopic sphincterotomy. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1990;78:315–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Menteş A, Batur Y, Eldem A, Ozbal O. Pancreatitis as a complication of a hydatic liver cyst—a case report. Jpn J Surg. 1990;20:356–8. doi: 10.1007/BF02470674 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Michalopoulos N, Laskou S, Papavramidis TS, Pliakos I, Kotidis E, Kesisoglou I, Papavramidis ST. Rupture of right hepatic duct into hydatid cyst. J Korean Med Sci. 2012;27:953–6. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.8.953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Moujahid M, Tajdine MT. Hydatid cysts of the liver ruptured into the biliary tracts: report of 120 cases. Pan Afr Med J. 2011;10:43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Naranjo A, Sánchez del Río A, Vignote L, Vega JF, Mino G. Effectiveness of endoscopic sphincterotomy in complicated hepactic hydatid disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48:593–7. 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70041-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Nemati Honar B, Hayatollah G, Nikshoar M, Forootan M, Feizi AM. Liver Hydatid Cyst and Acute Cholangitis: a Case Report. Acta Med Iran. 2016;54:286–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ochando Cerdán F. Ictericia obstructiva y colangitis secundaria a quiste hidatídico hepático. Cir Esp. 2006;80:53–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Önder RO, Bekci T, Yayla Dİ. Ruptured hepatic hydatid cyst causing cholangitis. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2022;55:e0530–2022. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0530-2022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Ovnat A, Peiser J, Avinoah E, Barki Y, Charuzi I. Acute cholangitis caused ruptured hydatid cyst. Surgery. 1984;5:497–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Ozcaglayan O, Halefoglu AM, Ozcaglayan T, Sumbul HA. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of acute pancreatitis caused by ruptured hydatid disease to the biliary system. BR-BTR. 2014;97:33–5. 10.5334/jbr-btr.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Paksoy M, Karahasanoglu T, Carkman S, Giray S, Senturk H, Ozcelik F, Erguney S. Rupture of the hydatid disease of the liver into the biliary tracts. Dig Surg. 1998;15:25–9. doi: 10.1159/000018582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Parthé S, Maier M, Kohler B, Kress S, Riemann JF. Acute pancreatitis due to the rupture of an echinococcal cyst into the bile duct system. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1994;119:624–7. 10.1055/s-2008-1058739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Pavlidis TE, Katsinelos PT, Tsiaousis PZ, Atmatzidis KS. Intrabiliary rupture of a large liver echinococcal cyst in an adolescent managed with endoscopic sphincterotomy and albendazole. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006;16:493–6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.16.493 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Ramia Angel JM, Sancho Calatrava E, Veguillas Redondo P, Santos Blanco JM, García-Parreño Jofré J. Acute hydatid pancreatitis. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2008;100:733–4. 10.4321/s1130-01082008001100015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Robleh H, Yassine F, Driss K, Khalid E, Fatima-Zahra B, Saad B, Rachid L, Abdalaziz F, Najib ZO. Total rupture of hydatid cyst of liver in to common bile duct: a case report. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;19:370. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2014.19.370.5727 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Rodríguez-Sicilia MJ, Gonzalez-Artacho C, Cabello-Tapia MJ, de-la-TorreRubio P, de-Teresa-Galvan J. Recurrent acute pancreatitis as clinical presentation of hydatid disease of the liver. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2012;104:441–2. 10.4321/S1130-01082012000800011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Saez-Royuela F, Yuguero L, López-Morante A, Pérez-Alvarez JC, Martín-Lorente JL, Ojeda C. Acute pancreatitis caused by hydatid membranes in the biliary tract: Treatment with endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:793–6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70305-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Settaf A, Bargach S, Aghzadi R, Lahlou MK, Oudghiri M. Treatment of cystobiliary fistula of hydatid cyst of the liver. Apropos of 33 cases. J Chir (Paris). 1991;128:133–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Schwartz MP, Samsom M. Image of the month. Ruptured Echinococcal cyst causing acute cholangitis. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:1039. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.29352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Sciumè C, Geraci G, Pisello F, Li Volsi F, Facella T, Modica G. Treatment of complications of hepatic hydatid disease by ERCP: our experience. Ann Ital Chir. 2004;75:531–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Sciumè C, Geraci G, Pisello F, Li Volsi F, Facella T, Modica G. Acute pancreatitis during liver hydatidosis: treatment with ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy. Ann Ital Chir. 2005;76:491–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Shalayiadang P, Jiang T, Yimiti Y, Ran B, Aini A, Zhang R, et al. Double versus single T-tube drainage for frank cysto-biliary communication in patients with hepatic cystic echinococcosis: a retrospective cohort study with median 11 years follow-up. BMC Surg. 2021;21:12. 10.1186/s12893-020-01028-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Sharma BC, Reddy RS, Garg V. Endoscopic management of hepatic hydatid cyst with biliary communication. Dig Endosc. 2012;24:267–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01225.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Shemesh E, Klein E, Abramowich D, Pines A. Common bile duct obstruction caused by hydatid daughter cysts—management by endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1986;81:280–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Sıkar HE, Kaptanoglu L, Kement M. An unusual appearance of complicated hydatid cyst: necrotizing pancreatitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2017;23:81–3. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2016.26820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Simsek H, Ozaslan E, Sayek I, Sava≈ü C, Abbasoƒülu O, Soylu AR, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP in hepatic hydatid disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:384–9. doi: 10.1067/s0016-5107(03)00013-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Singh V, Reddy DC, Ram Verma G, Singh G. Endoscopic management of intrabiliary-ruptured hepatic hydatid cyst. Liver Int. 2006;26:621–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2006.01259.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Spârchez Z, Osian G, Onica A, Bărbântă C, Tanţău M, Pascu O. Ruptured hydatid cyst of the liver with biliary obstruction: presentation of a case and review of the literature. Rom J Gastroenterol. 2004;13:245–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Tacyildiz I, Aldemir M, Aban N, Keles C. Diagnosis and surgical treatment of intrabiliary ruptured hydatid disease of the liver. S Afr J Surg. 2004;42:43–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Tekin A, Küçükkartallar T, Aksoy F , Metin Belviranlı, Murat Çakır, Bülent Erenoğlu. Our patients with hepatic hydatid cyst rupturing into bile ducts. Turk J Surg. 2007;23:125–8. [Google Scholar]
- 108.Toka B, Karaman K, Eminler AT, et al. A Case of Cyst Hydatid which is Diagnosed By Appperarence of Girl Vesicles in Choledoc with ERCP. Sakarya Tıp Dergisi. 2016;6:240–4. 10.5505/sakaryamedj.2016.33602. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Toumi O, Ammar H, Gupta R, Ben Jabra S, Hamida B, Noomen F, et al. Management of liver hydatid cyst with cystobiliary communication and acute cholangitis: a 27-year experience. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019;45:1115–9. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0995-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Trébol J, Sánchez R, Blanco CA, Rodríguez MB, Roldán M, Ozalla F, Francos CM. Quiste hidatídico hepático con migración de material hidatídico a la vía biliar principal, colangitis y pancreatitis aguda. Revista ACIRCAL. 2013. http://www.acircal.net/revista/articulo.php?id=17. [Google Scholar]
- 111.Trigui A, Rejab H, Krichene J, Tlili A, Trabelsi J, Kachoua A, et al. Surgical treatment of hydatid cysts with large biliocystic fistula in conservative strategy. Pan Afr Med J. 2021;38:195. 10.11604/pamj.2021.38.195.27098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Turan M, Duman M, Aydin C, Erdem M, Goktas S, Topcu O, et al. Management of frank intrabiliary rupture of hepatic hydatid cyst. Chirurgische Gastroenterologie. 2005;21:74–7. doi: 10.1159/000082675 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Ufuk F, Duran M. Intrabiliary Rupture of Hepatic Hydatid Cyst Leading to Biliary Obstruction, Cholangitis, and Septicemia. J Emerg Med. 2018;54:e15–e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.09.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Ugurlu ET, Baykan M, Donder Y. Treatment of hepatic hydatid cyst rupture into the biliary tract: endoscopic evacuation. Acta Medica Nicomedia. 2022;5:218–22. 10.53446/actamednicomedia.1137988. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Villán-González A. Obstructive jaundice secondary to a hepatic hydatid cyst. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2018:110:741–2. doi: 10.17235/reed.2018.5574/2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Wani I, Bhat Y, Khan N, Mir F, Nanda S, Shah OJ. Concomitant Rupture of Hydatid Cyst of Liver in Hepatic Duct and Gallbladder: Case Report. Gastroenterology Res. 2010;3:175–9. doi: 10.4021/gr215e [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Yahya AI, Shwereif HE, Thoboot AS, Ekheil MA, Algader KA, Abosherda A, et al. Hepatic Hydatid Induced Obstructive Jaundice. Ann Clin Pathol. 2016;4(1):1059. [Google Scholar]
- 118.Yücesoy AN, Poçan S. Secondary gallbladder hydatidosis and nonfragmanted germinative membrane sourced obstructive jaundice caused by intrabiliary ruptured hepatic hydatid cyst (a case report): two rare complication of the intrabiliary ruptured hepatic hydatid cyst. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2014;3:209–11. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2014.07.05 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Yagnik VD, Dawka S, Patel N. Gallbladder Hydatid Cyst: A Review on Clinical Features, Investigations and Current Management. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2020;13:87–97. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S243344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data are in the manuscript.



