Skip to main content
Parasitology logoLink to Parasitology
. 2021 Jan 13;148(5):630–635. doi: 10.1017/S0031182021000056

Therapeutic efficacy of mebendazole and artemisinin in different phases of trichinellosis: a comparative experimental study

Amal Farahat Allam 1,, Reham Ahmed Mostafa 2, Wael Lotfy 3, Hoda Fahmy Farag 1, Naglaa Fathi 1, Esraa Abdelhamid Moneer 4, Amel Youssef Shehab 1
PMCID: PMC10950373  PMID: 33517933

Abstract

The present work aimed at studying the efficacy of mebendazole (MBZ) compared to artemisinin (ART) for the treatment of trichinellosis at various phases of infection. Seventy Swiss albino mice were orally infected by 300 Trichinella spiralis (T. spiralis) larvae. Mice were divided into infected untreated control group and infected groups treated with 50 mg kg−1 MBZ and 300 mg kg−1 ART for three and five consecutive days, respectively, at the enteral phase [2–4 days post infection (PI)], invasive phase (10–12 days PI) and encapsulated phase (28–30 days PI). All mice were sacrificed 35–42 days PI. MBZ and ART revealed a significant decrease in mean larval counts and increase of larval per cent reduction (LR %) when treatment was initiated during the enteral phase compared to the other phases. MBZ showed significantly higher LR % (99.7, 83.95 and 89.65%) than ART (80.58, 67.0 and 79.2%) when administered at the three infection phases. Histopathological study showed a decrease in the number of encysted larvae, their surrounding cellular infiltrates and increased regenerative muscles in all treated mice. In conclusion, ART possesses a substantial anthelmintic activity against T. spiralis infection in mice both at the enteral and encapsulated phases, yet, significantly lower than MBZ.

Key words: Artemisinin, encysted larvae, mebendazole, mice, Trichinella spiralis

Introduction

Trichinellosis is a worldwide zoonosis caused by nematodes of the genus Trichinella. It has a very broad range of host species of animals. Most human infections are accidental, caused by the ingestion of undercooked pork meat containing infective larvae (Rainova et al., 2016). Globally, 10 000 people are estimated to be infected with Trichinella spp. per year, among which Trichinella spiralis (T. spiralis) is the most common due to its universal distribution and high pathogenicity (Dupouy-Camet, 2000; Murrell and Pozio, 2011). Trichinella spiralis has a unique life cycle, which passes through all phases of development (adult, migratory and encysted stage) in a single host (Gottstein et al., 2009).

Treatment of trichinellosis is somewhat controversial, anthelmintic drugs such as mebendazole (MBZ); a benzimidazole derivative that is used to treat various worm infections is the drug of choice (Gottstein et al., 2009). However, it was reported to have a limited effect against the encapsulated larval stage (Pozio et al., 2001). MBZ has low water solubility that limits its absorption from the intestinal lumen resulting in reduced bioavailability (Codina et al., 2015). Therefore, a high dose of MBZ is used with numerous adverse effects mainly gastrointestinal in nature. Central nervous system side effects were also described. In addition, several experimental studies have shown evidence of teratogenicity of MBZ in rats and mice (De la Torre-Iglesias et al., 2014).

Current studies focus on artemether, a derivative of artemisinin which is isolated from the sweet wormwood plant, Artemisia that grows in Southeast Asia (Obistioiu et al., 2014). There are about 300 species in the Artemisia genus, some of which are medical species used for the treatment of many infectious and non-infectious diseases. It came to the attention of the World Health Organization in the 1970s when Quinine lost efficacy against malaria resulting in the use of ART for the treatment of malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum. In addition, ART has potential roles in the treatment of parasitic helminthic infections. Generally, it is considered a safe drug and is well tolerated with minimal undesirable side effects in normal or high doses (Keiser and Utzinger, 2007; Cui and Su, 2009). Experimentally, its efficacy against trichinellosis was conducted by Abou Rayia et al. (2017) in vitro on adult worms and in vivo during enteral and migratory phases. Based on these studies, the present work was designed aiming at studying the efficacy of ART compared to MBZ for the treatment of T. spiralis in mice when administered during the various phases of infection.

Materials and methods

Parasite and dose of infection

Trichinella spiralis strain was obtained from the Parasitology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University. The standard experimental infective dose for each mouse was 300 orally inoculated larvae (Basyoni and El-Sabaa , 2013). Before infection, mice were starved for 12 h, after which they were given the larvae.

Drugs

Mebendazole

MBZ (micronized product of Nasr for Chemical Pharmaceutical, Egypt) was given at a dose of 50 mg kg−1 body weight/mouse/day (it is ten times higher than the human dose) for three consecutive days (vs 10–14 days in human) (Keittivuti and Keittivuti, 1989; Nair and Jacob, 2016; Abou Rayia et al., 2017).

Artemether

Artemisinin (Mether®, a product of Kunming Pharmaceutical Corp. Kunming, China, 100 mg tablet) was suspended in a solution of 3% ethanol, 7% Tween 80 and distilled water. It was given orally at a dose of 300 mg kg−1 body weight mouse−1 day−1 for five consecutive days which is 100 times higher than the dose used to treat malaria in humans (3 mg kg−1 day−1) (Li et al., 2011; Abou Rayia et al., 2017).

Mice grouping and experimental design

The present work was carried out on 70 laboratory-bred Swiss albino mice known to be susceptible to T. spiralis larvae. Their age at the start of the experiment was between 6 and 8 weeks and their weight was in the range of 20–25 g. Animals were put on a standard pellet diet and water ad libitum. All animals were inoculated with the infective dose of T. spiralis larvae then divided into two main groups:

Group I: infected untreated control group

Ten infected untreated mice.

Group II: experimental group: infected treated mice

Sixty infected mice were treated with either MBZ or ART (30 each). They were then equally subdivided into three subgroups as follows:

  • IIa: 10 mice treated with MBZ and 10 mice treated with ART during enteral phase [2–4 days post infection (PI)]

  • IIb: 10 mice treated with MBZ and 10 mice treated with ART 10–12 days PI (invasive phase)

  • IIc: 10 mice treated with MBZ and 10 mice treated with ART 28–30 days PI (encapsulated phase)

Parasitological evaluation of drug efficacy

Mice of all groups were sacrificed after 35–42 days PI, skinned and eviscerated (Abou Rayia et al., 2017). As described below, portions of the diaphragm of each mouse were examined by the compression method to demonstrate T. spiralis larvae. The mean count of T. spiralis larvae in muscles of each group was determined by an artificial digestion method. All mice survived till the end of the study.

Compression diagnostic method

Before artificial digestion, a piece of diaphragm from each mouse was placed between two slides and pressed to obtain a thin layer which was examined under low-power objective to detect the presence of T. spiralis larvae and confirm infection (Dyab et al., 2019).

Artificial digestion method

Following evisceration, the carcasses of mice were weighed, minced then digested in acid pepsin solution (Bruschi and Murrell, 2002). Digestion was performed at 37°C for 2 h. Larvae were then isolated from the digest of each mouse by filtration through two layers of gauze onto a 200 mesh cm−2 sieve (Kapel et al., 2005), which retained any undigested tissues, but allowed the passage of T. spiralis larvae. The tissues were then washed with tap water and larvae concentrated by simple sedimentation method for 30 min. The supernatant was poured off, and the sediment was washed three times with tap water by repeated sedimentation.

Counting of T. spiralis larvae

The sediment was measured, then three samples of 0.1 mL each were spread on a microscope slide for larvae count using McMaster counting chamber (10 ×  objective). The number of larvae was expressed per gram of tissue and was established from the mean result of three counts (Kapel et al., 2005; Abou Rayia et al., 2017). The efficacy of each drug was assessed by comparing the number of larvae recovered from treated and untreated infected groups.

Histopathological study

Parts of the mice skeletal muscles were kept in 10% formalin, processed for paraffin sectioning, and stained by haematoxylin and eosin stain (H&E) according to Carleton et al. (1967). Trichinella spiralis larvae in the tissues, the presence of encapsulated larvae, nurse cells, atrophic muscles and inflammatory reaction were elucidated.

Statistical analysis

The data collected were tabulated as mean ± s.d. and analysed using the statistical package for the Social Sciences, version 20 (SPSS-20). Larvae reduction rate (LR %) was calculated as follows:

graphic file with name S0031182021000056_eqnU1.jpg

Student's t-test was used for comparing means of two quantitative, normally distributed groups. ANOVA test (F-test) was used to relate more than two arithmetic means. Post hoc (Tukey's) test was applied to explore all possible pairwise comparisons of means comprising a factor using the equivalent of multiple t-tests. The P value was used to test the level of significance among the different groups. P value was set at 0.05 (P < 0.05, significant).

Results

Evaluation of drug efficacy

By microscopic examination of the compressed diaphragm, all mice were found infected. Trichinella spiralis larvae were obtained from the muscles of the infected mice 35–42 days PI and counted (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Trichinella spiralis larvae with typical coil shape in the artificial digested muscles of the infected control mice (100 × )

Parasitological study

LR % of the treated groups compared to control

The mean larval count in the muscles of the infected untreated control mice was 7504 ± 59.4 larvae g−1. As for mice receiving MBZ and ART, a maximal LR % of 99.75 and 80.58% were detected when the drugs were administered during the enteral phase. In the encapsulated phase, the LR % was 98.65 and 79.24% for MBZ- and ART-treated mice, respectively. The lowest LR % was attained during the invasive phase (83.95 and 67.03%). A statistically significant reduction in the mean parasite counts among the three subgroups as compared to the control was observed (P1, P2 and P3 < 0.05) (Table 1).

Table 1.

The mean larval count and larval reduction rate (LR%) among the MBZ- and ART-treated subgroups

Parameters Infected untreated Infected treated subgroups ANOVA (F-test)
Group I (n = 10) Subgroup IIa (enteral phase) (n = 20) Subgroup IIb (invasive phase) (n = 20) Subgroup IIc (encapsulated phase) (n = 20)
Control
Mean ± s.d.
7504 ± 59.4 F = 1419.11
P < 0.001*
MBZ
Mean ± s.d.
20 ± 4.24 1204 ± 39.6 100.5 ± 16.26
t, P1 177.74, P < 0.003* 124.81, P < 0.05* 170.02, P < 0.002*
LR % 99.75% 83.95% 98.65%
P2** (IIa, IIb) (IIb, IIc) (IIa, IIc)
P < 0.001** P < 0.001** P < 0.05**
ART F = 426.79
P < 0.001*
Mean ± s.d. 1457.5 ± 41.72 2474.5 ± 40.31 1557.5 ± 33.23
t, P1 117.81, P 0.001* 99.09, P < 0.001* 123.56, P < 0.001*
LR % 80.58% 67.03% 79.24%
P2** (IIa, IIb) (IIb, IIc) (IIa, IIc)
P < 0.001** P < 0.001** P = 0.081
t, P3 48.48, P = 0.021* 31.8, P = 0.001* 55.69, P = 0.002*

Infected treated subgroups (10 mice each).

P1 Comparison between treated mice and control group.

F: ANOVA test (F-test) to compare more than two arithmetic means.

P2** Comparison between pairs of groups using post hoc test (Tukey's).

P3: Comparison between MBZ and ART efficacy in each phase.

*Significantly different at P < 0.05.

Comparison between mean numbers of larval counts for each of MBZ and ART during the various phases

On receiving MBZ or ART, the lowest mean larval count was observed when the drugs were given during the enteral phase, 2–4 days PI, followed by encapsulated phase, 28–30 days PI and finally the invasive phase, 10–12 days PI. MBZ showed lower mean counts compared to ART during all phases. Few larvae were still alive after the ART administration in contrast to MBZ. In the subgroups receiving MBZ, post hoc pairwise comparison revealed a statistically significant difference between each subgroup (P2). Subgroups IIa and IIc treated with ART showed no statistically significant difference in parasite counts. By comparing the mean larvae numbers and LR% from all three subgroups, a significant difference was disclosed between MBZ and ART in each phase (P3 < 0.001) (Table 1).

Histopathological studies

Specimens from skeletal muscles of all groups obtained 35–42 days PI were stained with H&E. Figure 3 showed a higher number of larvae in the control group as compared to the treated groups (Figs 3 and 4). Stained skeletal muscle sections revealed numerous T. spiralis larvae encysted in or between the muscle fibres forming several nurse cells (LC), each containing 4–5 intersected larvae forming a nucleated feature (N) in the infected untreated control mice (group I). They were separated by definite subcapsular space, in which remnants of homogenized muscle fibres were seen. The parasitized muscles showed interstitial inflammatory reaction (myositis) that appeared as heavy cellular infiltrates (CI) around the capsule and in between the muscle fibres. The muscular tissues appeared as a cross-section with peripheral nuclei surrounding the muscular bundles and atrophic muscles (AM) surrounding the larvae capsules (Fig. 2).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

H&E stained sections of T. spiralis-infected mice muscles in the subgroups administered MBZ at a dose of 50 mg kg−1 in the different phases and examined at 100 × .

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

H&E stained sections of T. spiralis-infected mice muscles examined at 100 ×  magnification. Subgroups were administered 300 mg kg−1 ART in the different phases.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Paraffin section photomicrograph of mice skeletal muscles infected with T. spiralis showed intersected muscle larvae forming a nucleated feature in cysts encapsulated by collagen sheath (C) forming nurse cells (LC) and containing parts of the larvae muscles (AN) (H&E stained 100 × ).

Muscles of mice from MBZ-treated group (group II a–c) showed larvae surrounded by moderate inflammatory reactions (Fig. 3). Phase IIa showed decreased number and size of larvae with empty necrotic nurse cells (NLC) and others with residual nuclei (R). Necrotic muscle bundles (NM) as well as atrophic muscles (AM) were observed. In phase IIb necrotic and atrophic larvae cysts, decreased cellular infiltrates and necrotic and atrophic muscular bundles appeared (AM). Phase IIc revealed atrophic nurse cells and regenerative muscles (RM).

Figures 3 and 4 showed paraffin section photomicrograph of infected mice muscles treated with MBZ and ART, respectively. In phases IIa and IIIc, decreased number and size of necrotic larval nurse cells (NLC) was observed as well as decreased atrophic muscles (AM) compared to phase IIb. Moreover, group IIc showed the appearance of some regenerative muscles (RM).

Figure 4 phase IIa showed fewer nurse cells containing intersected larvae (LC) of nucleic features in nurse cells (ALC). Necrotic muscle bundles as well as increased regenerative muscles (RM) were seen. Phase IIb showed necrotic and atrophic nurse cells, others with residual nuclei (RN), and few regenerative muscles. Phase IIc showed atrophic nurse cells with elongated intersected muscle larvae and some regenerative muscles (RM).

Discussion

The treatment of trichinellosis has not yet been standardized, and the curative efficacy of antiparasitic drugs has not been convincingly demonstrated (Sun et al., 2019). In the present study, the administration of MBZ and ART at doses of 50 and 300 mg kg−1 body weight, respectively, was effective in reducing T. spiralis larval counts compared to the untreated control group. Their efficacy varied according to the time lapse after infection. A significant lower mean larval count and higher LR % were observed when treatments were initiated during the enteral phase compared to that obtained in the invasive and encapsulated phases. Moreover, the invasive phase was the least sensitive to treatment compared to the other phases.

Regarding MBZ, similar results were obtained by Keittivuti and Keittivuti (1989), they reported that MBZ was effective in eliminating 99.77% of T. spiralis larvae in mice in the enteral phase compared to 76.21 and 96.70% during the invasive and encapsulated phases, respectively. Similarly, albendazole and ricobendazole derivatives were less active against migrating and encysted T. spiralis larvae as reported by Lopez-Garcia et al. (1997). On the other hand, McCracken and Taylor (1980) reported that MBZ showed high efficacy against experimental trichinellosis in mice which had received a 3-day course of treatment during the invasive and encapsulated phases. De la Rosa et al. (2008) reported a reduction of 72.9–89.9% in the parasite load in MBZ-treated mice with a single dose of 20 mg kg−1 given during enteral and encapsulated phases. However, Pozio et al. (2001) revealed that MBZ was incapable of killing encapsulated larvae in human muscles. Therefore, the efficacy of benzimidazole and its derivatives in the treatment of T. spiralis varied according to different treatment regimens, parasite strain, the host and the used experimental model.

The action of MBZ is related to its ability to interfere with glucose metabolism and hence killing the parasite. Yet, it has many side effects when taken for prolonged periods at the recommended doses (Vadlamudi et al., 2015). Additionally, it was demonstrated that MBZ at a dose of 150 mg kg−1 amplifies the lipid peroxidation processes in the blood of both infected and parasite-free animals (Tolstoj et al., 2007). Accordingly, the search for alternative drugs would be extremely welcomed.

Alternatively, the current work investigated the trichinicidal action of a commercial preparation of ART. The significantly greater larvae reduction observed with ART administered 2 days PI (enteral phase) compared to that given 10 days (invasive phase) and 21 days (encapsulated phase) PI may be explained by greater susceptibility of adult worms to the drug compared to the larval forms. Another possibility is that the orally administered drug that reached the intestine had higher absorption capacity and bioavailability during inflammation attaining a higher concentration in the intestine prior to parenteral dissemination (Rodríguez et al., 2009).

Generally, lower efficacy of MBZ and ART was observed in the infected treated mice during the invasive phase compared to those treated in the encapsulated phase. Intestinal infection by T. spiralis is known to induce a transient acute inflammation, which is gradually abrogated after worm expulsion from the gut. This situation stimulates the recovery of absorption capacity and oral bioavailability of the drugs (Velebný et al., 1992). On the same line, Hong (2018) reported that albendazole restored its absorption and bioavailability when the inflammatory reaction ceased after worm expulsion by day 22 PI (encapsulated phase). During the encapsulated phase, T. spiralis larvae reside successfully in nurse cells owing to their ability to endorse angiogenesis for nutrition.

The presence of few fragile and distorted undigested live larvae after ART might be explained by the fact that nurse cells act as a barrier against drugs reducing their efficacy against these larvae. Moreover, Abou Rayia et al. (2017) verified that ART may deprive the larvae of nutrition because of interference with the angiogenesis process.

Although, the present study showed that ART possesses a substantial anthelmintic activity against T. spiralis infection in mice, its efficacy was significantly lower than that of MBZ. It was confirmed that derivatization may be one possible strategy to prolong the clinical usefulness of Artemisia preparations (Sukul et al., 2005; Caner et al., 2008; Held et al., 2011). Sukul et al. (2005) reported that the administration of the artemether homoeopathic drugs (Cina 30 and Santanicum 30 prepared from the flowering tops of Artemisia nilagirica) in mice starting 7 days PI and continued daily for 120 days caused LR% by 84.1 and 81.2%, respectively. The results of the present study are comparable to those reported by Caner et al. (2008) who examined the efficacy of Artemisia vulgaris and Artemisia absinthium against T. spiralis in rats.

Histopathological examination revealed an improvement of the histopathological changes with both treatments including decreased number of encysted larvae and their surrounding cellular infiltrates and increased regenerative muscles. The larvae were surrounded by mild inflammatory reactions when treatment was given during the enteral phase followed by the encapsulated phase. MBZ showed higher effectiveness compared to ART. These histopathological findings were supported by many previous studies, suggesting the higher effectiveness of different trichinicidal medications when given at an early stage (Soliman et al., 2011; Basyoni and El-Sabaa, 2013).

In conclusion, the highest drug efficacy was obtained during enteral and encapsulated phases. ART is highly tolerated and safe. It possesses anthelmintic activity against T. spiralis infection in mice; however, it was significantly lower than that of MBZ. ART needs further investigation to improve its trichinicidal effect solely or in combination with other therapy. Also, giving two or three divided doses over 24 h may increase drug therapeutic effect during the invasive and encapsulated phases. New treatment discovery and other anthelmintics should be investigated.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Ethical standards

Ethical clearance was obtained by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University in accordance with the ethical guidelines of animal experiments.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. Abou Rayia DM, Saad AE, Ashour DS and Oreiby RM (2017) Implication of artemisinin nematocidal activity on experimental trichinellosis: in vitro and in vivo studies. International Journal for Parasitology 66, 56–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Basyoni MM and El-Sabaa AA (2013) Therapeutic potential of myrrh and ivermectin against experimental Trichinella spiralis infection in mice. Korean Journal of Parasitology 51, 297–304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bruschi F and Murrell KD (2002) New aspects of human trichinellosis: the impact of new Trichinella species. Postgraduate Medical Journal 78, 15–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Caner A, Döşkaya M, Değirmenci A, Can H, Baykan Ş, Üner A, Başdemir G, Zeybek U and Gürüz Y (2008) Comparison of the effects of Artemisia vulgaris and Artemisia absinthium growing in western Anatolia against trichinellosis (Trichinella spiralis) in rats. Experimental Parasitology 119, 173–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carleton MA, Drury GA, Willington EA and Cammeron H (1967) Carleton's Histological Technique, 4th Edn., New York, Toronto, London: Oxford Univ. Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Codina AV, García A, Leonardi D, Vasconi MD, Di Masso RJ, Lamas MC and Hinrichsen LI (2015) Efficacy of albendazole: β-cyclodextrin citrate in the parenteral stage of Trichinella spiralis infection. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 77, 203–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cui L and Su XZ (2009) Discovery, mechanisms of action and combination therapy of artemisinin. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 7, 999–1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. De la Rosa JL, Alvarez N and Gómez-Priego A (2008) Study of the reproductive capacity of Trichinella spiralis recovered from experimentally infected mice under-dosed with albendazole or mebendazole. Tropical Biomedicine 24, 93–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. De la Torre-Iglesias PM, García-Rodriguez JJ, Torrado G, Torrado S, Torrado-Santiago S and Bolás-Fernández F (2014) Enhanced bioavailability and anthelmintic efficacy of mebendazole in redispersible microparticles with low-substituted hydroxypropylcellulose. Drug Design, Development and Therapy 18, 1467–1479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dupouy-Camet J (2000) Trichinellosis: a worldwide zoonosis. Veterinary Parasitology 93, 191–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dyab AK, Ahmed MA and Abdelazeem AG (2019) Prevalence and histopathology of Trichinella spiralis larvae of slaughtered pigs in Cairo governorate, Egypt. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology 49, 439–442. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gottstein B, Pozio E and Nöckler K (2009) Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and control of trichinellosis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 22, 127–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Held J, Soomro SA, Kremsner PG, Jansen FH and Mordmüller B (2011) In vitro activity of new Artemisinin derivatives against Plasmodium falciparum clinical isolates from Gabon. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 37, 485–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hong ST (2018) Albendazole and praziquantel: review and safety monitoring in Korea. Infection and Chemotherapy 50, 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kapel CM, Webster P and Gamble HR (2005) Muscle distribution of sylvatic and domestic Trichinella larvae in production animals and wildlife. Veterinary Parasitology 132, 101–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Keiser J and Utzinger J (2007) Food-borne trematodiasis: current chemotherapy and advances with artemisinins and synthetic trioxolanes. Trends in Parasitology 23, 555–562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Keittivuti A and Keittivuti B (1989) Anthelmintic effects of albendazole, mebendazole and diethylcarbamazine on Trichinella spiralis in mice. Journal of the Science Society of Thailand 15, 49–54. [Google Scholar]
  18. Li HJ, Wang W, Li YZ, Qu GL, Xing YT, Tao YH, Wei JY, Dai JR and Liang YS (2011) Effects of artemether, artesunate and dihydroartemisinin administered orally at multiple doses or combination in treatment of mice infected with Schistosoma japonicum. Parasitology Research 109, 515–519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lopez-Garcia ML, Torrado-Duran S, Torrado-Duran J, Martínez-Fernández AR and Bolás-Fernández F (1997) Albendazole versus ricobendazole (albendazole-sulphoxide) against enteral and parenteral stages of Trichinella spiralis in mice. International Journal for Parasitology 27, 781–785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McCracken RO and Taylor DD (1980) Mebendazole therapy of parenteral trichinellosis. Science 207, 1220–1222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Murrell KD and Pozio E (2011) Worldwide occurrence and impact of human trichinellosis, 1986-2009. Emerging Infectious Diseases 17, 2194–2202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nair AB and Jacob S (2016) A simple practice guide for dose conversion between animals and human. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy 7, 27–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Obistioiu D, Cristina RT, Schmerold I, Chizzola R, Stolze K, Nichita I and Chiurciu V (2014) Chemical characterization by GC-MS and in vitro activity against Candida albicans of volatile fractions prepared from Artemisia dracunculus, Artemisia abrotanum, Artemisia absinthium and Artemisia vulgaris. Chemistry Central Journal 8, 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pozio E, Sacchini D, Sacchi L, Tamburrini A and Alberici F (2001) Failure of mebendazole in the treatment of humans with Trichinella spiralis infection at the stage of encapsulating larvae. Clinical Infectious Diseases 32, 638–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rainova I, Kaftandjiev I, Harizanov R, Tsvetkova N, Jordanova D, Marinova I, Kurdova R, Kantardjiev T and Lalkovski N (2016) Outbreaks of human trichinellosis, still a challenge for the public health authorities in Bulgaria. Journal of Public Health 24, 291–297. [Google Scholar]
  26. Rodríguez JJG, de Prada I, Durán JJT and Fernández FB (2009) The effect of intestinal trichinellosis on oral bioavailability of albendazole in mice. Parasitology Research 105, 65–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Soliman GA, Taher ES and Mahmoud MA (2011) Therapeutic efficacy of Dormectin, ivermectin and levamisole against different stages of Trichinella spiralis in rats. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 35, 86–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sukul NC, Ghosh S and Sinhababu SP (2005) Reduction in the number of infective Trichinella spiralis larvae in mice by use of homeopathic drugs. Research in Complementary Medicine 12, 202–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sun S, Li H, Yuan Y, Wang L, He W and Xie H (2019) Preventive and therapeutic effects of Trichinella spiralis adult extracts on allergic inflammation in an experimental asthma mouse model. Parasites & Vectors 12, 326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tolstoj VA, Lytvynets A and Langrova I (2007) Pro-oxidant effects of mebendazole in albino rats experimentally infected with Trichinella spiralis. Parasitology Research 100, 1277–1280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Vadlamudi HC, Reddy D and Raju P (2015) A critical analysis on the bioavailability enhancement approaches for mebendazole. JGTPS 6, 2528–2533. [Google Scholar]
  32. Velebny S, Tomasovicova O and Stpiczynska R (1992) Pharmacokinetics of 3H-cambendazole in mice in the course of experimental trichinellosis. Helminthologia 29, 207–210. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES